Overlooked monkeypox cases among men having sex with men during the 2022 outbreak - a retrospective study

A global systematic evidence review with meta-analysis of the epidemiological characteristics of the 2022 Mpox outbreaks

BACKGROUND

In 2022, there were outbreaks of Mpox where the disease is not endemic. We summarized published full-text epidemiological data from the outbreaks.

METHODS

A global evidence review (protocol: osf.io/j3kb7) with systematic literature search up to February 09, 2023. We focused on experimental/observational studies of laboratory confirmed Mpox, excluding case reports and case series of < 5 cases. Epidemiological data were pooled using an inverse variance, random-effects model, and pooled estimates presented with associated 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

We included 66 studies. Mean incubation period was 7.8 days (6.6-9.0 days, 8 studies: 560 cases), reproductive number 1.8 (1.7-1.9, 6 studies), mean duration from symptom onset to diagnosis 5.8 days (4.8-6.8 days, 4 studies: 982 cases), mean symptom duration 17.5 days (14.7-20.2 days, 3 studies: 292 cases), mean serial interval 8.5 days (7.3-9.9 days, 1 study), hospitalisation 6% (4-9%, 26 studies: 5339 cases), and vaccine effectiveness 78% (65-91%, 3 studies: 953 cases). Highly relevant clinical manifestations were pleomorphic skin lesions 82% (68-94%, 26 studies: 4093 cases), anogenital lesions 64% (51-77%, 9 studies: 10,398 cases), fever 54% (50-57%, 52 studies: 25,992 cases), and lymphadenopathy 51% (46-57%, 42 studies: 17,803 cases), with cases mostly men who have sex with men (MSM). Possibly relevant manifestations were perianal lesions, fatigue, asthenia, myalgia, and headache.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2022 Mpox outbreaks presented with sex-related clinical manifestations and were mostly reported among MSM.

Mpox patients' experience from infection to treatment and implications for prevention and control: A multicenter qualitative study in China

Monkeypox (mpox), a viral zoonotic disease, is spreading worldwide. However, evidence that informs prevention and control strategies in the Asia Pacific Region is very limited. Our study aims to investigate the experiences of mpox patients from infection to treatment to provide scientific basis for the prevention and control. A multicenter qualitative design was used. A total of 15 mpox patients were recruited between July 6 and July 25, 2023, from six cities in China. Semistructured interviews were conducted by telephone and analyzed using the thematic analysis. The interview was divided into two sections: patients' experiences (prediagnosis experience, treatment-seeking experience, and quarantine experience) and advice. Prediagnosis experience was summarized into three themes: symptoms, possible routes of infection, and knowledge of mpox. Treatment-seeking experience was summarized into three themes: time of visit to hospital, diagnostic difficulties, and attitude toward diagnosis. Quarantine experience was summarized into three themes: body and mind reactions, reluctance to self-disclose infection status, and factors facilitating recovery. Themes identified from patients' advice were as follows: (1) Increase in testing channels and methods, (2) Development and introduction of vaccines, (3) Adjustment of quarantine program, (4) Improvement of treatment measures, and (5) Improvement of publicity and education. To effectively curb the mpox epidemic, structured measures are urgently needed to address the mpox-related stigma and discrimination. Targeted health education should be provided to MSM, focusing on the prevention, detection, and treatment services. Hospitals should enhance the training of clinicians in key departments including infectious disease and dermatology, to improve diagnostic capability and sensitivity. Furthermore, given the absence of specific antiviral medications, supervised home quarantine may be a good option.

Environmental detection and spreading of mpox in healthcare settings: a narrative review

Monkeypox virus (MPXV), which causes Monkeypox (Mpox), has recently been found outside its usual geographic distribution and has spread to 117 different nations. The World Health Organization (WHO) designated the epidemic a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC). Humans are at risk from MPXV's spread, which has raised concerns, particularly in the wake of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. The risk of virus transmission may rise due to the persistence of MPXV on surfaces or in wastewater. The risk of infection may also increase due to insufficient wastewater treatment allowing the virus to survive in the environment. To manage the infection cycle, it is essential to investigate the viral shedding from various lesions, the persistence of MPXV on multiple surfaces, and the length of surface contamination. Environmental contamination may contribute to virus persistence and future infection transmission. The best possible infection control and disinfection techniques depend on this knowledge. It is thought to spread mainly through intimate contact. However, the idea of virus transmission by environmental contamination creates great concern and discussion. There are more cases of environmental surfaces and wastewater contamination. We will talk about wastewater contamination, methods of disinfection, and the present wastewater treatment in this review as well as the persistence of MPXV on various environmental surfaces.

