Phase II study of oral S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;80:119-125. [PMID: 20605363 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.027]

Clinical Outcomes of Proton Beam Therapy for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Purpose

We retrospectively researched the treatment outcome of proton beam therapy (PBT) and assessed its efficacy for inoperable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) at our institution.

Methods and Materials

Fifty-four patients (28 men and 26 women, median age 67 years ranging from 40-88 years) were diagnosed with unresectable stage III LAPC and administered PBT from April 2009 to March 2020. Patients who could not complete PBT, had new distant metastases during the treatment, or did not have enough follow-up time were excluded from this study. All patients were clinically staged based on the International Union of Cancer TNM staging system (eighth edition) using computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography and were diagnosed as stage III (histologic type: 18 patients with adenocarcinoma and 36 clinically diagnosed patients). PBT was performed using the passive method, with a median total dose of 67.5 GyE (range, 50-77 GyE/25-35 fractions).Chemotherapy was used in combination during PBT in 46 patients (85.2%). Overall survival (OS), local progression-free survival (LPFS), progression-free survival, and median OS time were analyzed by Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed for the following factors: maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), Eastern Cooperative Group performance status (PS), tumor site, total irradiation dose, concurrent chemotherapy, and primary tumor site. Cutoff values for SUVmax and tumor diameter were estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves and the area under the curve based on OS. Multivariate analysis was evaluated using the Cox proportional hazards models. Adverse events were evaluated using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Results

The median observation period was 17.4 months, ranging from 4.0 to 89.7 months. The median tumor diameter was 36.5 mm, ranging from 15 to 90 mm, the median SUVmax was 5.85 (range, 2.1-27.6), and their cutoff values were estimated to be 37 mm and 4.8 mm, respectively. The 1- and 2-year OS was 77.8% and 35.2%, respectively, with a median OS time of 18.2 months, and only one patient survived >5 years. Twelve patients (22.2%) developed local recurrence, and 1- and 2-year LPFS rates were 89.7% and 74.5%, respectively; progression-free survival at 1 year was 58.8%. The PS score, tumor site, and irradiation dose were the prognostic factors related to OS that showed a significant difference. On the other hand, there was a significant difference in factors involved in LPFS, at 96.7%/77.9% in the first year and 86.6%/54.4% in the second year in the groups with tumor dose ≥67.5 GyE and <67.5 GyE, respectively (P = .015). Treatment-related acute toxicities were neutropenia (grade 1/2/3 at 3.7%/11.1%/31.5%, respectively), leukopenia (grade 1/2/3 at 1.8%/7.4%/20.4%, respectively), and thrombocytopenia (grade 1/2 at 1.8%/7.4%, respectively), whereas the late effects including peptic ulcer were captured only grade 2+. The late adverse events of grade 3 or higher were not observed.

Conclusions

PBT achieving 67.5 Gy combined with standard chemotherapy showed excellent local control for unresectable LAPC. Total irradiation dose, tumor site, and PS score at an initial diagnosis could be important prognostic factors. In this study, the dose-effect relationship was found, so an increase in dose should be considered to improve prognosis.

Neoadjuvant therapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with S-1 for borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer

AIM

We evaluated the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (NAC-IMRT) in patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC).

METHODS

BRPC patients were treated with IMRT (45 Gy/15fr) combined with two courses of S-1 (40 mg/m2 bid) before surgery. Outcomes after NAC-IMRT, surgery, and survival were then evaluated. This single-center retrospective study assessed 26 consecutive patients.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients (BR-PV: 7, BR-A: 19) with a median age of 73 years were enrolled from 2016 to 2021. Ten (38%) patients were 75-years-old and above. Twenty-three patients completed NAC-IMRT treatment. The median reductions in tumor size and cancer antigen 19-9 level were 13.6% and 69%, respectively. All 26 patients underwent resection within a median time of 71 days after NAC-IMRT initiation. R0 resection was achieved in 24 patients (92%). The median overall survival (OS) was 28.0 months, and the 1- and 3-year OS rates were 100% and 34%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.5 months, and the 1- and 3-year PFS rates were 50% and 32%, respectively. No significant differences were observed in OS between the patients under and over the age of 75 (29 vs. 20 months, p = 0.86). The 12 patients who completed NAC-IMRT, resection, and subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) exhibited a 3-year survival rate of 73%, which was significantly better than that of the patients who did not receive or complete AC (median OS, not reached vs. 19 months, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

NAC-IMRT showed outstanding clinical efficacy with acceptable tolerability in patients with BRPC, including geriatric patients.

Programmed cell death 1 inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, a malignancy that arises in the cells of the pancreas, is a devastating disease with unclear etiology and often poor prognosis. Locally advanced pancreatic cancer, a stage where the tumor has grown significantly but has not yet spread to distant organs, presents unique challenges in treatment. This article aims to discuss the current strategies, challenges, and future directions in the management of locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LAPC).

AIM

To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy for LAPC.

METHODS

Eligible patients had LAPC, an Eastern cooperative oncology group performance status of 0 or 1, adequate organ and marrow functions, and no prior anticancer therapy. In the observation group, participants received intravenous sintilimab 200 mg once every 3 wk, and received concurrent chemoradiotherapy (concurrent conventional fractionated radiotherapy with doses planning target volume 50.4 Gy and gross tumor volume 60 Gy in 28 fractions and oral S-1 40 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1-14 of a 21-d cycle and intravenous gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-d cycle for eight cycles until disease progression, death, or unacceptable toxicity). In the control group, participants only received concurrent chemoradiotherapy. From April 2020 to November 2021, 64 participants were finally enrolled with 34 in the observation group and 30 in the control group.

RESULTS

Thirty-four patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy, while 32 (94.1%) received sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 2 patients discontinuing sintilimab in the observation group. Thirty patients completed the scheduled course of chemoradiotherapy in the control group. Based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors guidelines, the analysis of the observation group revealed that a partial response was observed in 11 patients (32.4%), stable disease was evident in 19 patients (55.9%), and 4 patients (11.8%) experienced progressive disease; a partial response was observed in 6 (20.0%) patients, stable disease in 18 (60%), and progressive disease in 6 (20%) in the control group. The major toxic effects were leukopenia and nausea. The incidence of severe adverse events (AEs) (grade 3 or 4) was 26.5% (9/34) in the observation group and 23.3% (7/30) in the control group. There were no treatment-related deaths. The observation group demonstrated a significantly longer median overall survival (22.1 mo compared to 15.8 mo) (P < 0.05) and progression-free survival (12.2 mo vs 10.1 mo) (P < 0.05) in comparison to the control group. The occurrence of severe AEs did not exhibit a statistically significant difference between the observation group and the control group (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Sintilimab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy was effective and safe for LAPC patients, and warrants further investigation.

Comparison of acute gastrointestinal toxicities between 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy including prophylactic regions in chemoradiotherapy with S-1 for pancreatic cancer-importance of dose volume histogram parameters in the stomach as the predictive factors

The purpose of this study was to compare acute gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities in patients who underwent 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 including prophylactic regions for pancreatic cancer. We also investigated the predictive factor of acute GI toxicities in dose volume histogram (DVH) parameters. Patients who received CRT with S-1 for pancreatic cancer between January 2014 and March 2021 were included. Radiotherapy (RT) with a total dose of 50-54 Gy was delivered. We examined the differences in the frequencies of acute GI toxicity of grade 2 or higher and DVH parameters of the stomach (ST) and duodenum (DU) between the 3DCRT group and the IMRT group. The RT-related predictive factors of acute GI toxicities were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. There were 25 patients in the 3DCRT group and 31 patients in the IMRT group. The frequencies of acute GI toxicity of G2 or higher were 36% in the 3DCRT group and 9.7% in the IMRT group (p = 0.035). ST V50 was the most predictive factor (p = 0.001), and the incidences of acute GI toxicity of G2 or higher in ST V50 ≥ 4.1 cc and < 4.1cc were 43.7% and 7.7%, respectively. ST V40 was also a significant predictive factor of acute GI toxicity (p = 0.002). IMRT could reduce acute GI toxicities in CRT with S-1 including prophylactic regions for pancreatic cancer. Acute GI toxicities may be affected by moderate to high doses to the ST.

