Rituximab therapy in patients with bullous pemphigoid: A retrospective study of 20 patients

Serum Biomarkers in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common type of subepidermal blistering disease, usually observed in the elderly population, with a mean age of presentation between 66 and 83 years. BP is a psychosocially ladened disease, with many patients experiencing negative body image, social isolation, and depression. The identification and validation of biomarkers in BP may further the understanding of disease pathogenesis, provide objective measures in assessing efficacy in clinical trials, and identify new targets for targeted therapy.

METHODS/RESULTS

Two databases (Medline and Embase) were searched from database inception to September 2023. All published articles reporting on biomarker levels of BP patients in serum compared to healthy controls were included. A total of 877 unique articles were identified, resulting in the inclusion of 62 case-control studies reporting on a total of 1837 patients and 140 unique biomarkers. Biomarkers were categorized into T-cell mediated, B-cell mediated, innate immune system, and coagulation cascade pathway. The most notable biomarkers identified include increases in anti-BP180/230 immunoglobulin (Ig)G/E, total IgE, TNF-α, B-cell activating factor, interleukin-31, eosinophil cationic protein, MMP-9, and coagulation cascade biomarker levels. The results of this review provide the greatest support for a role of anti-BP180/230 autoantibodies, Th2 cells, eosinophils, and the coagulation cascade in the pathogenesis of BP.

CONCLUSIONS

The pathogenesis of BP has an underlying autoimmune etiology centred around the production of autoantibodies against BP180/230, but increased Th2, eosinophil and coagulation cascade activity may be contributory.

Advancements in Bullous Pemphigoid Treatment: A Comprehensive Pipeline Update

ABASTRACT

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a common autoimmune bullous disease affecting mainly the elderly, with rising incidence due to increased life expectancy. This disease is characterized by tense bullous lesions on normal or erythematous skin, accompanied by pruritus. BP pathogenesis involves autoantibodies against hemidesmosomal proteins BP180 and BP230, leading to detachment at the dermo-epidermal junction as well as blister formation. BP is associated with coexisting comorbidities and drug exposure, and its management often requires high doses or chronic use of systemic glucocorticoids, posing risks of adverse effects. This review focuses on novel treatment options for BP, exploring therapies targeting different immune pathways. Rituximab, a CD20 monoclonal antibody, depletes B-lymphocytes and has shown efficacy in severe cases. Dupilumab, targeting interleukin (IL)-4 receptor α and thus blocking IL-4 and IL-13, downregulates type 2 helper (Th2) responses and has demonstrated promising results. Targeting eosinophil-related molecules using bertilimumab and AKST4290 has yielded positive results in clinical trials. Omalizumab, an immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibody, can reduce disease severity and allows corticosteroid tapering in a number of cases. Complement inhibitors such as nomacopan and avdoralimab are being investigated. IL-17 and IL-23 inhibitors such as secukinumab and tildrakizumab have shown potential in a limited number of case reports. Neonatal Fc receptor antagonists such as efgartigimod are under investigation. Additionally, topical therapies and Janus kinase inhibitors are being explored as potential treatments for BP. These novel therapies offer promising alternatives for managing BP, with potential to improve outcomes and reduce high cumulative doses of systemic corticosteroids and related toxicities. Further research, including controlled clinical trials, is needed to establish their efficacy, safety, and optimal dosing regimens for BP management.

Advancing Treatment in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Comprehensive Review of Novel Therapeutic Targets and Approaches

Bullous pemphigoid is one of the most common autoimmune bullous diseases occurring primarily in the elderly. Pathogenic autoantibodies against BP180 and BP230 at the dermal-epidermal junction cause subepidermal blisters, erosions, and intense pruritus, all of which adversely affect the patients' quality of life and may increase their morbidity and mortality. Current systemic treatment options for bullous pemphigoid are limited to corticosteroids and immunosuppressants, which can have substantial side effects on these vulnerable patients that even exceed their therapeutic benefits. Therefore, more precisely, targeting therapies to the pathogenic cells and molecules in bullous pemphigoid is an urgent issue. In this review, we describe the pathophysiology of bullous pemphigoid, focusing on autoantibodies, complements, eosinophils, neutrophils, proteases, and the T helper 2 and 17 axes since they are crucial in promoting proinflammatory environments. We also highlight the emerging therapeutic targets for bullous pemphigoid and their latest discoveries in clinical trials or experimental studies. Further well-designed studies are required to establish the efficacy and safety of these prospective therapeutic options.

Evaluation of Dupilumab in Patients With Bullous Pemphigoid

Importance

Dupilumab is a theoretically novel therapy for bullous pemphigoid (BP). However, its effectiveness and safety have yet to be confirmed in a large-scale study.

