Evaluation of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy (GRID) and Definitive Chemoradiotherapy With Curative Intent for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck: Initial Response Rates and Toxicity

Overview and Recommendations for Prospective Multi-institutional Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials

PURPOSE

The highly heterogeneous dose delivery of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a profound departure from standard radiation planning and reporting approaches. Early SFRT studies have shown excellent clinical outcomes. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. This NRG Oncology/American Association of Physicists in Medicine working group consensus aimed to develop recommendations on dosimetric planning, delivery, and SFRT dose reporting to address this current obstacle toward the design of SFRT clinical trials.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Working groups consisting of radiation oncologists, radiobiologists, and medical physicists with expertise in SFRT were formed in NRG Oncology and the American Association of Physicists in Medicine to investigate the needs and barriers in SFRT clinical trials.

RESULTS

Upon reviewing the SFRT technologies and methods, this group identified challenges in several areas, including the availability of SFRT, the lack of treatment planning system support for SFRT, the lack of guidance in the physics and dosimetry of SFRT, the approximated radiobiological modeling of SFRT, and the prescription and combination of SFRT with conventional radiation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing these challenges, the group further recommended several areas of improvement for the application of SFRT in cancer treatment, including the creation of clinical practice guidance documents, the improvement of treatment planning system support, the generation of treatment planning and dosimetric index reporting templates, and the development of better radiobiological models through preclinical studies and through conducting multi-institution clinical trials.

Which Modality of SFRT Should be Considered First for Bulky Tumor Radiation Therapy, GRID or LATTICE?

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), also known as the GRID and LATTICE radiotherapy (GRT, LRT), the concept of treating tumors by delivering a spatially modulated dose with highly non-uniform dose distributions, is a treatment modality of growing interest in radiation oncology, physics, and radiation biology. Clinical experience in SFRT has suggested that GRID and LATTICE therapy can achieve a high response and low toxicity in the treatment of refractory and bulky tumors. Limited initially to GRID therapy using block collimators, advanced, and versatile multi-leaf collimators, volumetric modulated arc technologies and particle therapy have since increased the capabilities and individualization of SFRT and expanded the clinical investigation of SFRT to various dosing regimens, multiple malignancies, tumor types and sites. As a 3D modulation approach outgrown from traditional 2D GRID, LATTICE therapy aims to reconfigure the traditional SFRT as spatial modulation of the radiation is confined solely to the tumor volume. The distinctively different beam geometries used in LATTICE therapy have led to appreciable variations in dose-volume distributions, compared to GRID therapy. The clinical relevance of the variations in dose-volume distribution between LATTICE and traditional GRID therapies is a crucial factor in determining their adoption in clinical practice. In this Point-Counterpoint contribution, the authors debate the pros and cons of GRID and LATTICE therapy. Both modalities have been used in clinics and their applicability and optimal use have been discussed in this article.

Clinical Implementation and Dosimetric Evaluation of a Robust Proton Lattice Planning Strategy Using Primary and Robust Complementary Beams

PURPOSE

Pencil-beam scanning proton therapy has been considered a potential modality for the 3D form of spatially fractionated radiation therapy called lattice therapy. However, few practical solutions have been introduced in the clinic. Existing limitations include degradation in plan quality and robustness when using single-field versus multifield lattice plans, respectively. We propose a practical and robust proton lattice (RPL) planning method using multifield and evaluate its dosimetric characteristics compared to clinically acceptable photon lattice plans.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seven cases previously treated with photon lattice therapy were used to evaluate a novel RPL planning technique using 2-orthogonal beams: a primary beam (PB) and a robust complementary beam (RCB) that deliver 67% and 33%, respectively, of the prescribed dose to vertices inside the gross target volume (GTV). Only RCB is robustly optimized for setup and range uncertainties. The number and volume of vertices, peak-to-valley dose ratios (PVDRs), and volume of low dose to GTV of proton and photon plans were compared. The RPL technique was then used in the treatment of 2 patients and their dosimetric parameters were reported.

RESULTS

The RPL strategy was able to achieve the clinical planning goals. Compared to previously treated photon plans, the average number of vertices increased by 30%, the average vertex volume by 49% (18.2 ± 25.9 cc vs 12.2 ± 14.5 cc, P = .21), and higher PVDR (10.5 ± 4.8 vs 2.5 ± 0.9, P < .005) was achieved. In addition, RPL plans show more conformal dose with less low dose to GTV (V30%, 60.9% ± 7.2% vs 81.6% ± 13.9% and V10%, 88.3% ± 4.5% vs 98.6% ± 3.6% [P < .01]). The RPL plan for 2 treated patients showed PVDRs of 4.61 and 14.85 with vertices-to-GTV ratios of 1.52% and 1.30%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel RPL planning strategy using a pair of orthogonal beams was developed and successfully translated to the clinic. The proposed method can generate better quality plans, a higher number of vertices, and higher PVDRs than currently used photon lattice plans.

Grid/lattice therapy: consideration of small field dosimetry

Small-field dosimetry used in special procedures such as gamma knife, Cyberknife, Tomotherapy, IMRT, and VMAT has been in evolution after several radiation incidences with very significant (70%) errors due to poor understanding of the dosimetry. IAEA-TRS-483 and AAPM-TG-155 have provided comprehensive information on small-fields dosimetry in terms of code of practice and relative dosimetry. Data for various detectors and conditions have been elaborated. It turns out that with a suitable detectors dose measurement accuracy can be reasonably (±3%) achieved for 6 MV beams for fields >1×1 cm2. For grid therapy, even though the treatment is performed with small fields created by either customized blocks, multileaf collimator (MLC), or specialized devices, it is multiple small fields that creates combined treatment. Hence understanding the dosimetry in collection of holes of small field is a separate challenge that needs to be addressed. It is more critical to understand the scattering conditions from multiple holes that form the treatment grid fields. Scattering changes the beam energy (softer) and hence dosimetry protocol needs to be properly examined for having suitable dosimetric parameters. In lieu of beam parameter unavailability in physical grid devices, MLC-based forward and inverse planning is an alternative path for bulky tumours. Selection of detectors in small field measurement is critical and it is more critical in mixed beams created by scattering condition. Ramification of small field concept used in grid therapy along with major consideration of scattering condition is explored. Even though this review article is focussed mainly for dosimetry for low-energy megavoltage photon beam (6 MV) but similar procedures could be adopted for high energy beams. To eliminate small field issues, lattice therapy with the help of MLC is a preferrable choice.

Dosimetric validation for prospective clinical trial on GRID collimator-based spatially fractionated radiation therapy: Dose metrics consistency and heterogeneous pattern reproducibility

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to characterize the dosimetric properties of a commercial brass GRID collimator for high energy photon beams including 15 and 10 MV. Then, the difference in dosimetric parameters of GRID beams among different energies and linacs was evaluated.

METHOD

A water tank scanning system was used to acquire the dosimetric parameters, including the percentage depth dose (PDD), beam profiles, peak to valley dose ratios (PVDRs), and output factors (OFs). The profiles at various depths were measured at 100 cm source to surface distance (SSD), and field sizes of 10 × 10 cm2 and 20 × 20 cm2 on three linacs. The PVDRs and OFs were measured and compared with the treatment planning system (TPS) calculations.

RESULTS

Compared with the open beam data, there were noticeable changes in PDDs of GRID fields across all the energies. The GRID fields demonstrated a maximal of 3 mm shift in dmax (Truebeam STX, 15MV, 10 × 10 cm2). The PVDR decreased as beam energy increases. The difference in PVDRs between Trilogy and Truebeam STx using 6MV and 15MV was 1.5% ± 4.0% and 2.1% ± 4.3%, respectively. However, two Truebeam linacs demonstrated less than 2% difference in PVDRs. The OF of the GRID field was dependent on the energy and field size. The measured PDDs, PVDRs, and OFs agreed with the TPS calculations within 3% difference. The TPS calculations agreed with the measurements when using 1 mm calculation resolution.

CONCLUSION

The dosimetric characteristics of high-energy GRID fields, especially PVDR, significantly differ from those of low-energy GRID fields. Two Truebeam machines are interchangeable for GRID therapy, while a pronounced difference was observed between Truebeam and Trilogy. A series of empirical equations and reference look-up tables for GRID therapy can be generated to facilitate clinical applications.