Competing Risk Analysis of Outcomes of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Patients Undergoing Definitive Radiotherapy

PURPOSE

We investigated potential factors, including clinicopathological features, treatment modalities, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 level, tumor responses correlating with overall survival (OS), local progression (LP), and distant metastases (DMs), in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) who received definitive radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed demographic characteristics; biologically effective doses (BED10, calculated with an α/β of 10) of RT; and clinical outcomes of 57 unresectable LAPC (all pancreatic adenocarcinoma) patients receiving definitive RT using modern techniques with and without systemic therapy between January 2009 and March 2019 at our institution. We used Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 to evaluate the radiographic tumor response after RT. The association between prognostic factors and OS was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier analysis and a Cox regression model, whereas baseline characteristics and treatment details were collected for competing-risk regression of the association with LP and DM using the Fine-Gray model.

RESULTS

A median BED10 of 67.1 Gy resulted in a disease control rate of 87.7%, and the median OS was 11.8 months after a median follow-up of 32.1 months. The 1-year OS rate, cumulative incidences of LP, and DM were 49.2%, 38.5%, and 62.9%, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that pre-RT NLR ≥3.5 (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 8.245, p < 0.001), CA19-9 reduction rate ≥50% (adjusted HR = 0.261, p = 0.005), RT without concurrent chemoradiotherapy (adjusted HR = 5.903, p = 0.004), and administration of chemotherapy after RT (adjusted HR = 0.207, p = 0.03) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Positive lymph nodal metastases (adjusted subdistribution HR [sHR] = 3.712, p = 0.003) and higher tumor reduction after RT (adjusted sHR = 0.922, p < 0.001) were significant prognostic factors for LP, whereas BED10 ≥ 67.1 Gy (adjusted sHR = 0.297, p = 0.002), CA19-9 reduction rate ≥50% (adjusted sHR = 0.334, p = 0.023), and RT alone (adjusted sHR = 2.633, p = 0.047) were significant prognostic factors for DM.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that pre-RT NLR and post-RT monitoring of CA19-9 and tumor size reduction can help identify whether patients belong to the good or poor prognostic group of LAPC. The incorporation of new systemic treatments during and after a higher BED10 RT dose for LAPC patients is warranted.

Duration of Reduced CA19-9 Levels Is a Better Prognostic Factor Than Its Rate of Reduction for Unresectable Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Simple Summary

Upon diagnosis, about 35% of patients have initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. The prognosis of these patients is still poor. Chemotherapy alone has been generally accepted as a standard therapeutic approach. However, clinical decision-making processes have not been established for aggressive treatments such as surgery and chemoradiotherapy in patients with a response and stable case of initially unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. In the current study, we evaluated the reduction rate and duration of carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 within 6 months as long-term survival. Cases of over 44% CA 19-9 reduction only one month from the baseline after treatment were not significantly associated with overall survival. On the other hand, more than 3 months of over 44% CA 19-9 reduction was significantly associated with prognosis, which is the same as the occurrence of distant metastasis. Multidisciplinary treatment focus on local treatment is expected in these selected patients.

Abstract

A decrease in carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 levels has been proposed as a prognostic marker for survival and recurrence in patients with pancreatic cancer. We evaluated the association between duration of reduced CA 19-9 levels during 6 months after treatment and long-term survival for 79 patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We calculated the differences between pretreatment and monthly CA19-9 levels. We categorized 71 patients with decreases in CA19-9 levels into three groups based on the duration of these reduced levels (>2, >3, and >4 months). The cut-off level for long-term (more than 2 years) survival was identified as a 44% reduction from the baseline, using a ROC curve. A reduction duration >2 months was not associated with overall survival (p = 0.1), while >3 months was significantly associated with survival (p =.04). In multivariate analysis, a reduction duration >3 months predicted a good long-term prognosis (odds ratio = 5.75; 95% confidence interval = 1.47–22.36; p < 0.01). In patients with unresectable LAPC, the duration of reduced CA19-9 levels for more than 3 months, rather than the rate of reduction in CA19-9 levels, during 6 months after treatment was significantly associated with good prognosis.

Changes in CRP and CA19-9 during Preoperative Oncological Therapy Predict Postoperative Survival in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Tumor and systemic inflammatory markers predict survival. This retrospective study aimed to explore the changes in CRP, CA19-9, and other routine laboratory tests during preoperative oncological therapy as prognostic factors in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2016, 68 borderline resectable PDAC patients received preoperative oncological therapy and underwent subsequent surgery at Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. We investigated changes in CRP, CA19-9, CEA, albumin, leukocytes, bilirubin, and platelets and examined the impact on survival.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis, CRP remaining at ≥3 mg/L after preoperative oncological therapy predicted a poorer postoperative outcome when compared to CRP decreasing to or remaining at <3 mg/L (hazard ratio [HR] 2.766, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.300-5.885, p = 0.008). Furthermore, a CA19-9 decrease >90% during preoperative treatment predicted a favorable postoperative outcome (HR 0.297, 95% CI: 0.124-0.708, p = 0.006). In the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median survival for patients with CRP remaining at <3 mg/L was longer than among patients with an increased CRP level at ≥3 mg/L (42 months vs. 24 months, p = 0.001). Patients with a CA19-9 decrease >90% or level normalization (to ≤37 kU/L) during preoperative treatment exhibited a median survival of 47 months; those with a 50-90% decrease, 15 months; and those with a <50% decrease, 17 months (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in CRP and CA19-9 during preoperative oncological therapy predict postoperative survival.

Impact of Renal Function on S-1 + Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: An Integrated Analysis of Data From 2 Clinical Trials

OBJECTIVES

S-1 monotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy (RT) is a standard of care for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Although renal dysfunction increases S-1 monotherapy toxicity, its effect in S-1 with concurrent RT remains unknown. We evaluated the effect of renal function on the safety of S-1 with RT for LAPC.

METHODS

We performed an integrated exploratory post hoc analysis of data from 2 prospective studies (JCOG1106 and LAPC-S1RT), where patients with LAPC received RT (50.4 Gy/28 fraction for 5.5 weeks) and concurrent S-1 (40 mg/m2 per dose, twice daily on the day of irradiation). We split the patients into high creatinine clearance (CCr; ≥80 mL/min) and low CCr (<80 mL/min) groups and compared the findings to determine treatment safety.

RESULTS

The high and low CCr groups showed a median of 97.5 (range, 80.0-194.6) and 64.4 (range, 50.0-78.3) mL/min, respectively. The low CCr group presented more adverse reactions (ARs) of grade 3 or higher and gastrointestinal ARs of grade 2 or higher than the high CCr group (30.8% vs 15.8% and 51.9% vs 36.8%).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of ARs associated with concurrent S-1 and RT increases in patients with low CCr; therefore, ARs should be duly considered in such patients.

A phase II study of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) is widely used in clinical practice, despite a lack of prospective data to validate its efficacy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We conducted a phase II study of GnP for LAPC to assess its efficacy and safety.We performed a single-arm, single-institution study with GnP in 24 patients with LAPC. The treatment protocol included successive administration of gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and nab-paclitaxel (125 mg/m2). The primary endpoint was the tumor overall response rate (ORR), and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs).The median PFS was 11.0 months, median OS was 21.2 months, ORR was 62.5%, and 37.5% of the patients had stable disease. Four (16.7%) of the patients were converted to surgical resection; 3 of these achieved R0 resection. Grade 3 to 4 AEs included hematological (neutropenia, 64%; thrombocytopenia, 12%), nonhematological (cholangitis, 16%), and sensory neuropathy (4%). These AEs were manageable and tolerable.The GnP treatment in patients with LAPC showed favorable tumor shrinkage, good toxicity profile, and enabled conversion to surgical resection in a subset of patients; therefore, GnP is an option for first-line chemotherapy in patients with LAPC.

