1
|
Almeida ND, Shekher R, Pepin A, Schrand TV, Goulenko V, Singh AK, Fung-Kee-Fung S. Artificial Intelligence Potential Impact on Resident Physician Education in Radiation Oncology. Adv Radiat Oncol 2024; 9:101505. [PMID: 38799112 PMCID: PMC11127091 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2024.101505] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 03/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/29/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Neil D. Almeida
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Rohil Shekher
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Abigail Pepin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Tyler V. Schrand
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
- Department of Chemistry, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, Ohio
| | - Victor Goulenko
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Anurag K. Singh
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Simon Fung-Kee-Fung
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Stenhouse K, Roumeliotis M, Ciunkiewicz P, Martell K, Quirk S, Banerjee R, Doll C, Phan T, Yanushkevich S, McGeachy P. Prospective validation of a machine learning model for applicator and hybrid interstitial needle selection in high-dose-rate (HDR) cervical brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2024; 23:368-376. [PMID: 38538415 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2024.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To Demonstrate the clinical validation of a machine learning (ML) model for applicator and interstitial needle prediction in gynecologic brachytherapy through a prospective clinical study in a single institution. METHODS The study included cervical cancer patients receiving high-dose-rate brachytherapy using intracavitary (IC) or hybrid interstitial (IC/IS) applicators. For each patient, the primary radiation oncologist contoured the high-risk clinical target volume on a pre-brachytherapy MRI, indicated the approximate applicator location, and made a clinical determination of the first fraction applicator. A pre-trained ML model predicted the applicator and IC/IS needle arrangement using tumor geometry. Following the first fraction, ML and radiation oncologist predictions were compared and a replanning study determined the applicator providing optimal organ-at-risk (OAR) dosimetry. The ML-predicted applicator and needle arrangement and the clinical determination were compared to this dosimetric ground truth. RESULTS Ten patients were accrued from December 2020 to October 2022. Compared to the dosimetrically optimal applicator, both the radiation oncologist and ML had an accuracy of 70%. ML demonstrated better identification of patients requiring IC/IS applicators and provided balanced IC and IC/IS predictions. The needle selection model achieved an average accuracy of 82.5%. ML-predicted needle arrangements matched or improved plan quality when compared to clinically selected arrangements. Overall, ML predictions led to an average total improvement of 2.0 Gy to OAR doses over three treatment fractions when compared to clinical predictions. CONCLUSION In the context of a single institution study, the presented ML model demonstrates valuable decision-support for the applicator and needle selection process with the potential to provide improved dosimetry. Future work will include a multi-center study to assess generalizability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kailyn Stenhouse
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Michael Roumeliotis
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
| | - Philip Ciunkiewicz
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kevin Martell
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sarah Quirk
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Robyn Banerjee
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Corinne Doll
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Tien Phan
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Svetlana Yanushkevich
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Philip McGeachy
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fechter T, Sachpazidis I, Baltas D. The use of deep learning in interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy): A review with a focus on open source and open data. Z Med Phys 2024; 34:180-196. [PMID: 36376203 PMCID: PMC11156786 DOI: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2022.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 10/07/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Deep learning advanced to one of the most important technologies in almost all medical fields. Especially in areas, related to medical imaging it plays a big role. However, in interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) deep learning is still in an early phase. In this review, first, we investigated and scrutinised the role of deep learning in all processes of interventional radiotherapy and directly related fields. Additionally, we summarised the most recent developments. For better understanding, we provide explanations of key terms and approaches to solving common deep learning problems. To reproduce results of deep learning algorithms both source code and training data must be available. Therefore, a second focus of this work is on the analysis of the availability of open source, open data and open models. In our analysis, we were able to show that deep learning plays already a major role in some areas of interventional radiotherapy, but is still hardly present in others. Nevertheless, its impact is increasing with the years, partly self-propelled but also influenced by closely related fields. Open source, data and models are growing in number but are still scarce and unevenly distributed among different research groups. The reluctance in publishing code, data and models limits reproducibility and restricts evaluation to mono-institutional datasets. The conclusion of our analysis is that deep learning can positively change the workflow of interventional radiotherapy but there is still room for improvements when it comes to reproducible results and standardised evaluation methods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Fechter
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Ilias Sachpazidis
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dimos Baltas
- Division of Medical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center University of Freiburg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Moterani VC, Abbade JF, Borges VTM, Fonseca CGF, Desiderio N, Moterani Junior NJW, Gonçalves Moterani LBB. [Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extensionDiretrizes para protocolos de ensaios clínicos com intervenções que utilizam inteligência artificial: a extensão SPIRIT-AI]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2023; 47:e149. [PMID: 38361499 PMCID: PMC10868409 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2023.149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
The SPIRIT 2013 statement aims to improve the completeness of clinical trial protocol reporting by providing evidence-based recommendations for the minimum set of items to be addressed. This guidance has been instrumental in promoting transparent evaluation of new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate their impact on health outcomes. The SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence) extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trial protocols evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for trial reports: CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Artificial Intelligence). Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process involving literature review and expert consultation to generate 26 candidate items, which were consulted upon by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed upon in a consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants). The SPIRIT-AI extension includes 15 new items that were considered sufficiently important for clinical trial protocols of AI interventions. These new items should be routinely reported in addition to the core SPIRIT 2013 items. SPIRIT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention will be integrated, considerations for the handling of input and output data, the human-AI interaction and analysis of error cases. SPIRIT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness for clinical trial protocols for AI interventions. Its use will assist editors and peer reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the design and risk of bias for a planned clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vinicius Cesar Moterani
- Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,”BotucatuBrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,” Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Joelcio Francisco Abbade
- Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,”BotucatuBrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,” Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Vera Therezinha Medeiros Borges
- Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,”BotucatuBrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,” Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Cecilia Guimarães Ferreira Fonseca
- Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,”BotucatuBrazilUniversidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho,” Botucatu, Brazil
| | - Nathalia Desiderio
- Marilia Medical SchoolMariliaBrazilMarilia Medical School, Marilia, Brazil
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sultan S, Acharya Y, Zayed O, Elzomour H, Parodi JC, Soliman O, Hynes N. Is the Cardiovascular Specialist Ready For the Fifth Revolution? The Role of Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Big Data Analysis, Intelligent Swarming, and Knowledge-Centered Service on the Future of Global Cardiovascular Healthcare Delivery. J Endovasc Ther 2023; 30:877-884. [PMID: 35695277 PMCID: PMC10637093 DOI: 10.1177/15266028221102660] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sherif Sultan
- Western Vascular Institute, Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Galway, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, Galway Clinic, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and National University of Ireland, Galway Affiliated Hospital, Galway, Ireland
- CORRIB-CÚRAM-Vascular Group, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Yogesh Acharya
- Western Vascular Institute, Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, University Hospital Galway, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Surgery, Galway Clinic, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland and National University of Ireland, Galway Affiliated Hospital, Galway, Ireland
| | - Omnia Zayed
- Data Science Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Hesham Elzomour
- Discipline of Cardiology, CORRIB-CÚRAM-Vascular Group, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Juan Carlos Parodi
- Department of Vascular Surgery and Biomedical Engineering Department, Alma Mater, University of Buenos Aires, and Trinidad Hospital, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Osama Soliman
- Discipline of Cardiology, CORRIB-CÚRAM-Vascular Group, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Niamh Hynes
- CORRIB-CÚRAM-Vascular Group, National University of Ireland, Galway, Galway, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Maes D, Holmstrom M, Helander R, Saini J, Fang C, Bowen SR. Automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning using deep learning dose prediction and dose-mimicking optimization. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e14065. [PMID: 37334746 PMCID: PMC10562035 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/20/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of a deep learning architecture for automated treatment planning for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). METHODS A 3-dimensional (3D) U-Net model has been implemented in a commercial treatment planning system (TPS) that uses contoured regions of interest (ROI) binary masks as model inputs with a predicted dose distribution as the model output. Predicted dose distributions were converted to deliverable PBS treatment plans using a voxel-wise robust dose mimicking optimization algorithm. This model was leveraged to generate machine learning (ML) optimized plans for patients receiving proton PBS irradiation of the chest wall. Model training was carried out on a retrospective set of 48 previously-treated chest wall patient treatment plans. Model evaluation was carried out by generating ML-optimized plans on a hold-out set of 12 contoured chest wall patient CT datasets from previously treated patients. Clinical goal criteria and gamma analysis were used to compare dose distributions of the ML-optimized plans against the clinically approved plans across the test patients. RESULTS Statistical analysis of mean clinical goal criteria indicates that compared to the clinical plans, the ML optimization workflow generated robust plans with similar dose to the heart, lungs, and esophagus while achieving superior dosimetric coverage to the PTV chest wall (clinical mean V95 = 97.6% vs. ML mean V95 = 99.1%, p < 0.001) across the 12 test patients. CONCLUSIONS ML-based automated treatment plan optimization using the 3D U-Net model can generate treatment plans of similar clinical quality compared to human-driven optimization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominic Maes
