1
|
Geng Y, Wang Y, Liu L, Miao G, Zhang O, Xue Y, Zhang P. Staged Revascularization for Chronic Total Occlusion in the Non-IRA in Patients with ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. CARDIOVASCULAR INNOVATIONS AND APPLICATIONS 2022. [DOI: 10.15212/cvia.2022.0007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of staged revascularization with concomitant chronic total occlusion (CTO) in the non-infarct-associated artery (non-IRA) in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous
coronary intervention (p-PCI).Methods: Various electronic databases were searched for studies published from inception to June, 2021. The primary endpoint was all-cause death, and the secondary endpoint was a composite of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Odds ratios (ORs) were
pooled with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous data.Results: Seven studies involving 1540 participants were included in the final analysis. Pooled analyses revealed that patients with successful staged revascularization for CTO in non-IRA with STEMI treated with p-PCI
had overall lower all-cause death compared with the occluded CTO group (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.23‐0.95), cardiac death (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20‐0.91), MACEs (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.32‐0.69) and heart failure (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.37‐0.89) compared with the occluded CTO
group. No significant differences were observed between groups regarding myocardial infarction and repeated revascularization.Conclusions: Successful revascularization of CTO in the non-IRA was associated with better outcomes in patients with STEMI treated with p-PCI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Geng
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yintang Wang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Lianfeng Liu
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Guobin Miao
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Ou Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yajun Xue
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Akbari T, Al-Lamee R. Percutaneous coronary intervention in multi-vessel disease. CARDIOVASCULAR REVASCULARIZATION MEDICINE 2022; 44:80-91. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2022.06.254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
|
3
|
Bortnick AE, Shitole SG, Hashim H, Khullar P, Park M, Weinreich M, Seibert S, Rauch J, Weisz G, Kizer JR. Residual SYNTAX II Score and long-term outcomes post-ST-elevation myocardial infarction in an urban US cohort: the Montefiore STEMI Registry. Coron Artery Dis 2022; 33:206-212. [PMID: 34049323 PMCID: PMC8617039 DOI: 10.1097/mca.0000000000001074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Higher residual anatomic disease was associated with increased mortality in a recent randomized controlled trial of revascularization after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Less is known about the impact of residual disease post-STEMI in race-ethnic minorities. METHODS Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery (SYNTAX)- II (SS-II) score is an established scoring method for anatomic disease and prevalent co-morbidities to describe patient complexity. We evaluated residual (r) SS-II in 165 patients from a single center urban US registry (n = 1208) presenting for primary percutaneous coronary intervention of STEMI and treated for 3-vessel or left main and any combination of 0, 1, 2 or 3-vessel disease. RESULTS The median age was 62 years (IQR 52-70), 29.1% women, 44.9% Hispanic/Latino and 19.4% non-Hispanic Black. Over median of 4.9 years (IQR 2.9-6.3), higher rSS-II was associated with increased death [hazard ratio 2.46 per SD increment in log rSS-II (~five-fold increment on the original scale) 95% CI 1.51, 3.99], death or all-cause readmission (hazard ratio 1.37 per SD increment in log rSS-II 95% CI, 1.11-1.70) and death or cardiovascular disease readmission (hazard ratio 1.46 per SD increment in log rSS-II 95% CI, 1.14-1.88). rSS-II was higher in older women with more co-morbidities, but not different by race-ethnicity. CONCLUSIONS In summary, higher rSS-II was associated with long-term outcomes post-STEMI in a prospective urban, minority cohort, suggesting a potential role for risk stratification with this measure in a non-trial setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna E. Bortnick
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Bronx, NY
- Division of Geriatrics, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Sanyog G. Shitole
- Cardiology Section, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, and Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Hayder Hashim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center and Georgetown University, Washington DC
| | | | - Michael Park
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY
| | | | | | - Judah Rauch
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Bronx, NY
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY
| | - Giora Weisz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, New York Presbyterian Hospital, NY, NY
| | - Jorge R. Kizer
- Cardiology Section, San Francisco Veterans Affairs Health Care System, and Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Almas T, Akram A, Ehtesham M, Ahmed R, Khedro T, Malik U, Alshaikh L, Alshaikh L, Sattar Y, Hassan Virk HU. Multi-vessel Versus Culprit-vessel-only PCI for STEMI: Where Does the Jury Stand? Ann Med Surg (Lond) 2021; 65:102343. [PMID: 33996070 PMCID: PMC8100091 DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2021.102343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 04/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Talal Almas
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Ayesha Akram
- Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan
| | - Maryam Ehtesham
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Reema Ahmed
