The impact of earlier intervention by an antimicrobial stewardship team for specific antimicrobials in a single weekly intervention

Approaches to Reduce Use and Duration of Anti-MRSA Agents for Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: A Review of Recent Literature

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have the potential to effectively deescalate unnecessary methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage. This review summarizes literature published from 2014 through 2021 describing contemporary ASP methods and their resulting effectiveness at reducing anti-MRSA agent use (ie vancomycin, linezolid, daptomycin, ceftaroline, and clindamycin). This review of the literature examined the following strategies, which had reports of success in either decreasing the use or duration of anti-MRSA agents: prospective review and feedback, antibiotic timeouts, health system or department protocol changes, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rapid testing of patient samples. Most of the current literature continue to support most ASP interventions including antibiotic timeouts, pathways, and molecular testing including MRSA nasal PCRs and rapid diagnostic testing can be successful at reducing unnecessary anti-MRSA use.

Evaluation of Hospital Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs: Implementation, Process, Impact, and Outcomes, Review of Systematic Reviews

Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) were introduced in healthcare as a public health priority to promote appropriate prescribing of antimicrobials, to reduce adverse events related to antimicrobials, as well as to control the escalating challenges of antimicrobial resistance. To deliver aimed outcome objectives, ASPs involve multiple connected implementation process measures. A systematic review was conducted to evaluate both concepts of ASPs. Guided by PRISMA frames, published systematic reviews (SR) focusing on ASPs restricted to secondary and tertiary healthcare were evaluated over the past 10 years involving all age groups. Out of 265 identified SR studies, 63 met the inclusion criteria. The majority were conducted in Europe and North America, with limited studies from other regions. In the reviewed studies, all age groups were examined, although they were conducted mainly on adults when compared to children and infants. Both process and outcomes measures of ASPs were examined equally and simultaneously through 25 different concepts, dominated by efficacy, antimicrobial resistance, and economic impact, while information technology as well as role of pharmacy and behavioral factors were equally examined. The main broad conclusions from the review were that, across the globe, ASPs demonstrated effectiveness, proved efficacy, and confirmed efficiency, while focused evaluation advocated that developed countries should target medium- and small-sized hospitals while developing countries should continue rolling ASPs across healthcare facilities. Additionally, the future of ASPs should focus on embracing evolving information technology to bridge the gaps in knowledge, skills, and attitude, as well as to enhance appropriate decision making.

Evaluation of a clinical pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program in a neurosurgical intensive care unit: a pre-and post-intervention cohort study

Background: Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant challenge in neurosurgical intensive care units (ICU). The excessive use of broad-spectrum antibiotics is closely linked to the emergence and dissemination of drug-resistant bacteria within neurosurgical ICUs. This study assessed the effects of implementing a comprehensive Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) program in a neurosurgical ICU setting. Methods: From April 2022 to September 2022, an AMS program was implemented in the neurosurgical ICU. The program involved the regular presence of a pharmacist and an infectious disease physician who conducted prospective audits and provided feedback. To assess the impact of the AMS program, the outcome measures were compared between the AMS period and the 6 months before AMS implementation (pre-AMS period). The primary outcome was the use of antibacterial agents, including anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams (APBLs), polymyxin, and tigecycline. Additionally, the study evaluated the appropriateness of antimicrobial de-escalation and the susceptibility of Gram-negative bacilli to antimicrobial agents. Results: A total of 526 were included during the AMS period, while 487 patients were included in the pre-AMS period. The two groups had no significant differences in disease severity and mortality rates. During the AMS period, there was a notable decrease in the use of APBLs as empiric treatment (43.92% vs. 60.99%, p < 0.001). Multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO) infections decrease significantly during AMS period (11.03% vs. 18.48%, p < 0.001). The number of prescription adjustment increased significantly in all patients (0 item vs. 0 item, p < 0.001) and MDRO-positive patients (3 items vs. 2 items, p < 0.001) during the AMS period. Additionally, appropriate antimicrobial de-escalation for patients with MDRO showed improvement during the AMS period (39.66% vs. 20%, p = 0.001). Polymyxin utilization also decreased during the AMS period (15.52% vs. 31.11%, p = 0.034). Furthermore, the susceptibility of Gram-negative Bacilli isolates to APBLs was significantly higher during the AMS period. Conclusion: Implementing a comprehensive pharmacist-led AMS program led to a decrease in the use of antibacterial agents. This reduction in usage is significant because it can potentially delay the emergence of bacterial resistance.

