1
|
McMillan MT, Khan AJ, Powell SN, Humm J, Deasy JO, Haimovitz-Friedman A. Spatially Fractionated Radiotherapy in the Era of Immunotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:276-283. [PMID: 38880536 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2024.04.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) includes historical grid therapy approaches but more recently encompasses the controlled introduction of one or more cold dose regions using intensity modulation delivery techniques. The driving hypothesis behind SFRT is that it may allow for an increased immune response that is otherwise suppressed by radiation effects. With both two- and three-dimensional SFRT approaches, SFRT dose distributions typically include multiple dose cold spots or valleys. Despite its unconventional methods, reported clinical experience shows that SFRT can sometimes induce marked tumor regressions, even in patients with large hypoxic tumors. Preclinical models using extreme dose distributions (i.e., half-sparing) have been shown to nevertheless result in full tumor eradications, a more robust immune response, and systemic anti-tumor immunity. SFRT takes advantage of the complementary immunomodulatory features of low- and high-dose radiotherapy to integrate the delivery of both into a single target. Clinical trials using three-dimensional SFRT (i.e., lattice-like dose distributions) have reported both promising tumor and toxicity results, and ongoing clinical trials are investigating synergy between SFRT and immunotherapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - John Humm
- Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Joseph O Deasy
- Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lin Y, Li W, Johnson D, Prezado Y, Gan GN, Gao H. Development and characterization of the first proton minibeam system for single-gantry proton facility. Med Phys 2024; 51:3995-4006. [PMID: 38642468 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 03/28/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 04/22/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minibeam represents a preclinical spatially fractionated radiotherapy modality with great translational potential. The advantage lies in its high therapeutic index (compared to GRID and LATTICE) and ability to treat at greater depth (compared to microbeam). Proton minibeam radiotherapy (pMBRT) is a synergy of proton and minibeam. While the single-gantry proton facility has gained popularity due to its affordability and compact design, it often has limited beam time available for research purposes. Conversely, given the current requirement of pMBRT on specific minibeam hardware collimators, necessitates a reproducible and fast setup to minimize pMBRT treatment time and streamline the switching time between pMBRT and conventional treatment for clinically translation. PURPOSE The contribution of this work is the development and characterization of the first pMBRT system tailored for single-gantry proton facility. The system allows for efficient and reproducible plug-and-play setup, achievable within minutes. METHODS The single room pMBRT system is constructed based on IBA ProteusONE proton machine. The end of nozzle is attached with beam modifying accessories though an accessory drawer. A small snout is attached to the accessory drawer and used to hold apertures and range shifters. The minibeam aperture consists of two components: a fitting ring and an aperture body. Three minibeam apertures were manufactured. The first-generation apertures underwent qualitatively analysis with film, and the second generation aperture underwent more comprehensive quantitative measurement. The reproducibility of the setup is accessed, and the film measurements are performed to characterize the pMBRT system in cross validation with Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. RESULTS We presented initial results of large field pMBRT aperture and the film measurements indicates the effect of source-to-isocenter distance = 930 cm in Y proton scanning direction. Consistent with TOPAS MC simulation, the dose uniformity of pMBRT field <2 cm is demonstrated to be better than 2%, rendering its suitability for pre-clinical studies. Subsequently, we developed the second generation of aperture with five slits and characterized the aperture with film dosimetry studies and compared the results to the benchmark MC. Comprehensive film measurements were also performed to evaluate the effect of divergence, air gap and gantry-angle dependency and repeatability and revealing a consistent performance within 5%. Furthermore, the 2D gamma analysis indicated a passing rate exceeding 99% using 3% dose difference and 0.2 mm distance agreement criteria. We also establish the peak valley dose ratio and the depth dose profile measurements, and the results are within 10% from MC simulation. CONCLUSIONS We have developed the first pMBRT system tailored for a single-gantry proton facility, which has demonstrated accuracy in benchmark with MC simulations, and allows for efficient plug-and-play setup, emphasizing efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuting Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Wangyao Li
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Daniel Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, University PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Orsay, France
