Intervention rates are low after direct discharge from the Edinburgh trauma triage clinic: Outcomes of 6,688 patients

Is clinician reported practice in Western Australian emergency departments aligned with direct discharge pathway protocols for minor self-limiting fractures? A multi-centre professional survey

OBJECTIVE

To determine ED clinician's current management for five common minor self-limiting fractures (MSLF) and evaluate practice against evidence-informed direct discharge pathway (DD) protocols.

METHODS

A survey was provided to doctors, nurse practitioners and advanced scope physiotherapists working in seven metropolitan, public health EDs in Perth, Australia. The relative odds of ED location (e.g. which facility) and clinician level factors (e.g. country of initial training, years of ED experience, profession) on recommending care completely consistent with evidence informed direct discharge pathway protocols were estimated.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-two clinicians completed the survey. There was variability in practice across all sites, with most reported care assessed at 60%-76% consistency with individual elements of DD care provision. Highest consistency was seen in lower limb immobilisation and DVT prophylaxis. Lowest consistency was seen in weight bearing advice, pain management and (boxer's) fracture reduction and immobilisation. There were very low levels of complete consistency, ranging from 9% (boxer's fracture) to 25% (radial head fracture). Two factors were associated with increased odds of completely consistent care: (i) clinician experience working in ED, with greater duration of practice associated with increased odds ratios (OR range, 1.6-3.3); and (ii) profession, where advanced scope physiotherapy was associated with increased odds ratios (OR range, 3.2-25.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Survey results suggested system wide variation in ED fracture management practice and target areas for service improvement. Avenues for service improvement could include hospital wide agreed management plans for specific fractures and support for less experienced clinicians.

A national multicentre study of outcomes and patient satisfaction with the virtual fracture clinic and the influence of the COVID-19 pandemic: The MAVCOV study

BACKGROUND

Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are advocated by the British Orthopaedic Association Standards for Trauma (BOAST). We aimed to assess the impact of the transition from face-to-face fracture clinic review and identify any change in clinical outcome and patient satisfaction.

METHODS

A national, cross-sectional cohort study of VFCs across the UK over two separate two-week periods pre- and during the first UK COVID-19 lockdown was undertaken. Data comprising patient and injury characteristics, unplanned reattendance and complications within three months following discharge from VFC were collected by local collaborators. Telephone questionnaires were conducted to determine patient satisfaction and patient-reported outcome for patients discharged without face-to-face consultation. The primary outcome measure was the percentage of unplanned reattendances after direct discharge from VFC.

RESULTS

Data was analysed for 51 UK VFCs comprising 6134 patients from the pre-pandemic group (06/05/2019-19/05/2019) and 4366 patients from the first UK lockdown (04/05/2020-17/05/2020). During lockdown, the rate of direct discharge from VFC increased significantly (odds ratio (OR) 2.01, p<0.001) from 30 % (n = 1856/6134) to 46 % (n = 2021/4366). The rate of compliance with BOAST guidance recommending fracture clinic review within three days increased (OR 1.93, p<0.001) from 82 % (n = 5003/6134) to 89 % (n = 3883/4366). There were no differences in the rates of unplanned reattendance (6 % pre- and 7 % during lockdown, p = 0.281) or complications (0.2 % for both, p = 0.815). There were 1527/3877 patients discharged without face-to-face review from VFC who completed telephone questionnaires (mean follow-up 18-months in pre-pandemic group and 6-months in lockdown group). Satisfaction was high in both cohorts (80 % pre- and 76 % lockdown, p = 0.093). Dissatisfaction was associated with an unplanned reattendance (p<0.001) or a missed injury (p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Despite a significant rise in direct discharge from VFC, there was no significant change in unplanned attendances, complications, or patient satisfaction. However, there are factors associated with dissatisfaction and these should be considered in the evolution of VFC.

'I just need to find out if I had broken something or not.' A qualitative descriptive study into patient decisions to present to an Emergency Department with a simple fracture

Background To investigate what factors contribute to a working age adult with a simple fracture seeking care in an Australian metropolitan Emergency Department (ED) Methods In this Qualitative Descriptive study, we interviewed ED patients with simple fractures including 5th metacarpal, 5th metatarsal, toe, radial head and clavicle fractures. Results We interviewed 30 patients aged 18-65. Two thirds of participants were aware they might have a minor injury. Many were well informed health consumers and convenience was the most important decision-making factor. Participants focussed on organising imaging, diagnosis and immobilisation. This sequence of care was often perceived as more complex and inefficient in primary care. ED was trusted and preferred to urgent primary care with an unknown doctor. Some patients defaulted to attending ED without considering alternatives due to poor health system knowledge or from escalating anxiety. Conclusions ED is safe, free and equipped to manage simple and complex injuries. Patients would attend primary care if comprehensive fracture management was easily accessible from a trusted clinician. To effectively divert simple fracture presentations from ED, primary care requires collocated imaging, imaging interpretation, orthopaedic expertise, and fracture management resources. Services need to operate 7 days a week and must have accessible 'urgent' appointments.