Objective

To assess the efficacy and safety of dupilumab in patients with BP and evaluate factors that potentially affect short-term and long-term outcomes.

Design, Setting, and Participants

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 24.6 (11.5-38.4) weeks. This multicenter study was performed in 6 dermatology departments of the National Autoimmune Bullous Diseases Cooperative Group of China. Adult patients with BP that received 300 mg of dupilumab every 2 weeks following an initial dose of 600 mg were included. Patients were eligible if they had a clinical presentation of BP combined with immunological or pathological evidence. Patients with drug-induced BP, with less than 4 weeks of follow-up, and who received dupilumab or any other biologics within 6 months were excluded.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved disease control within 4 weeks. Disease control was defined as the absence of new lesions and pruritus, combined with the healing of existing lesions. Complete remission rates, relapse rates, changes in Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) scores, itching numerical rating scale (NRS) scores, laboratory results within 64 weeks, and adverse events (AEs) were also assessed.

Results

Among 146 patients (median [IQR] age, 73 [64-85] years; 86 [58.9%] male patients) included in the study, 127 (87.0%) patients achieved disease control within 4 weeks, with a median (IQR) time of 14 (7-14) days. A total of 52 (35.6%) patients achieved complete remission, and 13 (8.9%) patients relapsed during the observation period. The complete remission rate and cumulative relapse rate at week 64 were 62.5% (5 of 8) and 30.9%, respectively. There was rapid and sustained improvement in clinical indicators and laboratory examination results after dupilumab treatment, including BPDAI scores, itching NRS scores, serum anti-BP180 and anti-BP230 antibodies, total IgE levels, and eosinophil count. Of these 146 patients, 107 (73.3%) did not report any AEs. The most common AEs were infections and eosinophilia. Serum anti-BP180 antibody levels of greater than 50 relative units (RU)/mL (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 0.97-12.61; P = .045) were associated with 4-week disease control, and male patients were more likely to relapse (HR, 10.97; 95% CI, 1.42-84.92; P = .02).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this retrospective cohort study, dupilumab treatment was associated with improved clinical symptoms in patients with BP. The safety profile was favorable, although concurrent infection and eosinophilia might pose potential concerns. This study suggests that patients with anti-BP180 antibody levels of at least 50 RU/mL and female sex may respond better.

Anti-interleukin 4 receptor α antibody for the treatment of Chinese bullous pemphigoid patients with diverse comorbidities and a 1-year follow-up: a monocentric real-world study

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is a common subepidermal bullous disorder that lacks adequate treatment alternatives. Dupilumab, an anti-interleukin (IL) 4 receptor α antibody blocking Th2 molecules IL-4 and 13, has been used off-label and shown to be effective in refractory BP cases.

Methods

BP patients with various disease severities and comorbidities were included in this case series. All patients received dupilumab alone or in combination with immunosuppressants in a real-world setting. Complete remission (CR) was defined as the absence of pruritus symptoms and previous BP eruptions, with only hyperpigmentation patches and without newly occurring lesions for at least 4 weeks. Disease relapse was classified as the appearance of three or more new lesions within 1 month or at least one large urticarial or eczematous lesion that did not resolve within a week.

Findings

Ten individuals were enrolled in this case series. Pruritus symptoms and BP eruptions improved significantly in nine patients (90%). Seven patients (70%) attained CR, including all mild-to-moderate (100%) cases and three of six (50%) severe BP cases. At the dupilumab monotherapy stage, eosinophilia was observed in two severe cases. One patient out of seven (14.3%) relapsed after 1 year of follow-up after CR.

Conclusion

Treatment of BP with diverse comorbidities with anti-IL-4 receptor α antibody provides further credentials to a prospective randomized study. More impressive efficacy and safety profiles were observed in patients with mild-to-moderate disease after 1 year of follow-up. Eosinophilia may occur in patients receiving dupilumab monotherapy.