| | - Gregory N Gan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Hao Gao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gregucci F, Beal K, Knisely JPS, Pagnini P, Fiorentino A, Bonzano E, Vanpouille-Box CI, Cisse B, Pannullo SC, Stieg PE, Formenti SC. Biological Insights and Radiation-Immuno-Oncology Developments in Primary and Secondary Brain Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2047. [PMID: 38893165 PMCID: PMC11171192 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16112047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Malignant central nervous system (CNS) cancers include a group of heterogeneous dis-eases characterized by a relative resistance to treatments and distinguished as either primary tumors arising in the CNS or secondary tumors that spread from other organs into the brain. Despite therapeutic efforts, they often cause significant mortality and morbidity across all ages. Radiotherapy (RT) remains the main treatment for brain cancers, improving associated symptoms, improving tumor control, and inducing a cure in some. However, the ultimate goal of cancer treatment, to improve a patient's survival, remains elusive for many CNS cancers, especially primary tumors. Over the years, there have thus been many preclinical studies and clinical trials designed to identify and overcome mechanisms of resistance to improve outcomes after RT and other therapies. For example, immunotherapy delivered concurrent with RT, especially hypo-fractionated stereotactic RT, is synergistic and has revolutionized the clinical management and outcome of some brain tumors, in particular brain metastases (secondary brain tumors). However, its impact on gliomas, the most common primary malignant CNS tumors, remains limited. In this review, we provide an overview of radioresistance mechanisms, the emerging strategies to overcome radioresistance, the role of the tumor microenviroment (TME), and the selection of the most significant results of radiation-immuno-oncological investigations. We also identify novel therapeutic opportunities in primary and secondary brain tumors with the purpose of elucidating current knowledge and stimulating further research to improve tumor control and patients' survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (F.G.); (K.B.); (J.P.S.K.); (P.P.); (C.I.V.-B.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, 70021 Bari, Italy;
| | - Kathryn Beal
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (F.G.); (K.B.); (J.P.S.K.); (P.P.); (C.I.V.-B.)
| | - Jonathan P. S. Knisely
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (F.G.); (K.B.); (J.P.S.K.); (P.P.); (C.I.V.-B.)
| | - Paul Pagnini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (F.G.); (K.B.); (J.P.S.K.); (P.P.); (C.I.V.-B.)
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, 70021 Bari, Italy;
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University, Casamassima, 70010 Bari, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Bonzano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, IRCCS San Matteo Polyclinic Foundation, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Claire I. Vanpouille-Box
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (F.G.); (K.B.); (J.P.S.K.); (P.P.); (C.I.V.-B.)
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Babacar Cisse
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (B.C.); (S.C.P.); (P.E.S.)
| | - Susan C. Pannullo
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (B.C.); (S.C.P.); (P.E.S.)
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14850, USA
| | - Philip E. Stieg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (B.C.); (S.C.P.); (P.E.S.)
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Silvia C. Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA; (F.G.); (K.B.); (J.P.S.K.); (P.P.); (C.I.V.-B.)
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
González-Vegas R, Yousef I, Seksek O, Ortiz R, Bertho A, Juchaux M, Nauraye C, Marzi LD, Patriarca A, Prezado Y, Martínez-Rovira I. Investigating the biochemical response of proton minibeam radiation therapy by means of synchrotron-based infrared microspectroscopy. Sci Rep 2024; 14:11973. [PMID: 38796617 PMCID: PMC11128026 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62373-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024] Open
Abstract
The biology underlying proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is not fully understood. Here we aim to elucidate the biological effects of pMBRT using Fourier Transform Infrared Microspectroscopy (FTIRM). In vitro (CTX-TNA2 astrocytes and F98 glioma rat cell lines) and in vivo (healthy and F98-bearing Fischer rats) irradiations were conducted, with conventional proton radiotherapy and pMBRT. FTIRM measurements were performed at ALBA Synchrotron, and multivariate data analysis methods were employed to assess spectral differences between irradiation configurations and doses. For astrocytes, the spectral regions related to proteins and nucleic acids were highly affected by conventional irradiations and the high-dose regions of pMBRT, suggesting important modifications on these biomolecules. For glioma, pMBRT had a great effect on the nucleic acids and carbohydrates. In animals, conventional radiotherapy had a remarkable impact on the proteins and nucleic acids of healthy rats; analysis of tumour regions in glioma-bearing rats suggested major nucleic acid modifications due to pMBRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto González-Vegas
- Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus UAB Bellaterra, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain
| | - Ibraheem Yousef
- MIRAS Beamline BL01, ALBA-CELLS Synchrotron, Cerdanyola del Vallès, 08209, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Olivier Seksek
- IJCLab, French National Centre for Scientific Research, 91450, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400, Orsay, France
| | - Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400, Orsay, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Nauraye
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, INSERM LITO, PSL Research University, University Paris-Saclay, Campus Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, INSERM LITO, PSL Research University, University Paris-Saclay, Campus Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Curie, INSERM LITO, PSL Research University, University Paris-Saclay, Campus Universitaire, 91898, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, 91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Campus UAB Bellaterra, 08193, Cerdanyola del Vallès, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Prezado Y, Grams M, Jouglar E, Martínez-Rovira I, Ortiz R, Seco J, Chang S. Spatially fractionated radiation therapy: a critical review on current status of clinical and preclinical studies and knowledge gaps. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:10TR02. [PMID: 38648789 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad4192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 04/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) is a therapeutic approach with the potential to disrupt the classical paradigms of conventional radiation therapy. The high spatial dose modulation in SFRT activates distinct radiobiological mechanisms which lead to a remarkable increase in normal tissue tolerances. Several decades of clinical use and numerous preclinical experiments suggest that SFRT has the potential to increase the therapeutic index, especially in bulky and radioresistant tumors. To unleash the full potential of SFRT a deeper understanding of the underlying biology and its relationship with the complex dosimetry of SFRT is needed. This review provides a critical analysis of the field, discussing not only the main clinical and preclinical findings but also analyzing the main knowledge gaps in a holistic way.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, F-91400, Orsay, France
