1
|
Amraee A, Mokhayeri Y, Gholami M, Resane S, Evazi MR, Abbasi M, Sadr M, Shamsi S, Tayebzadeh P, Jahani A, Darvish L. Evaluation of normal tissue complications in breast cancer re-irradiation: a meta-analysis study. Clin Transl Oncol 2024:10.1007/s12094-024-03632-z. [PMID: 39103729 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03632-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 07/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, evidence has accumulated that a second method of conserving the breast from cancer with re-irradiation as part of treatment may be feasible and safe. Many oncologists are skeptical of breast re-irradiation due to concerns about late complications, so access to quantitative data on the prevalence of breast re-irradiation complications is very important. In this meta-analysis, we determine the prevalence of complications in normal tissue after breast re-irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS A search was done to recognize qualified studies using EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Collaboration Library electronic databases from 2000 to 2023. In total, ten primary studies were applied in this meta-analysis to estimate the prevalence of complications of disorders, skin fibrosis, and chest pain. Heterogeneity was investigated using the I2 index and the meta-regression to evaluate variables suspected of causing heterogeneity. Statistical analysis and synthesis were performed using Stata 17. RESULTS The average dose received by patients who underwent radiation therapy in two stages was 100.32 Gy, and in these patients, the prevalence of skin fibrosis and disorders was 47% (95% CI 71-22%; I2 = 96.76%, P < 0.001) and the prevalence of chest pain was 35% (95% CI 68-8%; I2 = 98.13%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS There is little clinical information about the incidence of complications in breast re-irradiation therapy. This meta-analysis presents the prevalence of complications after breast re-irradiation to help radiation oncologists and physicists make better decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Amraee
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran.
| | - Y Mokhayeri
- Cardiovascular Research Center, Shahid Rahimi Hospital, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - M Gholami
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - S Resane
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - M R Evazi
- Hematologist and Medical Oncologist, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran
| | - M Abbasi
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - M Sadr
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - Sh Shamsi
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - P Tayebzadeh
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - A Jahani
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine, Lorestan University of Medical Sciences, Khorramabad, Iran
| | - L Darvish
- Mother and Child Welfare Research Center, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Paramedicine, Hormozgan University of Medical Sciences, Bandar Abbas, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang X, Allen C. Synergistic effects of thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin, mild hyperthermia, and radiotherapy in breast cancer management: an orthotopic mouse model study. Drug Deliv Transl Res 2024:10.1007/s13346-024-01654-2. [PMID: 38977541 DOI: 10.1007/s13346-024-01654-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/10/2024]
Abstract
Liposome formulations of the cancer drug doxorubicin have been developed to address the severe side effects that result from administration of this drug in a conventional formulation. Among them, thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin presents enhanced tumor targeting and efficient drug release when combined with mild hyperthermia localized to the tumor site. Exploiting the radiosensitizing benefits of localized thermal therapy, the integration of radiation therapy with the thermally activated liposomal system is posited to amplify the anti-tumor efficacy. This study explored a synergistic therapeutic strategy that combines thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin, mild hyperthermia, and radiotherapy, using an orthotopic murine model of breast cancer. The protocol of sequential multi-modal treatment, incorporating low-dose chemotherapy and radiotherapy, substantially postponed the progression of primary tumor growth in comparison to the application of monotherapy at elevated dosages. Improvements in unheated distant lesions were also observed. Furthermore, the toxicity associated with the combination treatment was comparable to that of either thermosensitive liposome treatment or radiation alone at low doses. These outcomes underscore the potential of multi-modal therapeutic strategies to refine treatment efficacy while concurrently diminishing adverse effects in the management of breast cancer, providing valuable insight for the future refinement of thermosensitive liposomal doxorubicin applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuehan Wang
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3M2, Canada
| | - Christine Allen
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, 144 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5S 3M2, Canada.
- Department of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Afzal RJ, Basree MM, Howard SP, Xu J, Wilke LG, Anderson BM. Mammary Paget's Disease as a Sign of Local Recurrence Two Decades Following Breast Conservation and Adjuvant Therapy for Early Stage Breast Cancer. Cureus 2024; 16:e61521. [PMID: 38957233 PMCID: PMC11218596 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.61521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Reports of mammary Paget's disease (MPD) as a manifestation of breast cancer recurrence are rare. MPD presents a particular challenge when emerging more than two decades after a breast cancer treated with evidence-based therapy. There is a broad spectrum of non-malignant causes for dermatitis of the nipple during the initial presentation that may delay cancer work-up. This case highlights the MPD work-up and management in the context of a personal history of breast cancer. This unique clinical presentation emphasizes the importance of vigilant cancer surveillance for timely intervention, especially for a presumed cured cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rimsha J Afzal
- Medical Education, University of Pikeville - Kentucky College of Osteopathic Medicine, Pikeville, USA
| | - Mustafa M Basree
- Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Steven P Howard
- Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Jin Xu
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Lee G Wilke
- Breast Surgery, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| | - Bethany M Anderson
- Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chakraborty MA, Khan AJ, Cahlon O, Xu AJ, Braunstein LZ, Powell SN, Choi JI. Proton Reirradiation for High-Risk Recurrent or New Primary Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:5722. [PMID: 38136268 PMCID: PMC10742022 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15245722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 12/01/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy is an integral component of multidisciplinary breast cancer care. Given how commonly radiotherapy is used in the treatment of breast cancer, many patients with recurrences have received previous radiotherapy. Patients with new primary breast cancer may also have received previous radiotherapy to the thoracic region. Curative doses and comprehensive field photon reirradiation (reRT) have often been avoided in these patients due to concerns for severe toxicities to organs-at-risk (OARs), such as the heart, lungs, brachial plexus, and soft tissue. However, many patients may benefit from definitive-intent reRT, such as patients with high-risk disease features such as lymph node involvement and dermal/epidermal invasion. Proton therapy is a potentially advantageous treatment option for delivery of reRT due to its lack of exit dose and greater conformality that allow for enhanced non-target tissue sparing of previously irradiated tissues. In this review, we discuss the clinical applications of proton therapy for patients with breast cancer requiring reRT, the currently available literature and how it compares to historical photon reRT outcomes, treatment planning considerations, and questions in this area warranting further study. Given the dosimetric advantages of protons and the data reported to date, proton therapy is a promising option for patients who would benefit from the added locoregional disease control provided by reRT for recurrent or new primary breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Molly A. Chakraborty
- Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ 07103, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Atif J. Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Amy J. Xu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Lior Z. Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Simon N. Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - J. Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kim N, Kim H, Hwang JH, Lee JE, Park W, Cho WK, Nam SJ, Kim SW, Yu J, Chae BJ, Lee SK, Ryu JM, Im YH, Ahn JS, Park YH, Kim JY, Kim TG. Incidence of and Influencing Factors for Arm Lymphedema After Salvage Treatment for an Isolated Locoregional Recurrence of Breast Cancer. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:544-557. [PMID: 37985381 PMCID: PMC10761755 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e43] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Data on subsequent arm lymphedema (SAL) after salvage treatment for locoregional recurrence (LRR) of breast cancer are limited. We conducted a study to evaluate the risk of SAL in patients with LRR. METHODS We reviewed the data of patients with breast cancer who had LRR and were initially diagnosed between January 2003 and December 2017. Among the 214 patients who received curative salvage treatment, most had local (n = 125, 57.9%), followed by regional (n = 73, 34.1%), and locoregional (n = 16, 7.9%) recurrences. A competing risk analysis considering the factors of death and a second LRR were performed to exclude potential malignant lymphedema. We used the Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards model to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) for comparing the risk of SAL. RESULTS With a median follow-up duration of 41.4 months (interquartile range, 25.6-65.1), 51 patients (23.8%) experienced SAL with a median interval of 9.9 months after treatment. The two-year cumulative incidence of SAL was 12.7%. Among the 18 patients with initial lymphedema, nine (50.0%) developed SAL. Multivariate analysis revealed that a history of lymphedema (HR, 4.61; p < 0.001) and taxane-based salvage chemotherapy (HR, 2.38; p = 0.009) were significantly associated with SAL development. CONCLUSION Salvage treatment for LRR-induced SAL was performed in 24% of the patients. A history of initial lymphedema and salvage taxane-based chemotherapy increases the risk of developing SAL. Therefore, close surveillance for the incidence of SAL is required in patients opting for salvage treatment for LRR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nalee Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haeyoung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Ji Hye Hwang
- Department of Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jeong Eon Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Kyung Cho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok Jin Nam
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seok Won Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jonghan Yu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Joo Chae
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Se Kyung Lee
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jai Min Ryu
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Hyuck Im
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Seok Ahn
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeon Hee Park
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji-Yeon Kim