Necrotizing Fasciitis-Severe Complication of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review, Risk Factors, and Treatment Challenges

Background and objectives: Bullous pemphigoid (BP), the most common subepidermal autoimmune skin blistering disease (AIBD) has an estimated annual incidence of 2.4 to 42.8 new cases per million in different populations, designating it an orphan disease. Characterized by disruption of the skin barrier combined with therapy-induced immunosuppression, BP could pose a risk for skin and soft tissue infections (SSTI). Necrotizing fasciitis (NF) is a rare necrotizing skin and soft tissue infection, with a prevalence of 0.40 cases per 100,000 to 15.5 cases per 100,000 population, often associated with immunosuppression. Low incidences of NF and BP classify them both as rare diseases, possibly contributing to the false inability of making a significant correlation between the two. Here, we present a systematic review of the existing literature related to the ways these two diseases correlate. Materials and methods: This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature review was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE), Google Scholar, and SCOPUS databases. The primary outcome was prevalence of NF in BP patients, while the secondary outcome was prevalence and mortality of SSTI in BP patients. Due to the scarcity of data, case reports were also included. Results: A total of 13 studies were included, six case reports of BP complicated by NF with six retrospective studies and one randomized multicenter trial of SSTIs in BP patients. Conclusions: Loss of skin integrity, immunosuppressive therapy, and comorbidities commonly related to BP patients are risk factors for necrotizing fasciitis. Evidence of their significant correlation is emerging, and further studies are deemed necessary for the development of BP-specific diagnostic and treatment protocols.

Case report: Bullous pemphigoid associated with sintilimab therapy for pMMR/MSS colorectal cancer

Immunotherapy has become a very effective treatment for many cancers. It has a unique set of immune system-related adverse effects, collectively known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Skin toxicities are the most common irAEs, of which bullous pemphigoid, although rare, is potentially life-threatening and affects patients’ survival. In this article, we report the treatment of bullous pemphigoid caused by programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) in a case of proficient mismatch repair (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS) colorectal cancer. No significant adverse effects were observed in the patient after methylprednisone was tapered to 4 mg twice a day. No new skin lesions occurred recently in the patient and the original skin lesions healed. In particular, the patient’s immunotherapy was not stopped and the best outcome was a partial remission of the disease, lasting for more than 8 months.

The cytokine milieu of bullous pemphigoid: Current and novel therapeutic targets

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune bullous disease, characterized by severe pruritus and skin blistering. The loss of tolerance against Collagen XVII, also referred to as BP180, is the main pathogenic event of BP, leading to production of IgG autoantibodies which mainly target the juxtamembranous extracellular non-collagenous 16th A (NC16A) domain of BP180. A complex inflammatory network is activated upon autoantibody binding to the basement membrane zone; this inflammatory loop involves the complement cascade and the release of several inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and proteases from keratinocytes, lymphocytes, mast cells and granulocytes. Collectively, these events disrupt the integrity of the dermal-epidermal junction, leading to subepidermal blistering. Recent advances have led to identify novel therapeutic targets for BP, whose management is mainly based on the long-term use of topical and systemic corticosteroids. As an example, targeting type-2 T-helper cell-associated cytokines, such as Interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 has shown meaningful clinical efficacy in case series and studies; targeting IL-17 and IL-23 has also been tried, owing to an important role of these cytokines in the chronic maintenance phase of BP. In this review article, we discuss the complex cytokine milieu that characterized BP inflammation, highlighting molecules, which are currently investigated as present and future therapeutic targets for this life-threatening disease.

Low-Dose Rituximab for Bullous Pemphigoid. Protocol and Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Low-dose rituximab is a protocol used in several autoimmune diseases, that has also shown to be effective and safe in pemphigus vulgaris.

OBJECTIVES

To study whether low-dose rituximab is also effective for bullous pemphigoid.

METHODS

Patients with BP were treated with a single cycle of two infusions of rituximab 500mg at an interval of 2 weeks. Early and late end points were monitored.

RESULTS

Six patients, five males and a female, with a mean age of 78.6 years (range 65-89) and a mean history of BP of 6.7 months (range 2-16) were included. A rapid and marked response was observed after a single cycle of treatment, with a mean time to disease control and to end of consolidation phase of 1.9 (range 1-3), and 4 weeks (range 3-5), respectively. Four patients achieved a late end point at a mean of 15.75 weeks (range 13-20). Three of them achieved partial remission with no therapy (two patients) or with minimal therapy (one patient), and one of them achieved complete remission with no therapy. One patient has 6 weeks of clinical follow-up after rituximab administration. The remaining patient relapsed 4 weeks after the rituximab treatment, and remains in complete remission with more than minimal therapy. One patient had a herpetic gingivostomatitis related to rituximab.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rituximab for BP achieved acceptable remission rates and steroid-sparing activity, with a better safety profile and a lower cost, compared to standard doses. This pilot study suggests that low-dose rituximab could be a therapeutic option for BP.

Biological treatment for bullous pemphigoid

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease. Topical or systemic corticosteroids are often used as the first-line treatment. However, long-term corticosteroid use may lead to significant side effects. Therefore, various adjuvant immunosuppressant therapies are used as steroid-sparing agents, with accumulating reports of biological treatments for severely recalcitrant BP.