Stereotactic central/core ablative radiation therapy: results of a phase I study of a novel strategy to treat bulky tumor

Purpose

Bulky tumor remains as a challenge to surgery, chemotherapy and conventional radiation therapy. Hence, in efforts to overcome this challenge, we designed a novel therapeutic paradigm via strategy of Stereotactic Central/Core Ablative Radiation Therapy (SCART).), which is based on the principles of SBRT (stereotactic body radiation therapy and spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT). We intend to safely deliver an ablative dose to the core of the tumor and with a low dose at tumor edge. The purpose of the phase 1 study was to determine dose-limiting toxicities (DLT)s and the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of SCART.

Methods and materials

We defined a SCART-plan volume inside the tumor, which is proportional to the dimension of tumor. VMAT/Cyberknife technique was adopted. In the current clinical trial; Patients with biopsy proven recurrent or metastatic bulky cancers were enrolled. The five dose levels were 15 Gy X1, 15Gy X3, 18GyX3, 21GyX3 and 24GyX3, while keeping the whole tumor GTV's border dose at 5Gy each fraction. There was no restriction on concurrent systemic chemotherapy agents.

Results

21 patients were enrolled and underwent SCART. All 21 patients have eligible data for study follow-up. Radiotherapy was well tolerated with all treatment completed as scheduled. The dose was escalated for two patients to 24GyX3. No grade 3 or higher toxicity was observed in any of the enrolled patients. The average age of patients was 66 years (range: 14-85) and 13 (62%) patients were male. The median SCART dose was 18Gy (range: 15 - 24). Six out of the 18 patients with data for overall survival (OS) died, and the median time to death was 16.3 months (range: 1 - 25.6). The mean percent change for tumor shrinkage between first visit volumes and post-SCART volumes was 49.5% (SD: 40.89, p-value:0.009).

Conclusion

SCART was safely escalated to 24 GyX 3 fractions, which is the maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) for SCART. This regimen will be used in future phase II trials.

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.

Automated target placement for VMAT lattice radiation therapy: enhancing efficiency and consistency

Objective. An algorithm was developed for automated positioning of lattice points within volumetric modulated arc lattice radiation therapy (VMAT LRT) planning. These points are strategically placed within the gross tumor volume (GTV) to receive high doses, adhering to specific separation rules from adjacent organs at risk (OARs). The study goals included enhancing planning safety, consistency, and efficiency while emulating human performance.Approach. A Monte Carlo-based algorithm was designed to optimize the number and arrangement of lattice points within the GTV while considering placement constraints and objectives. These constraints encompassed minimum spacing between points, distance from OARs, and longitudinal separation along thez-axis. Additionally, the algorithm included an objective to permit, at the user's discretion, solutions with more centrally placed lattice points within the GTV. To validate its effectiveness, the automated approach was compared with manually planned treatments for 24 previous patients. Prior to clinical implementation, a failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) was conducted to identify potential shortcomings.Main results.The automated program successfully met all placement constraints with an average execution time (over 24 plans) of 0.29 ±0.07 min per lattice point. The average lattice point density (# points per 100 c.c. of GTV) was similar for automated (0.725) compared to manual placement (0.704). The dosimetric differences between the automated and manual plans were minimal, with statistically significant differences in certain metrics like minimum dose (1.9% versus 1.4%), D5% (52.8% versus 49.4%), D95% (7.1% versus 6.2%), and Body-GTV V30% (20.7 c.c. versus 19.7 c.c.).Significance.This study underscores the feasibility of employing a straightforward Monte Carlo-based algorithm to automate the creation of spherical target structures for VMAT LRT planning. The automated method yields similar dose metrics, enhances inter-planner consistency for larger targets, and requires fewer resources and less time compared to manual placement. This approach holds promise for standardizing treatment planning in prospective patient trials and facilitating its adoption across centers seeking to implement VMAT LRT techniques.

Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy in Sarcomas: A Large Single-Institution Experience

Purpose

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a recognized technique for enhancing tumor response in radioresistant and bulky tumors. We analyzed clinical and treatment outcomes in patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas treated with modern SFRT techniques.

Methods and Materials

Patients with metastatic or unresectable sarcoma treated with brass collimator, volumetric modulated arc therapy lattice, or proton SFRT from December 2019 to June 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Consolidative external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) was delivered at the physician's discretion. Patient and treatment characteristics, treatment response (symptom improvement, local control, and imaging response), and toxicity data were collected.

Results

The cohort consisted of 53 patients treated with 61 SFRT treatments. Median age at treatment was 60.0 years. The primary location was soft tissue in 46 courses (75%) and bone in 15 (25%). Fifty-three courses (87%) were treated for symptom relief. The most used SFRT technique was volumetric modulated arc therapy lattice (n = 52, 85%) to a dose of 20 Gy (n = 48, 79%; range, 16-20 Gy). EBRT was delivered post-SFRT in 55 (90%) treatment courses with a median time interval from SFRT to EBRT of 5 days (range, 0-14 days). Median physical EBRT dose and fractionation was 40 Gy (range, 9-73.5 Gy) and 10 fractions (range, 3-33 fractions). Median follow up was 7.4 months (range, 0.2-30 months). One-year overall survival and local control rates were 53% and 82%. Symptom relief was documented with 32 treatment courses (60%). Stable or partial response was observed with 47 treatment courses (90%). Four grade 3 to 4 acute and subacute toxicities were attributable to SFRT (8%).

Conclusions

The current series is the largest to date documenting outcomes for SFRT in sarcomas. Our results suggest combined SFRT with EBRT is associated with a favorable toxicity profile and high rates of symptomatic and radiographic responses for metastatic or unresectable sarcomas.

Beam quality and the mystery behind the lower percentage depth dose in grid radiation therapy

Grid therapy recently has been picking momentum due to favorable outcomes in bulky tumors. This is being termed as Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy (SFRT) and lattice therapy. SFRT can be performed with specially designed blocks made with brass or cerrobend with repeated holes or using multi-leaf collimators where dosimetry is uncertain. The dosimetric challenge in grid therapy is the mystery behind the lower percentage depth dose (PDD) in grid fields. The knowledge about the beam quality, indexed by TPR20/10 (Tissue Phantom Ratio), is also necessary for absolute dosimetry of grid fields. Since the grid may change the quality of the primary photons, a new [Formula: see text] should be evaluated for absolute dosimetry of grid fields. A Monte Carlo (MC) approach is provided to resolving the dosimetric issues. Using 6 MV beam from a linear accelerator, MC simulation was performed using MCNPX code. Additionally, a commercial grid therapy device was used to simulate the grid fields. Beam parameters were validated with MC model for output factor, depth of maximum dose, PDDs, dose profiles, and TPR20/10. The electron and photon spectra were also compared between open and grid fields. The dmax is the same for open and grid fields. The PDD with grid is lower (~ 10%) than the open field. The difference in TPR20/10 of open and grid fields is observable (~ 5%). Accordingly, TPR20/10 is still a good index for the beam quality in grid fields and consequently choose the correct [Formula: see text] in measurements. The output factors for grid fields are 0.2 lower compared to open fields. The lower depth dose with grid therapy is due to lower depth fluence with scatter radiation but it does not impact the dosimetry as the calibration parameters are insensitive to the effective beam energies. Thus, standard dosimetry in open beam based on international protocol could be used.

Practice Patterns of Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Practice Survey

Purpose

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is increasingly used for bulky advanced tumors, but specifics of clinical SFRT practice remain elusive. This study aimed to determine practice patterns of GRID and Lattice radiation therapy (LRT)-based SFRT.

Methods and Materials

A survey was designed to identify radiation oncologists' practice patterns of patient selection for SFRT, dosing/planning, dosimetric parameter use, SFRT platforms/techniques, combinations of SFRT with conventional external beam radiation therapy (cERT) and multimodality therapies, and physicists' technical implementation, delivery, and quality procedures. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Group comparisons were analyzed with permutation tests.

