Analysis of cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma outcomes after different surgical interventions

Merkel-cell carcinoma: ESMO-EURACAN Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up

•This ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline provides key recommendations for managing Merkel-cell carcinoma (MCC). •Recommendations are based on available scientific data and the multidisciplinary group of experts’ collective opinion. •The guideline covers clinical and pathological diagnosis, staging and risk assessment, treatment and follow-up. •Algorithms for the management of locoregional and inoperable/metastatic disease are provided. •A multidisciplinary team with a high level of expertise in MCC should diagnose and make decisions about therapy.

An update on Merkel cell carcinoma

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare cancer of the skin characterized by a neuroendocrine phenotype and an aggressive clinical behavior. It frequently originates in sun-exposed body areas, and its incidence has steadily increased in the last three decades. Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV) and ultraviolet (UV) radiation exposure are the main causative agents of MCC, and distinct molecular features have been documented in virus-positive and virus-negative malignancies. Surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment for localized tumors, but even when integrated with adjuvant radiotherapy is able to definitively cure only a fraction of MCC patients. While characterized by a high objective response rate, chemotherapy is associated with a short-lasting benefit of approximately 3 months. On the other hand, immune checkpoint inhibitors including avelumab and pembrolizumab have demonstrated durable antitumor activity in patients with stage IV MCC, and investigations on their use in the neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting are currently underway. Addressing the needs of those patients who do not persistently benefit from immunotherapy is currently one of the most compelling unmet needs in the field, and multiple clinical trials of new tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), therapeutic vaccines, immunocytokines as well as innovative forms of adoptive cellular immunotherapies are under clinical scrutiny at present.

Diagnosis and treatment of Merkel cell carcinoma: European consensus-based interdisciplinary guideline - Update 2022

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare skin cancer, accounting for less than 1% of all cutaneous malignancies. It is found predominantly in white populations and risk factors include advanced age, ultraviolet exposure, male sex, immunosuppression, such as AIDS/HIV infection, haematological malignancies or solid organ transplantation, and Merkel cell polyomavirus infection. MCC is an aggressive tumour with 26% of cases presenting lymph node involvement at diagnosis and 8% with distant metastases. Five-year overall survival rates range between 48% and 63%. Two subsets of MCC have been characterised with distinct molecular pathogenetic pathways: ultraviolet-induced MCC versus virus-positive MCC, which carries a better prognosis. In both subtypes, there are alterations in the retinoblastoma protein and p53 gene structure and function. MCC typically manifests as a red nodule or plaque with fast growth, most commonly on sun exposed areas. Histopathology (small-cell neuroendocrine appearance) and immunohistochemistry (CK20 positivity and TTF-1 negativity) confirm the diagnosis. The current staging systems are the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for international Cancer control 8th edition. Baseline whole body imaging is encouraged to rule out regional and distant metastasis. For localised MCC, first-line treatment is surgical excision with postoperative margin assessment followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (RT). Sentinel lymph node biopsy is recommended in all patients with MCC without clinically detectable lymph nodes or distant metastasis. Adjuvant RT alone, eventually combined with complete lymph nodes dissection is proposed in case of micrometastatic nodal involvement. In case of macroscopic nodal involvement, the standard of care is complete lymph nodes dissection potentially followed by post-operative RT. Immunotherapy with anti-PD-(L)1 antibodies should be offered as first-line systemic treatment in advanced MCC. Chemotherapy can be used when patients fail to respond or are intolerant for anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy or clinical trials.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma, the Impact of Clinical Excision Margins and Mohs Micrographic Surgery on Recurrence and Survival: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

When treating Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), the relation between wide local excision (WLE) margin and recurrence or survival is unclear. Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) is an alternative surgical option for MCC, but it is unknown whether the local recurrence rate differs between MMS and WLE.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically assess the available literature to determine the recurrence and survival rates when treating MCC with MMS and different clinical excision margins.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases were searched. Two independent reviewers selected studies that defined clear excision margins and either recurrence or survival. When possible, individual cases were extracted from case series and included in the analyses. Other studies were reviewed narratively.

