1
|
Bao H, Ai S, Wang G, Yi L, Lai J, Wang S, Lv Z, Li C, Liu Q, Zhao X, Wu C, Liu C, Mi S, Sun X, Hao C, Liang P. Intraoperative radiotherapy in recurrent IDH-wildtype glioblastoma with gross total resection: A single-center retrospective study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2024; 236:108103. [PMID: 38199118 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.108103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Revised: 12/08/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isocitrate dehydrogenase-wildtype (IDHwt) glioblastoma (GBM) is one of the most aggressive primary brain tumors. The recurrence of GBM is almost inevitable. As an adjuvant option to surgery, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is gaining increasing attention in the treatment of glioma. This study is aimed to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of IORT on recurrent IDHwt GBM. METHODS In total, 34 recurrent IDHwt GBM patients who received a second surgery were included in the analysis (17 in the surgery group and 17 in the surgery + IORT group). RESULTS The progression-free survival and overall survival after the second surgery were defined as PFS2 and OS2, respectively. The median PFS2 was 7.3 months (95% CI: 6.3-10.5) and 10.6 months (95% CI: 9.3-14.6) for those patients who received surgery and surgery + IORT, respectively. Patients in the surgery + IORT group also had a longer OS2 (12.8 months, 95% CI: 11.4-17.2) than those in the surgery group (9.3 months, 95% CI: 8.9-12.9). The Kaplan-Meier survival curves, analyzed by log-rank test, revealed a statistically significant difference in PFS2 and OS2 between both groups, suggesting that IORT plays an active role in the observed benefits for PFS2 and OS2. The effects of IORT on PFS2 and OS2 were further confirmed by multivariate Cox hazards regression analysis. Two patients in the surgery group developed distant glioma metastases, and no radiation-related complications were observed in the IORT group. CONCLUSIONS This study suggests that low-dose IORT may improve the prognosis of recurrent IDHwt GBM patients. Future prospective large-scale studies are needed to validate the efficacy and safety of IORT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongbo Bao
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China; Department of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Siqi Ai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China; Department of Neurosurgery, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Gang Wang
- Department of Radiotherapy, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Liye Yi
- Department of Neurosurgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Jiacheng Lai
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Shuai Wang
- Department of Imaging Center, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Zhonghua Lv
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chenlong Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Qing Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xinyu Zhao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chou Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chang Liu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Shan Mi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Xiaoyang Sun
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Chuncheng Hao
- Department of Radiotherapy, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
| | - Peng Liang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kossmann MRP, Ehret F, Roohani S, Winter SF, Ghadjar P, Acker G, Senger C, Schmid S, Zips D, Kaul D. Histopathologically confirmed radiation-induced damage of the brain - an in-depth analysis of radiation parameters and spatio-temporal occurrence. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:198. [PMID: 38087368 PMCID: PMC10717523 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-023-02385-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation-induced damage (RID) after radiotherapy (RT) of primary brain tumors and metastases can be challenging to clinico-radiographically distinguish from tumor progression. RID includes pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis; the latter being irreversible and often associated with severe symptoms. While histopathology constitutes the diagnostic gold standard, biopsy-controlled clinical studies investigating RID remain limited. Whether certain brain areas are potentially more vulnerable to RID remains an area of active investigation. Here, we analyze histopathologically confirmed cases of RID in relation to the temporal and spatial dose distribution. METHODS Histopathologically confirmed cases of RID after photon-based RT for primary or secondary central nervous system malignancies were included. Demographic, clinical, and dosimetric data were collected from patient records and treatment planning systems. We calculated the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD22) and the biologically effective dose (BED2) for normal brain tissue (α/β ratio of 2 Gy) and analyzed the spatial and temporal distribution using frequency maps. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were identified. High-grade glioma patients (n = 18) mostly received one normofractionated RT series (median cumulative EQD22 60 Gy) to a large planning target volume (PTV) (median 203.9 ccm) before diagnosis of RID. Despite the low EQD22 and BED2, three patients with an accelerated hyperfractionated RT developed RID. In contrast, brain metastases patients (n = 15; 16 RID lesions) were often treated with two or more RT courses and with radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic RT, resulting in a higher cumulative EQD22 (median 162.4 Gy), to a small PTV (median 6.7 ccm). All (n = 34) RID lesions occurred within the PTV of at least one of the preceding RT courses. RID in the high-grade glioma group showed a frontotemporal distribution pattern, whereas, in metastatic patients, RID was observed throughout the brain with highest density in the parietal lobe. The cumulative EQD22 was significantly lower in RID lesions that involved the subventricular zone (SVZ) than in lesions without SVZ involvement (median 60 Gy vs. 141 Gy, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Accelerated hyperfractionated RT can lead to RID despite computationally low EQD22 and BED2 in high-grade glioma patients. The anatomical location of RID corresponded to the general tumor distribution of gliomas and metastases. The SVZ might be a particularly vulnerable area.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario R P Kossmann
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Pius-Hospital Oldenburg, Georgstr. 12, 26121, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Felix Ehret
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Siyer Roohani
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian F Winter
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA
| | - Pirus Ghadjar
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Güliz Acker
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Neurosurgery, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Simone Schmid
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Neuropathology, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - David Kaul
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Radiation Oncology, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Berlin, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mendoza MG, Azoulay M, Chang SD, Gibbs IC, Hancock SL, Pollom EL, Adler JR, Harraher C, Li G, Gephart MH, Nagpal S, Thomas RP, Recht LD, Jacobs LR, Modlin LA, Wynne J, Seiger K, Fujimoto D, Usoz M, von Eyben R, Choi CYH, Soltys SG. Patterns of Progression in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Treated With 5-mm Margins in a Phase 1/2 Trial of 5-Fraction Stereotactic Radiosurgery With Concurrent and Adjuvant Temozolomide. Pract Radiat Oncol 2023; 13:e239-e245. [PMID: 36736621 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2023.01.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM), tumor margins of at least 20 mm are the standard of care. We sought to determine the pattern of tumor progression in patients treated with 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with 5-mm margins. METHODS AND MATERIALS Thirty adult patients with newly diagnosed GBM were treated with 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery in escalated doses from 25 to 40 Gy with a 5-mm total treatment margin. Progression was scored as "in-field" if the recurrent tumor was within or contiguous with the 5-mm margin, "marginal" if between 5 and 20 mm, and "distant" if entirely occurring greater than 20 mm. As geometric patterns of progression do not reflect the biologic dose received, we calculated the minimum equi-effective dose in 2 Gy (EQD2) per day at the site of tumor recurrence. Progression was "dosimetrically in-field" if covered by a minimum EQD2 per day of 48 Gy10. RESULTS From 2010 to 2016, 27 patients had progressed. Progression was in-field in 17 (63%), marginal in 3 (11%), and distant in 7 (26%) patients. In the 3 patients with marginal progression, the minimum EQD2 to recurrent tumor were 48 Gy10, 56 Gy10 (both considered dosimetrically in-field), and 7 Gy10 (ie, dosimetrically out-of-field). Median overall survival was 12.1 months for in-field (95% confidence interval [CI], 8.9-17.6), 15.1 months (95% CI, 10.1 to not achieved) for marginal, and 21.4 months (95% CI, 11.2-33.5) for distant progression. Patients with radiation necrosis were less likely to have in-field progression (1 of 7; 14%) compared with those without radiation necrosis (16 of 20; 80%; P = .003); those with necrosis had a median overall survival of 27.2 months (95% CI, 11.2-48.3) compared with 11.7 months (95% CI, 8.9-17.6) for patients with no necrosis (P = .077). CONCLUSIONS In patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated with a 5-mm clinical target volume margin, 3 patients (11%) had marginal progression within 5 to 20 mm; only 1 patient (4%) may have dosimetrically benefitted from conventional 20-mm margins. Radiation necrosis was associated with in-field tumor control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria G Mendoza
