Urticarial vasculitis

Managing Urticarial Vasculitis: A Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm Based on Expert Consensus

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare and difficult-to-treat, small-vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis presenting with recurrent long-lasting wheals. So far, no guidelines and treatment algorithms exist that could help clinicians with the management of UV. In this review, we describe evidence on systemic treatments used for UV and propose a clinical decision-making algorithm for UV management based on the Urticarial Vasculitis Activity Score assessed for 7 days (UVAS7). Patients with occasional UV-like urticarial lesions and patients with UV with skin-limited manifestations and/or mild arthralgia/malaise (total UVAS7 ≤7 of 70) can be initially treated using the step-wise algorithm for chronic urticaria including second-generation H1-antihistamines, omalizumab, and cyclosporine A. Patients with UV with more severe symptoms (UVAS7 >7), especially those with hypocomplementemic UV, may require a multidisciplinary approach, particularly if underlying diseases, for example, systemic lupus erythematosus, cancer, or infection, are present. Immunomodulatory therapy is based on clinical signs and symptoms, and the drug availability and safety profile, and includes systemic corticosteroids, dapsone, hydroxychloroquine, anti-interleukin-1 agents, and other therapies. The level of evidence for all UV treatments is low. Prospective studies with current and novel drugs are needed and could provide further insights into UV pathogenesis and treatment.

Adult-Onset Still's Disease With Normal Ferritin Levels and Severe Sulfasalazine-Induced Probable Case of Drug Reaction With Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) Syndrome: A Unique Presentation and Management Challenges

Adult-onset Still's disease (AOSD) is an uncommon clinical condition with an uncertain cause, characterized by arthritis, fever, evanescent rash, and other systemic presentations. This case report describes a 26-year-old female who had a fever, arthralgia, vomiting, sore throat, bilateral distal extremities edema, hypertension, and normal ferritin. She was diagnosed with AOSD using the Yamaguchi criteria based on exclusion and was treated with hydroxychloroquine and sulfasalazine. The patient's arthralgia improved significantly. However, she returned with complaints of a diffuse erythematous burning, pruritic, maculopapular, non-evanescent rash caused by a severe reaction to sulfasalazine, with a skin biopsy revealing urticarial vasculitis, with probable DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome. This was treated with topical and short-course oral steroids, intravenous antibiotics, and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor, improving her condition remarkably. To the best of our knowledge, there are no prior reports of a case of AOSD with normal ferritin levels that also exhibited a severe reaction to sulfasalazine, compounded by complications due to NSAIDs (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and steroid use. This rarity distinguishes our case report.

Urticarial vasculitis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Urticarial vasculitis is a rare condition manifesting with a variety of clinical presentations ranging from skin limited lesions to life-threatening systemic illnesses. This review aims to highlight the recent findings on the etiology, diagnostic modalities, and therapeutic strategies and course of urticarial vasculitis.

RECENT FINDINGS

In addition to well established triggers, urticarial vasculitis (UV) cases associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-Cov2) disease and COVID-19 vaccines, vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic (VEXAS) syndrome, and adenosine deaminase (ADA) deficiency have been reported. A clinical-dermoscopic model for differentiating urticarial vasculitis has been developed with purpuric patches and globules favoring UV diagnosis and thus diminishing the need for histopathology. The efficacy of treatment modalities has been reviewed, and antihistamines, systemic corticosteroids, omalizumab, cyclophosphamide, tocilizumab, anti-interleukin (IL)-1 agents, and rituximab were shown to have the highest success rates. Regarding the durability of remission, rituximab, dapsone, and MMF were related to long-lasting treatment free responses. The course of hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis was investigated in an epidemiological study, revealing 5- and 10-year survival rates of 92% and 83%, respectively. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, septicemia, and end-stage renal disease were identified as causes of mortality.

