Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop bipartition: A novel metabolic operation in treating obese type II diabetes mellitus

One Anastomosis Transit Bipartition (OATB): Rational and Mid-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The "One-anastomosis transit bipartition" (OATB) is a promising emerging technique in the metabolic syndrome treatment.

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the results achieved with OATB in the first 5 years after surgery.

METHOD

Cross-sectional, retrospective study, with individuals undergoing primary OATB. Individuals included in the study were: ≥ 18 years, BMI ≥ 35 kg/m2; and excluded smoking habits, drug dependence, inflammatory bowel diseases. The data analyzed demographic, anthropometric, surgical, clinical, and nutritional.

RESULTS

Sixty eight participants, 75% women, average age 45.5 years and BMI 41 kg/m2. Associated diseases: osteoarthritis (52.9%), hypertension (48.5%) and type 2 diabetes mellitus-T2DM (39.7%). All underwent laparoscopy, without conversions. Average operative time is 122.6 ± 31.7 min, and hospital stay is 2.2 ± 0.8 days. The common channel length 27 and 41 patients with 250 cm and 300 cm respectively. We registered no intraoperative complications, 2 (2.9%) early complications, and 14 (20.6%) late complications. In the first 6 months, 94.7% (250 cm) and 88.9% (300 cm) of the patients no longer used medication for T2DM, with no statistical difference between the two groups. The incidence of nutritional disorders at any time during follow-up: hypovitaminosis D (14.7%), folate hypovitaminosis (14.7%), elevated PTH (7.4%), hypoproteinemia (5.9%) and anemia (5.9%). We found no statistically significant difference between 250 and 300 cm common channel groups.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that OATB is a safe and effective technique, demonstrating good control of T2DM and metabolic syndrome. There is a requirement to treat previous nutritional deficits. We need more long-term evidence and comparison to other surgical techniques.

Sleeve gastrectomy with one anastomosis bipartition versus one anastomosis gastric bypass: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

One anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is a new recognized metabolic surgery, but the problem that we cannot screen the excluded stomach is a troubling issue in China. The emergence of sleeve gastrectomy plus one anastomosis bipartition (SG + OAB) makes us see a hope to solve this problem.

OBJECTIVES

By comparing the efficacy of the two surgical methods, to evaluate whether SG + OAB surgery can solve the dilemma faced by OAGB that the excluded stomach cannot be screened.

METHODS

A retrospective study to compare the patients who underwent OAGB and SG + OAB was conducted. The main outcome measures were (1) operation risk, (2) weight loss, and (3) diabetes remission at 6 months.

RESULTS

This study was conducted in the bariatric/metabolic surgical center. From November 2021 to February 2022, a total of 30 patients with obesity who received SG + OAB surgery were recruited. Another matched 60 patients undergoing OAGB were recruited as control group. There was no difference in preoperative age (32.15 ± 9.02 vs. 34.47 ± 7.22; p = .224), female ratio (83% vs. 85%; p = .837), and BMI (36.18 ± 5.30 vs. 34.68 ± 5.58; p = .217) between the two groups. OAGB had a shorter mean operation time (121.67 ± 20.41 vs. 143.50 ± 25.07 min; p < .001) and a lower intraoperative blood loss (21.92 ± 12.35 vs. 32.43 ± 22.01 mL; p = .005), but a longer postoperative flatus passage (2.13 ± 0.43 vs. 1.87 ± 0.43 days; p = .007) compared with the SG + OAB group. Two patients (6.7%) developed major surgical complication in SG + OAB group but no major complication developed in OAGB group. At 6 months after surgery, SG + OAB had a higher %total weight loss than OAGB (31.05 ± 3.12 vs. 28.14 ± 5.43%; p = .015), but diabetes remission rate was similarly high in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SG + OAB operation had a non-inferior or even better weight loss than OAGB, with a similar glycemic control efficacy. However, the high complication rate of SG + OAB is the major drawback that needs attention.

Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Jejunal Bypass as a Treatment for Morbid Obesity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Single-anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SASJ) bypass is a bariatric surgery technique with promising results. However, evidence of its efficacy and safety is still lacking. This study aimed to summarize the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of SASJ bypass surgery in the treatment of morbid obesity. The literature was searched for English-language studies published from inception till November 26, 2023, on MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ProQuest, Scopus, SCINAPSE, and Google Scholar. The search terms included "morbid obesity," "bariatric surgery," and "single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass." Extracted data included the body mass index (BMI) before and after surgery, percent total weight loss (%TWL), percent excess weight loss (%EWL), and improvement in preoperative comorbidities. Pooling of the data was done using random effects or fixed-effect models based on the presence of significant heterogeneity. Nine studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The change in BMI from baseline at 12 months after SASJ bypass was significant (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -3.576, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -5.423, -1.730; I² = 99.23%). At 12 months after surgery, the pooled %TWL was 42.526 (95% CI = 37.948, 47.105; I² = 97.15%), and the pooled %EWL was 75.258 (95% CI = 67.061, 83.456; I² = 99.26%). The pooled incidence of postoperative improvement in diabetes mellitus was 91% (95% CI = 79.6%, 98%, I² = 82%). The overall rate of complications was 9.9% (95% CI = 2.5%, 21.6%; I² = 92.64%). Regarding the short- and mid-term outcomes, SASJ bypass is a safe and effective procedure for weight loss in patients with morbid obesity, with an acceptable rate of complications. The procedure is also associated with a marked improvement in obesity-related comorbidities.

Comparison of Single Versus Double Anastomosis Bariatric Metabolic Surgery in Obesity: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Major BMS are modified through loop rather than Roux-en-Y type reconstruction recently, and this study systematically reviews the BMS from the perspective of SA (single anastomosis) and DA (double anastomosis) procedures, aiming to research the differences among bariatric procedures. A total of 39 studies compared SA- and DA-BMS were finally eligible for analysis after searching in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Compared with DA, SA shortens operative time and decreases complications especially obstruction, internal hernia, and reoperation. SA-GB (gastric bypass) has significantly higher %TWL and T2DM remission rate than DA-GB 1- and 5-year postoperatively. SA-DS (duodenal switch) has similar 1-year %TWL and lower 5-year %TWL, and comparable 1- and 5-year T2DM remission with DA-DS. SA provides significant advantages about simplicity and safety. This, together with the shorter learning curve, makes SA a promising choice.

BRAZILIAN MULTI-SOCIETY POSITION STATEMENT ON EMERGING BARIATRIC AND METABOLIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES

This Brazilian multi-society position statement on emerging bariatric and metabolic surgical procedures was issued by the Brazilian Society of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery (SBCBM), the Brazilian College of Digestive Surgery (CBCD), and the Brazilian College of Surgeons (CBC). This document is the result of a Brazilian Emerging Surgeries Forum aimed at evaluating the results of surgeries that are not yet listed in the Federal Council of Medicine (CFM), the regulatory agency that oversees and regulates medical practice in Brazil. The Forum integrated more than 400 specialists and academics with extensive knowledge about bariatric and metabolic surgery, representing the three surgical societies: SBCBM, CBC, and CBCD. International speakers participated online and presented their experiences with the techniques under discussion, emphasizing the regulatory policies in their countries. The indications for surgery and the subsequent procedures were carefully reviewed, including one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB), single anastomosis duodeno-ileal with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S or OADS), sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SGTB), and sleeve gastrectomy with ileal interposition (SGII). The recommendations of this document are based on an extensive literature review and discussions among bariatric surgery specialists from the three surgical societies. We concluded that patients with a body mass index over 30 kg/m2 may be candidates for metabolic surgery in the presence of comorbidities (arterial hypertension and type 2 diabetes) with no response to clinical treatment of obesity or in the control of other associated diseases. Regarding the surgical procedures, we concluded that OAGB, OADS, and SGTB are associated with low morbidity rates, satisfactory weight loss, and resolution of obesity-related comorbidities such as diabetes and arterial hypertension. SGII was considered a good and viable promising surgical alternative technique. The recommendations of this statement aim to synchronize our societies with the sentiments and understandings of most of our members and also serve as a guide for future decisions regarding bariatric surgical procedures in our country and worldwide.

Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Transit Loop Bipartition and Transit Bipartition in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Obesity: A Retrospective Analysis

AIM

We aimed to compare 1-year postoperative results of patients with obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (LSG-TB) and transit loop bipartition (LSG-TLB) and mini gastric bypass (MGB).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective comparison of 2 novel bariatric surgery techniques with MGB. Primary outcome measure of the study was a rate of T2DM remission. Secondary outcomes included excess body mass index (BMI) loss, improvement in hepatosteatosis, and duration of operation. Revision surgery needs were also assessed.

RESULTS

Overall, 32 patients underwent the LSG-TLB, 15 underwent LSG-TB, and 50 underwent MGB. Mean age and sex distribution were comparable for all groups. Presurgical BMI was similar in MGB and LSG + TB groups, whereas LSG + TLB group had significantly lower BMI values compared with the MGB group. In both groups, BMI values reduced significantly compared with respective baseline values. Excess BMI loss was significantly higher in patients who underwent LSG-TLB compared with patients treated with LSG-TB and MGB. Bariatric surgery procedures lasted shorter in LSG-TLB than in LSG-TB. However, the shortest of all was MGB. The remission of T2DM rates were 71% and 73.3% in LSG-TLB and LSG-TB groups, respectively ( P > 9.999). The rate of revision surgeries was comparable in both groups.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, LSG-TLB took less time and provided significantly higher excess BMI loss compared with LSG-TB. T2DM remission and improvement rates were similar in both groups. LSG-TLB seemed like a promising bariatric surgery technique in patients with obesity and T2DM.

Mid-term outcomes after single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass in treatment of morbid obesity

BACKGROUND

According to several short-term studies, single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass offers similar weight loss to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGB) with fewer complication and better comorbidity reduction/resolution. Long-term data on this operation is lacking in the literature. The purpose of this study was to analyze the outcomes of SASI bypass up to 4 years.

METHODS

This study is a retrospective cohort analysis of 366 patients with morbid obesity who underwent primary SASI bypass from January 2018 to February 2022.

RESULTS

The mean age and preoperative body mass index (BMI) were 41 years (range 22-71 years) and 43.9 ± 6.5 kg/m², respectively. Follow-up was available for 229 patients at 1-year (89%), 112 patients at 2-year (75%), 61 patients at 3-year (75%), and 35 patients at 4-year (71%). The intraoperative, short-term, and long-term complication rates were 0%, 2.5%, 4.6%, respectively. After 4 years, mean percentage excess weight loss (%EWL) was 93.3% and total weight loss (%TWL) was 41.2%. Remission of comorbidities was 93% for type 2 diabetes mellitus, 73% for hypertension, 83% for hyperlipidemia, 79% for sleep apnea, and 25% for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Biliary gastritis and ulcers are seldom. Eight patients developed de novo GERD symptoms requiring proton pump inhibitor treatment. None of the patients in our study had hypoalbuminemia or malabsorption that did not respond to increased protein intake and vitamin or mineral supplementation.

CONCLUSION

SASI bypass appears to be safe, and one of the most effective bariatric procedures regarding weight loss and obesity related comorbidities. The double-outlet created in this procedure seemingly minimizes nutritional complications.

Innovative Bariatric Procedures and Ethics in Bariatric Surgery: the IFSO Position Statement

With the rise in obesity and bariatric procedures worldwide, there has been a surge in new and innovative procedures that has been increasingly offered to patients. In this position statement, IFSO highlights the importance of surgical ethics in innovation and when offering new procedures. Furthermore, the task force reviewed the current literature to describe which procedures can be offered as mainstream outside research protocols versus those that are still investigational and need further data.

