Factors predicting patient satisfaction following major trauma

Press Ganey Surveys in Patients Undergoing Upper-Extremity Surgical Procedures: Response Rate and Evidence of Nonresponse Bias

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction surveys are important measures of the patient experience that provide data for quality improvement. The purpose of this study was to establish the response rate and the factors associated with the completion of the Press Ganey (PG) Ambulatory Surgery Survey (PGAS) in patients who underwent ambulatory upper-extremity surgical procedures.

METHODS

A prospective orthopaedic registry at a single academic ambulatory surgical center was retrospectively reviewed for patients who underwent an upper-extremity surgical procedure from 2015 to 2019. The institutional PG database was queried to determine the patients who completed the PGAS postoperatively. The response rate was calculated, and baseline characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures were compared between responders and nonresponders.

RESULTS

Of the 1,489 patients included, 201 (13.5%) were responders and 1,288 (86.5%) were nonresponders. Differences existed in baseline characteristics between groups, with responders being significantly older (p = 0.004) and having significantly higher proportions of White race (p < 0.001), college education (p = 0.011), employment (p = 0.005), marriage (p = 0.006), and higher income earners (p < 0.001). Responders had significantly better baseline Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System scores across multiple domains (p < 0.05), but these differences were not clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSIONS

PGAS response rates were low (13.5%), and differences between responders and nonresponders may be utilized by hospitals to target feedback from underrepresented patient populations. Surgeons, policymakers, and health-care administrators should use caution with the interpretation of PGAS results because responders may not be representative of all patients.

Prognostic factors for recovery of health status after injury: a prospective multicentre cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To determine prognostic factors for health status and recovery patterns during the first 2 years after injury in the clinical trauma population.

DESIGN

A prospective longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

Ten participating hospitals in Brabant, the Netherlands.

PARTICIPANTS

Injured adult patients admitted to a hospital between August 2015 and November 2016 were followed: 4883 (50%) patients participated.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was health status, measured with the EuroQol-5-dimensions-3-levels (EQ-5D), including a cognition item and the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale. Health status was collected at 1 week, 1, 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after injury. Potential prognostic factors were based on literature and clinical experience (eg, age, sex, pre-injury frailty (Groningen Frailty Index), pre-injury EQ-5D).

RESULTS

Health status increased mainly during the first 6 months after injury with a mean EQ-5D utility score at 1 week of 0.49 and 0.79 at 24 months. The dimensions mobility, pain/discomfort and usual activities improved up to 2 years after injury. Lower pre-injury health status, frailty and longer length of stay at the hospital were important prognostic factors for poor recovery. Spine injury, lower and upper extremity injury showed to be prognostic factors for problems after injury. Traumatic brain injury was a prognostic factor for cognitive problems.

CONCLUSION

This study contributes to the increase in knowledge of health recovery after injury. It could be a starting point to develop prediction models for specific injury classifications and implementation of personalised medicine.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02508675.

Patient Satisfaction Is Improved With Exposure to Trauma Recovery Services

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study is to assess the impact of Trauma Recovery Services (TRS), a program facilitating engagement and recovery on satisfaction after orthopaedic trauma.

METHODS

Two hundred ninety-four patients with surgically managed extremity fractures were prospectively surveyed. Satisfaction was assessed after 12 months using a 13-question telephone survey, rated on a Likert scale from 1 to 5 (with five being excellent). TRS resource utilization during and after hospitalization was recorded. Eighty-eight patients (30%) used TRS.

RESULTS

Overall satisfaction was high with a mean score of 4.32. Although no differences were observed between the control group and patients with TRS utilization in age, sex, race, insurance, smoking history, or employment status, TRS patients sustained more high-energy mechanisms (81% versus 56%) and had more associated psychiatric illness (33% versus 17%), both P < 0.01. Multivariable regression indicated general exposure to TRS to be an independent predictor of higher overall care ratings (B = 1.31; P = 0.03).

DISCUSSION

Utilization of TRS was the greatest predictor of better overall care ratings. This study builds on existing evidence demonstrating the positive impact of Trauma Survivor Network programming. We conclude that a hospital-wide program supporting patient education and engagement can effectively increase patient satisfaction after traumatic injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II.

