The role of active surveillance of small renal masses

The evolving management of small renal masses

Small renal masses (SRMs) are a heterogeneous group of tumours with varying metastatic potential. The increasing use and improving quality of abdominal imaging have led to increasingly early diagnosis of incidental SRMs that are asymptomatic and organ confined. Despite improvements in imaging and the growing use of renal mass biopsy, diagnosis of malignancy before treatment remains challenging. Management of SRMs has shifted away from radical nephrectomy, with active surveillance and nephron-sparing surgery taking over as the primary modalities of treatment. The optimal treatment strategy for SRMs continues to evolve as factors affecting short-term and long-term outcomes in this patient cohort are elucidated through studies from prospective data registries. Evidence from rapidly evolving research in biomarkers, imaging modalities, and machine learning shows promise in improving understanding of the biology and management of this patient cohort.

Utility of cytopathologic diagnosis of adult solid renal lesions: An academic Institution's 10-year experience

BACKGROUND

Fine needle aspiration (FNA) and/or needle core biopsy (NCB) are increasingly used for managing patients with renal lesions, especially small renal masses (SRMs). One of the treatment options for SMRs is active surveillance. Hence, accurate diagnosis of renal lesions is critical for treatment planning. The aim of this study is to investigate the utility of FNA and/or NCB in the diagnosis of adult renal lesions at our institute.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Laboratory information system was queried over a period of 10 years (2011-2020) to identify cases of FNA and/or NCB with touch preparation (TP) of adult renal masses. Patient demographics, cytopathologic diagnoses, ancillary tests and follow-up surgical resection data were reviewed and correlated.

RESULTS

A total 138 cases from 138 patients (male = 80, female = 58) were identified. Sixty-one (44.20%) cases had FNA and NCB, 48 (34.78%) had NCB only and 29 (21.01%) had FNA only. 118 (85.50%) cases had definitive diagnoses and 13 (9.42%) had indeterminant diagnoses and seven cases were non-diagnostic (5.07%). Most common benign and malignant diagnoses were oncocytoma and clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC). 41/138 (29.71%) cases had follow-up resection. There were no false positive or false negative cases. Subtyping was feasible in majority cases with only 3/138 (2.17%) misclassified cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Majority of renal masses (85.50%) had definitive cytology diagnoses. Only three had misclassification. FNA and/or NCB are useful methods in diagnosing and subclassifying adult renal masses and showed high accuracy (91.89%) when compared to surgical resections.

MDCT diagnosis of synchronous primary gastrointestinal tract carcinoma and other solid malignancies: case series study

Background

The presentation of synchronous multiple primary tumors is rare. The aim of this report was to report an uncommon series of cases diagnosed with synchronous gastrointestinal tract carcinoma and other solid malignancies by multidetector computed tomography.

Case presentation

Our report included 34 patients with synchronous gastrointestinal tract carcinoma and other solid malignancies from November 2009 to September 2019. They were 14 men and 20 women (mean age, 65.5 year; range, 52–82 years). The highest number of GIT cases were colonic carcinomas detected in 70% (24/34) of the patients. The most frequent extra-gastrointestinal primary malignancy sites were renal cell and breast carcinomas, 17.6% (6/34) of each.

Conclusions

Careful preoperative evaluation is recommended to detect this pattern of synchronous extra-gastrointestinal tumors. More reports of such cases should help to clarify the pathogenesis of this phenomenon and may lead to a new treatment strategy for synchronous gastrointestinal malignancy and other solid malignancies.

Multi-detector computed tomography (MDCT) evaluation of synchronous renal cell carcinoma and other solid malignancies

Background

Multiple primary malignant neoplasms (MPMNs) became more prevalent as the population aged and medical technology progressed. The purpose of this research was to review the findings of multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in synchronous renal cell carcinoma and other solid tumors.

Results

31 individuals with synchronous renal cell carcinoma and additional solid cancers were included in this retrospective analysis. CT scanning was carried out using 64 MDCT scanners. All sixty-two malignancies were undergoing pathological assessment. Out of 685 patients with renal cell carcinoma, 31 individuals were identified with another primary solid cancer that occurred concurrently. All of our instances were pathologically verified. In all 31 individuals, clear renal cell carcinoma was found. The most frequent extra-renal malignancies were hepatocellular carcinoma (10/31), followed by breast carcinoma (4/31), non-Hodgkin lymphoma (4/31), bronchogenic carcinoma (3/31), colonic carcinoma (3/31), prostatic carcinoma (2/31), urinary bladder carcinoma (1/31), periampullary carcinoma (1/31), mucoepidermoid carcinoma (1/31) and skin squamous cell carcinoma (1/31) as well as malignant hemangioendothelioma (1/31).

