Favorable prognosis in patients with high-grade glioma with radiation necrosis: the University of Colorado reoperation series

Intraoperative radiotherapy in recurrent IDH-wildtype glioblastoma with gross total resection: A single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive primary brain tumors. The recurrence of GBM is almost inevitable. As an adjuvant option to surgery, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is gaining increasing attention in the treatment of glioma. This study is aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of IORT on recurrent IDHwt GBM.

METHODS

In total, 34 recurrent IDHwt GBM patients who received a second surgery were included in the analysis (17 in the surgery group and 17 in the surgery + IORT group).

RESULTS

The progression-free survival and overall survival after the second surgery were defined as PFS2 and OS2, respectively. The median PFS2 was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.5) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 9.3-14.6) for those patients who received surgery and surgery + IORT, respectively. Patients in the surgery + IORT group also had a longer OS2 (12.8 months, 95% CI: 11.4-17.2) than those in the surgery group (9.3 months, 95% CI: 8.9-12.9). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves, analyzed by log-rank test, revealed a statistically significant difference in PFS2 and OS2 between both groups, suggesting that IORT plays an active role in the observed benefits for PFS2 and OS2. The effects of IORT on PFS2 and OS2 were further confirmed by multivariate Cox hazards regression analysis. Two patients in the surgery group developed distant glioma metastases, and no radiation-related complications were observed in the IORT group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that low-dose IORT may improve the prognosis of recurrent IDHwt GBM patients. Future prospective large-scale studies are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of IORT.

Histopathologically confirmed radiation-induced damage of the brain - an in-depth analysis of radiation parameters and spatio-temporal occurrence

BACKGROUND

Radiation-induced damage (RID) after radiotherapy (RT) of primary brain tumors and metastases can be challenging to clinico-radiographically distinguish from tumor progression. RID includes pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis; the latter being irreversible and often associated with severe symptoms. While histopathology constitutes the diagnostic gold standard, biopsy-controlled clinical studies investigating RID remain limited. Whether certain brain areas are potentially more vulnerable to RID remains an area of active investigation. Here, we analyze histopathologically confirmed cases of RID in relation to the temporal and spatial dose distribution.

METHODS

Histopathologically confirmed cases of RID after photon-based RT for primary or secondary central nervous system malignancies were included. Demographic, clinical, and dosimetric data were collected from patient records and treatment planning systems. We calculated the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD22) and the biologically effective dose (BED2) for normal brain tissue (α/β ratio of 2 Gy) and analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution using frequency maps.

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were identified. High-grade glioma patients (n = 18) mostly received one normofractionated RT series (median cumulative EQD22 60 Gy) to a large planning target volume (PTV) (median 203.9 ccm) before diagnosis of RID. Despite the low EQD22 and BED2, three patients with an accelerated hyperfractionated RT developed RID. In contrast, brain metastases patients (n = 15; 16 RID lesions) were often treated with two or more RT courses and with radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic RT, resulting in a higher cumulative EQD22 (median 162.4 Gy), to a small PTV (median 6.7 ccm). All (n = 34) RID lesions occurred within the PTV of at least one of the preceding RT courses. RID in the high-grade glioma group showed a frontotemporal distribution pattern, whereas, in metastatic patients, RID was observed throughout the brain with highest density in the parietal lobe. The cumulative EQD22 was significantly lower in RID lesions that involved the subventricular zone (SVZ) than in lesions without SVZ involvement (median 60 Gy vs. 141 Gy, p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Accelerated hyperfractionated RT can lead to RID despite computationally low EQD22 and BED2 in high-grade glioma patients. The anatomical location of RID corresponded to the general tumor distribution of gliomas and metastases. The SVZ might be a particularly vulnerable area.

Patterns of Progression in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Treated With 5-mm Margins in a Phase 1/2 Trial of 5-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide

PURPOSE

In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), tumor margins of at least 20 mm are the standard of care. We sought to determine the pattern of tumor progression in patients treated with 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with 5-mm margins.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM were treated with 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in escalated doses from 25 to 40 Gy with a 5-mm total treatment margin. Progression was scored as "in-field" if the recurrent tumor was within or contiguous with the 5-mm margin, "marginal" if between 5 and 20 mm, and "distant" if entirely occurring greater than 20 mm. As geometric patterns of progression do not reflect the biologic dose received, we calculated the minimum equi-effective dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) per day at the site of tumor recurrence. Progression was "dosimetrically in-field" if covered by a minimum EQD2 per day of 48 Gy10.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2016, 27 patients had progressed. Progression was in-field in 17 (63%), marginal in 3 (11%), and distant in 7 (26%) patients. In the 3 patients with marginal progression, the minimum EQD2 to recurrent tumor were 48 Gy10, 56 Gy10 (both considered dosimetrically in-field), and 7 Gy10 (ie, dosimetrically out-of-field). Median overall survival was 12.1 months for in-field (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9-17.6), 15.1 months (95% CI, 10.1 to not achieved) for marginal, and 21.4 months (95% CI, 11.2-33.5) for distant progression. Patients with radiation necrosis were less likely to have in-field progression (1 of 7; 14%) compared with those without radiation necrosis (16 of 20; 80%; P = .003); those with necrosis had a median overall survival of 27.2 months (95% CI, 11.2-48.3) compared with 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.9-17.6) for patients with no necrosis (P = .077).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with a 5-mm clinical target volume margin, 3 patients (11%) had marginal progression within 5 to 20 mm; only 1 patient (4%) may have dosimetrically benefitted from conventional 20-mm margins. Radiation necrosis was associated with in-field tumor control.