Objective

To describe the clinical and immunological features of a series of patients with recalcitrant BP treated with immunobiological therapies. To assess the efficacy and safety of their therapies.

Methods

Patients receiving biological treatment for BP from two centers were assessed. Here, we described the clinical, immunopathological, and immunofluorescence findings of adult patients with BP and analyzed the clinical response and adverse events associated with various biological therapies.

Results

We identified nine eligible patients treated with rituximab (seven), omalizumab (three), or dupilumab (one). The mean age at diagnosis was 60.4 years, the average BP duration before biologic initiation was 1.9 years, and the average previous treatment failure was 2.11 therapies. The mean follow-up period from the first biological treatment to the last visit was 29.3 months. Satisfactory response, defined as clinical improvement, was achieved in 78% (7) of the patients, and total BP clearance was achieved in 55% (5) of the patients at the last follow-up visit. Additional rituximab courses improved the disease outcomes. No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Efficient and safe novel therapies can be considered in recalcitrant steroid-dependent BP non-responsive to conventional immunosuppressant therapies.

Low-Dose Rituximab for Bullous Pemphigoid. Protocol and Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Low-dose rituximab is a protocol used in several autoimmune diseases, that has also shown to be effective and safe in pemphigus vulgaris.

OBJECTIVES

To study whether low-dose rituximab is also effective for bullous pemphigoid.

METHODS

Patients with BP were treated with a single cycle of two infusions of rituximab 500 mg at an interval of 2 weeks. Early and late end points were monitored.

RESULTS

Six patients, five males and a female, with a mean age of 78.6 years (range 65-89) and a mean history of BP of 6.7 months (range 2-16) were included. A rapid and marked response was observed after a single cycle of treatment, with a mean time to disease control and to end of consolidation phase of 1.9 (range 1-3), and 4 weeks (range 3-5), respectively. Four patients achieved a late end point at a mean of 15.75 weeks (range 13-20). Three of them achieved partial remission with no therapy (two patients) or with minimal therapy (one patient), and one of them achieved complete remission with no therapy. One patient has 6 weeks of clinical follow-up after rituximab administration. The remaining patient relapsed 4 weeks after the rituximab treatment, and remains in complete remission with more than minimal therapy. One patient had a herpetic gingivostomatitis related to rituximab.

CONCLUSIONS

Low-dose rituximab for BP achieved acceptable remission rates and steroid-sparing activity, with a better safety profile and a lower cost, compared to standard doses. This pilot study suggests that low-dose rituximab could be a therapeutic option for BP.

Review of an Anti-CD20 Monoclonal Antibody for the Treatment of Autoimmune Diseases of the Skin

Biologic therapies targeting B-cells are emerging as an effective strategy to treat a variety of immune-mediated diseases. One of the most studied B-cell-targeted therapies is rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that exemplifies B-cell depletion therapy and has served as the prototype for other anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies and the development of biosimilars. While there are multiple studies on the use of rituximab in dermatology, a comprehensive review of rituximab therapy in autoimmune skin conditions is lacking. In this literature review, we summarize indications, treatment efficacy, and safety of rituximab among common autoimmune diseases of the skin: pemphigus vulgaris, cutaneous lupus erythematous, dermatomyositis, systemic sclerosis, thyroid dermopathy, autoimmune pemphigoid diseases, and cutaneous vasculitis diseases. Existing data on rituximab support the approach of rituximab, biosimilars, and newer B-cell-targeting therapies in immune-mediated cutaneous diseases. Overall, rituximab, which targets CD20, provides an effective alternative or concomitant option to traditional immunosuppressants in the management of various autoimmune diseases of the skin. Further studies are necessary to expand the understanding and possible utility of B-cell-targeted therapies among autoimmune skin diseases.

Three cases of refractory bullous pemphigoid in the elderly treated successfully with ultra‐low‐dose rituximab

Rituximab has proven effective for the treatment of steroid-refractory bullous pemphigoid (BP), but there is controversy over the dosing protocol. We report three cases of refractory BP treated successfully with ultra-low-dose rituximab (100 mg weekly for 4 weeks). Our cases confirmed the efficacy and good follow-up outcomes of this treatment strategy for refractory BP. The ultra-low-dose rituximab regimen (100 mg weekly for 4 weeks) may be a useful alternative therapy in patients with refractory BP.

