A meta-analysis of amputation versus limb salvage in mangled lower limb injuries--the patient perspective

Lower Extremity Penetrating Trauma Care Associated With Race and Income in the United States of America

INTRODUCTION

For lower extremity penetrating traumas (LEPT), the impact of race and insurance status, as a surrogate of socioeconomic status, is still not fully elucidated. This study aims to explore the relationship between these variables and the likelihood of receiving an amputation for LEPT to further identify disparities in trauma care.

METHODS

We analyzed the 2017-2019 Trauma Quality Improvement Program databases to identify patients with LEPT. Univariate analysis of various patient factors was performed for mortality. Linear and logistic multivariate regressions were then conducted for the primary and secondary outcomes using significant variables from the univariate analysis. Finally, multivariate logistic regression identified associations between race, ethnicity, primary payor, and amputation rates.

RESULTS

The independent factors significantly linked to amputation included Black race (odds ratio (OR) 0.745, P < 0.001), Medicare (OR 0.557, P < 0.001), Medicaid (OR 0.697, P < 0.001), and uninsured status (OR 0.661, P < 0.001). We additionally evaluated the incidence of death among the penetrating trauma victims and determined that male (OR 2.008, P < 0.001), Black (OR 1.801, P = 0.001), and uninsured patients (OR 1.910, P = 0.003) were more likely to die during admission than the privately insured.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to privately insured victims, uninsured patients and those on Medicaid and Medicare experience lower amputation rates post-LEPT. Black patients were found to have not only a decreased likelihood of receiving an amputation following LEPT but also an increased rate of mortality during admission compared to Caucasian victims. These findings underscore the urgency to address institutional barriers hindering vulnerable populations from accessing appropriate care after trauma.

Complex Limb Injuries: Limb Salvage Versus Amputation-A Mini Review and Meta-Analysis

Introduction: The management of complex limb injuries can be very challenging, and it demands a multidisciplinary approach to treatment. Amputation and limb reconstruction are the two options that clinicians must choose. This study aims to comprehensively synthesize existing tools and resources from the literature that can assist clinicians in the decision-making process. Evaluation: The initial resuscitation and the prehospital care are the first important steps in the management of these injuries, while the immediate transfer to trauma centers is recommended for complex cases. After the stabilization of the patient, a thorough clinical examination of the limb is necessary with emphasis on the degree of soft tissue damage. Blunt trauma in the lower limb is associated with a higher risk of early amputation. Polytrauma patients with complex limb injuries require a holistic approach, with Damage Control Orthopedics (DCO) principles. Traumatic bleeding significantly increases mortality rates, necessitating prompt control using pressure bandages or tourniquets. Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is necessary in order to assess the viability of the limb. Management: Scoring systems can be used as a tool in the management of complex lower and upper limb injuries. Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) calculates ischemia, shock, bone and soft tissue damage, and patient characteristics. The Narakawa Index (NISSSA score) constitutes an alteration of MESS with the implementation of a nerve injury element. The Musculoskeletal Score for Severity of Injury (MESI score) estimates the risk of limb amputation by evaluating injury, neurovascular damage, type of fracture, patient characteristics, and the period from the occurrence of trauma to the definitive treatment. Further interventions and patient preferences should be incorporated into the decision-making process. Outcome: The outcomes of limb salvage versus amputation for complex limb injuries encompass various factors, including patient's preinjury health status, psychological well-being, functional outcomes, and economic impact. While some studies suggest better psychological outcomes with limb reconstruction and others find similar functional outcomes between the two approaches, economic considerations play a significant role in decision-making. Conclusion: Managing complex limb injuries effectively necessitates a comprehensive approach involving thorough assessment, multidisciplinary collaboration, and patient-centered care. Given the diverse factors influencing management and long-term outcomes, it is crucial to integrate medical expertise with patient preferences and expectations.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes after Local Flap Coverage versus Amputation for Complex Lower Extremity Trauma

Background  There is a paucity of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) data in lower extremity salvage. Limb salvage can often be achieved with the use of local muscle flaps or fasciocutaneous flaps. The purpose of this study was to compare PROs of patients who underwent lower extremity salvage using local fasciocutaneous flaps or muscle flaps to lower extremity amputation. Materials and Methods  The outcomes of 61 patients that underwent lower extremity local flap reconstruction ( n  = 33) or amputation ( n  = 28) between 2014 and 2020 were recorded. Chart reviews were performed to collect perioperative data. Patients were contacted via telephone for participation in the survey portion of our study. PROs were recorded utilizing both the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results  Surveys were completed by 61 patients (response rate 59.2%). The mean time of survey after flap reconstruction or amputation was 2.7 ± 1.4 years. Recent trauma (within 90 days) was the most common indication for local flap coverage ( n  = 23). LEFS score and SF-36 physical functioning scores were significantly lower in patients who underwent muscle flaps compared with fasciocutaneous flaps ( p  = 0.021 and p  = 0.022). Muscle flap patients had similar LEFS and SF-36 scores to amputation patients, while fasciocutaneous flap patients had significantly higher LEFS ( p  = 0.01), SF-36 physical functioning ( p  = 0.031), physical role functioning ( p  = 0.031), and emotional role functioning ( p  = 0.047) scores than amputation patients. Conclusion  Patients who underwent local fasciocutaneous flaps for limb salvage reported higher PRO scores than those undergoing amputation, while patients undergoing muscle flaps reported outcomes similar to those undergoing amputation. PROs for muscle flap patients were significantly lower than those of fasciocutaneous flap patients. These data suggest that while fasciocutaneous and muscle flaps are both useful limb salvage procedures, fasciocutaneous flaps may confer advantages that result in improved patient-perceived outcomes. Further study is needed to better characterize outcomes in limb salvage.

The LIMB-Q: Reliability and Validity of a Novel Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for Patients with Lower Extremity Trauma

BACKGROUND

The LIMB-Q is a novel patient-reported outcome measure for patients with lower extremity trauma. The aim of this study was to perform a psychometric validation of the LIMB-Q based on the Rasch measurement theory.

METHODS

An international, multisite convenience sample of patients with lower extremity traumatic injuries distal to the midfemur was recruited from clinical sites in the United States and the Netherlands and online platforms (in English; Trauma Survivors Network patient support group and the Prolific academic research platform). A cross-sectional survey of the LIMB-Q was conducted with test-retest reliability analysis performed 1 to 2 weeks after initial completion in a subgroup of patients.

RESULTS

The LIMB-Q was field-tested in 713 patients. The mean age was 41 years (SD, 17 years; range, 18 to 85 years), the mean time from injury was 7 years (SD, 9 years; range, 0 to 58 years), and there were various injury and treatment characteristics (39% fracture surgery only, 38% flap or graft, 13% amputation, 10% amputation and flap or graft). Out of 382 items tested, 164 were retained across 16 scales. Reliability was demonstrated with person separation index values of 0.80 or greater in 14 scales (0.78 to 0.79 in the remaining 2 scales), Cronbach alpha values 0.83 or greater, and intraclass correlation coefficient values 0.70 or greater. Each scale was unidimensional, measurement invariance was confirmed across clinical and demographic factors, test-retest analysis showed adequate reliability, and construct validity was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

The LIMB-Q is a patient-reported outcome measure with 16 independently functioning scales (6 to 15 items per scale) developed and validated specifically for patients with lower extremity trauma with fractures, reconstruction, or amputation.

The integration of ortho-plastic limb salvage teams in the humanitarian response to violence-related open tibial fractures: evaluating outcomes in the Gaza Strip

BACKGROUND

Limb salvage by ortho-plastic teams is the standard protocol for treating open tibial fractures in high-income countries, but there's limited research on this in conflict settings like the Gaza Strip. This study assessed the clinical impact of gunshot-related open tibial fractures, compared patient management by orthopedic and ortho-plastic teams, and identified the risk factors for bone non-union in this context.

