Improved biochemical outcomes with statin use in patients with high-risk localized prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy

Exposure to statins post localized prostate cancer diagnosis and risk of metastasis among men who did not receive curative prostate cancer treatment

BACKGROUND

Few studies have evaluated the effect of statin exposure on metastasis risk among prostate cancer patients not receiving curative treatment.

METHODS

We included men diagnosed with localized prostate cancer at an integrated health care system between 1997 and 2006 who did not receive curative treatment within 6 months of diagnosis. We followed these men until a metastatic event, disenrollment, death, or 12/31/2016. We collected all data from electronic health records supplemented by chart review. We used Cox regressions to examine the association between post-diagnostic statin exposure and metastasis, controlling for clinical characteristics and pre-diagnostic statin exposure.

RESULTS

There were 4245 men included. Mean age of diagnosis was 68.02 years. 46.6% of men used statins after prostate cancer diagnosis. During follow-up, 192 men developed metastasis (cumulative incidence rate: 14.5%). In the adjusted Cox model, statin use post-prostate cancer diagnosis was not significantly associated with a metastatic event (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.69, 1.36). Pre-diagnostic statin use was also not associated with development of metastasis (HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.53, 1.10). We did not observe a dose-response for the proportion of person-time at-risk post-prostate cancer diagnosis on statins (HR = 0.98 per 10% increase in person-time exposed [95% CI = 0.93, 1.03]).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not find an inverse association between post-diagnosis statin exposure and metastasis development in localized prostate cancer patients who did not receive active treatment. Our results did not offer support to the chemopreventive potential of post-diagnostic statin use among men on active surveillance.

Association of Statin Use with the Risk of Incident Prostate Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

Background

With the growth and aging of population, the incidence of prostate cancer will increase year by year, which is bound to bring greater economic burden to the society. There has been greater interest in the anticancer effects of statin in recent years. It is controversial whether statin use is associated with the risk of prostate cancer (PCa). Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review to explore the effects of statin use and their duration and cumulative dose on the overall incidence of PCa.

Method

The study was conducted according to the latest guidelines for PRISMA 2020. We searched PubMed and other databases for studies about the association of statin use with the risk of incident prostate cancer between January 1, 1990, and April 11, 2022. Two independent researchers extracted data and evaluated the quality of the studies. R x64 4.1.2 and random-effects model were used for data statistics. Relative risk (RR) and odds ratio (OR) effective values with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were used to assess the main results.

Results

The results of 6 RCT and 26 cohort studies showed that statins did not significantly associate with the incidence of PCa (RR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.82-1.08). The similar results were obtained from 9 case-control studies (OR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.99-1.07). However, statins were associated with a lower risk of Pca (RR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.28-0.70) when the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) was high. Using statins for more than five years could be associated with a reduced incidence of Pca (RR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.23-0.97). There was a significant heterogeneity in these studies (RCT and cohort study: I ² = 98%, P < 0.01; case-control study: I ² = 72%, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

We concluded that statins had a neutral association with the overall risk of PCa. High cDDD and long duration were associated with a lower risk of PCa.

Modulation of radiosensitivity of DU145 prostate carcinoma cells by simvastatin

PURPOSE

To investigate antiproliferative effects of simvastatin in combination with ionizing radiation on DU145 prostate cancer cells and its influence on cellular HMG-CoA-reductase levels.

METHODS

Proliferative responses of DU145 cells were estimated by means of a clonogenic assay or the crystal violet procedure. HMG-CoA-reductase levels were measured by western blot analysis.

RESULTS

The antiproliferative effects of simvastatin and radiation are dependent on simvastatin dose, radiation dose and treatment time. In vitro treatment of DU145 cells with simvastatin induced HMG-CoA-reductase levels.

CONCLUSION

Ionizing radiation more profoundly reduces proliferation as compared to simvastatin exposure, while the combined application of both modalities is synergistic. The inhibition of CoA-reductase may contribute to these effects.

Interactions of radiation therapy with common and innovative systemic treatments: Antidiabetic treatments, antihypertensives, lipid-lowering medications, immunosuppressive medications and other radiosensitizing methods

The invention and approval of innovative anticancer therapies in the last decade have revolutionized oncology treatment. Radiotherapy is one of the three traditional pillars in oncology treatment with surgery and systemic therapies. Some standard-of-care combinations of chemoradiotherapy widened the therapeutic window of radiation, while some other chemotherapies such as gemcitabine caused unacceptable toxicities when combined with radiation in lung cancers. Fast-paced progress are specially focused on immunotherapies, targeted-therapies, anti-angiogenic treatment, DNA repair inhibitors, hormonotherapy and cell cycle inhibitors. New anticancer therapeutic arsenals provided new possibilities of combined oncological treatments. The interactions of the radiotherapy with other systemic treatments, such as non-anticancer immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive medications are sometimes overlooked even though they could offer a real therapeutic benefit. In this review, we summarize the new opportunities and the risks of historical and novel combined therapies with radiation: non-anticancer immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive drugs, systemic reoxygenation, new therapies such as nanoparticles and SMAC mimetics. Key biological mechanisms, pre-clinical and available clinical data will be provided to demonstrate the promising opportunities in the years to come.

Impact of Statin Use on Localized Prostate Cancer Outcomes after Radiation Therapy: Long-Term Follow-Up

Simple Summary

Statins represent a promising class of agents to improve clinical outcomes of prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy, but the results of numerous studies are contradictory. We aimed to assess the impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence in a large database of patients of different risk groups undergoing different modalities of radiation therapy. We evaluated 3555 patients treated with curative external beam radiotherapy, low-dose-rate seed brachytherapy, or external beam radiotherapy plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy. We found no improvement in biochemical recurrence-free survival in statin users, regardless of radiotherapy modality. Our study underlines the need to search for biomarkers that predict an additive effect of statins and determine which patients treated with radiotherapy may benefit from statins as an anticancer drug.

Abstract

The impact of statin use on localized prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial, especially for patients treated with radiation therapy. We assessed the impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients treated for PCa with different modalities of radiation therapy. We evaluated 3555 patients undergoing radiation therapy between January 2001 and January 2022. The impact of statin use on BCR was analyzed for three treatment groups: external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), low-dose-rate seed brachytherapy (LDR), and EBRT plus high-dose-rate brachytherapy (EBRT + HDR). Median follow-up was 52 months among 1208 patients treated with EBRT, 1679 patients treated with LDR, and 599 patients treated with EBRT + HDR. A total of 1544 (43%) patients were taking a statin at the time of treatment, and 497 (14%) patients were in the D’Amico high-risk group. Only intermediate-risk patients treated with LDR fared better with statin use in univariate analysis (p = 0.025). This association was not significant in multivariate analysis (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.18–1.10, p = 0.06). Statin use was not associated with a reduced risk of BCR in patients treated with radiation therapy. In the era of precision medicine, further investigation is needed to assess the benefit of statins in well-defined patients.

Statin Use and the Risk of Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence Following Definitive Therapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cohort Studies

Background

Numerous studies have reported the role of statins on biochemical recurrence (BCR) among patients with prostate cancer (PCa) after definite treatment. However, the conclusions of these studies are contradictory. We aimed to determine the effect of statins on BCR of PCa using a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Methods

We searched PubMed (Medline) and other databases for cohort studies evaluating the effect of statins on the BCR of patients with PCa between January 1, 2000, and December 31, 2021. The random effects (RE) model and quality effects (QE) model were used to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (pHR) and pooled risk ratio (pRR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI).

Results

A total of 33 cohort studies were finally selected and included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. Statin use was significantly associated with a 14% reduction in the HR of BCR (pHR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.78 to 0.95, I² = 64%, random effects model, 31 studies) and a 26% reduction in the RR of BCR (pRR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.94, 24,591 patients, I² = 88%, random effects model, 15 studies) among patients with PCa. The subgroup analyses showed that statins could result in 22% reduction in the HR of BCR (pHR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.61 to 0.98, I² = 57%, random effects model) among patients accepting radiotherapy (RT).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that statins have a unique role in the reduction of BCR in patients with PCa after definite treatment, especially RT. In the future, more clinical trials and in vitro and animal experiments are needed to further verify the effects of statins in PCa and the potential mechanisms.