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Melissa Azoulay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Iris C Gibbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Steven L Hancock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - John R Adler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Ciara Harraher
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Gordon Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | - Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Reena P Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Lawrence D Recht
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Lisa R Jacobs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Leslie A Modlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Jacob Wynne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Kira Seiger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Dylann Fujimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Melissa Usoz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Rie von Eyben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Clara Y H Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Prajapati HP, Ansari A. Updates in the Management of Recurrent Glioblastoma Multiforme. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2023; 84:174-187. [PMID: 35772723 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1749351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma is the most aggressive and diffusely infiltrative primary brain tumor. Recurrence is almost universal even after all primary standard treatments. This article aims to review the literature and update the standard treatment strategies for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. METHODS A systematic search was performed with the phrase "recurrent glioblastoma and management" as a search term in PubMed central, Medline, and Embase databases to identify all the articles published on the subject till December 2020. The review included peer-reviewed original articles, clinical trials, review articles, and keywords in title and abstract. RESULTS Out of 513 articles searched, 73 were included in this review after screening for eligibility. On analyzing the data, most of the studies report a median overall survival (OS) of 5.9 to 11.4 months after re-surgery and 4.7 to 7.6 months without re-surgery. Re-irradiation with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) result in a median OS of 10.2 months (range: 7.0-12 months) and 9.8 months (ranged: 7.5-11.0 months), respectively. Radiation necrosis was found in 16.6% (range: 0-24.4%) after SRS. Chemotherapeutic agents like nitrosourea (carmustine), bevacizumab, and temozolomide (TMZ) rechallenge result in a median OS in the range of 5.1 to 7.5, 6.5 to 9.2, and 5.1-13.0 months and six months progression free survival (PFS-6) in the range of 13 to 17.5%, 25 to 42.6%, and 23 to 58.3%, respectively. Use of epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors results in a median OS in the range of 2.0 to 3.0 months and PFS-6 in 13%. CONCLUSION Although recurrent glioblastoma remains a fatal disease with universal mortality, the literature suggests that a subset of patients may benefit from maximal treatment efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanuman Prasad Prajapati
- Department of Neurosurgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Etawah, Uttar Pradesh, India
| | - Ahmad Ansari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Uttar Pradesh University of Medical Sciences, Safai, Uttar Pradesh, India
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Y, Liu R, Zhang Q, Dong M, Wang D, Chen J, Ou Y, Luo H, Yang K, Wang X. Charged particle therapy for high-grade gliomas in adults: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol 2023; 18:29. [PMID: 36755321 PMCID: PMC9906872 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-022-02187-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023] Open
Abstract
High-grade gliomas are the most common intracranial malignancies, and their current prognosis remains poor despite standard aggressive therapy. Charged particle beams have unique physical and biological properties, especially high relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of carbon ion beam might improve the clinical treatment outcomes of malignant gliomas. We systematically reviewed the safety, efficacy, and dosimetry of carbon-ion or proton radiotherapy to treat high-grade gliomas. The protocol is detailed in the online PROSPERO database, registration No. CRD42021258495. PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases were collected for data analysis on charged particle radiotherapy for high-grade gliomas. Until July 2022, two independent reviewers extracted data based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Eleven articles were eligible for further analysis. Overall survival rates were marginally higher in patients with the current standard of care than those receiving concurrent intensity-modulated radiotherapy plus temozolomide. The most common side effects of carbon-ion-related therapy were grade 1-2 (such as dermatitis, headache, and alopecia). Long-term toxicities (more than three to six months) usually present as radiation necrosis; however, toxicities higher than grade 3 were not observed. Similarly, dermatitis, headache, and alopecia are among the most common acute side effects of proton therapy treatment. Despite improvement in survival rates, the method of dose-escalation using proton boost is associated with severe brain necrosis which should not be clinically underestimated. Regarding dosimetry, two studies compared proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy plans. Proton therapy plans aimed to minimize dose exposure to non-target tissues while maintaining target coverage. The use of charged-particle radiotherapy seems to be effective with acceptable adverse effects when used either alone or as a boost. The tendency of survival outcome shows that carbon ion boost is seemingly superior to proton boost. The proton beam could provide good target coverage, and it seems to reduce dose exposure to contralateral organs at risk significantly. This can potentially reduce the treatment-related dose- and volume-related side effects in long-term survivors, such as neurocognitive impairment. High-quality randomized control trials should be conducted in the future. Moreover, Systemic therapeutic options that can be paired with charged particles are necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhang Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Ruifeng Liu
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Qiuning Zhang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| | - Meng Dong
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Dandan Wang
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Junru Chen
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Yuhong Ou
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Hongtao Luo
- grid.9227.e0000000119573309Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China ,grid.410726.60000 0004 1797 8419Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China ,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China
| | - Kehu Yang
- grid.32566.340000 0000 8571 0482Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Xiaohu Wang
- Institute of Modern Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Lanzhou, China. .,The First School of Clinical Medicine, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China. .,Department of Postgraduate, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. .,Heavy Ion Therapy Center, Lanzhou Heavy Ions Hospital, Lanzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wetzel EA, Farrell MJ, Eldred BSC, Liu V, Saha I, Zapanta Rinonos S, Prins T, Li T, Cao M, Hegde J, Kaprealian T, Khanlou N, Liau LM, Nghiemphu PL, Cloughesy TF, Chong RA, Ellingson BM, Lai A. Retrospective examination of pseudoprogression in IDH mutant gliomas. Neurooncol Adv 2023; 5:vdad028. [PMID: 37128507 PMCID: PMC10148681 DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdad028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Tumor surveillance of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant gliomas is accomplished via serial contrast MRI. When new contrast enhancement (CEnew) is detected during postsurgical surveillance, clinicians must assess whether CEnew indicates pseudoprogression (PsP) or tumor progression (TP). PsP has been better studied in IDH wild-type glioblastoma but has not been well characterized in IDH mutant gliomas. We conducted a retrospective study evaluating the incidence, predictors, natural history, and survival of PsP patients in a large cohort of IDH mutant glioma patients treated at a single institution. Methods We identified 587 IDH mutant glioma patients treated at UCLA. We directly inspected MRI images and radiology reports to identify CEnew and categorized CEnew into TP or PsP using MRI or histopathology. Results Fifty-six percent of patients developed CEnew (326/587); of these, 92/326 patients (28% of CEnew; 16% of all) developed PsP and 179/326 (55%) developed TP. All PsP patients had prior radiation, chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy. PsP was associated with longer overall survival (OS) versus TP patients and similar OS versus no CEnew. PsP differs from TP based on earlier time of onset (median 5.8 vs 17.4 months from treatment, P < .0001) and MRI features that include punctate enhancement and enhancement location. Conclusion PsP patients represented 28% of CEnew patients and 16% of all patients; PsP patients demonstrated superior outcomes to TP patients, and equivalent survival to patients without CEnew. PsP persists for <1 year, occurs after treatment, and differs from TP based on time of onset and radiographic features. Poor outcomes after CEnew are driven by TP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan A Wetzel