METHODS

A retrospective review of medical records was conducted on Gaza Strip patients with gunshot-induced-open tibial fractures from March 2018 to October 2020. Data included patient demographics, treatments, and outcomes, with at least one year of follow-up. Primary outcomes were union, non-union, infection, and amputation.

RESULTS

The study included 244 injured individuals, predominantly young adult males (99.2%) with nearly half (48.9%) having Gustilo-Anderson type IIIB fractures and more than half (66.8%) with over 1 cm of bone loss. Most patients required surgery, including rotational flaps and bone grafts with a median of 3 admissions and 9 surgeries. Ortho-plastic teams managed more severe muscle and skin injuries, cases with bone loss > 1 cm, and performed less debridement compared to other groups, though these differences were not statistically significant. Non-union occurred in 53% of the cases, with the ortho-plastic team having the highest rate at 63.6%. Infection rates were high (92.5%), but no significant differences in bone or infection outcomes were observed among the different groups. Logistic regression analysis identified bone loss > 1 cm, vascular injury, and the use of a definitive fixator at the first application as predictors of non-union.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the severity and complexity of such injuries, emphasizing their significant impact on patients and the healthcare system. Ortho-plastic teams appeared to play a crucial role in managing severe cases. However, further research is still needed to enhance our understanding of how to effectively manage these injuries.

Concomitant vascular and orthopedic trauma: 10 points to consider

Although vascular injuries complicate only 1-2% of patients with orthopedic trauma, they may be encountered in a much higher rate of around 10 % in injuries around the knee and elbow joints following both fractures and dislocations. In case of vascular involvement, specific diagnostic and therapeutic challenges arise and there is a higher risk for significant morbidity (i.e. limb loss) or mortality. In the absence of randomized data, diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms are not always straightforward and clinical practice may be based on experience and local protocols rather than firm evidence. With this article we intend to review available literature regarding concomitant skeletal and vascular trauma in order to provide concise information and clear guidelines of when to operate with least investigations and when to go for a full spectrum of investigations in the absence of hard clinical signs. Additionally, other aspects concerning the manipulation of these patients are discussed, such as the indications of primary amputation, the potential role of endovascular techniques and the value of the Resuscitative Endovascular Balloon Occlusion of the Aorta. In summary, this scoping review summarizes current practices in the diagnostic and therapeutic management of patients with concomitant orthopedic and vascular injuries, discusses different treatment strategies and gives a practical perspective for implementation on every day practice.

Neglected war injuries: Reconstruction versus amputation

INTRODUCTION

War injuries are remarkably different situations with profound severity and significant contamination compared to civilian injuries. Delayed definitive management makes the situation much more complicated. This study aimed to report the outcomes of limb reconstruction of neglected war injuries with a previous decision of amputation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 2010 to 2021, 1104 patients with war-related fractures from conflict-zone countries were referred to our center including 589 open tibial fractures. Of these tibial fractures, amputation had already been decided in 54 cases, and the patients were looking for a trial of reconstruction and avoiding amputation. These cases were included in the current study. The treatment approach was a single-stage procedure with bone and soft tissue reconstruction.

RESULTS

This study included 54 male patients with a mean age of 26.3 years. Infection was the predominant feature in 43 cases (79.6 %). CT angiography revealed a one-vessel limb in 17 patients. Peripheral nerve injuries affected 15 patients. The mean time from injury to presentation was 8.5 weeks. The bone gap (2-13 cm) was evident in 44 cases. In four cases, the contralateral limb was amputated below the knee. There were associated injuries in nine cases. Rotational flap coverage was done in the same setting for 19 legs. Gastrocnemius flap was done in two cases. The mean follow-up duration was 45.1 months. The treatment methods included bifocal management (33 cases), trifocal management (17 cases), fibular transfer (two cases), and a mono-focal approach in two cases. All fractures healed successfully. The mean external fixation period was 7.6 months. Recurrence of infection occurred in three patients. A non-displaced refracture developed in one case. Five cases had a residual angular deformity. Eventually, the ASAMI bone and functional results were good in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Neglected war injuries constitute a complex problem where amputation may be indicated. Our approach includes one-stage limb reconstruction with the corticotomy-first technique, conservative debridement of the docking site, concomitant osteoplastic procedure, and gradual distraction to tackle all the aspects of the problem. The good results obtained in the presented series make it a valid approach to avoid amputation in neglected war injuries.

Salvage of a severely mangled limb following traumatic injury

Management of a severely damaged extremity poses a dilemma-whether to perform a primary amputation or attempt limb salvage. A multitude of factors-such as the extent of neurovascular injury, limb ischaemia time, severity of bone and soft tissue loss, physiological reserve of the patient and availability of surgical expertise and resources-influence this decision. The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was developed as a predictor of the need for limb amputation, and a MESS of 7 or more is considered a predictor of primary amputation. Here we describe a case where a man in his 20s sustained traumatic avulsion of his right ankle with severe neurovascular damage and multiple tendon injuries onboard a ship at high sea. Despite a MESS of 10, limb ischaemia time of more than 10 hours and injuries to all three extremity vessels (anterior tibial, posterior tibial and peroneal arteries), limb salvage was successfully carried out at a level-II trauma centre.

The effect of time to amputation on medical costs accrued during the first twelve months after injury-A California workers' compensation claims study

BACKGROUND

This study investigated whether the time to amputation (TtoA) after a work-related injury had a significant effect on the medical costs accrued in the first year after injury.

DATA SOURCE

Six thousand nine hundred fifty-three person-level workers' compensation claims data from the state of California, USA, from 2007 to 2018.

METHODS

Multiple quantile regression was used to assess the impact of TtoA on medical costs accrued during the first 12 months after injury. Three time intervals for TtoA were investigated: immediate (0, 1 days), short-delay (2-31 days), and long-delay (>31 days).

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) medical dollars paid per claim during the first 12 months for the study population was $12,414 ($6,324-$29,347). Amputations that occurred during the short-delay time interval resulted in significant ( p < 0.001) median (95% CI) savings of -$3,196 (-$3,968 to -$2,424) compared with the immediate amputation group. The long-delay time interval resulted in significantly ( p < 0.001) increased median (95% CI) spending of $5,613 ($4,675-$6,551) compared with the immediate amputation group. Covariates that significantly increased costs were medical intensity, medical complexity, use of a prosthesis, and if the injured worker pursued legal action in addition to a workers' compensation claim.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents the impact of TtoA on medical spending in the first year after a work-related injury that results in an amputation. Amputations that occurred within the first month after an injury resulted in reduced medical spending compared with immediate amputations, and amputations that occurred after the first month resulted in increased medical spending.

Limb salvage versus primary amputation in Gustilo-Anderson IIIB and IIIC tibial fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The last systematic review on this topic was published in 2008. With advances in surgical techniques, patients with mangled extremities may now be potentially salvageable with comparable outcomes. This review aims to evaluate the outcomes of limb salvage compared to primary amputation in patients with severe open tibial fractures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search on PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, CENTRAL and CINAHL was performed from inception to 19 January 2022. The primary outcome was to evaluate clinical and functional outcomes. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate pain, patient preference, quality of life, and patient preferences. Methodological quality was evaluated using the MINORS criteria. Pooled estimates of relative risk (RR) and mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as a summary statistic for dichotomous variables and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Sixteen studies with 645 patients met inclusion criteria. The methodological quality was moderate based on the MINORS score. The majority were male. Mean age was 36.3 years. There was no significant differences in the length of hospitalization (n = 8), return to work rates (n = 9), return to sport rates (n = 4) and quality of life scores (n = 4). Patients with primary amputation had a significantly lower risk of total complications (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.08-0.53, p = 0.001) (n = 10), infections (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.25-0.85, p = 0.01) (n = 9), and number of surgeries (MD - 4.17, 95% CI - 6.49 to - 1.85, p = 0.0004) (n = 6). Patients with primary amputation were able to ambulate significantly earlier (MD - 4.06, 95% CI - 7.65 to - 0.46, p = 0.03) (n = 3). Three studies found a significantly higher cost of hospitalization in limb salvage patients. Functional outcomes were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

While patients with primary amputation had better clinical outcomes in the short-term, functional outcomes were not significantly different in both groups. Despite the heterogenicity of the results in this review, surgeons need to contextualize the decision making for their patients and incorporate these findings.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022303357.

