Predictive factors for pacemaker implantation in patients receiving an implantable loop recorder for syncope remained unexplained after an extensive cardiac and neurological workup

Usefulness of last generation insertable cardiac monitors in the diagnosis of unexplained syncope

AIMS

Guidelines recommend insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) in the early phases of the evaluation of unexplained syncope (US) syncope, when an arrhythmic etiology is suspected. We examined the diagnostic yield of the last generation ICM (LG-ICM) to establish the causes of US, by assessing in the clinical practice the incidence of: relevant arrhythmia diagnosis, syncope recurrences and CM-guided cardiac electronic device (CIED) implantation. We investigated also baseline patient characteristics associated to an increased risk of relevant arrhythmias and of syncope recurrence.

METHODS

Data prospectively collected from consecutive patients receiving LG-ICM for investigation of US or presyncope in our institution between November 2020 and January 2023 were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients (mean age 64.4 ± 16.1 years, 40.4% women) with US or pre-syncope episodes underwent implantation of the LG-ICM. During a mean follow-up of 11.7 ± 8.1 months, LG-ICM diagnostic yield was 42%. In particular, LG-ICM detected cardiac arrhythmias in 29 (27%) patients (in 6 out of them during a syncope recurrence) and to exclude the arrhythmic origin of the syncope in additional 19 (17%) patients. LG-ICM guided the implantation of a CIED in 16 (15%) US patients, due to the diagnosis of asystole or severe bradycardia. Age ≥ 65 years (p = 0.012) and atrial arrhythmia history (p = 0.004) are significant independent predictors of arrhythmic diagnoses performed by LG-ICM, while CAD is predictor of syncope recurrence (bordering on statistical significance, p = 0.056).

CONCLUSIONS

The diagnostic yield of LG-ICM in US syncope is comparable to those of ILR and previous generation ICM. The advantages of LG-ICM should be sought in lower hospital workload necessary to manage ICM data. Age ≥ 65 years and atrial arrhythmia history are independent predictors of significant ICM-detected arrhythmias.

Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients receiving implantable loop recorders for unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) are increasingly used to evaluate patients with unexplained syncope. Identification of all predictors of bradycardic syncope and consequent permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion is of substantial clinical interest as patients in the highest risk category may benefit from upfront pacemaker insertion.

OBJECTIVE

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to identify risk predictors for PPM insertion in ILR recipients with unexplained syncope.

METHODS

An electronic database search (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Cochrane) was performed in June 2023. Studies evaluating ILR recipients with unexplained syncope and recording risk factors for eventual PPM insertion were included. A random effects model was used to calculate the pooled odds ratio (OR) for clinical and electrocardiographic characteristics with respect to future PPM requirement.

RESULTS

Eight studies evaluating 1007 ILR recipients were included; 268 patients (26.6%) underwent PPM insertion during study follow-up. PPM recipients were older (mean age, 70.2 ± 15.4 years vs 61.6 ± 19.7 years; P < .001). PR prolongation on baseline electrocardiography was a significant predictor of PPM requirement (pooled OR, 2.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.63-5.20). The presence of distal conduction system disease, encompassing any bundle branch or fascicular block, yielded a pooled OR of 2.88 for PPM insertion (95% confidence interval, 1.53-5.41). Injurious syncope and lack of syncopal prodrome were not significant predictors of PPM insertion. Sinus node dysfunction accounted for 62% of PPM insertions, whereas atrioventricular block accounted for 26%.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-quarter of ILR recipients for unexplained syncope require eventual PPM insertion. Advancing age, PR prolongation, and distal conduction disease are the strongest predictors for PPM requirement.

Bradycardia risk stratification with implantable loop recorder after unexplained syncope

BACKGROUND

An implantable loop recorder is an effective tool for diagnosing unexplained syncope. However, after a first episode in non-high-risk patients, the usefulness of implantable loop recorder implantation remains unclear.

AIMS

To analyse relevant risk factors for significant bradycardia in order to identify patients who do or do not benefit from implantable loop recorder implantation. Also, to study whether implantable loop recorder implantation with remote monitoring is associated with less recurrence of traumatic syncope.

