A comparative analysis of the accuracy, diagnostic uncertainty and cost of imaging modalities in suspected scaphoid fractures

The use of digital tomosynthesis in suspected scaphoid fractures

We report a retrospective observational series of patients undergoing digital tomosynthesis (DTS) for suspected scaphoid fractures. With a specificity and sensitivity of 100%, DTS demonstrates the potential to be an excellent tool in the diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures.

Reasons for scaphoid non-union: Analysis of behavior of health care providers and patients

To assess factors related to health-system and patient behavior in scaphoid fracture non-union, a retrospective analysis of 134 patients treated by scaphoid reconstruction was performed. Mean age at the accident was 26 years (range, 9-75 years), and the mean age at surgery was 28 years (range, 13-75 years). Mean time to first consultation was 233 days (range, 0-12,136 days), and time to surgery 740 days (range, 19-12,362 days). The physician was mainly a general practitioner (52.2%), or an orthopedist/traumatologist (17.9%), general surgeon (12.7%), or hand surgeon (17.2%). The initial diagnostic procedure was X-ray in 76.9% of cases, computed tomography (CT) in 20.9%, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in 13.4%, and none in 11.2%. A fracture was diagnosed in 32.8% of cases, and non-union in 14.9%. Patients mainly presented late: 63% within 3 weeks, and a minority on the day of the accident (39%). In 11% of cases, healthcare providers performed either no or inadequate imaging (77%) and missed correct diagnosis in 52% of cases. 128 patients had a second consultation, and 77 a third, with the same or different physicians, before surgery, leading to increased healthcare costs due to delayed diagnosis and treatment. Delayed presentation and lack of suspicion by attending physicians were the main reasons. Speeding up diagnosis and improving physician training are vital and could significantly reduce health care costs. CT or MRI should be performed if scaphoid fracture is suspected.

Charting Trends in Medicare Reimbursement for Lower Extremity Imaging

Background

Medicare reimbursement is rapidly declining in many specialties. An in-depth analysis of Medicare reimbursement for routinely performed diagnostic imaging procedures in the United States is warranted.

Purpose/Hypothesis

The purpose of this study was to evaluate Medicare reimbursement trends for the 20 most common lower extremity imaging procedures performed between 2005 and 2020, including radiographs, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We hypothesized that Medicare reimbursement for imaging procedures would decline substantially over the studied period.

Study Design

Cohort study.

Methods

The Physician Fee Schedule Look-up Tool from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services was analyzed for reimbursement rates and relative value units associated with the top 20 most utilized Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes in lower extremity imaging from 2005 to 2020. Reimbursement rates were adjusted for inflation and listed in 2020 US dollars using the US Consumer Price Index. To compare year-to-year changes, the percentage change per year and compound annual growth rate were calculated. A 2-tailed t test was used to compare the unadjusted and adjusted percentage change over the 15-year period.

Results

After adjusting for inflation, mean reimbursement for all procedures decreased by 32.41% (P = .013). The mean adjusted percentage change per year was -2.82%, and the mean compound annual growth rate was -1.03%. Compensation for the professional and technical components for all CPT codes decreased by 33.02% and 85.78%, respectively. Mean compensation for the professional component decreased by 36.46% for radiography, 37.02% for CT, and 24.73% for MRI. Mean compensation for the technical component decreased by 7.76% for radiography, 127.66% for CT, and 207.88% for MRI. Mean total relative value units decreased by 38.7%. The commonly billed imaging procedure CPT 73720 (MRI lower extremity, other than joint, with and without contrast) had the greatest adjusted decrease of 69.89%.

Conclusion

Medicare reimbursement for the most billed lower extremity imaging studies decreased by 32.41% between 2005 and 2020. The greatest decreases were noted in the technical component. Of the modalities, MRI had the largest decrease, followed by CT and then radiography.

What Is the Diagnostic Performance of Conventional Radiographs and Clinical Reassessment Compared With HR-pQCT Scaphoid Fracture Diagnosis?

BACKGROUND

Conventional radiographs and clinical reassessment are considered guides in managing clinically suspected scaphoid fractures. This is a unique study as it assessed the value of conventional radiographs and clinical reassessment in a cohort of patients, all of whom underwent additional imaging, regardless of the outcome of conventional radiographs and clinical reassessment.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What is the diagnostic performance of conventional radiographs in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture compared with high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT)? (2) What is the diagnostic performance of clinical reassessment in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture compared with HR-pQCT? (3) What is the diagnostic performance of conventional radiographs and clinical reassessment combined compared with HR-pQCT?

METHODS

Between December 2017 and October 2018, 162 patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture presented to the emergency department (ED). Forty-six patients were excluded and another 25 were not willing or able to participate, which resulted in 91 included patients. All patients underwent conventional radiography in the ED and clinical reassessment 7 to 14 days later, together with CT and HR-pQCT. The diagnostic performance characteristics and accuracy of conventional radiographs and clinical reassessment were compared with those of HR-pQCT for the diagnosis of fractures since this was proven to be superior to CT scaphoid fracture detection. The cohort included 45 men and 46 women with a median (IQR) age of 52 years (29 to 67). Twenty-four patients with a median age of 44 years (35 to 65) were diagnosed with a scaphoid fracture on HR-pQCT.

RESULTS

When compared with HR-pQCT, conventional radiographs alone had a sensitivity of 67% (95% CI 45% to 84%), specificity of 85% (95% CI 74% to 93%), positive predictive value (PPV) of 62% (95% CI 46% to 75%), negative predictive value (NPV) of 88% (95% CI 80% to 93%), and a positive and negative likelihood ratio (LR) of 4.5 (95% CI 2.4 to 8.5) and 0.4 (95% CI 0.2 to 0.7), respectively. Compared with HR-pQCT, clinical reassessment alone resulted in a sensitivity of 58% (95% CI 37% to 78%), specificity of 42% (95% CI 30% to 54%), PPV of 26% (95% CI 19% to 35%), NPV of 74% (95% CI 62% to 83%), as well as a positive and negative LR of 1.0 (95% CI 0.7 to 1.5) and 1.0 (95% CI 0.6 to 1.7), respectively. Combining clinical examination with conventional radiography produced a sensitivity of 50% (95% CI 29% to 71%), specificity of 91% (95% CI 82% to 97%), PPV of 67% (95% CI 46% to 83%), NPV of 84% (95% CI 77% to 88%), as well as a positive and negative LR of 5.6 (95% CI 2.4 to 13.2) and 0.6 (95% CI 0.4 to 0.8), respectively.

CONCLUSION

The accuracy of conventional radiographs (80% compared with HR-pQCT) and clinical reassessment (46% compared with HR-pQCT) indicate that the value of clinical reassessment is limited in diagnosing scaphoid fractures and cannot be considered directive in managing scaphoid fractures. The combination of conventional radiographs and clinical reassessment does not increase the accuracy of these diagnostic tests compared with the accuracy of conventional radiographs alone and is therefore also limited in diagnosing scaphoid fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, diagnostic study.

Thousand shades of gray - The role of imaging display in diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures - A pilot study

Introduction

Most hospitals and clinics utilize commercial grade displays for viewing wrist radiographs. There is no evidence regarding the role of the imaging display used to evaluate the radiographs. The aim of this study was to compare the rates of scaphoid fracture diagnosis by commercial grade and medical grade displays.

Methods

Wrist radiographs of patients that had clinical signs of scaphoid fracture without findings on plain radiography (suspected scaphoid fractures) were retrospectively collected from ER department and interpreted for radiographic signs of fracture by four orthopedics seniors commercial grade and medical grade displays. The difference in fracture diagnosis rates were studied. Inter- and intra-observer variability were also studied.

Results

Study population comprised of 175 high quality wrist radiographs were interpreted. Mean 48.25 (27%) scaphoid fractures were observed on commercial grade display compared to 66 (38.2%) on medical grade display (p = 0.076). The total inter-observer agreement could be defined as a moderate agreement (κ = 0.527, Accuracy = 0.77). Total agreement between all observers were observed in 86 (49.1%) cases compared to 89 (50.9%) cases when reviewing X-rays on commercial and medical displays, respectively.

Discussion

The scaphoid fracture detection rate on medical grade display was not statistically higher compared to non-medical grade displays, but we did find a tendency toward medical grade display. We found that in a substantial number of cases, our observers recognize signs of fracture that were initially evaluated as "suspected fracture" by the ER physicians. As a pilot study, we found evidence that support the need for a prospective study designed to compare the observations to a gold standard modality, such as MRI. We believe utilizing medical grade displays can increase the rate of diagnosis in cases of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures and better manage the clinical scenario of a suspected scaphoid fracture.