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew J Farrell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Blaine S C Eldred
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vicki Liu
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ishan Saha
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Terry Prins
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tie Li
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Minsong Cao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Hegde
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tania Kaprealian
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Negar Khanlou
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda M Liau
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Robert A Chong
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Benjamin M Ellingson
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Albert Lai
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harat M, Blok M, Miechowicz I, Wiatrowska I, Makarewicz K, Małkowski B. Safety and efficacy of irradiation boost based on 18F-FET-PET in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Clin Cancer Res 2022; 28:3011-3020. [PMID: 35552391 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-22-0171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 04/05/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Dual timepoint FET-PET acquisition (10 and 60 minutes after FET injection) improves the definition of glioblastoma location and shape. Here we evaluated the safety and efficacy of simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) planned using dual FET-PET for postoperative glioblastoma treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN In this prospective pilot study (March 2017-December 2020), 17 patients qualified for FET-PET-based SIB intensity-modulated radiotherapy after resection. The prescribed dose was 78 and 60 Gy (2.6 and 2.0 Gy per fraction, respectively) for the FET-PET- and MR-based target volumes. Eleven patients had FET-PET within nine months to precisely define biological responses. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicities, and radiation necrosis were evaluated. Six patients (35%) had tumors with MGMT promoter methylation. RESULTS The one- and two-year OS and PFS rates were 73% and 43% and 53% and 13%, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 24 (95%CI 9-26) and 12 (95%CI 6-18) months, respectively. Two patients developed uncontrolled seizures during radiotherapy and could not receive treatment per protocol. In patients treated per protocol, 7/15 presented with new or increased neurological deficits in the first month after irradiation. Radiation necrosis was diagnosed by MRI three months after SIB in five patients and later in another two patients. In two patients, the tumor was larger in FET-PET images after six months. CONCLUSIONS Survival outcomes using our novel dose escalation concept (total 78 Gy) were promising, even within the MGMTunmethylated subgroup. Excessive neurotoxicity was not observed, but radionecrosis was common and must be considered in future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Harat
- Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Maciej Blok
- Franciszek Lukaszczyk Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Flies CM, van Leuken KH, Voorde MT, Verhoeff JJC, De Vos FYF, Seute T, Robe PA, Witkamp TD, Hendrikse J, Dankbaar JW, Snijders TJ. Conventional MRI Criteria to Differentiate Progressive Disease from Treatment-Induced Effects in High-Grade (WHO Grade 3-4) Gliomas. Neurology 2022; 99:e77-e88. [PMID: 35437259 PMCID: PMC9259090 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000200359] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Post-treatment radiological deterioration of patients with an irradiated high-grade (WHO grade 3-4) glioma (HGG) may be the result of true progressive disease (PD) or treatment-induced effects (TIE). Differentiation between these entities is of great importance, but remains a diagnostic challenge. This study assesses the diagnostic value of conventional MRI characteristics to differentiate PD from TIE in HGGs. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this single-centre, retrospective, consecutive cohort study, we included adults with a HGG, who were treated with (chemo-)radiotherapy and subsequently developed a new or increasing contrast-enhancing lesion on conventional follow-up MRI. TIE and PD were defined radiologically as stable/decreased for ≥6 weeks or RANO-progression, and histologically as TIE without viable tumour or PD. Two neuroradiologists assessed twenty-one preselected MRI characteristics of the progressive lesions. The statistical analysis included logistic regression to develop a) a full multivariable model b) a diagnostic model with model reduction, and a Cohen's Kappa interrater reliability (IRR) coefficient. RESULTS 210 patients (median age=61, IQR=54-68, 189 males) with 284 lesions were included, of which 141 (50%) had PD. Median time to PD was 2 (0.7-6.1) and to TIE 0.9 (0.7-3.5) months after radiotherapy. After multivariable modelling and model reduction, the following determinants prevailed: Radiation dose (Odds ratio (OR)=0.68, 95%-CI=0.49-0.93), longer time to progression (TTP, OR=3.56, 95%-CI=1.84-6.88), marginal enhancement (OR=2.04, 95%-CI=1.09-3.83), soap bubble enhancement (OR=2.63, 95%-CI=1.39-4.98) and isointense apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-signal (OR=2.11, 95%-CI=1.05-4.24). ORs>1 indicate higher odds of PD. The Hosmer&Lemeshow test showed good calibration (p=0.947) and the area under the ROC-curve was 0.722 (95%-CI=0.66-0.78). In the glioblastoma subgroup, TTP, marginal enhancement and ADC-signal were significant. IRR analysis between neuroradiologists revealed moderate to near-perfect agreement for the predictive items, but poor agreement for others. DISCUSSION Several characteristics from conventional MRI are significant predictors for the discrimination between PD and TIE. However, IRR was variable. Conventional MRI characteristics from this study should be incorporated into a multimodal diagnostic model with advanced imaging techniques. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE This study provides Class II evidence that in patients with irradiated HGGs, radiation dose, longer time to progression, marginal enhancement, soap bubble enhancement and isointense apparent ADC-signal distinguish PD from TIE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M Flies
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Karlijn H van Leuken
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Stichting Beroepsopleiding Huisarts, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies Ten Voorde
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands.,Mission of the Netherlands Reformed Congregations, in Guinea (Conakry)
| | - Joost J C Verhoeff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Filip Y F De Vos
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Tatjana Seute
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Pierre A Robe
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Theodoor D Witkamp
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jeroen Hendrikse
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Willem Dankbaar
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tom J Snijders
- Department of Neurology & Neurosurgery, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Barz M, Bette S, Janssen I, Aftahy AK, Huber T, Liesche-Starnecker F, Ryang YM, Wiestler B, Combs SE, Meyer B, Gempt J. Age-adjusted Charlson comorbidity index in recurrent glioblastoma: a new prognostic factor? BMC Neurol 2022; 22:32. [PMID: 35062885 PMCID: PMC8780246 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-021-02532-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
For recurrent glioblastoma (GB) patients, several therapy options have been established over the last years such as more aggressive surgery, re-irradiation or chemotherapy. Age and the Karnofsky Performance Status Scale (KPSS) are used to make decisions for these patients as these are established as prognostic factors in the initial diagnosis of GB. This study’s aim was to evaluate preoperative patient comorbidities by using the age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (ACCI) as a prognostic factor for recurrent GB patients.
Methods
In this retrospective analysis we could include 123 patients with surgery for primary recurrence of GB from January 2007 until December 2016 (43 females, 80 males, mean age 57 years (range 21–80 years)). Preoperative age, sex, ACCI, KPSS and adjuvant treatment regimes were recorded for each patient. Extent of resection (EOR) was recorded as a complete/incomplete resection of the contrast-enhancing tumor part.