SUMMARY

With the aid of dermoscopy, a noninvasive tool, differentiation from chronic spontaneous urticaria can be made, and the need for histopathological examination can be diminished. Although clear definitions and consensus criteria for performing disease severity are lacking, careful screening is needed to tailor the treatment on an individual basis. Emerging infections like SARS-CoV 2, vaccines, and autoinflammatory disorders like VEXAS syndrome and ADA deficiency are new associations. The optimal use of well established agents like systemic corticosteroids and immunomodulators are mainstay treatment modalities, whereas IL-1 inhibitors, omalizumab, rituximab and Janus Kinase inhibitors may represent viable alternatives in selected cases.

A Case of Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis Syndrome With Severe Renal and Gastrointestinal Involvement

We present a severe case of hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome (HUVS) and its diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. A 56-year-old male presenting with fever and impaired kidney function was diagnosed with HUVS. Before the initiated treatment was effective, he developed severe colon ischemia, and a subtotal colectomy was required. We discuss other affected organs, such as kidneys, lungs, the heart, and the skin. Pathophysiology is briefly reviewed and the difficulty of overlapping autoimmune diseases is discussed. Treatment continues to be challenging, as there is no consensus about the optimal immunosuppressive therapy.

Urticarial Vasculitis

Urticarial vasculitis is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by persistent edematous papules and plaques on the skin that last longer than 24 hours, often accompanied by systemic symptoms such as joint pain and fever. Unlike common urticaria, this condition involves inflammation of small blood vessels, leading to more severe and long-lasting skin lesions with a tendency to leave a bruiselike appearance. Diagnosis is challenging and may require a skin biopsy. Associated with underlying autoimmune diseases, treatment involves managing symptoms with medications such as antihistamines and corticosteroids, addressing the immune system's dysfunction, and treating any concurrent autoimmune conditions.

Lung Involvement in Pulmonary Vasculitis: A Radiological Review

Pulmonary vasculitis identifies a heterogeneous group of diseases characterized by inflammation, damage and necrosis of the wall of pulmonary vessels. The most common approach to classify vasculitis is according to etiology, therefore dividing them into primary and secondary, with a further sub-classification of primary vasculitis based on the size of the affected vessels (large, medium, and small). Pulmonary involvement is frequently observed in patients with systemic vasculitis and radiological presentation is not pathognomonic, but may vary between diseases. The main findings using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) include small vessel wall thickening, nodular lesions, cavitary lesions, reticular opacities, ground-glass opacities (GGO), consolidations, interlobular septal thickening, tracheobronchial stenosis, and aneurysmal dilatation of pulmonary arteries, with or without pleural effusion. Radiological diagnosis alone is difficult since signs and symptoms of lung vessel involvement are often non-specific and might overlap with other conditions such as infections, connective tissue diseases and neoplasms. Therefore, the aim of this review is to describe the most common radiological features of lung involvement in pulmonary vasculitis so that, alongside detailed clinical history and laboratory tests, a prompt diagnosis can be performed.

Navigating the diagnostic maze: A case presentation of C1q vasculitis mimicking hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis in a patient with systemic lupus erythematosus

In rare instances, patients with SLE may exhibit atypical clinical manifestations, such as Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis, which can pose diagnostic challenges. Here, we present a case report of a 28-year-old female with a history of SLE with lupus nephritis clase IV who developed HUV-like symptoms, ultimately leading to a diagnosis of C1q Vasculitis. This case underscores the importance of considering C1q Vasculitis in SLE patients presenting with HUV-like features and highlights Rituximab as a promising therapeutic option for managing this rare condition.

Non-Skin Related Symptoms Are Common in Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria and Linked to Active and Uncontrolled Disease: Results From the Chronic Urticaria Registry

BACKGROUND

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) can present with non-skin related symptoms (NSRS), including recurrent unexplained fever, joint, bone, or muscle pain (JBMP), and malaise, which also occur in other conditions that manifest with wheals (eg, urticarial vasculitis or autoinflammatory disorders) or without wheals (eg, infection).