Updates in the Management of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme

BACKGROUND

 Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and diffusely infiltrative primary brain tumor. Recurrence is almost universal even after all primary standard treatments. This article aims to review the literature and update the standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

METHODS

 A systematic search was performed with the phrase "recurrent glioblastoma and management" as a search term in PubMed central, Medline, and Embase databases to identify all the articles published on the subject till December 2020. The review included peer-reviewed original articles, clinical trials, review articles, and keywords in title and abstract.

RESULTS

 Out of 513 articles searched, 73 were included in this review after screening for eligibility. On analyzing the data, most of the studies report a median overall survival (OS) of 5.9 to 11.4 months after re-surgery and 4.7 to 7.6 months without re-surgery. Re-irradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) result in a median OS of 10.2 months (range: 7.0-12 months) and 9.8 months (ranged: 7.5-11.0 months), respectively. Radiation necrosis was found in 16.6% (range: 0-24.4%) after SRS. Chemotherapeutic agents like nitrosourea (carmustine), bevacizumab, and temozolomide (TMZ) rechallenge result in a median OS in the range of 5.1 to 7.5, 6.5 to 9.2, and 5.1-13.0 months and six months progression free survival (PFS-6) in the range of 13 to 17.5%, 25 to 42.6%, and 23 to 58.3%, respectively. Use of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors results in a median OS in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 months and PFS-6 in 13%.

CONCLUSION

 Although recurrent glioblastoma remains a fatal disease with universal mortality, the literature suggests that a subset of patients may benefit from maximal treatment efforts.

Charged particle therapy for high-grade gliomas in adults: a systematic review

High-grade gliomas are the most common intracranial malignancies, and their current prognosis remains poor despite standard aggressive therapy. Charged particle beams have unique physical and biological properties, especially high relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ion beam might improve the clinical treatment outcomes of malignant gliomas. We systematically reviewed the safety, efficacy, and dosimetry of carbon-ion or proton radiotherapy to treat high-grade gliomas. The protocol is detailed in the online PROSPERO database, registration No. CRD42021258495. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases were collected for data analysis on charged particle radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Until July 2022, two independent reviewers extracted data based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eleven articles were eligible for further analysis. Overall survival rates were marginally higher in patients with the current standard of care than those receiving concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus temozolomide. The most common side effects of carbon-ion-related therapy were grade 1-2 (such as dermatitis, headache, and alopecia). Long-term toxicities (more than three to six months) usually present as radiation necrosis; however, toxicities higher than grade 3 were not observed. Similarly, dermatitis, headache, and alopecia are among the most common acute side effects of proton therapy treatment. Despite improvement in survival rates, the method of dose-escalation using proton boost is associated with severe brain necrosis which should not be clinically underestimated. Regarding dosimetry, two studies compared proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. Proton therapy plans aimed to minimize dose exposure to non-target tissues while maintaining target coverage. The use of charged-particle radiotherapy seems to be effective with acceptable adverse effects when used either alone or as a boost. The tendency of survival outcome shows that carbon ion boost is seemingly superior to proton boost. The proton beam could provide good target coverage, and it seems to reduce dose exposure to contralateral organs at risk significantly. This can potentially reduce the treatment-related dose- and volume-related side effects in long-term survivors, such as neurocognitive impairment. High-quality randomized control trials should be conducted in the future. Moreover, Systemic therapeutic options that can be paired with charged particles are necessary.

Retrospective examination of pseudoprogression in IDH mutant gliomas

Background

Tumor surveillance of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas is accomplished via serial contrast MRI. When new contrast enhancement (CEnew) is detected during postsurgical surveillance, clinicians must assess whether CEnew indicates pseudoprogression (PsP) or tumor progression (TP). PsP has been better studied in IDH wild-type glioblastoma but has not been well characterized in IDH mutant gliomas. We conducted a retrospective study evaluating the incidence, predictors, natural history, and survival of PsP patients in a large cohort of IDH mutant glioma patients treated at a single institution.

Methods

We identified 587 IDH mutant glioma patients treated at UCLA. We directly inspected MRI images and radiology reports to identify CEnew and categorized CEnew into TP or PsP using MRI or histopathology.

