|
1
|
Upadhyay R, Klamer BG, Perlow HK, White JR, Bazan JG, Jhawar SR, Blakaj DM, Grecula JC, Arnett A, Mestres-Villanueva MA, Healy EH, Thomas EM, Chakravarti A, Raval RR, Lustberg M, Williams NO, Palmer JD, Beyer SJ. Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Women Older than 65 with Breast Cancer Brain Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:137. [PMID: 38201564 PMCID: PMC10778270 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010137] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/22/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Breast cancer is the second most common cause of brain metastases (BM). Despite increasing incidence of BM in older women, there are limited data on the optimal management of BM in this age group. In this study, we assessed the survival outcomes and treatment patterns of older breast cancer patients ≥65 years old with BM compared to younger patients at our institution. METHODS An IRB-approved single-institutional retrospective review of biopsy-proven breast cancer patients with BM treated with 1- to 5-fraction stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS) from 2015 to 2020 was performed. Primary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (PFS) defined as the time interval between the end of SRS to the date of the first CNS progression. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) from the end of SRS and radiation treatment patterns. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazard regression method were used for survival analyses. RESULTS A total of 112 metastatic breast cancer patients with BMs were included of which 24 were ≥65 years old and 88 were <65 years old. Median age at RT was 72 years (range 65-84) compared to 52 years (31-64) in younger patients. There were significantly higher number of older women with ER/PR positive disease (75% vs. 49%, p = 0.036), while younger patients were more frequently triple negative (32% vs. 12%, p = 0.074) and HER2 positive (42% vs. 29%, p = 0.3). Treatment-related adverse events were similar in both groups. Overall, 14.3% patients had any grade radiation necrosis (RN) (older vs. young: 8.3% vs. 16%, p = 0.5) while 5.4% had grade 3 or higher RN (0% vs. 6.8%, p = 0.7). Median OS after RT was poorer in older patients compared to younger patients (9.5 months vs. 14.5 months, p = 0.037), while intracranial PFS from RT was similar between the two groups (9.7 months vs. 7.1 months, p = 0.580). On univariate analysis, significant predictors of OS were age ≥65 years old (hazard risk, HR = 1.70, p = 0.048), KPS ≤ 80 (HR = 2.24, p < 0.001), HER2 positive disease (HR = 0.46, p < 0.001), isolated CNS metastatic disease (HR = 0.29, p < 0.001), number of brain metastases treated with RT (HR = 1.06, p = 0.028), and fractionated SRS (HR = 0.53, p = 0.013). On multivariable analysis, KPS ≤ 80, HER2 negativity and higher number of brain metastases predicted for poorer survival, while age was not a significant factor for OS after adjusting for other variables. Patients who received systemic therapy after SRS had a significantly improved OS on univariate and multivariable analysis (HR = 0.32, p < 0.001). Number of brain metastases treated was the only factor predictive of worse PFS (HR = 1.06, p = 0.041), which implies a 6% additive risk of progression for every additional metastasis treated. CONCLUSIONS Although older women had poorer OS than younger women, OS was similar after adjusting for KPS, extracranial progression, and systemic therapy; and there was no difference in rates of intracranial PFS, neurological deaths, and LMD in the different age groups. This study suggests that age alone may not play an independent role in treatment-selection and that outcomes for breast cancer patients with BMs and personalized decision-making including other clinical factors should be considered. Future studies are warranted to assess neurocognitive outcomes and other radiation treatment toxicities in older patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rituraj Upadhyay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Brett G. Klamer
- Department of Biostatistics, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Haley K. Perlow
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Julia R. White
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS 66103, USA;
| | - Jose G. Bazan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA 91010, USA;
| | - Sachin R. Jhawar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Dukagjin M. Blakaj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - John C. Grecula
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Andrea Arnett
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Mariella A. Mestres-Villanueva
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Erin H. Healy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Irvine, CA 92697, USA;
| | - Evan M. Thomas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Arnab Chakravarti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Raju R. Raval
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Maryam Lustberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT 06511, USA;
| | - Nicole O. Williams
- Department of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA;
| | - Joshua D. Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| | - Sasha J. Beyer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH 43210, USA; (R.U.); (H.K.P.); (S.R.J.); (D.M.B.); (J.C.G.); (A.A.); (M.A.M.-V.); (E.M.T.); (A.C.); (R.R.R.); (J.D.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Lee J, Kim HJ, Kim WC. CyberKnife-based stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy in older patients with brain metastases from non-small cell lung cancer. Radiat Oncol J 2023; 41:258-266. [PMID: 38185930 PMCID: PMC10772598 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2023.00563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Revised: 08/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE We analyzed clinical results of CyberKnife (CK)-based stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (FSRT) in older patients (age ≥65 years) affected by brain metastases (BM) from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-three older patients with 92 BM were treated with CK-based SRS/FSRT at our institution between 2009 and 2019. The end-point was overall survival (OS). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the prognostic factors influencing OS. The in-field local control (IFLC) within the SRS/FSRT field was also assessed. RESULTS During a median follow-up period of 18 months, the median OS was 32 months. NSCLC-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) (p = 0.027) was an independent significant factor affecting OS in the multivariate analysis. The median IFLC period was 31 months, and the total BM volume (p = 0.025) appeared to be a significant feature of IFLC. No adverse events >grade 2 were reported after SRS/FSRT. CONCLUSION CK-based SRS/FSRT is a safe and efficient option for older patients with BM arising from NSCLC, showing good OS without severe side effects. GPA, which was consisted in age, performance status, extra-cerebral metastasis, and number of BM, seemed to be predictive factors for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeongshim Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hun Jung Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Woo Chul Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Inha University Hospital, Inha University School of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Nieder C, Andratschke NH, Grosu AL. How we treat octogenarians with brain metastases. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1213122. [PMID: 37614511 PMCID: PMC10442834 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1213122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Biologically younger, fully independent octogenarians are able to tolerate most oncological treatments. Increasing frailty results in decreasing eligibility for certain treatments, e.g., chemotherapy and surgery. Most brain metastases are not an isolated problem, but part of widespread cancer dissemination, often in combination with compromised performance status. Multidisciplinary assessment is key in this vulnerable patient population where age, frailty, comorbidity and even moderate additional deficits from brain metastases or their treatment may result in immobilization, hospitalization, need for nursing home care, termination of systemic anticancer treatment etc. Here, we provide examples of successful treatment (surgery, radiosurgery, systemic therapy) and best supportive care, and comment on the limitations of prognostic scores, which often were developed in all-comers rather than octogenarians. Despite selection bias in retrospective studies, survival after radiosurgery was more encouraging than after whole-brain radiotherapy. Prospective research with focus on octogenarians is warranted to optimize outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carsten Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital, Bodø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT – The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Nicolaus H. Andratschke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Anca L. Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center, Medical Faculty, University Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Galve-Calvo E, Alonso-Babarro A, Martínez-García M, Pi-Figueras M, Villalba G, Alonso S, Contreras J. Narrative Review of Multidisciplinary Management of Central Nervous Involvement in Patients with HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer: Focus on Elderly Patients. Adv Ther 2023; 40:3304-3331. [PMID: 37291377 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02538-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
