Stereotactic body radiosurgery for spinal metastases: a critical review

Early Experience With Two-Fraction Spine Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Treating Spinal Metastases

OBJECTIVES

Spinal metastases are common in metastatic cancer, affecting around 40% of patients. The primary treatment involves radiation therapy, transitioning from conventional external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) to stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for its superior, durable response. While spine SBRT has gained popularity in the United States, Level I evidence supporting it over EBRT is limited to a Canadian trial using a 2-fraction SBRT regimen. We present our findings from one of the earliest US experiences of 2-fraction spine SBRT for spinal metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic spine cancer receiving 2-fraction spine SBRT at a single center was conducted. Patients received treatment based on Level 1 evidence (24 Gy in 2 fractions). Follow-up records were assessed for local control outcomes and toxicity.

RESULTS

Twenty patients since August 2022 have been treated with 2-fraction spine SBRT. Most patients were treated at 1 (45%) or 2 (40%) spinal levels, with the thoracic (55%) and lumbar (50%) spine being the most common locations. Common primary sites included the lung (30%), breast (20%), esophagus (15%), and prostate (10%). The rate of local control was 100%, while the rate of vertebral compression fracture was 15%. No esophageal or bowel toxicity occurred, and no fractures required intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that 2-fraction spine SBRT is safe and effective, consistent with existing Level I evidence. Our local control rate exceeding 95% aligns with the literature, indicating the feasibility and achievability of implementing this approach in the United States over a short period of time.

A Prospective Study Assessing the Efficacy and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Oligometastatic Bone Metastases

Purpose

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a promising treatment for oligometastatic disease in bone because of its delivery of high dose to target tissue and minimal dose to surrounding tissue. The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and toxicity of this treatment in patients with previously unirradiated oligometastatic bony disease.

Methods and Materials

In this prospective phase II trial, patients with oligometastatic bone disease, defined as ≤3 active sites of disease, were treated with SBRT at Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Center and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center between December 2016 and May 2019. SBRT dose and fractionation regimen were not protocol mandated. Local progression-free survival, progression-free survival, prostatic specific antigen progression, and overall survival were reported. Treatment-related toxicity was also reported.

Results

A total of 98 patients and 126 lesions arising from various tumor histologies were included in this study. The median age of patients enrolled was 72.8 years (80.6% male, 19.4% female). Median follow-up was 26.7 months. The most common histology was prostate cancer (68.4%, 67/98). The most common dose prescriptions were 27/30 Gy in 3 fractions (27.0%, 34/126), 30 Gy in 5 fractions (16.7%, 21/126), or 30/35 Gy in 5 fractions (16.7%, 21/126). Multiple doses per treatment regimen reflect dose painting employing the lower dose to the clinical target volume and higher dose to the gross tumor volume. Four patients (4.1%, 4/98) experienced local progression at 1 site for each patient (3.2%, 4/126). Among the entire cohort, 2-year local progression-free survival (including death without local progression) was 84.8%, 2-year progression-free survival (including deaths as well as local, distant, and prostatic specific antigen progression) was 47.5%, and 2-year overall survival was 87.3%. Twenty-six patients (26.5%, 26/98) developed treatment-related toxicities.

Conclusions

Our study supports existing literature in showing that SBRT is effective and tolerable in patients with oligometastatic bone disease. Larger phase III trials are necessary and reasonable to determine long-term efficacy and toxicities.

Practice and principles of stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine and non-spine bone metastases

Radiotherapy is the dominant treatment modality for painful spine and non-spine bone metastases (NSBM). Historically, this was achieved with conventional low dose external beam radiotherapy, however, stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is increasingly applied for these indications. Meta-analyses and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated improved pain response and more durable tumor control with SBRT for spine metastases. However, in the setting of NSBM, there is limited evidence supporting global adoption and large scale randomized clinical trials are in need. SBRT is technically demanding requiring careful consideration of organ at risk tolerance, and strict adherence to technical requirements including immobilization, simulation, contouring and image-guidance procedures. Additional considerations include follow up practices after SBRT, with appropriate imaging playing a critical role in response assessment. Finally, there is renewed research into promising new technologies that may further refine the use of SBRT in both spinal and NSBM in the years to come.

Stereotactic Body and Conventional Radiotherapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Importance

Conventional external beam radiotherapy (cEBRT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are commonly used treatment options for relieving metastatic bone pain. The effectiveness of SBRT compared with cEBRT in pain relief has been a subject of debate, and conflicting results have been reported.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness associated with SBRT vs cEBRT for relieving metastatic bone pain.

Data Sources

A structured search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases on June 5, 2023. Additionally, results were added from a new randomized clinical trial (RCT) and additional unpublished data from an already published RCT.

Study Selection

Comparative studies reporting pain response after SBRT vs cEBRT in patients with painful bone metastases.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Two independent reviewers extracted data from eligible studies. Data were extracted for the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) populations. The study is reported following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guideline.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Overall and complete pain response at 1, 3, and 6 months after radiotherapy, according to the study's definition. Relative risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated for each study. A random-effects model using a restricted maximum likelihood estimator was applied for meta-analysis.

Results

There were 18 studies with 1685 patients included in the systematic review and 8 RCTs with 1090 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 7 RCTs, overall pain response was defined according to the International Consensus on Palliative Radiotherapy Endpoints in clinical trials (ICPRE). The complete pain response was reported in 6 RCTs, all defined according to the ICPRE. The ITT meta-analyses showed that the overall pain response rates did not differ between cEBRT and SBRT at 1 (RR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.99-1.30), 3 (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.96-1.47), or 6 (RR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.96-1.54) months. However, SBRT was associated with a higher complete pain response at 1 (RR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.02-2.01), 3 (RR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.16-2.78), and 6 (RR, 2.47; 95% CI, 1.24-4.91) months after radiotherapy. The PP meta-analyses showed comparable results.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, patients with painful bone metastases experienced similar overall pain response after SBRT compared with cEBRT. More patients had complete pain alleviation after SBRT, suggesting that selected subgroups will benefit from SBRT.

MRI feature-based radiomics models to predict treatment outcome after stereotactic body radiotherapy for spinal metastases

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to extract radiomics features from MRI using machine learning (ML) algorithms and integrate them with clinical features to build response prediction models for patients with spinal metastases undergoing stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

Patients with spinal metastases who were treated using SBRT at our hospital between July 2018 and April 2023 were recruited. We assessed their response to treatment using the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1). The lesions were categorized into progressive disease (PD) and non-PD groups. Radiomics features were extracted from T1-weighted image (T1WI), T2-weighted image (T2WI), and fat-suppression T2WI sequences. Feature selection involved intraclass correlation coefficients, minimal-redundancy-maximal-relevance, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator methods. Thirteen ML algorithms were employed to construct the radiomics prediction models. Clinical, conventional imaging, and radiomics features were integrated to develop combined models. Model performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the clinical value was assessed using decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

We included 194 patients with 142 (73.2%) lesions in the non-PD group and 52 (26.8%) in the PD group. Each region of interest generated 2264 features. The clinical model exhibited a moderate predictive value (area under the ROC curve, AUC = 0.733), while the radiomics models demonstrated better performance (AUC = 0.745-0.825). The combined model achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.828).

CONCLUSION

The MRI-based radiomics models exhibited valuable predictive capability for treatment outcomes in patients with spinal metastases undergoing SBRT.

CRITICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

Radiomics prediction models have the potential to contribute to clinical decision-making and improve the prognosis of patients with spinal metastases undergoing SBRT.

KEY POINTS

• Stereotactic body radiotherapy effectively delivers high doses of radiation to treat spinal metastases. • Accurate prediction of treatment outcomes has crucial clinical significance. • MRI-based radiomics models demonstrated good performance to predict treatment outcomes.

Spine Patient Optimal Radiosurgery Treatment for Symptomatic Metastatic Neoplasms (SPORTSMEN): a randomized phase II study protocol

Background

Approximately 40% of patients with metastatic cancer will have spinal metastatic disease. Historically treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with limited durability in pain control, the increased lifespan of this patient population has necessitated more durable treatment results via spine radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The goal of this study is to assess three-month pain freedom rates via the Spine Patient Optimal Radiosurgery Treatment for Symptomatic Metastatic Neoplasms (SPORTSMEN) randomized trial.