Does a shorter residual first metatarsal length after first ray amputation in diabetic patients leads to poorer outcomes - A risk factor study

BACKGROUND

The first ray plays a vital role in the normal function of the foot and the gait cycle where in its absence can lead to abnormal changes in weight distribution to the residual first metatarsal stump and lesser metatarsals with predisposition to developing lesser toe deformities reulcerations and reamputations particularly in diabetic patients. This study aims to characterise the outcomes after first ray amputation and its associated risk factors with focus on the impact of residual first metatarsal length.

METHODS

All diabetic patients with first ray amputations from January 2012 to December 2016 were reviewed. Residual first metatarsal length was measured using postoperative radiographs. Risk factors for outcomes such as readmission, reulceration and/or reamputation, transfer ulceration and/or amputation of lesser toes, proximal amputations, ulcer-free duration (UFD) and mortality were analysed using bivariate logistic/linear regression followed by multiple logistic/linear regression models adjusting for confounding factors.

RESULTS

Among 89 patients with first ray amputations, 65.3 % needed readmission for further treatment. Although only 10.1 % had reulceration at the first ray which all led to reamputation, there were 56.2 % with transfer ulceration and 40.4 % with transfer amputation of the lesser toes in this cohort. The prevalence of transmetatarsal amputation was 18 % and proximal amputations at 12.4 % while the average UFD was 27 months. Mortality rate was 31.5 % with an average of 3-year survival. Preservation of the first metatarsal length via metatarsophalangeal joint disarticulation independently reduced likelihood of readmissions and residual metatarsal length of > one third when compared to < one third after first ray amputations had lower likelihood of transfer amputation of lesser toes.

CONCLUSION

First ray amputation in diabetic patients leads to significant morbidities and mortality. Preservation of the residual first metatarsal length independently reduced the likelihood of readmissions and transfer amputation to the lesser toes.

Patient-reported outcomes following free flap lower extremity reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity has shown success for the management of large and complex defects, restoration of function, and favorable aesthetic outcomes. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have not been well explored in previous literature. This meta-analysis aimed to provide a comprehensive summary of PROs after free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE and Embase from 1946 to 2021 for studies reporting on PROs following free flap reconstruction in the lower extremity.

RESULTS

Overall, 53 studies were included, and 11 studies reported validated PRO measures for meta-analysis. A total of 1953 patients underwent reconstruction with 1958 free flaps for lower limb defects with a mean follow-up of 3.26 (0.25-7.83) months. The mean postoperative Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS) scores were 60.3 (±12) out of 80 points (4 studies, 85 patients). The mean postoperative AOFAS scores were 75.1 (±15) out of 100 points (4 studies, 68 patients). The mean postoperative SF-36 scores were 88.1 (±8.0) out of 100 points; mental health component was 48.7 (±8.9), and physical component was 38.4 (±8.2), out of 50 points (4 studies, 88 patients).

CONCLUSION

Our findings demonstrated that patients report improved physical health, mental health, and function following lower extremity reconstruction with free flaps. Patients reported similar improvements in functional scores following lower extremity reconstruction regardless of their free flap type. Furthermore, patients with myocutaneous flaps may have improved mental health and worse physical health scores when compared to perforator flaps. The evidence profiles presented in this review indicate that additional research is needed to help guide future decision-making.

Clinical effectiveness of the Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Score for limb salvage versus amputation in patients with complex limb injuries : a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIMS

Clinical management of open fractures is challenging and frequently requires complex reconstruction procedures. The Gustilo-Anderson classification lacks uniform interpretation, has poor interobserver reliability, and fails to account for injuries to musculotendinous units and bone. The Ganga Hospital Open Injury Severity Score (GHOISS) was designed to address these concerns. The major aim of this review was to ascertain the evidence available on accuracy of the GHOISS in predicting successful limb salvage in patients with mangled limbs.

METHODS

We searched electronic data bases including PubMed, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies that employed the GHOISS risk tool in managing complex limb injuries published from April 2006, when the score was introduced, until April 2021. Primary outcome was the measured sensitivity and specificity of the GHOISS risk tool for predicting amputation at a specified threshold score. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, need for plastic surgery, deep infection rate, time to fracture union, and functional outcome measures. Diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis was performed using a random effects bivariate binomial model.

RESULTS

We identified 1,304 records, of which six prospective cohort studies and two retrospective cohort studies evaluating a total of 788 patients were deemed eligible for inclusion. A diagnostic test meta-analysis conducted on five cohort studies, with 474 participants, showed that GHOISS at a threshold score of 14 has a pooled sensitivity of 93.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 78.4 to 98.2) and a specificity of 95% (95% CI 88.7 to 97.9) for predicting primary or secondary amputations in people with complex lower limb injuries.

CONCLUSION

GHOISS is highly accurate in predicting success of limb salvage, and can inform management and predict secondary outcomes. However, there is a need for high-quality multicentre trials to confirm these findings and investigate the effectiveness of the score in children, and in predicting secondary amputations.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(1):21-28.

Three-stage limb salvage in tibial fracture related infection with composite bone and soft-tissue defect

INTRODUCTION

Managing critical-sized tibial defects is one of the most complex challenges orthopedic surgeons face. This is even more problematic in the presence of infection and soft-tissue loss. The purpose of this study is to describe a comprehensive three-stage surgical protocol for the reconstruction of infected tibial injuries with combined bone defects and soft-tissue loss, and report the clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study at a specialized limb reconstruction center identified all patients with infected tibial injuries with bone and soft-tissue loss from 2010 through 2018. Thirty-one patients were included. All cases were treated using a three-stage protocol: (1) infected limb damage control; (2) soft-tissue coverage with a vascularized or local flap; (3) definitive bone reconstruction using distraction osteogenesis principles with external fixation.

PRIMARY OUTCOMES

limb salvage rate and infection eradication.

SECONDARY OUTCOMES

patient functional outcomes and satisfaction.

RESULTS

Patients in this series of chronically infected tibias had been operated upon 3.4 times on average before starting our limb salvage protocol. The mean soft-tissue and bone defect sizes were 124 cm2 (6-600) and 5.4 cm (1-23), respectively. A free flap was performed in 67.7% (21/31) of the cases; bone transport was the selected bone-reconstructive option in 51.7% (15/31). Local flap failure rate was 30% (3/10), with 9.5% for free flaps (2/21). Limb salvage rate was 93.5% (29/31), with infection eradicated in all salvaged limbs. ASAMI bone score: 100% good/excellent. Mean VAS score was 1.0, and ASAMI functional score was good/excellent in 86% of cases. Return-to-work rate was 83%; 86% were "very satisfied" with the treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

A three-stage surgical approach to treat chronically infected tibial injuries with combined bone and soft-tissue defects yields high rates of infection eradication and successful limb salvage, with favorable functional outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Comparative analysis of clinical outcome and quality of life between amputations and combined bone and flap reconstructions at the lower leg

PURPOSE

At the lower leg, soft tissue defects with exposed bones, tendons, or hardware require flap coverage. In this retrospective study, we analyzed combined bone and soft tissue reconstructions compared to amputations of the lower leg in a civilian setting.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent combined bone and flap reconstruction (LR) or amputation (LA) of the lower leg were eligible for the study. Bone conditions included fractures and bony defects due to posttraumatic osteomyelitis and non-union. Besides the analysis of the medical history, the study included clinical examination including extremity functional scale (LEFS) and SF-36-questionnaire.