Diagnostic Performance and Advanced Imaging Reduction With Digital Tomosynthesis in Scaphoid Fracture Management

BACKGROUND

Management of scaphoid fractures often requires advanced imaging to achieve accurate diagnoses and appropriate treatment. Digital tomosynthesis (DTS) is a cross-sectional imaging modality that may be used to substitute magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomographic scans. The purpose of this study is to: (1) determine the diagnostic accuracy of DTS in occult scaphoid fractures; and (2) report on the reduction of other advanced imaging when using DTS.

METHODS

From May 2014 to October 2017, the charts of all patients who underwent scaphoid tomogram were retrospectively reviewed. The diagnostic accuracy of DTS for occult fracture was compared with 2-week follow-up plain films. To measure the reduction in utilization of advanced imaging, it was determined whether DTS eliminated the need for advanced imaging by providing adequate information regarding the clinical question.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients underwent scaphoid tomography in this time frame: 39 for occult fracture, 33 for fracture union, 5 for fracture morphology, and 1 for hardware positioning. For the detection of occult fracture, DTS had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value of 64%, and negative predictive value of 100%. Advanced imaging was not used in 35 of the remaining 39 patients based on the results obtained by DTS. In patients who did receive advanced imaging, 83% of tomograms provided conclusive diagnostic information.

CONCLUSIONS

Digital tomosynthesis increases the diagnostic sensitivity of occult scaphoid fractures, reducing unnecessary immobilization and advanced imaging. Digital tomosynthesis provides clinical detail beyond plain film, which reduces the need to obtain advanced imaging when assessing union, fracture pattern, and hardware placement.

A Machine Learning Algorithm to Estimate the Probability of a True Scaphoid Fracture After Wrist Trauma

PURPOSE

To identify predictors of a true scaphoid fracture among patients with radial wrist pain following acute trauma, train 5 machine learning (ML) algorithms in predicting scaphoid fracture probability, and design a decision rule to initiate advanced imaging in high-risk patients.

METHODS

Two prospective cohorts including 422 patients with radial wrist pain following wrist trauma were combined. There were 117 scaphoid fractures (28%) confirmed on computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, or radiographs. Eighteen fractures (15%) were occult. Predictors of a scaphoid fracture were identified among demographics, mechanism of injury and examination maneuvers. Five ML-algorithms were trained in calculating scaphoid fracture probability. ML-algorithms were assessed on ability to discriminate between patients with and without a fracture (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve), agreement between observed and predicted probabilities (calibration), and overall performance (Brier score). The best performing ML-algorithm was incorporated into a probability calculator. A decision rule was proposed to initiate advanced imaging among patients with negative radiographs.

RESULTS

Pain over the scaphoid on ulnar deviation, sex, age, and mechanism of injury were most strongly associated with a true scaphoid fracture. The best performing ML-algorithm yielded an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration slope, intercept, and Brier score of 0.77, 0.84, -0.01 and 0.159, respectively. The ML-derived decision rule proposes to initiate advanced imaging in patients with radial-sided wrist pain, negative radiographs, and a fracture probability of ≥10%. When applied to our cohort, this would yield 100% sensitivity, 38% specificity, and would have reduced the number of patients undergoing advanced imaging by 36% without missing a fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

The ML-algorithm accurately calculated scaphoid fracture probability based on scaphoid pain on ulnar deviation, sex, age, and mechanism of injury. The ML-decision rule may reduce the number of patients undergoing advanced imaging by a third with a small risk of missing a fracture. External validation is required before implementation.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy for the treatment of scaphoid delayed union in a tennis player: A case report

Operative procedures are considered the gold standard when treating delayed union or non-union of the scaphoid despite their considerable complexity and the risk of intraoperative complications. Although extracorporeal shockwave therapy has been reported as a non-invasive treatment option for non-union cases, only a few papers on delayed union or non-union of the scaphoid have been published. A 57-year-old man with delayed union of a scaphoid fracture was treated with extracorporeal shockwave therapy and showed complete bone healing with promising results two months after the start of treatment without undergoing surgery. This result indicated that extracorporeal shockwave therapy could be an option for treating delayed union of scaphoid fractures.

Value of the 45-degree reverse oblique view of the carpal palm in diagnosing scaphoid waist fractures

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the value of 45° reverse oblique view of the carpal palm in diagnosing scaphoid waist fracture and displacement.

METHODS

Eighty-four patients with wrist injury and plain radiography including posteroanterior, lateral, Stecher, and 45° reverse oblique view of the wrist were analyzed for the detection rate in diagnosing scaphoid fractures and displacement. The degree of difficulty in the four views for detecting the scaphoid waist fracture and displacement was rated on a five-grade Likert scale.

RESULTS

Among 84 patients, scaphoid waist fractures occurred in 43, and fracture displacement in 32. A significantly (P<0.01) greater rate of detecting the scaphoid waist fracture was found in the Stecher, and 45° reverse oblique view than in the posteroanterior and lateral views. The rate of detecting fracture displacement was significantly (P<0.01) greater in the Stecher and 45° reverse oblique view than in the posteroanterior and lateral views. The Stecher view had a significantly (P = 0.006) lower rate of detecting fracture displacement than the 45° reverse oblique view. It was significantly (P<0.001) easier to identify the scaphoid waist fracture and displacement with the 45° reverse oblique view and the Stecher view than with the posteroanterior and lateral view. The 45° reverse oblique view had the easiest degree to identify the scaphoid waist fracture displacement, followed by the Stecher view, the posteroanterior and the lateral view (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The 45° reverse oblique view clearly shows the scaphoid oblique view in the long axis for better observation of the scaphoid waist fracture and displacement.

Imaging Review of Snowboard Injuries

Snowboarding and skiing remain the two most popular winter sports worldwide. Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are common in snowboarding, and the number has increased significantly since the advent of snow parks. The number of injuries is the highest for novice snowboarders; more experienced boarders generally sustain more severe injuries. Snowboarders can experience a wide array of MSK injuries, but some injury types are more frequently encountered because of the specific injury mechanism unique to snowboarding. This article reviews the most common snowboarding injuries with a focus on the current understanding of the injury mechanism and provides an approach to imaging.

Prospective comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography in diagnosing occult scaphoid fractures

BACKGROUND

Suspected scaphoid fracture (SF) after a fall on an outstretched hand is a common presentation in the emergency department. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) has been suggested to assist in the diagnosis or exclusion of SF.

PURPOSE

To compare MRI and CT at diagnosing occult SFs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We routinely perform CT scans in patients with clinically suspected occult SF, after 7-10 days of injury following two negative radiographs. All eligible patients with a clinically suspected SF, but negative radiographs and a negative CT, underwent an MRI scan to assess further for evidence of occult fracture.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were included in our study. MRI showed fractures in 16% of the time (in 15 patients) when plain radiographs and CT did not. Of these fractures, 8% were SFs. In addition to fractures, 10% had bone bruising. A total of 25% of patients with fractures and bone bruising were referred to the hand surgery team for further follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The study demonstrated that MRI would identify a radiographically occult SF more often than CT. This supports NICE guidelines which recommend MRI as the best early diagnostic tool for occult SFs.

Diagnosis of Suspected Scaphoid Fractures

»

Suspected scaphoid fractures are a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge despite the advances in knowledge regarding these injuries and imaging techniques. The risks and restrictions of routine immobilization as well as the restriction of activities in a young and active population must be weighed against the risks of nonunion that are associated with a missed fracture.

»

The prevalence of true fractures among suspected fractures is low. This greatly reduces the statistical probability that a positive diagnostic test will correspond with a true fracture, reducing the positive predictive value of an investigation.

»

There is no consensus reference standard for a true fracture; therefore, alternative statistical methods for calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values are required.

»

Clinical prediction rules that incorporate a set of demographic and clinical factors may allow stratification of secondary imaging, which, in turn, could increase the pretest probability of a scaphoid fracture and improve the diagnostic performance of the sophisticated radiographic investigations that are available.

»

Machine-learning-derived probability calculators may augment risk stratification and can improve through retraining, although these theoretical benefits need further prospective evaluation.

»

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are a form of artificial intelligence that have demonstrated great promise in the recognition of scaphoid fractures on radiographs. However, in the more challenging diagnostic scenario of a suspected or so-called "clinical" scaphoid fracture, CNNs have not yet proven superior to a diagnosis that has been made by an experienced surgeon.