Materials and methods

This study is a prospective randomized three-arm phase II trial which will recruit patients with symptomatic spine metastases. All patients will be randomized to standard-of care SBRT (24 Gy in 2 fractions), single-fraction SBRT (19 Gy in 1 fraction), or EBRT (8 Gy in 1 fraction), with the primary endpoint of three-month pain freedom (using the Brief Pain Inventory). We expect that SPORTSMEN will help definitively answer the efficacy of spine SBRT versus EBRT for achieving pain freedom, while defining the safety and efficacy of 19 Gy single-fraction spine SBRT. Local control will be defined according to Spine Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) criteria.

Discussion

This is the first phase II trial to objectively assess optimal spine SBRT dosing in the treatment of symptomatic spine metastatic disease, while assessing spine SBRT versus EBRT. Findings should allow for better determination of the efficacy of two-fraction spine SBRT versus EBRT in the United States, as well as for the novel single-fraction 19 Gy spine SBRT regimen in patients with symptomatic spine metastases.

Trial Registration

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05617716 (registration date: November 14, 2022).

Team Approach: Management of Pathologic Fractures

»

Optimal care for pathologic fractures centers on the use of a multidisciplinary team; thus, whenever there is a concern for pathologic fracture and proper workup is unable to be performed, prompt referral to a center equipped to manage these injuries should occur.

»

Fixation strategies for pathologic fractures must take into account patient characteristics, cancer subtypes, and overall goals of treatment.

»

As the treatments of cancers improve, patient life expectancy with disease will improve as well. This will lead to an increase in the incidence of impending or completed pathologic fractures. The broader subspecialties of orthopaedics must be aware of general principles in the diagnosis and management of these injuries.

Dosimetric comparison of robotic- and LINAC-based treatment of spine stereotactic body radiotherapy

To determine which treatment technique and modality would offer better dosimetric results and be preferable for spinal stereotactic body therapy (SBRT) depending on the three different regions of the vertebrae. Linear accelerator (LINAC)- and CyberKnife (CK)-based treatment techniques were compared in terms of their dosimetric quality, treatment efficiency, and delivery accuracy. Thirty previously treated patients were included in this study. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) techniques were used for LINAC-based treatment, whereas CK-based treatment plans were generated for two different collimator systems: fixed and multileaf collimator (MLC). The plans were compared based on spinal cord sparing, dose homogeneity, conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), monitor unit (MU), and beam-on time. The percentage volumes of V2Gy, V5Gy (representing volume low of the dose spillage region), V10Gy, and V20Gy (representing the volume of the high-dose spillage region) of the healthy tissue were analyzed. The CI and GI of the VMAT plans were better than those of the IMRT plans. For spinal cord sparing, the VMAT and MLC-based CK (CK-MLC) techniques were superior. The percentage of low-dose spillage regions was the lowest for IMRT and fixed cone-based CK (CK-FIX) plans. The percentage of the high-dose spillage region was the lowest for the VMAT and CK-MLC plans. In terms of treatment efficiency, the VMAT and CK-MLC plans were superior to the IMRT and CK-FIX plans. The VMAT technique lowered the MU and beam-on time values. The plan delivery accuracy of the VMAT and CK-FIX plans was better than that of the IMRT plans. VMAT is the best option for LINAC-based spinal SBRT. For CK-based spinal SBRT, MLC-based plans are preferred. If the clinic has both treatment modalities and the patient can tolerate long treatment times, CK-MLC-based treatment should be chosen because of its superiority in sparing the spinal cord and sharp dose fall-off.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy versus Conventional External Beam Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and conventional external beam radiation therapy (cEBRT) in patients with previously unirradiated painful bone metastases (BM).

METHODS

We searched biomedical databases for eligible randomized trials (RCTs). The outcomes of interest were pain response, local progression, overall survival (OS) and adverse events. We used established tools to assess the quality of the individual trials and certainty of the pooled evidence. We performed meta-analyses using random effects models.

RESULTS

Six RCTs were identified. SBRT improved complete pain response rates at 3 months (OR, 3.38; 95% CI, 1.88-6.07; high certainty), reduced local progression rates (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.62; high certainty) and increase pain flare rates. There were no differences for other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Among patients with previously unirradiated painful BM, SBRT significantly improved complete pain response rates at 3 months, delayed local progression and increase pain flare rates.

State-of-the-Art Imaging Techniques in Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression

Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression (MSCC) is a debilitating complication in oncology patients. This narrative review discusses the strengths and limitations of various imaging modalities in diagnosing MSCC, the role of imaging in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for MSCC treatment, and recent advances in deep learning (DL) tools for MSCC diagnosis. PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched using targeted keywords. Studies were reviewed in consensus among the co-authors for their suitability before inclusion. MRI is the gold standard of imaging to diagnose MSCC with reported sensitivity and specificity of 93% and 97% respectively. CT Myelogram appears to have comparable sensitivity and specificity to contrast-enhanced MRI. Conventional CT has a lower diagnostic accuracy than MRI in MSCC diagnosis, but is helpful in emergent situations with limited access to MRI. Metal artifact reduction techniques for MRI and CT are continually being researched for patients with spinal implants. Imaging is crucial for SBRT treatment planning and three-dimensional positional verification of the treatment isocentre prior to SBRT delivery. Structural and functional MRI may be helpful in post-treatment surveillance. DL tools may improve detection of vertebral metastasis and reduce time to MSCC diagnosis. This enables earlier institution of definitive therapy for better outcomes.

Bone-only oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy: a multi-institutional study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the prognostic factors associated with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with bone-only metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) who have five or fewer lesions treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

METHODS

The clinical data of 54 patients with 70 bone metastases undergoing SBRT treated between 2013 and 2020 with a dose of at least 5 Gy per fraction and a biologically effective dose (BED) of at least 90 Gy were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

The majority of lesions were located in the spine (57.4%) and had only one metastasis (64.8%). After a median follow-up of 22.4 months, the 1‑ and 2‑year OS rates were 84.6% and 67.3%, respectively, and median OS was 43.1 months. The 1‑ and 2‑year PFS rates and median PFS were 63.0%, 38.9%, and 15.3 months, respectively. In SBRT-treated lesions, the 1‑year local control (LC) rate was 94.9%. Age, metastasis localization, and number of fractions of SBRT were significant prognostic factors for OS in univariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, patients with spinal metastasis had better OS compared to their counterparts, and patients who received single-fraction SBRT had better PFS than those who did not. No patient experienced acute or late toxicities of grade 3 or greater.

CONCLUSION

Despite excellent LC at the oligometastatic site treated with SBRT, disease progression was observed in nearly half of patients 13 months after metastasis-directed local therapy, particularly as distant disease progression other than the treated lesion, necessitating an effective systemic treatment to improve treatment outcomes.

Evaluation of a proprietary software application for motion monitoring during stereotactic paraspinal treatment

PURPOSE

Stereotactic paraspinal treatment has become increasingly popular due to its favorable clinical outcome. An often-overlooked factor that compromises the effectiveness of such treatment is the patients' involuntary intrafractional motion. This work introduces and validates a proprietary software application that quantifies such motion for accurate patient monitoring during treatment.

METHODS

The software uses a separate full-trajectory cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) after daily patient setup to establish reference projections. Once treatment starts, the software grabs the intrafraction motion review (IMR) image acquired by TrueBeam via the Varian iTools Capture software and compares it against the corresponding reference projection to instantly determine the 2D shifts of the vertebrae being monitored using the classical downhill simplex optimization method. To evaluate its performance, an anthropomorphic phantom was shifted 0, 0.6, 1.2, 1.8, 2.4, 3.0, and 5 mm in three orthogonal directions, immediately after the full-trajectory CBCT but prior to treatment. Depending on the scenario of shift, a nine-field fixed gantry intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan and/or a four partial-posterior-arcs volume-modulated radiation therapy (VMAT) plan were delivered. For the IMRT plan, three IMR images were acquired sequentially every 200 monitor units (MU) at each treatment angle. For the VMAT plan, one IMR image was acquired every 15° of each arc. For each IMR image, the software-reported 2D shift was compared with the ground truth. Certain tests were repeated with 1°, 2°, and 3° of rotation, pitch, and roll, respectively. Some of these tests were also repeated independently on separate days.

