1
|
Cooke ME, Knoll SJ, Streck JM, Potter K, Lamberth E, Rychik N, Gilman JM, Evins AE, Schuster RM. Contingency management is associated with positive changes in attitudes and reductions in cannabis use even after discontinuation of incentives among non-treatment seeking youth. Drug Alcohol Depend 2024; 256:111096. [PMID: 38277735 PMCID: PMC10923125 DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2024.111096] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/13/2024] [Indexed: 01/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is important to identify interventions that reduce harm in youth not motivated to change their cannabis use. This study evaluated how short-duration contingency management (CM) impacts cannabis use attitudes and behavior after abstinence incentives are discontinued among non-treatment seeking youth. METHODS Participants (N=220) were randomized to 4 weeks of abstinence-based CM (CB-Abst; n=126) or monitoring (CB-Mon; n=94). Participants completed self-report and provided biochemical measures of cannabis exposure at baseline, end-of-intervention, and 4-week follow-up. Changes in self-reported cannabis use frequency (days/week; times/week) and biochemically verified creatinine-adjusted 11-nor-9-carboxy-tetrahydrocannabinol concentrations (CN-THCCOOH) were analyzed between groups from baseline to follow-up. In CB-Abst, cannabis use goals at end-of-intervention were described and changes in cannabis use at follow-up were explored by goals and cannabis use disorder (CUD) diagnosis. RESULTS There was a group by visit interaction on cannabis use (days: beta=0.93, p=0.005; times: beta=0.71, p<0.001; CN-THCCOOH: beta=0.26, p=0.004), with reductions at follow-up detected only in CB-Abst. Following 4 weeks of abstinence, 68.4% of CB-Abst participants wanted to reduce or abstain from cannabis use following completion of CM. Those in CB-Abst who set end-of-intervention reduction goals and were without CUD had greater decreases in cannabis use frequency at follow-up (Goals*time on days/week: beta=-2.27, p<0.001; CUD*time on times/week: beta=0.48, SE=0.24, t=2.01, p=0.048). CONCLUSIONS Findings support the utility of brief incentivized abstinence for generating motivation to reduce cannabis use and behavior change even after incentives end. This study supports CM as a potentially viable harm reduction strategy for those not yet ready to quit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan E Cooke
- Department of Psychiatry, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ, USA
| | - Sarah J Knoll
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Joanna M Streck
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kevin Potter
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erin Lamberth
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Natali Rychik
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
| | - Jodi M Gilman
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A Eden Evins
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Randi M Schuster
- Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Johnstad PG. Unhealthy behaviors associated with mental health disorders: a systematic comparative review of diet quality, sedentary behavior, and cannabis and tobacco use. Front Public Health 2024; 11:1268339. [PMID: 38249418 PMCID: PMC10797041 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1268339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Background There are well-established literatures documenting the associations between mental disorders and unhealthy behaviors such as poor diet quality, sedentary behavior, and cannabis and tobacco use. Few studies have attempted to understand the respective findings in light of each other, however. Objective The purpose of this review was to assemble comparable data for each behavior-disorder association and assess the associations in terms of their overall strength. The review aimed to include a representative, but not exhaustive, range of studies that would allow for explorative comparisons. Methods Eligible studies were identified via Pubmed searches and citation searching, restricted to publications no older than 2015 written in English. To obtain comparable data, only studies that reported findings as odds ratios were included, and risk of bias related to study samples, behavioral measurement disparities, and control variables was assessed via sensitivity analyses. Findings for each disorder were compared on the basis of different measures of central tendency. Results From 3,682 records, 294 studies were included. The review found evidence of associations between each of the four unhealthy behaviors and psychosis, depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), while personality disorder was only investigated in relation to cannabis and tobacco use. In overall comparison, the associations were generally of similar strength, and only the association between cannabis use and personality disorder was exceptional in terms of being significantly stronger than its counterparts across disorders and across behaviors. Analyses of bias risk identified some influence from behavioral measurement disparities and lack of adequate statistical control, but findings were generally robust across a range of sensitivity analyses. Conclusion This explorative and comparative review found that poor diet quality, sedentary behavior, and cannabis and tobacco use are about equally strongly associated with a range of different mental disorders. Given the general nature of these associations, we should probably understand them to reflect a general and shared etiology. However, the findings in this review should be regarded as tentative until confirmed by more comprehensive investigations.
