1
|
Jiguet S, Michel T, Capdevielle D. Programme de soins psychiatriques : Etude de l’expérience de jeunes patients par une méthode qualitative: Psychiatric care program: A qualitative study of the experience of young patients. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2024; 69:598-606. [PMID: 38656192 PMCID: PMC11298094 DOI: 10.1177/07067437241246589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Ambulatory care without consent is widely used, but it is controversial, and its effectiveness has not yet been proven. The patient experience remains largely unstudied in France, particularly that of young patients, yet their adherence to care in the early stages of the disease is complex and has an impact on their prognoses. The aim of this study is to investigate the experience of young patients undergoing a program of care (POC) in order to suggest ways of optimizing their care and to enrich the debate on the use of POCs. METHOD Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 11 patients between ages 20 and 32, who were either undergoing a POC or had done so in the previous 5 years, followed by a semi-pragmatic phenomenological analysis of the resulting transcripts. RESULTS (1) The outpatient experience with restraints is contradictory, ranging from deprivation and intrusion to support and protection. (2) The POC is portrayed as a framework for developing awareness of disorders and acceptance of care. (3) Patients report a lack of information about care with restraints, even to the point of being unaware of its existence. Patient-psychiatrist interactions within the POC are complicated by the restraints, but remain perceived as a care relationship. (4) They report constraints in their daily lives in connection to the POC, which can complicate professional involvement. CONCLUSION The results support the importance of nurturing the therapeutic relationship within the POC and involving patients more in their care, starting with better information. They support the use of POCs as a temporary tool to be combined with work on adherence to treatment and support for social and professional reintegration. SPECIALTY Psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Jiguet
- Centre Hospitalier Leon Jean Gregory, Thuir, France
- Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie Adulte, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Thibault Michel
- Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie Adulte, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Delphine Capdevielle
- Service Universitaire de Psychiatrie Adulte, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IGF, Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, INSERM, Montpellier, France
- Fondation FondaMental, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kisely S, Zirnsak T, Corderoy A, Ryan CJ, Brophy L. The benefits and harms of community treatment orders for people diagnosed with psychiatric illnesses: A rapid umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2024; 58:555-570. [PMID: 38650311 PMCID: PMC11193324 DOI: 10.1177/00048674241246436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Community treatment orders have been introduced in many jurisdictions with increasing use over time. We conducted a rapid umbrella review to synthesise the quantitative and qualitative evidence from systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses of their potential harms and benefits. METHODS A systematic search of Medline, PubMed, Embase and PsycINFO for relevant systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses. Where available, participants on community treatment orders were compared with controls receiving voluntary psychiatric treatment. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023398767) and the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/zeq35). RESULTS In all, 17 publications from 14 studies met the inclusion criteria. Quantitative synthesis of data from different systematic reviews was not possible. There were mixed findings on the effects of community treatment orders on health service use, and clinical, psychosocial or forensic outcomes. Whereas uncontrolled evidence suggested benefits, results were more equivocal from controlled studies and randomised controlled trials showed no effect. Any changes in health service use took several years to become apparent. There was evidence that better targeting of community treatment order use led to improved outcomes. Although there were other benefits, such as in mortality, findings were mostly rated as suggestive using predetermined and standardised criteria. Qualitative findings suggested that family members and clinicians were generally positive about the effect of community treatment orders but those subjected to them were more ambivalent. Any possible harms were under-researched, particularly in quantitative designs. CONCLUSIONS The evidence for the benefits of community treatment orders remains inconclusive. At the very least, use should be better targeted to people most likely to benefit. More quantitative research on harms is indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steve Kisely
- School of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Metro South Addiction and Mental Health Services, Woolloongabba, QLD, Australia
- Griffith Criminology Institute (GCI), Griffith University, Mount Gravatt, QLD, Australia
- Departments of Psychiatry, Community Health and Epidemiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS, Canada
| | - Tessa Zirnsak
- Social Work and Social Policy, Department of Community and Clinical Health, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amy Corderoy
- Discipline of Psychiatry & Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Christopher James Ryan
- Discipline of Psychiatry & Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Specialty of Psychiatry, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent’s Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Lisa Brophy
- Social Work and Social Policy, Department of Community and Clinical Health, School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brekke E, Clausen H, Brodahl M, Landheim AS. Patients' experiences with coercive mental health treatment in Flexible Assertive Community Treatment: a qualitative study. BMC Psychiatry 2023; 23:764. [PMID: 37853402 PMCID: PMC10585822 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-023-05264-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2023] [Accepted: 10/08/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Flexible Assertive Community Treatment (FACT) teams have been implemented in Norwegian health and social services over the last years, partly aiming to reduce coercive mental health treatment. We need knowledge about how service users experience coercion within the FACT context. The aim of this paper is to explore service user experiences of coercive mental health treatment in the context of FACT and other treatment contexts they have experienced. Are experiences of coercion different in FACT than in other treatment contexts? If this is the case, which elements of FACT lead to a different experience? METHOD Within a participatory approach, 24 qualitative interviews with service users in five different FACT teams were analyzed with thematic analysis. RESULTS Participants described negative experiences with formal and informal coercion. Three patterns of experiences with coercion in FACT were identified: FACT as clearly a change for the better, making the best of FACT, and finding that coercion is just as bad in FACT as it was before. Safety, improved quality of treatment, and increased participation were described as mechanisms that can prevent coercion. CONCLUSION Results from this study support the argument that coercion is at odds with human rights and therefore should be avoided as far as possible. Results suggest that elements of the FACT model may prevent the use of coercion by promoting safety, improved quality of treatment and increased participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Brekke
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Inland Hospital Trust, Postbox 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway.
| | - Hanne Clausen
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Inland Hospital Trust, Postbox 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway
- Department of Research and Development, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
| | - Morten Brodahl
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Inland Hospital Trust, Postbox 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway
| | - Anne S Landheim
- Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Concurrent Substance Abuse and Mental Health Disorders, Inland Hospital Trust, Postbox 104, Brumunddal, 2381, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jin J, Burback L, Greenshaw AJ, Winkler O. Commentary: Coercion in Psychiatry: Lessons Learned from Trauma-Informed Care. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2023; 68:86-88. [PMID: 36131544 PMCID: PMC9923135 DOI: 10.1177/07067437221125884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Jin
- Department of Psychiatry, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Lisa Burback
- Department of Psychiatry, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | | - Olga Winkler
- Department of Psychiatry, 3158University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bui TNT, Hotham E, Loughhead M, McMillan SS, Procter N, Poole K, Suppiah V. Exploring mental health clients' current medication knowledge, beliefs and experience with healthcare providers in the community in South Australia. HEALTH & SOCIAL CARE IN THE COMMUNITY 2022; 30:e5968-e5978. [PMID: 36148522 PMCID: PMC10086827 DOI: 10.1111/hsc.14029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
In Australia, mental illness has been recognised as a National Health Priority area, with the coronavirus pandemic adding a layer of urgency to the need to address the multiple health problems faced by clients with mental illnesses. Whilst much has been done in efforts to support these clients, little is known about their medication knowledge and experience with health professionals. The aim of the study was to explore the knowledge and beliefs of clients on the use of psychotropic medications and study their experiences with healthcare providers. Adult participants at a not-for-profit community-managed specialist mental health service provider in Adelaide, South Australia were recruited. Four focus group sessions were conducted between February 2020 and March 2021. All sessions were co-facilitated by a peer practitioner with lived experience. Sessions were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Participants (n = 27) reported that provision of medication education was inadequate and, in some cases, non-existent. There was an apparent lack of support for monitoring and managing common side effects, such as weight gain. Participants described not being involved in any decision-making processes and that establishing and maintaining a therapeutic relationship with their healthcare providers was challenging. Perceived stigma remains a barrier in accessing healthcare. Despite participants regularly interacting with a range of healthcare providers, findings highlight key gaps in care, particularly medication education and establishing a therapeutic relationship with their healthcare providers. Future mental health reforms should consider the provision of additional medication education in community settings, such as at not-for-profit organisations. Moreover, healthcare providers should take a proactive approach in establishing therapeutic relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tien Ngoc Thi Bui
- UniSA Clinical and Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Elizabeth Hotham
- UniSA Clinical and Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Mark Loughhead
- UniSA Clinical and Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Research GroupUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Sara S. McMillan
- Quality Use of Medicines Network, Menzies Health Institute QueenslandGriffith UniversityGold CoastQueenslandAustralia
| | - Nicholas Procter
- UniSA Clinical and Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Mental Health and Suicide Prevention Research GroupUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Kessie Poole
- Sub‐Acute ServicesMind Australia LimitedAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| | - Vijayaprakash Suppiah
- UniSA Clinical and Health SciencesUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
- Australian Centre for Precision HealthUniversity of South AustraliaAdelaideSouth AustraliaAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Beaglehole B, Newton-Howes G, Porter R, Frampton C. Impact of diagnosis on outcomes for compulsory treatment orders in New Zealand. BJPsych Open 2022; 8:e145. [PMID: 35913107 PMCID: PMC9380042 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2022.547] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compulsory community treatment orders (CTOs) are controversial because they enforce psychiatric treatment of patients in the community. It is important to know which patients benefit from compulsory treatment to better inform CTO use. AIMS To examine the effect of a range of diagnoses on outcomes associated with CTOs to determine whether there are specific outcome signatures for CTOs according to diagnosis. METHOD New Zealand's Ministry of Health databases provided demographic, service use and medication-dispensing data for all individuals placed on a CTO between 2009 and 2018. We used a hierarchical approach to categorise individuals according to diagnosis. Admission rates, admission days per year, community care and medication dispensing were analysed according to diagnosis and CTO status. RESULTS In total, 14 726 patients were placed on a CTO over the 10-year period between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018. For psychotic disorders, CTOs were associated with reduced admission frequency and duration. However, the opposite occurred for dementia disorders, bipolar disorders, major depressive disorder and personality disorders. Higher rates of medications, including depot antipsychotic medications, were dispensed on CTOs for all diagnostic groups. CONCLUSIONS CTOs were associated with reduced admission frequency and admission days per year for patients with psychotic disorders, whereas the opposite occurred for other diagnostic groups. Rather than seeking to establish whether CTOs are effective, we suggest that there are specific outcome signatures associated with CTOs for different disorders and knowledge of these can improve understanding and clinical practice in this area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Beaglehole
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Giles Newton-Howes
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Richard Porter
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Chris Frampton
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Aragonés-Calleja M, Sánchez-Martínez V. Current State of Research on Coercion in Mental Health: Umbrella Review Protocol. J Psychosoc Nurs Ment Health Serv 2022; 60:49-55. [PMID: 35522935 DOI: 10.3928/02793695-20220428-02] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
In recent years, international organizations, professionals, and representatives of mental health service users have expressed the need to regulate, limit, and even eliminate coercive measures in psychiatric treatment. The main objective of the current review is to provide a comprehensive synthesis of existing evidence on coercion in mental health care through a protocol for an umbrella review of systematic reviews. This protocol was designed according to the Joanna Briggs Institute guide for methodological development, conduct, and reporting of umbrella reviews. To minimize bias in the process, two independent reviewers selected the studies to be included, extracted, and synthesized; analyzed the data; and assessed risk of bias of each review. The review protocol was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. This review offers a comprehensive compilation of systematic reviews on coercion developed to date. Coercion causes adverse physical and psychological effects and is an emotional stressor for individuals with psychiatric diagnoses and health care workers. Characterization of coercion across care settings, its impact on clinical outcomes, the perception of those involved, and how coercion could be reduced will also be discussed. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, xx(xx), xx-xx.].
Collapse
|
8
|
Lessard-Deschênes C, Goulet MH. The therapeutic relationship in the context of involuntary treatment orders: The perspective of nurses and patients. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs 2022; 29:287-296. [PMID: 34551167 DOI: 10.1111/jpm.12800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
WHAT IS KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT?: Involuntary treatment orders are increasingly being used around the world to allow the treatment of individuals living with a mental illness deemed incapable of giving consent and who are actively refusing treatment. The use of involuntary treatment orders can impact the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship, which is essential to offer quality care and promote recovery. WHAT THE PAPER ADDS TO EXISTING KNOWLEDGE?: Nurses and patients do not agree on the possibility to develop a therapeutic relationship, with nurses believing they can build a bond with the patients despite the challenges imposed by the involuntary treatment order, and patients rejecting this possibility. Nurses caring for patients on involuntary treatment orders feel obligated to apply the conditions of this measure, even if it damages the relationship with their patients. This difficult aspect of their work leads them to question their role in relation to the management of involuntary treatment orders. WHAT ARE THE IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE?: Nurses need to be aware of the reasons why patients on involuntary treatment orders do not believe in the possibility of building a therapeutic relationship. Nurses need to reflect on and express their concerns about the damaging effects that managing involuntary treatment orders conditions can have on the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship. ABSTRACT: Introduction Involuntary treatment orders (ITO) can impact the nurse-patient therapeutic relationship (TR) negatively. Despite the increasing use of ITOs around the world, few studies have explored their influence on the TR from the perspectives of nurses and patients. Aim To describe the TR in the context of ITOs as reported by nurses and individuals living with a mental illness. Method Secondary data analysis of qualitative interviews with nurses (n = 9) and patients (n = 6) was performed using content analysis. Results Participants described the TR as fundamentally embedded in a power imbalance amplified by the ITO, which was discussed through the conflicting roles of nurses, the legal constraints imposed on patients and nurses, the complex relation between the ITO and the TR, and the influence of mental healthcare settings' context. Discussion Nurses and patients' views were opposed, questioning the authenticity of the relationship. Implications for Practice Nurses should be aware of the patients' lack of faith in the TR to ensure that they are sensitive to patients' behaviours that may falsely suggest that a relationship is established. Further studies should explore ways to alleviate the burden of the management of ITOs on nurses and allow for a trusting relationship to be build.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clara Lessard-Deschênes
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Hélène Goulet
- Faculty of Nursing, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada.,Centre de Recherche de l'Institut Universitaire en Santé Mentale de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Beaglehole B, Newton-Howes G, Frampton C. Compulsory Community Treatment Orders in New Zealand and the provision of care: An examination of national databases and predictors of outcome. THE LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. WESTERN PACIFIC 2021; 17:100275. [PMID: 34734198 PMCID: PMC8488594 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2021.100275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compulsory Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) are contentious because they impose severe restrictions on individuals in community settings. The existing evidence for CTOs is constrained by ethical and methodological limitations and may not support usual clinical practise. This study examines the effectiveness of CTOs using routine data in the New Zealand context. METHODS Ministry of Health, New Zealand databases provided demographic, service use, and medication dispensing data for all individuals placed on a CTO between 2009 and 2018. We examined the effectiveness of CTOs through a comparison of psychiatric endpoints identified as useful in the literature according to CTO status. Further analyses examined the moderating influences of age, sex, ethnicity, and diagnosis on outcome. FINDINGS 14,726 patients were placed under a CTO over the 10 year period between 1 January 2009 and 31 December 2018. Patients on CTOs experienced a reduced frequency of admissions (rate ratio of 0∙94, 95% CI 0.93-0.95, p<0.01) reduced admission days (rate ratio 0∙97, 95% CI 0.97-0.98 p<0∙01), increased frequency of psychiatric community contacts (rate ratio 3∙03, 95% CI 3.02-3.03 p<0.01), and increased dispensing of psychiatric medication (rate ratio 2.27, 95% CI 2.27-2.28, p<0.01). When sub-group analyses were undertaken, the association between treatment under a CTO and reduced admission frequency was only present for those with Psychotic Disorders. INTERPRETATION CTOs in New Zealand are associated with increased community care, and increased dispensing of psychiatric medication. Patients with Psychotic Disorders also experienced reduced frequency and length of admissions whilst under a CTO. FUNDING No specific funding was received for this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ben Beaglehole
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, PO Box 4345, Christchurch Mail Centre, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| | - Giles Newton-Howes
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, 23a Mein Street, Newtown, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Chris Frampton
- Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, PO Box 4345, Christchurch Mail Centre, Christchurch 8140, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Simms-Sawyers C, Miles H, Harvey J. An exploration of perceived coercion into psychological assessment and treatment within a low secure forensic mental health service. PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY, AND LAW : AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF THE AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND ASSOCIATION OF PSYCHIATRY, PSYCHOLOGY AND LAW 2020; 27:578-600. [PMID: 33679199 PMCID: PMC7901700 DOI: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1734981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Psychologists working within forensic mental health (FMH) services face challenges around supporting clients' informed consent when engaging in psychological assessment and treatment. Given that there is little research in this area, this qualitative study interviewed ten forensic inpatients from a low secure FMH service, to determine the impact of any perceived coercion to engage with psychologists. Interviews were transcribed and subject to Thematic Analysis. Three over-arching themes emerged from the analysis: 'Awareness of Coercive Power', 'Experiencing and Responding to Coercion' and 'Psychological Treatment is Helpful, But…'. Participants perceived coercion to engage with psychologists. Perceived coercion led to psychological distress, wanting to resist, and superficial engagement. Despite this, therapeutic alliance was established with the psychologist but the quality of the therapeutic alliance was compromised. The findings have implications for psychologists working in FMH services. Suggestions for reducing perceived coercion and future directions for research are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Helen Miles
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
- Kent Forensic & Specialist Care Group, Kent & Medway NHS & Social Care Partnership Trust (KMPT) & Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| | - Joel Harvey
- Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Løvsletten M, Husum TL, Granerud A, Haug E. Outpatient commitment in mental health services from a municipal view. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2020; 69:101550. [PMID: 32241457 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2020.101550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 02/01/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outpatient commitment (OC) is a legal decision for compulsory mental health care when the patient stays in his or her own home. Municipal health-care workers have a key role for patients with OC decision, but little is known about how the legislation system with OC works from the municipality's point of view. METHOD The present study has a quantitative descriptive design using an electronic questionnaire sent to health-care workers in the municipalities that participated. The study included health-care workers from the mental health services in two counties in Norway who have experience with psychosis and OC decisions. RESULTS There were 230 people who received the questionnaire. The sample consisted of various health professionals from both small and large municipalities.The results show which tasks they have in follow-up of patients in the municipalities. CONCLUSION From the municipality's point of view, there are no significant differences in follow-up for patients with or without an OC decision, apart from conversations about medication. An individual plan is rarely used to facilitate follow-up, although this is the statutory right of patients with OC decisions. The health-care workers lack knowledge and education about the OC scheme. The cooperation between municipalities and the specialist health-care services is not clearly defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Løvsletten
- Innlandet Hospital Trust, Division Psykisk Helsevern, Postboks 104, NO-2381 Brumunddal, Norway; Faculty of Public Health, Inland Norway University of Applied Science, Elverum, Norway; Helsam, Universitet I, Oslo, Norway.
| | - Tonje Lossius Husum
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute for Health & Society, University of Oslo, Norway
| | - Arild Granerud
- Faculty of Public Health, Inland Norway University of Applied Science, Elverum, Norway
| | - Elisabeth Haug
- Division of Mental Health Care, Innlandet Hospital Trust, 2840 Reinsvoll, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Pariseau-Legault P, Vallée-Ouimet S, Goulet MH, Jacob JD. Nurses' perspectives on human rights when coercion is used in psychiatry: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence. Syst Rev 2019; 8:318. [PMID: 31815660 PMCID: PMC6900841 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-019-1224-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization describes the perpetuation of human rights violations against people with mental health problems as a global emergency. Despite this observation, recent studies suggest that coercive measures, such as seclusion, restraints, involuntary hospitalization, or involuntary treatment, are steadily or increasingly being used without proof of their effectiveness. In nursing, several literature reviews have focused on understanding nurses' perspectives on the use of seclusion and restraints. Although many studies describe the ethical dilemmas faced by nurses in this context, to this date, their perspectives on patient's rights when a broad variety of coercive measures are used are not well understood. The aim of this review is to produce a qualitative synthesis of how human rights are actually integrated into psychiatric and mental health nursing practice in the context of coercive work. METHODS Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnographic approach will be used to conduct this systematic review. The search will be conducted in CINAHL, Medline, PsycINFO, ERIC, and Scopus databases, using the PICo model (Population, phenomenon of Interest, Context) and a combination of keywords and descriptors. It will be complemented by a manual search of non-indexed articles, gray literature, and other applicable data sources, such as human rights related documents. Qualitative and mixed-method study designs will be included in this review. Empirical and peer-reviewed articles published between 2008 and 2019 will be selected. Articles will be evaluated independently by two reviewers to determine their inclusion against eligibility criteria. The quality of the selected papers will then be independently evaluated by two reviewers, using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Checklist for Qualitative Research. Data extraction and content analysis will focus on first- and second-order constructs, that is, the extraction of research participants' narratives and their interpretation. DISCUSSION This review will provide a synthesis of how psychiatric and mental health nurses integrate human rights principles into their practice, as well as it will identify research gaps in this area. The results of this review will then provide qualitative evidence to better understand how nurses can contribute to the recognition, protection, and advocate for human rights in a psychiatric context. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO, CRD42019116862.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Pariseau-Legault
- Department of Nursing Sciences, Université du Québec en Outaouais, 5 rue Saint-Joseph, Saint-Jerome, Québec, J7Z 0B7, Canada.
| | - Sandrine Vallée-Ouimet
- Department of Nursing Sciences, Université du Québec en Outaouais, 5 rue Saint-Joseph, Saint-Jerome, Québec, J7Z 0B7, Canada
| | | | - Jean-Daniel Jacob
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nakhost A, Simpson AIF, Sirotich F. Service Users' Knowledge and Views on Outpatients' Compulsory Community Treatment Orders: A Cross-Sectional Matched Comparison Study. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY. REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE 2019; 64:726-735. [PMID: 30895806 PMCID: PMC6783670 DOI: 10.1177/0706743719828961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Community treatment orders (CTOs) have been used in the treatment of some individuals with serious mental illness who fail to adhere to their psychiatric treatment, leading to frequent hospitalization. This article examines perceptions and knowledge of CTOs amongst outpatient service users in Toronto, Canada. METHOD Service users under a CTO were matched to a comparison control group of voluntary outpatients (n = 69 in each group). Participants were interviewed using a series of questionnaires aimed at assessing instead of evaluating their knowledge and perceptions of CTOs, as well as understanding their views about the utility and impact of CTOs in the treatment of individuals with mental health issues. RESULTS Participants in the CTO group knew significantly more about CTO processes, restrictions, and procedural protections than the control group. Both groups thought that a CTO could improve certain individuals' mental health. The control group felt more strongly that a CTO could improve a service user's physical health by providing better access to care and closer monitoring (P = 0.019) while a significant proportion of the CTO group thought that being on a CTO was better than being in the hospital (P = 0.001) and that service users should be able to contest their CTO (P = 0.001). In addition, CTO group participants were significantly more optimistic about the potential positive impact of CTOs on other service users' quality of life (P = 0.008) and mental health (P = 0.023) compared to themselves. CONCLUSIONS In general, both groups viewed CTOs as potentially capable of positively affecting treatment and lives of some individuals with mental illness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arash Nakhost
- Department of Psychiatry University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.,Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael Hospital, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Alexander I F Simpson
- Division of Forensic Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.,Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Frank Sirotich
- Canadian Mental Health Association (CMHA), Toronto Branch, Factor-Inwentash Toronto, Ontario.,Factor-Inwentash Faculty of Social Work, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Riley H, Sharashova E, Rugkåsa J, Nyttingnes O, Christensen TB, Austegard ATA, Løvsletten M, Lau B, Høyer G. Out-patient commitment order use in Norway: incidence and prevalence rates, duration and use of mental health services from the Norwegian Outpatient Commitment Study. BJPsych Open 2019; 5:e75. [PMID: 31474238 PMCID: PMC6737513 DOI: 10.1192/bjo.2019.60] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Norway authorised out-patient commitment in 1961, but there is a lack of representative and complete data on the use of out-patient commitment orders. AIMS To establish the incidence and prevalence rates on the use of out-patient commitment in Norway, and how these vary across service areas. Further, to study variations in out-patient commitment across service areas, and use of in-patient services before and after implementation of out-patient commitment orders. Finally, to identify determinants for the duration of out-patient commitment orders and time to readmission. METHOD Retrospective case register study based on medical files of all patients with an out-patient commitment order in 2008-2012 in six catchment areas in Norway, covering one-third of the Norwegian population aged 18 years or more. For a subsample of patients, we recorded use of in-patient care 3 years before and after their first-ever out-patient commitment. RESULTS Annual incidence varied between 20.7 and 28.4, and prevalence between 36.5 and 48.9, per 100 000 population aged 18 years or above. Rates differed significantly between catchment areas. Mean out-patient commitment duration was 727 days (s.d. = 889). Use of in-patient care decreased significantly in the 3 years after out-patient commitment compared with the 3 years before. Use of antipsychotic medication through the whole out-patient commitment period and fewer in-patient episodes in the 3 years before out-patient commitment predicted longer time to readmission. CONCLUSIONS Mechanisms behind the pronounced variations in use of out-patient commitment between sites call for further studies. Use of in-patient care was significantly reduced in the 3 years after a first-ever out-patient commitment order was made. DECLARATION OF INTEREST None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henriette Riley
- Research Director, Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway
| | - Ekaterina Sharashova
- Postdoctoral Fellow, Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
| | - Jorun Rugkåsa
- Professor, Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital; and Centre for Care Research, University of South-Eastern Norway, Norway
| | - Olav Nyttingnes
- Postdoctoral Fellow, Health Services Research Unit, Akershus University Hospital; and R&D Department, Division of Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Norway
| | | | | | - Maria Løvsletten
- Doctoral Research Fellow, Division of Mental Health Care, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Norway
| | - Bjørn Lau
- Professor, Lovisenberg Diaconal Hospital, Norway
| | - Georg Høyer
- Professor Emeritus, Division of Mental Health and Substance Abuse, University Hospital of North Norway; and Department of Community Medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Weller P, Alvarez-Vasquez S, Dale M, Hill N, Johnson B, Martin J, Maylea C, Thomas S. The need for independent advocacy for people subject to mental health community treatment orders. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2019; 66:101452. [PMID: 31706387 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101452] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 04/08/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Independent mental health advocacy (IMHA) has been proposed as a way of maintaining peoples' rights in involuntary settings, but little is known about the challenges and opportunities associated with the provision of independent mental health advocacy to those on compulsory treatment orders in the community. In Victoria, Australia, an IMHA service is available to people who are at risk of or subject to compulsory treatment, including those who are subject to Community Treatment Orders. The IMHA service is based on the independent advocacy model developed in the United Kingdom. This paper details the benefits and challenges of providing independent non-legal advocacy to those in the community, drawing on a 15-month independent co-produced evaluation of the IMHA service. With limited publicly available sector level data, the evaluation employed qualitative approaches. Issues raised include the need to better target limited resources in the most effective way and the problem of ensuring timely and adequate access. While advocacy was well received by consumers, tensions specific to the community setting were influenced by the attitudes of clinicians to need, risk and recovery as opposed to a coherent understanding of consumer preference and choice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Penelope Weller
- RMIT University, Building 13, City Campus, Melbourne, Australia.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Corring D, O'Reilly R, Sommerdyk C, Russell E. The lived experience of community treatment orders (CTOs) from three perspectives: A constant comparative analysis of the results of three systematic reviews of published qualitative research. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2019; 66:101453. [PMID: 31706379 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2018] [Revised: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah Corring
- Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Richard O'Reilly
- Department of Psychiatry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada; Parkwood Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Elizabeth Russell
- Parkwood Institute, St. Joseph's Health Care London, London, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jager F, Perron A. The social utility of community treatment orders: Applying Girard's mimetic theory to community-based mandated mental health care. Nurs Philos 2019; 21:e12280. [PMID: 31441197 DOI: 10.1111/nup.12280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Serious mental illness (SMI) has long posed a dilemma to society. The use of community treatment orders (CTOs), a legal means by which to deliver mandated psychiatric treatment to individuals while they live in the community, is a contemporary technique for managing SMI. CTOs (or a similar legal mechanism) are used in every province in Canada and in many jurisdictions around the world in the care and management of clients with severe and persistent mental illness (most frequently schizophrenia) who have a history of treatment non-compliance and subsequent relapse. Although there is ongoing controversy around CTOs, their use continues to be on the rise. René Girard's mimetic theory, in which he posits the social utility of the scapegoat mechanism, may shed some light on how established cultural patterns contribute to contemporary responses to SMI: how culture depends on the reproduction of certain narratives, and how these act to shape the identity of those involved. The CTO specifically can be seen to act as a scapegoating mechanism, wherein, by singling out and controlling individuals who appear to threaten social order, social order is restored. This paper reviews Girard's theory, looks at how it has been applied to SMI, and then considers how it may illuminate the social role of the CTO. This examination may provide mental health nurses with insight into the constructed identities of their patients, as well as the role of mental health care within broader cultural narratives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiona Jager
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Amélie Perron
- School of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Light E. Rates of use of community treatment orders in Australia. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2019; 64:83-87. [PMID: 31122644 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Revised: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 02/20/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The variable and changing rates of use of involuntary community treatment orders (CTOs) in the treatment of people living with mental illness are not well-documented or well understood. This new study sought to determine contemporary rates of use in Australia, where local jurisdictions were previously shown to have varied and shifting rates of use that were high by world standards. METHODS Australian state and territory mental health review tribunals, health departments, and/or offices of the chief psychiatrist were surveyed for the most recent published annual data on the total number of individual people placed on a CTO and/or the total number of CTOs made. FINDINGS Contemporary rates of CTO use in Australia range from 40.0 per 100,000 population (in Western Australia) to 112.5 per 100,000 (in South Australia). Since the last national survey, the rates of people subject to CTOs fell into in two jurisdictions (Victoria and Western Australia). However, rates of CTOs made were higher than previous figures in all jurisdictions reporting data. Use of CTOs in Australia varies considerably within and between jurisdictions. CONCLUSIONS Australian jurisdictions continue to use CTOs at high and varying rates, despite unresolved questions about their role and impact. Transparency and accountability around their use would be improved by regular and nationally uniform public reporting of CTO data. Further research into how and why CTOs are used may also provide opportunities to respond to factors driving their use and thereby reduce the use of coercion in mental health care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwina Light
- Sydney Health Ethics, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Edan V, Brophy L, Weller PJ, Fossey E, Meadows G. The experience of the use of Community Treatment Orders following recovery-oriented practice training. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2019; 64:178-183. [PMID: 31122627 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/02/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
States across Australia are changing and adapting policy and laws to deliver mental health services using principles of personal recovery. Yet, the use of Community Treatment Orders (CTOs) remains high in apparent contradiction with this change. As part of the PULSAR trial investigating the outcomes of recovery oriented practice (ROP) training in primary and secondary care services within Metropolitan Melbourne, Victoria, a qualitative study was undertaken to explore the intersection between implementing ROP and working with consumers on CTOs. In-depth interviews were undertaken with consumers with experience being on CTOs and staff of secondary care services, and inductively analysed to identify themes. For consumers, being on a CTO meant lacking choice and control, an emphasis on medication, fear of the threat of hospitalisation, an absence of recovery oriented practice, and staying supported. For staff, recovery oriented practice in the presence of CTOs is challenging, with CTOs being seen to be a primary way to manage risk. Staff supported recovery as a practice, but identified a lack of organisational 'buy in' by services. The findings of this small scale study, embedded in a much larger study about ROP, support other literature that identifies implementing ROP in services that use CTOs as potentially problematic; and that ROP can enhance both consumers and staff experiences of services but, without systemic change, there may not be a significant shift in the use of CTOs, while CTOs also inhibit uptake of ROP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vrinda Edan
- Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, 126 Cleeland St, Dandenong, VIC, Australia; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
| | - Lisa Brophy
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Mind Australia, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia; School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | | - Ellie Fossey
- School of Primary and Allied Health Care, Monash University Peninsula Campus, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Graham Meadows
- Southern Synergy, Department of Psychiatry, Monash University, 126 Cleeland St, Dandenong, VIC, Australia; Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Monash Health, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lei H, Barnicot K, Maynard E, Etherington A, Zalewska K, Quirk A, Sanatinia R, Cooper SJ, Crawford MJ. Factors influencing use of community treatment orders and quality of care that people receive: results of a national survey in England and Wales. BJPsych Bull 2019; 43:227-235. [PMID: 30971324 DOI: 10.1192/bjb.2019.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims and methodWe conducted a secondary analysis of data from the National Audit of Psychosis to identify factors associated with use of community treatment orders (CTOs) and assess the quality of care that people on CTOs receive. RESULTS: Between 1.1 and 20.2% of patients in each trust were being treated on a CTO. Male gender, younger age, greater use of in-patient services, coexisting substance misuse and problems with cognition predicted use of CTOs. Patients on CTOs were more likely to be screened for physical health, have a current care plan, be given contact details for crisis support, and be offered cognitive-behavioural therapy.Clinical implicationsCTOs appear to be used as a framework for delivering higher-quality care to people with more complex needs. High levels of variation in the use of CTOs indicate a need for better evidence about the effects of this approach to patient care.Declaration of interestNone.
Collapse
|
21
|
Harris A, Chen W, Jones S, Hulme M, Burgess P, Sara G. Community treatment orders increase community care and delay readmission while in force: Results from a large population-based study. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2019; 53:228-235. [PMID: 29485289 DOI: 10.1177/0004867418758920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is debate about the effectiveness of community treatment orders in the management of people with a severe mental illness. While some case-control studies suggest community treatment orders reduce hospital readmissions, three randomised controlled trials find no effects. These randomised controlled trials measure outcomes over a longer period than the community treatment order duration and assess the combined effectiveness of community treatment orders both during and after the intervention. This study examines the effectiveness of community treatment orders in a large population-based sample, restricting observation to the period under a community treatment order. METHODS All persons ( n = 5548) receiving a community treatment order in New South Wales, Australia, over the period 2004-2009 were identified. Controls were matched using a propensity score based on demographic, clinical and prior care variables. A baseline period equal to each case's duration of treatment was constructed. Treatment effects were compared using zero-inflated negative binomial regression, adjusting for demographics, clinical characteristics and pre-community treatment order care. RESULTS Compared to matched controls, people on community treatment orders were less likely to be readmitted (odds ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval = [0.84, 0.97]) and had a significantly longer time to their first readmission (incidence rate ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = [1.36, 1.58]), fewer hospital admissions (incidence rate ratio = 0.90, 95% confidence interval = [0.84, 0.96]) and more days of community care (incidence rate ratio = 1.55, 95% confidence interval = [1.51, 1.59]). Increased community care and delayed first admission were found for all durations of community treatment order care. Reduced odds of readmission were limited to people with 6 months or less of community treatment order care, and reduced number of admissions and days in hospital to people with prolonged (>24 months) community treatment order care. CONCLUSION In this large population-based study, community treatment orders increase community care and delay rehospitalisation while they are in operation. Some negative findings in this field may reflect the use of observation periods longer than the period of active intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Harris
- 1 Brain Dynamics Centre, The Westmead Institute for Medical Research, University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.,2 Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Wendy Chen
- 3 InforMH, Mental Health and Drug and Alcohol Office, NSW Health, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Sharon Jones
- 3 InforMH, Mental Health and Drug and Alcohol Office, NSW Health, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Melissa Hulme
- 4 Department of Psychiatry, Westmead Hospital, Wentworthville, NSW, Australia
| | - Philip Burgess
- 5 School of Public Health, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Grant Sara
- 2 Discipline of Psychiatry, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,3 InforMH, Mental Health and Drug and Alcohol Office, NSW Health, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Verbeke E, Vanheule S, Cauwe J, Truijens F, Froyen B. Coercion and power in psychiatry: A qualitative study with ex-patients. Soc Sci Med 2019; 223:89-96. [PMID: 30739039 DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.01.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2018] [Revised: 12/28/2018] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Coercion is a controversial issue in mental health care. Recent research highlights that coercion is a relational phenomenon, although, it remains unclear how this intersubjective context should be understood. The aim of this study is to propose an interactional model of the relational aspects of coercion that enhances theoretical understanding, based on the assumptions of patients. METHOD The research question was studied by means of interpretative phenomenological analysis. Twelve people who had psychiatric hospitalisations were interviewed in-depth, using broad open questions relating to the experience of coercion and power in psychiatry. Data were collected in 2016 and 2017 in Belgium. RESULTS Across participants' accounts we observed a specific structure. The relational quality of coercion seemed to be embedded within a process where individuals were one-sidedly approached as a 'sick patient', which led to profound segregation between staff and patients. This segregation caused a form of de-subjectivation: participants felt that important aspects of their subjectivity were neglected and they experienced professionals as de-subjectivated. They felt as if power resides within the (non-) interactions between patients and mental health workers. De-subjectivation arose and was enlarged within relations by broken contact, by silence in coercive acts, and by the necessity of patients to conform to the professionals' treatment regime. Helpful encounters that were not deemed coercive were those where patients and staff were individuated, which altered their relation. CONCLUSIONS To understand the relational quality of coercion, interventions like seclusion and house rules should also be understood within this structure of de-subjectivation. We need to tackle this dynamic if we want to reduce coercion in psychiatric care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evi Verbeke
- Univeristy of Ghent, Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
| | - Stijn Vanheule
- Univeristy of Ghent, Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
| | - Joachim Cauwe
- Univeristy of Ghent, Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
| | - Femke Truijens
- Univeristy of Ghent, Department of Psychoanalysis and Clinical Consulting, Henri Dunantlaan 2, 9000, Gent, Belgium.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Brophy L, Kokanovic R, Flore J, McSherry B, Herrman H. Community Treatment Orders and Supported Decision-Making. Front Psychiatry 2019; 10:414. [PMID: 31244699 PMCID: PMC6580382 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
This paper presents findings from an interdisciplinary project undertaken in Victoria, Australia, investigating the barriers and facilitators to supported decision-making (SDM) for people living with diagnoses including schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, and severe depression; family members supporting them; and mental health practitioners, including psychiatrists. We considered how SDM can be used to align Australian laws and practice with international human rights obligations. The project examined the experiences, views, and preferences of consumers of mental health services, including people with experiences of being on Community Treatment Orders (CTOs), in relation to enabling SDM in mental health service delivery. It also examined the perspectives of informal family members or carers and mental health practitioners. Victoria currently has high rates of use of CTOs, and the emphasis on SDM in the Mental Health Act, 2014, is proposed as one method for reducing coercion within the mental health system and working towards more recovery-oriented practice. Our findings cautiously suggest that SDM may contribute to reducing the use of CTOs, encouraging less use of coercive practices, and improving the experience of people who are subject to these orders, through greater respect for their views and preferences. Nonetheless, the participants in our study expressed an often ambivalent stance towards CTOs. In particular, the emphasis on medication as the primary treatment option and the limited communication about distressing side effects, alongside lack of choice of medication, was a primary source of concern. Fears, particularly among staff, about the risk of harm to self and others, and stigma attached to complex mental health conditions experienced by consumers and their families, represent important overarching concerns in the implementation of CTOs. Supporting the decision-making of people on CTOs, respecting their views and preferences about treatment, and moving towards reducing the use of CTOs require system-wide transformation and a significant shift in values and practice across mental health service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa Brophy
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University.,Centre for Mental Health, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Mind Australia, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| | - Renata Kokanovic
- Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jacinthe Flore
- Social and Global Studies Centre, RMIT University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Bernadette McSherry
- Melbourne Social Equity Institute and Melbourne Law School, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Herrman
- Orygen, The National Centre of Excellence in Youth Mental Health, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Centre for Youth Mental Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ryan CJ. Community treatment orders are (somewhat) effective: Their future in the context of rights-based mental health law. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2019; 53:11-12. [PMID: 30091367 DOI: 10.1177/0004867418791300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher James Ryan
- 1 Discipline of Psychiatry and Sydney Health Ethics, The University of Sydney, Westmead, NSW, Australia.,2 Department of Psychiatry, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jobling H. The legal oversight of community treatment orders: A qualitative analysis of tribunal decision-making. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LAW AND PSYCHIATRY 2019; 62:95-103. [PMID: 30616860 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2018] [Revised: 11/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/05/2018] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Community treatment orders (CTOs) have been in place in various jurisdictions for over three decades, and yet are still a controversial aspect of mental health provision. One of the ethical concerns CTOs may engender is how difficult it can be to secure discharge from them, which in some jurisdictions can result in service users being subject to compulsion in the community indefinitely. Given the questions that can therefore be raised about the discharge process, it is important to understand the role of the mental health tribunal as a key safeguard in the management of CTOs. However, whilst a substantial body of literature exists on CTOs and on various aspects of tribunal practice in inpatient settings respectively, relatively little has been written about the role of the tribunal in the oversight of CTO discharge decisions. This article presents the results of an eight month ethnographic investigation into CTO use in England, focusing on the factors which contribute to tribunal decisions. A total of 62 participants were involved in the study, including 18 service users on CTOs, 36 mental health practitioners and 8 tribunal chairs. A combination of interviews, observations and documentary analysis are drawn upon to illustrate tribunal decision-making practice on CTOs. The key themes reported on are: the mediating influence of participant presentation and interaction in tribunals; tribunal framing and interpretation of insight and risk; and the importance of timing to tribunals, both in terms of the perceived stability of a service user's social circumstances, and the length of the CTO. The findings highlight the cumulative and interrelated effect of such factors on tribunal decision-making, and point to how tribunal judgements are heavily weighted towards upholding CTOs, with the implications that holds for individual rights.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Jobling
- Department of Social Policy and Social Work, University of York, York YO10 5DD, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Barnett P, Matthews H, Lloyd-Evans B, Mackay E, Pilling S, Johnson S. Compulsory community treatment to reduce readmission to hospital and increase engagement with community care in people with mental illness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry 2018; 5:1013-1022. [PMID: 30391280 PMCID: PMC6251967 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(18)30382-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 09/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compulsory community treatment (CCT) aims to reduce hospital readmissions among people with mental illness. However, research examining the usefulness of CCT is inconclusive. We aimed to assess the effectiveness of CCT in reducing readmission and length of stay in hospital and increasing community service use and treatment adherence. METHODS For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched three databases (PsycINFO, MEDLINE and Embase) for quantitative studies on CCT published in English between Jan 1, 1806, and Jan 4, 2018. We included both randomised and non-randomised designs that compared CCT with no CCT, and pre-post designs that compared patients before and after CCT. Studies were eligible if they had been peer-reviewed, if 50% or more of patients had severe mental illness, and if CCT was the intervention. Trials in which CCT was used in response to a criminal offence were excluded. We extracted data on study characteristics and length of follow-up, patient-level data on diagnosis, age, sex, race, and admission history, and outcomes of interest (readmission to hospital, inpatient bed-days, community service use, and treatment adherence) for meta-analysis, for which we extracted summary estimates. We used a random-effects model to compare disparate outcome measures and convert effect size statistics into standardised mean differences. This systematic review is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42018086232. FINDINGS Of 1931 studies identified, 41 (2%) met inclusion criteria and had sufficient data for analysis. Before and after CCT comparisons showed significant large effects on readmission to hospital (standardised mean difference 0·80, 95% CI 0·53-1·08; I2=94·74), use of community services (0·83, 0·46-1·21; I2=87·26), and treatment adherence (2·12, 1·69-2·55; I2=0), and a medium effect on inpatient bed-days (0·66, 0·46-0·85; I2=94·12). Contemporaneous controlled comparison studies (randomised and non-randomised) showed no significant effect on readmission, inpatient bed-days, or treatment adherence, but a moderate effect on use of community services (0·38, 0·19-0·58; I2=96·92). A high degree of variability in study quality was found, with observational study ratings ranging from three to nine. Bias most frequently centred on poor comparability between CCT and control participants. INTERPRETATION We found no consistent evidence that CCT reduces readmission or length of inpatient stay, although it might have some benefit in enforcing use of outpatient treatment or increasing service provision, or both. Future research should focus on why some people do not engage with treatment offered and on enhancing quality of the community care available. Shortcomings of this study include high levels of variability between studies and variation in study quality. FUNDING National Institute for Health Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Phoebe Barnett
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Hannah Matthews
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Euan Mackay
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen Pilling
- Centre for Outcomes Research and Effectiveness, Department of Clinical Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK; NIHR Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Sonia Johnson
- NIHR Policy Research Unit, University College London, London, UK; Camden and Islington NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
New Dutch Legislation and Preventive Coercive Home Health Care for Excessive Alcohol Consumers. Int J Ment Health Addict 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s11469-018-0020-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
|