Accuracy and clinical outcomes of CT image integration with Carto-Sound compared to electro-anatomical mapping for atrial fibrillation ablation: A randomized controlled study

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Impact of intracardiac echocardiography on readmission morbidity and mortality following atrial fibrillation ablation

INTRODUCTION

The use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) is beneficial during the ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Evidence is conflicting regarding the clinical impact of using ICE on arrhythmia recurrence and mortality.

METHODS

Patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF during 2010-2017 were identified using the International Classification of Diseases-9th and 10th Revision-Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM) from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Propensity matching was used to generate a control group. Patient demographics, Charlson comorbidity indexes, time from discharge to readmission, and the reason of readmission were extracted.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2017, 51 129 patients were included in the analysis out of which ICE was used in 8005 (15.7%) patients. The in-hospital mortality at readmission was significantly higher in the patients without ICE use (2.9% vs. 1.7%, p = .02). The length of stay (LOS) at readmission was significantly higher in non-ICE arm (median [interquartile range, IQR]: 3 [2-6] vs. 2 [3-5] days, p < .0001) with similar healthcare-associated cost (HAC) in both the groups (median [IQR]: US$7507.3 [4057.8-15 474.2] vs. 7339.4 [4024.8-15 191.6], p = .43). Freedom from readmission was 12% higher (hazard ratio [HR] [95% confidence interval, CI]: 0.88 [0.83-0.94], p < .0001) with the use of ICE at 90-day follow-up, which was driven by 24% reduction in heart failure (HF) at follow-up (HR [95% CI]: 0.76 [0.60-0.96], p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

ICE use during AF ablation procedure reduces readmissions at 90 days by 12%, driven by a 24% decrease in HF-related admissions. The non-ICE arm showed a significantly higher LOS which offsets marginally higher HAC in the ICE arm.

Radiofrequency ablation for treatment of atrial fibrillation with the use of intracardiac echocardiography vs without intracardiac echocardiography: A meta-analysis of observational and randomized studies

AIMS

Intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) provides superior quality images and can monitor catheter location within the heart continuously. Given the limited evidence, we conducted the meta-analysis to evaluate outcomes with ICE in radiofrequency (RF) ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS AND RESULTS

PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane were searched for studies reporting RF ablation for treatment of AF with the use of ICE vs without ICE and 12 studies were included. Sensitivity analyses limiting studies to ablation with the use of contact force (CF) catheters were conducted and subgroup analyses were performed according to the published year. In main analyses, RF ablation with ICE for treatment of AF was associated with significant reduction in total X-ray time (MD, -9.80; 95% CI, -15.57 to -4.04; I² =99%; p <0.01), total procedure time (MD, -17.65; 95% CI, -30.22 to -5.09; I² =89%; p <0.01), and complications (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.92; I² =20%; p<0.01) vs without ICE. The ICE-guided group tended to decrease total absorbed X-ray dose (SMD, -0.91; 95% CI, -1.86 to 0.04; I² =96%; p =0.06). Freedom from arrhythmia (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.14; I² =0%; p =0.13) was comparable between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In patients with AF, ICE-guided RF ablation is correlated with significant reductions in total X-ray time, total procedure time, and complications vs ablation without ICE. Total absorbed X-ray dose tends to reduce in the ICE group and freedom from arrhythmia is comparable between the two groups. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Fluoroless and contrast-free catheter ablation without a lead apron in routine clinical practice