METHODS

This was a retrospective monocentric study including patients with implantable loop recorder implantation after unexplained syncope, using remote monitoring and iterative consultations.

RESULTS

Two hundred and thirty-seven patients were implanted for unexplained syncope. Significant bradycardia occurred in 53 patients (22.4%): 23 (43.4%) caused by paroxysmal atrioventricular block and 30 (56.6%) caused by sinus node dysfunction, leading to permanent pacemaker implantation in 48 patients. Compared with younger patients, there was a 3.46-fold increase (95% confidence interval 1.92-6.23; P<0.0001) in the risk of significant bradycardia in patients aged≥60 years. Based on multivariable analysis, only "typical syncope" was associated with significant bradycardia occurrence (hazard ratio 3.14, 95% confidence interval 1.75-5.65; P=0.0001). There was no recurrence of significant bradycardia with traumatic complications among patients implanted for traumatic syncope.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that: (1) implantable loop recorders identify more significant bradycardia in patients aged≥60 presenting with a first non-high-risk typical syncope, suggesting that an implantable loop recorder should be implanted after a first episode of unexplained syncope in such conditions; and (2) after traumatic syncope, implantable loop recorder implantation is safe, and is associated with little or no recurrence of traumatic syncope.

Predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Identifying the underlying cause of unexplained syncope is crucial for appropriate management of recurrent syncopal episodes. Implantable loop recorders (ILRs) have emerged as valuable diagnostic tools for monitoring patients with unexplained syncope. However, the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with ILR and unexplained syncope remain unclear. In this study, we shed light on these prognostic factors. PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL were systematically searched until May 04, 2023. Studies that evaluated the predictors of pacemaker requirement in patients with implantable loop recorder and unexplained syncope were included. The "Quality In Prognosis Studies" appraisal tool was used for quality assessment. The pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated. The publication bias was evaluated using Egger's and Begg's tests. Ten studies (n = 4200) were included. Right bundle branch block (OR: 3.264; 95% CI: 1.907-5.588, p < .0001) and bifascicular block (OR: 2.969; 95% CI: 1.859-4.742, p < .0001) were the strongest predictors for pacemaker implantation. Pacemaker requirement was more than two times in patients with atrial fibrillation, sinus bradycardia and first degree AV block. Valvular heart disease, diabetes mellitus, and hypertension were also significantly more in patients with pacemaker implantation. Age (standardized mean difference [SMD]: 0.560; 95% CI: 0.410/0.710, p < .0001) and PR interval (SMD: 0.351; 95% CI: 0.150/0.553, p = .001) were significantly higher in patients with pacemaker requirement. Heart conduction disorders, atrial arrhythmias and underlying medical conditions are main predictors of pacemaker device implantation following loop recorder installation in unexplained syncopal patients.

Effectiveness and safety of implantable loop recorder and clinical utility of remote monitoring in patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorder (ILR) is still underutilized in clinical practice, especially in the setting of elderly patients with recurrent, traumatic, unexplained syncope. Data on the actual risk of traumatic syncopal recurrence during ILR monitoring in this specific patient setting are lacking.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Prospective, multicentre registry enrolling consecutive patients undergoing ILR insertion for unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope. In a proportion of enrolled patients, remote monitoring (RM) was used for device follow-up. The risk of traumatic and non-traumatic syncopal recurrences during ILR observation were prospectively assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 483 consecutive patients (68±14 years, 59% male) were enrolled. During a median follow-up of 18 months, a final diagnosis was reached in 270 patients (55.9%). The risk of syncopal and traumatic syncopal recurrence was of 26.5 and 9.3%, respectively. RM significantly reduced the time to diagnosis (19.7±10.3 vs. 22.1±10.8 months; p=0.015) and was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of syncope recurrence of 48% (p<0.001), and of traumatic syncope recurrence of 49% (p=0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

ILR monitoring is effective and safe in patients with unexplained, recurrent, traumatic syncope. RM reduces the time to diagnosis and significantly reduces the risk of traumatic and non-traumatic syncopal relapses.