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | | | | | - Jatinder Saini
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Christine Fang
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Stephen R. Bowen
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
- Department of RadiologyUniversity of Washington School of MedicineSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhao JZ, Ni R, Chow R, Rink A, Weersink R, Croke J, Raman S. Artificial intelligence applications in brachytherapy: A literature review. Brachytherapy 2023; 22:429-445. [PMID: 37248158 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2023.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to simplify and optimize various steps of the brachytherapy workflow, and this literature review aims to provide an overview of the work done in this field. METHODS AND MATERIALS We conducted a literature search in June 2022 on PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for papers that proposed AI applications in brachytherapy. RESULTS A total of 80 papers satisfied inclusion/exclusion criteria. These papers were categorized as follows: segmentation (24), registration and image processing (6), preplanning (13), dose prediction and treatment planning (11), applicator/catheter/needle reconstruction (16), and quality assurance (10). AI techniques ranged from classical models such as support vector machines and decision tree-based learning to newer techniques such as U-Net and deep reinforcement learning, and were applied to facilitate small steps of a process (e.g., optimizing applicator selection) or even automate the entire step of the workflow (e.g., end-to-end preplanning). Many of these algorithms demonstrated human-level performance and offer significant improvements in speed. CONCLUSIONS AI has potential to augment, automate, and/or accelerate many steps of the brachytherapy workflow. We recommend that future studies adhere to standard reporting guidelines. We also stress the importance of using larger sample sizes and reporting results using clinically interpretable measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Zl Zhao
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ruiyan Ni
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Ronald Chow
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada; Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Alexandra Rink
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Robert Weersink
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Medical Biophysics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Jennifer Croke
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Srinivas Raman
- Princess Margaret Hospital Cancer Centre, Radiation Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kallis K, Moore LC, Cortes KG, Brown D, Mayadev J, Moore KL, Meyers SM. Automated treatment planning framework for brachytherapy of cervical cancer using 3D dose predictions. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:10.1088/1361-6560/acc37c. [PMID: 36898161 PMCID: PMC10101723 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acc37c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023]
Abstract
Objective. To lay the foundation for automated knowledge-based brachytherapy treatment planning using 3D dose estimations, we describe an optimization framework to convert brachytherapy dose distributions directly into dwell times (DTs).Approach. A dose rate kernelḋ(r,θ,φ)was produced by exporting 3D dose for one dwell position from the treatment planning system and normalizing by DT. By translating and rotating this kernel to each dwell position, scaling by DT and summing over all dwell positions, dose was computed (Dcalc). We used a Python-coded COBYLA optimizer to iteratively determine the DTs that minimize the mean squared error betweenDcalcand reference doseDref, computed using voxels withDref80%-120% of prescription. As validation of the optimization, we showed that the optimizer replicates clinical plans whenDref= clinical dose in 40 patients treated with tandem-and-ovoid (T&O) or tandem-and-ring (T&R) and 0-3 needles. Then we demonstrated automated planning in 10 T&O usingDref= dose predicted from a convolutional neural network developed in past work. Validation and automated plans were compared to clinical plans using mean absolute differences (MAD=1N∑n=1Nabsxn-xn') over all voxels (xn= Dose,N= #voxels) and DTs (xn= DT,N= #dwell positions), mean differences (MD) in organD2ccand high-risk CTV D90 over all patients (where positive indicates higher clinical dose), and mean Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) for 100% isodose contours.Main results. Validation plans agreed well with clinical plans (MADdose= 1.1%, MADDT= 4 s or 0.8% of total plan time,D2ccMD = -0.2% to 0.2% and D90 MD = -0.6%, DSC = 0.99). For automated plans, MADdose= 6.5% and MADDT= 10.3 s (2.1%). The slightly higher clinical metrics in automated plans (D2ccMD = -3.8% to 1.3% and D90 MD = -5.1%) were due to higher neural network dose predictions. The overall shape of the automated dose distributions were similar to clinical doses (DSC = 0.91).Significance. Automated planning with 3D dose predictions could provide significant time savings and standardize treatment planning across practitioners, regardless of experience.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline Kallis
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Lance C Moore
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Katherina G Cortes
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Derek Brown
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Jyoti Mayadev
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Kevin L Moore
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| | - Sandra M Meyers
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK. [Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extensionDiretrizes para relatórios de ensaios clínicos com intervenções que utilizam inteligência artificial: a extensão CONSORT-AI]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2023; 48:e13. [PMID: 38352035 PMCID: PMC10863743 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2024.13] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The CONSORT 2010 statement provides minimum guidelines for reporting randomized trials. Its widespread use has been instrumental in ensuring transparency in the evaluation of new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate impact on health outcomes. The CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Artificial Intelligence) extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trials evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for clinical trial protocols: SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence). Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process involving literature review and expert consultation to generate 29 candidate items, which were assessed by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed upon in a two-day consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants). The CONSORT-AI extension includes 14 new items that were considered sufficiently important for AI interventions that they should be routinely reported in addition to the core CONSORT 2010 items. CONSORT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention is integrated, the handling of inputs and outputs of the AI intervention, the human-AI interaction and provision of an analysis of error cases. CONSORT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness in reporting clinical trials for AI interventions. It will assist editors and peer reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the quality of clinical trial design and risk of bias in the reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxuan Liu
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondresReino UnidoMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Londres, Reino Unido.
- Academic Unit of OphthalmologyInstitute of Inflammation and AgeingUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamReino UnidoUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Health Data Research Reino UnidoLondresReino UnidoHealth Data Research Reino Unido, Londres, Reino Unido.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and InnovationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoBirmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and InnovationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoBirmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes ResearchInstitute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirmingham Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
- Institute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
| | - David Moher
- Centre for JournalologyClinical Epidemiology ProgramOttawa Hospital Research InstituteOttawaCanadáCentre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canadá.
- School of Epidemiology and Public HealthFaculty of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanadaSchool of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Melanie J. Calvert
- Health Data Research Reino UnidoLondresReino UnidoHealth Data Research Reino Unido, Londres, Reino Unido.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and InnovationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoBirmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes ResearchInstitute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirmingham Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
- Institute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamReino UnidoNational Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West MidlandsCoventryReino Unido.National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, Coventry, Reino Unido.
- National Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology CentreUniversity of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamReino UnidoNational Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
| | - Alastair K. Denniston
- Academic Unit of OphthalmologyInstitute of Inflammation and AgeingUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamReino UnidoUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Health Data Research Reino UnidoLondresReino UnidoHealth Data Research Reino Unido, Londres, Reino Unido.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and InnovationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoBirmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes ResearchInstitute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirmingham Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham.
- NIHR Biomedical Research Center at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of OphthalmologyLondresReino UnidoNIHR Biomedical Research Center at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, Londres, Reino Unido.
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Cruz Rivera S, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ. [Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extensionDiretrizes para protocolos de ensaios clínicos com intervenções que utilizam inteligência artificial: a extensão SPIRIT-AI]. Rev Panam Salud Publica 2023; 48:e12. [PMID: 38304411 PMCID: PMC10832304 DOI: 10.26633/rpsp.2024.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2024] Open
Abstract
The SPIRIT 2013 statement aims to improve the completeness of clinical trial protocol reporting by providing evidence-based recommendations for the minimum set of items to be addressed. This guidance has been instrumental in promoting transparent evaluation of new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate their impact on health outcomes. The SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence) extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trial protocols evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for trial reports: CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Artificial Intelligence). Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process involving literature review and expert consultation to generate 26 candidate items, which were consulted upon by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed upon in a consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants). The SPIRIT-AI extension includes 15 new items that were considered sufficiently important for clinical trial protocols of AI interventions. These new items should be routinely reported in addition to the core SPIRIT 2013 items. SPIRIT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention will be integrated, considerations for the handling of input and output data, the human-AI interaction and analysis of error cases. SPIRIT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness for clinical trial protocols for AI interventions. Its use will assist editors and peer reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the design and risk of bias for a planned clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes ResearchInstitute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Institute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and InnovationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoBirmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and InnovationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoBirmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Academic Unit of OphthalmologyInstitute of Inflammation and AgeingUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamReino UnidoUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Health Data Research UKLondresReino UnidoHealth Data Research UK, Londres, Reino Unido.