Conclusion

MDCT scanning was an accurate imaging method for diagnosing synchronous renal cell carcinoma and other solid tumors. Even in the face of numerous cancers, the goal of therapy in cancer patients must always be curative. During the pretreatment examination, the potential of synchronous double malignancies with renal cell carcinoma should be explored.

Urgent and unexpected findings in oncology and hematology patients: A practical approach to imaging

Urgent and unexpected findings are very common in oncology and haematology patients. This article reviews the most important points included in the European Society of Radiology's guidelines and proposes a practical approach to reporting and communicating these findings more efficiently. This approach is explained with illustrative examples. Radiologists can provide added value in the management of these findings by helping referring clinicians reach the best decisions. To this end, it is essential to know the imaging manifestations of the most common findings that must be reported urgently, such as the specific toxicity of different treatments, the complications of tumours and catheters, infections, and thrombosis. Moreover, it is crucial to consider the individual patient's treatment, risk factors, clinical situation, and immune status.

Imaging considerations for thermal and radiotherapy ablation of primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma

Ablative (percutaneous and stereotactic) thermal and radiotherapy procedures for management of both primary and metastatic renal cell carcinoma are increasing in popularity in clinical practice. Data suggest comparable efficacy with lower cost and morbidity compared to nephrectomy. Ablative therapies may be used alone or in conjunction with surgery or chemotherapy for treatment of primary tumor and metastatic disease. Imaging plays a crucial role in pre-treatment selection and planning of ablation, intra-procedural guidance, evaluation for complications, short- and long-term post-procedural surveillance of disease, and treatment response. Treatment response and disease recurrence may differ considerably after ablation, particularly for stereotactic radiotherapy, when compared to conventional surgical and chemotherapies. This article reviews the current and emerging role of imaging for ablative therapy of renal cell carcinoma.

Assessment of predictors of renal cell carcinoma progression after nephrectomy at short and intermediate term follow-up and implication on surveillance protocols

BACKGROUND

Prediction of risk of RCC progression after surgery is important for follow-up planning. We identified predictors of progression-free survival (PFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) in a large single institutional cohort and investigated patterns and sites of progression according to stage and grade.

METHODS

Node-negative non-metastatic clear-cell RCC (ccRCC) patients treated with radical or partial nephrectomy from 2000 to 2020 were included. Sites of progression were defined as thoracic, abdominal and others (bone/brain). Kaplan Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression (MCR) models tested for PFS and CSS.

RESULTS

Of 384 clear cell RCC N0M0 patients, 301 (78.4%) vs. 83 (21.6%) were pT1-2 vs. pT3-4, respectively; 253 (65.9%) vs. 130 (33.9%) were G1-G2 vs. G3-G4. Thoracic progressions occurred in 2.7% pT1-T2 vs. 21.7% pT3-T4 and 2.8% G1-G2 vs. 14.6% G3-G4 tumors. Abdominal progressions occurred in 4.0% pT1-T2 vs. 13.3% pT3-T4 and 4.3% G1-G2 vs. 9.2% G3-G4. Other progressions occurred in 0.3% pT1-T2 vs. 9.6% pT3-T4 and 0.8% G1-G2 vs. 5.4% G3-G4 (5.4%). Five-year PFS and CSS were 81.7 and 90.6%, respectively. At MCR models, pT3-4 (HR 9.1, p<0.001), G3-G4 (HR 2.7, p=0.003) and PSMs (HR 6.1, p<0.001) independently predicted PFS. Similarly, pT3-4 (HR 10.1, p<0.001), G3-G4 (HR 4.1, p=0.02), and PSMs (HR 5.2, p=0.04) independently predicted CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

In ccRCC N0M0 patients, G3-G4, pT3-4, PSMs were independent predictors of progression after surgery. Lower stage and grade ccRCCs progress predominantly in the abdominal sites and may be followed with less frequent extra-abdominal imaging compared to more advanced/aggressive tumors.