RESULTS

Based on the group of tests that involved only the IMRT delivery, the maximum standard deviation of the software-reported shifts for each set of three IMR images was 0.16 mm, with 95th percentile at 0.02 mm. For translational shift, the maximum registration error was 0.44 mm, with 95th percentile at 0.23 mm. Left unaccounted for, rotation and pitch degraded the registration accuracy mainly in the longitudinal direction, while roll degraded it mainly in the lateral direction. The degradation of registration accuracy is positively related to the degree of rotation, pitch, and roll. The maximum registration errors under 3° rotation, pitch, and roll were 2.97, 1.44, 2.72 mm, respectively. Based on the group of tests that compared IMRT delivery with VMAT delivery, the registration errors slightly increased as magnitude of shifts increased; however, they were well under the 0.5-mm threshold. No significant differences in registration errors were observed between IMRT and VMAT deliveries. In addition, the variation in registration errors among different days was limited for both IMRT and VMAT deliveries.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proprietary software has high repeatability, both intrafractionally and interfractionally, and high accuracy in registering IMR images with the reference projections for motion monitoring, regardless of the magnitude of shifts or treatment delivery technique. Rotation, pitch, and roll degrade registration accuracy and need to be accounted for in the future work.

Is Halcyon feasible for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT?

Purpose

Halcyon linear accelerators employ intensity‐modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) techniques. The Halcyon offers translational, but not rotational, couch correction, which only allows a 3 degrees of freedom (3‐DOF) correction. In contrast, the TrueBeam (TB) linear accelerator offers full 6‐DOF corrections. This study aims to evaluate the difference in treatment plan quality for single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment SBRT between the Halcyon and TB linear accelerators. In addition, this study will also investigate the effect of patient rotational setup errors on the final plan quality.

Methods

We analyzed 20 patients with a single‐level spine metastasis located between the T7 and L5 vertebrae near the spinal canal. The median planning target volume was 52.0 cm³ (17.9–138.7 cm³). The median tumor diameter in the axial plane was 4.6 cm (range 1.7–6.8 cm), in the sagittal plane was 3.3 cm (range 2–5 cm). The prescription doses were either 12–16 Gy in 1 fraction or 18–24 Gy in 3 fractions. All patients were treated on the TB linear accelerator with a 2.5 mm Multi‐Leaf Collimator (MLC) leaf width. Treatment plans were retrospectively created for the Halcyon, which has a 5 mm effective MLC leaf width. The 20 patients had a total of 50 treatments. Analysis of the 50 cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans showed average rotational setup errors of 0.6°, 1.2°, and 0.8° in pitch, yaw, and roll, respectively. Rotational error in roll was not considered in this study, as the original TB plans used a coplanar volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique, and each 1° of roll will contribute an error of 1/360. If a plan has 3 arcs, the contribution from errors in roll will be < 0.1%. To simulate different patient setup errors, for each patient, 12 CT image datasets were generated in Velocity AI with different rotational combinations at a pitch and yaw of 1°, 2°, and 3°, respectively. We recalculated both the TB and Halcyon plans on these rotated images.  The dosimetric plan quality was evaluated based on the percent tumor coverage, the Conformity Index (CI), Gradient Index (GI), Homogeneity index (HI), the maximum dose to the cord/cauda, and the volume of the cord/cauda receiving 8, 10, and 12 Gy (V8Gy, V10Gy and V12Gy). Paired t‐tests were performed between the original and rotated plans with a significance level of 0.05.

Results

The Eclipse based VMAT plans on Halcyon achieved a similar target coverage (92.3 ± 3.0% vs. 92.4 ± 3.3%, p = 0.82) and CI (1.0 ± 0.1 vs. 1.1 ± 0.2, p = 0.12) compared to the TB plans. The Gradient index of Halcyon is higher (3.96 ±0.8) than TB (3.85 ±0.7), but not statistically significant. The maximum dose to the spinal cord/cauda was comparable (11.1 ± 2.8 Gy vs. 11.4 ± 3.6 Gy, p = 0.39), as were the V8Gy, V10Gy and V12Gy to the cord/cauda. The dosimetric influence of patient rotational setup error was statistically insignificant for rotations of up to 1° pitch/yaw (with similar target coverage, CI, max cord/cauda dose and V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy for cord/cauda). The total number of monitor units (MUs) for Halcyon (4998 ± 1688) was comparable to that of TB (5463 ± 2155) (p = 0.09).

Conclusions

The Halcyon VMAT plans for a single thoracic or lumbar spine metastasis were dosimetrically comparable to the TB plans. Patient rotation within 1° in the pitch and yaw directions, if corrected by translation, resulted in insignificant dosimetric effects. The Halcyon linear accelerator is an acceptable alternative to TB for the treatment of single thoracic or lumbar spinal level metastasis, but users need to be cautious about the patient rotational setup error.  It is advisable to select patients appropriately, including only those with the thoracic or lumbar spine involvement and keeping at least 2 mm separation between the target and the cord/cauda. More margin is needed if the distance between the isocenter and cord/cauda is larger. It is advisable to place the planning isocenter close to the spinal canal to further mitigate the rotational error.

Summary

We simulated various scenarios of patient setup errors with different rotational combinations of pitch and yaw with 1°, 2°, and 3°, respectively. Rotation was corrected with translation only to mimic the Halcyon treatment scenario. Using the Halcyon for treating a tumor in a single thoracic or lumbar vertebral segment is feasible, but caution should be noted in patients requiring rotational corrections of > 1° in the absence of 6‐DOF correction capabilities.

The Roles of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Focused Ultrasound in Pain Relief in Patients With Bone Metastases: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

Cancer pain, the most common skeleton-related event of bone metastases, significantly disturbs patients' life. MRI-guided focused ultrasound (MRgFUS) is a therapeutic option to relieve pain; however, its efficacy and safety have not been fully explored. Therefore, we aim to conduct a meta-analysis on studies reporting MRgFUS for patients with bone metastases.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCT) and non-RCTs on MRgFUS treatment for patients with bone metastases were collected using PubMed, MEDLINE In-Process (US National Library of Medicine), National Institutes of Health (US National Library of Medicine), Embase (Elsevier), Web of Science, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library between August 2007 and September 2019. Data on quantitative pain assessment before/after MRgFUS, response rate, and complication were extracted and analyzed.

Results

Fifteen eligible studies with 362 patients were selected in this meta-analysis. The average pain score was 6.74 (95% CI: 6.30-7.18) at baseline, 4.15 (95% CI: 3.31-4.99) at 0-1 week, 3.09 (95% CI: 2.46-3.72) at 1-5 weeks, and 2.28 (95% CI: 1.37-3.19) at 5-14 weeks. Compared with baseline, the pain improvement at 0-1 week was 2.54 (95% CI: 1.92-3.16, p < 0.01), at 1-5 weeks was 3.56 (95% CI: 3.11-4.02, p < 0.01), and at 5-14 weeks was 4.22 (95% CI: 3.68-4.76, p < 0.01). Change from baseline in OMEDD at 2 weeks after treatment was -15.11 (95% CI: -34.73, 4.50), at 1 month after treatment was -10.87 (95% CI: -26.32, 4.58), and at 3 months after treatment was -5.53 (95% CI: -20.44, 9.38). The overall CR rate was 0.36 (95% CI: 0.24-0.48), PR rate was 0.47 (95% CI: 0.36-0.58), and NR rate was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.13-0.34). Among 14 studies including 352 patients, 93 (26.4%) patients with minor complications and 5 (1.42%) patients with major complications were recorded.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis identifies MRgFUS as a reliable therapeutic option to relieve cancer pain for patients with metastatic bone tumors with controllable related complications.

An international pooled analysis of SBRT outcomes to oligometastatic spine and non-spine bone metastases

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of data on SBRT to non-spine bone (NSB) lesions compared to spine metastases. We report local recurrence (LR), widespread progression (WSP), and overall survival (OS) for oligometastatic patients treated to bone lesions with SBRT and investigate the hypothesis that outcomes are different between patients with spine and non-spine bone oligometastatic disease.