Association between bone shape and the presence of a fracture in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture

Scaphoid fractures are difficult to diagnose with current imaging modalities. It is unknown whether the shape of the scaphoid bone, assessed by statistical shape modeling, can be used to differentiate between fractured and non-fractured bones. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether the presence of a scaphoid fracture is associated with shape modes of a statistical shape model (SSM). Forty-one high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) scans were available from patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture of whom 15 patients had a scaphoid fracture. The scans showed no motion artefacts affecting bone shape. The scaphoid bones were semi-automatically contoured, and the contours were converted to triangular meshes. The meshes were registered, followed by principal component analysis to determine mean shape and shape modes describing shape variance. The first five out of the forty shape modes cumulatively explained 87.8% of the shape variance. Logistic regression analysis was used to study the association between shape modes and fracture presence. The regression models were used to classify the 41 scaphoid bones as fractured or non-fractured using a cut-off value that maximized the sum of sensitivity and specificity. The classification of the models was compared with fracture diagnosis on HR-pQCT. A regression model with four shape modes had an area under the ROC-curve of 72.3% and correctly classified 75.6% of the scaphoid bones (fractured: 60.0%, non-fractured: 84.6%). To conclude, fracture presence in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture appears to be associated with the shape of the scaphoid bone.

Vascularized pisiform graft for the treatment of scaphoid nonunion: An anatomical study

Scaphoid fracture can evolve into scaphoid nonunion leading to wrist arthritis. Vascularized bone flaps used to treat scaphoid nonunion are supplied by delicate, small, or short arteries that are not always reliable. The pisiform bone has never been considered as a possible treatment of scaphoid nonunion since the traditionally harvested pedicle is too short. This study aimed to characterize the vascularization of the pisiform with the goal of developing a method of harvesting it with a longer pedicle that can be used as a graft to treat scaphoid nonunion. A cadaver study on 30 upper limbs was done in two parts: firstly, we dissected 20 cadaver specimens and documented the pisiform's vascularization (size, length, and articular surface) as well as anatomical characteristics of the dorsal ulnar artery; secondly, we used 10 cadaver specimens to study an experimental surgical procedure in which a vascularized pisiform graft is used to treat an artificially created nonunion and confirm its feasibility. The pisiform artery originated from the dorsal ulnar artery in all 20 dissections. Its average length of 4.036cm could be increased by 11% by ligating the upstream collateral branches from the dorsal ulnar artery. The pedicled vascularized pisiform flap was grafted to the scaphoid in 10 experimental procedures performed on fresh cadavers. The vascularized pisiform graft consists of a reliable vascular pedicle and well vascularized multi-cortical bone with a cartilaginous surface. However, more studies are needed to confirm the feasibility of this flap as an alternative for treating unstable scaphoid nonunion.

Diagnostic performance of cone-beam computed tomography for scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fractures. Diagnosing scaphoid fractures is challenging. Recently, cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) has been shown to be a promising strategy for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. The diagnostic performance of CBCT remains inconclusive in the literature. Through a systematic review and meta-analysis, our study aims to determine the diagnostic performance of CBCT for diagnosing scaphoid fractures. Five databases were searched up to March 25, 2020. We included prospective and retrospective studies describing the diagnostic accuracy of CBCT for scaphoid fractures in adult patients. QUADAS-2 tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Four studies (n = 350) were included in the meta-analysis. Three of the four studies had high bias risk. The result showed that CBCT had a pooled sensitivity of 0.88 and a pooled specificity of 0.99 for scaphoid fracture diagnosis. The heterogeneities of sensitivity and specificity were substantial. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.98. No significant publication bias was observed. The result suggested that the diagnostic performance of CBCT for scaphoid fracture was excellent. The certainty of current evidence is low. Further well-designed studies with large sample sizes are warranted to confirm this finding.

Improved Detection of Scaphoid Fractures with High-Resolution Peripheral Quantitative CT Compared with Conventional CT

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging, and bone scintigraphy are second-line imaging techniques that are frequently used for the evaluation of patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture. However, as a result of varying diagnostic performance results, no true reference standard exists for scaphoid fracture diagnosis. We hypothesized that the use of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture could improve scaphoid fracture detection compared with conventional CT in the clinical setting.

METHODS

The present study included 91 consecutive patients (≥18 years of age) who presented to the emergency department with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture between December 2017 and October 2018. All patients were clinically reassessed within 14 days after first presentation, followed by CT and HR-pQCT. If a scaphoid fracture was present, the fracture type was determined according to the Herbert classification system and correlation between CT and HR-pQCT was estimated with use of the Kendall W statistic or coefficient of concordance (W) (the closer to 1, the higher the correlation).

RESULTS

The cohort included 45 men and 46 women with a median age of 52 years (interquartile range, 29 to 67 years). HR-pQCT revealed a scaphoid fracture in 24 patients (26%), whereas CT revealed a scaphoid fracture in 15 patients (16%). Patients with a scaphoid fracture were younger and more often male. The correlation between CT and HR-pQCT was high for scaphoid fracture type according to the Herbert classification system (W = 0.793; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.57 to 0.91; p < 0.001) and very high for scaphoid fracture location (W = 0.955; 95%, CI 0.90 to 0.98; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In the present study, the number of patients diagnosed with a scaphoid fracture was 60% higher when using HR-pQCT as compared with CT. These findings imply that a substantial proportion of fractures-in this study, more than one-third-will be missed by the current application of CT scanning in patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Cost-Effectiveness of Immediate Magnetic Resonance Imaging In the Management of Patients With Suspected Scaphoid Fracture: Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVES

Given the limited diagnostic accuracy of radiographs on presentation to the emergency department (ED), the management of suspected scaphoid fractures remains clinically challenging and poses an unknown economic burden to healthcare systems. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of immediate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the management of patients presenting with suspected scaphoid fracture to an ED in England.

METHODS

A pragmatic, randomized, single-center trial compared the use of immediate MRI in the ED against standard care with radiographs only. Participants' use of healthcare services and costs were estimated from primary care and secondary care databases and questionnaires at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months postrecruitment. Costs were compared using generalized linear models and combined with quality-adjusted life years (QALYs, based on the EQ-5D-5L) to estimate cost-effectiveness at 6 months postrecruitment. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves and bootstrapping techniques were used to estimate the probability of cost-effectiveness at different willingness-to-pay (WTP) thresholds. Four deterministic sensitivity scenarios were considered around key parameters.

RESULTS

The MRI intervention dominated standard care in the base case and all 4 deterministic sensitivity scenarios, costing less and achieving more QALY gains, with a probability of 100% of being cost-effective at 6 months using the conventional United Kingdom WTP thresholds of £20 000 to £30 000 per QALY.

CONCLUSION

The use of immediate MRI is a cost-effective intervention in the management of suspected scaphoid fractures in a Central Hospital in London. Routine clinical practice at our institution has been changed to include the intervention.

Has NICE guidance changed the management of the suspected scaphoid fracture: A survey of UK practice

INTRODUCTION

Despite scaphoid fractures being relatively uncommon pro-active treatment of suspected fractures has been seen as a risk management strategy. The poor positive predictive value of X-rays has led to published guidelines advocating MRI as a first-line or early imaging tool. It is unclear whether UK hospitals have been able to introduce early scanning and this national survey sought to establish the current management strategies for patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture.

METHOD

An electronic survey of UK emergency departments (ED) was conducted to establish the initial and follow up strategies for patients with negative imaging. Comparison of first and second-line imaging modalities was undertaken together with review of the clinical speciality responsible for ongoing management.

RESULTS

166 UK NHS Trusts were identified with emergency department facilities of which 66 (39.8%) responded. All sites perform an X-ray as the initial examination. For those with a negative examination ED follow up was the most common approach (54.6%), although many sites refer patients to other specialities including orthopaedics (39.4%) for follow up. The data demonstrated inconsistencies in the number of follow-up episodes and the different imaging investigations utilised. Frustration with the challenges presented by this patient cohort was evident.

CONCLUSION

The suspected scaphoid fracture represents an ongoing challenge to the NHS with many resource intensive pathways reliant on access to complex imaging investigations.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Our study identified that UK Emergency Departments have limited early access to complex imaging for scanning of the scaphoid. A range of strategies are used for follow up of suspected scaphoid fractures and these are resource intensive. Overtreatment of patients with suspected scaphoid fracture is used as a risk management approach.

The interobserver reliability of the diagnosis and classification of scaphoid fractures using high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT

Aims

Besides conventional radiographs, the use of MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy is frequent in the diagnosis of a fracture of the scaphoid. However, which techniques give the best results remain unknown. The investigation of a new imaging technique initially requires an analysis of its precision. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the interobserver agreement of high-resolution peripheral quantitative CT (HR-pQCT) in the diagnosis of a scaphoid fracture. A secondary aim was to investigate the interobserver agreement for the presence of other fractures and for the classification of scaphoid fracture.