RESULTS

LEFS score was significantly higher in the LR group compared to the LA group. Importantly, 42% in the LR group as opposed to 80% in the LA group could not return to their occupation. Mean hospitalization was 119 in the LR and 49 days in the LA group. SF-36 body item scores were significantly higher in the LR group as compared to LA.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing complex extremity reconstructions, including flap transfer to the lower leg have better functionality and higher quality of life than amputated patients. These data emphasize the advantages of these procedures and justify reconstructive efforts for limb salvage. Level of Evidence III.Implications for RehabilitationAmputation and combined bone and flap reconstruction in severe injuries of the lower leg can imply functional disabilities even after successful treatment.Albeit longer hospitalizations, patients with complex reconstructions showed better functional outcomes and had a higher quality of life.Limb salvage showed better functional outcomes and a higher rate in reintegration to work as compared to limb amputation.These data emphasize the importance of complex bone and soft tissue reconstruction in this patient cohort.

Limb Salvage vs. Amputation: Factors Influencing the Decision-Making Process and Outcomes for Mangled Extremity Injuries

In the setting of acute severe limb injury, the clinical decision to either attempt limb salvage or to perform a primary amputation presents a significant challenge to the trauma team. The initial step in the management of a mangled limb is invariably resuscitation and stabilisation of the patient and an evaluation of the limb. However, the decision-making process on whether to amputate vs attempt limb salvage is dependent on a range of complex factors. This includes assessing the degree of injury to the components of the limb architecture, essential skeletal stability, soft tissues, vasculature, and neurological structures. Whether or not the patient would survive an attempt to limb salvage is of course not the only variable to be taken into account. The likely and expected outcomes of attempted salvage in each individual case must be considered and furthermore, what the acceptable side-effect profile including the risk of failure would be for each individual patient should be assessed against the importance, real or perceived, that limb function is maintained. Finally, the patient's choice should also be taken into account alongside their occupation and pre-morbid functional status. How the surgeon makes this life-changing, or life-threatening decision, is of great clinical significance, and there are myriad scoring systems published that purport to assist in this matter. However, the changing structures of the trauma system, expansion and advancement of skillsets and technology means an updated review is required to help weigh up the challenging decision of limb amputation vs salvage, which usually takes place in a time-pressured and highly emotional emergency setting. An evidence-based, standardised structure to assist in these calculations could support surgeons and improve outcomes for these patients.

Microsurgical Strategies after Free Flap Failure in Soft Tissue Reconstruction of the Lower Extremity: A 17-Year Single-Center Experience

Background: There is no clear consensus on the optimal surgical strategy for providing safe coverage in salvage free flap surgery after total free flap failure. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate patients with total failure of the primary free flap in lower extremity reconstruction between 2000 and 2017. Results: In a cohort of 1.016 patients, we identified 43 cases of total flap failure (4.2%). A total of 30 patients received a salvage free flap with a success rate of 83.3% (25/30). One patient received a secondary salvage free flap. Overall limb salvage after primary free flap loss was 83.7% (36/43). Conclusions: Microsurgical management of free flap loss in the lower extremity is challenging and requires a decisive re-evaluation of risk factors and alternative strategies. This should include reconsidering the flap choice with a tendency towards traditional and safe workhorse flaps, a low-threshold switch to different recipient vessels, including arteriovenous (AV) loops, bypasses (especially in case of venous insufficiency) and back-up procedures, such as negative pressure wound therapy or dermal regeneration templates with skin grafting in cases of lower demand and critically ill patients. We derived one suggestion from our previous practice: replacing perforator flaps with axial pattern flaps (“safe workhorses”).

Comparison of patient-reported outcomes at one year after injury between limb salvage and amputation: A prospective cohort study

Purpose

This single-center, prospective cohort study aimed to compare the patient-reported outcomes one year after injury between limb salvage and amputation and to elucidate whether amputation contributes to early recovery of functionality and quality of life.

Methods

We included 47 limbs of 45 patients with severe open fractures of the lower limb and categorized them into limb salvage and amputation groups. Data on patient-reported outcomes one year after injury were obtained from the Database of Orthopaedic Trauma by the Japanese Society for Fracture Repair at our center. Patients’ limbs were evaluated using the lower extremity functional scale and Short-Form 8. Early recovery was assessed using functionality and quality-of-life questionnaires.

Results

Of the 47 limbs, 34 limbs of 34 patients were salvaged, and 13 limbs of 11 patients were amputated. Significant differences were noted between the limb salvage and amputation groups in terms of the lower extremity functional scale scores (mean: 49.5 vs. 33.1, P = 0.025) and scores for the mental health component (mean: 48.7 vs. 38.7, P = 0.003), role–physical component (mean: 42.2 vs. 33.3, P = 0.026), and mental component summary (mean: 48.2 vs. 41.3, P = 0.042) of the Short-Form 8. The limb salvage group had better scores than the amputation group.

Conclusions

As reconstruction technology has advanced and limb salvaging has become possible, the focus of studies should now be based on the perspective of “how the patient feels;” hence, we believe that the results of this study, which is based on patient-reported outcomes, are meaningful.

Limb Salvage Versus Amputation for the Mangled Extremity: Factors Affecting Decision-Making and Outcomes

Complex limb injuries are severe injuries of the extremities that affect most or all components of the limb. Industrial/farm accidents and motor vehicle crashes are the mechanisms of injury for a large proportion of these presentations in the civilian population. While recent advances in surgery have led to more patients with complex limb injuries (that would have qualified for a primary amputation a few decades ago) undergoing limb-reconstruction surgeries, the existing evidence is inconclusive on the merits of limb salvage over amputation. Limb salvage surgery still carries considerable morbidity and mortality risks and requires careful consideration of several factors by the managing surgeons.

Lower Limb Salvage Using Patent-Specific 3D-Printed Titanium Cage Following Severe Left Ankle Traumatic Partial Amputation: A Pediatric Case Report

BACKGROUND

Patients with large bony defects of the ankle who wish to avoid amputation have limited surgical intervention options for limb salvage. Each of these interventions are technically complex and present significant risk for complications. The use of a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium cage in conjunction with a tibiotalocalcaneal (TTC) arthrodesis using a retrograde nail is another management option. This case adds to the scarce published literature on this technique.

CASE PRESENTATION

This report presents the case of a 16-year-old female who suffered a traumatic partial amputation of her left distal lower extremity following an all-terrain-vehicle accident that resulted in a 10.0 × 10.0 cm skin laceration and a 5-cm subsegmental bony loss of the distal tibia. She was successfully treated using a patient-specific 3D-printed titanium truss cage in conjunction with a TTC arthrodesis using a retrograde nail.

CONCLUSIONS

The decision to amputate or attempt limb salvage in a severely injured lower limb is still a topic of active debate. However, literature has shown that patients who undergo limb salvage surgery have better psychological health outcomes and equivalent functional outcomes as patients who have undergone amputation. Therefore, research on techniques that optimize and advance limb salvage surgery is needed. As the numerous potential benefits and limitations of patient-specific 3D-printed implants are assessed throughout the field of orthopedics, further research and cost-analysis will be required. Cases such as the one presented add to the limited existing literature of patient-specific 3D-printed implant for treatment of large distal lower extremity bony defects.

LEVELS OF EVIDENCE

Level V (Case Report).

Short-term and long-term outcomes of free flap reconstruction versus amputation for diabetic foot reconstruction in patients with end-stage renal disease

BACKGROUND

In Taiwan, the prevalence of diabetes mellitus complicated by end-stage renal disease (ESRD) has been increasing and diabetes-related foot amputation is commonplace. In recent years, limb salvage has become top priority. The long-term outcomes of patients on hemodialysis undergoing diabetic foot reconstruction using free flaps remain unknown.

METHODS

Data from the National Health Insurance Research Database on hemodialysis patients with type 2 diabetes who received amputation or free flap reconstruction surgery for diabetic foot ulcer were analyzed from 2000 to 2013 using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. After 1:4 propensity score matching, 86 and 344 patients were assigned to the free flap reconstruction and amputation groups, respectively.