Randomized phase II study of chemoradiotherapy with versus without induction chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Japan Clinical Oncology Group trial, JCOG1106

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is a treatment option for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the efficacy of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiotherapy is uncertain. The aim of this randomized, multicentre phase II study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chemoradiotherapy with and without induction chemotherapy to determine the significance of induction chemotherapy.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm A) or induction chemotherapy followed by the chemoradiotherapy arm (Arm B). Patients in Arm A underwent radiotherapy with concurrent S-1. Patients in Arm B received induction gemcitabine for 12 weeks, and thereafter, only patients with controlled disease underwent the same chemoradiotherapy as Arm A. After chemoradiotherapy, gemcitabine was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity in both arms. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

Amongst 102 patients enrolled, 100 were eligible for efficacy assessment. The probability of survival was greater in Arm B in the first 12 months, but the trend was reversed in the following periods (1-year survival 66.7 vs. 69.3%, 2-year survival 36.9 vs. 18.9%). The hazard ratio was 1.255 (95% confidence interval 0.816-1.930) in favour of Arm A. Gastrointestinal toxicity was slightly more frequent and three treatment-related deaths occurred in Arm A.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggested that the chemoradiotherapy using S-1 alone had more promising efficacy with longer-term survival, compared with induction gemcitabine followed by chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study was registered at the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000006811.

An Aggressive Approach to Locally Confined Pancreatic Cancer: Defining Surgical and Oncologic Outcomes Unique to Pancreatectomy with Celiac Axis Resection (DP-CAR)

Background:

Modern chemotherapeutics have led to improved systemic disease control for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Surgical strategies such as distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) are increasingly entertained. Herein we review procedure specific outcomes and assess biologic rationale for DP-CAR.

Methods:

A prospectively maintained single-institution database of all pancreatectomies was queried for patients undergoing DP-CAR. We excluded all patients for whom complete data were not available and those who were not treated with contemporary multi-agent therapy. Data was supplemented with dedicated chart review and outreach for long-term oncologic outcomes.

Results:

Fifty-four patients underwent DP-CAR between 2008–2018. The median age was 62.7 years. 98% received induction chemotherapy. Arterial reconstruction was performed in 17% and concomitant visceral resection in 30%. R0 resection rate was 87%. Postoperative complications were common (43%) with chyle leak being the most frequent (17%). Length of stay was 8 days, readmission occurred in one-third, and ninety-day mortality was 2%. Disease recurrence occurred in 74% during a median follow up of 17.4 months. Median recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 9 and 25 months, respectively.

Conclusions:

Following modern induction paradigms, DP-CAR can be performed with low mortality, manageable morbidity, and excellent rates of margin-negative resection in high volume settings. The profile of complications of DP-CAR is distinct from pancreaticoduodenectomy and simple distal pancreatectomy. OS and RFS are similar to those undergoing resection of borderline resectable and resectable disease. Improved systemic disease control will likely lead to increasing utilization of aggressive surgical approaches to LAPC.

Successful Management of Hemosuccus Pancreaticus due to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma by Chemoradiotherapy

Management of hemosuccus pancreaticus (HP) due to pancreatic adenocarcinoma is problematic. This is the first report of the successful management of HP caused by pancreatic adenocarcinoma by chemoradiotherapy, which is a treatment option for cases with a high surgical risk that are not suitable for interventional radiology. In the present case, bloody pancreatic juice was detected in the main pancreatic duct, and anemia worsened without repeated blood transfusions. The patient ultimately underwent chemoradiotherapy comprising radiation of 3 Gy in 15 fractions concomitant with systemic chemotherapy of S-1. After the treatments, the anemia improved, and the patient was discharged on day 45.

Consolidative Chemoradiotherapy After Induced Chemotherapy Is an Optimal Regimen for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Object: To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of consolidative chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) after induced chemotherapy (iCT) for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

Patients and methods: Patients with LAPC were enrolled from January 2013 to November 2018. In stage one, all patients received iCT. Those without distant metastasis proceeded to stage two, received 50.4 Gy cCRT with S-1 as radiosensitizer. Efficacy and tolerability were evaluated in all patients.

Results: Sixty-five patients enrolled into this study and accepted iCT. Eleven (16.9%) patients got early progressions or declined general condition, 1 (1.5%) patient quit the trial after one cycle of iCT. These 12 patients didn't receive cCRT. The remaining 53 (81.5%) patients received cCRT. After cCRT, 4 of 53 (7.5%) patients accepted radical resection. The treatment was well-tolerated. In stage one, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were the most frequent toxicities, the severe toxicity (grade 3 and 4) were 26.2 and 20.0%, respectively. In stage two, fatigue (45.3%) and nausea (41.5%) were the most frequent toxic effects but most were mild. The median overall survival (OS) of whole group was 18.1 months [95% CI, 15.11–21.03 months]. The OS of patients with early progression and patients accepted cCRT were 7.6 months [95% CI, 5.22–10.02 months] and 19.5 months [95% CI, 18.08–20.95 months], respectively (P < 0.001). The PFS of the 53 patients was 10.3 months [95% CI, 8.54–11.96 months] and survival rates at 1- and 2- years were 84.8 and 24.3%, respectively.

Conclusion: The current results indicate that iCT is a useful screening method to selecting LAPC patients with less-aggressive biological behavior. cCRT after iCT in patients with LAPC is an optimal treatment. The prognosis of patients who received complete treatment is significantly improved.

Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel for locally advanced or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer

Overall survival in a phase III study for metastatic pancreatic cancer has significantly improved with gemcitabine (GEM) plus nab-paclitaxel. However, to date, there is limited data on the efficacy and safety of its use for patients with locally advanced (LA) or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC). Here, we investigated the efficacy and safety of first-line GEM plus nab-paclitaxel for LA or BRPC. We retrospectively analysed consecutive patients with pathologically confirmed, untreated LA or BRPC who started receiving first-line GEM plus nab-paclitaxel. A total of 30 patients (LA, n = 22; BRPC, n = 8) were analysed. Twelve patients (40%) without distant metastasis received additional chemoradiotherapy using S-1. Laparotomy was performed on 8 patients and 6 (20%; LA, n = 3; BR, n = 3) achieved R0 resection. Objective response rate was 44.8%. For all patients, median progression-free survival and overall survival were 14.8 and 29.9 months, respectively. Median overall survival for LA was 24.1 months with a 2-year survival rate of 50.8%. The most frequently observed grade 3 or 4 toxicities were neutropenia (73%) and biliary infection (13%). First-line GEM plus nab-paclitaxel was well-tolerated and feasible with an encouraging survival for LA or BRPC.

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Metastasis and Micrometastasis Along the Left Side of Superior Mesenteric Artery in Pancreatic Head Cancer

BACKGROUNDS AND OBJECTIVES

Although metastasis in lymph nodes along the left side of superior mesenteric artery (SMA-LNs-lt) is sometimes found, survival benefit of SMA-LN-lt dissection for pancreatic head cancer is still unclear. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significance of SMA-LN-lt metastasis and micrometastasis.

METHODS

A total of 166 patients with pancreatic head cancer who underwent pancreatectomy with lymphadenectomy including SMA-LNs-lt between 2002 and 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. Micrometastasis was evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

Twenty patients (12%) had SMA-LN-lt metastasis detected by hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining, and eight patients (5%) had micrometastasis. Patients with SMA-LN-lt HE-positive or micrometastasis group experienced significantly shorter overall survival (OS) than those without (p = .015). In multivariate analysis, SMA-LN-lt HE-positive or micrometastasis (p = .034), portal vein resection (p = .002), histologic grade 2/3 (p = .046), LN metastasis (p = .002), and lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (p < .001) were independent risk factors. Within a subset of SMA-LN-lt HE-positive or micrometastasis group, lack of adjuvant chemotherapy (p = .003) was the independent poor prognostic factor.