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation TrustLondresReino UnidoMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Londres, Reino Unido.
| | - An-Wen Chan
- Department of Medicine, Women’s College Research InstituteWomen’s College HospitalUniversity of TorontoOntarioCanadáDepartment of Medicine, Women’s College Research Institute, Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canadá.
| | - Alastair K. Denniston
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes ResearchInstitute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and InnovationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoBirmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Academic Unit of OphthalmologyInstitute of Inflammation and AgeingUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoAcademic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamReino UnidoUniversity Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Health Data Research UKLondresReino UnidoHealth Data Research UK, Londres, Reino Unido.
- National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for OphthalmologyMoorfields Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and University College LondonInstitute of OphthalmologyLondresReino UnidoNational Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, Institute of Ophthalmology, Londres, Reino Unido.
| | - Melanie J. Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes ResearchInstitute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoCentre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Institute of Applied Health ResearchUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and InnovationUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamReino UnidoBirmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- Health Data Research UKLondresReino UnidoHealth Data Research UK, Londres, Reino Unido.
- National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research CentreUniversity of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamReino UnidoNational Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
- National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West MidlandsCoventryReino UnidoNational Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, Coventry, Reino Unido.
- National Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology CentreUniversity of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustBirminghamReino UnidoNational Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Reino Unido.
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Optical spectroscopy and chemometrics in intraoperative tumor margin assessment. Trends Analyt Chem 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2023.116955] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
|
12
|
|
13
|
Liu D, Tupor S, Singh J, Chernoff T, Leong N, Sadikov E, Amjad A, Zilles S. The Challenges Facing Deep Learning based Catheter Localization for Ultrasound Guided High-Dose-Rate Prostate Brachytherapy. Med Phys 2022; 49:2442-2451. [PMID: 35118676 DOI: 10.1002/mp.15522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 01/09/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Automated catheter localization for ultrasound guided high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy faces challenges relating to imaging noise and artifacts. To date, catheter reconstruction during the clinical procedure is performed manually. Deep learning has been successfully applied to a wide variety of complex tasks and has the potential to tackle the unique challenges associated with multiple catheter localization on ultrasound. Such a task is well suited for automation, with the potential to improve productivity and reliability. PURPOSE We developed a deep learning model for automated catheter reconstruction and investigated potential factors influencing model performance. The model was designed to integrate into a clinical workflow, with a proposed reconstruction confidence metric to aid in planner verification. METHODS Datasets from 242 patients treated from 2016 to 2020 were collected retrospectively. The anonymized dataset comprises of 31,000 transverse images reconstructed from 3D sagittal ultrasound acquisitions and 3,500 implanted catheters manually localized by the planner. Each catheter was retrospectively ranked based on the severity of imaging artifacts affecting reconstruction difficulty. The U-NET deep learning architecture was trained to localize implanted catheters on transverse images. A five-fold cross-validation method was used, allowing for evaluation over the entire dataset. The post-processing software combined the predictions with patient-specific implant information to reconstructed catheters in 3D space, uniquely matched to the implanted grid positions. A reconstruction confidence metric was calculated based on the number and probability of localized predictions per catheter. For each patient, deep learning prediction and post-processing reconstruction was completed in under two minutes on a non-performance PC. RESULTS Overall, 80% of catheter reconstructions were accurate, within 2 mm along 90% of the length. The catheter tip was often not detected and required extrapolation during reconstruction. The reconstruction accuracy was 89% for the easiest catheter ranking and decreased to 13% for the highest difficulty ranking, when the aid of live ultrasound would have been recommended. Even when limited to the easiest ranked catheters, the reconstruction accuracy decreased at distal grid positions, down to 50%. Individual implantation style was found to influence the frequency of severe artifacts, slightly impacting the model accuracy. A reconstruction confidence metric identified the difficult catheters, removed the observed individual variation, and increased the overall accuracy to 91% while excluding 27% of the reconstructions. CONCLUSIONS The deep learning model localized implanted catheters over a large clinical dataset, with overall promising results. The model faced challenges due to ultrasound artifacts and image degradation distal to the probe, underlining the continued importance of maintaining image quality and minimizing artifacts. A potential workflow for integration into the clinical procedure was demonstrated, including the use of a confidence metric to predict low accuracy reconstructions. Comparison between models evaluated on different datasets should also consider underlying differences, such as the frequency and severity of imaging artifacts. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Liu
- Dept of Medical Physics, Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1, Canada.,Dept of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E5, Canada
| | - Shayantonee Tupor
- Dept of Computer Science, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2, Canada
| | - Jaskaran Singh
- College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E5, Canada
| | - Trey Chernoff
- Dept of Physics, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2, Canada
| | - Nelson Leong
- Dept of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E5, Canada.,Dept of Radiation Oncology, Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1, Canada
| | - Evgeny Sadikov
- Dept of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E5, Canada.,Dept of Radiation Oncology, Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1, Canada
| | - Asim Amjad
- Dept of Oncology, College of Medicine, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7N 5E5, Canada.,Dept of Radiation Oncology, Allan Blair Cancer Centre, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4T 7T1, Canada
| | - Sandra Zilles
- Dept of Computer Science, University of Regina, Regina, Saskatchewan, S4S 0A2, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Jia X, Cunha JAM, Rong Y. Artificial intelligence can overcome challenges in brachytherapy treatment planning. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2022; 23:e13504. [PMID: 35041263 PMCID: PMC8803284 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xun Jia
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of Texas‐SouthwesternDallasTexasUSA
| | - J. Adam M. Cunha
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of California San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Yi Rong
- Department of Radiation OncologyMayo Clinic ArizonaPhoenixArizonaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Song WY, Robar JL, Morén B, Larsson T, Carlsson Tedgren Å, Jia X. Emerging technologies in brachytherapy. Phys Med Biol 2021; 66. [PMID: 34710856 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac344d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/28/2021] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Brachytherapy is a mature treatment modality. The literature is abundant in terms of review articles and comprehensive books on the latest established as well as evolving clinical practices. The intent of this article is to part ways and look beyond the current state-of-the-art and review emerging technologies that are noteworthy and perhaps may drive the future innovations in the field. There are plenty of candidate topics that deserve a deeper look, of course, but with practical limits in this communicative platform, we explore four topics that perhaps is worthwhile to review in detail at this time. First, intensity modulated brachytherapy (IMBT) is reviewed. The IMBT takes advantage ofanisotropicradiation profile generated through intelligent high-density shielding designs incorporated onto sources and applicators such to achieve high quality plans. Second, emerging applications of 3D printing (i.e. additive manufacturing) in brachytherapy are reviewed. With the advent of 3D printing, interest in this technology in brachytherapy has been immense and translation swift due to their potential to tailor applicators and treatments customizable to each individual patient. This is followed by, in third, innovations in treatment planning concerning catheter placement and dwell times where new modelling approaches, solution algorithms, and technological advances are reviewed. And, fourth and lastly, applications of a new machine learning technique, called deep learning, which has the potential to improve and automate all aspects of brachytherapy workflow, are reviewed. We do not expect that all ideas and innovations reviewed in this article will ultimately reach clinic but, nonetheless, this review provides a decent glimpse of what is to come. It would be exciting to monitor as IMBT, 3D printing, novel optimization algorithms, and deep learning technologies evolve over time and translate into pilot testing and sensibly phased clinical trials, and ultimately make a difference for cancer patients. Today's fancy is tomorrow's reality. The future is bright for brachytherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William Y Song
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, United States of America
| | - James L Robar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Björn Morén
- Department of Mathematics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Torbjörn Larsson
- Department of Mathematics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Åsa Carlsson Tedgren
- Radiation Physics, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.,Medical Radiation Physics and Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Xun Jia
