Mid-trimester dilation and evacuation with laminaria does not increase the risk for severe subsequent pregnancy complications

Risk Factors for Failure of Second-Trimester Termination with Misoprostol as a Single Agent

Background: Understanding the potential risk factors for failure of pregnancy termination is crucial for informed clinical decision making. Such insights can assist clinicians in adjusting the dosage or route of various regimens, as well as in counseling patients and predicting the likelihood of successful outcomes. However, research on these risk factors has been limited, and existing studies have yielded inconsistent results. To address this gap, we conducted a study with a large sample size, focusing on identifying the potential risk factors for failure of second-trimester termination using misoprostol as a single agent, specifically between 14 and 28 weeks of gestation. Methods: A secondary analysis based on a database of second-trimester terminations was conducted. The inclusion criteria were a singleton pregnancy, gestational age between 14 and 28 weeks, an unfavorable cervix, no spontaneous labor pain, intact membranes, and termination with misoprostol alone. Potential risk factors for failure of termination, defined as no abortion within 48 h, were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: A total of 1094 cases were included in the analysis, consisting of 991 successful cases and 103 (9.4%) cases of failure. The significant risk factors for failure of termination included early gestational age, live fetuses, sublingual regimen of 400 mcg every 6 h, and high maternal pre-pregnancy BMI. Previous cesarean sections and lower Bishop scores tended to increase the risk but did not reach a significant level. Conclusions: Second-trimester termination with misoprostol as a single agent was highly effective, with a failure rate of 9.4%. The risk factors for failure included gestational age, fetal viability, misoprostol regimen, and maternal pre-pregnancy BMI, suggesting that these factors should be taken into consideration for second-trimester terminations with misoprostol.

Impact of first-trimester mechanical cervical dilatation during curettage on maternal and neonatal outcomes: A retrospective comparative study

OBJECTIVE

Earlier studies have indicated a potential link between dilatation and curettage (D&C) and subsequent preterm delivery, possibly attributed to cervical damage. This study examines outcomes in pregnancies subsequent to first-trimester curettage with and without cervical dilatation.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on women who conceived after undergoing curettage due to a first trimester pregnancy loss. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of the subsequent pregnancy were compared between two groups: women who underwent cervical dilatation before their curettage and those who had curettage without dilatation. The primary outcome assessed was the rate of preterm delivery at the subsequent pregnancy, and secondary outcomes included other adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was performed, followed by multiple logistic regression models to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Among the 1087 women meeting the inclusion criteria during the study period, 852 (78.4 %) underwent first-trimester curettage with cervical dilatation, while 235 (21.6 %) opted for curettage only. No significant maternal or neonatal different outcomes were noted between the study groups, including preterm delivery (5.5 % vs. 3.5 %, p = 0.16), fertility treatments, placental complications, and mode of delivery. However, deliveries following D&C were associated with higher rates of small for gestational age neonates (7.6 % vs. 3.8 %, p = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that cervical dilation before curettage was not significantly linked to preterm delivery [adjusted odds ratio 0.64 (0.33-1.26), p = 0.20].

CONCLUSION

The use of cervical dilatation during a curettage procedure for first trimester pregnancy loss, does not confer additional risk of preterm delivery. Further studies are needed to reinforce and validate these results.

Is a pregnancy following a second trimester uterine evacuation associated with increased adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies following a uterine evacuation in the second trimester, in comparison to a first trimester spontaneous pregnancy loss.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of data of women who conceived ≤6 months following a uterine evacuation due to a spontaneous pregnancy loss and subsequently delivered in a single tertiary medical center between 2016 and 2021. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between women with second trimester (14-23 weeks) and first trimester (<14 weeks) pregnancy loss. The primary outcome of this study was the preterm delivery (<37 weeks) rate. Secondary outcomes were adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. Univariate analysis was followed by multiple logistic regression models; adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1365 women met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 272 (19.9 %) women gave birth following a second trimester uterine evacuation and 1093 (80.1 %) women following a first trimester uterine evacuation. There were no demographic differences between the two groups. No difference was found in the preterm delivery rate in the subsequent pregnancy (5.1 % vs. 5.3 %, p = 0.91), further confirmed in the multivariate analysis [aOR 1.02 (0.53-1.94), p = 0.96]. No differences were identified with respect to other maternal and neonatal parameters examined, including hypertension disorders of pregnancy, third stage placental complications, mode of delivery and neonatal birth weight.