Results
Median overall survival (OS) was 9.0 months (95% CI 7.1–10.9 months) after first re-resection. Preoperative KPSS > 80% (P < 0.001) and EOR (P = 0.013) were associated with significantly improved survival in univariate analysis. Including these factors in multivariate analysis, preoperative KPSS < 80 (HR 2.002 [95% CI: 1.246–3.216], P = 0.004) and EOR are the only significant prognostic factor (HR 1.611 [95% CI: 1.036–2.505], P = 0.034). ACCI was not shown as a prognostic factor in univariate and multivariate analyses.
Conclusion
For patients with surgery for recurrent glioblastoma, the ACCI does not add further information about patient’s prognosis besides the well-established KPSS and extent of resection.
Collapse
|
10
|
García-Cabezas S, Rivin del Campo E, Solivera-Vela J, Palacios-Eito A. Re-irradiation for high-grade gliomas: Has anything changed? World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:767-786. [PMID: 34631441 PMCID: PMC8479348 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i9.767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2021] [Revised: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Optimal management after recurrence or progression of high-grade gliomas is still undefined and remains a challenge for neuro-oncology multidisciplinary teams. Improved radiation therapy techniques, new imaging methods, published experience, and a better radiobiological knowledge of brain tissue have positioned re-irradiation (re-RT) as an option for many of these patients. Decisions must be individualized, taking into account the pattern of relapse, previous treatment, and functional status, as well as the patient’s preferences and expected quality of life. Many questions remain unanswered with respect to re-RT: Who is the most appropriate candidate, which dose and fractionation are most effective, how to define the target volume, which imaging technique is best for planning, and what is the optimal timing? This review will focus on describing the most relevant studies that include re-RT as salvage therapy, with the aim of simplifying decision-making and designing the best available therapeutic strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia García-Cabezas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | | | - Juan Solivera-Vela
- Department of Neurosurgery, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| | - Amalia Palacios-Eito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba 14004, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Azoulay M, Chang SD, Gibbs IC, Hancock SL, Pollom EL, Harsh GR, Adler JR, Harraher C, Li G, Hayden Gephart M, Nagpal S, Thomas RP, Recht LD, Jacobs LR, Modlin LA, Wynne J, Seiger K, Fujimoto D, Usoz M, von Eyben R, Choi CYH, Soltys SG. A phase I/II trial of 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery with 5-mm margins with concurrent temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: primary outcomes. Neuro Oncol 2021; 22:1182-1189. [PMID: 32002547 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 5-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) with 5-mm margins delivered with concurrent temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS We enrolled adult patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to 5 days of SRS in a 3 + 3 design on 4 escalating dose levels: 25, 30, 35, and 40 Gy. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grades 3-5 acute or late CNS toxicity, including adverse radiation effect (ARE), the imaging correlate of radiation necrosis. RESULTS From 2010 to 2015, thirty patients were enrolled. The median age was 66 years (range, 51-86 y). The median target volume was 60 cm3 (range, 14.7-137.3 cm3). DLT occurred in 2 patients: one for posttreatment cerebral edema and progressive disease at 3 weeks (grade 4, dose 40 Gy); another patient died 1.5 weeks following SRS from postoperative complications (grade 5, dose 40 Gy). Late grades 1-2 ARE occurred in 8 patients at a median of 7.6 months (range 3.2-12.6 mo). No grades 3-5 ARE occurred. With a median follow-up of 13.8 months (range 1.7-64.4 mo), the median survival times were: progression-free survival, 8.2 months (95% CI: 4.6-10.5); overall survival, 14.8 months (95% CI: 10.9-19.9); O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase hypermethylated, 19.9 months (95% CI: 10.5-33.5) versus 11.3 months (95% CI: 8.9-17.6) for no/unknown hypermethylation (P = 0.03), and 27.2 months (95% CI: 11.2-48.3) if late ARE occurred versus 11.7 months (95% CI: 8.9-17.6) for no ARE (P = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS The per-protocol MTD of 5-fraction SRS with 5-mm margins with concurrent temozolomide was 40 Gy in 5 fractions. ARE was limited to grades 1-2 and did not statistically impact survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa Azoulay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Steven D Chang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Iris C Gibbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Steven L Hancock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Griffith R Harsh
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - John R Adler
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Ciara Harraher
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Gordon Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | | | - Seema Nagpal
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Reena P Thomas
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Lawrence D Recht
- Department of Neurology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Lisa R Jacobs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Leslie A Modlin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Jacob Wynne
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Kira Seiger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Dylann Fujimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Melissa Usoz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Rie von Eyben
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Clara Y H Choi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, San Jose, California, USA
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Patrizz A, Dono A, Zhu P, Tandon N, Ballester LY, Esquenazi Y. Tumor recurrence or treatment-related changes following chemoradiation in patients with glioblastoma: does pathology predict outcomes? J Neurooncol 2021; 152:163-172. [PMID: 33481149 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03690-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 12/28/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite surgical resection and chemoradiation, all patients with GBM invariably recur. Radiological imaging is limited in differentiating tumor recurrence (TR) from treatment-related changes (TRC); therefore, re-resection is often needed. Few studies have assessed the relationship between re-resection histopathology and overall survival (OS). We performed a large retrospective study to analyze the clinical significance of histopathology following re-resection and its influence on genomic sequencing results. METHODS Clinical, radiographic, and histological information was compiled from 675 patients with GBM (2005-2017). 137-patients met the inclusion criteria. IDH1 p.R132H immunohistochemistry was performed in all patients. Next-generation sequencing interrogating 205 tumor-related genes was performed in 68-patients. Molecular alterations from initial and subsequent resections were compared in a subset of cases. RESULTS There were no differences in OS (17.3-months TRC vs. 21-months TR, p = 0.881) and survival from progression (9.0 vs. 11.7-months, p = 0.778) between patients with TR and TRC on re-resection. TR patients were more likely to receive salvage radiotherapy (26% vs. 0%) and tumor-treating fields (25% vs. 5%,) after the 2nd surgery than the TRC group (p = < 0.045). There was no correlation between mutations and TRC. IDH status was not predictive of TRC. Fifteen-patients had sequencing results from multiple surgeries without evident differences in genomic alterations. CONCLUSIONS Histopathologic findings following chemoradiation do not correlate with clinical outcomes. Such findings should be considered during patient management and clinical trial enrollment. Standardization of tissue sampling and interpretation following reoperation is urgently needed. Future work is required to understand the relationship between the mutation profile following TRC and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony Patrizz
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Antonio Dono
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ping Zhu
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Human Genetics, and Environmental Sciences, UTHealth School of Public Health, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nitin Tandon
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Leomar Y Ballester
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, Houston, TX, USA. .,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA. .,Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine and Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston - McGovern Medical School, 6431 Fannin Street, MSB 2.136, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Yoshua Esquenazi
- Vivian L. Smith Department of Neurosurgery, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, McGovern Medical School, 6400 Fannin Street, Suite # 2800, Houston, TX, 77030, USA. .,Center for Precision Health, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA. .,Memorial Hermann Hospital-TMC, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Scoccianti S, Perna M, Olmetto E, Delli Paoli C, Terziani F, Ciccone LP, Detti B, Greto D, Simontacchi G, Grassi R, Scoccimarro E, Bonomo P, Mangoni M, Desideri I, Di Cataldo V, Vernaleone M, Casati M, Pallotta S, Livi L. Local treatment for relapsing glioblastoma: A decision-making tree for choosing between reirradiation and second surgery. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 157:103184. [PMID: 33307416 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2020.103184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2020] [Revised: 05/21/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