Evaluation of the initial timing of infection control pharmacist-driven audit and monitoring of vancomycin therapy in patients with infectious diseases: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Early monitoring and feedback on the treatment of infectious diseases are some of the methods for optimising antimicrobial treatment throughout the treatment period. Prospective audits and feedback interventions have also been shown to improve antimicrobial use and reduce antimicrobial resistance. We examined the appropriate use of antimicrobials by focusing on the initial timing for audits and feedback intervention of antimicrobial prescription by Infection Control Team pharmacists.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective observational study in a university hospital in Tokyo, Japan from 1 January 2019 to 31 May 2021. We retrospectively enrolled patients with infections and those patients suspected of having an infection, who were administered vancomycin and assessed at our hospital. The definition of primary outcome was the maintenance of target vancomycin trough blood concentrations of 10-20 μg/ml during treatment. Multivariable logistic regression and multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to test the effectiveness of the initial timing of the intervention by Infection Control Team pharmacists as the explanatory variable.

RESULTS

A total of 638 patients were included in this study, with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range: 54-78 years). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the maintenance of target vancomycin trough concentrations was not associated with the timing of the audit and the initiation of monitoring by Infection Control Team pharmacists (adjusted odds ratio: 0.99, 95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.00, p = 0.990). Multivariate linear regression revealed that the duration of vancomycin administration was significantly correlated with the timing of initiation of monitoring by Infection Control Team pharmacists (adjusted estimate: 0.0227, standard error: 0.0051, p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that early initiation of a comprehensive audit and monitoring by Infection Control Team pharmacists did not affect the maintenance of the target vancomycin trough blood concentration. However, it reduced the duration of vancomycin administration.

A National Survey of Neonatal Nurses' Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices of Antibiotic Stewardship

BACKGROUND

In the neonatal intensive care unit, implementation of antibiotic stewardship programs has been challenging, especially for staff nurses.

PURPOSE

To identify neonatal nurses' knowledge and attitudes toward antibiotic stewardship programs in neonatal intensive care units.

METHODS

This was a descriptive survey study to assess knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of neonatal nurses related to antibiotic stewardship. The survey consisted of 23 questions, 6 of which were open-ended. The questions evaluated perceptions of general understanding of antibiotic stewardship, administration of antibiotics, information and perspective about antibiotic use, antibiotic resistance, and availability and usage of resources and education related to antibiotics. The survey was posted online for about 3 months on the Web site of a professional organization of neonatal nurses.

RESULTS

Of the 78 neonatal nurses who responded to the survey, 39% were very familiar with the term antibiotic stewardship . The majority of participants did not question the treating provider about the choice, route, or dose of antibiotics. The majority also agreed that more education is needed to achieve the goal of incorporating principles of antibiotic stewardship more fully into practice in the neonatal intensive care unit.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Results suggest that although most nurses are familiar with the term antibiotic stewardship , they would like to have more education on the appropriate use of antibiotics.

IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH

Further studies are needed to identify nurse involvement in applying the principles of antibiotic stewardship programs while working with the vulnerable population of preterm infants.

