Impairment of arterial elastic properties and elevated circulating levels of transforming growth factor-beta in subjects with repaired coarctation of aorta

Pro-inflammatory Cytokines in Acute Coronary Syndromes

BACKGROUND

Over the last decades, the role of inflammation and immune system activation in the initiation and progression of coronary artery disease (CAD) has been established.

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to present the interplay between cytokines and their actions preceding and shortly after ACS.

METHODS

We searched in a systemic manner the most relevant articles to the topic of inflammation, cytokines, vulnerable plaque and myocardial infarction in MEDLINE, COCHRANE and EMBASE databases.

RESULTS

Different classes of cytokines (intereleukin [IL]-1 family, Tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) family, chemokines, adipokines, interferons) are implicated in the entire process leading to destabilization of the atherosclerotic plaque, and consequently, to the incidence of myocardial infarction. Especially IL-1 and TNF-α family are involved in inflammatory cell accumulation, vulnerable plaque formation, platelet aggregation, cardiomyocyte apoptosis and adverse remodeling following the myocardial infarction. Several cytokines such as IL-6, adiponectin, interferon-γ, appear with significant prognostic value in ACS patients. Thus, research interest focuses on the modulation of inflammation in ACS to improve clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Understanding the unique characteristics that accompany each cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction could illuminate the signaling pathways involved in plaque destabilization and indicate future treatment strategies to improve cardiovascular prognosis in ACS patients.

Impact of Treatment Modality on Vascular Function in Coarctation of the Aorta: The LOVE - COARCT Study

Background Optimally treated patients with coarctation of the aorta remain at risk for late vascular dysfunction. The effect of treatment modality on vascular function is unknown. The LOVE-COARCT (Long-term Outcomes and Vascular Evaluation After Successful Coarctation of the Aorta Treatment) study was done to compare vascular function in patients with coarctation of the aorta treated with surgery, balloon dilation (BD), or stent implantation. Methods and Results In treated coarctation of the aorta patients without residual coarctation, we prospectively compared aortic stiffness by applanation tonometry and cardiac magnetic resonance; endothelial function by endothelial pulse amplitude testing; blood pressure ( BP ) phenotype by office BP , ambulatory BP monitoring, and BP response to exercise; left ventricular mass by cardiac magnetic resonance; and blood biomarkers of endothelial function, inflammation, vascular wall function, and extracellular matrix. Participants included 75 patients treated with surgery (n=28), BD (n=23), or stent (n=24). Groups had similar age at enrollment, coarctation of the aorta severity, residual gradient, and metabolic profile, but differed by age at treatment. Prevalence of systemic hypertension, aortic stiffness, endothelial function, and left ventricular mass were similar among treatment groups. However, BD patients had more-distensible ascending aortas, lower peak systolic BP during exercise, less impairment in diurnal BP variation, and lower inflammatory biomarkers. Results were unchanged after adjustment for potential confounders, including age at treatment. Conclusions In our cohort of patients without residual coarctation, treatment modality was not associated with major vascular outcomes, even though there were some favorable vascular characteristics in the BD patients. Although this suggests that choice of treatment modality should continue to be driven by likelihood of achieving a good anatomical result, more long-term studies are required to assess the clinical significance of the more-optimal results of secondary markers of vascular function in BD patients. Clinical Trial Registration URL : http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT 03262753.

[Effects of FTY720-P on EphA2-EphrinA2 bidirectional signaling in osteoclasts]

Objective

To investigate the effects of FTY720-P on EphA2-EphrinA2 bidirectional signaling in osteoclasts.

Methods

Murine RAW264.7 macrophages were induced into osteoclasts by dexamethasone and 1α, 25-dihydroxyvitamin D ₃, and identified by tartrate resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. Then, the osteoclasts were divided into 2 groups. The osteoclasts were treated with 400 ng/mL FTY720-P in experimental group and without FTY720-P in control group, respectively. After 48 hours of culture, the cells in 2 groups were detected by real-time fluorescent quantitative PCR, Western blot, and immunofluorescence staining. The expressions of EphA2, EphrinA2, RhoA, and the bone reconstruction associated proteins［bone morphogenetic protein 2 (BMP-2) and transform growth factor β ₁ (TGF-β ₁)］were analyzed and compared.

Results

RAW264.7 cells were successfully induced into osteoclasts identified by TRAP staining. Compared with control group, the relative expressions of EphA2 and EphrinA2 mRNAs and proteins in experimental group significantly decreased after 48 hours ( P<0.05), and the relative expression of RhoA protein also significantly decreased ( P<0.05). The relative expressions of BMP-2 and TGF-β ₁ mRNAs were significantly increased ( P<0.05), and those protein expressions were enhanced.

Conclusion

FTY720-P can down-regulate the expression of RhoA and promote the expressions of TGF- β ₁ and BMP-2 by affecting the transduction of EphA2-EphrinA2 bidirectional signaling in osteoclasts.

Rationale and design of Long-term Outcomes and Vascular Evaluation after Successful Coarctation of the Aorta Treatment study

Background:

Coarctation of the aorta (CoA) can be treated using surgery, balloon angioplasty, or stent implantation. Although short-term results are excellent with all three treatment modalities, long-term cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality remain high, likely due to persistently abnormal vascular function. The effects of treatment modality on long-term vascular function remain uncharacterized. The goal of this study is to assess vascular function in this patient population for comparison among the treatment modalities.

Methods:

We will prospectively assess vascular Afunction in large and small arteries fusing multiple noninvasive modalities and compare the results among the three groups of CoA patients previously treated using surgery, balloon angioplasty, or stent implantation after frequency matching for confounding variables. A comprehensive vascular function assessment protocol has been created to be used in 7 centers. Our primary outcome is arterial stiffness measured by arterial tonometry. Inclusion and exclusion criteria have been carefully established after consideration of several potential confounders. Sample size has been calculated for the primary outcome variable.

Conclusion:

Treatment modalities for CoA may have distinct impact on large and small arterial vascular function. The results of this study will help identify the treatment modality that is associated with the most optimal level of vascular function, which, in the long term, may reduce CV risk.