The tumor biology of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer (BC) promotes the development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases, with 25% of patients with HER2-positive BC developing CNS metastases. Furthermore, the incidence of HER2-positive BC brain metastases has increased in the last decades, likely because of the improved survival with targeted therapies and better detection methods. Brain metastases are detrimental to quality of life and survival and represent a challenging clinical problem, particularly in elderly women, who comprise a substantial proportion of patients diagnosed with BC and often have comorbidities or an age-related decline in organ function. Treatment options for patients with BC brain metastases include surgical resection, whole-brain radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, chemotherapy, and targeted agents. Ideally, local and systemic treatment decisions should be made by a multidisciplinary team, with input from several specialties, based on an individualized prognostic classification. In elderly patients with BC, additional age-associated conditions, such as geriatric syndromes or comorbidities, and the physiologic changes associated with aging, may impact their ability to tolerate cancer therapy and should be considered in the treatment decision-making process. This review describes the treatment options for elderly patients with HER2-positive BC and brain metastases, focusing on the importance of multidisciplinary management, the different points of view from the distinct disciplines, and the role of oncogeriatric and palliative care in this vulnerable patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Galve-Calvo
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario Basurto (OSI Bilbao-Basurto), Avda. Montevideo 18, 48013, Bilbao, Bisczy, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Jorge Contreras
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Carlos Haya, Málaga, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Liang L, Wang Z, Duan H, He Z, Lu J, Jiang X, Hu H, Li C, Yu C, Zhong S, Cui R, Guo X, Deng M, Chen Y, Du X, Wu S, Chen L, Mou Y. Survival Benefits of Radiotherapy and Surgery in Lung Cancer Brain Metastases with Poor Prognosis Factors. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2227-2236. [PMID: 36826133 PMCID: PMC9954973 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30020172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiotherapy and surgery are the standard local treatments for lung cancer brain metastases (BMs). However, limited studies focused on the effects of radiotherapy and surgery in lung cancer BMs with poor prognosis factors. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed 714 patients with lung cancer BMs. Analyses of overall survival (OS) and risk factors for OS were assessed by the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model. RESULTS Age ≥ 65 years, a Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) score ≤ 70, anaplastic large-cell lymphoma kinase (ALK)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) wild type, and extracranial metastases were related to poor prognosis. Patients were stratified according to these poor prognosis factors. In patients with the ALK/EGFR wild type, whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), and surgery improved the OS of patients. WBRT and SRS were the independent protective factors for OS. In patients with extracranial metastases, patients who received WBRT plus SRS or WBRT alone had longer OS than those who did not receive radiotherapy. WBRT plus SRS and WBRT were the independent protective factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS Radiotherapy and surgery are associated with improved survival for lung cancer BMs with the ALK/EGFR wild type. Radiotherapy is associated with improved survival in lung cancer BMs with extracranial metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lun Liang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Zhenning Wang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
- Department of Neurosurgery, Dongguan People’s Hospital (Affiliated Dongguan Hospital, South Medical University), Dongguan 523058, China
| | - Hao Duan
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Zhenqiang He
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Jie Lu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiaobing Jiang
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Hongrong Hu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Chang Li
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Chengwei Yu
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Sheng Zhong
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Run Cui
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiaoyu Guo
- Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Ji’nan University, Guangzhou 518053, China
| | - Meiling Deng
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Yuanyuan Chen
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Xiaojing Du
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Shaoxiong Wu
- Department of Radiotherapy, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
| | - Likun Chen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
- Correspondence: (L.C.); (Y.M.); Tel.: +86-20-8734-3899 (L.C. & Y.M.); Fax: +86-20-8734-3310 (L.C. & Y.M.)
| | - Yonggao Mou
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou 510060, China
- Correspondence: (L.C.); (Y.M.); Tel.: +86-20-8734-3899 (L.C. & Y.M.); Fax: +86-20-8734-3310 (L.C. & Y.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Tohidinezhad F, Di Perri D, Zegers CML, Dijkstra J, Anten M, Dekker A, Van Elmpt W, Eekers DBP, Traverso A. Prediction Models for Radiation-Induced Neurocognitive Decline in Adult Patients With Primary or Secondary Brain Tumors: A Systematic Review. Front Psychol 2022; 13:853472. [PMID: 35432113 PMCID: PMC9009149 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.853472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Although an increasing body of literature suggests a relationship between brain irradiation and deterioration of neurocognitive function, it remains as the standard therapeutic and prophylactic modality in patients with brain tumors. This review was aimed to abstract and evaluate the prediction models for radiation-induced neurocognitive decline in patients with primary or secondary brain tumors. Methods MEDLINE was searched on October 31, 2021 for publications containing relevant truncation and MeSH terms related to “radiotherapy,” “brain,” “prediction model,” and “neurocognitive impairments.” Risk of bias was assessed using the Prediction model Risk Of Bias ASsessment Tool. Results Of 3,580 studies reviewed, 23 prediction models were identified. Age, tumor location, education level, baseline neurocognitive score, and radiation dose to the hippocampus were the most common predictors in the models. The Hopkins verbal learning (n = 7) and the trail making tests (n = 4) were the most frequent outcome assessment tools. All studies used regression (n = 14 linear, n = 8 logistic, and n = 4 Cox) as machine learning method. All models were judged to have a high risk of bias mainly due to issues in the analysis. Conclusion Existing models have limited quality and are at high risk of bias. Following recommendations are outlined in this review to improve future models: developing cognitive assessment instruments taking into account the peculiar traits of the different brain tumors and radiation modalities; adherence to model development and validation guidelines; careful choice of candidate predictors according to the literature and domain expert consensus; and considering radiation dose to brain substructures as they can provide important information on specific neurocognitive impairments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fariba Tohidinezhad