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Tae-Gyu Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Salvage Perioperative Interstitial High-Dose-Rate Interventional Radiotherapy (Brachytherapy) for Local Recurrences of the Chest Wall Following Mastectomy and Previous External Irradiation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030614. [PMID: 36765571 PMCID: PMC9913130 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: To investigate the technical feasibility, safety, and efficacy of interstitial perioperative high-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (HDR-IRT, brachytherapy) as a local salvage treatment combined with surgery for local chest wall recurrences following mastectomy and subsequent external beam radiation treatment (EBRT). (2) Methods: A retrospective analysis of 56 patients treated with interstitial HDR-IRT in combination with local surgery of a chest wall recurrence of breast cancer after previous treatment with mastectomy and EBRT from 2008 to 2020. (3) Results: Local recurrence following HDR-IRT was encountered in seven (12.5%) patients. The 1-year local recurrence-free survival (RFS), 3-year RFS, and 5-year RFS were 91%, 82%, and 82%, respectively. The 1-year overall survival (OS), 3-year OS, and 5-year OS was 85.5%, 58%, and 30%, respectively. Acute grade 1-2 radiation dermatitis was observed in 22 (39.3%) patients. Late ≥grade 3 toxicities were encountered in five (8.9%) patients. (4) Conclusions: Salvage perioperative interstitial high-dose-rate interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) combined with surgery seems to be an effective interdisciplinary management with acceptable treatment-related toxicity for local recurrences of the chest wall following mastectomy and previous external irradiation.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chicheł A, Burchardt W, Chyrek AJ, Bielęda G. Thermal Boost Combined with Interstitial Brachytherapy in Early Breast Cancer Conserving Therapy—Initial Group Long-Term Clinical Results and Late Toxicity. J Pers Med 2022; 12:jpm12091382. [PMID: 36143167 PMCID: PMC9504368 DOI: 10.3390/jpm12091382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) In breast-conserving therapy (BCT), adjuvant radiation, including tumor bed boost, is mandatory. Safely delivered thermal boost (TB) based on radio-sensitizing interstitial microwave hyperthermia (MWHT) preceding standard high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) boost has the potential for local control (LC) improvement. The study is to report the long-term results regarding LC, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, and cosmetic outcome (CO) of HDR-BT boost ± MWHT for early breast cancer (BC) patients treated with BCT. (2) In the years 2006 and 2007, 57 diverse stages and risk (IA-IIIA) BC patients were treated with BCT ± adjuvant chemotherapy followed by 42.5–50.0 Gy whole breast irradiation (WBI) and 10 Gy HDR-BT boost. Overall, 25 patients (group A; 43.9%) had a BT boost, and 32 (group B; 56.1%) had an additional pre-BT single session of interstitial MWHT on a tumor bed. Long-term LC, DFS, OS, CO, and late toxicity were evaluated. (3) Median follow-up was 94.8 months (range 1.1–185.5). LC was 55/57, or 96.5% (1 LR in each group). DFS was 48/57, or 84.2% (4 failures in group A, 5 in B). OS was 46/57, or 80.7% (6 deaths in group A, 5 in B). CO was excellent in 60%, good in 36%, and satisfactory in 4% (A), and in 53.1%, 34.4%, and 9.4% (B), respectively. One poor outcome was noted (B). Late toxicity as tumor bed hardening occurred in 19/57, or 33.3% of patients (9 in A, 10 in B). In one patient, grade 2 telangiectasia occurred (group A). All differences were statistically insignificant. (4) HDR-BT boost ± TB was feasible, well-tolerated, and highly locally effective. LC, DFS, and OS were equally distributed between the groups. Pre-BT MWHT did not increase rare late toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Chicheł
- Department of Brachytherapy, Greater Poland Cancer Center, 61-866 Poznan, Poland
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +48-618-850-818 or +48-600-687-369
| | - Wojciech Burchardt
- Department of Brachytherapy, Greater Poland Cancer Center, 61-866 Poznan, Poland
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznan, Poland
| | - Artur J. Chyrek
- Department of Brachytherapy, Greater Poland Cancer Center, 61-866 Poznan, Poland
| | - Grzegorz Bielęda
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 61-866 Poznan, Poland
- Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Center, 61-866 Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
De-Colle C, Beller A, Gani C, Weidner N, Heinrich V, Lamprecht U, Gaupp S, Voigt O, Dohm O, Zips D, Müller AC. Radiotherapy and hyperthermia for breast cancer patients at high risk of recurrence. Int J Hyperthermia 2022; 39:1010-1016. [PMID: 35902116 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2022.2103593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/16/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the long-term efficacy of combined radiotherapy (RT) and hyperthermia (HT) in a large mono-institutional cohort of breast cancer (BC) patients affected by recurrent, newly diagnosed non-resectable or high risk resected tumor. MATERIALS AND METHODS Records of BC patients treated with RT + HT between 1995 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. RT doses of 50-70 Gy concurrent to a twice per week superficial HT were applied. For HT, a temperature between 41 and 42 °C was applied for approximately 1 h. Primary endpoint was local control (LC), secondary endpoints comprised toxicity, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS). RESULTS A total of 191 patients and 196 RT + HT treatments were analyzed. In 154 cases (78.6%) RT + HT was performed for patients with recurrent BC. Among these, 93 (47.4% of the entire cohort) had received RT prior to RT + HT. Median follow up was 12.7 years. LC at 2, 5, and 10 years was 76.4, 72.8, and 69.5%, respectively. OS at 2, 5, and 10 years was 73.5, 52.3, and 35.5%, respectively. PFS at 2, 5, and 10 years was 55.6, 41, and 33.6%, respectively. Predictive factors for LC were tumor stage, distant metastases, estrogen/progesterone receptor expression, resection status and number of HT fractions. At multivariate analysis tumor stage and receptor expression were significant. No acute or late toxicities higher than grade 3 were observed. CONCLUSION Combined RT + HT offers long-term high LC rates with acceptable toxicity for patients with recurrent, newly diagnosed non-resectable or resected BC at high risk of relapse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara De-Colle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Anna Beller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nicola Weidner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Vanessa Heinrich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ulf Lamprecht
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Gaupp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Otilia Voigt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Oliver Dohm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) Partner Site Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Arndt-Christian Müller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Clinic of Radiation Oncology, Ludwisburg Hospital, Ludwisburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Modern Management of Chest Wall Recurrences after Mastectomy. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00454-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
|
10
|
Schouten D, van Os R, Westermann AM, Crezee H, van Tienhoven G, Kolff MW, Bins AD. A randomized phase-II study of reirradiation and hyperthermia versus reirradiation and hyperthermia plus chemotherapy for locally recurrent breast cancer in previously irradiated area. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:441-448. [PMID: 35139725 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2033315] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In patients with inoperable local regional recurrences of breast cancer in previously irradiated areas, local control is difficult to maintain and treatment options are limited. The Dutch standard treatment for such recurrences is reirradiation combined with hyperthermia. Apart from enhancing the effect of reirradiation, hyperthermia is also known to improve local effects of chemotherapy like cisplatin. This randomized phase-II trial compares reirradiation and hyperthermia versus the same treatment combined with cisplatin. PATIENTS AND METHODS From December 2010 up to January 2019, 49 patients were randomized, 27 in the standard arm and 22 in the combined arm. A total of 32 Gy was given in eight fractions of 4 Gy in 4 weeks, at two fractions per week. After January 2015, the radiation schedule was changed to 46 Gy in 23 fractions of 2 Gy, at five fractions per week. Hyperthermia was added once a week after radiotherapy. The combined arm was treated with four cycles of weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m2. RESULTS Complete response rate was 60.9% in the standard arm and 61.1% in the combined arm (p = 0.87). Partial response rate was 30.4% in the standard arm and 33.3% in the combined arm (p = 0.79). One-year overall survival was 63.4% in the standard arm and 57.4% in the combined arm. One-year local progression-free interval was 81.5% in the standard arm and 88.1% in the combined arm (p = 0.95). Twenty-five percentage of patients in the standard arm experienced grade 3 or 4 acute toxicity and 29% of patients in the combined arm (p = 0.79). CONCLUSION No potential benefit could be detected of adding cisplatin to reirradiation and hyperthermia in patients with recurrent breast cancer in a previously irradiated area. With or without cisplatin, most patients had subsequent local control until last follow-up or death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Schouten
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rob van Os
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneke M. Westermann
- Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Crezee
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geertjan van Tienhoven
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M. Willemijn Kolff
- Department of Radiotherapy, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan D. Bins
- Medical Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Russano F, Del Fiore P, Di Prata C, Pasqual A, Marconato R, Campana LG, Spina R, Gianesini CM, Collodetto A, Tropea S, Dall’Olmo L, Carraro S, Parisi A, Galuppo S, Scarzello G, De Terlizzi F, Rastrelli M, Mocellin S. The Role of Electrochemotherapy in the Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Metastases From Breast Cancer: Analysis of Predictive Factors to Treatment From an Italian Cohort of Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:772144. [PMID: 34993137 PMCID: PMC8724516 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.772144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous localizations from breast cancer (BC) is still a therapeutic challenge. Electrochemotherapy (ECT) is one of the available options, and it is characterized by the association between the administration of a chemotherapic agent (Bleomycin) with the temporary raise of permeability of the cellular membrane induced by the local administration of electrical impulses (electroporation). ECT represents an effective therapy for loco-regional control of this disease. This study aimed to investigate the predictive factors of response in cutaneous and subcutaneous localizations from breast cancer treated with ECT. We decided to evaluate the response to this treatment in 55 patients who underwent ECT between January 2013 and March 2020 at our Institute. We performed a monocentric retrospective cohort study. ECT was administered following the ESOPE (European Standard Operative Procedure of Electrochemotherapy) guidelines, a set of criteria updated in 2018 by a panel of European experts on ECT who defined the indications for selecting the patients who can benefit from the ECT treatment and the ones for technically performing the procedure. The responses were evaluated with the RECIST criteria (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor). We found after 12 weeks of treatment a complete response (CR) in 64% of our patients. From the analysis divided for subgroups of covariates is emerged that lower BMI, reduced body surface, and absence of previous radiation treatment could be predictive for a better complete response. This study suggests that the efficacy of the ECT treatment is related to the concurrent systemic therapies while administering ECT. The association between ECT and immunotherapy has offered better results than the association between ECT and chemotherapy (p-value = 0.0463). So, ECT is a valuable tool in the treatment of cutaneous and subcutaneous metastases from breast cancer and its efficacy in local control of these lesions improves when it is well planned in a therapeutic scenario.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Russano
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Paolo Del Fiore
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- *Correspondence: Paolo Del Fiore,
| | - Claudia Di Prata
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Andrea Pasqual
- Department of Medicine, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Roberto Marconato
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Luca Giovanni Campana
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Romina Spina
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Carlo Maria Gianesini
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandra Collodetto
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Saveria Tropea
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Luigi Dall’Olmo
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Sabrina Carraro
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandro Parisi
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Sara Galuppo
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | - Giovanni Scarzello
- Radiotherapy Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
| | | | - Marco Rastrelli
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Simone Mocellin