In case of circumscribed recurrent glioblastoma (rec-GBM), a second surgery (Re-S) and reirradiation (Re-RT) are local strategies to consider. The aim is to provide an algorithm to use in the daily clinical practice. The first step is to consider the life expectancy in order to establish whether the patient should be a candidate for active treatment. In case of a relatively good life expectancy (>3 months) and a confirmed circumscribed disease(i.e. without multiple lesions that are in different lobes/hemispheres), the next step is the assessment of the prognostic factors for local treatments. Based on the existing prognostic score systems, patients who should be excluded from local treatments may be identified; based on the validated prognostic factors, one or the other local treatment may be preferred. The last point is the estimation of expected toxicity, considering patient-related, tumor-related and treatment-related factors impacting on side effects. Lastly, patients with very good prognostic factors may be considered for receiving a combined treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Scoccianti
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
| | - Marco Perna
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Emanuela Olmetto
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Camilla Delli Paoli
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Terziani
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Pia Ciccone
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Beatrice Detti
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Daniela Greto
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Gabriele Simontacchi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberta Grassi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Erika Scoccimarro
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Bonomo
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Monica Mangoni
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Isacco Desideri
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Vanessa Di Cataldo
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marco Vernaleone
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Marta Casati
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Stefania Pallotta
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "Mario Serio", Medical Physics Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Livi
- Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi, Radiotherapy Unit, Oncology Department, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Dalle Ore CL, Chandra A, Rick J, Lau D, Shahin M, Nguyen AT, McDermott M, Berger MS, Aghi MK. Presence of Histopathological Treatment Effects at Resection of Recurrent Glioblastoma: Incidence and Effect on Outcome. Neurosurgery 2020; 85:793-800. [PMID: 30445646 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Resection may be appropriate for select patients with recurrent glioblastoma. The incidence of histopathological findings related to prior treatment and their prognostic implications are incompletely characterized. OBJECTIVE To quantify the incidence and survival outcomes associated with treatment effect at resection of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM). METHODS Patients who underwent resection for recurrent GBM were retrospectively reviewed, and pathology, treatment history, and survival data were collected. Treatment effect was defined as any component of treatment-related changes on pathology. RESULTS In total, 110 patients underwent 146 reoperations. Median age at first reoperation was 57.2 yr and overall survival from reoperation was 10.8 mo. Treatment effect of any kind was noted in 81 of 146 reoperations (55%). Increased treatment effect was observed closer to radiotherapy; by quartile of time from radiotherapy, the rates of treatment effect were 77.8%, 55.6%, 40.7%, and 44.4% (P = .028). Treatment effect was associated with earlier reoperation (8.9 vs 13.8 mo after radiotherapy, P = .003), and the presence of treatment effect did not impact survival from primary surgery (25.4 vs 24.3 mo, P = .084). Patients treated with bevacizumab prior to reoperation were less likely to have treatment effect (20% vs 65%, P < .001). CONCLUSION Histopathological treatment-related changes are evident in a majority of patients undergoing resection for recurrent glioblastoma. There was no association of treatment effect with overall survival from primary surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilia L Dalle Ore
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Ankush Chandra
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Jonathan Rick
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Darryl Lau
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Maryam Shahin
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alan T Nguyen
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Michael McDermott
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Mitchel S Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Manish K Aghi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lowe S, Bhat KP, Olar A. Current clinical management of patients with glioblastoma. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2019; 2:e1216. [PMID: 32721125 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2019] [Revised: 04/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Glioblastoma (GB) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, historically resistant to treatment, and with overall fatal outcome. RECENT FINDINGS Recently, several molecular subgroups and rare genetic alterations have been described in GB. In this review article, we will describe the current clinical management of patients with GB in the United States, discuss selected next-generation molecular-targeted therapies in GB, and present ongoing clinical trials for patients with GB. This review is intended for clinical and preclinical researchers who conduct work on GB and would like to understand more about the current standard of treatment of GB patients, historical perspectives, current challenges, and ongoing and upcoming clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS GB is an extremely complex disease, and despite recent progress and advanced therapeutic strategies, the overall patient's prognosis remains dismal. Innovative strategies and integrative ways of approach to disease are urgently needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen Lowe
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Krishna P Bhat
- Deparment of Translational Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adriana Olar
- Department of Neurosurgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.,Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina & Hollings Cancer Center, Charleston, South Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shah AH, Mahavadi AK, Morell A, Eichberg DG, Luther E, Sarkiss CA, Semonche A, Ivan ME, Komotar RJ. Salvage craniotomy for treatment-refractory symptomatic cerebral radiation necrosis. Neurooncol Pract 2019; 7:94-102. [PMID: 32257288 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npz028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The incidence of symptomatic radiation necrosis (RN) has risen as radiotherapy is increasingly used to control brain tumor progression. Traditionally managed with steroids, symptomatic RN can remain refractory to medical treatment, requiring surgical intervention for control. The purpose of our study was to assess a single institution's experience with craniotomy for steroid-refractory pure RN. Methods The medical records of all tumor patients who underwent craniotomies at our institution from 2011 to 2016 were retrospectively reviewed for a history of preoperative radiotherapy or radiosurgery. RN was confirmed histopathologically and patients with active tumor were excluded. Preoperative, intraoperative, and outcome information was collected. Primary outcomes measured were postoperative KPS and time to steroid freedom. Results Twenty-four patients with symptomatic RN were identified. Gross total resection was achieved for all patients. Patients with metastases experienced an increase in KPS (80 vs 100, P < .001) and required a shortened course of dexamethasone vs patients with high-grade gliomas (3.4 vs 22.2 weeks, P = .003). RN control and neurological improvement at 13.3 months' follow-up were 100% and 66.7%, respectively. Adrenal insufficiency after rapidly tapering dexamethasone was the only morbidity (n = 1). Overall survival was 93.3% (14/15) at 1 year. Conclusion In cases of treatment-refractory symptomatic RN, resection can lead to an overall improvement in postoperative health status and neurological outcomes with minimal RN recurrence. Craniotomy for surgically accessible RN can safely manage symptomatic patients, and future studies assessing the efficacy of resection vs bevacizumab may be warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashish H Shah
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Alexis Morell
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Evan Luther
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Alexa Semonche
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, FL, USA
| | - Michael E Ivan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Miami, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Cerebral Radiation Necrosis: Incidence, Pathogenesis, Diagnostic Challenges, and Future Opportunities. Curr Oncol Rep 2019; 21:66. [PMID: 31218455 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-019-0818-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cerebral radiation necrosis (CRN) is a major dose-limiting adverse event of radiotherapy. The incidence rate of RN varies with the radiotherapy modality, total dose, dose fractionation, and the nature of the lesion being targeted. In addition to these known and controllable features, there is a stochastic component to the occurrence of CRN-the genetic profile of the host or the lesion and their role in the development of CRN. RECENT FINDINGS Recent studies provide some insight into the genetic mechanisms underlying radiation-induced brain injury. In addition to these incompletely understood host factors, the diagnostic criteria for CRN using structural and functional imaging are also not clear, though multiple structural and functional imaging modalities exist, a combination of which may prove to be the ideal diagnostic imaging approach. As the utilization of novel molecular therapies and immunotherapy increases, the incidence of CNR is expected to increase and its diagnosis will become more challenging. Tissue biopsies can be insensitive and suffer from sampling biases and procedural risks. Liquid biopsies represent a promising, accurate, and non-invasive diagnostic strategy, though this modality is currently in its infancy. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of CRN will expand and optimize the diagnosis and management of CRN by better utilizing existing treatment options including bevacizumab, pentoxifylline, hyperbaric oxygen therapy, and laser interstitial thermal therapy.