MDCT evaluation of synchronous breast carcinoma and other solid malignancies

BACKGROUND

Multiple primary malignancies are two or more malignancies in an individual without any relationship between the tumors. The development of improved diagnostic techniques, increased survival of cancer patients and the growing life expectancy have all contributed to the increased frequency of this phenomenon.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to review the multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) findings of synchronous breast carcinoma and other solid malignancies.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 65 patients confirmed with diagnosis of synchronous breast carcinoma and other solid malignancies. CT scanning was performed using 128 MDCT in all patients. All one hundred-thirty malignancies underwent pathological evaluation.

RESULTS

Out of 4120 patients with breast carcinoma; 65 patients were diagnosed with other synchronous primary solid malignancy. All one hundred-thirty malignancies were confirmed pathologically. Breast carcinoma detected in all 65 patients; of them metastatic breast carcinoma detected in 8 patients. Hepatocellular carcinoma was detected in 18 patients, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in 12 patients, endometrial carcinoma in 8 patients, uterine sarcoma in 3 patients, malignant mixed Müllerian tumor in one patient, ovarian carcinoma in 5 patients, renal cell carcinoma in 4 patients, thyroid carcinoma in 4 patients, gastric carcinoma in 2 patients, colonic carcinoma in 2 patients, ano-rectal carcinoma in one patient, hilar cholangiocarcinoma in 2 patients, malignant melanoma in 2 patients and bronchogenic carcinoma in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with breast carcinoma have a risk of other synchronous primary malignancy. So, careful preoperative examination is recommended to improve the patients' prognosis. MDCT scanning is accurately imaging modality for evaluation of synchronous breast carcinoma and other solid malignancies. The aim of treatment in cancer patients should always be curative even in the presence of multiple malignancies.

Urgent and unexpected findings in oncology and hematology patients: a practical approach to imaging

Urgent and unexpected findings are very common in oncology and hematology patients. This article reviews the most important points included in the European Society of Radiology's guidelines and proposes a practical approach to reporting and communicating these findings more efficiently. This approach is explained with illustrative examples. Radiologists can provide added value in the management of these findings by helping referring clinicians reach the best decisions. To this end, it is essential to know the imaging manifestations of the most common findings that must be reported urgently, such as the specific toxicity of different treatments, the complications of tumors and catheters, infections, and thrombosis. Moreover, it is crucial to consider the individual patient's treatment, risk factors, clinical situation, and immune status.

Summary from the Kidney Cancer Association's Inaugural Think Thank: Coalition for a Cure

Close to 74,000 cases of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are diagnosed each year in the United States. The past 2 decades have shown great developments in surgical techniques, targeted therapy and immunotherapy agents, and longer complete response rates. However, without a global cure, there is still room for further advancement in improving patient care in this space. To address some of the gaps restricting this progress, the Kidney Cancer Association brought together a group of 27 specialists across the areas of clinical care, research, industry, and advocacy at the inaugural "Think Tank: Coalition for a Cure" session. Topics addressed included screening, imaging, rarer RCC subtypes, combination drug therapy options, and patient response. This commentary summarizes the discussion of these topics and their respective clinical challenges, along with a proposal of projects for collaboration in overcoming those needs and making a greater impact on care for patients with RCC moving forward.

Available active surveillance follow-up protocols for small renal mass: a systematic review

PURPOSE

To evaluate follow-up strategies for active surveillance of renal masses and to assess contemporary data.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive search of electronic databases (Embase, Medline, and Cochrane). A systematic review of the follow-up protocols was carried out. A total of 20 studies were included.

RESULT

Our analysis highlights that most of the series used different protocols of follow-up without consistent differences in the outcomes. Most common protocol consisted in imaging and clinical evaluation at 3, 6, and 12 months and yearly thereafter. Median length of follow-up was 42 months (range 1-137). Mean age was 74 years (range 67-83). Of 2243 patients 223 (10%) died during the follow-up and 19 patients died of kidney cancer (0.8%). The growth rate was the most used parameter to evaluate disease progression eventually triggering delayed intervention. Maximal axial diameter was the most common method to evaluate growth rate. CT scan is the most used, probably because it is usually more precise than kidney ultrasound and more accessible than MRI. Performing chest X-ray at every check does not seem to alter the clinical outcome during AS.

CONCLUSION

The minimal cancer-specific mortality does not seem to correlate with the follow-up scheme. Outside of growth rate and initial size, imaging features to predict outcome of RCC during AS are limited. Active surveillance of SRM is a well-established treatment option. However, standardized follow-up protocols are lacking. Prospective, randomized, trials to evaluate the best follow-up strategies are pending.