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the rate of patients with CSU affected by fever, JBMP, and malaise, their trigger factors, links with clinical and laboratory characteristics, and their impact on everyday life and treatment responses.

METHODS

We analyzed baseline data from the Chronic Urticaria Registry of 2,521 patients with CSU who were aged 16 years or older.

RESULTS

One third of CSU patients (31.2%; 786 of 2,521) had one or more NSRS, including recurrent fever (5.3%), JBMP (19.1%), and/or malaise (18.6%). In a multivariable analysis, having one or more of these NSRS correlated with food and infection as trigger factors of urticaria (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.7 and 1.5), wheals of 24 hours or greater duration (aOR = 2.5), sleep disturbance (aOR = 2.4), anxiety (aOR = 2.8), comorbid atopic dermatitis (aOR = 2.1), gastrointestinal disease (aOR = 1.8), elevated leukocytes (aOR = 1.7) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (aOR = 1.5). In a bivariate analysis, these NSRS were additionally associated with higher disease activity (weekly Urticaria Activity Score, median: 21 vs 14; P = .009), longer disease duration (years, median: 2 vs 1; P = .001), the presence of angioedema (74.6% vs 58.7%; P < .001), worse quality of life (Chronic Urticaria Quality of Life Questionnaire, median: 42 vs 29; P < .001) and more frequent poor control of CSU (78% vs 69%; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of NSRS in a subpopulation of patients with CSU points to the need for better control of the disease, exclusion of comorbid conditions, and/or exclusion of urticarial vasculitis and urticarial autoinflammatory diseases.

Breaking Out of the Hive: A Case Report on Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis Syndrome

Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome (HUVS) is a rare autoimmune disorder characterized by chronic urticaria, systemic vasculitis, and hypocomplementemia, posing significant diagnostic challenges due to its overlap with common conditions and varied systemic manifestations. We report the case of a 36-year-old female with a history of post-birth cerebral hemorrhage and seizure disorder, who presented with abdominal pain, diarrhea, and subtle urticarial lesions. Initial investigations by gastroenterology suggested inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but persistent symptoms and evolving cutaneous signs prompted further evaluation. A skin biopsy demonstrated leukocytoclastic vasculitis, while serological tests showed hypocomplementemia and positive antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA), confirming HUVS. The patient's management included high-dose corticosteroids and mycophenolate mofetil, with partial symptom relief. Subsequent introduction of rituximab markedly improved her gastrointestinal and dermatological symptoms, highlighting its effectiveness in treating refractory HUVS. This case emphasizes the necessity for vigilance, interdisciplinary collaboration, and personalized treatment adaptations in managing HUVS.

Urticarial Vasculitis Induced by Adalimumab Biosimilar in an Elderly Female With Hidradenitis Suppurativa: A Case Report

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a type of small-vessel vasculitis, which is rarely associated with anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha medication. We describe a 72-year-old woman with multiple comorbidities on several medications, including an adalimumab biosimilar for Hurley stage II recalcitrant hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), who presented with new-onset severe angioedema and a rash with urticarial wheals that covered most of her body surface area. The diagnosis of drug-induced UV is supported by both the history of adalimumab biosimilar use and the histopathology result. The patient responded successfully to a course of doxycycline administered for three months, which was preceded by corticosteroid dosages, both orally and intravenously, to reduce inflammation. The given case highlights the correlation between a distinct dermatologic autoimmune manifestation and TNF-targeted therapy, demonstrating the importance for dermatologists to be aware of the potential side effects of adalimumab biosimilars in order to manage them effectively.

Annular dermatoses with rheumatologic implications

A wide variety of cutaneous disorders present with annular (ringlike) skin lesions, and some of them carry rheumatologic implications because they may involve the joints or belong to the spectrum of connective tissue diseases. The diagnosis of an annular rheumatologic skin disease is possible with a correct clinicopathologic correlation, with a correct anamnesis of the patient, with the evaluation of systemic symptoms, laboratory and instrumental investigations, and finally with a cutaneous biopsy.