- Soft-Tissue, Peritoneum and Melanoma Surgical Oncology Unit, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Vicini E, Leonardi MC, Fontana SKR, Pagan E, Bagnardi V, Gilardi L, Cardillo A, Rafaniello Raviele P, Sargenti M, Morigi C, Intra M, Veronesi P, Galimberti V. How to Perform Repeat Sentinel Node Biopsy Safely After a Previous Mastectomy: Technical Features and Oncologic Outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 29:1750-1760. [PMID: 34750715 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-10986-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The latest National Comprehensive Cancer Network Breast Cancer Guidelines still discourage repeat sentinel node biopsy (SNB) after mastectomy, and the largest multicentric study available reports only 35 cases in the absence of previous axillary dissection (AD). METHODS From January 2003 to November 2018, 89 patients of the European Institute of Oncology with local recurrence of breast cancer after mastectomy, free of distant metastases, with a clinically negative axilla and a negative axillary ultrasound, in absence of AD, underwent lymphatic mapping before wide local excision. RESULTS During surgery, SNB was successful for 99% of the patients, with 14% being metastatic. Additional metastatic nodes removed by AD after a positive sentinel node occurred in 82% of cases. After a medium follow-up period of 3.7 years, the overall survival rate was 96.7%, and the disease-free survival rate was 84.4%. No axillary relapse after AD was recorded. One patient who refused human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-targeted treatment experienced ipsilateral axillary recurrence after a negative repeat SNB. The first axillary level was never directly irradiated because all the patients with positive repeat SNB underwent AD. For invasive luminal-like HER2-negative recurrences, the metastatic sentinel node was significantly associated with the choice to prescribe adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS In specialized centers, repeat axillary SNB for patients with local recurrence after mastectomy in the absence of previous AD can represent a safe option for detection and removal of occult axillary disease that would otherwise not be excised/irradiated to achieve better local control and could possibly influence the choice of adjuvant treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa Vicini
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | | | | | - Eleonora Pagan
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Bagnardi
- Department of Statistics and Quantitative Methods, University of Milan-Bicocca, Milan, Italy
| | - Laura Gilardi
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Cardillo
- Division of Medical Senology, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Manuela Sargenti
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Consuelo Morigi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Intra
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Viviana Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Choi JI, Khan AJ, Powell SN, McCormick B, Lozano AJ, Del Rosario G, Mamary J, Liu H, Fox P, Gillespie E, Braunstein LZ, Mah D, Cahlon O. Proton reirradiation for recurrent or new primary breast cancer in the setting of prior breast irradiation. Radiother Oncol 2021; 165:142-151. [PMID: 34688807 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.10.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Late local recurrences and second primary breast cancers are increasingly common. Proton beam therapy (PBT) reirradiation (reRT) may allow safer delivery of a second definitive radiotherapy (RT) course. We analyzed outcomes of patients with recurrent or new primary breast cancer who underwent reRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS In an IRB-approved retrospective study, patient/tumor characteristics, treatment parameters, outcomes, and toxicities were collected for all consecutive patients with recurrent or new primary non-metastatic breast cancer previously treated with breast or chest wall RT who underwent PBT reRT. RESULTS Forty-six patients received reRT using uniform (70%) or pencil beam (30%) scanning PBT. Median first RT, reRT, and cumulative doses were 60 Gy (range 45-66 Gy), 50.4 Gy(RBE) (40-66.6 Gy(RBE)), and 110 Gy(RBE) (96.6-169.4 Gy(RBE)), respectively. Median follow-up was 21 months. There were no local or regional recurrences; 17% developed distant recurrence. Two-year DMFS and OS were 92.0% and 93.6%, respectively. Nine of 13 (69.2%) patients who underwent implant or flap reconstruction developed capsular contracture, 3 (23.1%) requiring surgical intervention. One (7.7%) patient developed grade 3 breast pain requiring mastectomy after breast conserving surgery. No acute or late grade 4-5 toxicities were seen. Increased body mass index (BMI) was protective of grade ≥ 2 acute toxicity (OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.70-1.00). CONCLUSION In the largest series to date of PBT reRT for breast cancer recurrence or new primary after prior definitive breast or chest wall RT, excellent locoregional control and few high-grade toxicities were encountered. PBT reRT may provide a relatively safe and highly effective salvage option. Additional patients and follow-up are needed to correlate composite normal tissue doses with toxicities and assess long-term outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; New York Proton Center, New York, USA.
| | - Atif J Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Beryl McCormick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | | | | | | | - Haoyang Liu
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, USA
| | - Pamela Fox
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, USA
| | - Erin Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Lior Z Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA
| | - Dennis Mah
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, USA
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, USA; New York Proton Center, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Goel A, Agarwal VK, Nayak V, Yogsrivas R, Gulia A. Surgical Management of Locoregional Recurrence in Breast Cancer. Indian J Surg Oncol 2021; 12:616-623. [PMID: 34658592 DOI: 10.1007/s13193-021-01342-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Locoregional recurrences from breast cancer represent a heterogeneous group of disease that poses a therapeutic challenge and needs a multidisciplinary team management. The incidence of local recurrence after breast conservation surgery ranges from 10 to 22% and 5-15% after mastectomy at 10-year follow-up. Management of locoregional recurrence depends on tumor biology, stage at presentation, and prior local and systemic therapy. With improvements in diagnostic, pathological, and surgical techniques, radiation and systemic therapy approach, outcomes in these patients have improved. In this review, we discuss the risk factors, prognostic factors, surgical and reconstruction options, re-irradiation, and role of systemic therapy to define a reasonable treatment approach without compromising oncologic safety and achieve good cosmetic and survival outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish Goel
- Department of Surgical and Radiation Oncolgy, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | | | - Vikash Nayak
- Department of Surgical and Radiation Oncolgy, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Rekha Yogsrivas
- Department of Surgical and Radiation Oncolgy, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| | - Abhishek Gulia
- Department of Surgical and Radiation Oncolgy, Jaypee Hospital, Noida, India
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shimbo T, Nakata M, Yoshioka H, Sato C, Hori A, Kimura K, Iwamoto M, Yoshida K, Uesugi Y, Akiyama H, Nihei K. New enzyme-targeting radiosensitizer (KORTUC II) treatment for locally advanced or recurrent breast cancer. Mol Clin Oncol 2021; 15:241. [PMID: 34650808 PMCID: PMC8506568 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2021.2388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Kochi oxydol radiation therapy for unresectable carcinomas II (KORTUC II) is currently the most widely used radiosensitizer in Japan. This sensitizer is a solution consisting of 0.83% sodium hyaluronate and 0.5% hydrogen peroxide. The mixture is injected intratumorally just before radiation therapy (RT) several times. KORTUC II has the effect of neutralizing antioxidant enzymes, while increasing the oxygen tension into the tumor tissue, and achieves marked local effects without notable adverse events. The present report describes cases in which KORTUC II was used to treat patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) or recurrent breast cancer (LRBC). The present study included 30 patients with LABC (n=9) or LRBC (n=21) aimed at local control of tumors, who were followed up for ≥3 months after treatment. The irradiation dose and extent fields were determined by the attending physicians considering various patient factors, such as a performance status, prognosis and presence or absence of adjuvant therapy. The median irradiation dose was 60.4 Gy3.5 (43.6-76.1 Gy3.5) based on the calculation of equivalents of 2 Gy fractions, and the median total number of sensitizer injections was 5 (2-7) times. The median maximum tumor shrinkage was 97.0% and 15 patients (50%) were assessed to have achieved a clinical complete response. The proportion with loco-regional control at 1, 2 and 3 years was 100, 94.7 and 75.4%, respectively, and progression free survival after RT at 1 and 2 years was 59.0 and 24.1%, respectively. KORTUC II exhibited high rates of local tumor control for LABC and LRBC. KORTUC II is expected to be an inexpensive and promising RT method because it is safe and has an excellent radio-sensitizing effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taiju Shimbo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical College, Takatuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Mio Nakata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical College, Takatuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Hiroto Yoshioka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical College, Takatuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Chikara Sato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical College, Takatuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Akihiro Hori
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical College, Takatuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Kosei Kimura
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Mitsuhiko Iwamoto
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Osaka Medical College, Takatuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Ken Yoshida
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University Medical Center, Moriguti, Osaka 573-1191, Japan
| | - Yasuo Uesugi
- Department of Rehabilitation, Kansai University of Welfare Sciences, Kashiwara, Osaka 583-0026, Japan
| | - Hironori Akiyama
- Department of Dental Radiology, Osaka Dental University, Hirakata, Osaka 573-1121, Japan
| | - Keiji Nihei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka Medical College, Takatuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mutter RW, Choi JI, Jimenez RB, Kirova YM, Fagundes M, Haffty BG, Amos RA, Bradley JA, Chen PY, Ding X, Carr AM, Taylor LM, Pankuch M, Vega RBM, Ho AY, Nyström PW, McGee LA, Urbanic JJ, Cahlon O, Maduro JH, MacDonald SM. Proton Therapy for Breast Cancer: A Consensus Statement From the Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Breast Cancer Subcommittee. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 111:337-359. [PMID: 34048815 PMCID: PMC8416711 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.05.110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy plays an important role in the multidisciplinary management of breast cancer. Recent years have seen improvements in breast cancer survival and a greater appreciation of potential long-term morbidity associated with the dose and volume of irradiated organs. Proton therapy reduces the dose to nontarget structures while optimizing target coverage. However, there remain additional financial costs associated with proton therapy, despite reductions over time, and studies have yet to demonstrate that protons improve upon the treatment outcomes achieved with photon radiation therapy. There remains considerable heterogeneity in proton patient selection and techniques, and the rapid technological advances in the field have the potential to affect evidence evaluation, given the long latency period for breast cancer radiation therapy recurrence and late effects. In this consensus statement, we assess the data available to the radiation oncology community of proton therapy for breast cancer, provide expert consensus recommendations on indications and technique, and highlight ongoing trials' cost-effectiveness analyses and key areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| | - J Isabelle Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rachel B Jimenez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Youlia M Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - Marcio Fagundes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Miami, Florida
| | - Bruce G Haffty
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Richard A Amos
- Proton and Advanced Radiotherapy Group, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Peter Y Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Xuanfeng Ding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Antoinette M Carr
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Leslie M Taylor
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Mark Pankuch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Medicine Proton Center, Warrenville, Illinois
| | | | - Alice Y Ho
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York Proton Center and Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Petra Witt Nyström
- The Skandion Clinic, Uppsala, Sweden and the Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - James J Urbanic
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, Encinitas, California
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - John H Maduro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
