Differences in clinical results after LINAC-based single-dose radiosurgery versus fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for patients with vestibular schwannomas

Dosimetric investigation of radiation-induced trigeminal nerve toxicity in parotid tumor patients

PURPOSE

We aimed to describe the association between trigeminal nerve (TN) dose and toxicity and determine a threshold value that leads to TN toxicity in patients with parotid tumors treated with adjuvant conventional fractionated radiation therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighteen patients who underwent adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) between 2013 and 2018 were included in this retrospective study. TN and its branches were outlined subsequently on the planning CT scans. The doses received by TN were obtained based on the dose-volume histogram. The dose and toxicity relationship was investigated over the total prescribed dose. RT-related toxicity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V4.0 (CTCAEv4.0).

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 29.5 months. After RT, 61% of patients had Grade I-II late TN toxicity divided into Grade I in 4 (22%) and Grade II in 7 (39%) patients. TN injury symptoms were as follows: loss of sensation in the chin area in 3, difficulty in jaw movements in 3, and paresthesia in 5 patients. The total RT dose (p = 0.001), Dmax (p = 0.001), PTV-TN Dmax (p = 0.001), D1cc (p = 0.004), D0.5cc (p = 0.001), and D0.1cc (p = 0.01) had a significant effect on TN toxicity. Cut-off values leading to toxicity were determined as 66, 65.5, 65.25, 63.6, and 62.7 Gy for Dmax, PTV-TN Dmax, D0.1cc, D 0.5cc, and D1cc, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation-induced TN injury in head and neck cancer patients may further be investigated in clinically prospective trials by virtue of high toxicity rates with current RT doses in our retrospectively designed dosimetric study in parotid tumors.

Long-term clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiotherapy for bilateral vestibular schwannomas in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients

PURPOSE

The evidence for treating patients with neurofibromatosis 2-related vestibular schwannoma (VS-NF2) using hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) is limited. This study aimed to investigate clinical outcomes in patients with VS-NF2 treated with Robotic HSRT.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 25 NF2 patients with 48 VSs who were treated using Robotic HSRT at Ramathibodi Hospital from January 2009 to January 2020.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 98 months (range, 24-155 months). Median tumor volume was 2.3 cm3 (range, 0.4-28.3 cm3). Median prescribed dose was 18 Gy (range, 18-25 Gy) in three fractions (range, 3-5). The 5- and 10-year local control rates were 87% and 80%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year hearing preservation rates were 59% and 35%, respectively. Three patients developed new symptoms associated with transient volume expansion after treatment: hydrocephalus in one, facial weakness in one, and ataxia in one. No patient developed worsening of trigeminal nerve function. No histologically confirmed of radiation induced malignancy was reported in the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic HSRT demonstrated excellent long-term tumor control with a low non-auditory complication rate in patients with VS-NF2. However, preservation of hearing remains a major concern.

Long-Term Hearing Outcome After Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is one of the main treatment options in the management of small to medium size vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because of high tumor control rate and low cranial nerves morbidity. Series reporting long-term hearing outcome (>3 years) are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis, with the aim of focusing on long-term hearing preservation after SRS.

METHODS

Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, we reviewed articles published between January 1990 and October 2020 and referenced in PubMed or Embase. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed clinical study or case series of VSs treated with SRS (single dose), reporting hearing outcome after SRS with a median or mean audiometric follow-up of at least 5 years. Hearing preservation, cranial nerves outcomes, and tumor control were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were included. Hearing preservation was found in 59.4% of cases (median follow-up 6.7 years, 1409 patients). Main favorable prognostic factors were young age, good hearing status, early treatment after diagnosis, small tumor volume, low marginal irradiation dose, and maximal dose to the cochlea. Tumor control was achieved in 96.1%. Facial nerve deficit and trigeminal neuropathy were found in 1.3% and 3.2% of patients, respectively, both significantly higher in Linear Accelerator series than Gamma Knife series ( P < .05).

CONCLUSION

Long-term hearing preservation remains one of the main issues after SRS, with a major impact on health-related quality of life. Our meta-analysis suggests that hearing preservation can be achieved in almost 60% of patients after a median follow-up of 6.7 years, irrespective of the technique.

Vestibular Schwannoma Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy in Five Fractions

AIM

To retrospectively analyse the long-term results of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) applied in five fractions for vestibular schwannomas.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-four patients with vestibular schwannomas underwent medical treatment of HSRT. The median follow-up time interval was 54 months (range 6-121 months). All patients had a prescribed dose of 22 Gy in five fractions to D90. Restaging was carried out by thin-slice contrast-enhanced T1 magnetic resonance imaging. Progression was defined as 2 mm post-treatment tumour enlargement. Progression or death for any reason was counted as an event in progression-free survival rates. Acute toxicity was defined as adverse events occurring within 3 months of HSRT; long-term toxicity was defined as such events occurring after 3 months.

RESULTS

In 74/128 patients who had >6 months of follow-up (54%), the HSRT resulted in a partial or a complete response. The mean time interval for response in 50% of these was 4 years, whereas in 49 patients (38%) vestibular schwannomas failed to show any response, resulting in stable disease. Five of 128 patients (4%) showed marked progressive vestibular schwannomas after treatment in the first 3 years; two of them received conventionally fractionated radiation therapy. Local control at 3, 5 and 7 years was 96%, 95% and 94%, respectively. Seven were lost to follow-up. The median planning target volume was 2.1 ml (range 0.78-8.66). The 3- and 5-year progression-free survival rates were 95% and 94%, respectively. Seven patients reported a marked deterioration in hearing ability. Post-radiation therapy magnetic resonance imaging showed variability in oedema collection, but no patient suffered from radio-necrosis. Grade 2 temporary facial nerve disorders were observed in 10 patients (8%) 3-6 months after HSRT.

CONCLUSION

Delivering HSRT in five fractions for vestibular schwannoma appears safe and efficient, combining both efficiency and short treatment time while optimising neurological function preservation.