- New Approaches in Radiotherapy Lab, Center for Research in Molecular Medicine and Chronic Diseases (CIMUS), Instituto de investigación Sanitaria de Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, E-15706, Spain
- Oportunius Program, Galician Agency of Innovation (GAIN), Xunta de Galicia, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
| | - Michael Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States of America
| | - Emmanuel Jouglar
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Department of Radiation Oncology, F-75005, Paris and Orsay Protontherapy Center, F-91400, Orsay, France
| | - Immaculada Martínez-Rovira
- Physics Department, Universitat Auto`noma de Barcelona, E-08193, Cerdanyola del Valle`s (Barcelona), Spain
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- University of California San Francisco, Department of Radiation Oncology, 1600 Divisadero Street, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States of America
| | - Joao Seco
- Division of Biomedical physics in Radiation Oncology, DKFZ-German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sha Chang
- Dept of Radiation Oncology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, United States of America
- Department of Clinical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, North Carolin State University, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bertho A, Ortiz R, Maurin M, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Espenon J, Ramasamy G, Patriarca A, De Marzi L, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Thoracic Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy: Tissue Preservation and Survival Advantage Over Conventional Proton Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00510-8. [PMID: 38621606 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Proton minibeam radiation therapy (pMBRT) is an innovative radiation therapy approach that highly modulates the spatial dimension of the dose delivery using narrow, parallel, and submillimetric proton beamlets. pMBRT has proven its remarkable healthy tissue preservation in the brain and skin. This study assesses the potential advantages of pMBRT for thoracic irradiations compared with conventional radiation therapy in terms of normal tissue toxicity. The challenge here was the influence of respiratory motion on the typical peak and valley dose patterns of pMBRT and its potential biologic effect. METHODS AND MATERIALS The whole thorax of naïve C57BL/6 mice received one fraction of high dose (18 Gy) pMBRT or conventional proton therapy (CPT) without any respiratory control. The development of radiation-induced pulmonary fibrosis was longitudinally monitored using cone beam computed tomography. Anatomopathologic analysis was carried out at 9 months postirradiation and focused on the reaction of the lungs' parenchyma and the response of cell types involved in the development of radiation-induced fibrosis and lung regeneration as alveolar type II epithelial cells, club cells, and macrophages. RESULTS pMBRT has milder effects on survival, skin reactions, and lung fibrosis compared with CPT. The pMBRT-induced lung changes were more regional and less severe, with evidence of potential reactive proliferation of alveolar type II epithelial cells and less extensive depletion of club cells and macrophage invasion than the more damaging effects observed in CPT. CONCLUSIONS pMBRT appears suitable to treat moving targets, holding a significant ability to preserve healthy lung tissue, even without respiratory control or precise targeting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annaïg Bertho
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Ramon Ortiz
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Mathieu Maurin
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, INSERM U932, Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Julie Espenon
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Gabriel Ramasamy
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiation therapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Annalisa Patriarca
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL University, Orsay, France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL University, Orsay, France; Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM, Orsay
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiation therapy (RadeXp), Paris, France; Institut Curie, PSL University, Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm, Laboratoire de Recherche Translationnelle en Oncologie, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France; Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Loap P, Giorgi M, Vu-Bezin J, Kirov K, Sampai JM, Prezado Y, Kirova Y. Dosimetric feasibility study ("proof of concept") of refractory ventricular tachycardia radioablation using proton minibeams. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:195-201. [PMID: 38599941 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Preclinical data demonstrated that the use of proton minibeam radiotherapy reduces the risk of toxicity in healthy tissue. Ventricular tachycardia radioablation is an area under clinical investigation in proton beam therapy. We sought to simulate a ventricular tachycardia radioablation with proton minibeams and to demonstrate that it was possible to obtain a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone with this technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS An arrhythmogenic target volume was defined on the simulation CT scan of a patient, localized in the lateral wall of the left ventricle. A dose of 25Gy was planned to be delivered by proton minibeam radiotherapy, simulated using a Monte Carlo code (TOPAS v.3.7) with a collimator of 19 0.4 mm-wide slits spaced 3mm apart. The main objective of the study was to obtain a plan ensuring at least 93% of the prescription dose in 93% of the planning target volume without exceeding 110% of the prescribed dose in the planning target volume. RESULTS The average dose in the planning treatment volume in proton minibeam radiotherapy was 25.12Gy. The percentage of the planning target volume receiving 93% (V93%), 110% (V110%), and 95% (V95%) of the prescribed dose was 94.25%, 0%, and 92.6% respectively. The lateral penumbra was 6.6mm. The mean value of the peak-to-valley-dose ratio in the planning target volume was 1.06. The mean heart dose was 2.54Gy versus 5.95Gy with stereotactic photon beam irradiation. CONCLUSION This proof-of-concept study shows that proton minibeam radiotherapy can achieve a homogeneous coverage of an arrhythmogenic cardiac zone, reducing the dose at the normal tissues. This technique, ensuring could theoretically reduce the risk of late pulmonary and breast fibrosis, as well as cardiac toxicity as seen in previous biological studies in proton minibeam radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - M Giorgi
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Inserm U1021, CNRS UMR3347, Institut Curie, université PSL, 91400 Orsay, France; Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas (LIP), Lisboa, Portugal; Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - J Vu-Bezin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - K Kirov
- Department of Anesthesia and Reanimation, institut Curie, Paris, France
| | - J M Sampai
- Laboratório de Instrumentação e Física Experimental de Partículas (LIP), Lisboa, Portugal; Departamento de Física, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Y Prezado
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Inserm U1021, CNRS UMR3347, Institut Curie, université PSL, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Y Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, institut Curie, Paris, France; Université Versailles, Saint-Quentin, France.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Wisdom AJ, Barker CA, Chang JY, Demaria S, Formenti S, Grassberger C, Gregucci F, Hoppe BS, Kirsch DG, Marciscano AE, Mayadev J, Mouw KW, Palta M, Wu CC, Jabbour SK, Schoenfeld JD. The Next Chapter in Immunotherapy and Radiation Combination Therapy: Cancer-Specific Perspectives. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024; 118:1404-1421. [PMID: 38184173 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.12.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 12/30/2023] [Indexed: 01/08/2024]
Abstract
Immunotherapeutic agents have revolutionized cancer treatment over the past decade. However, most patients fail to respond to immunotherapy alone. A growing body of preclinical studies highlights the potential for synergy between radiation therapy and immunotherapy, but the outcomes of clinical studies have been mixed. This review summarizes the current state of immunotherapy and radiation combination therapy across cancers, highlighting existing challenges and promising areas for future investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy J Wisdom
- Harvard Radiation Oncology Program, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Christopher A Barker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joe Y Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Silvia Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Clemens Grassberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Fred Hutch Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Bradford S Hoppe
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - David G Kirsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ariel E Marciscano
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jyoti Mayadev
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UC San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
| | - Kent W Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Manisha Palta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Duke Cancer Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Cheng-Chia Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Salma K Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
| | - Jonathan D Schoenfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Chi MS, Tien DC, Chi KH. Inhomogeneously distributed ferroptosis with a high peak-to-valley ratio may improve the antitumor immune response. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1178681. [PMID: 37700825 PMCID: PMC10494438 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1178681] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Combined radiotherapy (RT) and mild hyperthermia have been used clinically for decades to increase local control. Both modalities tend to achieve a homogeneous dose distribution within treatment targets to induce immunogenic cell death. However, marked, and long-lasting abscopal effects have not usually been observed. We proposed a hypothesis to emphasize the importance of the peak-to-valley ratio of the dose distribution inside the tumor to induce immunogenic ferrroptosis in peak area while avoid nonimmunogenic ferroptosis in valley area. Although inhomogeneous distributed energy absorption has been noted in many anticancer medical fields, the idea of sedulously created dose inhomogeneity related to antitumor immunity has not been discussed. To scale up the peak-to-valley ratio, we proposed possible implications by the combination of nanoparticles (NP) with conventional RT or hyperthermia, or the use of a high modulation depth of extremely low frequency hyperthermia or high resolution spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT) to enhance the antitumor immune reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mau-Shin Chi
- Department of Radiation Therapy & Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Institute of Veterinary Clinical Science, School of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Der-Chi Tien
- Department of Radiation Therapy & Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kwan-Hwa Chi