LaRiviere MJ, Dreyfuss A, Taunk NK, Freedman GM. Proton Reirradiation for Locoregionally Recurrent Breast Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2021; 6:100710. [PMID: 34409209 PMCID: PMC8361062 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Local-regional recurrence (LRR) of breast cancer after prior adjuvant radiation (RT) can present a clinical challenge. Proton therapy is recommended by the American Society for Radiation Oncology in cases where reirrradiation is needed; however, data are limited. We present the toxicity and outcomes after reirradiation for local-regional recurrence of breast cancer with proton therapy. Methods and Materials A single-institution retrospective review identified patients with the following criteria: LRR of breast cancer, prior photon radiation to the same region, proton beam reirradiation, and definitive intent. Surgery or systemic therapy at the time of recurrence was used when indicated. The log-rank test was used to compare Kaplan-Meier survival estimates. Kruskal-Wallis tests were performed to compare worst reported toxicities with clinical variables. Results The population included 27 patients with a history of prior radiation and treated with proton therapy for LRR between 2012 and 2019. The median interval between courses was 9.7 years. Proton reirradiation regimens included whole breast/chest wall (WB/CW) with regional nodal RT (22/27), nodal RT alone (2/27), or WB/CW alone (3/27). The median dose was 51 Gy, and the most common fractionation was 1.5 Gy twice daily. Median follow-up after reirradiation was 16.6 months. Acute grade 3 toxicities included dermatitis in 2 patients and breast pain in 2 patients. Grade 2 or higher late toxicities included 6 G2 rib fractures and 1 G2 brachial plexopathy, 1 G3 dermatitis, 1 G3 breast pain, and 1 G4 dermatitis. Twelve patients had new documented recurrences of which 1 was a second in-field LRR, and there were 7 deaths. Conclusions Proton salvage reirradiation to median 51 Gy in 1.5 Gy twice daily appears to be safe with acceptable acute and late toxicity, and effective with >95% local-regional control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J LaRiviere
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Alexandra Dreyfuss
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Neil K Taunk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Gary M Freedman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Joo JH, Ki Y, Kim W, Nam J, Kim D, Park J, Kim HY, Jung YJ, Choo KS, Nam KJ, Nam SB. Pattern of local recurrence after mastectomy and reconstruction in breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Gland Surg 2021; 10:2037-2046. [PMID: 34268088 DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-15] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Background This study aimed to describe the locations of local recurrences based on the mastectomy and reconstruction type in breast cancer patients. Methods In November 2020, a systematic literature review was performed through MEDLINE/PubMed and the Cochrane Centre Register of Controlled Trials. Publications that included skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy followed by breast reconstruction and described the location of local recurrences were analyzed. Exclusion criteria included salvage or prophylactic mastectomy, unclear distinction between local and regional recurrences, rare tumor types. Results From 19 publications, 272 local recurrences lesions were reported in a total of 4,787 patients. After autologous reconstruction (n=2,465), local recurrences were located in the skin in 45 (1.8%) patients, in the chest wall in 18 (0.7%), and in the nipple-areolar complex in 9 (0.4%). After implant reconstruction (n=1,917), local recurrences sites included the skin in 91 (4.7%) patients, chest wall in 8 (0.4%), and nipple-areolar complex in 8 (0.4%). Of the 70 lesions with reported in-breast location, 57 (81.4%) relapsed in the original tumor location. Discussion Although meta-analysis was not conducted, present analysis demonstrated that most local recurrences after skin-sparing or nipple-sparing mastectomy occurred within the skin or subcutaneous tissues. It was found that the original tumor location was the most frequent site of relapse. Therefore, special attention should be paid to the original tumor overlying the skin while planning postmastectomy radiation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji Hyeon Joo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Yongkan Ki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Wontaek Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jiho Nam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University Hospital, Busan, Korea
| | - Donghyun Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Jongmoo Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kyungbook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Hyun Yul Kim
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Youn Joo Jung
- Department of Surgery, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Ki Seok Choo
- Department of Radiology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Kyung Jin Nam
- Department of Radiology, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| | - Su Bong Nam
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Yangsan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chatzikonstantinou G, Strouthos I, Scherf C, Köhn J, Solbach C, Rödel C, Tselis N. Interstitial multicatheter HDR-brachytherapy as accelerated partial breast irradiation after second breast-conserving surgery for locally recurrent breast cancer. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2021; 62:465-472. [PMID: 33604659 PMCID: PMC8127653 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrab004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2020] [Revised: 11/27/2020] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Our aim was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of interstitial multicatheter high dose rate brachytherapy (imHDR-BRT) as accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after second breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in patients with ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). Between January 2010 and December 2019, 20 patients with IBTR who refused salvage mastectomy (sMT) were treated with second BCS and post-operative imHDR-BRT as APBI. All patients had undergone primary BCS followed by adjuvant external beam radiotherapy. Median imHDR-BRT dose was 32 Gy delivered in twice-daily fractions of 4 Gy. Five-year IBTR-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS) as well as toxicity and cosmesis were evaluated in the present retrospective analysis. Median age at recurrence and median time from the first diagnosis to IBTR was 65.1 years and 12.2 years, respectively. After a median follow-up of 69.9 months, two patients developed a second local recurrence resulting in 5-year IBTR free-survival of 86.8%. Five-year DMFS and 5-year OS were 84.6% and 92.3%, respectively. Grade 1-2 fibrosis was noted in 60% of the patients with no grade 3 or higher toxicity. Two (10%) cases of asymptomatic fat necrosis were documented. Cosmetic outcome was classified as excellent in 6 (37.5%), good in 6 (37.5%), fair in 3 (18.75%) and poor in 1 (6.25%) patient, respectively. We conclude that imHDR-BRT as APBI re-irradiation is effective and safe for IBTR and should be considered in appropriately selected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Chatzikonstantinou
- Corresponding author. Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Tel: +49 69 6301 5130; Fax: +49 69 6301 5091;
| | | | - Christian Scherf
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Janett Köhn
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Christine Solbach
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Claus Rödel
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Nikolaos Tselis
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Chen I, Botty Van den Bruele AM, Gillespie EF, Mueller BA, Xu AJ, Cuaron J, Khan AJ, McCormick B, Cahlon O, Powell SN, Cody H, Braunstein LZ. Salvage of locally recurrent breast cancer with repeat breast conservation using 45 Gy hyperfractionated partial breast re-irradiation. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2021; 188:409-414. [PMID: 33770311 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06206-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/19/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Mastectomy has long been the preferred approach for local salvage of recurrent breast cancer following breast-conservation therapy (BCT). Growing interest in avoiding mastectomy prompted RTOG 1014, a landmark phase two study demonstrating the feasibility of repeat BCT using a novel radiotherapy (RT) regimen (i.e., 45 Gy administered in 30 fractions of 1.5 Gy twice-daily to the partial breast, "rePBI"). We adopted this regimen as our institutional standard and report our observations regarding the safety and efficacy of rePBI as salvage therapy. METHODS All patients at our institution who underwent repeat BCT and subsequently received rePBI from 2011 to 2019 were identified. Clinicopathologic features and treatment characteristics for both primary breast cancers and recurrences were collected, as were rates of subsequent recurrence and treatment-associated toxicities. RESULTS The cohort included 34 patients with a median age of 65.8 (46.2-78.2) at the time of rePBI. At a median follow-up of 23.5 months, there were two subsequent locoregional recurrences (2-year local control rate 97%). There was no grade ≥ 3 toxicity. The most common acute toxicity (< 3 months) was radiation dermatitis (100%), and common grade 1-2 late toxicities (> 3 months) included fibrosis in 14 (41%), breast asymmetry in 12 (35%), and chest wall pain in 11 (32%). CONCLUSIONS Repeat breast conservation using the hyperfractionated partial breast RT regimen defined by RTOG 1014 (45 Gy administered in 30 1.5 Gy twice-daily fractions) appears effective and well tolerated. No grade 3 or higher toxicities were observed and local control was excellent. Longer term follow-up among larger cohorts will define whether salvage mastectomy should remain the preferred standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishita Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA
| | | | - Erin F Gillespie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA
| | - Boris A Mueller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA
| | | | - John Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA
| | - Atif J Khan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA
| | - Beryl McCormick
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA
| | - Oren Cahlon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA
| | - Simon N Powell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA
| | - Hiram Cody
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lior Z Braunstein
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Box 22, New York, NY , 10044, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Reirradiation for Locoregional Recurrent Breast Cancer. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 6:100640. [PMID: 33506143 PMCID: PMC7814100 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.100640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 12/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Reirradiation poses a distinct therapeutic challenge owing to risks associated with exceeding normal tissue tolerances and possibly more therapeutically resistant disease biology. We report our experience with reirradiation for locoregional recurrent or second primary breast cancer. Methods and Materials Between 1999 and 2019, all patients with breast cancer treated with repeat breast/chest wall radiation therapy (RT) at our institution were identified. Adverse events were assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0. Fisher exact, Mann-Whitney rank-sum, and unpaired t tests were used for statistical analysis. Freedom from locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis as well as overall survival were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results Seventy-two patients underwent reirradiation. Median prior RT dose, reirradiation dose, and cumulative dose were 60 Gy (interquartile range [IQR], 50-60.4 Gy), 45 Gy (IQR, 40-50 Gy), and 103.54 Gy2 (IQR, 95.04-109.62 Gy2), respectively. Median time between RT courses was 73 months (IQR, 29-129 months). Thirty-four patients (47%) had gross residual disease at time of reirradiation. Course intent was described as curative in 44 patients (61%) and palliative in 28 (39%). Fifty-two patients (72%) were treated with photons ± electrons and 20 (28%) with protons. With a median follow-up of 22 months (IQR, 10-43 months), grade 3 adverse events were experienced by 13% of patients (10% acute skin toxicity and 3% late skin necrosis). Time between RT courses and reirradiation fields was significantly associated with the development of grade 3 toxicity at any point. Proton therapy conferred a dosimetric advantage without difference in toxicity. At 2 years, locoregional recurrence-free survival was 74.6% and overall survival was 65.5% among all patients, and 93.1% and 76.8%, respectively, among curative intent patients treated without gross disease. Distant metastasis-free survival was 59.0% among all curative intent patients. Conclusions Reirradiation for locoregional recurrent breast cancer is feasible with acceptable rates of toxicity. Disease control and survival are promising among curative intent reirradiation patients without gross disease.
