Matching the Evaluation of the Clinical Efficacy of Clopidogrel to Platelet Function Tests Relevant to the Biological Properties of the Drug

Antiplatelet response to clopidogrel is associated with a haplotype in CYP2C19 gene in Pakistani patients

Clopidogrel, an antiplatelet drug, is frequently prescribed to patients diagnosed with ischemic diseases such as those suffering from acute coronary syndromes or ischemic stroke. Despite the drug being effective in majority of the patients, some still experience ischemic events early in the treatment which might be due to poor platelet inhibition. This study aims to investigate the association of cytochrome P450 2C19 (CYP2C19) loss-of-function polymorphisms, haplotypes as well as a wide range of clinical and demographic variables with platelet aggregation phenotypes to clopidogrel in a Pakistani cohort. The study comprised of a total of 120 patients diagnosed with cardiovascular diseases and were treated with clopidogrel. Antiplatelet response to clopidogrel was monitored by Helena AggRAM (HL-2-1785P) and patients with maximal platelet aggregation more than 50% were categorized as low responders and those with less than 50% as high responders. Our results show that 56.6% of patients were homozygous for the CYP2C19 wild-type allele, 38.3% of patients possessed one copy of the CYP2C19*2 allele and 5% of patients possessed both CYP2C19*2 alleles. No CYP2C19*3 allele was found in our patient cohort. There was no statistically significant difference between the high and low responder groups to clopidogrel in terms of extensive, intermediate and poor metabolizer genotypes. However, haplotype (H1), leukocyte count, random blood glucose, and history of diabetes mellitus was associated with the antiplatelet response to clopidogrel. The prevalence of clopidogrel resistance in our population was in line with that reported for other regional and global populations.

Effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary aneurysms caused by Kawasaki disease in children: study protocol for a multicenter randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Medium or large coronary artery aneurysm (CAA) is a serious complication of Kawasaki disease (KD) and may cause thrombosis, coronary artery stenosis, and even myocardial infarction at different stages of the disease. Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus clopidogrel) is considered for prophylaxis of coronary thrombosis in KD presenting with more than medium CAAs based on adult coronary artery disease experience and expert consensus. This paper describes the study protocol for a randomized controlled trial that measures the clinical effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in the thromboprophylactic treatment of KD.

METHODS

The present study is a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RCT) with a 12-month follow-up. KD patients with medium or large CAAs (Z-value ≥5), evaluated by echocardiogram and clinicians before treatment, are randomized in a 1:1 ratio and assigned to aspirin therapy alone (Control group), or dual antiplatelet (aspirin plus clopidogrel) therapy (Experimental group). Antiplatelet therapy is given to the KD patients from the time of diagnosis until the coronary artery returns to normal. Weekly or monthly follow-up visits are conducted to record compliance, recovery, and biochemical indicators and continue for one year. The primary outcome is the incidence of thrombus throughout the disease and the effective of dual antiplatelet. The secondary outcomes are the safety of dual antiplatelet drugs, platelet-related indicators, inflammatory indicators, biochemical indexes and drug-related indicators during the study period. Patients who do not meet the inclusion criteria of the RCT trial or those unwilling to provide informed consent enter the registration trial.

DISCUSSION

This is the first study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary aneurysms caused by Kawasaki disease in children. It is hoped that this study will play an important and significant role in improving the prognosis and long-term quality of life for children with KD complicated by CAAs.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR1800019181. Registered on Oct 30, 2018.

Is monitoring of antiplatelet therapy by light transmission aggregometry dependent on instrument and reagent used?

INTRODUCTION

Light transmission aggregometry (LTA), used to detect clopidogrel resistance in patients under antiplatelet therapy, is prone to multiple variables potentially influencing results and interpretation. Currently, no attention is given to type of aggregometer or reagent used. The aim of this study was to evaluate the interassay variability between two aggregometers (Chronolog700 and TA-8V), using two different ADP reagents (Chrono-Par^® and Agro-Bio ADP) in patients under clopidogrel therapy. Additionally, LTA results were correlated to CYP2C19-polymorphism.