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Dario Di Perri
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Catharina M L Zegers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Jeanette Dijkstra
- Department of Medical Psychology, School for Mental Health and Neurosciences (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Monique Anten
- Department of Neurology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHeNS), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Andre Dekker
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Wouter Van Elmpt
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle B P Eekers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| | - Alberto Traverso
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Lam FC, Salehi F, Kasper EM. Integrating Nanotechnology in Neurosurgery, Neuroradiology, and Neuro-Oncology Practice-The Clinicians' Perspective. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2022; 10:801822. [PMID: 35223783 PMCID: PMC8864069 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.801822] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Fred C Lam
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Fateme Salehi
- Department of Radiology, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Ekkehard M Kasper
- Division of Neurosurgery, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University Faculty of Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Risk Factors for Radiation Necrosis in Patients Undergoing Cranial Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13194736. [PMID: 34638223 PMCID: PMC8507553 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13194736] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2021] [Revised: 09/18/2021] [Accepted: 09/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Radiation necrosis is a known complication after stereotactic radiosurgery of intracranial tumors. We evaluated 388 patients who underwent stereotactic radiosurgery at our institution. The most common tumors were metastases (47.2%), followed by vestibular schwannomas (32.2%) and meningiomas (13.4%). 15.7% developed radiation necrosis after a median of 8 months. According to our data, larger tumor diameter (HR 1.065) and higher radiation dose (HR 1.302) were associated with an increased risk of radiation necrosis independently of tumor type. Advanced age was shown to be a risk factor for radiation necrosis only in cases with metastasis (HR 1.066). The data from this study suggest that the development of radiation necrosis is dependent on size and dose, not on the type of the neoplasm. Abstract Purpose: single-staged stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an established part of the multimodal treatment in neuro-oncology. Radiation necrosis after high-dose irradiation is a known complication, but there is a lack of evidence about the risk factors. The aim of this study was to evaluate possible risk factors for radiation necrosis in patients undergoing radiosurgery. Methods: patients treated with radiosurgery between January 2004 and November 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The clinical data, imaging and medication were gathered from electronic patient records. The largest diameter of the tumors was measured using MRI scans in T1 weighted imaging with gadolinium and the edema in T2 weighted sequences. The diagnosis of a radiation necrosis was established analyzing imaging criteria combined with clinical course or pathologically confirmed by subsequent surgical intervention. Patients developing radiation necrosis detected after SRS were compared to patients without evidence of an overshooting irradiation reaction. Results: 388 patients were included retrospectively, 61 (15.7%) of whom developed a radiation necrosis. Median follow-up was 24 (6–62) months with a radiation necrosis after 8 (6–12) months. The most frequent tumors were metastases in 47.2% of the cases, followed by acoustic neuromas in 32.2% and meningiomas in 13.4%. Seventy-three (18.9%) patients already underwent one or more previous radiosurgical procedures for different lesions. The mean largest diameter of the tumors amounted to 16.3 mm (±6.1 mm). The median—80%—isodose administered was 16 (14–25) Gy. Of the radiation necroses, 25 (43.1%) required treatment, in 23 (39.7%) thereof, medical treatment was applied and in 2 (3.4%) cases, debulking surgery was performed. In this study, significantly more radiation necroses arose in patients with higher doses (HR 1.3 [CI 1.2; 1.5], p < 0.001) leading to a risk increment of over 180% between a radiation isodose of 14 and 20 Gy. The maximum diameter was a second significant risk factor (p = 0.028) with an HR of 1065 for every 1 mm increase in multivariate analysis. Conclusion: large diameter and high doses were reliable independent risk factors leading to more frequent radiation necroses, regardless of tumor type in patients undergoing radiosurgery. Alternative therapeutic procedures may be considered in lesions with large volume and an expected high radiation doses due to the increased risk of developing radiation necrosis.
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Heimann M, Schäfer N, Bode C, Borger V, Eichhorn L, Giordano FA, Güresir E, Jacobs AH, Ko YD, Landsberg J, Lehmann F, Radbruch A, Schaub C, Schwab KS, Weller J, Herrlinger U, Vatter H, Schuss P, Schneider M. Outcome of Elderly Patients With Surgically Treated Brain Metastases. Front Oncol 2021; 11:713965. [PMID: 34381733 PMCID: PMC8350563 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.713965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Object In the light of an aging population and ongoing advances in cancer control, the optimal management in geriatric patients with brain metastases (BM) poses an increasing challenge, especially due to the scarce data available. We therefore analyzed our institutional data with regard to factors influencing overall survival (OS) in geriatric patients with BM. Methods Between 2013 and 2018, patients aged ≥ 65 years with surgically treated BM were included in this retrospective analysis. In search of preoperatively identifiable risk factors for poor OS, in addition to the underlying cancer, the preoperative frailty of patients was analyzed using the modified Frailty Index (mFI). Results A total of 180 geriatric patients with surgically treated BM were identified. Geriatric patients categorized as least-frail achieved a median OS of 18 months, whereas frailest patients achieved an OS of only 3 months (p<0.0001). Multivariable cox regression analysis detected “multiple intracranial metastases” (p=0.001), “infratentorial localization” (p=0.011), “preoperative CRP >5 mg/l” (p=0.01) and “frailest patients (mFI ≥ 0.27)” (p=0.002) as predictors for reduced OS in older patients undergoing surgical treatment for BM. Conclusions In this retrospective series, pre-operative frailty was associated with poor survival in elderly patients with BM requiring surgery. Our analyses warrant thorough counselling and support of affected elderly patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muriel Heimann
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Niklas Schäfer
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Bode
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Valeri Borger
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Lars Eichhorn
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Frank A Giordano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Erdem Güresir
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Andreas H Jacobs
- Department of Geriatric Medicine and Neurology, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Yon-Dschun Ko
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, Johanniter Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Jennifer Landsberg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Felix Lehmann
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Alexander Radbruch
- Department of Neuroradiology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christina Schaub
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Katjana S Schwab
- Department of Internal Medicine III, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Johannes Weller
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Ulrich Herrlinger
- Division of Clinical Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neurology, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Hartmut Vatter
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Patrick Schuss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Matthias Schneider
