Total hip replacement for neck of femur fracture: Comparing outcomes with matched elective cohort

A Meta-Analysis to Evaluate Implant Survival and Benefits of the Use of Dual Mobility Constructs in Total Hip Replacement Following Hip Fracture

Total hip replacement (THR) is commonly performed to treat hip fractures. Dual-mobility constructs (DMCs) are increasingly used for this indication. The aim of this study was to use evidence synthesis techniques to estimate net all-cause construct survival for THR with DMC performed for hip fracture. Additionally, we aimed to investigate and describe differences in all-cause construct survival (if present) between THRs performed with DMC (DMC-THR) or with a conventional bearing construct following hip fracture. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies (including joint registries), including DMC-THR for hip fracture which provided Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival estimates. The primary outcome was all-cause construct survival over time. The study was prospectively registered on PROSPERO (CRD42020173117). A total of 557 papers and 17 registry reports were identified. Six studies (four registry reports, one matched-pair cohort study utilising joint registry data, and one single-institution case series) met the inclusion criteria, including 17,370 DMC THRs and 167,377 conventional THRs. Five-year KM survival estimates (95% confidence intervals) were similar at 95.4% (94.9 to 95.8%) for DMC-THR and 96.2% (96.0 to 96.4%) for conventional THR. The relative risk of revision for DMC-THR at five years was 1.21 (1.05 to 1.41). These results suggest that DMC-THR has a lower all-cause survival than conventional THR following hip fracture. This analysis does not support the routine use of DMC-THR over conventional bearing THR.

Dislocation of Total Hip Arthroplasty of Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly: A Narrative Review

Femoral neck fracture (FNF) is a common and devastating injury in the elderly population. The incidence of FNF is expected to increase in the future, particularly in the aging population. The displaced intracapsular FNF is replaced with a reconstruction prosthesis. These treatment options typically include hemiarthroplasty (HA) or total hip arthroplasty (THA). Dislocation after THA can be a significant complication, leading to increased hospital costs and patient dissatisfaction. This narrative review aims to investigate the potential risk factors for dislocation following THA after FNF. A systematic literature search was conducted, and 21 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included a total of 1703 patients who underwent THA after FNF. The majority of the patients were women, and the average age of participants was 76.2 years. The studies were primarily conducted by the orthopedic and traumatology departments. The surgical approach used for THA varied, with the anterior approach being associated with lower dislocation rates compared to the posterior approach. The analysis of surgical volume revealed that high-volume hospitals had lower dislocation rates compared to low-volume hospitals. Eight studies reported postoperative Harris Hip Scores (HHS), with higher HHS scores correlating with lower dislocation rates. Body mass index (BMI) was mentioned in 11 studies, and a normal BMI range was associated with lower dislocation rates compared to the overweight group. Rehabilitation protocols, particularly early initiation of physiotherapy, showed promising results in reducing dislocation rates. Additionally, the type of prosthesis used in the acetabulum was found to influence dislocation rates, with dual mobility cups demonstrating lower rates compared to single cups. In conclusion, several factors may contribute to the risk of dislocation following THA after FNF. These include the surgical approach, surgical volume, postoperative HHS scores, BMI, rehabilitation protocols, and the type of acetabular cup used. Further research is needed to better understand these risk factors and develop strategies to minimize dislocation rates and improve patient outcomes.

Clinical Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty With the Anterolateral Modified Watson-Jones Approach for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures

Objective

In recent years, many studies have reported good results with total hip arthroplasty (THA) for displaced femoral neck fractures (FNFs). However, no study has reported the clinical outcomes of the anterolateral modified Watson–Jones THA (MWJ-THA) for displaced FNFs. This study aimed to investigate the clinical results of THA for displaced FNFs at our hospital and to discuss the advantages of MWJ-THA over THA with other approaches for displaced FNFs.

Methods

Forty-three patients who underwent MWJ-THA for displaced FNFs were included in this study. Patient characteristics, preinjury walking ability, activities of daily living, implants used, walking ability (at 1, 3, and 6 months after surgery), cup placement angle, clinical hip score, surgical complications, revision surgery, and death within 1 year after surgery were investigated.

