1
|
Paganetti H, Simone CB, Bosch WR, Haas-Kogan D, Kirsch DG, Li H, Liang X, Liu W, Mahajan A, Story MD, Taylor PA, Willers H, Xiao Y, Buchsbaum JC. NRG Oncology White Paper on the Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)02974-2. [PMID: 39059509 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.07.2152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
This position paper, led by the NRG Oncology Particle Therapy Work Group, focuses on the concept of relative biologic effect (RBE) in clinical proton therapy (PT), with the goal of providing recommendations for the next-generation clinical trials with PT on the best practice of investigating and using RBE, which could deviate from the current standard proton RBE value of 1.1 relative to photons. In part 1, current clinical utilization and practice are reviewed, giving the context and history of RBE. Evidence for variation in RBE is presented along with the concept of linear energy transfer (LET). The intertwined nature of tumor radiobiology, normal tissue constraints, and treatment planning with LET and RBE considerations is then reviewed. Part 2 summarizes current and past clinical data and then suggests the next steps to explore and employ tools for improved dynamic models for RBE. In part 3, approaches and methods for the next generation of prospective clinical trials are explored, with the goal of optimizing RBE to be both more reflective of clinical reality and also deployable in trials to allow clinical validation and interpatient comparisons. These concepts provide the foundation for personalized biologic treatments reviewed in part 4. Finally, we conclude with a summary including short- and long-term scientific focus points for clinical PT. The practicalities and capacity to use RBE in treatment planning are reviewed and considered with more biological data in hand. The intermediate step of LET optimization is summarized and proposed as a potential bridge to the ultimate goal of case-specific RBE planning that can be achieved as a hypothesis-generating tool in near-term proton trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles B Simone
- New York Proton Center, New York, New York; Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Walter R Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David G Kirsch
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heng Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Xiaoying Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michael D Story
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | | | - Henning Willers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ying Xiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jeffrey C Buchsbaum
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gardner LL, O'Connor JD, McMahon SJ. Benchmarking proton RBE models. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:085022. [PMID: 38471187 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad3329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 03/12/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
Objective.To biologically optimise proton therapy, models which can accurately predict variations in proton relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are essential. Current phenomenological models show large disagreements in RBE predictions, due to different model assumptions and differences in the data to which they were fit. In this work, thirteen RBE models were benchmarked against a comprehensive proton RBE dataset to evaluate predictions when all models are fit using the same data and fitting techniques, and to assess the statistical robustness of the models.Approach.Model performance was initially evaluated by fitting to the full dataset, and then a cross-validation approach was applied to assess model generalisability and robustness. The impact of weighting the fit and the choice of biological endpoint (either single or multiple survival levels) was also evaluated.Main results.Fitting the models to a common dataset reduced differences between their predictions, however significant disagreements remained due to different underlying assumptions. All models performed poorly under cross-validation in the weighted fits, suggesting that some uncertainties on the experimental data were significantly underestimated, resulting in over-fitting and poor performance on unseen data. The simplest model, which depends linearly on the LET but has no tissue or dose dependence, performed best for a single survival level. However, when fitting to multiple survival levels simultaneously, more complex models with tissue dependence performed better. All models had significant residual uncertainty in their predictions compared to experimental data.Significance.This analysis highlights that poor quality of error estimation on the dose response parameters introduces substantial uncertainty in model fitting. The significant residual error present in all approaches illustrates the challenges inherent in fitting to large, heterogeneous datasets and the importance of robust statistical validation of RBE models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lydia L Gardner
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - John D O'Connor
- School of Engineering, Ulster University, Belfast, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen J McMahon
- Patrick G Johnston Centre for Cancer Research, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Berlin E, Eisenberg R, Hill-Kayser C, Lustig RA, Kurtz G, Cummings E, LaRiviere M. Delivery of re-irradiation and complex palliative radiotherapy using proton therapy in pediatric cancer patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30708. [PMID: 37794575 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The intent of this study is to characterize indications for pediatric palliative-intent proton radiation therapy (PIPRT). PROCEDURE We retrospectively reviewed patients 21 years and younger who received PIPRT. We defined PIPRT as radiotherapy (RT) aimed to improve cancer-related symptoms/provide durable local control in the non-curative setting. Mixed proton/photon plans were included. Adjacent re-irradiation (reRT) was defined as a reRT volume within the incidental dose cloud of a prior RT target, whereas direct reRT was defined as in-field overlap with prior RT target. Acute toxicity during RT until first inspection visit was graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. The Kaplan-Meier method, measured from last PIPRT fraction, was used to assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS Eighteen patients underwent PIPRT between 2014 and 2020. Median age at treatment start was 10 years [2-21]. Median follow-up was 8.2 months [0-48]. Treatment sites included: brain/spine [10], abdomen/pelvis [3], thorax [3], and head/neck [2]. Indications for palliation included: durable tumor control [18], neurologic symptoms [4], pain [3], airway compromise [2], and great vessel compression [1]. Indications for protons included: reRT [15] (three adjacent, 12 direct), craniospinal irradiation [4], reduction of dose to normal tissues [3]. Sixteen experienced grade (G) 1-2 toxicity; two G3. There were no reports of radionecrosis. Median PFS was 5.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 2.7-16.3]. Median OS was 8.3 months [95% CI: 5.5-26.3]. CONCLUSIONS The most common indication for PIPRT was reRT to provide durable tumor control. PIPRT appears to be safe, with no cases of high-grade toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Berlin
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rachel Eisenberg
- Albany Medical College, Albany Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA
| | - Christine Hill-Kayser
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Goldie Kurtz
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elizabeth Cummings
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael LaRiviere
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Durante M, Bender T, Schickel E, Mayer M, Debus J, Grosshans D, Schroeder I. Aberrant choroid plexus formation in human cerebral organoids exposed to radiation. RESEARCH SQUARE 2023:rs.3.rs-3445801. [PMID: 37886443 PMCID: PMC10602134 DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3445801/v1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
Brain tumor patients are commonly treated with radiotherapy, but the efficacy of the treatment is limited by its toxicity, particularly the risk of radionecrosis. We used human cerebral organoids to investigate the mechanisms and nature of postirradiation brain image changes commonly linked to necrosis. Irradiation of cerebral organoids lead to increased formation of ZO1+/AQP1+/CLN3+-choroid plexus (CP) structures. Increased CP formation was triggered by radiation via the NOTCH/WNT signaling pathways and associated with delayed growth and neural stem cell differentiation, but not necrosis. The effect was more pronounced in immature than in mature organoids, reflecting the clinically-observed increased radiosensitivity of the pediatric brain. Protons were more effective than X-rays at the same dose, as also observed in clinical treatments. We conclude that radiation-induced brain image-changes can be attributed to aberrant CP formation, providing a new cellular mechanism and strategy for possible countermeasures.
Collapse
|
5
|
Soffietti R, Pellerino A, Bruno F, Mauro A, Rudà R. Neurotoxicity from Old and New Radiation Treatments for Brain Tumors. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10669. [PMID: 37445846 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 06/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Research regarding the mechanisms of brain damage following radiation treatments for brain tumors has increased over the years, thus providing a deeper insight into the pathobiological mechanisms and suggesting new approaches to minimize this damage. This review has discussed the different factors that are known to influence the risk of damage to the brain (mainly cognitive disturbances) from radiation. These include patient and tumor characteristics, the use of whole-brain radiotherapy versus particle therapy (protons, carbon ions), and stereotactic radiotherapy in various modalities. Additionally, biological mechanisms behind neuroprotection have been elucidated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessia Pellerino
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Bruno
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| | - Alessandro Mauro
- Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
- I.R.C.C.S. Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Division of Neurology and Neuro-Rehabilitation, San Giuseppe Hospital, 28824 Piancavallo, Italy
| | - Roberta Rudà
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University and City of Health and Science University Hospital, 10126 Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Peters S, Frisch S, Stock A, Merta J, Bäumer C, Blase C, Schuermann E, Tippelt S, Bison B, Frühwald M, Rutkowski S, Fleischhack G, Timmermann B. Proton Beam Therapy for Pediatric Tumors of the Central Nervous System-Experiences of Clinical Outcome and Feasibility from the KiProReg Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235863. [PMID: 36497345 PMCID: PMC9737072 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
As radiotherapy is an important part of the treatment in a variety of pediatric tumors of the central nervous system (CNS), proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an evolving role due to its potential benefits attributable to the unique dose distribution, with the possibility to deliver high doses to the target volume while sparing surrounding tissue. Children receiving PBT for an intracranial tumor between August 2013 and October 2017 were enrolled in the prospective registry study KiProReg. Patient's clinical data including treatment, outcome, and follow-up were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analysis. Adverse events were scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0 before, during, and after PBT. Written reports of follow-up imaging were screened for newly emerged evidence of imaging changes, according to a list of predefined keywords for the first 14 months after PBT. Two hundred and ninety-four patients were enrolled in this study. The 3-year overall survival of the whole cohort was 82.7%, 3-year progression-free survival was 67.3%, and 3-year local control was 79.5%. Seventeen patients developed grade 3 adverse events of the CNS during long-term follow-up (new adverse event n = 7; deterioration n = 10). Two patients developed vision loss (CTCAE 4°). This analysis demonstrates good general outcomes after PBT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Peters
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-201-723-8943
| | - Sabine Frisch
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Annika Stock
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Wuerzburg, 97080 Wuerzburg, Germany
| | - Julien Merta
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Bäumer
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Blase
- AnästhesieNetz Rhein-Ruhr, Westenfelder Str. 62/64, 44867 Bochum, Germany
| | - Eicke Schuermann
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Stephan Tippelt
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Brigitte Bison
- Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
- Neuroradiological Reference Center for the Pediatric Brain Tumor (HIT) Studies of the German Society of Pediatric Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Würzburg, 97080 Würzburg, Germany
| | - Michael Frühwald
- Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, Swabian Childrens Cancer Center, University Medical Center Augsburg, 86156 Augsburg, Germany
| | - Stefan Rutkowski
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, 20251 Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gudrun Fleischhack
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Pediatrics III, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- West German Proton Therapy Center Essen (WPE), University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Clinic for Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- West German Cancer Center (WTZ), 45147 Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
A systematic review of clinical studies on variable proton Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE). Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:79-92. [PMID: 35988776 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.08.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Recently, a number of clinical studies have explored links between possible Relative Biological Effectiveness (RBE) elevations and patient toxicities and/or image changes following proton therapy. Our objective was to perform a systematic review of such studies. We applied a "Problem [RBE], Intervention [Protons], Population [Patients], Outcome [Side effect]" search strategy to the PubMed database. From our search, we retrieved studies which: (a) performed novel voxel-wise analyses of patient effects versus physical dose and LET (n = 13), and (b) compared image changes between proton and photon cohorts with regard to proton RBE (n = 9). For each retrieved study, we extracted data regarding: primary tumour type; size of patient cohort; type of image change studied; image-registration method (deformable or rigid); LET calculation method, and statistical methodology. We compared and contrasted their methods in order to discuss the weight of clinical evidence for variable proton RBE. We concluded that clinical evidence for variable proton RBE remains statistically weak at present. Our principal recommendation is that proton centres and clinical trial teams collaborate to standardize follow-up protocols and statistical analysis methods, so that larger patient cohorts can ultimately be considered for RBE analyses.
