1
|
Romesser PB, Neal BP, Crane CH. External Beam Radiation Therapy for Liver Metastases. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2025; 39:161-175. [PMID: 39510671 DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2024.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2024]
Abstract
Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) commonly is used for small liver metastases. Modern conformal radiotherapy techniques, including 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy, enable the safe delivery of SABR to small liver volumes. For larger tumors, the safe delivery of SABR can be challenging due to a more limited volume of healthy normal liver parenchyma and the proximity of the tumor to radiosensitive organs, such as the stomach, duodenum, and large intestine. Controlling respiratory motion, the use of image guidance, and increasing the number of radiation fractions sometimes are necessary for the safe delivery of SABR in these situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul B Romesser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, New York, NY 10065, USA; Early Drug Development Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Brian P Neal
- Medical Physics, ProCure Proton Therapy Center, 103 Cedar Grove Lane, Somerset, NJ 08873, USA
| | - Christopher H Crane
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, Box #22, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Marc L, Unkelbach J. Optimal use of limited proton resources for liver cancer patients in combined proton-photon treatments. Phys Med Biol 2025; 70:025020. [PMID: 39569865 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad94c8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2024] [Accepted: 11/19/2024] [Indexed: 11/22/2024]
Abstract
Objective. Liver cancer patients may benefit from proton therapy through increase of the tumor control probability (TCP). However, proton therapy is a limited resource and may not be available for all patients. We consider combined proton-photon liver SBRT treatments (CPPT) where only some fractions are delivered with protons. It is investigated how limited proton fractions can be used best for individual patients and optimally allocated within a patient group.Approach. Photon and proton treatment plans were created for five liver cancer patients. In CPPT, limited proton fractions may be optimally exploited by increasing the fraction dose compared to the photon fraction dose. To determine a patient's optimal proton and photon fraction doses, we maximize the target biologically effective dose (BED) while constraining the mean normal liver BED, which leads to an up- or downscaling of the proton and photon plan, respectively. The resulting CPPT balances the benefits of fractionation in the normal liver versus exploiting the superior proton dose distributions. After converting the target BED to TCP, the optimal number of proton fractions per patient is determined by maximizing the overall TCP of the patient group.Main results. For the individual patient, a CPPT treatment that delivers a higher fraction dose with protons than photons allows for dose escalation in the target compared to delivering the same proton and photon fraction dose. On the level of a patient group, CPPT may allow to distribute limited proton slots over several patients. Through an optimal use and allocation of proton fractions, CPPT may increase the average patient group TCP compared to a proton patient selection strategy where patients receive single-modality proton or photon treatments.Significance. Limited proton resources can be optimally exploited via CPPT by increasing the target dose in proton fractions and allocating available proton slots to patients with the highest TCP increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Louise Marc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Rose F, Carmen De Santis M, Lucidi S, Ray Colciago R, Marino L, Cucciarelli F, La Rocca E, Di Pressa F, Lohr F, Vanoni V, Meduri B. Dose constraints in breast cancer radiotherapy. A critical review. Radiother Oncol 2025; 202:110591. [PMID: 39427931 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 10/13/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024]
Abstract
Radiotherapy plays an essential role in the treatment of breast cancer (BC). Recent advances in treatment technology and radiobiological knowledge have a major impact in BC patients with locoregional disease as the majority are now long-term survivors. Over the last three decades, intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) techniques, together with the increasing adoption of moderately hypofractionated and ultra-hypofractionated treatment schedules as well as the possibility to offer partial breast radiotherapy to a well-defined patient subset have significantly changed radiotherapy for BC patients. As dose-volume constraints (DVCs) have to be adapted to these new treatment paradigms we have reviewed available evidence-based data concerning dose-constraints for the main organs at risk (OARs) that apply to the treatment of whole breast/chest wall radiotherapy, whole breast/chest wall radiotherapy including regional nodal irradiation (RNI) and partial breast irradiation (PBI), for the most relevant fractionation schedules that have been introduced recently. This narrative review provides a comprehensive summary that may help to harmonize treatment planning strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Maria Carmen De Santis
- Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Lorenza Marino
- Servizio di Radioterapia, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, CT, Italy
| | - Francesca Cucciarelli
- Radiotherapy Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Eliana La Rocca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Di Pressa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Frank Lohr
- Proton Therapy Unit, APSS, Trento, Italy; CISMED - Centro Interdipartimentale di Scienze Mediche, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
| | | | - Bruno Meduri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Grosu-Bularda A, Lita FF, Hodea FV, Bordeanu-Diaconescu EM, Cretu A, Dumitru CS, Cacior S, Marinescu BM, Lascar I, Hariga CS. Navigating the Complexities of Radiation Injuries: Therapeutic Principles and Reconstructive Strategies. J Pers Med 2024; 14:1100. [PMID: 39590592 PMCID: PMC11595796 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14111100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2024] [Revised: 10/21/2024] [Accepted: 11/08/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation injuries, particularly those resulting from therapeutic or accidental exposure, present complex challenges for medical management. These injuries can manifest localized skin damage or extend to deeper tissues, presenting as various clinical entities that require treatment strategies, ranging from conservative management to complex surgical interventions. Radiation treatment constitutes a fundamental component of neoplastic management, with nearly two out of three oncological instances undergoing it as an element of their therapeutic strategy. The therapeutic approach to radiation injury consists of expanding prophylactic measures while maintaining the efficacy of treatment, such as conservative treatment or local debridement followed by reconstruction. The armamentarium of reconstructive methods available for plastic surgeons, from secondary healing to free tissue transfer, can be successfully applied to radiation injuries. However, the unique pathophysiological changes induced by radiation necessitate a careful and specialized approach for their application, considering the altered tissue characteristics and healing dynamics. The therapeutic strategy is guided by both the severity and progression of the injury, with the primary aim of restoring functionality and aesthetic aspects while simultaneously minimizing the risk of complications. This paper explores the various conditions encompassed by the term "radiation injury," reviews both non-surgical and surgical therapeutic strategies for managing these injuries, and highlights the unique challenges associated with treating irradiated tissues within specific oncological contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreea Grosu-Bularda
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Flavia-Francesca Lita
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
- Clinical Department Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Central Military Emergency University Hospital “Dr. Carol Davila”, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Florin-Vlad Hodea
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Eliza-Maria Bordeanu-Diaconescu
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Andrei Cretu
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Catalina-Stefania Dumitru
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Stefan Cacior
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Bogdan-Mihai Marinescu
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinical Department Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Central Military Emergency University Hospital “Dr. Carol Davila”, 010825 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Ioan Lascar
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Cristian-Sorin Hariga
- Department 11, Discipline Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy Carol Davila, 050474 Bucharest, Romania; (A.G.-B.); (I.L.); (C.-S.H.)
- Clinic of Plastic Surgery and Reconstructive Microsurgery, Clinical Emergency Hospital of Bucharest, 014461 Bucharest, Romania
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Park S, Rim CH, Yoon WS. Clinical outcomes and safety of external beam radiotherapy with extensive intrahepatic targets for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A single institutional clinical experience. Saudi J Gastroenterol 2024; 30:399-406. [PMID: 39215481 PMCID: PMC11630486 DOI: 10.4103/sjg.sjg_195_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2024] [Revised: 08/06/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study observed the clinical outcome of radiotherapy to extensive intrahepatic targets for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a single institution. METHODS From September 2009 to July 2021, patients who underwent fractionated radiotherapy to a planning target volume (PTV) of over 100 ml with biological effective dose >30 Gy 10 for advanced HCC were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) and radiation-induced liver toxicity (RILD) were evaluated. RILD was defined as an increase in Child-Pugh (CP) score ≥2 or liver function tests ≥2.5 times at 3 months after the end of radiotherapy. RESULTS A total of 136 patients were evaluated. Eighty-nine patients had portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), 37 patients were in CP B stage, and the median radiation dose to PTV was 48.8 Gy 10 . The median OS was 12.3 months. The factors most affecting OS were PVTT ( P = 0.001), PTV (>500 ml, P = 0.001), incomplete coverage of the intrahepatic tumor ( P = 0.004), and CP B ( P = 0.006) in Cox regression. RILD occurred in 22.4% of the patients and was affected by PVTT ( P = 0.003), PTV ( P = 0.010), pretreatment bilirubin levels (>1.5 mg/ml, P = 0.016), and the mean normal liver dose (MNLD) (≥ EQD 2 18 Gy 3 , P = 0.021) in binary logistic regression. As the PTV was in excess of >500 ml, RILD developed in 30.2% of patients and the prognostic importance of pretreatment bilirubin levels ( P = 0.006) and the MNLD ( P = 0.014) increased. CONCLUSIONS As PTV is more extensive, the bilirubin level and the MNLD have to be taken into consideration for safe radiotherapy, in addition to the traditional prognostic factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sunmin Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Ansan, Republic of Korea
| | - Chai Hong Rim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Ansan, Republic of Korea
| | - Won Sup Yoon
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ansan Hospital, College of Medicine, Korea University, Ansan, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tavakol DN, Nash TR, Kim Y, Graney PL, Liberman M, Fleischer S, Lock RI, O'Donnell A, Andrews L, Ning D, Yeager K, Harken A, Deoli N, Amundson SA, Garty G, Leong KW, Brenner DJ, Vunjak‐Novakovic G. Modeling the Effects of Protracted Cosmic Radiation in a Human Organ-on-Chip Platform. ADVANCED SCIENCE (WEINHEIM, BADEN-WURTTEMBERG, GERMANY) 2024; 11:e2401415. [PMID: 38965824 PMCID: PMC11558103 DOI: 10.1002/advs.202401415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2024] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 07/06/2024]
Abstract
Galactic cosmic radiation (GCR) is one of the most serious risks posed to astronauts during missions to the Moon and Mars. Experimental models capable of recapitulating human physiology are critical to understanding the effects of radiation on human organs and developing radioprotective measures against space travel exposures. The effects of systemic radiation are studied using a multi-organ-on-a-chip (multi-OoC) platform containing engineered tissue models of human bone marrow (site of hematopoiesis and acute radiation damage), cardiac muscle (site of chronic radiation damage) and liver (site of metabolism), linked by vascular circulation with an endothelial barrier separating individual tissue chambers from the vascular perfusate. Following protracted neutron radiation, the most damaging radiation component in deep space, a greater deviation of tissue function is observed as compared to the same cumulative dose delivered acutely. Further, by characterizing engineered bone marrow (eBM)-derived immune cells in circulation, 58 unique genes specific to the effects of protracted neutron dosing are identified, as compared to acutely irradiated and healthy tissues. It propose that this bioengineered platform allows studies of human responses to extended radiation exposure in an "astronaut-on-a-chip" model that can inform measures for mitigating cosmic radiation injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Trevor R. Nash
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Youngbin Kim
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Pamela L. Graney
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Martin Liberman
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Sharon Fleischer
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Roberta I. Lock
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Aaron O'Donnell
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Leah Andrews
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Derek Ning
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Keith Yeager
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Andrew Harken
- Center for Radiological ResearchColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Naresh Deoli
- Center for Radiological ResearchColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Sally A. Amundson
- Center for Radiological ResearchColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Guy Garty
- Center for Radiological ResearchColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Kam W. Leong
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - David J. Brenner
- Center for Radiological ResearchColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| | - Gordana Vunjak‐Novakovic
- Department of Biomedical EngineeringDepartment of Medicine, and College of Dental MedicineColumbia UniversityNew YorkNY10032USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Brewster F, Middleton Z, McWilliam A, Brocklehurst A, Radhakrishna G, Chuter R. Feasibility of using contrast-free quantitative magnetic resonance imaging for liver sparing stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 49:100859. [PMID: 39376618 PMCID: PMC11456905 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2024.100859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2024] [Revised: 09/06/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 10/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Tumours in the liver often develop on a background of liver cirrhosis and impaired liver function. As a result, radiotherapy treatments are limited by radiation-induced liver disease, parameterised by the liver mean dose (LMD). Liver function is highly heterogeneous, especially in liver cancer, but the use of LMD does not take this into account. One possible way to improve liver treatments is to use quantitative imaging techniques to assess liver health and prioritise the sparing of healthy liver tissue. Materials and methods Anatomical T2 and quantitative iron-corrected T1 (cT1) images were made available for 10 patients with liver metastases. Functional liver volumes were automatically segmented on the quantitative images using a threshold. Liver stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) plans were made using a departmental protocol. Liver-sparing plans were then made by reducing the dose to the functional sub-volume. Results The sparing plans achieved a statistically significant ( p = 0.002 ) reduction in the functional liver mean dose, with a mean reduction of 1.4 Gy. The LMD was also significantly different ( p = 0.002 ) but had a smaller magnitude with a mean reduction of 0.7 Gy. There were some differences in the planning target volume D99% ( p = 0.04 ) but the sparing plans remained within the optimal tolerance and the D95% was not significantly different ( p = 0.2 ). Conclusions This study has, for the first time, demonstrated the use of cT1 maps in radiotherapy showing significant reductions in dose to the healthy liver. Further work is needed to validate this in liver cancer patients, who would likely benefit most.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Brewster
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Alan McWilliam
- Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew Brocklehurst
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Ganesh Radhakrishna
- Department of Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Robert Chuter
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Department of Radiotherapy Related Research, Division of Clinical Cancer Science, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Gravell R, Frood R, Littlejohns A, Casanova N, Goody R, Podesta C, Albazaz R, Scarsbrook A. Can Patient Characteristics and Pre-Treatment MRI Features Predict Survival After Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) Treatment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC): Preliminary Assessment. Curr Oncol 2024; 31:6384-6394. [PMID: 39451778 PMCID: PMC11506294 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31100474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2024] [Revised: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 10/08/2024] [Indexed: 10/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study purpose was to develop a machine learning (ML)-based predictive model for event-free survival (EFS) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR). METHODS Patients receiving SABR for HCC at a single institution, between 2017 and 2020, were included in the study. They were split into training and test (85%:15%) cohorts. Events of interest were HCC recurrence or death. Three ML models were trained, the features were selected, and the hyperparameters were tuned. The performance was measured using Harrell's C index with the best-performing model being tested on the unseen cohort. RESULTS Overall, 41 patients were included (training = 34, test = 7) and 64 lesions were analysed (training = 50, test = 14), resulting in 30 events (60% rate) in the training set (death = 6, recurrence = 24) and 8 events (57% rate) in the test set (death = 5, recurrence = 3). A Cox regression model, using age at treatment, albumin, and intra-lesional fat identified through MRI as variables, had the best performance with a mean training score of 0.78 (standard deviation (SD) 0.02), a mean validation of 0.78 (SD 0.18), and a test score of 0.94. CONCLUSIONS Predicting the outcomes in patients with HCC, following SABR, using a novel model is feasible and warrants further evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Gravell
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Russell Frood
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| | - Anna Littlejohns
- Department of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Nathalie Casanova
- Department of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Rebecca Goody
- Department of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Christine Podesta
- Department of Oncology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Raneem Albazaz
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds LS9 7TF, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bas FY, Asci H, Sevuk MA, Imeci OB, Milletsever A. Enhancing radioprotection: exploring the impact of L-carnitine supplementation on the oxidative stress in the liver. Mol Biol Rep 2024; 51:1015. [PMID: 39325219 DOI: 10.1007/s11033-024-09959-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The adverse effects of radiotherapy (RT) primarily occur through oxidative stress, and attempts are being made to mitigate these effects. L-Carnitine (L-Car) involved in physiological functions, possesses antioxidant and tissue-protective properties. The goal of this investigation is to appraise the radioprotective efficacy of L-Car supplementation. METHODS AND RESULTS The groups were established by dividing thirty-two rats as: control, RT (10 Gy), RT + L-Car (200 mg/kg/d), L-Car. Upon completion of the experiment, the livers were harvested for histopathological, immunostaining [tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), Caspase-3], spectrophotometric [total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant status (TAS), oxidative stress index (OSI)], and mRNA expression [(Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap-1), Heme Oxygenase (HO-1), Transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGF-β1)] analyses. In the damage group, decreased Keap-1, Nrf2, HO-1, and TAS values, along with increased histopathological findings, alanine transferase, aspartate transferase, TNF-α, Caspase-3, TOS, OSI, TGF-β1 levels were found. All findings were improved with L-Car treatment. CONCLUSIONS Considering these findings, it can be inferred that L-Car exhibits tissue-protective effects against organ damage predominantly induced by RT-related oxidative stress. Additionally, it has prevented the development of inflammation, apoptosis, and fibrosis. Therefore, L-Car may be considered as a supplement to reduce complications associated with RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Funda Yildirim Bas
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Family Medicine, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, 32200, Turkey
| | - Halil Asci
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, 32200, Turkey
| | - Mehmet Abdulkadir Sevuk
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, 32200, Turkey.