Outcome after Radiotherapy for Vestibular Schwannomas (VS)—Differences in Tumor Control, Symptoms and Quality of Life after Radiotherapy with Photon versus Proton Therapy

Background: To evaluate differences in local tumor control (LC), symptoms and quality of life (QOL) of 261 patients with VS after stereotactic radiosurgery/hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRS/HFSRT) vs. fractionated radiotherapy (FRT) vs. fractionated proton therapy (FPT) were studied. Methods: For SRS/HFSRT (n = 149), the median fraction dose applied was 12 Gy. For FRT (n = 87) and FPT (n = 25), the median cumulative doses applied were 57.6 Gy and 54 Gy (RBE), respectively. FRT and FPT used single median doses of 1.8 Gy/Gy (RBE). Median follow-up was 38 months. We investigated dosimetry for organs at risk and analyzed toxicity and QOL by sending out a questionnaire. Results: LC was 99.5% at 12 months after RT with no statistical difference between treatment groups (p = 0.19). LC was significantly lower in NF2 patients (p = 0.004) and in patients with higher tumor extension grade (p = 0.039). The hearing preservation rate was 97% at 12 months after RT with no statistical difference between treatment groups (p = 0.31). Facial and trigeminal nerve affection after RT occurred as mild symptoms with highest toxicity rate in FPT patients. Conclusion: SRS/HFSRT, FRT and FPT for VS show similar overall clinical and functional outcomes. Cranial nerve impairment rates vary, potentially due to selection bias with larger VS in the FRT and FPT group.

Effectiveness and Toxicity of Fractionated Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Cranial Nerve Schwannoma Unsuitable for Stereotactic Radiosurgery

Purpose

In this benign tumor entity, preservation of cranial nerve function is of special importance. Due to its advantageous physical properties, proton beam radiotherapy (PRT) is a promising approach that spares healthy tissue. Could PRT go along with satisfactory preservation rates for cranial nerve function without compromising tumor control in patients with cranial nerve schwannoma unsuitable for stereotactic radiosurgery?

Methods

We analyzed 45 patients with cranial nerve schwannomas who underwent PRT between 2012 and 2020 at our institution. Response assessment was performed by MRI according to RECIST 1.1, and toxicity was graded following CTCAE 5.0.

Results

The most common schwannoma origin was the vestibulocochlear nerve with 82.2%, followed by the trigeminal nerve with 8.9% and the glossopharyngeal nerve as well as the vagal nerve, both with each 4.4%. At radiotherapy start, 58% of cranial nerve schwannomas were progressive and 95.6% were symptomatic. Patients were treated with a median total dose of 54 Gy RBE in 1.8 Gy RBE per fraction. MRI during the median follow-up period of 42 months (IQR 26–61) revealed stable disease in 93.3% of the patients and partial regression in 6.7%. There was no case of progressive disease. New or worsening cranial nerve dysfunction was found in 20.0% of all patients, but always graded as CTCAE °I-II. In seven cases (16%), radiation-induced contrast enhancements (RICE) were detected after a median time of 14 months (range 2–26 months). RICE were asymptomatic (71%) or transient symptomatic (CTCAE °II; 29%). No CTCAE °III/IV toxicities were observed. Lesions regressed during the follow-up period in three of the seven cases, and no lesion progressed during the follow-up period.

Conclusion

These data demonstrate excellent effectiveness with 100% local control in a median follow-up period of 3.6 years with a promising cranial nerve functional protection rate of 80%. RICE occurred in 16% of the patients after PRT and were not or only mildly symptomatic.

Tufts Medical Center Experience With Long-Term Follow-Up of Vestibular Schwannoma Treated With Gamma Knife Stereotactic Radiosurgery: Novel Finding of Delayed Pseudoprogression

Purpose

Our purpose was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated with Gamma Knife stereotactic radiosurgery (GKSRS) with modern techniques, with attention to posttreatment tumor growth dynamics, dosimetric predictors, and late toxicities.

Methods and Materials

One hundred twelve patients with VS were treated with GKSRS with a median dose of 12.5 Gy to the 50% isodose line treated between 2004 and 2015, with patients followed up to 15 years. Target and organ-at-risk doses were recorded, and tumor diameter/volume, audiologic decline, and trigeminal/facial nerve preservation were tracked from treatment onward.

Results

GKSRS yielded local control of 5, 10, and 15 years at 96.9%, 90.0%, and 87.1% respectively. Pseudoprogression was found in 45%, with a novel pattern detected with peak swelling at 31 months. Pseudoprogression was associated with smaller tumor diameter at treatment and fewer treatment isocenters, but not with the development of any toxicity, nor was it predicted by any dosimetric factor. Median time to hearing loss was 3.4 years with actuarial hearing preservation at 2, 5, and 10 years of 66.5%, 43.1%, and 37.6%, with rate of hearing loss correlating with maximum cochlea and modiolus doses. Trigeminal and facial nerve preservation rates were 92.7% and 97.6%, respectively. Increasing maximum tumor dose was associated with facial paresthesia.

Conclusions

Modern GKSRS is a safe and effective treatment for VS on long-term follow-up, with high levels of facial and trigeminal nerve preservation. A novel pattern of pseudoprogression has been identified suggesting longer imaging follow-up may be needed before initiating salvage in those without symptomatic progression. Several tumor and dosimetric predictors have been suggested for the development of different toxicities, requiring further evaluation.

Tumor Control Following Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Vestibular Schwannomas - A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

To better counsel vestibular schwannoma patients, it is necessary to understand the tumor control rates of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

OBJECTIVES

To determine tumor control rates, factors determining control and complication rates following SRS.

METHODS

Tertiary hospital retrospective cohort.

RESULTS

579 tumors (576 patients) were treated with SRS. 477 tumors (474 patients, 82%) had ≥1 year follow up and 60% (344) ≥3 years follow up. 88% of tumors had primary SRS and 6.7% salvage SRS. Median follow up time was 4.6 years. At 3 years, the tumor control rate of primary SRS was 89% (258 of 290) in sporadic tumors compared to 43% in Neurofibromatosis type II (3 of 17) (p < 0.01). Our bivariable survival data analysis showed that Neurofibromatosis type II, documented pre-SRS growth, tumor measured by maximum dimension, SRS given as nonprimary treatment increased hazard of failure to control. There was one case of malignancy and another of rapid change following intra-tumoral hemorrhage. For tumors undergoing surgical salvage (25 of 59), 56% had a total or near-total resection, 16% had postoperative CSF leak, with 12% new facial paralysis (House-Brackmann grade VI) and worsening of facial nerve outcomes (House-Brackmann grade worse in 59% at 12 mo).

CONCLUSIONS

Control of vestibular schwannoma after primary SRS occurs in the large majority. Salvage surgical treatment was notable for higher rates of postoperative complications compared to primary surgery reported in the literature.

Long-term clinical outcomes of stereotactic radiosurgery and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy using the CyberKnife® robotic radiosurgery system for vestibular schwannoma

AIM

The study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical outcomes of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) with frameless robotic whole-body radiosurgery system (CyberKnife^® ).