- Innovative Technology Of Radiotherapy Computations and Hardware (iTORCH) Laboratory, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kallis K, Mayadev J, Kisling K, Brown D, Scanderbeg D, Ray X, Cortes K, Simon A, Yashar CM, Einck JP, Mell LK, Moore KL, Meyers SM. Knowledge-based dose prediction models to inform gynecologic brachytherapy needle supplementation for locally advanced cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1187-1199. [PMID: 34393059 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The use of interstitial needles, combined with intracavitary applicators, enables customized dose distributions and is beneficial for complex cases, but increases procedure time. Overall, applicator selection is not standardized and depends on physician expertise and preference. The purpose of this study is to determine whether dose prediction models can guide needle supplementation decision-making for cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Intracavitary knowledge-based models for organ-at-risk (OAR) dose estimation were trained and validated for tandem-and-ring/ovoids (T&R/T&O) implants. Models were applied to hybrid cases with 1-3 implanted needles to predict OAR dose without needles. As a reference, 70/67 hybrid T&R/T&O cases were replanned without needles, following a standardized procedure guided by dose predictions. If a replanned dose exceeded the dose objective, the case was categorized as requiring needles. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of needle classification accuracy were generated. Optimal classification thresholds were determined from the Youden Index. RESULTS Needle supplementation reduced dose to OARs. However, 67%/39% of replans for T&R/T&O met all dose constraints without needles. The ROC for T&R/T&O models had an area-under-curve of 0.89/0.86, proving high classification accuracy. The optimal threshold of 99%/101% of the dose limit for T&R/T&O resulted in classification sensitivity and specificity of 78%/86% and 85%/78%. CONCLUSIONS Needle supplementation reduced OAR dose for most cases but was not always required to meet standard dose objectives, particularly for T&R cases. Our knowledge-based dose prediction model accurately identified cases that could have met constraints without needle supplementation, suggesting that such models may be beneficial for applicator selection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline Kallis
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Jyoti Mayadev
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Kelly Kisling
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Derek Brown
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Daniel Scanderbeg
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Xenia Ray
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Katherina Cortes
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Aaron Simon
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - John P Einck
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Kevin L Moore
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA
| | - Sandra M Meyers
- Department of Radiation Medicine & Applied Sciences, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kallis K, Mayadev J, Covele B, Brown D, Scanderbeg D, Simon A, Frisbie-Firsching H, Yashar CM, Einck JP, Mell LK, Moore KL, Meyers SM. Evaluation of dose differences between intracavitary applicators for cervical brachytherapy using knowledge-based models. Brachytherapy 2021; 20:1323-1333. [PMID: 34607771 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2021.08.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 08/12/2021] [Accepted: 08/14/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Currently, there is a lack of patient-specific tools to guide brachytherapy planning and applicator choice for cervical cancer. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of organ-at-risk (OAR) dose predictions using knowledge-based intracavitary models, and the use of these models and clinical data to determine the dosimetric differences of tandem-and-ring (T&R) and tandem-and-ovoids (T&O) applicators. MATERIALS AND METHODS Knowledge-based models, which predict organ D2cc, were trained on 77/75 cases and validated on 32/38 for T&R/T&O applicators. Model performance was quantified using ΔD2cc=D2cc,actual-D2cc,predicted, with standard deviation (σ(ΔD2cc)) representing precision. Model-predicted applicator dose differences were determined by applying T&O models to T&R cases, and vice versa, and compared to clinically-achieved D2cc differences. Applicator differences were assessed using a Student's t-test (p < 0.05 significant). RESULTS Validation T&O/T&R model precision was 0.65/0.55 Gy, 0.55/0.38 Gy, and 0.43/0.60 Gy for bladder, rectum and sigmoid, respectively, and similar to training. When applying T&O/T&R models to T&R/T&O cases, bladder, rectum and sigmoid D2cc values in EQD2 were on average 5.69/2.62 Gy, 7.31/6.15 Gy and 3.65/0.69 Gy lower for T&R, with similar HRCTV volume and coverage. Clinical data also showed lower T&R OAR doses, with mean EQD2 D2cc deviations of 0.61 Gy, 7.96 Gy (p < 0.01) and 5.86 Gy (p < 0.01) for bladder, rectum and sigmoid. CONCLUSIONS Accurate knowledge-based dose prediction models were developed for two common intracavitary applicators. These models could be beneficial for standardizing and improving the quality of brachytherapy plans. Both models and clinical data suggest that significant OAR sparing can be achieved with T&R over T&O applicators, particularly for the rectum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karoline Kallis
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Jyoti Mayadev
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Brent Covele
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Derek Brown
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Daniel Scanderbeg
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Aaron Simon
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Helena Frisbie-Firsching
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - John P Einck
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Kevin L Moore
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA
| | - Sandra M Meyers
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yusufaly TI, Meyers SM, Mell LK, Moore KL. Knowledge-Based Planning for Intact Cervical Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2021; 30:328-339. [PMID: 32828388 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Cervical cancer radiotherapy is often complicated by significant variability in the quality and consistency of treatment plans. Knowledge-based planning (KBP), which utilizes prior patient data to correlated achievable optimal dosimetry with patient-specific anatomy, has demonstrated promise as a quality control tool for controlling this variability, with consequences for patient outcomes, as well as for the reliability of data from multi-institutional clinical trials. In this article we highlight the application of KBP-based quality control to cervical cancer radiotherapy. We discuss the potential impact of KBP on multi-institutional clinical trials to standardize cervical cancer treatment planning across diverse clinics, and discuss challenges and progress in the implementation of KBP for brachytherapy treatment planning. Additionally, we briefly discuss secondary applications of KBP for cervical cancer. The emerging picture from these studies indicates several exciting opportunities for increasing the utilization of KBP in day-to-day cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahir I Yusufaly
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Sandra M Meyers
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Kevin L Moore
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Banerjee S, Goyal S, Mishra S, Gupta D, Bisht SS, K V, Narang K, Kataria T. Artificial intelligence in brachytherapy: a summary of recent developments. Br J Radiol 2021; 94:20200842. [PMID: 33914614 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20200842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) applications, in the form of machine learning and deep learning, are being incorporated into practice in various aspects of medicine, including radiation oncology. Ample evidence from recent publications explores its utility and future use in external beam radiotherapy. However, the discussion on its role in brachytherapy is sparse. This article summarizes available current literature and discusses potential uses of AI in brachytherapy, including future directions. AI has been applied for brachytherapy procedures during almost all steps, starting from decision-making till treatment completion. AI use has led to improvement in efficiency and accuracy by reducing the human errors and saving time in certain aspects. Apart from direct use in brachytherapy, AI also contributes to contemporary advancements in radiology and associated sciences that can affect brachytherapy decisions and treatment. There is a renewal of interest in brachytherapy as a technique in recent years, contributed largely by the understanding that contemporary advances such as intensity modulated radiotherapy and stereotactic external beam radiotherapy cannot match the geometric gains and conformality of brachytherapy, and the integrated efforts of international brachytherapy societies to promote brachytherapy training and awareness. Use of AI technologies may consolidate it further by reducing human effort and time. Prospective validation over larger studies and incorporation of AI technologies for a larger patient population would help improve the efficiency and acceptance of brachytherapy. The enthusiasm favoring AI needs to be balanced against the short duration and quantum of experience with AI in limited patient subsets, need for constant learning and re-learning to train the AI algorithms, and the inevitability of humans having to take responsibility for the correctness and safety of treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susovan Banerjee
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta- The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shikha Goyal
- Department of Radiotherapy, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India
| | - Saumyaranjan Mishra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta- The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Deepak Gupta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta- The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Shyam Singh Bisht
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta- The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Venketesan K
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta- The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Kushal Narang
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta- The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| | - Tejinder Kataria
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Medanta- The Medicity, Gurgaon, Haryana, India
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Centre-specific autonomous treatment plans for prostate brachytherapy using cGANs. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2021; 16:1161-1170. [PMID: 34050909 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-021-02405-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (LDR-PB), treatment planning is the process of determining the arrangement of implantable radioactive sources that radiates the prostate while sparing healthy surrounding tissues. Currently, these plans are prepared manually by experts incorporating the centre's planning style and guidelines. In this article, we develop a novel framework that can learn a centre's planning strategy and automatically reproduce rapid clinically acceptable plans. METHODS The proposed framework is based on conditional generative adversarial networks that learn our centre's planning style using a pool of 931 historical LDR-PB planning data. Two additional losses that help constrain prohibited needle patterns and produce similar-looking plans are also proposed. Once trained, this model generates an initial distribution of needles which is passed to a planner. The planner then initializes the sources based on the predicted needles and uses a simulated annealing algorithm to optimize their locations further. RESULTS Quantitative analysis was carried out on 170 cases which showed the generated plans having similar dosimetry to that of the manual plans but with significantly lower planning durations. Indeed, on the test cases, the clinical target volumes achieving [Formula: see text] of the prescribed dose for the generated plans was on average [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text] for manual plans) with an average planning time of [Formula: see text] min ([Formula: see text] min for manual plans). Further qualitative analysis was conducted by an expert planner who accepted [Formula: see text] of the plans with some changes ([Formula: see text] requiring minor changes & [Formula: see text] requiring major changes). CONCLUSION The proposed framework demonstrated the ability to rapidly generate quality treatment plans that not only fulfil the dosimetric requirements but also takes into account the centre's planning style. Adoption of such a framework would save significant amount of time and resources spent on every patient; boosting the overall operational efficiency of this treatment.