CONCLUSION

Pregnancy conceived shortly after second trimester uterine evacuation as compared to first trimester, confers no additional risk for preterm delivery or other adverse perinatal outcomes. Further studies to strengthen these findings are needed.

Risk of preterm delivery after medically indicated termination of pregnancy with induced vaginal delivery: a case-control study

We investigated whether nonsurgical termination of pregnancy after 14 weeks of gestation increases the risk of preterm delivery in a subsequent pregnancy. We conducted a two-centre retrospective case-control study. Patients who underwent non-surgical termination of pregnancy after 14 weeks of gestation between 2012 and 2015 and who gave birth after 14 weeks of gestation to a live-born singleton infant were included. Control patients were those who gave birth after 37 weeks of gestation (the same month as a case patient) and had a second delivery of a singleton foetus after 14 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome was preterm delivery during the second pregnancy period. We included 151 cases and 302 controls and observed 13 (8.6%) preterm births during the second pregnancy in the case group versus 8 (2.6%) (odds ratio: 3.62; 95% confidence interval: 1.40-8.65, p < .001) in the control group. This result remained significant after multivariate analysis. Impact statementWhat is already known about this topic? Many studies have evaluated the association between first-trimester surgical or non-surgical termination of pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. However, no study has evaluated the association between second- or third-trimester non-surgical termination of pregnancy due to foetal disease and the risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. A small number of studies have included a small proportion of patients who previously underwent non-surgical termination of pregnancy after 14 weeks of gestation and later experienced first-trimester termination during their second pregnancy. These studies focussed on the impact of the interpregnancy interval or pharmacological induction of labour on the risk of preterm delivery in the subsequent pregnancy.What did the results of this study add? This is the first study to specifically evaluate the association between second- and third-trimester non-surgical terminations of pregnancy and the risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy. When compared with term birth, nonsurgical termination of pregnancy was associated with the risk of spontaneous preterm birth and hospitalisation in the neonatal intensive care unit in the subsequent pregnancy.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and further research? Further studies are required to confirm our results, but information delivered to patients with a late termination of pregnancy and during their pregnancy follow-up for the subsequent pregnancy could be modified to provide this information.

Society of Family Planning clinical recommendations: Cervical preparation for dilation and evacuation at 20-24 weeks' gestation

Although only 1.3% of abortions in the United States are between 20 and 24 weeks' gestation, these procedures are associated with elevated risks of morbidity and mortality. Adequate cervical preparation before dilation and evacuation (D&E) at 20-24 weeks' gestation reduces procedural risk. For this gestational range, at least one day of cervical preparation with osmotic dilators is recommended before D&E. The use of overnight osmotic dilators alone is sufficient for most D&Es at 20-24 weeks' gestation. Dilapan-S® dilators require a shorter time to achieve maximum dilation, may be more effective than laminaria and may increase the likelihood of success on the first D&E attempt. The use of adjunctive mifepristone administered one-day pre-operatively at the time of osmotic dilator placement, should be considered because evidence demonstrates that it makes D&E subjectively easier at 20-24 weeks without increasing side effects. While older studies suggest that two-days of serial osmotic dilators provide greater dilation than one day of dilators, adjunctive mifepristone may be comparable to a second day of dilators. Adjunctive misoprostol administered on the day of D&E does not appear to affect initial cervical dilation and procedure time and compared with mifepristone is associated with more side effects, such as pain and nausea. Using overnight mifepristone and same-day misoprostol without osmotic dilators at 20-24 weeks' gestation lengthens D&E procedure time and appears to increase immediate complications, at least among less experienced providers. Some evidence shows the feasibility of same-day cervical preparation before D&E at 20-24 weeks using Dilapan-S® with adjunctive misoprostol or serial repeat dosing of misoprostol, but same-day preparation should be limited to providers with significant experience with these regimens. The Society of Family Planning recommends preoperative cervical preparation before D&E at 20-24 weeks' gestation. Further studies are needed to clarify the best means of preparing the cervix in order to minimize abortion complications and improve outcomes in this gestational range.

The duration of gestation at previous induced abortion and its impacts on subsequent births: A nationwide registry-based study

INTRODUCTION

Previous induced abortions have been associated with adverse birth outcomes. However, only a few studies have considered the possible influence of gestational age at induced abortion. Therefore, this study aimed to identify the impacts of gestational age during prior induced abortion(s) on subsequent births among first-time mothers in Finland.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

First-time mothers (n = 418 690) with singleton births between 1996 and 2013 were identified from the Finnish Medical Birth Register and linked to the Abortion Register. Logistic regression analysis was used to estimate the risk (odds ratio [OR] and 95% confidence interval [CI]) of birth outcomes such as prematurity, low birthweight, perinatal death and small for gestational age (SGA).