Urticaria: A Narrative Overview of Differential Diagnosis

Urticaria is an inflammatory skin disorder that may occur in isolation or associated with angioedema and/or anaphylaxis. Clinically, it is characterized by the presence of smooth, erythematous or blanching, itchy swelling, called wheals or hives, which greatly vary in size and shape and last less than 24 h before fading to leave normal skin. Urticaria is the consequence of mast-cell degranulation that can be caused by immunological or non-immunological mechanisms. From a clinical point of view, many skin conditions can mimic urticaria and their recognition is mandatory for a correct management and therapeutic approach. We have reviewed all of the main relevant studies which addressed differential diagnosis of urticarial, published until December 2022. The National Library of Medicine PubMed database was used for the electronic research. The present review offers a clinical narrative overview, based on the available literature, of the principal skin disorders that can be misdiagnosed as urticaria (mainly autoinflammatory or autoimmune disorders, drug-induced reactions, and hyperproliferative diseases). The aim of this review is to provide clinicians a useful tool for correctly suspecting and identifying all of these conditions.

Normocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis secondary to Lyme disease: A rare association with challenging treatment

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare entity characterised by long-lasting recurrent episodes of urticarial lesions. Although frequently idiopathic, UV has been associated with multiple diseases, including infections. We present a case of Lyme disease (LD) as a trigger of normocomplementemic UV, a very rarely described association. The patient presented first with episodes of inflammatory polyarthritis and a positive serology for Borrelia burgdorferi, later followed by the appearance of long-lasting urticarial lesions, histologically suggestive of UV. Lyme arthritis resolved with doxycycline, but UV persisted. Response to cyclosporine was satisfactory but with side effects, and only methotrexate showed substantial and consistent improvement. This case reminds physicians that chronic urticaria with atypical characteristics should raise suspicion of UV. Possible triggers for this disease must be sought, even if rarely described, such as LD. Normocomplementemic UV frequently presents a therapeutic challenge, but methotrexate can be a particularly effective therapy in this setting.

Case Report of Serum Sickness-like Reaction following the First Dose of the Chimpanzee Adenovirus-Vectored AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine, ChAdOx1

Serum sickness-like reaction from serum sickness is critical. Serum sickness-like reaction has comparable symptoms to serum sickness, but their underlying pathophysiology is distinct. This delayed hypersensitivity response was first characterized as a drug-induced reaction and is uncommon in adults; it is more common in children. COVID-19 vaccinations are now being routinely given in the COVID-19 period, and adverse reactions to immunization have been recorded. We present a case of COVID-19 vaccination-induced serum sickness-like reaction which developed after receiving the first dose of AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine.

An update on anaphylaxis and urticaria

Notable scientific developments have taken place in the field of anaphylaxis and urticaria in recent years; they are highlighted in this review. Case-control studies, genome-wide association studies, and large omics analyses have promoted further insights into not only the underlying genetics but also the biomarkers of both anaphylaxis and urticaria. New evidence regarding IgE-dependent and non-IgE-dependent mechanisms of anaphylaxis and urticaria, including the Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor (MRGPR [formerly MRG]) signaling pathway, has been gained. Putative elicitors of anaphylactic reactions in the context of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination and impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the management and course of chronic urticaria have been reported. Clinical progress has also been made regarding the severity grading and risk factors of anaphylaxis, as well as the distinction of phenotypes and elicitors of both diseases. Furthermore, novel treatment approaches for anaphylaxis and subtypes of urticaria have been assessed, with different outcome and potential for a better disease control or prevention.

Acupuncture for gastrointestinal urticaria: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Introduction

The purpose of this review is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal urticaria (GU) and to provide a clinician's guide to GU treatment options.