| | - Orhan Berk Imeci
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Suleyman Demirel University, Isparta, 32200, Turkey
| | - Adem Milletsever
- Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathology, Burdur Mehmet Akif Ersoy University, Burdur, 15030, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Saha B, Pallatt S, Banerjee A, Banerjee AG, Pathak R, Pathak S. Current Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Potential Biomarkers for Treating Radiation-Induced Liver Damage. Cells 2024; 13:1560. [PMID: 39329744 PMCID: PMC11429644 DOI: 10.3390/cells13181560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2024] [Revised: 09/10/2024] [Accepted: 09/11/2024] [Indexed: 09/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Highly conformal delivery of radiation therapy (RT) has revolutionized the treatment landscape for primary and metastatic liver cancers, yet concerns persist regarding radiation-induced liver disease (RILD). Despite advancements, RILD remains a major dose-limiting factor due to the potential damage to normal liver tissues by therapeutic radiation. The toxicity to normal liver tissues is associated with a multitude of physiological and pathological consequences. RILD unfolds as multifaceted processes, intricately linking various responses, such as DNA damage, oxidative stress, inflammation, cellular senescence, fibrosis, and immune reactions, through multiple signaling pathways. The DNA damage caused by ionizing radiation (IR) is a major contributor to the pathogenesis of RILD. Moreover, current treatment options for RILD are limited, with no established biomarker for early detection. RILD diagnosis often occurs at advanced stages, highlighting the critical need for early biomarkers to adjust treatment strategies and prevent liver failure. This review provides an outline of the diverse molecular and cellular mechanisms responsible for the development of RILD and points out all of the available biomarkers for early detection with the aim of helping clinicians decide on advance treatment strategies from a single literature recourse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biki Saha
- Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chennai 603103, India
| | - Sneha Pallatt
- Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chennai 603103, India
| | - Antara Banerjee
- Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chennai 603103, India
| | - Abhijit G. Banerjee
- R&D, Genomic Bio-Medicine Research and Incubation (GBMRI), Durg 491001, Chhattisgarh, India
| | - Rupak Pathak
- Division of Radiation Health, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR 72205, USA
| | - Surajit Pathak
- Medical Biotechnology, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Chettinad Academy of Research and Education (CARE), Chettinad Hospital and Research Institute (CHRI), Chennai 603103, India
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Brunner TB, Boda-Heggemann J, Bürgy D, Corradini S, Dieckmann UK, Gawish A, Gerum S, Gkika E, Grohmann M, Hörner-Rieber J, Kirste S, Klement RJ, Moustakis C, Nestle U, Niyazi M, Rühle A, Lang ST, Winkler P, Zurl B, Wittig-Sauerwein A, Blanck O. Dose prescription for stereotactic body radiotherapy: general and organ-specific consensus statement from the DEGRO/DGMP Working Group Stereotactic Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery. Strahlenther Onkol 2024; 200:737-750. [PMID: 38997440 PMCID: PMC11343978 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02254-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 06/02/2024] [Indexed: 07/14/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE AND OBJECTIVE To develop expert consensus statements on multiparametric dose prescriptions for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) aligning with ICRU report 91. These statements serve as a foundational step towards harmonizing current SBRT practices and refining dose prescription and documentation requirements for clinical trial designs. MATERIALS AND METHODS Based on the results of a literature review by the working group, a two-tier Delphi consensus process was conducted among 24 physicians and physics experts from three European countries. The degree of consensus was predefined for overarching (OA) and organ-specific (OS) statements (≥ 80%, 60-79%, < 60% for high, intermediate, and poor consensus, respectively). Post-first round statements were refined in a live discussion for the second round of the Delphi process. RESULTS Experts consented on a total of 14 OA and 17 OS statements regarding SBRT of primary and secondary lung, liver, pancreatic, adrenal, and kidney tumors regarding dose prescription, target coverage, and organ at risk dose limitations. Degree of consent was ≥ 80% in 79% and 41% of OA and OS statements, respectively, with higher consensus for lung compared to the upper abdomen. In round 2, the degree of consent was ≥ 80 to 100% for OA and 88% in OS statements. No consensus was reached for dose escalation to liver metastases after chemotherapy (47%) or single-fraction SBRT for kidney primaries (13%). In round 2, no statement had 60-79% consensus. CONCLUSION In 29 of 31 statements a high consensus was achieved after a two-tier Delphi process and one statement (kidney) was clearly refused. The Delphi process was able to achieve a high degree of consensus for SBRT dose prescription. In summary, clear recommendations for both OA and OS could be defined. This contributes significantly to harmonization of SBRT practice and facilitates dose prescription and reporting in clinical trials investigating SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B Brunner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria.
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria.
| | - Judit Boda-Heggemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel Bürgy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medicine Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ute Karin Dieckmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Ahmed Gawish
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sabine Gerum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Bonn, 53127, Bonn, Germany
| | - Maximilian Grohmann
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Juliane Hörner-Rieber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Simon Kirste
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center-University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Rainer J Klement
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Leopoldina Hospital Schweinfurt, Robert-Koch-Straße 10, 97422, Schweinfurt, Germany
| | - Christos Moustakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Moenchengladbach, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Eberhard Karls University Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alexander Rühle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Leipzig, Stephanstraße 9a, 04103, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stephanie-Tanadini Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Peter Winkler
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 32, 8036, Graz, Austria
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | - Brigitte Zurl
- Department of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Graz, 8036, Graz, Austria
| | | | - Oliver Blanck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Straße 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mattke M. Particle therapy in gastrointestinal cancer-a narrative review. J Gastrointest Oncol 2024; 15:1861-1869. [PMID: 39279975 PMCID: PMC11399865 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-23-757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 09/18/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective Radiation therapy is one of the main pillars in the treatment of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, especially esophageal and anorectal malignancies. The worldwide standard of care is yet an irradiation with photons. Though not commonly used, charged particles offer some physical advantages with a highly conformal dose distribution, which allows an even better sparing of organs at risk. In addition to dosimetric advantages, heavy-ion beams like carbon ions may offer an additional set of biological advantages. Because particle therapy is not standard of care, data are scarce-especially concerning the use in GI malignancies. The aim of this review is to provide a compact overview of the currently available literature. Methods PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for publications on particle radiotherapy in GI cancer (e.g., proton therapy in esophageal cancer, carbon ion radiotherapy in pancreatic cancer). Key Content and Findings Here we present a review of the current data on particle therapy with regard to esophageal, pancreatic, hepatic and anorectal malignancies. Conclusions Data on particle therapy in GI cancer are scarce. Nevertheless, the current literature shows some promising results. Further clinical evidence, especially randomized trials, is crucial to augment the role of particle radiotherapy in GI cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias Mattke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Paracelsus Medical University, SALK, Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Park H, Lee SY. Radiation-induced liver disease mimicking liver metastasis after low-dose hepatic irradiation during radiotherapy for gastric mucosa-assisted lymphoid tissue lymphoma: A case report. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e39191. [PMID: 39183416 PMCID: PMC11346857 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000039191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2024] [Revised: 07/13/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/27/2024] Open
Abstract
RATIONALE Radiation-induced liver disease (RILD) is an established complication of hepatic irradiation that is typically reported in patients receiving high-dose radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma or liver metastases. However, RILD can also occur after unintentional low-dose liver exposure during radiotherapy for other gastrointestinal malignancies when careful precautions are not taken. PATIENT CONCERNS We report the case of a 44-year-old woman with gastric mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma who underwent salvage radiotherapy administered to the entire stomach. One month after completing this radiotherapy, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of the patient's abdomen revealed a 4 cm lesion in the left lateral liver segment, suggestive of metastasis. DIAGNOSES An ultrasound-guided biopsy was performed, and the histopathological findings were consistent with those of RILD. INTERVENTIONS Conservative management was pursued with close monitoring of liver function tests. OUTCOMES The patient's imaging findings and liver enzyme levels normalized approximately 3 months after the initial diagnosis. LESSONS This case highlights the importance of considering RILD in the differential diagnosis of new hepatic lesions detected after radiotherapy, even in patients with low-dose liver exposure within generally acceptable limits. Careful correlation with the radiotherapy plan is crucial to avoid misdiagnosing RILD as metastatic disease and to guide appropriate management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeli Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Presbyterian Medical Center, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea
- Department of Medicine, Jeonbuk National University, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea
| | - Sun Young Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Jeonbuk National University Hospital-Jeonbuk National University Medical School, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Jeonbuk, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lu Z, Polan DF, Wei L, Aryal MP, Fitzpatrick K, Wang C, Cuneo KC, Evans JR, Roseland ME, Gemmete JJ, Christensen JA, Kapoor BS, Mikell JK, Cao Y, Mok GSP, Dewaraja YK. PET/CT-Based Absorbed Dose Maps in 90Y Selective Internal Radiation Therapy Correlate with Spatial Changes in Liver Function Derived from Dynamic MRI. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:1224-1230. [PMID: 38960710 PMCID: PMC11294069 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.124.267421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/07/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Functional liver parenchyma can be damaged from treatment of liver malignancies with 90Y selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Evaluating functional parenchymal changes and developing an absorbed dose (AD)-toxicity model can assist the clinical management of patients receiving SIRT. We aimed to determine whether there is a correlation between 90Y PET AD voxel maps and spatial changes in the nontumoral liver (NTL) function derived from dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI before and after SIRT. Methods: Dynamic gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI scans were acquired before and after treatment for 11 patients undergoing 90Y SIRT. Gadoxetic acid uptake rate (k1) maps that directly quantify spatial liver parenchymal function were generated from MRI data. Voxel-based AD maps, derived from the 90Y PET/CT scans, were binned according to AD. Pre- and post-SIRT k1 maps were coregistered to the AD map. Absolute and percentage k1 loss in each bin was calculated as a measure of loss of liver function, and Spearman correlation coefficients between k1 loss and AD were evaluated for each patient. Average k1 loss over the patients was fit to a 3-parameter logistic function based on AD. Patients were further stratified into subgroups based on lesion type, baseline albumin-bilirubin scores and alanine transaminase levels, dose-volume effect, and number of SIRT treatments. Results: Significant positive correlations (ρ = 0.53-0.99, P < 0.001) between both absolute and percentage k1 loss and AD were observed in most patients (8/11). The average k1 loss over 9 patients also exhibited a significant strong correlation with AD (ρ ≥ 0.92, P < 0.001). The average percentage k1 loss of patients across AD bins was 28%, with a logistic function model demonstrating about a 25% k1 loss at about 100 Gy. Analysis between patient subgroups demonstrated that k1 loss was greater among patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, higher alanine transaminase levels, larger fractional volumes of NTL receiving an AD of 70 Gy or more, and sequential SIRT treatments. Conclusion: Novel application of multimodality imaging demonstrated a correlation between 90Y SIRT AD and spatial functional liver parenchymal degradation, indicating that a higher AD is associated with a larger loss of local hepatocyte function. With the developed response models, PET-derived AD maps can potentially be used prospectively to identify localized damage in liver and to enhance treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhonglin Lu
- Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Taipa, China
- Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Institute of Collaborative Innovation, University of Macau, Taipa, China
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Daniel F Polan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lise Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Madhava P Aryal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kellen Fitzpatrick