Impact of medical and pharmaceutical interventions on anti-infective prescriptions: an observational study

Appropriate prescribing of anti-infectives is a public health challenge. In our hospital, clinical microbiologists (clinical microbiology mobile unit, UMMc) and clinical pharmacists (clinical pharmacy, PHAc) carry out interventions on anti-infective prescriptions to improve practices. Our main objective was to evaluate the acceptance of UMMc and PHAc interventions on anti-infective prescriptions by quantifying the rate of prescription change 24 h after intervention. The secondary objective was to characterize the type of intervention and associate the rate of change for each. All prescriptions are computerized, and interventions traced via DxCare® software, which feeds a local data warehouse (HEGP-CDW). This descriptive, retrospective, single-center, uncontrolled study was conducted from January 2015 to December 2018. The data were extracted over this period from the data warehouse and analyzed using R software. UMMc interventions were accepted 72.2% of the time and PHA interventions 87.3%. The types of interventions found were mostly dose adjustments (61.1% for the UMMc and 54.2% for the PHAc) and proposals to change or stop a drug. Interventions have an impact on anti-infective prescriptions and are generally followed by clinicians. For the category "discontinuation of a molecule", almost half of the advice from the UMMc was refused. The collaboration between the UMMc and PHAc should be reinforced to improve acceptance.

Evaluation of Carbapenem Use Before and After Implementation of an Antimicrobial Stewardship-Led Carbapenem-Sparing Strategy in a Lebanese Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

The use of carbapenem before and after implementation of an antimicrobial stewardship-led carbapenem-sparing strategy at a tertiary care center in Lebanon was evaluated.

Methods

A retrospective, observational chart review was performed on all hospitalized pediatric and adult patients who received carbapenem therapy during January 2019 and January 2020. Patients who started their regimen before January or received carbapenems for less than 24 hours were excluded. Primary outcomes included the appropriateness of physician prescribing patterns and pharmacists’ interventions, as well as appropriateness and response rates of the latter. Secondary outcomes included the carbapenem defined daily dose (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT). Descriptive statistics were used in the analysis and a p-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results

A total of 157 and 150 patients charts were reviewed in January 2019 and January 2020, respectively. There was no difference in baseline characteristics except for inpatient services and rates of isolated multidrug-resistant organisms. When comparing the two timelines, the appropriateness of physicians’ prescribing patterns increased in terms of empirical therapy, targeted therapy, and duration of therapy but the results were not statistically significant. Pharmacists’ interventions significantly increased with regards to the duration of therapy (p= <0.001), dose adjustment (p<0.001), de-escalation to a narrower spectrum antibiotic (p=0.007), and use of extended infusion (p=0.042). The DDD and DOT were higher for ertapenem and lower for anti-pseudomonal carbapenems in January 2020.

Conclusion

The carbapenem-sparing strategy adopted by the antimicrobial stewardship program contributed to an increase in the number of interventions made by pharmacists on carbapenem therapy, including their appropriateness, and response rate. Despite an improvement in the physician-prescribing patterns, more awareness and education may be needed to achieve a better impact.

Evaluation of a carbapenem antimicrobial stewardship program and clinical outcomes in a Japanese hospital

INTRODUCTION

Microorganisms can evolve and become resistant to antimicrobials, and this is known as antimicrobial resistance (AMR). Inappropriate use of antibiotics contributes to AMR, and antimicrobial stewardship programs have been developed to mitigate AMR. The Appropriate Use of Carbapenems Program was implemented in March 2019 in a university hospital and its effect was evaluated.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective audit and feedback on carbapenems at the time of prescription daily. Additionally, we compared a monthly survey of the total days of therapy (DOTs) per 1000 patient-days for carbapenems, piperacillin/tazobactam, and fluoroquinolones. The susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and levofloxacin was tested before (January 2018 to February 2019) and after (March 2019 to December 2020) the intervention.

RESULTS

The monthly median DOTs of carbapenem usage decreased after the intervention; carbapenem use immediately declined during the intervention period. The monthly median DOTs of piperacillin/tazobactam and fluoroquinolones also decreased and continued to decline significantly after the intervention. Susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to meropenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, and levofloxacin did not change significantly during the study.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of the Appropriate Use of Carbapenems Program was effective in reducing the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics and maintaining the antibiotic susceptibility of P. aeruginosa.