Collapse
|
8
|
A case-control study of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness related to symptomatic brainstem toxicity following pediatric proton therapy. Radiother Oncol 2022; 175:47-55. [PMID: 35917900 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE A fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1 (RBE1.1) is used clinically in proton therapy even though the RBE varies with properties such as dose level and linear energy transfer (LET). We therefore investigated if symptomatic brainstem toxicity in pediatric brain tumor patients treated with proton therapy could be associated with a variable LET and RBE. MATERIALS AND METHODS 36 patients treated with passive scattering proton therapy were selected for a case-control study from a cohort of 954 pediatric brain tumor patients. Nine children with symptomatic brainstem toxicity were each matched to three controls based on age, diagnosis, adjuvant therapy, and brainstem RBE1.1 dose characteristics. Differences across cases and controls related to the dose-averaged LET (LETd) and variable RBE-weighted dose from two RBE models were analyzed in the high-dose region. RESULTS LETd metrics were marginally higher for cases vs. controls for the majority of dose levels and brainstem substructures. Considering areas with doses above 54 Gy(RBE1.1), we found a moderate trend of 13% higher median LETd in the brainstem for cases compared to controls (P = .08), while the difference in the median variable RBE-weighted dose for the same structure was only 2% (P = .6). CONCLUSION Trends towards higher LETd for cases compared to controls were noticeable across structures and LETd metrics for this patient cohort. While case-control differences were minor, an association with the observed symptomatic brainstem toxicity cannot be ruled out.
Collapse
|
9
|
Mohan R. A review of proton therapy – Current status and future directions. PRECISION RADIATION ONCOLOGY 2022; 6:164-176. [DOI: 10.1002/pro6.1149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston Texas USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Upadhyay R, Liao K, Grosshans DR, McGovern SL, Frances McAleer M, Zaky W, Chintagumpala MM, Mahajan A, Nana Yeboa D, Paulino AC. Quantifying the risk and dosimetric variables of symptomatic brainstem injury after proton beam radiation in pediatric brain tumors. Neuro Oncol 2022; 24:1571-1581. [PMID: 35157767 PMCID: PMC9435496 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noac044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Brainstem toxicity after radiation therapy (RT) is a devastating complication and a particular concern with proton radiation (PBT). We investigated the incidence and clinical correlates of brainstem injury in pediatric brain tumors treated with PBT. METHODS All patients <21 years with brain tumors treated with PBT at our institution from 2007-2019, with a brainstem Dmean >30 Gy and/or Dmax >50.4 Gy were included. Symptomatic brainstem injury (SBI) was defined as any new or progressive cranial neuropathy, ataxia, and/or motor weakness with corresponding radiographic abnormality within brainstem. RESULTS A total of 595 patients were reviewed and 468 (medulloblastoma = 200, gliomas = 114, ependymoma = 87, ATRT = 43) met our inclusion criteria. Median age at RT was 6.3 years and median prescribed RT dose was 54Gy [RBE]. Fifteen patients (3.2%) developed SBI, at a median of 4 months after RT. Grades 2, 3, 4, and 5 brainstem injuries were seen in 7, 5, 1, and 2 patients respectively. Asymptomatic radiographic changes were seen in 51 patients (10.9%). SBI was significantly higher in patients with age ≤3 years, female gender, ATRT histology, patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy with stem cell rescue, and those not receiving craniospinal irradiation. Patients with SBI had a significantly higher V50-52. In 2014, our institution started using strict brainstem dose constraints (Dmax ≤57 Gy, Dmean ≤52.4 Gy, and V54≤10%). There was a trend towards decrease in SBI from 4.4% (2007-2013) to 1.5% (2014-2019) (P = .089) without affecting survival. CONCLUSION Our results suggest a low risk of SBI after PBT for pediatric brain tumors, comparable to photon therapy. A lower risk was seen after adopting strict brainstem dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Centre Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Kaiping Liao
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David R Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Susan L McGovern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Mary Frances McAleer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Wafik Zaky
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Debra Nana Yeboa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- Corresponding Author: Arnold C. Paulino, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX 77030, USA ()
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Harreld J, Zou P, Sabin N, Edwards A, Han Y, Li Y, Bieri O, Khan R, Gajjar A, Robinson G, Merchant T. Pretreatment Normal WM Magnetization Transfer Ratio Predicts Risk of Radiation Necrosis in Patients with Medulloblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2022; 43:299-303. [PMID: 35058296 PMCID: PMC8985672 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a7393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Radiation necrosis, for which abnormal WM enhancement is a hallmark, is an uncommon complication of craniospinal irradiation in children with medulloblastoma. The magnetization transfer ratio measures macromolecular content, dominated by myelin in the WM. We investigated whether the pretreatment supratentorial (nonsurgical) WM magnetization transfer ratio could predict patients at risk for radiation necrosis after radiation therapy for medulloblastoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS Ninety-five eligible patients with medulloblastoma (41% female; mean age, 11.0 [SD, 5.4] years) had baseline balanced steady-state free precession MR imaging before proton or photon radiation therapy. Associations among baseline supratentorial magnetization transfer ratio, radiation necrosis (spontaneously resolving/improving parenchymal enhancement within the radiation field)3, age, and the presence of visible brain metastases were explored by logistic regression and parametric/nonparametric techniques as appropriate. RESULTS Twenty-three of 95 (24.2%) children (44% female; mean age, 10.7 [SD, 6.7] years) developed radiation necrosis after radiation therapy (19 infratentorial, 1 supratentorial, 3 both). The mean pretreatment supratentorial WM magnetization transfer ratio was significantly lower in these children (43.18 versus 43.50, P = .03). There was no association between the supratentorial WM magnetization transfer ratio and age, sex, risk/treatment stratum, or the presence of visible brain metastases. CONCLUSIONS A lower baseline supratentorial WM magnetization transfer ratio may indicate underlying structural WM susceptibility to radiation necrosis and may identify children at risk for developing radiation necrosis after craniospinal irradiation for medulloblastoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J.H. Harreld
- From the Department of Radiology (J.H.H.), Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire,Geisel School of Medicine (J.H.H.), Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire
| | - P. Zou
- Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (P.Z., N.D.S., A.E.)
| | - N.D. Sabin
- Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (P.Z., N.D.S., A.E.)
| | - A. Edwards
- Departments of Diagnostic Imaging (P.Z., N.D.S., A.E.)
| | - Y. Han
- Biostatistics (Y.H., Y.L.)
| | - Y. Li
- Biostatistics (Y.H., Y.L.)
| | - O. Bieri
- Department of Radiology (O.B.), Division of Radiological Physics, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland,Department of Biomedical Engineering (O.B), University of Basel, Allschwil, Switzerland
| | | | - A. Gajjar
- Department of Pediatrics, and Departments of Neuro-Oncology (A.G., G.R.)
| | - G. Robinson
- Department of Pediatrics, and Departments of Neuro-Oncology (A.G., G.R.)
| | - T.E. Merchant
- Radiation Oncology (T.E.M.), St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Paganetti H. Mechanisms and Review of Clinical Evidence of Variations in Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022; 112:222-236. [PMID: 34407443 PMCID: PMC8688199 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2021] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Proton therapy is increasingly being used as a radiation therapy modality. There is uncertainty about the biological effectiveness of protons relative to photon therapies as it depends on several physical and biological parameters. Radiation oncology currently applies a constant and generic value for the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1, which was chosen conservatively to ensure tumor coverage. The use of a constant value has been challenged particularly when considering normal tissue constraints. Potential variations in RBE have been assessed in several published reviews but have mostly focused on data from clonogenic cell survival experiments with unclear relevance for clinical proton therapy. The goal of this review is to put in vitro findings in relation to clinical observations. Relevant in vivo pathways determining RBE for tumors and normal tissues are outlined, including not only damage to tumor cells and parenchyma but also vascular damage and immune response. Furthermore, the current clinical evidence of varying RBE is reviewed. The assessment can serve as guidance for treatment planning, personalized dose prescriptions, and outcome analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Radiation induced contrast enhancement after proton beam therapy in patients with low grade glioma - How safe are protons? Radiother Oncol 2021; 167:211-218. [PMID: 34973277 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.12.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2021] [Revised: 11/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The optimal treatment strategy for low-grade glioma (LGG) is still a matter of controversy. Considering that the prognosis is typically favorable, the prevention of late sequelae is of particular importance. Proton beam therapy (PRT) has the potential to further reduce the burden of treatment related side effects. We set out to evaluate the clinical outcome of proton irradiation with a particular focus on morphologic features on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). METHODS We assessed prospectively 110 patients who received radiotherapy with protons for histologically proven LGG. Clinical and radiological information were analyzed resulting in more than 1200 available MRI examinations with a median follow-up of 39 months. Newly diagnosed contrast-enhancing lesions on MRI were delineated and correlated with parameters of the corresponding treatment plan. A voxel-based dose-matched paired analysis of the linear energy transfer (LET) inside vs outside lesions was performed. RESULTS Proton beam irradiation of patients with low-grade glioma results in overall survival (OS) of 90% after seven years. Median progression free survival had not yet been reached with surviving fraction of 54% after seven years. The incidence of temporary or clinically silent radiation induced contrast enhancement was significantly higher than previously assumed, however, symptomatic radiation necrosis was only detected in one patient. These radiation-induced contrast-enhancing lesions were almost exclusively seen at the distal beam end of the proton beam. In 22 out of 23 patients, the average LET of voxels inside contrast-enhancing lesions was significantly increased, compared to dose-matched voxels outside the lesions. CONCLUSION Symptomatic radiation necrosis following PRT was as rare as conventional photon-based treatment series suggest. However, the increased incidence of asymptomatic radiation-induced brain injuries with an increased average LET observed in this cohort provides strong clinical evidence to support the hypothesis that the relative biological effectiveness of protons is variable and different to the fixed factor of 1.1 currently used worldwide.