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Chang Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Kyle C Cuneo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joseph R Evans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Molly E Roseland
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joseph J Gemmete
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jared A Christensen
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Baljendra S Kapoor
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Justin K Mikell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Yue Cao
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | - Greta S P Mok
- Biomedical Imaging Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Macau, Taipa, China;
- Center for Cognitive and Brain Sciences, Institute of Collaborative Innovation, University of Macau, Taipa, China
- Ministry of Education Frontiers Science Center for Precision Oncology, Faculty of Health Science, University of Macau, Taipa, China
| | - Yuni K Dewaraja
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Torelli N, Bicker Y, Marc L, Fabiano S, Unkelbach J. A new approach to combined proton-photon therapy for metastatic cancer patients. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:145008. [PMID: 38942008 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad5d48] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 06/28/2024] [Indexed: 06/30/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Proton therapy is a limited resource and is typically not available to metastatic cancer patients. Combined proton-photon therapy (CPPT), where most fractions are delivered with photons and only few with protons, represents an approach to distribute proton resources over a larger patient population. In this study, we consider stereotactic radiotherapy of multiple brain or liver metastases, and develop an approach to optimally take advantage of a single proton fraction by optimizing the proton and photon dose contributions to each individual metastasis.Approach.CPPT treatments must balance two competing goals: (1) deliver a larger dose in the proton fractions to reduce integral dose, and (2) fractionate the dose in the normal tissue between metastases, which requires using the photon fractions. Such CPPT treatments are generated by simultaneously optimizing intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans based on their cumulative biologically effective dose (BEDα/β). The dose contributions of the proton and photon fractions to each individual metastasis are handled as additional optimization variables in the optimization problem. The method is demonstrated for two patients with 29 and 30 brain metastases, and two patients with 4 and 3 liver metastases.Main results.Optimized CPPT plans increase the proton dose contribution to most of the metastases, while using photons to fractionate the dose around metastases which are large or located close to critical structures. On average, the optimized CPPT plans reduce the mean brain BED2by 29% and the mean liver BED4by 42% compared to IMRT-only plans. Thereby, the CPPT plans approach the dosimetric quality of IMPT-only plans, for which the mean brain BED2and mean liver BED4are reduced by 28% and 58%, respectively, compared to IMRT-only plans.Significance.CPPT with optimized proton and photon dose contributions to individual metastases may benefit selected metastatic cancer patients without tying up major proton resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan Torelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Yves Bicker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Louise Marc
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Silvia Fabiano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Jan Unkelbach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Su CW, Teng W, Shen EYL, Huang BS, Lin PT, Hou MM, Wu TH, Tsan DL, Hsieh CH, Wang CT, Chai PM, Lin CY, Lin SM, Lin CC. Concurrent Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and High-Dose External Beam Radiotherapy for Highly Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncologist 2024; 29:e922-e931. [PMID: 38530254 PMCID: PMC11224977 DOI: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/27/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (atezo-bev) has been recommended for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). High-dose external beam radiotherapy (RT) is recognized for its excellent local tumor control. The efficacy and safety of concurrent atezo-bev with RT for highly advanced HCC has been minimally explored. METHODS In this preliminary retrospective study, we assessed patients with highly advanced HCC, characterized by Vp4 portal vein thrombosis or tumors exceeding 50% of liver volume, who received concurrent atezo-bev and RT (group A). Group A included 13 patients who received proton radiation at a dose of 72.6 GyE in 22 fractions, and one patient who received photon radiation at a dose of 54 Gy in 18 fractions. This group was compared with 34 similar patients treated atezo-bev alone as a control (group B). The primary objectives were to evaluate the objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS Baseline characteristics were similar between groups, except for a higher incidence of Vp4 portal vein thrombosis in group A (78.6% vs. 21.4%, P = .05). Group A achieved a higher ORR (50.0% vs. 11.8%, P < .01) and a longer OS (not reached vs. 5.5 months, P = .01) after a median follow-up of 5.2 months. Multivariate analysis indicated that concurrent RT independently favored longer OS (hazard ratio: 0.18; 95% CI, 0.05-0.63, P < .01). Group A did not increase any grade adverse events (78.6% vs. 58.8%, P = .19) or severe adverse events of grade ≥ 3 (14.3% vs. 14.7%, P = .97) compared to group B. CONCLUSIONS The concurrent high-dose external beam radiotherapy appears to safely enhance the effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for highly advanced patients with HCC. Further studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chung-Wei Su
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wei Teng
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Eric Yi-Liang Shen
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Clinical Metabolomics Core Lab, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Shen Huang
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Po-Ting Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Mo Hou
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Han Wu
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Din-Li Tsan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hsun Hsieh
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital (Built and Operated by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital), New Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Ting Wang
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Mei Chai
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Yen Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Shi-Ming Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Medical Center, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Chun Lin
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital (Built and Operated by Chang Gung Memorial Hospital), New Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhou M, Li TS, Abe H, Akashi H, Suzuki R, Bando Y. Expression levels of K ATP channel subunits and morphological changes in the mouse liver after exposure to radiation. World J Exp Med 2024; 14:90374. [PMID: 38948415 PMCID: PMC11212743 DOI: 10.5493/wjem.v14.i2.90374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND ATP sensitive K+ (KATP) channels are ubiquitously distributed in various of cells and tissues, including the liver. They play a role in the pathogenesis of myocardial and liver ischemia. AIM To evaluate the radiation-induced changes in the expression of KATP channel subunits in the mouse liver to understand the potential role of KATP channels in radiation injury. METHODS Adult C57BL/6 mice were randomly exposed to γ-rays at 0 Gy (control, n = 2), 0.2 Gy (n = 6), 1 Gy (n = 6), or 5 Gy (n = 6). The livers were removed 3 and 24 h after radiation exposure. Hematoxylin and eosin staining was used for morphological observation; immunohistochemical staining was applied to determine the expression of KATP channel subunits in the liver tissue. RESULTS Compared with the control group, the livers exposed to 0.2 Gy γ-ray showed an initial increase in the expression of Kir6.1 at 3 h, followed by recovery at 24 h after exposure. Exposure to a high dose of 5.0 Gy resulted in decreased expression of Kir6.1 and increased expression of SUR2B at 24 h. However, the expression of Kir6.2, SUR1, or SUR2A had no remarkable changes at 3 and 24 h after exposure to any of these doses. CONCLUSION The expression levels of Kir6.1 and SUR2B in mouse liver changed differently in response to different radiation doses, suggesting a potential role for them in radiation-induced liver injury.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ming Zhou
- Department of Anatomy, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan
| | - Tao-Sheng Li
- Department of Stem Cell Biology, Atomic Bomb Disease Institute, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki 852-8523, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Abe
- Sendai Old Age Refresh Station, A Long-term Care Health Facility, Sendai 981-1105, Japan
| | - Hideo Akashi
- Department of Anatomy, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan
| | - Ryoji Suzuki
- Department of Anatomy, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan
| | - Yoshio Bando
- Department of Anatomy, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abuduxiku M, Chen X, Zhang S, Yang J, Liao W, Xiao J. Optimization of collimator angle combined island blocking with parked gap achieves superior normal tissue sparing in SBRT planning of multiple liver lesions. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14267. [PMID: 38259201 PMCID: PMC11163495 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14267] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To propose an efficient collimator angle optimization method by combining island blocking (IB) and parked gap (PG) problem to reduce the radiotherapy dose for normal tissue. The reduction will be done with single-isocenter multi-lesion volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for the stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of liver cancer. METHODS A novel collimator angle optimization algorithm was developed based on the two-dimensional projection of targets on a beam's eye view (BEV) plane as a function of gantry and collimator angle. This optimization algorithm minimized the sum of the combined IB and PG (IB & PG) areas from all gantry angles for each arc. For comparison, two SBRT plans were respectively generated for each of the 20 retrospective liver cancer cases with multiple lesions. One plan was optimized using the IB & PG algorithm, and the other plan was optimized with a previously reported optimization algorithm that only considered the IB area. Plans were then evaluated and compared using typical dosimetric metrics. RESULTS With the comparable target coverage, IB & PG plans had significantly lower D500cc, D700cc, mean dose (Dmean), and V15 of normal liver tissues when compared to IB plans. The median percent reductions were 3.32% to 5.36%. The D1cc, D5cc, and Dmean for duodenum and small intestine in IB & PG plans were significantly reduced in a range from 7.60% up to 16.03%. Similarly, the median integral dose was reduced by 3.73%. Furthermore, the percentage of normal liver Dmean sparing when IB & PG plans compared to IB plans, was found to be positively correlated (ρ = 0.669, P = 0.001) with the inter-target distance. CONCLUSION The proposed IB & PG algorithm has been demonstrated to outperform the IB algorithm in almost all normal tissue sparing, and the magnitude of liver sparing was positively correlated with inter-target distance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maidina Abuduxiku
- Radiotherapy Physics & Technology CenterCancer CenterWest China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduSichuanChina
| | - Xiaoqiang Chen
- Radiotherapy Physics & Technology CenterCancer CenterWest China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduSichuanChina
| | - Shu Zhang
- Head and Neck Oncology DepartmentCancer CenterWest China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduSichuanChina
- Department of Radiation OncologyCancer CenterWest China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduSichuanChina
| | - Jiangping Yang
- Head and Neck Oncology DepartmentCancer CenterWest China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduSichuanChina
| | - Wenjun Liao
- Department of Radiation OncologyAffiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Radiotherapy Physics & Technology CenterCancer CenterWest China HospitalSichuan UniversityChengduSichuanChina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Milano MT, Marks LB, Olch AJ, Yorke ED, Jackson A, Bentzen SM, Constine LS. Comparison of Risks of Late Effects From Radiation Therapy in Children Versus Adults: Insights From the QUANTEC, HyTEC, and PENTEC Efforts. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:387-400. [PMID: 38069917 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) seeks to refine quantitative radiation dose-volume relationships for normal-tissue complication probabilities (NTCPs) in survivors of pediatric cancer. This article summarizes the evolution of PENTEC and compares it with similar adult-focused efforts (eg, Quantitative Analysis of Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic [QUANTEC] and Hypofractionated Treatment Effects in the Clinic [HyTEC]) with respect to content, oversight, support, scope, and methodology of literature review. It then summarizes key organ-specific findings from PENTEC in an attempt to compare NTCP estimates in children versus adults. In brief, select normal-tissue risks within developing organs and tissues (eg, maldevelopment of musculoskeletal tissue, teeth, breasts, and reproductive organs) are primarily relevant only in children. For some organs and tissues, children appear to have similar (eg, brain for necrosis, optic apparatus, parotid gland, liver), greater (eg, brain for neurocognition, cerebrovascular, breast for lactation), less (ovary), or perhaps slightly less (eg, lung) risks of toxicity versus adults. Similarly, even within the broad pediatric age range (including adolescence), for some endpoints, younger children have greater (eg, hearing and brain for neurocognition) or lesser (eg, ovary, thyroid) risks of radiation-associated toxicities. NTCP comparisons in adults versus children are often confounded by marked differences in treatment paradigms that expose normal tissues to radiation (ie, cancer types, prescribed radiation therapy dose and fields, and chemotherapy agents used). To add to the complexity, it is unclear if age is best analyzed as a continuous variable versus with age groupings (eg, infants, young children, adolescents, young adults, middle-aged adults, older adults). Further work is needed to better understand the complex manner in which age and developmental status affect risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael T Milano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York.