Clinical outcomes of intervention for carbapenems and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus antibiotics by an antimicrobial stewardship team

BACKGROUND

There are no reports on the effects of interventions, such as discontinuation and change and/or de-escalation of carbapenems and anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) antibiotics by an antimicrobial stewardship team focusing on detailed patient outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate these effects.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital from December 2018 to November 2019.

RESULTS

Favorable clinical responses were obtained in 165 of 184 cases (89.7%) in the intervention-accepted group, higher than those in the not accepted group (14/19 cases, 73.7%; P = .056). All-cause 30 day mortality was lower in the accepted group than in the not accepted group (1.1% and 10.5%, respectively; P = .045). The microbiological outcomes were similar between the two groups. Duration of carbapenem and anti-MRSA antibiotic use in the accepted group was significantly lower than that in the not accepted group (median [interquartile range]: 8 days [5-13] versus 14 days [8-15], respectively, P = .026 for carbapenem; 10 days [5.3-15] vs 15.5 days [13.8-45.3], respectively, P = .014 for anti-MRSA antibiotic).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to investigate the effects of interventions such as discontinuation and change and/ or de-escalation of antibiotics on detailed outcomes. Our intervention could reduce the duration of carbapenem and anti-MRSA antibiotic use without worsening clinical and microbiological outcomes.

Clinical impact of monitoring frequency per day as a prospective audit and feedback strategy for patients receiving antimicrobial agents by injection

BACKGROUND

Implementation of antimicrobial stewardship programmes improve antimicrobial therapies and thus result in better patient outcomes and safety. The impact of prospective audit and feedback (PAF) is likely dependent on how frequently it is conducted, and how quickly after antibiotic prescription it is initiated. To our knowledge, however, no report has yet investigated the impact of an increase in monitoring frequency per day on PAF strategy. Here, we evaluated the clinical impact of an increase in monitoring frequency per day as a PAF strategy in patients receiving antimicrobial injections.

METHODS

We conducted a single-centre, retrospective observational pre-post study to evaluate the impact of increasing the frequency of monitoring from once daily (once daily review group) to twice daily (twice daily review group). Time to intervention and clinical outcomes were compared before and after implementation of twice daily review.

RESULTS

Time to intervention for inappropriate antimicrobial therapy was significantly shorter in the twice daily review group than the once daily review group (5.1 ± 6.1 hours vs 29.9 ± 21.5 hours, HR: 4.53, 95% CI: 2.90-7.07, P < .001). The twice daily review group had a significantly lower rate of clinical failure (16.2% vs 38.3%, P = .004) and hepatotoxicity (4.1% vs 15.0%, P = .035) than the once daily review group.

CONCLUSIONS

An increase in monitoring frequency from once daily to twice daily significantly shortened the time to intervention for inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, with a concomitant reduction in clinical failure and hepatotoxicity.

Impact of an antimicrobial stewardship in a 126-bed community hospital with close communication between pharmacists working on post-prescription audit, ward pharmacists, and the antimicrobial stewardship team

Background

Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) is defined as coordinated interventions to improve and measure the appropriate use of antimicrobial agents. However, available resources for AS differ depending on the size of the clinical setting. Therefore, AS programs based on guidelines need to be selected in order to implement AS in small- to medium-sized hospitals. The present study compared the impact of AS in a 126-bed community hospital between pre- and post-AS periods.

Methods

The present study was retrospectively performed by selecting data on eligible patients from electronic medical records stored in the central database of the hospital. The roles of the AS team included weekly rounds and recommendations on the appropriate use of antimicrobials, and pharmacists working on post-prescription audits and pharmaceutical care at the bedside closely communicated with the AS team to assist with its implementation. As process measurements, the order rate of culture examinations, the conducting rate of de-escalation, antimicrobial use density (AUD), days of therapy (DOT), and the AUD/DOT ratio of carbapenems and tazobactam-piperacillin (TAZ/PIPC) were measured. Thirty-day mortality and recurrence rates were examined as clinical outcomes.