METHODS

Light transmission aggregometry was performed in 20 healthy individuals and 30 patients using both aggregometers, and applying two different reagents (2.5 and 5 µmol/L). The maximum platelet aggregation (ADP_max ), the platelet aggregation at 6 minutes (ADP_6min ), and the percentage of disaggregation at 6 min (ADP_%disaggr ) were compared between four applied combinations. Additionally, 23 clopidogrel-resistant patients according to Chronolog700-Chrono-par^® ADP reagent analysis were tested for CYP2C19*2 polymorphism.

RESULTS

Comparison of the LTA of healthy individuals revealed a significant lower ADP_max , lower ADP_6min , and higher ADP_%disaggr with the TA-8V aggregometer compared to Chronolog700, regardless of the reagent. In contrast, LTA results in patients are depending on the reagent, with significant higher ADP_max and ADP_6min and lower ADP_%disaggr using Chrono-Par^® compared to Agro-Bio ADP reagent. All intermediate clopidogrel metabolizers (CYP2C19*2 carriers) were correctly classified as clopidogrel resistant using Chrono-Par^® , in contrast to the Agro-Bio ADP reagent.

CONCLUSION

Light transmission aggregometry in clopidogrel-treated patients is mainly depending on the type of ADP reagent. Comparison of LTA with genotype reveals that the choice of instrument seems less influencing. In contrast, in the healthy individuals, differences could be attributed to the instrument.

The potency of selatogrel, a reversible antagonist of the P2Y12 receptor, is affected by calcium concentration

Here, we report the in vitro characterization of the P2Y12 receptor antagonist selatogrel (ACT-246475). Binding studies with radiolabeled selatogrel demonstrated that selatogrel is a competitive antagonist of ADP binding to the P2Y12 receptor with a fast onset of action. Consequently, selatogrel was confirmed to be a potent inhibitor of P2Y12-mediated intra-platelet signaling and ADP-induced platelet activation. Characterization of selatogrel in platelet-rich plasma in vitro demonstrated that the mode of anti-coagulation affected the anti-platelet potency. Specifically, in platelet-rich plasma containing physiological calcium concentration (anticoagulated with a direct thrombin inhibitor), selatogrel achieved half-maximal inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation at a 3-fold lower concentration than in conditions with low calcium concentration (anticoagulated with citrate). Furthermore, calcium-dependent reduction in selatogrel potency was observed in whole blood platelet aggregation using the VerifyNow™ system with a 3.7-fold potency loss in low calcium conditions. A comparable potency loss was also observed with the reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel. Furthermore, receptor-binding experiments using radiolabeled selatogrel confirmed a 3-fold lowering of selatogrel binding affinity to the P2Y12 receptor in low calcium conditions. In conclusion, our data suggest that in low calcium conditions (i.e., citrate-anticoagulated blood), there is a risk of underestimating the potency of reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists. To avoid overdosing, and a potential increase in bleeding risk, we propose that the ex vivo evaluation of reversible P2Y12 receptor antagonists should be performed with platelet assay systems containing physiological calcium concentration.

Pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and pharmacogenetic assays to monitor clopidogrel therapy

Clopidogrel is the most common and widely used antiplatelet agent for patients with coronary artery disease following confirmation by electrocardiographic studies. The nonresponsiveness of patients to clopidogrel and the possibility of testing for clopidogrel resistance by platelet function assays (PFA) are contentious issues. Light transmission aggregometry (LTA) is considered as the gold standard test among all PFA. In this review, the most commonly used PFA used for monitoring the effect of clopidogrel, LTA, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein assay phosphorylation, rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) delta and ROTEM platelet, thromboelastography, PFA-100, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay, Multiplate analyzer, Plateletworks assay and pharmacogenetic studies, are comparatively discussed including their principles of action, advantages, and disadvantages. VerifyNow P2Y12 assay can be accepted as the ideal point of care test out of the discussed assays. However, modified assays are required which could overcome the limitations associated with currently available assays.