| | - Lawrence B Marks
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Lineberger Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Arthur J Olch
- Radiation Oncology Program, Children's Hospital Los Angeles/Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ellen D Yorke
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Søren M Bentzen
- Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hall MD, Howell RM, Jackson A, Owens CA, Hernandez S, Castellino SM, Ronckers CM, Constine LS, Bradley JA. Liver Late Effects in Childhood Cancer Survivors Treated With Radiation Therapy: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:575-587. [PMID: 37480885 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A pediatric normal tissue effects in the clinic (PENTEC) comprehensive review of patients with childhood cancer who received radiation therapy (RT) to the liver was performed to develop models that may inform RT dose constraints for the liver and improve risk forecasting of toxicities. METHODS AND MATERIALS A systematic literature search was performed to identify published data on hepatic toxicities in children. Treatment and outcome data were extracted and used to generate normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) models. Complications from both whole and partial liver irradiation were considered. For whole liver irradiation, total body irradiation and non-total body irradiation treatments were considered, but it was assumed that the entire liver received the prescribed dose. For partial liver irradiation, only Wilms tumor flank field RT could be analyzed. However, a prescribed dose assumption could not be applied, and there was a paucity of analyzable liver dosimetry data. To associate the dose-volume exposures with the partial volume complication data from flank irradiation, liver dose-volume metrics were reconstructed for Wilms tumor flank RT using age-specific computational phantoms as a function of field laterality and superior extent of the field. RESULTS The literature search identified 2103 investigations pertaining to hepatic sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS) and liver failure in pediatric patients. All abstracts were screened, and 241 articles were reviewed in full by the study team. A model was developed to calculate the risk of developing SOS after whole liver RT. RT dose (P = .006) and receipt of nonalkylating chemotherapy (P = .01) were significant. Age <20 years at time of RT was borderline significant (P = .058). The model predicted a 2% risk of SOS with zero RT dose, 6.1% following 10 Gy, and 14.5% following 20 Gy to the whole liver (modeled as the linear-quadratic equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions [α/β = 3 Gy]). Patients with Wilms tumor treated with right flank RT had a higher observed rate of SOS than patients receiving left flank RT, but data were insufficient to generate an NTCP model for partial liver irradiation. From the phantom-based dose reconstructions, mean liver dose was estimated to be 2.16 ± 1.15 Gy and 6.54 ± 2.50 Gy for left and right flank RT, respectively, using T10-T11 as the superior field border and a prescription dose of 10.8 Gy (based on dose reconstruction). Data were sparse regarding rates of late liver injury after RT, which suggests low rates of severe toxicity after treatment for common pediatric malignancies. CONCLUSIONS This pediatric normal tissue effects in the clinic (PENTEC) review provides an NTCP model to estimate the risk of hepatic SOS as a function of RT dose following whole liver RT and quantifies the range of mean liver doses from typical Wilms tumor flank irradiation fields. Patients treated with right flank RT had higher rates of SOS than patients treated with left flank RT, but data were insufficient to develop a model for partial liver irradiation. Risk of SOS was estimated to be approximately ≤6% in pediatric patients receiving whole liver doses of <10 Gy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida.
| | - Rebecca M Howell
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Constance A Owens
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Soleil Hernandez
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sharon M Castellino
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Aflac Cancer and Blood Disorders Center of Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Cecile M Ronckers
- Department of Pediatrics, UMC Amsterdam, Location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Paediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Institute of Biostatistics and Registry Research, Medical University Brandenburg-Theodor Fontane, Neuruppin, Germany
| | - Louis S Constine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Julie A Bradley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Wu Q, Wang Y, Wei Y, Yang Z, Chen K, Li J, Li L, Su T, Liang S. Development and validation of a nomogram for radiation-induced hepatic toxicity after intensity modulated radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2024; 54:699-707. [PMID: 38376811 PMCID: PMC11144290 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyae024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to construct a nomogram to predict radiation-induced hepatic toxicity in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy. METHODS This study reviewed the clinical characteristics and dose-volume parameters of 196 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiation-induced hepatic toxicity was defined as progression of the Child-Pugh score caused by intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Factors relevant to radiation-induced hepatic toxicity were selected using receiver operating characteristic and univariate logistic analysis. A risk assessment model was developed, and its discrimination was validated. RESULTS Eighty-eight (44.90%) and 28 (14.29%) patients had radiation-induced hepatic toxicity ≥ 1 (Child-Pugh ≥ 1) and radiation-induced hepatic toxicity ≥ 2 (Child-Pugh ≥ 2). Pre-treatment Child-Pugh, body mass index and dose-volume parameters were correlated with radiation-induced hepatic toxicity ≥ 1 using univariate logistic analysis. V15 had the best predictive effectiveness among the dose-volume parameters in both the training (area under the curve: 0.763, 95% confidence interval: 0.683-0.842, P < 0.001) and validation cohorts (area under the curve: 0.759, 95% confidence interval: 0.635-0.883, P < 0.001). The area under the curve values of the model that was constructed by pre-treatment Child-Pugh, body mass index and V15 for radiation-induced hepatic toxicity ≥1 were 0.799 (95% confidence interval: 0.719-0.878, P < 0.001) and 0.775 (95% confidence interval: 0.657-0.894, P < 0.001) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. Patients with a body mass index ≤ 20.425, Barcelona clinic liver cancer = C, Hepatitis B Virus-positive, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group = 1-2 and hepatic fibrosis require lower V15 dose limits. CONCLUSIONS Risk assessment model constructed from Pre-treatment Child-Pugh, V15 and body mass index can guide individualized patient selection of toxicity minimization strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiaoyuan Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Yudan Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Yuxin Wei
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Zhengqiang Yang
- Department of Interventional Therapy, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Kai Chen
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA, and Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jianxu Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Liqing Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Tingshi Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| | - Shixiong Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Nitta Y, Ueda Y, Ohira S, Isono M, Hirose A, Inui S, Murata S, Minami H, Sagawa T, Nagayasu Y, Miyazaki M, Konishi K. Feasibility of a portable respiratory training system with a gyroscope sensor. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1162-1168. [PMID: 38648776 PMCID: PMC11135790 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Revised: 03/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A portable respiratory training system with a gyroscope sensor (gyroscope respiratory training system [GRTS]) was developed and the feasibility of respiratory training was evaluated. METHODS Simulated respiratory waveforms from a respiratory motion phantom and actual respirator waveforms from volunteers were acquired using the GRTS and Respiratory Gating for Scanners system (RGSC). Respiratory training was evaluated by comparing the stability and reproducibility of respiratory waveforms from patients undergoing expiratory breath-hold radiation therapy, with and without the GRTS. The stability and reproducibility of respiratory waveforms were assessed by root mean square error and gold marker placement-based success rate of expiratory breath-hold, respectively. RESULTS The absolute mean difference for sinusoidal waveforms between the GRTS and RGSC was 2.0%. Among volunteers, the mean percentages of errors within ±15% of the respiratory waveforms acquired by the GRTS and RGSC were 96.1% for free breathing and 88.2% for expiratory breath-hold. The mean root mean square error and success rate of expiratory breath-hold (standard deviation) with and without the GRTS were 0.65 (0.24) and 0.88 (0.89) cm and 91.0% (6.9) and 89.1% (11.6), respectively. CONCLUSIONS Respiratory waveforms acquired by the GRTS exhibit good agreement with waveforms acquired by the RGSC. Respiratory training with the GRTS reduces inter-patient variability in respiratory waveforms, thereby improving the success of expiratory breath-hold radiation therapy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE A respiratory training system with a gyroscope sensor is inexpensive and portable, making it ideal for respiratory training. This is the first report concerning clinical implementation of a respiratory training system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuya Nitta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Ueda
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Shingo Ohira
- Department of Comprehensive Radiation Oncology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan
| | - Masaru Isono
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Asako Hirose
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Shoki Inui
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Seiya Murata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Hikari Minami
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Tomohiro Sagawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Yukari Nagayasu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Masayoshi Miyazaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| | - Koji Konishi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka 541-8567, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ma Y, Kong Y, Zhang S, Peng Y, Xu M, Zhang J, Xu H, Hong Z, Xing P, Qian J, Zhang L. The relationship between splenic dose and radiation-induced lymphopenia. JOURNAL OF RADIATION RESEARCH 2024; 65:337-349. [PMID: 38718391 PMCID: PMC11115471 DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
Lymphocytes, which are highly sensitive to radiation, play a crucial role in the body's defense against tumors. Radiation-induced lymphopenia has been associated with poorer outcomes in different cancer types. Despite being the largest secondary lymphoid organ, the spleen has not been officially designated as an organ at risk. This study hypothesizes a connection between spleen irradiation and lymphopenia and seeks to establish evidence-based dosage limits for the spleen. We retrospectively analyzed data from 96 patients with locally advanced gastric cancer who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) between May 2010 and May 2017. Complete blood counts were collected before, during and after CRT. We established a model for predicting the minimum absolute lymphocyte count (Min ALC) and to investigate potential associations between spleen dosimetric variables and Min ALC. The median follow-up was 60 months. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 65.2% and 56.8%, respectively. The median values of pre-treatment ALC, Min ALC and post-treatment ALC were 1.40 × 109, 0.23 × 109 and 0.28 × 109/L, respectively. Regression analysis confirmed that the primary tumor location, number of fractions and spleen V5 were significant predictors of Min ALC during radiation therapy. Changes in ALC (ΔALC) were identified as an independent predictor of both OS and DFS. Spleen V5 is an independent predictor for Min ALC, and the maximum dose of the spleen is associated with an increased risk of severe lymphopenia. Therefore, these doses should be restricted in clinical practice. Additionally, ΔALC can serve as a prognostic indicator for adjuvant radiotherapy in gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifu Ma
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Yuehong Kong
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Shuying Zhang
- Department of Ultrasound, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Yong Peng
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Meiling Xu
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Junjun Zhang
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Hong Xu
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Oncology, Changshu Hospital Affiliated to Soochow University, Shu Yuan Road No. 1, Suzhou 215500, China
| | - Zhihui Hong
- Department of Nuclear medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Pengfei Xing
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Jianjun Qian
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
| | - Liyuan Zhang
- PRaG Therapy Center, Center for Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- Institute of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Soochow University, San Xiang Road No. 1055, Suzhou 215004, China
- State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Ren Ai Road No. 199, Suzhou 215004, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Liu D, Cao F, Xu Z, Zhao C, Liu Z, Pang J, Liu ZX, Moghiseh M, Butler A, Liang S, Fan W, Yang J. Selective Organ-Targeting Hafnium Oxide Nanoparticles with Multienzyme-Mimetic Activities Attenuate Radiation-Induced Tissue Damage. ADVANCED MATERIALS (DEERFIELD BEACH, FLA.) 2024; 36:e2308098. [PMID: 37777858 DOI: 10.1002/adma.202308098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Revised: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/02/2023]
Abstract
Radioprotective agents hold clinical promises to counteract off-target adverse effects of radiation and benefit radiotherapeutic outcomes, yet the inability to control drug transport in human organs poses a leading limitation. Based upon a validated rank-based multigene signature model, radiosensitivity indices are evaluated of diverse normal organs as a genomic predictor of radiation susceptibility. Selective ORgan-Targeting (SORT) hafnium oxide nanoparticles (HfO2 NPs) are rationally designed via modulated synthesis by α-lactalbumin, homing to top vulnerable organs. HfO2 NPs like Hensify are commonly radioenhancers, but SORT HfO2 NPs exhibit surprising radioprotective effects dictated by unfolded ligands and Hf(0)/Hf(IV) redox couples. Still, the X-ray attenuation patterns allow radiological confirmation in target organs by dual-beam spectral computed tomography. SORT HfO2 NPs present potent antioxidant activities, catalytically scavenge reactive oxygen species, and mimic multienzyme catalytic activities. Consequently, SORT NPs rescue radiation-induced DNA damage in mouse and rabbit models and provide survival benefits upon lethal exposures. In addition to inhibiting radiation-induced mitochondrial apoptosis, SORT NPs impede DNA damage and inflammation by attenuating activated FoxO, Hippo, TNF, and MAPK interactive cascades. A universal methodology is proposed to reverse radioenhancers into radioprotectors. SORT radioprotective agents with image guidance are envisioned as compelling in personalized shielding from radiation deposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dingxin Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Fei Cao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zhifeng Xu
- Department of Radiology, The First People's Hospital of Foshan, Foshan, 528041, China
| | - Chunhua Zhao
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Zekun Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jiadong Pang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Ze-Xian Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Mahdieh Moghiseh
- Department of Radiology, Centre for Bioengineering and Nanomedicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand
- MARS Bioimaging Ltd., Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand
| | - Anthony Butler
- Department of Radiology, Centre for Bioengineering and Nanomedicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, 8011, New Zealand
- MARS Bioimaging Ltd., Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, 8041, New Zealand
| | | | - Weijun Fan
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
- Department of Minimally Invasive Interventional Therapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| | - Jiang Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Diagnosis and Therapy, Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, 510060, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Agrawal S, Gupta A, Kapoor V, Rahul R, Singh A, Mishra P, Saxena R. Predictors of Toxicity in a Randomized Study of Consolidation Chemoradiation Versus Observation After First Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Gall Bladder Cancers. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101468. [PMID: 38590716 PMCID: PMC10999813 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Gall bladder cancers (GBC) usually presents in advanced stage. First-line chemotherapy (CT) is the standard of care, and there is no other option for responders than to wait for disease progression. We conducted a randomized study of consolidation chemoradiation (CTRT) versus observation in responders to first line CT (NCT05493956), which showed an improvement in overall survival by 6 months and therefore is practice changing. We are reporting the toxicity and factors predicting toxicity due to CTRT so that it informs appropriate patient selection. Methods and Materials Responders to first line CT (partial response, stable disease) were randomized to CTRT versus observation after 4 cycles. CTRT was delivered by 3D conformal radiotherapy (along-with concurrent capecitabine at 1250 mg/m2) to a dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions to GBC and lymphatics followed by a boost of 9 Gy in 5 fractions to the GBC. Toxicities documented during CTRT were recorded using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria. Dose volume data were correlated with the radiation induced side effects. Results Among 135 patients enrolled both arms are well balanced demographically, and 58% patients had T4 tumors, 42% had N2 and 15% had paraaortic lymph node, and 27% underwent upfront stenting. Grade 3 adverse events, such as anemia, dyspepsia, hepatotoxicity (Child Pugh B), and gastrointestinal bleed due to CTRT was observed in 9%, 1.5%, 13%, and 5.8%, respectively. Age >58 years (P = .02), planning target volume (PTV) 1 volume (>919 cc, P = .02), PTV2 volume (>380 cc, P = .01), mean liver dose (>28 Gy, P = .07), and liver V40 (>50%, P = .02) predicted radiation-induced liver disease. A receiver operating curve analysis revealed a cut-off value of PTV1 volume of 800 cc (sensitivity and specificity of 75% and 54%) and PTV2 volume of 300 cc (sensitivity and specificity of 81% and 65%) for prediction of hepatotoxicity. Duodenum V45 >45% (P = .02) predicted grade 3 anemia. Numerically high V15 duodenum (98%, P = .11), large PTV2 volume >484 cc (P = .06) and prior stenting had predilection for gastrointestinal bleed. Conclusions Consolidation CTRT is tolerable in those with PTV1 volume less than 800 cc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sushma Agrawal