Percutaneous tumor ablation versus partial nephrectomy for small renal mass: the impact of histologic variant and tumor size

BACKGROUND

The aim, of this study was to investigate recurrence rates in patients with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) undergone partial nephrectomy (PN), radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cryoablation (Cryo).

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated data from 665 (81.4%), 68 (8.3%) and 83 (10.3%) patients who underwent PN, RFA and Cryo, respectively. Kaplan-Meier curves depict recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates in the overall population and after stratifying according to tumor's histology (namely, clear cell RCC and non-clear RCC) and size (namely <2 cm and 2-4 cm). Multivariable Cox regression model was used to identify predictors of recurrence. Cumulative-incidence plots evaluated disease recurrence and other causes of mortality (OCM).

RESULTS

Patients referred to PN experienced higher RFS rate compared to those treated with RFA and Cryo at 60-month in the overall population (96.4% vs. 79.4% vs. 87.8%), in patients with clear cell RCC (93.3% vs. 75% vs. 80.4%) and in those with tumor of 2-4 cm (97.3% vs. 78% and 84.4%; all P≤0.01). In patients with non-clear cell RCC and with tumor <2cm, PN showed higher RFS rate at 60-month as compared to RFA (97.9% vs. 84.4% and 95.1% vs. 78.1%, respectively: all P≤0.02). At multi-variate analysis, ablative techniques (RFA [HR=4.03] and Cryo [HR=3.86]) were independent predictors of recurrence (all P<0.03). At competing risks analysis, recurrence rate and OCM were 7.3% and 1.3% vs. 25% and 7.2% vs. 19.9% and 19.9% for PN, RFA and Cryo, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

PN and Cryo showed similar RFS rates in patients with non-clear cell RCC and with renal mass <2cm.

Renal tumor growth rate in patients with previously normal CT scan: Analysis of the initial stage of growth

OBJECTIVE

Most of the studies regarding natural history of renal masses are based on active surveillance series and suggest that the renal masses have a slow growth rate. Nevertheless, only a few studies report the time between a normal computed tomography (CT) scan to the first detection of a tumor. We aimed to analyze the growth rate in newly diagnosed kidney tumors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed patients with enhancing renal masses that developed after a normal CT scan, which was performed at most 12 months earlier. Variables examined included patient age, gender, tumor size, volume, tumor linear growth rate (LGR). All cases were surgically treated. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare variables. A p<0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

RESULTS

We found 31 patients with 33 lesions. Male to female ratio was 1.58 (19/12). The average age was 59.2 years (standard deviation [SD]±12.1), and the mean tumor size was 4.27 cm (SD±4.3). Tumor LGR was 0.87 cm/month (range: 0.28-1.66) and presumed to be 10.4 cm at 1 year (range: 3.36-19.9). Tumor LGR for time detection at <6 month or ≥6 months were 1.1 cm/month and 0.68 cm/month (range: 0.27-1.08 and 0.88-1.76, respectively; p=0.0004), respectively. Tumor LGRs for low- and high-grade tumors were 0.89 cm/month and 0.83 cm/month (p=0.65), respectively. Median volume was 36.1 cm³ (range: 2.61-143.7), and for low and high grade the median volumes were 27.9 cm³ and 47.6 cm³, respectively (p=0.54). Malignant pathology was present in 93.9 % (31 of 33) of masses (lesions).

CONCLUSION

We found differences in tumor LGR in tumors detected before and after 6 months. We did not find any correlation between tumor growth rate and Fuhrman grade system, gender, histology, or age. We found the highest LGR published up to date.

Interventional oncology at the time of COVID-19 pandemic: Problems and solutions

•

COVID-19 pandemic modifies in-depth interventional oncology practice.

•

Identification of aerosol-generating procedures is crucial for safety.

•

Curative treatment of cancers should not be delayed during the COVID-19 pandemic.

•

Solutions to overcome shortage in anesthesiology resources are described.

The COVID-19 pandemic has deeply impacted the activity of interventional oncology in hospitals and cancer centers. In this review based on official recommendations of different international societies, but also on local solutions found in different expert large-volume centers, we discuss the changes that need to be done for the organization, safety, and patient management in interventional oncology. A literature review of potential solutions in a context of scarce anesthesiologic resources, limited staff and limited access to hospital beds are proposed and discussed based on the literature data.