Results

The majority of practicing radiation oncologists (United States, 100%; global, 72.7%) considered SFRT an accepted standard-of-care radiation therapy option for bulky/advanced tumors. Treatment of metastases/recurrences and nonmetastatic primary tumors, predominantly head and neck, lung cancer and sarcoma, was commonly practiced. In palliative SFRT, regimens of 15 to 18 Gy/1 fraction predominated (51.3%), and in curative-intent treatment of nonmetastatic tumors, 15 Gy/1 fraction (28.0%) and fractionated SFRT (24.0%) were most common. SFRT was combined with cERT commonly but not always in palliative (78.6%) and curative-intent (85.7%) treatment. SFRT-cERT time sequencing and cERT dose adjustments were variable. In curative-intent treatment, concurrent chemotherapy and immunotherapy were found acceptable by 54.5% and 28.6%, respectively. Use of SFRT dosimetric parameters was highly variable and differed between GRID and LRT. SFRT heterogeneity dosimetric parameters were more commonly used (P = .008) and more commonly thought to influence local control (peak dose, P = .008) in LRT than in GRID therapy.

Conclusions

SFRT has already evolved as a clinical practice pattern for advanced/bulky tumors. Major treatment approaches are consistent and follow the literature, but SFRT-cERT combination/sequencing and clinical utilization of dosimetric parameters are variable. These areas may benefit from targeted education and standardization, and knowledge gaps may be filled by incorporating identified inconsistencies into future clinical research.

Dosimetric Validation for Prospective Clinical Trial of GRID Collimator-Based Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: Dose Metrics Consistency and Heterogeneous Pattern Reproducibility

PURPOSE

Dose heterogeneity within a tumor target is likely responsible for the biologic effects and local tumor control from spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT). This study used a commercially available GRID-pattern dose mudulated nonuniform radiation therapy (GRID) collimator to assess the interplan variability of heterogeneity dose metrics in patients with various bulky tumor sizes and depths.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The 3-dimensional heterogeneity metrics of 14 bulky tumors, ranging from 155 to 2161 cm3 in volume, 6 to 23 cm in equivalent diameter, and 3 to 13 cm in depth, and treated with GRID collimator-based SFRT were studied. A prescription dose of 15 Gy was given at the tumor center with 6 MV photons. The dose-volume histogram indices, dose heterogeneity parameters, and peak/valley dose ratios were derived; the equivalent uniform doses of cancer cells with various radiosensitivities in each plan were estimated. To account for the spatial fractionation, high dose core number density of the tumor target was defined and calculated.

RESULTS

Among 14 plans, the dose-volume histogram indices D5, D10, D50, D90, and D95 (doses covering 5%, 10%, 50%, 90%, and 95% of the target volume) were found within 10% variation. The dose ratio of D10/D90 also showed a moderate consistency (range, 3.9-5.0; mean, 4.4). The equivalent uniform doses were consistent, ranging from 4.3 to 5.5 Gy, mean 4.6 Gy, for radiosensitive cancer cells and from 5.8 to 6.9 Gy, mean 6.2 Gy, for radioresistant cancer cells. The high dose core number density was within 20% among all plans.

CONCLUSIONS

GRID collimator-based SFRT delivers a consistent heterogeneity dose distribution and high dose core density across bulky tumor plans. The interplan reproducibility and simplicity of GRID therapy may be useful for certain clinical indications and interinstitutional clinical trial design, and its heterogeneity metrics may help guide multileaf-collimator-based SFRT planning to achieve similar or further optimized dose distributions.

Script-based implementation of automatic grid placement for lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy

Background and purpose

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) has demonstrated promising clinical response in treating large tumors with heterogeneous dose distributions. Lattice stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an SFRT technique that leverages inverse optimization to precisely localize regions of high and lose dose within disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate an automated heuristic approach to sphere placement in lattice SBRT treatment planning.

Materials and methods

A script-based algorithm for sphere placement in lattice SBRT based on rules described by protocol was implemented within a treatment planning system. The script was applied to 22 treated cases and sphere distributions were compared with manually placed spheres in terms of number of spheres, number of protocol violations, and time required to place spheres. All cases were re-planned using script-generated spheres and plan quality was compared with clinical plans.

Results

The mean number of spheres placed excluding those that violate rules was greater using the script (13.8) than that obtained by either dosimetrist (10.8 and 12.0, p < 0.001 and p = 0.003) or physicist (12.7, p = 0.061). The mean time required to generate spheres was significantly less using the script (2.5 min) compared to manual placement by dosimetrists (25.0 and 29.9 min) and physicist (19.3 min). Plan quality indices were similar in all cases with no significant differences, and OAR constraints remained met on all plans except two.

Conclusion

A script placed spheres for lattice SBRT according to institutional protocol rules. The script-produced placement was superior to that of manually-specified spheres, as characterized by sphere number and rule violations.

Comment on "Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel definitive radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer"

see pages 230‐231

Clinical aspects of spatially fractionated radiation therapy treatments

PURPOSE

To provide clinical guidance for centers wishing to implement photon spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) treatments using either a brass grid or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lattice approach.

METHODS

We describe in detail processes which have been developed over the course of a 3-year period during which our institution treated over 240 SFRT cases. The importance of patient selection, along with aspects of simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery are discussed. Illustrative examples involving clinical cases are shown, and we discuss safety implications relevant to the heterogeneous dose distributions.

RESULTS

SFRT can be an effective modality for tumors which are otherwise challenging to manage with conventional radiation therapy techniques or for patients who have limited treatment options. However, SFRT has several aspects which differ drastically from conventional radiation therapy treatments. Therefore, the successful implementation of an SFRT treatment program requires the multidisciplinary expertise and collaboration of physicians, physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists.

CONCLUSIONS

We have described methods for patient selection, simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance and delivery of clinical SFRT treatments which were built upon our experience treating a large patient population with both a brass grid and VMAT lattice approach. Preclinical research and patient trials aimed at understanding the mechanism of action are needed to elucidate which patients may benefit most from SFRT, and ultimately expand its use.

Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy with Interdigitated High-Dose LRT for Voluminous High-Grade Soft-Tissue Sarcoma

Purpose

To report a case of large extremity soft tissue sarcoma (2933 cc), safely treated with a novel approach of interdigitating high-dose LATTICE radiation therapy (LRT) with standard radiation therapy as a neoadjuvant treatment to surgery.

Patients and Methods

Four sessions of high-dose LRT were delivered in a weekly interval, interdigitated with standard radiation therapy. The LRT plan consisted of 15 high-dose vertices receiving a dose >12 Gy per session, with 2-3 Gy to the peripheral margin of the tumor. The patient underwent surgical excision 2 months after the new regimen of induction radiation therapy.

Results and Discussion

The patient tolerated the radiation therapy regimen well. The post-operative assessment revealed a negative surgical margin and over 95% necrosis of the total tumor volume. The post-surgical wound complication was mitigated by outpatient wound care. Interdigitating multiple sessions of high-dose LATTICE radiation treatments with standard neoadjuvant radiation therapy as a neoadjuvant therapy for soft tissue sarcoma was feasible and did not incur additional toxicity in this clinical case. A phase-I/II trial will be conducted to further evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of the new treatment strategy with the intent to increase the rate of pathologic necrosis, which has been shown to positively correlate with the overall survival.

Dosimetric Performance Evaluation of MLC-based and Cone-based 3D Spatially Fractionated LATTICE Radiotherapy

This study aims to dosimetrically compare multi-leaf collimator (MLC)-based and cone-based 3D LATTICE radiotherapy (LRT) plans. Valley-peak ratios were evaluated using seven different 3D LATTICE designs. Target volumes of 8 cm and 12 cm were defined on the RANDO phantom. Valley-peak dose patterns were obtained by creating high-dose vertices in the target volumes. By changing the vertex diameter, vertices separation, and volume ratio, seven different LATTICE designs were generated. Treatment plans were implemented using CyberKnife and Varian RapidArc. Thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD), EBT3 films, and electronic portal-imaging device (EPID) were employed for dosimetric treatment verification, and measured doses were compared to calculated doses. By changing the vertex diameter and vertices separation, the valley-peak ratio was exhibited little difference between the two systems. By changing the vertex diameter and volume ratio, the valley-peak ratio was observed nearly the same for the two systems. The film, TLD, and EPID dosimetry showed good agreement between the calculated and measured doses. Based on the results, we concluded that although smaller valley-peak ratios were obtained with cone-based plans, the dose-volume histograms were comparable in both systems. Also, when we evaluated the treatment duration, the MLC-based plans were more appropriate to apply the treatment in a single fraction.