RESULTS

The 5-year survival rate was significantly higher in patients who received free flap compared to the amputated group (1-year survival rate = 80.0% vs. 67.6%, p = 0.030; 3-year survival rate = 49.7% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.024; 5-year rate=30.1% vs. 19.9%, p = 0.018; however, after 5 years, the overall long-term survival rate was similar in both groups (p = 0.064). Patients who had lower limb amputation after flap reconstruction were susceptible to mortality (adjusted HR = 1.39; p = 0.069). Peripheral arterial disease was a dependent risk factor (HR = 1.45; p = 0.037) for long-term survival, whereas old age (> 75 years; HR = 1.65; p = 0.004), cerebrovascular disease (adjusted HR = 1.36; p = 0.011), and sepsis (adjusted HR = 1.85; p = 0.035) served as independent risk factors. Hemodialysis patients with diabetic foot ulcer who had limb salvaged showed a higher 5-year survival rate as compared to the amputated group.

Analysis of bone transport for ankle arthrodesis as a limb salvage procedure for the treatment of septic pilon fracture nonunion

Septic nonunion of the pilon region with ankle joint infection is challenging for orthopedic surgeons to treat and is associated with a high risk of limb loss. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of bone transport for ankle arthrodesis in salvaging the limp after septic ankle destruction of the pilon region. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study including 21 patients treated for septic pilon nonunion with accompanying septic ankle destruction via Ilizarov bone transport between 2004 and 2018. In all cases, the complete excision of the nonunion and the resection of the ankle joint were carried out, followed by treating the bone and joint defect with a bone transport into the ankle arthrodesis. In 12/21 patients an additional flap transfer was required due to an accompanying soft tissue lesion. The overall healing and failure rate, final alignment and complications were recorded by the patients’ medical files. The bone-related and functional results were evaluated according to the Association for the Study and Application of Methods of Ilizarov (ASAMI) scoring system and a modified American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) scale. After a mean follow-up of 30.9 ± 15.7 months (range 12–63 months), complete bone and soft tissue healing occurred in 18/21 patients (85.7%). The patients had excellent (5), good (7), fair (4), and poor (3) results based on the ASAMI functional score. Regarding bone stock, 6 patients had excellent, 7 good, and 6 fair results. The modified AOFAS score reached 60.6 ± 18 points (range, 29–86). In total, 33 minor complications and 28 major complications occurred during the study period. In 2 cases, a proximal lower leg amputation was performed due to a persistent infection and free flap necrosis with a large soft tissue defect, whereas in one case, persistent nonunion on the docking side was treated with a carbon orthosis because the patient refused to undergo an additional surgery. Bone transport for ankle arthrodesis offers the possibility of limb salvage after septic ankle destruction of the pilon region, with acceptable bony and functional results. However, a high number of complications and surgical revisions are associated with the treatment of this severe complication after pilon fracture.

The mangled extremity: assessment, decision making and outcomes

The management of the mangled extremity continues to pose a significant challenge for ortho- paedic trauma surgeons. This article provides a comprehensive, up-to-date literature review on the assessment of complex limb injuries, and the variables that affect decision-making and outcomes in both limb salvage and amputation. Initial assessment involves using a systematic approach, saving life before limb, with early involvement of the relevant surgical specialities and multidisciplinary team. The decision to attempt limb salvage or perform amputation can be extremely difficult. Scoring systems can be used as a guide but should not be wholly relied upon; instead more emphasis should be placed on the surgeon's experience, extent of soft tissue damage, and patient factors and wishes. Outcomes following amputation versus limb salvage are comparable, with some studies suggesting amputation may be favourable. It is important to advise patients and families on what treatment is in their best interest so they can make an informed decision, and this must utilise a multidisciplinary approach.

Hyperbaric oxygen adjuvant therapy in severe mangled extremities

BACKGROUND

Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was first described more than 30 years ago by attempting to predict the need for empiric amputation. In severe traumatic crush and blast injuries, achieving satisfactory limb salvage may be difficult. Notably, a MESS of 7 or higher is consistently predictive of amputation. Additionally, Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy (HBOT) has been described for many purposes, and related studies have reported HBOT showed benefits in wound healing properties.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to evaluate the results of a prospective series of a new modality of adjuvant HBOT for severe mangled extremities.

METHOD

A total of 18 patients were evaluated for clinical and radiographic review. Current standard treatments followed by adjuvant HBOT were administered, and the mean follow-up period was 22 months. Time to wound closure, the number of surgeries and adjuvant HBOT treatment were analyzed for patient clinical evaluation. Complications and limb amputation rates were also recorded.

RESULT

Most clinical findings on follow-up were good to excellent after adjunctive HBOT. Minimal soft tissue infection was recorded, and limb salvage was successful in most cases. Only 1 patient (5.56 %) needed limb amputation because of a dying limb with chronic refractory osteomyelitis.

CONCLUSION

HBOT is an excellent adjunctive option in severely mangled extremities. Nevertheless, the main treatments are eliminating infection and managing surgery, and are promising in the recovery of severe extremity injuries. Although the MESS was evaluated at 7 or higher, limb salvage procedures followed by HBOT should be considered.

Guidelines for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients

GOAL

To provide healthcare professionals with comprehensive multidisciplinary expert recommendations for the acute care of severe limb trauma patients, both during the prehospital phase and after admission to a Trauma Centre.

DESIGN

A consensus committee of 21 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the onset of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e., pharmaceutical, medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of the quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasised. Few recommendations remained non-graded.

METHODS

The committee addressed eleven questions relevant to the patient suffering severe limb trauma: 1) What are the key findings derived from medical history and clinical examination which lead to the patient's prompt referral to a Level 1 or Level 2 Trauma Centre? 2) What are the medical devices that must be implemented in the prehospital setting to reduce blood loss? 3) Which are the clinical findings prompting the performance of injected X-ray examinations? 4) What are the ideal timing and modalities for performing fracture fixation? 5) What are the clinical and operative findings which steer the surgical approach in case of vascular compromise and/or major musculoskeletal attrition? 6) How to best prevent infection? 7) How to best prevent thromboembolic complications? 8) What is the best strategy to precociously detect and treat limb compartment syndrome? 9) How to best and precociously detect post-traumatic rhabdomyolysis and prevent rhabdomyolysis-induced acute kidney injury? 10) What is the best strategy to reduce the incidence of fat emboli syndrome and post-traumatic systemic inflammatory response? 11) What is the best therapeutic strategy to treat acute trauma-induced pain? Every question was formulated in a PICO (Patient Intervention Comparison Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

RESULTS

The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 19 recommendations. Among the formalised recommendations, 4 had a high level of evidence (GRADE 1+/-) and 12 had a low level of evidence (GRADE 2+/-). For 3 recommendations, the GRADE method could not be applied, resulting in an expert advice. After two rounds of scoring and one amendment, strong agreement was reached on all the recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant agreement among experts on strong recommendations to improve practices for severe limb trauma patients.

Contemporary approach to soft-tissue reconstruction of the lower extremity after trauma

The complex lower extremity wound is frequently encountered by orthopedic and plastic surgeons. Innovations in wound care, soft tissue coverage and surgical fixation techniques allow for improved functional outcomes in this patient population with highly morbid injuries. In this review, the principles of reconstruction of complex lower extremity traumatic wounds are outlined. These principles include appropriate initial evaluation of the patient and mangled extremity, as well as appropriate patient selection for limb salvage. The authors emphasize proper planning for reconstruction, timing of reconstruction and the importance of an understanding of the most appropriate reconstructive option. The role of different reconstructive and wound care modalities is discussed, notably negative pressure wound therapy and dermal substitutes. The role of pedicled flaps and microvascular free-tissue transfer are discussed, as are innovations in understanding of perforator anatomy and perforator flap surgery that have broadened the reconstruction surgeon’s armamentarium. Finally, the importance of a multidisciplinary team is highlighted via the principle of the orthoplastic approach to management of complex lower extremity wounds. Upon completion of this review, the reader should have a thorough understanding of the principles of contemporary lower extremity reconstruction.