Results

The mean age of the 43 patients was 63.3 years, and the mean body mass index (kg/m²) was 21.1. Regarding the heads used, 28-mm heads were used in 4 patients, 32-mm heads were used in 32 patients, and 36-mm heads were used in 7 patients. The cups were placed in the Lewinnek safety zone (93.0%). Four patients had stem sinkage of a few millimeters. 6 months postoperatively, 38 patients walked unaided, and 4 patients walked with a cane. The Harris Hip Score averaged over 90 points at all time points. No postoperative dislocation was observed. Two patients died within 1 year postoperatively.

Conclusion

In this study, MWJ-THA was performed for displaced FNFs and resulted in no postoperative dislocations. Furthermore, more than 90% of the patients regained their preinjury walking ability at 6 months postoperatively. MWJ-THA has great dislocation control and is effective in treating displaced FNFs.

Total Hip Arthroplasty for Acute Femoral Neck Fractures: Who Should Perform the Operation-Adult Reconstructive or Trauma Surgeons?

OBJECTIVE

To compare the results and complications of a large consecutive series of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed for acute femoral neck (FN) fracture by adult reconstructive (AR) and trauma (T) surgeons to determine if there is a difference in outcomes.

DESIGN

Retrospective chart review.

SETTING

Level 1 trauma center.

PATIENTS

One hundred forty-nine consecutive patients who presented to our institution with displaced FN fractures treated by THA were included in this study.

INTERVENTION

All patients were treated with THA.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Implant survival, 90-day complications, 90-day readmission, 1-year complications.

RESULTS

For the group as a whole, the major surgical complication rate (defined as dislocation, deep infection, loosening, fracture) was significantly higher for T surgeons (20%) than for AR surgeons (7%) (P = 0.021). AR surgeons had significantly less radiographic component malpositioning 12% versus 3% (P = 0.024). Mortality and readmission rates were similar between the 2 cohorts at all time points. Implant survivorship was significantly higher at 1 year for AR surgeons (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

THA for acute FN fracture performed by AR surgeons demonstrated higher rates of accurate radiographic component positioning, significantly lower major complication rates at 90 days and 1 year, and greater implant survival at 1 year.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Total hip replacement for displaced intracapsular neck of femur fracture. Are current guidelines appropriate for all patients? Five-year retrospective analysis of 315 cases

BACKGROUND

According to the National Hip Fracture Database (NHFD), in 2018 31.4% of patients with displaced intracapsular neck of femur (NOF) fracture who, National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) viewed eligible for total hip replacement (THR), received this operation. We aimed to identify the compliance of performing THR for those patients in our unit and identify the reasons for proceeding with the alternative type of surgery.

METHODS

A five-year retrospective review of eligible patients was conducted between January 2014 and Dec 2018. Statistical analysis was performed between groups who did or didn't receive THR. Reasons for not performing THR were identified from pre-operative ward rounds notes.

RESULTS

In 2018 our unit performed THR for 44% of eligible cases. This was the highest result over five-years and higher than the national average. Out of the 348 eligible cases, pathological or undisplaced intracapsular fractures were excluded. Reminder received THR (138), hip hemiarthroplasty (166) or internal fixation (11). The average age was 77. Younger patients were more likely to receive THR than 80 years or older (p<0.05). THR group scored 0.4 points higher on AMTS and 0.2 lower on ASA scale then non-THR group (9.8 vs. 9.4 and 2.7 vs. 2.5 respectively). Mean time to surgery was 1.24 days with no significant difference between THR and non-THR group (1.6 vs. 1.1) but a slight delay to surgery during the weekends was noted (1.3 vs 1.8 days). Reasons for not performing THR were well documented as a combination of mobility restrictions and serious medical comorbidities. Retrospectively we judged the surgical decision making to be correct in 95% of cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Annual NHFD report comments on poor national and individual hospital's compliance with NICE guidelines without allowing surgeons to justify their choice of the procedure undertaken. Surgical decisions are made in a highly specialised multi-disciplinary environment taking into consideration individual patient's frailty and potential morbidity. Details of those discussions should be collected in NHFD to allow further analysis of reasons why surgeons decide not to offer THR to a patient NHFD views as eligible for this procedure. This could help in understanding the complex factors impacting on decision making in those cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) for Femoral Neck Fractures: Comparison between Standard and Dual Mobility Implants