Results

Fifty-six percent of patients developed CEnew (326/587); of these, 92/326 patients (28% of CEnew; 16% of all) developed PsP and 179/326 (55%) developed TP. All PsP patients had prior radiation, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. PsP was associated with longer overall survival (OS) versus TP patients and similar OS versus no CEnew. PsP differs from TP based on earlier time of onset (median 5.8 vs 17.4 months from treatment, P < .0001) and MRI features that include punctate enhancement and enhancement location.

Conclusion

PsP patients represented 28% of CEnew patients and 16% of all patients; PsP patients demonstrated superior outcomes to TP patients, and equivalent survival to patients without CEnew. PsP persists for <1 year, occurs after treatment, and differs from TP based on time of onset and radiographic features. Poor outcomes after CEnew are driven by TP.

Safety and efficacy of irradiation boost based on 18F-FET-PET in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

PURPOSE

Dual timepoint FET-PET acquisition (10 and 60 minutes after FET injection) improves the definition of glioblastoma location and shape. Here we evaluated the safety and efficacy of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) planned using dual FET-PET for postoperative glioblastoma treatment.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

In this prospective pilot study (March 2017-December 2020), 17 patients qualified for FET-PET-based SIB intensity-modulated radiotherapy after resection. The prescribed dose was 78 and 60 Gy (2.6 and 2.0 Gy per fraction, respectively) for the FET-PET- and MR-based target volumes. Eleven patients had FET-PET within nine months to precisely define biological responses. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicities, and radiation necrosis were evaluated. Six patients (35%) had tumors with MGMT promoter methylation.

RESULTS

The one- and two-year OS and PFS rates were 73% and 43% and 53% and 13%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 24 (95%CI 9-26) and 12 (95%CI 6-18) months, respectively. Two patients developed uncontrolled seizures during radiotherapy and could not receive treatment per protocol. In patients treated per protocol, 7/15 presented with new or increased neurological deficits in the first month after irradiation. Radiation necrosis was diagnosed by MRI three months after SIB in five patients and later in another two patients. In two patients, the tumor was larger in FET-PET images after six months.

CONCLUSIONS

Survival outcomes using our novel dose escalation concept (total 78 Gy) were promising, even within the MGMTunmethylated subgroup. Excessive neurotoxicity was not observed, but radionecrosis was common and must be considered in future trials.

Conventional MRI Criteria to Differentiate Progressive Disease from Treatment-Induced Effects in High-Grade (WHO Grade 3-4) Gliomas

BACKGROUND

Post-treatment radiological deterioration of patients with an irradiated high-grade (WHO grade 3-4) glioma (HGG) may be the result of true progressive disease (PD) or treatment-induced effects (TIE). Differentiation between these entities is of great importance, but remains a diagnostic challenge. This study assesses the diagnostic value of conventional MRI characteristics to differentiate PD from TIE in HGGs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this single-centre, retrospective, consecutive cohort study, we included adults with a HGG, who were treated with (chemo-)radiotherapy and subsequently developed a new or increasing contrast-enhancing lesion on conventional follow-up MRI. TIE and PD were defined radiologically as stable/decreased for ≥6 weeks or RANO-progression, and histologically as TIE without viable tumour or PD. Two neuroradiologists assessed twenty-one preselected MRI characteristics of the progressive lesions. The statistical analysis included logistic regression to develop a) a full multivariable model b) a diagnostic model with model reduction, and a Cohen's Kappa interrater reliability (IRR) coefficient.

RESULTS

210 patients (median age=61, IQR=54-68, 189 males) with 284 lesions were included, of which 141 (50%) had PD. Median time to PD was 2 (0.7-6.1) and to TIE 0.9 (0.7-3.5) months after radiotherapy. After multivariable modelling and model reduction, the following determinants prevailed: Radiation dose (Odds ratio (OR)=0.68, 95%-CI=0.49-0.93), longer time to progression (TTP, OR=3.56, 95%-CI=1.84-6.88), marginal enhancement (OR=2.04, 95%-CI=1.09-3.83), soap bubble enhancement (OR=2.63, 95%-CI=1.39-4.98) and isointense apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-signal (OR=2.11, 95%-CI=1.05-4.24). ORs>1 indicate higher odds of PD. The Hosmer&Lemeshow test showed good calibration (p=0.947) and the area under the ROC-curve was 0.722 (95%-CI=0.66-0.78). In the glioblastoma subgroup, TTP, marginal enhancement and ADC-signal were significant. IRR analysis between neuroradiologists revealed moderate to near-perfect agreement for the predictive items, but poor agreement for others.

DISCUSSION

Several characteristics from conventional MRI are significant predictors for the discrimination between PD and TIE. However, IRR was variable. Conventional MRI characteristics from this study should be incorporated into a multimodal diagnostic model with advanced imaging techniques.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with irradiated HGGs, radiation dose, longer time to progression, marginal enhancement, soap bubble enhancement and isointense apparent ADC-signal distinguish PD from TIE.

Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in recurrent glioblastoma: a new prognostic factor?

Background

For recurrent glioblastoma (GB) patients, several therapy options have been established over the last years such as more aggressive surgery, re-irradiation or chemotherapy. Age and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) are used to make decisions for these patients as these are established as prognostic factors in the initial diagnosis of GB. This study’s aim was to evaluate preoperative patient comorbidities by using the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) as a prognostic factor for recurrent GB patients.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis we could include 123 patients with surgery for primary recurrence of GB from January 2007 until December 2016 (43 females, 80 males, mean age 57 years (range 21–80 years)). Preoperative age, sex, ACCI, KPSS and adjuvant treatment regimes were recorded for each patient. Extent of resection (EOR) was recorded as a complete/incomplete resection of the contrast-enhancing tumor part.

Results

Median overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.1–10.9 months) after first re-resection. Preoperative KPSS > 80% (P < 0.001) and EOR (P = 0.013) were associated with significantly improved survival in univariate analysis. Including these factors in multivariate analysis, preoperative KPSS < 80 (HR 2.002 [95% CI: 1.246–3.216], P = 0.004) and EOR are the only significant prognostic factor (HR 1.611 [95% CI: 1.036–2.505], P = 0.034). ACCI was not shown as a prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses.

Conclusion

For patients with surgery for recurrent glioblastoma, the ACCI does not add further information about patient’s prognosis besides the well-established KPSS and extent of resection.

Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed?

Optimal management after recurrence or progression of high-grade gliomas is still undefined and remains a challenge for neuro-oncology multidisciplinary teams. Improved radiation therapy techniques, new imaging methods, published experience, and a better radiobiological knowledge of brain tissue have positioned re-irradiation (re-RT) as an option for many of these patients. Decisions must be individualized, taking into account the pattern of relapse, previous treatment, and functional status, as well as the patient’s preferences and expected quality of life. Many questions remain unanswered with respect to re-RT: Who is the most appropriate candidate, which dose and fractionation are most effective, how to define the target volume, which imaging technique is best for planning, and what is the optimal timing? This review will focus on describing the most relevant studies that include re-RT as salvage therapy, with the aim of simplifying decision-making and designing the best available therapeutic strategy.

A phase I/II trial of 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with 5-mm margins with concurrent temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: primary outcomes

BACKGROUND

We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with 5-mm margins delivered with concurrent temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

We enrolled adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to 5 days of SRS in a 3 + 3 design on 4 escalating dose levels: 25, 30, 35, and 40 Gy. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades 3-5 acute or late CNS toxicity, including adverse radiation effect (ARE), the imaging correlate of radiation necrosis.

RESULTS

From 2010 to 2015, thirty patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years (range, 51-86 y). The median target volume was 60 cm3 (range, 14.7-137.3 cm3). DLT occurred in 2 patients: one for posttreatment cerebral edema and progressive disease at 3 weeks (grade 4, dose 40 Gy); another patient died 1.5 weeks following SRS from postoperative complications (grade 5, dose 40 Gy). Late grades 1-2 ARE occurred in 8 patients at a median of 7.6 months (range 3.2-12.6 mo). No grades 3-5 ARE occurred. With a median follow-up of 13.8 months (range 1.7-64.4 mo), the median survival times were: progression-free survival, 8.2 months (95% CI: 4.6-10.5); overall survival, 14.8 months (95% CI: 10.9-19.9); O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase hypermethylated, 19.9 months (95% CI: 10.5-33.5) versus 11.3 months (95% CI: 8.9-17.6) for no/unknown hypermethylation (P = 0.03), and 27.2 months (95% CI: 11.2-48.3) if late ARE occurred versus 11.7 months (95% CI: 8.9-17.6) for no ARE (P = 0.08).

CONCLUSIONS

The per-protocol MTD of 5-fraction SRS with 5-mm margins with concurrent temozolomide was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. ARE was limited to grades 1-2 and did not statistically impact survival.

Tumor recurrence or treatment-related changes following chemoradiation in patients with glioblastoma: does pathology predict outcomes?

BACKGROUND

Despite surgical resection and chemoradiation, all patients with GBM invariably recur. Radiological imaging is limited in differentiating tumor recurrence (TR) from treatment-related changes (TRC); therefore, re-resection is often needed. Few studies have assessed the relationship between re-resection histopathology and overall survival (OS). We performed a large retrospective study to analyze the clinical significance of histopathology following re-resection and its influence on genomic sequencing results.

METHODS

Clinical, radiographic, and histological information was compiled from 675 patients with GBM (2005-2017). 137-patients met the inclusion criteria. IDH1 p.R132H immunohistochemistry was performed in all patients. Next-generation sequencing interrogating 205 tumor-related genes was performed in 68-patients. Molecular alterations from initial and subsequent resections were compared in a subset of cases.