A systematic review of the association between fault or blame-related attributions and procedures after transport injury and health and work-related outcomes

Attributions of fault are often associated with worse injury outcomes; however, the consistency and magnitude of these impacts is not known. This review examined the prognostic role of fault on health, mental health, pain and work outcomes after transport injury. A systematic search of five electronic databases (Medline, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library) yielded 16,324 records published between 2000 and January 2018. Eligibility criteria were: adult transport injury survivors; prospective design; multivariable analysis; fault-related factor analysed; pain, mental health, general health or work-related outcome. Citations (n = 10,558, excluding duplicates) and full text articles (n = 555) were screened manually (Reviewer 1), and using concurrent machine learning and text mining (Reviewer 2; using Abstrackr, WordStat and QDA miner). Data from 55 papers that met all inclusion criteria were extracted, papers were evaluated for risk of bias using the QUIPS tool, and overall level of evidence was assessed using the GRADE tool. There were six main fault-related factors classified as: fault or responsibility, fault-based compensation, lawyer involvement or litigation, blame or guilt, road user or position in vehicle, and impact direction. Overall there were inconsistent associations between fault and transport injury outcomes, and 60% of papers had high risk of bias. There was moderate evidence that fault-based compensation claims were associated with poorer health-related outcomes, and that lawyer involvement was associated with poorer work outcomes beyond 12 months post-injury. However, the evidence of negative associations between fault-based compensation claims and work-related outcomes was limited. Lawyer involvement and fault-based compensation claims were associated with adverse mental health outcomes six months post-injury, but not beyond 12 months. The most consistent associations between fault and negative outcomes were not for fault attributions, per se, but were related to fault-related procedures (e.g., lawyer engagement, fault-based compensation claims).

Patient Satisfaction With Venous Thromboembolism Treatment

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) represents a major health-care problem. Understanding patient satisfaction with VTE care is an important health-care goal. A national online survey was administered to adults who had experienced a recent VTE event. The survey assessed patient satisfaction by: (1) satisfaction with VTE care provider; (2) likelihood to recommend VTE provider; and (3) satisfaction with communication between VTE care providers. Each question was correlated with patient demographics, patient care harms (ie, misdiagnosis, wrong treatment), patient beliefs concerning outcomes, and type of anticoagulant therapy. Respondents (907) were 52.4 ± 14.4 years, predominantly Caucasian, mostly women, and generally had health insurance. Most respondents were satisfied with VTE care providers, likely to recommend their VTE provider, and satisfied with communication between providers. Dissatisfaction was strongly associated with treatment mistakes, a wrong diagnosis or treatment, or delayed treatment. A national sample of VTE patients were generally satisfied with VTE care experiences. The VTE care dissatisfaction was strongly associated with perceived mistakes in VTE care. Interventions aimed at reducing, acknowledging, and communicating errors could be studied to improve VTE care satisfaction.

Self-Reported Recovery Likelihood Predicts Higher Physician Ratings: A Survey of Patients After Orthopaedic Surgery

OBJECTIVES

What are the differences between elective and trauma patient satisfaction and do patient and diagnosis factors predict physician scores?

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Urban Level 1 Trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Three hundred twenty-three trauma patients and 433 elective orthopaedic patients treated at our center by the same surgeons.

INTERVENTION

Trauma patients treated surgery for one or more fractures; elective patients treated with hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty, or rotator cuff repair.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Telephone survey regarding patient experience and satisfaction with their care. The survey included questions from Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) surveys, and responses were rated on a 1-5 point Likert scale (5 best).

RESULTS

Elective surgery patients had mean age of 56.4 years, and trauma patients were mean 50.3 years of age. Trauma patients rated their likelihood to make a full recovery lower than elective patients (median, interquartile range), 5.0 (1.0) versus 4.0 (2.0) (P < 0.001). After multivariate binary logistic regression, patients who rated the hospital higher (≥4 vs. ≤3) were more likely (odds ratio = 10.0, 95% confidence interval, 6.4-15.8) to score physicians better. Similarly, patients who scored their overall likelihood of recovering ≥4 compared with ≤3 were more likely (odds ratio = 3.6, 95% confidence interval, 2.9-5.6) to rate their physicians more positively.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient perceptions including their likelihood to make a full recovery and their overall impression of the hospital predicted higher physician scores. We conclude that these physician scores are subject to patient perception biases and are not independent of the overall care experience. We recommend HCAHPS and physician ratings' web sites include internal controls, such as the patient perception of overall likelihood to recover, to aid in interpreting survey results.

The Association of Patient Satisfaction with Pain, Anxiety, and Self-Reported Physical Function

BACKGROUND

A complete understanding of the variables that influence patient satisfaction has yet to be reached. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patient-reported physical function, pain, and/or anxiety are associated with patient satisfaction in a hand and upper-extremity outpatient setting.

METHODS

This is a cohort study of 1,160 adult patients presenting to an upper-extremity (non-shoulder) clinic from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016, who completed functional patient-reported outcome measures (PROMIS [Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System] Physical Function, PROMIS Upper Extremity, and abbreviated Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scale [QuickDASH]) and psychological patient-reported outcome measures (PROMIS Anxiety and PROMIS Pain Interference) immediately prior to their physician encounter. After the clinic visit, included patients filled out the Press Ganey Medical Practice satisfaction survey online. Logistic regression models were used to predict overall patient satisfaction and satisfaction with the care provider among all, new, and return clinic visit types from the patient-reported functional and psychological measures, controlling for age and provider.

RESULTS

Among all visit types, there was a significant negative association of both pain and anxiety with patient satisfaction, whereby a 10-point increase in PROMIS Pain Interference (higher self-reported pain symptomatology) was associated with a 17% decrease in the odds of overall satisfaction (odds ratio [OR], 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.71 to 0.98]; p = 0.03), and a 10-point increase in PROMIS Anxiety (higher self-reported anxiety) was associated with a 16% decrease in the odds of satisfaction with the care provider (OR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.72 to 0.97]; p = 0.02). A significant positive association was found between higher levels of self-reported physical function and new-patient satisfaction with their care provider (OR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.02 to 1.47]; p = 0.03). Among return patient visits, there was a negative association with overall patient satisfaction between both pain interference (OR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.58 to 0.98]; p = 0.04) and anxiety (OR, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.53 to 0.89]; p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In hand and upper-extremity (non-shoulder) clinic visits, pre-encounter levels of patient-reported physical function, anxiety, and pain were significantly associated with patient satisfaction with the care provided. As the U.S. health-care system increasingly utilizes satisfaction scores in payment models and in quality assessment, these associations may influence how such metrics are interpreted and are utilized.

(Can't Get No) Patient Satisfaction: The Predictive Power of Demographic, GI, and Psychological Factors in IBS Patients

GOALS

The goal of this study is to assess: (1) the relative contribution of patient factors to satisfaction ratings in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) patients and (2) the relationship between patient satisfaction (PS) and the number of diagnostic tests patients underwent prior to receiving IBS diagnosis.

BACKGROUND

Although PS is regarded as an important indicator of quality of care, little is known about its determinants.

STUDY

A total of 448 Rome III-diagnosed patients (M age=41 y; 79% F), whose GI symptoms were at least moderate in severity completed patient-reported outcome measures as part of pretreatment evaluation of an NIH-funded clinical trial. PS was measured with the 11-point Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems global rating scale modified to assess for IBS treatments. A series of multiple regression analyses were conducted for demographic, IBS-specific, general physical health, and psychological predictors before running a final model of significant predictors from each domain.

RESULTS

The final regression model was significant, F6,419=6.34, P<0.001, R=0.08, with race, insurance, number of diagnostic tests, and lower neuroticism predicting PS. Medical tests were rendered nonsignificant when history of seeking care from a gastroenterologist was introduced into the equation.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrary to hypotheses, neither the IBS symptom severity nor quality of life impairment predicted PS. Patient factors such as a neurotic personality style and sociodemographic profile had a significant but modest impact on PS. Pattern of regression analyses suggests that patients may turn to their gastroenterologist for testing for reassurance, which may in the long-term fuel demand for more testing.

The impact of non weight bearing: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with lower limb injuries are commonly advised to non weight bear (NWB) on their injured limb as part of treatment. Occasionally, patients complain that offloading one limb, associated with the use of crutches or other mobility aids, may lead to pain on one of the other supporting limbs. This has led to compensation claims (1) but has never been the subject of formal research.

METHODS

A prospective cohort trial was undertaken to address this question. Patients were recruited from two Metropolitan Hospital Orthopaedic Fracture Clinics and Orthopaedic Wards. A survey was administered at two time points; the first at the point of definitive orthopaedic treatment and commencement of the NWB phase. The second after the NWB phase was completed. The surveys included a pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Short Form (SF)12, a pain body chart and a health questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients were enrolled in the study. Seven patients developed new joint pain after a period NWB. These patients scored significantly lower on the follow up SF12 when compared to those who did not develop new pain (p=0.045). Follow up phone calls at least 6 months following completion of the second survey revealed that all initial and new pain areas in these participants had resolved. The main limitation of this study was the limited numbers.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the idea that crutches, prescribed in the short term to allow a limb to be NWB, achieve this aim with minimal impact. Their use may be associated with new other joint pain however it can be anticipated this will resolve after cessation of crutch use.

Outcomes following non-life-threatening orthopaedic trauma: Why are they considered to be so poor?

The purpose of this review article is to assess the current literature on the outcomes of simple orthopaedic trauma. Simple trauma is defined as the fracture or injury of one limb due to an acute event. Fractures are the most common cause of hospitalized trauma in Australia and associated with multiple social, psychological and physical consequences for patients. The literature to date suggests that there are multiple factors leading to relatively poor outcomes following simple trauma, modifiable and non-modifiable. The most oft cited are older age, lower educational status, being injured at work, injury severity score, pre-existing disease, workers compensation, litigation and pain at initial assessment. Additional psychological risk factors quoted attribute to the injury to an external source and the use of passive coping strategies. This review aims to summarise the relevant literature relating to these risk factors and give direction to improving outcomes and future research into this important area.

The effect of socio-economic status on non-fatal outcome after injury: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Over the past decades, the number of survivors of injuries has rapidly grown. It has become important to focus more on the determinants of non-fatal outcome. Although socio-economic status (SES) is considered to be a fundamental determinant of health in general, the role of SES as a determinant of non-fatal outcome after injury is largely unknown.

METHODS

An online search was conducted in November 2015 using Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cinahl, Cochrane, Google scholar and PubMed. Studies examining the relation between SES and a physical or psychological outcome measure, or using SES as a confounder in a general trauma population were included. There were no restrictions regarding study design. The 'Quality in Prognostic Studies tool' was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies.

RESULTS

The 24 included studies showed large variations in methodological quality. The number of participants ranged from 56 to 4639, and assessments of the measures ranged from immediately to 6year post-injury. Studies used a large number of variables as indicators of SES. Participant's educational level was used most frequently. The majority of the studies used a multivariable technique to analyse the relation between SES and non-fatal outcome after injury. All studies found a positive association (80% of studies significant, n=19) between increased SES and better non-fatal outcome after injury.

CONCLUSION

Although an adequate and valid measure of SES is lacking, the results of this review showed that SES is an important determinant of non-fatal outcome after injury. Future research should focus on the definition and measurement of SES and should further underpin the effect of SES on non-fatal outcome after injury.

Association Between Orthopaedic Outpatient Satisfaction and Non-Modifiable Patient Factors

BACKGROUND

Increasingly, patient satisfaction surveys are being utilized to evaluate hospital and physician performance. Despite this, little is known about factors associated with patient satisfaction. The objective of this study was to determine whether selected non-modifiable patient characteristics are associated with outpatient satisfaction scores.

METHODS

We reviewed patient satisfaction scores from 12,177 outpatient clinical encounters at an academic orthopaedic outpatient clinic between December 2010 and October 2013. Any adult patient who completed at least one patient satisfaction survey at any point during the study period was included in this study. Factors including age, sex, employment status, type of health insurance, zip code, and orthopaedic subspecialty were recorded. Patients were divided into more satisfied and less satisfied groups, and generalized estimating equation logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors predictive of lower patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Age was found to be strongly associated with patient satisfaction, with younger patients reporting less satisfaction; the adjusted odds ratio for the patient age of eighteen to twenty-nine years compared with the patient age of eighty years or older was 2.78 (95% confidence interval, 1.74 to 3.82) (p < 0.001). This relationship was maintained in a predictive model across all age groups, both sexes, all travel distances, and all orthopaedic subspecialties. Travel distance was also associated with patient satisfaction, with patients who live closer reporting less satisfaction compared with patients who live farther away; the adjusted odds ratio for a distance of less than fifty miles compared with a distance of fifty miles or more was 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.03 to 1.33) (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

The finding that non-modifiable patient factors such as age and geographic location affect patient satisfaction challenges the utility of comparing patient satisfaction between populations that differ significantly with regard to such characteristics.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A more complete knowledge of the factors that influence patient satisfaction may enable better insight into the interpretation of current patient satisfaction metrics and may allow physicians and hospitals to improve their delivery of care.

Association between patient-reported measures of psychological distress and patient satisfaction scores after spine surgery

BACKGROUND

Patient satisfaction has become an important component of the delivery of health care in the United States. Previous studies have shown that patient satisfaction is influenced by patient-specific characteristics. The goal of this study was to determine whether psychological distress influences outpatient satisfaction scores following spine surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records from all outpatient clinical encounters at a single academic spine surgery center between February 2011 and January 2013. Any patient who completed both a patient satisfaction survey and a Distress and Risk Assessment Method (DRAM) questionnaire for the same clinical encounter was included in the study. Statistical analysis was performed to determine whether patient satisfaction scores were influenced by psychological distress.

RESULTS

During the study period, 103 patients who met the inclusion criteria were identified. On the basis of their responses to the DRAM questionnaire, fifty-six were classified as normal (no evidence of distress), twenty-two as at risk, thirteen as distressed depressive, and twelve as distressed somatic. The mean overall patient satisfaction scores (and standard deviation) were 90.2 ± 10.9 in the normal group, 94.7 ± 8.2 in the at-risk group, 87.5 ± 16.2 in the distressed-depressive group, and 75.7 ± 22.4 in the distressed-somatic group (p = 0.003). The mean score for the patients' satisfaction with their provider was 94.2 ± 12.0 in the normal group, 94.2 ± 9.5 in the at-risk group, 90.6 ± 24.0 in the distressed-depressive group, and 74.9 ± 26.2 in the distressed-somatic group (p = 0.011).

CONCLUSIONS

These results indicate a significant association between patient satisfaction and psychological distress as measured with the DRAM questionnaire. "Distressed" patients gave significantly lower scores for overall satisfaction and satisfaction with their provider compared with patients categorized as "normal." These results suggest that psychological factors may influence patients' perception of the medical care provided to them.

[Long-term results after multiple trauma with ISS ≥ 25. Outcome and predictors of quality of life]

BACKGROUND

The survival chances of multiple trauma patients have continually improved over the last decades; therefore, it is often not a question of whether a patient survives a severe accident but rather how the patient survives.

METHODS

In a retrospective study 127 patients were questioned regarding quality of life and health and possible influencing factors using the POLO chart an average of 70 months after suffering severe trauma (ISS Ø 35.6).

RESULTS

The quality of life of severely injured patients is significantly reduced compared with the normal population even years after the trauma. In addition to four pretraumatic factors (older age, female gender, low education and previous illnesses) four posttraumatic variables (difficulties with authorities/institutions and unemployment as a consequence of the accident, long duration and subjectively inadequate treatment in hospital) were identified that have a negative impact on long-term quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

The self-reported quality of life after multiple trauma no longer permanently achieves the original level despite extensive rehabilitation measures. Post-traumatic factors have a greater impact on the long-term quality of life than the injury severity. A long-term care and specialized rehabilitation services are needed to improve outcome further.

Factors associated with patient satisfaction scores for physician care in trauma patients

BACKGROUND

The Affordable Care Act of 2010 identifies "patient experience of care" as one of five domains of excellent care. We hypothesized that there are specific demographic factors associated with higher or lower physician satisfaction (PS) scores in trauma patients.

METHODS

Press-Ganey PS scores for September 2004 to December 2010 were compared with trauma variables and the association of a mean PS greater than or equal to 75 (high score) or less than or equal to 50 (low score). Those variables that proved significant on univariate analysis were subjected to multivariate logistic regression analysis. Significance was at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

There were 12,196 admissions, of whom 1,631 (13.4%) returned patient satisfaction survey. A total of 1,174 patients (75.5%) returned a high PS (≥75), and 126 patients (8.1%) returned a low PS (≤50). In the multiple logistic regression analysis, 65 years or older (odds ratio [OR], 1.7), having had a surgical procedure (OR, 1.6), and having a positive impression of the hospital care (OR, 7.0) proved significant for a high PS. Those patients who scored a low PS were significantly more likely to be younger (18-29 years: OR, 2.4; 30-64 years: OR, 1.8), to have not had surgery (OR, 2.2), had an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 16 or lower (OR, 2.6), had a complication of care (OR, 4.4), and rated the hospital care as poor (OR, 9.2).