Statin as a therapeutic agent in gastroenterological cancer

Statins inhibit 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, the rate-limiting enzyme of the mevalonate pathway, and are widely used as an effective and safe approach handle hypercholesterolemia. The mevalonate pathway is a vital metabolic pathway that uses acetyl-CoA to generate isoprenoids and sterols that are crucial to tumor growth and progression. Multiple studies have indicated that statins improve patient prognosis in various carcinomas. Basic research on the mechanisms underlying the antitumor effects of statins is underway. The development of new anti-cancer drugs is progressing, but increasing medical costs from drug development have become a major obstacle. Readily available, inexpensive and well-tolerated drugs like statins have not yet been successfully repurposed for cancer treatment. Identifying the cancer patients that may benefit from statins is key to improved patient treatment. This review summarizes recent advances in statin research in cancer and suggests important considerations for the clinical use of statins to improve outcomes for cancer patients.

The association of statin use and biochemical recurrence after curative treatment for prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

: To investigate the association between statin use and biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy (RP) or radiotherapy (RT) as a curative treatment, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed.

METHODS

: We conducted a literature search of online databases for studies assessing BCR associated with statin use in patients with prostate cancer undergoing RP or RT. We performed a pooled analysis of BCR-free survival with subgroup analysis of treatment, cancer risk, and medication.

RESULTS

: We identified 27 studies and found that statin use was associated with a potential tendency to improve BCR-free survival in patients undergoing curative treatment (P = .05). In addition, we revealed that statin use after curative treatment did not improve BCR-free survival (P = .33), whereas statin use could improve BCR-free survival in high-risk patients (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

: Statin use is associated with a potential tendency to improve BCR-free survival in prostate cancer and could reduce BCR in high-risk patients.

Linkage of the CHHiP randomised controlled trial with primary care data: a study investigating ways of supplementing cancer trials and improving evidence-based practice

BACKGROUND

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) are the gold standard for evidence-based practice. However, RCTs can have limitations. For example, translation of findings into practice can be limited by design features, such as inclusion criteria, not accurately reflecting clinical populations. In addition, it is expensive to recruit and follow-up participants in RCTs. Linkage with routinely collected data could offer a cost-effective way to enhance the conduct and generalisability of RCTs. The aim of this study is to investigate how primary care data can support RCTs.

METHODS

Secondary analysis following linkage of two datasets: 1) multicentre CHHiP radiotherapy trial (ISRCTN97182923) and 2) primary care database from the Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre. Comorbidities and medications recorded in CHHiP at baseline, and radiotherapy-related toxicity recorded in CHHiP over time were compared with primary care records. The association of comorbidities and medications with toxicity was analysed with mixed-effects logistic regression.

RESULTS

Primary care records were extracted for 106 out of 2811 CHHiP participants recruited from sites in England (median age 70, range 44 to 82). Complementary information included longitudinal body mass index, blood pressure and cholesterol, as well as baseline smoking and alcohol usage but was limited by the considerable missing data. In the linked sample, 9 (8%) participants were recorded in CHHiP as having a history of diabetes and 38 (36%) hypertension, whereas primary care records indicated incidence prior to trial entry of 11 (10%) and 40 (38%) respectively. Concomitant medications were not collected in CHHiP but available in primary care records. This indicated that 44 (41.5%) men took aspirin, 65 (61.3%) statins, 14 (13.2%) metformin and 46 (43.4%) phosphodiesterase-5-inhibitors at some point before or after trial entry.

CONCLUSIONS

We provide a set of recommendations on linkage and supplementation of trials. Data recorded in primary care are a rich resource and linkage could provide near real-time information to supplement trials and an efficient and cost-effective mechanism for long-term follow-up. In addition, standardised primary care data extracts could form part of RCT recruitment and conduct. However, this is at present limited by the variable quality and fragmentation of primary care data.

Small-molecule drug repurposing to target DNA damage repair and response pathways

For decades genotoxic therapy has been a mainstay in the treatment of cancer, based on the understanding that the deregulated growth and genomic instability that drive malignancy also confer a shared vulnerability. Although chemotherapy and radiation can be curative, only a fraction of patients benefit, while nearly all are subjected to the harmful side-effects. Drug repurposing, defined here as retooling existing drugs and compounds as chemo or radiosensitizers, offers an attractive route to identifying otherwise non-toxic agents that can potentiate the benefits of genotoxic cancer therapy to enhance the therapeutic ratio. This review seeks to highlight recent progress in defining cellular mechanisms of the DNA damage response including damage sensing, chromatin modification, DNA repair, checkpoint signaling, and downstream survival and death pathways, as a framework to determine which drugs and natural products may offer the most potential for repurposing as chemo- and/or radiosensitizers. We point to classical examples and recent progress that have identified drugs that disrupt cellular responses to DNA damage and may offer the greatest clinical potential. The most important next steps may be to initiate prospective clinical trials toward translating these laboratory discoveries to benefit patients.

The effect of anaemia on normal tissue toxicity and survival outcomes in prostate cancer treated with radical radiotherapy and neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation

OBJECTIVE

It has been established that survival and toxicity outcomes in some cancer types could be influenced by haemoglobin (Hb) levels. This study aims to determine if pre-treatment Hb is associated with late toxicity or survival outcomes in prostate cancer.

METHODS

Data from one Phase III randomised controlled trial and one single arm translational trial were analysed. Patients had localized prostate cancer and received ≥70 Gy radiotherapy and neo-adjuvant androgen deprivation between 1997 and 2013.

RESULTS

302 males were included. Median follow-up was 6.8 years for toxicity and 10.3 years for survival outcomes. Patients with Hb below the reference range were more likely to experience Grade 2-3 late gastrointestinal toxicity than patients with Hb within the range (p = 0.050). Neither late genitourinary toxicity, erectile function toxicity, prostate-specific antigen relapse free survival nor overall survival of patients were statistically significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Anaemia in prostate cancer is found in the minority of patients and is usually mild. Prostate cancer patients undergoing radiotherapy with low Hb were more likely to experience Grade 2-3 late gastrointestinal toxicity.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study is one of the first in the published literature to investigate the role of Hb in prostate cancer toxicity and survival. We have found an association between Hb below the reference range and late GI toxicity. Consideration should be given to further investigating patients with iron deficiency anaemia to guide management options and outrule underlying GI pathology before proceeding with radiotherapy treatment.

SPAR - a randomised, placebo-controlled phase II trial of simvastatin in addition to standard chemotherapy and radiation in preoperative treatment for rectal cancer: an AGITG clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Retrospective studies show improved outcomes in colorectal cancer patients if taking statins, including overall survival, pathological response of rectal cancer to preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pCRT), and reduced acute and late toxicities of pelvic radiation. Major tumour regression following pCRT has strong prognostic significance and can be assessed in vivo using MRI-based tumour regression grading (mrTRG) or after surgery using pathological TRG (pathTRG).

METHODS

A double-blind phase 2 trial will randomise 222 patients planned to receive long-course fluoropyrimidine-based pCRT for rectal adenocarcinoma at 18+ sites in New Zealand and Australia. Patients will receive simvastatin 40 mg or placebo daily for 90 days starting 1 week prior to standard pCRT. Pelvic MRI 6 weeks after pCRT will assess mrTRG grading prior to surgery. The primary objective is rates of favourable (grades 1-2) mrTRG following pCRT with simvastatin compared to placebo, considering mrTRG in 4 ordered categories (1, 2, 3, 4-5). Secondary objectives include comparison of: rates of favourable pathTRG in resected tumours; incidence of toxicity; compliance with intended pCRT and trial medication; proportion of patients undergoing surgical resection; cancer outcomes and pathological scores for radiation colitis. Tertiary objectives include: association between mrTRG and pathTRG grouping; inter-observer agreement on mrTRG scoring and pathTRG scoring; studies of T-cell infiltrates in diagnostic biopsies and irradiated resected normal and malignant tissue; and the effect of simvastatin on markers of systemic inflammation (modified Glasgow prognostic score and the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio). Trial recruitment commenced April 2018.