Clinical Predictors of Pacing Device Implantation in Implantable Cardiac Monitor Recipients for Unexplained Syncope

Background

Implantable cardiac monitors (ICMs) help investigate the cause of unexplained syncope, but the probability and predictors of needing a pacing device thereafter remain unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of patients who received ICM insertion for unexplained syncope with suspected arrhythmic etiology. The data were obtained from a nationwide database obtained between April 1, 2012 and March 31, 2020. Multivariable mixed-effects survival analysis was performed to identify predictors of pacing device implantation (PDI), and a risk score model was developed accordingly.

Results

In total, 2905 patients (age: 72 years [range: 60-78]) implanted with ICMs to investigate the cause of syncope were analyzed. During the median follow-up period of 128 days (range: 68-209) days, 473 patients (16%) underwent PDI. Older age, history of atrial fibrillation, bundle branch block (BBB), and diabetes were independent predictors of PDI in multivariable analysis. A risk score model was developed with scores ranging from 0 to 32 points. When patients with the lowest quartile score (0-13 points) were used as a reference, those with higher quartiles had a higher risk of PDI (second quartile: 14-15 points, hazard ratio [HR]: 3.86, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.62-5.68; third quartile: 16-18 points, HR: 4.67, 95% CI: 3.14-6.94; fourth quartile: 19-32 points, HR: 6.59, 95% CI: 4.47-9.71).

Conclusions

The 4 identified predictors are easily assessed during the initial evaluation of patients with syncope. They may help identify patients with a higher risk of requiring permanent PDI.

Clinical predictors of cardiac syncope in patients with unexplained syncope after the implantation of an insertable cardiac monitor

Syncope prognosis is related to both its etiology and comorbidities, with cardiac syncope (CS) having higher risks for mortality and cardiovascular events than syncope of non-cardiac causes. Although a novel insertable cardiac monitor (ICM) is an effective diagnostic tool for unexplained syncope, decision regarding ICM implantation with a high pre-test likelihood of CS should contribute to economic cost reduction and avoidance of unnecessary complications. This study aimed to investigate clinical factors associated with CS after ICM implantation in patients with unexplained syncope. This retrospective observational study included 31 consecutive patients with ICM implantation for syncope between September 2016 and August 2021. The initial examinations for syncope included a detailed history, physical examination, blood tests, 12-lead electrocardiograms, and transthoracic echocardiography. Of the 31 patients, 13 (41.9%) experienced recurrent CS during follow-up (676 ± 469 days). Among several clinical factors, syncope-related minor injuries (p = 0.017) and higher brain natriuretic peptide (BNP; p = 0.043) levels were significantly associated with CS. Moreover, multivariable analysis showed that both syncope-related minor injuries (odds ratio, 11.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.4-88.4; p = 0.022) and BNP higher than 64.0 pg/mL (odds ratio, 7.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.1-44.2; p = 0.038) were independent predictors of CS after ICM implantation. In conclusion, a history of minor injury secondary to syncope and higher BNP levels were independent CS predictors in patients receiving ICM for syncope. These results emphasized the utility of ICM implantation early in the diagnostic journey of patients presenting with CS predictors requiring specific treatments.

Prediction of Pacemaker Requirement in Patients With Unexplained Syncope: The DROP Score

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are increasingly utilised in the evaluation of unexplained syncope. However, they are expensive and do not protect against future syncope.

OBJECTIVES

To compare patients requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation during ILR follow-up with those without abnormalities detected on ILR in order to identify potential predictors of benefit from upfront pacing.

METHODS

We analysed 100 consecutive patients receiving ILR: Group 1 (n=50) underwent PPM insertion due to bradyarrhythmias detected on ILR; Group 2 (n=50) had no arrhythmias detected on ILR over >3 years follow-up. Baseline clinical characteristics, syncope history, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic parameters were assessed to identify predictors of ultimate requirement for pacing.