RESULTS

There were no differences in OS (17.3-months TRC vs. 21-months TR, p = 0.881) and survival from progression (9.0 vs. 11.7-months, p = 0.778) between patients with TR and TRC on re-resection. TR patients were more likely to receive salvage radiotherapy (26% vs. 0%) and tumor-treating fields (25% vs. 5%,) after the 2nd surgery than the TRC group (p = < 0.045). There was no correlation between mutations and TRC. IDH status was not predictive of TRC. Fifteen-patients had sequencing results from multiple surgeries without evident differences in genomic alterations.

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathologic findings following chemoradiation do not correlate with clinical outcomes. Such findings should be considered during patient management and clinical trial enrollment. Standardization of tissue sampling and interpretation following reoperation is urgently needed. Future work is required to understand the relationship between the mutation profile following TRC and outcomes.

Local treatment for relapsing glioblastoma: A decision-making tree for choosing between reirradiation and second surgery

In case of circumscribed recurrent glioblastoma (rec-GBM), a second surgery (Re-S) and reirradiation (Re-RT) are local strategies to consider. The aim is to provide an algorithm to use in the daily clinical practice. The first step is to consider the life expectancy in order to establish whether the patient should be a candidate for active treatment. In case of a relatively good life expectancy (>3 months) and a confirmed circumscribed disease(i.e. without multiple lesions that are in different lobes/hemispheres), the next step is the assessment of the prognostic factors for local treatments. Based on the existing prognostic score systems, patients who should be excluded from local treatments may be identified; based on the validated prognostic factors, one or the other local treatment may be preferred. The last point is the estimation of expected toxicity, considering patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related factors impacting on side effects. Lastly, patients with very good prognostic factors may be considered for receiving a combined treatment.

Presence of Histopathological Treatment Effects at Resection of Recurrent Glioblastoma: Incidence and Effect on Outcome

BACKGROUND

Resection may be appropriate for select patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The incidence of histopathological findings related to prior treatment and their prognostic implications are incompletely characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the incidence and survival outcomes associated with treatment effect at resection of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM).

METHODS

Patients who underwent resection for recurrent GBM were retrospectively reviewed, and pathology, treatment history, and survival data were collected. Treatment effect was defined as any component of treatment-related changes on pathology.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients underwent 146 reoperations. Median age at first reoperation was 57.2 yr and overall survival from reoperation was 10.8 mo. Treatment effect of any kind was noted in 81 of 146 reoperations (55%). Increased treatment effect was observed closer to radiotherapy; by quartile of time from radiotherapy, the rates of treatment effect were 77.8%, 55.6%, 40.7%, and 44.4% (P = .028). Treatment effect was associated with earlier reoperation (8.9 vs 13.8 mo after radiotherapy, P = .003), and the presence of treatment effect did not impact survival from primary surgery (25.4 vs 24.3 mo, P = .084). Patients treated with bevacizumab prior to reoperation were less likely to have treatment effect (20% vs 65%, P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Histopathological treatment-related changes are evident in a majority of patients undergoing resection for recurrent glioblastoma. There was no association of treatment effect with overall survival from primary surgery.

Current clinical management of patients with glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, historically resistant to treatment, and with overall fatal outcome.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recently, several molecular subgroups and rare genetic alterations have been described in GB. In this review article, we will describe the current clinical management of patients with GB in the United States, discuss selected next-generation molecular-targeted therapies in GB, and present ongoing clinical trials for patients with GB. This review is intended for clinical and preclinical researchers who conduct work on GB and would like to understand more about the current standard of treatment of GB patients, historical perspectives, current challenges, and ongoing and upcoming clinical trials.

CONCLUSIONS

GB is an extremely complex disease, and despite recent progress and advanced therapeutic strategies, the overall patient's prognosis remains dismal. Innovative strategies and integrative ways of approach to disease are urgently needed.

Salvage craniotomy for treatment-refractory symptomatic cerebral radiation necrosis

Background

The incidence of symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) has risen as radiotherapy is increasingly used to control brain tumor progression. Traditionally managed with steroids, symptomatic RN can remain refractory to medical treatment, requiring surgical intervention for control. The purpose of our study was to assess a single institution's experience with craniotomy for steroid-refractory pure RN.

Methods

The medical records of all tumor patients who underwent craniotomies at our institution from 2011 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed for a history of preoperative radiotherapy or radiosurgery. RN was confirmed histopathologically and patients with active tumor were excluded. Preoperative, intraoperative, and outcome information was collected. Primary outcomes measured were postoperative KPS and time to steroid freedom.