Clinical effect of omalizumab as an adjuvant treatment to rituximab in patient with refractory bullous pemphigoid

Patients with refractory bullous pemphigoid (BP) achieve remission after rituximab treatment but require high-dose systemic corticosteroids until the remission. The aim of this retrospective study was to examine the clinical efficacy of omalizumab as an adjuvant treatment to rituximab in patients with refractory BP. Patients with BP receiving treatment with either rituximab monotherapy or rituximab plus omalizumab were considered for the study. The total dose of corticosteroids received for 60 days after administration of rituximab, mortality and relapse rates, and median time to relapse were also investigated. Of 49 patients included in the study, 25 received rituximab monotherapy and 17 received the combination therapy with rituximab and omalizumab. The rituximab plus omalizumab group showed shorter time to disease control with minimal treatment (15 days vs. 67.5 days, p < 0.001) and lower corticosteroid dose for 60 days after administration of rituximab (698.4 mg vs. 1087.4 mg of methylprednisolone, p < 0.001) compared to the rituximab monotherapy group. The results of this study suggest that combination therapy with rituximab and omalizumab can achieve disease control status faster than the rituximab monotherapy, reducing the total dose of corticosteroids.

Engineered exosomes for studies in tumor immunology

Exosomes are a type of extracellular vesicle (EV) with diameters of 30-150 nm secreted by most of the cells into the extracellular spaces and can alter the microenvironment through cell-to-cell interactions by fusion with the plasma membrane and subsequent endocytosis and release of the cargo. Because of their biocompatibility, low toxicity and immunogenicity, permeability (even through the blood-brain barrier (BBB)), stability in biological fluids, and ability to accumulate in the lesions with higher specificity, investigators have started making designer's exosomes or engineered exosomes to carry biologically active protein on the surface or inside the exosomes as well as using exosomes to carry drugs, micro RNA, and other products to the site of interest. In this review, we have discussed biogenesis, markers, and contents of various exosomes including exosomes of immune cells. We have also discussed the current methods of making engineered and designer's exosomes as well as the use of engineered exosomes targeting different immune cells in the tumors, stroke, as well as at peripheral blood. Genetic engineering and customizing exosomes create an unlimited opportunity to use in diagnosis and treatment. Very little use has been discovered, and we are far away to reach its limits.

Off-Label Uses of Rituximab in Dermatology

Purpose of Review

Rituximab has transformed the treatment of B-cell malignancies and rheumatoid arthritis in the past 2 decades. More recently, this anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody has seen increasing usage in the field of dermatology. This review highlights the evidence supporting its use in several important dermatologic conditions.

Recent Findings

Key recent findings include the 2018 FDA approval of rituximab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe pemphigus.

Summary

Data from randomized controlled trials have demonstrated the efficacy of rituximab in pemphigus, ANCA-associated vasculitis, and cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. More limited data suggests its use in recalcitrant cases of diseases such as pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, and dermatomyositis. There is scarce evidence and mixed results for rituximab when studied in cutaneous polyarteritis nodosa and cutaneous lupus erythematosus.

Bullous Pemphigoid Complicated by Sepsis

Patients with bullous pemphigoid face many challenges when managing their disorder, one of which is balancing medication with their ailments. Because the patient population with bullous pemphigoid are primarily elderly, the current first-line treatment of corticosteroids tends to increase their rates of morbidity and mortality. During the acute process of the disease, providers must also consider the increased chance of infections caused by the opening in the skin. These patient cases are often complicated further by secondary symptoms such as pruritis and pain. Here we present a case in which we provided care to a 38-year-old female with a history of bullous pemphigoid and multiple medical problems who presented to the emergency department with nausea, vomiting, fevers, abdominal pain, and blisters on her forearm. Due to concern for sepsis and her past failure of outpatient therapy, the patient was hospitalized and treated for her possible infection, bullous pemphigoid, nausea, and pain.

Rituximab, Omalizumab, and Dupilumab Treatment Outcomes in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Systematic Review

Background

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal bullous disease of the skin. First-line treatment of systemic corticosteroids may cause serious adverse events. Rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab should be explored as alternative treatment options to improve outcomes.

Objective

To systematically review the rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab treatment outcomes in bullous pemphigoid.

Methods

A PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library search were conducted on March 10, 2022. A total of 75 studies were included using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines.

Results

Use of rituximab (n=122), omalizumab (n=53) and dupilumab (n=36) were reported in 211 patients with BP. Rituximab led to complete remission in 70.5% (n=86/122) and partial remission in 23.8% (n=29/122) of patients within 5.7 months, with a recurrence rate of 20.5% (n=25/122). 9.0% (n=11/122) of patients died and infection (6.6%, n=8/122) was the most common adverse event. Omalizumab led to complete remission in 67.9% (n=36/53) and partial remission in 20.8% (n=11/53) of patients within 6.6 months, with a recurrence rate of 5.7% (n=3/53). 1.9% (n=1/53) of patients died and thrombocytopenia (1.9%, n=1/53) was observed as the most common adverse event. Dupilumab led to complete remission in 66.7% (n=24/36) and partial remission in 19.4% (n=7/36) of patients within 4.5 months of treatment without any reported adverse events, with a recurrence rate of 5.6% (n=2/36).