CONCLUSIONS

In pancreatic head cancer, the rate of SMA-LN-lt HE-positive and micrometastasis was found in 12% and 5%, respectively. Adjuvant chemotherapy may contribute to improvement of prognosis in patients with LN metastasis including SMA-LN-lt metastasis and micrometastasis.

Is hepatic artery coil embolization useful in distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection for locally advanced pancreatic cancer?

BACKGROUND

The exact contribution of preoperative coil embolization in distal pancreatectomy with en bloc celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) for the prevention of ischemic liver complication is not fully elucidated.

METHODS

From January 2004 to July 2015, 31 patients underwent DP-CAR for the pancreatic body-tail cancer. Twenty-three patients received preoperative coil embolization. The characteristics and operative outcomes were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median survival time and 1- and 3-year overall survival rates were 23.7 months and 74.2% and 34.4%, respectively. No 30-day mortality occurred in any of the patients. Postoperative liver infarction developed only in 8 patients (25.8%) even though 7 of 8 patients had undergone preoperative coil embolization. Tumor contact with the gastroduodenal artery (GDA)/proper hepatic artery (PHA) on preoperative multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT), tumor size, operative time, portal vein resection, and stenosis of the GDA/PHA after DP-CAR are related to liver infarction. Among them, postoperative stenosis of the GDA/PHA on MDCT, which was observed in all 8 patients with liver infarction, was the most closely related factor to postoperative liver infarction. Tumor contact with the GDA/PHA did not worsen the R0 resection rate or overall survival rate.

CONCLUSION

Our data indicate that preoperative coil embolization of the common hepatic artery is not useful in DP-CAR as long as GDA is completely preserved during surgery.

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer: current status and unresolved issues

Pancreatic cancer is one of the most lethal of all malignancies. One of the reasons for the dismal prognosis is that most diagnoses are made when the disease is either locally advanced or metastatic. Recent advances in chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) enable "conversion surgery" to be performed for selected patients with initially unresectable pancreatic cancer following favorable responses to preoperative treatment. Using FOLFIRINOX as preoperative treatment, the resection rate was reported as 6-44% of patients with locally advanced cancer and the prognosis of these patients was favorable. Even for metastasized cancer, recent reports show the effectiveness of conversion surgery, which has achieved 27-56 months of median overall survival. However, there are many unanswered questions about conversion surgery. The optimal regimen and duration of preoperative treatment remain unclear and there is still debate regarding the safety and effectiveness of vascular resection, which is often required for curative resection of locally advanced cancer. Accumulation of more data on conversion surgery is required to establish the safety and effectiveness of this treatment. In this review, we summarize the current status and unresolved issues about conversion surgery for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Conversion surgery only for highly selected patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer: a satisfactory outcome in exchange for a lower resection rate

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to clarify the resection rate, safety, and significance of conversion surgery for highly selected patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (URPca).

METHODS

We studied 434 URPca patients. Conversion surgery was permitted only for patients who met following requirements: responders to first-line therapy, showing sufficient reduction of the local tumor to enable complete resection, at least 6 months of disease control, and no metastatic lesions detected on radiological examinations (for patients with metastatic disease). The overall survival (OS) was compared between patients who underwent surgery and those who did not. Furthermore, a multivariate analysis was performed to identify possible predictive factors for both total patients with URPca and responders.

RESULTS

Conversion surgery was performed in 18 patients (4.1%). The pathologically complete resection rate was 88.9% (16/18). The median operative time, blood loss, and hospitalization duration were 450 min, 780 ml, and 29 days, respectively. The OS was significantly better in patients who underwent surgery than in those who did not. In a multivariate analysis, conversion surgery was shown to be significantly correlated with the OS both in total patients and responders.

CONCLUSIONS

A satisfactory outcome was achieved for highly selected patients with URPca in exchange for a lower resection rate (4.1%).

S-1-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the world, and non-small cell lung cancer accounts for > 75% of all lung cancer cases. Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy has become the standard treatment for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Third-generation chemotherapy agents plus cisplatin have been most commonly used in concurrent chemoradiotherapy, which is also associated with more adverse effects and acute toxicities. S-1 as an oral chemotherapeutic agent exhibits higher antitumor activity, less adverse effects, and better biological availability. Recently, studies illustrated S-1-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy also had excellent effects in the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC.

METHODS

A systematic literature search will be performed through February 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials and prospective comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the efficacy and safety of S-1-based chemoradiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced unresectable NSCLC and provides level I evidence for clinical decision makings.

A retrospective clinical study of comparing paclitaxel plus S-1 versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), paclitaxel plus cisplatin are considered as active and tolerable. The current clinical study was conducted to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of first-line paclitaxel/S-1(PS) and paclitaxel/cisplatin(TP) regimens in advanced ESCC.

RESULTS

The overall response rate of PS was slightly, but not significantly, higher (25 patients, 46%) than that of TP (23 patients, 39%, P = 0.432). Median overall survival (OS) was similar for PS and TP (11.5 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.37). However PS had longer median progression-free survival than TP (PFS: 5.5 months vs5.0months, p = 0.04). When compared with PS, more grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded for TP, including leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, anorexia and vomiting (P < 0.05). No treatment-related deaths were recorded in either group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2014, all patients diagnosed with advanced ESCC and treated with paclitaxel/S-1 or paclitaxel/cisplatin at Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University were analyzed retrospectively. One hundred and thirteen patients were included in this study. Disease control rates and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Survival analysis was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier method.

CONCLUSIONS

The PS option improves PFS and its OS is similar to TP. Moreover, the PS regimen is an effective and safe first-line treatment for ESCC with less hematological and non-hematological toxicity.

Effects of S-1 combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

BACKGROUND

Esophageal cancer is one of the worst malignant digestive neoplasms with poor treatment outcomes. Definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has become the standard nonsurgical treatment option for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The chemotherapeutic drugs 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin have been most commonly used in CRT of esophageal cancer. However, radiotherapy combined with 5-FU/cisplatin often delivers severe toxicity to patients. S-1 as an oral chemotherapeutic drug exhibits higher anti-tumor activity, less adverse effects, and better biological availability. S-1 also has excellent effects as a CRT regimen for esophageal cancer.

METHODS

A systematic literature search will be performed through January 2018 using MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar for relevant articles published in any language. Randomized controlled trials, prospective comparative studies will be included. All meta-analyses will be performed using Review Manager software. The quality of the studies will be evaluated using the guidelines listed in the Cochrane Handbook. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statements will be followed until the findings of the systematic review and meta-analysis are reported.

RESULTS

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

CONCLUSION

Our study will draw an objective conclusion of the effects of S-1 combined with radiotherapy in the treatment of unresectable esophageal cancer and provide level I evidence for clinical decision makings.