Collapse
|
14
|
Cognitive and Imaging Differences After Proton and Photon Whole Brain Irradiation in a Preclinical Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:554-564. [PMID: 34509550 PMCID: PMC8748279 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2021] [Revised: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Purpose: Compared with photon cranial radiation therapy (X-CRT), proton cranial radiation therapy (P-CRT) offers potential advantages in limiting radiation-induced sequalae in the treatment of pediatric brain tumors. This study aims to identify cognitive, functional magnetic resonance and positron emission tomography imaging markers and molecular differences between the radiation modalities. Methods and Materials: Juvenile rats received a single faction of 10 Gy (relative biological effectiveness−weighted dose) delivered with 6 MV X-CRT or at the midspread out Bragg peak of a 100 MeV P-CRT beam. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-CRT, executive function was measured using 5-choice serial reaction time task. At ~12 months post-CRT, animals were imaged with 18F-Flurodeoxy-glucose positron emission tomography imaging followed by functional ex vivo magnetic resonance imaging and stained for markers of neuroinflammation. Results: Irradiated animals had cognitive impairment with a higher number of omissions and lower incorrect and premature responses compared with sham (P ≤ .05). The accuracy of the animals’ X-CRT was less than that of sham (P ≤ .001). No significant difference in rates of cognitive change were found between the radiation modalities. At 12 months post-CRT, glucose metabolism was significantly higher than sham in X-CRT (P = .04) but not P-CRT. Using diffusion tensor imaging, P-CRT brains were found to have higher white matter volume and fiber lengths compared with sham (P < .03). Only X-CRT animals had higher apparent diffusion coefficient values compared with sham (P = .04). P-CRT animals had more connectomic changes compared with X-CRT. Correlative analysis identified several imaging features with cognitive performance. Further-more, microgliosis (P < .05), astrogliosis (P < .01), and myelin thinning (P <.05) were observed in both radiation modalities, with X-CRT showing slightly more inflammation. Conclusions: Both P-CRT and X-CRT lead to neurocognitive changes compared with sham. Although no significant difference was observed in neuroinflammation between the irradiated groups, differences were found in late-term glucose metabolism and brain connectome. Our results indicate that despite relative biological effectiveness weighting of the proton dose there are still differential effects which warrants further investigation.
Collapse
|
15
|
Bär E, Collins-Fekete CA, Rompokos V, Zhang Y, Gaze MN, Warry A, Poynter A, Royle G. Assessment of the impact of CT calibration procedures for proton therapy planning on pediatric treatments. Med Phys 2021; 48:5202-5218. [PMID: 34174092 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Relative stopping powers (RSPs) for proton therapy are estimated using single-energy computed tomography (SECT), calibrated with standardized tissues of the adult male. It is assumed that those tissues are representative of tissues of all age and sex. Female, male, and pediatric tissues differ from one another in density and composition. In this study, we use tabulated pediatric tissues and computational phantoms to investigate the impact of this assumption on pediatric proton therapy. The potential of dual-energy CT (DECT) to improve the accuracy of these calculations is explored. METHODS We study 51 human body tissues, categorized into male/female for the age groups newborn, 1-, 5-, 10-, and 15-year-old children, and adult, with given compositions and densities. CT numbers are simulated and RSPs are estimated using SECT and DECT methods. Estimated tissue RSPs from each method are compared to theoretical RSPs. The dose and range errors of each approach are evaluated on three computational phantoms (Ewing's sarcoma, salivary sarcoma, and glioma) derived from pediatric proton therapy patients. RESULTS With SECT, soft tissues have mean estimation errors and standard deviation up to (1.96 ± 4.18)% observed in newborns, compared to (0.20 ± 1.15)% in adult males. Mean estimation errors for bones are up to (-3.35 ± 4.76)% in pediatrics as opposed to (0.10 ± 0.66)% in adult males. With DECT, mean errors reduce to (0.17 ± 0.13)% and (0.23 ± 0.22)% in newborns (soft tissues/bones). With SECT, dose errors in a Ewing's sarcoma phantom are exceeding 5 Gy (10% of prescribed dose) at the distal end of the treatment field, with volumes of dose errors >5 Gy ofV diff > 5 = 4630.7 mm3 . Similar observations are made in the head and neck phantoms, with overdoses to healthy tissue exceeding 2 Gy (4%). A systematic Bragg peak shift resulting in either over- or underdosage of healthy tissues and target volumes depending on the crossed tissues RSP prediction errors is observed. Water equivalent range errors of single beams are between -1.53 and 5.50 mm (min, max) (Ewing's sarcoma phantom), -0.78 and 3.62 mm (salivary sarcoma phantom), and -0.43 and 1.41 mm (glioma phantom). DECT can reduce dose errors to <1 Gy and range errors to <1 mm. CONCLUSION Single-energy computed tomography estimates RSPs for pediatric tissues with systematic shifts. DECT improves the accuracy of RSPs and dose distributions in pediatric tissues compared to the SECT calibration curve based on adult male tissues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Bär
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Vasilis Rompokos
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - Mark N Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Alison Warry
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Poynter
- Department of Radiotherapy Physics, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gary Royle
- Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bertolet A, Abolfath R, Carlson DJ, Lustig RA, Hill-Kayser C, Alonso-Basanta M, Carabe A. Correlation of LET With MRI Changes in Brain and Potential Implications for Normal Tissue Complication Probability for Patients With Meningioma Treated With Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 112:237-246. [PMID: 34425196 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.08.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/15/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to investigate the correlation between imaging changes in brain normal tissue and the spatial distribution of linear energy transfer (LET) for a cohort of patients with meningioma treated with scanned proton beams. Then, assuming imaging changes are induced by cell lethality, we studied the correlation between normal tissue complication probability and LET. METHODS AND MATERIALS Magnetic resonance imaging T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery acquired at different intervals after proton radiation were coregistered with the planning computed tomography (CT) images from 26 patients with meningioma with abnormalities after proton radiation therapy. For this purpose, the T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery areas not on the original magnetic resonance images were contoured, and the LET values for each voxel in the patient geometry were calculated to investigate the correlation between the position of imaging changes and the LET at those positions. To separate the effect of the dose as the inductor of these changes, we compared the LET in these areas with a sample of voxels matching the dose distributions across the image change areas. Patients with a higher LET in image change areas were grouped to verify whether they shared common characteristics. RESULTS Eleven of the patients showed higher dose-averaged LET (LETd) in imaging change regions than in the group of voxels with the same dose. This group of patients had significantly shallower targets for their treatment than the other 15 and used fewer beams and angles. CONCLUSIONS This study points toward the possibility that areas with imaging change are more likely to occur in regions with high dose or in areas with lower dose but increased LETd. The effect of LETd on imaging changes seems to be more relevant when treating superficial lesions with few nonopposed beams. However, most patients did not show a spatial correlation between their image changes and the LETd values, limiting the cases for the possible role of high LET as a toxicity inductor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Bertolet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Ramin Abolfath
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Department of Radiation Oncology, New Jersey Urology, West Orange, New Jersey
| | - David J Carlson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Robert A Lustig
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Christine Hill-Kayser
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Alejandro Carabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Hampton University Proton Institute, Hampton, Virginia.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed and brainstem during photon and proton therapy for pediatric tumors of the posterior fossa: dosimetric impact and predictive factors. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1113-1123. [PMID: 34351450 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01828-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brainstem radionecrosis is an important issue during the irradiation of tumors of the posterior fossa. The aim of the present study is to analyze postsurgical geometrical variations of tumor bed (TB) and brainstem (BS) and their impact on dosimetry. METHODS Retrospective collection of data from pediatric patients treated at a single institution. Availability of presurgical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was verified; availability of at least two postsurgical MRIs was considered a further inclusion criterion. The following metrics were analyzed: total volume, Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), and Haudsdorff distances (HD). RESULTS Fourteen patients were available for the quantification of major postsurgical geometrical variations of TB. DSC, HD max, and HD average values were 0.47 (range: 0.08;0.76), 11.3 mm (7.7;24.5), and 2.6 mm (0.7;6.7) between the first and the second postoperative MRI, respectively. Postsurgical geometrical variations of the BS were also observed. Coverage to the TB was reduced in one patient (D95: -2.9 Gy), while D2 to the BS was increased for the majority of patients. Overall, predictive factors for significant geometrical changes were presurgical gross tumor volume (GTV) > 33 mL, hydrocephaly at diagnosis, Luschka foramen involvement, and younger age (≤ 8 years). CONCLUSION Major volume changes were observed in this cohort, with some dosimetric impact. The use of a recent co-registration MRI is advised. The 2-3 mm HD average observed should be considered in the planning target volume/planning organ at risk volume (PTV/PRV) margin and/or robust optimization planning. Results from wider efforts are needed to verify our findings.
Collapse
|
18
|
Tinganelli W, Luoni F, Durante M. What can space radiation protection learn from radiation oncology? LIFE SCIENCES IN SPACE RESEARCH 2021; 30:82-95. [PMID: 34281668 DOI: 10.1016/j.lssr.2021.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2021] [Revised: 06/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Protection from cosmic radiation of crews of long-term space missions is now becoming an urgent requirement to allow a safe colonization of the moon and Mars. Epidemiology provides little help to quantify the risk, because the astronaut group is small and as yet mostly involved in low-Earth orbit mission, whilst the usual cohorts used for radiation protection on Earth (e.g. atomic bomb survivors) were exposed to a radiation quality substantially different from the energetic charged particle field found in space. However, there are over 260,000 patients treated with accelerated protons or heavier ions for different types of cancer, and this cohort may be useful for quantifying the effects of space-like radiation in humans. Space radiation protection and particle therapy research also share the same tools and devices, such as accelerators and detectors, as well as several research topics, from nuclear fragmentation cross sections to the radiobiology of densely ionizing radiation. The transfer of the information from the cancer radiotherapy field to space is manifestly complicated, yet the two field should strengthen their relationship and exchange methods and data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Walter Tinganelli
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Francesca Luoni
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Marco Durante
- GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung, Biophysics Department, Darmstadt, Germany; Technische Universität Darmstadt, Institut für Physik Kondensierter Materie, Darmstadt, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Supratentorial Extraventricular Ependymomas: Imaging Features and the Added Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2021; 45:463-471. [PMID: 34297516 DOI: 10.1097/rct.0000000000001164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To improve the understanding and the diagnosis of intracranial ependymal tumors. METHODS The clinical, radiological and prognostic features of 48 supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas and 74 intraventricular ependymomas were summarized and compared. RESULTS Supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas, most often located in the frontal lobe (33.3%) and classified as grade III (75.0%), had relatively large eccentric cysts (3.07 ± 2.03 cm), significant enhancement (84.8%), low apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values, and associated with higher mortality (41.3%). The majority of intraventricular lesions occurred in the fourth ventricle (86.5%) and classified as grade II (78.4%), had relatively small and multiple cystic changes (1.04 ± 0.87 cm), slight or moderate enhancement (76.9%), high ADC values and associated with lower mortality (20.7%). There were few significant differences between grade II and grade III tumors in these 2 groups, respectively. Young age, high grade and low ADC values are worse prognostic indicators for patients with supratentorial extraventricular ependymomas, but not for those with intraventricular ependymomas. CONCLUSIONS Conventional radiological features, combined with clinical manifestations and quantitative information provided by diffusion-weighted imaging, may not only enhance the diagnosis and assist in determining prognosis but also provide a better pathophysiological understanding of intracranial ependymal tumors.