- Department of Neurosurgery, Center of Integrated Oncology (CIO) Bonn, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Socha J, Rychter A, Kepka L. Management of brain metastases in elderly patients with lung cancer. J Thorac Dis 2021; 13:3295-3307. [PMID: 34164222 PMCID: PMC8182516 DOI: 10.21037/jtd-2019-rbmlc-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of brain metastases (BM) is continuing to grow in the elderly population with lung cancer, but these patients are seriously under-represented in clinical trials. Thus, their treatment is not based on the evidence from randomized prospective studies. Age is a well recognized poor prognostic factor for survival in patients with BM from lung cancer, which is reflected in prognostic scales, but its impact on the patients' prognosis reflected by its value in gradually updated grading indices seems to decrease. The reason for poorer outcomes in the elderly is unknown—it may result from the influence of the age per se, simplified staging work-up and suboptimal treatment in this patient subgroup or the excess toxicity of the aggressive anticancer treatment secondary to the impaired physiological regulation mechanisms and comorbidities. The main goal of treatment of BM is to ameliorate neurological symptoms and delay neurological progression, with the focus on the improvement and maintenance of the patients’ quality of life. The possible treatment options for BM from lung cancer are whole-brain radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, surgery, chemotherapy, targeted therapies and best supportive care. The aim of this review is to summarize the problems related to the management of BM in elderly patients with lung cancer, to analyze the value of the above mentioned treatment options, and to provide an insight into the influence of age-related clinical factors on the patients’ outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Socha
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland.,Department of Radiotherapy, Regional Oncology Centre, Czestochowa, Poland
| | - Anna Rychter
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Lucyna Kepka
- Department of Radiotherapy, Military Institute of Medicine, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Baumert BG, Pesce GA. Elderly patients with brain metastases: new support for the balancing act in treatment decision making. Neuro Oncol 2021; 23:533-534. [PMID: 33704489 PMCID: PMC8041342 DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noab028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Brigitta G Baumert
- Cantonal Hospital Graubünden, Institute for Radiation-Oncology, Chur, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Harat M, Blok M, Miechowicz I, Kowalewska J. Stereotactic Radiosurgery of Brain Metastasis in Patients with a Poor Prognosis: Effective or Overtreatment? Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:12569-12579. [PMID: 33324101 PMCID: PMC7732755 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s272369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) of brain metastasis in patients with a poor prognosis remains controversial. Here, we compared results of SRS alone to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in poor-prognosis patients and defined the most important unfavorable prognostic factors related to early death after SRS alone. Patients and Methods In this retrospective analysis of prospective SRS data, 180 patients with brain metastases not previously treated with WBRT were analyzed. Results of SRS were compared to WBRT by propensity score matching in patients with a poor prognosis defined by graded prognostic assessment (GPA) <2. Further, SRS patients were divided into training (n=82) and validation (n=48) cohorts. Overall survival (OS) and the risk of early death were defined by univariable and multivariable analyses. Results Median survival of the WBRT and SRS cohorts was 86 days (IQR: 38-172 days) and 201 days (IQR: 86-not reached), respectively (p<0.0001). OS in patients with GPA<2 was significantly longer in the SRS vs WBRT group (123 vs 58 days; p=0.008). Survival was longer in the SRS group in a propensity score matched analysis. In multivariable analysis, GPA (OR: 0.44, 95%CI: 0.21-0.95; p=0.001), extensive extracranial disease (OR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.02-0.66; p=0.013), and serious neurological deficits (OR: 0.13, 95%CI: 0.04-0.45; p=0.001) were associated with early death. If one factor was favorable, 73% (training) and 92% (validation) of patients survived three months. Patients with GPA <2 presenting with serious neurological deficits and extensive extracranial disease had a low expected benefit due to the highest risk of death within three months (AUC: 0.822 training; 0.932 validation). Conclusion SRS is a viable treatment option for patients with a poor prognosis defined as GPA <2. Good neurological status, extracranial oligometastatic disease, or GPA ≥2 should be present to justify SRS in patients with brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maciej Harat
- Department of Oncology and Brachytherapy, Collegium Medicum Nicolaus Copernicus University, Bydgoszcz, Poland.,Department of Radiosurgery and Neurooncology, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Maciej Blok
- Department of Radiotherapy, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Izabela Miechowicz
- Department of Computer Science and Statistics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| | - Joanna Kowalewska
- Department of Radiotherapy, Prof. Franciszek Łukaszczyk Memorial Oncology Center, Bydgoszcz, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Nabors LB, Portnow J, Ahluwalia M, Baehring J, Brem H, Brem S, Butowski N, Campian JL, Clark SW, Fabiano AJ, Forsyth P, Hattangadi-Gluth J, Holdhoff M, Horbinski C, Junck L, Kaley T, Kumthekar P, Loeffler JS, Mrugala MM, Nagpal S, Pandey M, Parney I, Peters K, Puduvalli VK, Robins I, Rockhill J, Rusthoven C, Shonka N, Shrieve DC, Swinnen LJ, Weiss S, Wen PY, Willmarth NE, Bergman MA, Darlow SD. Central Nervous System Cancers, Version 3.2020, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2020; 18:1537-1570. [PMID: 33152694 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.0052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 247] [Impact Index Per Article: 61.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The NCCN Guidelines for Central Nervous System (CNS) Cancers focus on management of adult CNS cancers ranging from noninvasive and surgically curable pilocytic astrocytomas to metastatic brain disease. The involvement of an interdisciplinary team, including neurosurgeons, radiation therapists, oncologists, neurologists, and neuroradiologists, is a key factor in the appropriate management of CNS cancers. Integrated histopathologic and molecular characterization of brain tumors such as gliomas should be standard practice. This article describes NCCN Guidelines recommendations for WHO grade I, II, III, and IV gliomas. Treatment of brain metastases, the most common intracranial tumors in adults, is also described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Manmeet Ahluwalia
- 3Case Comprehensive Cancer Center/University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center and Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute
| | | | - Henry Brem
- 5The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | - Steven Brem
- 6Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania
| | | | - Jian L Campian
- 8Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University School of Medicine
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Craig Horbinski
- 13Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | - Larry Junck
- 14University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center
| | | | - Priya Kumthekar
- 13Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center of Northwestern University
| | | | | | | | - Manjari Pandey
- 19St. Jude Children's Research Hospital/The University of Tennessee Health Science Center
| | | | | | - Vinay K Puduvalli
- 21The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center - James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute
| | - Ian Robins
- 22University of Wisconsin Carbone Cancer Center
| | - Jason Rockhill
- 23Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center/Seattle Cancer Care Alliance
| | | | | | | | - Lode J Swinnen