Methods

Two radiologists and two orthopaedic trauma surgeons evaluated HR-pQCT scans of 31 patients with a clinically-suspected scaphoid fracture. The observers were asked to determine the presence of a scaphoid or other fracture and to classify the scaphoid fracture based on the Herbert classification system. Fleiss kappa statistics were used to calculate the interobserver agreement for the diagnosis of a fracture. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the agreement for the classification of scaphoid fracture.

Results

A total of nine (29%) scaphoid fractures and 12 (39%) other fractures were diagnosed in 20 patients (65%) using HR-pQCT across the four observers. The interobserver agreement was 91% for the identification of a scaphoid fracture (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.76 to 1.00) and 80% for other fractures (95% CI 0.72 to 0.87). The mean ICC for the classification of a scaphoid fracture in the seven patients diagnosed with scaphoid fracture by all four observers was 73% (95% CI 0.42 to 0.94).

Conclusion

We conclude that the diagnosis of scaphoid and other fractures is reliable when using HR-pQCT in patients with a clinically-suspected fracture. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2020;102-B(4):478–484.

Anatomical relationship of palmar carpal bone landmarks used in locating the lunate and capitate during palpation: A cadaveric investigation

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive in situ cadaveric study.

INTRODUCTION

Performing accurately directed examination and treatment to the wrist requires clinicians to orient to carpal bone structures.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To examine the anatomical relationships that exist within the wrist-hand complex and identify the accuracy of surface anatomy mapping strategies for localizing anatomical landmarks using a palmar approach.

METHODS

Twenty-three embalmed cadavers were dissected using standardized procedures. Metal markers were placed in the most prominent palmar landmark of key carpal structures. Relationships between the most prominent palpation landmarks and the carpal bones of interest were visualized using fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

The most successful methods of palmar capitate localization included the midpoint of a line from trapezium tubercle to pisiform; the midpoint of a line from scaphoid tubercle to hamate hook; or the intersection (cross) of these 2 diagonal lines, with successful capitate identification 100% (23/23) of the time. The most successful method for locating the lunate included the midpoint of a line from the radial styloid process to the ulnar styloid process, which identified the lunate in 100% (23/23) of cases.

DISCUSSION

The results of this cadaveric anatomical relationship study support the use of the midpoint of a line from pisiform to trapezium tubercle, the midpoint of a line from scaphoid tubercle to hamate hook, or a combination (cross) of these lines to locate the capitate from a palmar approach. In addition, the anatomical relationships examined in this study support the use of the midpoint of a line from the radial styloid process to ulnar styloid process to locate the lunate from a palmar approach. Knowledge of these anatomical relationships may improve the clinician's confidence in locating the capitate and lunate during intercarpal examination, special testing, and treatment.

CONCLUSION

Results of this study provide information of the anatomical relationships of the carpal bones from a palmar approach, giving clinicians a foundation for proper orientation to the carpal bones during clinical examination and intervention. Further research is needed to evaluate the reliability and accuracy of these methods for surface palpation on live patients.

Systematic Review of Diagnosis of Clinically Suspected Scaphoid Fractures

Background  Scaphoid fracture accounts for approximately 15% of acute wrist fractures. Clinical examination and plain X-rays are commonly used to diagnose the fracture, but this approach may miss up to 16% of fractures in the absence of clear-cut lucent lines on plain radiographs. As such, additional imaging may be required. It is not clear which imaging modality is the best. The goal of this study is to summarize the current literature on scaphoid fractures to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of four different imaging modalities. Case Description  A systematic-review and meta-analysis was performed. The search term "scaphoid fracture" was used and all prospective articles investigating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), bone scintigraphy, and ultrasound were included. In total, 2,808 abstracts were reviewed. Of these, 42 articles investigating 51 different diagnostic tools in 2,507 patients were included. Literature Review  The mean age was 34.1 ± 5.7 years, and the overall incidence of scaphoid fractures missed on X-ray and diagnosed on advanced imaging was 21.8%. MRI had the highest sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing scaphoid fractures, which were 94.2 and 97.7%, respectively, followed by CT scan with a sensitivity and specificity at 81.5 and 96.0%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound were 81.5 and 77.4%, respectively. Significant differences between MRI, bone scintigraphy, CT, and ultrasound were identified. Clinical Relevance  MRI has higher sensitivity and specificity than CT scan, bone scintigraphy, or ultrasound. Level of Evidence  This is a Level II systematic review.

Detecting scaphoid fractures in wrist injury: a clinical decision rule

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to develop and validate an easy to use clinical decision rule, applicable in the ED that limits the number of unnecessary cast immobilizations and diagnostic follow-up in suspected scaphoid injury, without increasing the risk of missing fractures.

METHODS

A prospective multicenter study was conducted that consisted of three components: (1) derivation of a clinical prediction model for detecting scaphoid fractures in adult patients following wrist trauma; (2) internal validation of the model; (3) design of a clinical decision rule. The predictors used were: sex, age, swelling of the anatomic snuffbox, tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox, scaphoid tubercle tenderness, painful ulnar deviation and painful axial thumb compression. The outcome measure was the presence of a scaphoid fracture, diagnosed on either initial radiographs or during re-evaluation after 1-2 weeks or on additional imaging (radiographs/MRI/CT). After multivariate logistic regression analysis and bootstrapping, the regression coefficient for each significant predictor was calculated. The effect of the rule was determined by calculating the number of missed scaphoid fractures and reduction of suspected fractures that required a cast.

RESULTS

A consecutive series of 893 patients with acute wrist injury was included. Sixty-eight patients (7.6%) were diagnosed with a scaphoid fracture. The final prediction rule incorporated sex, swelling of the anatomic snuffbox, tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox, painful ulnar deviation and painful axial thumb compression. Internal validation of the prediction rule showed a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 20%. Using this rule, a 15% reduction in unnecessary immobilization and imaging could be achieved with a 50% decreased risk of missing a fracture compared with current clinical practice.

CONCLUSIONS

This dataset provided a simple clinical decision rule for scaphoid fractures following acute wrist injury that limits unnecessary immobilization and imaging with a decreased risk of missing a fracture compared to current clinical practice.

CLINICAL PREDICTION RULE

1/(1 + EXP (-(0.649662618 × if man) + (0.51353467826 × if swelling anatomic snuffbox) + (-0.79038263985 × if painful palpation anatomic snuffbox) + (0.57681198857 × if painful ulnar deviation) + (0.66499549728 × if painful thumb compression)-1.685).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Trial register NTR 2544, www.trialregister.nl.

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Scaphoid Fractures

The scaphoid is the most commonly fractured carpal bone; despite its frequent injury, the diagnosis of fracture can be complicated by the presence of normal radiographs at the time of presentation. Clinical intuition can be increased by physical examination and immediately available modalities such as ultrasound within the emergency department. Definitive diagnosis should be made with computed tomography and magnetic resonance to verify the presence of displacement. This article provides an overview of the incidence and presentation of acute scaphoid fractures with a surgical focus on percutaneous dorsal screw fixation.

Changes in Medicare Reimbursement for Advanced Upper Extremity Imaging

PURPOSE

Advanced noninvasive imaging of the upper extremity joints, including computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and ultrasound (US) , has numerous applications in the evaluation of musculoskeletal pathology. Choice of modality is influenced by clinical and cost concerns, with US and CT traditionally considered less expensive than MRI. We analyzed the changes in Medicare reimbursement for these imaging modalities with the hypothesis that recent reimbursement decreases in MRI have made this modality more cost-competitive than other commonly used imaging modalities.

METHODS

Using the Medicare Fee Schedule Database, we reviewed the Medicare reimbursements fee schedule for CT, US, and MRI from 2000 to 2015 at the national, regional, and state levels. Charges were identified and queried by Common Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for each modality. Changes in reimbursement were calculated for each of the modalities.

RESULTS

Total (technical and professional) reimbursement for MRI decreased from $516.93 to $237.16 between 2007 and 2015. Adjusted for inflation, this represents a 60% decrease in reimbursement. During the same time period, total (technical and professional) reimbursement for CT decreased from $256.95 to $180.03, a 39% decrease adjusted for inflation. Total (technical and professional) reimbursement for US increased over the same time period, from $98.91 to $118.22 in 2015, in conjunction with changes in the CPT coding for US. Total (technical and professional) MRI reimbursement decreased from 5.23 times the reimbursement of US in 2007 to 2.01 times in 2015.

CONCLUSIONS

In concordance with our hypothesis, these findings demonstrate that upper extremity MRI and CT reimbursements as scheduled by Medicare have declined significantly in recent years and that these modalities are approaching financial parity with wrist US. In spite of these decreases, MRI remains the most costly advanced imaging modality. Depending on each clinical scenario, the added cost may be justified by the value added by the type of information that can be garnered from each study. Cost-analysis studies evaluating the clinical application of MRI performed prior to the reimbursement decline should be evaluated with caution, and cost-benefit analyses based on these data are at risk of being out-of-date.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Analysis IV.