Single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SAS-J) bypass as a treatment for morbid obesity, technique and review of 1986 cases and 6 Years follow-up. Retrospective cohort

BACKGROUND

Santoro's operation is a sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition. The operation aims to maintain passage to the duodenum to minimize nutritional deficiency. This procedure is rapidly changed to single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass. SAS-J bypass is a modification of SASI with a short biliary limb.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This study is a retrospective study of prospectively collected data. The study includes a comprehensive review of 1986 patients who underwent SAS-J bypass over 6 years. The total number is used to evaluate the perioperative data. One- and two-year follow-up was used to evaluate weight loss and comorbidities; follow-up of more than 5 years was used to obtain long-term results.

RESULTS

In this study, 70.4% of patients were female and 29.6% were male. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 44.7. The mean age was 42 years. Regarding comorbidities, 25.8% of the patients had type 2 diabetes, 31% were hypertensive, 14.2% had sleep apnea syndrome, 6.6% had gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), and 39.6% had hyperlipidemia. Of the 1294 patients who complete one-year follow up, %EWL reached 87%. Blood glucose levels were normalized in 98.5% of patients, hypertension remitted in 93%, hyperlipidemia improved in 97%, SAS is improved in all cases, and GERD improved in 89% of patients. After 5 years, 94 patients' BMI decreased from 44.3 to 28.3 without significant nutritional deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic SAS-J bypass is an effective and simple alternative bariatric procedure at short- and long-term follow-up.

Short-term Results of Transit Bipartition to Promote Weight Loss After Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy

Objective

To evaluate (1) the efficacy of transit bipartition (TB) as revisional bariatric surgery (RBS) after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG); (2) the impact of the length of the common channel (CC) on weight loss.

Background

LSG in combination with TB has been shown to be highly efficacious for treating morbid obesity. The role of TB as RBS to address the problem of primary failure or weight recidivism after LSG is less well defined.

Methods

Observational study of outcomes in 100 morbidly obese patients who received a TB following LSG. Follow-up examinations (FE) were performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Variables analyzed included BMI, percent excess weight loss (%EWL), total body weight loss (%TBWL), effect on obesity-related conditions and complications.

Results

The mean BMI before LSG was 49.9 ± 8.5 kg/m2. A nadir of 32.7 ± 6.1 kg/m2 was reached 22.1 ± 16.9 months after LSG (%EWL 70.0 ± 14.5). The time interval between LSG and TB was 52.2 ± 26.6 months at which the BMI had increased to 37.6 ± 7.1 kg/m2 and %EWL decreased to 49.4 ± 19.7. Following TB, the BMI decreased continuously to 31.4 ± 5.7 kg/m2 after 12 months with a parallel increase in %EWL to 74.7 ± 20.3 and %TWL reaching 36.3 ± 10.5. Weight loss was significantly higher for CC length of 250 versus 300 cm after 12 months (BMI 29.4 ± 5.3/33 ± 5.3 kg/m2, P = 0.002; %EWL 79.8 ± 26.6/70.4 ± 17; P = 0.009). Improvement of comorbidities was observed in a high proportion of patients. Major early complications occurred in 3% of the patients.

Conclusion

TB is an effective second-step procedure to address insufficient weight loss or weight recidivism after LSG. CC length of 250 versus 300 cm had a significant impact. While most improvements of obesity-related comorbidities are likely linked to weight loss, amelioration of GERD is largely mediated by accelerated gastric emptying. Major complications were observed in 3% of patients and managed without fatalities.

Emerging Procedures in Bariatric Metabolic Surgery

Bariatric/metabolic surgery has emerged as an option for significant and durable weight loss in the treatment of clinically severe obesity; there is increasing demand for bariatric/metabolic surgery worldwide. New procedures have been developed and changed the face of modern bariatric surgery. Gastrointestinal metabolic surgery is a new treatment modality for obesity-related type 2 diabetes mellitus for patients with body mass index greater than 35 kg/m². Providing safe bariatric/metabolic surgery, training qualified bariatric surgeons, and developing better techniques are important issues. This article discusses emerging procedures; a multitude of bariatric metabolic procedures enables surgeons to tailor treatment to patients' needs.