A geranylated chalcone with antiplatelet activity from the leaves of breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis)

Platelet plays a crucial role in cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) development. Abnormalities in platelet aggregation provokes thromboembolism, eventually leading to death. In Indonesia, breadfruit (Artocarpus altilis) leaf is traditionally used to treat CVDs. This study aimed to evaluate the antiplatelet activity of A. altilis leaf extract (AAE) and to identify its active compound. A. altilis leaves were extracted with ethanol, and the antiplatelet activity was assessed using ADP-induced platelet aggregation. The major compound was isolated with column chromatography followed by preparative TLC, and the structure was determined on the basis of UV, MS, IR, and NMR spectra. The binding mode of the active compound to platelet receptors was characterized in in silico study. AAE exhibited an antiplatelet activity (IC50 of 252.23 µg/mL). A geranylated chalcone, 2-geranyl-2ʹ,3,3,4ʹ-tetrahydroxydihydrochalcone (GTDC) was identified as the antiplatelet compound (IC50 of 9.09 µM). GTDC actions with P2Y12 platelet receptor involving three amino acid residues.

Effect of P2Y12 inhibitors on thrombus stability and endogenous fibrinolysis

Although used routinely to reduce thrombotic events in patients with coronary disease, the effects of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors on thrombus stability and endogenous fibrinolysis are largely unknown. Blood taken from patients pre- and post-aspirin (n = 20) and on aspirin alone and on dual antiplatelet therapy comprising aspirin plus clopidogrel (n = 20), ticagrelor (n = 20) or cangrelor (n = 20), was tested using the Global Thrombosis Test. The number of "rebleeds" or drops (D) after early platelet-rich thrombus formation (occlusion time, OT), and before final lasting occlusion, was used as an inverse measure of thrombus stability. Whilst clopidogrel had no effect, ticagrelor and cangrelor both increased D significantly, reflecting increased thrombus instability [D pre- and post-clopidogrel 4.3 ± 1.6 vs. 4.5 ± 1.4, p = 0.833; pre- and post-ticagrelor 4.1 ± 2.4 vs. 6.8 ± 5.1, p = 0.048; pre- and post-cangrelor 3.6 ± 2.0 vs. 7.9 ± 8.9, p = 0.046]. Platelet reactivity was reduced by all P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, demonstrated by OT prolongation (clopidogrel 378 ± 87 s vs. 491 ± 93 s, p < 0.001; ticagrelor 416 ± 122 s vs. 549 ± 121 s, p < 0.001; cangrelor 381 ± 146 s vs. 613 ± 210 s, p < 0.001). The magnitude of OT prolongation compared to baseline (ΔOT) was significantly greater for cangrelor compared to clopidogrel and ticagrelor. Cangrelor was the only agent to enhance fibrinolysis (lysis time pre- and post-cangrelor 1622[1240-2048]s vs. 1388[960-1634]s, p = 0.005). We demonstrate the ability to assess the effect of pharmacotherapy on thrombus stability in vitro and show that P2Y₁₂ inhibitors potentiate thrombus instability at high shear. Cangrelor, and to a lesser extent ticagrelor, de-stabilised thrombus formation and cangrelor also enhanced fibrinolysis. Potentiation of thrombus instability could become a new pharmacological target, that may be particularly important in acute coronary syndromes.

Potentiation of thrombus instability: a contributory mechanism to the effectiveness of antithrombotic medications

The stability of an arterial thrombus, determined by its structure and ability to resist endogenous fibrinolysis, is a major determinant of the extent of infarction that results from coronary or cerebrovascular thrombosis. There is ample evidence from both laboratory and clinical studies to suggest that in addition to inhibiting platelet aggregation, antithrombotic medications have shear-dependent effects, potentiating thrombus fragility and/or enhancing endogenous fibrinolysis. Such shear-dependent effects, potentiating the fragility of the growing thrombus and/or enhancing endogenous thrombolytic activity, likely contribute to the clinical effectiveness of such medications. It is not clear how much these effects relate to the measured inhibition of platelet aggregation in response to specific agonists. These effects are observable only with techniques that subject the growing thrombus to arterial flow and shear conditions. The effects of antithrombotic medications on thrombus stability and ways of assessing this are reviewed herein, and it is proposed that thrombus stability could become a new target for pharmacological intervention.