DISCUSSION

When completed this study will be able to observe meaningful differences in measurable tumour outcome parameters and/or toxicity from simvastatin. A positive result will require a larger RCT to confirm and validate the merit of statins in the preoperative management of rectal cancer. Such a finding could also lead to studies of statins in conjunction with chemoradiation in a range of other malignancies, as well as further exploration of possible mechanisms of action and interaction of statins with both radiation and chemotherapy. The translational substudies undertaken with this trial will provisionally explore some of these possible mechanisms, and the tissue and data can be made available for further investigations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ANZ Clinical Trials Register ACTRN12617001087347. (www.anzctr.org.au, registered 26/7/2017) Protocol Version: 1.1 (June 2017).

Assessment of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (Review)

The assessment of the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) is critical in the management of males with prostate cancer (PC). Over the past decades, a comprehensive effort has been focusing on improving risk stratification; a variety of models have been constructed using PC-associated pathological features and molecular alterations occurring at the genome, protein and RNA level. Alterations in RNA expression (lncRNA, miRNA and mRNA) constitute the largest proportion of the biomarkers of BCR. In this article, we systemically review RNA-based BCR biomarkers reported in PubMed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Individual miRNAs, mRNAs, lncRNAs and multi-gene panels, including the commercially available signatures, Oncotype DX and Prolaris, will be discussed; details related to cohort size, hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals will be provided. Mechanistically, these individual biomarkers affect multiple pathways critical to tumorigenesis and progression, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN), Wnt, growth factor receptor, cell proliferation, immune checkpoints and others. This variety in the mechanisms involved not only validates their associations with BCR, but also highlights the need for the coverage of multiple pathways in order to effectively stratify the risk of BCR. Updates of novel biomarkers and their mechanistic insights are considered, which suggests new avenues to pursue in the prediction of BCR. Additionally, the management of patients with BCR and the potential utility of the stratification of the risk of BCR in salvage treatment decision making for these patients are briefly covered. Limitations will also be discussed.

Lovastatin Enhances Cytotoxicity of Temozolomide via Impairing Autophagic Flux in Glioblastoma Cells

Drug resistance to temozolomide (TMZ) contributes to the majority of tumor recurrence and treatment failure in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Autophagy has been reported to play a role in chemoresistance in various types of cancer, including GBM. The anticancer effect of statins is arousing great research interests and has been demonstrated to modulate autophagic function. In this study, we investigated the combinational effects of lovastatin and TMZ on treating U87 and U251 GBM cell lines. Cytotoxicity was measured by MTT and colony formation assays; apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry; the cellular autophagic function was detected by the EGFP-mRFP-LC3 reporter and western blot assay. The results showed that lovastatin might enhance the cytotoxicity of TMZ, increase the TMZ-induced cellular apoptosis, and impair the autophagic flux in GBM cells. Lovastatin triggered autophagy initiation possibly by inhibiting the Akt/mTOR signaling pathway. Moreover, lovastatin might impair the autophagosome-lysosome fusion machinery by suppressing LAMP2 and dynein. These results suggested that lovastatin could enhance the chemotherapy efficacy of TMZ in treating GBM cells. The mechanism may be associated with impaired autophagic flux and thereby the enhancement of cellular apoptosis. Combining TMZ with lovastatin could be a promising strategy for GBM treatment.

Statin use associated with improved overall and cancer specific survival in patients with head and neck cancer

OBJECTIVES

Studies have shown the utility of lipid-lowering agents in improving outcomes in various cancers. We aim to explore how statins affect overall survival and cancer specific survival in head and neck cancer patients using population-based datasets.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare linked dataset, we separated HNC patients into three groups: those with no hyperlipidemia (nH), those with hyperlipidemia and not taking a statin (HnS), and those with hyperlipidemia and taking a statin (H + S). Overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) were compared between the three groups based on disease subsite (oral cavity, oropharynx, and other) using Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression analysis (MVA), controlling for demographic, socioeconomic, staging, treatment, and comorbidity covariates. Using Pearson chi-square analysis, we also compared the incidence of cancer-related toxicity events.

RESULTS

There were 495 nH, 567 HnS, and 530 H + S patients. H + S patients had superior OS and CSS (73.0, 81.2%) relative to nH (58.6, 69.1%) and HnS groups (61.7, 69.2%) (p < 0.01). On MVA, H + S patients showed improved OS (p < 0.01) and CSS (p = 0.04) compared to nH (HR = 1.64, 1.56) and HnS (HR = 1.40, 1.37). MVA stratified by subsite yielded similar results for oral cavity and oropharyngeal disease. Toxicity-related events did not differ significantly between the groups.

CONCLUSION

HNC patients with hyperlipidemia and taking a statin demonstrated improved outcomes compared to nH and HnS patients, further supporting statins' role as a potential adjuvant anti-neoplastic agent in HNC. Further prospective studies to investigate the impact of statins on HNC outcomes are warranted.

Survival benefit of statins in older patients with rectal cancer: A Swedish population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Increasing evidence suggests that statins may have antitumor effects but their role in rectal cancer appears inconclusive. The aim of this study was to investigate whether statins may have an impact on survival of older and younger patients with rectal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study included 238 patients ≥70 years and 227 patients <70 years old, from the Southeast Health Care Region of Sweden, who were diagnosed with rectal adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2013.

RESULTS

In the older group (n = 238), statin use at the time of diagnosis was related to better cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS), compared to non-use (CSS: Hazard Ratio (HR), 0.37; 95% CI, 0.19-0.72; P = .003; OS: HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39-0.96; P = .032). In the older group with stages I-III disease (n = 199), statin use was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) compared to non use (HR, 0.18; 95% CI, 0.06-0.59; P = .005). The improvement of CSS, OS and DFS remained significant after adjusting for potential confounders. In the older group with stage III disease, statin users had better CSS and DFS compared to non-users (log rank P = .043; log-rank P = .028, respectively). In the older group with short course radiotherapy, statin use was related to better CSS (log-rank P = .032). No such association was present in the younger group.

CONCLUSION

Statin use was related to improved survival in older patients with rectal cancer. This observation is important given the low cost and safety of statins as a drug.

Power analysis for multivariable Cox regression models

In power analysis for multivariable Cox regression models, variance of the estimated log-hazard ratio for the treatment effect is usually approximated by inverting the expected null information matrix. Because, in many typical power analysis settings, assumed true values of the hazard ratios are not necessarily close to unity, the accuracy of this approximation is not theoretically guaranteed. To address this problem, the null variance expression in power calculations can be replaced with one of the alternative expressions derived under the assumed true value of the hazard ratio for the treatment effect. This approach is explored analytically and by simulations in the present paper. We consider several alternative variance expressions and compare their performance to that of the traditional null variance expression. Theoretical analysis and simulations demonstrate that, whereas the null variance expression performs well in many nonnull settings, it can also be very inaccurate, substantially underestimating, or overestimating the true variance in a wide range of realistic scenarios, particularly those where the numbers of treated and control subjects are very different and the true hazard ratio is not close to one. The alternative variance expressions have much better theoretical properties, confirmed in simulations. The most accurate of these expressions has a relatively simple form. It is the sum of inverse expected event counts under treatment and under control scaled up by a variance inflation factor.