Collapse
|
20
|
Howard ME, Denbeigh JM, Debrot EK, Garcia DA, Remmes NB, Herman MG, Beltran CJ. Dosimetric Assessment of a High Precision System for Mouse Proton Irradiation to Assess Spinal Cord Toxicity. Radiat Res 2021; 195:541-548. [PMID: 33826742 DOI: 10.1667/rade-20-00153.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2020] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The uncertainty associated with the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in proton therapy, particularly near the Bragg peak (BP), has led to the shift towards biological-based treatment planning. Proton RBE uncertainty has recently been reported as a possible cause for brainstem necrosis in pediatric patients treated with proton therapy. Despite this, in vivo studies have been limited due to the complexity of accurate delivery and absolute dosimetry. The purpose of this investigation was to create a precise and efficient method of treating the mouse spinal cord with various portions of the proton Bragg curve and to quantify associated uncertainties for the characterization of proton RBE. Mice were restrained in 3D printed acrylic boxes, shaped to their external contour, with a silicone insert extending down to mold around the mouse. Brass collimators were designed for parallel opposed beams to treat the spinal cord while shielding the brain and upper extremities of the animal. Up to six animals may be accommodated for simultaneous treatment within the restraint system. Two plans were generated targeting the cervical spinal cord, with either the entrance (ENT) or the BP portion of the beam. Dosimetric uncertainty was measured using EBT3 radiochromic film with a dose-averaged linear energy transfer (LETd) correction. Positional uncertainty was assessed by collecting a library of live mouse scans (n = 6 mice, two independent scans per mouse) and comparing the following dosimetric statistics from the mouse cervical spinal cord: Volume receiving 90% of the prescription dose (V90); mean dose to the spinal cord; and LETd. Film analysis results showed the dosimetric uncertainty to be ±1.2% and ±5.4% for the ENT and BP plans, respectively. Preliminary results from the mouse library showed the V90 to be 96.3 ± 4.8% for the BP plan. Positional uncertainty of the ENT plan was not measured due to the inherent robustness of that treatment plan. The proposed high-throughput mouse proton irradiation setup resulted in accurate dose delivery to mouse spinal cords positioned along the ENT and BP. Future directions include adapting the setup to account for weight fluctuations in mice undergoing fractionated irradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Janet M Denbeigh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Darwin A Garcia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Michael G Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Chris J Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Dell'Oro M, Short M, Wilson P, Bezak E. Normal tissue tolerance amongst paediatric brain tumour patients- current evidence in proton radiotherapy. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2021; 164:103415. [PMID: 34242771 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103415] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy (PT) is used increasingly for paediatric brain cancer patients. However, as demonstrated here, the knowledge on normal tissue dose constraints, to minimize side-effects, for this cohort is limited. METHODS A search strategy was systematically conducted on MEDLINE® database. 65 papers were evaluated ranging from 2013 to 2021. RESULTS Large variations in normal tissue tolerance and toxicity reporting across PT studies makes estimation of normal tissue dose constraints difficult, with the potential for significant late effects to go unmeasured. Mean dose delivered to the pituitary gland varies from 20 to 30 Gy across literature. Similarly, the hypothalamic dose delivery ranges from 20 to 54.6 Gy for paediatric patients. CONCLUSION There is a significant lack of radiobiological data for paediatric brain cancer patients undergoing proton therapy, often using data from x-ray radiotherapy and adult populations. The way forward is through standardisation of reporting in order to validate relevant dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mikaela Dell'Oro
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
| | - Michala Short
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Puthenparampil Wilson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; UniSA STEM, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
| | - Eva Bezak
- Cancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia; Department of Physics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Veiga C, Lim P, Anaya VM, Chandy E, Ahmad R, D'Souza D, Gaze M, Moinuddin S, Gains J. Atlas construction and spatial normalisation to facilitate radiation-induced late effects research in childhood cancer. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 33735848 PMCID: PMC8112163 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/abf010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
Reducing radiation-induced side effects is one of the most important challenges in paediatric cancer treatment. Recently, there has been growing interest in using spatial normalisation to enable voxel-based analysis of radiation-induced toxicities in a variety of patient groups. The need to consider three-dimensional distribution of doses, rather than dose-volume histograms, is desirable but not yet explored in paediatric populations. In this paper, we investigate the feasibility of atlas construction and spatial normalisation in paediatric radiotherapy. We used planning computed tomography (CT) scans from twenty paediatric patients historically treated with craniospinal irradiation to generate a template CT that is suitable for spatial normalisation. This childhood cancer population representative template was constructed using groupwise image registration. An independent set of 53 subjects from a variety of childhood malignancies was then used to assess the quality of the propagation of new subjects to this common reference space using deformable image registration (i.e. spatial normalisation). The method was evaluated in terms of overall image similarity metrics, contour similarity and preservation of dose-volume properties. After spatial normalisation, we report a dice similarity coefficient of 0.95 ± 0.05, 0.85 ± 0.04, 0.96 ± 0.01, 0.91 ± 0.03, 0.83 ± 0.06 and 0.65 ± 0.16 for brain and spinal canal, ocular globes, lungs, liver, kidneys and bladder. We then demonstrated the potential advantages of an atlas-based approach to study the risk of second malignant neoplasms after radiotherapy. Our findings indicate satisfactory mapping between a heterogeneous group of patients and the template CT. The poorest performance was for organs in the abdominal and pelvic region, likely due to respiratory and physiological motion and to the highly deformable nature of abdominal organs. More specialised algorithms should be explored in the future to improve mapping in these regions. This study is the first step toward voxel-based analysis in radiation-induced toxicities following paediatric radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catarina Veiga
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Pei Lim
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Virginia Marin Anaya
- Radiotherapy Physics Services, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Edward Chandy
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom.,UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Reem Ahmad
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Derek D'Souza
- Radiotherapy Physics Services, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mark Gaze
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Syed Moinuddin
- Radiotherapy, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer Gains
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Patteson BE, Baliga S, Bajaj BVM, MacDonald SM, Yeap BY, Gallotto SL, Giblin MJ, Weyman EA, Ebb DH, Huang MS, Jones RM, Tarbell NJ, Yock TI. Clinical outcomes in a large pediatric cohort of patients with ependymoma treated with proton radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:156-166. [PMID: 32514542 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noaa139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Treatment for pediatric ependymoma includes surgical resection followed by local radiotherapy (RT). Proton RT (PRT) enables superior sparing of critical structures compared with photons, with potential to reduce late effects. We report mature outcomes, patterns of failure, and predictors of outcomes in patients treated with PRT. METHODS One hundred fifty patients (<22 y) with World Health Organization grades II/III ependymoma were treated with PRT between January 2001 and January 2019 at Massachusetts General Hospital. Demographic, tumor, and treatment-related characteristics were analyzed. Event-free survival (EFS), overall survival (OS), and local control (LC) were assessed. RESULTS Median follow-up was 6.5 years. EFS, OS, and LC for the intracranial cohort (n = 145) at 7 years were 63.4%, 82.6%, and 76.1%. Fifty-one patients recurred: 26 (51.0%) local failures, 19 (37.3%) distant failures, and 6 (11.8%) synchronous failures. One hundred sixteen patients (77.3%) underwent gross total resection (GTR), 5 (3.3%) underwent near total resection (NTR), and 29 (19.3%) underwent subtotal resection (STR). EFS for the intracranial cohort at 7 years for GTR/NTR and STR was 70.3% and 35.2%. With multivariate analysis, the effect of tumor excision persisted after controlling for tumor location. There was no adverse effect on disease control if surgery to RT interval was within 9 weeks of GTR/NTR. CONCLUSION PRT is effective and safe in pediatric ependymoma. Similar to previous studies, GTR/NTR was the most important prognostic factor. Intervals up to 9 weeks from surgery to PRT did not compromise disease outcomes. There was no LC benefit between patients treated with >54 Gray relative biological effectiveness (GyRBE) versus ≤54 GyRBE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke E Patteson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sujith Baliga
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.,Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Benjamin V M Bajaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Shannon M MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beow Y Yeap
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sara L Gallotto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Megan J Giblin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth A Weyman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David H Ebb
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Mary S Huang
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robin M Jones
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nancy J Tarbell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Mizumoto M, Fuji H, Miyachi M, Soejima T, Yamamoto T, Aibe N, Demizu Y, Iwata H, Hashimoto T, Motegi A, Kawamura A, Terashima K, Fukushima T, Nakao T, Takada A, Sumi M, Oshima J, Moriwaki K, Nozaki M, Ishida Y, Kosaka Y, Ae K, Hosono A, Harada H, Ogo E, Akimoto T, Saito T, Fukushima H, Suzuki R, Takahashi M, Matsuo T, Matsumura A, Masaki H, Hosoi H, Shigematsu N, Sakurai H. Proton beam therapy for children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs): JASTRO and JSPHO Guidelines. Cancer Treat Rev 2021; 98:102209. [PMID: 33984606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2021.102209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2020] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer are often treated with a multidisciplinary approach. This includes use of radiotherapy, which is important for local control, but may also cause adverse events in the long term, including second cancer. The risks for limited growth and development, endocrine dysfunction, reduced fertility and second cancer in children and AYAs are reduced by proton beam therapy (PBT), which has a dose distribution that decreases irradiation of normal organs while still targeting the tumor. To define the outcomes and characteristics of PBT in cancer treatment in pediatric and AYA patients, this document was developed by the Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology (JASTRO) and the Japanese Society of Pediatric Hematology/Oncology (JSPHO).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masashi Mizumoto
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Fuji
- Department of Radiology and National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Miyachi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Toshinori Soejima
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Tetsuya Yamamoto
- Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Norihiro Aibe
- Department of Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yusuke Demizu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hyogo Ion Beam Medical Center Kobe Proton Center, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Hiromitsu Iwata
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Nagoya Proton Therapy Center, Nagoya City University West Medical Center, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Takayuki Hashimoto
- Department of Radiation Biomedical Science and Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Atsushi Motegi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Atsufumi Kawamura
- Department of Neurosurgery, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keita Terashima
- Children's Cancer Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takashi Fukushima
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Hidaka, Saitama, Japan
| | - Tomohei Nakao
- Department of Pediatrics, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Akinori Takada
- Department of Radiology, Mie University Hospital, Tsu-shi, Mie, Japan
| | - Minako Sumi
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Geriatric Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kensuke Moriwaki
- Department of Medical Statistics, Kobe Pharmaceutical University, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Miwako Nozaki
- Department of Radiology, Dokkyo Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Koshigaya, Saitama, Japan
| | - Yuji Ishida
- Department of Pediatrics, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Yoshiyuki Kosaka
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ae
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ako Hosono
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Harada
- Division of Radiation Therapy, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Etsuyo Ogo
- Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Akimoto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Saito
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukushima
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Ryoko Suzuki
- Department of Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Takahashi
- Department of Orthopaedic Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center Hospital, Nagaizumi, Shizuoka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Matsuo
- Department of Neurosurgery, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Akira Matsumura
- Departments of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan
| | - Hidekazu Masaki
- Proton Therapy Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Nagano, Japan
| | - Hajime Hosoi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Shigematsu
- Department of Radiology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Sakurai