- 5The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Sato Y, Higuchi Y, Kasuya H, Barfod BE. Stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases: A retrospective cohort study comparing treatment results between two lung cancer patient age groups, 75 years or older vs 65-74 years. Lung Cancer 2020; 149:103-112. [PMID: 33007676 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2020] [Revised: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/31/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is little information on stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) results for brain metastases (BMs) in lung cancer patients ≥75 years of age. We aimed to reappraise whether SRS results for patients ≥75 (very elderly) differ from those of patients with 65-74 years old (elderly). METHODS This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study was based on our prospectively-accumulated database including 7351 consecutive patients undergoing gamma knife (GK) SRS performed for BMs by two highly experienced neurosurgeons during the 1998-2018 period. We selected a total of 2915 elderly patients (age ≥65 years, 39.7 % of the 7351) with lung cancers (902 females, 2013 males, median age; 72 [maximum; 96] years, 2441 NSCLCs, 474 SCLCs) for this study. RESULTS Post-SRS median survival times (MSTs, months) differed significantly between the two lung cancer types, NSCLC (9.0) and SCLC (7.2, p < 0.0001). In NSCLC patients, post-SRS MSTs were significantly shorter in the very elderly (9.7) than those in the elderly (7.8) group (p < 0.0001). However, in SCLC patients, there were no significant MST differences (7.3 vs 6.9, p = 0.52) between the two age groups. In both NSCLC and SCLC patients, neither crude nor cumulative incidences of secondary endpoints in the very elderly group, i.e., neurological death, neurological deterioration, local recurrence, repeat SRS, salvage whole brain radiotherapy and SRS-related complications, were shown to be unfavorable to those in the elderly group. CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest that carefully-selected patients ≥75 years of age are not poor candidates for SRS as compared to those 65-74 years old.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaaki Yamamoto
- Katsuta Hospital Mito GammaHouse, Hitachi-naka, Japan; Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Toru Serizawa
- Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, 1-9-9 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasunori Sato
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yoshinori Higuchi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Kasuya
- Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Acker G, Hashemi SM, Fuellhase J, Kluge A, Conti A, Kufeld M, Kreimeier A, Loebel F, Kord M, Sladek D, Stromberger C, Budach V, Vajkoczy P, Senger C. Efficacy and safety of CyberKnife radiosurgery in elderly patients with brain metastases: a retrospective clinical evaluation. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:225. [PMID: 32993672 PMCID: PMC7523070 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01655-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly applied for up to 10 brain metastases instead of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) to achieve local tumor control while reducing neurotoxicity. Furthermore, brain-metastasis incidence is rising due to the increasing survival of patients with cancer. Our aim was to analyze the efficacy and safety of CyberKnife (CK) radiosurgery for elderly patients. Methods We retrospectively identified all patients with brain metastases ≥ 65 years old treated with CK-SRS at our institution since 2011 and analyzed data of primary diseases, multimodality treatments, and local therapy effect based on imaging follow-up and treatment safety. Kaplan–Meier analysis for local progression-free interval and overall survival were performed. Results We identified 97 patients (233 lesions) fulfilling the criteria at the first CK-SRS. The mean age was 73.2 ± 5.8 (range: 65.0–87.0) years. Overall, 13.4% of the patients were > 80 years old. The three most frequent primary cancers were lung (40.2%), kidney (22.7%), and malignant melanoma (15.5%). In 38.5% (47/122 treatments) multiple brain metastases were treated with the CK-SRS, with up to eight lesions in one session. The median planning target volume (PTV) was 1.05 (range: 0.01–19.80) cm3. A single fraction was applied in 92.3% of the lesions with a median prescription dose of 19 (range: 12–21) Gy. The estimated overall survivals at 3-, 6-, and 12 months after SRS were 79, 55, and 23%, respectively. The estimated local tumor progression-free intervals at 6-, 12-, 24-, 36-, and 72 months after SRS were 99.2, 89.0, 67.2, 64.6, and 64.6%, respectively. Older age and female sex were predictive factors of local progression. The Karnofsky performance score remained stable in 97.9% of the patients; only one patient developed a neurological deficit after SRS of a cerebellar lesion (ataxia, CTCAE Grade 2). Conclusions SRS is a safe and efficient option for the treatment of elderly patients with brain metastases with good local control rates without the side effects of WBRT. Older age and female sex seem to be predictive factors of local progression. Prospective studies are warranted to clarify the role of SRS treatment for elderly patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gueliz Acker
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany. .,Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Str. 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany. .,Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Seyed-Morteza Hashemi
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Josch Fuellhase
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Kluge
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alfredo Conti
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Neurosurgery, Biomedical and Neuromotor sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Markus Kufeld
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anita Kreimeier
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franziska Loebel
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Melina Kord
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Diana Sladek
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Stromberger
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Vajkoczy
- Department of Neurosurgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Charitéplatz 1, 10117, Berlin, Germany.,Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carolin Senger
- Charité CyberKnife Center, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Palmer JD, Bhamidipati D, Shukla G, Epperla N, Glass J, Kim L, Shi W. Outcomes after stereotactic radiosurgery for CNS lymphoma. J Neurooncol 2020; 147:465-476. [PMID: 32108296 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-020-03444-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard of care for CNS lymphoma typically includes high dose methotrexate followed by whole brain radiation therapy, but there is an increased risk of neurotoxicity with this regimen. In our institution, we offered stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for disease refractory to HD-MTX in a subset of patients. A search of the literature on this modality for CNS lymphoma was also conducted. METHODS Medical records of six patients who received partial brain radiation therapy for persistent CNS lymphoma were reviewed. SRS was given via 1-3 fractions to doses of 21 or 24 Gy. PubMed, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched for articles reporting on outcomes for CNS lymphoma treated with SRS. RESULTS Six patients (eleven lesions) were treated with SRS for CNS lymphomas. Median follow up was 15.6 months (range 3.3-37.8). Median RT dose per lesion was 21 Gy and median time to progression was 12.7 months. Median overall survival was not reached. Four patients had distant intracranial failure with two developing local recurrence. The search strategy yielded 16 studies of which only one was prospective and included a control group. 183 out of 256 evaluated lesions (69%) responded completely to treatment and 13 of 204 patients (6%) recurred within the treatment area at last follow-up. Overall, the treatment was well tolerated. CONCLUSION SRS may provide favorable local control in patients with refractory CNS lymphomas. A prospective trial is warranted to validate the efficacy of such an approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, 460 W 10th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | - Deepak Bhamidipati
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Gaurav Shukla
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Narendranath Epperla
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, The James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, USA
| | - Jon Glass