RESULTS

Group 1 (64% male, median age 70.8 years; IQR 65.5-78.8) were older than Group 2 (58% male, median 60.2 years; IQR 44.0-73.0 p=0.001) and were less likely to have related historical factors such as overheating, posture and exercise (98% vs 70% p<0.001). PR interval was also longer in Group 1 (192±51 vs 169±23 p=0.006) with greater prevalence of distal conduction system disease (30% vs 4.3% p=0.002). Significant univariate predictors for PPM insertion were distal conduction disease (p=0.007), first degree atrioventricular (AV) block (p=0.003), absence of precipitating factors (p=0.004), and age >65 years (p=0.001). Injury sustained, recurrent syncope, history of atrial fibrillation (AF) or heart failure, left atrial (LA) size and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were not predictive. These significant predictors were incorporated into the DROP score¹ (0-4). Using time-to-event analysis, no patients with a score of 0 progressed to pacing, while higher scores (3-4) strongly predicted pacing requirement (log-rank p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

The DROP score may be helpful in identifying patients likely to benefit from upfront permanent pacemaker (PPM) insertion following unexplained syncope. Larger prospective studies are required to validate this tool.

Clinical predictors for bradycardia and supraventricular tachycardia necessitating therapy in patients with unexplained syncope monitored by insertable cardiac monitor

Background

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICMs) improve diagnostic yield in patients with unexplained syncope. The most of cardiac syncope is arrhythmic causes include paroxysmal bradycardia and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) in patients with unexplained syncope receiving ICM. Predictors for bradycardia and SVT that necessitate therapy in patients with unexplained syncope are not well known.

Hypothesis

This study aimed to investigate predictors of bradycardia and SVT necessitating therapy in patients with unexplained syncope receiving ICMs.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of consecutive patients who received ICMs to monitor unexplained syncope. We performed Cox's stepwise logistic regression analysis to identify significant independent predictors for bradycardia and SVT.

Results

One hundred thirty‐two patients received ICMs to monitor unexplained syncope. During the 17‐month follow‐up period, 19 patients (14%) needed pacemaker therapy for bradycardia; 8 patients (6%) received catheter ablation for SVT. The total estimated diagnostic rates were 34% and 48% at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Stepwise logistic regression analysis indicated that syncope during effort (odds ratio [OR] = 3.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21 to 9.6; p = .02) was an independent predictor for bradycardia. Palpitation before syncope (OR = 9.46; 95% CI, 1.78 to 50.10; p = .008) and history of atrial fibrillation (OR = 10.1; 95% CI, 1.96 to 52.45; p = .006) were identified as significant independent predictors for SVT.

Conclusion

Syncope during effort, and palpitations or history of atrial fibrillation were independent predictors for bradycardia and for SVT. ICMs are useful devices for diagnosing unexplained syncope.

Causes of syncopal recurrences in patients treated with permanent pacing for bradyarrhythmic syncope: Findings from the SYNCOPACED registry

BACKGROUND

Few studies have examined the causes of syncope/collapse recurrences in patients with a previously implanted pacemaker for bradyarrhythmic syncope.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the causes of syncope/collapse recurrences after pacemaker implantation for bradyarrhythmic syncope in a large patient population.

METHODS

The SYNCOpal recurrences in patients treated with permanent PACing for bradyarrhythmic syncope (SYNCOPACED) registry was a prospective multicenter observational registry enrolling 1364 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation for bradyarrhythmic syncope. During follow-up, the time to the first syncope/collapse recurrence was recorded. Patients with syncope/collapse recurrences underwent a predefined diagnostic workup aimed at establishing the mechanism of syncope/collapse.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 50 months, 213 patients (15.6%) reported at least 1 syncope/collapse recurrence. The risk of syncope/collapse recurrence was highest in patients who underwent implantation for cardioinhibitory vasovagal syncope (26.4%), followed by unexplained syncope and chronic bifascicular block (21.5%), cardioinhibitory carotid sinus syndrome (17.2%), atrial fibrillation needing pacing (15.5%), atrioventricular block (13.6%), and sinus node disease (12.5%) (P = .017). The most frequent cause of syncope/collapse recurrence was reflex syncope (27.7%), followed by orthostatic hypotension (26.3%), pacemaker or lead malfunction (5.6%), structural cardiac disease (5.2%), and atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmias (4.7% and 3.8%, respectively). In 26.8% of cases, the mechanism of syncope/collapse remained unexplained.