Results

Twenty-four patients with symptomatic RN were identified. Gross total resection was achieved for all patients. Patients with metastases experienced an increase in KPS (80 vs 100, P < .001) and required a shortened course of dexamethasone vs patients with high-grade gliomas (3.4 vs 22.2 weeks, P = .003). RN control and neurological improvement at 13.3 months' follow-up were 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Adrenal insufficiency after rapidly tapering dexamethasone was the only morbidity (n = 1). Overall survival was 93.3% (14/15) at 1 year.

Conclusion

In cases of treatment-refractory symptomatic RN, resection can lead to an overall improvement in postoperative health status and neurological outcomes with minimal RN recurrence. Craniotomy for surgically accessible RN can safely manage symptomatic patients, and future studies assessing the efficacy of resection vs bevacizumab may be warranted.

Cerebral Radiation Necrosis: Incidence, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Challenges, and Future Opportunities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a major dose-limiting adverse event of radiotherapy. The incidence rate of RN varies with the radiotherapy modality, total dose, dose fractionation, and the nature of the lesion being targeted. In addition to these known and controllable features, there is a stochastic component to the occurrence of CRN-the genetic profile of the host or the lesion and their role in the development of CRN.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies provide some insight into the genetic mechanisms underlying radiation-induced brain injury. In addition to these incompletely understood host factors, the diagnostic criteria for CRN using structural and functional imaging are also not clear, though multiple structural and functional imaging modalities exist, a combination of which may prove to be the ideal diagnostic imaging approach. As the utilization of novel molecular therapies and immunotherapy increases, the incidence of CNR is expected to increase and its diagnosis will become more challenging. Tissue biopsies can be insensitive and suffer from sampling biases and procedural risks. Liquid biopsies represent a promising, accurate, and non-invasive diagnostic strategy, though this modality is currently in its infancy. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of CRN will expand and optimize the diagnosis and management of CRN by better utilizing existing treatment options including bevacizumab, pentoxifylline, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and laser interstitial thermal therapy.

Pseudoprogression as an adverse event of glioblastoma therapy

We explored predictive factors of pseudoprogression (PsP) and its impact on prognosis in a retrospective series of uniformly treated glioblastoma patients. Patients were classified as having PsP, early progression (eP) or neither (nP). We examined potential associations with clinical, molecular, and basal imaging characteristics and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) as well as the relationship between PFS and PPS in the three groups. Of the 256 patients studied, 56 (21.9%) were classified as PsP, 70 (27.3%) as eP, and 130 (50.8%) as nP. Only MGMT methylation status was associated to PsP. MGMT methylated patients had a 3.5-fold greater possibility of having PsP than eP (OR: 3.48; 95% CI: 1.606-7.564; P = 0.002). OS was longer for PsP than eP patients (18.9 vs. 12.3 months; P = 0.0001) but was similar for PsP and nP patients (P = 0.91). OS was shorter-though not significantly so-for PsP than nP patients (OS: 19.5 vs. 27.9 months; P = 0.63) in methylated patients. PPS was similar for patients having PsP, eP or nP (PPS: 7.2 vs. 5.4 vs. 6.7; P = 0.43). Neurological deterioration occurred in 64.3% of cases at the time they were classified as PsP and in 72.8% of cases of eP (P = 0.14). PsP confounds the evaluation of disease and does not confer a survival advantage in glioblastoma.

Are three weeks hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) comparable to six weeks for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients? Results of a phase II study

Background

The current standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is surgical resection, followed by radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (TMZ-CHT). The patients outcome is still poor. In this study we evaluated hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT), instead of standard fractionated radiation therapy, with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy, in terms of safety and effectiveness.

Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed GBM, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) ≥70, and tumor up to 10 cm underwent maximal feasible surgical resection were treated. HFRT consisted of 60 Gy, in daily fractions of 4 Gy given 5 days per week for 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and incidence of radiation induced brain toxicity. Secondary endpoint was the evaluation of neurocognitive function.

Results

A total of 97 patients were included in this phase II study. The median age was 60.5 years (range 23-77 years). Debulking surgery was performed in 83.5% of patients, HFRT was completed in all 97 patients, concurrent and adjuvant TMZ in 93 (95.9%). The median number of TMZ cycles was six (range 1-12 cycles). No severe toxicity occurred and the neuropsychological evaluation remained stable. At a median follow up time of 15.2 months the median OS time, 1,2-year OS rate were 15.9 months (95% CI 14-18), 72.2% (95% CI 62.1-80) and 30.4% (95% CI 20.8-40.6). Age, KPS, MGMT methylation status, and extent of surgical resection were significant factors influencing the outcome.

Conclusion

HFRT with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy is an effective and safe treatment.

Impact of Resecting Radiation Necrosis and Pseudoprogression on Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Radiation necrosis (RN) and pseudoprogression are known as postradiation treatment effects and may simulate tumor progression. The disease course of glioblastoma patients who had developed RN and the impact of resecting RN on survival have not been evaluated. This study examines the clinical course of patients considered candidates for repeat surgery for a recurring brain mass proven to be RN and compared these with patients who had true tumor recurrence at surgery.

