Dosage regimen and toxicity risk assessment of linezolid in sepsis patients

Estimation of linezolid exposure in patients with hepatic impairment using machine learning based on a population pharmacokinetic model

PURPOSE

To investigate the pharmacokinetic changes of linezolid in patients with hepatic impairment and to explore a method to predict linezolid exposure.

METHODS

Patients with hepatic impairment who received linezolid were recruited. A population pharmacokinetic model (PPK) was then built using NONMEM software. And based on the final model, virtual patients with rich concentration values was constructed through Monte Carlo simulations (MCS), which were used to build machine learning (ML) models to predict linezolid exposure levels. Finally, we investigated the risk factors for thrombocytopenia in patients included.

RESULTS

A PPK model with population typical values of 3.83 L/h and 34.1 L for clearance and volume of distribution was established, and the severe hepatic impairment was identified as a significant covariate of clearance. Then, we built a series of ML models to predict the area under 0 -24 h concentration-time curve (AUC0-24) of linezolid based on virtual patients from MCS. The results showed that the Xgboost models showed the best predictive performance and were superior to the methods for estimating linezolid AUC0-24 based on though concentration or daily dose. Finally, we found that baseline platelet count, linezolid AUC0-24, and combination with fluoroquinolones were independent risk factors for thrombocytopenia, and based on this, we proposed a method for calculating the toxicity threshold of linezolid.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we successfully constructed a PPK model for patients with hepatic impairment and used ML algorithm to estimate linezolid AUC0-24 based on limited data. Finally, we provided a method to determine the toxicity threshold of linezolid.

Population Pharmacokinetic Model of Linezolid and Probability of Target Attainment in Patients with COVID-19-Associated Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome on Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation-A Step toward Correct Dosing

During veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (vv ECMO) therapy, antimicrobial drugs are frequently used, and appropriate dosing is challenging due to there being limited data to support the dosage. Linezolid is effective against multidrug-resistant Gram-positive pathogens frequently isolated in ECMO patients. In total, 53 steady-state linezolid levels were obtained following 600 mg intravenous (IV) injections every 8 h, and these were used to develop a population pharmacokinetic (PopPK) model in patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS) on vv ECMO. The data were analyzed using a nonlinear mixed-effects modelling approach. Monte Carlo simulation generated 5000 patients' individual PK parameters and corresponding concentration-time profiles using the PopPK model, following the administration of 600 mg/8 h (a higher-than-standard dosing) and 600 mg/12 h (standard). The probabilities of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment (PTA) and the cumulative fraction of responses (CFR) for three pathogens were calculated and compared between the two dosing scenarios. Linezolid 600 mg/8 h was predicted to achieve greater than or equal to 85%Tf>MIC in at least 90% of the patients with CARDS on vv ECMO compared to only approximately two thirds of the patients after dosing every 12 h at a minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 2 mg/L. In addition, for the same MIC, fAUC24/MIC ≥ 80 was achieved in almost three times the number of patients following an 8-h versus a 12-h interval. PopPK simulation predicted that a significantly higher proportion of the patients with CARDS on vv ECMO would achieve the PK/PD targets following the 8-h dosing interval compared to standard linezolid dosing. Nevertheless, the safety concern, in particular, for thrombocytopenia, with higher-than-standard linezolid dosage is reasonable, and consequently, monitoring is essential.

Long-Term Intake of Linezolid Elevates Drug Exposure and Reduces Drug Clearance and Elimination in Adults With Drug-Resistant Pulmonary Tuberculosis

PURPOSE

Pharmacokinetic (PK) studies are critical for dose optimization, and there is a paucity of linezolid (LZD) PK data for prolonged use in drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB). Therefore, the authors evaluated the pharmacokinetics of LZD at two-time intervals in DR-TB during long-term use.

METHODS

PK evaluation of LZD was performed at the end of the 8th and 16th weeks of treatment in a randomly selected subset of adult pre-extensively drug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis patients (n = 18) from a multicentric interventional study (Building Evidence to Advance Treatment of TB/BEAT study; CTRI/2019/01/017310), wherein a daily dose of 600 mg LZD was used for 24 weeks. Plasma LZD levels were measured using a validated high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC) method.