METHODS

This retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data included 123 consecutive patients with VS treated at the Radiosurgery center, Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. SRS was recommended for patients with unserviceable hearing and Koos grade I-III tumors, and HSRT for patients with serviceable hearing or Koos grade III-IV tumors. Between March 2009 and December 2015, 23 patients (19%) were treated with SRS, whereas 100 (81%) received HSRT. The commonly used regimen was 12 Gy in one fraction for SRS and 18 Gy in three fractions for HSRT.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 72 months (range: 12-123 months), the 5-year and 8-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates for the whole cohort were 96% and 92%, respectively. The PFS was not significantly different between the SRS and HSRT groups (p = 0.23). Among 28 patients with serviceable hearing in the HSRT group, the 5-year and 8-year hearing preservation rates were 87% and 65%, respectively. The rate of nonauditory complications was 14%. Koos grade III/IV was a predictor of disease progression and was associated with nonauditory complications.

CONCLUSION

SRS and HSRT with the CyberKnife^® system provided excellent long-term tumor control with a low rate of nonauditory complications. HSRT may result in acceptable hearing preservation rates.

Vestibular Schwannoma: Results of Hypofractionated Stereotactic Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

Our purpose was to study the outcomes of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (HSRT) in terms of hearing and radiologic response for vestibular schwannomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This was a longitudinal retrospective study at a referral center from 2011 to 2016. All treatments were performed on a Cyberknife device with a dose of 21 Gy (3 × 7 Gy) or 25 Gy (5 × 5 Gy). We assessed tumor response, neurologic outcomes (hearing and facial nerve function), and treatment toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients were included. Fifty-three patients were treated with the 3 × 7 Gy scheme and 29 with the 5 × 5 Gy. Sixteen patients (20%) had a previous surgery. The median follow-up was 48 months (range, 12-88 months). We noted 3 recurrences leading to a control rate of 96.3%. In our cohort, predictive factors of vestibular schwannoma growth were a tumor volume >2 mm3 and a conformal index <1.1 (P < .0001). The treatment was well tolerated with only 5 grade III acute toxicities (4 vertigo and 1 headache) and no grade IV or V. As for late toxicity, we noticed 2 cases of mild peripheral facial palsy (House and Brackman grade II) in previously operated patients. There was 46.0% hearing preservation among patients with serviceable hearing after HSRT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that HSRT using 3 or 5 fractions is a well-tolerated and effective regimen. These findings are in addition to the few previous hypofractionation studies and contribute to the validity of this treatment modality.

Proton and Heavy Particle Intracranial Radiosurgery

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) involves the delivery of a highly conformal ablative dose of radiation to both benign and malignant targets. This has traditionally been accomplished in a single fraction; however, fractionated approaches involving five or fewer treatments have been delivered for larger lesions, as well as lesions in close proximity to radiosensitive structures. The clinical utilization of SRS has overwhelmingly involved photon-based sources via dedicated radiosurgery platforms (e.g., Gamma Knife® and Cyberknife®) or specialized linear accelerators. While photon-based methods have been shown to be highly effective, advancements are sought for improved dose precision, treatment duration, and radiobiologic effect, among others, particularly in the setting of repeat irradiation. Particle-based techniques (e.g., protons and carbon ions) may improve many of these shortcomings. Specifically, the presence of a Bragg Peak with particle therapy at target depth allows for marked minimization of distal dose delivery, thus mitigating the risk of toxicity to organs at risk. Carbon ions also exhibit a higher linear energy transfer than photons and protons, allowing for greater relative biological effectiveness. While the data are limited, utilization of proton radiosurgery in the setting of brain metastases has been shown to demonstrate 1-year local control rates >90%, which are comparable to that of photon-based radiosurgery. Prospective studies are needed to further validate the safety and efficacy of this treatment modality. We aim to provide a comprehensive overview of clinical evidence in the use of particle therapy-based radiosurgery.

ESTRO ACROP guideline for target volume delineation of skull base tumors

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

For skull base tumors, target definition is the key to safe high-dose treatments because surrounding normal tissues are very sensitive to radiation. In the present work we established a joint ESTRO ACROP guideline for the target volume definition of skull base tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed using various combinations of the following medical subjects headings (MeSH) and free-text words: "radiation therapy" or "stereotactic radiosurgery" or "proton therapy" or "particle beam therapy" and "skull base neoplasms" "pituitary neoplasms", "meningioma", "craniopharyngioma", "chordoma", "chondrosarcoma", "acoustic neuroma/vestibular schwannoma", "organs at risk", "gross tumor volume", "clinical tumor volume", "planning tumor volume", "target volume", "target delineation", "dose constraints". The ACROP committee identified sixteen European experts in close interaction with the ESTRO clinical committee who analyzed and discussed the body of evidence concerning target delineation.

RESULTS

All experts agree that magnetic resonance (MR) images with high three-dimensional spatial accuracy and tissue-contrast definition, both T2-weighted and volumetric T1-weighted sequences, are required to improve target delineation. In detail, several key issues were identified and discussed: i) radiation techniques and immobilization, ii) imaging techniques and target delineation, and iii) technical aspects of radiation treatments including planning techniques and dose-fractionation schedules. Specific target delineation issues with regard to different skull base tumors, including pituitary adenomas, meningiomas, craniopharyngiomas, acoustic neuromas, chordomas and chondrosarcomas are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

This ESTRO ACROP guideline achieved detailed recommendations on target volume definition for skull base tumors, as well as comprehensive advice about imaging modalities and radiation techniques.

Vestibular Schwannoma: What We Know and Where We are Heading

Vestibular schwannoma (VS) is a Schwann cell-derived tumour arising from the vestibulocochlear nerve. Although benign, it represents a threat to intracranial structures due to mass effect and carries a small risk of malignant transformation. VS therefore represents an important healthcare burden. We review the literature regarding pathogenesis, risk factors, and diagnosis of VS. The current and future potential management strategies are also discussed. A narrative review of all relevant papers known to the authors was conducted. The majority of VS remain clinically stable and do not require interventional procedures. Nevertheless, various surgical techniques exist for removing VS, the most common of which are translabyrinthine and retrosigmoid approaches. Due to surgical risks such as hearing loss, facial nerve dysfunction, post-operative headache, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, a "watch and rescan" approach is adopted for most patients. Radiotherapy is a useful alternative and has been shown to have a similar response for growth restriction. Due to the heterogeneous nature of VS, there is a lack of consensus regarding management of tumours that are too large for conservative management but too small to indicate surgery. Emerging biologic therapies, such as Bevacizumab, Everolimus, and Lapatinib, as well as anti-inflammatories like aspirin are promising potential treatments; however, long-term evidence of their efficacy is required. The knowledge base regarding VS continues to improve. With increased understanding of the pathogenesis of these tumors, we believe future work should focus on pharmacologic intervention. Biologic therapies aimed toward improved patient outcomes are particularly promising.