RESULTS

Higher risk was determined for extremely preterm birth (OR 2.28; 95% CI 1.53-3.39) and very low birthweight (OR 1.62; 95% CI 1.22-2.16) in women having had late-induced abortion(s) (≥12 gestational weeks) compared with women having had early-induced abortion(s) (<12 gestational weeks); after adjusting for women's background characteristics, abortion method and interval between the pregnancies. When the analysis was limited to a single abortion, an increased risk was found for extremely preterm birth (OR 1.71; 95% CI 1.02-2.81). Higher risks were found for extremely preterm (OR 4.09; 95% CI 2.05-8.18) and very low birthweight (OR 2.65; 95% CI 1.61-4.35) among women with two or more late-induced abortions compared with those with two or more early-induced abortions. Worse outcomes were seen after a late-induced abortion compared to an early-induced abortion for both medically and surgically induced abortion.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of subsequent adverse birth outcomes is very small if any, but the risk is higher with increasing gestational age at the time of induced abortion. Our study supports reduction of unintended pregnancy and offering abortion services without delay and as early in gestation as possible.

No. 360-Induced Abortion: Surgical Abortion and Second Trimester Medical Methods

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews evidence relating to the provision of surgical induced abortion (IA) and second trimester medical abortion, including pre- and post-procedural care.

INTENDED USERS

Gynaecologists, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who currently or intend to provide and/or teach IAs.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with an unintended or abnormal first or second trimester pregnancy.

EVIDENCE

PubMed, Medline, and the Cochrane Database were searched using the key words: first-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester surgical abortion, second-trimester medical abortion, dilation and evacuation, induction abortion, feticide, cervical preparation, cervical dilation, abortion complications. Results were restricted to English or French systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, clinical trials, and observational studies published from 1979 to July 2017. National and international clinical practice guidelines were consulted for review. Grey literature was not searched.

VALUES

The quality of evidence in this document was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology framework. The summary of findings is available upon request.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND/OR COSTS

IA is safe and effective. The benefits of IA outweigh the potential harms or costs. No new direct harms or costs identified with these guidelines.

Second trimester dilation and evacuation: a risk factor for preterm birth?

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether second trimester pregnancy termination with dilation and evacuation (D&E) vs induction of labor (IOL) affects subsequent risk of preterm birth.

STUDY DESIGN

Our cohort was a retrospective cohort of women undergoing second trimester pregnancy termination for fetal anomalies, fetal death or previable premature rupture of membranes. We analyzed the rates of spontaneous delivery <37 weeks in the first pregnancy following the termination. We also compared preterm birth rates in our cohort with national averages and analyzed by the total number of prior procedures.

RESULT

There were 173 women in our cohort. Women who had undergone a D&E (n=130) were less likely to have a subsequent preterm birth (6.9 vs 30.2%; P<0.01). This held true for a low risk subset without obstetric risk factors. There was no statistical difference in preterm birth rates for women who had undergone a D&E as compared with national averages, nor between the rates of preterm birth for women with 0, 1, 2 or 3 or more prior first or second trimester procedures.

CONCLUSION

We did not find that D&E was a risk factor for preterm delivery when compared with women with a prior IOL or national rates.

Management of stillbirth delivery

Stillbirth is a common adverse outcome of pregnancy. Management should be individualized based on gestational age, maternal condition, prior uterine surgery, availability of skilled professionals, and maternal desires. This article discusses available data on management by gestational age and prior uterine surgery. Expectant management is a viable option for women and families who desire it and do not have any contraindications. In the second trimester, misoprostol induction and dilatation and evacuation are effective in the evacuation of the uterus. In the third trimester, induction of labor with prostaglandins, mechanical dilators, and augmentation with oxytocin is appropriate. Care should be taken with women with prior cesarean delivery; prostaglandins ideally should be avoided. Delivery by cesarean section should be performed selectively, i.e., when there is a maternal indication.