The purpose of this retrospective study is to compare the short-term clinical and radiological results between standard and dual mobility THA for femoral neck fractures (FNF) in older patients. The hypothesis is that the dual mobility cup (DMC) has the same outcomes but a lower dislocation rate than the standard THA. The study population included 56 patients (mean age 77.7 years, range 71–85) that underwent THA for displaced FNF. Patients were divided in two comparable groups for baseline characteristics (age, sex and comorbidities): 28 patients underwent THA with a standard cup (SC) and 28 THA with DMCs. The clinical records and radiograms were reviewed to search relevant data in their postoperative history. Two postoperative dislocations occurred in the SC group and none in the DMC group. At an average follow up of 23 months (12–40), 48 patients were available for the final evaluation. The WOMAC score for all patients averaged 6.26 (0–46) and was slightly better in the DMC group (4.94 vs. 7.58; p-value = 0.41); scores were significantly better in presence of neurological comorbidities (p-value = 0.04), in the absence of diabetes (p-value = 0.04) and in the case of psychiatric disorders (p-value = 0.02). Radiographic evaluation at one year showed signs of osteointegration in 42/48 (87.5%) acetabular components (20 DMCs, 22 SC). According to our experience, DMCs proved to be a valid option for the treatment of displaced FNF in older patients, since it allowed them to achieve short-term outcomes comparable to conventional THA, while decreasing the incidence of postoperative dislocations.

Use of Dual Mobility Acetabular Component and Anterior Approach in Patients With Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture

BACKGROUND

Although the antidislocation effect of total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) with dual mobility cup (DMC) for displaced femoral neck fracture (FNF) has already been reported, the clinical result of DMC-DAA-THA for displaced FNF in terms of mortality, complications, and walking ability are still unclear.

METHODS

106 cases with DMC-DAA-THA for displaced FNF were investigated of dislocation; perioperative complications; 3-, 6-, and12-month mortality rate; and pre/early postoperative walking ability. The walking ability was stratified into the following four categories: (1) use of a wheelchair (no walking), (2) walking alongside a support (including walkers designed for the elderly), (3) walking using one stick, and (4) unaided walking.

RESULTS

There was no dislocation withing one-year postoperative. The 3-, 6-, and 12-month mortality rate was 2.8%, 4.7%, and 5.7%. Total complications occurred in 14 cases (14.7%). Although there was no revision surgery, two cases (1.9%) of intraoperative fracture treated without additional fixation, and one case of postoperative fracture was occurred. Among patients with preinjury walking category 2, 3, and 4 (total 94 cases), the number of patients who recovered same walking category at two-week postoperation was 56 cases (59.6%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that DMC-DAA-THA for displaced FNF offered quick recovery of walking ability with no dislocation and low one-year mortality rate. We believe that the combination of early postoperative recovery due to the minimal invasiveness of the DAA and decreased dislocation rate due to increased range of motion by DMC and adequate soft tissue tension by DAA contributed to null dislocation.

Tranexamic acid in non-elective primary total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Blood loss during and following elective total hip arthroplasty (THA) can be substantial and may require allogeneic blood transfusions which carries significant risks and morbidity for patients. Intraoperative use of tranexamic acid (TXA) has been proven to reduce the need for allogeneic blood transfusion in elective THA patients. Data regarding TXA efficacy in reducing blood loss in trauma patients undergoing non-elective primary THA is sparse, and its routine use is not well established.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of a consecutive cohort of patients who underwent non-elective primary THA in a tertiary medical center between January 1st 2011- December 31st 2019. The cohort was divided into two groups; one received perioperative TXA treatment while the other did not. Blood loss, blood product administration, peri and postoperative complications, readmissions and 1-year mortality were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 419 patients (146 males, 273 females) who underwent THA were included in this study. The "TXA" group consisted 315 patients compared to 104 patients in the "no TXA" group. TXA use reduced postoperative bleeding, as indicated by changes in hemoglobin levels before and after surgery (ΔHb= -2.75 gr/dL vs. ΔHb= -3.34 gr/dL, p<0.001) and by administration of allogeneic blood transfusions (7.0% vs. 16.3%, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Similar to the known effect of TXA in elective THA patients, the use of TXA treatment in patients undergoing non-elective THA led to a significant reduction in postoperative blood loss and in the proportion of patients requiring allogeneic blood transfusions.