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Anshika Gupta
- Departments of Radiotherapy, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Vishwas Kapoor
- Biostatistics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Rahul Rahul
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Ashish Singh
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Prabhakar Mishra
- Biostatistics, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| | - Rajan Saxena
- Surgical Gastroenterology, Sanjay Gandhi Post Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Lucknow, India
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang B, Zhang Y, Niu H, Zhao X, Chen G, Zhao Q, Ma G, Du S, Zeng Z. METTL3-Mediated STING Upregulation and Activation in Kupffer Cells Contribute to Radiation-Induced Liver Disease via Pyroptosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 119:219-233. [PMID: 37914138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.10.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2023] [Revised: 09/17/2023] [Accepted: 10/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiation therapy is a vital adjuvant treatment for liver cancer, although the challenge of radiation-induced liver diseases (RILDs) limits its implementation. Kupffer cells (KCs) are a crucial cell population of the hepatic immune system, and their biologic function can be modulated by multiple epigenetic RNA modifications, including N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation. However, the mechanism for m6A methylation in KC-induced inflammatory responses in RILD remains unclear. The present study investigated the function of m6A modification in KCs contributing to RILD. METHODS AND MATERIALS Methylated RNA-immunoprecipitation sequencing and RNA transcriptome sequencing were used to explore the m6A methylation profile of primary KCs isolated from mice after irradiation with 3 × 8 Gy. Western blotting and quantitative real-time PCR were used to evaluate gene expression. DNA pulldown and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays were performed to verify target gene binding and identify binding sites. RESULTS Methylated RNA-immunoprecipitation sequencing revealed significantly increased m6A modification levels in human KCs after irradiation, suggesting the potential role of upregulated m6A in RILD. In addition, the study results corroborated that methyltransferase-like 3 (METTL3) acts as a main modulator to promote the methylation and gene expression of TEAD1, leading to STING-NLRP3 signaling activation. Importantly, it was shown that IGF2BP2 functions as an m6A "reader" to recognize methylated TEAD1 mRNA and promote its stability. METTL3/TEAD1 knockdown abolished the activation of STING-NLRP3 signaling, protected against RILD, and suppressed inflammatory cytokines and hepatocyte apoptosis. Moreover, clinical human normal liver tissue samples collected after irradiation showed increased expression of STING and interleukin-1β in KCs compared with nonirradiated samples. Notably, STING pharmacologic inhibition alleviated irradiation-induced liver injury in mice, indicating its potential therapeutic role in RILD. CONCLUSIONS The results of our study reveal that TEAD1-STING-NLRP3 signaling activation contributes to RILD via METTL3-dependent m6A modification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biao Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yang Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hao Niu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xiaomei Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Genwen Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qianqian Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Guifen Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shisuo Du
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Zhaochong Zeng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China; Cancer Center, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hayashi K, Suzuki O, Wakisaka Y, Ichise K, Uchida H, Anzai M, Hasegawa A, Seo Y, Shimizu S, Ishii T, Teshima T, Fujimoto J, Ogawa K. Prognostic analysis of radiation-induced liver damage following carbon-ion radiotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiat Oncol 2024; 19:51. [PMID: 38649902 PMCID: PMC11034055 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02444-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced liver damage (RILD) occasionally occurs following carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for liver tumors, such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), in patients with impaired liver function disease. However, the associated risk factors remain unknown. The present study aimed to determine the risk factors of RILD after CIRT. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 108 patients with HCC treated with CIRT at the Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center between December 2018 and December 2022. RILD was defined as a worsening of two or more points in the Child-Pugh score within 12 months following CIRT. The median age of the patients was 76 years (range 47-95 years), and the median tumor diameter was 41 mm (range 5-160 mm). Based on the pretreatment liver function, 98 and 10 patients were categorized as Child-Pugh class A and B, respectively. We analyzed patients who received a radiation dose of 60 Gy (relative biological effectiveness [RBE]) in four fractions. The median follow-up period was 9.7 months (range 2.3-41.1 months), and RILD was observed in 11 patients (10.1%). RESULTS Multivariate analysis showed that pretreatment Child-Pugh score B (p = 0.003, hazard ratio [HR] = 6.90) and normal liver volume spared from < 30 Gy RBE (VS30 < 739 cm3) (p = 0.009, HR = 5.22) were significant risk factors for RILD. The one-year cumulative incidences of RILD stratified by Child-Pugh class A or B and VS30 < 739 cm3 or ≥ 739 cm3 were 10.3% or 51.8% and 39.6% or 9.2%, respectively. CONCLUSION In conclusion, the pretreatment Child-Pugh score and VS30 of the liver are significant risk factors for RILD following CIRT for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuhiko Hayashi
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 (D10) Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Osamu Suzuki
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yushi Wakisaka
- Department of Radiation Technology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Koji Ichise
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hirofumi Uchida
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Anzai
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Azusa Hasegawa
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yuji Seo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 (D10) Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shinichi Shimizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 (D10) Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takayoshi Ishii
- Department of Radiation Technology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Teruki Teshima
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jiro Fujimoto
- Department of Radiology, Osaka Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Ogawa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, 2-2 (D10) Yamada-Oka, Suita, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Fijardo M, Kwan JYY, Bissey PA, Citrin DE, Yip KW, Liu FF. The clinical manifestations and molecular pathogenesis of radiation fibrosis. EBioMedicine 2024; 103:105089. [PMID: 38579363 PMCID: PMC11002813 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2024.105089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Advances in radiation techniques have enabled the precise delivery of higher doses of radiotherapy to tumours, while sparing surrounding healthy tissues. Consequently, the incidence of radiation toxicities has declined, and will likely continue to improve as radiotherapy further evolves. Nonetheless, ionizing radiation elicits tissue-specific toxicities that gradually develop into radiation-induced fibrosis, a common long-term side-effect of radiotherapy. Radiation fibrosis is characterized by an aberrant wound repair process, which promotes the deposition of extensive scar tissue, clinically manifesting as a loss of elasticity, tissue thickening, and organ-specific functional consequences. In addition to improving the existing technologies and guidelines directing the administration of radiotherapy, understanding the pathogenesis underlying radiation fibrosis is essential for the success of cancer treatments. This review integrates the principles for radiotherapy dosimetry to minimize off-target effects, the tissue-specific clinical manifestations, the key cellular and molecular drivers of radiation fibrosis, and emerging therapeutic opportunities for both prevention and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Fijardo
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jennifer Yin Yee Kwan
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Deborah E Citrin
- Radiation Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States of America
| | - Kenneth W Yip
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Cell and Systems Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Fei-Fei Liu
- Research Institute, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Medical Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Yilidir G, Demir M. Determination of Critical Organ Doses with 177Lu Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Dosimetry in Metastatic Prostate Cancer Treatment. J Med Phys 2024; 49:304-310. [PMID: 39131436 PMCID: PMC11309138 DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_12_24] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 08/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Aim This study aimed to perform dosimetry in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with 177Lutetium (Lu) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-617 radiopharmaceutical, calculating organ blood clearance and consequently determining the maximum tolerable treatment activity. Materials and Methods Eighteen patients with metastatic prostate cancer were enrolled in the study. Patients were administered 5.55 gigabecquerel (GBq) of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical per treatment cycle through infusion. Blood samples (2 mL each) were collected at 2, 4, 6, 8, 18, 24, 36, and 44 h postinjection to assess the bone marrow absorbed dose. Organ doses were calculated using the OLINDA/EXM software based on scintigraphic images of the 18 patients who received 177Lu-PSMA-617. Results The blood clearance of 177Lu-PSMA-617 radiopharmaceutical was determined to be bi-exponential. The mean absorbed doses for the parotid glands, kidneys, bone marrow, and liver were found to be 1.18 ± 0.27, 1.05 ± 0.3, 0.07 ± 0.05, and 0.31 ± 0.2 Gy/GBq, respectively. The radiation dose to the bone marrow was significantly lower than that to the kidneys and parotid glands. No dose limitations were necessary for kidneys and bone marrow in any of the patients. Conclusions Our dosimetry results indicate that 177Lu-PSMA-617 therapy is safe in terms of radiation toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gulcihan Yilidir
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Demir
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Cerrahpaşa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hall JT, Moon AM, Young M, Tan X, Darawsheh R, Danquah F, Tepper JE, Yanagihara TK. Biochemical Safety of SBRT to Multiple Intrahepatic Lesions for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2024; 11:443-454. [PMID: 38476559 PMCID: PMC10928924 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s447025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background We aim to better characterize stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT)-related hepatic biochemical toxicity in patients with multiple intrahepatic lesions from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with HCC who underwent SBRT for 2 or more synchronous or metachronous liver lesions. We collected patient characteristics and dosimetric data (mean liver dose [MLD], cumulative effective volume [Veff], cumulative volume of liver receiving 15 Gy [V15Gy], and cumulative planning target volume [PTV]) along with liver-related toxicity (measured by albumin-bilirubin [ALBI] and Child-Pugh [CP] scores). A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the effect of multi-target SBRT on changes in ALBI. Results There were 25 patients and 56 lesions with median follow-up of 29 months. Eleven patients had synchronous lesions, and 14 had recurrent lesions treated with separate SBRT courses. Among those receiving multiple SBRT courses, there were 7 lesions with overlap of V15Gy (median V15Gy overlap: 35 mL, range: 0.5-388 mL). There was no association between cumulative MLD, Veff, V15Gy, or PTV and change in ALBI. Four of 25 patients experienced non-classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), due to an increase of CP score by ≥2 points 3 to 6 months after SBRT. Sixteen of 25 patients experienced an increase in ALBI grade by 1 or more points 3 to 6 months after SBRT. Comparing the groups that received SBRT in a single course versus multiple courses revealed no statistically significant differences in liver toxicity. Conclusion Liver SBRT for multiple lesions in a single or in separate courses is feasible and with acceptable risk of hepatotoxicity. Prospective studies with a larger cohort are needed to better characterize safety in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob T Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Andrew M Moon
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Michael Young
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Xianming Tan
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rami Darawsheh
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Flora Danquah
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Joel E Tepper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Ted K Yanagihara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina Hospitals, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chan QYP, Morrow D, Lurie D. Canine primary liver tumors treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy: A case series. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2024; 65:121-129. [PMID: 38279767 DOI: 10.1111/vru.13336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an increasingly used alternative treatment option for nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in people. Comparatively, the publication of SBRT of dogs with HCC is limited. The objective of this retrospective, descriptive case series was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and toxicity data of SBRT in dogs with HCC and imaging-documented primary liver tumors using volumetric-modulated arc therapy delivery at two private institutions. Medical records of 14 dogs treated between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. All dogs had macroscopic tumors, and 9 of 14 dogs had HCC diagnoses confirmed on cytology or histopathology. The median longest tumor diameter was 5.5 cm. The median percentage of planning target volume relative to liver volume was 27.1%. Most dogs were treated with three daily fractions of 7-7.5 Gy. All dogs completed their radiotherapy protocols. Three of nine HCC dogs experienced partial responses and clinical improvement. Five of nine HCC dogs had stable disease. Overall median survival time was 164 days for nine HCC dogs (range: 93-706 days). One late grade 5 liver and two late grade 3 kidney side effects were reported. One dog received repeated SBRT to the same HCC treatment field, and one dog had two courses of SBRT to bifocal HCC treatment fields, both with no more than grade 2 acute and chronic toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deanna Morrow
- ONE Cancer Care for Pets, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Lurie
- ONE Cancer Care for Pets, Artarmon, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hsieh RCE, Lee CH, Huang HC, Wu SW, Chou CY, Hung SP, Lee CW, Krishnan S, Venkatesulu BP, Lee JC, Chou YC, Chan KM, Lin PT, Lee WC, Lin CC, Lin SY, Hong JH. Clinical and Dosimetric Results of Proton or Photon Radiation Therapy for Large (>5 cm) Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Retrospective Analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:712-724. [PMID: 37778426 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.09.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Revised: 09/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our purpose was to report the clinical and dosimetric attributes of patients with large unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing proton or photon radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes and dosimetric indices of 159 patients with >5 cm nonmetastatic HCC who underwent definitive radiation therapy using either protons (N = 105) or photons (N = 54) between 2014 and 2018. Additional photon plans were performed in the 105 proton-treated patients using the same dose prescription criteria for intragroup dosimetric comparison. RESULTS After a median follow-up of 47 months, patients with biologically effective dose (BED10) ≥ 75 Gy exhibited significantly better local control (LC; 2-year: 85.6% vs 20.5%; P < .001), progression-free survival (PFS; median, 7.4 vs 3.2 months; P < .001), and overall survival (OS; median, 18.1 vs 7.3 months; P < .001) compared with those with BED10 < 75 Gy. Notably, proton-treated patients had a significantly higher BED10 (96 vs 67 Gy; P < .001) and improved LC (2-year: 88.5% vs 33.8%; P < .001), PFS (median, 7.4 vs 3.3 months; P = .001), and OS (median, 18.9 vs 8.3 months; P < .001) than those undergoing photon radiation therapy. Furthermore, patients treated with protons had significantly lower V1 of the liver (P < .001), mean upper gastrointestinal tract dose (P < .001), and mean splenic dose (P < .001), with significantly decreased incidences of radiation-induced liver disease (P = .007), grade ≥3 upper gastrointestinal bleeding (P = .001), and grade ≥3 lymphopenia (P = .003). On multivariate analysis, proton radiation therapy consistently correlated with superior LC (P < .001), PFS (P < .001), and OS (P < .001). In intragroup dosimetric comparison, photon plans demonstrated significantly higher mean liver dose (P < .001) compared with actually delivered proton treatments, and 72 (69%) of them had mean liver dose exceeding 28 Gy, which necessitated target dose de-escalation. CONCLUSIONS In the context of large HCC radiation therapy, a higher target BED10 was associated with improved outcomes. Notably, proton therapy has demonstrated the capability to deliver ablative doses while also being accompanied by fewer instances of severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney Cheng-En Hsieh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Department of Medical Imaging and Radiological Science, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston and MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Cancer Genome Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan.