Collapse
|
21
|
Chen Z, Zeng DD, Seltzer RGN, Hamilton BD. Automated Generation of Personalized Shock Wave Lithotripsy Protocols: Treatment Planning Using Deep Learning. JMIR Med Inform 2021; 9:e24721. [PMID: 33973862 PMCID: PMC8150413 DOI: 10.2196/24721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 12/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Though shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) has developed to be one of the most common treatment approaches for nephrolithiasis in recent decades, its treatment planning is often a trial-and-error process based on physicians’ subjective judgement. Physicians’ inexperience with this modality can lead to low-quality treatment and unnecessary risks to patients. Objective To improve the quality and consistency of shock wave lithotripsy treatment, we aimed to develop a deep learning model for generating the next treatment step by previous steps and preoperative patient characteristics and to produce personalized SWL treatment plans in a step-by-step protocol based on the deep learning model. Methods We developed a deep learning model to generate the optimal power level, shock rate, and number of shocks in the next step, given previous treatment steps encoded by long short-term memory neural networks and preoperative patient characteristics. We constructed a next-step data set (N=8583) from top practices of renal SWL treatments recorded in the International Stone Registry. Then, we trained the deep learning model and baseline models (linear regression, logistic regression, random forest, and support vector machine) with 90% of the samples and validated them with the remaining samples. Results The deep learning models for generating the next treatment steps outperformed the baseline models (accuracy = 98.8%, F1 = 98.0% for power levels; accuracy = 98.1%, F1 = 96.0% for shock rates; root mean squared error = 207, mean absolute error = 121 for numbers of shocks). The hypothesis testing showed no significant difference between steps generated by our model and the top practices (P=.480 for power levels; P=.782 for shock rates; P=.727 for numbers of shocks). Conclusions The high performance of our deep learning approach shows its treatment planning capability on par with top physicians. To the best of our knowledge, our framework is the first effort to implement automated planning of SWL treatment via deep learning. It is a promising technique in assisting treatment planning and physician training at low cost.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhipeng Chen
- Shenzhen Artificial Intelligence and Data Science Institute (Longhua), Longhua, Shenzhen, China
| | - Daniel D Zeng
- The State Key Laboratory of Management and Control for Complex Systems, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Ryan G N Seltzer
- Translational Analytics and Statistics, Tucson, AZ, United States
| | - Blake D Hamilton
- School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Artificial Intelligence and Its Impact on Urological Diseases and Management: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10091864. [PMID: 33925767 PMCID: PMC8123407 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10091864] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) have certainly had a significant impact on the healthcare industry. In urology, AI has been widely adopted to deal with numerous disorders, irrespective of their severity, extending from conditions such as benign prostate hyperplasia to critical illnesses such as urothelial and prostate cancer. In this article, we aim to discuss how algorithms and techniques of artificial intelligence are equipped in the field of urology to detect, treat, and estimate the outcomes of urological diseases. Furthermore, we explain the advantages that come from using AI over any existing traditional methods.
Collapse
|
23
|
Stenhouse K, Roumeliotis M, Banerjee R, Yanushkevich S, McGeachy P. Development of a Machine Learning Model for Optimal Applicator Selection in High-Dose-Rate Cervical Brachytherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:611437. [PMID: 33747926 PMCID: PMC7973285 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.611437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2020] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop and validate a preliminary machine learning (ML) model aiding in the selection of intracavitary (IC) versus hybrid interstitial (IS) applicators for high-dose-rate (HDR) cervical brachytherapy. Methods From a dataset of 233 treatments using IC or IS applicators, a set of geometric features of the structure set were extracted, including the volumes of OARs (bladder, rectum, sigmoid colon) and HR-CTV, proximity of OARs to the HR-CTV, mean and maximum lateral and vertical HR-CTV extent, and offset of the HR-CTV centre-of-mass from the applicator tandem axis. Feature selection using an ANOVA F-test and mutual information removed uninformative features from this set. Twelve classification algorithms were trained and tested over 100 iterations to determine the highest performing individual models through nested 5-fold cross-validation. Three models with the highest accuracy were combined using soft voting to form the final model. This model was trained and tested over 1,000 iterations, during which the relative importance of each feature in the applicator selection process was determined. Results Feature selection indicated that the mean and maximum lateral and vertical extent, volume, and axis offset of the HR-CTV were the most informative features and were thus provided to the ML models. Relative feature importances indicated that the HR-CTV volume and mean lateral extent were most important for applicator selection. From the comparison of the individual classification algorithms, it was found that the highest performing algorithms were tree-based ensemble methods – AdaBoost Classifier (ABC), Gradient Boosting Classifier (GBC), and Random Forest Classifier (RFC). The accuracy of the individual models was compared to the voting model for 100 iterations (ABC = 91.6 ± 3.1%, GBC = 90.4 ± 4.1%, RFC = 89.5 ± 4.0%, Voting Model = 92.2 ± 1.8%) and the voting model was found to have superior accuracy. Over the final 1,000 evaluation iterations, the final voting model demonstrated a high predictive accuracy (91.5 ± 0.9%) and F1 Score (90.6 ± 1.1%). Conclusion The presented model demonstrates high discriminative performance, highlighting the potential for utilization in informing applicator selection prospectively following further clinical validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kailyn Stenhouse
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Michael Roumeliotis
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Robyn Banerjee
- Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Svetlana Yanushkevich
- Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Philip McGeachy
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Medical Physics, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada.,Department of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Prostate Cancer Patient Management-Current Trends and Future Perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11020354. [PMID: 33672608 PMCID: PMC7924061 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11020354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2021] [Revised: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) is the field of computer science that aims to build smart devices performing tasks that currently require human intelligence. Through machine learning (ML), the deep learning (DL) model is teaching computers to learn by example, something that human beings are doing naturally. AI is revolutionizing healthcare. Digital pathology is becoming highly assisted by AI to help researchers in analyzing larger data sets and providing faster and more accurate diagnoses of prostate cancer lesions. When applied to diagnostic imaging, AI has shown excellent accuracy in the detection of prostate lesions as well as in the prediction of patient outcomes in terms of survival and treatment response. The enormous quantity of data coming from the prostate tumor genome requires fast, reliable and accurate computing power provided by machine learning algorithms. Radiotherapy is an essential part of the treatment of prostate cancer and it is often difficult to predict its toxicity for the patients. Artificial intelligence could have a future potential role in predicting how a patient will react to the therapy side effects. These technologies could provide doctors with better insights on how to plan radiotherapy treatment. The extension of the capabilities of surgical robots for more autonomous tasks will allow them to use information from the surgical field, recognize issues and implement the proper actions without the need for human intervention.