Conclusions

Rituximab, omalizumab, and dupilumab have similar clinical benefits for BP patients. However, rituximab resulted in higher recurrence rates, adverse events, and mortality rates.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022316454.

Clinical Effectiveness and Safety of Initial Combination Therapy with Corticosteroids and Rituximab in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Rituximab is a potential initial adjuvant therapy for bullous pemphigoid, yet clinical experience is scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to examine the clinical outcomes and safety of initial combination therapy with systemic corticosteroids and adjuvant rituximab for the treatment of bullous pemphigoid.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed on 84 patients with bullous pemphigoid, who received systemic corticosteroids with or without initial adjuvant rituximab therapy (defined as rituximab use within 12 weeks after initiation of systemic corticosteroids).

RESULTS

Among the 84 patients included (37 received systemic corticosteroids with rituximab and 47 were treated with systemic corticosteroids without rituximab), the median time to complete remission on minimal therapy or off therapy was 215 days (95% confidence interval 176.9-253.1) in patients receiving rituximab vs 529 days (95% confidence interval 338.6-719.4) in those not receiving rituximab. A Cox regression analysis showed an increased probability of reaching complete remission on minimal therapy or off therapy with the combined therapy (hazard ratio = 2.28 [1.28-4.07], p = 0.005) after age, Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Activity Index score, and underlying diseases were controlled. In multivariate logistic/linear regressions, initial adjuvant rituximab therapy was associated with a higher complete remission rate (odds ratio = 6.63 [2.09-21.03]) and lower cumulative prednisolone (mg)/body weight (kg) (B = -24.86 [-44.06 to -8.29]) within 48 weeks. Risk of hospitalization for infection was not elevated in the group treated with adjuvant rituximab.

CONCLUSIONS

Rituximab use as adjuvant therapy within 12 weeks after initiation of systemic corticosteroids was associated with a faster and higher rate of achieving complete remission on minimal therapy or off therapy, as well as a significant corticosteroid-sparing effect and a comparable safety profile in this retrospective study. Hence, initial combination therapy with corticosteroids and adjuvant rituximab could serve as an effective treatment option for bullous pemphigoid, but this requires confirmation in randomized controlled studies.

Pemphigus and Pemphigoid: From Disease Mechanisms to Druggable Pathways

Pemphigus and pemphigoid are paradigms for understanding the mechanisms of antibody-mediated autoimmune disease in humans. In pemphigus, IgG4-predominant autoantibodies cause intraepidermal blistering by direct interference with desmoglein interactions and subsequent disruption of desmosomes and signaling pathways. In pemphigoid, IgG1, IgG4, and IgE autoantibodies against basement membrane zone antigens directly interfere with hemidesmosomal adhesion, activating complement and Fc receptor‒mediated effector pathways. Unraveling disease mechanisms in pemphigus and pemphigoid has identified numerous opportunities for clinical trials, which hold promise to identify safer and more effective therapies for these potentially life-threatening diseases.

Assessing Disease Outcome Measures in Bullous Pemphigoid on Standard-Of-Care Therapies

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an autoimmune blistering disease resulting in pruritus and cutaneous blistering. Longitudinal studies characterizing the disease course of patients with BP on conventional therapy are lacking. We sought to characterize the changes in disease activity and pruritus of patients with BP on standard-of-care treatments. We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients with BP on standard-of-care therapy. Generalized Estimating Equations were used to estimate the mean and standard errors for Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Activity Index (BPDAI) total activity score, BPDAI pruritus component score, and anti-BP180 autoantibody levels (BP180) over time. A total of 80 patients with BP showed consistent reductions in BPDAI total activity score and BPDAI pruritus component score, with a nadir at 4 months. BP180 decreased over time, with the largest reductions at 6 and 9 months. Median partial/complete remission was at 6.7 months, with relapses at a median time of 15.9 months. Receiving operating characteristic analysis determined an optimal BPDAI total activity score cutoff of 3.3 to discriminate partial/complete remission incidence (area under the curve = 0.895, sensitivity = 0.844, specificity = 0.78). In conclusion, in patients with BP on standard-of-care therapy, a natural course of BPDAI total activity score and BPDAI pruritus component score over time was comprehensively projected. BPDAI ≤ 3.3 was associated with partial/complete remission. These results provide reference data to guide future clinical trial design for BP.