The effectiveness of ultrasound in the detection of fractures in adults with suspected upper or lower limb injury: a systematic review and subgroup meta-analysis

Background

The aim of the present review is to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound (US) in the detection of upper and lower limb bone fractures in adults compared to a diagnostic gold standard available in secondary and tertiary care centres (e.g. radiography, CT scan or MRI).

Methods

The review followed PRISMA guidelines and used a database-specific search strategy with Medline, EMBASE and The Cochrane Library plus secondary sources (see supplementary material for completed PRISMA checklist). Diagnostic performance of ultrasound was assessed with a qualitative synthesis and a meta-analysis of two data subgroups.

Results

Twenty-six studies were included (n = 2360; fracture prevalence =5.3 % to 75.0%); data were organised into anatomical subgroups, two of which were subjected to meta-analysis. Sensitivity and specificity ranged from 42.11 − 100% and 65.0 − 100%, with the highest diagnostic accuracy in fractures of the foot and ankle. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of US was 0.93 and 0.92 for upper limb fractures (I² = 54.7 % ; 66.3%), and 0.83 and 0.93 for lower limb fractures (I² = 90.1 % ; 83.5%).

Conclusion

Ultrasonography demonstrates good diagnostic accuracy in the detection of upper and lower limb bone fractures in adults, especially in fractures of the foot and ankle. This is supported by pooled analysis of upper and lower limb fracture subgroups. Further research in larger populations is necessary to validate and strengthen the quality of the available evidence prior to recommending US as a first-line imaging modality for prehospital use.

Trial registration

The protocol is registered with the PROSPERO International register of systematic reviews: ID = CRD42017053640.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12873-019-0226-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

HOW SCAPHOID FRACTURES ARE TREATED IN BRAZIL

OBJECTIVE

To verify how hand surgeons manage scaphoid fractures and their complications.

METHODS

Two hundred questionnaires were distributed during the 36^th Brazilian Hand Surgery Congress (2016).

RESULTS

On suspicion of fracture without radiographic confirmation, 57% of surgeons request a CT or MRI scan, while 43% opt for immobilization and consecutive radiographs. In stable fractures the preference was for treatment with plaster cast. In fractures with no scaphoid waist displacement, 33% opt for percutaneous fixation. In displaced waist or proximal pole fractures, 66% and 99.4%, respectively, opted for surgical treatment. Most surgeons treat waist nonunion with a nonvascularized bone graft. When absorption at the site of nonunion is greater than 4 mm, 50% prefer to use iliac graft and screw fixation. In proximal pole nonunion, the Zaidemberg technique is preferred by 64%. More experienced surgeons are more likely to request tests in occult fractures (63.9% versus 47.6%; p=0.04), and tend to recommend surgery for distal third fractures more frequently (16.4% versus 4.7%; p=0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

We have provided an overview of treatment preferences for scaphoid fractures. It should be noted that more experienced surgeons are more likely to request additional tests for occult fractures and to recommend surgical treatment of distal third fractures. Level of Evidence IV, Cross-sectional survey.

Ultrasound for diagnosing radiographically occult scaphoid fracture

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the literature on the performance of ultrasound in diagnosing radiographically occult scaphoid fracture.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the MEDLINE and Embase databases. Original studies investigating the performance of ultrasound in diagnosing radiographically occult scaphoid fracture in more than 10 patients were eligible for inclusion. Studies that included both radiographically apparent and occult scaphoid fractures (at initial radiography) were only included if independent data on radiographically occult fractures were reported. Methodological quality of the studies included was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Accuracy data were extracted. Sensitivity and specificity were pooled with a bivariate random-effects model.

RESULTS

The inclusion criteria were met by 7 studies; total sample size comprised 314 patients. All studies, except 1, included cortical disruption of the scaphoid in their diagnostic criteria. The sensitivity and specificity of ultrasound in diagnosing radiographically occult scaphoid fracture ranged from 77.8% to 100% and from 71.4% to 100% respectively, with pooled estimates of 85.6% (95% CI: 73.9%, 92.6%) and 83.3% % (95% CI: 72.0%, 90.6%) respectively. Exclusion of two studies with a high risk of bias in any QUADAS-2 domain did not affect the pooled results.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound can diagnose radiographically occult scaphoid fracture with a fairly high degree of accuracy. Because of its relatively low costs and fairly high sensitivity, ultrasound seems more cost-effective than empiric cast immobilization and may be used when CT and MRI are not readily available.

The economic evidence for advanced imaging in the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures: systematic review of evidence

Given the limitations of conventional radiography in the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures on presentation, advanced imaging, particularly magnetic resonance imaging, is a useful additional investigation. We carried out a systematic review of the economic evidence for the use of advanced imaging in the management of suspected scaphoid fractures. Fifteen articles were included in the review. Owing to the heterogeneity of study designs, the type and timing of interventions and the economic analyses performed, direct comparisons between the 15 studies were difficult. From a health care perspective, little could be concluded regarding the economic implications of the use of advanced imaging in clinical practice. However, from a societal perspective, the evidence favours the use of advanced imaging in the management of suspected scaphoid fractures as it does appear to lead to overall cost-savings.

The diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging for detecting acute scaphoid fractures in children: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

To determine the diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging for the diagnosis of acute scaphoid fractures in children.

METHODS

A systematic review of Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases between 1980 and July 2017 was independently performed by two observers. Criteria for study inclusion in a meta-analysis and assessment of the quality of such studies using the QADAS tool, were predetermined.

RESULTS

No studies were eligible for inclusion in a meta-analysis. Three studies (of low quality when assessed against the STARD guidelines for reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy) assessed MRI (performed between Days 2 and 10 after acute injury) for the diagnosis of scaphoid fractures in a total of 119 children (age range 6 to 16 years). Study 1 (45 children) reported inter-observer reliability of radiographs and MRI of 0.53 and 0.95 respectively. Study 3 (18 children) reported a negative predictive value of MRI (even as early as Day 2), of 100%. No measure of diagnostic accuracy or observer reliability was reported in Study 2 (56 children). In all 3 studies, MRI identified more scaphoid fractures (and other carpal injuries) than radiographs. Study 3 showed that follow-up MRI between Days 38 and 45 added no new information compared to initial MRI.

CONCLUSION

Based on a systematic review of the literature, there is currently no evidence on which to suggest an imaging protocol for suspected scaphoid fracture in children. Until such evidence is available, existing guidelines (which are based on findings from adult studies) should be followed. Advances in knowledge: (1) There is low quality evidence regarding the diagnostic accuracy of cross-sectional imaging for suspected scaphoid fractures in children and no evidence on which to propose an optimal imaging strategy. (2) Until such evidence is available, current guidelines (based predominantly on findings in adults and expert opinion) should be followed.

Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography and radiography for scaphoid fractures

The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic accuracy, the inter-rater agreement and raters’ certainty of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and radiography for the detection of scaphoid fractures. Our hypothesis is that the CBCT has a higher diagnostic accuracy for scaphoid fractures than radiography. We retrospectively analysed patients who underwent both radiography and CBCT examinations within 4 days to rule out a scaphoid fracture over a 2-year period in our institution. 4 blinded radiologists and orthopaedic surgeons independently rated the images regarding the presence of a scaphoid fracture. The reference standard was evaluated by two radiologists in a consensus reading. Inter-rater correlation was evaluated, pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were calculated and compared. 102 patients met the inclusion criteria. 52% of them had a scaphoid fracture. The inter-rater correlation was higher in the CBCT compared to radiography (P < 0.001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were higher for CBCT than for radiography (P < 0.019). Observers’ fracture classifications showed a higher correlation with the reference standard in the CBCT. Observers’ certainty for fracture detection and classification were higher in the CBCT. CBCT shows a higher diagnostic accuracy for scaphoid fractures than radiography.