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Lyndon Kim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| | - Wenyin Shi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Ascha MS, Funk K, Sloan AE, Kruchko C, Barnholtz-Sloan JS. Disparities in the use of stereotactic radiosurgery for the treatment of lung cancer brain metastases: a SEER-Medicare study. Clin Exp Metastasis 2020; 37:85-93. [PMID: 31705229 DOI: 10.1007/s10585-019-10005-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2019] [Accepted: 11/03/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a costly procedure used to irradiate disease tissue while sparing healthy tissue, ideally limiting the side effects of treatment. SRS is frequently used in the setting of lung cancer, which is associated with greater rates of BM, though its cost may lead to potentially inequitable use across patient populations. This study investigates potential disparities in the use of SRS to treat Medicare patients. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End-Results cancer registry data for patients diagnosed between the years 2010 and 2012 were examined to identify lung cancer patients diagnosed with BM at the same time as their primary cancer (SBM). Medicare claims for SRS were identified; the odds of having SRS claims and hazards of mortality associated with those odds were examined with respect to various clinical and demographic characteristics. Of 74,142 Medicare-enrolled patients diagnosed with lung cancer, 9192 were diagnosed with SBM and 3259 of those patients received SRS. Adjusting for clinical and demographic characteristics, males with SBM had 0.85 times the odds of SRS compared to females with SBM. Black patients and those of other race had significantly lower odds of evidence of SRS compared to WNH patients. SRS may not be delivered equitably among Medicare patients. Males and minority patients may have decreased odds of SRS and worse survival compared to female and WNH patients, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mustafa S Ascha
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Center for Clinical Investigation, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Kaitlyn Funk
- Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Andrew E Sloan
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Carol Kruchko
- Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States, Hinsdale, IL, USA
| | - Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan
- Department of Population and Quantitative Health Sciences, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Institute for Computational Biology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 2-526 Wolstein Research Bldg, 2103 Cornell Rd, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7295, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Higuchi Y, Nagano O, Aiyama H, Koiso T, Watanabe S, Kawabe T, Sato Y, Kasuya H. Prognostic grading system specifically for elderly patients with brain metastases after stereotactic radiosurgery: a 2-institution study. J Neurosurg 2019; 129:95-102. [PMID: 30544299 DOI: 10.3171/2018.7.gks181458] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2018] [Accepted: 07/25/2018] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVEWith the aging of the population, increasing numbers of elderly patients with brain metastasis (BM) are undergoing stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Among recently reported prognostic grading indexes, only the basic score for brain metastases (BSBM) is applicable to patients 65 years or older. However, the major weakness of this system is that no BM-related factors are graded. This prompted the authors to develop a new grading system, the elderly-specific (ES)-BSBM.METHODSFor this IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study, the authors used their prospectively accumulated database comprising 3267 consecutive patients undergoing Gamma Knife SRS for BMs during the 1998-2016 period at the Mito GammaHouse. Among these 3267 patients, 1789 patients ≥ 65 years of age were studied (Yamamoto series [Y-series]). Another series of 1785 patients ≥ 65 years of age in whom Serizawa and colleagues performed Gamma Knife SRS during the same period (Serizawa series [S-series]) was used for validity testing of the ES-BSBM.RESULTSTwo factors were identified as strongly impacting longer survival after SRS by means of multivariable analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model with a stepwise selection procedure. These factors are the number of tumors (solitary vs multiple: HR 1.450, 95% CI 1.299-1.621; p < 0.0001) and cumulative tumor volume (≤ 15 cm3 vs > 15 cm3: HR 1.311, 95% CI 1.078-1.593; p = 0.0067). The new index is the addition of scores 0 and 1 for these 2 factors to the BSBM. The ES-BSBM system is based on categorization into 3 classes by adding these 2 scores to those of the original BSBM. Each ES-BSBM category has 2 possible scores. For the category ES-BSBM 4-5, the score is either 4 or 5; for ES-BSBM 2-3, the score is either 2 or 3; and for ES-BSBM 0-1, the score is either 0 or 1. In the Y-series, the median survival times (MSTs, months) after SRS were 17.5 (95% CI 15.4-19.3) in ES-BSBM 4-5, 6.9 (95% CI 6.4-7.4) in ES-BSBM 2-3, and 2.8 (95% CI 2.5-3.6) in ES-BSBM 0-1 (p < 0.0001). Also, in the S-series, MSTs were, respectively, 20.4 (95% CI 17.2-23.4), 7.9 (95% CI 7.4-8.5), and 3.2 (95% CI 2.8-3.6) (p < 0.0001). The ES-BSBM system was shown to be applicable to patients with all primary tumor types as well as to those 80 years or older.CONCLUSIONSThe authors found that the addition of the number of tumors and cumulative tumor volume as scoring factors to the BSBM system significantly improved the prognostic value of this index. The present study is strengthened by testing the ES-BSBM in a different patient group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masaaki Yamamoto
- 1Katsuta Hospital Mito GammaHouse, Hitachi-naka, Ibaraki.,2Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo
| | - Toru Serizawa
- 3Tokyo Gamma Unit Center, Tsukiji Neurological Clinic, Tokyo.,4Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba
| | - Yoshinori Higuchi
- 4Department of Neurological Surgery, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba
| | - Osamu Nagano
- 5Gamma Knife House, Chiba Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Ichihara
| | - Hitoshi Aiyama
- 1Katsuta Hospital Mito GammaHouse, Hitachi-naka, Ibaraki.,6Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, and
| | - Takao Koiso
- 1Katsuta Hospital Mito GammaHouse, Hitachi-naka, Ibaraki.,6Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, and
| | - Shinya Watanabe
- 1Katsuta Hospital Mito GammaHouse, Hitachi-naka, Ibaraki.,7Tsukuba Clinical Research and Development Organization, University of Tsukuba
| | - Takuya Kawabe
- 8Department of Neurosurgery, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyoto; and
| | - Yasunori Sato
- 9Department of Clinical Research Center, Chiba University Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hidetoshi Kasuya
- 2Department of Neurosurgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Medical Center East, Tokyo
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Stereotactic radiosurgery in elderly patients with brain metastases: comparison with non-elderly patients using database of a multi-institutional prospective observational study (JLGK0901-Elderly). J Neurooncol 2019; 144:393-402. [PMID: 31338786 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-019-03242-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) has been increasingly used for elderly patients with brain metastases (BMs). However, no studies based on a large sample size have been reported. To compare SRS treatment results between elderly and non-elderly patients, we performed a subset study of elderly patients using our prospectively-accumulated multi-institution study database (JLGK0901 Study, Lancet Oncol 15:387-395, 2014). METHODS During the 2009-2011 period, 1194 eligible patients undergoing gamma knife SRS alone for newly diagnosed BMs were enrolled in this study from 23 gamma knife facilities in Japan. Observation was discontinued at the end of 2013. The 1194 patients were divided into the two age groups, 693 elderly ( ≥ 65 years) and 501 non-elderly ( < 65 years) patients. Our study protocol neither set an upper age limit nor required dose de-escalation. RESULTS Median post-SRS survival time was significantly shorter in the elderly than in the non-elderly patient group (10.3 vs 14.3 months, HR 1.380, 95% CI 1.218-1.563, p < 0.0001). However, regarding all secondary endpoints including neurological death, neurological deterioration, SRS-related complications, leukoencephalopathy, local recurrence, newly-developed tumors, meningeal dissemination, salvage SRS, whole brain radiotherapy and surgery and decreased mini-mental state examination scores, the elderly patient group was not inferior to the non-elderly patient group. In the 693 elderly patients, there was no post-SRS median survival time difference between those with 5-10 versus 2-4 tumors (10.8 vs 8.9 months, HR 0.936, 95% CI 0.744-1.167, p = 0.5601). CONCLUSIONS We conclude that elderly BM patients are not unfavorable candidates for SRS alone treatment.