The technique of catheter ablation has been improved within the past few decades, especially by three-dimensional (3D) mapping system. 3D mapping system has reduced radiation exposure but ablation procedures still require fluoroscopy. Our previous study showed the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation based on intracardiac echogram combined with CARTOSOUND/CARTO3 system, however fluoroscopy use for an average of 16 min is required for this procedure. The present study was aimed to reduce radiation exposure to zero and establish a radiation free catheter ablation method with the goal of utilizing it in routine clinical practice. We conducted single center, retrospective study during 2019 April to 2020 February. Consecutive 76 patients were enrolled. In the first 18 cases, the previously reported procedure (CARTOSOUND/CARTO3 method) was used. The remaining 58 cases were transitioned to fluoroless catheter ablation. The procedure time, success rates and complication rates were analyzed. Not only AF patients but atrial flutter (AFL), paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) and ventricular arrhythmia patients were included. Catheter positioning, catheter visualization and collecting the geometry of each camber of the heart were conducted by using contact force and ICE based geometry on CARTO system without either prior computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance image (MRI). In fluoroless group, all catheter ablations were successfully performed without lead aprons. No complications occurred in either group. There were no significant differences in procedure time in any type of procedure (Total procedure time Fluoro-group; 149 ± 51 min vs. Fluoroless-group; 162 ± 43 min, N.S.), (PSVT 170 ± 53 min vs. 162 ± 29 min, N.S.), (AFL 110 ± 70 min vs. 123 ± 43 min, N.S.), (AF 162 ± 43 min vs. 163 ± 32 min, N.S.). The total radiation time was reduced to zero in fluoroless group. Catheter ablation with ICE and 3D mapping system guide without fluoroscopy could be safely performed with a high success rate, without any prior CT/MRI 3D images. Radiation was reduced completely for patients and staff, negating the need for protective wear for operators.

The use of intracardiac echocardiography catheters in endocardial ablation of cardiac arrhythmia: Meta-analysis of efficiency, effectiveness, and safety outcomes

Aims

The optimal use of intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) may reduce fluoroscopy time and procedural complications during endocardial ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Due to limited evidence in this area, we conducted the first systematic literature review and meta‐analysis to evaluate outcomes associated with the use of ICE.

Methods and Results

Studies reporting the use of ICE during ablation procedures vs without ICE were searched using PubMed/MEDLINE. A meta‐analysis was performed on the 19 studies (2186 patients) meeting inclusion criteria, collectively representing a broad range of arrhythmia mechanisms. Use of ICE was associated with significant reductions in fluoroscopy time (Hedges' g −1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI] −1.81 to −0.32; P < .01), fluoroscopy dose (Hedges' g −1.27; 95% CI −1.91 to −0.62; P < .01), and procedure time (Hedges' g −0.35; 95% CI −0.64 to −0.05; P = .02) vs ablation without ICE. A 6.95 minute reduction in fluoroscopy time and a 15.2 minute reduction in procedure time was observed between the ICE vs non‐ICE groups. These efficiency gains were not associated with any decreased effectiveness or safety. Sensitivity analyses limiting studies to an atrial fibrillation (AF) only population yielded similar results to the main analysis.

Conclusion

The use of ICE in the ablation of cardiac arrhythmias is associated with significantly lower fluoroscopy time, fluoroscopy dose, and shorter procedure time vs ablation without ICE. These efficiency improvements did not compromise the clinical effectiveness or safety of the procedure.

Selection Strategies for Atlas-Based Mosaicing of Left Atrial 3-D Transesophageal Echocardiography Data

Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) provides real-time soft tissue information, but its use is hampered by its limited field of view. The mosaicing of multiple TEE views makes it possible to visualize a large structure, like the left atrium, in a single volume. To this end, an automatic registration method is required. Similarly to atlas-based segmentation approaches, atlas-based mosaicing (ABM) uses a full volume atlas set to moderate the onerous registration of the individual TEE views. The performance of ABM depends both on the quality of the involved registrations and on the selection of the optimal transformation from the candidate transformations that result from the various atlases. The study described here explored the performance of different selection strategies on multiview TEE data of the left atrium. We found that by incorporating two stages of transformation selection, using the image similarity and the conformity between the candidate transformations as selection criteria, the average registration error dropped below 3 mm with respect to manual registration of these data. Finally, we used this method for the automatic construction of a wide-view TEE volume of the left atrium.

An automatic and accurate registration method for electro-anatomical map and CT surface

BACKGROUND

Electro-anatomical maps (EAM) and CT surface registration are widely used for catheter navigation in atrial fibrillation ablations. However, few studies have investigated the registration algorithm. Moreover, some of them are semiautomatic, so that physicians must be proficient; some are inaccurate for catheter navigation. A both automatic and accurate registration method is needed.