Rationale and design of the SMaRT trial: A randomised, prospective, parallel, non-blinded, one-centre trial to evaluate the use of magnetic resonance imaging in acute setting in patients presenting with suspected scaphoid fracture

Background Wrist injury is a common presentation to the Emergency Department in the United Kingdom. Among these injuries, the scaphoid is the most common fractured carpal bone. However, given the limited ability of conventional radiography to accurately diagnose a suspected scaphoid fracture on presentation, its diagnosis and management remain challenging. Despite the vast clinical evidence supporting the superior accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging, there is little to no evidence around the real-world clinical and economic impact of immediate magnetic resonance imaging in the management of suspected scaphoid fractures. Methods Review of design and implementation challenges associated with the identification and subsequent recruitment of eligible patients, implementation of a novel clinical pathway in an acute setting, rationale behind the primary and secondary outcomes selected and measurement of the primary outcome. Results The Scaphoid Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Trauma trial is a single-site prospective, randomised, non-blinded, parallel design trial that aims to evaluate the use of immediate magnetic resonance imaging in the management of patients presenting to the acute setting with suspected scaphoid fractures. The primary outcome is the total 3-month cost per patient associated with the diagnosis and treatment of suspected scaphoid fractures. It is hypothesised that the immediate use of magnetic resonance imaging, a more accurate but expensive imaging modality, in patients with negative findings in the initial four-view radiography, will reduce the overall National Health Service costs by promoting definitive care and avoiding unnecessary diagnostic and treatment procedures. Other rationale design considerations in the recruitment, randomisation, data acquisition and intervention implementation are also discussed. Several of these challenges derive from real-world operational issues associated with the provision of magnetic resonance imaging in an intrinsically complex acute setting. Staff engagement during the trial's planning phase, combined with an extensive training programme rolled out prior to the trial's launch, were essential to raise staff awareness and engagement. Given the acute nature of the clinical condition, the latter was deemed essential as the eligibility assessment, recruitment, randomisation and treatment allocation processes all need to happen in a very tight time frame. Limitations Findings from the Scaphoid Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Trauma trial might not be generalisable to other National Health Service hospitals, foreign healthcare systems nor patient presentations outside normal magnetic resonance imaging working hours. Conclusion The Scaphoid Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Trauma trial was designed to evaluate the costs, patient satisfaction and clinical outcomes around the management of suspected scaphoid fractures and ultimately provide solid evidence on which to base the United Kingdom and international clinical practice. This article discusses the steps considered in the design of this novel trial, with particular emphasis on the issues and lessons learned during the planning and implementation stages.

Controversies and best practices for acute scaphoid fracture management

Acute scaphoid fractures are common wrist injuries that continue to elicit debate from surgeons regarding the most appropriate diagnostic and management algorithms. This review will examine the current literature and trends, in an attempt to provide the reader with an evidence-based discussion regarding current controversies of interest to clinicians. In addition, an attempt will be made to provide recommendations for the best treatment practices for acute scaphoid fractures.

The efficiency of bedside ultrasonography in patients with wrist injury and comparison with other radiological imaging methods: A prospective study

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Our aim was to determine the efficiency of ultrasound (US) scanning in patients with wrist trauma admitted to the emergency department and to compare US diagnostic usage with other radiological imaging methods.

METHODS

Patients who presented to the emergency department with wrist injury and who met the inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria were eligible. For all patients, US evaluation of the whole wrist was performed by an emergency physician before other radiological imaging methods (radiographies, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging). All of the patients included in the study underwent US, radiography, CT, and MR.

RESULTS

During the study, 122 patients were admitted with a wrist injury. After filtering for the exclusion criteria, 80 patients were included in the study. The sensitivity of US scanning in detecting fractures was 95.31% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 87.1-98.39), the specificity was 93.75% (95% CI: 71.67-98.89), and the positive predictive value was 98.39% (95% CI: 91.72-99.85), and the negative predictive value was 83.33% (95% CI: 72.98-90.41). The sensitivity of US scanning in detecting tendon and ligamentous structural injury was 66.67% (95% CI: 41.71-84.82), the specificity was 100% (95% CI: 94.42-100), the positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI: 94.29-99.89), and the negative predictive was 92.86% (95% CI: 84.25-97.14).

CONCLUSION

US scanning is an effective method that can be applied in the emergency department to adult patients to diagnose distal forearm and carpal bones fractures. In soft tissue injuries, US and MR examinations produce similar results.

Cone-Beam CT in diagnosis of scaphoid fractures

OBJECTIVE

This prospective study investigated the sensitivity of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), a low dose technique recently made available for extremity examinations, in detecting scaphoid fractures. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used as gold standard for scaphoid fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 95 patients with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture were examined with radiography and CBCT in the acute setting. A negative CBCT exam was followed by an MRI within 2 weeks. When a scaphoid fracture was detected on MRI a new CBCT was performed.

RESULTS

Radiography depicted seven scaphoid fractures, all of which were also seen with CBCT. CBCT detected another four scaphoid fractures. With MRI another five scaphoid fractures were identified that were not seen with radiography or with CBCT. These were also not visible on the reexamination CBCT. Sensitivity for radiography was 44, 95 % confidence interval 21-69 %, and for CBCT 69 %, 95 % confidence interval 41-88 % (p = 0.12). Several non-scaphoid fractures in the carpal region were identified, radiography and CBCT depicted 7 and 34, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

CBCT is a superior alternative to radiography, entailing more accurate diagnoses of carpal region fractures, and thereby requiring fewer follow-up MRI examinations. However, CBCT cannot be used to exclude scaphoid fractures, since MRI identified additional occult scaphoid fractures.

Use of advanced imaging techniques during visits to emergency departments--implications, costs, patient benefits/risks

25 years ago, on a Friday evening at 9 pm, the emergency department (ED) was full of patients with a wide range of clinical problems. Their investigations included plain radiographs, but no other imaging was included until the next working day. At present, many patients are receiving advanced imaging such as ultrasound, CT and MRI, often delivered out of hours--an obvious advance for patients or sometimes an unnecessary development? In this article, we will consider how to assess patient benefits and whether increased use of advanced imaging is an overall advance for patients. We will address the general implications for healthcare services which come with greater use of advanced imaging. We will then address the effect of advanced imaging on individual fictional ED patients with a variety of complaints.

Diagnosis of Occult Scaphoid Fractures: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

BACKGROUND

Scaphoid fractures are common but may be missed on initial radiographs. Advanced imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have improved diagnostic accuracy, but at an increased initial cost. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of immediate advanced imaging for suspected occult scaphoid fractures.

METHODS

A decision analysis model was created to evaluate three diagnostic strategies for patients with concerning history and examination but negative radiographs: (1) empiric cast immobilization with orthopaedic follow-up and repeat radiography at two weeks post-injury, (2) immediate CT scanning, or (3) immediate MRI. Prevalence of occult scaphoid fracture, sensitivity and specificity of CT and MRI, and risks and outcomes of a missed fracture were derived from published clinical trials. Costs of imaging, lost worker productivity, and surgical costs of nonunion surgery were estimated on the basis of the literature.

RESULTS

Advanced imaging was dominant over empiric cast immobilization; advanced imaging had lower costs and its health outcomes were projected to be better than those of empiric cast immobilization. MRI was slightly more cost-effective than CT on the basis of the mean published diagnostic performance, but was highly sensitive to test performance characteristics. Advanced imaging would have to increase in cost to more than $2000 or decrease in sensitivity to <25% for CT or <32% for MRI for empiric cast immobilization to be cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS

Given its relatively low cost and high diagnostic accuracy, advanced imaging for suspected scaphoid fractures in the setting of negative radiographs represents a cost-effective strategy for reducing both costs and morbidity. The decision to use CT compared with MRI is a function of individual institutional costs and local test performance characteristics.

Cost-Effectiveness of Diagnostic Strategies for Suspected Scaphoid Fractures

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the cost effectiveness of multiple competing diagnostic strategies for suspected scaphoid fractures.

METHODS

With published data, the authors created a decision-tree model simulating the diagnosis of suspected scaphoid fractures. Clinical outcomes, costs, and cost effectiveness of immediate computed tomography (CT), day 3 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), day 3 bone scan, week 2 radiographs alone, week 2 radiographs-CT, week 2 radiographs-MRI, week 2 radiographs-bone scan, and immediate MRI were evaluated. The primary clinical outcome was the detection of scaphoid fractures. The authors adopted societal perspective, including both the costs of healthcare and the cost of lost productivity. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), which expresses the incremental cost per incremental scaphoid fracture detected using a strategy, was calculated to compare these diagnostic strategies. Base case analysis, 1-way sensitivity analyses, and "worst case scenario" and "best case scenario" sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS

In the base case, the average cost per scaphoid fracture detected with immediate CT was $2553. The ICER of immediate MRI and day 3 MRI compared with immediate CT was $7483 and $32,000 per scaphoid fracture detected, respectively. The ICER of week 2 radiographs-MRI was around $170,000. Day 3 bone scan, week 2 radiographs alone, week 2 radiographs-CT, and week 2 radiographs-bone scan strategy were dominated or extendedly dominated by MRI strategies. The results were generally robust in multiple sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate CT and MRI were the most cost-effective strategies for diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic and Decision Analyses Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Computed tomography versus magnetic resonance imaging versus bone scintigraphy for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures in patients with negative plain radiographs

BACKGROUND

In clinically suspected scaphoid fractures, early diagnosis reduces the risk of non-union and minimises loss in productivity resulting from unnecessary cast immobilisation. Since initial radiographs do not exclude the possibility of a fracture, additional imaging is needed. Computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and bone scintigraphy (BS) are widely used to establish a definitive diagnosis, but there is uncertainty about the most appropriate method.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of this study is to identify the most suitable diagnostic imaging strategy for identifying clinically suspected fractures of the scaphoid bone in patients with normal radiographs. Therefore we looked at the diagnostic performance characteristics of the most used imaging modalities for this purpose: computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and bone scintigraphy.