Collapse
|
25
|
Hameed BMZ, Shah M, Naik N, Ibrahim S, Somani B, Rice P, Soomro N, Rai BP. Contemporary application of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer: an i-TRUE study. Ther Adv Urol 2021; 13:1756287220986640. [PMID: 33633799 PMCID: PMC7841858 DOI: 10.1177/1756287220986640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Accepted: 12/16/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) involves technology that is able to emulate tasks previously carried out by humans. The growing incidence, novel diagnostic strategies and newer available therapeutic options have had resource and economic impacts on the healthcare organizations providing prostate cancer care. AI has the potential to be an adjunct to and, in certain cases, a replacement for human input in prostate cancer care delivery. Automation can also address issues such as inter- and intra-observer variability and has the ability to deliver analysis of large volume datasets quickly and accurately. The continuous training and testing of AI algorithms will facilitate development of futuristic AI models that will have integral roles to play in diagnostics, enhanced training and surgical outcomes and developments of prostate cancer predictive tools. These AI related innovations will enable clinicians to provide individualized care. Despite its potential benefits, it is vital that governance with AI related care is maintained and responsible adoption is achieved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B M Zeeshan Hameed
- Department of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Milap Shah
- Department of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Nithesh Naik
- Department of Mechanical and Manufacturing Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka 576104, India
| | - Sufyan Ibrahim
- i-TRUE: International Training and Research in Uro-oncology and Endourology, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, Kasturba Medical College Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| | - Patrick Rice
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Naeem Soomro
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Bhavan Prasad Rai
- i-TRUE: International Training and Research in Uro-oncology and Endourology, Manipal, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang X, Wang P, Tang B, Kang S, Hou Q, Wu Z, Gou C, Li L, Orlandini L, Lang J, Li J. An Inverse Dose Optimization Algorithm for Three-Dimensional Brachytherapy. Front Oncol 2020; 10:564580. [PMID: 33194640 PMCID: PMC7606999 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.564580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 09/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate an implementation method and the results of an inverse dose optimization algorithm, Gradient Based Planning Optimization (GBPO), for three-dimensional brachytherapy. METHODS The GBPO used a quadratic objective function, and a dwell time modulation item was added to the objective function to restrict the dwell time variance. We retrospectively studied 4 cervical cancer patients using different applicators and 15 cervical cancer patients using the Fletcher applicator. We assessed the plan quality of GBPO by isodose lines for the patients using different applicators. For the 15 patients using the Fletcher applicator, we utilized dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters of HR-CTV (D100%, V150%) and organs at risk (OARs) (D0.1cc, D1cc, D2cc) to evaluate the difference between the GBPO plans and the IPSA (Inverse Planning Simulated Annealing) plans, as well as the GBPO plans and the Graphic plans. RESULTS For the 4 patients using different applicators, the dose distributions are conformable. For the 15 patients using the Fletcher applicator, when the dwell time modulation factor (DTMF) is less than 20, the dwell time deviation reduces quickly; however, after the DTMF increased to 100, the dwell time deviation has no remarkable change. The difference in dosimetric parameters between the GBPO plans and the IPSA plans is not statistically significant (P>0.05). The GBPO plans have a higher D100% (3.57 ± 0.36, 3.38 ± 0.34; P<0.01) and a lower V150% (55.73 ± 4.06, 57.75 ± 3.79; P<0.01) than those of the Graphic plans. The differences in other DVH parameters are negligible between the GBPO plans and the Graphic plans. CONCLUSIONS The GBPO plans have a comparable quality as the IPSA plans and the Graphic plans for the studied cervical cancer cases. The GBPO algorithm could be integrated into a three-dimensional brachytherapy treatment planning system after studying more sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianliang Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory Of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Pei Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory Of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Bin Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory Of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Shengwei Kang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory Of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Qing Hou
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology, Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zhangwen Wu
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology, Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chengjun Gou
- Key Laboratory of Radiation Physics and Technology, Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Lintao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory Of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Lucia Orlandini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory Of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Jinyi Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory Of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| | - Jie Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital & Institute, School of Medicine, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Radiation Oncology Key Laboratory Of Sichuan Province, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Lancet Digit Health 2020; 2:e537-e548. [PMID: 33328048 PMCID: PMC8183333 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30218-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 107] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The CONSORT 2010 statement provides minimum guidelines for reporting randomised trials. Its widespread use has been instrumental in ensuring transparency in the evaluation of new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate impact on health outcomes. The CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Artificial Intelligence) extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trials evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for clinical trial protocols: SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence). Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process involving literature review and expert consultation to generate 29 candidate items, which were assessed by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed upon in a two-day consensus meeting (31 stakeholders), and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants). The CONSORT-AI extension includes 14 new items that were considered sufficiently important for AI interventions that they should be routinely reported in addition to the core CONSORT 2010 items. CONSORT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention is integrated, the handling of inputs and outputs of the AI intervention, the human-AI interaction and provision of an analysis of error cases. CONSORT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness in reporting clinical trials for AI interventions. It will assist editors and peer reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret, and critically appraise the quality of clinical trial design and risk of bias in the reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxuan Liu
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada; School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK; National National Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, and National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Eye Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
The Application of Artificial Intelligence in Prostate Cancer Management—What Improvements Can Be Expected? A Systematic Review. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/app10186428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is progressively remodeling our daily life. A large amount of information from “big data” now enables machines to perform predictions and improve our healthcare system. AI has the potential to reshape prostate cancer (PCa) management thanks to growing applications in the field. The purpose of this review is to provide a global overview of AI in PCa for urologists, pathologists, radiotherapists, and oncologists to consider future changes in their daily practice. A systematic review was performed, based on PubMed MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and DBLP databases for original studies published in English from January 2009 to January 2019 relevant to PCa, AI, Machine Learning, Artificial Neural Networks, Convolutional Neural Networks, and Natural-Language Processing. Only articles with full text accessible were considered. A total of 1008 articles were reviewed, and 48 articles were included. AI has potential applications in all fields of PCa management: analysis of genetic predispositions, diagnosis in imaging, and pathology to detect PCa or to differentiate between significant and non-significant PCa. AI also applies to PCa treatment, whether surgical intervention or radiotherapy, skills training, or assessment, to improve treatment modalities and outcome prediction. AI in PCa management has the potential to provide a useful role by predicting PCa more accurately, using a multiomic approach and risk-stratifying patients to provide personalized medicine.
Collapse
|
29
|
Rivera SC, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI Extension. BMJ 2020; 370:m3210. [PMID: 32907797 PMCID: PMC7490785 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 124] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The SPIRIT 2013 (The Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials) statement aims to improve the completeness of clinical trial protocol reporting, by providing evidence-based recommendations for the minimum set of items to be addressed. This guidance has been instrumental in promoting transparent evaluation of new interventions. More recently, there is a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate their impact on health outcomes.The SPIRIT-AI extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trials protocols evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for trial reports: CONSORT-AI. Both guidelines were developed using a staged consensus process, involving a literature review and expert consultation to generate 26 candidate items, which were consulted on by an international multi-stakeholder group in a 2-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed on in a consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants).The SPIRIT-AI extension includes 15 new items, which were considered sufficiently important for clinical trial protocols of AI interventions. These new items should be routinely reported in addition to the core SPIRIT 2013 items. SPIRIT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention will be integrated, considerations around the handling of input and output data, the human-AI interaction and analysis of error cases.SPIRIT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness for clinical trial protocols for AI interventions. Its use will assist editors and peer-reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the design and risk of bias for a planned clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - An-Wen Chan
- Department of Medicine, Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cruz Rivera S, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. LANCET DIGITAL HEALTH 2020; 2:e549-e560. [PMID: 33328049 PMCID: PMC8212701 DOI: 10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30219-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
The SPIRIT 2013 statement aims to improve the completeness of clinical trial protocol reporting by providing evidence-based recommendations for the minimum set of items to be addressed. This guidance has been instrumental in promoting transparent evaluation of new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate their impact on health outcomes. The SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence) extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trial protocols evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for trial reports: CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Artificial Intelligence). Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process involving literature review and expert consultation to generate 26 candidate items, which were consulted upon by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed upon in a consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants). The SPIRIT-AI extension includes 15 new items that were considered sufficiently important for clinical trial protocols of AI interventions. These new items should be routinely reported in addition to the core SPIRIT 2013 items. SPIRIT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention will be integrated, considerations for the handling of input and output data, the human–AI interaction and analysis of error cases. SPIRIT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness for clinical trial protocols for AI interventions. Its use will assist editors and peer reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret, and critically appraise the design and risk of bias for a planned clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK
| | - An-Wen Chan
- Department of Medicine, Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK; Health Data Research UK, London, UK; National Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, and National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK; National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Liu X, Rivera SC, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI Extension. BMJ 2020; 370:m3164. [PMID: 32909959 PMCID: PMC7490784 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.m3164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 160] [Impact Index Per Article: 40.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The CONSORT 2010 (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) statement provides minimum guidelines for reporting randomised trials. Its widespread use has been instrumental in ensuring transparency when evaluating new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate impact on health outcomes.The CONSORT-AI extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trials evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for clinical trial protocols: SPIRIT-AI. Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process, involving a literature review and expert consultation to generate 29 candidate items, which were assessed by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed on in a two-day consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants).The CONSORT-AI extension includes 14 new items, which were considered sufficiently important for AI interventions, that they should be routinely reported in addition to the core CONSORT 2010 items. CONSORT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention is integrated, the handling of inputs and outputs of the AI intervention, the human-AI interaction and providing analysis of error cases.CONSORT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness in reporting clinical trials for AI interventions. It will assist editors and peer-reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the quality of clinical trial design and risk of bias in the reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxuan Liu
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, UK
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcome Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Cruz Rivera S, Liu X, Chan AW, Denniston AK, Calvert MJ. Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension. Nat Med 2020; 26:1351-1363. [PMID: 32908284 PMCID: PMC7598944 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1037-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 207] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The SPIRIT 2013 statement aims to improve the completeness of clinical trial protocol reporting by providing evidence-based recommendations for the minimum set of items to be addressed. This guidance has been instrumental in promoting transparent evaluation of new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate their impact on health outcomes. The SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence) extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trial protocols evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for trial reports: CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Artificial Intelligence). Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process involving literature review and expert consultation to generate 26 candidate items, which were consulted upon by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed upon in a consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants). The SPIRIT-AI extension includes 15 new items that were considered sufficiently important for clinical trial protocols of AI interventions. These new items should be routinely reported in addition to the core SPIRIT 2013 items. SPIRIT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention will be integrated, considerations for the handling of input and output data, the human-AI interaction and analysis of error cases. SPIRIT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness for clinical trial protocols for AI interventions. Its use will assist editors and peer reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the design and risk of bias for a planned clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Xiaoxuan Liu
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - An-Wen Chan
- Department of Medicine, Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
- National Institute of Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Ophthalmology, Moorfields Hospital London NHS Foundation Trust and University College London, Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, Coventry, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Liu X, Cruz Rivera S, Moher D, Calvert MJ, Denniston AK. Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension. Nat Med 2020; 26:1364-1374. [PMID: 32908283 PMCID: PMC7598943 DOI: 10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 351] [Impact Index Per Article: 87.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The CONSORT 2010 statement provides minimum guidelines for reporting randomized trials. Its widespread use has been instrumental in ensuring transparency in the evaluation of new interventions. More recently, there has been a growing recognition that interventions involving artificial intelligence (AI) need to undergo rigorous, prospective evaluation to demonstrate impact on health outcomes. The CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials-Artificial Intelligence) extension is a new reporting guideline for clinical trials evaluating interventions with an AI component. It was developed in parallel with its companion statement for clinical trial protocols: SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence). Both guidelines were developed through a staged consensus process involving literature review and expert consultation to generate 29 candidate items, which were assessed by an international multi-stakeholder group in a two-stage Delphi survey (103 stakeholders), agreed upon in a two-day consensus meeting (31 stakeholders) and refined through a checklist pilot (34 participants). The CONSORT-AI extension includes 14 new items that were considered sufficiently important for AI interventions that they should be routinely reported in addition to the core CONSORT 2010 items. CONSORT-AI recommends that investigators provide clear descriptions of the AI intervention, including instructions and skills required for use, the setting in which the AI intervention is integrated, the handling of inputs and outputs of the AI intervention, the human-AI interaction and provision of an analysis of error cases. CONSORT-AI will help promote transparency and completeness in reporting clinical trials for AI interventions. It will assist editors and peer reviewers, as well as the general readership, to understand, interpret and critically appraise the quality of clinical trial design and risk of bias in the reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxuan Liu
- Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Samantha Cruz Rivera
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - David Moher
- Centre for Journalology, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Melanie J Calvert
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Applied Research Collaborative West Midlands, Coventry, UK
- National Institute of Health Research Surgical Reconstruction and Microbiology Centre, University of Birmingham and University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alastair K Denniston
- Academic Unit of Ophthalmology, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
- Health Data Research UK, London, UK.
- Birmingham Health Partners Centre for Regulatory Science and Innovation, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- Centre for Patient Reported Outcomes Research, Institute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
- NIHR Biomedical Research Center at Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and UCL Institute of Ophthalmology, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Siddique S, Chow JC. Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:656-666. [PMID: 32617080 PMCID: PMC7321818 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2019] [Revised: 01/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has already been implemented widely in the medical field in the recent years. This paper first reviews the background of AI and radiotherapy. Then it explores the basic concepts of different AI algorithms and machine learning methods, such as neural networks, that are available to us today and how they are being implemented in radiotherapy and diagnostic processes, such as medical imaging, treatment planning, patient simulation, quality assurance and radiation dose delivery. It also explores the ongoing research on AI methods that are to be implemented in radiotherapy in the future. The review shows very promising progress and future for AI to be widely used in various areas of radiotherapy. However, basing on various concerns such as availability and security of using big data, and further work on polishing and testing AI algorithms, it is found that we may not ready to use AI primarily in radiotherapy at the moment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarkar Siddique
- Department of Physics, Ryerson University, Toronto, ON M5B 2K3, Canada
| | - James C.L. Chow
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON M5G 1X6, Canada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5T 1P5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Yusufaly TI, Kallis K, Simon A, Mayadev J, Yashar CM, Einck JP, Mell LK, Brown D, Scanderbeg D, Hild SJ, Covele B, Moore KL, Meyers SM. A knowledge-based organ dose prediction tool for brachytherapy treatment planning of patients with cervical cancer. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:624-634. [PMID: 32513446 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.04.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study is to explore knowledge-based organ-at-risk dose estimation for intracavitary brachytherapy planning for cervical cancer. Using established external-beam knowledge-based dose-volume histogram (DVH) estimation methods, we sought to predict bladder, rectum, and sigmoid D2cc for tandem and ovoid treatments. METHODS AND MATERIALS A total of 136 patients with loco-regionally advanced cervical cancer treated with 456 (356:100 training:validation ratio) CT-based tandem and ovoid brachytherapy fractions were analyzed. Single fraction prescription doses were 5.5-8 Gy with dose criteria for the high-risk clinical target volume, bladder, rectum, and sigmoid. DVH estimations were obtained by subdividing training set organs-at-risk into high-risk clinical target volume boundary distance subvolumes and computing cohort-averaged differential DVHs. Full DVH estimation was then performed on the training and validation sets. Model performance was quantified by ΔD2cc = D2cc(actual)-D2cc(predicted) (mean and standard deviation). ΔD2cc between training and validation sets were compared with a Student's t test (p < 0.01 significant). Categorical variables (physician, fraction-number, total fractions, and case complexity) that might explain model variance were examined using an analysis of variance test (Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.01 threshold). RESULTS Training set deviations were bladder ΔD2cc = -0.04 ± 0.61 Gy, rectum ΔD2cc = 0.02 ± 0.57 Gy, and sigmoid ΔD2cc = -0.05 ± 0.52 Gy. Model predictions on validation set did not statistically differ: bladder ΔD2cc = -0.02 ± 0.46 Gy (p = 0.80), rectum ΔD2cc = -0.007 ± 0.47 Gy (p = 0.53), and sigmoid ΔD2cc = -0.07 ± 0.47 Gy (p = 0.70). The only significant categorical variable was the attending physician for bladder and rectum ΔD2cc. CONCLUSION: A simple boundary distance-driven knowledge-based DVH estimation exhibited promising results in predicting critical brachytherapy dose metrics. Future work will examine the utility of these predictions for quality control and automated brachytherapy planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tahir I Yusufaly
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Karoline Kallis
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Aaron Simon
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Jyoti Mayadev
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Catheryn M Yashar
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - John P Einck
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Loren K Mell
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Derek Brown
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Daniel Scanderbeg
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Sebastian J Hild
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Brent Covele
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Kevin L Moore
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
| | - Sandra M Meyers
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bardis MD, Houshyar R, Chang PD, Ushinsky A, Glavis-Bloom J, Chahine C, Bui TL, Rupasinghe M, Filippi CG, Chow DS. Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Prostate Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI): Current and Emerging Trends. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1204. [PMID: 32403240 PMCID: PMC7281682 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 05/02/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate carcinoma is one of the most prevalent cancers worldwide. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is a non-invasive tool that can improve prostate lesion detection, classification, and volume quantification. Machine learning (ML), a branch of artificial intelligence, can rapidly and accurately analyze mpMRI images. ML could provide better standardization and consistency in identifying prostate lesions and enhance prostate carcinoma management. This review summarizes ML applications to prostate mpMRI and focuses on prostate organ segmentation, lesion detection and segmentation, and lesion characterization. A literature search was conducted to find studies that have applied ML methods to prostate mpMRI. To date, prostate organ segmentation and volume approximation have been well executed using various ML techniques. Prostate lesion detection and segmentation are much more challenging tasks for ML and were attempted in several studies. They largely remain unsolved problems due to data scarcity and the limitations of current ML algorithms. By contrast, prostate lesion characterization has been successfully completed in several studies because of better data availability. Overall, ML is well situated to become a tool that enhances radiologists' accuracy and speed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michelle D. Bardis
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201, USA; (R.H.); (P.D.C.); (J.G.-B.); (C.C.); (T.-L.B.); (M.R.); (D.S.C.)