- Department of Radiation Therapy & Oncology, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zhang T, García-Calderón D, Molina-Hernández M, Leitão J, Hesser J, Seco J. A theoretical study of H 2 O 2 as the surrogate of dose in minibeam radiotherapy, with a diffusion model considering radical removal process. Med Phys 2023; 50:5262-5272. [PMID: 37345373 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2022] [Revised: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 06/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is an innovative dose delivery method with the potential to spare normal tissue while achieving similar tumor control as conventional radiotherapy. However, it is difficult to use a single dose parameter, such as mean dose, to compare different patterns of MBRT due to the spatially fractionated radiation. Also, the mechanism leading to the biological effects is still unknown. PURPOSE This study aims to demonstrate that the hydrogen peroxide (H2 O2 ) distribution could serve as a surrogate of dose distribution when comparing different patterns of MBRT. METHODS A free diffusion model (FDM) for H2 O2 developed with Fick's second law was compared with a previously published model based on Monte Carlo & convolution method. Since cells form separate compartments that can eliminate H2 O2 radicals diffusing inside the cell, a term describing the elimination was introduced into the equation. The FDM and the diffusion model considering removal (DMCR) were compared by simulating various dose rate irradiation schemes and uniform irradiation. Finally, the DMCR was compared with previous microbeam and minibeam animal experiments. RESULTS Compared with a previous Monte Carlo & Convolution method, this analytical method provides more accurate results. Furthermore, the new model shows H2 O2 concentration distribution instead of the time to achieve a certain H2 O2 uniformity. The comparison between FDM and DMCR showed that H2 O2 distribution from FDM varied with dose rate irradiation, while DMCR had consistent results. For uniform irradiation, FDM resulted in a Gaussian distribution, while the H2 O2 distribution from DMCR was close to the dose distribution. The animal studies' evaluation showed a correlation between the H2 O2 concentration in the valley region and treatment outcomes. CONCLUSION DMCR is a more realistic model for H2 O2 simulation than the FDM. In addition, the H2 O2 distribution can be a good surrogate of dose distribution when the minibeam effect could be observed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tengda Zhang
- Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Daniel García-Calderón
- Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Miguel Molina-Hernández
- Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Laboratory of Instrumentation and Experimental Particle Physics (LIP), Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Joana Leitão
- Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Laboratory of Instrumentation and Experimental Particle Physics (LIP), Lisbon, Portugal
- Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Jürgen Hesser
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Masilela TAM, Prezado Y. Monte Carlo study of the free radical yields in minibeam radiation therapy. Med Phys 2023; 50:5115-5134. [PMID: 37211907 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Revised: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) is a novel technique which has been shown to widen the therapeutic window through significant normal tissue sparing. Despite the heterogeneous dose distributions, tumor control is still ensured. Nevertheless the exact radiobiological mechanisms responsible for MBRT efficacy are not fully understood. PURPOSE Reactive oxygen species (ROS) resulting from water radiolysis were investigated given their implications not only on targeted DNA damage, but also for their role in the immune response and non-targeted cell signalling effects: two potential drivers of MBRT efficacy. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations were performed using TOPAS-nBio to carry out the irradiation of a water phantom with beams of protons (pMBRT), photons (xMBRT), 4 He ions (HeMBRT), and 12 C ions (CMBRT). Primary yields at the end of the chemical stage were calculated in spheres of 20 μm diameter, located in the peaks and valleys at various depths up to the Bragg peak. The chemical stage was limited to 1 ns to approximate biological scavenging, and the yield of · OH, H2 O2 , ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ was recorded. RESULTS Beyond 10 mm, there were no substantial differences in the primary yields between peaks and valleys of the pMBRT and HeMBRT modalities. For xMBRT, there was a lower primary yield of the radical species · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ at all depths in the valleys compared to the peaks, and a higher primary yield of H2 O2 . Compared to the peaks, the valleys of the CMBRT modality were subject to a higher · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ yield, and lower H2 O2 yield. This difference between peaks and valleys became more severe in depth. Near the Bragg peak, the increase in the primary yield of the valleys over the peaks was 6% and 4% for · OH ande aq - ${\rm e}^{-}_{\rm aq}$ respectively, while there was a decrease in the yield of H2 O2 by 16%. Given the similar ROS primary yields in the peaks and valleys of pMBRT and HeMBRT, the level of indirect DNA damage is expected to be directly proportional to the peak to valley dose ratio (PVDR). The difference in the primary yields implicates a lower level of indirect DNA damage in the valleys compared to the peaks than what would be suggested by the PVDR for xMBRT, and a higher level for CMBRT. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight the notion that depending on the particle chosen, one can expect different levels of ROS in the peaks and valley that goes beyond what would be expected by the macroscopic PVDR. The combination of MBRT with heavier ions is shown to be particularly interesting as the primary yield in the valleys progressively diverges from the level observed in the peaks as the LET increases. While differences in the reported · OH yields of this work implicated the indirect DNA damage, H2 O2 yields particularly implicate non-targeted cell signalling effects, and therefore this work provides a point of reference for future simulations in which the distribution of this species at more biologically relevant timescales could be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thongchai A M Masilela