Influence of serum cholesterol level and statin treatment on prostate cancer aggressiveness

Both cholesterol levels and the use of statins have been described to influence the development and prognosis of prostate cancer (PC). In this retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of consecutive cases from a tertiary referral center we evaluated an association between hypercholesterolemia (≥5.0mmol/l), the use of statins, and advanced/aggressive PC in 767 men with histologically confirmed, clinically localized PC awaiting radical prostatectomy. We found that patients with HCE (n=287, 37.4%) had a significantly higher incidence of poorly differentiated PC (Gleason score ≥7b, 81.1% vs. 4.9%), advanced local tumor stage (≥pT3, 57.7% vs. 22.2%), and nodal involvement (19.8% vs. 1.6%). Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified hypercholesterolemia as a risk factor for aggressive and/or advanced PC (OR 2.01, p<0.001) whereas statin intake showed an odds ratio of 0.49 (p=0.005) indicating a negative association with high-risk PC. Despite a limited number of patients using statins (~9.5%), adjusted and weighed multivariate logistic regression models revealed that preoperative hypercholesterolemia is associated with a diagnosis of high-risk PC which is negatively influenced by statin intake.

HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibition Delays DNA Repair and Promotes Senescence After Tumor Irradiation

Despite significant advances in combinations of radiotherapy and chemotherapy, altered fractionation schedules and image-guided radiotherapy, many cancer patients fail to benefit from radiation. A prevailing hypothesis is that targeting repair of DNA double strand breaks (DSB) can enhance radiation effects in the tumor and overcome therapeutic resistance without incurring off-target toxicities. Unrepaired DSBs can block cancer cell proliferation, promote cancer cell death, and induce cellular senescence. Given the slow progress to date translating novel DSB repair inhibitors as radiosensitizers, we have explored drug repurposing, a proven route to improving speed, costs, and success rates of drug development. In a prior screen where we tracked resolution of ionizing radiation-induced foci (IRIF) as a proxy for DSB repair, we had identified pitavastatin (Livalo), an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor commonly used for lipid lowering, as a candidate radiosensitizer. Here, we report that pitavastatin and other lipophilic statins are potent inhibitors of DSB repair in breast and melanoma models both in vitro and in vivo When combined with ionizing radiation, pitavastatin increased persistent DSBs, induced senescence, and enhanced acute effects of radiation on radioresistant melanoma tumors. shRNA knockdown implicated HMG-CoA reductase, farnesyl diphosphate synthase, and protein farnesyl transferase in IRIF resolution, DSB repair, and senescence. These data confirm on-target activity of statins, although via inhibition of protein prenylation rather than cholesterol biosynthesis. In light of prior studies demonstrating enhanced efficacy of radiotherapy in patients taking statins, this work argues for clinical evaluation of lipophilic statins as nontoxic radiosensitizers to enhance the benefits of image-guided radiotherapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(2); 407-18. ©2017 AACRSee all articles in this MCT Focus section, "Developmental Therapeutics in Radiation Oncology."

Linking CHHiP prostate cancer RCT with GP records: A study proposal to investigate the effect of co-morbidities and medications on long-term symptoms and radiotherapy-related toxicity

Background

Patients receiving cancer treatment often have one or more co-morbid conditions that are treated pharmacologically. Co-morbidities are recorded in clinical trials usually only at baseline. However, co-morbidities evolve and new ones emerge during cancer treatment. The interaction between multi-morbidity and cancer recovery is significant but poorly understood.

Purpose

To investigate the effect of co-morbidities (e.g. cardiovascular and diabetes) and medications (e.g. statins, antihypertensives, metformin) on radiotherapy-related toxicity and long-term symptoms in order to identify potential risk factors. The possible protective effect of medications such as statins or antihypertensives in reducing radiotherapy-related toxicity will also be explored.

Methods

Two datasets will be linked. (1) CHHiP (Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer) randomised control trial. CHHiP contains pelvic symptoms and radiation-related toxicity reported by patients and clinicians. (2) GP (General Practice) data from RCGP RSC (Royal College of General Practitioners Research and Surveillance Centre). The GP records of CHHiP patients will be extracted, including cardiovascular co-morbidities, diabetes and prescription medications. Statistical analysis of the combined dataset will be performed in order to investigate the effect.

Conclusions

Linking two sources of healthcare data is an exciting area of big healthcare data research. With limited data in clinical trials (not all clinical trials collect information on co-morbidities or medications) and limited lengths of follow-up, linking different sources of information is increasingly needed to investigate long-term outcomes. With increasing pressures to collect detailed information in clinical trials (e.g. co-morbidities, medications), linkage to routinely collected data offers the potential to support efficient conduct of clinical trials.

Effects of statins on cancer mortality and progression: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 95 cohorts including 1,111,407 individuals

Statins have been implicated in the regulation of cell proliferation, apoptosis and tumor progression in cancer patients and statin use at the time of cancer diagnosis has been reported to be associated with reduced cancer risk and improved survival, irrespective of concomitant anti-cancer therapy. A systematic literature search of relevant databases through May 2015 was conducted to identify studies assessing the prognostic impact of statin use on prognostic outcomes in cancer patients. Literature search identified 95 cohort studies that met the inclusion criteria. A meta-analysis of 55 articles showed that statin use was significantly associated with decreased risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.70, 95% Cl 0.66 to 0.74) compared with nonusers. The observed pooled estimates were retained for cancer-specific mortality (HR 0.60, 95% Cl 0.47 to 0.77), progression-free survival (HR 0.67, 95% Cl 0.56 to 0.81), recurrence-free survial (HR 0.74, 95% Cl 0.65 to 0.83) and disease-free survival (HR 0.53, 95% Cl 0.40 to 0.72). These associations almost remained consistent across those outcomes when stratified by publication type, tumour location, study design, sample size, initiation of statins, disease stage, research country, follow-up duration or research hospital involved. Subgroup analyses according to initiation of statins showed postdiagnosis statin users (HR 0.65, 95% Cl 0.54 to 0.79) gained significantly more recurrence-free survival benefit than prediagnosis statin users (HR 0.86, 95% Cl 0.77 to 0.96) (p for interaction = 0.018). Statin therapy has potential survival benefit for patients with malignancy. Further large-scale prospective studies emphasising survival outcomes of individual cancer type are strongly encouraged.

Statins and Metformin Use Is Associated with Lower PSA Levels in Prostate Cancer Patients Presenting for Radiation Therapy

Background

A possible association between the level of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and the use of some commonly prescribed medications has been reported in recent studies. Most of these studies were carried out in general populations of men who were screened for prostate cancer using the PSA test. We reported on the association between the initial PSA level and the use of statins, metformin and alpha-blockers in patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer and presented for radiation therapy.

Methods

Three hundred and eighty one patients treated between the years of 2000-2005 and 2009-2012 were included in this retrospective study. The information about statin, metformin and alpha-blockers use was recorded immediately prior to treatment. Differences in PSA levels prior to treatment by medication status were estimated using univa-riate and multivariate linear regression on log PSA values.

Results

Compared with men who were not on these medications, the PSA level at presentation was 20% lower for statin users (p = 0.002) and 33% lower for metformin users (p = 0.004). We did not observe statistically significant associations between the use of statins or metformin and cancer stage, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk score, or therapy outcome. A statistically significant association between the NCCN risk score and the use of alpha-blockers was observed (p = 0.002).

Conclusions

We found that statins and metformin were associated with lower PSA levels in prostate cancer patients to an extent that could influence management decisions. We found no statistically significant associations between the use of these medications and treatment outcomes.

A validated tumor control probability model based on a meta-analysis of low, intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer patients treated by photon, proton, or carbon-ion radiotherapy

PURPOSE

A fully heterogeneous population averaged mechanistic tumor control probability (TCP) model is appropriate for the analysis of external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). This has been accomplished for EBRT photon treatment of intermediate-risk prostate cancer. Extending the TCP model for low and high-risk patients would be beneficial in terms of overall decision making. Furthermore, different radiation treatment modalities such as protons and carbon-ions are becoming increasingly available. Consequently, there is a need for a complete TCP model.

METHODS

A TCP model was fitted and validated to a primary endpoint of 5-year biological no evidence of disease clinical outcome data obtained from a review of the literature for low, intermediate, and high-risk prostate cancer patients (5218 patients fitted, 1088 patients validated), treated by photons, protons, or carbon-ions. The review followed the preferred reporting item for systematic reviews and meta-analyses statement. Treatment regimens include standard fractionation and hypofractionation treatments. Residual analysis and goodness of fit statistics were applied.