2D mapping of radiation dose and clonogenic survival for accurate assessment ofin vitroX-ray GRID irradiation effects

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT or GRID) is an approach to deliver high local radiation doses in an 'on-off' pattern. To better appraise the radiobiological effects from GRID, a framework to link local radiation dose to clonogenic survival needs to be developed. A549 lung cancer cells were irradiated in T25 cm²flasks using 220 kV x-rays with an open field or through a tungsten GRID collimator with periodical 5 mm openings and 10 mm blockings. Delivered nominal doses were 2, 5, and 10 Gy. A novel approach for image segmentation was used to locate the centroid of surviving colonies in scanned images of the cell flasks. Gafchromic^TMfilm dosimetry (GFD) and FLUKA Monte Carlo (MC) simulations were employed to map the dose at each surviving colony centroid. Fitting the linear-quadratic (LQ) function to clonogenic survival data for open field irradiation, the expected survival level at a given dose level was calculated. The expected survival levels were then mapped together with the observed levels in the GRID-irradiated flasks. GFD and FLUKA MC gave similar dose distributions, with a mean peak-to-valley dose ratio of about 5. LQ-parameters for open field irradiation gaveα=0.24±0.02Gy^-1andβ=0.019±0.002Gy^-2. The mean relative percentage deviation between observed and predicted survival in the (peak; valley) dose regions was (4.6; 3.1) %, (26.6; -1.0) %, and (129.8; -2.3) % for 2, 5 and 10 Gy, respectively. In conclusion, a framework for mapping of surviving colonies following GRID irradiation together with predicted survival levels from homogeneous irradiation was presented. For the given cell line, our findings indicate that GRID irradiation causes reduced survival in the peak regions compared to an open field configuration.

Boosted Radiation Bystander Effect of PSMA-Targeted Gold Nanoparticles in Prostate Cancer Radiosensitization

Metal nanoparticles are effective radiosensitizers that locally enhance radiation doses in targeted cancer cells. Compared with other metal nanoparticles, gold nanoparticles (GNPs) exhibit high biocompatibility, low toxicity, and they increase secondary electron scatter. Herein, we investigated the effects of active-targeting GNPs on the radiation-induced bystander effect (RIBE) in prostate cancer cells. The impact of GNPs on the RIBE presents implications for secondary cancers or spatially fractionated radiotherapy treatments. Anti-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) antibodies were conjugated with PEGylated GNPs through EDC-NHS chemistry. The media transfer technique was performed to induce the RIBE on the non-irradiated bystander cells. This study focused on the LNCaP cell line, because it can model a wide range of stages relating to prostate cancer progression, including the transition from androgen dependence to castration resistance and bone metastasis. First, LNCaP cells were pretreated with phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or PSMA-targeted GNPs (PGNPs) for 24 h and irradiated with 160 kVp X-rays (0-8 Gy). Following that, the collected culture media were filtered (sterile 0.45 µm polyethersulfone) in order to acquire PBS- and PGNP- conditioned media (CM). Then, PBS- and PGNP-CM were transferred to the bystander cells that were loaded with/without PGNPs. MTT, γ-H2AX, clonogenic assays and reactive oxygen species assessments were performed to compare RIBE responses under different treatments. Compared with 2 Gy-PBS-CM, 8 Gy-PBS-CM demonstrated a much higher RIBE response, thus validating the dose dependence of RIBE in LNCaP cells. Compared with PBS-CM, PGNP-CM exhibited lower cell viability, higher DNA damage, and a smaller survival fraction. In the presence of PBS-CM, bystander cells loaded with PGNPs showed increased cell death compared with cells that did not have PGNPs. These results demonstrate the PGNP-boosted expression and sensitivity of RIBE in prostate cancer cells.

An International Consensus on the Design of Prospective Clinical–Translational Trials in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy for Advanced Gynecologic Cancer

Simple Summary

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) delivers intentionally heterogenous dose to tumors. This is a major departure from current radiation therapy, which strives for uniform dose. Early pilot experience suggests promising treatment outcomes with SFRT in patients with challenging bulky tumors, including gynecologic cancer. Well-conducted prospective multi-institutional clinical trials are now needed to further test SFRT as a treatment modality. However, clinical trial development is hampered by the variabilities in SFRT approach and the overall unfamiliarity with heterogeneous dosing. A broad consensus among SFRT experts, potential investigators, and the wider radiation oncology community is needed so that clinical trials in SFRT can be successfully designed and carried out. We developed an international consensus guideline for the design parameters of clinical/translational trials in SFRT for gynecologic cancer. High-to-moderate consensus was achieved, and harmonized fundamental design parameters for SFRT trials in advanced gynecologic cancer were defined.

Abstract

Despite the unexpectedly high tumor responses and limited treatment-related toxicities observed with SFRT, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials of SFRT are still lacking. High variability of SFRT technologies and methods, unfamiliar complex dose and prescription concepts for heterogeneous dose and uncertainty regarding systemic therapies present major obstacles towards clinical trial development. To address these challenges, the consensus guideline reported here aimed at facilitating trial development and feasibility through a priori harmonization of treatment approach and the full range of clinical trial design parameters for SFRT trials in gynecologic cancer. Gynecologic cancers were evaluated for the status of SFRT pilot experience. A multi-disciplinary SFRT expert panel for gynecologic cancer was established to develop the consensus through formal panel review/discussions, appropriateness rank voting and public comment solicitation/review. The trial design parameters included eligibility/exclusions, endpoints, SFRT technology/technique, dose/dosimetric parameters, systemic therapies, patient evaluations, and embedded translational science. Cervical cancer was determined as the most suitable gynecologic tumor for an SFRT trial. Consensus emphasized standardization of SFRT dosimetry/physics parameters, biologic dose modeling, and specimen collection for translational/biological endpoints, which may be uniquely feasible in cervical cancer. Incorporation of brachytherapy into the SFRT regimen requires additional pre-trial pilot investigations. Specific consensus recommendations are presented and discussed.

Radiobiological and Treatment-Related Aspects of Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy

The continuously evolving field of radiotherapy aims to devise and implement techniques that allow for greater tumour control and better sparing of critical organs. Investigations into the complexity of tumour radiobiology confirmed the high heterogeneity of tumours as being responsible for the often poor treatment outcome. Hypoxic subvolumes, a subpopulation of cancer stem cells, as well as the inherent or acquired radioresistance define tumour aggressiveness and metastatic potential, which remain a therapeutic challenge. Non-conventional irradiation techniques, such as spatially fractionated radiotherapy, have been developed to tackle some of these challenges and to offer a high therapeutic index when treating radioresistant tumours. The goal of this article was to highlight the current knowledge on the molecular and radiobiological mechanisms behind spatially fractionated radiotherapy and to present the up-to-date preclinical and clinical evidence towards the therapeutic potential of this technique involving both photon and proton beams.

An International Consensus on the Design of Prospective Clinical–Translational Trials in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy

Purpose

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), which delivers highly nonuniform dose distributions instead of conventionally practiced homogeneous tumor dose, has shown high rates of clinical response with minimal toxicities in large-volume primary or metastatic malignancies. However, prospective multi-institutional clinical trials in SFRT are lacking, and SFRT techniques and dose parameters remain variable. Agreement on dose prescription, technical administration, and clinical and translational design parameters for SFRT trials is essential to enable broad participation and successful accrual to rigorously test the SFRT approach. We aimed to develop a consensus for the design of multi-institutional clinical trials in SFRT, tailored to specific primary tumor sites, to help facilitate development and enhance the feasibility of such trials.

Methods and Materials

Primary tumor sites with sufficient pilot experience in SFRT were identified, and fundamental trial design questions were determined. For each tumor site, a comprehensive consensus effort was established through disease-specific expert panels. Clinical trial design criteria included eligibility, SFRT technology and technique, dose and fractionation, target- and normal-tissue dose parameters, systemic therapies, clinical trial endpoints, and translational science considerations. Iterative appropriateness rank voting, expert panel consensus reviews and discussions, and public comment posting were used for consensus development.

Results

Clinical trial criteria were developed for head and neck cancer and soft-tissue sarcoma. Final consensus among the 22 trial design categories each (a total of 163 criteria) was high to moderate overall. Uniform patient cohorts of advanced bulky disease, standardization of SFRT technologies and dosimetry and physics parameters, and collection of translational correlates were considered essential to trial design. Final guideline recommendations and the degree of agreement are presented and discussed.