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Institut Curie, Université PSL, Orsay, France
- Signalisation radiobiologie et cancer, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gregucci F, Spada S, Barcellos-Hoff MH, Bhardwaj N, Chan Wah Hak C, Fiorentino A, Guha C, Guzman ML, Harrington K, Herrera FG, Honeychurch J, Hong T, Iturri L, Jaffee E, Karam SD, Knott SR, Koumenis C, Lyden D, Marciscano AE, Melcher A, Mondini M, Mondino A, Morris ZS, Pitroda S, Quezada SA, Santambrogio L, Shiao S, Stagg J, Telarovic I, Timmerman R, Vozenin MC, Weichselbaum R, Welsh J, Wilkins A, Xu C, Zappasodi R, Zou W, Bobard A, Demaria S, Galluzzi L, Deutsch E, Formenti SC. Updates on radiotherapy-immunotherapy combinations: Proceedings of 6 th annual ImmunoRad conference. Oncoimmunology 2023; 12:2222560. [PMID: 37363104 PMCID: PMC10286673 DOI: 10.1080/2162402x.2023.2222560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Focal radiation therapy (RT) has attracted considerable attention as a combinatorial partner for immunotherapy (IT), largely reflecting a well-defined, predictable safety profile and at least some potential for immunostimulation. However, only a few RT-IT combinations have been tested successfully in patients with cancer, highlighting the urgent need for an improved understanding of the interaction between RT and IT in both preclinical and clinical scenarios. Every year since 2016, ImmunoRad gathers experts working at the interface between RT and IT to provide a forum for education and discussion, with the ultimate goal of fostering progress in the field at both preclinical and clinical levels. Here, we summarize the key concepts and findings presented at the Sixth Annual ImmunoRad conference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Sheila Spada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff
- Department of Radiation Oncology, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Nina Bhardwaj
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
- Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miulli General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, LUM University, Casamassima, Bari, Italy
| | - Chandan Guha
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center and Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Monica L. Guzman
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kevin Harrington
- The Institute of Cancer Research/The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre, London, UK
| | - Fernanda G. Herrera
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, University of Lausanne and Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research at the Agora Cancer Research Center, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jamie Honeychurch
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Theodore Hong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Lorea Iturri
- Institut Curie, Université PSL, CNRS UMR3347, INSERM U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Elisabeth Jaffee
- Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Sana D. Karam
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Simon R.V. Knott
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Constantinos Koumenis
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - David Lyden
- Children’s Cancer and Blood Foundation Laboratories, Departments of Pediatrics, and Cell and Developmental Biology, Drukier Institute for Children’s Health, Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Alan Melcher
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| | - Michele Mondini
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
- Université of Paris-Saclay, Saclay, France
- INSERM U1030, Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Villejuif, France
| | - Anna Mondino
- Division of Immunology, Transplantation and Infectious Diseases, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Zachary S. Morris
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI, USA
| | - Sean Pitroda
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Sergio A. Quezada
- Cancer Immunology Unit, Research Department of Haematology, University College London Cancer Institute, London, UK
| | - Laura Santambrogio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen Shiao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - John Stagg
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Universite de Montreal, Faculty of Pharmacy, Montreal, Canada
| | - Irma Telarovic
- Laboratory for Applied Radiobiology, Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Timmerman
- Departments of Radiation Oncology and Neurosurgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Marie-Catherine Vozenin
- Laboratory of Radiation Oncology, Radiation Oncology Service, Department of Oncology, CHUV, Lausanne University Hospital and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ralph Weichselbaum
- Department of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, Ludwig Center for Metastases Research, University of Chicago, IL, USA
| | - James Welsh
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anna Wilkins
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom, Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK
| | - Chris Xu
- School of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Roberta Zappasodi
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Immunology and Microbial Pathogenesis Program, Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences, New York, NY, USA
- Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Weiping Zou
- Departments of Surgery and Pathology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | - Sandra Demaria
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus, Villejuif, France
- Université of Paris-Saclay, Saclay, France
- INSERM U1030, Radiothérapie Moléculaire et Innovation Thérapeutique, Villejuif, France