Results

A total of 535 patients (288 in the pre-AS period and 247 in the post-AS period) were enrolled in the present study. The recommendation rate to prescribers significantly increased (p < 0.01) from 10.4% in the pre-AS period to 21.1% in the post-AS period. The order rate of culture examinations increased from 56.3 to 73.3% (p < 0.01). The conducting rate of de-escalation increased from 10.2 to 30.8% (p < 0.05). The AUD of carbapenems and TAZ/PIPC significantly decreased (p < 0.05). The DOT of carbapenems (p < 0.01) and TAZ/PIPC (p < 0.05) also significantly decreased. The AUD/DOT ratio of carbapenem significantly increased from 0.37 to 0.60 (p < 0.01). Thirty-day mortality rates were 11.2 and 14.2%, respectively, and were not significantly different. The 30-day recurrence rate significantly decreased (p < 0.05) from 14.7 to 7.5%.

Conclusions

The implementation of AS in this hospital improved the appropriate use of antimicrobials without negatively affecting clinical outcomes. These results may be attributed to close communication between pharmacists working on post-prescription audits and pharmaceutical care at the bedside and the AS team.

Impact of Sepsis Flow Chip, a novelty fast microbiology method, in the treatment of bacteremia caused by Gram-negative bacilli

Objective

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the information provided by the new Sepsis Chip Flow system (SFC) and other fast microbiological techniques on the selection of the appropriate antimicrobial treatment by the clinical researchers of an antimicrobial stewardship team.

Methods

Two experienced clinical researchers performed the theoretical exercise of independently selecting the treatment for patients diagnosed by bacteremia due to bacilli gram negative (BGN). At first, the clinicians had only available the clinical characteristics of 74 real patients. Sequentially, information regarding the Gram stain, MALDI-TOF, and SFC from Vitro were provided. Initially, the researchers prescribed an antimicrobial therapy based on the clinical data, later these data were complementing with information from microbiological techniques, and the clinicians made their decisions again.

Results

The data provided by the Gram stain reduced the number of patients prescribed with combined treatments (for clinician 1, from 23 to 7, and for clinician 2, from 28 to 12), but the use of carbapenems remained constant. In line with this, the data obtained by the MALDI-TOF also decreased the combined treatment, and the use of carbapenems remained unchanged. By contrast, the data on antimicrobial resistance provided by the SFC reduced the carbapenems treatment.

Conclusions

From the theoretical model the Gram stain and the MALDI-TOF results achieved a reduction in the combined treatment. However, the new system tested (SFC), due to the resistance mechanism data provided, not only reduced the combined treatment, it also decreased the prescription of the carbapenems.

Effects of a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship program in a surgical intensive care unit

OBJECTIVES

We evaluated the effects of a comprehensive antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) in a surgical intensive care unit (SICU).

METHODS

The ASP was implemented from March 2018 to February 2019 at an SICU in a teaching hospital. An infectious disease physician and a pharmacist visited the SICU 3 times per week for prospective audit and feedback. Outcomes were compared between the ASP period and the same months in the preceding year (pre-ASP period). The primary outcome measure was the use of anti-pseudomonal beta-lactams (APBL). Appropriate antimicrobial de-escalation and ICU mortality rates were also compared.

RESULTS

A total of 182 and 149 patients were included in the study for the pre-ASP and ASP periods, respectively. Although disease severity was higher in the ASP group (septic shock 39.0% in pre-ASP vs 65.1% in ASP group, P<0.001), the use of APBL as a definitive treatment was lower during ASP (68.7% vs 57.7%, OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.98). Appropriate antimicrobial de-escalation improved (63.2% vs 94.6%, P<0.001). ICU mortality was comparable (7.7% vs 7.4%) and significantly lower during the ASP, after adjustment (adjusted OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.92, P=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive ASP decreased the use of APBL and was associated with improved patient outcomes.