Methods and analysis

We plan to search multiple databases (i.e., PubMed, EMBASE, Springer, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database and Wanfang Database) for studies published before September 1, 2022. We will electronically search for all relevant studies concerning clinical acupuncture treatments of GU, including unpublished conference articles and other gray literature. The language limit of this systematic review is Chinese and English. Any reports of clinical randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for the treatment of GU will be included in the study. Two researchers will perform independent data extraction to increase the quality of the data extraction. The primary outcome was the Urticaria Activity Score 7 (UAS7). Abdominal visual analog scale (VAS) for abdominal pain, dermatological life quality index (DLQI), the total effective rate, recurrence rate, and occurrence of adverse events were secondary outcomes. We will use RevMan V.5.3 statistical software for pairwise meta-analysis and ADDIS V.1.16.8 software for Bayesian network meta-analysis. If feasible, meta-regression and subgroup analyses will also be performed to address the potential causes of inconsistency and heterogeneity. We will conduct a GRADE assessment of the quality of evidence for the interventions included in this review.

Discussion

This study may validate acupuncture as an alternative therapy for the effective treatment of GU.

Trial registration number

PROSPERO CRD42022333977.

Cutaneous vasculitis and vasculopathy in the era of COVID-19 pandemic

Cutaneous vasculitides encompass a heterogeneous group of clinicopathological entities, which may occur as single-organ vasculitis of the skin or present as skin-limited variant of systemic vasculitis (i.e., skin-limited ANCA-associated vasculitis), and are triggered by various factors, including infections, drugs and vaccines. The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged us with a variety of both disease- and vaccine-associated skin manifestations, including vasculitis. Among the latter, cutaneous small-vessel vasculitis, previously known as leukocytoclastic vasculitis, seems to be the most reported in either scenario, i.e., natural infection and vaccination. Vasculopathy without true vasculitic changes on histology develops in but a minority of cases, mostly severe/critical COVID-19 patients, and appears to be the result of endothelial injury due to pauci-immune thromboembolic mechanisms. Herein, we provide an overview of the available literature on COVID-19-associated and anti-SARS-CoV-2-vaccine-associated cutaneous vasculitis. Although evidence is mostly limited to isolated reports, with a proportion of cases lacking histopathological confirmation, ample overlap with pre-pandemic forms is shown.

Efficacy and safety of omalizumab therapy in urticaria vasculitis

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a small-vessel leukocytoclastic vasculitis characterized by different clinical manifestations ranging from long-lasting urticarial lesions to severe and potentially life-threatening multi-organ involvement. Omalizumab (OMA), anti-IgE recombinant humanized IgG1 monoclonal antibody, has been successfully used to treat few cases of severe and/or refractory UV. In this study we report our experience on 6 patients with refractory normocomplementemic UV successfully treated with anti-IgE therapy (OMA), suggesting that this biological therapy may be a safe and effective therapeutic option in UV.

Hypocomplementemic Urticarial Vasculitis Syndrome Masquerading as Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Case Report

Introduction

Hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis syndrome (HUVS) is an infrequent immune complex-mediated condition characterized by nonpruritic urticarial lesions, low serum complement levels, and autoantibodies, associated with systemic manifestations like arthralgia/arthritis, angioedema, ocular inflammation with conjunctivitis, episcleritis, uveitis, renal, gastrointestinal, and pulmonary involvement. HUVS and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) overlap and the criteria for identifying HUVS as an entity distinct from SLE are lacking. Despite the diagnostic criteria established by Schwartz et al. [Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2014;26(5):502-9], differentiation from SLE is sometimes difficult as patients often also fulfill the classification criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). The prognosis of HUVS depends on the organ system involved. Lung disease results in significant morbidity and mortality and is made worse by smoking. Kidney involvement with glomerulonephritis may ultimately result in end-stage renal disease with the need for kidney transplant. Death may also occur due to acute laryngeal edema.