Benign Intracranial Lesions - Radiotherapy: An Overview of Treatment Options, Indications and Therapeutic Results

BACKGROUND

Radiation Therapy (RT) is an established treatment option for benign intracranial lesions. The aim of this study is to display an update on the role of RT concerning the most frequent benign brain lesions and tumors.

METHODS

Published articles about RT and meningiomas, Vestibular Schwannomas (VSs), Pituitary Adenomas (PAs), Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs) and craniopharyngiomas were reviewed and extracted data were used.

RESULTS

In meningiomas RT is applied as an adjuvant therapy, in case of patientrefusing surgery or in unresectable tumors. The available techniques are External Beam RT (EBRT) and stereotactic ones such as Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS), Fractionated Stereotactic RT (FSRT), Intensity Modulated RT (IMRT) and proton-beam therapy. The same indications are considered in PAs, in which SRS and FSRT achieve excellent tumor control rate (92-100%), acceptable hormone remission rates (>50%) and decreased Adverse Radiation Effects (AREs). Upon tumor growth or neurological deterioration, RT emerges as alone or adjuvant treatment against VSs, with SRS, FSRT, EBRT or protonbeam therapy presenting excellent tumor control growth (>90%), facial nerve (84-100%), trigeminal nerve (74-99%) and hearing (>50%) preservation. SRS poses an effective treatment modality of certain AVMs, demonstrating a 3-year obliteration rate of 80%. Lastly, a combination of microsurgery and RT presents equal local control and 5-year survival rate (>90%) but improved toxicity profile compared to total resection in case of craniopharyngiomas.

CONCLUSION

RT comprises an effective treatment modality of benign brain and intracranial lesions. By minimizing its AREs with optimal use, RT projects as a potent tool against such diseases.

The Role of Particle Therapy for the Treatment of Skull Base Tumors and Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS)

Radiation therapy (RT) is a mainstay in the interdisciplinary treatment of brain tumors of the skull base and brain. Technical innovations during the past 2 decades have allowed for increasingly precise treatment with better sparing of adjacent healthy tissues to prevent treatment-related side effects that influence patients' quality of life. Particle therapy with protons and charged ions offer favorable kinetics with sharp dose deposition in a well-defined depth (Bragg-Peak) and a steep radiation fall-off beyond that maximum. This review highlights the role of particle therapy in the management of primary brain tumors and tumors of the skull base.

Facial Nerve Paralysis Occurring 4 Days following Stereotactic Radiosurgery for a Vestibular Schwannoma

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is commonly used for the treatment of vestibular schwannomas given its high rate of tumor control and low rate of complications. Facial nerve palsy has been reported several months after treatment as a rare late complication of SRS. Here, we report a case of facial weakness occurring only 4 days after treatment and discuss potential etiology and management considerations.

Tinnitus Management in Lateral Skull Base Lesions

Tinnitus, the phantom perception of sound in the absence of a physical sound source, is a complex problem with multiple etiologies. While most commonly presenting in a subjective fashion caused by measurable hearing loss, other etiologies including lateral skull base tumors that encroach on middle and inner ear structures can lead to phantom sound perception as well. In addition to discussing the basic background of tinnitus, here we also review current theories of etiology that include central auditory and nonauditory neural mechanisms and potential treatments that range from sound therapy to medications to cognitive and behavioral therapies and cranial nerve and brain stimulation. One main purpose of this article is to relate tinnitus causes to skull base tumors, surgical removal, and resultant sequelae, including damage to cranial nerves resulting in audiovestibular dysfunction. We also discuss the utility of microvascular decompression for both tumor and nontumor-associated tinnitus and the current literature regarding hearing preservation rates and tinnitus perception, where documented, with the three common treatment modalities employed for most lateral skull base tumors that includes watchful waiting with serial imaging, stereotactic radiosurgery and primary surgical resection using hearing preservation and hearing ablative approaches. The management of skull base tumors is a complex process that depending upon the approach and sequelae, may lead to manageable or worsening phantom sound perception that must be considered when discussing the multiple treatment options with patients.

Hearing Preservation in Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Vestibular Schwannoma

Despite no universally accepted definition of hearing preservation following vestibular schwannoma (VS) treatment, numerous variables have been identified as possible factors that may affect hearing outcomes following radiotherapy. Age, pretreatment hearing, radiation dose, tumor location and size, length of follow-up, fractionation, and timing of radiation have all been explored, among other variables, as factors related to hearing outcomes following radiation. These variables and associated hearing outcomes will be explored in detail, summarizing the literature to date to improve patient counseling for those patients who present with serviceable hearing and are considering their VS management options.

Progression of hearing loss after LINAC-based stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma is associated with cochlear dose, not with pre-treatment hearing level

Background

Although stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for vestibular schwannoma has demonstrated excellent local control rates, hearing deterioration is often reported after treatment. We therefore wished to assess the change in hearing loss after SRT and to determine which patient, tumor and treatment-related factors influence deterioration.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed progression of hearing loss in patients with vestibular schwannoma who had received stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) as a primary treatment between 2000 and 2014. SRS had been delivered as a single fraction of 12 Gy, and patients treated with FSRT had received 30 fractions of 1.8 Gy. To compare the effects of SRS and FSRT, we converted cochlear doses into EQD₂. Primary outcomes were loss of functional hearing, Gardner Robertson (GR) classes I and II, and loss of baseline hearing class. These events were used in Kaplan Meier plots and Cox regression. We also calculated the rate of change in Pure Tone Average (PTA) in dB per month elapsed after radiation—a measure we use in linear regression—to assess the associations between the rate of change in PTA and age, pre-treatment hearing level, tumor size, dose scheme, cochlear dose, and time elapsed after treatment (time-to-first-audiogram).

Results

The median follow-up was 36 months for 67 SRS patients and 63 months for 27 FSRT patients. Multivariate Cox regression and in linear regression both showed that the cochlear V90 was significantly associated with the progression of hearing loss. But although pre-treatment PTA correlated with rate of change in Cox regression, it did not correlate in linear regression. The time-to-first-audiogram was also significantly associated, indicating time dependency of the rate of change. None of the analysis showed a significant difference between dose schemes.

Conclusions

We found no significant difference between SRS and FSRT. As the deterioration in hearing after radiotherapy for vestibular schwannoma was associated with the cochlea V90, restricting the V90 may reduce progression of hearing loss. The association between loss of functional hearing and baseline PTA seems to be biased by the use of a categorized variable for hearing loss.