Predictive Value of In Vivo MR Spectroscopy With Semilocalization by Adiabatic Selective Refocusing in Differentiating Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma From Other Subtypes

OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the diagnostic value of in vivo MR spectroscopy (MRS) with semilocalization by adiabatic selective refocusing (semi-LASER MRS) in differentiating clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) from the non-clear cell subtype. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Sixteen patients with biopsy-proven RCC or masses highly suspicious for RCC were prospectively recruited to participate in the study. Single-voxel ¹H spectra were acquired using a 3-T MRI system, with a semi-LASER sequence acquired for renal tumors in 14 patients and for healthy renal tissue (control tissue) in 12 patients. Offline processing of the MR spectra was performed. MRI and spectra analysis were performed independently by radiologists who were blinded to the reference histopathologic findings. RESULTS. Semi-LASER MRS was diagnostic for nine of 11 patients (82%) with histopathologically proven clear cell RCC, showing a strong lipid peak in seven patients and a weaker lipid resonance in two others, whereas control spectra showed weakly positive findings in only one patient. MRS findings were negative for lipid resonance in two of three patients (67%) with non-clear cell tumors and were weakly positive in another patient. Semi-LASER MRS had a high sensitivity and positive predictive value of 82% and 90%, respectively, in addition to a specificity of 67%, a negative predictive value of 50%, and overall accuracy of 79% for the detection of clear cell RCC. Lipid resonance was detected by MRS for four of six clear cell RCCs with no intravoxel fat on chemical-shift MRI. CONCLUSION. The preliminary results of the present study show that semi-LASER MRS is promising for the noninvasive discrimination of clear cell RCC from non-clear cell RCC on the basis of detection of lipid resonance and that it provides an incremental yield compared with chemical-shift MRI.

Roles for active surveillance in renal cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

With this review, we describe the most recent advances in active surveillance as well as diagnosis and management of small renal masses (SRMs).

RECENT FINDINGS

We discuss diagnosis, differentiation of solid from cystic lesions, risk prediction and treatment of the SRM. A better understanding of the disease facilitates the use of more conservatory treatments, such as active surveillance. Active surveillance has been increasingly accepted not only for SRM, but also for larger tumors and even metastatic patients. Exiting advances in risk prediction will help us define which patients can be safely managed with active surveillance and which require immediate treatment. Meanwhile, the use of renal tumor biopsies is still an important tool for these cases.

SUMMARY

Active surveillance is an option for many patients with renal masses. Noninvasive methods for diagnosis and risk prediction are being developed, but meanwhile, renal tumor biopsy is a useful tool. A better understanding of the disease increases the number of patients who can undergo active surveillance fully certain of the safety of their management.

Update on Indications for Percutaneous Renal Mass Biopsy in the Era of Advanced CT and MRI

OBJECTIVE. The objective of this article is to review the burgeoning role of percutaneous renal mass biopsy (RMB). CONCLUSION. Percutaneous RMB is safe, accurate, and indicated for an expanded list of clinical scenarios. The chief scenarios among them are to prevent treatment of benign masses and help select patients for active surveillance (AS). Imaging characterization of renal masses has improved; however, management decisions often depend on a histologic diagnosis and an assessment of biologic behavior of renal cancers, both of which are currently best achieved with RMB.

[Limits of surgery in uro-oncology]

The limits of cancer surgery in uro-oncology are characterized by a carefully weighed risk of surgical feasibility and oncological necessity. The limits of uro-oncological cancer surgery do not represent fixed dogmas but ideally these more or less cognitive boundaries move based on new scientific findings, improved imaging modalities, optimized surgical techniques and perioperative care. The limits of cancer surgery are defined by patient-specific parameters, the biological aggressiveness of the tumor itself, the skills and expertise of the surgeon, and adequate perioperative care of the patient. Dependent on the origin of the cancers of the upper and lower urogenital tract, the specific particularities of each individual cancer in terms of prognosis need to be known, taking into consideration the newest molecular insights and modern multimodality treatment regimes. Only the consideration of the above mentioned basics will allow the best decision to be made with the patient concerning the optimal individual treatment. The current article highlights general parameters of the patient, tumor and surgeon which might define the limits of cancer surgery in uro-oncology. In addition, specific clinical scenarios are discussed with regard to surgery limits in cancer of the kidney, the prostate and the testis.