Monolithic Dual Mobility Cup Total Hip Arthroplasty Has High Complication Rates With Surgical Fixation in Elderly With Femur Neck Fracture

BACKGROUND

This study is prospectively conducted to evaluate surgical complications of monolithic dual mobility cup total hip arthroplasty (THA) in elderly patients with fractured neck of the femur.

METHODS

Ninety-seven patients (97 hips) with displaced femoral neck fracture who gave informed consent for participation were prospectively enrolled. Their mean age was 76.6 years (range, 60-95 years), and the mean bone mineral density T-score of neck of the femur was -2.8 (range, -1.2 to -5.5). All patients underwent THA with monolithic dual mobility cup, and computed tomography scans were obtained to evaluate radiographic parameters including anteversion, inclination, and loosening of acetabular cups, and periprosthetic acetabular fractures.

RESULTS

With regard to cup orientation, mean inclination angle was 40.2° (range, 23.5°-63°) and mean anteversion was 32.6° (range, 7°-66.2°). The proportion of surgical outliers was 10.3% (10/97) in inclination and 35.1% (34/97) in anteversion. Early cup loosening within 2 weeks was detected in 2 hips. Periprosthetic acetabular fractures were identified in 6 hips (6/97, 6.2%). Of the 6 fractures, 5 nondisplaced fractures were healed with conservative management, but 1 fracture with displacement eventually led to cup loosening and the patient underwent revision surgery. Reoperation rate of the monolithic dual mobility cup was 4.1% (4/97).

CONCLUSION

The use of the monolithic dual mobility was associated with improper cup fixation and periprosthetic acetabular fractures in the elderly with poor bone stock, although the dual mobility cup lowered the risk of early dislocation after THA.

Early outcomes of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty for trauma during COVID-19

Aims

This study aimed to identify patients receiving total hip arthroplasty (THA) for trauma during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK and quantify the risks of contracting SARS-CoV-2 virus, the proportion of patients requiring treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU), and rate of complications including mortality.

Methods

All patients receiving a primary THA for trauma in four regional hospitals were identified for analysis during the period 1 March to 1 June 2020, which covered the current peak of the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK.

Results

Overall, one of 48 patients (2%) contracted COVID-19 during their admission. Although they required a protracted stay in hospital, they did not require ICU treatment. Two patients did require ICU support for medical problems but not relating to COVID-19. Complications were no greater than expected given the short follow-up. There were no mortalities.

Conclusion

There is a paucity of evidence to guide restarting elective joint arthroplasties following the COVID-19 pandemic. Although THAs for trauma are by no means a perfect surrogate, the results of this study show a low incidence of contracting COVID-19 virus during admission and no significant sequalae during this period.

Cite this article: Bone Joint Open 2020;1-7:438–442.

Can Total Hip Arthroplasty for Hip Fracture Be Safely Performed by Trainees? A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

No research is available comparing trainee and consultant outcomes for total hip arthroplasty (THA) for hip fracture. The aim of our study is to determine whether trainee-performed and consultant-performed THA produced equivalent radiological outcomes and complication rates for this patient cohort.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study at our institution, with inclusion of patients who underwent a primary THA for hip fracture between March 30, 2017 and February 07, 2019. Relevant perioperative and outcome data were collected through electronic records. Radiological outcomes were assessed by 2 independent reviewers. Follow-up was performed until August 07, 2019.

RESULTS

Eighty-seven patients were included in the study. The mean length of follow-up was 13 months (range, 6-29). Forty-three patients underwent consultant-led operations and 44 underwent trainee-performed (ST3-ST8) operations under consultant supervision. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding complication risk (no recorded dislocation, infection requiring reoperation, revision or 30-day mortality in either group). There were also no significant differences between trainees and consultants regarding the radiological outcomes of mean acetabular component inclination (37.2° vs 36.7°, respectively, P = .74); offset difference (+7.1 mm vs +7.2 mm, respectively, P = .91); leg length difference (+6.4 mm vs +5.7 mm, respectively, P = .56); and barrack grade for femoral cement mantle.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that radiological and safety outcomes for trainees performing THA for hip fracture with appropriate supervision are equivalent to consultant surgeons. However, given the low event rate of complications, a larger study is required to determine whether there is any statistically significant difference.