[Open fractures]

Open fractures are associated with a higher rate of infections and delayed fracture healing; therefore, in addition to fracture fixation, infection prevention and soft tissue management are also important. Administration of antibiotics should be carried out as early as possible and over 24-72 h depending on the injury. The initial debridement and assessment of the severity of injury determine the treatment strategy. Fracture fixation follows the general traumatological principles. Simple injury patterns can be treated by primary fixation and wound closure. With substantial contamination, loss of bone or extensive soft tissue damage, temporary fixation and temporary wound closure are carried out. The definitive treatment with soft tissue coverage should be performed within 72 h in order to reduce the risk of fracture-related infections. For osseous segmental defects, different approaches are available to restore bone continuity, depending on the size and soft tissue situation.

A Leg to Stand on: Trauma Center Designation and Association with Rate of Limb Salvage in Patients Suffering Severe Lower Extremity Injury

BACKGROUND

Mangled extremities are one of the most difficult injuries for trauma surgeons to manage. We compare limb salvage rates for a limb-threatening lower extremity injuries managed at Level I vs Level II trauma centers (TCs).

STUDY DESIGN

We identified all adult patients with a limb-threatening injury who underwent primary amputation or limb salvage (LS) using the American College of Surgeons (ACS) Trauma Quality Improvement Program database at ACS Level I vs II TCs between 2007 and 2017. A limb-threatening injury was defined as an open tibial fracture with concurrent arterial injury (Gustilo type IIIc). Multivariable analysis and propensity score matching were performed to minimize confounding by indication.

RESULTS

There were 712 records for analysis; 391 (54.9%) LS performed and 321 (45.1%) underwent amputation. The rate of LS was statistically higher among patients treated at Level I TCs vs those treated at Level II TCs (47.4% vs 34.8%; p = 0.01). Patients with penetrating injuries (13% vs 9.5%; p = 0.046) and tibial/peroneal artery injury (72.9% vs 50.4%; p < 0.001), as opposed to popliteal artery injury (30.8% vs 58.8%; p < 0.001), were more likely to have LS. The risk-adjusted odds of LS was 3.13 times higher at Level I TCs vs Level II TCs (95% CI, 1.59 to 6.34; p = 0.001). Limb salvage rates were significantly higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs (53.0% vs 34.8%; p = 0.004), even after propensity matching.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with a mangled extremity, limb salvage rates are 50% higher at Level I TCs compared with Level II TCs, independent of case mix and injury severity.

Outcomes of severe lower limb injury with Mangled Extremity Severity Score ≥ 7

AIMS

Complex fractures of the femur and tibia with associated severe soft tissue injury are often devastating for the individual. The aim of this study was to describe the two-year patient-reported outcomes of patients in a civilian population who sustained a complex fracture of the femur or tibia with a Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) of ≥ 7, whereby the score ranges from 2 (lowest severity) to 11 (highest severity).

METHODS

Patients aged ≥ 16 years with a fractured femur or tibia and a MESS of ≥ 7 were extracted from the Victorian Orthopaedic Trauma Outcomes Registry (January 2007 to December 2018). Cases were grouped into surgical amputation or limb salvage. Descriptive analysis were used to examine return to work rates, three-level EuroQol five-dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D-3L), and Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) outcomes at 12 and 24 months post-injury.

RESULTS

In all, 111 patients were included: 90 (81%) patients who underwent salvage and 21 (19%) patients with surgical amputation. The mean age of patients was 45.8 years (SD 15.8), 93 (84%) were male, 37 (33%) were involved in motor vehicle collisions, and the mean MESS score was 8.2 (SD 1.4). Two-year outcomes in the cohort were poor: six (7%) patients achieved a GOS-E good recovery, the mean EQ-5D-3L summary score was 0.52 (SD 0.27), and 17 (20%) patients had returned to work.

CONCLUSION

A small proportion of patients with severe lower limb injury (MESS ≥ 7) achieved a good level of function 24 months post-injury. Further follow-up is needed to better understand the long-term trajectory of these patients, including delayed amputation, hospital readmissions, and healthcare utilization. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(4):769-774.

Advancements in Reconstructive Surgery Broaden Opportunities for Salvage of the Injured Lower Extremity

Advancements in microsurgery have made lower extremity reconstruction possible even after major soft tissue loss or tibial nerve disruption. There is an ongoing paradigm shift in the indications for amputation versus salvage and in flap selection protocols for different areas of the lower extremity. Initial evaluation, patient selection, triage, and timing of reconstruction are essential factors that can influence functional and aesthetic outcomes. The emergence of perforator flaps and the application of new concepts such as free-style flaps, propeller perforator flaps, thinning of free flaps, and supermicrosurgery have provided reconstructive surgeons with many techniques to decrease donor-site morbidity and improve outcomes. This includes options for reconstruction on extremities with single or no adequate runoff vessels. We present a review of the major advancements in reconstructive surgery for salvage of the traumatic lower extremity.

Outcomes of tissue reconstruction in distal lower leg fractures: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Open and closed fractures can be associated with posttraumatic or postoperative soft tissue defects caused by initial trauma, operative procedures, or infections. This study evaluated the postoperative outcomes in patients with open or closed lower leg fractures, related soft tissue defects, and subsequent flap coverage.

Methods

We performed a retrospective single-center cohort study in a level 1 trauma center. We analyzed the patients treated from January 2012 through December 2017 and recorded demographics, treatment, and outcome data. The outcome data were measured via patient-reported Foot and Ankle Outcomes Scores (FAOS) and EQ-5D-5L scores.

Results

We included 22 patients with complicated fractures (11 open and 11 closed) and subsequent soft tissue defects and flap coverages. The mean follow-up time was 41.2 months. Twenty-one patients developed infections, and necrosis at the site of surgery manifested in all closed fractures. Therefore, all patients needed soft tissue reconstructions. Preoperatively, 16 patients underwent arterial examinations via angiography and six underwent ultrasound examinations of the venous system. Ten patients had complications involving the flaps due to ischemia and consequent necrosis. The mean EQ-5D index was 0.62 ± 0.27, and EQ-5D VAS score was 57.7 ± 20.2. The mean FAOS was 60.7 ± 22.2; in particular, quality of life was 32.3 ± 28.8. The rate of returning to work in our patient group was 37.5% after 1 year.

Conclusions

Distal tibial fractures often require revisions and soft tissue reconstruction. The evaluated patient population had poor outcomes in terms of function, quality of life, and return to work. Furthermore, patients suffering from flap ischemia have worse outcomes than those without flap ischemia.

Limb Salvage Versus Amputation: A Review of the Current Evidence

In the trauma situation where the trauma team is faced with a severely injured limb, it requires judicious thinking and evaluating not only the injury in isolation but the patient as a whole when considering the management options. The aim must be to give the best quality of life and avoid repeated admissions to hospital for associated complications in the future.

The decision to amputate or salvage a limb should be based on numerous factors, such as the patient’s pre-injury status, injury factors (soft tissue injury, location, contamination and physiological status), patient’s wish and available resources.

The biggest challenge when faced with a complex limb injury is deciding what management route to take with a satisfactory outcome for the patient being the main goal.

Many studies have been undertaken looking at the outcome of successful limb salvage versus primary amputation. Studies such as the Lower Extremity Assessment Project (LEAP) study have concluded that there was no difference of outcome at the two-year stage between the two strategies.

Hindfoot blast injuries caused by improvised explosive devices: long-term functional assessment in French military personnel

PURPOSE

The chosen treatment and long-term evaluation of hindfoot blast injuries are not well-represented in the literature. The first objective of this retrospective study was to evaluate functional outcomes in French service personnel who had sustained such injuries caused by improvised explosive devices. The second objective was to compare the results for patients who had amputations with those who did not. The hypothesis was that amputee recovered better function.