METHOD

A Hausdorff distance based approach (HD) was proposed for EAM/CT registration. First, using principal axes based registration, EAM/CT pairs were coarsely aligned. Then, using Hausdorff distance as the fine objective function, EAM/CT pairs were finely aligned.

RESULTS

Six real EAM/CT pairs were collected from five patients and 38 simulated pairs were generated. Each pair was aligned using Carto-Merge, a stochastic approach (SA) and HD. Considering the balance of operability, accuracy and robustness, HD obtained the best EAM/CT registration results among the three approaches.

CONCLUSION

Experiments validate that the proposed method registers EAM and CT surface both automatically and accurately.

Atlas-Based Mosaicing of Left Atrial 3-D Transesophageal Echocardiography Images

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a promising imaging modality used to guide cardiac interventions, such as catheter ablation for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. These procedures rely on good visualization of the left atrium and pulmonary veins. To visualize these structures in a single volume, the acquisition, registration and fusion of multiple TEE views of the left atrium are required. We introduce atlas-based mosaicing as a method for the registration of images that are acquired according to a standardized protocol. Inspired by atlas-based segmentation approaches, compounded data of other patients serve as atlases for the registration of new data. The performance of atlas-based mosaicing is studied on 3-D TEE data of the left atrium and compared with that of regular pairwise registration. This study indicates that improved registration robustness and smaller registration errors are achieved with atlas-based mosaicing compared with regular pairwise registration. This is an important step toward the use of TEE for interventional guidance of ablation procedures.

Use of New Imaging CARTO® Segmentation Module Software to Facilitate Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias

INTRODUCTION

A new imaging software (CARTO® Segmentation Module, Biosense Webster) allows preprocedural 3-D reconstruction of all heart chambers based on cardiac CT. We describe our initial experience with the new module during ablation of ventricular arrhythmias.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighteen consecutive patients with idiopathic ventricular arrhythmias or ischemic ventricular tachycardia (VT) were studied. In the latter group, a combined endocardial and epicardial ablation was performed. Of the 14 patients with idiopathic arrhythmias, 12 were ablated in the outflow tract (OT), 1 in the midseptal left ventricle, and 1 at the left posterior fascicular area; acute successful ablation was achieved in 11 (78.6%) patients. The procedure was discontinued due to close proximity of the arrhythmia origin to the coronary arteries (CA) in 2 patients. Acute successful uncomplicated ablation was achieved in all 4 patients with ischemic VT. During ablation in the coronary cusps commissures, the CARTO® Segmentation Module accurately defined the cusps anatomy. The precise anatomic location provided by the module assisted in successfully ablating when information from activation mapping was not optimal, by ablating at the opposite side of the cusps. In addition, by demonstrating the precise location of the CA, it allowed safe ablation of arrhythmias that originated in close proximity to the CA both in the OT area and the epicardium, eliminating the need for repeat angiography.

CONCLUSIONS

The CARTO® Segmentation Module is useful for accurate definition of the exact anatomic location of ventricular arrhythmias and for safely ablating them especially in close proximity to the CA.

Direct left atrial ICE imaging guided ablation for atrial fibrillation without employing contrast medium

BACKGROUND

Preoperative and intraoperative use of a contrast medium is unavoidable in catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation, which can become a particularly significant issue for patients suffering from renal impairment.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study is to investigate the feasibility and safety of a technique for atrial fibrillation ablation without a contrast medium via intra-cardiac ultrasound imaging only.

METHODS

We prepared the geometry of the pulmonary vein and left atrium via a SOUNDSTAR catheter from inside the left atrium, without preoperative and intraoperative investigations using contrast mediums, for computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging and pulmonary venography. This was followed by retrospective investigation of the success rate and complications observed in 200 successive paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation cases that underwent catheter ablation from January 2011 to November 2012. The outcomes were assessed after the one-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Inserting a SOUNDSTAR catheter into the left atrium was successful in all cases, wherein rendering of all pulmonary veins and the left atrium was possible, and extensive encircling pulmonary vein isolation was successful in all cases. The sinus rhythm maintenance rate one year after the procedure was 90.4% for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 76.0% for persistent atrial fibrillation. The major complication rate was 0.5% (cardiac tamponade), with no cases presenting aggravation of renal function.