| | - Ching-Hsin Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiao-Chieh Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Wei Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Yu Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Sheng-Ping Hung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Wei Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Sunil Krishnan
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston McGovern Medical School, Houston, Texas
| | - Bhanu Prasad Venkatesulu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois; Edward Hines Veteran Affairs Hospital, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Jin-Chiao Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Chih Chou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan; Department of Radiation Oncology, New Taipei Municipal Tucheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Kun-Ming Chan
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Po-Ting Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Chen Lee
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Chen-Chun Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Shen-Yen Lin
- Department of Medical Imaging and Intervention, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| | - Ji-Hong Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan City, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Bonù ML, Nicosia L, Turkaj A, Pastorello E, Vitali P, Frassine F, Toraci C, Spiazzi L, Lechiara M, Frittoli B, Grazioli L, Ghirardelli P, Costantino G, Barbera F, Borghetti P, Triggiani L, Portolani N, Buglione M, Dionisi F, Giacomelli I, Lancia A, Magrini SM, Tomasini D. High dose proton and photon-based radiation therapy for 213 liver lesions: a multi-institutional dosimetric comparison with a clinical perspective. LA RADIOLOGIA MEDICA 2024; 129:497-506. [PMID: 38345714 PMCID: PMC10942931 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-024-01788-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 03/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) and Proton therapy (PT) are both options in the management of liver lesions. Limited clinical-dosimetric comparison are available. Moreover, dose-constraint routinely used in liver PT and SRT considers only the liver spared, while optimization strategies to limit the liver damaged are poorly reported. METHODS Primary endpoint was to assess and compare liver sparing of four contemporary RT techniques. Secondary endpoints were freedom from local recurrence (FFLR), overall survival (OS), acute and late toxicity. We hypothesize that Focal Liver Reaction (FLR) is determined by a similar biologic dose. FLR was delineated on follow-up MRI. Mean C.I. was computed for all the schedules used. A so-called Fall-off Volume (FOV) was defined as the area of healthy liver (liver-PTV) receiving more than the isotoxic dose. Fall-off Volume Ratio (FOVR) was defined as ratio between FOV and PTV. RESULTS 213 lesions were identified. Mean best fitting isodose (isotoxic doses) for FLR were 18Gy, 21.5 Gy and 28.5 Gy for 3, 5 and 15 fractions. Among photons, an advantage in terms of healthy liver sparing was found for Vmat FFF with 5mm jaws (p = 0.013) and Cyberknife (p = 0.03). FOV and FOVR resulted lower for PT (p < 0.001). Three years FFLR resulted 83%. Classic Radiation induced liver disease (RILD, any grade) affected 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS Cyberknife and V-MAT FFF with 5mm jaws spare more liver than V-MAT FF with 10 mm jaws. PT spare more liver compared to photons. FOV and FOVR allows a quantitative analysis of healthy tissue sparing performance showing also the quality of plan in terms of dose fall-off.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Lorenzo Bonù
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy.
| | - Luca Nicosia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, Negrar, Italy
| | | | - Edoardo Pastorello
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paola Vitali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| | - Francesco Frassine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| | - Cristian Toraci
- Department of Medical Physics, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Spiazzi
- Department of Medical Physics, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Marco Lechiara
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Barbara Frittoli
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luigi Grazioli
- Department of Radiology, Spedali Civili di Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Ghirardelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Gianluca Costantino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Humanitas Gavazzeni Hospital, Bergamo, Italy
| | - Fernando Barbera
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| | - Paolo Borghetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| | - Luca Triggiani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| | | | - Michela Buglione
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| | | | | | - Andrea Lancia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefano Maria Magrini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davide Tomasini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto del Radio O. Alberti, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili Hospital, Piazzale Spedali Civili 1, 25121, Brescia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Santoso AP, Vinogradskiy Y, Robin TP, Goodman KA, Schefter TE, Miften M, Jones BL. Clinical and Dosimetric Impact of 2D kV Motion Monitoring and Intervention in Liver Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101409. [PMID: 38298328 PMCID: PMC10828584 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2023.101409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Positional errors resulting from motion are a principal challenge across all disease sites in radiation therapy. This is particularly pertinent when treating lesions in the liver with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). To achieve dose escalation and margin reduction for liver SBRT, kV real-time imaging interventions may serve as a potential solution. In this study, we report results of a retrospective cohort of liver patients treated using real-time 2D kV-image guidance SBRT with emphasis on the impact of (1) clinical workflow, (2) treatment accuracy, and (3) tumor dose. Methods and Materials Data from 33 patients treated with 41 courses of liver SBRT were analyzed. During treatment, planar kV images orthogonal to the treatment beam were acquired to determine treatment interventions, namely treatment pauses (ie, adequacy of gating thresholds) or treatment shifts. Patients were shifted if internal markers were >3 mm, corresponding to the PTV margin used, from the expected reference condition. The frequency, duration, and nature of treatment interventions (ie, pause vs shift) were recorded, and the dosimetric impact associated with treatment shifts was estimated using a machine learning dosimetric model. Results Of all fractions delivered, 39% required intervention, which took on average 1.9 ± 1.6 minutes and occurred more frequently in treatments lasting longer than 7 minutes. The median realignment shift was 5.7 mm in size, and the effect of these shifts on minimum tumor dose in simulated clinical scenarios ranged from 0% to 50% of prescription dose per fraction. Conclusion Real-time kV-based imaging interventions for liver SBRT minimally affect clinical workflow and dosimetrically benefit patients. This potential solution for addressing positional errors from motion addresses concerns about target accuracy and may enable safe dose escalation and margin reduction in the context of liver SBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew P. Santoso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Yevgeniy Vinogradskiy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tyler P. Robin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Karyn A. Goodman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Tracey E. Schefter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Moyed Miften
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Bernard L. Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Tsai YL, Yu PC, Nien HH, Lu TP. Time variation of high-risk groups for liver function deteriorations within fluctuating long-term liver function after hepatic radiotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Med Res 2024; 29:104. [PMID: 38326881 PMCID: PMC10848403 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-024-01692-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to find essential risk factors associated with liver function (LF) deteriorations within fluctuating long-term LF and their time-varying effects in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving hepatic radiotherapy and to identify high-risk groups for adverse LF deteriorations and their changes over time in facilitating the prevention of hepatic decompensation and the improvement of survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 133 HCC patients treated by hepatic radiotherapy were enrolled. A study design was conducted to convert posttreatment long-term LF with fluctuating levels over time to recurrent LF events using defined upgrades in a grading scale. The hazard ratios (HR) of pretreatment biochemical, demographic, clinical, and dosimetric factors in developing posttreatment LF events were estimated using the Cox model. Methodologies of the counting process approach, robust variance estimation, goodness-of-fit testing based on the Schoenfeld residuals, and time-dependent covariates in survival analysis were employed to handle the correlation within subjects and evaluate the time-varying effects during long-term follow-up. RESULTS Baseline LF score before radiotherapy and gender were significant factors. Initial HR in developing LF events was 1.17 (95% CI 1.11-1.23; P < 0.001) for each increase of baseline LF score and kept almost constant over time (HR, 1.00; 95% CI 1.00-1.01; P = 0.065). However, no difference was observed regarding initial hazards for gender (HR, 1.00; 95% CI 0.64-1.56; P = 0.994), but the hazard for women got higher monthly over time compared with men (HR, 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07; P = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS High-risk groups for adverse LF deteriorations after hepatic radiotherapy may change over time. Patients with poor baseline LF are vulnerable from the beginning. Women require prevention strategies and careful monitoring for deteriorations at a later stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Lun Tsai
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Chieh Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Hua Nien
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cathay General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, College of Electrical and Computer Engineering, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Tzu-Pin Lu
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Core, Center of Genomic and Precision Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Institute of Health Data Analytics and Statistics, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bae SH, Chun SJ, Chung JH, Kim E, Kang JK, Jang WI, Moon JE, Roquette I, Mirabel X, Kimura T, Ueno M, Su TS, Tree AC, Guckenberger M, Lo SS, Scorsetti M, Slotman BJ, Kotecha R, Sahgal A, Louie AV, Kim MS. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Meta-Analysis and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society Practice Guidelines. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:337-351. [PMID: 37597757 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/05/2023] [Indexed: 08/21/2023]
Abstract
This systematic review and meta-analysis reports on outcomes and hepatic toxicity rates after stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver-confined hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and presents consensus guidelines regarding appropriate patient management. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systemic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines, a systematic review was performed from articles reporting outcomes at ≥5 years published before October 2022 from the Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Scopus databases with the following search terms: ("stereotactic body radiotherapy" OR "SBRT" OR "SABR" OR "stereotactic ablative radiotherapy") AND ("hepatocellular carcinoma" OR "HCC"). An aggregated data meta-analysis was conducted to assess overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) using weighted random effects models. In addition, individual patient data analyses incorporating data from 6 institutions were conducted as their own subgroup analyses. Seventeen observational studies, comprising 1889 patients with HCC treated with ≤9 SBRT fractions, between 2003 and 2019, were included in the aggregated data meta-analysis. The 3- and 5-year OS rates after SBRT were 57% (95% confidence interval [CI], 47%-66%) and 40% (95% CI, 29%-51%), respectively. The 3- and 5-year LC rates after SBRT were 84% (95% CI, 77%-90%) and 82% (95% CI, 74%-88%), respectively. Tumor size was the only prognostic factor for LC. Tumor size and region were significantly associated with OS. Five-year LC and OS rates of 79% (95% CI, 0.74-0.84) and 25% (95% CI, 0.20-0.30), respectively, were observed in the individual patient data analyses. Factors prognostic for improved OS were tumor size <3 cm, Eastern region, Child-Pugh score ≤B7, and the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage of 0 and A. The incidence of severe hepatic toxicity varied according to the criteria applied. SBRT is an effective treatment modality for patients with HCC with mature follow-up. Clinical practice guidelines were developed on behalf of the International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society (ISRS).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sun Hyun Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Seok-Joo Chun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo-Hyun Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunji Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Seoul Metropolitan Government-Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Kyu Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inje University Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Eun Moon
- Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Korea
| | - Isaure Roquette
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Xavier Mirabel
- Academic Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - Tomoki Kimura
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kochi Medical School, Kochi University, Kochi, Japan
| | - Masayuki Ueno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Okayama, Japan; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ting-Shi Su
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital, Nanning, Guangxi, China
| | - Alison C Tree
- Department of Radiotherapy, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Simon S Lo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Ben J Slotman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida; Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, Florida
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mi-Sook Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