Collapse
|
22
|
Albright EL, Lizarraga IM. Regional Nodal Recurrence after Treatment for Breast Cancer. CURRENT BREAST CANCER REPORTS 2020. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-020-00392-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
23
|
Assessing the Need for Adjusted Organ-at-Risk Planning Goals for Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Radiation Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer with Proton Radiation. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 11:108-118. [PMID: 33109494 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2020.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 08/25/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Locally advanced breast cancer requires surgical management via lumpectomy or mastectomy with or without systemic therapy followed by chest wall or breast (CW) and comprehensive nodal irradiation (CNI). Radiation (RT) dose constraints for the heart and ipsilateral lung have been developed based on photon RT. Proton therapy (PBT) can deliver significantly lower doses of RT to these organs-at-risk (OARs) and may warrant adjustments to OAR planning goals. METHODS AND MATERIALS The RT plans of consecutive patients undergoing adjuvant CW-CNI RT with PBT within a single center were reviewed. A inital treatment volume, comprised of CW/intact breast + CNI (CTV_init) structure, including the CW and CNI but excluding any boost plans was analyzed. Frequency distributions were generated based on doses received by the heart, lungs, and esophagus for validated dosimetric parameters. Frequency distributions were generated and then stratified by laterality and compared using the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The 75th, 85th, and 95th percentiles for each dosimetric parameter were calculated, overall and by laterality. The 75th percentile (Q3), was used as a suggested primary goal, and the 95th percentile was used as a suggested secondary goal. RESULTS One hundred and seventy-two plans were analyzed. Forty-nine plans were right-sided, 107 were left-sided, and 16 were bilateral. The overall Q3 of the mean and V25 of the heart were 1.5 Gy and 1.7%, respectively. The mean and V25 to the heart differed significantly by laterality. Pulmonary values were similar to current recommendations. For all lateralites, the median volume of the esophagus receiving 70% prescription dose was ≤1 cm3. CONCLUSIONS We present the first dosimetric study providing complete OAR dose-volume histograms data for patients undergoing adjuvant pencil-beam scanning-PBT for locally advanced breast cancer, with detailed information on central tendencies, ranges and distributions of data. We have provided suggested planning goals and metrics for the lungs, heart, and esophagus; the latter 2 differing significantly from current Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (QUANTEC) constraints and classical photon goals.
Collapse
|
24
|
Armstrong S, Hoskin P. Complex Clinical Decision-Making Process of Re-Irradiation. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:688-703. [PMID: 32893056 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.07.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2020] [Revised: 07/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
As patients live longer with their cancer as a result of more effective treatment, recurrences and second malignancies in a previously irradiated field are an increasing challenge. The technical advances that enable high-dose radiation to limited volumes, excluding critical normal tissues, have increased the use of re-irradiation for many tumour sites. Minimising the volume, selecting patients with good performance status, negative metastatic screening and longer disease-free intervals are important principles. Despite this there is a narrow therapeutic window, and careful consideration with open discussion, including the patient, of the probable benefit and the implications of potential toxicities will always be essential. In this overview we evaluate the various radiobiological factors that need to be considered for re-irradiation, tissue recovery and dose tolerances in the setting of re-irradiation and summarise the available literature to guide clinicians in their decision-making for re-irradiation to primary and metastatic site/s of disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - P Hoskin
- Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Datta NR, Kok HP, Crezee H, Gaipl US, Bodis S. Integrating Loco-Regional Hyperthermia Into the Current Oncology Practice: SWOT and TOWS Analyses. Front Oncol 2020; 10:819. [PMID: 32596144 PMCID: PMC7303270 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00819] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Moderate hyperthermia at temperatures between 40 and 44°C is a multifaceted therapeutic modality. It is a potent radiosensitizer, interacts favorably with a host of chemotherapeutic agents, and, in combination with radiotherapy, enforces immunomodulation akin to “in situ tumor vaccination.” By sensitizing hypoxic tumor cells and inhibiting repair of radiotherapy-induced DNA damage, the properties of hyperthermia delivered together with photons might provide a tumor-selective therapeutic advantage analogous to high linear energy transfer (LET) neutrons, but with less normal tissue toxicity. Furthermore, the high LET attributes of hyperthermia thermoradiobiologically are likely to enhance low LET protons; thus, proton thermoradiotherapy would mimic 12C ion therapy. Hyperthermia with radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy substantially improves therapeutic outcomes without enhancing normal tissue morbidities, yielding level I evidence reported in several randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various tumor sites. Technological advancements in hyperthermia delivery, advancements in hyperthermia treatment planning, online invasive and non-invasive MR-guided thermometry, and adherence to quality assurance guidelines have ensured safe and effective delivery of hyperthermia to the target region. Novel biological modeling permits integration of hyperthermia and radiotherapy treatment plans. Further, hyperthermia along with immune checkpoint inhibitors and DNA damage repair inhibitors could further augment the therapeutic efficacy resulting in synthetic lethality. Additionally, hyperthermia induced by magnetic nanoparticles coupled to selective payloads, namely, tumor-specific radiotheranostics (for both tumor imaging and radionuclide therapy), chemotherapeutic drugs, immunotherapeutic agents, and gene silencing, could provide a comprehensive tumor-specific theranostic modality akin to “magic (nano)bullets.” To get a realistic overview of the strength (S), weakness (W), opportunities (O), and threats (T) of hyperthermia, a SWOT analysis has been undertaken. Additionally, a TOWS analysis categorizes future strategies to facilitate further integration of hyperthermia with the current treatment modalities. These could gainfully accomplish a safe, versatile, and cost-effective enhancement of the existing therapeutic armamentarium to improve outcomes in clinical oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niloy R Datta
- Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - H Petra Kok
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Hans Crezee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Udo S Gaipl
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Stephan Bodis
- Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Vavassori A, Riva G, Cavallo I, Spoto R, Dicuonzo S, Fodor C, Comi S, Cambria R, Cattani F, Morra A, Leonardi MC, Lazzari R, Intra M, Luini A, Galimberti VE, Veronesi P, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA. High-dose-rate Brachytherapy as Adjuvant Local rEirradiation for Salvage Treatment of Recurrent breAst cancer (BALESTRA): a retrospective mono-institutional study. J Contemp Brachytherapy 2020; 12:207-215. [PMID: 32695191 PMCID: PMC7366017 DOI: 10.5114/jcb.2020.96860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate clinical results of catheter-based interstitial high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as adjuvant treatment in previously irradiated recurrent breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 2011 and September 2015, 31 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed recurrent breast cancer after conservative surgery and conventional whole breast radiotherapy, were retreated with a second conservative surgical resection and reirradiated with adjuvant interstitial HDR-BT. None of the brachytherapy implant was performed during the quadrantectomy procedure. A dose of 34 Gy in 10 fractions, 2 fractions per day, with a minimal interval of 6 hours was delivered. RESULTS At the time of the implant, the median age of patients was 59.7 years (range, 39.3-74.9 years). The median time from first treatment until BT for local recurrence was 11.9 years (range, 2.5-27.8 years). The median interval between salvage surgery and BT was 3.6 months (range, 1-8.2 months). No acute epidermitis or soft tissue side effects higher than grade 2 were recorded, with good cosmetic results in all patients. Most of the patients presented grade 1-2 late side effects. Only one patient developed grade 3 liponecrosis. After a median follow-up of 73.7 months (range, 28.8-102.4 months), the overall survival and cancer specific survival were 87.1% and 90.3%, respectively; 5-year local control and 5-year progression-free survival rate were 90.3% and 83.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our preliminary analysis showed that HDR-BT is a feasible treatment for partial breast reirradiation offering very low complications rate and fast procedure. Higher patients' cohort is warranted in order to define the role of this treatment modality in the breast conservative management of local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Vavassori