A Rodent Model of Jejunal-Ileal Loop Bipartition (JILB): a Novel Malabsorptive Operation

BACKGROUND

We designed a novel malabsorptive procedure named as jejunal-ileal loop bipartition (JILB), in which a jejunal-ileal loop is created to reduce the effective length of food chyme passage in the small bowel, but without exclusion of any segment of the intestine. This study is to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of JILB on weight loss and glycemic control in obese diabetic mouse model.

METHODS

High-fat diet-induced C57BL/6 mice with typical obese and diabetic phenotypes were randomly divided into two groups according to the surgical procedure performed, including JILB (n = 8) and sham group (n = 8). Age-matched naïve C57BL/6 mice fed with rodent chow diet were adopted as normal controls. Body weight, food intake, fasting plasma glucose (FPG), fasting plasma insulin (FPI), and oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) were measured in vivo before and 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery. Plasma glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) was assayed before and 15 min after oral glucose challenge at the 8th week postoperatively.

RESULTS

Comparing to the sham animals, JILB group consumed similar amount of food, but had lower body weight after surgery (P < 0.01). It led to significant lower FPG (p < 0.05) and improved glucose tolerance with lower FPI (p < 0.001). And GLP-1 secretion at 15 min after oral glucose challenge was higher than shams (P < 0.05). No intestinal obstruction was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

JILB is potentially a metabolic and bariatric procedure that leads to effective weight loss and diabetes remission in obese diabetic subjects.

The outcomes of single anastomosis sleeve jejunal bypass as a treatment for morbid obesity (Two-year follow-up)

INTRODUCTION

Santoro's operation is a sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition. The aim of the procedure is to keep pass to the duodenum to decrease nutritional deficiency and to allow endoscopic management of obstructive jaundice. To be easier, this procedure was rapidly altered to a single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI). In this study, we shifted the anastomosis up to the jejunum to evaluate the effect of laparoscopic single anastomosis sleeve jejunal (SASJ) bypass as a treatment for morbid obesity and related comorbidities. In addition, the effect of the SASJ procedure on nutritional deficiency was examined.

METHODS

In this study, 150 morbidly obese patients underwent SASJ bypass with a biliary limb length of 200-250 cm. All patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months. We evaluated all cases by assessing BMI, complications, nutritional status, and obesity-related comorbidities.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 30.6 years, and the mean body mass index (BMI) was 44.6 kg/m². Of the patients, 35 (23.2%) had type two diabetes and 47 (31.3%) were hypertensive. Postoperative bleeding occurred in two cases (1.3%). One patient developed a gastric leak (0.7%), and five patients developed biliary gastritis (3.3%). One patient (0.7%) developed a pulmonary embolism. The %EWL reached 85% in 1 year. Normalization of blood glucose occurred within 2 months after surgery in all diabetic patients. Hypertension underwent remittance in 89% of hypertensive patients. All patients were gradually weaned from four types of multivitamin regimens to only one multivitamin regimen without apparent nutritional deficiency.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic SASJ bypass is an effective, safe, and simple procedure for treating morbid obesity and comorbid conditions with least nutritional deficiency. However, long-term studies are needed.

Single-Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass: Hopes and Concerns after a Two-Year Follow-up

BACKGROUND

Single-anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass is a simplification of sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition. Both share a metabolic foundation through early postprandial ileal brake, and SASI bypass has the advantages of shorter operative time and less incidence of internal herniation. This study evaluates the safety and outcome of SASI bypass with 2-year follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent SASI bypass in the period between June 2016 and January 2019. The primary outcome was weight loss and diabetic remission.