| | - Silvia C. Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Grams MP, Deufel CL, Kavanaugh JA, Corbin KS, Ahmed SK, Haddock MG, Lester SC, Ma DJ, Petersen IA, Finley RR, Lang KG, Spreiter SS, Park SS, Owen D. Clinical aspects of spatially fractionated radiation therapy treatments. Phys Med 2023; 111:102616. [PMID: 37311338 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2023.102616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide clinical guidance for centers wishing to implement photon spatially fractionated radiation therapy (SFRT) treatments using either a brass grid or volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) lattice approach. METHODS We describe in detail processes which have been developed over the course of a 3-year period during which our institution treated over 240 SFRT cases. The importance of patient selection, along with aspects of simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance, and treatment delivery are discussed. Illustrative examples involving clinical cases are shown, and we discuss safety implications relevant to the heterogeneous dose distributions. RESULTS SFRT can be an effective modality for tumors which are otherwise challenging to manage with conventional radiation therapy techniques or for patients who have limited treatment options. However, SFRT has several aspects which differ drastically from conventional radiation therapy treatments. Therefore, the successful implementation of an SFRT treatment program requires the multidisciplinary expertise and collaboration of physicians, physicists, dosimetrists, and radiation therapists. CONCLUSIONS We have described methods for patient selection, simulation, treatment planning, quality assurance and delivery of clinical SFRT treatments which were built upon our experience treating a large patient population with both a brass grid and VMAT lattice approach. Preclinical research and patient trials aimed at understanding the mechanism of action are needed to elucidate which patients may benefit most from SFRT, and ultimately expand its use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael P Grams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Christopher L Deufel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - James A Kavanaugh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Kimberly S Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Safia K Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Michael G Haddock
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Scott C Lester
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Daniel J Ma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Ivy A Petersen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Randi R Finley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Karen G Lang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Sheri S Spreiter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Sean S Park
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Schneider T, Malaise D, Pouzoulet F, Prezado Y. Orthovoltage X-ray Minibeam Radiation Therapy for the Treatment of Ocular Tumours-An In Silico Evaluation. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15030679. [PMID: 36765637 PMCID: PMC9913874 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15030679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Radiotherapeutic treatments of ocular tumors are often challenging because of nearby radiosensitive structures and the high doses required to treat radioresistant cancers such as uveal melanomas. Although increased local control rates can be obtained with advanced techniques such as proton therapy and stereotactic radiosurgery, these modalities are not always accessible to patients (due to high costs or low availability) and side effects in structures such as the lens, eyelids or anterior chamber remain an issue. Minibeam radiation therapy (MBRT) could represent a promising alternative in this regard. MBRT is an innovative new treatment approach where the irradiation field is composed of multiple sub-millimetric beamlets, spaced apart by a few millimetres. This creates a so-called spatial fractionation of the dose which, in small animal experiments, has been shown to increase normal tissue sparing while simultaneously providing high tumour control rates. Moreover, MBRT with orthovoltage X-rays could be easily implemented in widely available and comparably inexpensive irradiation platforms. (2) Methods: Monte Carlo simulations were performed using the TOPAS toolkit to evaluate orthovoltage X-ray MBRT as a potential alternative for treating ocular tumours. Dose distributions were simulated in CT images of a human head, considering six different irradiation configurations. (3) Results: The mean, peak and valley doses were assessed in a generic target region and in different organs at risk. The obtained doses were comparable to those reported in previous X-ray MBRT animal studies where good normal tissue sparing and tumour control (rat glioma models) were found. (4) Conclusions: A proof-of-concept study for the application of orthovoltage X-ray MBRT to ocular tumours was performed. The simulation results encourage the realisation of dedicated animal studies considering minibeam irradiations of the eye to specifically assess ocular and orbital toxicities as well as tumour response. If proven successful, orthovoltage X-ray minibeams could become a cost-effective treatment alternative, in particular for developing countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Schneider
- Institut Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
- Correspondence:
| | - Denis Malaise
- Department of Ophthalmology, Institut Curie, 75005 Paris, France
- LITO, INSERM U1288, Institut Curie, PSL University, 91898 Orsay, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- LITO, INSERM U1288, Institut Curie, PSL University, 91898 Orsay, France
- Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Institut Curie, PSL University, 91400 Orsay, France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Institut Curie, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, 91400 Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mirjolet C, Baude J, Galluzzi L. Dual impact of radiation therapy on tumor-targeting immune responses. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2023; 378:xiii-xxiv. [PMID: 37438022 DOI: 10.1016/s1937-6448(23)00114-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/14/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Céline Mirjolet
- Radiation Oncology Department, Preclinical Radiation Therapy and Radiobiology Unit, GF Leclerc Centre, Unicancer, Dijon, France; TIReCS Team, UMR INSERM 1231, Dijon, France.