METHODS

Of 159 patients with glioblastoma who were reoperated on because of a presumed recurrent tumor requiring repeat surgery, 18 had RN as the major component of the resected mass. The characteristics and outcome of these 18 patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared with patients in whom active and bulky tumor was found during surgery.

RESULTS

Radiation necrosis occurred significantly earlier than true tumor recurrence. Patients with RN harbored larger lesions and were significantly more symptomatic before the second surgery. Most patients with RN who underwent GTR of the lesion in the second operation experienced faster resolution of the surrounding edema compared with patients who underwent STR or biopsy only. There was no significant difference in survival between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide an opportunity to examine the clinical course of a selected group of patients with histologically verified RN. Although RN is associated with more severe neurologic symptoms that improve after surgery, its occurrence or surgical removal carries no survival advantage compared with patients who undergo a repeat operation for true tumor recurrence.

Second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: A concise overview of the current literature

Optimal treatment for recurrent glioblastoma continues to evolve. Currently, however, there is no consensus in the literature on the role of reoperation in the management of these patients, as several studies provide evidence for a longer overall survival in selected patients with recurrent glioblastoma who underwent second surgery and other studies report a limited impact of second surgery in the clinical course. In this paper, a review of the current literature was performed to analyze the role of reoperation in patients with recurrent glioblastoma and to report the overall survival from diagnosis, progression-free survival and quality of life. Using PubMed and Ovid Medline databases, we performed a review of the literature of the last seven years, finding a total of 28 studies and 2279 patients who underwent second surgery, that were included in the final analysis. The median overall survival from diagnosis and the median survival from second surgery were 18.5 months and 9.7 months, respectively. Extent of resection at reoperation improves overall survival, even in patients with subtotal resection at initial operation. Preoperative performance status and age are important predictors of a longer survival, reason why younger patients with a good preoperative performance status could benefit from reoperation.

Proliferation Index Predicts Survival after Second Craniotomy within 6 Months of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for High-grade Glioma

AIMS

To determine pathological features that predict survival in patients having repeat craniotomy within 6 months of radiotherapy for high-grade glioma (HGG).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

HGG patients (World Health Organization grade 3/4) managed with repeat craniotomy within 6 months of completing radiotherapy between 2008 and 2012 were included. Based on the presence of residual tumour cells, the pathology was reported as pathological progression or pathological pseudoprogression. The proliferation index (Ki67) was reported and compared with initial pathology as a percentage change. Tumour necrosis was estimated as a percentage of the specimen. Overall survival was calculated in months.

RESULTS

Of 327 patients managed with HGG, 27 patients underwent repeat craniotomy within 6 months of radiotherapy. The median survival after reoperation was 11 months (95% confidence interval 1-22). Ki67 at reoperation of 0%, 1-9% and >10% was associated with survival with a median survival of 13, 13 and 3 months, respectively (P = 0.007). Change in Ki67 was also associated with median survival, with <50% reduction median survival 3 months, 50-80% median survival 7 months and >80% reduction median survival 13 months, P = 0.02. Widespread treatment-related necrosis improved outcome, with >80% necrosis having a median survival of 13 months versus 3 months in those with <80% necrosis (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The presence of residual tumour at repeat craniotomy within 6 months of radiotherapy is not an independent indicator of prognosis. Patients with residual tumour that had a low Ki67 had a similar median survival as those with only treatment necrosis. Reduced proliferation of residual tumour cells and widespread necrosis may be more important indicators for future outcome.

Localized radiation necrosis model in mouse brain using proton ion beams

Brain radiation necrosis is the most serious late adverse event that occurs after 6 months following radiation therapy. Effective treatment for this irreversible brain necrosis has not been established yet. This study tries to establish brain radiation necrosis mouse model using proton or helium beam. The right cerebral hemispheres of C57BL/6J mouse brains were irradiated at doses of 40, 50, 60 Gy with charged particles. In 60 Gy group, brain necrosis that recapitulates human disease was detected after 8 months.

Reoperation for Recurrent High-Grade Glioma

Optimal treatment for recurrent high-grade glioma continues to evolve. Currently, however, there is no consensus in the literature on the role of reoperation in the management of these patients. In this analysis, we reviewed the literature to examine the role of reoperation in patients with World Health Organization grade III or IV recurrent gliomas, focusing on how reoperation affects outcome, perioperative complications, and quality of life. An extensive literature review was performed through the use of the PubMed and Ovid Medline databases for January 1980 through August 2013. A total 31 studies were included in the final analysis. Of the 31 studies with significant data from single or multiple institutions, 29 demonstrated a survival benefit or improved functional status after reoperation for recurrent high-grade glioma. Indications for reoperation included new focal neurological deficits, tumor mass effect, signs of elevated intracranial pressure, headaches, increased seizure frequency, and radiographic evidence of tumor progression. Age was not a contraindication to reoperation. Time interval of at least 6 months between operations and favorable performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status score ≥70) were important predictors of benefit from reoperation. Extent of resection at reoperation improved survival, even in patients with subtotal resection at initial operation. Careful patient selection such as avoiding those individuals with poor performance status and bevacizumab within 4 weeks of surgery is important. Although limited to retrospective analysis and patient selection bias, mounting evidence suggests a survival benefit in patients receiving a reoperation at the time of high-grade glioma recurrence.

MRI patterns of T1 enhancing radiation necrosis versus tumour recurrence in high-grade gliomas

INTRODUCTION

Despite the emergence of new imaging technologies, the differentiation of treatment-related changes from recurrent tumour in patients with high-grade gliomas remains a difficult challenge. We evaluated whether specific MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) T1 post-contrast enhancement patterns can help to distinguish between radiation necrosis and tumour recurrence.

METHODS

This study was approved by local institutional review board. Fifty-one patients with World Health Organization grade III-IV glioma underwent reoperation after prior chemoradiation. The percentage of radiation necrosis versus recurrent tumour in reoperation specimens was estimated by an experienced neuropathologist. Enhancement patterns on T1 post-contrast sequences from the MRIs obtained prior to reoperation were evaluated according to pathology.

RESULTS

T1 contrast enhancement patterns correlating with recurrent tumour included focal solid nodules and solid uniform enhancement with distinct margins. Eighty-five per cent (17/20) of patients with ≥70% recurrent tumour at reoperation demonstrated one of these patterns on preoperative MRI. Enhancement patterns correlating with radiation necrosis included a hazy mesh-like diffuse enhancement and rim enhancement with feathery indistinct margins. Ninety-four per cent (17/18) of patients with ≥70% radiation necrosis demonstrated one of these two patterns. Thirteen cases had more mixed pathology (>30% of tumour/necrosis) and demonstrated patterns associated with recurrence and/or necrosis. Compared to MR spectroscopy performed in 10 patients, enhancement patterns on MRI were just as accurate in predicting pathologic diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

Identifying distinct patterns of contrast enhancement on MRI may help to differentiate between radiation necrosis and tumour recurrence in high-grade gliomas.

Pseudoprogression after glioma therapy: a comprehensive review

Over the last decade, pseudoprogression as a clinically significant entity affecting both glioma patient management and the conduct of clinical trials has been recognized as a significant issue. The authors have summarized the literature relative to the incidence, chronological sequence, therapy-relatedness, impact of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation status and clinical features of pseudoprogression. Evidence regarding numerous neuroradiologic techniques to differentiate pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence is summarized. The implications of pseudoprogression on prognosis and clinical trial design are substantial, and are reviewed. Relative to this, the overlapping terms pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis are clarified to produce an appropriate basis for future consideration and research regarding this important biological phenomenon.

Predictors of long-term survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: advancements from the last quarter century

Over the last quarter century there has been significant progress toward identifying certain characteristics and patterns in GBM patients to predict survival times and outcomes. We sought to identify clinical predictors of survival in GBM patients from the past 24 years. We examined patient survival related to tumor locations, surgical treatment, postoperative course, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, patient age, GBM recurrence, imaging characteristics, serum, and molecular markers. We present predictors that may increase, decrease, or play no significant role in determining a GBM patient's long-term survival or affect the quality of life.

γ knife surgery versus reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

BACKGROUND

The optimal management of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a subject of controversy. These patients may be candidates for both reoperation and/or gamma knife surgery (GKS). Few studies have addressed the role of GKS for relapsing gliomas, and the results have not been compared with reoperation. To validate the efficacy and safety of GKS, we compared the survival and complication rates of GKS and reoperation for recurrent GBMs.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 77 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed GBMs retreated for recurrent GBM between 1996 and 2007. Thirty-two patients underwent GKS, 26 reoperation and 19 both procedures.

RESULTS

The median time from the second intervention to tumor progression was longer after GKS than after resection, P = 0.009. Median survival after retreatment was 12 months for the 51 patients receiving GKS compared with 6 months for reoperation only (P = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] 2.4), and 19 months versus 16 months from the time of primary diagnosis (P = 0.021, HR 1.8). A multivariate analysis adjusted for possible confounding factors (tumor volume, recursive partitioning analysis class, neurological deficits, time to recurrence, adjuvant therapy, and tumor location) showed significantly longer survival for patients treated with GKS, both from retreatment (P = 0.013, HR 4.1) and from primary diagnosis (P = 0.002, HR 5.8). The adjusted results were still significant after separate analysis according to tumor volume <5 mL, 5 to 20 mL, and >20 mL. The complications rate was 9.8% after GKS and 25.2% after reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

GKS may be an alternative to open surgery for small GBMs at the time of recurrences, with a significantly lower complication rate and a possible survival benefit compared with reoperation.