Collapse
|
3
|
Riggs P. Epilogue. Psychiatr Clin North Am 2023; 46:801-804. [PMID: 37879840 DOI: 10.1016/j.psc.2023.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paula Riggs
- Division of Addiction Science, Prevention, and Treatment, Department of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, 3434 Jennings Street, San Diego, CA 92106, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Editorial: Early Cannabis Exposure Definitions That Correspond With High Cumulative Lifetime Dose During Adolescence Are the Strongest Predictors of Adverse Health Outcomes. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2022; 61:612-614. [PMID: 35248431 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaac.2022.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Although cannabis use during adolescence has been consistently linked to adverse health effects, the extent, nature, and cause of these effects remain widely debated in the public domain.1 Results from longitudinal studies conducted in North American, Europe, Australia, and New Zealand and meta-analytic reports suggest that exposure to cannabis during adolescence is associated with cognitive impairment, increased risk for psychiatric disorders, and academic and vocational failure.2,3 Recently, the rigor of some of these studies has been questioned, as a few of the studies have not found relationships between cannabis and adverse health outcomes or have shown nonsignificant effects after controlling for premorbid factors such as psychopathology or low IQ prior to cannabis exposure. Although adolescent cannabis users are at increased risk for developing a cannabis use disorder (CUD) compared to adults, not all adolescents who try cannabis develop problems related to its use. In fact, there is significant heterogeneity in how adolescents respond to cannabis exposure at the individual level.4 Some adolescents experiment with cannabis, use it sporadically and for a limited duration of time, and experience few negative consequences related to their cannabis use. Others, particularly those who use it frequently and for prolonged periods of time, go on to develop significant impairment related to their use. Cannabis use patterns among US adolescents and young adults are changing following 2 decades of legislative changes and expanding normalization of recreational and medical cannabis use.1 To improve prevention and early-intervention efforts during this time of societal change, it is critical that we identify which vulnerable populations are at greatest risk for experiencing negative outcomes related to cannabis use, and which features/aspects of adolescent cannabis use are most predictive of cannabis-associated adverse health outcomes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaur N, Bastien G, Gagnon L, Graham J, Mongeau-Pérusse V, Bakouni H, Morissette F, Theriault C, Fischer B, Jutras-Aswad D. Variations of cannabis-related adverse mental health and addiction outcomes across adolescence and adulthood: A scoping review. Front Psychiatry 2022; 13:973988. [PMID: 36299544 PMCID: PMC9590692 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.973988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Evidence supporting associations between cannabis use and many health outcomes is growing, however it remains unclear how such associations vary across the lifespan. We therefore aim to answer the following questions: (1) Are the risks of cannabis's adverse effects on mental health and addiction-related outcomes different in adolescents than in adults? (2) What are the relationships between these cannabis's adverse effects and (a) an individual's age at first cannabis use, (b) age at assessment, and (c) duration of cannabis use? METHODS We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL, and PsychINFO from inception to 18 October 2021. Two reviewers independently screened studies and descriptively synthesized results. RESULTS We included 140 studies. Cannabis effects on mental health and addiction-related outcomes were worse in adolescents, early cannabis initiators and cannabis users who consumed for longest periods. Evidence of worse long-term adverse effects in adolescents was substantial for psychosis, cannabis, and nicotine use disorders; mixed for depression, suicidality, other substance use and disorders; and limited for anxiety. Additionally, acute cannabis exposure had the opposite trend with adults more often reporting adverse effects than adolescents. CONCLUSION The available evidence suggests that cannabis use should be delayed as late as possible in adulthood and shortened in duration across the lifespan to decrease the risk of negative outcomes, while emphasizing the need for adapted harm reduction approaches. This scoping review provides evidence on the role of age and duration of exposure as determinants of cannabis-related adverse effects, which may inform prevention and harm reduction strategies. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/BYG72.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navdeep Kaur
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Gabriel Bastien
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Lea Gagnon
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Johann Graham
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, QC, Canada
| | - Violaine Mongeau-Pérusse
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Hamzah Bakouni
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Florence Morissette
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Camille Theriault
- Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Benedikt Fischer
- School of Population Health, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Centre for Applied Research in Mental Health and Addiction, Faculty of Health Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry, Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Didier Jutras-Aswad
- Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, QC, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|