SEARCH METHODS

In July 2012, we searched the Cochrane Register of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Studies, MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the NHS Economic Evaluation Database. In September 2012, we searched MEDION, ARIF, Current Controlled Trials, the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, conference proceedings and reference lists of all articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all prospective or retrospective studies involving a consecutive series of patients of all ages that evaluated the accuracy of BS, CT or MRI, or any combination of these, for diagnosing suspected scaphoid fractures. We considered the use of one or two index tests or six-week follow-up radiographs as adequate reference standards.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened titles and abstracts and assessed full-text reports of potentially eligible studies. The same authors extracted data from full-text reports and assessed methodological quality using the QUADAS checklist. For each index test, estimates of sensitivity and specificity from each study were plotted in ROC space; and forest plots were constructed for visual examination of variation in test accuracy. We performed meta-analyses using the HSROC model to produce summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 11 studies that looked at diagnostic accuracy of one or two index tests: four studies (277 suspected fractures) looked at CT, five studies (221 suspected fractures) looked at MRI and six studies (543 suspected fractures) looked at BS. Four of the studies made direct comparisons: two studies compared CT and MRI, one study compared CT and BS, and one study compared MRI and BS. Overall, the studies were of moderate to good quality, but relevant clinical information during evaluation of CT, MRI or BS was mostly unclear or unavailable.As few studies made direct comparisons between tests with the same participants, our results are based on data from indirect comparisons, which means that these results are more susceptible to bias due to confounding. Nonetheless, the direct comparisons showed similar patterns of differences in sensitivity and specificity as for the pooled indirect comparisons.Summary sensitivity and specificity of CT were 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.36 to 0.92) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.00); for MRI, these were 0.88 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.97) and 1.00 (95% CI 0.38 to 1.00); for BS, these were 0.99 (95% CI 0.69 to 1.00) and 0.86 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.94). Indirect comparisons suggest that diagnostic accuracy of BS was significantly higher than CT and MRI; and CT and MRI have comparable diagnostic accuracy. The low prevalence of a true fracture among suspected fractures (median = 20%) means the lower specificity for BS is problematic. For example, in a cohort of 1000 patients, 112 will be over-treated when BS is used for diagnosis. If CT is used, only 8 will receive unnecessary treatment. In terms of missed fractures, BS will miss 2 fractures and CT will miss 56 fractures.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Although quality of the included studies is moderate to good, findings are based on only 11 studies and the confidence intervals for the summary estimates are wide for all three tests. Well-designed direct comparison studies including CT, MRI and BS could give valuable additional information.Bone scintigraphy is statistically the best diagnostic modality to establish a definitive diagnosis in clinically suspected fractures when radiographs appear normal. However, physicians must keep in mind that BS is more invasive than the other modalities, with safety issues due to level of radiation exposure, as well as diagnostic delay of at least 72 hours. The number of overtreated patients is substantially lower with CT and MRI.Prior to performing comparative studies, there is a need to raise the initially detected prevalence of true fractures in order to reduce the effect of the relatively low specificity in daily practice. This can be achieved by improving clinical evaluation and initial radiographical assessment.

Costs analysis and comparison of usefulness of acute MRI and 2 weeks of cast immobilization for clinically suspected scaphoid fractures

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Fractures of the scaphoid are often not detected on initial plain radiographs. Conventional management of clinically suspected scaphoid fractures is cast immobilization for 2 weeks and then reassessment. Early MRI is a diagnostic alternative. We compared the cost and usefulness of the early MRI diagnostic strategy with that of conventional management.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective pseudo-randomized study included patients between 18 and 49 years of age who attended Bergen Accident and Emergency Department, Bergen, Norway during 1 year in 2009-2010, after sustaining an acute wrist trauma in the previous week and with a clinically suspected scaphoid fracture. 61 patients were investigated with acute MRI, while 63 patients received standard treatment as a control group. We used cost-minimization analysis to estimate the cost of the 2 patient groups.

RESULTS

Concerning cost, there were no statistically significant differences in the total direct medical costs or in indirect costs between the groups. Concerning usefulness, patients in the MRI group without a fracture (n = 35) used a cast for fewer days (mean 1 day) than patients in the control group with no fractures (n = 52) (mean 14 days; p < 0.001). They had less than half the number of days on sick leave than patients in the control group (mean 7 days vs. 15 days; p = 0.002).

INTERPRETATION

In a Norwegian setting, an early MRI was of value in patients with clinically suspected scaphoid fracture and normal plain radiographs.

Point-of-care ultrasound detection of acute scaphoid fracture

In cases of traumatic wrist pain, emergency physicians must maintain a high index of suspicion for scaphoid fractures due to their potential for serious complications. A growing body of literature supports the use of point-of-care ultrasonography by emergency physicians in the evaluation of potential fractures. We report a case of a pediatric scaphoid fracture that was initially not visualized on x-ray and was subsequently detected using point-of-care ultrasound in the ED.

Scaphoid fractures: a higher order analysis of clinical tests and application of clinical reasoning strategies

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to identify clinical tests for scaphoid fractures and, using a higher order analysis, to determine their diagnostic accuracy.

METHODS

A literature review of the databases CINAHL, Embase, Medline and PUBMED from 1980 to September 30, 2011 was conducted to obtain applicable literature on clinical tests used in identifying scaphoid fractures. Methodological quality was determined using the criteria for validity suggested by Sackett et al (2000). Using a random effects model, pooled positive likelihood ratios (PPLR) were established for any test evaluated in at least 3 published studies. Moderator analyses provided insight into heterogeneity of results.

RESULTS

Higher order analysis indicated that the scaphoid compression test, anatomical snuffbox tenderness and scaphoid tubercle tenderness demonstrated statistically significant ability to identify scaphoid fractures with PPLR of 2.37 (1.27-4.41), 1.52 (1.12-2.06) and 1.67 (1.33-2.09) respectively. Descriptive factors (gender and mechanism of injury) were also identified but did not demonstrate significant diagnostic ability. Pooled data revealed the existence of heterogeneity for the three clinical tests and descriptive factors, which could not be easily explained.

CONCLUSION

Three clinical tests with statistically significant diagnostic validity were identified. In isolation, the clinical significance of each is questionable. Further studies with description of sample characteristics, blinded assessments, and agreement on a reference standard are recommended.

Clinical diagnostic evaluation for scaphoid fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To provide an overview of available clinical evaluation tests for scaphoid fractures and to compare their diagnostic accuracies.

METHODS

PWe performed a systematic review of all studies assessing diagnostic characteristics of clinical evaluation in scaphoid fractures by searching MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and CINAHL databases. Only studies on clinical testing prior to radiographic evaluation and with acceptable reference standard for occult fractures were included. Thirteen relevant articles were analyzed that described a total of 25 tests. Diagnostic characteristics of the tests were used to construct contingency tables. If possible, data were pooled and summary receiver operating characteristic curves were fitted.

RESULTS

Anatomic snuff-box tenderness (ASB, 8 studies, 1,164 patients) and longitudinal thumb compression (LTC, 8 studies, 961 patients) had sufficient data for statistical analyses. Sensitivity for ASB ranged from 0.87 to 1.00; for LTC, 0.48 to 1.00. Specificity of ASB ranged from 0.03 to 0.98; for LTC, 0.22 to 0.97. Owing to considerable heterogeneity, pooled estimate points were not calculated. Other high-sensitivity tests were scaphoid tubercle tenderness, with sensitivity and specificity ranging from 0.82 to 1.00 and 0.17 to 0.57, respectively, and painful ulnar deviation, ranging from 0.67 to 1.00 and 0.17 to 0.60, respectively. Three studies showed that combining tests increased the specificity and post-test fracture probability while maintaining high sensitivity. Quality assessment showed high or unclear risk of bias and applicability concerns in reference standard and patient selection. Twelve study designs were prospective, and 1 was retrospective.