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Tarek Khedro
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Uzair Malik
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lamees Alshaikh
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Lina Alshaikh
- RCSI University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Yasar Sattar
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, NY, USA
| | - Hafeez Ul Hassan Virk
- Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Case Western Reserve University, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim YH, Her AY, Jeong MH, Kim BK, Hong SJ, Kim S, Ahn CM, Kim JS, Ko YG, Choi D, Hong MK, Jang Y. Culprit-only versus multivessel or complete versus incomplete revascularization in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease who underwent successful percutaneous coronary intervention using newer-generation drug-eluting stents. Atherosclerosis 2020; 301:54-64. [PMID: 32330691 DOI: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2020.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 04/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS The long-term comparative results between culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention (C-PCI) and multivessel PCI (M-PCI) or those between complete revascularization (CR) and incomplete revascularization (IR) in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) after successful newer-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation are limited. Therefore, we compared the 2-year clinical outcomes in such patients. METHODS A total of 4588 patients with NSTEMI and MVD (C-PCI, n = 2055; M-PCI, n = 2533; CR, n = 2029; IR, n = 504) were evaluated. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) defined as all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction MI, and any repeat coronary revascularization. The secondary outcome was stent thrombosis (ST). RESULTS The cumulative incidences of the primary and secondary outcomes were similar in the three comparison groups (C-PCI vs. M-PCI, CR vs. IR, or CR vs. C-PCI). However, the cumulative incidence of non-target vessel revascularization (non-TVR) was higher in the C-PCI group than in the M-PCI group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.011; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.942-3.985; p = 0.012), higher in the IR group than in the CR group (aHR: 2.051; 95% CI: 1.216-4.183; p = 0.043), and higher in the C-PCI group than in the CR group (aHR: 2.099; 95% CI: 1.237-3.564; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS Regarding the higher cumulative incidence of non-TVR, M-PCI and CR were preferred compared to C-PCI or IR in patients with NSTEMI and MVD. However, further randomized studies are required to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Hoon Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea.
| | - Ae-Young Her
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Ho Jeong
- Department of Cardiology, Cardiovascular Center, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, Republic of Korea
| | - Byeong-Keuk Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung-Jin Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Seunghwan Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Inje University College of Medicine, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Chul-Min Ahn
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung-Sun Kim
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Young-Guk Ko
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Donghoon Choi
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Myeong-Ki Hong
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| | - Yangsoo Jang
- Division of Cardiology, Severance Cardiovascular Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rathod KS, Koganti S, Jain AK, Astroulakis Z, Lim P, Rakhit R, Kalra SS, Dalby MC, O'Mahony C, Malik IS, Knight CJ, Mathur A, Redwood S, Sirker A, MacCarthy PA, Smith EJ, Wragg A, Jones DA. Complete Versus Culprit-Only Lesion Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019; 72:1989-1999. [PMID: 30336821 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.07.089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2018] [Revised: 06/29/2018] [Accepted: 07/30/2018] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A large proportion of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) present with multivessel disease (MVD). There is uncertainty in the role of complete coronary revascularization in this group of patients. OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of complete revascularization compared with culprit vessel-only intervention in a large contemporary cohort of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for NSTEMI. METHODS The authors undertook an observational cohort study of 37,491 NSTEMI patients treated between 2005 and 2015 at the 8 heart attack centers in London. Clinical details were recorded at the time of the procedure into local databases using the British Cardiac Intervention Society (BCIS) PCI dataset. A total of 21,857 patients (58.3%) presented with NSTEMI and MVD. Primary outcome was all-cause mortality at a median follow-up of 4.1 years (interquartile range: 2.2 to 5.8 years). RESULTS A total of 11,737 (53.7%) patients underwent single-stage complete revascularization during PCI for NSTEMI, rates that significantly increased during the study period (p = 0.006). Those patients undergoing complete revascularization were older and more likely to be male, diabetic, have renal disease and a history of previous myocardial infarction/revascularization compared with the culprit-only revascularization group. Although crude, in-hospital major adverse cardiac event rates were similar (5.2% vs. 4.8%; p = 0.462) between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significant differences in mortality rates between the 2 groups (22.5% complete revascularization vs. 25.9% culprit vessel intervention; p = 0.0005) during the follow-up period. After multivariate Cox analysis (hazard ratio: 0.90; 95% confidence interval: 0.85 to 0.97) and the use of propensity matching (hazard ratio: 0.89; 95% confidence interval: 0.76 to 0.98) complete revascularization was associated with reduced mortality. CONCLUSIONS In NSTEMI patients with MVD, despite higher initial (in-hospital) mortality rates, single-stage complete coronary revascularization appears to be superior to culprit-only vessel PCI in terms of long-term mortality rates. This supports the need for further randomized study to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ajay K Jain