RESULTS

Three hundred twenty-two patients underwent SASI bypass with a mean age of 37.4 ± 15 years and a mean body mass index of 50.1 ± 7.7 kg/m². Thirteen patients (4%) had early major postoperative complications. The 1-year percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) was 86.9 ± 9.2, and diabetic remission rate was 98.2%. The 2-year %EWL was 96.7 ± 5, and diabetic remission rate was 97.9%. Twenty-six patients had gastroesophageal reflux that improved in 21 (80.7%) patients, remained stationary in 4 (15.4%) patients, and worsened in one patient who required reversal. One patient (0.3%) had severe protein-energy malnutrition and is prepared for reversal. Technical variations had no significant impact on %EWL or diabetic remission.

CONCLUSION

SASI bypass had a promising outcome in terms of 2-year %EWL, diabetic remission, and improvement of preoperative GERD. However, stationary or progressive course of GERD is a substantial possibility. Although the double-outlet for the gastric content allows duodenal access, it may be an obstacle to the standardization of postoperative care. The double-outlet is not a guarantee for absence of malnutrition.

Early Results of Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy With Loop Bipartition

PURPOSE

We evaluated early results of this new procedure of transit loop bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy (TLB-SG), making a comparison with transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between January 2017 and September 2017, 22 patients have undergone transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy or TLB-SG surgery in our clinic. Patients' body mass index, excess body mass index loss, and HOMA-IR were calculated before and after the surgical operation. The values of c-peptide, HgA1C, insulin, blood sugar, albumin, Hg, urea, creatinine, calcium, total cholesterol, 25-hydroxy vitamin D, and vitamin B12 were evaluated retrospectively.

RESULTS

Vitamin and mineral deficiency, malnutrition, and anemia were not observed in both groups during the follow-up process. The operation time was shorter in the TLB-SG operation. Both groups were found to be effective at the expected level in terms of weight loss, diabetes remission, and improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

TLB-SG is a more effective and simpler method, becoming a candidate for being the most frequently performed surgical operation, in the field of metabolic surgery.

Laparoscopic Ileal Interposition with Diverted Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Transit Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy for Better Glycemic Outcomes in T2DM Patients

BACKGROUND

Metabolic procedures provide better outcomes for obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our aim was to compare the glycemic regulation in patients that have undergone the laparoscopic ileal interposition with diverted sleeve gastrectomy (II-DSG), laparoscopic transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy (TB-SG), and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) throughout a 12-month follow-up period retrospectively.

METHODS

This study considered patients with T2DM who underwent metabolic procedures. The postoperative changes in the glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, insulin, cholesterol, body mass index, and total weight loss (TWL) were compared retrospectively. The intended outcome was to reach a long lasting fasting blood glucose (FBG) <126 mg/dl. A multivariate regression analysis was applied to define the predictive markers in glucose regulation.

RESULTS

Present study consisted of 83 patients with a mean age of 47.25 ± 6.58 years, mean preoperative BMI of 37.36 ± 2.71 kg/m², and mean outcomes in the HbA1C and FBG of 9.05 ± 1.33% and 237 ± 15 mg/dl, respectively. There were similar correlations in BMI and total weight loss (TWL). At 12-month follow up period, compared to LSG group, TB-SG and II-DSG groups have higher remission proportions (35.3, 67.9, 54.7, respectively, p < 0.05) with similar TWL% (22.35, 27.14, 23.16%) outcomes. The II-DSG and TB-SG results drew closer together toward the end of this study interval unlike the LSG group.

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that II-DSG and TB-SG ensured significant regression rates during the follow-up period. Since the TB-SG achieved these outcomes by finite anastomoses and intervening segments, it was considered to be a superior procedure compared to II-DSG and LSG procedures.

A Feasibility Study of Novel “Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy with Loop Gastroileal Bypass” for Obesity: An Indian Experience

Objective:

This study is aimed to evaluate the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a novel technique: laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop gastroileal bypass.

Summary of Background Data:

Standard bariatric surgeries, such as sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, although very effective, carry certain inherent limitations and inevitable sequelae. Newer bariatric/metabolic surgeries are required to address these limitations.