Review of antimicrobial resistance control strategies: low impact of prospective audit with feedback on bacterial antibiotic resistance within hospital settings

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship constitutes an essential element of any concerted effort to tackle bacterial resistance, a rising public health threat both in community as well as hospital settings. The term comprises variable strategies which aim to optimise prescribing practices through either antibiotic restrictions or prospective audits of prescriptions with subsequent feedback to clinicians. Although highly debated, the actual effects of the latter on the antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of hospital flora are uncertain. The present study aims to review and evaluate the literature concerning the impact of persuasive stewardship strategies on antimicrobial resistance within hospitals.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A literature review covering the period to 1st April 2020 was conducted using the PubMed/Medline, Embase, Global Health and CINAHL Plus databases.

RESULTS

Fifteen studies were retrieved, including twelve simple before-and-after, and three interrupted time-series studies. Audit frequency and compliance rates varied broadly. The rationale of treatment optimisation is not clear in most cases. Overall, surveillance of sentinel microorganisms through antibiograms indicates ambiguous results, with uncertainty as to whether the few successes are due to a causal effect, random incidence fluctuations, or confounding. The most informative approach targeted solely fluoroquinolones, reporting improvements in relevant Pseudomonas susceptibilities and MRSA, but without sufficient data on other effects of the strategy to assess its overall utility in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Higher standard research is needed to address the actual effects of persuasive stewardship strategies on antimicrobial susceptibility patterns. At present, they seem inadequate to play a decisive role in bacterial resistance control within hospitals.

Impact of an infectious disease physician-led carbapenem postprescription feedback on prescribing behavior in a Japanese tertiary hospital: A before-after study

INTRODUCTION

There is an insufficient number of infectious disease (ID) physicians in Japan. Hence, we considered a strategy to implement antimicrobial stewardship under these resource-limited settings.

METHODS

We compared carbapenem consumption, measured as days of therapy per 100 patient-days, between 24-month baseline and 12-month intervention periods. During the intervention period, an ID physician provided daily advises to prescribers against prolonged carbapenem use (≥14 days). Additionally, we sent all doctors a table containing the weekly point prevalence aggregate of carbapenem use of each department for 7-13 and ≥ 14 days via e-mail.

RESULTS

Among the 1241 carbapenem courses during the intervention period, the ID physician provided a total of 96 instances of feedback regarding carbapenem use for ≥14 days, with an acceptance rate of 76%. After the initiation of the intervention, the trend in monthly carbapenem consumption changed (coefficient: -0.62; 95% CI: -1.15 to -0.087, p = 0.024), and its consumption decreased (coefficient: -0.098; 95% CI: -0.16 to -0.039, p = 0.002) without an increase in the consumption of broad-spectrum antimicrobials or in-hospital mortality. Interestingly, the monthly number of carbapenem courses, but not the duration of carbapenem use, significantly decreased (coefficient: -3.02; 95% CI: -4.63 to -1.42, p = 0.001). The carbapenem-related annual estimated savings after the intervention was $83,745, with a 22% cost reduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Our ID physician-led daily intervention with weekly feedback regarding long-term carbapenem use was effective in reducing antimicrobial consumption. Such feedback may be useful in changing the prescribing behavior and promoting appropriate antimicrobial usage even in resource-limited settings.

The Impact of an Antibiotic Stewardship Program on the Consumption of Specific Antimicrobials and Their Cost Burden: A Hospital-wide Intervention

Background

Inappropriate use of antimicrobials (AM) is a major concern worldwide that leads to the propagation of antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In addition to its clinical implications, AMR imposes an economic burden on communities, especially developing countries with more infectious diseases and less available resources. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have been found to be effective in reducing AMR. This study was designed to evaluate the effect of implementing an ASP in reducing AM consumption, its economic burden, and AMR as a consecutive result.