Collapse
|
18
|
Balaña C, Capellades J, Pineda E, Estival A, Puig J, Domenech S, Verger E, Pujol T, Martinez-García M, Oleaga L, Velarde J, Mesia C, Fuentes R, Marruecos J, Del Barco S, Villà S, Carrato C, Gallego O, Gil-Gil M, Craven-Bartle J, Alameda F. Pseudoprogression as an adverse event of glioblastoma therapy. Cancer Med 2017; 6:2858-2866. [PMID: 29105360 PMCID: PMC5727237 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.1242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2017] [Revised: 09/22/2017] [Accepted: 09/25/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
We explored predictive factors of pseudoprogression (PsP) and its impact on prognosis in a retrospective series of uniformly treated glioblastoma patients. Patients were classified as having PsP, early progression (eP) or neither (nP). We examined potential associations with clinical, molecular, and basal imaging characteristics and compared overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), post-progression survival (PPS) as well as the relationship between PFS and PPS in the three groups. Of the 256 patients studied, 56 (21.9%) were classified as PsP, 70 (27.3%) as eP, and 130 (50.8%) as nP. Only MGMT methylation status was associated to PsP. MGMT methylated patients had a 3.5-fold greater possibility of having PsP than eP (OR: 3.48; 95% CI: 1.606-7.564; P = 0.002). OS was longer for PsP than eP patients (18.9 vs. 12.3 months; P = 0.0001) but was similar for PsP and nP patients (P = 0.91). OS was shorter-though not significantly so-for PsP than nP patients (OS: 19.5 vs. 27.9 months; P = 0.63) in methylated patients. PPS was similar for patients having PsP, eP or nP (PPS: 7.2 vs. 5.4 vs. 6.7; P = 0.43). Neurological deterioration occurred in 64.3% of cases at the time they were classified as PsP and in 72.8% of cases of eP (P = 0.14). PsP confounds the evaluation of disease and does not confer a survival advantage in glioblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmen Balaña
- Medical Oncology, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Anna Estival
- Medical Oncology, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Josep Puig
- Imaging Research Unit, Institut de Diagnostic per la Imatge (IDI), Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), Hospital Universitari Dr Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain
| | - Sira Domenech
- Radiology, Institut Diagnòstic per la Imatge (IDI), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - JoseMaria Velarde
- Statistics, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Carlos Mesia
- Medical Oncology, IDIBELL, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Hospitalet de LLobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rafael Fuentes
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Girona, Spain
| | - Jordi Marruecos
- Radiation Oncology, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Girona, Spain
| | - Sonia Del Barco
- Medical Oncology, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Girona, Spain
| | - Salvador Villà
- Radiation Oncology, Statistics, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cristina Carrato
- Pathology, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Oscar Gallego
- Medical Oncology, Hospital de Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Miguel Gil-Gil
- Medical Oncology, IDIBELL, Institut Catala Oncologia (ICO), Hospitalet de LLobregat, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Navarria P, Pessina F, Tomatis S, Soffietti R, Grimaldi M, Lopci E, Chiti A, Leonetti A, Casarotti A, Rossi M, Cozzi L, Ascolese AM, Simonelli M, Marcheselli S, Santoro A, Clerici E, Bello L, Scorsetti M. Are three weeks hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) comparable to six weeks for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients? Results of a phase II study. Oncotarget 2017; 8:67696-67708. [PMID: 28978064 PMCID: PMC5620204 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18809] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/14/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The current standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is surgical resection, followed by radiation therapy (RT) with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide chemotherapy (TMZ-CHT). The patients outcome is still poor. In this study we evaluated hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT), instead of standard fractionated radiation therapy, with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy, in terms of safety and effectiveness. Methods Patients with newly diagnosed GBM, Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) ≥70, and tumor up to 10 cm underwent maximal feasible surgical resection were treated. HFRT consisted of 60 Gy, in daily fractions of 4 Gy given 5 days per week for 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and incidence of radiation induced brain toxicity. Secondary endpoint was the evaluation of neurocognitive function. Results A total of 97 patients were included in this phase II study. The median age was 60.5 years (range 23-77 years). Debulking surgery was performed in 83.5% of patients, HFRT was completed in all 97 patients, concurrent and adjuvant TMZ in 93 (95.9%). The median number of TMZ cycles was six (range 1-12 cycles). No severe toxicity occurred and the neuropsychological evaluation remained stable. At a median follow up time of 15.2 months the median OS time, 1,2-year OS rate were 15.9 months (95% CI 14-18), 72.2% (95% CI 62.1-80) and 30.4% (95% CI 20.8-40.6). Age, KPS, MGMT methylation status, and extent of surgical resection were significant factors influencing the outcome. Conclusion HFRT with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy is an effective and safe treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierina Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Federico Pessina
- Neurosurgical Oncology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Consultant of Neurosurgical Oncology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marco Grimaldi
- Neuroradiology Unit, Radiology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Arturo Chiti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonella Leonetti
- Laboratory of Motor Control, Department of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine, Milan University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Casarotti
- Neurosurgical Oncology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marco Rossi
- Neurosurgical Oncology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luca Cozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Ascolese
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Matteo Simonelli
- Hematology and Oncology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Simona Marcheselli
- Department of Neurology, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- Hematology and Oncology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Elena Clerici
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Bello
- Neurosurgical Oncology Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Survival outcomes following repeat surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: a single-center retrospective analysis. J Neurooncol 2016; 131:585-591. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-016-2330-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
21
|
Impact of Resecting Radiation Necrosis and Pseudoprogression on Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma. World Neurosurg 2016; 89:37-41. [PMID: 26805684 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.01.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2015] [Revised: 01/05/2016] [Accepted: 01/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Radiation necrosis (RN) and pseudoprogression are known as postradiation treatment effects and may simulate tumor progression. The disease course of glioblastoma patients who had developed RN and the impact of resecting RN on survival have not been evaluated. This study examines the clinical course of patients considered candidates for repeat surgery for a recurring brain mass proven to be RN and compared these with patients who had true tumor recurrence at surgery. METHODS Of 159 patients with glioblastoma who were reoperated on because of a presumed recurrent tumor requiring repeat surgery, 18 had RN as the major component of the resected mass. The characteristics and outcome of these 18 patients were retrospectively analyzed and compared with patients in whom active and bulky tumor was found during surgery. RESULTS Radiation necrosis occurred significantly earlier than true tumor recurrence. Patients with RN harbored larger lesions and were significantly more symptomatic before the second surgery. Most patients with RN who underwent GTR of the lesion in the second operation experienced faster resolution of the surrounding edema compared with patients who underwent STR or biopsy only. There was no significant difference in survival between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS These data provide an opportunity to examine the clinical course of a selected group of patients with histologically verified RN. Although RN is associated with more severe neurologic symptoms that improve after surgery, its occurrence or surgical removal carries no survival advantage compared with patients who undergo a repeat operation for true tumor recurrence.