Conclusions

This consensus provides design guidelines for the development of prospective multi-institutional clinical trials testing SFRT in advanced head and neck cancer and soft-tissue sarcoma through in-advance harmonization of the fundamental clinical trial design among SFRT experts, potential investigators, and the SFRT community.

An investigation of kV mini-GRID spatially fractionated radiation therapy: dosimetry and preclinical trial

Objective. To develop and characterize novel methods of extreme spatially fractionated kV radiation therapy (including mini-GRID therapy) and to evaluate efficacy in the context of a pre-clinical mouse study.Approach. Spatially fractionated GRIDs were precision-milled from 3 mm thick lead sheets compatible with mounting on a 225 kVp small animal irradiator (X-Rad). Three pencil-beam GRIDs created arrays of 1 mm diameter beams, and three 'bar' GRIDs created 1 × 20 mm rectangular fields. GRIDs projected 20 × 20 mm2fields at isocenter, and beamlets were spaced at 1, 1.25, and 1.5 mm, respectively. Peak-to-valley ratios and dose distributions were evaluated with Gafchromic film. Syngeneic transplant tumors were induced by intramuscular injection of a soft tissue sarcoma cell line into the gastrocnemius muscle of C57BL/6 mice. Tumor-bearing mice were randomized to four groups: unirradiated control, conventional irradiation of entire tumor, GRID therapy, and hemi-irradiation (half-beam block, 50% tumor volume treated). All irradiated mice received a single fraction of 15 Gy.Results. High peak-to-valley ratios were achieved (bar GRIDs: 11.9 ± 0.9, 13.6 ± 0.4, 13.8 ± 0.5; pencil-beam GRIDs: 18.7 ± 0.6, 26.3 ± 1.5, 31.0 ± 3.3). Pencil-beam GRIDs could theoretically spare more intra-tumor immune cells than bar GRIDs, but they treat less tumor tissue (3%-4% versus 19%-23% area receiving 90% prescription, respectively). Bar GRID and hemi-irradiation treatments significantly delayed tumor growth (P < 0.05), but not as much as a conventional treatment (P < 0.001). No significant difference was found in tumor growth delay between GRID and hemi-irradiation.Significance. High peak-to-valley ratios were achieved with kV grids: two-to-five times higher than values reported in literature for MV grids. GRID irradiation and hemi-irradiation delayed tumor growth, but neither was as effective as conventional whole tumor uniform dose treatment. Single fraction GRID therapy could not initiate an anti-cancer immune response strong enough to match conventional RT outcomes, but follow-up studies will evaluate the combination of mini-GRID with immune checkpoint blockade.

A Dosimetric Parameter Reference Look-Up Table for GRID Collimator-Based Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy

Simple Summary

Dose prescription for the inhomogeneous dosing in spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is challenging, and further hampered by the inability of several planning systems to incorporate complex SFRT dose patterns. We developed dosing reference tables for an inventory of tumour scenarios and tested their accuracy with water phantom measurements of GRID therapy, delivered by a standard commercial GRID collimator. We find that dose heterogeneity parameters and EUD modeling are consistent across tumour sizes, configurations, and treatment depths. These results suggest that the developed reference tables can be used as a practical clinical resource for clinical decision-making on GRID therapy and to facilitate heterogeneity dose estimates in clinical patients when this commercially available GRID device is used.

Abstract

Computations of heterogeneity dose parameters in GRID therapy remain challenging in many treatment planning systems (TPS). To address this difficulty, we developed reference dose tables for a standard GRID collimator and validate their accuracy. The .decimal Inc. GRID collimator was implemented within the Eclipse TPS. The accuracy of the dose calculation was confirmed in the commissioning process. Representative sets of simulated ellipsoidal tumours ranging from 6–20 cm in diameter at a 3-cm depth; 16-cm ellipsoidal tumours at 3, 6, and 10 cm in depth were studied. All were treated with 6MV photons to a 20 Gy prescription dose at the tumour center. From these, the GRID therapy dosimetric parameters (previously recommended by the Radiosurgery Society white paper) were derived. Differences in D5 through D95 and EUD between different tumour sizes at the same depth were within 5% of the prescription dose. PVDR from profile measurements at the tumour center differed from D10/D90, but D10/D90 variations for the same tumour depths were within 11%. Three approximation equations were developed for calculating EUDs of different prescription doses for three radiosensitivity levels for 3-cm deep tumours. Dosimetric parameters were consistent and predictable across tumour sizes and depths. Our study results support the use of the developed tables as a reference tool for GRID therapy.

Divide and conquer: spatially fractionated radiation therapy

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) challenges some of the classical dogmas in conventional radiotherapy. The highly modulated spatial dose distributions in SFRT have been shown to lead, both in early clinical trials and in small animal experiments, to a significant increase in normal tissue dose tolerances. Tumour control effectiveness is maintained or even enhanced in some configurations as compared with conventional radiotherapy. SFRT seems to activate distinct radiobiological mechanisms, which have been postulated to involve bystander effects, microvascular alterations and/or immunomodulation. Currently, it is unclear which is the dosimetric parameter which correlates the most with both tumour control and normal tissue sparing in SFRT. Additional biological experiments aiming at parametrizing the relationship between the irradiation parameters (beam width, spacing, peak-to-valley dose ratio, peak and valley doses) and the radiobiology are needed. A sound knowledge of the interrelation between the physical parameters in SFRT and the biological response would expand its clinical use, with a higher level of homogenisation in the realisation of clinical trials. This manuscript reviews the state of the art of this promising therapeutic modality, the current radiobiological knowledge and elaborates on future perspectives.

Feasibility Study of 3D-VMAT-Based GRID Therapy

Background: Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (GRID) could effectively de-bulk tumor volumes for shallow and deep-seated locally advanced tumors. A new treatment planning method using the three-dimensional-volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique combined with a novel, software-generated, virtual GRID block (VGB) was developed which allows better conformity plans (VMAT-GRID) and maintain the GRID dosimetric characteristics. The dosimetric metrics calculated via the valley/peak ratio (D_min/D_max), D₉₀/D₁₀, gross tumor volume (GTV) mean dose (D_mean), GTV equivalent uniform dose (EUD), and normal tissue maximum dose. Methods: Twenty-five patients with tumor volumes ranging between 71.6 cc and 4683 cc at various tumor sites were retrospectively studied. The prescription was 20 Gy to the maximum point of GTV in a single fraction, and the VMAT-GRID plan was generated using 6 MV/10 MV flattening-filter-free beams. Results: The optimized VGB was designed with the median center-to-center distance of 27 mm, and 9 mm for the median diameter of the opening area in this study. These 2 values can be used to design any optimized VGB, the final VGB may be modified to generate a patient-specific VGB. The median GTV mean dose was 918 (877- 938) cGy, and the median GTV EUD dose was 818 (597-916) cGy. In terms of dose inhomogeneity, the median valley-to-peak dose ratio was 0.07 (0.02-0.26); and the median ratio of D₉₀/D₁₀ was 0.70 (0.38-0.94). For the organ-at-risk doses, there was a rapid dose drop-off in the normal tissue area immediately adjacent to the target, and the maximum global doses were all located inside the GTV. Conclusion: Our results indicated that the VMAT-GRID planning approach could successfully deliver dose with acceptable GRID dose metric while sparing the normal tissue especially in the region near the target due to the rapid dose drop-off and restricting maximum dose inside the target.

Investigating spatial fractionation and radiation induced bystander effects: a mathematical modelling approach

Radiation induced bystander effects (RIBEs) have been shown to cause death in cells receiving little or no physical dose. In standard radiotherapy, where uniform fields are delivered and all cells are directly exposed to radiation, this phenomenon can be neglected. However, the role of RIBEs may become more influential when heterogeneous fields are considered. Mathematical modelling can be used to determine how these heterogeneous fields might influence cell survival, but most established techniques account only for the direct effects of radiation. To gain a full appreciation of how non-uniform fields impact cell survival, it is also necessary to consider the indirect effects of radiation. In this work, we utilise a mathematical model that accounts for both the direct effects of radiation on cells and RIBEs. This model is used to investigate how spatially fractionated radiotherapy plans impact cell survivalin vitro. These predictions were compared to survival in normal and cancerous cells following exposure to spatially fractionated plans using a clinical linac. The model is also used to explore how spatially fractionated radiotherapy will impact tumour controlin vivo. Results suggest that spatially fractionated plans are associated with higher equivalent uniform doses than conventional uniform plans at clinically relevant doses. The model predicted only small changes changes in normal tissue complication probability, compared to the larger protection seen clinically. This contradicts a central paradigm of radiotherapy where uniform fields are assumed to maximise cell kill and may be important for future radiotherapy optimisation.