Efficacy of different chemotherapy regimens in treatment of advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: A network meta-analysis

We performed a network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the short- and long-term efficacy of Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine + S-1 (tegafur), Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, FOLFIRINOX (oxaliplatin + irinotecan + fluorouracil + leucovorin), Gemcitabine + oxaliplatin, Gemcitabine + irinotecan, Gemcitabine + Exatecan, Gemcitabine + pemetrexed, Gemcitabine + 5-FU, and S-1 in treating advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC). The odds radios (OR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) and surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) were evaluated by a combination of direct evidence and indirect evidence. In total twenty studies were included in this paper. For short-term efficacy, the overall response rate (ORR) was lower for patients treated with Gemcitabine compared with Gemcitabine + S-1, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, Gemcitabine + irinotecan and S-1. The ORR for FOLFIRINOX was higher compared with Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine and Gemcitabine + Cisplatin. The disease control rate (DCR) for Gemcitabine was lower compared with Gemcitabine + S-1, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, and FOLFIRINOX. For long-term efficacy, the 12-month overall survival (OS) rate for FOLFIRINOX was higher compared with Gemcitabine, Gemcitabine + Capecitabine, Gemcitabine + Cisplatin, Gemcitabine + irinotecan, Gemcitabine + Exatecan, and Gemcitabine + pemetrexed. The SUCRA revealed that FOLFIRINOX was relatively better in both short- and long-term efficacy, while Gemcitabine was relatively poorer. In both short- and long-term efficacy, FOLFIRINOX had the best short- and long-term efficacy among the 12 chemotherapy regimens while efficacy of Gemcitabine was relatively poorer in the treatment of advanced or metastatic PC.

Phase II study of induction gemcitabine and S-1 followed by chemoradiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy using S-1 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

S-1 has systemic activity for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Here, the efficacy and safety of induction gemcitabine (GEM) and S-1 (GS) followed by chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and systemic chemotherapy using S-1 for LAPC were assessed.

METHODS

The treatment consisted of four cycles of induction GS (S-1 60, 80, or 100 mg/day based on body surface area for 14 days every 3 weeks plus GEM 1000 mg/m² on days 8 and 15), followed by S-1 (80, 100, or 120 mg/day based on body surface area on days 1-14 and 22-35) and concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). Maintenance chemotherapy with S-1 was started 1-4 weeks after CRT until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity was observed. The primary endpoint was 1-year survival.

RESULTS

A total of 30 patients with LAPC were enrolled. The median survival and progression-free survival were 21.3 and 12.7 months, respectively. Overall survival rates at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years were 73.3, 36.7, 23.3, and 16.7%, respectively. The median survival of 23 patients who received CRT was 22.9 months, with a 3-year survival rate of 30.4%. The two most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events during induction GS were neutropenia (63.3%) and biliary tract infection (20%). Toxicities during CRT or maintenance chemotherapy were generally mild.

CONCLUSIONS

This regimen was feasible and highly active resulting in encouraging survival in patients with LAPC. Further investigations are warranted to elucidate the effectiveness of this treatment strategy in future studies. Clinical trials information: UMIN000006332.

Locally advanced pancreatic cancer successfully treated by distal pancreatectomy with celiac axis resection (DP-CAR) after S-1 with radiation therapy followed by gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel therapy: a case report

Background

The prognosis for pancreatic cancer remains dismal because many patients are diagnosed with unresectable cancer at the initial diagnosis. Recently, conversion surgery was reported as an effective treatment for initially unresectable pancreatic cancer with a favorable response to non-surgical treatment lasting over 240 days. Here, we describe a case of locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) successfully resected after treatment with S-1 and radiation followed by gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel therapy.

Case presentation

A 73-year-old man with LAPC was referred to our hospital. Computed tomography findings revealed a 2.5-cm mass in the pancreatic body that had invaded the celiac artery, common hepatic artery, and splenic artery. Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) encasement was not observed, but tumor abutment over 180° with the main tumor was detected. Staging laparoscopy showed no findings of distant metastasis, and washing cytology revealed no malignancy. He was diagnosed with unresectable pancreatic cancer. Treatment with S-1 with radiation therapy followed by gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel was performed. Six months after the initial treatment, the tumor size had decreased to 1.2 cm, and encasement of the main artery was diminished. Though abutment to the main artery, including the SMA, was still detected, distal pancreatectomy with celiac artery resection was performed. The histopathological findings around the celiac artery revealed fibrous changes with an Evans classification of grade IIb. There was no residual cancer at the periphery; thus, R0 resection was achieved. The patient has been healthy and without recurrence for more than 12 months since the initial treatment.

Conclusions

Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel therapy revealed high response rate for metastasic pancreatic cancer (PC), but the effect for LAPC proposing conversion surgery was not well discussed. In this case, we achieve R0 resection combined with chemoradiation therapy and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel therapy. This regimen was also effective for LAPC and may be used to increase the population of conversion surgery by its high response rate.

Survival impact of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy for patients with borderline resectable pancreatic carcinoma with arterial contact

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) chemotherapy as measured by overall survival for patients with pancreatic carcinoma with arterial contact.

METHODS

Medical records of 77 patients with pancreatic carcinoma with arterial contact who intended to undergo tumor resection were analyzed retrospectively. These patients were divided into two groups: patients who underwent upfront surgery and patients who underwent tumor resection after neoadjuvant GS chemotherapy. Clinicopathological factors were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Of the 77 patients, 25 patients underwent upfront surgery while the remaining 52 patients received neoadjuvant GS chemotherapy. Seven patients did not undergo tumor resection due to distant metastasis. No serious adverse effects associated with neoadjuvant GS chemotherapy were observed. The R0 resection rate of patients who received neoadjuvant GS chemotherapy was significantly higher than that of patients who did not (P < 0.001). Overall survival of patients who received neoadjuvant GS chemotherapy was significantly longer than that of patients who did not among all 77 patients (P = 0.003, median survival time, 27.1 vs. 11.6 months) as well as among the 70 patients who underwent tumor resection (P = 0.001, median survival time, 27.2 vs. 11.6 months). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that neoadjuvant GS chemotherapy was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival for patients who underwent tumor resection (P = 0.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant GS chemotherapy may provide a survival benefit to patients with pancreatic carcinoma with arterial contact.

Association of radiotherapy with favorable prognosis in daily clinical practice for treatment of locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Radiotherapy (RT) with or without chemotherapy is currently used in definitive therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer. We sought to evaluate the prognostic significance, pattern of care, and use of RT in locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Between 2002 and 2011, patients with invasive pancreatic carcinoma and prior exposure to systemic chemotherapy were included. We used Cox regression model and propensity score matching for prognostic analyses and logistic regression for analyzing the factors impacting the use of RT.

RESULTS

We identified 217 pancreatic cancer patients (74 with unresectable stage II or III and 143 with stage IV). Of all patients, 90.8% had adenocarcinoma, and only 19.2% (42/217) received RT with doses ranging from 50 to 55 Gy in 25 to 28 fractions using modern RT techniques. Logistic regression showed stage (P < 0.001) and initial CA 19-9 level (P = 0.026) were significantly predictive of the choice of RT as a first-line treatment, whereas the second-line use of RT was associated with the response to first-line chemotherapy and longer progression-free survival. Patients with RT had a better median survival than those without it (14.6 vs 8.1 months, P < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis and propensity score matching, RT remained a good prognostic factor for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

The use of RT might be associated with a favorable clinical outcome in patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer. Further exploration of RT as a first-line therapy or second-line therapy for locally advanced or even metastatic pancreatic cancer is warranted.

Comparative evaluation of respiratory-gated and ungated FDG-PET for target volume definition in radiotherapy treatment planning for pancreatic cancer

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of respiratory-gated positron emission tomography (4D-PET) in pancreatic cancer radiotherapy treatment planning (RTTP).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fourteen patients with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid pancreatic tumours were evaluated between December 2013 and March 2015. Two sets of volumes were contoured for the pancreatic tumour of each patient. The biological target volume in three-dimensional RTTP (BTV3D) was contoured using conventional respiratory un-gated PET. The BTV3D was then expanded using population-based margins to generate a series of internal target volume 3D (ITV3D) values. The ITV 4D (ITV4D) was contoured using 4D-PET. Each of the five phases of 4D-PET was used for 4D contouring, and the ITV4D was constructed by summing the volumes defined on the five individual 4D-PET images. The relative volumes and normalized volumetric overlap were computed between ITV3D and ITV4D.

RESULTS

On average, the FDG-avid tumour volumes were 1.6 (range: 0.8-2.3) fold greater in the ITV4D than in the BTV3D. On average, the ITV3D values were 2.0 (range: 1.1-3.4) fold larger than the corresponding ITV4D values.