FDA trial regulation of laboratory developed tests (LDTs): An academic medical center's experience with Mpox in-house testing

The 2022 mpox outbreak presented a familiar challenge to clinical laboratories. Accordingly, our institution was able to swiftly implement in-house mpox testing to meet the imminent diagnostic needs of the public health emergency. While the FDA authorized laboratory-developed tests (LDTs) for lesion specimens, however, it restricted the testing of rectal swabs despite mounting evidence of its clinical utility. Notably, within the short timeframe when rectal testing was available, we identified a high-risk patient without apparent lesions who tested monkeypox-positive only by our in-house rectal swab assay. In order for our institution to continue testing non-lesion samples, The FDA required a separate Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) application that demanded additional resource-costly validation studies despite utilizing the same testing platform as lesion samples. Here, we provide a brief review of the history, current status, and legal scope surrounding LDT validations, with an in-depth comparison of the technical requirements by CLIA, CAP and the FDA. Importantly, we provide our experience with the mpox EUA submission process to serve as context for the challenges that may be imposed by the new FDA regulations. We hope that our experience will offer a valuable perspective that promotes constructive discourse towards addressing the imperative to offer high-quality laboratory diagnostics without compromising on the need of the medical laboratory community to provide effective patient care.

Design and validation of a laboratory-developed diagnostic assay for monkeypox virus

Mpox is a viral zoonosis with endemic circulation in animals and humans in some West and Central African countries. The disease was imported a few times in the past to countries outside the African continent through infected animals or travelers, one of which resulted in an unprecedented global outbreak sustained by human-to-human transmission in 2022. Although timely and reliable diagnosis is a cornerstone of any disease control, availability of accurate diagnostic assays and comparative performance studies of diagnostic assays remains limited despite of the long-known identification of monkeypox virus (MPXV) as a human pathogen since 1970. We laboratory-developed a real-time PCR test (LDT) and evaluated its performance against the commercial TaqMan™ Monkeypox Virus Microbe Detection Assay (Applied Biosystems, Cat A50137). The limit of detection of the LDT was established at 1.2 genome copies/ml. The sensitivity and specificity of both assays were 99.14% and 100%, respectively, and both are capable of detecting both clade I and clade II of MPXV. Our results demonstrate the validity and accuracy of the LDT for confirmation of MPXV infection from lesion swabs samples.

Current Clinical Trials for the Monkeypox Virus

Background

Monkeypox (MPX) is a zoonotic Orthopoxvirus causing smallpox-like symptoms. Before April 2022, MPX cases outside Africa were rare. The virus can spread through skin-to-skin contact, sexual contact, respiratory droplets, and household items such as towels and blankets.

Aim

This study was aimed at highlighting the dire need for vaccination and treatment against this infection. Several in-process clinical trials that may help overcome MPX infection are discussed.

Methods

A search for recent clinical studies was conducted in the clinicaltrials.gov database.

Results

A total of 15 trials were identified. After February 2022, 14 new trials were launched. Of the 15 trials, 9 were observational studies, 3 were treatment studies and 3 were preventive studies. MPX clinical trial topics were classified into four broad categories: MPX virus shedding and clearance; response to MPX vaccine; antiviral treatment for MPX; and awareness regarding MPX. One medication, tecovirimat, and two vaccines are currently in clinical trials.

Conclusions

Few treatments and vaccines are under evaluation. Although multiple trials have been conducted, evidence to determine the present state of MPX infection is currently insufficient. Global collaboration is required to achieve complete understanding of the epidemiology, prevention and control of MPX.