METHODS

Long-term functional evaluations were carried out using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society scale (AOFAS), the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM), and the Short Form 12 health survey (SF-12).

RESULTS

Eight servicemen with ten hindfoot blast injuries were reviewed at a mean follow-up time of seven years. Primary management was always conservative although half of the patients required late amputation for chronic pain. The patients who underwent amputation reported significantly lower levels of pain than those who did not have an amputation, with higher FAAM and SF-12 scores.

CONCLUSION

In this series, long-term functional results appear better in the amputated group.

Treatment of traumatic losses of substance in the foot

Treatment of traumatic loss of bone and tissue substance in the foot necessitates special consideration of the anatomy and physiology of the segment. The causes of foot trauma are multiple and in many cases violent, leading to progressive tissue deterioration that may require multi-phased debridement. The therapeutic objective is to reconstruct a functional foot permitting painless pushing off, walking and footwear use by restoring a stable bone framework, with resistant covering satisfactorily adjusted to the different zones of the foot. While coverage of the back of the foot must be fine, coverage of the plantar zones will be padded. The reconstructive surgeon shall be particularly attentive to plantar sensitivity. To take up the surgical challenge, it is of paramount importance to fully master a wide-ranging therapeutic arsenal ranging from conventional grafts to composite free flaps in view of proposing the solution most suited to the type, size and location of the loss of substance, all the while striving to generate as few sequelae as possible at the donor site. In order for reconstruction to be successful, multidisciplinary collaboration between plastic surgeons, orthopedists and physician is highly recommended.

Socioeconomic position is associated with surgical treatment of open fractures of the lower limb: results from a Swedish population-based study

Background and purpose - High-energy trauma to the lower limbs can result in open fractures, treated by reconstructive surgery or amputation. We examined whether socioeconomic position is associated with choice of primary treatment.Patients and methods - We performed a nationwide population-based study using the Swedish National Patient Register to identify all adult patients who between 1998 and 2013 underwent reconstruction or amputation after an open fracture below the knee. Information on socioeconomic position was collected from Statistics Sweden.Results - Of 275 individuals undergoing surgery after an open fracture below the knee during the study period, the 1st surgery was reconstructive in 58% of the patients and amputation in 42%. The chance of having an initial reconstruction was lower for women than for men (OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.3-0.9), lower with age (OR 0.97, CI 0.96-0.99), and lower for individuals without employment compared with individuals in employment (OR 0.3, CI 0.2-0.5). Primary treatment was in women associated with family composition, whereas in men it was associated with level of education.Interpretation - Choice of primary treatment after open fracture in the lower limb is affected by socioeconomic position including sex, age, employment, family composition, level of education, and income.

Identifying Factors Most Important to Lower Extremity Trauma Patients: Key Concepts from the Development of a Patient-Reported Outcome Instrument for Lower Extremity Trauma, The LIMB-Q

BACKGROUND

Severe lower extremity injuries are challenging to treat. The aspects of limb salvage and amputation most important to patients are not well-defined. This study's aim is to develop a conceptual framework for a patient-reported outcome instrument for lower extremity trauma patients, by defining issues and concepts most important to this patient population.

METHODS

This is an interpretative description of transcripts collected from semistructured qualitative interviews at a single institution. High-energy lower extremity trauma patients were recruited by means of purposeful sampling to maximize variability. Thirty-three participant interviews were needed to reach content saturation. These participants were aged 19 to 79 years; 21 were men (63.6 percent); participation was after reconstruction [n= 15 (45.5 percent)], after amputation [n = 11 (33.3 percent)], or after amputation after failed reconstruction [n = 7 (21.2 percent)]. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and coded line-by-line. Concepts were labeled with major and minor themes and refined through a process of constant comparison. Analysis led to the development of a conceptual framework and item pool to inform the development of a patient-reported outcome measure.

RESULTS

In total, 2430 unique codes were identified and used to generate the conceptual framework covering 10 major themes: appearance, environment, finances, physical, process of care, prosthesis, psychological, sexual, social, and treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This study establishes a comprehensive set of concepts, identifying what is most important to severe lower extremity trauma patients. These findings can be used to inform and focus research and clinical care, and provides the framework to develop a lower extremity trauma-specific patient-reported outcome instrument: the LIMB-Q.

The Ethical Triage and Management Guidelines of the Entrapped and Mangled Extremity in Resource Scarce Environments: A Systematic Literature Review

OBJECTIVE

A systematic literature review (SLR) was performed to elucidate the current triage and treatment of an entrapped or mangled extremity in resource scarce environments (RSEs).

METHODS

A lead researcher followed the search strategy following inclusion and exclusion criteria. A first reviewer (FR) was randomly assigned sources. One of the 2 lead researchers was the second reviewer (SR). Each determined the level of evidence (LOE) and quality of evidence (QE) from each source. Any differing opinions between the FR and SR were discussed between them, and if differing opinions remained, then a third reviewer (the other lead researcher) discussed the article until a consensus was reached. The final opinion of each article was entered for analysis.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight (58) articles were entered into the final study. There was 1 study determined to be LOE 1, 29 LOE 2, and 28 LOE 3, with 15 determined to achieve QE 1, 37 QE 2, and 6 QE 3.

CONCLUSION

This SLR showed that there is a lack of studies producing strong evidence to support the triage and treatment of the mangled extremity in RSE. Therefore, a Delphi process is suggested to adapt and modify current civilian and military triage and treatment guidelines to the RSE.

Time to intravenous antibiotic administration (TIbiA) in severe open tibial fractures: Impact of change to national guidance

INTRODUCTION

Severe open tibial fractures are limb-threatening injuries. Outcomes depend on a complex interplay of patient, injury and treatment factors. 2009 guidelines from the British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) and British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons (BAPRAS) recommend prophylactic intravenous antibiotic administration within three hours of injury. More recent National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2016 guidelines recommend pre-hospital antibiotic administration where possible. This study aimed to analyse the impact of time to antibiotics on development of deep infection.

METHODS

Adult acute Gustilo-Anderson 3B open tibial fractures managed at a single UK Major Trauma Centre were reviewed retrospectively over a three-year period, including a period before and after the regional ambulance service introduced a policy of administering pre-hospital intravenous antibiotics to open fractures in 2016. Development of deep infection was recorded as the primary outcome measure. Complete case regression analysis was performed. Time was assessed as a continuous variable and as thresholds with antibiotics received within one or three hours of injury.

RESULTS

156 patients with 159 fractures were included. Following introduction of new guidance in 2016, median time to antibiotics decreased from 180 to 160 min and more patients received pre-hospital antibiotics (2% vs. 33%). Overall, 7.5% developed deep infection (n = 12) within a median follow-up of 26 months. Logistic regression found no relationship between any independent variable, including time to antibiotic administration, and development of deep infection.

CONCLUSIONS

There are a variety of factors identified in the literature and in national policies and treatment guidelines as potentially modifiable to reduce the risk of deep infection following open fractures. In this study, time to antibiotic administration was not associated with the risk of developing deep infection. The results of this study demonstrate a low infection rate, which may be due to expedient expert care delivered by a dedicated orthoplastic service in line with national guidance where achievable.

Psychosocial reactions to upper extremity limb salvage: A case series

STUDY DESIGN

Case series.

INTRODUCTION

A salvaged limb is one that has undergone a major traumatic injury, followed by repeated surgical attempts in order to avoid amputation. Psychological recovery for individuals with lower extremity limb salvage has been examined in a number of studies. However, psychosocial reactions for individuals with upper extremity (UE) limb salvage are understudied in the literature.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The purpose of this study was to explore the process of psychosocial adaptation for 3 trauma cases after UE limb salvage.

METHODS

The Reactions to Impairment and Disability Inventory was used to assess psychosocial adaptation. Physical function outcomes (pain, range of motion, edema, sensation, and dexterity) are presented. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand measure was used to assess perceived disability. Medical and rehabilitation history are discussed for each case, in order to provide in-depth understanding of the impact of these injuries.