RESULTS

The LZD median plasma C max was comparable between the 8th and 16th weeks [18.3 mg/L, interquartile range (IQR: 15.5-20.8 and 18.8 mg/L, IQR: 16.0-22.7, respectively)]. However, the trough concentration increased significantly in the 16th week (3.16 mg/L, IQR: 2.30-4.76), compared with the 8th week (1.98 mg/L, IQR: 0.93-2.75). Furthermore, compared with the 8th week, in the 16th week, there was a significant increase in drug exposure (AUC 0-24 = 184.2 mg*h/L, IQR: 156.4-215.8 versus 233.2 mg*h/L, IQR: 187.9-277.2), which corroborated with a longer elimination half-life (6.94 hours, IQR: 5.55-7.99 versus 8.47 hours, IQR:7.36-11.35) and decreased clearance (2.91 L/h, IQR: 2.45-3.33 versus 2.19 L/h, IQR: 1.49-2.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term daily intake of 600 mg LZD resulted in a significant elevation in trough concentration (>2.0 mg/L) in 83% of the study participants. Furthermore, increased LZD drug exposure may be partly because of decreased clearance and elimination. Overall, the PK data underscore the need for dose adjustment when LZDs are intended for long-term treatment.

Model-informed precision dosing of antimicrobial drugs in pediatrics: experiences from a pilot scale program

Antibiotics are among the most utilized drugs in pediatrics. Nonetheless, there is a lack in pharmacokinetics information for this population, and dosing criteria may vary between healthcare centers. Physiological variability associated with maturation in pediatrics makes it challenging to reach a consensus on adequate dosing, which is further accentuated in more vulnerable groups, such as critically ill or oncology patients. Model-informed precision dosing is a useful practice that allows dose optimization and attainment of antibiotic-specific pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets. The aim of this study was to evaluate the needs of model-informed precision dosing of antibiotics in a pediatrics unit, at a pilot scale. Pediatric patients under antibiotic treatment were monitored with either a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic optimized sampling scheme or through opportunistic sampling. Clindamycin, fluconazole, linezolid, meropenem, metronidazole, piperacillin, and vancomycin plasma concentrations were quantified through a liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated using a Bayesian approach to verify pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. A total of 23 pediatric patients aged 2 to 16 years were included, and 43 dosing regimens were evaluated; 27 (63%) of them required adjustments as follows: 14 patients were underdosed, 4 were overdosed, and 9 patients needed infusion rate adjustments. Infusion rate adjustments were mostly recommended for piperacillin and meropenem; daily doses were augmented for vancomycin and metronidazole, meanwhile linezolid was adjusted for under- and overdosing. Clindamycin and fluconazole regimens were not adjusted at all.  Conclusion: Results showcase a lack of antibiotic pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment (particularly for linezolid, vancomycin, meropenem, and piperacillin), and the need for model-informed precision dosing in pediatrics. This study provides pharmacokinetic evidence which can further improve antibiotic dosing practices. What is Known: • Model-informed precision dosing is performed in pediatrics to optimize the treatment of antimicrobial drugs such as vancomycin and aminoglycosides, while its usefulness is debated for other groups (beta-lactams, macrolides, etc.). What is New: • Vulnerable pediatric subpopulations, such as critically ill or oncology patients, can benefit the most from model-informed precision dosing of antibiotics. • Model-informed precision dosing of linezolid, meropenem, piperacillin, and vancomycin is particularly useful in pediatrics, and further research may improve dosing practices altogether.

Bayesian prediction-based individualized dosing of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment: Recent advancements and prospects in therapeutic drug monitoring

As one of the efficient techniques for TDM, the population pharmacokinetic (popPK) model approach for dose individualization has been developed due to the rapidly growing innovative progress in computer technology and has recently been considered as a part of model-informed precision dosing (MIPD). Initial dose individualization and measurement followed by maximum a posteriori (MAP)-Bayesian prediction using a popPK model are the most classical and widely used approach among a class of MIPD strategies. MAP-Bayesian prediction offers the possibility of dose optimization based on measurement even before reaching a pharmacokinetically steady state, such as in an emergency, especially for infectious diseases requiring urgent antimicrobial treatment. As the pharmacokinetic processes in critically ill patients are affected and highly variable due to pathophysiological disturbances, the advantages offered by the popPK model approach make it highly recommended and required for effective and appropriate antimicrobial treatment. In this review, we focus on novel insights and beneficial aspects of the popPK model approach, especially in the treatment of infectious diseases with anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents represented by vancomycin, and discuss the recent advancements and prospects in TDM practice.