RESULTS

The TCP model achieves a good level of fit overall, linear regression results in a p-value of <0.000 01 with an adjusted-weighted-R(2) value of 0.77 and a weighted root mean squared error (wRMSE) of 1.2%, to the fitted clinical outcome data. Validation of the model utilizing three independent datasets obtained from the literature resulted in an adjusted-weighted-R(2) value of 0.78 and a wRMSE of less than 1.8%, to the validation clinical outcome data. The weighted mean absolute residual across the entire dataset is found to be 5.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

This TCP model fitted and validated to clinical outcome data, appears to be an appropriate model for the inclusion of all clinical prostate cancer risk categories, and allows evaluation of current EBRT modalities with regard to tumor control prediction.

The current evidence on statin use and prostate cancer prevention: are we there yet?

An increasing amount of data supports an inverse association between statin use and cancer risk. The findings for prostate cancer, particularly advanced disease, are the most promising of all cancers studied. Use of these agents seems to also be associated with improved prostate- cancer-specific survival, particularly in men undergoing radiotherapy, suggesting usefulness of statins in secondary and tertiary prevention. Some study results might be influenced by increased PSA screening and health-conscious behaviour in statin users but these factors are unlikely to completely account for observed beneficial effects. The epidemiological evidence is supported by preclinical studies that show that statins directly inhibit prostate cancer development and progression in cell-based and animal-based models. The antineoplastic effect of statins might arise from a number of cholesterol-mediated and non-cholesterol-mediated mechanisms that affect pathways essential for cancer formation and progression. Understanding these mechanisms is instrumental in drug discovery research for the development of future prostate cancer therapeutics, as well as in designing clinical trials to test a role for statins in prostate cancer prevention. Currently, sufficient data are lacking to support the use of statins for the primary prevention of prostate cancer and further research is clearly warranted. Secondary and tertiary prevention trials in men who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer might soon be performed.

Statin Use in Prostate Cancer: An Update

3-Hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, known as statins, are commonly prescribed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia and cardiovascular disease. A systematic review was conducted using the keywords “statin and prostate cancer” within the title search engines including PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for relevant research work published between 2004 and December 2015. Although still premature, accumulating clinical evidence suggests that statin use may be beneficial in the prevention and/or treatment of prostate cancer. These human studies consist of meta-analyses of secondary endpoints obtained from randomized, controlled cardiovascular disease clinical trials of statins, patient database, observational studies, and a few, small case–control studies, directly addressing statin use on prostate cancer pathology and recurrence. This review summarizes and discusses the recent clinical literature on statins and prostate cancer with a recommendation to move forward with randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials, investigating the use of statins. Additional preclinical testing of statins on prostate cancer cell lines and in vivo models is needed to elucidate pathways and determine its efficacy for prevention and/or treatment of prostate cancer, more specifically, the difference in the effectiveness of lipophilic versus hydrophilic statins in prostate cancer.

The effect of statins on prostate cancer recurrence and mortality after definitive therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In this work, we aim to further analyze the association of statins use with biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer (PCa) and PCa-specific mortality after definitive therapy. A systematic literature search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE through Jul 2015 was conducted. Pooled Hazard ratio (HR) estimates with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model. STATA version 10 (Stata corporation, college station, TX) was employed to conduct all statistical analyses. A total of 22 and 8 studies contributed to the biochemical recurrence analysis and PCa-specific mortality, respectively. 13 trials were included for BCR-free survival analysis. The combined result showed statins users had lowered 12% BCR risk of PCa compared with non-users (HR = 0.88, 95%CI: 0.765–0.998) (p < 0.05). The association was null among the men who underwent radical prostatectomy as primary therapy (HR = 0.96, 95%CI: 0.83–1.09), while the improved outcomes had be seen among patients who received radiation therapy (HR = 0.67, 95%CI: 0.48–0.86). After excluding the patients undergoing ADT, participants did not benefit from statins use (HR = 0.94, 95%CI: 0.77–1.11). Meanwhile, long-term statins using did not alter recurrence risk. A lower risk of prostate cancer-specific mortality was observed among statins users (HR = 0.68, 95%CI: 0.56–0.80). There was a plausible trend towards increasing the BCR-free survival rate among statins users.

The Incidence and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence Following Radical Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer in Men on Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors (ACEIs) or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers (ARBs)

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are linked to prostate cancer, but their effect on biochemical recurrence (BR) remains unknown. Our aims were to investigate the incidence and risk of BR in men on ACEIs/ARBs after radical radiotherapy with adjuvant∖neoadjuvant hormone treatment.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A propensity score analysis of 558 men was conducted. Men were stratified into 3 groups: hypertensive men on ACEIs/ARBs (as a study group), non-hypertensive men not on ACEIs/ARBs, and hypertensive men not on ACEIs/ARBs (both as a control group). The multivariate analysis of variance, chi-square, Kruskal-Wallis, analysis of variance, risk ratio, confidence interval, Kaplan-Meier plots, and log-rank tests were used.

RESULTS

The mean age and follow-up were 68.51 and 3.33 years, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of BR among the treatment groups (P < .001). The incidence of BR was significantly lower in hypertensive men taking ACEIs/ARBs than in non-hypertensive men not taking ACEIs/ARBs (P < .001) or in hypertensive men not taking ACEIs/ARBs (P < .009). The incidence of BR was significantly lower in hypertensive men not taking ACEIs/ARBs than in non-hypertensive men not taking ACEIs/ARBs (P < .013). The risk ratio (RR) of BR in the group of hypertensive men taking ACEIs/ARBs was significantly lower than in the group of non-hypertensive men not taking ACEIs/ARBs (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.86; P < .001) and in the group of hypertensive men not taking ACEIs/ARBs (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.67-0.91; P < .001). The time-to-event analysis revealed that the group of hypertensive men taking ACEIs/ARBs was significantly different compared with the control groups (P < .031).

CONCLUSION

Men who were taking ACEIs/ARBs had significantly lower incidence of BR after radical radiotherapy with hormone treatment. The intake of ACEIs/ARBs was associated with reduced risk of BR.

Effect of statin and aspirin use on toxicity and pathological complete response rate of neo-adjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer

AIM

To retrospectively evaluate the potential impact of statin and aspirin use on acute toxicity and pathological complete response (pCR) rate in rectal cancer patients receiving neo-adjuvant long-course radiation therapy (LCRT) with concurrent chemotherapy.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing neo-adjuvant LCRT for rectal adenocarcinoma at the Regional Cancer Treatment Service between 1 September 2007 and 1 June 2011. Data obtained include demographic details; date and radiological TNM stage at diagnosis; medication taken at time of RT; toxicity during LCRT; and surgical histology to determine if a pCR was obtained following LCRT.

RESULTS

Neo-adjuvant LCRT was administered to 142 patients for rectal cancer during this period; concurrent chemotherapy was omitted in 13 due to significant comorbidities. TNM stage was 2 or 3 radiologically at diagnosis in 127 (89.4%) of patients. At the time of LCRT, 23% were taking a statin and 25% were taking aspirin. Of 135 assessable patients, 34 (13%) achieved a pCR at surgery. On logistic regression, pCR was not significantly associated with the use of chemotherapy, statins, aspirin, other NSAIDs, T-stage or N-stage. There was no significant correlation between statin or aspirin use with bladder or rectal toxicity. Actuarial time to maximum rectal toxicity was not different in statin users or nonusers.

CONCLUSION

In contrast to other larger retrospective series, this study did not find improvements in toxicity or pCR rate through statin or aspirin use in rectal cancer patients undergoing LCRT. Their potential benefits in this setting would be best studied prospectively in a large randomized trial.