Letter-only discharge process for virtual fracture clinic, a safe alternative to telephone discharge, outcomes and 12 month follow up for 1140 patients

Telephone consult has become the accepted discharge method for virtual fracture clinic (VFC) within the United Kingdom. Telephone consultations are time consuming; many orthopaedic units lack the resources and staff to deliver large numbers of daily telephone consultations which may block the development of an effective VFC. Our study aim was to validate a letter only VFC discharge process for safety and efficacy. A letter only discharge VFC was instigated in response to the COVID-19 pandemic (April 2020). No ethical approval was required, the protocol was designed as a phased service evaluation and improvement project after change in practice. After smaller pilot audits, a comprehensive review of discharges outcomes from the VFC August-September 2021 (Phase 1) and January-March 2022 (Phase 2) was completed. Electronic letters, AE (accident and emergency) attendances and PACS database images (radiography and scans) taken over a 12 month follow up were analysed for failed discharges and adverse outcomes. Of 4810 patients reviewed in VFC, 1140 were discharged (24%). Mean patient age; 35 years (range 2-98), two thirds of patients were adults (>16 years). 116 (10%) returned with symptoms related to their initial presentation usually within the first few weeks via contact with the VFC helpline. Of the returning patients 65 were discharged again with the same advice, 48 underwent further imaging (CT/ MRI/ US scanning). 6 patients (0.5%) underwent surgery for problems relating to the initial injury; 2 knee meniscal repair/debridement, 1 ACL reconstruction, 1 fixation fifth metatarsal non-union, 2 shoulder arthroscopy. All surgeries were performed on elective timescales between 4 and 12 months after injury. Discharging letters detailed rehabilitation and symptom resolution timeframes. Our approach did not result in high return rates or adverse events (unexpected operations) in comparison to published traditional telephone discharge VFC. Units with limited staffing resources wishing to implement a VFC could safely adopt this approach as an alternative to telephone discharge.

Return to sport following toe phalanx fractures: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based guidance on return to sport following toe phalanx fractures is limited.

AIM

To systemically review all studies recording return to sport following toe phalanx fractures (both acute fractures and stress fractures), and to collate information on return rates to sport (RRS) and mean return times (RTS) to the sport.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, and Google Scholar was performed in December 2022 using the keywords 'Toe', 'Phalanx', 'Fracture', 'injury', 'athletes', 'sports', 'non-operative', 'conservative', 'operative', 'return to sport'. All studies which recorded RRS and RTS following toe phalanx fractures were included.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies were included: one retrospective cohort study and twelve case series. Seven studies reported on acute fractures. Six studies reported on stress fractures. For the acute fractures (n = 156), 63 were treated with primary conservative management (PCM), 6 with primary surgical management (PSM) (all displaced intra-articular (physeal) fractures of the great toe base of the proximal phalanx), 1 with secondary surgical management (SSM) and 87 did not specify treatment modality. For the stress fractures (n = 26), 23 were treated with PCM, 3 with PSM, and 6 with SSM. For acute fractures, RRS with PCM ranged from 0 to 100%, and RTS with PCM ranged from 1.2 to 24 wk. For acute fractures, RRS with PSM were all 100%, and RTS with PSM ranged from 12 to 24 wk. One case of an undisplaced intra-articular (physeal) fracture treated conservatively required conversion to SSM on refracture with a return to sport. For stress fractures, RRS with PCM ranged from 0% to 100%, and RTS with PCM ranged from 5 to 10 wk. For stress fractures, RRS with PSM were all 100%, and RTS with surgical management ranged from 10 to 16 wk. Six cases of conservatively-managed stress fractures required conversion to SSM. Two of these cases were associated with a prolonged delay to diagnosis (1 year, 2 years) and four cases with an underlying deformity [hallux valgus (n = 3), claw toe (n = 1)]. All six cases returned to the sport after SSM.

CONCLUSION

The majority of sport-related toe phalanx fractures (acute and stress) are managed conservatively with overall satisfactory RRS and RTS. For acute fractures, surgical management is indicated for displaced, intra-articular (physeal) fractures, which offers satisfactory RRS and RTS. For stress fractures, surgical management is indicated for cases with delayed diagnosis and established non-union at presentation, or with significant underlying deformity: both can expect satisfactory RRS and RTS.