Effects of dabigatran on the cellular and protein phase of coagulation in patients with coronary artery disease on dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel

There is growing interest in understanding the effects of adding an oral anticoagulant in patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) and clopidogrel represent the most broadly utilised oral anticoagulant and P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, respectively. However, VKAs can interfere with clopidogrel metabolism via the cytochrome P450 (CYP) system which in turn may result in an increase in platelet reactivity. Dabigatran is a direct acting (anti-II) oral anticoagulant which does not interfere with CYP and has favourable safety and efficacy profiles compared with VKAs. The pharmacodynamic (PD) effects on platelet reactivity and clot kinetic of adjunctive dabigatran therapy in patients on DAPT are poorly explored. In this prospective, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled PD study, patients (n=30) on maintenance DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel were randomised to either dabigatran 150 mg bid or placebo for seven days. PD testing was performed before and after treatment using four different assays exploring multiple pathways of platelet aggregation and fibrin clot kinetics: light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), kaolin-activated thromboelastography (TEG) and turbidimetric assays. There were no differences in multiple measures of platelet reactivity investigating purinergic and non-purinergic signaling pathways assessed by LTA, MEA and TEG platelet mapping. Dabigatran significantly increased parameters related to thrombin activity and thrombus generation, and delayed fibrin clot formation, without affecting clot structure or fibrinolysis. In conclusion, in patients on DAPT with aspirin and clopidogrel, adjunctive dabigatran therapy is not associated with modulation of profiles of platelet reactivity as determined by several assays assessing multiple platelet signalling pathways. However, dabigatran significantly interferes with parameters related to thrombin activity and delays fibrin clot formation.

Prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel

The existence of poor biological response to clopidogrel has been shown in some patients. Despite the increasing number of studies, this phenomenon remains difficult to quantify. We performed a systematic review to estimate the prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel and investigate the factors known to modulate this. An exhaustive search was performed. Altogether 171 publications were identified, providing data for a total of 45,664 subjects. The estimated prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel ranged from 15.9% to 49.5% according to the platelet function assay employed. The assays most frequently used were light transmittance aggregometry (LTA), the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) assay and the Verify -now® assay. For all these assays, higher cut-off values were associated with a lower prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel. However, when choosing a fixed cut-off point for each assay, the prevalence of poor biological response to clopidogrel was highly variable suggesting that other factors could modulate poor biological response to clopidogrel. Finally, none of the studied factors could apparently explain the variability of poor biological response to clopidogrel. This meta-analysis shows that the prevalence of poor biological response depends on the assay employed, the cut-off value and on various unidentified additional factors.

Antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor compared to tirofiban in non-ST-segment elevation ACS patients undergoing PCI

Addition of a potent P2Y12 inhibitor to aspirin is the standard therapy for non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Glyco-protein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, together with antiplatelet therapy, may be considered as part of initial therapy in NSTE-ACS patients with high-risk features. This study investigated the antiplatelet effect of ticagrelor loading dose (LD) versus tirofiban bolus injection with a post-bolus infusion on top of aspirin among NSTE-ACS patients planned to PCI. NSTE-ACS patients were randomised to receive either ticagrelor (n = 47) or tirofiban (n = 48). Platelet reactivity was assessed by light transmittance aggregometry at 0, 2, 8, and 24 hours (h) after treatment initiation. Primary endpoint was inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA, 20 µM ADP, final extent) at 2 h after LD therapy, with a non-inferiority margin of 10 %. The prevalence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR) was also compared at 0, 2, 8, and 24 h. The mean difference in IPA between ticagrelor and tirofiban was -9.9 % (95 % confidence interval: –25.7 % to 5.9 %) at 2 h, –1.6 % (-8.0 % to 4.8 %) at 8 h, and –3.3 % (-18.4 % to 12.0 %) at 24 h. The prevalence of HPR did not differ between the two groups at any time point (all p values ≥ 0.059), which was almost abolished by 8 h post-LD (< 5 %). In conclusion, the antiplatelet effect during the early phase (~2 h) after ticagrelor LD appeared to be relatively strong, but it did not reach that of tirofiban in NSTE-ACS patients.

Comparison of current platelet functional tests for the assessment of aspirin and clopidogrel response

The two most widely used antiplatelet drugs in the world are aspirin and clopidogrel. However, some patients on aspirin and/or clopidogrel therapy do not respond appropriately to either aspirin or clopidogrel. This phenomenon is usually called “aspirin/clopidogrel resistance”. Several platelet function tests have been used in various studies for the assessment of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance in healthy individuals and patients admitted in cardiology departments. An accurate assessment of platelet response to aspirin/clopidogrel could benefit patients by proposing tailored-antiplatelet therapy based on test results. However, there is a clear lack of standardisation of such techniques and their analytical variability may induce misinterpretation. After a quick report of the mechanisms responsible for aspirin/clopidogrel resistance, we describe the pre-analytical aspects and the analytical performances of current platelet function tests (Light-transmission aggregometry, whole-blood aggregometry, VerifyNow®, Platelet Function Analyzer®, thromboelastography, VASP assay) that are used for the assessment of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance in clinical studies. Considering the different variables that have to be taken into account with each of the platelet function tests, a particular attention should be paid when interpreting results.