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Riva
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Clinical Department, National Center for Oncological Hadrontherapy (CNAO), Pavia, Italy
| | - Iacopo Cavallo
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruggero Spoto
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristiana Fodor
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefania Comi
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Cambria
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Federica Cattani
- Unit of Medical Physics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Morra
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Roberta Lazzari
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mattia Intra
- Department of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Luini
- Department of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Breast Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Department of Radiotherapy, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- University of Milan, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Buchholz TA, Ali S, Hunt KK. Multidisciplinary Management of Locoregional Recurrent Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2020; 38:2321-2328. [PMID: 32442059 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02806] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas A Buchholz
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Diego, CA
| | - Sonia Ali
- Division of Medical Oncology, Scripps MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Diego, CA
| | - Kelly K Hunt
- Department of Breast Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pulsed Reduced Dose Rate for Reirradiation of Recurrent Breast Cancer. Pract Radiat Oncol 2020; 10:e61-e70. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2019.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 08/15/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
29
|
Oei A, Kok H, Oei S, Horsman M, Stalpers L, Franken N, Crezee J. Molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2020; 163-164:84-97. [PMID: 31982475 DOI: 10.1016/j.addr.2020.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2019] [Revised: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Mild hyperthermia, local heating of the tumour up to temperatures <43 °C, has been clinically applied for almost four decades and has been proven to substantially enhance the effectiveness of both radiotherapy and chemotherapy in treatment of primary and recurrent tumours. Clinical results and mechanisms of action are discussed in this review, including the molecular and biological rationale of hyperthermia as radio- and chemosensitizer as established in in vitro and in vivo experiments. Proven mechanisms include inhibition of different DNA repair processes, (in)direct reduction of the hypoxic tumour cell fraction, enhanced drug uptake, increased perfusion and oxygen levels. All mechanisms show different dose effect relationships and different optimal scheduling with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Therefore, obtaining the ideal multi-modality treatment still requires elucidation of more detailed data on dose, sequence, duration, and possible synergisms between modalities. A multidisciplinary approach with different modalities including hyperthermia might further increase anti-tumour effects and diminish normal tissue damage.
Collapse
|
30
|
Grann A, Haffty BG. Excision and Reirradiation for Local Recurrence in Previously Treated Patient. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:473. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
31
|
Clinical outcomes and toxicity of proton beam radiation therapy for re-irradiation of locally recurrent breast cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2019; 19:116-122. [PMID: 31692702 PMCID: PMC6806378 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2019.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2019] [Revised: 09/27/2019] [Accepted: 09/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Re-irradiation using proton therapy for recurrent breast cancer has excellent local control. Re-irradiation using proton beam radiation therapy increases risk of skin toxicity. There is minimal increase in the late toxicity due to re-irradiation using proton beam therapy.
Purpose Repeat radiation therapy (RT) using photons/X-rays for locally recurrent breast cancer results in increased short and long-term toxicity. Proton beam RT (PBRT) can minimize dose to surrounding organs, thereby potentially reducing toxicity. Here, we report the toxicity and clinical outcomes for women who underwent re-irradiation to the chest wall for locally recurrent breast cancer using PBRT. Materials and methods This was a retrospective study analyzing 16 consecutive patients between 2013 and 2018 with locally recurrent breast cancer who underwent re-irradiation to the chest wall with PBRT. For the recurrent disease, patients underwent maximal safe resection, including salvage mastectomy, wide local excision, or biopsy only per surgeons recommendations. Systemic therapy was used per the recommendation of the medical oncologist. Patients were treated with median dose of 50.4 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGyE) in 28 fractions at the time of re-irradiation. Follow-up was calculated from the start of second RT course. Acute toxicities were defined as those occurring during treatment or up to 8 weeks after treatment. Late toxicities were defined as those occurring more than 8 weeks after the completion of therapy. Toxicities were based on CTCAE 4.0. Results The median age at original diagnosis and at recurrence was 49.8 years and 60.2 years, respectively. The median time between the two RT courses was 10.2 (0.7–20.2) years. The median follow-up time was 18.7 (2.5–35.2) months. No local failures were observed after re-irradiation. One patient developed distant metastasis and ultimately died. Grade 3–4 acute skin toxicity was observed in 5 (31.2%) patients. Four (25%) patients developed chest wall infections during or shortly (2 weeks) after re-irradiation. Late grade 3–4 fibrosis was observed in only 3 (18.8%) patients. Grade 5 toxicities were not observed. Hyperpigmentation was seen in 12 (75%) patients. Pneumonitis, telangiectasia, rib fracture, and lymphedema occurred in 2 (12.5%), 4 (25%), 1 (6.3%), and 1 (6.3%) patients, respectively. Conclusions Re-irradiation with PBRT for recurrent breast cancer has acceptable toxicities. There was a high incidence of acute grade 3–4 skin toxicity and infections, which resolved, however, with skin care and antibiotics. Longer follow-up is needed to determine long-term clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
32
|
Lin YL. Reirradiation of recurrent breast cancer with proton beam therapy: A case report and literature review. World J Clin Oncol 2019; 10:256-268. [PMID: 31396475 PMCID: PMC6682500 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v10.i7.256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2019] [Revised: 06/22/2019] [Accepted: 07/22/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Locoregional recurrence of breast cancer is challenging for clinicians, due to the various former treatments patients have undergone. However, treatment of the recurrence with systemic therapy and subsequent reirradiation of chest wall is accompanied by increased toxicities, particularly radiation-induced cardiovascular disease. Reirradiation by proton beam therapy (PBT) enables superior preservation of adjacent organs at risk as well as concurrent dose escalation for delivery to the gross tumor. This technology is expected to improve the overall outcome of recurrent breast cancer.
CASE SUMMARY A 47-year-old female presented with an extensive locoregional recurrence at 10 yr after primary treatment of a luminal A breast cancer. Because of tumor progression despite having undergone bilateral ovarectomy and systemic therapy, the patient was treated with PBT BE total dose of 64.40 Gy to each gross tumor and 56.00 Gy to the upper mediastinal and retrosternal lymphatics including the entire sternum in 28 fractions. Follow-up computed tomography showed a partial remission, without evidence of newly emerging metastasis. At 19 mo after the PBT, the patient developed a radiation-induced pericardial disease and pleural effusions with clinical burden of dyspnea, which were successfully treated by drainage and corticosteroid. Cytological analysis of the puncture fluid showed no malignancy, and the subsequent computed tomography scan indicated stable disease as well as significantly decreased pericardial and pleural effusions. The patient remains free of progression to date.