Patient-Centered Care: Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture Does Not Increase Infection Risk

INTRODUCTION

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is often used for displaced femoral neck fracture. In this study, institutional hip arthroplasty data were compared with the National American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data for any differences in outcomes between our hospital, with an integrated hip fracture care pathway, and those of the country as a whole.

METHODS

Elective THA was compared with arthroplasty performed for acute fracture. Outcomes for both groups included thromboembolic event (VTE), death, and deep prosthetic infection.

RESULTS

Institutional data revealed no increased rate of infection after THA for fracture compared with elective. National Surgical Quality Improvement Program analysis revealed higher infection rates in fracture arthroplasty. There was an increased VTE rate in fracture performed for arthroplasty compared with elective in both institutional and NSQIP data.

CONCLUSIONS

When performed at an academic medical center with an integrated care program, THA for fracture can have similar infection rates to elective THA. By contrast, national data showed significantly higher rates of infection and VTE for arthroplasty for fracture compared with elective. The contrast in complication rates may be related to well-functioning comprehensive interdisciplinary pathways. Patient-centered care pathways may be optimal for hip fracture patients.

Studying the effects of primary arthroplasty on post-treatment results among elderly patients with pertrochanteric fracture

Various therapeutic methods are available to treat patients with intertrochantric fracture, which is usually caused by falling down. This complication is usually observed among the elderly, particularly old women. The choice of the proper therapeutic method depends on many factors including patient’s condition, type of fracture, and the amount of movement. Hip arthroplasty is one of these therapeutic methods, which have certain advantages and disadvantages. Immediate resumption of walking with the ability of weight toleration and absence of complications such as aseptic necrosis are some advantages of this method. Sixtyeight elderly patients with pertrochanteric fracture who had resorted to Iranian Army’s hospitals and had undergone arthroplasty. These cases were examined with due comparison with historical and external controls. Variables such a type of operation, age, post-operation pain, the pace of resuming walking ability, embolism, surgical site infection, bedsore and DVT were studied and compared against standard operation. The results achieved through assessment of variables showed a significant difference with standard operation in terms of variables such as post-operative movement ability, pain scale in various times, surgical complications, embolism, surgical site infection, bedsore, and DVT. Post-operative pain within the first 3 months following it are some complications with not much attention is paid to them, but they are important complications which can cause many negative and influential effects on patients. Arthroplasty is more expensive than standard operation and the patient may initially feel more pain.

Femoral neck fractures after removal of hardware in healed trochanteric fractures

INTRODUCTION

Hardware removal in healed trochanteric fractures (TF) in the absence of infection or significant mechanical complications is rarely indicated. However, in patients with persistent pain, prominent material and discomfort in the activities of daily living, the implant is eventually removed. Publications of ipsilateral femoral neck fracture after removal of implants from healed trochanteric fractures (FNFARIHTF) just because of pain or discomfort are rare. The purpose of this systematic review of the literature is to report on the eventual risk factors, the mechanisms, the clinical presentation, and frequency, and to pay special emphasis in their prevention.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A comprehensive review of the literature was undertaken using the PRISMA guidelines with no language restriction. Case reports of FNFARIHTF and series of TF with cases of FNFARIHTF due to pain or discomfort published between inception of journals to December 2016 were eligible for inclusion. Relevant information was divided in two parts. Part I included the analysis of cases of FNFARIHTF, with the objective of establishing the eventual risk factors, mechanisms and pathoanatomy, clinical presentation and diagnosis, treatment and prevention. Part II analyzed series of TF which included cases of FNFARIHTF for assessing the incidence of femoral neck fractures in this condition.