CONCLUSION

The ITV generated from 4D-PET can be used to improve the accuracy or reduce normal tissue irradiation compared with conventional un-gated PET-based ITV.

Combination of carbon ion beam and gemcitabine causes irreparable DNA damage and death of radioresistant pancreatic cancer stem-like cells in vitro and in vivo

We try to elucidate whether a carbon ion beam alone or in combination with gemcitabine has advantages over X-ray in targeting putative pancreatic cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) in vitro and in vivo. Colony, spheroid formation and tumorigenicity assays confirmed that CD44+/ESA+ cells sorted from PANC1 and PK45 cells have more CSC properties than CD44−/ESA− cells. The number of colonies and spheroids formed from CSCs after carbon ion beam irradiation was significantly reduced compared to after X-ray irradiation, and they were extremely highly suppressed when carbon ion beam combined with gemcitabine. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for the carbon ion beam relative to X-ray at the D10 levels for CSCs were 2.23-2.66. Expressions of multiple cell death-related genes were remarkably highly induced, and large numbers of γH2AX foci in CSCs were formed after carbon ion beam combined with gemcitabine. The highly expressed CSC markers were significantly inhibited after 30 Gy of carbon ion beam and almost lost after 25 Gy carbon ion beam combined with 50 mg/kg gemcitabine. In conclusion, a carbon ion beam combined with gemcitabine has superior potential to kill pancreatic CSCs via irreparable clustered DSB compared to a carbon ion alone or X-rays combined with gemcitabine.

Survival effects of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1 chemotherapy on pancreatic carcinoma stratified by preoperative resectability status

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant gemcitabine plus S-1(GS) chemotherapy for pancreatic carcinoma patients, stratified by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) preoperative resectability definition.

METHODS

A total of 141 consecutive patients with resected pancreatic carcinoma who received adjuvant GS chemotherapy were evaluated retrospectively. According to the NCCN preoperative resectability definition, tumors were divided into resectable tumors (R group), borderline resectable tumors with portal vein contact (BR-PV group), and borderline resectable tumors with arterial contact (BR-A group). Overall survival and prognostic factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall 1-, 2-, and 5-year survival rates for the 141 patients were 89.6%, 69.9%, and 41.1%, respectively. Overall survival of the R group was significantly better than that of the BR-PV group and the BR-A group (P < 0.05). Overall 5-year survival rates of the R group, the BR-PV group, and the BR-A group were 49.0%, 25.0%, and 11.3%, respectively. Arterial contact (P = 0.020), preoperative CA 19-9 level ≥150 U/ml (P < 0.001), and positive nodal involvement (P = 0.025) were independent prognostic factors for poor overall survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant GS chemotherapy may provide a survival benefit especially for patients with resectable pancreatic carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;113:405-412. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Concurrent radiotherapy with oral fluoropyrimidine versus gemcitabine in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Gemcitabine (GEM) is the most widely utilized systemic agent in combination with radiation therapy (RT) for treating locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) in the concurrent setting. Despite recent interest in using two novel oral fluoropyrimidines (FUs), capecitabine and S-1, in this setting, there is a lack of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to support this approach.

Methods

Trials published between 1994 and 2014 were identified by an electronic search of public databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library). All prospective studies were independently identified by two authors for inclusion. Demographic data, treatment response, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS, respectively), and toxicities were extracted and analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis software (version 2.0).

Results

Twenty-three cohorts with 843 patients were included: 497 patients were treated with GEM and 346 patients were treated with oral FU. Pooled OS was significantly higher at 1 and 2 years for S-1 plus RT than for GEM plus RT (relative risk [RR] 1.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00–1.65; P=0.03; and RR 1.75; 95% CI, 1.18–2.60, P=0.002, respectively), while 1-year PFS and ORR were not significantly different between S-1 and GEM-based chemoradiotherapy (P=0.37 and P=0.06, respectively). Additionally, comparable efficacy was found between capecitabine and GEM-based chemoradiotherapy in terms of OS, PFS, and ORR. As for grade 3 and 4 acute toxicity, oral FU plus RT significantly reduced the risk of developing hematologic toxicities, nausea, and vomiting when compared to GEM plus RT (P<0.001).

Conclusions

Oral FU plus RT may be a safe and feasible regimen for patients with LAPC, with similar efficacy and low rate of toxicities compared with GEM plus RT. Our findings support the need to compare S-1 with GEM in the concurrent setting in large prospective RCTs due to its potential survival benefits.

Proposed preoperative risk factors for early recurrence in patients with resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after surgical resection: A multi-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Although surgical resection remains the only chance for cure in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), postoperative early recurrence (ER) is frequently encountered. The purpose of this study is to determine the preoperative predictive factors for ER after upfront surgical resection.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2012, 968 patients who underwent upfront surgery with R0 or R1 resection for PDAC at seven high-volume centers in Japan were retrospectively reviewed. ER was defined as relapse within 6 months after surgery. Study analysis stratified by resectable (R) and borderline resectable (BR) PDACs was conducted according to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.

RESULTS

ER occurred in 239 patients (25%) with a median survival time (MST) of 8.8 months. Modified Glasgow prognostic score = 2 (odds ratio (OR) 2.06, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05-3.95; P = 0.044), preoperative CA19-9 ≥300 U/ml (OR 1.94, 1.29-2.90; P = 0.003), and tumor size ≥30 mm (OR 1.72, 1.16-2.56; P = 0.006), were identified as preoperative independent predictive risk factors for ER in patients with R-PDAC. In the R-PDAC patients, MST was 35.5, 26.3, and 15.9 months in patients with 0, 1 and ≥2 risk factors, respectively. There were significant differences in overall survival between the three groups (P < 0.001). No preoperative risk factors were identified in BR-PDAC patients with a high rate of ER (39%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high-risk subset for ER even in patients with R-PDAC and a simple risk scoring system is useful for prediction of ER.

Serum ferritin predicted prognosis in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

AIM

The present study evaluated the value of serum ferritin (SF) level for the prognosis of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC).

PATIENTS & METHODS

A total of 79 patients with LAPC treated by chemoradiotherapy were reviewed retrospectively. Pretreatment and post-treatment levels of SF were obtained.

RESULTS

Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 11.8 months; median overall survival was 18.3 months. A total of 36 patients with elevated SF level showed significantly worse overall survival and PFS than patients with low SF level (p = 0.002 and p = 0.004, respectively). In total, 17 patients showed normal SF level after chemoradiotherapy, and their median PFS was 3.2 months longer than that of patients whose SF levels were not restored after chemoradiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

SF may serve as a valuable tool to assess prognosis and monitor chemoradiotherapy response in patients with LAPC.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network Resectability Status for Pancreatic Carcinoma Predicts Overall Survival

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of preoperative resectability status, as defined by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), from the viewpoint of overall survival.

METHODS

A total of consecutive 704 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy with upfront surgery at seven Japanese hospitals between 2001 and 2012 were evaluated retrospectively. According to the NCCN definition of preoperative resectability status, tumors were divided into resectable tumors without vascular contact (R group), resectable tumors with portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) contact of ≦180° (R-PV group), borderline resectable(BR) tumors with PV/SMV contact of >180° (BR-PV group), and BR tumors with arterial contact (BR-A group). The relationship between the NCCN definition of preoperative resectability status and overall survival was analyzed.

RESULTS

Of the 704 patients, 389, 114, 145, and 56 were classified into the R group, the R-PV group, the BR-PV group, and the BR-A group, respectively. Overall survival of the BR-PV and BR-A groups was significantly worse than that of the R group and R-PV groups (P < 0.05), although there was no significant difference in overall survival between the R group and the R-PV group (P = 0.310). Multivariate analysis revealed that PV/SMV contact of >180° (P = 0.008) and arterial contact (P < 0.001) were independent prognostic factors of overall survival.