CONCLUSION

In patients receiving a pacemaker for bradyarrhythmic syncope, reflex syncope and orthostatic hypotension are the most frequent mechanisms of syncope/collapse recurrence after implantation. Pacing system malfunction, structural cardiac diseases, and tachyarrhythmias are rare mechanisms. The mechanism remains unexplained in >25% of patients.

Change in the use of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Italian clinical practice over a 5-year period: results of two surveys promoted by the AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing)

AIMS

The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of remote monitoring in Italian clinical practice and its trend over the last 5 years.

METHODS

In 2012 and 2017, two surveys were conducted. Both were open to all Italian implanting centres and consisted of 25 questions on the characteristics of the centre, their actual use of remote monitoring, applied organizational models and administrative and legal aspects.

RESULTS

The questionnaires were completed by 132 and 108 centres in 2012 and 2017, respectively (30.6 and 24.7% of all Italian implanting centres). In 2017, significantly fewer centres followed up fewer than 200 patients by remote monitoring than in 2012, while more followed up more than 500 patients (all P < 0.005). In most of the centres (77.6%) that responded to both surveys, the number of patients remotely monitored significantly increased from 2012 to 2017.In both surveys, remote monitoring was usually managed by physicians and nurses. Over the period, primary review of transmissions by physicians declined, while it was increasingly performed by nurses; the involvement of technicians rose, while that of manufacturers' technical personnel decreased. The percentage of centres in which transmissions were submitted to the physician only in critical cases rose (from 28.3 to 64.3%; P < 0.001). In 86.7% of centres, the lack of a reimbursement system was deemed the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring.

CONCLUSION

In the last 5 years, the number of patients followed up by remote monitoring has increased markedly. In most Italian centres, remote monitoring has increasingly been managed through a primary nursing model. The lack of a specific reimbursement system is perceived as the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring .

Risk of syncopal recurrences in patients treated with permanent pacing for bradyarrhythmic syncope: role of correlation between symptoms and electrocardiogram findings

Aims 

To evaluate the risk of syncopal recurrences after pacemaker implantation in a population of patients with syncope of suspected bradyarrhythmic aetiology.

Methods and results 

Prospective, multicentre, observational registry enrolling 1364 consecutive patients undergoing pacemaker implantation for syncope of bradyarrhythmic aetiology (proven or presumed). Before pacemaker implantation, all patients underwent a cardiac work-up in order to establish the bradyarrhythmic aetiology of syncope. According to the results of the diagnostic work-up, patients were divided into three groups: Group A, patients in whom a syncope-electrocardiogram (ECG) correlation was established (n = 329, 24.1%); Group B, those in whom clinically significant bradyarrhythmias were detected without a documented syncope-ECG correlation (n = 877, 64.3%); and Group C, those in whom bradyarrhythmias were not detected and the bradyarrhythmic origin of syncope remained presumptive (n = 158, 11.6%). During a median follow-up of 50 months, 213 patients (15.6%) reported at least one syncopal recurrence. Patients in Groups B and C showed a significantly higher risk of syncopal recurrences than those in Group A [hazard ratios (HRs): 1.60 and 2.66, respectively, P &lt; 0.05]. Failure to establish a syncope-ECG correlation during diagnostic work-up before pacemaker implantation was an independent predictor of syncopal recurrence on multivariate analysis (HR: 1.90; P = 0.002).

Conclusion

In selecting patients with syncope of suspected bradyarrhythmic aetiology for pacemaker implantation, establishing a correlation between syncope and bradyarrhythmias maximizes the efficacy of pacing and reduces the risk of syncopal recurrences.

Risk factors and a 3-month risk score for predicting pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillations

Objectives

To identify risk factors and to develop a predictive risk score for pacemaker implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

Using Danish nationwide registries, patients with newly diagnosed AF from 2000 to 2014 were identified. Cox proportional-hazards regression computed HRs for risk factors of pacemaker implantation. A logistic regression was used to fit a prediction model for 3-month risk of pacemaker implantation and derived a risk score using 80% of the data and its predictive accuracy estimated using the remaining 20%.