[Fetal death beyond 14 weeks of gestation: induction of labor and obtaining of uterine vacuity]

The objective of this review was to assess benefits and harms of different management options for induction of labor and obtaining of uterine vacuity in case of fetal death beyond of 14 weeks of gestation. In second-trimester, the data are numerous but low methodological quality. In terms of efficiency (induction-expulsion time and uterine evacuation within 24 hours rate) and tolerance in the absence of antecedent of caesarean section, the best protocol for induction of labor in the second-trimester of pregnancy appears to be mifepristone 200mg orally followed 24-48 hours later by vaginal administration of misoprostol 200 to 400 μg every 4 to 6 hours. In third-trimester, there is very little data. The circumstances are similar to induction of labor with living fetus. A term or near term, oxytocin and dinoprostone have a marketing authorization in this indication but misoprostol may be an alternative as the Bishop score and dose of induction of labor with living fetus. In case of previous caesarean section, the risk of uterine rupture is increased in case of a medical induction of labor with prostaglandins. The lowest effective doses should be used (100 to 200 μg every 4 to 6 hours). Prior cervical preparation by the administration of mifepristone and possibly the use of laminar seems essential in this situation.

Term induction of labor and subsequent preterm birth

OBJECTIVE

Although the rate of inductions continues to rise, there is a paucity of data investigating subsequent pregnancy outcomes after induction. Our objective was to compare term inductions with term spontaneous labor and evaluate the rate of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study of women with 2 consecutive deliveries from 2005 through 2010 was performed. Term inductions or term spontaneous labor in the index pregnancy was included, and those with a prior sPTB were excluded. Data were obtained through chart abstraction. The primary outcome was sPTB (<37 weeks) in a subsequent pregnancy. Categorical variables were compared with χ(2) analyses, and logistic regression was used to calculate odds.

RESULTS

Eight hundred eighty-seven women were included (622 inductions, 265 spontaneous labor). The overall subsequent sPTB rate was 7.2%. Term inductions were less likely to have a subsequent sPTB compared with term spontaneous labor (6% vs 11%; odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-0.81; P = .005). This remained after adjusting for confounders (adjusted OR, 0.55; P = .04). The sPTB risk depended on gestational age of index delivery. At 37-38.9 weeks, the sPTB rate after spontaneous labor was 24% vs 9% after induction (OR, 3.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.44-6.16; P = .003). This was not significant for 39-39.9 weeks (P = .2) or 40 weeks or longer (P = .8).

CONCLUSION

Induction is not a risk factor for subsequent sPTB. Spontaneous labor, however, in the early term period is associated with subsequent sPTB. Further investigation among early term deliveries is warranted to evaluate the risk of sPTB and target interventions in this cohort.

Pathologic Examination of Fetal and Placental Tissue Obtained by Dilation and Evacuation

Context.—Dilation and evacuation (D&E) is an alternative method to induction of labor for pregnancy termination and intrauterine fetal demise, and it is the most common mode of second-trimester uterine evacuation in the United States. Many D&E specimens are examined in surgical pathology, and there is little information available in surgical pathology textbooks or the literature to assist pathologists in these examinations.

Objective.—To provide an overview of the D&E procedure, discuss related legal issues, provide guidelines for routine pathologic examination of D&E specimens, and demonstrate the importance of careful pathologic examination of D&E specimens.

Data Sources.—Case-derived material and literature review.

Conclusions.—Pathologic examination of D&E specimens has been understudied. However, the available literature and our experience support the fact that careful pathologic examination of D&E specimens can identify significant fetal and placental changes that can confirm clinical diagnoses or provide definitive diagnosis, assist in explaining the cause of intrauterine fetal demise, and identify unexpected anomalies that may provide further clues to a diagnostic syndrome or mechanism of anomaly formation.

Public Health Impact of Legal Termination of Pregnancy in the US: 40 Years Later

During the 40 years since the US Supreme Court decision in Doe versus Wade and Doe versus Bolton, restrictions on termination of pregnancy (TOP) were overturned nationwide. The use of TOP was much wider than predicted and a substantial fraction of reproductive age women in the U.S. have had one or more TOPs and that widespread uptake makes the downstream impact of any possible harms have broad public health implications. While short-term harms do not appear to be excessive, from a public perspective longer term harm is conceiving, and clearly more study of particular relevance concerns the associations of TOP with subsequent preterm birth and mental health problems. Clearly more research is needed to quantify the magnitude of risk and accurately inform women with the crisis of unintended pregnancy considering TOP. The current US data-gathering mechanisms are inadequate for this important task.

Late termination of pregnancy and foetal reduction for foetal anomaly

Late termination of pregnancy is a relatively rare procedure accounting for approximately 1% of all registered terminations in England and Wales; however, with improving detection rates for foetal anomalies, this number is increasing. Surgical dilation and evacuation (D&E) appears to be a safe and cost-effective procedure as long as the clinical expertise exists to provide this service. Medical termination appears equally safe and is best undertaken with the combined use of mifepristone and misoprostol. Foeticide, when required, should be performed from 22 weeks' gestation using strong KCl administered either by cardiocentesis or by cordocentesis. All women should be offered a post-mortem and any other appropriate investigation to allow accurate counselling regarding future pregnancies. The issue of late selective foetal reduction for foetal abnormality is complicated by the need to balance the risks to the healthy co-twin of expectant management versus selective termination.