CONCLUSION

Atrial fibrillation ablation using an intra-cardiac ultrasound from the left atrium without employing a contrast medium was safe, with no adverse effects on renal function.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias using a Fluoroscopy Image Integration Module

BACKGROUND

The impact of the CartoUnivu™ technology (Biosense Webster, Diamond Bar, CA, USA) on fluoroscopy exposure compared to a conventional approach using electroanatomical mapping (Carto 3™) was evaluated in patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation for ventricular tachyarrhythmias (VT).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively evaluated 23 patients undergoing VT ablation using the CartoUnivu™ technology. The CartoUnivu™ Module integrates fluoroscopic images and cine loops into the electroanatomical mapping system. As a control group, 23 out of 88 VT patients (ablated using conventional fluoroscopy supplemented by electromagnetic mapping with the Carto 3™ System) were matched for age, gender, body surface area, operator, redo-procedure, presence of coronary artery disease, and left ventricular dysfunction using propensity score matching. A significant reduction in fluoroscopy exposure was observed in the CartoUnivu™ group when compared to the conventional group (10.57 ± 7.93 minutes vs 18.52 ± 11.24 minutes, P_= 0.008; 611 cGy/cm(2) vs 1650 cGy/cm(2) , P = 0.001). In multivariate analysis, the CartoUnivu™ module was an independent predictor of reduced fluoroscopy use.

CONCLUSION

This is a report on the clinical application of the CartoUnivu system for VT ablation. CartoUnivu™ markedly reduced fluoroscopy time and dose compared to conventional fluoroscopy/electroanatomical mapping.

Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation Without Radiation Exposure Using A 3D Mapping System

Transcatheter ablation procedures have been traditionally performed under fluoroscopic guidance. However, x-ray exposure is afflicted by the risk of developing malignancies as well as other deterministic effects of radiation. For this reason, radiation doses in the interventional laboratory should be reduced "As Low As Reasonably Achievable", with respect to the safety of the patients and the medical staff. This is of utmost importance in atrial fibrillation (AF) ablations, which are usually lengthy procedures. With the improvement of technology, the development of additional imaging tools and the widespread of 3D electroanatomic mapping systems (EAM), near-zero fluoroscopy AF ablation procedure is becoming a reality, limiting fluoroscopy use mainly to guide transseptal puncture. In the present paper we reviewed the risks to health related to x-ray exposure and we discussed the current state of knowledge of catheter ablation of AF without fluoroscopy in the 3D EAM system era.

Periprocedural imaging and outcomes after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an increasingly safe and effective therapy. This has been partly attributed to the use of adjunctive imaging modalities. We aimed to describe the use and associated outcomes of periprocedural imaging for AF ablation.

METHODS

We studied all Medicare fee-for-service claims for AF ablation from July 2007 to December 2009, and identified associated imaging studies before and during ablation, including transoesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), CT and MRI. The primary outcomes were death, stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), repeat ablation, and bleeding (pericardial or vascular) at 6 months.

RESULTS

11 525 patients underwent AF ablation during the study period. There was significant variation in imaging use at the practice level. In addition to electroanatomic mapping, 53% (n=6060/11 525) underwent TEE, 67% (n=7715/11 525) received ICE, and 50% (n=5724/11 525) underwent a preprocedure CT or MRI. Imaging generally increased from 2007 to 2009. After adjustment, the use of preablation CT or MRI was associated with a significantly lower risk of stroke or TIA (0.4% vs 0.9%, adjusted HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.74, p=0.002), and the use of ICE was associated with a lower risk of repeat ablation (5.7% vs 8.5%, adjusted HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.37 to 0.92, p=0.02) but higher risk of bleeding (1.1% vs 0.7%, adjusted HR 1.76, 95% CI 1.15 to 2.70, p=0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

Periprocedural imaging for AF ablation is increasingly used, although practice patterns vary widely. Our data suggest that periprocedural imaging is associated with better outcomes after catheter ablation; however, prospective studies of periprocedural imaging strategies are warranted.