RESULTS

Overall, 1108 studies were identified; of which, 19 case series (168 cases) and 12 cohort studies were eligible. None of the cohort studies showed significant differences in recurrence or survival for either excision margins or MMS. Equally, logistic and Cox regression analyses of the case series revealed no significant differences in recurrence or survival between different excision margins and MMS.

CONCLUSION

Synthesis of the available data does not indicate differences in recurrence and/or survival rates for MCC between different clinical excision margins and MMS.

Effects of surgery on survival of patients aged 75 years or older with Merkel cell carcinoma

Objective

To investigate whether surgery improves prognosis in elderly patients with Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC).

Materials/Methods

Data of all patients with MCC diagnosed between 2004 and 2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Differences in baseline characteristics were analyzed among the age groups (75–80, 80–85, and ≥85 years). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess the effects of each variable on patient outcomes. The Kaplan–Meier curves were employed to evaluate MCC overall survival (OS) and MCC‐specific survival (MSS).

Results

A total of 1156 of patients with MCC met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The surgery rate decreased with age (75–80, 80–85, and ≥85 years were 93.3%, 91.1%, and 88.7%, respectively; p = 0.082). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that the OS of patients in the 80–85 years group (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.14–1.70; p = 0.001) and the ≥85 years group (HR = 2.18; 95% CI = 1.80–2.63; p < 0.0001) was worse than that in the 75–80 years group. Compared with the non‐surgery groups, the HR for the surgery group was 0.75 for OS (95% CI = 0.56–1.00; p = 0.048) and 0.73 for MSS (95% CI = 0.48–1.10; p = 0.130). Subgroup analyses showed that patients aged ≥85 years undergoing surgery had better OS (HR = 0.65; 95% CI = 0.45–0.95; p = 0.024).

Conclusions

MCC patients aged 75 years and older would benefit from surgical resection. However, surgical resection should be performed cautiously, and larger prospective clinical trials are needed to further verify these findings.

Nomogram prediction for the overall survival and cancer-specific survival of patients diagnosed with Merkel cell carcinoma

Background

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) is a rare and aggressive neuroendocrine carcinoma of the skin, with a high recurrence rate and a high mortality rate worldwide. The purpose of this article is to construct a nomogram that incorporates significant clinical parameters and predicts the survival of individuals with MCC.

Methods

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database was employed to retrospectively analyze all confirmed MCC cases from 2004 to 2015. The data was collected from 3,688 patients, and was randomized as the training or validation group (1:1 ratio). The independent factors which predicted the cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) for MCC cases were searched for nomogram construction respectively. Independent parameters that affected CSS were determined using the Fine and Gray competing risk regression model. In addition, the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed. Then, the area under the curve (AUC) values, calibration curve, and the concordance index (C-index) were used to determine the nomogram performance. At last, decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to determine the net clinical benefit.

Results

The multivariate analysis results revealed that sex, age, race, marriage, American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, chemotherapy and radiotherapy were independent OS prognostic factors. Furthermore, competing risk analysis showed age, sex, AJCC stage, chemotherapy were the independent CSS prognostic factors. For validation, the C-index value of OS nomogram was 0.703 (95% CI: 0.686-0.721), while C-index value of CSS nomogram was 0.737 (95% CI: 0.710-0.764). Both C-index and AUC suggested that nomograms had superior performance to that of the AJCC stage system. In addition, according to the calibration curve, both nomograms were capable of accurate prediction of MCC prognosis. The DCA showed that the net benefits of the nomograms were superior among various threshold probabilities than these of AJCC stage system.

Conclusions

The present work established and verified the novel nomograms to predict the OS and CSS of MCC patients. If further confirmed in future studies, it may become another helpful tool for risk stratification and management of MCC patients.