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Zoe Astroulakis
- St. George's Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pitt Lim
- St. George's Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, St. George's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Roby Rakhit
- Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Miles C Dalby
- Royal Brompton & Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, Harefield Hospital, Middlesex, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Iqbal S Malik
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | - Simon Redwood
- St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guys & St. Thomas Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Philip A MacCarthy
- Kings College Hospital, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, London, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lamelas P, Winter J, Villablanca PA, Mehta S, Ramakrishna H. Culprit-Only Versus Complete Coronary Revascularization After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction- A Systematic Review and Analysis of Clinical Outcomes. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2019; 33:850-857. [DOI: 10.1053/j.jvca.2018.05.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
8
|
McCutcheon K, Triantafyllis AS, Marynissen T, Adriaenssens T, Bennett J, Dubois C, Sinnaeve PR, Desmet W. Major adverse cardiovascular events while awaiting staged non-culprit percutaneous coronary intervention after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Acta Cardiol 2019; 74:60-64. [PMID: 29560788 DOI: 10.1080/00015385.2018.1453959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal therapeutic strategy for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients found to have multi-vessel disease (MVD) is controversial but recent data support complete revascularisation (CR). Whether CR should be completed during the index admission or during a second staged admission remains unclear. Our main objective was to measure rates of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) during the waiting period in STEMI patients selected for staged revascularisation (SR), in order to determine the safety of delaying CR. For completeness, we also describe 30-day and long-term outcomes in STEMI patients with MVD who underwent in-hospital CR. METHODS A single-centre retrospective analysis of 931 STEMI patients treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) identified 397 patients with MVD who were haemodynamically stable and presented within 12 hours of chest pain onset. Of these, 191 underwent multi-vessel PCI: 49 during the index admission and 142 patients undergoing a strategy of SR. RESULTS Our main finding was that waiting period MACE were 2% (three of 142) in patients allocated to SR (at a median of 31 days). In patients allocated to in-hospital CR, 30-day MACE rates were 10% (five of 49). During a median follow up of 39 months, all-cause mortality was 7.0% vs. 28.6%, and cardiac mortality was 2% vs. 8%, in patients allocated to SR or CR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Patients with STEMI and MVD who, based on clinical judgement, were allocated to a second admission SR strategy had very few adverse events during the waiting period and excellent long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keir McCutcheon
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Thomas Marynissen
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Tom Adriaenssens
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Johan Bennett
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Christophe Dubois
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Peter R. Sinnaeve
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Walter Desmet
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Villablanca PA, Olmedo W, Weinreich M, Gupta T, Mohananey D, Albuquerque FN, Kassas I, Briceño D, Sanina C, Brevik TA, Ong E, Ramakrishna H, Attubato M, Menegus M, Wiley J, Kalra A. Staged Percutaneous Intervention for Concurrent Chronic Total Occlusions in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2018; 7:JAHA.117.008415. [PMID: 29654206 PMCID: PMC6015413 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.008415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Background Studies have shown that chronic total occlusion (CTO) in a noninfarct‐related artery in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction is linked to increased mortality. It remains unclear whether staged revascularization of a noninfarct‐related artery CTO in patients with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction translates to improved outcomes. We performed a meta‐analysis to compare outcomes between patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction with concurrent CTO who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention of noninfarct‐related artery CTO versus those who did not. Method and Results We conducted an electronic database search of all published data. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events. Secondary end points were all‐cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization with either percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke, and heart failure readmission. Odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed. Random effects model was used and heterogeneity was considered if I2 >25. Six studies (n=1253 patients) were included in the analysis. There was a significant difference in major adverse cardiovascular events (OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.32–0.91), cardiovascular mortality (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.20–0.95), and heart failure readmissions (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.36–0.89), favoring the patients in the CTO percutaneous coronary intervention group. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for all‐cause mortality (OR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.22–1.00), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.41–1.46), repeat revascularization (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.56–2.27), and stroke (OR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.20–1.33). Conclusions In this meta‐analysis, CTO percutaneous coronary intervention of the noninfarct‐related artery in patients presenting with ST‐segment–elevation myocardial infarction was associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular mortality, and heart failure readmissions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pedro A Villablanca
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Wilman Olmedo
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Michael Weinreich
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Tanush Gupta
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | | | - Felipe N Albuquerque
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL
| | - Ibrahim Kassas
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - David Briceño
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Cristina Sanina
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Thomas A Brevik
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Emily Ong
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Harish Ramakrishna
- Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Anesthesiology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Michael Attubato
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Mark Menegus
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Jose Wiley
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Ankur Kalra
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization in STEMI: a Contemporary Review. CURRENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN CARDIOVASCULAR MEDICINE 2018; 20:41. [PMID: 29627944 DOI: 10.1007/s11936-018-0636-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, urgent revascularization of the culprit coronary vessel and restoration of coronary flow is the goal of the initial management. However, obstructive non-culprit disease is frequently concomitantly found during initial angiography and portends a poor prognosis. Management of non-culprit lesions in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) has been the subject of extensive debate. This review will examine the currently available evidence, with a specific focus on randomized clinical trials performed to date. RECENT FINDINGS Although early observational data suggested better outcomes with culprit-only revascularization, more recent data from several randomized trials have suggested improved outcomes with complete multivessel revascularization, either during the index PCI procedure or as a staged procedure. Data from recent randomized controlled trials have suggested the superiority of complete or multivessel revascularization and have subsequently led to changes to the most recent iterations of STEMI guidelines. However, the optimal management and timing of revascularization of non-culprit lesions in STEMI remain controversial.
Collapse
|
11
|
Kwon SW, Park SD, Moon J, Oh PC, Jang HJ, Park HW, Kim TH, Lee K, Suh J, Kang W. Complete Versus Culprit-Only Revascularization for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease in the 2 nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era: Data from the INTERSTELLAR Registry. Korean Circ J 2018; 48:989-999. [PMID: 30334385 PMCID: PMC6196156 DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2017.0387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Revised: 04/11/2018] [Accepted: 05/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives We aimed to compare outcomes of complete revascularization (CR) versus culprit-only revascularization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and multivessel disease (MVD) in the 2nd generation drug-eluting stent (DES) era. Methods From 2009 to 2014, patients with STEMI and MVD, who underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using a 2nd generation DES for culprit lesions were enrolled. CR was defined as PCI for a non-infarct-related artery during the index admission. Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) was defined as cardiovascular (CV) death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or heart failure during the follow-up year. Results In total, 705 MVD patients were suitable for the analysis, of whom 286 (41%) underwent culprit-only PCI and 419 (59%) underwent CR during the index admission. The incidence of MACE was 11.5% in the CR group versus 18.5% in the culprit-only group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–0.86; p<0.01; adjusted HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.40–0.99; p=0.04). The CR group revealed a significantly lower incidence of CV death (7.2% vs. 12.9%; HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.31–0.86; p=0.01 and adjusted HR, 0.57; 95% CI; 0.32–0.97; p=0.03, respectively). Conclusions CR was associated with better outcomes including reductions in MACE and CV death at 1 year of follow-up compared with culprit-only PCI in the 2nd generation DES era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Woo Kwon
- Department of Cardiology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Sang Don Park
- Department of Cardiology, Inha University Hospital, Incheon, Korea.