Collapse
|
22
|
Second surgery for recurrent glioblastoma: A concise overview of the current literature. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 142:60-64. [PMID: 26811867 DOI: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2016.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/20/2015] [Revised: 12/29/2015] [Accepted: 01/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Optimal treatment for recurrent glioblastoma continues to evolve. Currently, however, there is no consensus in the literature on the role of reoperation in the management of these patients, as several studies provide evidence for a longer overall survival in selected patients with recurrent glioblastoma who underwent second surgery and other studies report a limited impact of second surgery in the clinical course. In this paper, a review of the current literature was performed to analyze the role of reoperation in patients with recurrent glioblastoma and to report the overall survival from diagnosis, progression-free survival and quality of life. Using PubMed and Ovid Medline databases, we performed a review of the literature of the last seven years, finding a total of 28 studies and 2279 patients who underwent second surgery, that were included in the final analysis. The median overall survival from diagnosis and the median survival from second surgery were 18.5 months and 9.7 months, respectively. Extent of resection at reoperation improves overall survival, even in patients with subtotal resection at initial operation. Preoperative performance status and age are important predictors of a longer survival, reason why younger patients with a good preoperative performance status could benefit from reoperation.
Collapse
|
23
|
Gzell C, Wheeler H, Huang D, Gaur P, Chen J, Kastelan M, Back M. Proliferation Index Predicts Survival after Second Craniotomy within 6 Months of Adjuvant Radiotherapy for High-grade Glioma. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2015; 28:215-22. [PMID: 26382848 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2015.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2015] [Revised: 07/31/2015] [Accepted: 08/25/2015] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
AIMS To determine pathological features that predict survival in patients having repeat craniotomy within 6 months of radiotherapy for high-grade glioma (HGG). MATERIALS AND METHODS HGG patients (World Health Organization grade 3/4) managed with repeat craniotomy within 6 months of completing radiotherapy between 2008 and 2012 were included. Based on the presence of residual tumour cells, the pathology was reported as pathological progression or pathological pseudoprogression. The proliferation index (Ki67) was reported and compared with initial pathology as a percentage change. Tumour necrosis was estimated as a percentage of the specimen. Overall survival was calculated in months. RESULTS Of 327 patients managed with HGG, 27 patients underwent repeat craniotomy within 6 months of radiotherapy. The median survival after reoperation was 11 months (95% confidence interval 1-22). Ki67 at reoperation of 0%, 1-9% and >10% was associated with survival with a median survival of 13, 13 and 3 months, respectively (P = 0.007). Change in Ki67 was also associated with median survival, with <50% reduction median survival 3 months, 50-80% median survival 7 months and >80% reduction median survival 13 months, P = 0.02. Widespread treatment-related necrosis improved outcome, with >80% necrosis having a median survival of 13 months versus 3 months in those with <80% necrosis (P = 0.003). CONCLUSION The presence of residual tumour at repeat craniotomy within 6 months of radiotherapy is not an independent indicator of prognosis. Patients with residual tumour that had a low Ki67 had a similar median survival as those with only treatment necrosis. Reduced proliferation of residual tumour cells and widespread necrosis may be more important indicators for future outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gzell
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| | - H Wheeler
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - D Huang
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - P Gaur
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - J Chen
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - M Kastelan
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia
| | - M Back
- Northern Sydney Cancer Centre, Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Northern Clinical School, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kondo N, Sakurai Y, Takata T, Takai N, Nakagawa Y, Tanaka H, Watanabe T, Kume K, Toho T, Miyatake SI, Suzuki M, Masunaga SI, Ono K. Localized radiation necrosis model in mouse brain using proton ion beams. Appl Radiat Isot 2015; 106:242-6. [PMID: 26260449 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2015.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2015] [Revised: 07/13/2015] [Accepted: 07/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Brain radiation necrosis is the most serious late adverse event that occurs after 6 months following radiation therapy. Effective treatment for this irreversible brain necrosis has not been established yet. This study tries to establish brain radiation necrosis mouse model using proton or helium beam. The right cerebral hemispheres of C57BL/6J mouse brains were irradiated at doses of 40, 50, 60 Gy with charged particles. In 60 Gy group, brain necrosis that recapitulates human disease was detected after 8 months.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natsuko Kondo
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan.