Hematological toxicities associated with linezolid therapy in adults: key findings and clinical considerations

INTRODUCTION

Linezolid can cause serious adverse effects including thrombocytopenia and anemia. Here, we focus specifically on linezolid-related hematological toxicity in adult patients requiring prolonged drug treatment.

AREAS COVERED

We review the available evidence on the likelihood of hematological toxicity in adult patients treated with linezolid, with a focus on the main risk factors and strategies to prevent this adverse event. A MEDLINE PubMed search for articles published from January 2000 to May 2022 was completed matching the terms linezolid, hematology, hematological toxicity, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Moreover, additional studies were identified from the reference lists of retrieved articles.

EXPERT OPINION

Thrombocytopenia is the major concern with administration of linezolid for Gram-positive infections, whereas anemia is more common in patients with tuberculosis. The important clinical risk factors for the development of linezolid-related thrombocytopenia are aging, renal dysfunction, low baseline platelet count, duration of treatment, and linezolid plasma trough concentrations >8 mg/L. Patients receiving linezolid for extended periods of time or patient populations with increased risk of altered drug pharmacokinetics would benefit from therapeutic drug monitoring or from the availability of toxico-dynamic predictive models to optimize linezolid dosing.

Serum linezolid concentrations are reduced in critically ill patients with pulmonary infections: A prospective observational study

RATIONALE

The concentration-time profile of linezolid varies considerably in critically ill patients. Question of interest is, if the site of infection influences linezolid serum concentrations.

METHODS

68 critically ill patients, treated with linezolid, were included. The concentration-time-profile for linezolid was determined using maximum a-posteriori predictions. A trough concentration (C_min) between 2 and 10 mg/L was defined as the target. A generalized linear model (GLM) was established to evaluate potential covariates.

RESULTS

The indications for linezolid therapy were in descending order: peritonitis (38.2%), pneumonia (25.0%), infectious acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) (19.1%), and other non-pulmonary infection (17.7%). 27.2 and 7.9% of C_min were subtherapeutic and toxic, respectively. In the GLM, ARDS (mean: -2.1 mg/L, CI: -3.0 to -1.2 mg/L) and pneumonia (mean: -2.2 mg/L, CI: -2.8 to -1.6 mg/L) were significant (p < 0.001) determinants of C_min. Patients with ARDS (mean: 2.3 mg/L, 51.2% subtherapeutic, 0.0% toxic) and pneumonia (mean: 3.5 mg/L, 41.5% subtherapeutic, 7.7% toxic) had significantly (p < 0.001) lower C_min than those with peritonitis (mean: 5.5 mg/L, 14.4% subtherapeutic, 9.3% toxic) and other non-pulmonary infection (mean: 5.2 mg/L, 3.3% subtherapeutic, 16.5% toxic).

CONCLUSION

Linezolid serum concentrations are reduced in patients with pulmonary infections. Future studies should investigate if other linezolid thresholds are needed in those patients due to linezolid pooling in patients´ lung.

Bedaquiline-Pretomanid-Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

BACKGROUND

The bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid regimen has been reported to have 90% efficacy against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis, but the incidence of adverse events with 1200 mg of linezolid daily has been high. The appropriate dose of linezolid and duration of treatment with this agent to minimize toxic effects while maintaining efficacy against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis are unclear.

METHODS

We enrolled participants with extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin, a fluoroquinolone, and an aminoglycoside), pre-XDR tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin and to either a fluoroquinolone or an aminoglycoside), or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis that was not responsive to treatment or for which a second-line regimen had been discontinued because of side effects. We randomly assigned the participants to receive bedaquiline for 26 weeks (200 mg daily for 8 weeks, then 100 mg daily for 18 weeks), pretomanid (200 mg daily for 26 weeks), and daily linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks or 600 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks. The primary end point in the modified intention-to-treat population was the incidence of an unfavorable outcome, defined as treatment failure or disease relapse (clinical or bacteriologic) at 26 weeks after completion of treatment. Safety was also evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 181 participants were enrolled, 88% of whom had XDR or pre-XDR tuberculosis. Among participants who received bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid with linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks or 600 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks, 93%, 89%, 91%, and 84%, respectively, had a favorable outcome; peripheral neuropathy occurred in 38%, 24%, 24%, and 13%, respectively; myelosuppression occurred in 22%, 15%, 2%, and 7%, respectively; and the linezolid dose was modified (i.e., interrupted, reduced, or discontinued) in 51%, 30%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. Optic neuropathy developed in 4 participants (9%) who had received linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks; all the cases resolved. Six of the seven unfavorable microbiologic outcomes through 78 weeks of follow-up occurred in participants assigned to the 9-week linezolid groups.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 84 to 93% of the participants across all four bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid treatment groups had a favorable outcome. The overall risk-benefit ratio favored the group that received the three-drug regimen with linezolid at a dose of 600 mg for 26 weeks, with a lower incidence of adverse events reported and fewer linezolid dose modifications. (Funded by the TB Alliance and others; ZeNix ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03086486.).

Linezolid Administration to Critically Ill Patients: Intermittent or Continuous Infusion? A Systematic Literature Search and Review

A judicious antibiotic therapy is one of the challenges in the therapy of critically ill patients with sepsis and septic shock. The pathophysiological changes in these patients significantly alter the antibiotic pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) with important consequences in reaching the therapeutic targets or the risk of side effects. The use of linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic, in intensive care is such an example. The optimization of its therapeutic effects, administration in intermittent (II) or continuous infusion (CI) is gaining increased interest. In a systematic review of the main databases, we propose a detailed analysis of the main PK/PD determinants, their relationship with the clinical therapeutic response and the occurrence of adverse effects following II or CI of linezolid to different classes of critically ill patients or in Monte Carlo simulations.

Continuous Versus Intermittent Linezolid Infusion for Critically Ill Patients with Hospital-Acquired and Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: Efficacy and Safety Challenges

High variability of linezolid blood concentrations with partial subtherapeutic levels was observed in critically ill patients who received a standard intravenous dose of linezolid, contributing to drug resistance and toxicity. Continuous infusions of linezolid have been suggested as an alternative and provide good serum and alveolar levels without fluctuations in trough concentration. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of continuous linezolid infusion versus the standard regimen in critically ill patients. A prospective randomized controlled study was conducted on 179 patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Patients were randomized into two groups. The first group received IV linezolid 600 mg twice daily, while the second group received 600 mg IV as a loading dose, followed by a continuous infusion of 1200 mg/day (50 mg/h) for at least 8−10 days. The continuous infusion group showed a higher clinical cure rate than the intermittent infusion group (p = 0.046). Furthermore, efficacy was proven by greater improvement of P/F ratio (p = 0.030) on day 7 of treatment, a lower incidence of developing sepsis after beginning treatment (p = 0.009), and a shorter time to reach clinical cure (p < 0.001). Hematological parameters were also assessed during the treatment to evaluate the safety between the two groups. The incidence of thrombocytopenia was significantly lower in the continuous infusion group than in the intermittent infusion group. In addition, a stepwise logistic regression model revealed that the intermittent infusion of linezolid was significantly associated with thrombocytopenia (OR =4.128; 95% CI = 1.681−10.139; p =0.001). The current study is the first to assess the clinical aspects of continuous infusion of linezolid beyond pharmacokinetic studies. Continuous infusion of linezolid outperforms intermittent delivery in safety and improves clinical effectiveness in critically ill patients with Gram-positive nosocomial pneumonia.

Are Antibiotics Appropriately Dosed in Critically Ill Patients with Augmented Renal Clearance? A Narrative Review

AIMS

Augmented renal clearance (ARC), which is commonly defined as increased renal clearance above 130 ml/min/1.73 m², is a common phenomenon among critically ill patients. The increased elimination rate of drugs through the kidneys in patients with ARC can increase the risk of treatment failure due to the exposure to subtherapeutic serum concentrations of medications and affect the optimal management of infections, length of hospital stay, and outcomes. The main goal of this review article is to summarize the recommendations for appropriate dosing of antibiotics in patients with ARC.