CONCLUSION

From the viewpoint of overall survival, the NCCN definition of preoperative resectability status was valid.

A phase I/II study of fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine and S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

This study was conducted to identify the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of fixed-dose-rate gemcitabine (FDR-gem) administered concurrently with S-1 and radical radiation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and to provide efficacy and safety data.

METHODS

Patients with unrespectable pancreatic cancer confined to the pancreatic region were treated with FDR-gem (300-400 mg/m(2), 5 mg/m(2)/min) on days 1, 8, 22, and 29 and 60 mg/m(2) of S-1 orally on days 1-14, 22-35. A total radiation dose of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/day, 28 fractions) was delivered concurrently.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients were enrolled; all were evaluable for toxicity assessment. In phase I, eight patients were treated in sequential cohorts of three to five patients per dose level. The MTD was reached at level 2, and dose-limiting toxicities were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The recommended doses were 300 mg/m(2) of gemcitabine and 60 mg/m(2) of S-1 daily. The overall response rate was 25% and disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) was 92%. The progression-free survival was 11.0 months. The median overall survival and 1-year survival rates were 16.0 months and 73%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of FDR-gem and S-1 with radiation is a feasible regimen that shows favorable antitumor activity with an acceptable safety profile in patients with LAPC.

Modeling Combined Chemotherapy and Particle Therapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is the only cancer for which deaths are predicted to increase in 2014 and beyond. Combined radiochemotherapy protocols using gemcitabine and hypofractionated X-rays are ongoing in several clinical trials. Recent results indicate that charged particle therapy substantially increases local control of resectable and unresectable pancreas cancer, as predicted from previous radiobiology studies considering the high tumor hypoxia. Combination with chemotherapy improves the overall survival (OS). We compared published data on X-ray and charged particle clinical results with or without adjuvant chemotherapy calculating the biological effective dose. We show that chemoradiotherapy with protons or carbon ions results in 1 year OS significantly higher than those obtained with other treatment schedules. Further hypofractionation using charged particles may result in improved local control and survival. A comparative clinical trial using the standard X-ray scheme vs. the best current standard with carbon ions is crucial and may open new opportunities for this deadly disease.

Treatment Approaches to Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

This article focuses on the management of locally advanced pancreatic cancer, which should be treated as a distinct entity separate from metastatic disease and borderline resectable disease. Although the role, timing, and sequencing of radiation relative to systemic therapy in this disease are controversial, an emerging treatment paradigm involves induction chemotherapy, followed by consolidative chemoradiation in patients who do not progress. In addition, new chemotherapy regimens as well as novel radiosensitizers have shown promise and need to be tested further in the locally advanced setting. Advances in radiotherapy have enabled stereotactic body radiotherapy and should continue to be prospectively evaluated.

Portal or superior mesenteric vein resection in pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to determine the added value of portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection during pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic head carcinoma.

METHODS

A multicentre observational study was conducted in patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy in seven Japanese hospitals between 2001 and 2012. Clinicopathological factors were compared between patients who did and did not undergo PV/SMV resection. Those with an impact on survival were identified by univariable and multivariable analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 937 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy, 435 (46·4 per cent) had PV/SMV resection, whereas the remaining 502 (53·6 per cent) did not. Some 71·5 and 63·9 per cent of patients with and without PV/SMV resection respectively had lymph node-positive disease. Patients who underwent PV/SMV resection had more advanced tumours. Perioperative mortality and morbidity rates did not differ between the two groups. Multivariable analysis revealed that PV/SMV resection was not an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (P = 0·268). Among the 435 patients in whom the PV/SMV was resected, borderline resectable tumours with arterial abutment (P = 0·021) and absence of adjuvant chemotherapy (P < 0·001) were independent predictors of poor survival in multivariable analysis. Patients with resectable or borderline resectable tumours with PV/SMV involvement had a median survival time with additional adjuvant chemotherapy of 43·7 and 29·7 months respectively. Median survival time in patients with borderline resectable tumours with arterial abutment was 18·6 months despite adjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatoduodenectomy with PV/SMV resection and adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with pancreatic head carcinoma may provide good survival without increased mortality and morbidity.

Reappraisal of peritoneal washing cytology in 984 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who underwent margin-negative resection

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present study was to reappraise the clinical value of peritoneal washing cytology (CY) in 984 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients who underwent margin-negative resection.

METHODS

In a 2001-2011 database from seven high-volume surgical institutions in Japan, 69 patients (7%) had positive CY (CY+ group) indicative of M1 disease and 915 patients had negative CY (CY- group). Clinicopathological data and survival were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Significant correlations between CY+ and high CA19-9 level, pancreatic body and tail cancer, lymph node metastasis, and a lower frequency of R0 resection were observed. Overall survival (OS) of CY+ patients was significantly worse than that of CY- patients (median survival time [MST], 16 vs. 25 months; 3-year OS rate, 6 vs. 37%; p < 0.001). CY+ patients had a significantly higher rate of post-operative peritoneal carcinomatosis than CY- patients (48 vs. 21%; p < 0.001). Administration of adjuvant chemotherapy did not provide a favorable survival outcome to CY+ patients. The current study showed that patients with M1 disease had acceptable MST after margin-negative resection and a high incidence of peritoneal carcinomatosis within 3 years after surgery, resulting in decreased long-term survival. The development of a new strategy to control peritoneal carcinomatosis when surgical resection is performed in such patients is required.

S-1 in the treatment of pancreatic cancer

S-1 is an oral 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) prodrug, which is designed to improve the antitumor activity of 5-FU by inhibiting dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the key enzyme of 5-FU catabolism. Recently, two important studies on the clinical use of S-1 for pancreatic cancer have been reported from Japan. In the first study (GEST study), S-1 demonstrated non-inferiority to gemcitabine (GEM) in overall survival (OS) for metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer, but combination chemotherapy with GEM and S-1 did not show superiority to GEM in OS. In the second study (JASPAC-01 study), S-1 showed superiority to adjuvant chemotherapy with GEM in OS in patients with resected pancreatic cancer. In addition to GEM, S-1 is now regarded as the key drug in the management of pancreatic cancer in Japan. To date, many studies have investigated the effectiveness of S-1 in various settings, such as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic cancer, second-line chemotherapy after GEM failure, and chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced disease. In this review, we focus on recent clinical trials of S-1-based chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer.

S-1 plus gemcitabine chemotherapy followed by concurrent radiotherapy and maintenance therapy with S-1 for unresectable pancreatic cancer

AIM: To investigate the feasibility and efficacy of the combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with concurrent radiotherapy (intensity modulated radiotherapy, IMRT) and maintenance therapy with S-1 for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

METHODS: Subjects selected in the study were patients who had unresectable and locally advanced pancreatic cancer without distant metastases, adequate organ and marrow functions, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1 and no prior anticancer therapy. Initially the subjects received two cycles of chemotherapy, oral administration of S-1 40 mg/m² twice daily from day 1 to day 14 of a 21-d cycle, with 30-min intravenous infusions of gemcitabine 1000 mg/m² on day 1 and day 8. Two weeks after the completion of chemotherapy, S-1 was administered orally with concurrent IMRT. Oral S-1 was administered at a dose of 80 mg/m² per day twice daily from day 1 to day 14 and from day 22 to day 35. Radiation was concurrently delivered at a dose of 50.4 Gy (1.8 Gy/d, 5 times per week, 28 fractions). One month after the completion of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, S-1 was administered orally at a dose of 80 mg/m² per day twice daily for 14 d, followed by a 14-d rest period. This cycle was repeated as maintenance therapy, until unacceptable toxicity occurred or the disease worsened. Thirty-two patients were involved in this study. The median follow-up was 15.6 mo (range: 8.6-32.3 mo).