Materials and Methods

Consumption of caspofungin, amphotericin B, voriconazole, colistin, linezolid, vancomycin, and carbapenems was compared in a prospective cross-sectional study between two time periods introduced as pre- and post-ASP. Drug use density presented as anatomical therapeutic chemical (ATC)/defined daily doses (DDD) and normalized per 1000 bed days, cost savings, and AMR patterns were evaluated.

Results

A total of 9400 AM prescriptions were analyzed during a 2-year period. Consumption measured in DDD/1000 bed days dropped by 24.8, 25.0, 35.3, 47.0, 39.2, 10.5, and 23.2 percent for amphotericin B, caspofungin, colistin, voriconazole, meropenem, imipenem, and vancomycin, respectively. Linezolid consumption increased by 26.8% after implementing ASP. The expenditure of target AMs in the average value of USD decreased by 41.3% after the intervention compared to the time before using ASP (P-value=0.001). Implementing ASP also increased AM susceptibility of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, while the susceptibility of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus did not change significantly.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that establishment of ASP can lead to a reduction in improper administration of AMs and their expenditure resulting in economic benefit and lowering AMR at hospitals with minimum resources. Clinical pharmacists' role was critical to the success of this ASP and was uniquely empowered at our center.

Antimicrobial stewardship program at a tertiary care academic medical hospital: Clinical, microbiological and economic impact. A 5-year temporary descriptive study

Introduction

Few prospective studies analyze, with sufficient duration, the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship program (AMSP) carried out entirely in a hospital.

Methods

Descriptive study evaluating the consumption of antimicrobials expressed in defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 hospital occupied bed-days (OBDs) stratified in medical, surgical and intensive care unit (ICU) and the incidence of densities (ID) per 1,000 hospital OBDs of the prevalent multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) in a tertiary hospital, over a period of 5 years before and after the implementation of an AMSP. Analysis of direct costs and those associated with hospital stay and mortality.

Results

A total of 32,802 patients with antibiotic treatment were included in the intervention period (2013–2017). Non-imposed advice was exercised in 14.9%. The degree of adherence to recommendation was 87.9%, direct treatment and de-escalation being the most frequently admitted interventions (P<0.001). Overall hospital consumption of antibacterials in DDD/100s decreased by 5.7% (77.04 vs. 71.33) between 2008 and 2017. In ICU, the average DDD/100s showed a reduction from 155 to 113 (mean difference -18, P=0.005). There was a decrease in the DI/1000 OBDs of MDROs in the post-intervention period (RR 0.78; CI 95% [0.73, 0.84], P<0.001). The average annual cost of antibacterials declined from €1,435,048 to €955,805 (mean difference -€469,243; P=0.001).

Conclusion

Long-term maintenance of a hospital AMSP was associated with a reduction in antibiotic consumption, especially in ICU, as well as a beneficial ecological impact and economic savings.

Interprofessional Antimicrobial Stewardship Influencing Clostridioides difficile Infection: An 8-Year Study Using Antimicrobial Use Density

PURPOSE

To reduce Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), we implemented interprofessional antimicrobial, infection control, and diagnostic stewardship (ipAS) conducted by physicians/pharmacists, infection control nurses, and medical technologists, respectively. As a numerical indicator for ipAS, we used antimicrobial use density (AUD) in an 8-year study to validate its efficacy in CDI reduction.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This was an observational study. CDI was defined as stool samples or C. difficile isolates containing toxin A and/or B from a patient with diarrhea occurring three or more times per day. From 2011-2018 at a 10-ward single site the subjects were in-patients with CDI, and the following data were collected: AUDs for 23 antibiotics, and antimicrobial test results. By 2015, we had established ipAS, consisting of culture submission before the administration of broad-spectrum antimicrobials, the promotion of point-of-care testing for diagnosis-based antimicrobials, perioperative prophylactic antibiotics, intervention at positive diagnosis of blood culture, team round for diarrhea, and inspection on contact precautions and disinfection in CDI cases. The study outcomes included annual numbers of CDI patients and blood culture sets. We compared annual AUDs between former (2011-14) and latter (2015-18) periods using Kruskal-Wallis tests and examined the correlation between AUDs and CDI numbers.

