An artificial intelligence electrocardiogram analysis for detecting cardiomyopathy in the peripartum period

Artificial Intelligence Interpretation of the Electrocardiogram: A State-of-the-Art Review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming electrocardiography (ECG) interpretation. AI diagnostics can reach beyond human capabilities, facilitate automated access to nuanced ECG interpretation, and expand the scope of cardiovascular screening in the population. AI can be applied to the standard 12-lead resting ECG and single-lead ECGs in external monitors, implantable devices, and direct-to-consumer smart devices. We summarize the current state of the literature on AI-ECG.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rhythm classification was the first application of AI-ECG. Subsequently, AI-ECG models have been developed for screening structural heart disease including hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, cardiac amyloidosis, aortic stenosis, pulmonary hypertension, and left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Further, AI models can predict future events like development of systolic heart failure and atrial fibrillation. AI-ECG exhibits potential in acute cardiac events and non-cardiac applications, including acute pulmonary embolism, electrolyte abnormalities, monitoring drugs therapy, sleep apnea, and predicting all-cause mortality. Many AI models in the domain of cardiac monitors and smart watches have received Food and Drug Administration (FDA) clearance for rhythm classification, while others for identification of cardiac amyloidosis, pulmonary hypertension and left ventricular dysfunction have received breakthrough device designation. As AI-ECG models continue to be developed, in addition to regulatory oversight and monetization challenges, thoughtful clinical implementation to streamline workflows, avoiding information overload and overwhelming of healthcare systems with false positive results is necessary. Research to demonstrate and validate improvement in healthcare efficiency and improved patient outcomes would be required before widespread adoption of any AI-ECG model.

Electrocardiogram-based prediction of conduction disturbances after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with convolutional neural network

Aims

Permanent pacemaker implantation and left bundle branch block are common complications after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and are associated with impaired prognosis. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI) model for predicting conduction disturbances after TAVR using pre-procedural 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) images.

Methods and results

We collected pre-procedural 12-lead ECGs of patients who underwent TAVR at West China Hospital between March 2016 and March 2022. A hold-out testing set comprising 20% of the sample was randomly selected. We developed an AI model using a convolutional neural network, trained it using five-fold cross-validation and tested it on the hold-out testing cohort. We also developed and validated an enhanced model that included additional clinical features. After applying exclusion criteria, we included 1354 ECGs of 718 patients in the study. The AI model predicted conduction disturbances in the hold-out testing cohort with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.764, accuracy of 0.743, F1 score of 0.752, sensitivity of 0.876, and specificity of 0.624, based solely on pre-procedural ECG images. The performance was better than the Emory score (AUC = 0.704), as well as the logistic (AUC = 0.574) and XGBoost (AUC = 0.520) models built with previously identified high-risk ECG patterns. After adding clinical features, there was an increase in the overall performance with an AUC of 0.779, accuracy of 0.774, F1 score of 0.776, sensitivity of 0.794, and specificity of 0.752.

Conclusion

Artificial intelligence-enhanced ECGs may offer better predictive value than traditionally defined high-risk ECG patterns.

Development and validation of an electrocardiographic artificial intelligence model for detection of peripartum cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

This study used electrocardiogram data in conjunction with artificial intelligence methods as a noninvasive tool for detecting peripartum cardiomyopathy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the efficacy of an artificial intelligence-based heart failure detection model for peripartum cardiomyopathy detection.

STUDY DESIGN

We first built a deep-learning model for heart failure detection using retrospective data at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center. Cases were adult and nonpregnant female patients with a heart failure diagnosis; controls were adult nonpregnant female patients without heart failure. The model was then tested on an independent cohort of pregnant women at the University of Tennessee Health Science Center with or without peripartum cardiomyopathy. We also tested the model in an external cohort of pregnant women at Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist. Key outcomes were assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. We also repeated our analysis using only lead I electrocardiogram as an input to assess the feasibility of remote monitoring via wearables that can capture single-lead electrocardiogram data.