RESULTS: Thirty-two patients completed the scheduled course of chemotherapy, while 30 patients (93.8%) received chemoradiotherapy with two patients ceasing to continue with radiotherapy. The major toxic effects were nausea and leukopenia. There was no grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death. According to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, the objective tumor response was partial response in 17 (53.1%) patients, stable disease in 9 (28.1%), and progressive disease in 6 (18.8%). The median overall survival and median progression-free survival were 15.2 mo and 9.3 mo, respectively. The survival rates at 1 year and 2 years were 75% and 34.4%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: The combination of S-1 with gemcitabine followed by oral S-1 with IMRT and maintenance therapy with S-1 alone in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer may be considered a well-tolerated, promising treatment regimen.

Randomized controlled study of gemcitabine plus S-1 combination chemotherapy versus gemcitabine for unresectable pancreatic cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus S-1 (GS) combination chemotherapy in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive GS (oral S-1 60 mg/m(2) daily on days 1-15 every 3 weeks and gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m(2) on days 8 and 15) or gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m(2) on days 1, 8, and 15 every 4 weeks). The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

One hundred and one patients were randomly assigned. PFS was significantly longer in the GS arm with an estimated hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 (95 % CI 0.43-0.98; P = 0.039; median 5.3 vs 3.8 months). Objective response rate (ORR) was also better in the GS arm (21.6 vs 6 %, P = 0.048). Median survival was 8.6 months for GS and 8.6 months for GEM (HR 0.93; 95 % CI 0.61-1.41; P = 0.714). Grade 3-4 neutropenia (44 vs 19.6 %, P = 0.011) and thrombocytopenia (26 vs 8.7 %, P = 0.051) were more frequent in the GS arm.

CONCLUSIONS

GS therapy improved PFS and ORR with acceptable toxicity profile in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Recent progress in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is currently one of the deadliest of the solid malignancies. However, surgery to resect neoplasms of the pancreas is safer and less invasive than ever, novel drug combinations have been shown to improve survival, advances in radiation therapy have resulted in less toxicity, and enormous strides have been made in the understanding of the fundamental genetics of pancreatic cancer. These advances provide hope but they also increase the complexity of caring for patients. It is clear that multidisciplinary care that provides comprehensive and coordinated evaluation and treatment is the most effective way to manage patients with pancreatic cancer.

Recent progress in pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer is currently one of the deadliest of the solid malignancies. However, surgery to resect neoplasms of the pancreas is safer and less invasive than ever, novel drug combinations have been shown to improve survival, advances in radiation therapy have resulted in less toxicity, and enormous strides have been made in the understanding of the fundamental genetics of pancreatic cancer. These advances provide hope but they also increase the complexity of caring for patients. It is clear that multidisciplinary care that provides comprehensive and coordinated evaluation and treatment is the most effective way to manage patients with pancreatic cancer.

S-1 monotherapy as second- or third-line chemotherapy for unresectable and recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

S-1 is widely used for various cancers. It may be useful for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC); however, there are insufficient data. The purpose is to provide results of an analysis of S-1 monotherapy for unresectable and recurrent ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty patients with histologically proven ESCC who were previously treated with other chemo(radio)therapies were treated with S-1 alone as second- or third-line chemotherapy.

RESULTS

A complete response (CR) was observed in 1 case (5%). A partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), and progressive disease (PD) were seen in 4 (20.0%), 7 (35.0%), and 8 (40.0%) cases, respectively. Two cases (10%) of anemia, 1 case (5%) of leukopenia, 3 cases (15%) of fatigue, and 3 cases (15%) of diarrhea were observed as grade 3 toxicity; however, there were no cases of grade 4 toxicity. The 1-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 10.0%, and the median PFS was 100 days. The 1-year overall survival (OS) was 30.5%, and the median OS was 330 days. The 1-year PFS rate in CR/PR/SD and PD was 16.7 and 0%, and the median survival time was 120 and 40 days.

CONCLUSION

S-1 is a promising new drug which can be used as a second- or third-line chemotherapy for ESCC.

Radiation dose responses for chemoradiation therapy of pancreatic cancer: an analysis of compiled clinical data using biophysical models

PURPOSE

We analyzed recent clinical data obtained from chemoradiation of unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) in order to examine possible benefits from radiation therapy dose escalation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A modified linear quadratic model was used to fit clinical tumor response and survival data of chemoradiation treatments for LAPC reported from 20 institutions. Biophysical radiosensitivity parameters were extracted from the fits.

RESULTS

Examination of the clinical data demonstrated an enhancement in tumor response with higher irradiation dose, an important clinical result for palliation and quality of life. Little indication of improvement in 1-year survival with increased radiation dose was observed. Possible dose escalation schemes are proposed based on calculations of the biologically effective dose required for a 50% tumor response rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the evaluation of tumor response data, the escalation of radiation dose presents potential clinical benefits which when combined with normal tissue complication analyses may result in improved treatment outcome for locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients.

Salvage chemoradiotherapy after primary chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a single-institution retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus on the indication for salvage chemoradiotherapy (CRT) after failure of primary chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Here we report on the retrospective analysis of patients who received salvage CRT after primary chemotherapy for LAPC. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of salvage CRT after primary chemotherapy for LAPC.

METHODS

Thirty patients who underwent salvage CRT, after the failure of primary chemotherapy for LAPC, were retrospectively enrolled from 2004 to 2011 at the authors' institution. All the patients had histologically confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Primary chemotherapy was continued until progression or emergence of unacceptable toxicity. Eventually, 26 patients (87%) discontinued primary chemotherapy because of local tumor progression, whereas four patients (13%) discontinued chemotherapy because of interstitial pneumonitis caused by gemcitabine. After a median period of 7.9 months from starting chemotherapy, 30 patients underwent salvage CRT combined with either S-1 or 5-FU. Toxicities were generally mild and self-limiting. Median survival time (MST) from the start of salvage CRT was 8.8 months. The 6 month, 1-year and 2-year survival rates from the start of CRT were 77%, 33% and 26%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that a lower pre-CRT serum CA 19-9 level (≤ 1000 U/ml; p = 0.009) and a single regimen of primary chemotherapy (p = 0.004) were independent prognostic factors for survival after salvage CRT. The MST for the entire patient population from the start of primary chemotherapy was 17.8 months, with 2- and 3-year overall survival rates of 39% and 22%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CRT had moderate anti-tumor activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in patients with LAPC, even after failure of gemcitabine-based primary chemotherapy. If there are any signs of failure of primary chemotherapy without distant metastasis, salvage CRT could be a treatment of choice as a second-line therapy. Patients with relatively low serum CA19-9 levels after primary chemotherapy may achieve higher survival rates after salvage CRT. The strategy of using chemotherapy alone as a primary treatment for LAPC, followed-by CRT with salvage intent should be further investigated in prospective clinical trials.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

2011-136

Benefit of portal or superior mesenteric vein resection with adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with pancreatic head carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of portal or superior mesenteric vein (PV/SMV) resection for patients with pancreatic carcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy.

METHODS

Medical records of 125 patients with pancreatic head carcinoma who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty-one patients underwent PV/SMV resection and 64 patients did not. Clinicopathological factors were compared between the two groups and the prognostic impact of PV/SMV resection was evaluated using univariate and multivariate survival analysis.

RESULTS

The frequency of mortality and morbidity did not differ between the two groups. Univariate analysis revealed that a significant difference in overall survival was found between patients who did and did not undergo PV/SMV resection (P = 0.046) as well as between patients with and without pathological PV/SMV invasion (P = 0.012). However, PV/SMV resection and pathological PV/SMV invasion were not independent prognostic factors by multivariate survival analysis. Among patients with PV/SMV resection, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was the only independent prognostic factor of overall survival (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Resection of the PV/SMV with adjuvant chemotherapy may provide an acceptable survival benefit to patients with pancreatic head carcinoma, which involves the PV/SMV without additional mortality and morbidity.