RESULTS

Of a total 50,970 patients, 1,750 patients underwent C. difficile toxin tests, of whom 171 patients (9.8%) were positive for CDI. Between the former and latter periods, AUDs for flomoxef (11.96 to 2.71 by medians), panipenem/betamipron (0.30 to 0.00), and clindamycin (3.87 to 2.19) significantly decreased (P<0.05) as did numbers of CDIs (26.5 to 10) (P=0.043). The correlation analysis revealed a significant correlation between AUD for flomoxef and CDIs (P=0.004) and the AUD for piperacillin/tazobactam and CDIs (P=0.010) with a positive Pearson r.

CONCLUSION

The integrated antimicrobial, diagnostic, and infection control approach used in ipAS may reduce CDIs.

Linezolid use in German acute care hospitals: results from two consecutive national point prevalence surveys

Background

Linezolid belongs to a reserve group of antibiotics. In recent years, reports on linezolid resistance in gram-positive cocci have become more frequent. Overuse of linezolid is a relevant factor for resistance development. The objective of this study was to describe current prescription practices of linezolid in German hospitals and identify targets for antimicrobial stewardship interventions.

Methods

We analyzed all linezolid prescriptions from the datasets of the consecutive national point prevalence surveys performed in German hospitals in 2011 and 2016. In both surveys, data on healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use were collected following the methodology of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control.

Results

Overall, the percentage of linezolid among all documented antimicrobials increased significantly from 2011 to 2016 (p < 0.01). In 2011, 0.3% (119 of 41,539) patients received linezolid, in 2016 this proportion was significantly higher (0.4%; 255 of 64,412 patients; p < 0.01). In 2016, intensive care units (ICUs) were the wards most frequently prescribing linezolid. The largest proportion of patients receiving linezolid were non-ICU patients. Roughly 38% of linezolid prescriptions were for treatment of skin/soft tissue and respiratory tract infections. In 2016, linezolid was administered parenterally in 70% (n = 179) of cases. Multivariable analysis showed that the ward specialty ICU posed an independent risk factor, while Northern and Southwestern regions in Germany were independent protective factors for a high rate of linezolid prescriptions.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we detected potentials for improving linezolid prescription practices in German hospitals. Given the emergence of linezolid resistance, optimization of linezolid use must be a target of future antimicrobial stewardship activities.

National prevalence estimates for resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter species in hospitalized patients in the United States

OBJECTIVES

To determine antimicrobial nonsusceptibility rates for Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp. in US hospitals.

METHODS

We analyzed antimicrobial susceptibilities of non-duplicate Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp. isolates reported in 2017 from 375 US hospitals in the BD Insights Research Database. Logistic and Poisson regression modeling methods were used to estimate proportions of resistant isolates and rates per 1000 hospital admissions. National projections were generated based on raking (weighting) methods.

RESULTS

The nationwide proportions of resistant isolates in inpatients were an estimated 12.6%, 6.6%, and 1.2% for Enterobacteriaceae with extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL), multidrug resistant (MDR), and carbapenem-nonsusceptible (Carb-NS) phenotypes, respectively, and 42.4% and 34.5% for Acinetobacter spp. with MDR and Carb-NS phenotypes. Resistance varied by geographic region and hospital size/type. Estimated nationwide rates per 1000 hospital admissions ranged from a high of 7.1 for ESBL Enterobacteriaceae to a low of 0.3 for Carb-NS Acinetobacter spp. The estimated number of isolates occurring in US inpatients each year was 290,220 ESBL, 173,984 MDR, and 30,194 Carb-NS for Enterobacteriaceae and 12,274 MDR and 9,991 Carb-NS for Acinetobacter spp.

CONCLUSIONS

National prevalence estimates suggest high levels of antimicrobial resistance and a substantial number of patients with resistant Enterobacteriaceae and Acinetobacter spp. in US hospitals.