Hearing preservation after Gamma Knife radiosurgery for cerebellopontine angle meningiomas

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to assess hearing function after Gamma Knife treatment of cerebellopontine angle (CPA) meningiomas and assess factors affecting hearing outcome. Additionally, the authors opted to compare these results with those after Gamma Knife treatment of vestibular schwannomas (VSs), because most of the information on hearing outcome after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) comes from reports on VS treatment. Hearing preservation, to the best of the authors’ knowledge, has never been separately addressed in studies involving Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for CPA meningiomas.

METHODS

This study included all patients who underwent a single session of GKRS between 2002 and 2014. The patients were divided into two groups. Group A included 66 patients with CPA meningiomas with serviceable hearing and tumor extension into the region centered on the internal auditory meatus. Group B included 144 patients with VSs with serviceable hearing. All patients had serviceable hearing before treatment (Gardner-Robertson [GR] Grades I and II). The median prescription dose was 12 Gy (range 10–12 Gy) in both groups. The median follow-up of groups A and B was 42 months (range 6–149 months) and 49 months (range 6–149 months), respectively.

RESULTS

At the last follow-up, the tumor control rate was 97% and 94% in groups A and B, respectively. Hearing preservation was defined as maintained serviceable hearing according to GR hearing score. The hearing preservation rate was 98% and 66% and the 7-year actuarial serviceable hearing preservation rate was 75% and 56%, respectively, between both groups. In group A, the median maximum cochlear dose in the patients with stable and worsened hearing grade was 6.3 Gy and 5.5 Gy, respectively. In group B, factors affecting hearing preservation were cochlear dose ≤ 7 Gy, follow-up duration, and tumor control. The only determinant of hearing preservation between both groups was tumor type.

CONCLUSIONS

GKRS for CPA meningiomas provides excellent hearing preservation in addition to high tumor control rate. Hearing outcome is better with CPA meningiomas than with VSs. Further long-term prospective studies on determinants of hearing outcome after GKRS for CPA meningiomas should be conducted.

Long-Term Outcomes of Fractionated Stereotactic Proton Therapy for Vestibular Schwannoma: A Case Series

Purpose

Evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) treated with fractionated proton therapy (PT) at a single institution.

Materials and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients treated with fractionated PT for definitive management of VS between November 2007 and December 2013 at our institution. No patient had received prior treatment for VS. Patients received 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions using passively scattered PT. Pretreatment and posttreatment hearing status, tumor dimensions, and cranial nerve V and VII function were evaluated. Hearing status was graded as nonserviceable or serviceable, defined as Gardner-Robertson grade I or II and the ability to use a telephone with the treated ear. Toxicities were prospectively evaluated using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0.

Results

Fourteen patients with 14 lesions (8 men, 6 women) were included in the analysis. Median age at treatment was 60 years (range, 24-74 years). Median clinical follow-up for living patients was 68 months (range, 36-106 months). Mean maximal tumor dimension was 2.1 cm (range, 0.5-3.8 cm). Mean tumor volume was 6.4 cm³ (range, 0.3-16.0 cm³). One patient died of unrelated causes 5 months after treatment, and 2 had subsequent surgical resections due to radiographic and/or clinical progression. The actuarial 3-year local control rate was 85%. There were no cranial nerve V or VII injuries. Two of 6 patients (33%) with serviceable hearing at the time of treatment retained serviceable hearing. Three patients (21%) demonstrated radiographic tumor regression on brain magnetic resonance imaging after a median of 26 months (range, 2-113 months). No acute toxicity of grade 3 or above was reported.

Conclusion

Fractionated PT for VS is well tolerated and provides good local control. Improvements in proton delivery techniques and patient selection may enable improved outcomes.

CyberKnife Radiosurgery of Skull-base Tumors: A UK Center Experience

The study aim was to evaluate patient individualized Cyberknife® treatment for heterogeneous skull-base tumors. Patients treated between 2009 and 2013 at The Harley Street Clinic were studied. In total, 66 patients received 15–30 Gy in 1–5 fractions to a median planning target volume (PTV) of 6.4 cc, including patients with secondary, multiple, residual and recurrent tumors, and those with tumors of uncertain pathological type. Outcome analysis was pragmatically restricted to 35 patients who had single, primary tumors treated with curative intent, and sufficient diagnostic and outcome information. Sixteen vestibular schwannoma patients with median PTV 3.8 cc (range 0.81–19.6) received 18–25 Gy in 3–5 fractions: 81% showed no acute toxicity, 50% reported no late toxicity, 71% of symptoms were stable/improved and local control was 100% at 11.4 months median follow-up. Twelve meningioma patients with median PTV of 5.5 cc (range 0.68–22.3) received 17–30 Gy in 1–5 fractions: 83% experienced no acute toxicity, 33% reported no late toxicity, 88% of symptoms were stable/improved and local control was 100% at 22.1 months median follow-up. Seven patients with other tumor types with median PTV of 24.3 cc (range 7.6–100.5) received 15–28.5 Gy in 1–5 fractions: 57% experienced no acute toxicity, 57% reported no late toxicities, 66% of symptoms were stable and local control was 43% at 14.9 months median follow-up. When tumor types were considered together, smaller tumors (PTV < 6.4 cc) showed reduced acute toxicity (p = 0.01). Overall, smaller benign tumors showed low acute toxicity, excellent local control, and good symptom management: a focus on enhanced neurological preservation may refine outcomes. For other tumor types outcome was encouraging: a focus on optimal dose and fractionation scheduling may reduce toxicity and improve local control. Individual patient experiences are detailed where valuable lessons were gained for optimizing local control and minimizing toxicity.

Radiotherapy in Patients with Vestibular Schwannoma and Neurofibromatosis Type 2: Clinical Results and Review of the Literature

Aims and Background

To evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) and neurofibromatosis type 2 (NF2) treated with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS).

Patients and Methods

Sixteen VS in 14 patients with NF2 were treated with FSRT (n = 14) and SRS (n = 2). Patients with tumor progression and/or progression of clinical symptoms were selected for treatment. For patients treated with FSRT a median total dose of 57.6 Gy was prescribed with a median fractionation of 5 × 1.8 Gy per week. For patients who underwent SRS a median single dose of 17 Gy was prescribed to the 80% isodose.

Results

FSRT and SRS were well tolerated. Local control rate was 94% for a median follow-up time of 131 months; 2- and 5-year progression-free survival were 100%. The probability of maintaining the pretreatment hearing level was 44%. Useful hearing preservation was 33%. Cranial nerve toxicity was moderate. Trigeminal nerve function worsened in 2 patients (12%) and facial nerve function in 3 patients (19%). One patient developed a new tinnitus.