Methods:

Between February 2016 and February 2018, a total of 113 Indians suffering from obesity with or without type 2 diabetes underwent sleeve gastrectomy with loop gastroileal bypass. Meticulous analysis of prospectively documented data was performed.

Results:

Mean age was 40.74 ± 10.4 years, mean body mass index was 43.48 ± 7.57 kg/m2. A total of 54 of 113 patients (47.79%) had type 2 diabetes. Mean duration of surgery was 148.36 ± 38.56 minutes. Common channel length was 250 cm in 18 patients, 300 cm in 88 patients, and 350 cm in 7 patients. There were no major complications, such as major intra-abdominal bleeding, perforation, or leak. According to Indian standards, when 23 kg/m2 was taken as a cutoff upper limit for normal weight, percentage of excess weight loss was 25.04% ± 10.13%, 67.81% ± 23.17% and 94.33% ± 24.96%, respectively, at 1, 6, and 12 months after surgery. A total of 51 of 54 patients with type 2 diabetes stopped using antidiabetes medications within 1 week after surgery.

Conclusion:

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy with loop gastroileal bypass appears to be a promising procedure to address limitations associated with standard bariatric procedures.

Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass: New Step in the Evolution of Bariatric Surgeries

PURPOSE

Single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass (SASI) procedure appears as a new metabolic and bariatric surgery based on Santoro's operation, in which a sleeve gastrectomy is followed by a side-to-side gastroileal anastomosis. The study is aimed to evaluate the short-term outcomes of laparoscopic single anastomosis sleeve ileal bypass with respect to postoperative weight loss and metabolic and nutritional effects on patients.

METHODS

Forty-five morbidly obese patients with a mean age of 31.2 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 43.2 kg/m² underwent SASI bypass. Postoperatively, all patients were followed up at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, and during each visit data about their BMI, obesity-related comorbidities, and nutritional status were collected.

RESULTS

One year after the surgery, mean BMI decreased to 29.1 kg/m² and there was significant decrease in plasma level of fasting blood glucose, insulin, and low-density lipoprotein. On the other hand, there was significant increase in high-density lipoprotein plasma level, whereas hemoglobin and albumin plasma level remained normal. Six months after the surgery, calcium plasma level showed mild decrease in two cases, which was improved with multivitamin tablets. In 93% of our patients, multivitamin supplements were stopped after six months of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic SASI bypass has been shown to be an effective, safe, and simple procedure for the treatment of morbid obesity and its associated metabolic consequences. Moreover, it results in minimal postoperative nutritional complications in comparison to other bariatric procedures.

Effects of sleeve gastrectomy with jejuno-jejunal or jejuno-ileal loop on glycolipid metabolism in diabetic rats

AIM

To explore the effect of sleeve gastrectomy (SG) with jejuno-jejunal or jejuno-ileal loop on glycolipid metabolism in diabetic rats.

METHODS

Diabetic rats, which were induced by high-fat diet (HFD), nicotinamide and low-dose streptozotocin, underwent sham operations, SG, SG with jejuno-ileal loop (SG-JI) and SG with jejuno-jejunal loop (SG-JJ) followed by postoperative HFD. Then, at the time points of baseline and 2, 12 and 24 wk postoperatively, we determined and compared several variables, including the area under the curve for the results of oral glucose tolerance test (AUC_OGTT), serum levels of triglyceride, cholesterol and ghrelin in fasting state, homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), body weight, calorie intake, glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 and insulin secretions after glucose gavage at dose of 1 g/kg.