CONCLUSION PBT was a safe and effective method of reirradiation for locoregionally recurrent breast cancer in our patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Lan Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rinecker Proton Therapy Center, Munich 81371, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Al-Hilli Z, Grobmyer SR. Management Strategies for Locally Recurrent Breast Cancer: Redo-Lumpectomy, Redo-Sentinel Node Biopsy, Redo-Radiation. Ann Surg Oncol 2019; 26:3018-3024. [DOI: 10.1245/s10434-019-07545-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
|
34
|
Thorpe CS, Niska JR, Girardo ME, Kosiorek HE, McGee LA, Hartsell WF, Larson GL, Tsai HK, Rossi CJ, Rosen LR, Vargas CE. Proton beam therapy reirradiation for breast cancer: Multi-institutional prospective PCG registry analysis. Breast J 2019; 25:1160-1170. [PMID: 31338974 DOI: 10.1111/tbj.13423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2018] [Revised: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
To investigate adverse events (AEs, CTCAE v4.0) and clinical outcomes for proton beam therapy (PBT) reirradiation (reRT) for breast cancer. From 2011 to 2016, 50 patients received PBT reRT for breast cancer in the prospective Proton Collaborative Group (PCG) registry. Acute AEs occurred within 180 days from start of reRT. Late AEs began or persisted beyond 180 days. Fisher's exact and Mann-Whitney rank-sum tests were utilized. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate overall survival (OS) and local recurrence-free survival (LFRS). Median follow-up was 12.7 months (0-41.8). Median prior RT dose was 60 Gy (10-96.7). Median reRT dose was 55.1 Gy (45.1-76.3). Median cumulative dose was 110.6 Gy (70.6-156.8). Median interval between RT courses was 103.8 months (5.5-430.8). ReRT included regional nodes in 84% (66% internal mammary node [IMN]). Surgery included the following: 44% mastectomy, 22% wide local excision, 6% lumpectomy, 2% reduction mammoplasty, and 26% no surgery. Grade 3 AEs were experienced by 16% of patients (10% acute, 8% late) and were associated with body mass index (BMI) > 30 kg/m2 (P = 0.04), bilateral recurrence (P = 0.02), and bilateral reRT (P = 0.004). All grade 3 AEs occurred in patients receiving IMN reRT (P = 0.08). At 1 year, LRFS was 93%, and OS was 97%. Patients with gross disease at time of PBT trended toward worse 1-year LRFS (100% without vs. 84% with, P = 0.06). PBT reRT is well tolerated with favorable local control. BMI > 30, bilateral disease, and IMN reRT were associated with grade 3 AEs. Toxicity was acceptable despite median cumulative dose > 110 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Joshua R Niska
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Marlene E Girardo
- Division of Biostatistics, Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Heidi E Kosiorek
- Division of Biostatistics, Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona
| | - Lisa A McGee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Gary L Larson
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - Henry K Tsai
- ProCure Proton Therapy Center, Somerset, New Jersey
| | - Carl J Rossi
- Scripps Proton Therapy Center, San Diego, California
| | - Lane R Rosen
- Willis-Knighton Proton Therapy Center, Shreveport, Louisiana
| | - Carlos E Vargas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Oldenborg S, van Os R, Oei B, Poortmans P. Impact of Technique and Schedule of Reirradiation Plus Hyperthermia on Outcome after Surgery for Patients with Recurrent Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 11:cancers11060782. [PMID: 31195763 PMCID: PMC6627207 DOI: 10.3390/cancers11060782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Combining reirradiation (reRT) with hyperthermia (HT) has shown to be of high therapeutic value for patients with loco-regionally recurrent breast cancer. The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term therapeutic effect and toxicity of reRT + HT following surgery of loco-regionally recurrent breast cancer using two different reRT regimens. Methods: The reRT regimen of the 78 patients treated in Institute A consisted of 8 × 4 Gy twice a week using mostly abutted photon-electron fields. The 78 patients treated in Institute B received a reRT regimen of 12 × 3 Gy, four times a week with single or multiple electron fields. Superficial hyperthermia was applied once a week in Institute A and twice a week in Institute B. Both institutes started HT treatment within 1 hour after reRT and used the same 434-MHz systems to heat the tumor area to 41–43 °C. Results: The 5-year-infield local control (LC) rates were similar; however, the 5-year-survival rates were 13% lower in Institute A. Most remarkable was the difference in risk with respect to 5-year ≥ grade 3 toxicity, which was more than twice as high in Institute A. Conclusion: The combination of reirradiation and hyperthermia after macroscopically complete excision of loco-regional breast cancer recurrences provides durable local control in patients at risk for locoregional recurrent breast cancer. Treatment is well tolerated with the 12 × 3 Gy schedule with limited-sized electron fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Oldenborg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam (AMC), 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Rob van Os
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam (AMC), 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Bing Oei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Verbeeten (BVI), 5042 SB Tilburg, The Netherlands.
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute Verbeeten (BVI), 5042 SB Tilburg, The Netherlands.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences & Lettres-PSL University, 75248 Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Datta NR, Bodis S. Hyperthermia with radiotherapy reduces tumour alpha/beta: Insights from trials of thermoradiotherapy vs radiotherapy alone. Radiother Oncol 2019; 138:1-8. [PMID: 31132683 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Hyperthermia inhibits the repair of irradiation-induced DNA damage and thereby could alter the α/β values of tumours. This study estimates the clinical α/βHTRT values from clinical trials of thermoradiotherapy (HTRT) vs radiotherapy (RT) in recurrent breast (RcBC), head and neck (III/IV) (LAHNC) and cervix cancers (IIB-IVA) (LACC). METHODS Three recently published meta-analyses for HTRT vs RT in RcBC, LAHNC and LACC were evaluated for complete response (CR). Studies with specified RT dose (D), dose/fraction (d) and corresponding CRs were selected. Tumour biological effective dose (BED) for each study with RT (BEDRT) was computed assuming an α/βRT of 10 Gy. As outcomes were favourable with HTRT, thermoradiobiological BED (BEDHTRT) was calculated as a product of BEDRT and %CRHTRT/%CRRT. The α/βHTRT was estimated as Dd/(BEDHTRT - D). RESULTS 12 trials with 864 patients were shortlisted - RcBC (3 studies, n = 259), LAHNC (5 studies, n = 338) and LACC (4 studies, n = 267). Overall risk difference of 0.28 favoured HTRT (p < 0.001). Mean BEDRT and BEDHTRT were 64.7 Gy (SD: ±15.5) and 109.5 Gy (SD: ±32.1) respectively and global α/βHTRT was 2.25 Gy (SD: ±0.79). Mean α/βHTRT for RcBC, LAHNC and LACC were 2.05 Gy, 1.74 Gy and 3.03 Gy respectively. On meta-regression, α/βHTRT was the sole predictor for the corresponding risk differences of the studies (coefficient = -0.096; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION Thermoradiobiological effects on the repair of RT induced DNA damage results in reduction in α/β values of tumours. This should be considered to effectively optimize HTRT dose-fractionation schedules in the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niloy R Datta
- Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland.
| | - Stephan Bodis
- Centre for Radiation Oncology KSA-KSB, Kantonsspital Aarau, Switzerland; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Hyperthermic chest wall re-irradiation in recurrent breast cancer: a prospective observational study. Strahlenther Onkol 2019; 195:318-326. [PMID: 30607453 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1414-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2018] [Accepted: 12/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To prospectively investigate the role of re-irradiation (re-RT) combined with hyperthermia (HT) in a contemporary cohort of patients affected by recurrent breast cancer (RBC). METHODS Within the prospective registry HT03, patients with resected RBC and previous irradiation were included. Re-RT was applied to the recurrence region with doses of 50-50.4 Gy, with a boost up to 60-60.4 Gy to the microscopically or macroscopically positive resection margins (R1/R2) region. Concurrent HT was performed at 40-42 ℃. Primary endpoint was LC. Acute and late toxicity, overall survival, cancer-specific survival (CSS), and progression-free survival (PFS) were also evaluated. RESULTS 20 patients and 21 RBC were analyzed. Median re-RT dose was 50.4 Gy and a median of 11 HT fractions were applied. Re-RT+HT was well tolerated, with three patients who experienced a grade (G) 3 acute skin toxicity and no cases of ≥G3 late toxicity. With a median follow up of 24.7 months, two local relapses occurred. Ten patients experienced regional and/or distant disease progression. Five patients died, four of them from breast cancer. PFS was favorable in patients treated with re-RT+HT for the first recurrence with doses of 60 Gy. A trend towards better CSS was found in patients with negative or close margins and after doses of 60 Gy. CONCLUSION Full-dose re-RT+HT for RBC is well tolerated, provides good LC, and seems to be more effective when applied at the time of the first relapse and after doses of 60 Gy. The registry will be continued for validation in a larger cohort and with longer follow-up.
Collapse
|
38
|
Belkacemi Y, Hanna NE, Besnard C, Majdoul S, Gligorov J. Local and Regional Breast Cancer Recurrences: Salvage Therapy Options in the New Era of Molecular Subtypes. Front Oncol 2018; 8:112. [PMID: 29719816 PMCID: PMC5913327 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Isolated local or regional recurrence of breast cancer (BC) leads to an increased risk of metastases and decreased survival. Ipsilateral breast recurrence can occur at the initial tumor bed or in another quadrant of the breast. Depending on tumor patterns and molecular subtypes, the risk and time to onset of metastatic recurrence differs. HER2-positive and triple-negative (TNG) BC have a risk of locoregional relapse between six and eight times than luminal A. Thus, the management of local and locoregional relapses must take into account the prognostic factors for metastatic disease development. It is important to personalize the overall management, including or not systemic treatment according to the metastatic risk. All isolated recurrence cases should be treated with curative intent. Complete surgical resection is recommended whenever possible. Patients who did not receive postoperative irradiation during their initial management should receive full-dose radiotherapy to the chest wall and to the regional lymph nodes if appropriate. Overall, total mastectomy is the “gold standard” among patients who were previously treated by conservative surgery followed by radiation therapy. In terms of systemic therapy, the benefits of additional treatments are not conclusively proven in cases of isolated recurrence. The beneficial role of chemotherapy has been reported in at least one randomized trial, while endocrine therapy and anti-HER2 are common practice. This review will discuss salvage treatment options of local and locoregional recurrences in the new era of BC molecular subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazid Belkacemi
- Henri Mondor Breast Center, Radiation Oncology Department of the Henri Mondor University Hospital, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), INSERM Unit 955, EQ07, Créteil, France
| | - Nivin E Hanna
- Kasr Al-Aini Center of Clinical Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Clementine Besnard
- Henri Mondor Breast Center, Radiation Oncology Department of the Henri Mondor University Hospital, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), INSERM Unit 955, EQ07, Créteil, France
| | - Soufya Majdoul
- Henri Mondor Breast Center, Radiation Oncology Department of the Henri Mondor University Hospital, University of Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), INSERM Unit 955, EQ07, Créteil, France
| | - Joseph Gligorov
- Sorbonne University, INSERM U938, APHP Tenon, Breast Cancer Expert Center, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Corbin KS, Mutter RW. Proton therapy for breast cancer: progress & pitfalls. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2018. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt-2018-0001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
As the number of patients cured from breast cancer increases with improvements in multidisciplinary care, emphasis on reducing late toxicities of treatment has increased, in order to improve long-term quality of life. Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a form of radiotherapy that uses particles with unique physical properties that enable treatment delivery with minimal dose deposition beyond the treatment target. Therefore, PBT has emerged as an exciting radiotherapy modality for breast cancer due to the ability to minimize exposure to the heart, lungs, muscle, and bone. Herein, we review the rationale for PBT in breast cancer, potential clinical applications, and the available clinical data supporting its use. We also address some of the technical and logistical challenges and areas of ongoing research that will ultimately establish the role for PBT for breast cancer in the years ahead.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kimberly S Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Robert W Mutter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Re-irradiation and Hyperthermia in Breast Cancer. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2017; 30:73-84. [PMID: 29224899 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2017.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Half of locoregional recurrences after breast cancer treatment are isolated events. Restaging should be carried out to select patients for curative salvage treatment. The approach depends on the characteristics of the primary and recurrent cancer, previous locoregional and systemic treatments, site of recurrence, comorbidities and the patient's wishes. A multidisciplinary discussion should be associated with the shared decision-making process. In view of the potential long-term disease-free survival, meticulous target volume delineation and selection of the most appropriate techniques should be used to decrease the risk of toxicity. This overview aims to provide clinicians with tools to manage the different scenarios of breast cancer patients with locoregional recurrences in the context of re-irradiation.