Case Presentation

We pre-sent a case of a 40-year-old female who had a diagnosis of SLE, presented with severe odynophagia, was found to have an erythematous macular rash, and had acute kidney injury attributed to contrast-related injury and cardiorenal syndrome. After the resolution of the AKI, she continued to have hematuria and low-grade proteinuria that led to a kidney biopsy that aided in the diagnosis of HUVS.

Discussion/Conclusion

Given the rarity of this disease and the difficulty in differentiating HUVS from other rheumatological diseases such as SLE, further accumulation of cases is necessary to understand the best diagnostic modality for this entity.

Erythema Multiforme Following Hepatitis A and Pneumococcal Vaccinations

Erythema multiforme (EM) is a rare cell-mediated immune response characterized by target or iris patches or plaques that present symmetrically on the extremities. This condition may be associated with pruritus but is usually self-limited and spontaneously resolves within 5 weeks of onset; prodromal symptoms are rare. Several known cases have been linked to vaccination, but many vaccines used in pediatric care have been reported as causative agents of EM. This case study offers an association of EM following administration of the hepatitis A and pneumococcal vaccines.

What Do We Need to Know About Musculoskeletal Manifestations of COVID-19?: A Systematic Review

»

COVID-19 is a disease that is challenging science, health-care systems, and humanity. An astonishingly wide spectrum of manifestations of multi-organ damage, including musculoskeletal, can be associated with SARS-CoV-2.

»

In the acute phase of COVID-19, fatigue, myalgia, and arthralgia are the most common musculoskeletal symptoms.

»

Post-COVID-19 syndrome is a group of signs and symptoms that are present for >12 weeks. The associated musculoskeletal manifestations are fatigue, arthralgia, myalgia, new-onset back pain, muscle weakness, and poor physical performance.

»

Data on COVID-19 complications are growing due to large absolute numbers of cases and survivors in these 2 years of the pandemic. Additional musculoskeletal manifestations encountered are falls by the elderly, increased mortality after hip fracture, reduced bone mineral density and osteoporosis, acute sarcopenia, rhabdomyolysis, Guillain-Barré syndrome, muscle denervation atrophy, fibromyalgia, rheumatological disease triggering, septic arthritis, adhesive capsulitis, myositis, critical illness myopathy, onset of latent muscular dystrophy, osteonecrosis, soft-tissue abscess, urticarial vasculitis with musculoskeletal manifestations, and necrotizing autoimmune myositis.

»

A wide range of signs and symptoms involving the musculoskeletal system that affect quality of life and can result in a decrease in disability-adjusted life years. This powerful and unpredictable disease highlights the importance of multimodality imaging, continuing education, and multidisciplinary team care to support preventive measures, diagnosis, and treatment.

Urticarial vasculitis: Clinical and laboratory findings with a particular emphasis on differential diagnosis

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare cutaneous vasculitis of small vessels characterized by recurrent episodes of wheal-like lesions that tend to last more than 24 hours, healing with a residual ecchymotic postinflammatory hyperpigmentation. The histopathologic pattern of UV is that of leukocytoclastic vasculitis, consisting of fibrinoid necrosis of dermal vessels' walls and neutrophil-rich perivascular inflammatory infiltrates. Although its etiopahogenesis remains still undefined, UV is now regarded as an immune complex-driven disease with activation of the complement cascade, leading to exaggerated production of anaphylatoxins that are responsible for neutrophil recruitment and activation. This condition can be categorized into 2 main entities according to serum complement levels: normocomplementemic UV and hypocomplementemic UV, the latter being associated with circulating anti-C1q autoantibodies and possible extracutaneous manifestations. Systemic multiorgan involvement may be seen particularly in syndromic hypocomplementemic UV, also known as McDuffie syndrome. This review summarizes the clinicopathological and laboratory features as well as the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of UV. A focus on its main differential diagnoses is provided, that is, chronic spontaneous urticaria, bullous pemphigoid, IgA (Henoch-Schönlein purpura) and IgM/IgG immune complex vasculitis, lupus erythematous tumidus, Wells syndrome, erythema multiforme, cutaneous mastocytosis, cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes, and coronavirus disease 2019-associated and anti-severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2-vaccine-associated urticarial eruptions.