Conclusion

FSRT and SRS are both safe and effective noninvasive and minimally invasive treatment options for patients with VS in the setting of NF2. The long-term local control rates are excellent. Functional hearing preservation is worse in patients with VS and NF2 than in patients with sporadic VS.

Impact of Cochlear Dose on Hearing Preservation following Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Fractionated Stereotactic Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Vestibular Schwannoma

Objective  The objective of this study was to examine the effect of cochlear dose on hearing preservation in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (fSRT) for vestibular schwannoma (VS). Design  This is a retrospective case-control study. Setting  This study was completed at the Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, a university-affiliated tertiary care center. Participants  Patients who underwent SRS (marginal dose of 12 Gy) or fSRT (marginal dose of 50.4 Gy) procedures for VS were included in the study. Main Outcome Measures  The main outcome measure was hearing preservation. Audiometric data, when available, were used to determine the level of hearing according to the Gardner Robertson scale. Results  A total of 38 patients (14 SRS and 24 fSRT) were analyzed. SRS patients with decreased hearing received a significantly higher minimum cochlear dose (7.41 vs. 4.24 Gy, p  = 0.02) as compared with those with stable hearing. In fSRT patients, there were no significant differences in cochlear dose for patients with decreased hearing as compared with those with stable hearing. For SRS patients, who received a minimum cochlear dose above 6 Gy, there was a significant risk of decreased hearing preservation (odds ratio: 32, p  = 0.02). Conclusion  Higher minimum cochlear dose was predictive of decreased hearing preservation following SRS. Though the study is low powered, the radiation dose to the cochlea should be a parameter that is considered when planning SRS or fSRT therapies for patients with VS.

Does Proton Therapy Have a Future in CNS Tumors?

OPINION STATEMENT

Proton therapy is characterized by certain physical properties leading to a reduction in integral dose. As proton therapy becomes more widely available, the ongoing discussion on the real indications for proton therapy becomes more important. In the present article, data on proton therapy for tumors of the central nervous system (CNS) is summarized and discussed in view of modern photon treatments. Still today, no randomized controlled trials are available confirming any clinical benefit of protons in CNS tumors. For certain skull base lesions, such as chordomas and chondrosarcomas, dose escalation is possible with protons thus patients should be referred to a proton center if readily available. For vestibular schwannoma, at present, proton data are inferior to advanced photons. For glioma patients, early data is present for low-grade gliomas, presenting comparable results to photons; dose escalation studies for high-grade gliomas have led to significant side effects, thus strategies of dose-escalation need to rethought. For skull base meningiomas, data from stereotactic series and IMRT present excellent local control with minimal side effects, thus any improvement with protons might only be marginal. The largest benefit is considered in pediatric CNS tumors, due to the intricate radiation sensitivity of children's normal tissue, as well as the potential of long-term survivorship. Long-term data is still lacking, and even recent analyses do not all lead to a clear reduction in side effects with improvement of outcome; furthermore, clinical data seem to be comparable. However, based on the preclinical evidence, proton therapy should be evaluated in every pediatric patient. Protons most likely have a benefit in terms of reduction of long-term side effects, such as neurocognitive sequelae or secondary malignancies; moreover, dose escalation can be performed in radio-resistant histologies. Clinical data with long-term follow-up is still warranted to prove any superiority to advanced photons in CNS tumors. If available, protons should be evaluated for chordoma or chondrosarcoma of the skull base and pediatric tumors. However, many factors are important for excellent oncology care, and no time delay or inferior oncological care should be accepted for the sake of protons only.

Fractionated vs. single-fraction stereotactic radiotherapy in patients with vestibular schwannoma : Hearing preservation and patients' self-reported outcome based on an established questionnaire

BACKGROUND

Stereotactic radiotherapy (RT) has been established as a valid treatment alternative in patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS). There is ongoing controversy regarding the optimal fractionation. Hearing preservation may be the primary goal for patients with VS, followed by maintenance of quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

From 2002 to 2015, 184 patients with VS were treated with radiosurgery (RS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT). A survey on current symptoms and QoL was conducted between February and June 2016.

RESULTS

Median follow-up after RT was 7.5 years (range 0-14.4 years). Mean overall survival (OS) after RT was 31.1 years, with 94 and 87% survival at 5 and 10 years, respectively [corrected]. Mean progression-free survival (PFS) was 13.3 years, with 5‑ and 10-year PFS of 92%. Hearing could be preserved in RS patients for a median of 36.3 months (range 2.3-13.7 years). Hearing worsened in 17 (30%) cases. Median hearing preservation for FSRT was 48.7 months (range 0.0-13.8 years); 29 (23%) showed hearing deterioration. The difference in hearing preservation was not significant between RS and FSRT (p = 0.3). A total of 123/162 patients participated in the patient survey (return rate 76%). The results correlate well with the information documented in the patient files for tinnitus and facial and trigeminal nerve toxicity. Significant differences appeared regarding hearing impairment, gait uncertainty, and imbalance.

CONCLUSION

These data confirm that RS and FSRT are comparable in terms of local control for VS. RS should be reserved for smaller lesions, while FSRT can be offered independently of tumor size. Patient self-reported outcome during follow-up is of high value. The established questionnaire could be validated in the independent cohort.

Radiotherapeutic management of vestibular schwannomas using size- and location-adapted fractionation regimens to maximize the therapeutic ratio

BACKGROUND

We evaluated and compared the radiographic and clinical outcomes of patients with vestibular schwannomas treated with single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), 5 fractions of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (hSRT), or 25 to 30 fractions of conventionally fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (cfSRT).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-six patients treated with LINAC-based SRS (median, 12.5 Gy), hSRT (25 Gy), or cfSRT (median, 54 Gy) were retrospectively reviewed. Fractionation was based on the size of the tumor, proximity to the brainstem, and potential risk of neurological sequelae. Median follow-up time was 55.2 months.

RESULTS

The pretreatment median tumor diameter was significantly smaller for SRS (1.14 cm) compared with hSRT (1.7 cm) (P = .03) and cfSRT (2.0 cm) (P < .001). The overall local tumor control was 96.4%: 100% SRS, 100% hSRT, and 90% cfSRT (P = .19). Tumor regression was observed in 53.3% of SRS, 76.2% of hSRT, and 90% of cfSRT (P = .05). There was less transient expansion of tumors treated with cfSRT (5%) than with SRS (53.3%) or hSRT (28.6%) (P = .005). The median time to regression was 13.8 months for SRS, 14.2 months for hSRT, and 5.5 months for cfSRT (P = .34). There was a 3.6% incidence of grade 3 trigeminal neuropathy, but there was no grade 3 facial neuropathy.

CONCLUSIONS

All 3 regimens demonstrated similar excellent local control with minimal toxicity; however, the ability of hSRT to treat larger tumors with comparable outcomes to SRS and greater patient convenience when compared with cfSRT suggest that hSRT may offer the optimal treatment approach.

3D quantitative assessment of response to fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and single-session stereotactic radiosurgery of vestibular schwannoma

OBJECTIVES

To determine clinical outcome of patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) after treatment with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) and single-session stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) by using 3D quantitative response assessment on MRI.

MATERIALS

This retrospective analysis included 162 patients who underwent radiation therapy for sporadic VS. Measurements on T1-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI (in 2-year post-therapy intervals: 0-2, 2-4, 4-6, 6-8, 8-10, 10-12 years) were taken for total tumour volume (TTV) and enhancing tumour volume (ETV) based on a semi-automated technique. Patients were considered non-responders (NRs) if they required subsequent microsurgical resection or developed radiological progression and tumour-related symptoms.

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 4.1 years (range: 0.4-12.0). TTV and ETV decreased for both the FSRT and SRS groups. However, only the FSRT group achieved significant tumour shrinkage (p < 0.015 for TTV, p < 0.005 for ETV over time). The 11 NRs showed proportionally greater TTV (median TTV pre-treatment: 0.61 cm(3), 8-10 years after: 1.77 cm(3)) and ETV despite radiation therapy compared to responders (median TTV pre-treatment: 1.06 cm(3); 10-12 years after: 0.81 cm(3); p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

3D quantification of VS showed a significant decrease in TTV and ETV on FSRT-treated patients only. NR had significantly greater TTV and ETV over time.

KEY POINTS

Only FSRT not GK-treated patients showed significant tumour shrinkage over time. Clinical non-responders showed significantly less tumour shrinkage when compared to responders. 3D volumetric assessment of vestibular schwannoma shows advantages over unidimensional techniques.

Hearing Preservation after Middle Fossa Vestibular Schwannoma Removal

Objective

To describe 5-year hearing preservation rates following microsurgical excision of vestibular schwannoma (VS) via the middle cranial fossa (MCF) approach.

Study Design

Case series with chart review.

Setting

This study was performed at a tertiary care academic medical center.

Subjects and Methods

Fifty-seven subjects with VS underwent resection via an MCF approach between February 1998 and January 2009. Pure-tone average (PTA) and word recognition score (WRS) were obtained preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at 5-year follow-up.

Results

Preoperative serviceable hearing (American Academy of Otolaryngology—Head and Neck Surgery class A/B) was present in 49 (86%) of the 57 patients, with an average PTA of 23 dB (range, 1-50 dB) and an average WRS of 97% (range, 76%-100%). Immediate postoperative serviceable hearing was maintained in 27 (55%) patients, with an average PTA and WRS of 31 dB (5-50 dB) and 96% (70%-100%), respectively. Five-year follow-up was available for 16 of the 27 patients. Twelve (75%) of the 16 patients maintained serviceable hearing with an average PTA and WRS of 35 dB (4-49 dB) and 95% (84%-100%), respectively. Of the 16 subjects who did maintain class A or B hearing, the mean change in PTA and WRS was 5 dB and 0.4%, respectively. Of the 4 patients who did not maintain class A/B hearing, average change in PTA and WRS was 16 dB (4.5-23 dB) and 16% (0%-40%), respectively.

Conclusions

For patients with VS in whom serviceable hearing is preserved following the MCF approach, the long-term hearing outcome remains durable in most patients.

Unyielding progress: recent advances in the treatment of central nervous system neoplasms with radiosurgery and radiation therapy

In the past decade, our understanding of the roles of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of brain tumors has dramatically improved. To highlight the changes and contemporary treatment approaches, we review the indications and outcomes of ionizing radiation for benign intracranial tumors and brain metastases. For nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, SRS is able to achieve radiographic tumor control in at least 90 % of cases. The rate of SRS-induced endocrine remission for functioning pituitary adenomas depends on the tumor subtype, but it is generally lower than the rate of radiographic tumor control. The most common complications from pituitary adenoma SRS treatment are hypopituitarism and cranial neuropathies. SRS has become the preferred treatment modality for vestibular schwannomas and skull base meningiomas less than 3 cm in size. Large vestibular schwannomas and meningiomas remain best managed with initial surgical resection or EBRT for surgically ineligible patients. For small to moderately sized brain metastases, there has been a shift toward treatment of newly diagnosed patients with SRS alone due to similar local control rates compared with surgical resection. RCTs have shown combined SRS and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) for brain metastases to decrease rates of local and distant intracranial recurrence compared to SRS alone. However, the improved intracranial control comes at the expense of poorer neurocognitive outcomes and without prolonging overall survival. Therefore, WBRT is generally reserved for salvage therapy. While EBRT has been frequently supplanted by SRS for the treatment pituitary adenomas and brain metastases, it still proves useful in selected cases of large lesions which are not amenable to surgical debulking or for those with widespread disease, poor performance status, and short life expectancy. In recent years, the scope of SRS has extended beyond the intracranial space to include extradural and intradural spinal tumors.

Reduced-dose fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for acoustic neuromas: maintenance of tumor control with improved hearing preservation

BACKGROUND

Fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) is a noninvasive treatment for acoustic neuromas (ANs). Initial reports from our institution demonstrated that the reduction of treatment dose to 46.8 Gy resulted in improved preservation of functional hearing status.

OBJECTIVE

We now report the tumor control (TC), symptomatic outcome, and hearing preservation (HP) rate in patients treated with reduced-dose FSRT.

METHODS

We analyzed all patients with AN treated from 2002 to 2011. All patients received 46.8 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions. Follow-up audiogram and magnetic resonance imaging were performed in ≤ 1-year intervals. TC and HP were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Analysis of HP, defined as Gardner-Robertson value ≤ 2, was determined by audiometric data. Non-hearing-related symptoms were defined by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.

RESULTS

In total, 154 patients were analyzed. At a median follow-up of 35 months (range, 4-108), TC was achieved in 96% of patients (n = 148/154) and at 3 and 5 years was 99% and 93%. Eighty-seven patients had serviceable hearing at the time of FSRT and evaluable audiometric follow-up. Overall HP was 67% and at 3 and 5 years was 66% and 54%. Pure tone average decreased by a median of 13 dB in all patients. Nineteen percent (n = 31) of patients experienced symptom improvement, and 8% (n = 13) had worsening of symptoms. Cranial nerve dysfunction occurred in 3.8% of patients (n = 6).

CONCLUSION

Reduced-dose FSRT to 46.8 Gy for AN achieves excellent functional HP rates and limited toxicity without compromising long-term TC. Based on these promising outcomes, further attempts at dose deescalation may be warranted.

Linac-based stereotactic radiosurgery and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for vestibular schwannomas: comparative observations of 139 patients treated at a single institution

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) have been recognized as an alternative to surgery for small to medium sized vestibular schwannoma (VS). This study analysed and compared the outcomes of VS treated with the first Thailand installation of a dedicated Linac-based stereotactic radiation machine using single-fraction radiosurgery (SRS), hypofraction stereotactic radiotherapy (HSRT) and conventional fraction stereotactic radiotherapy (CSRT). From 1997 to 2010, a total of 139 consecutive patients with 146 lesions of VS were treated with X-Knife at Ramathibodi hospital, Bangkok, Thailand. SRS was selected for 39 lesions (in patients with small tumors ≤3 cm and non-serviceable hearing function), whereas HSRT (79 lesions) and CSRT (28 lesions) were given for the remaining lesions that were not suitable for SRS. With a median follow-up time of 61 months (range, 12-143), the 5-year local control rate was 95, 100 and 95% in the SRS, HSRT and CSRT groups, respectively. Hearing preservation was observed after SRS in 75%, after HSRT in 87% and after CSRT in 63% of the patients. Cranial nerve complications were low in all groups. There were no statistically significant differences in local control, hearing preservation or complication between the treatment schedules. In view of our results, it may be preferable to use HSRT over CSRT for patients with serviceable hearing because of the shorter duration of treatment.

Single institution experience treating 104 vestibular schwannomas with fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy or stereotactic radiosurgery

The pupose of this study is to assess the long-term outcome and toxicity of fractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (FSRT) and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for 100 vestibular schwannomas treated at a single institution. From 1993 to 2007, 104 patients underwent were treated with radiation therapy for vestibular schwannoma. Forty-eight patients received SRS, with a median prescription dose of 12.5 Gy for SRS (range 9.7-16 Gy). For FSRT, two different fraction schedules were employed: a conventional schedule (ConFSRT) of 1.8 Gy per fraction (Gy/F) for 25 or 28 fractions to a total dose of 45 or 50.4 Gy (n = 19); and a once weekly hypofractionated course (HypoFSRT) consisting of 4 Gy/F for 5 fractions to a total dose of 20 Gy (n = 37). Patients treated with FSRT had better baseline hearing, facial, and trigeminal nerve function, and were more likely to have a diagnosis of NF2. The 5-year progression free rate (PFR) was 97.0 after SRS, 90.5% after HypoFSRT, and 100.0% after ConFSRT (p = NS). Univariate analysis demonstrated that NF2 and larger tumor size (greater than the median) correlated with poorer local control, but prior surgical resection did not. Serviceable hearing was preserved in 60.0% of SRS patients, 63.2% of HypoFSRT patients, and 44.4% of ConFSRT patients (p = 0.6). Similarly, there were no significant differences in 5-year rates of trigeminal toxicity facial nerve toxicity, vestibular dysfunction, or tinnitus.

CONCLUSIONS

Equivalent 5-year PFR and toxicity rates are shown for patients with vestibular schwanoma selected for SRS, HypoFSRT, and ConFSRT after multidisciplinary evaluation. Factors correlating with tumor progression included NF2 and larger tumor size.

Analysis of inter- and intrafraction accuracy of a commercial thermoplastic mask system used for image-guided particle radiation therapy

The present paper reports and discusses the results concerning both the inter- and intrafraction accuracy achievable combining the immobilization system employed in patients with head-and-neck, brain and skull base tumors with image guidance at our particle therapy center. Moreover, we investigated the influence of intrafraction time on positioning displacements. A total of 41 patients treated between January and July 2011 represented the study population. All the patients were immobilized with a tailored commercial thermoplastic head mask with standard head-neck rest (HeadSTEP(®), IT-V). Patient treatment position was verified by two orthogonal kilovoltage images acquired through a ceiling imaging robot (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The analysis of the applied daily corrections during the first treatment week before and after treatment delivery allowed the evaluation of the interfraction and intrafraction reproducibility of the thermoplastic mask, respectively. Concerning interfraction reproducibility, translational and rotational systematic errors (Σs) were ≤ 2.2 mm and 0.9º, respectively; translational and rotational random errors (σs) were ≤ 1.6 mm and 0.6º, respectively. Regarding the intrafraction accuracy translational and rotational Σs were ≤ 0.4 mm and 0.4º, respectively; translational and rotational σs were ≤ 0.5 mm and 0.3º, respectively. Concerning the time-intrafraction displacements correlation Pearson coefficient was 0.5 for treatment fractions with time between position checks less than or equal to median value, and 0.2 for those with time between position controls longer than the median figure. These results suggest that intrafractional patient motion is smaller than interfractional patient motion. Moreover, we can state that application of different imaging verification protocols translate into a relevant difference of accuracy for the same immobilization device. The magnitude of intrafraction displacements correlates with the time for short treatment sessions or during the early phase of long treatment delivery.

Frameless fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery for vestibular schwannomas: a single-institution experience

Objective: To examine tumor control, hearing preservation, and complication rates after frameless fractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in patients with vestibular schwannomas (VS).

Methods: Thirty-seven patients treated with fractionated SRS from 2002 to 2011 were retrospectively analyzed. Ninety-five percent were treated with 25 Gy in five fractions, targeting a median tumor volume of 1.03 cc (range 0.14–7.60).

Results: With a median follow-up of 4.25 years (range, 15 months–9 years), no tumors required an additional treatment resulting in 100% tumor control rate. Radiographic control rate was 91% in 32 patients at a median follow-up of 3 years. Of the 14 patients with serviceable hearing and with audiograms, the hearing preservation rate was 78% at a median follow-up of 18 months. Twenty-six patients with serviceable hearing pretreatment, were evaluated by a phone survey with a hearing preservation rate of 73% at a 5 year median follow-up. There were two cases that developed both new increased trigeminal parasthesias and facial spasms but there were no cases of facial weakness. Patient had 96% of good to excellent satisfaction rate with the treatment at a median follow-up of 5 years.

Conclusion: Frameless fractionated SRS treatment of VS results in good rate of tumor control. Hearing preservation rate and rates of cranial nerve toxicity are comparable to what is reported in the literature. Patients choose this modality because of its non-invasive nature and are generally very satisfied with their long term outcome.