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Leduc A, Chaouni S, Pouzoulet F, De Marzi L, Megnin-Chanet F, Corre E, Stefan D, Habrand JL, Sichel F, Laurent C. Differential normal skin transcriptomic response in total body irradiated mice exposed to scattered versus scanned proton beams. Sci Rep 2021; 11:5876. [PMID: 33712719 PMCID: PMC7955113 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-85394-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Proton therapy allows to avoid excess radiation dose on normal tissues. However, there are some limitations. Indeed, passive delivery of proton beams results in an increase in the lateral dose upstream of the tumor and active scanning leads to strong differences in dose delivery. This study aims to assess possible differences in the transcriptomic response of skin in C57BL/6 mice after TBI irradiation by active or passive proton beams at the dose of 6 Gy compared to unirradiated mice. In that purpose, total RNA was extracted from skin samples 3 months after irradiation and RNA-Seq was performed. Results showed that active and passive delivery lead to completely different transcription profiles. Indeed, 140 and 167 genes were differentially expressed after active and passive scanning compared to unirradiated, respectively, with only one common gene corresponding to RIKEN cDNA 9930021J03. Moreover, protein-protein interactions performed by STRING analysis showed that 31 and 25 genes are functionally related after active and passive delivery, respectively, with no common gene between both types of proton delivery. Analysis showed that active scanning led to the regulation of genes involved in skin development which was not the case with passive delivery. Moreover, 14 ncRNA were differentially regulated after active scanning against none for passive delivery. Active scanning led to 49 potential mRNA-ncRNA pairs with one ncRNA mainly involved, Gm44383 which is a miRNA. The 43 genes potentially regulated by the miRNA Gm44393 confirmed an important role of active scanning on skin keratin pathway. Our results demonstrated that there are differences in skin gene expression still 3 months after proton irradiation versus unirradiated mouse skin. And strong differences do exist in late skin gene expression between scattered or scanned proton beams. Further investigations are strongly needed to understand this discrepancy and to improve treatments by proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Leduc
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Samia Chaouni
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, RadeXp Platform, centre universitaire, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, Laboratoire d'Imagerie Translationnelle en Oncologie, INSERM, 91401, Orsay, France
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Frédérique Megnin-Chanet
- INSERM U1196/UMR9187 CMIB, University Paris-Saclay, Institut Curie-Recherche, bât. 112, rue H. Becquerel, 91405, Orsay, France
| | - Erwan Corre
- CNRS, Sorbonne Université, R2424, ABiMS platform, Station Biologique, 29680, Roscoff, France
| | - Dinu Stefan
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
- Radiotherapy Department, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
- Radiotherapy Department, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - François Sichel
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France
| | - Carine Laurent
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE-EA4651, ToxEMAC, Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
- SAPHYN/ARCHADE (Advanced Resource Centre for HADrontherapy in Europe), Cancer Centre François Baclesse, 14000, Caen, France.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Bhattacharya D, Chhabda S, Lakshmanan R, Tan R, Warne R, Benenati M, Michalski A, Aquilina K, Jacques T, Hargrave D, Chang YC, Gains J, Mankad K. Spectrum of neuroimaging findings post-proton beam therapy in a large pediatric cohort. Childs Nerv Syst 2021; 37:435-446. [PMID: 32705327 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-020-04819-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton beam therapy (PBT) is now well established for the treatment of certain pediatric brain tumors. The intrinsic properties of PBT are known to reduce long-term negative effects of photon radiotherapy (PRT). To better understand the intracranial effects of PBT, we analyzed the longitudinal imaging changes in a cohort of children with brain tumors treated by PBT with clinical and radiotherapy dose correlations. MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective imaging review of 46 patients from our hospital with brain tumors treated by PBT. The imaging findings were correlated with clinical and dose parameters. RESULTS Imaging changes were assessed by reviewing serial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans following PBT over a follow-up period ranging from 1 month to 7 years. Imaging changes were observed in 23 patients undergoing PBT and categorized as pseudoprogression (10 patients, 43%), white matter changes (6 patients, 23%), parenchymal atrophy (6 patients, 23%), and cerebral large vessel arteriopathy (5 patients, 25%). Three patients had more than one type of imaging change. Clinical symptoms attributable to PBT were observed in 13 (28%) patients. CONCLUSION In accordance with published literature, we found evidence of varied intracranial imaging changes in pediatric brain tumor patients treated with PBT. There was a higher incidence (10%) of large vessel cerebral arteriopathy in our cohort than previously described in the literature. Twenty-eight percent of patients had clinical sequelae as a result of these changes, particularly in the large vessel arteriopathy subgroup, arguing the need for angiographic and perfusion surveillance to pre-empt any morbidities and offer potential neuro-protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ronald Tan
- KK Women's and Children's Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | - Thomas Jacques
- UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
| | | | | | - Jenny Gains
- University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Suckert T, Beyreuther E, Müller J, Azadegan B, Meinhardt M, Raschke F, Bodenstein E, von Neubeck C, Lühr A, Krause M, Dietrich A. Late Side Effects in Normal Mouse Brain Tissue After Proton Irradiation. Front Oncol 2021; 10:598360. [PMID: 33520710 PMCID: PMC7842140 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.598360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2020] [Accepted: 11/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiation-induced late side effects such as cognitive decline and normal tissue complications can severely affect quality of life and outcome in long-term survivors of brain tumors. Proton therapy offers a favorable depth-dose deposition with the potential to spare tumor-surrounding normal tissue, thus potentially reducing such side effects. In this study, we describe a preclinical model to reveal underlying biological mechanisms caused by precise high-dose proton irradiation of a brain subvolume. We studied the dose- and time-dependent radiation response of mouse brain tissue, using a high-precision image-guided proton irradiation setup for small animals established at the University Proton Therapy Dresden (UPTD). The right hippocampal area of ten C57BL/6 and ten C3H/He mice was irradiated. Both strains contained four groups (nirradiated = 3, ncontrol = 1) treated with increasing doses (0 Gy, 45 Gy, 65 Gy or 85 Gy and 0 Gy, 40 Gy, 60 Gy or 80 Gy, respectively). Follow-up examinations were performed for up to six months, including longitudinal monitoring of general health status and regular contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of mouse brains. These findings were related to comprehensive histological analysis. In all mice of the highest dose group, first symptoms of blood-brain barrier (BBB) damage appeared one week after irradiation, while a dose-dependent delay in onset was observed for lower doses. MRI contrast agent leakage occurred in the irradiated brain areas and was progressive in the higher dose groups. Mouse health status and survival corresponded to the extent of contrast agent leakage. Histological analysis revealed tissue changes such as vessel abnormalities, gliosis, and granule cell dispersion, which also partly affected the non-irradiated contralateral hippocampus in the higher dose groups. All observed effects depended strongly on the prescribed radiation dose and the outcome, i.e. survival, image changes, and tissue alterations, were very consistent within an experimental dose cohort. The derived dose–response model will determine endpoint-specific dose levels for future experiments and may support generating clinical hypotheses on brain toxicity after proton therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa Suckert
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elke Beyreuther
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiation Physics, Dresden, Germany
| | - Johannes Müller
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Behnam Azadegan
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Physics, Hakim Sabzevari University, Sabzevar, Iran
| | - Matthias Meinhardt
- Neuropathology, Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Felix Raschke
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | - Elisabeth Bodenstein
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Cläre von Neubeck
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Armin Lühr
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Medical Physics and Radiotherapy, Faculty of Physics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany
| | - Mechthild Krause
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Antje Dietrich
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Niemierko A, Schuemann J, Niyazi M, Giantsoudi D, Maquilan G, Shih HA, Paganetti H. Brain Necrosis in Adult Patients After Proton Therapy: Is There Evidence for Dependency on Linear Energy Transfer? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2021; 109:109-119. [PMID: 32911019 PMCID: PMC7736370 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2020.08.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2020] [Revised: 08/26/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate if radiographic imaging changes defined as necrosis correlate with regions in the brain with elevated linear energy transfer (LET) for proton radiation therapy treatments with partial brain involvement in central nervous system and patients with head and neck cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS Fifty patients with head and neck, skull base, or intracranial tumors who underwent proton therapy between 2004 to 2016 with a minimum prescription dose of 59.4 Gy (relative biological effectiveness) and with magnetic resonance imaging changes indicative of brain necrosis after radiation therapy were retrospectively reviewed. Each treatment plan was recalculated using Monte Carlo simulations to provide accurate dose distributions as well as 3-dimensional distributions of LET. To assess the effect of LET on radiographic imaging changes several voxel-based analyses were performed. RESULTS In this patient cohort, LET adjusted for dose was not found to be associated with risk of brain necrosis. CONCLUSIONS A voxel-based analysis of brain necrosis as an endpoint is difficult owing to uncertainties in the origin of necrosis, timing of imaging, variability in patient specific radiosensitivity, and the simultaneous effect of dose and LET. Even though it is expected that the LET and thus relative biological effectiveness increases at the end of range, effects in patients might be small compared with interpatient variability of radiosensitivity and might be obscured by other confounding factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrzej Niemierko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; German Cancer Consortium, partner site Munich, Heidelberg, Germany; German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Drosoula Giantsoudi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Genevieve Maquilan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Helen A Shih
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Carabe A, Karagounis IV, Huynh K, Bertolet A, François N, Kim MM, Maity A, Abel E, Dale R. Radiobiological effectiveness difference of proton arc beams versus conventional proton and photon beams. Phys Med Biol 2020; 65:165002. [PMID: 32413889 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab9370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
This paper aims to demonstrate the difference in biological effectiveness of proton monoenergetic arc therapy (PMAT) compared to intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and conventional 6 MV photon therapy, and to quantify this difference when exposing cells of different radiosensitivity to the same experimental conditions for each modality. V79, H1299 and H460 cells were cultured in petri dishes placed in the central axis of a cylindrical and homogeneous solid water phantom of 20 cm in diameter. For the PMAT plan, cells were exposed to 13 mono-energetic proton beams separated every 15° over a 180° arc, designed to deliver a uniform dose of higher LET to the petri dishes. For the IMPT plans, 3 fields were used, where each field was modulated to cover the full target. Cells were also exposed to 6 MV photon beams in petri dishes to characterize their radiosensitivity. The relative biological effectiveness of the PMAT plans compared with those of IMPT was measured using clonogenic assays. Similarly, in order to study the quantity and quality of the DNA damage induced by the PMAT plans compared to that of IMPT and photons, γ-H2AX assays were conducted to study the relative amount of DNA damage induced by each modality, and their repair rate over time. The clonogenic assay revealed similar survival levels to the same dose delivered with IMPT or x-rays. However, a systematic average of up to a 43% increase in effectiveness in PMAT plans was observed when compared with IMPT. In addition, the repair kinetic assays proved that PMAT induces larger and more complex DNA damage (evidenced by a slower repair rate and a larger proportion of unrepaired DNA damage) than IMPT. The repair kinetics of IMPT and 6 MV photon therapy were similar. Mono-energetic arc beams offer the possibility of taking advantage of the enhanced LET of proton beams to increase TCP. This study presents initial results based on exposing cells with different radiosensitivity to other modalities under the same experimental conditions, but more extensive clonogenic and in-vivo studies will be required to confirm the validity of these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Carabe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, PA, United States of America. Author to whom any correspondence should be addressed
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Imaging issues specific to hadrontherapy (proton, carbon, helium therapy and other charged particles) for radiotherapy planning, setup, dose monitoring and tissue response assessment. Cancer Radiother 2020; 24:429-436. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2020.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
31
|
Hwang EJ, Gorayski P, Le H, Hanna GG, Kenny L, Penniment M, Buck J, Thwaites D, Ahern V. Particle therapy toxicity outcomes: A systematic review. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2020; 64:725-737. [PMID: 32421259 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Owing to its physical properties, particle therapy (PT), including proton beam therapy (PBT) and carbon ion therapy (CIT), can enhance the therapeutic ratio in radiation therapy. The major factor driving PT implementation is the reduction in exit and integral dose compared to photon plans, which is expected to translate to reduced toxicity and improved quality of life. This study extends the findings from a recent systematic review by the current authors which concentrated on tumour outcomes for PT, to now examine toxicity as a separate focus. Together, these reviews provide a comprehensive collation of the evidence relating to PT outcomes in clinical practice. Three major databases were searched by two independent researchers, and evidence quality was classified according to the National Health and Medical Research Council evidence hierarchy. One hundred and seventy-nine studies were included. Most demonstrated acceptable and favourable toxicity results. Comparative evidence reported reduced morbidities and improvement in quality of life in head and neck, paediatrics, sarcomas, adult central nervous system, gastrointestinal, ocular and prostate cancers compared to photon radiotherapy. This suggestion for reduced morbidity must be counterbalanced by the overall low quality of evidence. A concerted effort in the design of appropriate comparative clinical trials is needed which takes into account integration of PT's pace of technological advancements, including evolving delivery techniques, image guidance availability and sophistication of planning algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Ji Hwang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medicine, Westmead Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Gorayski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Hien Le
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.,School of Health Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Gerard G Hanna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum, Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Liz Kenny
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Michael Penniment
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Jacqueline Buck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Verity Ahern