Prevalence and outcomes of incidental imaging findings: umbrella review

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the evidence on prevalence and outcomes of incidental imaging findings.

DESIGN

Umbrella review of systematic reviews.

DATA SOURCES

Searches of MEDLINE, EMBASE up to August 2017; screening of references in included papers.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Criteria included systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies that gave a prevalence of incidental abnormalities ("incidentalomas"). An incidental imaging finding was defined as an imaging abnormality in a healthy, asymptomatic patient or an imaging abnormality in a symptomatic patient, where the abnormality was not apparently related to the patient's symptoms. Primary studies that measured the prevalence of incidentalomas in patients with a history of malignancy were also considered in sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

20 systematic reviews (240 primary studies) were identified from 7098 references from the database search. Fifteen systematic reviews provided data to quantify the prevalence of incidentalomas, whereas 18 provided data to quantify the outcomes of incidentalomas (13 provided both). The prevalence of incidentalomas varied substantially between imaging tests; it was less than 5% for chest computed tomography for incidental pulmonary embolism in patients with and without cancer and whole body positron emission tomography (PET) or PET/computed tomography (for patients with and without cancer). Conversely, incidentalomas occurred in more than a third of images in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), chest computed tomography (for incidentalomas of thorax, abdomen, spine, or heart), and computed tomography colonoscopy (for extra-colonic incidentalomas). Intermediate rates occurred with MRI of the spine (22%) and brain (22%). The rate of malignancy in incidentalomas varied substantially between organs; the prevalence of malignancy was less than 5% in incidentalomas of the brain, parotid, and adrenal gland. Extra-colonic, prostatic, and colonic incidentalomas were malignant between 10% and 20% of the time, whereas renal, thyroid, and ovarian incidentalomas were malignant around a quarter of the time. Breast incidentalomas had the highest percentage of malignancy (42%, 95% confidence interval 31% to 54%). Many assessments had high between-study heterogeneity (15 of 20 meta-analyses with I² >50%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is large variability across different imaging techniques both in the prevalence of incidentalomas and in the prevalence of malignancy for specific organs. This umbrella review will aid clinicians and patients weigh up the pros and cons of requesting imaging scans and will help with management decisions after an incidentaloma diagnosis. Our results can underpin the creation of guidelines to assist these decisions.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42017075679.

Patient and provider experiences with active surveillance: A scoping review

Objective

Active surveillance (AS) represents a fundamental shift in managing select cancer patients that initiates treatment only upon disease progression to avoid overtreatment. Given uncertain outcomes, patient engagement could support decision-making about AS. Little is known about how to optimize patient engagement for AS decision-making. This scoping review aimed to characterize research on patient and provider communication about AS, and associated determinants and outcomes.

Methods

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library were searched from 2006 to October 2016. English language studies that evaluated cancer patient or provider AS views, experiences or behavioural interventions were eligible. Screening and data extraction were done in duplicate. Summary statistics were used to describe study characteristics and findings.

Results

A total of 2,078 studies were identified, 1,587 were unique, and 1,243 were excluded based on titles/abstracts. Among 344 full-text articles, 73 studies were eligible: 2 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 4 chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), 6 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and 61 prostate cancer. The most influential determinant of initiating AS was physician recommendation. Others included higher socioeconomic status, smaller tumor size, comorbid disease, older age, and preference to avoid adverse treatment effects. AS patients desired more information about AS and reassurance about future treatment options, involvement in decision-making and assessment of illness uncertainty and supportive care needs during follow-up. Only three studies of prostate cancer evaluated interventions to improve AS communication or experience.

Conclusions

This study revealed a paucity of research on AS communication for DCIS, RCC and CLL, but generated insight on how to optimize AS discussions in the context of routine care or clinical trials from research on AS for prostate cancer. Further research is needed on AS for patients with DCIS, RCC and CLL, and to evaluate interventions aimed at patients and/or providers to improve AS communication, experience and associated outcomes.

Percutaneous radiofrequency and microwave ablation in the treatment of renal tumors - 10 years of experience

Introduction

The standard radical treatment of renal cell carcinoma is surgical resection, but it is not suitable for patients with serious medical comorbidities and solitary kidney tumors. Minimally invasive ablation techniques could be an appropriate therapeutic alternative.