CONCLUSION

A trauma patient who is satisfied with his or her physician care is one who is 65 years or older, requires surgery, and is predominantly satisfied with other aspects of their hospital care. Unsatisfied patients are younger, are nonoperative, had lower ISS, had a complication of care, and rated their hospital care as poor. Understanding the specific characteristics of Press-Ganey results for trauma patients will allow trauma surgeons and their hospital partners to develop strategies to improve patients' satisfaction with their trauma surgeon's care.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Epidemiologic study, level III; therapeutic study, level IV.

Can lumbopelvic fixation salvage unstable complex sacral fractures?

BACKGROUND

Traditional screw or plate fixation options can be used to fix the majority of sacral fractures. However, these techniques are unreliable with dysmorphic upper sacral segments, U-fractures, osseous compression of neural elements, and previously failed fixation. Lumbopelvic fixation can potentially address these injuries but is a technically demanding procedure requiring spinal and pelvic fixation and it is unclear whether it reliably corrects the deformity and restores function.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We therefore assessed reduction quality and loss of fixation, pain related to prominent hardware, subjective dysfunction measured by the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA), and complications.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 15 patients with unstable sacral fractures treated with lumbopelvic fixation between 2002 and 2010. Patients had radiographic monitoring regarding reduction quality and loss of fixation and clinical followup using the SMFA. The minimum followup was 12 months (mean, 23 months; range, 12-41 months).

RESULTS

Posterior reduction quality was 11 of 15 with less than 5 mm persistent displacement and four of 15 with 5 to 10 mm displacement. Loss of fixation was observed in one patient as a result of a technical error. Prominent hardware resulted in greater pain. Despite daily activity and bother subscores improving over time, we found long-term dysfunction in the SMFA. Eleven of the 15 patients were able to return to previous work or activities.

CONCLUSION

Complex posterior pelvic ring injuries of the sacrum not amenable to traditional fixation options can be salvaged with adherence to the technical details of lumbopelvic fixation. Hardware prominence and pain are markedly reduced with screw head recession. Long-term impairment is noted in patients with complex pelvic ring injuries requiring lumbopelvic fixation compared with normative data.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, therapeutic study. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

[Surviving multiple trauma--what comes next? The rehabilitation of seriously injured patients]

The survival chances of multiple trauma patients have improved continuously over the last decades. Therefore, not only the question of whether the patient survives a serious accident arises, but rather how the patient survives it. The after effects of trauma are seen not only physically, but also psychologically and socially. These affect quality of life and are evident years after the accident. The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) provides a system to classify the after effects of trauma, which can be measured with the help of assessment instruments. Knowing which parameters can influence trauma after effects is essential for the planning, organization, and implementation of a rehabilitation programme following severe injury. The requirements of an optimal rehabilitation process place high demands on the rehabilitation facility and on the rehabilitation team, which ultimately can only be fulfilled by specialized facilities.

Prosthetic replacement for proximal humeral fractures

The ideal management of complex proximal humeral fractures continues to be debatable. Evolution of proximal humeral fracture management, during the past decade, led to the implementation of many innovations in surgical treatment. Even though the pendulum of treatment seems to swing towards new trends such as locked plating, hemiarthroplasty remains a valid and reliable option that serves the patient's needs well. Hemiarthroplasty is indicated for complex proximal humeral fractures in elderly patients with poor bone stock and when internal fixation is difficult or unreliable. Hemiarthroplasty provides a better result when it is performed early post-injury. Stem height, retroversion and tuberosity positioning are technical aspects of utmost importance. Additionally reverse total shoulder arthroplasty is an alternative new modality that can be used as a primary solution in selected patients with proximal humeral fracture treatment. Failed hemiarthroplasty and fracture sequelae can be successfully managed with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Individual decision-making and tailored treatment that takes into consideration the personality of the fracture and the patient's characteristics should be used.