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sydney West Radiation Oncology Network, Crown Princess Mary Cancer Centre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Greenberger BA, Yock TI. The role of proton therapy in pediatric malignancies: Recent advances and future directions. Semin Oncol 2020; 47:8-22. [PMID: 32139101 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2020.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Proton radiotherapy has promised an advantage in safely treating pediatric malignancies with an increased capability to spare normal tissues, reducing the risk of both acute and late toxicity. The past decade has seen the proliferation of more than 30 proton facilities in the United States, with increased capacity to provide access to approximately 3,000 children per year who will require radiotherapy for their disease. We provide a review of the initial efforts to describe outcomes after proton therapy across the common pediatric disease sites. We discuss the main attempts to assess comparative efficacy between proton and photon radiotherapy concerning toxicity. We also discuss recent efforts of multi-institutional registries aimed at accelerating research to better define the optimal treatment paradigm for children requiring radiotherapy for cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin A Greenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College & Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Torunn I Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital/Harvard Medical School, Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Thariat J, Valable S, Laurent C, Haghdoost S, Pérès EA, Bernaudin M, Sichel F, Lesueur P, Césaire M, Petit E, Ferré AE, Saintigny Y, Skog S, Tudor M, Gérard M, Thureau S, Habrand JL, Balosso J, Chevalier F. Hadrontherapy Interactions in Molecular and Cellular Biology. Int J Mol Sci 2019; 21:E133. [PMID: 31878191 PMCID: PMC6981652 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21010133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The resistance of cancer cells to radiotherapy is a major issue in the curative treatment of cancer patients. This resistance can be intrinsic or acquired after irradiation and has various definitions, depending on the endpoint that is chosen in assessing the response to radiation. This phenomenon might be strengthened by the radiosensitivity of surrounding healthy tissues. Sensitive organs near the tumor that is to be treated can be affected by direct irradiation or experience nontargeted reactions, leading to early or late effects that disrupt the quality of life of patients. For several decades, new modalities of irradiation that involve accelerated particles have been available, such as proton therapy and carbon therapy, raising the possibility of specifically targeting the tumor volume. The goal of this review is to examine the up-to-date radiobiological and clinical aspects of hadrontherapy, a discipline that is maturing, with promising applications. We first describe the physical and biological advantages of particles and their application in cancer treatment. The contribution of the microenvironment and surrounding healthy tissues to tumor radioresistance is then discussed, in relation to imaging and accurate visualization of potentially resistant hypoxic areas using dedicated markers, to identify patients and tumors that could benefit from hadrontherapy over conventional irradiation. Finally, we consider combined treatment strategies to improve the particle therapy of radioresistant cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juliette Thariat
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN-UMR6534-Unicaen-Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France;
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Samuel Valable
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Carine Laurent
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Siamak Haghdoost
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Elodie A. Pérès
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Myriam Bernaudin
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - François Sichel
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Paul Lesueur
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Mathieu Césaire
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Edwige Petit
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Aurélie E. Ferré
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, ISTCT/CERVOxy Group, GIP CYCERON, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Yannick Saintigny
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| | - Sven Skog
- Sino-Swed Molecular Bio-Medicine Research Institute, Shenzhen 518057, China;
| | - Mihaela Tudor
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
- Department of Life and Environmental Physics, Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear Engineering, PO Box MG-63, 077125 Magurele, Romania
- Faculty of Biology, University of Bucharest, Splaiul Independentei 91-95, R-050095 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Michael Gérard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - Sebastien Thureau
- Laboratoire de Physique Corpusculaire IN2P3/ENSICAEN-UMR6534-Unicaen-Normandie Université, 14000 Caen, France;
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, 76000 Rouen, France
| | - Jean-Louis Habrand
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- Normandie Univ, UNICAEN, UNIROUEN, ABTE, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Jacques Balosso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centre François Baclesse, 14000 Caen, France; (J.T.); (P.L.); (M.C.); (M.G.); (J.-L.H.); (J.B.)
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
| | - François Chevalier
- ARCHADE Research Community, 14000 Caen, France; (S.V.); (C.L.); (S.H.); (E.A.P.); (M.B.); (F.S.); (E.P.); (A.E.F.); (Y.S.)
- LARIA, iRCM, François Jacob Institute, DRF-CEA, 14000 Caen, France
- UMR6252 CIMAP, CEA-CNRS-ENSICAEN-Université de Caen Normandie, 14000 Caen, France;
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Ödén J, Toma‐Dasu I, Witt Nyström P, Traneus E, Dasu A. Spatial correlation of linear energy transfer and relative biological effectiveness with suspected treatment‐related toxicities following proton therapy for intracranial tumors. Med Phys 2019; 47:342-351. [DOI: 10.1002/mp.13911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Revised: 10/07/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jakob Ödén
- Department of Physics Medical Radiation Physics Stockholm University Stockholm171 76Sweden
- RaySearch Laboratories AB Stockholm111 34Sweden
| | - Iuliana Toma‐Dasu
- Department of Physics Medical Radiation Physics Stockholm University Stockholm171 76Sweden
- Department of Oncology and Pathology Medical Radiation Physics Karolinska Institutet Stockholm17176Sweden
| | - Petra Witt Nyström
- The Skandion Clinic Uppsala752 37Sweden
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy Aarhus8200Denmark
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Vogel J, Grewal A, O’Reilly S, Lustig R, Kurtz G, Minturn JE, Shah AC, Waanders AJ, Belasco JB, Cole KA, Fisher MJ, Phillips PC, Balamuth NJ, Storm PB, Hill-Kayser CE. Risk of brainstem necrosis in pediatric patients with central nervous system malignancies after pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Acta Oncol 2019; 58:1752-1756. [PMID: 31512931 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2019.1659996] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Background: Radiation therapy (RT) plays an important role in management of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) malignancies. Centers are increasingly utilizing pencil beam scanning proton therapy (PBS-PT). However, the risk of brainstem necrosis has not yet been reported. In this study, we evaluate the rate of brainstem necrosis in pediatric patients with CNS malignancies treated with PBS-PT.Material and methods: Pediatric patients with non-hematologic CNS malignancies treated with PBS-PT who received dose to the brainstem were included. All procedures were approved by the institutional review board. Brainstem necrosis was defined as symptomatic toxicity. The actuarial rate was analyzed by the Kaplan Meier method.Results: One hundred and sixty-six consecutive patients were reviewed. Median age was 10 years (range 0.5-21 years). Four patients (2.4%) had prior radiation. Median maximum brainstem dose in the treated course was 55.4 Gy[RBE] (range 0.15-61.4 Gy[RBE]). In patients with prior RT, cumulative median maximum brainstem dose was 98.0 Gy [RBE] (range 17.0-111.0 Gy [RBE]). Median follow up was 19.6 months (range, 2.0-63.0). One patient who had previously been treated with twice-daily radiation therapy and intrathecal (IT) methotrexate experienced brainstem necrosis. The actuarial incidence of brainstem necrosis was 0.7% at 24 months (95% CI 0.1-5.1%).Conclusion: The rate of symptomatic brainstem necrosis was extremely low after treatment with PBS-PT in this study. Further work to clarify clinical and dosimetric parameters associated with risk of brainstem necrosis after PBS-PT is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Vogel
- Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - A. Grewal
- Radiation Oncology, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - S. O’Reilly
- Radiation Oncology, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - R. Lustig
- Radiation Oncology, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - G. Kurtz
- Radiation Oncology, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J. E. Minturn
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A. C. Shah
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - A. J. Waanders
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - J. B. Belasco
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - K. A. Cole
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - M. J. Fisher
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - P. C. Phillips
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - N. J. Balamuth
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - P. B. Storm
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - C. E. Hill-Kayser
- Radiation Oncology, The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Division of Oncology, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chin AL, Moding EJ, Donaldson SS, Gibbs IC, Soltys SG, Hiniker SM, Pollom EL. Survival impact of postoperative radiotherapy timing in pediatric and adolescent medulloblastoma. Neuro Oncol 2019; 20:1133-1141. [PMID: 29309676 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noy001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Radiation therapy (RT) remains a critical component of multimodality treatment for medulloblastoma. Traditionally, clinicians strive to start RT within 4-5 weeks of surgery, but the optimal timing after surgery remains unclear. Methods Using the National Cancer Database, we identified pediatric and adolescent patients with medulloblastoma treated with curative-intent surgery, RT, and chemotherapy. Factors associated with early or delayed RT were identified using Pearson chi-squared tests. Overall survival (OS) differences based on RT timing were compared using the Kaplan-Meier estimator with log-rank tests. Patient, tumor, and treatment characteristics associated with OS were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. Results Among the 1338 patients analyzed, early RT (defined as initiation ≤3 wk after surgery) was associated with younger age, M1-3 disease, and subtotal resection. Patients who initiated RT early had decreased 5-year OS compared with patients who initiated RT 3.1-4, 4.1-5, or >5 weeks after surgery (72.5% vs. 80.5%, 79.4%, and 77.8%, respectively; P = 0.019), but there was no significant difference in OS among the latter 3 groups (P = 0.788). On multivariate analysis, early RT versus the 3.1- to 4-week interval was significantly associated with poorer OS (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.72; 95% CI: 1.19-2.48; P = 0.004), while time to RT of >5 weeks but within 90 days of surgery did not adversely impact OS (P = 0.563). Conclusions In this large national database analysis, delaying RT within 90 days of surgery was not associated with inferior outcomes. Although clinical judgment remains paramount, postoperative RT timing should allow for healing and the development of an optimal treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander L Chin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Everett J Moding
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Sarah S Donaldson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Iris C Gibbs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Scott G Soltys
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Susan M Hiniker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| | - Erqi L Pollom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Proton beam therapy is a highly conformal form of radiation therapy, which currently represents an important therapeutic component in multidisciplinary management in paediatric oncology. The precise adjustability of protons results in a reduction of radiation-related long-term side-effects and secondary malignancy induction, which is of particular importance for the quality of life. Proton irradiation has been shown to offer significant advantages over conventional photon-based radiotherapy, although the biological effectiveness of both irradiation modalities is comparable. This review evaluates current data from clinical and dosimetric studies on the treatment of tumours of the central nervous system, soft tissue and bone sarcomas of the head and neck region, paraspinal or pelvic region, and retinoblastoma. To date, the clinical results of irradiating childhood tumours with high-precision proton therapy are promising both with regard to tumour cure and the reduction of adverse events. Modern proton therapy techniques such as pencil beam scanning and intensity modulation are increasingly established modern facilities. However, further investigations with larger patient cohorts and longer follow-up periods are required, in order to be able to have clear evidence on clinical benefits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heike Thomas
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany
| | - Beate Timmermann
- Department of Particle Therapy, University Hospital Essen, West German Proton Therapy Centre Essen (WPE), West German Cancer Centre (WTZ), West German, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Brainstem Injury in Pediatric Patients Receiving Posterior Fossa Photon Radiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:1034-1042. [PMID: 31472183 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.08.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Revised: 08/09/2019] [Accepted: 08/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brainstem necrosis is a rare, but dreaded complication of radiation therapy; however, data on the incidence of brainstem injury for tumors involving the posterior fossa in photon-treated patient cohorts are still needed. METHODS AND MATERIALS Clinical characteristics and dosimetric parameters were recorded for 107 pediatric patients who received photon radiation for posterior fossa tumors without brainstem involvement from 2000 to 2016. Patients were excluded if they received a prescription dose <50.4 Gy, a brainstem maximum dose <50.4 Gy, or had fewer than 2 magnetic resonance imaging scans within 18 months after radiation. Post-radiation therapy magnetic resonance imaging findings were recorded, and brainstem toxicity was graded using National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5. RESULTS The most common histologies were medulloblastoma (61.7%) and ependymoma (15.9%), and median age at diagnosis was 8.3 years (range, 0.8-20.7). Sixty-seven patients (62.6%) received craniospinal irradiation (median, 23.4 Gy; range, 18.0-39.6) as a component of their radiation therapy, and 39.3% and 40.2% of patients received an additional involved field or whole posterior fossa boost, respectively. Median prescribed dose was 55.8 Gy (range, 50.4-60.0). Median clinical and imaging follow-up were 4.7 years (range, 0.1-17.5) and 4.2 years (range, 0.1-17.3), respectively. No grade ≥2 toxicities were observed. The incidence of grade 1 brainstem necrosis was 1.9% (2 of 107). These patients were by definition asymptomatic and experienced resolution of imaging abnormality after 5.3 months and 2.1 years, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Risk of brainstem necrosis was minimal in this multi-institutional study of pediatric patients treated with photon radiation therapy for tumors involving the posterior fossa with no cases of symptomatic brainstem injury, suggesting that brainstem injury risk is minimal in patients treated with photon therapy.