Results

Among 155 934 AF patients included, the median age (IQR) was 75 (65–83) and 51.3% were men. During a median follow-up time of 3.4 (1.2–5.0) years, 8348 (5.4%) patients received a pacemaker implantation. Risk factors of pacemaker implantation were (in order of highest risk first) age above 60 years, congenital heart disease, heart failure at age under 60 years, prior syncope, valvular AF, hypertension, ischaemic heart disease, male sex and diabetes mellitus. The derived risk score assigns points ranging from 1 to 14 to each of these risk factors. The 3-month risk of pacemaker implantation increased from 0.4% (95% CI: 0.2 to 0.8) at 1 point to 2.6% (95% CI: 1.9 to 3.6) at 18 points. Area under the receiver operator characteristics curve was 62.9 (95% CI: 60.3 to 65.5).

Conclusion

We highlighted risk factors of pacemaker implantation in newly diagnosed AF patients and created a risk score. The clinical utility of the risk score needs further investigation.

Usefulness of an Implantable Loop Recorder in Diagnosing Unexplained Syncope and Predictors for Pacemaker Implantation

BACKGROUND

An implantable loop recorder (ILR) is an effective tool for diagnosing unexplained syncope (US). We examined the diagnostic utility of an ILR in detecting arrhythmic causes of US and determining which clinical factors are associated with pacemaker (PM) implantation.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter, observational study was conducted from February 2006 to April 2018 at 11 hospitals in Korea. Eligible patients with recurrent US received an ILR to diagnose recurrent syncope and document arrhythmia.

RESULTS

A total of 173 US patients (mean age, 67.6 ± 16.5 years; 107 men [61.8%]) who received an ILR after a negative conventional workup were enrolled. During a mean follow-up of 9.4 ± 11.1 months, 52 patients (30.1%) had recurrent syncope, and syncope-correlated arrhythmia was confirmed in 34 patients (19.7%). The ILR analysis showed sinus node dysfunction in 24 patients (70.6%), supraventricular tachyarrhythmia in 4 (11.8%), ventricular arrhythmia in 4 (11.8%), and sudden atrioventricular block in 2 (5.9%). Overall, ILR detected significant arrhythmia in 99 patients (57.2%) irrespective of syncope. Among patients with clinically relevant arrhythmia detected by ILR, PM implantation was performed in 60 (34.7%), an intra-cardiac defibrillator in 5 (2.9%), and catheter ablation in 4 (2.3%). In a Cox regression analysis, history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) (hazard ratio [HR], 2.34; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33-4.12; P < 0.01) and any bundle branch block (BBB) (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.09-5.85; P = 0.03) were significantly associated with PM implantation.

CONCLUSION

ILR is useful for detecting syncope-correlated arrhythmia in patients with US. The risk of PM is high in US patients with a history of PAF and any BBB.

Real-World Incidence of Pacemaker and Defibrillator Implantation Following Diagnostic Monitoring With an Insertable Cardiac Monitor

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) are used in patients with suspected or known cardiac arrhythmias; the resulting diagnosis can lead to therapeutic interventions such as a pacemaker (PPM) or defibrillator (ICD) implant. We investigated the incidence of these implants in a large, real-world, cohort of ICM patients. The Optum^© EHR de-identified database was used to identify patients with cardiovascular diseases, an ICM implant, ≥180 days of follow-up before and after ICM implant, and no previous history of a PPM or ICD. The Kaplan-Meier (KM) incidence estimates for device implants following an ICM implant were determined. A total of 19,173 patients with an ICM implant were identified. During a mean follow-up of 40 months, either a PPM or ICD was implanted in 21% of patients. A device was implanted in 25% of patients with history of syncope compared with 15% in patients with another indication for ICM implant (p <0.001). There was a significantly greater number of PPM implants following an ICM in patients with history of syncope compared with another indication for ICM implant (23% vs 13% p <0.001); in contrast, there was no difference in ICD implants between the 2 groups (3% in both groups, p = 0.84). In conclusion, a PPM or ICD was ultimately implanted in 21% of ICM patients. Pacemaker implant rates varied significantly with indication for ICM implant, whereas ICD implants rates were similar. In particular, patients with history of syncope had the greatest likelihood of needing a PPM during follow-up.