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical snuff box tenderness was the most sensitive clinical test. The low specificity of the clinical tests may result in a considerable number of overtreated patients. Combining tests improved the post-test fracture probability. This can be used to limit unnecessary immobilization, number of hospital visits, and use of imaging. The data presented herein may help to develop clinical prediction rules that could increase specificity without reducing sensitivity.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic II.

The suspected scaphoid injury: resource implications in the absence of magnetic resonance imaging

INTRODUCTION

Undiagnosed and untreated scaphoid fractures have poorer outcomes and many patients are unnecessarily immobilised for prolonged periods of time to avoid missing occult injuries. Magnetic resonance imaging has a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting occult scaphoid fractures, but many units do not routinely use this imaging modality in the diagnostic pathway. We aimed to determine the patterns of suspected scaphoid injuries, report the process of care, and calculate the costs involved in their management.

METHODS

We prospectively identified all adult patients referred to fracture clinic at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh with a scaphoid-related injury, between October 2007 and September 2008. Clinical notes were examined retrospectively. We defined three injury groups: true fractures, occult fractures, and suspected scaphoid injuries. We analysed patient demographics, treatment timelines, and the treatment costs involved.

RESULTS

Fracture clinic received 537 scaphoid-related referrals. There were 87 true fractures, 43 occult fractures, and 407 suspected injuries, incurring average treatment costs of £1,173, £773, and £384 respectively. Occult fractures accounted for 33% of all confirmed scaphoid fractures. The majority of scaphoid-related referrals (76%) were never proven to have a scaphoid fracture, and many were unnecessarily immobilised. The costs involved in the treatment of suspected scaphoid injuries were found to be higher than the cost of magnetic resonance imaging (£97).

CONCLUSION

In this group of suspected scaphoid injury, we believe the introduction of an early magnetic resonance imaging protocol would lead to an earlier definitive diagnosis and potentially a more cost-effective service.

Computed tomography for suspected scaphoid fractures: comparison of reformations in the plane of the wrist versus the long axis of the scaphoid

BACKGROUND

Definitive diagnosis of occult scaphoid fractures remains difficult. We tested the null hypothesis that, for diagnosis of true fractures among suspected scaphoid fractures, computed tomography (CT) reformations along the long axis of the scaphoid have the same accuracy as reformations made relative to the anatomical planes of the wrist.

METHODS

In a prospective trial, 34 patients with a suspected scaphoid fracture underwent CT scanning within 10 days after trauma. CT reformations along the long axis of the scaphoid (CT-scaphoid) and along planes relative to the wrist (CT-wrist) were made. We used radiographs obtained 6 weeks after injury as the reference standard for a true fracture. A blinded panel including two surgeons and one radiologist came to a consensus diagnosis for each reformation plane.

RESULTS

The reference standard showed six fractures of the scaphoid (prevalence, 18 %). Using CT-wrist, a scaphoid fracture was diagnosed in five patients (15 %), with three false positive, four false negative and two true positive diagnoses. Using CT-scaphoid, a scaphoid fracture was diagnosed in five patients (15 %), with one false positive, two false negative and four true positive results. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 33, 89 and 79 % for CT-wrist and 67, 96 and 91 % for CT-scaphoid, respectively. This resulted in positive predictive values of 36 % for CT-wrist and 76 % for CT-scaphoid. Negative predictive values were 87 % for CT-wrist and 94 % for CT-scaphoid. No significant differences were found with the number of patients available.

CONCLUSIONS

For diagnosis of true fractures among suspected scaphoid fractures, the diagnostic performance characteristics of CT scans reformatted along the long axis of the scaphoid were better than CT scans in the planes of the wrist, but the differences were not significant.

Adult scaphoid fracture

OBJECTIVES

Scaphoid fractures are the most common carpal fracture, representing 70% of carpal bone fractures. The diagnostic accuracy of physical examination findings and emergency medicine (EM) imaging studies for scaphoid fracture has not been previously described in the EM literature. Plain x-rays are insufficient to rule out scaphoid fractures in a patient with a suggestive mechanism and radial-sided tenderness on physical examination. This study was a meta-analysis of historical features, physical examination findings, and imaging studies for scaphoid fractures not visualized on plain x-ray in adult emergency department (ED) patients, specifically to address which types of imaging tests should be recommended in patients with persistent concern for acute fracture after ED discharge.

METHODS

A medical librarian and two emergency physicians (EPs) conducted a medical literature search of PUBMED and EMBASE. The original studies' bibliographies were reviewed for additional references and unpublished manuscripts were located via a hand search of EM research abstracts from national meetings. All abstracts were independently reviewed by the two physicians, and Quality Assessment Tool for Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess individual study quality. When two or more qualitatively similar studies were identified, meta-analysis was conducted using Meta-DiSc software. Primary outcomes were sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LRs) for predictors of scaphoid fracture detected on follow-up in patients with normal ED x-rays.

RESULTS

A total of 957 unique citations were identified, yielding 75 studies eligible for inclusion in this systematic review. Studies were significantly heterogeneous in design, study population, and criterion standard. The majority of studies were conducted in non-ED settings (e.g., orthopedic clinics). No studies used accepted diagnostic research publishing guidelines, and the overall QUADAS-2 methodologic quality was low, indicating an increased risk of bias in the estimates of diagnostic accuracy. The prevalence of scaphoid fractures ranged from 12% to 57% with the point estimate of 25% pretest probability for adult ED patients with concern for scaphoid injuries, nondiagnostic index x-rays, and scaphoid fractures on later imaging studies. Except for the absence of snuffbox tenderness (LR- = 0.15), physical examination findings lack accuracy to rule in or rule out scaphoid fractures, and no validated clinical decision rules exist. In patients with persistent concern for injury, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is superior to bone scan, computed tomography (CT), or ultrasound (US) to both rule in and rule out scaphoid fractures. Both MRI and CT share the added benefit of identifying alternative etiologies for posttraumatic wrist pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Except for the absence of snuffbox tenderness, which can significantly reduce the probability of scaphoid fracture, history and physical examination alone are inadequate to rule in or rule out scaphoid fracture. MRI is the most accurate imaging test to diagnose scaphoid fractures in ED patients with no evidence of fracture on initial x-rays. If MRI is unavailable, CT is adequate to rule in scaphoid fractures, but inadequate for ruling out scaphoid fractures.

Clinical scaphoid score (CSS) to identify scaphoid fracture with MRI in patients with normal x-ray after a wrist trauma

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare a combination of three commonly used tests to identify scaphoid fractures with MRI in patients with normal x-ray after a wrist trauma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This prospective MRI study included patients between 18 years and 49 years, who attended the Emergency Department, Bergen, Norway after sustaining an acute wrist trauma within the previous week. Initial x-rays of the wrist were normal. MRI was done within a median of 1 day after the trauma. The study period lasted 1 year. The patients were examined with three commonly used clinical scaphoid tests; tenderness in the anatomical snuffbox with the wrist in ulnar deviation (3 points), tenderness over the scaphoid tubercle (2 points) and pain upon longitudinal compression of the thumb (1 point). The clinical scaphoid score (CSS) is a sum of these points, which was compared with MRI verified fracture of the scaphoid.

RESULTS

We included 154 patients with wrist sprain and normal x-rays; 13 had occult scaphoid fracture. A CSS of 4 or more was the only statistically significant 'cut-off' value to identify occult scaphoid fractures (p<0.05). Diagnostic sensitivity increased with more experienced Emergency Department doctors.

CONCLUSIONS

If a patient with wrist pain after injury and normal x-ray has a CSS≥4 (pain in the anatomical snuffbox in addition to pain at scaphoid tubercle or longitudinal compression or both) we recommend MRI. A CSS <4 has a negative predictive value of 96%, which makes scaphoid fracture unlikely.

The clinical and radiological outcome of pulsed electromagnetic field treatment for acute scaphoid fractures

The use of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) to stimulate bone growth has been recommended as an alternative to the surgical treatment of ununited scaphoid fractures, but has never been examined in acute fractures. We hypothesised that the use of PEMF in acute scaphoid fractures would accelerate the time to union by 30% in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. A total of 53 patients in three different medical centres with a unilateral undisplaced acute scaphoid fracture were randomly assigned to receive either treatment with PEMF (n = 24) or a placebo (n = 29). The clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed at four, six, nine, 12, 24 and 52 weeks.

A log-rank analysis showed that neither time to clinical and radiological union nor the functional outcome differed significantly between the groups. The clinical assessment of union indicated that at six weeks tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox (p = 0.03) as well as tenderness on longitudinal compression of the scaphoid (p = 0.008) differed significantly in favour of the placebo group.

We conclude that stimulation of bone growth by PEMF has no additional value in the conservative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures.