1
|
Lucia F, Miranda O, Schick U, Bourbonne V, Duvergé L. Dose escalation by brachytherapy for gynecological cancers. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:905-910. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
2
|
Glatzer M, Tanderup K, Rovirosa A, Fokdal L, Ordeanu C, Tagliaferri L, Chargari C, Strnad V, Dimopoulos JA, Šegedin B, Cooper R, Nakken ES, Petric P, van der Steen-Banasik E, Lössl K, Jürgenliemk-Schulz IM, Niehoff P, Hermansson RS, Nout RA, Putora PM, Plasswilm L, Tselis N. Role of Brachytherapy in the Postoperative Management of Endometrial Cancer: Decision-Making Analysis among Experienced European Radiation Oncologists. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14040906. [PMID: 35205653 PMCID: PMC8869913 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14040906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary There are various society-specific guidelines addressing adjuvant brachytherapy (BT) after surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). However, these recommendations are not uniform. Against this background, clinicians need to make decisions despite gaps between best scientific evidence and clinical practice. We analysed decision criteria influencing the selection for adjuvant radiotherapy among European radiation oncology experts. For this, GEC-ESTRO provided 19 European radiation oncology experts on gynaecological brachytherapy for decision-making analyses. The manuscript presents patterns in decision-making among these experts and demonstrates areas of consensus/discrepancies. We also analysed dose prescription and techniques of brachytherapy. This analysis is of special value as the objective approach enabled us to obtain an unbiased description of decision-making among the specialists (the study was not aimed to create or enforce a consensus). The manuscript provides valuable insight into clinical decision-making with a high impact on treatment selection, as expected differences between experts were observed. With this manuscript we are able to visualize and quantify these. This information is relevant for interdisciplinary discussions. Abstract Background: There are various society-specific guidelines addressing adjuvant brachytherapy (BT) after surgery for endometrial cancer (EC). However, these recommendations are not uniform. Against this background, clinicians need to make decisions despite gaps between best scientific evidence and clinical practice. We explored factors influencing decision-making for adjuvant BT in clinical routine among experienced European radiation oncologists in the field of gynaecological radiotherapy (RT). We also investigated the dose and technique of BT. Methods: Nineteen European experts for gynaecological BT selected by the Groupe Européen de Curiethérapie and the European Society for Radiotherapy & Oncology provided their decision criteria and technique for postoperative RT in EC. The decision criteria were captured and converted into decision trees, and consensus and dissent were evaluated based on the objective consensus methodology. Results: The decision criteria used by the experts were tumour extension, grading, nodal status, lymphovascular invasion, and cervical stroma/vaginal invasion (yes/no). No expert recommended adjuvant BT for pT1a G1-2 EC without substantial LVSI. Eighty-four percent of experts recommended BT for pT1a G3 EC without substantial LVSI. Up to 74% of experts used adjuvant BT for pT1b LVSI-negative and pT2 G1–2 LVSI-negative disease. For 74–84% of experts, EBRT + BT was the treatment of choice for nodal-positive pT2 disease and for pT3 EC with cervical/vaginal invasion. For all other tumour stages, there was no clear consensus for adjuvant treatment. Four experts already used molecular markers for decision-making. Sixty-five percent of experts recommended fractionation regimens of 3 × 7 Gy or 4 × 5 Gy for BT as monotherapy and 2 × 5 Gy for combination with EBRT. The most commonly used applicator for BT was a vaginal cylinder; 82% recommended image-guided BT. Conclusions: There was a clear trend towards adjuvant BT for stage IA G3, stage IB, and stage II G1–2 LVSI-negative EC. Likewise, there was a non-uniform pattern for BT dose prescription but a clear trend towards 3D image-based BT. Finally, molecular characteristics were already used in daily decision-making by some experts under the pretext that upcoming trials will bring more clarity to this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Glatzer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (P.M.P.); (L.P.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Kari Tanderup
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (K.T.); (L.F.)
| | - Angeles Rovirosa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain;
- Fonaments Clinics Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universitat de Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lars Fokdal
- Department of Oncology, Aarhus University Hospital, 8200 Aarhus, Denmark; (K.T.); (L.F.)
| | - Claudia Ordeanu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institute of Oncology “Prof. Dr. Ion Chiricuta”, 400015 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Luca Tagliaferri
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, 00168 Roma, Italy;
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Comprehensive Cancer Center, 94805 Paris, France;
| | - Vratislav Strnad
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Johannes Athanasios Dimopoulos
- Department of Clinical Therapeutics, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11528 Athens, Greece;
| | - Barbara Šegedin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia;
| | - Rachel Cooper
- Radiotherapy Research Group, Leeds Cancer Centre, St. Jame’s University Hospital, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK;
| | | | - Primoz Petric
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | | | - Kristina Lössl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3041 Bern, Switzerland;
| | - Ina M. Jürgenliemk-Schulz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 AB Utrecht, The Netherlands;
| | - Peter Niehoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sana Klinikum Offenbach GmbH, 63069 Offenbach, Germany;
| | - Ruth S. Hermansson
- Department of Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, 70 185 Örebro, Sweden;
| | - Remi A. Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Paul Martin Putora
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (P.M.P.); (L.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3041 Bern, Switzerland;
| | - Ludwig Plasswilm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, 9007 St. Gallen, Switzerland; (P.M.P.); (L.P.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, 3041 Bern, Switzerland;
| | - Nikolaos Tselis
- Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt, Goethe Universität, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Barcellini A, Dominoni M, Dal Mas F, Biancuzzi H, Venturini SC, Gardella B, Orlandi E, Bø K. Sexual Health Dysfunction After Radiotherapy for Gynecological Cancer: Role of Physical Rehabilitation Including Pelvic Floor Muscle Training. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 8:813352. [PMID: 35186978 PMCID: PMC8852813 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2021.813352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Accepted: 12/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The present study aims to describe: 1. How the side effects of radiotherapy (RT) could impact sexual health in women; 2. The effectiveness of physical rehabilitation including pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the management of sexual dysfunction after RT. Materials and Methods Search keys on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, PEDro, and Cochrane were used to identify studies on women treated with radical or adjuvant RT and/or brachytherapy for gynecological cancers with an emphasis on vulvo-vaginal toxicities and PFMT studies on sexual dysfunction for this group of women. Results Regarding the first key question, we analyzed 19 studies including a total of 2,739 women who reported vaginal dryness, stenosis, and pain as the most common side effects. Reports of dosimetric risk factors and dose-effect data for vaginal and vulvar post-RT toxicities are scant. Only five studies, including three randomized controlled trials (RCTs), were found to report the effect of PFMT alone or in combination with other treatments. The results showed some evidence for the effect of training modalities including PFMT, but to date, there is insufficient evidence from high-quality studies to draw any conclusion of a possible effect. Conclusions Gynecological toxicities after RT are common, and their management is challenging. The few data available for a rehabilitative approach on post-actinic vulvo-vaginal side effects are encouraging. Large and well-designed RCTs with the long-term follow-up that investigate the effect of PFMT on vulvo-vaginal tissues and pelvic floor muscle function are needed to provide further guidance for clinical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
- *Correspondence: Amelia Barcellini
| | - Mattia Dominoni
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Lincoln International Business School, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom
- Center of Organization and Governance of the Public Administration, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Helena Biancuzzi
- Ipazia, International Observatory on Gender Research, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Barbara Gardella
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Paediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Kari Bø
- Department of Sports Medicine, Norwegian School of Sports Sciences, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Akershus University Hospital, Lorenskog, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gultekin M, Sari SY, Yazici G, Hurmuz P, Yildiz F, Ozyigit G. Gynecological Cancers. Radiat Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-97145-2_7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
|
5
|
Vaginal toxicity after high-dose-rate endovaginal brachytherapy: 20 years of results. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2018; 10:559-566. [PMID: 30662479 PMCID: PMC6335557 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2018.79713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2018] [Accepted: 10/25/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate vaginal toxicity (primary endpoint) and local control (secondary endpoint) in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery and adjuvant high-dose-rate (HDR) endovaginal brachytherapy (BT). Material and methods In September 2017, the authors conducted a comprehensive literature search of the following electronic databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane library. In this systematic review, the authors included randomized trials, non-randomized trials, prospective studies, retrospective studies, and cases. The time period of the research included articles published from September 1997 to September 2017. Results Acute endovaginal toxicity occurred in less than 20.6% and all acute toxicities were G1-G2. The most common early side effects due to HDR-BT treatment were vaginal inflammation, vaginal irritation, dryness, discharge, soreness, swelling, and fungal infection. G1-G2 late toxicity occurred in less than 27.7%. Finally, G3-G4 late vaginal occurred in less than 2%. The most common late side effects consisted of vaginal discharge, dryness, itching, bleeding, fibrosis, telangiectasias, stenosis, short or narrow vagina, and dyspareunia. Conclusions The data suggest that HDR endovaginal brachytherapy, with or without chemotherapy, is very well tolerated with low rates of acute and late vaginal toxicities. Further prospective studies with higher numbers of patients and longer follow-up are necessary to evaluate acute and late toxicities after HDR endovaginal brachytherapy.