A Brief Overview of the Preclinical and Clinical Radiobiology of Microbeam Radiotherapy

Microbeam radiotherapy (MRT) is the delivery of spatially fractionated beams that have the potential to offer significant improvements in the therapeutic ratio due to the delivery of micron-sized high dose and dose rate beams. They build on longstanding clinical experience of GRID radiotherapy and more recently lattice-based approaches. Here we briefly overview the preclinical evidence for MRT efficacy and highlight the challenges for bringing this to clinical utility. The biological mechanisms underpinning MRT efficacy are still unclear, but involve vascular, bystander, stem cell and potentially immune responses. There is probably significant overlap in the mechanisms underpinning MRT responses and FLASH radiotherapy that needs to be further defined.

Spatially fractionated radiotherapy: tumor response modelling including immunomodulation

A mathematical tumor response model has been developed, encompassing the interplay between immune cells and cancer cells initiated by either partial or full tumor irradiation. The iterative four-compartment model employs the linear-quadratic radiation response theory for four cell types: active and inactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (immune cells, CD8⁺T cells in particular), viable cancer cells (undamaged and reparable cells) and doomed cells (irreparably damaged cells). The cell compartment interactions are calculated per day, with total tumor volume (TV) as the main quantity of interest. The model was fitted to previously published data on syngeneic xenografts (67NR breast carcinoma and Lewis lung carcinoma; (Markovskyet al2019Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.103697-708)) subjected to single doses of 10 or 15 Gy by 50% (partial) or 100% (full) TV irradiation. The experimental data included effects from anti-CD8⁺antibodies and immunosuppressive drugs. Using a new optimization method, promising fits were obtained where the lowest and highest root-mean-squared error values were observed for anti-CD8⁺treatment and unirradiated control data, respectively, for both cell types. Additionally, predictive capabilities of the model were tested by using the estimated model parameters to predict scenarios for higher doses and different TV irradiation fractions. Here, mean relative deviations in the range of 19%-34% from experimental data were found. However, more validation data is needed to conclude on the model's predictive capabilities. In conclusion, the model was found useful in evaluating the impact from partial and full TV irradiation on the immune response and subsequent tumor growth. The model shows potential to support and guide spatially fractionated radiotherapy in future pre-clinical and clinical studies.

The role of the spatially fractionated radiation therapy in the management of advanced bulky tumors

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) refers to the delivery of a single large dose of radiation within the target volume in a heterogeneous pattern using either a custom GRID block, multileaf collimators, and virtual methods such as helical tomotherapy or synchrotron-based microbeams. The potential impact of this technique on the regression of bulky deep-seated tumors that do not respond well to conventional radiotherapy has been remarkable. To date, a large number of patients have been treated using the SFRT techniques. However, there are yet many technical and medical challenges that have limited their routine use to a handful of clinics, most commonly for palliative intent. There is also a poor understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying the clinical efficacy of this approach. In this article, the methods of SFRT delivery together with its potential biological mechanisms are presented. Furthermore, technical challenges and clinical achievements along with the radiobiological models used to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SFRT are highlighted.

Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy Using Lattice Radiation in Far-advanced Bulky Cervical Cancer: A Clinical and Molecular Imaging and Outcome Study

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) has shown promise in generating high tumor response and local control in the treatment of various palliative and locally advanced bulky tumors. SFRT has not yet been studied systematically in cancer of the cervix. Here we report the first series of patients receiving SFRT for advanced/bulky cervical cancer. Ten patients with far-advanced bulky cervical cancer, stage IIIB-IVA (seven squamous cell and three adeno/adenosquamous carcinomas) received lattice radiation therapy (LRT), a variant of SFRT. The LRT regimen consisted of a dose of 24 Gy in three fractions, given to an average of five high-dose spheres within the gross tumor volume (GTV). The dose in the peripheral GTV was limited to 9 Gy in three fractions, using the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique. LRT was followed subsequently by conventionally fractionated external beam irradiation to 44.28 Gy (range: 39.60-45.00 Gy in 1.8 Gy fractions). All patients received concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy. Tumor response was assessed clinically, by morphological imaging (CT, MRI) and 18FDG PET/CT. Tumor control and survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. All patients had local control at a median follow-up of 16 months (1-77). The two-year disease-specific survival rate was 53.3%. All cancer deaths were due to metastatic failure with local control maintained. Among the three patients who died of disease, all had adeno- or adenosquamous carcinoma histology, and no deaths from disease occurred among the patients with squamous cell carcinoma (P = 0.010). There were no grade ≥3 short-term or long-term treatment-related complications. Intra-treatment morphological tumor regression was highly variable (mean: 54%, range: 6-91%). After therapy, the complete metabolic response was 88.9% (8/9), and one patient out of the nine patients with post-treatment PET-CT had partial response (11.1%). Our preliminary data suggest that LRT-based SFRT is well tolerated in patients with far-advanced bulky cervical cancer and results in favorable tumor responses and high local control. These observations confirm prior reports of favorable tumor control and toxicity outcomes with SFRT in other advanced/bulky malignancies. Our findings are corroborated by high molecular-imaging-based tumor response. These encouraging hypothesis-generating results require cautious interpretation and confirmation with larger patient cohorts, preferably through a multi-institutional controlled randomized clinical trial.

The Technical and Clinical Implementation of LATTICE Radiation Therapy (LRT)

The concept of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) was conceived over 100 years ago, first in the form of GRID, which has been applied to clinical practice since its early inception and continued to the present even with markedly improved instrumentation in radiation therapy. LATTICE radiation therapy (LRT) was introduced in 2010 as a conceptual 3D extension of GRID therapy with several uniquely different features. Since 2014, when the first patient was treated, over 150 patients with bulky tumors worldwide have received LRT. Through a brief review of the basic principles and the analysis of the collective clinical experience, a set of technical recommendations and guidelines are proposed for the clinical implementation of LRT. It is to be recognized that the current clinical practice of SFRT (GRID or LRT) is still largely based on the heuristic principles. With advancements in basic biological research and the anticipated clinical trials to systemically assess the efficacy and risk, progressively robust optimizations of the technical parameters are essential for the broader application of SFRT in clinical practice.

Photon GRID Radiation Therapy: A Physics and Dosimetry White Paper from the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/LATTICE, Microbeam and FLASH Radiotherapy Working Group

The limits of radiation tolerance, which often deter the use of large doses, have been a major challenge to the treatment of bulky primary and metastatic cancers. A novel technique using spatial modulation of megavoltage therapy beams, commonly referred to as spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) (e.g., GRID radiation therapy), which purposefully maintains a high degree of dose heterogeneity across the treated tumor volume, has shown promise in clinical studies as a method to improve treatment response of advanced, bulky tumors. Compared to conventional uniform-dose radiotherapy, the complexities of megavoltage GRID therapy include its highly heterogeneous dose distribution, very high prescription doses, and the overall lack of experience among physicists and clinicians. Since only a few centers have used GRID radiation therapy in the clinic, wide and effective use of this technique has been hindered. To date, the mechanisms underlying the observed high tumor response and low toxicity are still not well understood. To advance SFRT technology and planning, the Physics Working Group of the Radiosurgery Society (RSS) GRID/Lattice, Microbeam and Flash Radiotherapy Working Groups, was established after an RSS-NCI Workshop. One of the goals of the Physics Working Group was to develop consensus recommendations to standardize dose prescription, treatment planning approach, response modeling and dose reporting in GRID therapy. The objective of this report is to present the results of the Physics Working Group's consensus that includes recommendations on GRID therapy as an SFRT technology, field dosimetric properties, techniques for generating GRID fields, the GRID therapy planning methods, documentation metrics and clinical practice recommendations. Such understanding is essential for clinical patient care, effective comparisons of outcome results, and for the design of rigorous clinical trials in the area of SFRT. The results of well-conducted GRID radiation therapy studies have the potential to advance the clinical management of bulky and advanced tumors by providing improved treatment response, and to further develop our current radiobiology models and parameters of radiation therapy design.