METHODS

Patients with oligometastatic disease (≤5 cumulative extracranial metastases) treated with bone SBRT at 6 international institutions from 2007 to 2016 were reviewed. Fine and Gray competing risks and Cox regressions were used to analyze univariable and multivariable relationships between disease/treatment factors and outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 288 spine and 233 NSB lesions are reported in 356 patients. Cumulative incidence of LR across all bone lesions was 6.3%, 12.6% and 19.3% at 6 mo, 1 yr and 2 yrs. While univariable analysis suggested inferior LC and OS in spine patients, this did not hold true in multivariable analysis. The final regression model for LR in NSB lesions included PTV ≥ median of 31.8 cc (HR 5.02, p = 0.014) and primary histology, with RCC and NSCLC conferring a 10.8- and 6.5-fold increased risk of LR compared to prostate histology, respectively. The spine LR model included radioresistant histology (HR 2.11, p = 0.0051), PTV Dmin (BED10) ≥ median of 19.1 Gy (HR 0.46, p = 0.0085), and epidural disease (HR 1.99, p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

This large multi-institutional series reports comparably excellent response to SBRT for a balanced distribution of oligometastatic NSB and spine lesions. Dose escalation for large and/or radioresistant NSB lesions should be explored, given the typical lack of an immediately adjacent dose-limiting critical structure.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastases: an open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial

BACKGROUND

Conventional external beam radiotherapy is the standard palliative treatment for spinal metastases; however, complete response rates for pain are as low as 10-20%. Stereotactic body radiotherapy delivers high-dose, ablative radiotherapy. We aimed to compare complete response rates for pain after stereotactic body radiotherapy or conventional external beam radiotherapy in patients with painful spinal metastasis.

METHODS

This open-label, multicentre, randomised, controlled, phase 2/3 trial was done at 13 hospitals in Canada and five hospitals in Australia. Patients were eligible if they were aged 18 years and older, and had painful (defined as ≥2 points with the Brief Pain Inventory) MRI-confirmed spinal metastasis, no more than three consecutive vertebral segments to be included in the treatment volume, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2, a Spinal Instability Neoplasia Score of less than 12, and no neurologically symptomatic spinal cord or cauda equina compression. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with a web-based, computer-generated allocation sequence to receive either stereotactic body radiotherapy at a dose of 24 Gy in two daily fractions or conventional external beam radiotherapy at a dose of 20 Gy in five daily fractions using standard techniques. Treatment assignment was done centrally by use of a minimisation method to achieve balance for the stratification factors of radiosensitivity, the presence or absence of mass-type tumour (extraosseous or epidural disease extension, or both) on imaging, and centre. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with a complete response for pain at 3 months after radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was analysed in the intention-to-treat population and all safety and quality assurance analyses were done in the as-treated population (ie, all patients who received at least one fraction of radiotherapy). The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02512965.

FINDINGS

Between Jan 4, 2016, and Sept 27, 2019, 229 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive conventional external beam radiotherapy (n=115) or stereotactic body radiotherapy (n=114). All 229 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. The median follow-up was 6·7 months (IQR 6·3-6·9). At 3 months, 40 (35%) of 114 patients in the stereotactic body radiotherapy group, and 16 (14%) of 115 patients in the conventional external beam radiotherapy group had a complete response for pain (risk ratio 1·33, 95% CI 1·14-1·55; p=0·0002). This significant difference was maintained in multivariable-adjusted analyses (odds ratio 3·47, 95% CI 1·77-6·80; p=0·0003). The most common grade 3-4 adverse event was grade 3 pain (five [4%] of 115 patients in the conventional external beam radiotherapy group vs five (5%) of 110 patients in the stereotactic body radiotherapy group). No treatment-related deaths were observed.

INTERPRETATION

Stereotactic body radiotherapy at a dose of 24 Gy in two daily fractions was superior to conventional external beam radiotherapy at a dose of 20 Gy in five daily fractions in improving the complete response rate for pain. These results suggest that use of conformal, image-guided, stereotactically dose-escalated radiotherapy is appropriate in the palliative setting for symptom control for selected patients with painful spinal metastases, and an increased awareness of the need for specialised and multidisciplinary involvement in the delivery of end-of-life care is needed.

FUNDING

Canadian Cancer Society and the Australian National Health and Medical Research Council.

Outcomes of extra-cranial stereotactic body radiotherapy for metastatic breast cancer: Treatment indication matters

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To summarize the clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for metastatic breast cancer (mBC) from a large institution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with mBC who received extra-cranial SBRT to metastatic lesions from 2011 to 2017 were identified. Treatment indications were: oligometastases, oligoprogression, and local control of dominant tumor (CDT). Endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), local control (LC) and cumulative incidence of starting/changing chemo or hormonal therapy (SCT). Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify predictive factors.

RESULTS

We analyzed 120 patients (193 treated metastatic lesions) with a median follow up of 15.25 months. 1-and 2-year LC rates were 89% and 86.6%, respectively. 1-and 2-year OS rates were 83.5% and 70%, respectively, with treatment indication and molecular subtype being the predictive factors on MVA. 1-year OS was 91.0%, 78.5% and 63.9% for oligometastases, oligoprogression and CDT, respectively (p = 0.003). The worst OS was seen in basal subtype with 1-and 2-year OS rates of 59.2% and 39.5% (p = 0.01). Treatment indication was found to be predictive for PFS and lower rates of SCT on MVA. 1-and 2-year PFS rates were 45% and 32%, respectively. The 1-year PFS for oligometastases, oligoprogression, and CDT was 66%, 19.6%, and 14.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of SCT at 1-year was 12% for oligometastases, 39.7% for oligoprogression and 53.3% for CDT (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients treated for oligometastases have better OS and PFS than those treated for oligoprogression or CDT. SBRT may delay SCT in mBC patients, particularly those with oligometastases. SBRT provided an excellent LC in mBC patients.

Long-Term Results of Dose-Intensified Fractionated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) for Painful Spinal Metastases

PURPOSE

To report long-term outcome of fractionated stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for painful spinal metastases.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase 2 clinical trial enrolled 57 patients with 63 painful, unirradiated spinal metastases between March 2012 and July 2015. Patients were treated with 48.5 Gy in 10 SBRT fractions (long life expectancy [Mizumoto score ≤4]) or 35 Gy in 5 SBRT fractions (intermediate life expectancy [Mizumoto score 5-9]). Pain response was defined as pain improvement of a minimum of 2 points on a visual analog scale, and net pain relief was defined as the sum of time with pain response (complete and partial) divided by the overall follow-up time.

RESULTS

All 57 patients received treatment per protocol; 32 and 25 patients were treated with 10- and 5-fraction SBRT, respectively. The median follow-up of living patients was 60 months (range, 33-74 months). Of evaluable patients, 82% had complete or partial pain response (responders) at 3 months' follow-up (primary endpoint), and pain response remained stable over 5 years. Net pain relief was 74% (95% CI, 65%-80%). Overall survival rates of 1, 3, and 5 years were 59.6% (95% CI, 47%-72%), 33.3% (95% CI, 21%-46%), and 21% (95% CI, 10%-32%), respectively. Freedom from local spinal-metastasis progression was 82% at the last imaging follow-up. Late grade-3 toxicity was limited to pain in 2 patients (nonresponders). There were no cases of myelopathy. SBRT resulted in long-term improvements of all dimensions of the 5-level EuroQol 5-Dimension Questionnaire except anxiety/depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractionated SBRT achieved durable pain response and improved quality of life at minimum late toxicity.

Addressing the dosimetric impact of bone cement and vertebroplasty in stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

Bone cement used for vertebroplasty can affect the accuracy on the dose calculation of the radiation therapy treatment. In addition the CT values of high density objects themselves can be misrepresented in kVCT images. The aim of our study is then to propose a streamlined approach for estimating the real density of cement implants used in stereotactic body radiation therapy.

METHODS

Several samples of cement were manufactured and irradiated in order to investigate the impact of their composition on the radiation dose. The validity of the CT conversion method for a range of photon energies was investigated, for the studied samples and on six patients. Calculations and measurements were carried out with various overridden densities and dose prediction algorithms (AXB with dose-to-medium reporting or AAA) in order to find the effective density override.

RESULTS

Relative dose differences of several percent were found between the dose measured and calculated downstream of the implant using an ion chamber and TPS or EPID dosimetry. If the correct density is assigned to the implant, calculations can provide clinically acceptable accuracy (gamma criteria of 3%/2 mm). The use of MV imaging significantly favors the attribution of a correct equivalent density to the implants compared to the use of kVCT images.

CONCLUSION

The porosity and relative density of the various studied implants vary significantly. Bone cement density estimations can be characterized using MV imaging or planar in vivo dosimetry, which could help determining whether errors in dose calculations are due to incorrect densities.

Clinical and dosimetric risk factors for vertebral compression fracture after single-fraction stereotactic body radiation therapy for spine metastases

Objectives

This analysis was performed to evaluate the incidence of vertebral compression fracture (VCF) and determine the contributing factors for VCF in patients undergoing single-fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal bone metastases (SBM).

Methods

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted for patients undergoing SBRT for SBM at our institution between January 2010 and December 2018. Patients who had undergone neither pre-SBRT surgical excision nor post-SBRT prophylactic fixation were included. The effects of clinical and dosimetric parameters were analyzed with respect to VCF risk. The following dosimietric parameters of the planning target volume (PTV) were calculated: mean/minimum/maximum dose, radiation dose to 10-90% volume, and irradiated volume receiving more than 10-25 Gy (PTV_V_{10 - 25 Gy}).

Results

Among 163 patients (179 vertebrae), 21 (12.8%) experienced VCF. The 1-year and 2-year VCF rates were 12.1% and 13.2%, respectively. Among dosimetric parameters, PTV_V15 Gy was the most significant for VCF prediction. In a univariate analysis, breast or prostate primary, no vertebral body collapse, and PTV_V_{15 Gy} ≤42 cm³ were significantly associated with a lower incidence rate of VCF. In a multivariate analysis, PTV_V_{15 Gy} was the only significant factor for VCF risk. The 1-year VCF rate was 3.8% in patients with PTV_V_{15 Gy} ≤42 cm³, while it was 22.1% in those with PTV_V_{15 Gy} > 42 cm³ (p < 0.01).

Conclusions

SBRT-related VCF was found in 12% of patients in our institution. The PTV_V_{15 Gy} is a significant factor for VCF prediction.

Local control and patterns of failure for "Radioresistant" spinal metastases following stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to a "Radiosensitive" reference

PURPOSE

The concept of a radioresistant (RR) phenotype has been challenged with use of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). We compared outcomes following SBRT to RR spinal metastases to a radiosensitive cohort.

METHODS

Renal cell, melanoma, sarcoma, gastro-intestinal, and thyroid spinal metastases were identified as RR and prostate cancer (PCA) as radiosensitive. The primary endpoint was MRI-based local failure (LF). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and vertebral compression fracture (VCF).

RESULTS

From a prospectively maintained database of 1394 spinal segments in 605 patients treated with spine SBRT, 173 patients/395 RR spinal segments were compared to 94 patients/185 PCA segments. Most received 24-28 Gy in 2 fractions (68.9%) and median follow-up was 15.5 months (range, 1.4-84.2 months). 1- and 2-year LF rates were 19.2% and 22.4% for RR metastases, respectively, which were significantly greater (p < 0.001) than PCA (3.2% and 8.4%, respectively). Epidural disease (HR: 2.47, 95% CI 1.65-3.71, p < 0.001) and RR histology (HR: 2.41, 95% CI 1.45-3.99, p < 0.001) predicted for greater LF. Median OS was 17.4 and 61.0 months for RR and PCA cohorts, respectively. Lung/liver metastases, polymetastatic disease and epidural disease predicted for worse OS. 2-year VCF rates were ~ 13% in both cohorts. Coverage of the CTV V90 (clinical target volume receiving 90% of prescription dose) by ≥ 87% (HR: 2.32, 95% CI 1.29-4.18, p = 0.005), no prior spine radiotherapy (HR: 1.96, 95% CI 1.09-3.55, p = 0.025), and a greater Spinal Instability Neoplasia Score (p = 0.013) predicted for VCF.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher rates of LF were observed after spine SBRT in RR metastases. Optimization strategies include dose escalation and aggressive management of epidural disease.

Residual intra-fraction error in robotic spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy without immobilization devices

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Spinal stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) involves large dose gradients and high geometrical accuracy is therefore required. The aim of this work was to assess residual intra-fraction error with a tracking robotic system for non-immobilized patients. Shifts from the first alignment (i.e. mimicking the unavailability of tracking) were also quantified.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-two patients treated for spinal metastasis (128 fractions, 4220 images) were analyzed. Residual error was quantified as the difference between translations/rotations referring to consecutive x-ray images during delivery (tracking) and to the initial set-up (no-tracking). The error distribution for each fraction/patient and the entire population was assessed for each axis/rotation angle. The impact of lesion sites, fractionation and patient's pain (VAS score) were investigated. Finally, the dosimetric impact of residual motion was quantified in the four most affected fractions.

RESULTS

Mean overall errors (OE) were near 0 (SD < 0.1 mm). Residual translations/rotations >1 mm/1° were found in less than 1.5%/1% of measurements. Lesion site and fractionation showed no impact. The dosimetric impact in the most affected fractions was negligible. For "no-tracking", mean OE was <1 mm/0.5°; less than 2% of displacements were >2 mm/1° within 10 min from the start of treatment with an increasing probability of shifts >2 mm over time. A significantly higher fraction of OE ≥ 2 mm was found for patients with pain in case of no-tracking.

CONCLUSIONS

Spine tracking with a latest-generation robotic system is highly efficient for non-immobilized patients: residual error is time independent and close to 0. For delivery times >7-8 min, tracking should be considered as mandatory for non-immobilized patients.

Evaluation of the Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group Algorithms as Part of a Multidisciplinary Spine Tumor Conference

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The Metastatic Spine Disease Multidisciplinary Working Group Algorithms are evidence and expert opinion-based strategies for utilizing radiation therapy, interventional radiology procedures, and surgery to treat 5 types of spine metastases: asymptomatic spinal metastases, uncomplicated spinal metastases, stable vertebral compression fractures (VCF), unstable VCF, and metastatic epidural spinal cord compression (MESCC). Evaluation of this set of algorithms in a clinical setting is lacking. The authors aimed to identify rate of treatment adherence to the Working Group Algorithms and, subsequently, update these algorithms based on actual patient management decisions made at a single-institution, multidisciplinary, spine tumor conference.

METHODS

Patients with metastatic spine disease from primary non-hematologic malignancies discussed at an institutional spine tumor conference from 2013 to 2016 were evaluated. Rates of Working Group Algorithms adherence were calculated for each type of metastasis. Based on the reasons for algorithm nonadherence, and patient outcomes in such cases, updated Working Group Algorithms recommendations were proposed.

RESULTS

In total, 154 eligible patients with 171 spine metastases were evaluated. Rates of algorithm adherence were as follows: asymptomatic (67%), uncomplicated (73%), stable VCF (20%), unstable VCF (32%), and MESCC (41%). The most common deviation from the Working Group Algorithms was surgery for MESCC despite poor prognostic factors, but this treatment strategy was supported based on median survival surpassing 6 months in these patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Adherence to the Working Group Algorithm was lowest for MESCC and VCF patients, but many nonadherent treatments were supported by patient survival outcomes. We proposed updates to the Working Group Algorithm based on these findings.

Systematic Review of the Role of Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Bone Metastases

Background

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SBRT) might improve pain and local control in patients with bone metastases compared to conventional radiotherapy, although an overall estimate of these outcomes is currently unknown.

Methods

A systematic review was carried out following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched to identify studies reporting pain response and local control among patients with bone metastases from solid-organ tumors who underwent SBRT in 1–6 fractions. All studies prior to April 15, 2017, were included. Study quality was assessed by predefined criteria, and pain response and local control rates were extracted.

Results

A total of 2619 studies were screened; 57 were included (reporting outcomes for 3995 patients) of which 38 reported pain response and 45 local control rates. Local control rates were high with pain response rates above those previously reported for conventional radiotherapy. Marked heterogeneity in study populations and delivered treatments were identified such that quantitative synthesis was not appropriate. Reported toxicity was limited. Of the pain response studies, 73.7% used a retrospective cohort design and only 10.5% used the international consensus endpoint definitions of pain response. The median survival within the included studies ranged from 8 to 30.4 months, suggesting a high risk of selection bias in the included observational studies.

Conclusions

This review demonstrates the potential benefit of SBRT over conventional palliative radiotherapy in improving pain due to bone metastases. Given the methodological limitations of the published literature, however, large randomized trials are now urgently required to better quantify this benefit.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy administered to a previously irradiated spine is effective and well-tolerated

PURPOSE

This study sought to discern the clinical outcomes of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) administered to the spine in patients who had undergone previous radiotherapy.

METHODS

A total of 81 sites of 74 patients who underwent previous radiotherapy administered to the spine or peri-spine and subsequently received IMRT for the spine were analyzed in this study. The prescribed dose of 80 Gy in a biologically effective dose (BED) of α/β = 10 (BED₁₀) was set as the planning target volume. The constraint for the spinal cord and cauda equine was D_0.1 cc ≤ 100 Gy and ≤ 150 Gy of BED for re-irradiation alone and the total irradiation dose, respectively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 10.1 (0.9-92.1) months after re-irradiation, while the median interval from the last day of the previous radiotherapy to the time of re-irradiation was 15.6 (0.4-210.1) months. Separately, the median prescript dose of re-irradiation was 78.0 (28.0-104.9) of BED₁₀. The median survival time in this study was 13.9 months, with 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival rates of 53.7%, 29.3%, and 26.6%, respectively. The 1-, 3-, and 5-year local control rates were 90.8%, 84.0%, and 84.0%, respectively. Neurotoxicity was observed in two of 72 treatments (2.8%) assessed after re-irradiation.

CONCLUSION

Re-irradiation for the spine using IMRT seems well-tolerated. Definitive re-irradiation can be a feasible treatment option in patients with the potential for a good prognosis.

Imaging response assessment following stereotactic body radiotherapy for solid tumour metastases of the spine: Current challenges and future directions

Patients with metastatic disease are routinely serially imaged to assess disease burden and response to systemic and local therapies, which places ever-expanding demands on our healthcare resources. Image interpretation following stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spine metastases can be challenging; however, appropriate and accurate assessment is critical to ensure patients are managed correctly and resources are optimised. Here, we take a critical review of the merits and pitfalls of various imaging modalities, current response assessment guidelines, and explore novel imaging approaches and the potential for radiomics to add value in imaging assessment.

Minimally invasive lateral approaches for the treatment of spinal tumors: single-position surgery without the "flip"

Although primary tumors of the spine and neural elements are rare, metastatic disease to the spine is quite common. Traditionally, surgical treatment for spinal tumor patients involves open decompression with or without stabilization. The single-position minimally invasive (MIS) lateral approach, which has been recently described over the recent decade, allows simultaneous access to the anterior and posterior columns with the patient positioned in the lateral decubitus position. Herein, we review the application of single-position MIS lateral surgery for the treatment of spinal neoplasm. The aim was to review the evolution, operative technique, outcomes, and complications associated with MIS lateral approaches for spinal tumors. The history of spinal tumor diagnosis and management are reviewed and discussed as well as the author's experience and literature regarding spinal tumor treatment outcome and surgical complications, with particular attention to single-position, MIS lateral approaches. In addition, the author's surgical technique is outlined in detail for thoracic, thoracolumbar and lumbar tumors. Furthermore, there are specific indications and complications associated with the surgical treatment of spinal tumors, and the MIS, single-position lateral approach, when applied appropriately, allows for concurrent access to the anterior and posterior column while mitigating the complications associated with traditional, open posterior-based approaches. In the treatment of spinal neoplasms, the goals of surgery are dictated by a number of tumor-specific and patient-specific factors. Therefore, operative treatment of tumors in the future may be a consolidation of historical surgical techniques and MIS, single-position lateral approaches. Regardless, multidisciplinary management is imperative for the individualized treatment of the patient and optimization of outcome.

Spine stereotactic radiosurgery for metastatic thyroid cancer: a single-institution experience

OBJECTIVE

Patients with metastatic thyroid cancer have prolonged survival compared to those with other primary tumors. The spine is the most common site of osseous involvement in cases of metastatic thyroid cancer. As a result, obtaining durable local control (LC) in the spine is crucial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of spine stereotactic radiosurgery (SSRS) in patients with metastatic thyroid cancer.

METHODS

Information on patients with metastatic thyroid cancer treated with SSRS for spinal metastases was retrospectively evaluated. SSRS was delivered with a simultaneous integrated boost technique using single- or multiple-fraction treatments. LC, defined as stable or reduced disease volume, was evaluated by examining posttreatment MRI, CT, and PET studies.

RESULTS

A total of 133 lesions were treated in 67 patients. The median follow-up duration was 31 months. Dose regimens for SSRS included 18 Gy in 1 fraction, 27 Gy in 3 fractions, and 30 Gy in 5 fractions. The histology distribution was 36% follicular, 33% papillary, 15% medullary, 13% Hurthle cell, and 3% anaplastic. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year LC rates were 96%, 89%, and 82%, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 43 months, with 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates of 86%, 74%, and 44%, respectively. There was no correlation between the absolute biological equivalent dose (BED) and OS or LC. Patients with effective LC had a trend toward improved OS when compared to patients who had local failure: 68 versus 28 months (p = 0.07). In terms of toxicity, 5 vertebral compression fractures (2.8%) occurred, and only 1 case (0.6%) of greater than or equal to grade 3 toxicity (esophageal stenosis) was reported.

CONCLUSIONS

SSRS is a safe and effective treatment option with excellent LC and minimal toxicity for patients with metastatic thyroid cancer. No association with increased radiation dose or BED was found, suggesting that such patients can be effectively treated with reduced dose regimens.

Intrafractional motion in stereotactic body radiotherapy of spinal metastases utilizing cone beam computed tomography image guidance

Background and purpose

Spine stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) requires a high degree of accuracy due to steep dose gradients close to the spinal cord. This study aimed to (1) evaluate intrafractional motion in spine SBRT utilizing flattening filter free (FFF) beam delivery and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance and (2) evaluate if adding another CBCT acquisition and corrections prior to treatment improves the overall position accuracy.

Materials and methods

Intrafractional motion was retrospectively analyzed for 78 fractions in 54 patients. All patients were immobilized with an evacuated cushion. Before treatment, a CBCT was acquired, a bony fusion with the planning CT was performed and translational and rotational errors were corrected. For 30 of the patients (39 fractions) acquisition of another CBCT and corrections were performed before treatment. A post treatment CBCT was acquired for all patients, and translational and rotational errors measured by fusion of the post treatment CBCT with the planning CT were recorded to calculate means and standard deviations (SDs).

Results

The positional errors were significantly smaller in 4 out of 6 error values in the patient group treated with verification CBCT. In this group, translational and rotational SDs ranged from 0.5 to 0.6 mm and 0.3°, respectively. Corresponding values in the group treated without verification CBCT were 0.7-1.0 mm and 0.4-0.7°.

Conclusion

With proper CBCT image guidance, patient immobilization and FFF-beam delivery, one can obtain very high patient position accuracy in spine SBRT. Inclusion of a verification CBCT prior to treatment increases the overall position accuracy.

A phase III randomized-controlled, single-blind trial to improve quality of life with stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with painful bone metastases (ROBOMET)

BACKGROUND

Bone metastases represent an important source of morbidity in cancer patients, mostly due to severe pain. Radiotherapy is an established symptomatic treatment for painful bone metastases, however, when conventional techniques are used, the effectiveness is moderate. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), delivering very high doses in a limited number of fractions in a highly conformal manner, could potentially be more effective and less toxic.

METHODS

This is a phase III, randomized-controlled, single-blind, multicenter study evaluating the response rate of antalgic radiotherapy for painful bone metastases and the acute toxicity associated with this treatment. A total of 126 patients will be randomly assigned to receive either the standard schedule of a single fraction of 8.0 Gy delivered through three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy or a single fraction of 20.0 Gy delivered through SBRT. Primary endpoint is pain response at the treated site at 1 month after radiotherapy. Secondary endpoints are pain flare at 24-48-72 h after radiotherapy, duration of pain response, re-irradiation need, acute toxicity, late toxicity, quality of life and subsequent serious skeletal events. In a supplementary analysis, patient-compliance for a paper-and-pencil questionnaire will be compared with an electronic mode.

DISCUSSION

If a dose-escalated approach within the context of single fraction stereotactic body radiotherapy could improve the pain response to radiotherapy and minimize acute toxicity, this would have an immediate impact on the quality of life for a large number of patients with advanced cancer. Potential disadvantages of this technique include increased pain flare or a higher incidence of radiation-induced fractures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The Ethics committee of the GZA Hospitals (B099201732915) approved this study on September 4th 2018. Trial registered on Clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT03831243 ) on February 5th 2019.

Comparison of treatment plan quality among MRI-based IMRT with a linac, MRI-based IMRT with tri-Co-60 sources, and VMAT for spine SABR

PURPOSE

This study compares the plan quality of magnetic-resonance image (MRI)-based intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using a linac (MR-linac-IMRT), MRI-based IMRT using tri-Co-60 sources (MR-Co-60-IMRT), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for spine stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR).

METHODS

Twenty patients with thoracic spine metastasis were retrospectively selected for this study. For each patient, the MR-linac-IMRT, MR-Co-60-IMRT, and VMAT plans were generated using an identical CT image set and structures, except for the spinal cord and spinal cord planning organ-at-risk volume (PRV). Those two structures were contoured based on CT image sets for VMAT planning while those were contoured based on MR image sets for MR-linac-IMRT and MR-Co-60-IMRT planning. The initial prescription doses were 18 Gy in a single fraction for every plan in this study. If the tolerance level of the spinal cord was not met, the prescription doses were reduced to meet the tolerance level of the spinal cord. Dose-volumetric parameters of each plan were analyzed.

RESULTS

The average spinal cord volumes contoured based on the CT and MR images were 3.8±1.6 cm3 and 1.1±1.0 cm3, respectively (p<0.001). For four patients, the prescription doses of VMAT plans were reduced to 16 Gy to satisfy the spinal cord tolerance level. For thirteen patients, the prescription doses of MR-Co-60-IMRT plans were reduced to be less than 16 Gy to meet the spinal cord tolerance level. However, for every MR-linac-IMRT plan, the initial prescription doses of 18 Gy could be delivered to the target volume while satisfying the spinal cord tolerance. The average values of D10%, V10Gy, and V14Gy of the spinal cord PRV consistently indicated that the doses to the spinal cord PRV in the MR-linac-IMRT plans were the lowest among three types of plans in this study (all with p≤0.003).

CONCLUSION

MR-linac-IMRT appears promising for spine SABR.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) for Oligometastatic Spine Metastases: An Overview

The oligometastatic state is hypothesized to represent an intermediary state of cancer between widely metastatic disease and curable, localized disease. Advancements in radiotherapy have allowed for delivery of high precision, dose escalated treatment known as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) to targets throughout the body with excellent rates of local control. Recently, the first phase II randomized trial comparing conventional radiotherapy to comprehensive SBRT of oligometastatic disease demonstrated an overall survival and progression free survival advantage. The spine is a common site of metastasis, and a complex site for SBRT given the adjacent spinal cord and the tumor embedded within the bone tissue putting the patient at risk of fracture. Although there are expert spine SBRT guidelines for practice, there are as yet no reported randomized trials that proves superiority as compared to conventional radiation. The use of SBRT in patients with oligometastatic disease and spinal metastases is the focus of this review.

Metastatic Phaeochromocytoma: Spinning Towards More Promising Treatment Options

Phaeochromocytomas (PCC) and paragangliomas (PGL) are rare tumours arising from the chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla (PCC) or the paraganglia located outside the adrenal gland (PGL). However, their incidence is likely to be underestimated; around 10% of all PCC/PGL are metastatic, with higher metastatic potential of PGLs compared to PCCs. If benign, surgery is the treatment of choice, but if metastatic, therapy is challenging. Here we review the currently existing therapy options for metastatic PCCs/PGLs including conventional chemotherapy (the original Averbuch scheme, but updated), radiopharmaceutical treatments (131I-MIBG, 90Y- and 177Lu-DOTATATE) and novel targeted therapies (anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and mTORC1 inhibitors), emphasising future therapeutic approaches (HIF-2α and PARP inhibitors, temozolomide alone, metronomic temozolomide, somatostatin analogues) based on the oncogenic signalling pathways related to three different clusters comprising more than 20 well-characterised PCC/PGL susceptibility genes. We suggest that targeted combination therapies including repurposed agents may offer more effective future options worthy of exploration.

Multidisciplinary approach for post-liver transplant recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma: A proposed management algorithm

A large number of liver transplants have been performed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and recurrence is increasingly encountered. The recurrence of HCC after liver transplantation is notoriously difficult to manage. We hereby propose multi-disciplinary management with a systematic approach. The patient is jointly managed by the transplant surgeon, physician, oncologist and radiologist. Immunosuppressants should be tapered to the lowest effective dose to protect against rejection. The combination of a mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor with a reduced calcineurin inhibitor could be considered with close monitoring of graft function and toxicity. Comprehensive staging can be performed by dual-tracer positron emission tomography-computed tomography or the combination of contrast computed tomography and a bone scan. In patients with disseminated recurrence, sorafenib confers survival benefits but is associated with significant drug toxicity. Oligo-recurrence encompasses recurrent disease that is limited in number and location so that loco-regional treatments convey disease control and survival benefits. Intra-hepatic recurrence can be managed with graft resection, but significant operative morbidity is expected. Radiofrequency ablation and stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) are effective alternative strategies. In patients with more advanced hepatic disease, regional treatment with trans-arterial chemoembolization or intra-arterial Yttrium-90 can be considered. For patients with extra-hepatic oligo-recurrence, loco-regional treatment can be considered if practical. Patients with more than one site of recurrence are not always contraindicated for curative treatments. Surgical resection is effective for patients with pulmonary oligo-recurrence, but adequate lung function is a pre-requisite. SBRT is a non-invasive and effective modality that conveys local control to pulmonary and skeletal oligo-recurrences.

High-Frequency Micro-Ultrasound Imaging and Optical Topographic Imaging for Spinal Surgery: Initial Experiences

High frequency micro-ultrasound (µUS) transducers with central frequencies up to 50 MHz facilitate dynamic visualization of patient anatomy with minimal disruption of the surgical work flow. Micro-ultrasound improves spatial resolution over conventional ultrasound imaging from millimeter to micrometer, but compromises depth penetration. This trade-off is sufficient during an open surgery in which the bone is removed and theultrasound probe can be placed into the surgical cavity. By fusing µUS with pre-operative imaging and tracking the ultrasound probe intra-operatively using our optical topographic imaging technology, we can provide dynamic feedback during surgery, thus affecting clinical decision making. We present our initial experience using high-frequency µUS imaging during spinal procedures. Micro-ultrasound images were obtained in five spinal procedures. Medical rationale for use of µUS was provided for each patient. Surgical procedures were performed using the standard clinical practice with bone removal to facilitate real-time ultrasound imaging of the soft tissue. During surgery, the µUS probe was registered to the pre-operative computed tomography and magnetic resonance images. Images obtained comprised five spinal decompression surgeries (four tumor resections, one cystic synovial mass). Micro-ultrasound images obtained during spine surgery delineated exquisite detailing of the spinal anatomy including white matter and gray matter tracts and nerve roots and allowed accurate assessment of the extent of decompression/tumor resection. In conclusion, tracked µUS enables real-time imaging of the surgical cavity, conferring significant qualitative improvement over conventional ultrasound.

Outcomes After Hypofractionated Dose-Escalation using a Simultaneous Integrated Boost Technique for Treatment of Spine Metastases Not Amenable to Stereotactic Radiosurgery

PURPOSE

Spine stereotactic radiosurgery delivers an ablative dose of radiation therapy (RT) with high conformity relative to standard fractionated RT. This technique is suboptimal for extended targets (>3 vertebral levels) owing to treatment alignment concerns or for patients with marked epidural extension. In these patients, we hypothesized that use of hypofractionated intensity modulated RT/volumetric modulated arc therapy to dose escalate the gross tumor volume (GTV) to 40 Gy as a spinal simultaneous integrated boost (SSIB) would allow for durable local control and palliation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 15 separate spinal sites (12 patients) that were treated with the SSIB technique between 2012 and 2016. The GTV and clinical target volume were prescribed at 40 Gy and 30 Gy, respectively, in 10 fractions. The spinal cord was allowed a maximum point dose of 34 Gy. The GTV was defined as gross tumor. The clinical target volume encompassed the GTV in addition to the involved vertebral bodies, at-risk paraspinal space, and spinal canal, followed by a planning target volume expansion of 3 to 5 mm.

RESULTS

The median follow-up for patients in our cohort was 17 months. At 1 year, local control was 93%, and overall survival was 58%, with a median time to death after treatment of 7 months. No grade ≥2 neurologic toxicities were reported for any of the patients. Nine of 12 patients had pain at presentation, of which 7 patients (78%) reported improvement and/or complete resolution of their pain after treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our early experience using a dose of 40 Gy to the GTV delivered via an SSIB technique, in lieu of spine stereotactic radiation surgery but more aggressive than conventional palliative doses, provides durable local control and pain relief. This technique may allow for improved local control and palliation in patients with radioresistant disease compared with conventional 3-dimensional conformal fractionated RT.

Phase I/II trial of combined kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy in spinal metastases

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Spinal metastases occur in 30%-50% of patients with systemic cancer. The primary goals of palliation are pain control and prevention of local recurrence.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to test the safety and efficacy of a combined modality approach consisting of kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy (Kypho-IORT).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy was a prospective, single-center phase I/II trial. Patients were enrolled in a classical 3+3 scheme within the initial phase I, where Kypho-IORT was applied using a needle-shaped 50 kV X-ray source at three radiation dose levels (8 Gy in 8-mm, 8 Gy in 11-mm, and 8 Gy in 13-mm depth). Thereafter, cohort expansion was performed as phase II of the trial. The trial is registered with clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01280032.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients aged 50 years and older with a Karnofsky Performance Status of at least 60% and with one to three painful vertebral metastases confined to the vertebral body were eligible to participate.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was safety as per the occurrence of dose-limiting toxicities. The secondary end points were pain reduction, local progression-free survival (L-PFS), and overall survival (OS).

METHODS

Pain was measured using the visual analog scale (VAS) and local control was assessed in serial computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging scans.

RESULTS

None of the nine patients enrolled in the phase I showed dose-limiting toxicities at any level and thus, 52 patients were subsequently enrolled into a phase II, where Kypho-IORT was performed at various dose levels. The median pain score significantly dropped from 5 preoperatively to 2 at the first postoperative day (p<.001). Of 43 patients who reported a pre-interventional pain level of 3 or more, 30 (69.8%) reported a reduction of ≥3 points on the first postoperative day. A persistent pain reduction beyond the first postoperative day of ≥3 points was seen in 34 (79.1%) patients. The 3, 6, and 12 month L-PFS was excellent with 97.5%, 93.8%, and 93.8%. The 3, 6, and 12 months OS was 76.9%, 64.0%, and 48.4%.

CONCLUSION

Kyphoplasty and intraoperative radiotherapy is safe and immediately provided sustained pain relief with excellent local control rates in patients with painful vertebral metastases.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy treatment planning of thoracic vertebral metastases using stereotactic body radiotherapy

Purpose/Objectives

To retrospectively evaluate the plan quality, treatment efficiency, and accuracy of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans for thoracic spine metastases using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

Materials/Methods

Seven patients with thoracic vertebral metastases treated with noncoplanar hybrid arcs (NCHA) (1 to 2 3D‐conformal partial arcs +7 to 9 IMRT beams) were re‐optimized with VMAT plans using three coplanar arcs. Tumors were located between T2 and T7 and PTVs ranged between 24.3 and 240.1 cc (median 48.1 cc). All prescriptions were 30 Gy in 5 fractions with 6 MV beams treated using the Novalis Tx linac equipped with high definition multileaf collimators (HDMLC). MR images were fused with planning CTs for target and OAR contouring. Plans were compared for target coverage using conformality index (CI), homogeneity index (HI), D90, D98, D2, and Dmedian. Normal tissue sparing was evaluated by comparing doses to the spinal cord (Dmax, D0.35, and D1.2 cc), esophagus (Dmax and D5 cc), heart (Dmax, D15 cc), and lung (V5 and V10). Data analysis was performed with a two‐sided t‐test for each set of parameters. Dose delivery efficiency and accuracy of each VMAT plan was assessed via quality assurance (QA) using a MapCHECK device. The Beam‐on time (BOT) was recorded, and a gamma index was used to compare dose agreement between the planned and measured doses.

Results

VMAT plans resulted in improved CI (1.02 vs. 1.36, P = 0.05), HI (0.14 vs. 0.27, P = 0.01), D98 (28.4 vs. 26.8 Gy, P = 0.03), D2 (32.9 vs. 36.0 Gy, P = 0.02), and Dmedian (31.4 vs. 33.7 Gy, P = 0.01). D90 was improved but not statistically significant (30.4 vs. 31.0 Gy, P = 0.38). VMAT plans showed statistically significant improvements in normal tissue sparing: Esophagus D_max (22.5 vs. 27.0 Gy, P = 0.03), Esophagus 5 cc (17.6 vs. 21.5 Gy, P = 0.02), and Heart D_max (13.1 vs. 15.8 Gy, P = 0.03). Improvements were also observed in spinal cord and lung sparing as well but were not statistically significant. The BOT showed significant reduction for VMAT, 4.7 ± 0.6 min vs. 7.1 ± 1 min for NCHA (not accounting for couch kicks). VMAT plans demonstrated an accurate dose delivery of 95.5 ± 1.0% for clinical gamma passing rate of 3%/3 mm criteria, which was similar to NCHA plans.

Conclusions

VMAT plans have shown improved dose distributions and normal tissue sparing compared to NCHA plans. Significant reductions in treatment time could potentially minimize patient discomfort and intrafraction movement errors. VMAT planning for SBRT is an attractive option for the treatment of metastases to thoracic vertebrae, and further investigation using alternative fractionation schedules is warranted.

Metastatic Osseous Pain Control: Radiation Therapy

Metastatic disease to the bone is a common manifestation of advanced cancer, and can result in pain, pathologic fractures, hypercalcemia, and overall functional compromise. External beam radiation is a proven, highly efficacious, and noninvasive therapy that can provide symptomatic relief from painful osseous lesions. When deciding upon the best treatment regimen, it is important to consider patient factors such as overall life expectancy, performance status, disease burden, and site of osseous metastatic pain. Determination of best treatment ideally requires multidisciplinary input from radiologists, medical oncologists, surgeons, pain management, and palliative care specialists together with radiation oncologists.

Organs at risk in lung SBRT

Lung stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is an accurate and precise technique to treat lung tumors with high 'ablative' doses. Given the encouraging data in terms of local control and toxicity profile, SBRT has currently become a treatment option for both early stage lung cancer and lung oligometastatic disease in patients who are medically inoperable or refuse surgical resection. Dose-adapted fractionation schedules and ongoing prospective trials should provide further evidence of SBRT safety trying to reduce toxicities and complications. In this heterogeneous scenario, a non-systematic review of dose constraints for lung SBRT was performed, including the main organs at risk in the thorax.

Clinical outcomes of multileaf collimator-based CyberKnife for spine stereotactic body radiation therapy

OBJECTIVE

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal metastases is becoming a prevalent therapeutic option. We aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and outcomes of the recently developed multileaf collimator (MLC)-based CyberKnife (CK-M) for spine SBRT.

METHODS

We reviewed 119 patients of 144 cases with 229 lesions treated with CK between November 2014 and March 2016. The lesion features, dosimetric parameters and clinical outcomes were compared between fixed cone collimator based CK (CK-F) and CK-M.

RESULTS

Of 144 cases, 78 and 66 were treated with CK-F and CK-M, respectively. CK-M achieved an adequate target volume coverage that was comparable with CK-F (median 92 vs 90%; p = 0.03) even in larger targets (median 64.2 vs 46.7 cm3; p = 0.01), respectively. CK-M showed an improvement in the gradient index (p < 0.001) and no difference in conformity (p = 0.16). With CK-M, the median beam delivery time was significantly reduced by 30% (to 34 vs 48 min; p < 0.001). CK-M showed 1 year local control rates that were comparable to CK-F (77 vs 78%, respectively; p = 0.83).

CONCLUSION

CK-M exhibits dosimetric data and local control that are comparable with CK-F, but with significant treatment time reduction. CK-M could be widely used in spine SBRT. Advances in knowledge: Given the recently developed MLC in CK, we aimed to evaluate the clinical feasibility and outcomes of MLC compared with fixed cone-based CK. MLC showed equivalent plan quality and significant treatment time reduction with comparable radiological control. We report here MLC as an effective and tolerable treatment option in CK.