RESULTS

Overall 24 publications with 45 cases of FNFARIHTF met the inclusion criteria. We found that the only prevalent factors for FNFARIHTF were: 1) preexisisting systemic osteoporosis, as most patients were older and elder females, with lower bone mineral density and bone mass; 2) local osteoporosis as a result of preloading by the fixation device in the femoral neck, leading to stress protection, reducing the strain at the neck, and increasing bone loss and weakness; and 3) the removal of hardware from the femoral neck, with reduction of the failure strength of the neck. The femoral neck fractures were spontaneous, i.e. not related to trauma or fall, in 87.5% of the cases, mostly subcapital, and with no prevalence between displaced and undisplaced fractures. The clinical presentation was that of a spontaneous fracture, and most of the patients consulted because of hip pain and presented in the emergency room walking by themselves which led to delayed diagnosis in several instances. Radiological diagnosis was mostly with radiographs, though in some cases CT scans or MRI were necessary. The overall median incidence of this complication was 14.5% after hardware removal because of pain or discomfort in healed trochanteric fractures.

CONCLUSION

The risk factors for FNFARIHTF seem to be preexisisting systemic osteoporosis, local osteoporosis as a result of preloading by the fixation device in the femoral neck, and the removal of hardware from the femoral neck, with reduction of the strength of the neck. The clinical presentation may be obscure as most of the patients complain of hip pain of some days or weeks, and arrive in the hospital walking. Therefore, the attending physician should be alert in order to request the appropriate radiological investigation and if this is not clear CT scan or MRI should be done in order to diagnose promptly these "spontaneous" fractures. Treatment should be replacement surgery in most cases; however, there is some place for internal fixation especially in undisplaced fractures or younger patients. The occurrence of the femoral neck fracture after hardware removal may be prevented with re-osteosynthesis and the use of bone chips or bone substitutes. Finally, the relatively high incidence of this complication should alert orthopaedic surgeons to reduce the removal of hardware in healed trochanteric fractures to very selected cases.

Comparison of functional outcome of bipolar hip arthroplasty and total hip replacement in displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly in a developing country: a 2-year prospective study

PURPOSE

To compare the short-term functional outcome between bipolar hip arthroplasty (BHA) and total hip replacement (THR) in displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients in a developing country.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study was conducted which included a total of 42 patients of age more than 60 years with closed displaced femoral neck fractures, and the patients were randomized into two groups of 21 patients each and their outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

At 24-month follow-up, patients in BHA group had a mean modified Harris hip score of 83.85 ± 6.62 and patients in THR group had a mean modified Harris hip score of 88.00 ± 5.76 (p value = 0.067). Seven (35%) patients in BHA group and 11 (55%) patients in THR group had hip scores from 91 to 100 (excellent), 9 (45%) patients in BHA and seven patients (35%) in THR had hip scores 81-90 (fair) and 4 (20%) patients in BHA group and 2 (10%) patients in THR group were rated 71-80 (good) and none was found in poor category. Total amount of blood  loss while performing BHA was 238.15 ± 20.43 ml compared to 336.85 ± 23.56 ml in THR (p < 0.0001). Mean of total duration of surgery was found to be 51.80 ± 8.70 min in BHA group which was significantly lesser than 119.10 ± 16.75 min of THR group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

BHA being comparable to THR in terms of functional outcome by modified Harris hip scoring with significantly less blood loss during surgery, less duration of surgery, more cost-effective can be recommended as first line of surgical management in elderly patients with displaced femur neck fractures in developing countries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, lesser-quality randomized controlled trial.

In total hip arthroplasty via the direct anterior approach, a dual-mobility cup prevents dislocation as effectively in hip fracture as in osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

The main purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) via the direct anterior approach (DAA) using a dual-mobility cup (DMC) in patients with femoral neck fracture to those in patients undergoing elective THA for osteoarthritis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively investigated 40 hips with femoral neck fracture (group A), and 81 hips with osteoarthritis (group B). THA via the DAA using the DMC was performed in both groups. A primary/secondary outcome variable were the presence of dislocation/operative time, intra- and/or peri-operative complication, and mortality.

RESULTS

Dislocation did not occur in either group. The complication rate was slightly higher in group A than in group B, but not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

THA with the DMC using the DAA was as effective for femoral neck facture as it was for elective THA in patients with osteoarthritis.