Association between statins and clinical outcomes among men with prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mixed evidence exists regarding the effects of statins among men with prostate cancer. We aimed to determine the association between statin use and clinical outcomes in prostate cancer using systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

Original articles published until second week of August 2015 were searched in electronic databases (Medline-Ovid, Pubmed, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest) for studies on statin use in prostate cancer. The main clinical outcomes for the review were: biochemical recurrence (BCR), metastases, and all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality. Meta-analysis was performed to calculate the pooled hazard ratio (pHR) and their 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Heterogeneity between the studies was examined using I(2) statistics. Meta-regression was performed, wherever significant heterogeneity was found in the meta-analyses, to find factors associated with poor outcomes, and sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of findings. The analyses were conducted using RevMan v5.3, STATA v14, and R v3.1.1.

RESULTS

Out of the 1002 retrieved citations, 34 observational cohort studies met the inclusion criteria. Statin use was associated with a 21% reduction in the risk of BCR among those treated with radiation therapy (pHR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.65, 0.95, P-value=0.01, 10 studies, I(2)=54%), whereas it was not associated with the BCR among those treated with radical prostatectomy (pHR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.09, P-value=0.43, 15 studies, I(2)=65%). Statin use was associated with a 22% reduction in the risk of metastases (pHR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.68, 0.87, P-value<0.001, 6 studies, I(2)=0%), and a 24% reduction in risk of both all-cause mortality (pHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.91, P-value=0.004, 6 studies, I(2)=71%), and prostate cancer-specific mortality (pHR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.64, 0.89, P-value=0.0007, 5 studies, I(2)=40%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review found that statin significantly reduced the all-cause and prostate cancer-specific mortality and improved the BCR in certain subgroup of men with prostate cancer. In future, randomized controlled trials should be conducted to establish efficacy of statins among men with prostate cancer.

Statin-Based Palliative Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Most hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients worldwide do not receive curative treatments. Alternative treatments for most HCC patients include palliative treatments, such as transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Although statins may be a chemopreventive treatment option for reducing hepatitis B virus (HBV)- and hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related HCC risks, their therapeutic effects are unknown. This study evaluated the effects of statin on HCC patients receiving palliative treatment.Data from the National Health Insurance claims database and cancer registry databases of The Collaboration Center of Health Information Application, Taiwan, were analyzed. We included HCC patients who were treated between January 1, 2001, and December 31, 2010, and followed them from the index date to December 31, 2012. The inclusion criteria were presence of HBV carrier-related HCC, age >20 years, and having received TACE, radiotherapy, or chemotherapy as palliative treatment. The exclusion criteria were cancer diagnosis before HCC was confirmed, surgery, liver transplantation, radiofrequency ablation, or percutaneous ethanol injection as curative treatment, missing sex-related information, HCC diagnosis before HBV, and age <20 years. We enrolled 20,200 HCC patients.The median follow-up duration was 1.66 years (interquartile range, 0.81). In total, 1988 and 18,212 patients received palliative treatment with and without statin use, respectively. HCC patients who received palliative treatment with statin use had lower HCC-specific deaths in all stages than those who received palliative treatment without statin use (P = 0.0001, 0.0002, 0.0012, and 0.0002, and relative risk (RR) = 0.763, 0.775, 0.839, and 0.718, for stages I-IV, respectively). In all-cause and HCC-specific deaths, decreasing trends (P for trend <0.0001) of adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) were observed in all stages with no treatment, statin use only, palliative treatment only, and palliative treatment plus statin use. The aHRs of all-cause and HCC-specific deaths increased with the progress in cancer stage and reduced with the use of advanced therapeutic modalities (P for trend <0.0001). Differences in HBV- and non-HBV-related HCC were solely due to statin use. Statin use alone reduced HCC-specific deaths by 36% in non-HBV-related HCC in stage I and 50% in HBV-related HCC in stages II and III. With a relatively substantial reduction in mortality, the therapeutic effects of statin use were stronger in HBV-related HCC than in non-HBV-related HCC.Palliative treatments are critical for HCC patients. Multiple therapeutic methods with statin use reduced the mortality risk. Statins prolong the survival of patients with advanced HCC receiving palliative treatment, thus demonstrating its therapeutic value as an adjuvant treatment. Furthermore, statin-based palliative treatment in early stage HCC remarkably reduced the number of deaths. For patients who cannot tolerate palliative treatments, statin use only might possibly reduce mortality, particularly in HBV-related early stage HCC patients (>50% reduction in HCC deaths).

The Prognostic Effect of Statin Use on Urologic Cancers: An Updated Meta-Analysis of 35 Observational Studies

Recent studies suggest that statin may benefit cancer prognosis, especially through its radiosensitization effect. But controversy exists in other studies. Hence, we performed a meta-analysis of results from 35 studies to evaluate the effect of statin use on urologic cancers.We conducted computerized search from PubMed, Embase, and ISI Web of Knowledge through May 2015, screened the retrieved references, and collected and evaluated relevant information. We extracted and synthesized corresponding hazard ratios (HR) and confidence interval (CI) by using Review Manager 5.3 and STATA 13. This review was registered at PROSPERO with registration No. CRD42015020171.We selected total 35 retrospective studies and conducted a meta-analysis of results from these studies. The pooled results suggested no benefit of statin use to bladder cancer and renal cell carcinoma, except overall survival [HR = 0.81, 95% CI: 0.69-0.96]. However, significant improvement of prostate cancer prognosis including overall survival [HR = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.70-0.97] and cancer-specific survival [HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.59-0.83] was indicated, but not including tumor progression [HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.62-1.14]. Statin use improved biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer in radiotherapy patients [HR = 0.68, 95% CI: 0.54-0.85] but not in radical prostatectomy patients [HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.82-1.15].Current evidence suggests no benefit of statin use to bladder cancer and renal cell carcinoma, except in overall survival. While statin use benefited prostate cancer patients in overall survival, cancer-specific survival but not in tumor progression; it also improved biochemical recurrence in radiotherapy patients but not in radical patients. To verify these results, randomized controlled trials are necessary.

Predictors of Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Treatment for Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Pathologic complete response (pCR) to neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) for rectal cancer is associated with better long-term outcomes, and is used as an early indicator of response to novel agents. To assess the rate and predictors of pCR, we performed a retrospective multicenter study involving 5 Canadian cancer centers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cancer registries identified consecutive patients with locally advanced rectal adenocarcinoma from the Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Cross Cancer Institute, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre, and the Dr H. Bliss Murphy Cancer Centre who received fluoropyrimidine-based CRT and had curative intent surgery from 2005 to 2012. Patient, tumor, and therapy characteristics were correlated with response.

RESULTS

Of the 891 patients included, 885 patients had pCR data available. Of the included patients, 161 (18.2%) had a pCR to CRT, and 724 (81.8%) did not. Patients with a pCR had a lower pretreatment carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level, and higher hemoglobin level in univariate analysis. In multivariable analysis, statin use at baseline (odds ratio [OR], 1.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-2.92; P = .04), lower pretreatment CEA level (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.06; P = .03), and distance closer to anal verge (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.15; P = .04) were significant predictors of pCR. The 3-year disease-free survival was 86% in those with a pCR versus 62.5% in those without a pCR (P < .0001) and pCR was associated with improved overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.17-0.51; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Lower pretreatment CEA level, proximity to anal verge, and statin use are predictors of pCR in our large retrospective cohort. Clinical trials to investigate statins combined with neoadjuvant CRT might be warranted.

Statin use and mortality in cancer patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have examined the effect of statin use on the mortality in cancer patients, but the results are inconsistent. A meta-analysis was performed to assess the association with all available studies.

METHODS

Relevant studies were identified by searching PubMed and EMBASE to April 2015. We calculated the summary hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models. We estimated combined HRs associated with defined increments of statin use, using random-effects meta-analysis and dose-response meta-regression models.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine cohort studies and two case-control studies involving 990,649 participants were included. The results showed that patients who used statins after diagnosis had a HR of 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72-0.91) for all-cause mortality compared to non-users. Those who used statin after diagnosis (vs. non-users) had a HR of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.66-0.88) for cancer-specific mortality. Prediagnostic exposure to statin was associated with both all-cause mortality (HR=0.79, 95% CI: 0.74-0.85) and cancer-specific mortality (HR=0.69, 95% CI: 0.60-0.79). Stratifying by cancer type, the three largest cancer-type subgroups were colorectal, prostate and breast cancer and all showed a benefit from statin use. HRs per 365 defined daily doses increment were 0.80 (95% CI: 0.69-0.92) for all-cause mortality and 0.77 (95% CI: 0.67-0.89) for cancer-specific mortality. A 1year increment in duration only conferred a borderline decreased risk of death.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the average effect of statin use, both postdiagnosis and prediagnosis, is beneficial for overall survival and cancer-specific survival.