| | - Yoshinori Sakurai
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
| | - Takushi Takata
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan; The Wakasa Wan Energy Research Center, 64-52-1, Nagatani, Tsuruga, Fukui 914-0315, Japan
| | - Nobuhiko Takai
- Nagasaki International University, 2825-7, Housetenbosu, Sasebo, Nagasaki 859- 3298, Japan
| | - Yosuke Nakagawa
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
| | - Hiroki Tanaka
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
| | - Tsubasa Watanabe
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
| | - Kyo Kume
- The Wakasa Wan Energy Research Center, 64-52-1, Nagatani, Tsuruga, Fukui 914-0315, Japan
| | - Taichiro Toho
- Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Shin-ichi Miyatake
- Osaka Medical College, 2-7, Daigaku-machi, Takatsuki, Osaka 569-8686, Japan
| | - Minoru Suzuki
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
| | - Shin-ichiro Masunaga
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
| | - Koji Ono
- Research Reactor Institute, Kyoto University, 2-1010, Asashiro-nishi, Kumatori, Sennan, Osaka 590-0494, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mizumoto M, Yamamoto T, Takano S, Ishikawa E, Matsumura A, Ishikawa H, Okumura T, Sakurai H, Miyatake SI, Tsuboi K. Long-term survival after treatment of glioblastoma multiforme with hyperfractionated concomitant boost proton beam therapy. Pract Radiat Oncol 2015; 5:e9-16. [DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2014.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2013] [Revised: 03/24/2014] [Accepted: 03/25/2014] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
26
|
Phase II trial of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy combined with temozolomide and bevacizumab for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol 2014; 122:135-43. [DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1691-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2014] [Accepted: 12/15/2014] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
27
|
Hervey-Jumper SL, Berger MS. Reoperation for Recurrent High-Grade Glioma. Neurosurgery 2014; 75:491-9; discussion 498-9. [DOI: 10.1227/neu.0000000000000486] [Citation(s) in RCA: 81] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Optimal treatment for recurrent high-grade glioma continues to evolve. Currently, however, there is no consensus in the literature on the role of reoperation in the management of these patients. In this analysis, we reviewed the literature to examine the role of reoperation in patients with World Health Organization grade III or IV recurrent gliomas, focusing on how reoperation affects outcome, perioperative complications, and quality of life. An extensive literature review was performed through the use of the PubMed and Ovid Medline databases for January 1980 through August 2013. A total 31 studies were included in the final analysis. Of the 31 studies with significant data from single or multiple institutions, 29 demonstrated a survival benefit or improved functional status after reoperation for recurrent high-grade glioma. Indications for reoperation included new focal neurological deficits, tumor mass effect, signs of elevated intracranial pressure, headaches, increased seizure frequency, and radiographic evidence of tumor progression. Age was not a contraindication to reoperation. Time interval of at least 6 months between operations and favorable performance status (Karnofsky Performance Status score ≥70) were important predictors of benefit from reoperation. Extent of resection at reoperation improved survival, even in patients with subtotal resection at initial operation. Careful patient selection such as avoiding those individuals with poor performance status and bevacizumab within 4 weeks of surgery is important. Although limited to retrospective analysis and patient selection bias, mounting evidence suggests a survival benefit in patients receiving a reoperation at the time of high-grade glioma recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shawn L. Hervey-Jumper
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Mitchel S. Berger
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Reddy K, Westerly D, Chen C. MRI patterns of T1 enhancing radiation necrosis versus tumour recurrence in high-grade gliomas. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2013; 57:349-55. [PMID: 23721146 DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-9485.2012.02472.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2012] [Accepted: 07/30/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Despite the emergence of new imaging technologies, the differentiation of treatment-related changes from recurrent tumour in patients with high-grade gliomas remains a difficult challenge. We evaluated whether specific MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) T1 post-contrast enhancement patterns can help to distinguish between radiation necrosis and tumour recurrence. METHODS This study was approved by local institutional review board. Fifty-one patients with World Health Organization grade III-IV glioma underwent reoperation after prior chemoradiation. The percentage of radiation necrosis versus recurrent tumour in reoperation specimens was estimated by an experienced neuropathologist. Enhancement patterns on T1 post-contrast sequences from the MRIs obtained prior to reoperation were evaluated according to pathology. RESULTS T1 contrast enhancement patterns correlating with recurrent tumour included focal solid nodules and solid uniform enhancement with distinct margins. Eighty-five per cent (17/20) of patients with ≥70% recurrent tumour at reoperation demonstrated one of these patterns on preoperative MRI. Enhancement patterns correlating with radiation necrosis included a hazy mesh-like diffuse enhancement and rim enhancement with feathery indistinct margins. Ninety-four per cent (17/18) of patients with ≥70% radiation necrosis demonstrated one of these two patterns. Thirteen cases had more mixed pathology (>30% of tumour/necrosis) and demonstrated patterns associated with recurrence and/or necrosis. Compared to MR spectroscopy performed in 10 patients, enhancement patterns on MRI were just as accurate in predicting pathologic diagnosis. CONCLUSION Identifying distinct patterns of contrast enhancement on MRI may help to differentiate between radiation necrosis and tumour recurrence in high-grade gliomas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krishna Reddy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado 80045, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Challenges With the Diagnosis and Treatment of Cerebral Radiation Necrosis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2013; 87:449-57. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 200] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2013] [Revised: 05/02/2013] [Accepted: 05/05/2013] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
30
|
Kruser TJ, Mehta MP, Robins HI. Pseudoprogression after glioma therapy: a comprehensive review. Expert Rev Neurother 2013; 13:389-403. [PMID: 23545054 DOI: 10.1586/ern.13.7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Over the last decade, pseudoprogression as a clinically significant entity affecting both glioma patient management and the conduct of clinical trials has been recognized as a significant issue. The authors have summarized the literature relative to the incidence, chronological sequence, therapy-relatedness, impact of O-6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase methylation status and clinical features of pseudoprogression. Evidence regarding numerous neuroradiologic techniques to differentiate pseudoprogression from tumor recurrence is summarized. The implications of pseudoprogression on prognosis and clinical trial design are substantial, and are reviewed. Relative to this, the overlapping terms pseudoprogression and radiation necrosis are clarified to produce an appropriate basis for future consideration and research regarding this important biological phenomenon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim J Kruser
- Department of Human Oncology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chaudhry NS, Shah AH, Ferraro N, Snelling BM, Bregy A, Madhavan K, Komotar RJ. Predictors of long-term survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme: advancements from the last quarter century. Cancer Invest 2013; 31:287-308. [PMID: 23614654 DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2013.789899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Over the last quarter century there has been significant progress toward identifying certain characteristics and patterns in GBM patients to predict survival times and outcomes. We sought to identify clinical predictors of survival in GBM patients from the past 24 years. We examined patient survival related to tumor locations, surgical treatment, postoperative course, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, patient age, GBM recurrence, imaging characteristics, serum, and molecular markers. We present predictors that may increase, decrease, or play no significant role in determining a GBM patient's long-term survival or affect the quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nauman S Chaudhry
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Reddy K, Damek D, Gaspar LE, Ney D, Waziri A, Lillehei K, Stuhr K, Kavanagh BD, Chen C. Phase II Trial of Hypofractionated IMRT With Temozolomide for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Multiforme. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2012; 84:655-60. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2011] [Accepted: 01/10/2012] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
33
|
Skeie BS, Enger PØ, Brøgger J, Ganz JC, Thorsen F, Heggdal JI, Pedersen PH. γ knife surgery versus reoperation for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme. World Neurosurg 2012; 78:658-69. [PMID: 22484078 DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2012.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2011] [Revised: 02/23/2012] [Accepted: 03/29/2012] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal management of patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a subject of controversy. These patients may be candidates for both reoperation and/or gamma knife surgery (GKS). Few studies have addressed the role of GKS for relapsing gliomas, and the results have not been compared with reoperation. To validate the efficacy and safety of GKS, we compared the survival and complication rates of GKS and reoperation for recurrent GBMs. METHODS This study retrospectively reviewed 77 consecutive patients with histopathologically confirmed GBMs retreated for recurrent GBM between 1996 and 2007. Thirty-two patients underwent GKS, 26 reoperation and 19 both procedures. RESULTS The median time from the second intervention to tumor progression was longer after GKS than after resection, P = 0.009. Median survival after retreatment was 12 months for the 51 patients receiving GKS compared with 6 months for reoperation only (P = 0.001, hazard ratio [HR] 2.4), and 19 months versus 16 months from the time of primary diagnosis (P = 0.021, HR 1.8). A multivariate analysis adjusted for possible confounding factors (tumor volume, recursive partitioning analysis class, neurological deficits, time to recurrence, adjuvant therapy, and tumor location) showed significantly longer survival for patients treated with GKS, both from retreatment (P = 0.013, HR 4.1) and from primary diagnosis (P = 0.002, HR 5.8). The adjusted results were still significant after separate analysis according to tumor volume <5 mL, 5 to 20 mL, and >20 mL. The complications rate was 9.8% after GKS and 25.2% after reoperation. CONCLUSIONS GKS may be an alternative to open surgery for small GBMs at the time of recurrences, with a significantly lower complication rate and a possible survival benefit compared with reoperation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bente Sandvei Skeie
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|