Collapse
|
41
|
Besson N, Hennequin C, Guillerm S, Fumagalli I, Martin V, Michaud S, Texeira L, Quero L. Plesiobrachytherapy for chest wall recurrences of breast cancer after mastectomy and radiotherapy for breast cancer. Brachytherapy 2017; 17:425-431. [PMID: 29174938 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Revised: 10/08/2017] [Accepted: 10/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of the study was to evaluate the results of high-dose-rate plesiobrachytherapy for local relapse after mastectomy and radiotherapy in terms of both local control and survival. METHODS We reviewed retrospectively 43 patients who experienced a chest wall relapse of breast cancer after local excision (22 patients) or not (21 patients). Patients were treated with an individually designed mold with four to six fractions of 3-6 Gy high-dose-rate brachytherapy, two fractions per week. Mean total dose was 24 Gy. RESULTS After surgical resection, the 3- and 5-year local control rates were 80% and 73%, respectively. For nonresectable patients, the overall response rate was 86%, and the 3-year infield local control and chest wall local control were 51% and 26%, respectively. The 5-year survival rate was 50.5% for the whole population, 62% after surgery, and 45.4% for irresectable patients. Acute Grade 2 or 3 toxicity occurred in 43% of the patients, resolving in a few days. Two patients had a local necrosis lasting 3 to 7 months. Late toxicity was observed in 5 patients. CONCLUSIONS High-dose-rate plesiobrachytherapy is a simple outpatient technique to treat chest wall local relapse of breast cancer. As a reirradiation technique, its tolerance is acceptable. This technique may obtain long-term local control after incomplete surgery; in case of nonresectable disease, a high response rate was observed, which might improve the quality of life of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Besson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - Sophie Guillerm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France; Breast Disease Centre, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Ingrid Fumagalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Valentine Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Sophie Michaud
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Luis Texeira
- Breast Disease Centre, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Quero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Arslan SA, Ozdemir N, Sendur MA, Eren T, Ozturk HF, Aral IP, Soykut ED, Inan GA. Hyperthermia and radiotherapy combination for locoregional recurrences of breast cancer: a review. BREAST CANCER MANAGEMENT 2017. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt-2017-0011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer is a second common form of malignancy and is one of the leading causes of mortality among cancer patients across the world. Locoregional recurrence occurs in 5–20% of patients despite upfront treatment. Local therapy (surgery plus minus re-irradiation) with or without systemic therapy is generally recommended for management. Local control rates vary; months to years, but a significant percentage lives 5 years. Therefore, treatment strategies to increase response rates are significant. Hyperthermia is one of the most potent radiosensitizers and data from meta-analysis and randomized trials support its use with radiotherapy. This study reviews the biologic rationale and clinical evidence about concomitant use of hyperthermia and radiotherapy in locally-recurrent breast cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nuriye Ozdemir
- Department of Medical Oncology, Ankara Numune Education & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Ali Sendur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Yıldırım Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Tulay Eren
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Huseyin Furkan Ozturk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara Atatürk Education & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ipek Pınar Aral
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara Atatürk Education & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ela Delikgoz Soykut
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsun Education & Research Hospital, Samsun, Turkey
| | - Gonca Altinisik Inan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ankara Atatürk Education & Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Thermal Skin Damage During Reirradiation and Hyperthermia Is Time-Temperature Dependent. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 98:392-399. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.02.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2016] [Revised: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 02/07/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
|
44
|
Reirradiation for locally recurrent breast cancer. Breast 2017; 33:159-165. [PMID: 28395234 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Revised: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 03/18/2017] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study is to review the current status of reirradiation therapy (Re-RT) for locally recurrent breast cancer. The overall outcome of breast/chest wall Re-RT is difficult to assess because of the wide range of different treatments that a patient may have undergone and the patient's individual features. The local control and complete response rates were reported to be 43-96% and 41-71%, respectively. The combination of Re-RT and hyperthermia seems to be related to improved outcomes. Toxicity rates vary between studies, and Re-RT is generally well tolerated. Re-RT may be considered an option for patients with breast cancer relapse after prior irradiation. Further studies are needed to determine the best irradiation volume and treatment modality for patients with locally recurrent disease.
Collapse
|
45
|
Chand AR, Ziauddin MF, Tang SC. Can Locoregionally Recurrent Breast Cancer Be Cured? Clin Breast Cancer 2017; 17:326-335. [PMID: 28365334 DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2017.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2016] [Revised: 01/22/2017] [Accepted: 02/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Locoregional recurrence (LRR) of breast cancer can occur after multidisciplinary treatment of a primary breast cancer. With modern multidisciplinary breast cancer treatment, the incidence of isolated LRR is decreasing. Improvements in systemic therapy are driving the decrease in LRR. LRR does still occur, however. LRR reflects biology of the cancer, as does systemic recurrence. LRR of breast cancer is frequently associated with systemic disease recurrence and poor prognosis. Given this associated poor prognosis, historically, it has been unclear whether patients with LRR would benefit from aggressive therapy with curative intent. Findings in retrospective studies suggest that prognosis for patients with LRR is not universally poor, and some patients may benefit from aggressive locoregional and systemic therapy. The challenge remains to assess prognosis and appropriately treat patients with locoregional breast cancer recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arati Rani Chand
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - M Firdos Ziauddin
- Department of Surgery, Georgia Cancer Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA
| | - Shou-Ching Tang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Georgia Cancer Center, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA; Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Hyperthermia with Radiotherapy and with Systemic Therapies. Breast Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
47
|
Surgical Treatment of Local Recurrence in Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_25] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
48
|
Multi-isocenter hybrid electron and rapid arc photon treatment for reirradiation of extensive recurrent inflammatory breast cancer. Med Dosim 2017; 42:363-367. [DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2017.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2017] [Revised: 06/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/10/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
49
|
Karlsson P, Lundstedt D. Radiotherapy for Metastatic Lesions. Breast Cancer 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-48848-6_57] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
50
|
Notter M, Piazena H, Vaupel P. Hypofractionated re-irradiation of large-sized recurrent breast cancer with thermography-controlled, contact-free water-filtered infra-red-A hyperthermia: a retrospective study of 73 patients. Int J Hyperthermia 2016; 33:227-236. [PMID: 27618745 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2016.1235731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluation of the efficacy and toxicity of a new setup of thermographically controlled water-filtered infra-red-A (wIRA) superficial hyperthermia (HT) combined with hypofractionated re-irradiation (re-RT) to treat large-sized breast cancer recurrences. METHODS Records of 73 heavily pre-irradiated patients with 103 treatment regions, treated from September 2009 to July 2015 were retrospectively analysed. Sixty-four patients with macroscopic disease were treated with 94 regions including 46 patients with lymphangiosis carcinomatosa. Hypofractionated RT consisted of 4 Gy once per week up to a total dose of 20 Gy delivered within 1-4 min after wIRA-HT. Heating of tumour nodules and diffusely spreading cancer lesions was performed under real-time thermographic temperature monitoring, maintaining the maximum skin temperature in the ROI between 42 °C and 43 °C, achieving intratumoural temperatures up to a depth of 2 cm between 39.5 °C and 42 °C. Seventeen patients received re-re-irradiation (re-re-RT) using the same HT/RT-treatment schedule. RESULTS Response rates in patients with macroscopic disease: 61% CR, 33% PR, 5% NC and 1% PD. Local control throughout life time after CR of macroscopic disease: 59%. All nine patients with microscopic disease had CR and local control throughout lifetime. Only grade 1 toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS Application of thermographically controlled wIRA-HT combined with extremely low-dose re-irradiation provides good local control throughout lifetime of heavily pre-treated breast cancer recurrences. The twin wIRA radiator provides a sufficiently homogeneous heat deposition for the treatment of larger areas. The time lag between HT and re-RT is substantially reduced. The possibility of re-re-RT opens new therapeutic options for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Markus Notter
- a Service de Radiothérapie , Hôpital neuchâtelois , La Chaux-de-Fonds , Switzerland
| | - Helmut Piazena
- b Medical Photobiology Group, Dept. Internal Medicine , Charité University Medicine , Berlin , Germany
| | - Peter Vaupel
- c Department of Radiooncology and Radiotherapy, Klinikum rechts der Isar , Technische Universität München (TUM) , München , Germany
| |
Collapse
|