Statin use after radical prostatectomy reduces biochemical recurrence in men with prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

The impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence (BCR) of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy (RP) is controversial.

METHODS

In 2,137 consecutive RP patients between 1998 and 2011 at Asan Medical Center, we aimed to assess the presence and impact of statin use according to types (hydrophilic vs. hydrophobic), dose equivalents (DEs), and postoperative duration of usage (<18, 18-36, >36 months). Between non-users and preoperative or postoperative users, clinicopathological characteristics, and impact of statin use on BCR were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards model. Mean (range) follow-up was 39.4 (8-183) months.

RESULTS

Compared to non-users, preoperative users had lower PSA (5.8 vs. 7 ng/ml), but the rates of organ confined disease, pathologic Gleason score (GS) or positive surgical margin (PSM) were not different. After adjusting for pathologic stage, postoperative statin use was associated with a higher BCR-free survival. In multivariate analysis, ≤36 months' statin use independently decreased the risk of BCR along with PSA, pathologic GS, pathologic stage, and PSM. Risk reduction was observed especially in patients with pathologic GS ≥ 7 (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.13-0.59, P = 0.001), NSM disease (HR 0.18, 95% CI 0.05-0.63, P = 0.007), or PSA ≥ 10.0 ng/ml (HR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.81, P = 0.018). Increasing duration of use nullified the effect. Preoperative statin use did not demonstrate significant risk reduction for BCR in any of the stratified multivariate models.

CONCLUSION

In Korean men undergoing RP, preoperative statin use was not associated with different pathologic outcome. However, postoperative statin use until 36 months decreased the risk of BCR independently especially in patients with high-risk disease.

Statin use not associated with improved outcomes in patients treated with brachytherapy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the association between statin use and prostate cancer outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk patients treated with brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1998 and 2010, 754 men with National Comprehensive Cancer Network intermediate- (n = 627) and high-risk (n = 127) prostate cancer were treated with prostate brachytherapy at our institution. Patients received either low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy as monotherapy or in combination with supplemental external beam radiotherapy. Two hundred eighty-five patients (37.8%) also received androgen-deprivation therapy. Two hundred seventy-three men (36.2%) were identified as taking statin medication before initiating radiation therapy. Prostate-specific antigen relapse-free survival (PSA-RFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and overall survival were compared using log-rank tests. Associations of patient and treatment characteristics with outcomes were analyzed with univariate and multivariate regression. The median followup was 48 months.

RESULTS

The 8-year PSA-RFS for intermediate-risk, high-risk, and all patients was 92.2%, 64.1%, and 87.7%, respectively. The 8-year DMFS was 97.1%, 82.9%, and 94.9%, respectively. The 8-year overall survival for the entire cohort was 86.6%. There were no significant differences between statin users and nonusers when stratified by risk group, nor when analyzed as a full cohort. On multivariate analysis, Gleason score 4 + 3 = 7 and >7 were significantly associated with worse PSA-RFS (p ≤ 0.003 and <0.001, respectively). Gleason score > 7 (p = 0.008) and the use of neoadjuvant androgen-deprivation therapy (p = 0.03) was associated with worse DMFS. Statin use did not significantly impact PSA-RFS or DMFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment statin use is not associated with improved outcomes in intermediate- and high-risk patients undergoing prostate brachytherapy-based regimens for prostate cancer.

Novel prospects of statins as therapeutic agents in cancer

Statins are well known competitive inhibitors of hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase enzyme (HMG-CoA reductase), thus traditionally used as cholesterol-lowering agents. In recent years, more and more effects of statins have been revealed. Nowadays alterations of lipid metabolism have been increasingly recognized as a hallmark of cancer cells. Consequently, much attention has been directed toward the potential of statins as therapeutic agents in the oncological field. Accumulated in vitro and in vivo clinical evidence point out the role of statins in a variety of human malignancies, in regulating tumor cell growth and anti-tumor immune response. Herein, we summarize and discuss, in light of the most recent observations, the anti-tumor effects of statins, underpinning the detailed mode of action and looking for their true significance in cancer prevention and treatment, to determine if and in which case statin repositioning could be really justified for neoplastic diseases.

Statins: protectors or pretenders in prostate cancer?

The role of statin therapy in prostate cancer (PCa) prevention and treatment is plagued by controversy. This critical review of published clinical series reveals several caveats in earlier studies, which reported no benefit. Recent studies that adjust for confounding factors have demonstrated statin therapy to be associated with PCa prevention and favorable clinical outcomes. Developed as inhibitors of cholesterol synthesis, the expected mechanism of statin action is systemic cholesterol reduction. By lowering circulating cholesterol, statins indirectly reduce cellular cholesterol levels in multiple cell types, impacting on membrane microdomains and steroidogenesis. Although non-cholesterol mechanisms of statin action have been proposed, they are limited by the uncertainties surrounding in vivo tissue statin concentrations.

Statin use is associated with decreased prostate cancer recurrence in men treated with brachytherapy

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Recent in vitro and in vivo evidence has suggested that statin medications may have anticancer activity. We sought to determine whether statin use was associated with improved clinical outcome in men treated with brachytherapy for prostate cancer.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A database of men with prostate cancer treated with permanent Iodine-125 brachytherapy between January 1999 and February 2009 was retrospectively analyzed. Standard guidelines (i.e., American Brachytherapy Society selection criteria) were used for selecting patients for brachytherapy. Biochemical failure was defined using the Phoenix definition.

RESULTS

From a total of 247 men with prostate adenocarcinoma treated with brachytherapy, 174 patients (70 %) were identified as using statin medications, either during initial visit or during follow-up. Median PSA follow-up was 51 months after date of implant (range 9.4-140.35). Overall biochemical failure rate was 7.3 % (18 patients). On univariate analysis, statin use was associated with significantly improved freedom from biochemical failure [hazard ratio (HR) 0.28; 95 % CI 0.10-0.72; p < 0.01 by log-rank test]. In multivariate Cox analysis performed with the variables statin use, pretreatment PSA, clinical T stage, Gleason score, and D90 or V100, statin use remained significantly associated with improved freedom from biochemical failure (HR 0.288; 95 % CI 0.086-0.886; p = 0.0299).

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use was associated with a significant improvement in freedom from biochemical failure in this cohort of men treated with brachytherapy for prostate cancer. Further investigation into the favorable effect of statin use on brachytherapy and radiation therapy in general is warranted, including prospective trials.

Does Statin or ASA Affect Survival When Prostate Cancer Is Treated with External Beam Radiation Therapy?

Background. Prior studies evaluating the effect of statins or acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) on the survival of men receiving prostate cancer were treatment have reported conflicting results, and have not adjusted for comorbidity. Our aim is to investigate the influence of statins and ASA on prostate cancer survival, when comorbidity is adjusted for, in men treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer. Methods. A cohort of 3851 patients with prostate cancer treated with curative EBRT ± androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) between 2000 and 2007. Stage, treatment, medication use, and Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) scores were analyzed. Results. Median followup was 8.4 years. Mean age was 70.3 years. Neoadjuvant ADT was used in 67%. Statins were used in 23%, ASA in 24%, and both in 11%. Comorbidity scores were 0 in 65%, 1 in 25%, and ≥2 in 10% of patients. Statin and ASA use were associated with increased age and comorbidity. Although statin and ASA use were significantly associated with improved prostate cancer specific survival (PCSS) on univariate analysis, neither were on multivariate analysis. Conclusion. Neither statin nor ASA use impacted PCSS on multivariate competing risks analysis. Survival was impacted by increased comorbidity as well as statin and ASA use.