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Soike MH, Hughes RT, Farris M, McTyre ER, Cramer CK, Bourland JD, Chan MD. Does Stereotactic Radiosurgery Have a Role in the Management of Patients Presenting With 4 or More Brain Metastases? Neurosurgery 2019; 84:558-566. [PMID: 29860451 PMCID: PMC6904415 DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyy216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2017] [Accepted: 04/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) are effective treatments for management of brain metastases. Prospective trials comparing the 2 modalities in patients with fewer than 4 brain metastases demonstrate that overall survival (OS) is similar. Intracranial failure is more common after SRS, while WBRT is associated with neurocognitive decline. As technology has advanced, fewer technical obstacles remain for treating patients with 4 or more brain metastases with SRS, but level I data supporting its use are lacking. Observational prospective studies and retrospective series indicate that in patients with 4 or more brain metastases, performance status, total volume of intracranial disease, histology, and rate of development of new brain metastases predict outcomes more accurately than the number of brain metastases. It may be reasonable to initially offer SRS to some patients with 4 or more brain metastases. Initiating therapy with SRS avoids the acute and late sequelae of WBRT. Multiple phase III trials of SRS vs WBRT, both currently open or under development, are directly comparing quality of life and OS for patients with 4 or more brain metastases to help answer the question of SRS appropriateness for these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael H Soike
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Ryan T Hughes
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Michael Farris
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Emory R McTyre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Christina K Cramer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - J D Bourland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Michael D Chan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Arscott WT, Zhu S, Plastaras JP, Maity A, Alonso-Basanta M, Jones J. Acute neurologic toxicity of palliative radiotherapy for brain metastases in patients receiving immune checkpoint blockade. Neurooncol Pract 2018; 6:297-304. [PMID: 31386046 DOI: 10.1093/nop/npy042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The interaction between immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) and radiation (RT) for brain metastases has not been well understood. Given that acute neurotoxicity from this combination is not well characterized, we reviewed patients receiving ICB and RT for brain metastases. Methods Patients treated with ICB and cranial RT from 2010 through 2017 were reviewed. ICB and RT must have been administered within 30 days of each other. Treatment parameters, performance status, symptoms prior to treatment, and toxicity were extracted from the electronic medical record. Survival was calculated from the end of RT to last follow-up or death. Results Seventy-eight patients were included. Median follow-up was 177 days (range, 12-1603). Median age was 64 years old (range, 29-98) and 47 (63%) were male. The main tumor types were melanoma (n = 47) and nonsmall-cell lung cancer (n = 19). Fifty-seven patients were treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and 21 with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT). Most patients received single-agent ICB, though 4 patients received nivolumab and ipilimumab. Forty-one (53%) patients reported no neurologic toxicity. Grade 2 or greater neurologic toxicities were reported in 12 (21%) and 8 (38%) patients in the SRS and WBRT groups, respectively. WBRT was associated with a greater risk of any neurotoxicity, though there was no correlation between ICB agent and toxicity. Sequencing of ICB and RT (ie, <30 days vs <7) did not influence rates of toxicity. Conclusions ICB during SRS or WBRT does not appear to worsen acute neurotoxicity compared to historical controls of RT alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Tristram Arscott
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA
| | - Simeng Zhu
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - John P Plastaras
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA
| | - Amit Maity
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA
| | - Michelle Alonso-Basanta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA
| | - Joshua Jones
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Kocik L, Geinitz H, Track C, Geier M, Nieder C. Feasibility of radiotherapy in nonagenarian patients: a retrospective study. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:62-68. [PMID: 30167713 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1355-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Specific information about radiation therapy in nonagenarians is limited. In order to shed more light on the feasibility of radiotherapy in this challenging subgroup, a retrospective study was performed. METHODS The data of 93 consecutive patients receiving irradiation treatment at the Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern between June 2005 and December 2016 were analyzed. Patient- and treatment-related factors were extracted from the patient records. Overall survival (OS) was defined as time from irradiation to death or last follow-up. The survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. RESULTS The study population of 93 patients was between 90 and 99 years old (median 91 years). It included 59 women (63%) and 34 men (37%). Of these, 38 (41%) received definitive radiotherapy, 14 (15%) received neoadjuvant or adjuvant radiotherapy, whereas a palliative regimen was prescribed in 44% of the cases (n = 41). In all, 79 patients (85%) were able to complete their prescribed course of radiotherapy. While 16 (17%) patients reported grade 2 toxicities or higher, 4 had ≥grade 3 side effects (4%). The median survival was significantly higher in patients treated with adjuvant, neoadjuvant or definitive radiotherapy (13.8 months) compared to patients treated with palliative radiotherapy (3.6 months; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Even in patients managed without preradiotherapy comprehensive geriatric assessment, carefully planned fractionated radiotherapy was feasible and resulted in acceptable rates of acute toxicities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Kocik
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010, Linz, Austria.
| | - H Geinitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010, Linz, Austria
| | - C Track
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010, Linz, Austria
| | - M Geier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ordensklinikum Linz Barmherzige Schwestern, 4010, Linz, Austria
| | - C Nieder
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Medicine, Nordland Hospital Trust, 8092, Bodø, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, 9037, Tromsø, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Neurocognitive evaluation of brain metastases patients treated with post-resection stereotactic radiosurgery: a prospective single arm clinical trial. J Neurooncol 2018; 140:307-315. [PMID: 30078070 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-018-2954-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Post-operative radiation therapy for brain metastases (BM) has become standard treatment. Concerns regarding the deleterious cognitive effects of Whole Brain Radiation Therapy spurred a trend to use focal therapies such as stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The purpose of this study was to prospectively evaluate the neuropsychological effects following post-resection SRS treatment since limited data exist in this context. METHODS We conducted a prospective single arm cohort study of patients with 1-2 BM, who underwent resection of a single BM between May 2015 to December 2016. Patients were evaluated for cognitive functions (NeuroTrax computerized neuropsychological battery; Modiin, Israel) and quality of life (QOL; QLQ-30, QLQ-BN20) before and 3 months following post-resection SRS. RESULTS Twelve out of 14 patients completed pre- and post-SRS neurocognitive assessments. Overall, we did not detect significant neurocognitive or QOL changes 3 months following SRS. In a subgroup analysis among patients younger than 60 years, median global cognitive score increased from a pre-treatment score of 88 (72-102) to 95 (79-108), 3 months following SRS treatment, p = 0.042; Wilcoxon paired non-parametric test. Immediate verbal memory and executive functions scores increased from 86 (72-98) to 98 (92-112) and 86 (60-101) to 100 (80-126), respectively, p = 0.043. No significant cognitive changes were discovered among patients at the age of 60 or older. CONCLUSIONS Post-resection radiosurgery has a safe neuro-cognitive profile and is associated with preservation of nearly all quality of life parameters. Patients younger than 60 years benefit most and may even regain some cognitive functions within a few months after treatment.