Aim

To retrospectively evaluate the technical success, mid-term and long-term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency and microwave ablation in patients with small renal tumors.

Material and methods

Over the course of 10 years, 91 ablation procedures in 64 patients for 68 tumors, of size 12–60 mm, were performed using only conscious sedation. These ablations were done under the guidance of computed tomography. We treated 41 males and 23 females with solitary kidney tumors (14 cases) and tumors in non-surgical candidates (54 cases).

Results

In 50 (73.5%) tumors single treatment was successful; in 13 (19.1%) cases a second procedure was used successfully, and in the 5 largest tumors (sizes 45–60 mm, 7.4%) a third treatment was necessary. Within the follow-up 10 (15.6%) patients died, but none due to metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Only 1 serious complication was observed – retroperitoneal and psoatic hematoma. Early recurrence occurred in 18 (26.5%) tumors. Late recurrence was detected in 5 (7.4%) cases. In all cases complete local control of the renal tumors was reached.

Conclusions

Percutaneous ablation is a very effective treatment for patients with small renal tumors of the T1a group with a minimal complication rate.

Active Surveillance in Small Renal Masses in the Elderly: A Literature Review

CONTEXT

Small renal masses have become increasingly common due to widespread imaging; however, optimal management of these lesions in the elderly can be complex due to the competing risks of intervention, natural history of disease, patient comorbidities, and expectations. In the properly selected elderly patient, active surveillance remains an accepted and attractive treatment approach.

OBJECTIVE

We completed a literature review of small renal masses (enhancing, <4cm, T1aN0M0 disease) in the elderly, aged ≥70 yr, aimed at identifying the utility of active surveillance in this population. The primary outcomes were conversion to active treatment while on active surveillance and cancer-specific mortality. Secondary outcomes included predictors of treatment, type of treatment performed (partial nephrectomy, radical nephrectomy, and ablation), progression to metastases, all-cause mortality, tumor growth rate, and demographic data including age and Charlson Comorbidity Index.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive search of electronic databases (e.g., MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) using search terms "small renal mass" OR "SRM", AND "elderly," "senior," "aging," "geriatric," OR "octogenarian" was completed. All randomized controlled trials, nonrandomized comparison studies, and case series were included and screened by the reviewers. All comparison studies included in the systematic review were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tools.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seventeen primary studies including 36495 patients met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. All studies were retrospective institutional chart or the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database reviews. There was a low (4-26%) rate of conversion to active treatment for active surveillance in the identified studies over a follow-up interval of up to 91.5 mo. Overall mortality was substantial in this elderly cohort, with 15-51% of patients being deceased over the course of study follow-up; however, there was minimal cancer-specific mortality due to patients succumbing to alternative comorbid disease. In the future, patient comorbidity and biological age versus the natural history of the individualized tumor biology may play an increasing role in the discussion regarding treatment options and consideration of active surveillance.

CONCLUSIONS

Active surveillance is an effective management strategy in the elderly population. Few patients required the conversion to active treatment and there was low cancer-specific mortality. The majority of patients who expired over the course of the identified studies succumbed to alternative disease. The goal of treatment strategies should include weighing patient-specific prognosis relative to their competing health risks and treatment goals against the natural history of disease and risks of intervention.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In this review article, the authors examined the utility of active surveillance in the setting of a small localized renal mass in the elderly population. Despite being on surveillance, we found that cancer-specific outcomes were excellent, and overall mortality was often a result of comorbid disease. However, there is significant heterogeneity among elderly patients, and treatment approaches should be focused around patient-centered goals and prognosis.

Precision surgery and genitourinary cancers

The landscape of the surgical management of urologic malignancies has dramatically changed over the past 20 years. On one side, better diagnostic and prognostic tools allowed better patient selection and more reliable surgical planning. On the other hand, the implementation of minimally invasive techniques and technologies, such as robot-assisted laparoscopy surgery and image-guided surgery, allowed minimizing surgical morbidity. Ultimately, these advances have translated into a more tailored approach to the management of urologic cancer patients. Following the paradigm of "precision medicine", contemporary urologic surgery has entered a technology-driven era of "precision surgery", which entails a range of surgical procedures tailored to combine maximal treatment efficacy with minimal impact on patient function and health related quality of life. Aim of this non-systematic review is to provide a critical analysis of the most recent advances in the field of surgical uro-oncology, and to define the current and future role of "precision surgery" in the management of genitourinary cancers.