Collapse
|
39
|
Nystrom H, Jensen MF, Nystrom PW. Treatment planning for proton therapy: what is needed in the next 10 years? Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190304. [PMID: 31356107 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190304] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Treatment planning is the process where the prescription of the radiation oncologist is translated into a deliverable treatment. With the complexity of contemporary radiotherapy, treatment planning cannot be performed without a computerized treatment planning system. Proton therapy (PT) enables highly conformal treatment plans with a minimum of dose to tissues outside the target volume, but to obtain the most optimal plan for the treatment, there are a multitude of parameters that need to be addressed. In this review areas of ongoing improvements and research in the field of PT treatment planning are identified and discussed. The main focus is on issues of immediate clinical and practical relevance to the PT community highlighting the needs for the near future but also in a longer perspective. We anticipate that the manual tasks performed by treatment planners in the future will involve a high degree of computational thinking, as many issues can be solved much better by e.g. scripting. More accurate and faster dose calculation algorithms are needed, automation for contouring and planning is required and practical tools to handle the variable biological efficiency in PT is urgently demanded just to mention a few of the expected improvements over the coming 10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hakan Nystrom
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Skandionkliniken, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | - Petra Witt Nystrom
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.,Skandionkliniken, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Roberts KW, Wan Chan Tseung HS, Eckel LJ, Harmsen WS, Beltran C, Laack NN. Biologic Dose and Imaging Changes in Pediatric Brain Tumor Patients Receiving Spot Scanning Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 105:664-673. [PMID: 31301328 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2019.06.2534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2018] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the incidence of imaging changes in our pediatric brain tumor population treated with spot-scanning proton therapy and analyze the spatial correlation of imaging changes with a novel biologic dose model. METHODS AND MATERIALS All pediatric patients treated during the first year of our institution's experience who received a minimum treatment planning dose (TPD) of 5040 cGyE with available follow-up magnetic resonance imaging scans were selected for analysis. Posttreatment magnetic resonance imaging scans were fused with the treatment planning computed tomography. All T1 post-gadolinium enhancement, T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery changes, TPD, and biologic dose (BD) volumes outside of the original gross tumor volume were contoured for analysis. RESULTS Thirty patients were included in the analysis, 7 of whom developed posttreatment radiologic changes. The volumetric overlap of the T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery changes and BD volumes was significantly greater than the overlap with the TPD volumes. Median volumetric overlaps of 85%, 18%, and 0% were observed with the BD105%, BD110%, and TPD105%, respectively. A nonsignificant increase in the volumetric overlap of the T1C+ changes and BD volumes was also observed. No correlation was observed between the total volume of BD110%, BD105%, or physical dose 105% and the development of imaging changes. CONCLUSIONS Within our pediatric brain tumor population treated with spot-scanning proton therapy, our BD model demonstrated superior volumetric overlap with posttreatment T2 changes compared with the TPD model. Using a BD model in treatment planning for spot-scanning proton therapy may help avoid delivery of excessive BD to critical structures and may help minimize the risk of radiation-related late effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Chris Beltran
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Nadia N Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Raschke F, Wesemann T, Wahl H, Appold S, Krause M, Linn J, Troost EGC. Reduced diffusion in normal appearing white matter of glioma patients following radio(chemo)therapy. Radiother Oncol 2019; 140:110-115. [PMID: 31265941 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2019] [Revised: 06/04/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Standard treatment of high grade gliomas includes gross tumour resection followed by radio(chemo)therapy. Radiotherapy inevitably leads to irradiation of normal brain tissue. The goal of this prospective, longitudinal study was to use MRI to quantify normal appearing white and grey matter changes following radiation treatment as a function of dose and time after radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pre-radiotherapy (proton or photon therapy) MRI and follow-up MRIs collected in 3 monthly intervals thereafter were analysed for 22 glioma patients and included diffusion tensor imaging, quantitative T1, T2* and proton density mapping. Abnormal tissue was excluded from analysis. MR signal changes were quantified within different dose bin regions for grey and white matter and subsequently for whole brain white matter. RESULTS We found significant reductions in mean diffusivity, radial diffusivity, axial diffusivity and T2* in normal appearing white matter regions receiving a radiation dose as low as 10-20 Gy within the observational period of up to 18 months. The magnitude of these changes increased with the received radiation dose and progressed with time after radiotherapy. Whole brain white matter also showed a significant reduction in radial diffusivity as a function of radiation dose and time after radiotherapy. No significant changes were observed in grey matter. CONCLUSION Diffusion tensor imaging and T2* imaging revealed normal appearing white matter changes following radiation treatment. The changes were dose dependant and progressed over time. Further work is needed to understand the underlying tissue changes and to correlate the observed diffusion changes with late brain malfunctions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Raschke
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Rossendorf, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden -Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
| | - T Wesemann
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Medical Faculty of Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - H Wahl
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Medical Faculty of Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - S Appold
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany
| | - M Krause
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Rossendorf, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden -Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - J Linn
- Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus and Medical Faculty of Technische Universität, Dresden, Germany
| | - E G C Troost
- Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Rossendorf, Germany; OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Germany; National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, and; Helmholtz Association / Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden -Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany; Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Quantifying effects of radiotherapy-induced microvascular injury; review of established and emerging brain MRI techniques. Radiother Oncol 2019; 140:41-53. [PMID: 31176207 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.05.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Microvascular changes are increasingly recognised not only as primary drivers of radiotherapy treatment response in brain tumours, but also as an important contributor to short- and long-term (cognitive) side effects arising from irradiation of otherwise healthy brain tissue. As overall survival of patients with brain tumours is increasing, monitoring long-term sequels of radiotherapy-induced microvascular changes in the context of their potential predictive power for outcome, such as cognitive disability, has become increasingly relevant. Ideally, radiotherapy-induced significant microvascular changes in otherwise healthy brain tissue should be identified as early as possible to facilitate adaptive radiotherapy and to proactively start treatment to minimise the influence on these side-effects on the final outcome. Although MRI is already known to be able to detect significant long-term radiotherapy induced microvascular effects, more recently advanced MR imaging biomarkers reflecting microvascular integrity and function have been reported and might provide a more accurate and earlier detection of microvascular changes. However, the use and validation of both established and new techniques in the context of monitoring early and late radiotherapy-induced microvascular changes in both target-tissue and healthy tissue currently are minimal at best. This review aims to summarise the performance and limitations of existing methods and future opportunities for detection and quantification of radiotherapy-induced microvascular changes, as well as the relation of these findings with key clinical parameters.