| | - Jeonggeun Moon
- Department of Cardiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Pyung Chun Oh
- Department of Cardiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Ho Jun Jang
- Department of Cardiology, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Hyun Woo Park
- Department of Cardiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Tae Hoon Kim
- Department of Cardiology, Sejong General Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Kyounghoon Lee
- Department of Cardiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jon Suh
- Department of Cardiology, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea
| | - WoongChol Kang
- Department of Cardiology, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Nguyen AV, Thanh LV, Kamel MG, Abdelrahman SAM, EL-Mekawy M, Mokhtar MA, Ali AA, Hoang NNN, Vuong NL, Abd-Elhay FAE, Omer OA, Mohamed AA, Hirayama K, Huy NT. Optimal percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel disease: An updated, large-scale systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
13
|
Andries G, Khera S, Timmermans RJ, Aronow WS. Complete versus culprit only revascularization in ST-elevation myocardial infarction-a perspective on recent trials and recommendations. J Thorac Dis 2017; 9:2159-2167. [PMID: 28840017 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2017.06.95] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The presence of multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) is strongly associated with higher 30-day mortality, reduced myocardial reperfusion success, reinfarction, and occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 1 year compared with single-vessel CAD. Despite higher morbidity and mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and coexistent multivessel CAD, major guidelines recommended against percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on non-culprit lesions at the time of primary PCI in patients with STEMI who are hemodynamically stable. The presence of multivessel CAD often poses a therapeutic dilemma for interventional cardiologists. A few larger scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and meta-analyses have been conducted. The conclusions regarding multivessel PCI generally trend towards lower risk of MACE, repeat revascularization, with similar risks of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) and mortality. However, none of the RCTs were adequately powered for hard outcomes of death and MI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriela Andries
- Division of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Sahil Khera
- Division of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA.,Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Robert J Timmermans
- Division of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| | - Wilbert S Aronow
- Division of Cardiology, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vogel B, Mehta SR, Mehran R. Reperfusion strategies in acute myocardial infarction and multivessel disease. Nat Rev Cardiol 2017; 14:665-678. [DOI: 10.1038/nrcardio.2017.88] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
|
15
|
Non-infarct related artery revascularization in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 2017; 32:600-607. [PMID: 28617684 DOI: 10.1097/hco.0000000000000427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Multivessel disease (MVD) is common in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and is associated with significant risk of future cardiovascular (CV) events including short and longer-term mortality. In this review, we examine the pathophysiologic construct contributing to adverse prognosis of MVD in STEMI, relevant available evidence that currently guides the management of the noninfarct-related artery (IRA) stenosis and define the remaining knowledge gaps for future studies. RECENT FINDINGS Results of recent small sized randomized trials, when pooled, suggest improvement in CV outcomes including CV mortality and repeat revascularization with revascularization of the non-IRA stenosis compared with medical management alone. In addition, there does not appear to be an increase in bleeding, contrast-induced nephropathy or stroke, as suggested by earlier observational data. SUMMARY These recent data have led to a Class IIb recommendation in the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines stating that non-IRA revascularization may be considered in selected patients with STEMI and MVD who are hemodynamically stable, either at the time of primary PCI or as a planned staged procedure. The ongoing COMPLETE and CULPRIT-SHOCK studies will provide additional data to further inform the role of non-IRA revascularization and its timing in the management of these patients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Gaffar R, Habib B, Filion KB, Reynier P, Eisenberg MJ. Optimal Timing of Complete Revascularization in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2017; 6:JAHA.116.005381. [PMID: 28396570 PMCID: PMC5533029 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.005381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Background Studies have suggested that complete revascularization is superior to culprit‐only revascularization for the treatment of enzyme‐positive acute coronary syndrome. However, the optimal timing of complete revascularization remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing single‐stage complete revascularization with multistage percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction or non–ST‐segment elevation myocardial infarction with multivessel disease. Methods and Results We systematically searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE for randomized controlled trials comparing single‐stage complete revascularization with multistage revascularization in patients with enzyme‐positive acute coronary syndrome. The primary outcome was the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events at longest follow‐up. Data were pooled using DerSimonian and Laird random‐effects models. Four randomized controlled trials (n=838) were included in our meta‐analysis. The risk of unplanned repeat revascularization at longest follow‐up was significantly lower in patients randomized to single‐stage complete revascularization (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47–0.99). Results also suggest a trend towards lower risks of major adverse cardiovascular events for patients randomized to single‐stage revascularization at 6 months (risk ratio, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.40–1.11) and at longest follow‐up (risk ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.52–1.20). Risks of mortality and recurrent myocardial infarction at longest follow‐up were also lower with single‐stage revascularization, but 95% CIs were wide and included unity. Conclusions Our results suggest that single‐stage complete revascularization is safe. There also appears to be a trend towards lower long‐term risks of mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events; however, additional randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the potential benefits of single‐stage multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rouan Gaffar
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Bettina Habib
