Effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam versus colistin in treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia

Clinical Characteristics and Molecular Insights of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates from Patients in Intensive Care Units

Background: Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP), a significant worldwide public health threat, is common in patients in intensive care units. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted over a period of 22 months to assess the risk factors associated with infection caused by CRKP isolates. Strain identification was performed using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), and antimicrobial sensitivity was assessed using the micro broth dilution method and Kirby-Bauer test. The genes blaKPC, blaOXA-48, blaNDM, blaVIM, and blaGES were amplified using polymerase chain reaction (PCR), followed by sequencing of the PCR products. The polymerase hypermucoviscosity phenotype was determined using the string test. Capsular serotypes (K1, K2) and presence of the virulence gene (rmpA) in positive isolates were investigated using phenotypic tests followed by PCR. Results: Length of hospitalization and use of carbapenems were associated with CRKP infection. CRKP isolates exhibited extensive drug resistance, but retained sensitivity to colistin and ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA). The main gene detected in 35 CRKP isolates was blaKPC-2. In addition, 11 strains were positive in the string test, and two of these strains carried rmpA. Conclusions: Prolonged hospitalization and carbapenem exposure increased the risk of CRKP infection in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The prevalence of CRKP carrying the blaKPC-2 gene was high, and suspected hypervirulent carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae isolates were scattered.

The impact of colistin-based regimens on mortality compared to other antimicrobials in patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales bacteremia in South African hospitals: a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections in low-resource settings is challenging particularly due to limited treatment options. Colistin is the mainstay drug for treatment; however, nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity make this drug less desirable. Thus, mortality may be higher among patients treated with alternative antimicrobials that are potentially less efficacious than colistin. We assessed mortality in patients with CRE bacteremia treated with colistin-based therapy compared to colistin-sparing therapy.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study using secondary data from a South African national laboratory-based CRE bacteremia surveillance system from January 2015 to December 2020. Patients hospitalized at surveillance sentinel sites with CRE isolated from blood cultures were included. Multivariable logistic regression modeling, with multiple imputations to account for missing data, was conducted to determine the association between in-hospital mortality and colistin-based therapy versus colistin-sparing therapy.

RESULTS

We included 1 607 case-patients with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range [IQR], 0-52 years) and 53% (857/1 607) male. Klebsiella pneumoniae caused most of the infections (82%, n=1 247), and the most common carbapenemase genes detected were blaOXA-48-like (61%, n=551), and blaNDM (37%, n=333). The overall in-hospital mortality was 31% (504/1 607). Patients treated with colistin-based combination therapy had a lower case fatality ratio (29% [152/521]) compared to those treated with colistin-sparing therapy 32% [352/1 086]) (p=0.18). In our imputed model, compared to colistin-sparing therapy, colistin-based therapy was associated with similar odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.33, p=0.873).

CONCLUSION

In our resource-limited setting, the mortality risk in patients treated with colistin-based therapy was comparable to that of patients treated with colistin-sparing therapy. Given the challenges with colistin treatment and the increasing resistance to alternative agents, further investigations into the benefit of newer antimicrobials for managing CRE infections are needed.

Comparative effectiveness and mortality of colistin monotherapy versus colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections: A propensity score analysis

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections pose a significant threat to global health due to limited treatment options and high mortality rates. Colistin-based regimens have emerged as a primary treatment approach, but the effectiveness and mortality outcomes of colistin monotherapy versus colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy remain uncertain. This study aims to compare the effectiveness and mortality of colistin monotherapy and colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy for CRE infections. Notably, our study is the first to undertake a comprehensive examination of the effectiveness and mortality outcomes between colistin monotherapy and colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy in the context of CRE infections.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted using data from patients diagnosed with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections at Nakornping Hospital during 2015 to 2022. Inverse probability weighting (IPW) was employed to create balanced cohorts of patients receiving either colistin monotherapy or colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy. The primary outcome measure was treatment effectiveness, assessed by 30-day mortality. Secondary outcome measures included clinical response, mortality at the end of treatment, and microbiologic response. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were employed after applying propensity score weighting using inverse probability of weighting (IPW).

RESULTS

A total of 220 patients were included in the analysis, with 67 receiving colistin monotherapy and 153 receiving colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy. Propensity score weighting using IPW balanced the baseline characteristics between the two groups. The effectiveness of treatment, as measured by 30-day mortality, was not significantly different between the colistin monotherapy group and the colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy group (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.60-3.78, p = 0.383). Similarly, no significant difference was observed in the mortality at the end of treatment between the two groups (aOR = 1.26, 95% CI: 0.55-2.90, p = 0.576). The clinical response (aOR = 1.48, 95% CI: 0.61-3.59, p = 0.383) and microbiologic response (aOR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.18-2.38, p = 0.527) were similar between the colistin monotherapy and colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy groups.

CONCLUSION

The propensity score analysis among 220 matched patients showed comparable treatment effectiveness and mortality between colistin monotherapy and colistin-fosfomycin combination therapy for CRE infections. These results suggest that colistin monotherapy may be as effective as combination therapy. More prospective randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm these findings and establish optimal CRE treatment strategies.

The Clinical Efficacy of Adding Ceftazidime/Avibactam to Standard Therapy in Treating Infections Caused by Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumonia with blaOXA-48-like Genes

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is FDA-approved for managing infections caused by resistant gram-negative bacilli, particularly infections via carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales pathogens. The clinical data are still limited, particularly those in Saudi Arabia. The present study is a retrospective cohort study that was carried out at the Armed Forces Hospital in the southern region of Saudi Arabia to compare the clinical and microbiological outcomes for CAZ-AVI-treated patients as monotherapy and as an add-on to standard therapy for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP) OXA-48 infections to those treated with standard drugs. The study included CRKP OXA-48-like infected patients who were administered antibiotics for more than seven days from 1 August 2018 to May 2023. Patients' baseline characteristics and demography were extracted from the clinical records, and their clinical/microbiology efficiencies were assessed as per the corresponding definitions. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were conducted to identify the potential independent variable for CAZ-AVI efficiency. A total of 114 patient files were included for the evaluation. Among these patients, 64 used CAZ-AVI combined with standard therapy and were included in the intervention group, and 50 of them used standard therapy and were included in the comparative group. Following analysis, CAZ-AVI's clinical success was 42.2% (p = 0.028), while the intervention versus comparative groups showed decreased 30-day all-cause mortality (50.0% versus 70.0%; p = 0.036) and infection recurrence (7.8% versus 24.0%; p = 0.019), as well as substantially increased rates of microbial eradication (68.8% versus 42.0%; p = 0.007). CAZ-AVI add-on therapy rather than monotherapy showed statistically significant favored clinical and microbial outcomes over the standard therapy. Furthermore, sex (female %), ICU admission, and fever were negatively associated with patients' 30-day all-cause mortality, serving as independent negative factors. Only fever, CRP bio levels, inotropes, and ICU admissions were significant predictors influencing the CAZ-AVI's clinical efficiency. The duration of CAZ-AVI therapy positively influenced CAZ-AVI's microbial eradication, while both WBC counts and fever experiences were negative predictors. This study shows the effective usage of CAZ-AVI against CRKP OXA-48-like infections. The influencing independent variables depicted here should recommend that clinicians individualize the CAZ-AVI dose based on co-existing risk factors to achieve optimal survival and efficacy. Prospective multicenter and randomized control studies are recommended, with individualized CAZ-AVI precision administration implemented based on patients' characteristics.

Rectal culture could predict carbapenem-resistant organism bloodstream infection and reduce the mortality in haematological patients: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVES

The objective is to explore the correlation between rectal swab culture and the overall 30-d survival of hematologic patients diagnosed with carbapenem-resistant organism (CRO) bloodstream infection.

METHODS

A total of 434 haematological patients who were complicated with Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by Gram-negative bacteria between January 2020 and December 2021 were included in our retrospective study. Based on their drug susceptibility results, we classified patients into CRO BSIs and non-CRO BSIs cases. Through group comparison, to uncover the correlation between the positive screening of rectal swabs and reducing the mortality of CRO BSI in patients with haematological diseases.

RESULTS

Among the 434 cases of Gram-negative bacteria bloodstream infection, 96 were identified as carbapenem-resistant bloodstream infection, which consisted of 57 cases of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CR-KP), 19 cases of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CR-PA), 11 cases of carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CR-CO), 5 cases of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CR-AB), and 4 cases of other Enterobacteriaceae. Before the onset of CRO bloodstream infection, rectal swab cultures were conducted on 36 patients, and the positive result rate was 75.0% (27/36), with 20 cases of CR-KP, 6 cases of CR-CO, and one case of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacter cloacae. It was observed that the rectal and blood cultures had matching outcomes in 75.0% of cases. The mortality rate within 30 d for CRO BSIs was 53.1% (51/96), while for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) BSIs it was 62.5% (45/72). Univariate analysis showed that 30-d mortality was significantly reduced when there were positive rectal culture results preceding bloodstream infection (P < 0.001), as well as preemptive anti-infection treatment (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that preemptive adjustment to an effective antibiotic regimen, guided by positive rectal culture results, had a significant effect on decreasing 30-d mortality following CRO BSIs (P= 0.002). Furthermore, for the management of CRE BSIs, antibiotic treatments utilising ceftazidime/avibactam (CAV/AVI) may be more beneficial compared to those that use tigecycline (TGC) or polymyxin (PMB).

CONCLUSION

CRO BSI, especially CRE BSI, can be life-threatening for those with haematological diseases. Utilising rectal culture can effectively identify CRO strains with high sensitivity and specificity. Adjusting antibiotic treatment based on the preemptive positive rectal culture results may significantly decrease 30-d mortality rates for haematological patients with CRO BSIs.

Ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in treating patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) pose a significant threat to human health and have emerged as a major public health concern. We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed by searching the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library. Published studies on the use of CAZ-AVI and polymyxin in the treatment of CRE infections were collected from the inception of the database until March 2023. Two investigators independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, evaluated the methodological quality of the included studies and extracted the data. The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Ten articles with 833 patients were included (CAZ-AVI 325 patients vs Polymyxin 508 patients). Compared with the patients who received polymyxin-based therapy, the patients who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower 30-days mortality (RR = 0.49; 95% CI 0.01-2.34; I2 = 22%; P < 0.00001), higher clinical cure rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 1.67-4.38; I2 = 40%; P < 0.00001), and higher microbial clearance rate (RR = 2.70; 95% CI 2.09-3.49; I2 = 0%; P < 0.00001). However, there was no statistically difference in the incidence of acute kidney injury between patients who received CAZ-AVI and polymyxin therapy (RR = 1.38; 95% CI 0.69-2.77; I2 = 22%; P = 0.36). In addition, among patients with CRE bloodstream infection, those who received CAZ-AVI therapy had significantly lower mortality than those who received polymyxin therapy (RR = 0.44; 95% CI 0.27-0.69, I2 = 26%, P < 0.00004).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to polymyxin, CAZ-AVI demonstrated superior clinical efficacy in the treatment of CRE infections, suggesting that CAZ-AVI may be a superior option for CRE infections.

Clinical Outcomes and Risk Factors for Death in Critically Ill Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Treated with Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Retrospective Study

Purpose

Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is a significant public health threat, because it is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. However, the risk factors associated with treatment failure of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and the need for CAZ-AVI-based combination remain unclear.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of critically ill patients (age: > 18 years) diagnosed with CRKP infections and treated with CAZ-AVI for at least 24 h between June 2020 and December 2022 at Henan Provincial People's Hospital.

Results

This study included a total of 103 patients who received CAZ-AVI. Of these, 91 (88.3%) patients received the standard dosage of 2.5 g every q8h, while only 20 (19.4%) received monotherapy. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the all-cause 30-day mortality was significantly higher among patients who experienced septic shock than those who did not. There was no significant difference in mortality between monotherapy and combination therapy. Dose reduction of CAZ-AVI was associated with a significantly increased mortality rate. Independent risk factors for the 30-day mortality included higher APACHE II score (HR: 1.084, 95% CI: 1.024-1.147, p = 0.005) and lower lymphocyte count (HR: 0.247, 95% CI: 0.093-0.655, p = 0.005). Conversely, a combination therapy regimen containing carbapenems was associated with lower mortality (HR: 0.273, 95% CI: 0.086-0.869, p = 0.028).

Conclusion

Our study suggests that CAZ-AVI provides clinical benefits in terms of survival and clinical response in critically ill patients with CRKP infection. A higher APACHE II score and lower lymphocyte count were associated with 30-day mortality, while the combination therapy regimen containing carbapenems was the only protective factor. CAZ-AVI dose reduction was associated with an increased mortality rate. Futher large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.

Ceftazidime-avibactam induced renal disorders: past and present

With the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacterial pathogens worldwide, antimicrobial resistance has become a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) exhibited excellent in vitro activity against many carbapenemase-producing pathogens, and was widely used for the treatment of various complicated infections. CAZ-AVI is well tolerated across all dosing regimens, and its associated acute kidney injury (AKI) in phase II/III clinical trials is rare. However, recent real-world studies have demonstrated that CAZ-AVI associated AKI was more frequent in real-world than in phase II and III clinical trials, particularly in patients receiving concomitant nephrotoxic agents, with critically ill patients being at a higher risk. Herein, we reviewed the safety data related to renal impairment of CAZ-AVI, and discussed its pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets and dosage adjustment in patients with impaired renal function. This review aimed to emphasize the importance for healthcare professionals to be aware of this adverse event of CAZ-AVI and provide practical insights into the dosage optimization in critically ill patients with renal dysfunction.

Management strategies for severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the management of severe Pseudomonas aeruginosa infections in critically ill patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the most common pathogen in intensive care; the main related infections are nosocomial pneumonias, then bloodstream infections. Antimicrobial resistance is common; despite new antibiotics, it is associated with increased mortality, and can lead to a therapeutic deadlock.

SUMMARY

Carbapenem resistance in difficult-to-treat P. aeruginosa (DTR-PA) strains is primarily mediated by loss or reduction of the OprD porin, overexpression of the cephalosporinase AmpC, and/or overexpression of efflux pumps. However, the role of carbapenemases, particularly metallo-β-lactamases, has become more important. Ceftolozane-tazobactam, ceftazidime-avibactam and imipenem-relebactam are useful against DTR phenotypes (noncarbapenemase producers). Other new agents, such as aztreonam-ceftazidime-avibactam or cefiderocol, or colistin, might be effective for carbapenemase producers. Regarding nonantibiotic agents, only phages might be considered, pending further clinical trials. Combination therapy does not reduce mortality, but may be necessary for empirical treatment. Short-term treatment of severe P. aeruginosa infections should be preferred when it is expected that the clinical situation resolves rapidly.

Ceftazidime-avibactam use for the treatment of OXA-48- and/or New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales in cancer patients: a retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Infection is the second-leading cause of death among cancer patients, but there have been few studies on the effectiveness of novel antimicrobial agents to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the mortality and clinical outcomes of ceftazi-dime-avibactam for OXA-48- and/or New Delhi metallo-β-lactamase (NDM)-producing Enterobacterales infection in cancer patients.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

Tertiary academic medical center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

This study included patients who had cancer and received ceftazidime-avibactam for at least 72 hours for infections caused by OXA-48- and/or NDM-producing Enterobacterales. We excluded patients who died within 72 hours of treatment, patients with polymicrobial infections, and patients who did not receive appropriate antimicrobial therapy.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Primary outcomes were 30-day mortality and hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included clinical cure, relapse, and reinfection.

SAMPLE SIZE

32 cancer patients.

RESULTS

The 30-day mortality among all patients was 15/32 (47%), clinical cure was achieved in 19/32 (59%) of the patients, and the relapse and reinfection rates were 2/19 (10.5%) and 4/17 (23.5%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest study to evaluate clinical outcomes associated with infections caused by OXA-48- and/or NDM-producing Enterobacterales in cancer patients. The mortality rate remains high; however, ceftazidime-avibactam is an encouraging alternative for treating severe infections in cancer patients.

LIMITATIONS

Small sample size and single center.

Epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients with carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales infections: experience from a large tertiary care center in a developing country

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CREs) are a significant source of healthcare-associated infections. These bacteria are difficult to treat and have a high mortality rate due to high rates of antibiotic resistance. These pathogens are also linked to major outbreaks in healthcare institutions especially those with limited resources in infection prevention and control (IPC). Therefore, our study aimed to describe the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of patients with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a referral hospital in a developing country.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cross-sectional study that included 218 patients admitted to An-Najah National University Hospital between January 1, 2021, and May 31, 2022. The target population was all patients with CRE infection or colonization in the hospital setting.

RESULTS

Of the 218 patients, 135 had CR-Klebsiella pneumoniae (61.9%), and 83 had CR-Escherichia coli (38.1%). Of these, 135 were male (61.9%) and 83 were female (38.1%), with a median age of 51 years (interquartile range 24-64). Malignancy was a common comorbidity in 36.7% of the patients. Approximately 18.3% of CRE patients were obtained from patients upon admission to the emergency department, the largest percentage among departments. Most CRE pathogens were isolated from rectal swabs, accounting for 61.3%. Among the 218 patients, colistin was the most widely used antimicrobial agent (13.3%). CR- E. coli showed resistance to amikacin in 23.8% of the pathogens tested and 85.7% for trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole compared to CR- K. pneumonia, for which the resistance to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole was 74.1%, while for amikacin it was 64.2%. Regarding meropenem minimum inhibitory concentration, 85.7% of CR- E. coli were greater than 16 µg/mL compared to 84% of CR- K. pneumonia isolates.

CONCLUSION

This study found that CRE is frequently reported in this tertiary care setting, implying the presence of selective pressure and transmission associated with healthcare setting. The antibiotics tested showed a variety of resistance rates, with CR-K. pneumoniae being more prevalent than CR-E. coli, and exhibiting an extremely high resistance pattern to the available therapeutic options.

Guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacilli

The dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (CRGNB) is a global public health issue. CRGNB isolates are usually extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant, resulting in limited antimicrobial treatment options and high mortality. A multidisciplinary guideline development group covering clinical infectious diseases, clinical microbiology, clinical pharmacology, infection control, and guideline methodology experts jointly developed the present clinical practice guidelines based on best available scientific evidence to address the clinical issues regarding laboratory testing, antimicrobial therapy, and prevention of CRGNB infections. This guideline focuses on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). Sixteen clinical questions were proposed from the perspective of current clinical practice and translated into research questions using PICO (population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes) format to collect and synthesize relevant evidence to inform corresponding recommendations. The grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to evaluate the quality of evidence, benefit and risk profile of corresponding interventions and formulate recommendations or suggestions. Evidence extracted from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) was considered preferentially for treatment-related clinical questions. Observational studies, non-controlled studies, and expert opinions were considered as supplementary evidence in the absence of RCTs. The strength of recommendations was classified as strong or conditional (weak). The evidence informing recommendations derives from studies worldwide, while the implementation suggestions combined the Chinese experience. The target audience of this guideline is clinician and related professionals involved in management of infectious diseases.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of ceftazidime avibactam versus colistin in carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae in Iran

INTRODUCTION

Ceftazidime avibactam (CA) is an effective treatment against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), but its cost-effectiveness is unclear. This study was performed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CA against the best available treatment colistin (Col) for patients with CRE-related infections in Iran.

METHODOLOGY

A model of a decision tree was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of CA in CRE patients over a period of 5 years. The Iran health system was the perspective of the study, and the discount rates of 5.8% and 3% were considered for the data of cost and utility, respectively. The clinical inputs were obtained from a prospective observational study. We established the costs of medical services and medical tariffs of Iran's health system, and obtained the rate of medical service resources used by patients from specialists. The results of this model included the quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), increasing costs, and incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR). We also performed the deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

CA reduced the burden of related to treatment failure and the need for treatment of nephrotoxicity and chronic failure, whereas, the costs related to drug procurement and long-term care (due to longer survival) increased. Treatment with CA versus Col resulted in a 53% increase in QALYs and $425 in costs, leading to an ICUR equal to 798 $/QALYs. Sensitivity analyses proved the model's strength and indicated that the cost-effectiveness of CA can reach 88% when paying 1111 $/QALY. Budget impact analysis estimated CA regimen will increase the health system costs by $1,270,462 in 5 years.

CONCLUSION

In Iranian settings, CA can significantly increase the quality of life and patients' survival; therefore, in comparison to the Col drug regimen, CA is a cost-effective strategy.

Bloodstream Infection and Gram-Negative Resistance: The Role for Newer Antibiotics

Gram-negative resistance remains a major challenge. Rates of in vitro resistance to commonly utilized antibiotics have skyrocketed over the last decade. Clinicians now encounter multidrug-resistant organisms routinely. Fortunately, newer agents, such as ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozone-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, and cefiderocol, have been developed and are now available for use against these pathogens. Clinical trials with these novel therapies have focused on multiple infection types ranging from complicated urinary tract infections to nosocomial pneumonia. Nonetheless, there remains little information about the efficacy of these drugs for bacteremia. To better appreciate the types and limitations of the evidence supporting the role for these unique molecules in bloodstream infection, one requires an appreciation of the initial clinical trials supporting the regulatory approval of these antibiotics. Furthermore, physicians must understand the subsequent case series and reports specifically focusing on outcomes for patients with bacteremia treated with these drugs. Despite the limitations of the data and reports relating to treatment for bacteremia with these antibiotics, each agent appears to be efficacious and can provide good outcomes in bloodstream infections due to resistant pathogens.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is increasingly recognised as a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxins are considered as the last therapeutic options worldwide. This is the first meta-analysis of recently published data to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched, for publications in any language, from database inception to February 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES

Studies comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins were included. Mortality, clinical success, microbiological eradication and nephrotoxicity were assessed as the main outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Literature screening, data extraction and the quality evaluation of studies were conducted by two researchers independently, with disagreements resolved by another researcher. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the bias risk for the included studies. Review Manager V.5.3 was employed for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included seven retrospective and four prospective cohort studies with 1111 patients enrolled. The CAZ-AVI groups demonstrated a lower 30-day mortality (risk ratio (RR)=0.48, 95% CI of 0.37 to 0.63, I²=10%, p<0.0001) in nine studies with 766 patients; higher clinical success (RR=1.71, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.20, I²=35%, p<0.0001) in four studies with 463 patients; and lower nephrotoxicity in seven studies with 696 patients (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.77, I²=35%, p<0.05). However, no significant difference in microbiological eradication rates was observed in 249 patients from two studies (RR=1.16, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.39, I²=0, p>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Available evidence suggested that CAZ-AVI treatment held a dominant position with respect to efficacy and safety compared with polymyxins in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. However, the analysis included only observational studies, and high-quality, large-scale, multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the advantage of CAZ-AVI.

What to Do with the New Antibiotics?

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria-related infections have become a real public health problem and have exposed the risk of a therapeutic impasse. In recent years, many new antibiotics have been introduced to enrich the therapeutic armamentarium. Among these new molecules, some are mainly of interest for the treatment of the multidrug-resistant infections associated with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (ceftolozane/tazobactam and imipenem/relebactam); others are for carbapenem-resistant infections associated with Enterobacterales (ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam); and finally, there are others that are effective on the majority of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (cefiderocol). Most international guidelines recommend these new antibiotics in the treatment of microbiologically documented infections. However, given the significant morbidity and mortality of these infections, particularly in the case of inadequate therapy, it is important to consider the place of these antibiotics in probabilistic treatment. Knowledge of the risk factors for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (local ecology, prior colonization, failure of prior antibiotic therapy, and source of infection) seems necessary in order to optimize antibiotic prescriptions. In this review, we will assess these different antibiotics according to the epidemiological data.

Mortality rate and factors associated with mortality of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection

Background:

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is a serious pathogen with high mortality. Recognition of factors associated with mortality and treating these modifiable factors are crucial to reducing mortality.

Objective:

To determine the 30-day mortality and factors associated with a 30-day mortality of CRE infection.

Methods:

A retrospective cohort study was conducted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2019. All patients diagnosed with CRE infection aged ≥18 years were included. Multivariate logistic regression was used for evaluating the factors associated with 30-day mortality and presented as adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence interval (CI).

Result:

One hundred and ninety-four patients were enrolled. The 30-day mortality occurred in 75 patients (38.7%). The common antibiotic regimen was monotherapy and combination of carbapenem, colistin, amikacin, tigecycline, and fosfomycin. CRE isolates were susceptible to tigecycline (93.8%), colistin (91.8%), fosfomycin (89.2%), and amikacin (89.2%). The independent factors associated with 30-day mortality were an increasing simplified acute physiology (SAP) II score (aOR 1.11, 95% CI 1.05-1.16, p < 0.001), sepsis at time of CRE infection diagnosis (aOR 7.93, 95% CI 2.21-28.51, p = 0.002), pneumonia (aOR 4.48, 95% CI 1.61-12.44, p = 0.004), monotherapy (aOR 4.69, 95% CI 1.71-12.85, p = 0.003), and improper empiric antibiotic (aOR 5.13, 95% CI 1.83-14.40, p = 0.002).

Conclusion:

The overall 30-day mortality of CRE infection was high. The factors associated with mortality were an increasing SAP II score, sepsis at time of CRE infection diagnosis, pneumonia, monotherapy, and improper empiric antibiotic. The study suggested that proper empiric antibiotic and combination antibiotics might reduce mortality from CRE infection.

Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Clinical Syndromes With Limited Treatment Options: A Retrospective Study

Background With rising trends of multi-drug organism infections and the limited availability of new antimicrobials, management of such cases has become a hassle for the clinician. Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CEF-AVI) is evolving as an effective alternative to polymyxins in the management of Carbapenem-Resistant Organisms (CRO) infections. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved CEF-AVI in a restricted group of clinical syndromes where the drug could have potential use. Objective The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome in terms of 14-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure at seven days in patients on CEF-AVI. Methodology A retrospective study was conducted on patients who received CEF-AVI in a period of one year in our hospital. Patients were included in the study if they have received CEF-AVI for more than one day of therapy (DOT) and samples from relevant sites have been sent for culture and sensitivity. Variables and outcomes were collected from the hospital information system and medical records. Results A total of 78 patients were included, 52 (66.7%) were started empirically on CEF-AVI while 26 (33.3%) were on targeted therapy. Out of the 78 patients, 43 patients had positive cultures among which 32 patients had Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE)/Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection. The most common clinical syndrome in which the drug was used was occult sepsis (27/78; 34.6%) followed by primary bacteremia (20/78; 25.6%) and neutropenic sepsis (11/78; 14.1%). The clinical efficacy which was primarily assessed in terms of clinical cure was met for 55 (70.5%) patients. The 14-day mortality for the studies group was found to be 18 (23%). Conclusion The analysis of results shows encouraging clinical cure rates and 14-day mortality rates in a subset of severe infections which has limited treatment options.

In vitro and in vivo Antimicrobial Activities of Ceftazidime/Avibactam Alone or in Combination with Aztreonam Against Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales

Introduction

To examine the in vitro and in vivo antimicrobial activities of ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) alone or in combination with aztreonam (ATM) against KPC-, NDM-, IMP-, KPC+IMP-, KPC+NDM-producing strains.

Methods

A total of 67 clinical non-repetitive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) strains were selected for the microdilution broth method that was performed to analyze the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and the combination antimicrobial susceptibility test using checkerboard titration method. The fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) was calculated to determine the antimicrobial effect. The time-kill assays and the mouse infection model were used to study the bactericidal effect and therapeutic effect of CZA alone or in combination with ATM.

Results

The CZA minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) values of CZA revealed that 29 KPC-producing strains and 1 OXA-producing strain were ≤4µg/mL. The CZA MIC values of 37 metal-β-lactamase (MBLs)-producing strains such as NDM-, IMP-, KPC+IMP-, KPC+NDM-producing strains were ≥128µg/mL, after combining with ATM, the FIC values were all below 0.51. The time-kill assays revealed that CZA at various concentrations of 2, 4 and 8 MIC showed significant bactericidal efficiency to the KPC-producing strains. For NDM-, IMP-producing strains, no colony growth was detected after 8 hours of incubation with CZA in combination with ATM. Six percent of the mice in the treatment group and 58% of the mice in the infection group died within 3 days.

Conclusion

Our in vitro results showed that CZA had a good antimicrobial effect on the KPC-producing and OXA-producing strains. CZA combined with ATM showed synergistic bacteriostatic or bactericidal activity against NDM-, IMP-, KPC+IMP-, KPC+NDM-producing strains. The combination of CZA and ATM reduced mortality and prolonged lifespan of mice infected with NDM-, IMP-, KPC+IMP-, and KPC+NDM-producing strains, which provides fundamental knowledge for improving treatment strategies and initializing clinical trials.

Evaluation of ceftazidime/avibactam for treatment of carbapenemase-producing carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales with OXA-48 and/or NDM genes with or without combination therapy

Background

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is an urgent public health threat of significant global concern. Few observational studies have evaluated the clinical outcomes for treatment of CRE harbouring OXA-48 or NDM genes with ceftazidime/avibactam. Previous findings showed lower 30 day mortality with ceftazidime/avibactam ranges between 8.3% and 22%.

Method

This single-centre retrospective cohort study included adult patients aged ≥18 years admitted to King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC) who had received ceftazidime/avibactam for at least 72 h for infections caused by CRE with genes encoding for carbapenemase production (CP-CRE).

Results

A total of 211 patients, mostly male (57%), having CP-CRE infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam were included, with an average age of 62 years. More than 50% of patients were critically ill, for which 46% received invasive ventilation and 36% were on inotropes. The most frequent infectious disease was hospital/ventilator-acquired pneumonia with Klebsiella pneumoniae being the most frequent causative pathogen. The majority of isolates harboured OXA-48 (81%), followed by NDM ± OXA-48 (19%). The overall clinical cure and 30 day mortality was 78% and 21% respectively (stratified per gene: 79% and 21.6% for OXA-48 and 75% and 17.5% for NDM ± OXA-48).

Conclusions

This was the largest study that evaluated clinical outcomes associate with CP-CRE harbouring OXA-48 gene infections treated with ceftazidime/avibactam. Clinical cure and 30 day mortality were consistent with those of previous studies. Findings suggested that combination therapy with ceftazidime/avibactam had no direct impact on clinical outcomes for CP-CRE with OXA-48.

Multidrug-resistant bacteria: a national challenge requiring urgent addressal

Background: Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections are a worldwide threat owing to their increased prevalence, and poor prognosis due to inadequate antibacterial drugs.Current Concepts: Until 2019, several new antibacterial agents, targeting gram-positive bacteria—including telavancin, oritavancin, dalbavancin, ceftaroline, lefamulin, and delafloxacin—had been approved for use in the United States and Europe. Newer antibiotics targeting gram-negative bacteria include ceftazidime-avibactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, cefiderocol, eravacycline, and plazomicin. The guidance on the treatment of multidrug-resistant bacteria by the Infectious Diseases Society of America, published in February 2022, recommend the use of new antibacterial agents recently approved. However these drugs have not yet been introduced in Korea, thus impeding their prescription by physicians. Multidrug-resistant bacterial infections demonstrably contribute to a high mortality rate and socioeconomic burden.Discussion and Conclusion: Considering the societal impact of antibiotic resistance, the government should monitor and encourage antimicrobial stewardship to reduce the prevalence of multidrug-resistant bacteria, and hasten the introduction of new antibacterial agents for treating multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in Korea.

Risk Factors for Mortality and Outcomes in Hematological Malignancy Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infections

Background

This study aimed to identify risk factors for mortality and outcomes in hematological malignancy (HM) patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP).

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary teaching hospital in Henan Province, China, between January 2018 and December 2021. All BSIs caused by CRKP in hospitalized HM patients were identified. Data on patient demographics, disease, laboratory tests, treatment regimens, outcomes of infection, and the antimicrobial susceptibility of each isolate were collected from medical records.

Results

A total of 129 patients with CRKP BSI were included in the study, and the 28-day mortality rate was 80.6% (104/129). In Cox analysis an absolute neutrophil count < 500 at discharge (hazard ratio [HR] 6.386, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.074–13.266, p < 0.001), intensive care unit admission (HR 1.834, 95% CI 1.065–3.157, p = 0.029), and higher Pitt bacteremia score (HR 1.185, 95% CI 1.118–1.255, p < 0.001) were independent risk factors associated with 28-day mortality. Survival curve analysis indicated that compared with ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy, both polymyxin b (HR 8.175, 95% CI 1.099–60.804, p = 0.040) and tigecycline (HR 14.527, 95% CI 2.000–105.541, p =0.008) were associated with a higher risk of mortality.

Conclusion

In HM patients CRKP BSI resulted in high mortality. Intensive care unit admission, higher Pitt bacteremia score, and absolute neutrophil count < 500 at discharge were independently associated with higher mortality. Early initiation of new agents such as ceftazidime-avibactam may improve outcomes.

Update of clinical application in ceftazidime-avibactam for multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria infections

PURPOSE

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) have become a major global public health threat. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a newer combination of β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor, with activity against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA). The aim of this review is to describe the recent real-world experience of CAZ-AVI for the infections due to MDR-GNB.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar for clinical application in CAZ-AVI for MDR-GNB infections. Reference lists were reviewed and synthesized for narrative review.

RESULTS

MDRGNB infections are associated with higher mortality significantly comparing to drug-susceptible bacterial infections. Fortunately, CAZ-AVI shows significant benefits for infections due to KPC or OXA-48 CRE, comparing to colistin, carbapenem, aminoglycoside and other older agents, even in those with immunocompromised status. The efficacy of CAZ-AVI varies in different infection sites due to CRE, which is lower in pneumonia. Early use is associated with improved clinical outcomes. Noteworthy, when adopted as salvage therapy, CAZ-AVI is still superior to other GNB active antibiotics. CAZ-AVI plus aztreonam is recommended as the first line of MBL-CRE infections. However, for infections caused by KPC- and OXA-48-producing isolates, further investigations are needed to demonstrate the benefit of combination therapy. Besides CRE, CAZ-AVI is also active to MDR-PA. However, the development of resistance in CRE and MDR-PA against CAZ-AVI is alarming, and more investigations and studies are needed to prevent, diagnose, and treat infections due to CAZ-AVI-resistant pathogens.

CONCLUSIONS

CAZ-AVI appears to be a valuable therapeutic option in MDR-GNB infections. Using CAZ-AVI appropriately to improve efficacy and decrease the emergence of resistance is important.

Molecular epidemiology and outcome of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales in Saudi Arabia

Background

The burden of carbapenem resistance is not well studied in the Middle East. We aimed to describe the molecular epidemiology and outcome of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections from several Saudi Arabian Centers.

Methods

This is a multicenter prospective cohort study conducted over a 28-month period. Patients older than 14 years of age with a positive CRE Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae culture and a clinically established infection were included in this study. Univariate and multivariable logistic models were constructed to assess the relationship between the outcome of 30-day all-cause mortality and possible continuous and categorical predictor variables.

Results

A total of 189 patients were included. The median patient age was 62.8 years and 54.0% were male. The most common CRE infections were nosocomial pneumonia (23.8%) and complicated urinary tract infection (23.8%) and 77 patients (40.7%) had CRE bacteremia. OXA-48 was the most prevalent gene (69.3%). While 100 patients (52.9%) had a clinical cure, 57 patients (30.2%) had died within 30 days and 23 patients (12.2%) relapsed. Univariate analysis to predict 30-day mortality revealed that the following variables are associated with mortality: older age, high Charlson comorbidity index, increased Pitt bacteremia score, nosocomial pneumonia, CRE bacteremia and diabetes mellitus. In multivariable analysis, CRE bacteremia remained as an independent predictor of 30 day all-cause mortality [AOR and 95% CI = 2.81(1.26–6.24), p = 0.01].

Conclusions

These data highlight the molecular epidemiology and outcomes of CRE infection in Saudi Arabia and will inform future studies to address preventive and management interventions.

Use of polymyxins for carbapenem-resistant infections in children and adolescents

Background

Polymyxins are still used in children in some regions due to limited availability of newer antibiotics.

Objectives

To describe our experience in a cohort of children who received polymyxins for suspected or confirmed carbapenem-resistant bacterial infections (CRI), and explore potential factors associated with therapeutic success.

Methods

Retrospective, observational study in children and adolescents <18 years who received IV polymyxin B or colistin therapy for suspected or culture-documented CRI and were admitted to a high complexity clinic in Cali, Colombia between 1 September 2016 and 22 June 2020. Patients’ demographic, clinical and microbiological characteristics were collected and analysed; associations with therapeutic success were explored using univariate and multivariate models.

Results

There were 40 episodes of polymyxin use (polymyxin B, n = 34; colistin, n = 6) in 34 patients with a median age of 10 years (IQR 7–15); 65% were male. There were 17 adverse events: 3 (17.6%) neurotoxic and 14 (82.4%) nephrotoxic. Therapeutic success was achieved in 28 episodes (70%), of which 32% (9/28) had adverse events. Therapeutic success decreased by 35% with each additional year of age (OR 0.65; 95% CI 0.49–0.80) and by 7% for every hour that elapsed between the onset of fever and the start of appropriate antibiotic therapy (OR 0.93; 95% CI 0.8–0.97) and increased with concomitant non-carbapenem treatment (OR 6.87; 95% CI 1.04–71.01) and the use of adequate empirical therapy (OR 121.36; 95% CI 2.90–1147.95).

Conclusions

Several factors were associated with the therapeutic success of polymyxins, however, more than half of episodes had therapeutic failure or adverse events. Antibiotics with greater efficacy and safety are needed in regions with high rates of CRI.

Infectious Diseases Society of America 2022 Guidance on the Treatment of Extended-Spectrum β-lactamase Producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with Difficult-to-Treat Resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa)

BACKGROUND

The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) is committed to providing up-to-date guidance on the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. The initial guidance document on infections caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P. aeruginosa) was published on 17 September 2020. Over the past year, there have been a number of important publications furthering our understanding of the management of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections, prompting a rereview of the literature and this updated guidance document.

METHODS

A panel of 6 infectious diseases specialists with expertise in managing antimicrobial-resistant infections reviewed, updated, and expanded previously developed questions and recommendations about the treatment of ESBL-E, CRE, and DTR-P. aeruginosa infections. Because of differences in the epidemiology of resistance and availability of specific anti-infectives internationally, this document focuses on the treatment of infections in the United States.

RESULTS

Preferred and alternative treatment recommendations are provided with accompanying rationales, assuming the causative organism has been identified and antibiotic susceptibility results are known. Approaches to empiric treatment, duration of therapy, and other management considerations are also discussed briefly. Recommendations apply for both adult and pediatric populations.

CONCLUSIONS

The field of antimicrobial resistance is highly dynamic. Consultation with an infectious diseases specialist is recommended for the treatment of antimicrobial-resistant infections. This document is current as of 24 October 2021. The most current versions of IDSA documents, including dates of publication, are available at www.idsociety.org/practice-guideline/amr-guidance/.

Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Bloodstream Infection: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Several clinicians use ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) to treat bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), although no conclusive data support this practice. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in the treatment of CRE bacteremia. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched until 5 November 2021. Studies comparing the clinical outcome of CAZ-AVI with other regimens in CRE BSI were included if they reported data on mortality. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences with accompanying 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Eleven articles with 1,205 patients were included. CAZ-AVI groups showed a significantly lower 30-day mortality than control groups of other regimens (RR = 0.55, 95% CI of 0.45 to 0.68, P < 0.00001). The result is robust when a colistin-based regimen serves as the control group (RR = 0.48, 95% CI 0.33 of 0.69, P < 0.0001). In subgroup meta-analyses, the 30-day mortality was significantly lower in patients infected with CRE producing Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (RR = 0.59, 95% CI of 0.46 to 0.75, P < 0.0001). Additionally, patients in CAZ-AVI groups had a significantly higher clinical cure rate (RR = 1.75, 95% CI of 1.57 to 2.18, P < 0.00001) and lower nephrotoxicity rate (RR = 0.41, 95% CI of 0.20 to 0.84, P = 0.02). No significant differences of relapse rates were demonstrated in 2 groups (RR = 0.69, 95% CI of 0.29 to 1.66, P = 0.41). Although the current study is based on observational studies with a small sample of participants, the findings suggest that CAZ-AVI treatment is effective and safe compared with other antibiotics, including colistin, in CRE BSI.

IMPORTANCE Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) has been used as a frontline agent in the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI on carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) bloodstream infections (BSIs) remain unclear. Patients with CRE BSIs were often enrolled in small-sized clinical studies, together with other sites of infections, which reported pooled results. In this meta-analysis, the efficacy and safety were compared between CAZ-AVI and any other regimens used against CRE infections. The findings suggest that patients in the CAZ-AVI group had a significantly lower 30-day mortality than any other regimens and than colistin-based regimens. This paper provides a rationale for the use of CAZ-AVI in one of the most urgent antimicrobial-resistant infections of CRE bloodstream infections.

Ceftazidime/Avibactam versus Polymyxin B in the Challenge of Carbapenem-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infection

Purpose

Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ/AVI) monotherapy and polymyxin B-based combination therapy are currently two treatment options for patients with carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) infection; however, few studies have contrasted the relative efficacy of the two antibiotic regimens. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of CAZ/AVI and polymyxin B against CRPA infection and analyze the independent predictors of 30-day mortality or survival.

Patients and Methods

This single-center retrospective observational study included patients with CRPA infection treated with CAZ/AVI or polymyxin B between January 2018 and December 2020. The primary outcomes were the 14-day and 30-day mortality. The secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and bacterial clearance. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared between the two groups, and COX regression analysis was used to identify predictors of 30-day mortality.

Results

A total of 136 patients with CRPA infection were enrolled, including 51 patients in the CAZ/AVI group and 85 patients in the polymyxin B group. The 14-day mortality (5.9% vs 27.1%, p=0.002), 30-day mortality (13.7% vs 47.1%, p<0.001) and in-hospital mortality (29.4% vs 60.0%, p=0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were significantly lower than the polymyxin B group. The bacterial clearance rate (45.1% vs 12.9%, p<0.001) in the CAZ/AVI group were higher than in the polymyxin B group. After adjustment by propensity score matching, the CAV/AVI group still had lower 30-day mortality (14.3% vs 42.9%, p=0.018) and higher bacterial clearance rate (42.9% vs 14.3%, p=0.018) than the polymyxin B group. The multivariate COX analysis showed that the age was identified as independent predictor of 30-day mortality while CAZ/AVI therapy and central venous catheterization emerged as independent predictors of 30-day survival.

Conclusion

CAZ/AVI therapy was superior to polymyxin B therapy for patients with CRPA infection, and provided significant survival benefits, but further larger studies were needed to substantiate our findings.

Ceftazidime-Avibactam versus Colistin for the Treatment of Infections Due to Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: A Multicenter Cohort Study

Background

The aim of this study was to compare the safety and effectiveness of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) to colistin-based regimen in the treatment of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE).

Methods

This was a retrospective, multicenter, observational cohort study of inpatients who received either CAZ-AVI or intravenous colistin for treatment of infections due to CRE. The study was conducted in 5 tertiary care hospitals in Saudi Arabia. Main study outcomes included in-hospital mortality, clinical cure at end of treatment, and acute kidney injury (AKI). Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression model were conducted to assess the independent impact of CAZ-AVI on the clinical outcome.

Results

A total of 230 patients were included in this study: 149 patients received CAZ-AVI and 81 patients received colistin-based regimen. Clinical cure (71% vs 52%; P = 0.004; OR, 2.29; 95% CI, 1.31–4.01) was significantly more common in patients who received CAZ-AVI. After adjusting the difference between the two groups, treatment with CAZ-AVI is independently associated with clinical cure (adjusted OR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.28–5.91). In-hospital mortality (35% vs 44%; P = 0.156; OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.39–1.16) was lower in patients who received CAZ-AVI but the difference was not significant. AKI (15% vs 33%; P = 0.002; OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19–0.69) was significantly less common in patients who received CAZ-AVI.

Conclusion

CAZ-AVI is associated with higher rate of clinical cure and lower rate of AKI compared to colistin. Our findings support the preferential use of CAZ-AVI over colistin-based regimen for treating these infections.

Current Treatment Strategies Against Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria: A Review

There are several bacteria called superbugs that are resistant to multiple antibiotics which can be life threatening specially for critically ill and hospitalized patients. This article provides up-to-date treatment strategies employed against some major superbugs, like methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus, multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and multidrug-resistant Escherichia coli. The pathogen-directed therapeutics decrease the toxicity of bacteria by altering their virulence factors by specific processes. On the other hand, the host-directed therapeutics limits these superbugs by modulating immune cells, enhancing host cell functions, and modifying disease pathology. Several new antibiotics against the global priority superbugs are coming to the market or are in the clinical development phase. Medicinal plants possessing potent secondary metabolites can play a key role in the treatment against these superbugs. Nanotechnology has also emerged as a promising option for combatting them. There is urgent need to continuously figure out the best possible treatment strategy against these superbugs as resistance can also be developed against the new and upcoming antibiotics in future. Rational use of antibiotics and maintenance of proper hygiene must be practiced among patients.

Menace of antimicrobial resistance in LMICs: Current surveillance practices and control measures to tackle hostility

Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is significant challenge humanity faces today, with many patients losing their lives every year due to AMR. It is more widespread and has shown a higher prevalence in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to lack of awareness and other associated reasons. WHO has suggested some crucial guidelines and specific strategies such as antimicrobial stewardship programs taken at the institutional level to combat AMR. Creating awareness at the grassroots level can help to reduce the AMR and promote safe and effective use of antimicrobials. Control strategies in curbing AMR also comprise hygiene and sanitation as microbes travel from contaminated surroundings to the human body surface. As resistance to multiple drugs increases, vaccines can play a significant role in curbing the menace of AMR. This article summarizes the current surveillance practices and applied control measures to tackle the hostility in these countries with particular reference to the role of antimicrobial stewardship programs and the responsibilities of regulatory authorities in managing the situation.

Antibiotic Approvals in the Last Decade: Are We Keeping Up With Resistance?

OBJECTIVE

To review the spectrum of activity, efficacy, safety, and role in therapy of all antibiotics and related biologics approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in the last decade.

DATA SOURCES

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar (2010 to end May 2021) with the search terms' name of the antibiotic or the biologic. Data were also obtained from the prescribing information, FDA, and ClinicalTrials.gov websites.

STUDY SELECTION

All relevant English-language, late phase clinical trials assessing the safety and efficacy of the identified drugs were included. Review articles and references of retrieved articles were evaluated for relevant data.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Antibiotic resistance is a public health crisis, and antibiotic development is imperative to outpace the ability of bacteria to develop resistance. Only 17 new systemic antibiotics and 1 related biologic have been approved by the FDA since 2010. Among these drugs, 14 were approved for common bacterial infections, 1 was approved for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), 1 was licensed to prevent CDI recurrence, and 2 were approved for drug-resistant tuberculosis. Very few antibiotics are in clinical development.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

The arrival of these new antibiotics was welcomed with great enthusiasm, particularly when they met previously unmet medical needs. Unfortunately, the majority of them represent modifications to existing chemical structures rather than new drug classes. Despite the availability of these antibiotics, managing patients with deep-seated infections and those with extensively resistant gram-negative organisms remains challenging.

CONCLUSIONS

The number of new antibiotics and their indications are not keeping up with resistance and the needs of the patients.