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Sundahl N, De Wolf K, Kruse V, Meireson A, Reynders D, Goetghebeur E, Van Gele M, Speeckaert R, Hennart B, Brochez L, Ost P. Phase 1 Dose Escalation Trial of Ipilimumab and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Metastatic Melanoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 100:906-915. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2017] [Revised: 10/11/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
|
25
|
Mahase SS, Julie D, Pannullo SC, Parashar B, Wernicke AG. Excellent Outcomes in a Geriatric Patient with Multiple Brain Metastases Undergoing Surgical Resection with Cesium-131 Implantation and Stereotactic Radiosurgery. Cureus 2017; 9:e1970. [PMID: 29492359 PMCID: PMC5820014 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.1970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is a minimally invasive, focal treatment option for brain metastases. Multiple studies support its use in various settings as an effective, comparable alternative to surgery and whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT). Here, we present excellent outcomes in a 90-year-old patient who underwent SRS after initially presenting at age 84 with multiple brain metastases of an unknown primary, as well as undergoing SRS to a site of tumor recurrence that was initially treated with surgical resection and intraoperative cesium-131 (Cs-131) brachytherapy. To our knowledge, this is one of the first reports describing the effective use of both intraoperative brachytherapy and SRS in the management of multiple brain metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean S Mahase
- Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | - Diana Julie
- Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | - Susan C Pannullo
- Neurological Surgery, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | - Bhupesh Parashar
- Radiation Oncology, NewYork-Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medical Center
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Chen L, Douglass J, Kleinberg L, Ye X, Marciscano AE, Forde PM, Brahmer J, Lipson E, Sharfman W, Hammers H, Naidoo J, Bettegowda C, Lim M, Redmond KJ. Concurrent Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Melanoma, and Renal Cell Carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2017; 100:916-925. [PMID: 29485071 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2017.11.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 231] [Impact Index Per Article: 33.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2017] [Revised: 11/04/2017] [Accepted: 11/27/2017] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize the effect of concurrent stereotactic radiosurgery-stereotactic radiation therapy (SRS-SRT) and immune checkpoint inhibitors on patient outcomes and safety in patients with brain metastases (BMs). METHODS AND MATERIALS We retrospectively identified metastatic non-small cell lung cancer, melanoma, and renal cell carcinoma patients who had BMs treated with SRS-SRT from 2010 to 2016 without prior whole-brain radiation therapy. We included SRS-SRT patients who were treated with anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (ipilimumab) and anti-programmed cell death protein 1 receptor (nivolumab, pembrolizumab). Patients who were given immune checkpoint inhibitors on active or unreported clinical trials were excluded, and concurrent immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) was defined as ICI given within 2 weeks of SRS-SRT. Patients were managed with SRS-SRT, SRS-SRT with nonconcurrent ICI, or SRS-SRT with concurrent ICI. Progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for multivariate analysis. Logistic regression was used to identify predictors of acute neurologic toxicity, immune-related adverse events, and new BMs. RESULTS A total of 260 patients were treated with SRS-SRT to 623 BMs. Of these patients, 181 were treated with SRS-SRT alone, whereas 79 received SRS-SRT and ICI, 35% of whom were treated with concurrent SRS-SRT and ICI. Concurrent ICI was not associated with increased rates of immune-related adverse events or acute neurologic toxicity and predicted for a decreased likelihood of the development of ≥3 new BMs after SRS-SRT (P=.045; odds ratio, 0.337). Median OS for patients treated with SRS-SRT, SRS-SRT with nonconcurrent ICI, and SRS-SRT with concurrent ICI was 12.9 months, 14.5 months, and 24.7 months, respectively. SRS-SRT with concurrent ICI was associated with improved OS compared with SRS-SRT alone (P=.002; hazard ratio [HR], 2.69) and compared with nonconcurrent SRS-SRT and ICI (P=.006; HR, 2.40) on multivariate analysis. The OS benefit of concurrent SRS-SRT and ICI was significant in comparison with patients treated with SRS-SRT before ICI (P=.002; HR, 3.82) or after ICI (P=.021; HR, 2.64). CONCLUSIONS Delivering SRS-SRT with concurrent ICI may be associated with a decreased incidence of new BMs and favorable survival outcomes without increased rates of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jacqueline Douglass
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Lawrence Kleinberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Xiaobu Ye
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Oncology Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ariel E Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Patrick M Forde
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Julie Brahmer
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Evan Lipson
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - William Sharfman
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Hans Hammers
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Medical and Surgical Oncology, Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jarushka Naidoo
- Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Chetan Bettegowda
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Michael Lim
- Department of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | - Kristin J Redmond
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Bennett EE, Vogelbaum MA, Barnett GH, Angelov L, Chao S, Murphy E, Yu J, Suh JH, Elson P, Stevens GHJ, Mohammadi AM. Evaluation of Prognostic Factors for Early Mortality After Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Brain Metastases: a Single Institutional Retrospective Review. Neurosurgery 2017; 83:128-136. [DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyx346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2016] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is used commonly for patients with brain metastases (BM) to improve intracranial disease control. However, survival of these patients is often dictated by their systemic disease course. The value of SRS becomes less clear in patients with anticipated short survival.
OBJECTIVE
To evaluate prognostic factors, which may predict early death (within 90 d) after SRS.
METHODS
A total of 1427 patients with BM were treated with SRS at our institution (2000-2012). There were 1385 cases included in this study; 1057 patients underwent upfront SRS and 328 underwent salvage SRS. The primary endpoint of the study was all-cause mortality within 90 d after first SRS. Multivariate analyses were performed to develop prognostic indices.
RESULTS
Two hundred sixty-six patients (19%, 95% confidence interval 17%-21%) died within 90 d after SRS. Multivariate analysis of upfront SRS patients showed that Karnofsky Performance Status, primary tumor type, extracranial metastases, age at SRS, boost treatment, total tumor volume, prior surgery, and interval from primary to BM were independent prognostic factors for 90-d mortality. The first 4 factors were also independent predictors in patients treated with salvage SRS. Based on these factors, an index was defined for each group that categorized patients into 3 and 2 prognostic groups, respectively. Ninety-day mortality was 5% to 7% in the most favorable cohort and 36% to 39% in the least favorable.
CONCLUSION
Indices based on readily available patient, clinical, and treatment factors that are highly predictive of early death in patients treated with upfront or salvage SRS can be calculated and used to define well-separated prognostic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Emily Bennett
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Michael A Vogelbaum
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Gene H Barnett
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Lilyana Angelov
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Samuel Chao
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Erin Murphy
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Jennifer Yu
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - John H Suh
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Paul Elson
- Department of Quantitative Health Science, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Glen H J Stevens
- Department of Neurology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Alireza M Mohammadi
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- Neurological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
- The Rose Ella Burkhardt Brain Tumor and Neuro-Oncology Center, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|