Evaluating the risk-to-benefit ratio of using cotrimoxazole as a pneumocystis pneumonia preventative intervention among pemphigus patients treated with rituximab: A retrospective study with 494 patients

Rituximab is widely used as the first-line treatment for pemphigus patients. Since it depletes the B cells, it increases the risk of infections. Here, we evaluated the prophylactic efficacy of cotrimoxazole in decreasing the risk of pneumocystis pneumonia (PCP) infection in the pemphigus patients treated with rituximab. The medical records of confirmed pemphigus patients receiving rituximab were evaluated in two groups; those who received cotrimoxazole as a prophylactic after rituximab and patients who only received rituximab without any prophylaxis. The occurrence of PCP infection was determined in each group and compared. Medical records of 494 patients, including 301 women and 193 men, with the mean age of 46.74 years were analyzed. The phenotypes of the disease were mucocutaneous (n = 364), mucosal (n = 88), and cutaneous (n = 42). Among them, 235 cases had received cotrimoxazole as a prophylaxis and 259 patients did not. The incidence of PCP in total patients was 2 (0.4%), one in each group. Accordingly, no significant difference was observed in the incidence of PCP between two groups (p = 0.84). Also, no cotrimoxazole-related side effect was observed in the treated group. It seems that due to the low incidence of PCP in pemphigus patients treated with rituximab, prophylactic cotrimoxazole therapy is not necessary and it only increases the overall therapy cost and might cause cotrimoxazole-related adverse effects in some patients. However, regarding its probable beneficial effect in patients with long-term history of immunosuppressive therapy, more studies are required.

A Rare Case of Bullous Pemphigoid Secondary to Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy: A Tense Situation

Bullous pemphigoid is a serious and rare complication of immunotherapy. Here, we present a case of bullous pemphigoid secondary to ipilimumab/nivolumab checkpoint inhibitor therapy in a patient with metastatic melanoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is more widely used now to treat cancer patients, bringing more challenging cases of adverse events associated with their use. Bullous pemphigoid can be a difficult diagnosis to make in the initial stages as the rash is similar to other red rashes before transforming into the typical appearance of a blister. As bullous pemphigoid can be a life-threatening adverse event, early identification is key to increasing patient survival.

Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) clinical practice guideline on immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are the standard of care for the treatment of several cancers. While these immunotherapies have improved patient outcomes in many clinical settings, they bring accompanying risks of toxicity, specifically immune-related adverse events (irAEs). There is a need for clear, effective guidelines for the management of irAEs during ICI treatment, motivating the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) to convene an expert panel to develop a clinical practice guideline. The panel discussed the recognition and management of single and combination ICI irAEs and ultimately developed evidence- and consensus-based recommendations to assist medical professionals in clinical decision-making and to improve outcomes for patients.

Subepithelial autoimmune bullous dermatoses disease activity assessment and therapy

Subepidermal (subepithelial) autoimmune blistering dermatoses are a group of rare skin disorders characterized by the disruption of the dermal-epidermal junction through the action of autoantibodies. The fourth article in this continuing medical education series presents the current validated disease activity scoring systems, serologic parameters, treatments, and clinical trials for bullous pemphigoid, mucous membrane pemphigoid, epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, bullous systemic lupus erythematosus, anti-p200 pemphigoid, linear IgA bullous dermatosis, and dermatitis herpetiformis.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of bullous pemphigoid patients with versus without oral prednisolone treatment

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) varies in severity and stratified treatments are needed. However, there are no definitive standards for choosing appropriate treatments. To elucidate the factors involved in choosing treatments and the clinical outcomes of BP, we retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 78 BP patients at a single center. Of the 78 patients, 49 (62.8%) were treated with oral prednisolone (PSL) and 29 (37.2%) were treated without PSL. The patients with older age, lower Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI), and/or lower anti-BP180NC16a antibody titer at onset tended to be treated without oral PSL. Notably, only 9.1% patients without PSL experienced relapse, whereas 36.7% patients with oral PSL experienced relapse when the PSL was around 0.1 mg/kg. It suggests that the patients with mild disease severity could be well controlled without oral PSL. Receiver-operator curve analysis demonstrated that the cut-off value for the use of oral PSL was 31 for total BPDAI and was 7 for BPDAI skin urticaria/erythema, with a high (>0.9) area under the curve. Notably, none of the patients who were negative for the anti-BP180NC16a antibody at onset experienced relapse even though they were treated without PSL. In conclusion, in BP patients who were negative for anti-BP180NC16a antibody at onset, with a total BPDAI score of less than 31 or with an urticaria/erythema score of less than 7 can be treated without PSL. When the PSL is tapered to around 0.1 mg/kg, we should carefully monitor the patients to detect relapse.