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Kristian B Filion
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Pauline Reynier
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mark J Eisenberg
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada .,Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.,Departments of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Qiu M, Li Y, Li J, Xu K, Jing Q, Dong S, Jin Z, Zhao P, Xu B, Han Y. Impact of six versus 12 months of dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with drug-eluting stent implantation after risk stratification with the residual SYNTAX score: Results from a secondary analysis of the I-LOVE-IT 2 trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2017; 89:565-573. [PMID: 28211603 DOI: 10.1002/ccd.26948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2016] [Accepted: 12/26/2016] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Miaohan Qiu
- The Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, China
- The Graduate School of Dalian Medical University, Dalian, China
| | - Yi Li
- The Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, China
| | - Jing Li
- The Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, China
| | - Kai Xu
- The Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, China
| | - Quanmin Jing
- The Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, China
| | - Shaohong Dong
- The Department of Cardiology, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Zhe Jin
- The Department of Cardiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, China
| | - Pitian Zhao
- The Department of Cardiology, Yidu Central Hospital of Weifang City, China
| | - Bo Xu
- The Catheterization Laboratory, Fu Wai Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yaling Han
- The Department of Cardiology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ifedili IA, Bob-Manuel T, Bolorunduro O, Askari R, Ibebuogu UN. Complete Revascularization of Simultaneous Multiple Culprit Lesions in a Septuagenarian with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CASE REPORTS 2016; 17:997-1001. [PMID: 28035135 PMCID: PMC5218367 DOI: 10.12659/ajcr.900849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Patient: Female, 74 Final Diagnosis: Multiple culprit lesions in ST-elevation myocardial infarction Symptoms: Chest pain • shortness of breath Medication: — Clinical Procedure: Cardiac catheterization Specialty: Cardiology
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ikechukwu A Ifedili
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Tennesse Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Tamunoinemi Bob-Manuel
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Oluwaseyi Bolorunduro
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Tennesse Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Raza Askari
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Tennesse Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Uzoma N Ibebuogu
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Tennesse Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nagaraja V, Ooi SY, Nolan J, Large A, De Belder M, Ludman P, Bagur R, Curzen N, Matsukage T, Yoshimachi F, Kwok CS, Berry C, Mamas MA. Impact of Incomplete Percutaneous Revascularization in Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Am Heart Assoc 2016; 5:JAHA.116.004598. [PMID: 27986755 PMCID: PMC5210416 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.116.004598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background Up to half of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention have multivessel coronary artery disease (MVD) with conflicting data regarding optimal revascularization strategy in such patients. This paper assesses the evidence for complete revascularization (CR) versus incomplete revascularization in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention, and its prognostic impact using meta‐analysis. Methods and Results A search of PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Current Contents Connect, Google Scholar, Cochrane library, Science Direct, and Web of Science was conducted to identify the association of CR in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with major adverse cardiac events and mortality. Random‐effects meta‐analysis was used to estimate the odds of adverse outcomes. Meta‐regression analysis was conducted to assess the relationship with continuous variables and outcomes. Thirty‐eight publications that included 156 240 patients were identified. Odds of death (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61‐0.78), repeat revascularization (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.45‐0.80), myocardial infarction (OR 0.64, 95% CI 0.50‐0.81), and major adverse cardiac events (OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.50‐0.79) were significantly lower in the patients who underwent CR. These outcomes were unchanged on subgroup analysis regardless of the definition of CR. Similar findings were recorded when CR was studied in the chronic total occlusion (CTO) subgroup (OR 0.65, 95% CI 0.53‐0.80). A meta‐regression analysis revealed a negative relationship between the OR for mortality and the percentage of CR. Conclusion CR is associated with reduced risk of mortality and major adverse cardiac events, irrespective of whether an anatomical or a score‐based definition of incomplete revascularization is used, and this magnitude of risk relates to degree of CR. These results have important implications for the interventional management of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinayak Nagaraja
- Department of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sze-Yuan Ooi
- Department of Cardiology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - James Nolan
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.,Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Adrian Large
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Mark De Belder
- The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
| | - Peter Ludman
- Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Rodrigo Bagur
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nick Curzen
- University Hospital Southampton & Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Takashi Matsukage
- Division of Cardiology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | | | - Chun Shing Kwok
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom.,Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| | - Colin Berry
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Mamas A Mamas
- Royal Stoke University Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom .,Keele Cardiovascular Research Group, Institute of Science and Technology in Medicine, University of Keele, Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Weng H, Zeng XT. How strong is the evidence of culprit-lesion only versus complete multivessel percutaneous intervention in ST-elevation myocardial infarction? Int J Cardiol 2016; 223:171-172. [PMID: 27541648 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Weng
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China
| | - Xian-Tao Zeng
- Center for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430071, China.
| |
Collapse
|