SARS‐CoV ‐2 Vaccination‐Induced Cutaneous Vasculitis: Report of two new cases and literature Review

Currently the most powerful tool in combating the COVID‐19 pandemic is vaccination against SARS‐CoV‐2. A growing percentage of the world's population is being vaccinated. Various vaccines are worldwide on the market. Several adverse reactions have been reported as a part of post‐marketing surveillance of COVID‐19 vaccines. Among the possible adverse events, cutaneous vasculitis has occasionally been reported. We present a narrative review on cutaneous vasculitis related to COVID‐19‐vaccination to summarize clinical findings, histopathology, treatment and outcome. We searched for “COVID vaccine”, “COVID vaccination” AND “cutaneous vasculitis” in PUBMED. Articles in English have been selected, from inception to December 2021, and analyzed for patient's characteristics, type of vaccine, time of appearance of cutaneous vasculitis and clinico‐histopathologic type. Treatment and outcome have also been considered in this narrative review. Two new unpublished cases of ours were added. Cutaneous vasculitis is a rare adverse event to COVID‐19 vaccination. It has been observed with mRNA and adenovirus‐vector vaccines. IgA vasculitis, lymphocytic and ANCA‐associated vasculitis, leukocytoclastic and urticarial vasculitis have been reported. This adverse event can occur after first or second shot. Most cases run a mild to moderate course. Cornerstone of medical treatment are systemic corticosteroids. Complete remission could be achieved in most patients. Vasculitis may not be considered as a contraindication of vaccination, being uncommonly reported and shows a favorable prognosis. The benefit of the vaccination remains high especially for immunocompromised patients. COVID‐vaccine induced vasculitis is important in the differential diagnosis of purpuric and vasculitis disorders.

[Update on etiopathogenesis of small vessel vasculitis]

Small vessel vasculitis is characterized by a necrotizing inflammation of the vessel wall predominantly with involvement of small intraparenchymal arteries, arterioles, capillaries and venules. Medium-sized and occasionally large vessels can also be involved. Antineutrophil cytoplasmic autoantibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis (granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis) are differentiated from immune complex vasculitides based on immunopathological and serological aspects. Immune complex vasculitides include IgA vasculitis, cryoglobulinemic vasculitis, hypocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis (anti-C1q vasculitis) and anti-glomerular basement membrane disease. Epidemiological and next-generation sequencing-based studies have significantly contributed to the identification of predisposing environmental factors and genetic risk factors in recent years. Under specific conditions ANCA and immune complexes can induce premature intravascular activation of neutrophilic granulocytes with degranulation and release of enzymes and reactive oxygen species, which leads to vascular damage. In granulomatosis with polyangiitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis various factors, such as barrier dysfunction and dysbiosis of the microbiome contribute to extravascular granuloma formation predominantly affecting the respiratory tract.

Benefits of Using Dapsone in Patients Hospitalized with COVID-19

Since the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, refractory and relentless hypoxia as a consequence of exuberant lung inflammation and parenchymal damage remains the main cause of death. We have earlier reported results of the addition of dapsone in this population to the standard of care. We now report a further chart review of discharge outcomes among patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The 2 × 2 table analysis showed a lower risk of death or discharge to LTAC (Long term acute care) (RR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.32 to 0.84) and a higher chance of discharge home (RR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2 to 5.9) among patients receiving dapsone compared to those receiving the usual standard of care. A larger, blinded randomized trial should be carried out urgently to determine if dapsone indeed improves outcomes in COVID-19.