Use of statins and the risk of death in patients with prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To determine whether the use of statins after prostate cancer diagnosis is associated with a decreased risk of cancer-related mortality and all-cause mortality and to assess whether this association is modified by prediagnostic use of statins.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cohort of 11,772 men newly diagnosed with nonmetastatic prostate cancer between April 1, 1998, and December 31, 2009, followed until October 1, 2012, was identified using a large population-based electronic database from the United Kingdom. Time-dependent Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs of mortality outcomes associated with postdiagnostic use of statins, lagged by 1 year to account for latency considerations and to minimize reverse causality, and considering effect modification by prediagnostic use of statins.

RESULTS

During a mean follow-up time of 4.4 years (standard deviation, 2.9 years), 3,499 deaths occurred, including 1,791 from prostate cancer. Postdiagnostic use of statins was associated with a decreased risk of prostate cancer mortality (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.88) and all-cause mortality (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.78 to 0.95). These decreased risks of prostate cancer mortality and all-cause mortality were more pronounced in patients who also used statins before diagnosis (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.74; and HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.81, respectively), with weaker effects in patients who initiated the treatment only after diagnosis (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.71 to 0.96; and HR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.82 to 1.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Overall, the use of statins after diagnosis was associated with a decreased risk in prostate cancer mortality. However, this effect was stronger in patients who also used statins before diagnosis.

Impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence in patients treated with radical prostatectomy

BACKGROUND

The impact of statin use on biochemical recurrence (BCR) in patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) remains controversial.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 6842 patients who underwent RP for clinically localized prostate cancer (PC) between 2000 and 2011. Uni- and multivariable cox regression models addressed the association of statin use with BCR.

RESULTS

Overall, 2275 (33.3%) patients used statins. Statin users were older and had a higher rate of positive surgical margins than patients not using statins (P-values 0.05). Within a median follow-up of 25 months (interquartile range: 8-42 months), 778 (11.4%) patients experienced BCR. Actuarial estimate 5-years BCR-free survival was 82%±1 for patients without statin use and 84±1% for patients using statins (P=0.05); statin use was not associated with BCR (hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.03, P=0.10) after adjusting for the effects of standard clinicopathologic features.

CONCLUSIONS

In PC patients undergoing RP, statin use was not independently associated with lower risk of BCR.

Statin use in relation to prostate cancer outcomes in a population-based patient cohort study

BACKGROUND

We investigated associations between statin use begun before prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and PCa recurrence/progression and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) in a prospective, population-based cohort study.

METHODS

The analysis included 1,001 PCa patients diagnosed in 2002-2005 in King County, Washington. Statin use was assessed at the time of diagnosis using a detailed in-person interview. Prostate cancer recurrence/progression events and cause-specific survival were ascertained from a follow-up survey and the SEER registry. Multivariable competing risk and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the risk of PCa outcomes according to categories of statin use.

RESULTS

Of the 1,001 PCa patients in our study, 289 men were ever users of statin drugs. During follow-up, we identified 151 PCa recurrence/progression events and 123 total deaths, including 39 PCa-specific deaths. In unadjusted analysis, the risk of PCSM was significantly lower for statin users compared to non-users (1% vs. 5% at 10 years; P < 0.01). In multivariable analysis, the adjusted hazard ratio of PCSM for statin users versus non-users was 0.19 (95% CI: 0.06, 0.56). Statin use was not associated with overall PCa recurrence/progression and other-cause mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use begun before PCa diagnosis was unrelated to PCa recurrence/progression but was associated with a decrease in risk of PCSM.

How can I help myself? A critical review of modifiable behaviors, medications, and complementary alternative medicine for men receiving radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Men receiving radiation for prostate cancer frequently want to know what steps they can take to optimize their chance of cure and reduce their risk of side effects. A variety of modifiable behaviors, medications, and complementary alternative medicine interventions have been investigated in this regard. In this review, we summarize data on tobacco use, exercise, statins and aspirin, and vitamins. There is limited randomized data supporting any of the interventions and additional studies are needed before clinicians can confidently inform their patients regarding what steps to take to improve their outcomes.

Statins and prostate cancer recurrence following radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In this meta-analysis, we evaluated associations between statins and recurrence-free survival (RFS) following treatment of localized prostate cancer, with attention to potential benefits among patients treated primarily with radiotherapy (RT) versus radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified original studies examining the effect of statins on men who received definitive treatment of localized prostate cancer using a systematic search of the PubMed and EMBASE databases through August 2012. Our search yielded 17 eligible studies from 794 references; 13 studies with hazard ratios (HRs) for RFS were included in the formal meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, statins did not affect RFS (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.74-1.08). However, in RT patients (six studies), statins were associated with a statistically significant improvement in RFS (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.49-0.93); this benefit was not observed in radical prostatectomy patients (seven studies). Sensitivity analyses suggested that primary treatment modality may impact the effect of statins on prostate cancer recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis suggests a potentially beneficial effect of statins on prostate cancer patients treated with RT but not among radical prostatectomy patients. Although limited by the lack of randomized data, these results suggest that primary treatment modality should be considered in future studies examining associations between statins and oncologic outcomes.

Use of statins and prostate cancer recurrence among patients treated with radical prostatectomy

WHAT'S KNOWN ON THE SUBJECT? AND WHAT DOES THE STUDY ADD?: Statins have shown broad spectrum anti-cancer properties in laboratory studies. In epidemiological studies, use of statins has been associated with reduced risk of advanced prostate cancer. However, the effects of statins on prostate cancer disease progression following curative treatment have not been extensively studied, and previous studies reported conflicting results. This study found no clear association between overall statin use and risk of disease progression, as well as lack of a monotone dose-response relationship between the use of statins, whether it was use before or after prostatectomy, and prostate cancer disease progression.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether use of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors ('statins'), which have shown broad spectrum anti-cancer properties in laboratory studies, is associated with a reduced risk of recurrence in patients with prostate cancer who undergo radical prostatectomy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All men with incident prostate cancer diagnosed between 2004 and 2005 who subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy by the end of 2005 in the Kaiser Permanente Southern California (KPSC) health plan were identified using KPSC's cancer registry. Subjects were followed for up to 5 years after prostatectomy for (i) biochemical recurrence, defined as a single PSA measurement >0.2 ng/mL, and (ii) clinical disease progression, defined as diagnosis of metastatic disease or prostate-cancer-related death. Information on statin use, demographics, comorbidities, patho-clinical factors and outcomes were ascertained from KPSC's electronic medical records. The effects of statin use prior to and after prostatectomy were both examined using bivariate and multivariate Cox models, adjusting for known prognostic factors. For postoperative statin exposure, a time-dependent Cox model was used.

RESULTS

A total of 1200 men were included; 37% had preoperative and 56% had postoperative statin use. Neither preoperative nor postoperative statin use was associated with biochemical recurrence (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.00 [0.72-1.39] and 1.05 [0.76-1.46], respectively) or clinical disease progression (HR = 0.63 [0.31-1.27] and 1.20 [0.63-2.30], respectively). No clear dose-response relationship was found for duration of use.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use may not prevent prostate cancer progression following radical prostatectomy. These findings do not provide support for the pursuit of a prospective clinical trial of statin use as a secondary prevention among surgically treated patients with prostate cancer.

Statin therapy is not associated with prostate cancer recurrence among patients who underwent radiation therapy

We investigated whether statin use is associated with reduced risk of recurrence in prostate cancer patients who undergo radiotherapy. A retrospective cohort of 774 patients from a California health plan was followed for 5 years. Statin use prior to, during and after radiotherapy was not associated with prostate cancer recurrence [hazard ratio=0.99 (0.70-1.39), 0.87 (0.62-1.22) and 0.78 (0.55-1.09), respectively] in multivariable Cox models. No clear dose-response relationship was observed for average daily statin dose or duration of statin use. Our findings do not support a preventive benefit of statins in prostate cancer recurrence after radiotherapy.