Narrow resection margins are not associated with mortality or recurrence in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma: A retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Wide local excision constitutes the standard of care for Merkel cell carcinoma, but the optimal margin width remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess whether narrow margins (0.5-1 cm) were associated with outcome.

METHODS

Patients were recruited from a retrospective French multicentric cohort and included if they had had excision of primary tumor with minimum lateral margins of 0.5 cm. Factors associated with mortality and recurrence were assessed by multivariate regression.

RESULTS

Among the 214 patients included, 58 (27.1%) had undergone excision with narrow margins (0.5-1 cm) versus 156 (72.9%) with wide margins (>1 cm). During a median follow-up of 50.7 months, cancer-specific survival did not differ between groups (5-year specific survival rate 76.8% [95% confidence interval 61.7%-91.9%] and 76.2% [95% confidence interval 68.8%-83.6%], respectively). Overall survival, any recurrence-free survival, and local recurrence-free survival did not significantly differ between groups. Cancer-specific mortality was associated with age, male sex, American Joint Committee on Cancer stage III, and presence of positive margins.

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design, heterogenous baseline characteristics between groups.

CONCLUSION

Excision with narrow margins was not associated with outcome in this cohort, in which most patients had clear margins and postoperative radiation therapy. Residual tumor, mostly found on deep surgical margins, was independently associated with prognosis.

Narrow excision margins are appropriate for Merkel cell carcinoma when combined with adjuvant radiation: Analysis of 188 cases of localized disease and proposed management algorithm

BACKGROUND

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) management typically includes surgery with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT). Major challenges include determining surgical margin size and whether aRT is indicated.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the association of aRT, surgical margin size, and MCC local recurrence.

METHODS

Analysis of 188 MCC cases presenting without clinical nodal involvement.

RESULTS

aRT-treated patients tended to have higher-risk tumors (larger diameter, positive microscopic margins, immunosuppression) yet had fewer local recurrences (LRs) than patients treated with surgery only (1% vs 15%; P = .001). For patients who underwent surgery alone, 7 of 35 (20%) treated with narrow margins (defined as ≤1.0 cm) developed LR, whereas 0 of 13 patients treated with surgical margins greater than 1.0 cm developed LR (P = .049). For aRT-treated patients, local control was excellent regardless of surgical margin size; only 1% experienced recurrence in each group (1 of 70 with narrow margins ≤1 cm and 1 of 70 with margins >1 cm; P = .56).

LIMITATIONS

This was a retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients treated with aRT, local control was superb even if significant risk factors were present and margins were narrow. We propose an algorithm for managing primary MCC that integrates risk factors and optimizes local control while minimizing morbidity.

Merkel Cell Carcinoma - Current Controversies and Future Directions

Merkel cell carcinoma is a rare, aggressive neuroendocrine skin malignancy. Evidence for management comes from case series and single-arm trials. Optimal outcomes require assessment of the patient in a multidisciplinary team setting. Rapid diagnosis and staging are essential for locoregional control and may reduce metastasis. Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) adds prognostic information. FDG-positron emission tomography has high sensitivity and specificity and affects management in a quarter of cases. Surgical excision and radiotherapy provide good locoregional control even with positive margins. Wide surgical margins are needed if adjuvant radiotherapy is not used. It is uncertain whether adjuvant radiotherapy or elective surgery for uninvolved nodes or for patients selected by positive SLNB improves survival. Total doses of 50 Gy provide high levels of control for microscopic disease but at least 60 Gy should be given for macroscopic disease. Chemotherapy can be given safely with radiotherapy, but the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy remains uncertain. Trials of adjuvant immune therapy are underway. Unresectable primaries might be controlled with radiotherapy alone or combination systemic therapy, radiotherapy and surgery. Metastatic disease often responds to chemotherapy, but the response duration can be short. Immunity is central to disease control. Immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment resulted in high response rates in chemotherapy-naive patients and lower rates in chemotherapy-refractory patients. Durable responses are observed.