George K, Chopra S, Rajamanickam K, Joshi K, Swamidas J, Shetty N, Engineer R. Evaluation of liver segmental dose threshold for hepatocyte regeneration following liver stereotactic body radiation therapy. Indian J Med Res 2024; 159:232-240. [PMID: 38442296 PMCID: PMC11050757 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_1171_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND OBJECTIVES There is limited evidence studying the relationship of liver segmental dose and segmental volume changes. The segmental dose thresholds could potentially allow for segmental regeneration after liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Given improved survival in hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and liver metastases and more salvage therapy options, this has become an important clinical question to explore. This study assesses the impact of liver segmental dose on segmental volume changes (gain or loss) after SBRT. METHODS Liver segmental contours were delineated on baseline and serial follow up triphasic computed tomography scans. The volumes of total liver and doses to total liver, uninvolved liver and individual segments were noted. A correlation was evaluated between liver/segmental volume and dose using Pearson's correlation. Furthermore, receiver operator's curve (ROC) analysis was performed to find the segmental dose, i.e . predictive for liver volume loss. RESULTS A total of 140 non-tumour liver segments were available for analysis in 21 participants. Overall, 13 participants showed loss of overall liver volume and eight showed gain of overall liver volume. The median dose in segments reporting an increase in volume was 9.1 Gy (7-36 Gy). The median dose in segments losing volume was 15.5 Gy (1-49 Gy). On ROC analysis, segmental dose >11 Gy was associated with volume loss. On univariate analysis, only liver segmental dose contributed to a significant segmental volume loss. INTERPRETATION CONCLUSIONS We propose from the findings of this study that in SBRT for large hepatocellular cancer or liver metastases, liver segments should be individually delineated. Furthermore, 3-5 liver segments may be preferentially subjected to <9 Gy to facilitate hepatocyte regeneration. Preferential sparing of uninvolved liver segments may improve outcomes in liver stereotaxyas lower segmental doses were associated with liver regeneration. This may have implications on future liver SBRT planning where segmental doses may be as important as the mean dose.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karishma George
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Supriya Chopra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Karthick Rajamanickam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Kishore Joshi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Jamema Swamidas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nitin Shetty
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Reena Engineer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Tata Memorial Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Gutman MJ, Serra LM, Koshy M, Katipally RR. SBRT for Liver Tumors: What the Interventional Radiologist Needs to Know. Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:1-10. [PMID: 38495259 PMCID: PMC10940045 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1778657] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
This review summarizes the clinical evidence supporting the utilization of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for liver tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma, liver metastases, and cholangiocarcinoma. Emerging prospective evidence has demonstrated the benefit and low rates of toxicity across a broad range of clinical contexts. We provide an introduction for the interventional radiologist, with a discussion of underlying themes such as tumor dose-response, mitigation of liver toxicity, and the technical considerations relevant to performing liver SBRT. Ultimately, we recommend that SBRT should be routinely included in the armamentarium of locoregional therapies for liver malignancies, alongside those liver-directed therapies offered by interventional radiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Gutman
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lucas M. Serra
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Matthew Koshy
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rohan R. Katipally
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Filoni E, Musci V, Di Rito A, Inchingolo R, Memeo R, Mannavola F. Multimodal Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases: State of the Art. Oncol Rev 2024; 17:11799. [PMID: 38239856 PMCID: PMC10794467 DOI: 10.3389/or.2023.11799] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver is the most common site of colorectal cancer (CRC) metastases. Treatment of CRC liver metastases (CRLM) includes different strategies, prevalently based on the clinical and oncological intent. Valid approaches in liver-limited or liver-prevalent disease include surgery, percutaneous ablative procedures (radiofrequency ablation, microwave ablation), intra-arterial perfusional techniques (chemo-embolization, radio-embolization) as well as stereotactic radiotherapy. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, immunotherapy and other biological agents, are the only options for patients with no chance of locoregional approaches. The use of chemotherapy in other settings, such as neoadjuvant, adjuvant or conversion therapy of CRLM, is commonly accepted in the clinical practice, although data from several clinical trials have been mostly inconclusive. The optimal integration of all these strategies, when applicable and clinically indicated, should be ever considered in patients affected by CRLM based on clinical evidence and multidisciplinary experience. Here we revised in detail all the possible therapeutic approaches of CRLM focusing on the current evidences, the studies still in progress and the often contradictory data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisabetta Filoni
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Vittoria Musci
- Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Alessia Di Rito
- Radiotherapy Unit, P.O. “Mons A.R. Dimiccoli”, Barletta, Italy
| | - Riccardo Inchingolo
- Unit of Interventional Radiology, “F. Miulli” General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, “F. Miulli” General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Italy
| | - Francesco Mannavola
- Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Li W, Xu L, Wang Y, Li W, Maimaiti M, Kou B, Liu C, Zhang M, Xia H, Yuan F. Protective effect of intermittent hypobaric hypoxia against radiation-induced liver damage in Sprague-Dawley rats. Technol Health Care 2024; 32:595-604. [PMID: 37483028 DOI: 10.3233/thc-220718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Without timely and effective interventions or treatments, radiation-induced liver damage (RILD) can lead to serious consequences for the patients and their families. OBJECTIVE To investigate the protective effect of intermittent hypobaric hypoxia preconditioning (IHHP) in RILD. METHODS Male adult SD rats were randomly divided into 8 groups including one control group, one only irradiation group and other experimental groups. Blood routine tests and liver function tests were all assessed with abdominal venous blood. Moreover, hematoxylin eosin (HE) staining and immunohistochemistry assay were used to detect the histopathological changes and expressions of transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1), tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) in radiated liver sections. RESULTS Blood routing tests showed that RBC, WBC and Hb were all significantly increased while the differences of these results between different groups with same simulated altitude were approximate. However, liver function in the IHHP plus irradiation at 4000 m group was significantly decreased (P< 0.05) compared to only irradiation groups, and the manifestation of HE and lower positive expression of TNF-α showed improved histopathological changes in the liver section. Furthermore, no significant difference of HIF-1α expression between any two groups treated with IHHP was observed. CONCLUSION IHHP at the altitude of 4000 m group could alleviate the radioactive liver damage by downregulating TNF-α and less strong positive expression of TGF-β1. Furthermore, patients exposed to radiation might benefit from this treatment to prevent or reduce the RILD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenzhe Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Yajing Wang
- Department of Chemistry, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Wenjun Li
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Meiligu Maimaiti
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Bin Kou
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Chenchen Liu
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Meng Zhang
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Hongjuan Xia
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Fang Yuan
- Department of Radiotherapy, General Hospital of Xinjiang Military Command, Wulumuqi, Xinjiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Zhang W, Cai X, Sun J, Wang W, Zhao J, Zhang Q, Jiang G, Wang Z. Pencil Beam Scanning Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Hepatocell Carcinoma 2023; 10:2397-2409. [PMID: 38169909 PMCID: PMC10759913 DOI: 10.2147/jhc.s429186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, evidence of using the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique to treat moving liver tumors remains lacking. The present study investigated the efficacy and toxicity of PBS CIRT in patients with HCC. Methods Between January 2016 and October 2021, 90 consecutive HCC patients treated with definitive CIRT in our center were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-eight patients received relative biological effectiveness-weighted doses of 50-70 Gy in 10 fractions, and 32 received 60-67.5 Gy in 15 fractions, which were determined by the tumor location and normal tissue constraints. Active motion-management techniques and necessary strategies were adopted to mitigate interplay effects efficiently. Oncologic outcomes and toxicities were evaluated. Results The median follow-up time was 28.6 months (range 5.7-74.6 months). The objective response rate was 75.0% for all 90 patients with 100 treated lesions. The overall survival rates at 1-, 2- and 3-years were 97.8%, 83.3% and 75.4%, respectively. The local control rates at 1-, 2- and 3-years were 96.4%, 96.4% and 93.1%, respectively. Radiation-induced liver disease was not documented, and 4 patients (4.4%) had their Child-Pugh score elevated by 1 point after CIRT. No grade 3 or higher acute non-hematological toxicities were observed. Six patients (6.7%) experienced grade 3 or higher late toxicities. Conclusion The active scanning technique was clinically feasible to treat HCC by applying necessary mitigation measures for interplay effects. The desirable oncologic outcomes as well as favorable toxicity profiles presented in this study will be a valuable reference for other carbon-ion centers using the PBS technique and local effect model-based system, and add to a growing body of evidence about the role of CIRT in the management of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenna Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin Cai
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jiayao Sun
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Weiwei Wang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jingfang Zhao
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Medical Physics, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qing Zhang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Guoliang Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| | - Zheng Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Radiation Oncology (20dz2261000), Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Proton and Heavy Ion Radiation Therapy, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Shanghai Proton and Heavy Ion Center, Fudan University Cancer Hospital, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Podesta C, Kayani M, Goody R, Samson A. Combination treatment of HCC with SBRT and immune checkpoint inhibition. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 192:104191. [PMID: 37865277 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 10/23/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of unresectable or metastatic HCC has been significantly advanced in recent years by developments in both radiotherapy and systemic cancer therapies. Independently, both Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) are licensed for the treatment of these tumours. Building on the successes seen in other solid tumours, there is significant interest in exploring combination treatments. In this review article we briefly present the evidence base for the use of these treatments in patients with HCC. With reference to our current understanding of the immuno-oncology and radiobiology of HCCs, we demonstrate why combining these two modalities is of interest. Finally, we discuss the clinical trials that are currently underway or planned and the direction that future research may take.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Podesta
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK
| | - Mahaz Kayani
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK.
| | - Rebecca Goody
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK
| | - Adel Samson
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James University Hospital, Beckett Street, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Iyer A, Apte AP, Bendau E, Thor M, Chen I, Shin J, Wu A, Gomez D, Rimner A, Yorke E, Deasy JO, Jackson A. ROE (Radiotherapy Outcomes Estimator): An open-source tool for optimizing radiotherapy prescriptions. COMPUTER METHODS AND PROGRAMS IN BIOMEDICINE 2023; 242:107833. [PMID: 37863013 PMCID: PMC10872836 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Radiotherapy prescriptions currently derive from population-wide guidelines established through large clinical trials. We provide an open-source software tool for patient-specific prescription determination using personalized dose-response curves. METHODS We developed ROE, a plugin to the Computational Environment for Radiotherapy Research to visualize predicted tumor control and normal tissue complication simultaneously, as a function of prescription dose. ROE can be used natively with MATLAB and is additionally made accessible in GNU Octave and Python, eliminating the need for commercial licenses. It provides a curated library of published and validated predictive models and incorporates clinical restrictions on normal tissue outcomes. ROE additionally provides batch-mode tools to evaluate and select among different fractionation schemes and analyze radiotherapy outcomes across patient cohorts. CONCLUSION ROE is an open-source, GPL-copyrighted tool for interactive exploration of the dose-response relationship to aid in radiotherapy planning. We demonstrate its potential clinical relevance in (1) improving patient awareness by quantifying the risks and benefits of a given treatment protocol (2) assessing the potential for dose escalation across patient cohorts and (3) estimating accrual rates of new protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditi Iyer
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, United States.