RESULTS

The University of Tennessee Health Science Center heart failure cohort comprised 346,339 electrocardiograms from 142,601 patients. In this cohort, 60% of participants were Black and 37% were White, with an average age (standard deviation) of 53 (19) years. The heart failure detection model achieved an area under the curve of 0.92 on the holdout set. We then tested the ability of the heart failure model to detect peripartum cardiomyopathy in an independent University of Tennessee Health Science Center cohort of pregnant women and an external Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohort of pregnant women. The independent University of Tennessee Health Science Center cohort included 158 electrocardiograms from 115 patients; our deep-learning model achieved an area under the curve of 0.83 (0.77-0.89) for this data set. The external Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohort involved 80 electrocardiograms from 43 patients; our deep-learning model achieved an area under the curve of 0.94 (0.91-0.98) for this data set. For identifying peripartum cardiomyopathy diagnosed ≥10 days after delivery, the model achieved an area under the curve of 0.88 (0.81-0.94) for the University of Tennessee Health Science Center cohort and of 0.96 (0.93-0.99) for the Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohort. When we repeated our analysis by building a heart failure detection model using only lead-I electrocardiograms, we obtained similarly high detection accuracies, with areas under the curve of 0.73 and 0.93 for the University of Tennessee Health Science Center and Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist cohorts, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Artificial intelligence can accurately detect peripartum cardiomyopathy from electrocardiograms alone. A simple electrocardiographic artificial intelligence-based peripartum screening could result in a timelier diagnosis. Given that results with 1-lead electrocardiogram data were similar to those obtained using all 12 leads, future studies will focus on remote screening for peripartum cardiomyopathy using smartwatches that can capture single-lead electrocardiogram data.

Electrocardiogram-based deep learning model to screen peripartum cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Peripartum cardiomyopathy, one of the most fatal conditions during delivery, results in heart failure secondary to left ventricular systolic dysfunction. Left ventricular dysfunction can result in abnormalities in electrocardiography. However, the usefulness of electrocardiography in the identification of peripartum cardiomyopathy in pregnant women remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a 12-lead electrocardiography-based artificial intelligence/machine learning-based software as a medical device for screening peripartum cardiomyopathy.

STUDY DESIGN

This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women who underwent transthoracic echocardiography between a month before and 5 months after delivery and underwent 12-lead electrocardiography within 30 days of echocardiography between December 2011 and May 2022 at Seoul National University Hospital. The performance of 12-lead electrocardiography-based artificial intelligence/machine learning analysis (AiTiALVSD software; version 1.00.00, which was developed to screen for left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the general population) was evaluated for the identification of peripartum cardiomyopathy. In addition, the performance of another artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithm using only 1-lead electrocardiography to detect left ventricular systolic dysfunction was evaluated in identifying peripartum cardiomyopathy. The results were obtained under a 95% confidence interval and considered significant when P<.05.

RESULTS

Among the 14,557 women who delivered during the study period, 204 (1.4%) underwent transthoracic echocardiography a month before and 5 months after delivery. Among them, 12 (5.8%) were diagnosed with peripartum cardiomyopathy. The results showed that AiTiALVSD for 12-lead electrocardiography was highly effective in detecting peripartum cardiomyopathy, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.979 (95% confidence interval, 0.953-1.000), an area under the precision-recall curve of 0.715 (95% confidence interval, 0.499-0.951), a sensitivity of 0.917 (95% confidence interval, 0.760-1.000), a specificity of 0.927 (95% confidence interval, 0.890-0.964), a positive predictive value of 0.440 (95% confidence interval, 0.245-0.635), and a negative predictive value of 0.994 (95% confidence interval, 0.983-1.000). In addition, a 1-lead (lead I) artificial intelligence/machine learning algorithm showed excellent performance; the area under the receiver operating characteristic, area under the precision-recall curve, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.944 (95% confidence interval, 0.895-0.993), 0.520 (95% confidence interval, 0.319-0.801), 0.833 (95% confidence interval, 0.622-1.000), 0.880 (95% confidence interval, 0.834-0.926), 0.303 (95% confidence interval, 0.146-0.460), and 0.988 (95% confidence interval, 0.972-1.000), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The 12-lead electrocardiography-based artificial intelligence/machine learning-based software as a medical device (AiTiALVSD) and 1-lead algorithm are noninvasive and effective ways of identifying cardiomyopathies occurring during the peripartum period, and they could potentially be used as highly sensitive screening tools for peripartum cardiomyopathy.

Diagnostic AI and Cardiac Diseases

(1) Background: The purpose of this study is to review and highlight recent advances in diagnostic uses of artificial intelligence (AI) for cardiac diseases, in order to emphasize expected benefits to both patients and healthcare specialists; (2) Methods: We focused on four key search terms (Cardiac Disease, diagnosis, artificial intelligence, machine learning) across three different databases (Pubmed, European Heart Journal, Science Direct) between 2017-2022 in order to reach relatively more recent developments in the field. Our review was structured in order to clearly differentiate publications according to the disease they aim to diagnose (coronary artery disease, electrophysiological and structural heart diseases); (3) Results: Each study had different levels of success, where declared sensitivity, specificity, precision, accuracy, area under curve and F1 scores were reported for every article reviewed; (4) Conclusions: the number and quality of AI-assisted cardiac disease diagnosis publications will continue to increase through each year. We believe AI-based diagnosis should only be viewed as an additional tool assisting doctors' own judgement, where the end goal is to provide better quality of healthcare and to make getting medical help more affordable and more accessible, for everyone, everywhere.