| | - Jérémy Baude
- Radiation Oncology Department, Preclinical Radiation Therapy and Radiobiology Unit, GF Leclerc Centre, Unicancer, Dijon, France
| | - Lorenzo Galluzzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States; Sandra and Edward Meyer Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States; Caryl and Israel Englander Institute for Precision Medicine, New York, NY, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Iturri L, Bertho A, Lamirault C, Juchaux M, Gilbert C, Espenon J, Sebrie C, Jourdain L, Pouzoulet F, Verrelle P, De Marzi L, Prezado Y. Proton FLASH Radiation Therapy and Immune Infiltration: Evaluation in an Orthotopic Glioma Rat Model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2022:S0360-3016(22)03639-2. [PMID: 36563907 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.12.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 12/02/2022] [Accepted: 12/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE FLASH radiation therapy (FLASH-RT) is a promising radiation technique that uses ultrahigh doses of radiation to increase the therapeutic window of the treatment. FLASH-RT has been observed to provide normal tissue sparing at high dose rates and similar tumor control compared with conventional RT, yet the biological processes governing these radiobiological effects are still unknown. In this study, we sought to investigate the potential immune response generated by FLASH-RT in a high dose of proton therapy in an orthotopic glioma rat model. METHODS AND MATERIALS We cranially irradiated rats with a single high dose (25 Gy) using FLASH dose rate proton irradiation (257 ± 2 Gy/s) or conventional dose rate proton irradiation (4 ± 0.02 Gy/s). We first assessed the protective FLASH effect that resulted in our setup through behavioral studies in naïve rats. This was followed by a comprehensive analysis of immune cells in blood, healthy tissue of the brain, and tumor microenvironment by flow cytometry. RESULTS Proton FLASH-RT spared memory impairment produced by conventional high-dose proton therapy and induced a similar tumor infiltrating lymphocyte recruitment. Additionally, a general neuroinflammation that was similar in both dose rates was observed. CONCLUSIONS Overall, this study demonstrated that FLASH proton therapy offers a neuro-protective effect even at high doses while mounting an effective lymphoid immune response in the tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorea Iturri
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France.
| | - Annaïg Bertho
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Charlotte Lamirault
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Marjorie Juchaux
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Cristèle Gilbert
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Julie Espenon
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| | - Catherine Sebrie
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Laurène Jourdain
- CEA, CNRS, Inserm, Service Hospitalier Frédéric Joliot, BIOMAPS Université Paris-Saclay, Orsay, France
| | - Frédéric Pouzoulet
- Institut Curie, PSL University, Département de Recherche Translationnelle, CurieCoreTech-Experimental Radiotherapy (RadeXp), Paris, France
| | - Pierre Verrelle
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO (U1288), Orsay, 91898 France; Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898 France
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Institut Curie, Campus Universitaire, PSL Research University, University Paris Saclay, INSERM LITO (U1288), Orsay, 91898 France; Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay, Radiation Oncology Department, Campus Universitaire, Institut Curie, PSL Research University, Orsay, 91898 France
| | - Yolanda Prezado
- Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS UMR3347, Inserm U1021, Signalisation Radiobiologie et Cancer, Orsay, France
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bertho A, Iturri L, Prezado Y. Radiation-induced immune response in novel radiotherapy approaches FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF CELL AND MOLECULAR BIOLOGY 2022; 376:37-68. [PMID: 36997269 DOI: 10.1016/bs.ircmb.2022.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The last several years have revealed increasing evidence of the immunomodulatory role of radiation therapy. Radiotherapy reshapes the tumoral microenvironment can shift the balance toward a more immunostimulatory or immunosuppressive microenvironment. The immune response to radiation therapy appears to depend on the irradiation configuration (dose, particle, fractionation) and delivery modes (dose rate, spatial distributions). Although an optimal irradiation configuration (dose, temporal fractionation, spatial dose distribution, etc.) has not yet been determined, temporal schemes employing high doses per fraction appear to favor radiation-induced immune response through immunogenic cell death. Through the release of damage-associated molecular patterns and the sensing of double-stranded DNA and RNA breaks, immunogenic cell death activates the innate and adaptive immune response, leading to tumor infiltration by effector T cells and the abscopal effect. Novel radiotherapy approaches such as FLASH and spatially fractionated radiotherapies (SFRT) strongly modulate the dose delivery method. FLASH-RT and SFRT have the potential to trigger the immune system effectively while preserving healthy surrounding tissues. This manuscript reviews the current state of knowledge on the immunomodulation effects of these two new radiotherapy techniques in the tumor, healthy immune cells and non-targeted regions, as well as their therapeutic potential in combination with immunotherapy.
Collapse
|