| | - Roozbeh Houshyar
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201, USA; (R.H.); (P.D.C.); (J.G.-B.); (C.C.); (T.-L.B.); (M.R.); (D.S.C.)
| | - Peter D. Chang
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201, USA; (R.H.); (P.D.C.); (J.G.-B.); (C.C.); (T.-L.B.); (M.R.); (D.S.C.)
| | - Alexander Ushinsky
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Saint Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | - Justin Glavis-Bloom
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201, USA; (R.H.); (P.D.C.); (J.G.-B.); (C.C.); (T.-L.B.); (M.R.); (D.S.C.)
| | - Chantal Chahine
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201, USA; (R.H.); (P.D.C.); (J.G.-B.); (C.C.); (T.-L.B.); (M.R.); (D.S.C.)
| | - Thanh-Lan Bui
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201, USA; (R.H.); (P.D.C.); (J.G.-B.); (C.C.); (T.-L.B.); (M.R.); (D.S.C.)
| | - Mark Rupasinghe
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201, USA; (R.H.); (P.D.C.); (J.G.-B.); (C.C.); (T.-L.B.); (M.R.); (D.S.C.)
| | | | - Daniel S. Chow
- Department of Radiology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, CA 92868-3201, USA; (R.H.); (P.D.C.); (J.G.-B.); (C.C.); (T.-L.B.); (M.R.); (D.S.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Nicolae A, Semple M, Lu L, Smith M, Chung H, Loblaw A, Morton G, Mendez LC, Tseng CL, Davidson M, Ravi A. Conventional vs machine learning-based treatment planning in prostate brachytherapy: Results of a Phase I randomized controlled trial. Brachytherapy 2020; 19:470-476. [PMID: 32317241 DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2020.03.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the noninferiority of Day 30 dosimetry between a machine learning-based treatment planning system for prostate low-dose-rate (LDR) brachytherapy and the conventional, manual planning technique. As a secondary objective, the impact of planning technique on clinical workflow efficiency was also evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS 41 consecutive patients who underwent I-125 LDR monotherapy for low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer were accrued into this single-institution study between 2017 and 2018. Patients were 1:1 randomized to receive treatment planning using a machine learning-based prostate implant planning algorithm (PIPA system) or conventional, manual technique. Treatment plan modifications by the radiation oncologist were evaluated by computing the Dice coefficient of the prostate V150% isodose volume between either the PIPA-or conventional-and final approved plans. Additional evaluations between groups evaluated the total planning time and dosimetric outcomes at preimplant and Day 30. RESULTS 21 and 20 patients were treated using the PIPA and conventional techniques, respectively. No significant differences were observed in preimplant or Day 30 prostate D90%, V100%, rectum V100, or rectum D1cc between PIPA and conventional techniques. Although the PIPA group had a larger proportion of patients with plans requiring no modifications (Dice = 1.00), there was no significant difference between the magnitude of modifications between each arm. There was a large significant advantage in mean planning time for the PIPA arm (2.38 ± 0.96 min) compared with the conventional (43.13 ± 58.70 min) technique (p >> 0.05). CONCLUSIONS A machine learning-based planning workflow for prostate LDR brachytherapy has the potential to offer significant time savings and operational efficiencies, while producing noninferior postoperative dosimetry to that of expert, conventional treatment planners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandru Nicolae
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Semple
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lin Lu
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mackenzie Smith
- Department of Radiation Therapy, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hans Chung
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrew Loblaw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Gerard Morton
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Lucas Castro Mendez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chia-Lin Tseng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melanie Davidson
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Ananth Ravi
- Department of Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Chen J, Remulla D, Nguyen JH, Dua A, Liu Y, Dasgupta P, Hung AJ. Current status of artificial intelligence applications in urology and their potential to influence clinical practice. BJU Int 2019; 124:567-577. [PMID: 31219658 DOI: 10.1111/bju.14852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the applications of artificial intelligence (AI) in diagnosis, treatment and outcome predictionin urologic diseases and evaluate its advantages over traditional models and methods. MATERIALS AND METHODS A literature search was performed after PROSPERO registration (CRD42018103701) and in compliance with Preferred Reported Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methods. Articles between 1994 and 2018 using the search terms "urology", "artificial intelligence", "machine learning" were included and categorized by the application of AI in urology. Review articles, editorial comments, articles with no full-text access, and nonurologic studies were excluded. RESULTS Initial search yielded 231 articles, but after excluding duplicates and following full-text review and examination of article references, only 111 articles were included in the final analysis. AI applications in urology include: utilizing radiomic imaging or ultrasonic echo data to improve or automate cancer detection or outcome prediction, utilizing digitized tissue specimen images to automate detection of cancer on pathology slides, and combining patient clinical data, biomarkers, or gene expression to assist disease diagnosis or outcome prediction. Some studies employed AI to plan brachytherapy and radiation treatments while others used video based or robotic automated performance metrics to objectively evaluate surgical skill. Compared to conventional statistical analysis, 71.8% of studies concluded that AI is superior in diagnosis and outcome prediction. CONCLUSION AI has been widely adopted in urology. Compared to conventional statistics AI approaches are more accurate in prediction and more explorative for analyzing large data cohorts. With an increasing library of patient data accessible to clinicians, AI may help facilitate evidence-based and individualized patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Chen
- Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Daphne Remulla
- Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jessica H Nguyen
- Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aastha Dua
- Computer Science Department, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yan Liu
- Computer Science Department, Viterbi School of Engineering, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Prokar Dasgupta
- Division of Transplantation Immunology and Mucosal Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, Kings College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew J Hung
- Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Center for Robotic Simulation & Education, University of Southern California Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Cui S, Després P, Beaulieu L. A multi-criteria optimization approach for HDR prostate brachytherapy: I. Pareto surface approximation. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:205004. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae24c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
|
40
|
Cui S, Després P, Beaulieu L. A multi-criteria optimization approach for HDR prostate brachytherapy: II. Benchmark against clinical plans. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2018; 63:205005. [DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aae24f] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
|
41
|
Sanders JC, Showalter TN. How Big Data, Comparative Effectiveness Research, and Rapid-Learning Health-Care Systems Can Transform Patient Care in Radiation Oncology. Front Oncol 2018; 8:155. [PMID: 29868477 PMCID: PMC5954037 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2018] [Accepted: 04/24/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Big data and comparative effectiveness research methodologies can be applied within the framework of a rapid-learning health-care system (RLHCS) to accelerate discovery and to help turn the dream of fully personalized medicine into a reality. We synthesize recent advances in genomics with trends in big data to provide a forward-looking perspective on the potential of new advances to usher in an era of personalized radiation therapy, with emphases on the power of RLHCS to accelerate discovery and the future of individualized radiation treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason C Sanders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Timothy N Showalter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Initial clinical assessment of “center-specific” automated treatment plans for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy. Brachytherapy 2018; 17:476-488. [DOI: 10.1016/j.brachy.2017.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2017] [Revised: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 10/16/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|