A retrospective cohort study reporting rituximab treatment for 33 patients with immunobullous disease

BACKGROUND

Autoimmune bullous disorders, encompassing pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases, are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. This is in part due to high cumulative doses of corticosteroids in combination with immunosuppressant agents used in traditional treatment regimes. Rituximab is an antiCD20 monoclonal antibody which can induce complete remission, but it is currently unlicensed in the UK and approved only after other treatments have failed.

METHODS

We report a retrospective cohort study of 33 patients with pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases treated with rituximab from a single tertiary centre from 2013 to 2019.

RESULTS

"Complete remission off therapy" was achieved by 27.3% (n = 9), and a further 27.3% (n = 9) had complete remission on minimal therapy. Twenty-one per cent (n = 7) had "partial remission on minimal therapy"; 9.1% (n = 3) patients were in the "consolidation phase," and 12.1% (n = 4) had a "relapse/flare." A steady reduction in prednisolone doses was observed post-Rituximab infusion. Pre-Rituximab the median dose of prednisolone was 20mg (range 10-35, IQR 25), 15mg (range 9.5-22.5, IQR 13) at 1 month, 9mg (range 5-10, IQR 5) at 6 months, 4mg (range 0-5mg, IQR 5) at 12 months and 0 (0-4.35, IQR 4.25) at 18 months. Twelve per cent (n = 4) of patients had documented infusion reaction symptoms. Twelve per cent (n = 4) had later infective complications.

CONCLUSION

This real clinic data adds to the evidence that Rituximab is a safe and effective treatment for both pemphigus and pemphigoid autoimmune blistering conditions. Significantly, we were able to demonstrate a substantial reduction in corticosteroid dosage in our cohort of patients following rituximab treatment.

Role of B cells in immune-mediated dermatoses

Although T cells are considered as the central component in immune-mediated diseases, supportive evidence has demonstrated that B cells also contribute to the progression of these diseases. B cells are divided into various subsets according to their secreted cytokines. Different B cell subsets play diverse roles in immune-mediated dermatoses. Regulatory B cells (Bregs) are defined functionally by their ability to secrete IL-10, which has been revealed to contribute to immunological tolerance. Drugs that deplete B cells, such as rituximab, are now used for the treatment of several immune-mediated dermatoses. In this review, we present and discuss the current knowledge on the roles of B cells in several immune-mediate dermatoses including psoriasis, pemphigus, bullous pemphigoid, and dermatomyositis, atopic dermatitis.

Updates on diagnosis and management of autoimmune blistering diseases

Over the last several decades, advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of autoimmune blistering diseases has resulted in significant improvements in diagnosis and management. These improvements include new diagnostic assays and therapies targeted at specific disease mediators. Furthermore, the abundance of new therapies in clinic trials for autoimmune blistering diseases will translate to an enhanced therapeutic armamentarium for clinicians. The aim of this article is to review new developments in the understanding of autoimmune blistering diseases and to summarize advancements in their diagnosis and management.

The pathogenesis of bullous skin diseases

Bullous skin diseases are a group of dermatoses characterized by blisters and bullae in the skin and mucous membranes. The etiology and pathogenesis of bullous skin diseases are not completely clear. The most common are pemphigus and bullous pemphigoid (BP). Autoantibodies play critical roles in their pathogenesis. Abnormalities in the adhesion between keratinocytes in patients with pemphigus leads to acantholysis and formation of intra-epidermal blisters. Anti-desmoglein autoantibodies are present both in the circulation and skin lesions of patients with pemphigus. The deficient adhesion of keratinocytes to the basement membrane in BP patients gives rise to subepidermal blisters. Autoantibodies against the components of hemidesmosome can be detected in BP patients. Many novel therapeutics based on knowledge of the pathogenesis have emerged in recent years.

Rituximab in autoimmune pemphigoid diseases: Indications, optimized regimens, and practice gaps

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody targeting CD20 on B cells with proven efficacy for pemphigus vulgaris, now an FDA-approved indication. Other autoimmune bullous diseases can be challenging to treat and have significant associated morbidity and mortality, but data supporting the use of rituximab in pemphigoid group diseases remain limited. Although rituximab demonstrates efficacy for clinical improvement and remission in pemphigoid, concern for adverse events may also limit the use of this medication. We review the current evidence fo rthe use of rituximab in pemphigoid diseases, pertinent dosing schedules and laboratory monitoring, and the associated common and rare adverse events. Review of the literature to date not only supports consideration of rituximab for treatment of refractory pemphigoid group diseases but also reflects tolerability and an acceptable safety profile.