| | - Aditya P Apte
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ethan Bendau
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY, United States
| | - Maria Thor
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ishita Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, United States
| | - Jacob Shin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Abraham Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Daniel Gomez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States
| | - Ellen Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, United States
| | - Joseph O Deasy
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, United States
| | - Andrew Jackson
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, New York, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Zhang S, Zhan W, Zeng N, Yang J, Xiong M, Liao W, Chen N, Xiao J. Dosimetric comparison in sparing normal tissue dosage by using auto-SBRT planning in oligo liver tumors. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1273042. [PMID: 38023203 PMCID: PMC10665725 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1273042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The study aimed to compare the dosimetric distribution of VMAT plans by increasing the number of half arcs in liver SBRT and investigate the effect by using automatic plan software in plan optimization. Method Thirty-one patients with oligo liver tumors were randomly selected. VMAT treatment plans with different numbers of coplanar half arcs were generated. Result Adding arcs significantly increased the PTV, D2%, D50%, and CI, but sacrificed the plan homogeneity. It also decreased the maximum dose of normal tissues such as the stomach, duodenum, and spinal cord and reduced Dmean, D500cc, and D700cc for the liver. Nevertheless, the diminishing effect gradually decayed into three arcs. Meanwhile, the addition of arcs substantially extended the beam-on time. Conclusion In the context of SBRT for oligo liver tumors, increasing the number of coplanar half arcs will improve PTV conformity and offer better protection for OARs, albeit at the expense of increased treatment duration. Considering the trade-off between plan quality and treatment efficiency, a three-arc plan may be more suitable for clinical implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shu Zhang
- Head and Neck Oncology Department, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Weiyi Zhan
- Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ni Zeng
- Head and Neck Oncology Department, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jiangping Yang
- Head and Neck Oncology Department, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Maoqi Xiong
- West China Clinical Skills Training Center, West China School of Medicine/West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Wenjun Liao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Sichuan Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Sichuan Cancer Hospital and Institute, Sichuan Cancer Center, Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China
| | - Nianyong Chen
- Head and Neck Oncology Department, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Jianghong Xiao
- Radiotherapy Physics and Technology Center, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Hallemeier CL, Sharma N, Anker C, Selfridge JE, Lee P, Jabbour S, Williams V, Liu D, Kennedy T, Jethwa KR, Kim E, Kumar R, Small W, Tchelebi L, Russo S. American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of liver-directed therapies for nonsurgical management of liver metastases: Systematic review and guidelines. Cancer 2023; 129:3193-3212. [PMID: 37409678 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - J Eva Selfridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Salma Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Liu
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Birth Columbia, Canada
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Leila Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Munker S, Roessler D, Öcal O, Ben-Khaled N, Bernhart K, Ye L, Piseddu I, Vielhauer J, Reiter FP, Rodriguez I, Ricke J, Teufel A, De Toni E, Seidensticker M, Niyazi M, Corradini S. Concomitant Irradiation to Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients: A Systematic Retrospective, Single-Center Analysis. Oncol Res Treat 2023; 46:466-475. [PMID: 37827135 PMCID: PMC10664332 DOI: 10.1159/000533983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Immunotherapy has been established as the standard treatment option for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Despite the increased efficacy, disease progression occurs in a relevant proportion of patients even after an objective response. Combination concepts with locoregional therapy are currently under investigation for hepatic disease but are also in discussion for the control of distant metastasis. Radiotherapy is a highly effective treatment modality for local tumor control. It is also thought to increase the efficacy of checkpoint inhibition and sensitize distant lesions to the effects of immunotherapy, but may potentially increase adverse effects. In our center, few patients with aHCC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) received concomitant radiotherapy for symptom or disease control. The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze adverse effects and efficacy of concomitant radiotherapy in patients with aHCC treated with checkpoint inhibition. METHODS To this aim, patients who received a combination of ICI and radiotherapy in our institution were retrospectively considered for analysis. The predefined inclusion criterion was radiotherapy after initiated checkpoint inhibition and continuation of ICI therapy for at least 8 weeks. Adverse effects and efficacy measurements were performed according to local standards. RESULTS The database search of 2016-2021 revealed six consecutive patients fulfilling the predefined criteria for concomitant ICI and radiotherapy. Three patients received high-dose-rate brachytherapy (15 Gy) to treat progredient hepatic lesions. Two patients received stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) (25-30 Gy) for symptom control, and 1 patient received brachytherapy and SBRT to treat metastases. No severe adverse events were reported in the period (<6 months) after concomitant radiotherapy. In 5 out of 6 cases, long-term tumor control could be achieved by this therapeutic combination. CONCLUSION A good efficacy of concomitant radiotherapy and checkpoint inhibition has been achieved with no safety concerns. Further investigations should evaluate the safety, appropriate clinical context, and efficacy of this promising approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Munker
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Daniel Roessler
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Osman Öcal
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Najib Ben-Khaled
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Kathrin Bernhart
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Liangtao Ye
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ignazio Piseddu
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jakob Vielhauer
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Florian P Reiter
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Isaac Rodriguez
- Department of Medicine II, Division of Hepatology, Division of Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany,
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andreas Teufel
- Department of Medicine II, Division of Hepatology, Division of Bioinformatics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Healthy Metabolism, Center for Preventive Medicine and Digital Health Baden-Württemberg (CPDBW), Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Enrico De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Liver Center Munich, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefanie Corradini
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Jang WI, Jo S, Moon JE, Bae SH, Park HC. The Current Evidence of Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4914. [PMID: 37894281 PMCID: PMC10605127 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), an advanced RT technique, is a considerable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the distinguishing features of IMRT for HCC have not yet been clearly defined. A systematic review was performed according to the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. The PubMed/MedLine, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and KoreaMed were used to screen eligible studies focusing on treatment outcomes after IMRT for HCC until 18 April 2023. A total of 1755 HCC patients receiving IMRT among 29 studies from 2009 to 2023 were selected for the meta-analysis. The median proportion of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C was 100% (range: 38-100%). Nineteen studies used combined treatment. Pooled rates of response and 1-year local control were 58% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50-65%) and 84% (95% CI, 70-94%), respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was 13 months (range: 5-45 months), and pooled 1- and 3-year OS rates were 59% (95% CI, 52-66%), and 23% (95% CI, 14-33%), respectively. Pooled rates of classic radiation-induced liver disease (RILD), nonclassic RILD, and hepatic toxicity ≥ grade 3 were 2%, 4%, and 4%, respectively. Although most patients had advanced-stage HCC and combined treatment was commonly used, IMRT for HCC showed similar survival to existing RT modalities and relatively low severe toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Won Il Jang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 75, Nowon-ro, Nowon-gu, Seoul 01812, Republic of Korea;
| | - Sunmi Jo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University School of Medicine, 875, Haeun-daero, Haeundae-gu, Busan 48108, Republic of Korea;
| | - Ji Eun Moon
- Department of Biostatistics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wongmi-gu, Bucheon-si 14584, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea;
| | - Sun Hyun Bae
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, 170 Jomaru-ro, Wongmi-gu, Bucheon-si 14584, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Chul Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Cazoulat G, Gupta AC, Al Taie MM, Koay EJ, Brock KK. Analysis and prediction of liver volume change maps derived from computational tomography scans acquired pre- and post-radiation therapy. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:205009. [PMID: 37714187 PMCID: PMC10547850 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acfa5f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 09/17/2023]
Abstract
External beam radiation therapy (EBRT) of liver cancers can cause local liver atrophy as a result of tissue damage or hypertrophy as a result of liver regeneration. Predicting those volumetric changes would enable new strategies for liver function preservation during treatment planning. However, understanding of the spatial dose/volume relationship is still limited. This study leverages the use of deep learning-based segmentation and biomechanical deformable image registration (DIR) to analyze and predict this relationship. Pre- and Post-EBRT imaging data were collected for 100 patients treated for hepatocellular carcinomas, cholangiocarcinoma or CRC with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with prescription doses ranging from 50 to 100 Gy delivered in 10-28 fractions. For each patient, DIR between the portal and venous (PV) phase of a diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scan acquired before radiation therapy (RT) planning, and a PV phase of a diagnostic CT scan acquired after the end of RT (on average 147 ± 36 d) was performed to calculate Jacobian maps representing volume changes in the liver. These volume change maps were used: (i): to analyze the dose/volume relationship in the whole liver and individual Couinaud's segments; and (ii): to investigate the use of deep-learning to predict a Jacobian map solely based on the pre-RT diagnostic CT and planned dose distribution. Moderate correlations between mean equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) and volume change was observed for all liver sub-regions analyzed individually with Pearson correlationrranging from -0.36 to -067. The predicted volume change maps showed a significantly stronger voxel-wise correlation with the DIR-based volume change maps than when considering the original EQD2 distribution (0.63 ± 0.24 versus 0.55 ± 23, respectively), demonstrating the ability of the proposed approach to establish complex relationships between planned dose and liver volume response months after treatment, which represents a promising prediction tool for the development of future adaptive and personalized liver radiation therapy strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guillaume Cazoulat
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Aashish C Gupta
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Mais M Al Taie
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Eugene J Koay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| | - Kristy K Brock
- Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Center, Houston, TX, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Chen Y, Yang X, Li X. Impact of radiation therapy and alpha-fetoprotein level on survival outcomes for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: A population-based study. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2023; 47:102196. [PMID: 37553066 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2023.102196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of radiation therapy (RT) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a matter for debate. Recently published research indicate that advanced RT techniques may improve survival in patients with HCC. This study aimed to evaluate this hypothesis in a large-scale retrospective cohort. The effect of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) was taken into account because of its important role in the prognosis of HCC. METHODS The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was queried for adults patients diagnosed 2010-2019 with HCC (≥ 18 years). The study population was divided into four groups: Non-radiation & AFP-positive (reference), Non-radiation & AF-negative, Radiation & AFP-positive, Radiation & AFP-negative. Distant metastasis (DM) was used as a stratification factor. Differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) of the four groups were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (HR). RESULTS A total of 34,656 patients were eligible for this analysis, including 21,084 (60.8%), 8,449 (24.4%), 3,810 (11.0%) and 1,313 (3.8%) in the Non-radiation & AFP-positive, Non-radiation & AF-negative, Radiation & AFP-positive and Radiation & AFP-negative groups, respectively. Median OSs of the four groups were 3, 4, 5 and 11 months in the DM cohort, and 12, 28, 15, and 28 months in the Non-DM cohort. Patients in the Radiation & AFP - group had the best OS and patients in the Non-radiation & AFP + group had the worst OS (adjusted HR [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 0.497 [0.399-0.619] in the DM cohort, and 0.405 [0.372-0.441] in the Non-DM cohort). Radiation & AFP + also showed improved survival compared with the reference group (adjusted HR [95%CI]: 0.725 [0.657-0.801] in the DM cohort, and 0.630 [0.600-0.661] in the Non-DM cohort). CONCLUSIONS This population-based cohort study confirmed a significant improvement in overall survival with radiation therapy in HCC. AFP-negative patients benefit the most from RT. Superior OS of radiation therapy and AFP-negative status persisted even in patients with complex metastasis patterns. Our data suggest that radiation may provide an alternative modality for unresectable HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yahong Chen
- Nursing Department, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xueqing Yang
- Nursing Department, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xiawei Li
- Department of Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Intervention, China National Ministry of Education, Cancer Institute, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China; Cancer Center, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Güzelöz Z, Ayrancıoğlu O, Aktürk N, Güneş M, Alıcıkuş ZA. Dose Volume and Liver Function Test Relationship following Radiotheraphy for Right Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:8763-8773. [PMID: 37887532 PMCID: PMC10605792 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30100632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Revised: 09/19/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The liver is a critical organ at risk during right breast radiotherapy (RT). Liver function tests (LFTs) such as alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) serve as biochemical markers for hepatobiliary damage. In this multicenter cross-sectional study, the effects of liver dose-volume on changes in LFTs pre- and post-RT in patients treated for right breast cancer were evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Between January 2019 and November 2022, data from 100 patients who underwent adjuvant right breast RT across three centers were retrospectively assessed. Target volumes and normal structures were contoured per the RTOG atlas. Patients were treated with a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the CTV, followed by a boost to the tumor bed where indicated. The percentage change in LFT values in the first two weeks post-RT was calculated. Statistics were analyzed with SPSS version 22 software, with significance set at p < 0.05. Statistical correlation between liver doses (in cGy) and the volume receiving specific doses (Vx in cc) on the change in LFTs were analyzed using Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS The median age among the 100 patients was 56 (range: 29-79). Breast-conserving surgery was performed on 75% of the patients. The most common T and N stages were T1 (53%) and N0 (53%), respectively. None of the patients had distant metastasis or simultaneous systemic treatment with RT. A total of 67% of the treatments utilized the IMRT technique and 33% VMAT. The median CTV volume was 802 cc (range: 214-2724 cc). A median boost dose of 10 Gy (range: 10-16 Gy) was applied to 28% of the patients with electrons and 51% with IMRT/VMAT. The median liver volume was 1423 cc (range: 825-2312 cc). Statistical analyses were conducted on a subset of 57 patients for whom all three LFT values were available both pre- and post-RT. In this group, the median values for AST, ALT, and GGT increased up to 15% post-RT compared to pre-RT, and a median liver Dmean below 208 cGy was found significant. While many factors can influence LFT values, during RT planning, attention to liver doses and subsequent regular LFT checks are crucial. CONCLUSION Due to factors such as anatomical positioning, planning technique, and breast posture, the liver can receive varying doses during right breast irradiation. Protecting patients from liver toxicity secondary to RT is valuable, especially in breast cancer patients with a long-life expectancy. Our study found that, even in the absence of any systemic treatment or risk factors, there was an average increase of nearly 15% in enzymes, indicating acute liver damage post-RT compared with pre-RT. Attention to liver doses during RT planning and regular follow-up with LFTs is essential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeliha Güzelöz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Health Science University Tepecik Training and Research Hospital, İzmir 35100, Türkiye
| | - Oğuzhan Ayrancıoğlu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, İzmir Tınaztepe University Galen Hospital, İzmir 35001, Türkiye; (O.A.); (M.G.); (Z.A.A.)
| | - Nesrin Aktürk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Katip Çelebi University Atatürk Training and Research Hospital, İzmir 35150, Türkiye;
| | - Merve Güneş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, İzmir Tınaztepe University Galen Hospital, İzmir 35001, Türkiye; (O.A.); (M.G.); (Z.A.A.)
| | - Zümre Arıcan Alıcıkuş
- Department of Radiation Oncology, İzmir Tınaztepe University Galen Hospital, İzmir 35001, Türkiye; (O.A.); (M.G.); (Z.A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|