A simple dosimetric approach to spatially fractionated GRID radiation therapy using the multileaf collimator for treatment of breast cancers in the prone position

The purpose of this study was to explore the treatment planning methods of spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT), commonly referred to as GRID therapy, in the treatment of breast cancer patients using multileaf collimator (MLC) in the prone position. A total of 12 patients with either left or right breast cancer were retrospectively chosen. The computed tomography (CT) images taken for the whole breast external beam radiation therapy (WB‐EBRT) were used for GRID therapy planning. Each GRID plan was made by using two portals and each portal had two fields with 1‐cm aperture size. The dose prescription point was placed at the center of the target volume, and a dose of 20 Gy with 6‐MV beams was prescribed. Dose‐volume histogram (DVH) curves were generated to evaluate dosimetric properties. A modified linear‐quadratic (MLQ) radiobiological response model was used to assess the equivalent uniform doses (EUD) and therapeutic ratios (TRs) of all GRID plans. The DVH curves indicated that these MLC‐based GRID therapy plans can deliver heterogeneous dose distribution in the target volume as seen with the conventional cerrobend GRID block. The plans generated by the MLC technique also demonstrated the advantage for accommodating different target shapes, sparing normal structures, and reporting dose metrics to the targets and the organs at risks. All GRID plans showed to have similar dosimetric parameters, implying the plans can be made in a consistent quality regardless of the shape of the target and the size of volume. The mean dose of lung and heart were respectively below 0.6 and 0.7 Gy. When the size of aperture is increased from 1 to 2 cm, the EUD and TR became smaller, but the peak/valley dose ratio (PVDR) became greater. The dosimetric approach of this study was proven to be simple, practical and easy to be implemented in clinic.

History and current perspectives on the biological effects of high-dose spatial fractionation and high dose-rate approaches: GRID, Microbeam & FLASH radiotherapy

The effects of various forms of ionising radiation are known to be mediated by interactions with cellular and molecular targets in irradiated and in some cases non-targeted tissue volumes. Despite major advances in advanced conformal delivery techniques, the probability of normal tissue complication (NTCP) remains the major dose-limiting factor in escalating total dose delivered during treatment. Potential strategies that have shown promise as novel delivery methods in achieving effective tumour control whilst sparing organs at risk involve the modulation of critical dose delivery parameters. This has led to the development of techniques using high dose spatial fractionation (GRID) and ultra-high dose rate (FLASH) which have translated to the clinic. The current review discusses the historical development and biological basis of GRID, microbeam and FLASH radiotherapy as advanced delivery modalities that have major potential for widespread implementation in the clinic in future years.

Understanding High-Dose, Ultra-High Dose Rate, and Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy

The National Cancer Institute's Radiation Research Program, in collaboration with the Radiosurgery Society, hosted a workshop called Understanding High-Dose, Ultra-High Dose Rate and Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy on August 20 and 21, 2018 to bring together experts in experimental and clinical experience in these and related fields. Critically, the overall aims were to understand the biological underpinning of these emerging techniques and the technical/physical parameters that must be further defined to drive clinical practice through innovative biologically based clinical trials.

Phase I Trial of MRI-Guided Prostate Cancer Lattice Extreme Ablative Dose (LEAD) Boost Radiation Therapy

PURPOSE

A phase I clinical trial was designed to test the feasibility and toxicity of administering high-dose spatially fractionated radiation therapy to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-defined prostate tumor volumes, in addition to standard treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We enrolled 25 men with favorable to high-risk prostate cancer and 1 to 3 suspicious multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) gross tumor volumes (GTVs). The mpMRI-GTVs were treated on day 1 with 12 to 14 Gy via dose cylinders using a lattice extreme ablative dose technique. The entire prostate, along with the proximal seminal vesicles, was then treated to 76 Gy at 2 Gy/fraction. For some high-risk patients, the distal seminal vesicles and pelvic lymph nodes received 56 Gy at 1.47 Gy/fraction concurrently in 38 fractions. The total dose to the lattice extreme ablative dose cylinder volume(s) was 88 to 90 Gy (112-123 Gy in 2.0 Gy equivalents, assuming an α-to-β ratio of 3).

RESULTS

Dosimetric parameters were satisfactorily met. Median follow-up was 66 months. There were no grade 3 acute/subacute genitourinary or gastrointestinal adverse events. Maximum late genitourinary toxicity was grade 1 in 15 (60%), grade 2 in 4 (16%), and grade 4 in 1 (4%; sepsis after a posttreatment transurethral resection). Maximum late gastrointestinal toxicity was grade 1 in 11 (44%) and grade 2 in 4 (16%). Two patients experienced biochemical failure.

CONCLUSIONS

External beam radiation therapy delivered with an upfront spatially fractionated, stereotactic high-dose mpMRI-GTV boost is feasible and was not associated with any unexpected events. The technique is now part of a follow-up phase II randomized trial.

FLASH and minibeams in radiation therapy: the effect of microstructures on time and space and their potential application to protontherapy

After years of lethargy, studies on two non-conventional microstructures in time and space of the beams used in radiation therapy are enjoying a huge revival. The first effect called “FLASH” is based on very high dose-rate irradiation (pulse amplitude ≥10⁶ Gy/s), short beam-on times (≤100 ms) and large single doses (≥10 Gy) as experimental parameters established so far to give biological and potential clinical effects. The second effect relies on the use of arrays of minibeams (e.g., 0.5–1 mm, spaced 1–3.5 mm). Both approaches have been shown to protect healthy tissues as an endpoint that must be clearly specified and could be combined with each other (e.g., minibeams under FLASH conditions). FLASH depends on the presence of oxygen and could proceed from the chemistry of peroxyradicals and a reduced incidence on DNA and membrane damage. Minibeams action could be based on abscopal effects, cell signalling and/or migration of cells between “valleys and hills” present in the non-uniform irradiation field as well as faster repair of vascular damage. Both effects are expected to maintain intact the tumour control probability and might even preserve antitumoural immunological reactions. FLASH in vivo experiments involving Zebrafish, mice, pig and cats have been done with electron beams, while minibeams are an intermediate approach between X-GRID and synchrotron X-ray microbeams radiation. Both have an excellent rationale to converge and be applied with proton beams, combining focusing properties and high dose rates in the beam path of pencil beams, and the inherent advantage of a controlled limited range. A first treatment with electron FLASH (cutaneous lymphoma) has recently been achieved, but clinical trials have neither been presented for FLASH with protons, nor under the minibeam conditions. Better understanding of physical, chemical and biological mechanisms of both effects is essential to optimize the technical developments and devise clinical trials.

Novel treatment planning approaches to enhance the therapeutic ratio: targeting the molecular mechanisms of radiation therapy

Radiation acts not only through cell death but has also angiogenic, immunomodulatory and bystander effects. The realization of its systemic implications has led to extensive research on the combination of radiotherapy with systemic treatments, including immunotherapy and antiangiogenic agents. Parameters such as dose, fractionation and sequencing of treatments are key determinants of the outcome. However, recent high-quality research indicates that these are not the only radiation therapy parameters that influence its systemic effect. To effectively integrate systemic agents with radiation therapy, these new aspects of radiation therapy planning will have to be taken into consideration in future clinical trials. Our aim is to review these new treatment planning parameters that can influence the balance between contradicting effects of radiation therapy so as to enhance the therapeutic ratio.

Clinical Outcomes of Spatially Fractionated GRID Radiotherapy in the Treatment of Bulky Tumors of the Head and Neck

Objectives

The clinical outcomes of patients treated with spatially fractionated GRID radiotherapy (SFGRT) for bulky tumors of the head and neck at a single institution were evaluated retrospectively. Endpoints of interest included tumor response, symptom improvement, treatment tolerance, and adverse events.

Methods

Institutional review board approval was obtained prior to study initiation. The institutional database was queried for patients with tumors of the head and neck treated with SFGRT between August 2007 and April 2015. Medical records of identified patients were reviewed for treatment details and clinical endpoints of interest. SFGRT was delivered in one fraction of 15 gray (Gy) or 20 Gy; 6 megavolt (MV) or 18 MV photon beams were passed through a multileaf collimator (MLC)-based or brass GRID template. All patients had a planned course of conventionally-fractionated external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) to begin on the day following SFGRT delivery.