Implantable loop recorders in patients with unexplained syncope: Clinical predictors of pacemaker implantation

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are a valuable tool for the investigation of unexplainedsyncopal episodes. The aim of this retrospective single center study was to identify predictive factors for pacemaker implantation in patients with unexplained syncope who underwent ILR insertion.

METHODS

One hundred six patients were retrospectively analyzed (mean age 59.1 years; 47.2% male) with unexplained syncope and negative conventional testing who underwent ILR implantation. The pri- mary study endpoint was detection of symptomatic or asymptomatic bradycardia requiring pacemaker implantation.

RESULTS

The average follow-up period after ILR implantation was 20 ± 15 months. Pacemaker im- plantation according to current guidelines was necessary in 22 (20.8%) patients, mean duration until index bradycardia was 81 ± 88 (2-350) days. Ten (45.5%) patients received a pacemaker due to sinus arrest, 7 (31.8%) patients due to third-degree atrioventricular block, 2 (9.1%) patients due to second- degree atrioventricular block and 1 (4.5%) patient due to atrial fibrillation with a slow ventricular rate. Three factors remained significant in multivariate analysis: obesity, which defined by a body mass index above 30 kg/m2 (OR: 7.39, p = 0.014), a right bundle branch block (OR: 9.40, p = 0.023) and chronic renal failure as defined by a glomerular filtration rate of less than 60 mL/min (OR: 6.42, p = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Bradycardia is a frequent finding in patients undergoing ILR implantation due to un- explained syncope. Obesity, right bundle branch block and chronic renal failure are independent clinical predictors of pacemaker implantation.

Syncope workup: Greater yield in select trauma population

BACKGROUND

There is great variation in practice regarding the assessment of trauma patients who present with syncope. The purpose of this study was to determine the yield of screening studies (electrocardiogram, echocardiogram, and carotid duplex) and define characteristics to identify groups that may benefit from these investigations.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all trauma patients from 2003 to 2015 who received a carotid duplex as part of a syncope evaluation at our urban Level 1 Trauma Center. Demographics, clinical findings as well as interventions undertaken (ie: placement of defibrillators/pacemakers) as a result of the syncope evaluation were collected. Data analysis was performed with STATA 14 and relationships between comorbidities, positive findings and interventions were assessed. Significance was assumed for p < 0.05.

RESULTS

736 trauma patients were included in the study. The most common mechanism of injury was fall (592, 82%). A history of congestive heart failure (CHF) and/or coronary artery disease (CAD) and age ≥ 65 were significantly associated with abnormal ECG and ECHO findings, but not with severe carotid stenosis. Elevated Injury Severity Scale (ISS) was significantly associated with an abnormal ECHO on both univariate and multivariate analysis. An abnormal ECG was predictive of an abnormal ECHO (p = 0.02). Ten patients (1.4%) underwent placement of a defibrillator and/or pacemaker, all of whom reported having CHF. Only 11 patients (1.7%) had severe carotid stenosis (>70%) requiring intervention.

CONCLUSION

The screening studies used in a syncope evaluation have low yield in the general trauma population. Carotid duplex should not be routinely performed. Cardiac evaluation should be tailored to individuals with cardiac comorbidities, older age and elevated ISS. An ECG should be used as initial screening in this patient cohort.

Performance of the New BioMonitor 2-AF Insertable Cardiac Monitoring System: Can Better be Worse?

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are valuable tools for the investigation of patients with suspected arrhythmias. The BioMonitor 2-AF is a novel insertable ILR with enhanced atrial fibrillation (AF) detection algorithm and remote monitoring capability.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this first-in-human study with the BioMonitor 2-AF was to analyze course of P-wave sensing performance and R-wave amplitude, prevalence of false and correctly sensed and classified episodes, and effectiveness of remote monitoring.