Pregnancy outcomes after laminaria placement and second-trimester removal

BACKGROUND

Even after comprehensive counseling, patients change their mind about the decision to terminate a pregnancy. There are few data about the effect of laminaria placement and removal on subsequent pregnancy outcome.

CASE

We describe four cases of laminaria removal at 12-17 weeks of gestation with varying outcomes. Two of the four cases developed cervical dilation and delivered early with documented acute chorioamnionitis.

CONCLUSION

Patients should be counseled that pregnancy termination begins with laminaria placement and that their removal could result in premature delivery.

Recent advances in second-trimester abortion: an evidence-based review

The proportion of US abortions performed in the second trimester has varied little since 1992. Although 30 years of cumulative data corroborate the safety of dilation and evacuation (D&E), the most commonly used method of second-trimester abortion in the United States, both D&E and alternative induction regimens continue to evolve such that the traditional safety gap between medical and surgical regimens has narrowed. Providers now have options that allow them to either expedite D&E by diminishing the cervical-ripening period or reduce induction abortion intervals during medical induction.

Risk factors for uteroplacental vascular compromise and inflammation

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify potentially modifiable risk factors of placental injury that reflect maternal uteroplacental vascular compromise (UPVC) and acute and chronic placental inflammation.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective epidemiologic study was conducted. A total of 1270 placentas were characterized by gross and microscopic examination. Placental pathologic condition was coded for features of amniotic fluid infection syndrome (AFIS), chronic villitis, UPVC, and fetal vascular obstructive lesions. Odds ratios between UPVC, the acute and the chronic inflammatory lesions, and risk factors of interest were calculated.

RESULTS

After adjustment for confounders, we found that women with a history of preterm birth had 1.60 times the odds of chronic inflammation (95% CI, 1.10, 2.55). Women with a previous elective termination had 3.28 times the odds of acute inflammation (95% CI, 1.89, 5.70). The odds of chronic villitis increased with parity; the odds of AFIS decreased with parity.

CONCLUSION

We have identified several predictors of UPVC, AFIS, and chronic villitis. Further studies are needed to examine whether interventions to alter UPVC, AFIS, and chronic villitis will lead to improved pregnancy outcomes.

Cervical preparation for second-trimester surgical abortion prior to 20 weeks of gestation

Roughly 11% of induced abortions in the United States are performed after 14 weeks of gestation, most commonly by dilation and evacuation (D&E). For a D&E procedure, the cervix must be dilated sufficiently to allow passage of operative instruments and products of conception without injuring the uterus or cervical canal. Preoperative preparation of the cervix reduces the risk of cervical laceration and uterine perforation. The cervix may be prepared with osmotic dilators, prostaglandin analogues, or both. Osmotic dilators currently available in the United States include Dilapan-S, Lamicel, and laminaria. Laminaria tents are made from dehydrated seaweed and require 12-24 h to achieve greatest dilation. The synthetic products, Dilapan-S and Lamicel, achieve maximum effect within 6 h. Dilapan-S achieves greater dilation than the others and, thus, requires fewer dilators to be placed but may be more difficult to remove. For same day procedures, Dilapan-S and Lamicel are preferable to laminaria. A single set of one to several dilators is usually adequate for D&E before 20 weeks of gestation. Additional sets over 1-2 days may be needed in challenging cases. Misoprostol, a prostaglandin analogue, is sometimes used instead of osmotic dilators; however, the data to support such use are limited. Misoprostol is inferior to overnight dilation with laminaria for cervical priming prior to D&E. Misoprostol use as an adjunct to overnight osmotic dilation is only marginally beneficial for priming beyond 16 weeks and does not truly demonstrate any benefit before 19 weeks of gestation. Limited data demonstrate the safety of misoprostol prior to D&E in patients with a uterine scar. The Society of Family Planning recommends preoperative cervical preparation to decrease the risk of complications when performing a D&E prior to 20 weeks of gestation. The three currently available osmotic dilators (laminaria, Lamicel, and Dilapan-S) are safe and effective for this use. Since no single protocol has been found to be superior, clinical judgment is warranted when selecting a method of preoperative cervical preparation.