Results

Twenty-one consecutive patients meeting study criteria were identified. The most common tumor histology was squamous cell carcinoma. Median patient age was 59 years (range 13 - 83 years); median maximum tumor dimension was 9.5 centimeters (cm) (range 5.0 - 25.0 cm). Fifteen patients (71.4%) completed their full course of EBRT. Twelve patients were treated with palliative intent for local tumor symptoms, of which 54.5% experienced some degree of symptom improvement. Of nine patients treated with curative intent, 44.4% achieved a clinical complete response (CR). Concurrent chemotherapy was administered in 12 patients, with all patients being treated having definitively received chemotherapy. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) grade three or higher skin toxicity occurred in five patients; no grade five events were reported.

Conclusions

Our institutional experience suggests that SFGRT is a feasible treatment option for the palliative or definitive management of large tumors of the head and neck. In combination with EBRT, SFGRT can provide timely symptom management and improve patient quality of life in the palliative setting. In the definitive setting, the addition of chemotherapy to SFGRT and EBRT can result in an excellent clinical response. Treatment toxicity was found to be within an acceptable range. When considering SFGRT for patients with these challenging presentations, careful patient selection is needed to identify those who will likely tolerate a full course of EBRT following SFGRT, as these patients are most likely to receive maximal benefit from SFGRT treatment. More data on the feasibility and efficacy of this radiation modality will be helpful for continued optimization of SFGRT delivery and patient selection.

A Current Review of Spatial Fractionation: Back to the Future?

Spatially fractionated radiation therapy represents a significant departure from canonical thinking in radiation oncology despite having origins in the early 1900s. The original and most common implementation of spatially fractionated radiation therapy uses commercially available blocks or multileaf collimators to deliver a nonconfluent, sieve-like pattern of radiation to the target volume in a nonuniform dose distribution. Dosimetrically, this is parameterized by the ratio of the valley dose in cold spots to the peak dose in hot spots, or the valley-to-peak dose ratio. The radiobiologic mechanisms are postulated to involve radiation-induced bystander effects, microvascular alterations, and/or immunomodulation. Current indications include bulky or locally advanced disease that would not be amenable to conventional radiation or that has proved refractory to chemoradiation. Early-phase clinical trials have shown remarkable success, with some response rates >90% and minimal toxicity. This has promoted technological developments in 3-dimensional formats (LATTICE), micron-size beams (microbeam), and proton arrays. Nevertheless, more clinical and biological data are needed to specify ideal dosimetry parameters and to formulate robust clinical indications and guidelines for optimal standardized care.

Spatially fractionated proton minibeams

Extraordinary normal tissue response to highly spatially fractionated X-ray beams has been explored for over 25 years. More recently, alternative radiation sources have been developed and utilized with the aim to evoke comparable effects. These include protons, which lend themselves well for this endeavour due to their physical depth dose characteristics as well as corresponding variable biological effectiveness. This paper addresses the motivation for using protons to generate spatially fractionated beams and reviews the technological implementations and experimental results to date. This includes simulation and feasibility studies, collimation and beam characteristics, dosimetry and biological considerations as well as the results of in vivo and in vitro studies. Experimental results are emerging indicating an extraordinary normal tissue sparing effect analogous to what has been observed for synchrotron generated X-ray microbeams. The potential for translational research and feasibility of spatially modulated proton beams in clinical settings is discussed.

Novel stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)-based partial tumor irradiation targeting hypoxic segment of bulky tumors (SBRT-PATHY): improvement of the radiotherapy outcome by exploiting the bystander and abscopal effects

Background

Despite the advances in oncology, patients with bulky tumors have worse prognosis and often receive only palliative treatments. Bulky disease represents an important challenging obstacle for all currently available radical treatment options including conventional radiotherapy. The purpose of this study was to assess a retrospective outcome on the use of a newly developed unconventional stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for PArtial Tumor irradiation of unresectable bulky tumors targeting exclusively their HYpoxic segment (SBRT-PATHY) that exploits the non-targeted effects of radiotherapy: bystander effects (local) and the abscopal effects (distant).

Materials and methods

Twenty-three patients with bulky tumors received partial bulky irradiation in order to induce the local non-targeted effect of radiation (bystander effect). The hypoxic tumor segment, called the bystander tumor volume (BTV), was defined using PET and contrast-enhanced CT, as a hypovascularized-hypometabolic junctional zone between the central necrotic and peripheral hypervascularized-hypermetabolic tumor segment. Based on tumor site and volume, the BTV was irradiated with 1–3 fractions of 10–12 Gy prescribed to 70% isodose-line. The pathologic lymph nodes and metastases were not irradiated in order to assess the distant non-targeted effects of radiation (abscopal effect). No patient received any systemic therapy.

Results

At the time of analysis, with median follow-up of 9.4 months (range: 4–20), 87% of patients remained progression-free. The bystander and abscopal response rates were 96 and 52%, respectively. Median shrinkage of partially irradiated bulky tumor expressing intensity of the bystander effect was 70% (range 30–100%), whereas for the non-irradiated metastases (intensity of the abscopal effect), it was 50% (range 30–100%). No patient experienced acute or late toxicity of any grade.

Conclusions

SBRT-PATHY showed very inspiring results on exploitation of the radiation-hypoxia-induced non-targeted effects that need to be confirmed through our ongoing prospective trial.

Present study has been retrospectively registered by the local ethic committee under study number A 26/18.

Spatial fractionation of the dose in heavy ions therapy: An optimization study

PURPOSE

The alliance of charged particle therapy and the spatial fractionation of the dose, as in minibeam or Grid therapy, is an innovative strategy to improve the therapeutic index in the treatment of radioresistant tumors. The aim of this work was to assess the optimum irradiation configuration in heavy ion spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) in terms of ion species, beam width, center-to-center distances, and linear energy transfer (LET), information that could be used to guide the design of the future biological experiments. The nuclear fragmentation leading to peak and valley regions composed of different secondary particles, creates the need for a more complete dosimetric description that the classical one in SFRT.

METHODS

Monte Carlo simulations (GATE 6.2) were performed to evaluate the dose distributions for different ions, beam widths, and spacings. We have also assessed the 3D-maps of dose-averaged LET and proposed a new parameter, the peak-to-valley-LET ratio, to offer a more thorough physical evaluation of the technique.

RESULTS

Our results show that beam widths larger than 400 μm are needed in order to keep a ratio between the dose in the entrance and the dose in the target of the same order as in conventional irradiations. A large ctc distance (3500 μm) would favor tissue sparing since it provides higher PVDR, it leads to a reduced contribution of the heavier nuclear fragments and a LET value in the valleys a factor 2 lower than the LET in the ctc leading to homogeneous distributions in the target.

CONCLUSIONS

Heavy ions MBRT provide advantageous dose distributions. Thanks to the reduced lateral scattering, the use of submillimetric beams still allows to keep a ratio between the dose in the entrance and the dose in the target of the same order as in conventional irradiations. Large ctc distances (3500 μm) should be preferred since they lead to valley doses composed of lighter nuclear fragments resulting in a much reduced dose-averaged LET values in normal tissue, favoring its preservation. Among the different ions species evaluated, Ne stands out as the one leading to the best balance between high PVDR and PVLR in normal tissues and high LET values (close to 100 keV/μm) and a favorable oxygen enhancement ratio in the target region.

Improved outcome of treating locally advanced lung cancer with the use of Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT): A case report

•

In a six-year follow-up the patient is alive and well with no evidence of disease.

•

This case reports successful treatment of a patient with advanced NSCLC using LRT.

•

LRT is frequently referred to as spatially fractionated GRID radiotherapy or SFGFT.

•

Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT) is a technical extension of 2D Grid Technique.

The Lattice Radiotherapy (LRT) technique is mainly based on the GRID technology with the improved feature of the 3D treatment delivery. A 72 year old male presented with left shoulder pain due to a 6 cm pulmonary mass in the left upper lobe (LUL) histologically proven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) stage IIIA. In July 2011 he was treated in our center with LRT followed by conventional fractionated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) combined with chemotherapy. Clinical and imaging follow up of 6 years demonstrated continued improvement and the patient is currently with no evidence of disease (NED). This outstanding result obtained in our first lung cancer patient treated with this approach corroborates its potential in the treatment of locally advanced lung cancer. In a period of 7 years we have treated more than 30 patients with LRT for different diagnosis and sites; 12 of them NSCLC patients, with markedly improved local control and minimal toxicity.