Collapse
|
43
|
Ager BJ, Christensen MT, Burt LM, Poppe MM. The value of high-dose radiotherapy in intracranial ependymoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2019; 66:e27697. [PMID: 30865382 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.27697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/15/2019] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We sought to evaluate the impact of adjuvant radiotherapy dose on overall survival (OS) after surgical resection for localized intracranial ependymoma. PROCEDURE The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried from 2004 to 2015 for patients of all ages with intracranial WHO grade II to III ependymoma treated with surgery and 4500 to 7000 cGy of adjuvant radiotherapy. Pearson χ2 test and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to assess clinicodemographic factors and patterns of care. After propensity-score matching, OS was assessed with Kaplan-Meier analyses and doubly robust estimation with multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. RESULTS Of the 1153 patients meeting criteria, 529 (46%) received ≤ 5400 cGy and 624 (54%) received > 5400 cGy. At a median follow-up of 54.5 months, an OS benefit was observed for > 5400 cGy in pediatric patients aged 2-18 years (hazard ratio [HR] 0.53; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.99, P = 0.047). No OS difference was found between ≤ 5400 cGy and > 5400 cGy in pediatric patients aged < 2 years (P = 0.819) or in adults (P = 0.180). Increasing age, WHO grade III, subtotal resection, and receipt of chemotherapy portended worse OS. Age 2 to 18 years, WHO III grade, supratentorial location, and receipt of chemotherapy were associated with receiving > 5400 cGy. CONCLUSION Adjuvant radiotherapy dose > 5400 cGy was associated with improved OS for children aged 2-18 years with WHO grade II-III intracranial ependymoma. No OS benefit was found with > 5400 cGy in adults or children less than two years of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bryan J Ager
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | | | - Lindsay M Burt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Matthew M Poppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Weber DC, Lim PS, Tran S, Walser M, Bolsi A, Kliebsch U, Beer J, Bachtiary B, Lomax T, Pica A. Proton therapy for brain tumours in the area of evidence-based medicine. Br J Radiol 2019; 93:20190237. [PMID: 31067074 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20190237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE This review details the indication of brain tumors for proton therapy and give a list of the open prospective trials for these challenging tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Damien C Weber
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.,University of Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Pei S Lim
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Sebastien Tran
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Marc Walser
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Bolsi
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Kliebsch
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Jürgen Beer
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Barbara Bachtiary
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Tony Lomax
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland.,Department of Physics, ETH, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Alessia Pica
- Center for Proton Therapy, Paul Scherrer Institute, Villigen, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ludmir EB, Mahajan A, Paulino AC, Jones JY, Ketonen LM, Su JM, Grosshans DR, McAleer MF, McGovern SL, Lassen-Ramshad YA, Adesina AM, Dauser RC, Weinberg JS, Chintagumpala MM. Increased risk of pseudoprogression among pediatric low-grade glioma patients treated with proton versus photon radiotherapy. Neuro Oncol 2019; 21:686-695. [PMID: 30753704 PMCID: PMC6502497 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noz042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pseudoprogression (PsP) is a recognized phenomenon after radiotherapy (RT) for high-grade glioma but is poorly characterized for low-grade glioma (LGG). We sought to characterize PsP for pediatric LGG patients treated with RT, with particular focus on the role of RT modality using photon-based intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT). METHODS Serial MRI scans from 83 pediatric LGG patients managed at 2 institutions between 1998 and 2017 were evaluated. PsP was scored when a progressive lesion subsequently decreased or stabilized for at least a year without therapy. RESULTS Thirty-two patients (39%) were treated with IMRT, and 51 (61%) were treated with PBT. Median RT dose for the cohort was 50.4 Gy(RBE) (range, 45-59.4 Gy[RBE]). PsP was identified in 31 patients (37%), including 8/32 IMRT patients (25%) and 23/51 PBT patients (45%). PBT patients were significantly more likely to have post-RT enlargement (hazard ratio [HR] 2.15, 95% CI: 1.06-4.38, P = 0.048). RT dose >50.4 Gy(RBE) similarly predicted higher rates of PsP (HR 2.61, 95% CI: 1.20-5.68, P = 0.016). Multivariable analysis confirmed the independent effects of RT modality (P = 0.03) and RT dose (P = 0.01) on PsP incidence. Local progression occurred in 10 patients: 7 IMRT patients (22%) and 3 PBT patients (6%), with a trend toward improved local control for PBT patients (HR 0.34, 95% CI: 0.10-1.18, P = 0.099). CONCLUSIONS These data highlight substantial rates of PsP among pediatric LGG patients, particularly those treated with PBT. PsP should be considered when assessing response to RT in LGG patients within the first year after RT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan B Ludmir
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anita Mahajan
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Arnold C Paulino
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
- Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jeremy Y Jones
- Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
- Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Leena M Ketonen
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jack M Su
- Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - David R Grosshans
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Susan L McGovern
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | - Adekunle M Adesina
- Texas Children’s Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Robert C Dauser
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
What Neuroradiologists Need to Know About Radiation Treatment for Neural Tumors. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 28:37-47. [PMID: 31022047 DOI: 10.1097/rmr.0000000000000196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Radiation oncologists and radiologists have a unique and mutually dependent relationship. Radiation oncologists rely on diagnostic imaging to locate the tumor and define the treatment target volume, evaluation of response to therapy, and follow-up. Accurate interpretation of post-treatment imaging requires diagnostic radiologists to have a basic understanding of radiation treatment planning and delivery. There are various radiation treatment modalities such as 3D conformal radiation therapy, intensity modulated radiation therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery as well as different radiation modalities such as photons and protons that can be used for treatment. All of these have subtle differences in how the treatment is planned and how the imaging findings might be affected. This paper provides an overview of the basic principles of radiation oncology, different radiation treatment modalities, how radiation therapy is planned and delivered, how knowledge of this process can help interpretation of images, and how the radiologist can contribute to this process.
Collapse
|
47
|
Are further studies needed to justify the use of proton therapy for paediatric cancers of the central nervous system? A review of current evidence. Radiother Oncol 2019; 133:140-148. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2018] [Revised: 12/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
48
|
Scherman J, Appelt AL, Yu J, Persson GF, Nygård L, Langendijk JA, Bentzen SM, Vogelius IR. Incorporating NTCP into Randomized Trials of Proton Versus Photon Therapy. Int J Part Ther 2019; 5:24-32. [PMID: 31788505 PMCID: PMC6874185 DOI: 10.14338/ijpt-18-00038.1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: We propose and simulate a model-based methodology to incorporate heterogeneous treatment benefit of proton therapy (PrT) versus photon therapy into randomized trial designs. We use radiation-induced pneumonitis (RP) as an exemplar. The aim is to obtain an unbiased estimate of how predicted difference in normal tissue complications probability (ΔNTCP) converts into clinical outcome on the patient level. Materials and Methods: ΔNTCP data from in silico treatment plans for photon therapy and PrT for patients with locally advanced lung cancer as well as randomly sampled clinical risk factors were included in simulations of trial outcomes. The model used at point of analysis of the trials was an iQUANTEC model. Trial outcomes were examined with Cox proportional hazards models, both in case of a correctly specified model and in a scenario where there is discrepancy between the dose metric used for ΔNTCP and the dose metric associated with the “true” clinical outcome, that is, when the model is misspecified. We investigated how outcomes from such a randomized trial may feed into a model-based estimate of the patient-level benefit from PrT, by creating patient-specific predicted benefit probability distributions. Results: Simulated trials showed benefit in accordance with that expected when the NTCP model was equal to the model for simulating outcome. When the model was misspecified, the benefit changed and we observed a reversal when the driver of outcome was high-dose dependent while the NTCP model was mean-dose dependent. By converting trial results into probability distributions, we demonstrated large heterogeneity in predicted benefit, and provided a randomized measure of the precision of individual benefit estimates. Conclusions: The design allows for quantifying the benefit of PrT referral, based on the combination of NTCP models, clinical risk factors, and traditional randomization. A misspecified model can be detected through a lower-than-expected hazard ratio per predicted ΔNTCP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Scherman
- Department of Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ane L Appelt
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.,Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds and Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Jen Yu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, FL, USA
| | | | - Lotte Nygård
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Søren M Bentzen
- Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, and Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Haas-Kogan D, Indelicato D, Paganetti H, Esiashvili N, Mahajan A, Yock T, Flampouri S, MacDonald S, Fouladi M, Stephen K, Kalapurakal J, Terezakis S, Kooy H, Grosshans D, Makrigiorgos M, Mishra K, Poussaint TY, Cohen K, Fitzgerald T, Gondi V, Liu A, Michalski J, Mirkovic D, Mohan R, Perkins S, Wong K, Vikram B, Buchsbaum J, Kun L. National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children: Considerations Regarding Brainstem Injury. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2019; 101:152-168. [PMID: 29619963 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 114] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Revised: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 01/01/2018] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton therapy can allow for superior avoidance of normal tissues. A widespread consensus has been reached that proton therapy should be used for patients with curable pediatric brain tumor to avoid critical central nervous system structures. Brainstem necrosis is a potentially devastating, but rare, complication of radiation. Recent reports of brainstem necrosis after proton therapy have raised concerns over the potential biological differences among radiation modalities. We have summarized findings from the National Cancer Institute Workshop on Proton Therapy for Children convened in May 2016 to examine brainstem injury. METHODS AND MATERIALS Twenty-seven physicians, physicists, and researchers from 17 institutions with expertise met to discuss this issue. The definition of brainstem injury, imaging of this entity, clinical experience with photons and photons, and potential biological differences among these radiation modalities were thoroughly discussed and reviewed. The 3 largest US pediatric proton therapy centers collectively summarized the incidence of symptomatic brainstem injury and physics details (planning, dosimetry, delivery) for 671 children with focal posterior fossa tumors treated with protons from 2006 to 2016. RESULTS The average rate of symptomatic brainstem toxicity from the 3 largest US pediatric proton centers was 2.38%. The actuarial rate of grade ≥2 brainstem toxicity was successfully reduced from 12.7% to 0% at 1 center after adopting modified radiation guidelines. Guidelines for treatment planning and current consensus brainstem constraints for proton therapy are presented. The current knowledge regarding linear energy transfer (LET) and its relationship to relative biological effectiveness (RBE) are defined. We review the current state of LET-based planning. CONCLUSIONS Brainstem injury is a rare complication of radiation therapy for both photons and protons. Substantial dosimetric data have been collected for brainstem injury after proton therapy, and established guidelines to allow for safe delivery of proton radiation have been defined. Increased capability exists to incorporate LET optimization; however, further research is needed to fully explore the capabilities of LET- and RBE-based planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daphne Haas-Kogan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Daniel Indelicato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Harald Paganetti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Natia Esiashvili
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Anita Mahajan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Torunn Yock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stella Flampouri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Florida, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Shannon MacDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Maryam Fouladi
- Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Kry Stephen
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - John Kalapurakal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stephanie Terezakis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hanne Kooy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David Grosshans
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Mike Makrigiorgos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kavita Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Tina Young Poussaint
- Department of Radiology, Harvard Medical School and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kenneth Cohen
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins Medical Institute, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Thomas Fitzgerald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Vinai Gondi
- Northwestern Medicine Chicago Proton Center, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Arthur Liu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Jeff Michalski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Dragan Mirkovic
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Radhe Mohan
- Department of Radiation Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Stephanie Perkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Kenneth Wong
- Children's Hospital of Angeles and University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angles, California
| | - Bhadrasain Vikram
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Jeff Buchsbaum
- Radiation Research Program, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Larry Kun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical School, Dallas, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Central nervous system ependymoma: clinical implications of the new molecular classification, treatment guidelines and controversial issues. Clin Transl Oncol 2019; 21:1450-1463. [PMID: 30868390 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-019-02082-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2019] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Ependymoma is an uncommon neuroepithelial tumor that may arise anywhere within the neuroaxis, both in children and in adults. It has been classically graded upon histopathological features, yet with limited clinical utility. Recently, DNA methylation profiling has provided a novel classification of ependymoma in nine molecular subgroups. This stratification method harbors prognostic value with supratentorial RELA-fusion and posterior fossa group A tumors showing a significantly shorter survival compared to the rest. Currently, the treatment of choice involves maximal safe resection and, in cases of residual disease, adjuvant conformal radiotherapy. Second-look surgery is also a feasible and recommended option for incompletely resected tumors. The role of chemotherapy is not yet established and can be considered in infants and children with relapsing disease or prior to re-intervention. Although targeted agents do not seem to play a role as adjuvant therapy, they are currently being tested for recurrent disease.
Collapse
|