METHODS

This article is a narrative review of the articles that evaluated different dosing regimens of antibiotics in patients with ARC. The keywords "Augmented Renal Clearance," "Critically ill patients," "Drug dosing," "Serum concentration," "Beta-lactams," "Meropenem," "Imipenem," "Glycopeptide," "Vancomycin," "Teicoplanin," "Linezolid," "Colistin," "Aminoglycosides," "Amikacin," "Gentamycin," "Fluoroquinolones," "Ciprofloxacin," and "Levofloxacin" were searched in Scopus, Medline, PubMed, and Google Scholar databases, and pediatric, nonhuman, and non-English studies were excluded.

RESULTS

PK properties of antibiotics including lipophilicity or hydrophilicity, protein binding, the volume of distribution, and elimination rate that affect drug concentration should be considered along with PD parameters for drug dosing in critically ill patients with ARC.

CONCLUSION

This review recommends a dosing protocol for some antibiotics to help the appropriate dosing of antibiotics in ARC and decrease the risk of subtherapeutic exposure that may be observed while receiving conventional dosing regimens in critically ill patients with ARC.

UPLC-MS/MS Determination of Linezolid and Heme in Plasma of Infected Patients and Correlation Analysis

Linezolid can cause serious haematological toxicity, such as thrombocytopenia and aneamia. Heme, composed of iron and porphyrin, is an important component of hemoglobin. In order to investigate the relationship between the concentration of linezolid and heme in the plasma of infected patients, a UPLC-MS/MS method that can determine the concentrations of linezolid and heme simultaneously was developed and validated. A total of 96 healthy subjects and 81 infected patients, who received blood routine blood tests, were included and determined by the UPLC-MS/MS method. The results showed that the concentration of linezolid was 5.08 ± 3.46 μg/mL in infected patients who were treated with linezolid. The heme in healthy subjects was 7.05 ± 8.68 μg/mL, and it was significantly decreased to 0.88 ± 0.79 μg/mL in infected patients (P < 0.01). Spearman correlation analysis showed that linezolid had a high negative correlation with platelet (PLT) (R = -0.309). Heme had a high positive correlation with hemoglobin (Hb) (R = 0.249) in healthy subjects and infected patients. The ROC analysis showed that heme had diagnostic value to distinguish low Hb (110 g/L). In conclusion, there was a positive correlation between heme and Hb, and this correlation was also observed in infected patients. A high concentration of linezolid was inclined to decrease PLT. Monitoring of heme and linezolid helps in the early diagnose of low Hb and PLT.

Lactococcus lactis KA-FF 1-4 reduces vancomycin-resistant enterococci and impacts the human gut microbiome

Probiotic is an alternative method to treat intestinal infection disease caused by antibiotic-resistant bacteria. In this study, Lactococcus lactis KA-FF 1-4 demonstrated to have the potential to inhibit the growth of Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) by producing anti-microbial substance. In co-culture, L. lactis KA-FF 1-4 (10⁸ CFU/mL) inhibited the growth of VRE from 10³-10⁴ CFU/mL to zero after 6 h of exposure. However, in a gut model contained human gut microbiota, this anti-VRE activity of L. lactis KA-FF 1-4 was reduced to only 3.59-6.12%. The unexpected difference in efficacy between the experimental models could be explained by the fact that the growth of L. lactis KA-FF 1-4 was stable in the gut model. Leaving aside these limitations, we observed that adding L. lactis KA-FF 1-4 into the human gut model containing VRE was able to enhance microbial richness and diversity. Specifically, a higher abundance of beneficial microbes from the group of Bifidobacterium spp. and Bacteroides fragilis. L. lactis KA-FF 1-4 also enhanced the abundance of Parabacteroides, Lactococcus, and Fusobacterium and promoted the production of lactic acid in the gut model. However, these effects were not observed in the gut model without L. lactis KA-FF 1-4. Even though this study could not demonstrate a significant anti-VRE effect of the L. lactis KA-FF 1-4 in a gut model, our results still offer evidence that L. lactis KA-FF 1-4 could positively modulate the gut microbiota by promoting the growth of beneficial microbes and their metabolite. L. lactis KA-FF 1-4 has probiotic properties to fight against VRE infection, therefore further investigation in animal model is needed.