RESULTS

At 2 wk postoperatively, rats that underwent SG, SG-JJ and SG-JI, compared with sham-operated (SHAM) rats, demonstrated lower body weight, calorie intake and ghrelin (P < 0.05 vs SHAM), enhanced secretion of insulin and GLP-1 after glucose gavage (P < 0.05 vs SHAM), improved AUC_OGTT, HOMA-IR, fasting serum triglyceride and cholesterol (AUC_OGTT: 1616.9 ± 83.2, 837.4 ± 83.7, 874.9 ± 97.2 and 812.6 ± 81.9, P < 0.05 vs SHAM; HOMA-IR: 4.31 ± 0.54, 2.94 ± 0.22, 3.17 ± 0.37 and 3.41 ± 0.22, P < 0.05 vs SHAM; Triglyceride: 2.35 ± 0.17, 1.87 ± 0.23, 1.98 ± 0.30 and 2.04 ± 0.21 mmol/L, P < 0.05 vs SHAM; Cholesterol: 1.84 ± 0.21, 1.53 ± 0.20, 1.52 ± 0.20 and 1.46 ± 0.23 mmol/L). At 12 wk postoperatively, rats receiving SG-JJ and SG-JI had lower body weight, reduced levels of triglyceride and cholesterol and elevated level of GLP-1 compared to those receiving SG (P < 0.05 vs SG). At 24 wk after surgery, compared with SG, the advantage of SG-JJ and SG-JI for glucolipid metabolism was still evident (P < 0.05 vs SG). SG-JI had a better performance in lipid metabolism and GLP-1 secretion of rats than did SG-JJ.

CONCLUSION

SG combined with intestinal loop induces better glycolipid metabolism than simple SG, with the lipid metabolism being more improved with SG-JI compared to SG-JJ.

Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: More than a restrictive bariatric surgery procedure?

Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) is a restrictive bariatric surgery technique that was first used as part of restrictive horizontal gastrectomy in the original Scopinaro type biliopancreatic diversion. Its good results as a single technique have led to a rise in its use, and it is currently the second most performed technique worldwide. SG achieves clearly better results than other restrictive techniques and is comparable in some aspects to the Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the current gold standard in bariatric surgery. These benefits have been associated with different pathophysiologic mechanisms unrelated to weight loss such as increased gastric emptying and intestinal transit, and activation of hormonal mechanisms such as increased GLP-1 hormone and decreased ghrelin. The aim of this review was to highlight the salient aspects of SG regarding its historical evolution, pathophysiologic mechanisms, main results, clinical applications and perioperative complications.

Early Effect of Bariatric Surgery on the Circadian Rhythms of Adipokines in Morbidly Obese Women

BACKGROUND

The circadian pattern of adipokines is blunted in obese subjects, and we tested the hypothesis that bariatric surgery could normalize the 24-hr pattern of adipokines. Therefore, this study was designed to examine the early impact of the newly designed sleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartition (SGTB) surgery on the circadian pattern of leptin, adiponectin, and resistin in morbidly obese subjects.

METHODS

The study group included six morbidly obese women [body mass index (BMI) 41.3 ± 1.53 kg/m(2)] who underwent SGTB and four lean women (BMI 18.61 ± 0.92 kg/m(2)). Blood from all subjects was collected before and 3 months after bariatric surgery every 6 hr throughout the 24-hr period. The circadian pattern of leptin, adiponectin, and resistin was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay or Luminex techniques.

RESULTS

Lean women exhibited rise of plasma leptin levels at nighttime, whereas obese women had an increase in the overall plasma leptin levels throughout the 24-hr period, lacking the physiological rise of nocturnal leptin levels compared to controls. Obese women had a decrease in 24-hr adiponectin levels and similar plasma resistin levels compared to controls. Three months after SGTB, obese women lost 16.0% (P < 0.005) of their initial body weight and had a decrease in overall 24-hr leptin levels. However, there was no recovery of the nocturnal rise in leptin levels 3 months after SGTB. The 24-hr adiponectin levels were still decreased after SGTB surgery compared to controls, while resistin levels were decreased only during night time after SGTB.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggested that SGTB is an efficient innovative procedure to rapidly decrease 24-hr leptin levels. However, after 3 months, SGTB was not enough to recover the physiological nocturnal rise of leptin levels present in lean subjects.