METHODS

All 19 patients who underwent ILR insertion were included in the BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring® system (BIOTRONIK GmbH, Berlin, Germany). Daily changes in P-wave and R-wave sensing were analyzed over 6 weeks. A breathing test (in- and expiration) was performed in two different body positions at baseline and during a 6-week in-house follow-up to investigate alterations of P-wave and R-wave sensing.

RESULTS

R-wave amplitude and the high P-wave visibility (94.4%) remained unchanged during the follow-up period. In most patients both an increase and decrease of R-wave amplitude, and in some cases a complete R-wave vector change (31.6%), was documented during the "breathing test." Change of body position did not alter R-wave sensing amplitude mostly. "Breathing test" and change of body position had no effect on P-wave sensing performance. In 15.8% of the patients, misclassification of episodes as AF or high ventricular rates due to P-wave oversensing occurred. No ILR-related complication occurred. Automatic transmission via BIOTRONIK Home Monitoring® was successful 100% of the time.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that the BioMonitor 2-AF is a safe and effective tool for continuous cardiac monitoring.

Clinical Predictors of Pacemaker Implantation in Patients with Syncope Receiving Implantable Loop Recorder with or without ECG Conduction Abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Implantable loop recorders (ILR) allow prolonged cardiac rhythm monitoring and improved diagnostic yield in syncope patients. Predictive factors for pacemaker (PM) implantation in the ILR population with unexplained syncope have not been adequately investigated. In this single center, retrospective, observational study we investigated factors that predict PM implantation in this population.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our ILR database of patients aged over 18 years who underwent ILR implantation for unexplained syncope between January 2009 and June 2013. Patient case notes were examined for demographics, history, electrocardiogram (ECG) abnormalities, investigations, and events during follow-up. The primary end-point was the detection of a symptomatic or asymptomatic bradycardia requiring PM implantation.

RESULTS

During a period of 4.5 years, 200 patients were implanted with ILR for unexplained syncope, of who n = 33 (16.5%) had clinically significant bradycardia requiring PM implantation. After multivariable analysis, history of injury secondary to syncope was found to be the strongest independent predictor for PM implantation (odds ratio [OR]:9.1; P < 0.001; 95% confidence interval [CI]: (3.26-26.81). Other significant predictors included female sex, PR interval > 200msec, and age >75 years. In patients without conduction abnormalities on the ECG, history of injury secondary to syncope was found to be the strongest independent predictor for PM implantation (OR: 8.16; P = 0.00027; 95% [CI]: (2.67-26.27).

CONCLUSIONS

A history of injury secondary to syncope and female sex were independent predictive factors for bradycardia necessitating PM implantation in patients receiving an ILR for syncope with or without ECG conduction abnormalities.

Clinical Factors Affecting Symptom Recurrence in Patients with Syncope

<b><i>Purpose:</i></b> Recurrent syncope leads to poor functional status and psychiatric impairment in patients with syncope. The aim of the study was to prospectively analyze the risk factors attributed to syncope recurrence. <b><i>Materials and Methods:</i></b> Between 2009 and 2010, 289 patients with all cause of syncope visited our institution. Syncope recurrences were followed for 1 year by telephone interview every 3 months. <b><i>Results:</i></b> We diagnosed 181 (63%) patients with neurally mediated syncope (NMS), 39 (13%) with orthostatic hypotension, 34 (12%) with cardiac syncope, and 35 (12%) with unexplained syncope. During the 1-year follow-up period, 19 (6.6%) patients suffered recurrent syncope. Kaplan-Meier curves showed that recurrent syncope was observed more often in patients with unexplained syncope compared with those with NMS (p < 0.01), and also observed more often in patients with six previous syncopal episodes compared to those with fewer episodes (p = 0.02). Cox regression analysis showed that the recurrence of syncope was significantly associated with more than six previous syncopal episodes (HR 5.38, 95% CI 1.17-24.71, p = 0.03) and that there was a tendency for association between recurrence of syncope and unexplained syncope (HR 6.13, 95% CI 0.96-39.1, p = 0.05). <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> Patients with previous frequent syncopal episodes or unexplained syncope had higher rates of syncope recurrence during the follow up period.