RESULTS

Reactions to injury varied across the cases; however, outcomes suggest that psychosocial adaptation may be influenced by the experience of pain, the ability to participate in valued roles and activities, and having a supportive social network.

DISCUSSION

For this population, therapists may consider emphasizing pain management, focusing on client-centered goals and interventions, and facilitating peer support. Providers should closely monitor patients for signs of poor adaptation, such as hand-hiding behaviors.

CONCLUSIONS

This study is among the first to examine psychological outcomes for the UE limb salvage population. Future research would be beneficial to provide deeper understanding of the psychosocial challenges for these individuals.

Psychosocial reactions to upper extremity limb salvage: A cross-sectional study

STUDY DESIGN

Descriptive cross-sectional survey study.

INTRODUCTION

Limb salvage spares an extremity at risk for amputation after a major traumatic injury. Psychosocial recovery for individuals with lower extremity limb salvage has been discussed in the literature. However, to date, psychosocial reactions for individuals with upper extremity (UE) limb salvage have not been examined.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

To determine which factors may influence psychosocial adaptation to UE limb salvage.

METHODS

Participants (n = 30; 28 males) were adults (mean, 30.13; range, 18-61) who sustained an UE limb salvage from a traumatic event. Adaptation was measured using a modified version of the Reactions to Impairment and Disability Inventory.

RESULTS

A linear mixed-effects regression found that worse psychosocial adaptation was associated with having less than a college degree, being less than 6 months post-injury, being older than 23 years, and having more pain. Dominant hand injuries were found to influence poor adaptation on the denial Reactions to Impairment and Disability Inventory subscale only.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study indicate that there is potential for nonadaptive reactions and psychological distress with certain variables in UE limb salvage. Therapists may use these results to anticipate which clients may be at risk for poor psychosocial outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates the need for early consideration to factors that affect psychological prognosis for the UE limb salvage population. However, future research is indicated to better understand the unique psychosocial challenges and needs of these individuals.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Key Points of Preliminary Treatment for Patients with Extremity Trauma Based on Analysis of Amputation Cases

INTRODUCTION

Severe trauma can lead to amputation of limbs. There is no golden standard or comprehensive evaluation indicator for amputation. It is difficult for the primary rescue organization to focus on the most essential indicators and to determine whether to perform amputation or take proper operation.

PROBLEM

For medical staff in first-line medical teams for disaster relief or in a common primary hospital, what indicators should they focus on to keep the patient's limbs when they receive wounded patients with severe trauma?

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study was performed based on the patients with severe trauma from January 2013 through December 2018 in the emergency department of Southwest Hospital (Shapingba District, Chongqing, China), a Level I trauma center. A total of 165 cases were divided into amputation group (n = 79) and non-amputation control group (n = 86), which had severe skin and muscle injury but without amputation. The causes of trauma and the special cases were analyzed. Binary logistic regression models were used to find the essential indicators for amputation.

CONCLUSIONS

Neurovascular injury with delayed treatment was the most decisive indicator leading to amputation, and time phase was also important for limb salvage. Preliminary treatment of disaster victims and patients with severe trauma should focus on neurovascular status and timely delivery.

Amputations versus Salvage: Reconciling the Differences

BACKGROUND

 There are many factors to consider when choosing between amputations versus salvage in lower extremity reconstructive surgery. Postoperative functionality and survival benefit are critical factors when deciding between limb salvage and amputation.

METHODS

 In this review, we present the evidence and the risks and benefits between these two options in the setting of the acute, trauma population and the chronic, diabetes population.

RESULTS

 The trauma population is on average young without significant comorbidities and with robust vasculature and core strength for recovery. Therefore, these patients can often recover significant function with anamputation and prosthesis. Amputation can therefore be the more desirable in this patient population, especially in the case of complete traumatic disruption, unstable patients, high risk of extensive infection, and significant nerve injury. However, traumatic lower extremity reconstruction is also a viable option, especially in the case of young patients and those with intact plantar sensation and sufficient available tissue coverage. The diabetic population with lower extremity insult has on average a higher comorbidity profile and often lower core strength. These patients therefore often benefit most from reconstruction to preserve limb length and improve survival. However, amputation may be favored for diabetics that have no blood flow to the lower extremity, recalcitrant infection, high-risk comorbidities that preclude multiple operations, and those with end stage renal disease.

CONCLUSION

 Many patient-specific factors should be considered when deciding between amputation vs. salvage in the lower extremity reconstruction population.

SOFT-TISSUE INJURY TO THE FOOT AND ANKLE: LITERATURE REVIEW AND STAGED MANAGEMENT PROTOCOL

Complex trauma of the foot and ankle is characterized by fractures with severe soft tissue damage associated with neurovascular injury and joint involvement. These injuries are frequently present in the polytraumatized patient and are a predictor of unfavorable clinical outcome. In the initial approach to a patient with complex foot and ankle trauma, the decision between amputation and reconstruction is crucial. The various existing classification systems are of limited effectiveness and should serve as tools to assist and support a clinical decision rather than as determinants of conduct. In the emergency department, one of two treatment options must be adopted: early complete treatment or staged treatment. The former consists of definitive fixation and immediate skin coverage, using either primary closure (suturing) or flaps, and is usually reserved for less complex cases. Staged treatment is divided into initial and definitive. The objectives in the first phase are: prevention of the progression of ischemia, necrosis and infection. The principles of definitive treatment are: proximal-to-distal bone reconstruction, anatomic foot alignment, fusions in severe cartilage lesions or gross instabilities, stable internal fixation and adequate skin coverage. Level of evidence III, Systematic review of level III studies.

Management of Post-Traumatic Composite Bone and Soft Tissue Defect of Leg

Management of composite defects of leg following trauma requires a planned ortho-plastic approach right from the outset. Timely, planned intervention results in reduced amputation rates and improved limb salvage and function. Right from the time of presentation of the patient to the emergency with such injury, the process of decision making in terms of salvage or amputation, local flap cover/free flap cover, bone reconstruction first or soft tissue or both combined, come into play. Guidelines on management are unclear for such defects, a literature search yielding various methods being used by different authors.

This article is a review of current literature on management of composite leg defects.

A summary of the literature search in terms of various management options given by various authors including the rationale, advantages and disadvantages of each strategy has been provided in this article. The management protocol and method followed by the author in his institute for management of such composite defects have been described in detail. The article seeks to provide readers with an understanding of the management strategies so that appropriate method could be chosen to provide best result.

Patient-reported Outcome Instruments in Lower Extremity Trauma: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background

Advances in fracture fixation and soft tissue coverage continue to improve the care of patients after limb-threatening lower extremity (LE) trauma. However, debate continues regarding which treatment option-reconstruction or amputation-is most appropriate. Many authors have attempted to quantify the patient experience in this treatment paradigm; however, they have not used patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments specific to this population. Our aim was to identify and evaluate PRO instruments developed specifically for LE trauma, applicable to reconstruction and amputation, using established PRO instrument development and validation guidelines.

Methods

A multidisciplinary team used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses method to query PubMed, Medline Ovid, EMBASE, Cochrane, Medline Web of Science, and Psych Info databases from inception to November 2016. Publications were included that described the development and/or validation of a PRO instrument assessing satisfaction and/or quality of life in LE trauma, applicable to both amputation and reconstruction. Two authors independently reviewed each full-text citation.

Results

After removing duplicates, 6,290 abstracts were identified via the database query. Following a preliminary title and abstract screen, 657 full-text citations were reviewed. Of these references, none satisfied the previously established inclusion criteria.

Conclusions

No studies were identified that described a PRO instrument developed to assess outcomes in LE trauma patients applicable to both reconstruction and amputation. There is thus a need for a PRO instrument designed specifically for patients who have sustained limb-threatening LE trauma to guide treatment decisions.