Collapse
|
6
|
De Boer SM, Nout RA, Bosse T, Creutzberg CL. Adjuvant therapy for high-risk endometrial cancer: recent evidence and future directions. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2018; 19:51-60. [DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2019.1531708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M. De Boer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Remi A. Nout
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - Carien L. Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
The absolute volume of PET-defined, active bone marrow spared predicts for high grade hematologic toxicity in cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation. Clin Transl Oncol 2017; 20:713-718. [DOI: 10.1007/s12094-017-1771-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 10/13/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Survival outcomes and patterns of failure in women with stage IIIC2 endometrial carcinoma. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2017; 216:192-197. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2017.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 07/31/2017] [Accepted: 08/01/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
9
|
Marnitz S. [Postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer : Rigorous and evidence-based processing of data still required]. Strahlenther Onkol 2016; 192:269-72. [PMID: 27084373 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-016-0954-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Marnitz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Strahlentherapie, CyberKnife Centrum, Medizinische Fakultät der Universität Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, Marth C, Nout R, Querleu D, Mirza MR, Sessa C. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: Diagnosis, Treatment and Follow-up. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016; 26:2-30. [PMID: 26645990 PMCID: PMC4679344 DOI: 10.1097/igc.0000000000000609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 426] [Impact Index Per Article: 53.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically-relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Colombo
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Carien Creutzberg
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Frederic Amant
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Tjalling Bosse
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Antonio González-Martín
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Jonathan Ledermann
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Christian Marth
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Remi Nout
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Denis Querleu
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | - Cristiana Sessa
- *Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy; †Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ‡Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium and Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; §Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ∥Medical Oncology Department, GEICO and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain; ¶Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, United Kingdom; #Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria; **Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands; ††Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France and Gynecology and Obstetrics Department, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; ‡‡Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark; and §§Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Colombo N, Creutzberg C, Amant F, Bosse T, González-Martín A, Ledermann J, Marth C, Nout R, Querleu D, Mirza MR, Sessa C, Altundag O, Amant F, van Leeuwenhoek A, Banerjee S, Bosse T, Casado A, de Agustín L, Cibula D, Colombo N, Creutzberg C, del Campo JM, Emons G, Goffin F, González-Martín A, Greggi S, Haie-Meder C, Katsaros D, Kesic V, Kurzeder C, Lax S, Lécuru F, Ledermann J, Levy T, Lorusso D, Mäenpää J, Marth C, Matias-Guiu X, Morice P, Nijman H, Nout R, Powell M, Querleu D, Mirza M, Reed N, Rodolakis A, Salvesen H, Sehouli J, Sessa C, Taylor A, Westermann A, Zeimet A. ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference on Endometrial Cancer: diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2015; 27:16-41. [PMID: 26634381 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 695] [Impact Index Per Article: 77.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2015] [Accepted: 10/05/2015] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The first joint European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO), European SocieTy for Radiotherapy & Oncology (ESTRO) and European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) consensus conference on endometrial cancer was held on 11-13 December 2014 in Milan, Italy, and comprised a multidisciplinary panel of 40 leading experts in the management of endometrial cancer. Before the conference, the expert panel prepared three clinically relevant questions about endometrial cancer relating to the following four areas: prevention and screening, surgery, adjuvant treatment and advanced and recurrent disease. All relevant scientific literature, as identified by the experts, was reviewed in advance. During the consensus conference, the panel developed recommendations for each specific question and a consensus was reached. Results of this consensus conference, together with a summary of evidence supporting each recommendation, are detailed in this article. All participants have approved this final article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Colombo
- Division of Medical Gynecologic Oncology, European Institute of Oncology and University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - C Creutzberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - F Amant
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium Center for Gynecological Oncology Amsterdam (CGOA), Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam
| | - T Bosse
- Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - A González-Martín
- Department of Medical Oncology, GEICO Cancer Center, Madrid Department of Medical Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Madrid, Spain
| | - J Ledermann
- Department of Oncology and Cancer Trials, UCL Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - C Marth
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Innsbruck Medical University, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - R Nout
- Department of Radiotherapy, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D Querleu
- Department of Surgery, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - M R Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - C Sessa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ospedale San Giovanni, Bellinzona, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
ESMO–ESGO–ESTRO consensus conference on endometrial cancer: Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Radiother Oncol 2015; 117:559-81. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2015.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2015] [Accepted: 11/18/2015] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
13
|
Sabater S, Andres I, Jimenez-Jimenez E, Berenguer R, Sevillano M, Lopez-Honrubia V, Rovirosa A, Sanchez-Prieto R, Arenas M. Rectal contrast increases rectal dose during vaginal cuff brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2015; 15:35-9. [PMID: 26612699 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2015.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2015] [Revised: 10/22/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the impact of rectal dose on rectal contrast use during vaginal cuff brachytherapy (VCB). METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective review of gynecology patients who received some brachytherapy fractions with and without rectal contrast was carried out. Rectal contrast was instilled at the clinician's discretion to increase rectal visibility. Thirty-six pairs of CT scans in preparation for brachytherapy were analyzed. Pairs of CTs were segmented and planned using the same parameters. The rectum was always defined from 1 cm above the cylinder tip up to 1.5 cm below the last activated dwell source position. An individual plan was computed at every VCB fraction. A set of values (Dmax, D(0.1cc), D(1cc), and D(2cc)) derived from dose-volume histograms were extracted and compared according to the rectal status. RESULTS Rectal volume was 26.7% larger in the fractions with rectal contrast. Such an increase in volume represented a significant increase from 7.7% to 10.4% in all parameters analyzed except Dmax dose-volume histogram. CONCLUSIONS Avoiding rectal contrast is a simple way of decreasing the rectal dose parameters of VCB, which would mean a better therapeutic ratio. Results also suggest that action directed at maintaining the rectum empty might have the same effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastia Sabater
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Albacete, Spain.
| | - Ignacio Andres
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Albacete, Spain
| | | | - Roberto Berenguer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Albacete, Spain
| | - Marimar Sevillano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Albacete, Spain
| | - Veronica Lopez-Honrubia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Albacete (CHUA), Albacete, Spain
| | - Angeles Rovirosa
- Gynecological Cancer Unit, Radiation Oncology Department, ICMHO, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ricardo Sanchez-Prieto
- Unidad de Medicina Molecular, Centro Regional de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Albacete, Spain; Unidad asociada de Biomedicina, UCLM-CSIC, Albacete, Spain
| | - Meritxell Arenas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitari Sant Joan, Reus, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Viswanathan AN, Moughan J, Miller BE, Xiao Y, Jhingran A, Portelance L, Bosch WR, Matulonis UA, Horowitz NS, Mannel RS, Souhami L, Erickson BA, Winter KA, Small W, Gaffney DK. NRG Oncology/RTOG 0921: A phase 2 study of postoperative intensity-modulated radiotherapy with concurrent cisplatin and bevacizumab followed by carboplatin and paclitaxel for patients with endometrial cancer. Cancer 2015; 121:2156-63. [PMID: 25847373 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.29337] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2014] [Accepted: 02/04/2015] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The current study was conducted to assess acute and late adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS), pelvic failure, regional failure, distant failure, and disease-free survival in a prospective phase 2 clinical trial of bevacizumab and pelvic intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with chemotherapy in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS Patients underwent a hysterectomy and lymph node removal, and had ≥1 of the following high-risk factors: grade 3 carcinoma with >50% myometrial invasion, grade 2 or 3 disease with any cervical stromal invasion, or known extrauterine extension confined to the pelvis. Treatment included pelvic IMRT and concurrent cisplatin on days 1 and 29 of radiation and bevacizumab (at a dose of 5 mg/kg on days 1, 15, and 29 of radiation) followed by adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel for 4 cycles. The primary endpoint was grade ≥3 AEs occurring within the first 90 days (toxicity was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [version 4.0]). RESULTS A total of 34 patients were accrued from November 2009 through December 2011, 30 of whom were eligible and received study treatment. Seven of 30 patients (23.3%; 1-sided 95% confidence interval, 10.6%-36.0%) developed grade ≥3 treatment-related nonhematologic toxicities within 90 days; an additional 6 patients experienced grade ≥3 toxicities between 90 and 365 days after treatment. The 2-year OS rate was 96.7% and the disease-free survival rate was 79.1%. No patient developed a within-field pelvic failure and no patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage I to IIIA disease developed disease recurrence after a median follow-up of 26 months. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative bevacizumab added to chemotherapy and pelvic IMRT appears to be well tolerated and results in high OS rates at 2 years for patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akila N Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Moughan
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Brigitte E Miller
- Carolinas Healthcare System NorthEast, Levine Cancer Institute, Concord, North Carolina
| | - Ying Xiao
- Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Anuja Jhingran
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | | | | | - Ursula A Matulonis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Neil S Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Robert S Mannel
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | | | | | - Kathryn A Winter
- NRG Oncology Statistics and Data Management Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - David K Gaffney
- University of Utah Health Science Center, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Jouglar E, Barillot I. [Evidence based medicine and high performance irradiation techniques: endometrial cancer]. Cancer Radiother 2014; 18:495-500. [PMID: 25155783 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2014.06.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2014] [Revised: 06/04/2014] [Accepted: 06/13/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Radiation oncology is a field in which many technologic improvements have been made over the past decades. External beam radiotherapy has evolved from treatment fields planned on X-rays to 3-dimensional planning with fusion with MRI's and PET images. Recently, intensity-modulated radiotherapy has been tested for many cancer localizations, and its role in the treatment of gynecologic cancers is still under evaluation. Potential benefits are well known: decrease of treatment toxicity, improvement of efficacy through better dose delivery. But the implementation of this technique requires a careful target and organs at risk delineation. The goal of this review is to evaluate the use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy in endometrial cancers with respect of dosimetric and clinical studies to date. In addition, challenges and perspectives of intensity-modulated radiotherapy integration are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Jouglar
- Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, boulevard Jacques-Monod, 44805 Saint-Herblain cedex, France.
| | - I Barillot
- Centre régional de cancérologie H.S.-Kaplan, CHU de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37000 Tours, France; Université François-Rabelais, 60, rue du Plat-d'Étain, 37000 Tours, France
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Smith GL, Smith BD. Radiation treatment in older patients: a framework for clinical decision making. J Clin Oncol 2014; 32:2669-78. [PMID: 25071132 DOI: 10.1200/jco.2014.55.1168] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In older patients, radiation treatment plays a vital role in curative and palliative cancer therapy. Radiation treatment recommendations should be informed by a comprehensive, personalized risk-benefit assessment that evaluates treatment efficacy and toxicity. We review several clinical factors that distinctly affect efficacy and toxicity of radiation treatment in older patients. First, locoregional tumor behavior may be more indolent in older patients for some disease sites but more aggressive for other sites. Assessment of expected locoregional relapse risk informs the magnitude and timeframe of expected radiation treatment benefits. Second, assessment of the competing cancer versus noncancer mortality and morbidity risks contextualizes cancer treatment priorities holistically within patients' entire spectrum and time course of health needs. Third, assessment of functional reserve helps predict patients' acute treatment tolerance, differentiating those patients who are unlikely to benefit from treatment or who are at high risk for treatment complications. Potential radiation treatment options include immediate curative treatment, delayed curative treatment, and no treatment, with additional consideration given to altered radiation target, dose, or sequencing with chemotherapy and/or surgery. Finally, when cure is not feasible, palliative radiation therapy remains valuable for managing symptoms and achieving meaningful quality-of-life improvements. Our proposed decision-making framework integrates these factors to help radiation oncologists formulate strategic treatment recommendations within a multidisciplinary context. Future research is still needed to identify how advanced technologies can be judiciously applied in curative and palliative settings to enhance risk-benefit profiles of radiation treatment in older patients and more accurately quantify treatment efficacy in this group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- All authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Benjamin D Smith
- All authors: University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Viswanathan AN, Lee LJ, Eswara JR, Horowitz NS, Konstantinopoulos PA, Mirabeau-Beale KL, Rose BS, von Keudell AG, Wo JY. Complications of pelvic radiation in patients treated for gynecologic malignancies. Cancer 2014; 120:3870-83. [DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 101] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2014] [Revised: 04/30/2014] [Accepted: 05/01/2014] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Akila N. Viswanathan
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Larissa J. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Brigham and Women's Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Boston Massachusetts
| | - Jairam R. Eswara
- Division of Urology; Washington University School of Medicine; St. Louis Missouri
| | - Neil S. Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology; Brigham and Women's Hospital; Boston Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Brent S. Rose
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Residency Program; Boston Massachusetts
| | | | - Jennifer Y. Wo
- Department of Radiation Oncology; Massachusetts General Hospital; Boston Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation for the treatment of advanced-stage endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2014; 134:24-8. [PMID: 24823648 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2014.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2014] [Revised: 05/02/2014] [Accepted: 05/05/2014] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ccombination chemotherapy and radiation therapy is used for adjuvant treatment of stage III-IV endometrial cancer. The goal of this study was to review the treatment duration, toxicity, and survival for patients treated with concomitant chemotherapy and radiation. METHODS Women with stage III-IV endometrial cancer treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiation between 2006 and 2013 were included. Toxicities were classified per CTCAE v3.0 and RTOG/EORTC late radiation morbidity scoring. Descriptive statistics were used to quantify treatment and toxicities. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival. RESULTS Fifty-one patients met our inclusion criteria. Median age was 60 (range 33-85). Thirty-six patients (70.6%) had endometrioid histology, 13 patients (25.5%) had serous, clear cell, or mixed histology, and 2 women (3.9%) had carcinosarcoma. Forty-eight patients had stage III disease and three patients were stage IVB. Mean treatment duration was 107 ± 19 days. Forty-two patients received all planned chemotherapy, and 16 patients required a dose reduction. Thirty-four patients (66.7%) experienced grade 3-4 toxicities, the majority of which were hematologic. There were no deaths related to therapy. Eighty-six percent of patients received leukocyte growth factors, and 25% of patients received a blood transfusion. Seven late grade 3-4 complications occurred: four gastrointestinal and two genitourinary, and one patient had ongoing neuropathy. Median progression-free survival was 42.8 months (range 4.4-81.5 months) and median overall survival was 44.9 months (range 5.1-82.6 months). Three-year overall survival was 80%. CONCLUSION Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation is an adequately tolerated treatment modality that allows for shorter treatment duration.
Collapse
|
19
|
Klopp A, Smith BD, Alektiar K, Cabrera A, Damato AL, Erickson B, Fleming G, Gaffney D, Greven K, Lu K, Miller D, Moore D, Petereit D, Schefter T, Small W, Yashar C, Viswanathan AN. The role of postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial cancer: Executive Summary of an American Society for Radiation Oncology evidence-based guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2014; 4:137-144. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Accepted: 01/15/2014] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
|
20
|
Lee LJ, Ratner E, Uduman M, Winter K, Boeke M, Greven KM, King S, Burke TW, Underhill K, Kim H, Boulware RJ, Yu H, Parkash V, Lu L, Gaffney D, Dicker AP, Weidhaas J. The KRAS-variant and miRNA expression in RTOG endometrial cancer clinical trials 9708 and 9905. PLoS One 2014; 9:e94167. [PMID: 24732316 PMCID: PMC3986055 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Accepted: 03/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the association of a functional germline variant in the 3'-UTR of KRAS with endometrial cancer risk, as well as the association of microRNA (miRNA) signatures and the KRAS-variant with clinical characteristics and survival outcomes in two prospective RTOG endometrial cancer trials. METHODS/MATERIALS The association of the KRAS-variant with endometrial cancer risk was evaluated by case-control analysis of 467 women with type 1 or 2 endometrial cancer and 582 age-matched controls. miRNA and DNA were isolated for expression profiling and genotyping from tumor specimens of 46 women with type 1 endometrial cancer enrolled in RTOG trials 9708 and 9905. miRNA expression levels and KRAS-variant genotype were correlated with patient and tumor characteristics, and survival outcomes were evaluated by variant allele type. RESULTS The KRAS-variant was not significantly associated with overall endometrial cancer risk (14% controls and 17% type 1 cancers), although was enriched in type 2 endometrial cancers (24%, p = 0.2). In the combined analysis of RTOG 9708/9905, miRNA expression differed by age, presence of lymphovascular invasion and KRAS-variant status. Overall survival rates at 3 years for patients with the variant and wild-type alleles were 100% and 77% (HR 0.3, p = 0.24), respectively, favoring the variant. CONCLUSIONS The KRAS-variant may be a genetic marker of risk for type 2 endometrial cancers. In addition, tumor miRNA expression appears to be associated with patient age, lymphovascular invasion and the KRAS-variant, supporting the hypothesis that altered tumor biology can be measured by miRNA expression, and that the KRAS-variant likely impacts endometrial tumor biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa J. Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Elena Ratner
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Mohamed Uduman
- Interdepartmental Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Kathryn Winter
- Statistical Center, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG), Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Marta Boeke
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Kathryn M. Greven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States of America
| | - Stephanie King
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Thomas W. Burke
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States of America
| | - Kelly Underhill
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Benefis Sletten Cancer Institute, Great Falls, Montana, United States of America
| | - Harold Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University Karamanos Cancer Center, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Raleigh J. Boulware
- Radiation Oncology, South Carolina Oncology Associates, Columbia, South Carolina, United States of America
| | - Herbert Yu
- Department of Chronic Disease and Epidemiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, Honolulu, Hawaii, United States of America
| | - Vinita Parkash
- Department of Pathology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - Lingeng Lu
- Department of Chronic Disease and Epidemiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
| | - David Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America
| | - Adam P. Dicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | - Joanne Weidhaas
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Milgrom SA, Kollmeier MA, Abu-Rustum NR, Tew WP, Sonoda Y, Barakat RR, Alektiar KM. Postoperative external beam radiation therapy and concurrent cisplatin followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel for stage III (FIGO 2009) endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2013; 130:436-40. [PMID: 23800696 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2013] [Revised: 06/14/2013] [Accepted: 06/17/2013] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The optimal adjuvant therapy in advanced endometrial cancer is controversial. One regimen is concurrent external beam pelvic irradiation (RT) and cisplatin, then carboplatin/paclitaxel. This study reports an institutional experience using this approach in stage III (FIGO 2009) endometrial cancer. METHODS Patients with stage III (FIGO 2009) endometrial cancer who underwent total hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at a single institution from 01/2004 to 12/2009 were identified retrospectively. Those treated with adjuvant RT/cisplatin, followed by carboplatin/paclitaxel comprised the study population. RESULTS Of the 40 eligible patients, 7 (18%) were stage IIIA and 33 (82%) IIIC. Nineteen patients (48%) were ≥ 60 years of age. Twenty-three (58%) had ≥ 50% myometrial invasion, 30 (75%) lymphovascular invasion, 11 (28%) cervical stromal invasion, and 5 (12%) positive peritoneal cytology. Histology was endometrioid in 32 (80%), serous in 6 (15%), and clear cell in 2 (5%). At a median follow-up of 49 months, the 5-year freedom from relapse was 79% and overall survival 85%. The 5-year rate of vaginal recurrence was 3%, non-vaginal pelvic recurrence 3%, para-aortic recurrence 11%, peritoneal recurrence 5%, and other distant recurrence 11%. Thirty-one patients (78%) were able to complete the planned RT/cisplatin and 4 cycles of carboplatin/paclitaxel. Acute grade 3 toxicity occurred in 10 patients (4 neutropenia, 2 anemia, 1 fatigue, 2 diarrhea). No late toxicity was grade ≥ 3. CONCLUSION These favorable outcomes corroborate those of RTOG 9708. Until prospective data that compare adjuvant therapy regimens mature, concurrent chemoradiation should be strongly considered in stage III endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A Milgrom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Monroe AT, Pikaart D, Peddada AV. Clinical outcomes of image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with gold fiducial vaginal cuff markers for high-risk endometrial cancer. Acta Oncol 2013; 52:1010-6. [PMID: 22998475 DOI: 10.3109/0284186x.2012.721932] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To report two year clinical outcomes of image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) to the vaginal cuff and pelvic lymph nodes in a series of high-risk endometrial cancer patients. METHODS Twenty-six consecutive high-risk endometrial cancer patients requiring adjuvant radiation to the vaginal cuff and regional lymph nodes were treated with vaginal cuff fiducial-based IGRT. Seventeen (65%) received sequential chemotherapy, most commonly with a sandwich technique. Brachytherapy followed external radiation in 11 patients to a median dose of 18 Gy in 3 fractions. The median external beam dose delivered was 47.5 Gy in 25 fractions. RESULTS All 656 fractions were successfully imaged and treated. The median overall translational shift required for correction was 9.1 mm (standard deviation, 5.2 mm) relative to clinical set-up with skin tattoos. Shifts of 1 cm, 1.5 cm, and 2 cm or greater were performed in 43%, 14%, and 4% of patients, respectively. Acute grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity occurred in eight patients (30%) and grade 3 toxicity occurred in one. At two years, there have been no local or regional failures and actuarial overall survival is 95%. CONCLUSION Daily image guidance for high-risk endometrial cancer results in a low incidence of acute GI/genitourinary (GU) toxicity with uncompromised tumor control at two years. Vaginal cuff translations can be substantial and may possibly result in underdosing if not properly considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan T Monroe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Penrose Cancer Center, Colorado Springs, CO 80907, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Klopp AH, Moughan J, Portelance L, Miller BE, Salehpour MR, Hildebrandt E, Nuanjing J, D'Souza D, Souhami L, Small W, Gaur R, Jhingran A. Hematologic toxicity in RTOG 0418: a phase 2 study of postoperative IMRT for gynecologic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 86:83-90. [PMID: 23582248 PMCID: PMC4572833 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2012] [Revised: 01/02/2013] [Accepted: 01/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), compared with conventional 4-field treatment, can reduce the volume of bone marrow irradiated. Pelvic bone marrow sparing has produced a clinically significant reduction in hematologic toxicity (HT). This analysis investigated HT in Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0418, a prospective study to test the feasibility of delivering postoperative IMRT for cervical and endometrial cancer in a multiinstitutional setting. METHODS AND MATERIALS Patients in the RTOG 0418 study were treated with postoperative IMRT to 50.4 Gy to the pelvic lymphatics and vagina. Endometrial cancer patients received IMRT alone, whereas patients with cervical cancer received IMRT and weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m(2)). Pelvic bone marrow was defined within the treatment field by using a computed tomography density-based autocontouring algorithm. The volume of bone marrow receiving 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy and the median dose to bone marrow were correlated with HT, graded by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0, criteria. RESULTS Eighty-three patients were eligible for analysis (43 with endometrial cancer and 40 with cervical cancer). Patients with cervical cancer treated with weekly cisplatin and pelvic IMRT had grades 1-5 HT (23%, 33%, 25%, 0%, and 0% of patients, respectively). Among patients with cervical cancer, 83% received 5 or more cycles of cisplatin, and 90% received at least 4 cycles of cisplatin. The median percentage volume of bone marrow receiving 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy in all 83 patients, respectively, was 96%, 84%, 61%, and 37%. Among cervical cancer patients with a V40 >37%, 75% had grade 2 or higher HT compared with 40% of patients with a V40 less than or equal to 37% (P =.025). Cervical cancer patients with a median bone marrow dose of >34.2 Gy also had higher rates of grade ≥ 2 HT than did those with a dose of ≤ 34.2 Gy (74% vs 43%, P=.049). CONCLUSIONS Pelvic IMRT with weekly cisplatin is associated with low rates of HT and high rates of weekly cisplatin use. The volume of bone marrow receiving 40 Gy and the median dose to bone marrow correlated with higher rates of grade ≥ 2 toxicity among patients receiving weekly cisplatin (cervical cancer patients). Evaluation and limitation of the volume of bone marrow treated with pelvic IMRT is warranted in patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ann H Klopp
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Rovirosa A, Valduvieco I, Ascaso C, Herreros A, Bautista C, Romera I, Arenas M, Pahisa J, Biete A. Daily schedule for high-dose-rate brachytherapy in postoperative treatment of endometrial carcinoma. Clin Transl Oncol 2012; 15:111-6. [PMID: 22855177 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-012-0893-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2012] [Accepted: 04/09/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze the results of daily high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) on local control and toxicity in the postoperative treatment of endometrial carcinoma (EC). MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2007 to September 2010, 112 patients were treated with HDRBT after surgery for EC. FIGO staging: 24-IA, 48-IB, 14-II, 12-IIIA, 2-IIIB, 8-IIIC1 and 4-IIIC2. Pathology 99/112 endometrioid and 23/112 other types. Radiotherapy patients were divided into two groups-Group 1 (70/112) consists of external beam irradiation (EBI) plus HDRBT (2 fractions of 5-6 Gy) and Group 2 (42/112) consists of HDRBT alone (4 fractions of 5-6 Gy). Toxicity evaluation RTOG scores for bladder and rectum, and the objective criteria of LENT-SOMA for vagina. Statistics bivariate analysis of Chi-square and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS With a mean follow-up of 29.52 months (range 9.60-53.57) no patient developed vaginal-cuff relapse. In Group 1 early toxicity appeared in 9 % in rectum, 8.5 % in bladder (G1-G2) and 1.4 % in vagina (G1); late toxicity was present in 8.5 % in rectum (all G1-G2 but 1 G3) and in 25 % in vagina (all G1-G2 but one G4). In Group 2, 9.4 % developed G1-G2 bladder and 6.9 % acute vagina (G1-G2) toxicity. Only 2.3 % had a G1 rectal score and 6.9 % had G1-G2 as vaginal scores for late problems. CONCLUSIONS (1) Daily HDRBT using two fractions of 5-6 Gy after EBI and four fractions of 5-6 Gy as exclusive treatment was a safe regime. (2) Group 1 showed a higher incidence of late vaginal toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeles Rovirosa
- Gynecological Cancer Unit, Radiation Oncology Department, ICMHO, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, IDIBAPS, C/Villarroel 170, 08036, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Johnson N, Bryant A, Miles T, Hogberg T, Cornes P. Adjuvant chemotherapy for endometrial cancer after hysterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011; 2011:CD003175. [PMID: 21975736 PMCID: PMC4164379 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003175.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endometrial adenocarcinoma (womb cancer) is a malignant growth of the lining (endometrium) of the womb (uterus). It is distinct from sarcomas (tumours of the uterine muscle). Survival depends the risk of microscopic metastases after surgery. Adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy improves survival from some other adenocarcinomas, and there is evidence that endometrial cancer is sensitive to cytotoxic therapy. This systematic review examines the effect of chemotherapy on survival after hysterectomy for endometrial cancer. OBJECTIVES To assess efficacy of adjuvant (postoperative) chemotherapy for endometrial cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library 2010, Issue 3), MEDLINE and EMBASE up to August 2010, registers of clinical trials, abstracts of scientific meetings, reference lists of included studies and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with any other adjuvant treatment or no other treatment. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used a random-effects meta-analysis to assess hazard ratios (HR) for overall and progression-free survival and risk ratios (RR) to compare death rates and site of initial relapse. MAIN RESULTS Five RCTs compared no additional treatment with additional chemotherapy after hysterectomy and radiotherapy. Four trials compared platinum based combination chemotherapy directly with radiotherapy. Indiscriminate pooling of survival data from 2197 women shows a significant overall survival advantage from adjuvant chemotherapy (RR (95% CI) = 0.88 (0.79 to 0.99)). Sensitivity analysis focused on trials of modern platinum based chemotherapy regimens and found the relative risk of death to be 0.85 ((0.76 to 0.96); number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNT) = 25; absolute risk reduction = 4% (1% to 8%)). The HR for overall survival is 0.74 (0.64 to 0.89), significantly favouring the addition of postoperative platinum based chemotherapy. The HR for progression-free survival is 0.75 (0.64 to 0.89). This means that chemotherapy reduces the risk of being dead at any censorship by a quarter. Chemotherapy reduces the risk of developing the first recurrence outside the pelvis (RR = 0.79 (0.68 to 0.92), 5% absolute risk reduction; NNT = 20). The analysis of pelvic recurrence rates is underpowered but the trend suggests that chemotherapy may be less effective than radiotherapy in a direct comparison (RR = 1.28 (0.97 to 1.68)) but it may have added value when used with radiotherapy (RR = 0.48 (0.20 to 1.18)). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS Postoperative platinum based chemotherapy is associated with a small benefit in progression-free survival and overall survival irrespective of radiotherapy treatment. It reduces the risk of developing a metastasis, could be an alternative to radiotherapy and has added value when used with radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Johnson
- Royal United Hospital NHS TrustGynaecological OncologyCombe ParkBathUKBA1 3NG
| | - Andrew Bryant
- Newcastle UniversityInstitute of Health & SocietyMedical School New BuildRichardson RoadNewcastle upon TyneUKNE2 4AX
| | - Tracie Miles
- Royal United Hospital NHS TrustGynaecological OncologyCombe ParkBathUKBA1 3NG
| | - Thomas Hogberg
- Tumor RegistryDepartment of Cancer EpidemiologyUniversity HospitalLundSweden221 85
| | - Paul Cornes
- University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation TrustBristol Haematology and Oncology CentreHorfield RoadBristolUKBS2 8ED
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Naumann RW. Endometrial Cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2011. [DOI: 10.1002/9781118003435.ch10] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
27
|
Feddock J, Kudrimoti M, Randall M. No cookie-cutter oncology: individualized treatment approaches for women with corpus endometrial cancer. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2010; 10:1087-100. [PMID: 20645698 DOI: 10.1586/era.10.85] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Endometrial adenocarcinoma is the most common gynecologic malignancy and, for the majority of patients who present with stage I (approximately 70%) or stage II ( approximately 10%) disease, 5-year overall survival rates approach 85%. However, the complicated mix of medical comorbidities, the broad spectrum of techniques and treatment modalities and controversial clinical trial outcomes makes treating this heterogeneous group of patients unique and challenging. Similar management controversies exist and, when one factors in histologic variability, no flow-chart treatment algorithm can be easily constructed. This article will discuss data from key clinical trials, consider the role of routine lymphadenectomy as a component of surgical staging, discuss the heterogeneity of stage III patients in both presentation and response to treatment, review options for medically inoperable patients and reflect on current and upcoming protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Feddock
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center and Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Rauh-Hain JA, Del Carmen MG. Treatment for advanced and recurrent endometrial carcinoma: combined modalities. Oncologist 2010; 15:852-61. [PMID: 20660059 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2010-0091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Women with recurrent or advanced endometrial cancer constitute a heterogeneous group of patients. Depending on previous treatment, women with recurrent endometrial cancer may be appropriate candidates for surgery, radiation therapy, hormonal therapy, or chemotherapy. Women with advanced stage disease at presentation may also be appropriate candidates for systemic and local therapies. We review the treatment options available to treat recurrent and locally advanced endometrial cancer. Treatment choice depends largely on the localization of disease, the patient's performance status and previous treatment history, as well the tumor's hormonal receptor status. Radiation therapy is appropriate for isolated vaginal recurrences in patients with no previous history of radiation therapy. Patients with recurrent low-grade tumors overexpressing estrogen and progesterone receptors may be treated with progestin therapy. Systemic therapy is appropriate for patients with disseminate recurrences or advanced stage disease at presentation, or for those with receptor-negative tumors. We review all these different treatment strategies available to patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Vincent Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Yawkey 9 E, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yang R, Xu S, Jiang W, Xie C, Wang J. Integral Dose in Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy and Helical Tomotherapy. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2009; 21:706-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2009.08.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2009] [Revised: 07/16/2009] [Accepted: 08/02/2009] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
30
|
Yang R, Jiang W, Wang J. A Novel Conformal Arc Technique for Postoperative Whole Pelvic Radiotherapy for Endometrial Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2009; 19:1574-9. [DOI: 10.1111/igc.0b013e3181bd35a6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction:Conventional whole pelvic radiotherapy (WPRT) with 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) exposes most of the contents of the true pelvis to the prescribed dose. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) provides more conformal dose distribution and better sparing of critical structures for WPRT. However, IMRT is more complicated in planning and delivery, requiring more expensive equipment and time-consuming quality assurance. We explore and evaluate a novel conformal arc radiotherapeutic technique for postoperative WPRT for endometrial cancer in this study.Methods:This technique involves 2-axis conformal arc therapy (2A-CAT) with 180-degree rotation around 2 isocenters each in 2 separate dose-shaping structures. Dosimetric comparison with 3D-CRT and IMRT for 10 endometrial cancer patients undergoing postoperative WPRT was performed to evaluate this new 2A-CAT technique.Results:The mean conformity indices were 0.83, 0.61, and 0.88 for 2A-CAT, 3D-CRT, and IMRT, respectively. The mean homogeneity indices were 1.15, 1.08, and 1.10. The mean doses to bowel, rectum, bladder, and pelvic bone marrow were, respectively, 1.19, 3.39, 4.65, and 1.64 Gy lower with 2A-CAT than with 3D-CRT (P < 0.05), whereas a little higher than with IMRT. The mean dose to normal tissue was 1.87 Gy higher with 2A-CAT than with IMRT (P = 0.00).Conclusions:In postoperative WPRT for endometrial cancer, 2A-CAT significantly improves the dose conformity and sparing of bowel, rectum, and bladder compared with 3D-CRT. Despite dose uniformity and conformity being still inferior to those of IMRT, its simplicity and extensive availability combined with further improvement warrant it as a potential shortcut alternative to IMRT.
Collapse
|
31
|
Srikantia N, B R, A G R, Kalyan SN. Endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma in a premenopausal woman with multiple organ metastases. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2009; 30:80-3. [PMID: 20596308 PMCID: PMC2885881 DOI: 10.4103/0971-5851.60053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Endometrial adenocarcinoma is the third common malignancy of the female genital tract occurring most often in the postmenopausal age group. High tumor grade, advanced surgical stage, and lymphovascular space invasion are implicated as poor prognostic factors for dissemination of disease. We present an unusual case of endometrial adenocarcinoma in a premenopausal woman with simultaneous metastases in brain, liver, skin and skeletal system, within one month of completion of treatment. The role of adjuvant/concurrent chemotherapy in addition to radiotherapy in high risk cases is discussed along with the review of literature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nirmala Srikantia
- Department of Radiotherapy, M S Ramaiah Medical College and Hospital, MSRIT Post, Bangalore - 560085
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Stage II Adenocarcinoma of the Endometrium: Adjuvant Radiotherapy and Recurrence Patterns. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 71:205-12. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.09.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2007] [Revised: 08/30/2007] [Accepted: 09/07/2007] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
33
|
Lian J, Mackenzie M, Joseph K, Pervez N, Dundas G, Urtasun R, Pearcey R. Assessment of Extended-Field Radiotherapy for Stage IIIC Endometrial Cancer Using Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, and Helical Tomotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2008; 70:935-43. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2007] [Revised: 08/24/2007] [Accepted: 10/02/2007] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
34
|
Fleming GF, Montag AC, Mundt AJ, Yamada S. Uterine Malignancies. Oncology 2007. [DOI: 10.1007/0-387-31056-8_53] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
|
35
|
Acute toxicity of postoperative IMRT and chemotherapy for endometrial cancer. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2007; 25:439-45. [DOI: 10.1007/s11604-007-0163-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2007] [Accepted: 06/13/2007] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
36
|
Affiliation(s)
- Gini F Fleming
- University of Chicago Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Lupe K, Kwon J, D'Souza D, Gawlik C, Stitt L, Whiston F, Nascu P, Wong E, Carey MS. Adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy with involved field radiation in advanced endometrial cancer: A sequential approach. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2007; 67:110-6. [PMID: 17084542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2006] [Revised: 08/10/2006] [Accepted: 08/13/2006] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the feasibility of adjuvant paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy interposed with involved field radiotherapy for women with advanced endometrial cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS This was a prospective cohort study of women with Stage III and IV endometrial cancer. Adjuvant therapy consisted of 4 cycles of paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) and carboplatin (350 mg/m(2)) every 3 weeks, followed sequentially by external beam radiotherapy (RT) to the pelvis (45 Gy), followed by an additional two cycles of chemotherapy. Para-aortic RT and/or HDR vault brachytherapy (BT) were added at the discretion of the treating physician. RESULTS Thirty-three patients (median age, 63 years) received treatment between April 2002 and June 2005. Median follow-up was 21 months. Stage distribution was as follows: IIIA (21%), IIIC (70%), IVB (9%). Combination chemotherapy was successfully administered to 30 patients (91%) and 25 patients (76%), before and after RT respectively. Nine patients (27%) experienced acute Grade 3 or 4 chemotherapy toxicities. All patients completed pelvic RT; 19 (58%) received standard 4-field RT and 14 (42%) received intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Ten (30%) received extended field radiation. Four patients (12%) experienced acute Grade 3 or 4 RT toxicities. Six (18%) patients developed chronic RT toxicity. There were no treatment-related deaths. Two-year disease-free and overall survival rates were both 55%. There was only one pelvic relapse (3%). CONCLUSIONS Adjuvant treatment with combination chemotherapy interposed with involved field radiation in advanced endometrial cancer was well tolerated. This protocol may be suitable for further evaluation in a clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krystine Lupe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Western Ontario and London Health Sciences Centre, London, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
38
|
Greven K, Winter K, Underhill K, Fontenesci J, Cooper J, Burke T. Final analysis of RTOG 9708: Adjuvant postoperative irradiation combined with cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy following surgery for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103:155-9. [PMID: 16545437 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2005] [Revised: 02/03/2006] [Accepted: 02/06/2006] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A phase II study was completed by the RTOG to assess the feasibility, safety, toxicity, and patterns of recurrence and survival when chemotherapy was combined with adjuvant radiation for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pathologic requirements included grade 2 or 3 endometrial adenocarcinoma with either >50% myometrial invasion, cervical stromal invasion, or pelvic-confined extrauterine disease. Radiation included 45 Gy in 25 fractions to the pelvis along with cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) on days 1 and 28. Vaginal brachytherapy was performed after the external beam radiation. Four courses of cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m(2)) were given at 4-week intervals following completion of radiotherapy. RESULTS Forty-six patients were entered between 10/97 and 4/99. Follow-up times range from 6.8 to 72 months with a median of 4.3 years. Maximum late toxicity was grade 1 in 16%, grade 2 in 41%, grade 3 in 16%, and grade 4 in 5%. At 4 years pelvic, regional and distant recurrence rates are 2%, 2%, and 19%, respectively. Overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 4 years are 85% and 81%, respectively. Four-year rates for survival and DFS for Stage III patients are 77% and 72%, respectively. There have been no recurrences for patients with stage IC, IIA, or IIB. CONCLUSION Local-regional control is excellent following combined modality treatment in all patients suggesting additive effects of chemotherapy and radiation. Distant metastases continue to occur in more advanced staged patients. This regimen appears reasonable to be tested for efficacy in randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn Greven
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Maggi R, Lissoni A, Spina F, Melpignano M, Zola P, Favalli G, Colombo A, Fossati R. Adjuvant chemotherapy vs radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial carcinoma: results of a randomised trial. Br J Cancer 2006; 95:266-71. [PMID: 16868539 PMCID: PMC2360651 DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 300] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma (stage IcG3, IIG3 with myometrial invasion >50%, and III) receive adjuvant therapy after surgery but it is not clear whether radiotherapy (RT) or chemotherapy (CT) is better. We randomly assigned 345 patients with high-risk endometrial carcinoma to adjuvant CT (cisplatin (50 mg m−2), doxorubicin (45 mg m−2), cyclophosphamide (600 mg m−2) every 28 days for five cycles, or external RT (45–50 Gy on a 5 days week−1 schedule). The primary end points were overall and progression-free survival. After a median follow-up of 95.5 months women in the CT group as compared with the RT group, had a no significant hazard ratio (HR) for death of 0.95 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.66–1.36; P=0.77) and a nonsignificant HR for event of 0.88 (95% CI, 0.63–1.23; P=0.45). The 3, 5 and 7-year overall survivals were 78, 69 and 62% in the RT group and 76, 66 and 62% in the CT group. The 3, 5 and 7-year progression-free survivals were, respectively, 69, 63 and 56 and 68, 63 and 60%. Radiotherapy delayed local relapses and CT delayed metastases but these trends did not achieve statistical significance. Overall, both treatments were well tolerated. This trial failed to show any improvement in survival of patients treated with CT or the standard adjuvant radiation therapy. Randomised trials of pelvic RT combined with adjuvant cytotoxic therapy compared with RT alone are eagerly awaited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Maggi
- Clinica ‘L. Mangiagalli’, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - A Lissoni
- Ospedale ‘San Gerardo’, Università degli Studi Milano ‘Bicocca’, Monza, Italy
| | - F Spina
- Clinica ‘L. Mangiagalli’, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - M Melpignano
- Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Parma, Università degli Studi di Parma, Italy
| | - P Zola
- Ospedale Mauriziano ‘Umberto I’, Università degli Studi di Torino, Italy
| | - G Favalli
- Ospedali Civili di Brescia, Università degli Studi di Brescia, Italy
| | | | - R Fossati
- Department of Oncology, Istituto ‘Mario Negri’, Via Eritrea 62, 20157 Milano, Italy
- E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Mangili G, De Marzi P, Beatrice S, Rabaiotti E, Viganò R, Frigerio L, Gentile C, Fazio F. Paclitaxel and concomitant radiotherapy in high-risk endometrial cancer patients: preliminary findings. BMC Cancer 2006; 6:198. [PMID: 16869961 PMCID: PMC1559635 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-6-198] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2005] [Accepted: 07/25/2006] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is still much debate about the best adjuvant therapy after surgery for endometrial cancer (EC) and there are no current guidelines. Radiotherapy (RT) alone does not seem to improve overall survival. We investigated whether concomitant Paclitaxel (P) and RT gave better clinical results. Methods Twenty-three patients with high-risk EC (stage IIB, IIIA, IIIC or IC G3 without lymphadenectomy or with aneuploid tumor) underwent primary surgery and were then referred for adjuvant therapy. P was given at a dose of 60 mg/m2 once weekly for five weeks during RT, which consisted of a total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy. Three further weekly cycles of P at a dose of 80 mg/m2 were given at the end of RT. Overall survival and disease-free survival were calculated from the time of surgery. Patterns of failure were recorded by the sites of failure. Results A total of 157 cycles of P were administered both during radiotherapy and consolidation chemotherapy. Relapses occurred in five patients (21.7%). Median time to recurrence was 18.6 months (range 3–28). Survival rate for all the patients was 78.2%. Overall survival for the patients who completed chemo-radiation was of 81%. In this group median time to recurrence was 19.2 months (range 3–28). All recurrences were outside the radiation field. Mortality rate was 14.2%. Conclusion This small series demonstrates pelvic radiotherapy in combination with weakly P followed by three consolidation chemotherapy cycles as an effective combined approach in high risk endometrial carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Cinzia Gentile
- Gynecology Department, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Ferruccio Fazio
- CNR IBSM, University of Milano-Bicocca, Nuclear Medicine Department, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Salama JK, Mundt AJ, Roeske J, Mehta N. Preliminary outcome and toxicity report of extended-field, intensity-modulated radiation therapy for gynecologic malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2006; 65:1170-6. [PMID: 16730136 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.02.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2005] [Revised: 01/24/2006] [Accepted: 02/09/2006] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this article is to report a preliminary analysis of our initial clinical experience with extended-field intensity-modulated radiotherapy for gynecologic malignancies. METHODS AND MATERIALS Between November 2002 and May 2005, 13 women with gynecologic malignancies were treated with extended-field radiation therapy. Of the women, 7 had endometrial cancer, 4 cervical cancer, 1 recurrent endometrial cancer, and 1 suspected cervical cancer. All women underwent computed tomography planning, with the upper vagina, parametria, and uterus (if present) contoured within the CTV. In addition, the clinical target volume contained the pelvic and presacral lymph nodes as well as the para-aortic lymph nodes. All acute toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v 3.0). All late toxicity was scored using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group late toxicity score. RESULTS The median follow-up was 11 months. Extended-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for gynecologic malignancies was well tolerated. Two patients experienced Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Both patients were treated with concurrent cisplatin based chemotherapy. Neither patient was planned with bone marrow sparing. Eleven patients had no evidence of late toxicity. One patient with multiple previous surgeries experienced a bowel obstruction. One patient with bilateral grossly involved and unresectable common iliac nodes experienced bilateral lymphedema. Extended-field-IMRT achieved good local control with only 1 patient, who was metastatic at presentation, and 1 patient not able to complete treatment, experiencing in-field failure. CONCLUSIONS Extended-field IMRT is safe and effective with a low incidence of acute toxicity. Longer follow-up is needed to assess chronic toxicity, although early results are promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph K Salama
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637-1407, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Kim S, Wu HG, Lee HP, Kang SB, Song YS, Park NH, Ha SW. Patterns of failure after postoperative radiation therapy for endometrial carcinoma. Cancer Res Treat 2006; 38:133-8. [PMID: 19771273 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2006.38.3.133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2005] [Accepted: 03/20/2006] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We tried to investigate the outcome and patterns of failure of endometrial cancer patients who were treated with surgery and postoperative radiation therapy (RT). MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-three patients with endometrial cancer who received postoperative RT between May 1979 and August 2000 were included in this retrospective study. Forty-one patients received total abdominal hysterectomy, 41 patients received Wertheim's operation and 1 underwent vaginal hysterectomy. Pelvic lymph node dissection or pelvic lymph node sampling was done in 56 patients and peritoneal cytology was done in 35. All the patients were staged according to 1988 FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) staging system; 2 were stage IA, 23 were stage IB, 20 were stage IC, 4 were stage IIA, 5 were stage IIB, 9 were stage IIIA, 2 were stage IIIB and 18 were stage IIIC. The histologic diagnoses were adenocarcinoma in seventy-four patients (89%). The histologic grades were Grade 1, 2 and 3 in 21 (25%), 43 (52%) and 10 (12%) patients, respectively. All the patients received external beam RT (EBRT) with a median dose of 5,040 cGy (range: 4,500 approximately 5,075 cGy) to the whole pelvis. Five patients with pathologically confirmed paraaortic lymph node metastasis received 4500 cGy to the paraaortic lymph nodes. Fifteen patients received low-dose intracavitary brachytherapy after their EBRT. A total dose of 7,500 approximately 9,540 cGy (median dose: 8511) was prescribed to the vaginal surface. RESULTS Overall, 11 patients (13%) experienced disease relapse: 4 with initial stage I or II disease and 7 with initial stage III disease. Among the 54 stage I or II patients, 1 (2%) relapsed in the pelvis only, 2 (4%) relapsed in the vagina and distant organs, and 1 (2%) relapsed in the paraaortic lymph nodes (PANs). Among the 29 stage III patients, 1 (3%) relapsed in the vagina. The most common sites of failure for the stage III patients were the peritoneum (3 patients, 10%), PANs (2 patients, 7%), and lung (2 patients, 7%). With a median follow-up period of 86 months, the overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates at 5 years were 87% for both. The five-year DFS rate was 93%, 100% and 74% for the stage I, II and III patients, respectively. Three patients experienced severe radiation-related late complications: RTOG (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group) grade 3 radiation cystitis was seen in one patient, and grade 3 bowel obstruction was seen in two patients. CONCLUSIONS Postoperative RT was useful for controlling pelvic disease. The major patterns of failure for stage III patients were peritoneal seeding and distant metastasis. Selective use of whole abdominal radiotherapy or adjuvant chemotherapy may improve the therapeutic outcome of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzy Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstracts from the Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium XXIV: Innovative Cancer Therapy for Tomorrow, November 8-11, 2006, New York, New York, USA. Cancer Invest 2006; 24 Suppl 1:1-59. [PMID: 16546846 DOI: 10.1080/07357900600560838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
44
|
Jolly S, Vargas CE, Kumar T, Weiner SA, Brabbins DS, Chen PY, Floyd W, Martinez AA. The impact of age on long-term outcome in patients with endometrial cancer treated with postoperative radiation. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 103:87-93. [PMID: 16545441 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2005] [Revised: 01/17/2006] [Accepted: 01/20/2006] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Endometrial cancer is the most commonly diagnosed gynecologic malignancy in the United States. Age has been associated with worse outcome in univariate analysis. However, the patterns of failure and associated risk factors in older patients remain unclear. We reviewed our institution's experience to assess the effect of age in a population of endometrial cancer patients treated with surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. METHODS From 1992-2002, 243 endometrial cancer patients underwent a total abdominal hysterectomy and adjuvant radiation. Forty-nine patients with stage I-II (occult) endometrial adenocarcinoma (no clear cell or serous papillary) were treated postoperatively with vaginal intracavitary high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy alone using Iridium-192 (median dose 30 Gy) to a median length of 4 cm. Forty-eight patients with stage I-III endometrial adenocarcinoma (no clear cell or papillary serous) were treated with postoperative pelvic RT (median dose 45 Gy) and intracavitary HDR brachytherapy (median dose 20 Gy). One hundred forty-six patients underwent postoperative whole abdomino-pelvic irradiation (WAPI) secondary to unfavorable histology (clear cell or serous papillary) or two of the following: deep myometrial invasion, grade 3, or FIGO stage III. Age was analyzed as a continuous and a categorical variable. The age of 63 year split the age group using various statistical analyses. RESULTS Median follow-up of all patients was 4.2 years. Patients grouped by age of < or =63 years or older had similar FIGO stage (P = 0.5), grade (P = 0.09), treatment modality (P = 0.7), and lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (P = 0.6). Twenty-five percent (60/243) of patients developed recurrence. Of these failures, 15% (15/102) were age < or =63 years and 32% (45/141) were age >63 years at diagnosis (P = 0.02). For all patients, the 5-year event-free survival (EFS), cause specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) were 64%, 82%, and 72%, respectively. Five-year EFS for patients age < or =63 years and >63 years was 76% vs. 55% (P < 0.001). Five-year OS for age < or =63 years and >63 years was 85% vs. 63% (P < 0.001). Five-year CSS for age < or =63 years and >63 years was 91% vs. 75% (P = 0.003). Various factors were analyzed to determine an association with age. Older patients with stage III-IVA had significantly more failures than patients less than age 63 (P = 0.002). Older patients (>63 years) were found to have serous papillary histology (28%) more often than younger patients (15%) (P = 0.02). Greater depth of invasion was associated with older age (P = 0.01). On univariate analysis, older age (P = 0.003), LVSI (P = 0.002), FIGO stage (P < 0.001), grade (P < 0.001), and depth of invasion (P = 0.03) predicted for failure. On Cox multivariate analysis, older age (P = 0.006, HR 2.83), higher FIGO stage (P = 0.001, HR 1.96), and higher grade (P = 0.002, HR 2.66) were significant prognostic factors for recurrence. No difference was seen between the two age groups from date of surgery and start of radiation. The duration of therapy was not different between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Older endometrial cancer (age >63 years) patients have a significantly decreased overall survival, cause-specific survival, and greater risk of recurrence following postoperative RT independent of other prognostic factors and/or treatment technique. The impact of treatment-related variables did not alter the age-related outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shruti Jolly
- Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 West Thirteen Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
45
|
Mariani A, Dowdy SC, Cliby WA, Haddock MG, Keeney GL, Lesnick TG, Podratz KC. Efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in node-positive endometrial cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 101:200-8. [PMID: 16510174 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2006.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2005] [Revised: 01/05/2006] [Accepted: 01/16/2006] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the efficacy of systematic lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy in minimizing pelvic sidewall and para-aortic failures. METHODS Between January 1984 and December 2001, a total of 146 patients with stage III and IV endometrial cancer and lymph node metastases were treated at our institution. Adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy was defined as the removal of more than 10 pelvic lymph nodes, and adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy was defined as removal of 5 or more para-aortic lymph nodes. The 24 patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We assessed the ability of adequate pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, together with radiotherapy, to prevent pelvic and para-aortic recurrences. RESULTS Of the 122 patients studied, 94 (77%) had adequate pelvic lymphadenectomy and 47 (39%) had adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Pelvic radiotherapy was administered to 78% and para-aortic radiotherapy to 29% of patients. Median follow-up of censored patients was 56 months. Twenty-five percent of patients had pelvic sidewall failure at 5 years. Pelvic sidewall failures at 5 years occurred in 57% of patients who had inadequate node dissection and/or no radiotherapy, compared with 10% for those having both adequate lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy (P < 0.001). After risk factor assessment in a regression model, only treatment with adequate lymphadenectomy and radiotherapy was a significant independent predictor of pelvic control (P = 0.03). The performance of definitive pelvic lymphadenectomy may have increased treatment-related morbidity in the subgroup of patients who had postoperative radiotherapy. For the 41 patients with positive para-aortic lymph nodes, the 5-year para-aortic failure rate was 34% after adequate lymphadenectomy but without adjuvant para-aortic radiotherapy. Likewise, 69% failed in the para-aortic area when adjuvant para-aortic radiotherapy was administered to patients not having adequate para-aortic lymphadenectomy; however, none of the 11 patients failed in the para-aortic area after adequate lymphadenectomy and para-aortic radiotherapy (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS Adequate (pelvic and para-aortic) lymphadenectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy appear complementary in reducing failures in both the pelvis and para-aortic areas in patients with node-positive endometrial cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Mariani
- Division of Gynecologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
Takeshima N, Umayahara K, Fujiwara K, Hirai Y, Takizawa K, Hasumi K. Effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy for para-aortic lymph node metastasis of endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2006; 102:214-7. [PMID: 16457876 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.12.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2005] [Revised: 11/15/2005] [Accepted: 12/01/2005] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the effectiveness of postoperative chemotherapy for para-aortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis in patients with endometrial cancer. METHODS Among 350 clinical stage I-II endometrial cancer patients who underwent systemic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy during the period 1995 through 2002, 26 patients were identified with PAN metastasis. Of these patients, nine had only one positive PAN and 17 had two or more positive PANs (mean 4.9, range 1-22). All patients were treated postoperatively with a single chemotherapy regimen consisting of ifosfamide, epiadriamycin, and cisplatin scheduled for 5 cycles. Median (range) follow-up for surviving patients was 85 (38-119) months. Treatment outcome, including disease-free survival relative to the number of positive PANs, was investigated. RESULTS Among the 26 patients with PAN involvement, four developed recurrence. Three of the four patients had 10 or more positive PANs. Estimated 5-year disease-free survival rates were 89% for patients with one positive PAN, 82% for those with two or more positive PANs, and 85% for all patients. No significant difference was identified between the first two groups (P = 0.6543). CONCLUSIONS Postoperative chemotherapy can yield a favorable outcome in endometrial cancer patients with PAN metastasis, even those with multiple positive nodes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhiro Takeshima
- Department of Gynecology, Cancer Institute Hospital, 3-10-6 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo 135-8550, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Endometrial cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers. Most women present with early disease that is curable. In women with poor prognostic factors or advanced disease, survival is greatly diminished. Recently there have been several trials of adjuvant treatment and treatment for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer. These trials of systemic therapy will be reviewed. RECENT FINDINGS Several areas have been the focus of recent literature on systemic therapy for endometrial cancer. These include large phase III trials of multi-agent chemotherapy regimens for advanced and recurrent endometrial cancer, combined chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatments, and novel targeted agents. SUMMARY New approaches to combining the traditional adjuvant modalities for high-risk endometrial cancer as well as combining new novel agents with traditional chemotherapeutics will improve patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Kieser
- Department of Gynaecologic Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Wong E, D'Souza DP, Chen JZ, Lock M, Rodrigues G, Coad T, Trenka K, Mulligan M, Bauman GS. Intensity-modulated arc therapy for treatment of high-risk endometrial malignancies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2005; 61:830-41. [PMID: 15708263 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.06.253] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2004] [Revised: 06/14/2004] [Accepted: 06/30/2004] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE We developed an intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT) technique for the treatment of women with high-risk endometrial malignancies. In the context of multimodality therapy, nodal and tumor bed irradiation was delivered while respecting tolerance doses for critical structures. METHODS AND MATERIALS Five patients were planned and treated with the IMAT technique after hysterectomy. Computed tomographic (CT) scans for treatment planning were acquired with the tumor bed contoured as the clinical target volume (CTV(tumor_bed)) and the iliac and presacral vessels contoured as the gross tumor volume (GTV). In 2 patients the lower para-aortic nodes were included into the GTV. The small bowel, iliac crests, femoral heads, bladder, and rectum were contoured as critical organs. For the nodes, a CTV(nodes) was generated with a 7-10-mm margin around the vessels, and the planning target volume (PTV(nodes)) was generated by a further 5-mm expansion. For the tumor bed, the PTV(tumor_bed) was generated with a margin of 7-10 mm around CTV(tumor_bed). Planning constraints included adequate coverage of the tumor bed (>95% receiving > or =45 Gy) and nodes (> or =95% receiving > or =40 Gy). Arc combinations with different extents were tested, and the final plan was generated based on the balance between complexity (number of arcs), PTV coverage, and critical structure sparing. Conventional and 8-field intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans were generated for each patient for comparison purposes. All patients were treated with IMAT. RESULTS We found that two anterior intensity-modulated arcs (300 degrees to 30 degrees and 330 degrees to 60 degrees ) adequately treated the PTVs. Furthermore, this IMAT technique allowed sparing of small bowel and the iliac crests (marrow space) to a similar degree as the 8-field IMRT. The 8-field IMRT yielded better dose uniformity than IMAT in the target volumes; however, neither technique was as uniform as the conventional plan. In the 5 patients, IMAT treatment was well tolerated and completed as planned. CONCLUSIONS We successfully piloted an optimized intensity-modulated arc technique to treat 5 high-risk endometrial cancer patients undergoing multimodality treatment. This allowed a significant reduction in dose to bone marrow and small bowel compared with conventional techniques and was simpler to deliver than multifield IMRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene Wong
- Department of Oncology, University of Western Ontario, and London Regional Cancer Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 4L6, Canada.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|