Impact of timing from blood sampling to pharmacodynamic assessment on measures of platelet reactivity in patients treated with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors

Several platelet function tests (PFT) are available to assess the pharmacodynamic (PD) effects of P2Y₁₂ inhibitors. However, there are technical variances between PFT, and P2Y₁₂ inhibitors differ in pharmacological properties. Manufactures of PFT recommend a time-frame within which assessments needs to be executed. However, if the timing from blood sampling to processing affects PD results is unknown. We conducted a prospective study assessing the impact of timing from blood sampling to processing on PD measures using three different PFT. We studied 60 aspirin-treated patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) on maintenance P2Y₁₂ inhibiting therapy [clopidogrel 75 mg/day (n=20), prasugrel 10 mg/day (n=20) and ticagrelor 90 mg bid (n=20)]. PD assessments (trough levels) were performed by VerifyNow P2Y12 (VN), light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) and vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) at 30 minutes, 2 and 4 hours post-sampling; VASP was also performed at 24 hours. P2Y₁₂ reaction units (PRU) by VN significantly decreased over time with all P2Y₁₂ inhibitors (clopidogrel p<0.001; prasugrel p=0.016; ticagrelor p<0.001). PRU at 30 minutes and 2 hours were similar, but decreased at 4 hours. LTA showed consistent findings with VN. Conversely, PD measures as assessed by VASP were stable over time (p>0.1 for all P2Y₁₂ inhibitors). In conclusion, in CAD patients on maintenance therapy with P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, timing from blood sampling to processing significantly influences PD measures as assessed by VN and LTA, but not by VASP.

Evidence of platelet sensitization to ADP following discontinuation of clopidogrel therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Epidemiological studies have linked clopidogrel discontinuation with an increased incidence of ischemic events. This has led to the hypothesis that clopidogrel discontinuation may result in a pharmacological rebound. We evaluated the impact of clopidogrel discontinuation on platelet function. Platelet aggregation was measured by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) in response to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 5 and 10 µM and by VerifyNow® P2Y12, in 37 clinically stable coronary artery disease (CAD) patients scheduled to discontinue clopidogrel treatment, and 37 clinically stable CAD patients not taking clopidogrel. Platelet function was assessed the day before clopidogrel cessation and 1, 3, 7, 14, 21 and 28 days after. Clopidogrel had been initiated a median of 555 days (ranging from 200 to 2280 days) before the treating cardiologist recommended its discontinuation. All participants were taking aspirin, most commonly 80 mg daily although a minority was prescribed 325 mg daily. Following clopidogrel discontinuation, VerifyNow® P2Y12 did not detect any rebound platelet activity, but ADP-induced LTA showed platelet sensitization to ADP, particularly at low ADP levels. Increased platelet activity was detectable seven days after clopidogrel cessation and remained higher than in controls 28 days after discontinuation. No clinical event occurred in any of the participants during the 28 days following clopidogrel cessation. In conclusion, platelet sensitization to ADP as a consequence of chronic clopidogrel administration may partially explain the recrudescence of ischemic events following clopidogrel discontinuation in otherwise stable coronary artery patients.

Ticagrelor: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy, and safety

Dual antiplatelet therapy, composed of aspirin plus a P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonist, is the cornerstone of treatment for patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). A number of U.S. Food and Drug Administration–approved P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonists are available for treating patients with ACS, including the thienopyridine compounds clopidogrel and prasugrel. Ticagrelor, the first of a new class of antiplatelet agents, is a noncompetitive, direct-acting P2Y₁₂-receptor antagonist. Unlike the thienopyridine compounds, ticagrelor does not require metabolism for activity. Also, whereas clopidogrel and prasugrel are irreversible inhibitors of the P2Y₁₂ receptor, ticagrelor binds reversibly to inhibit receptor signaling and subsequent platelet activation. In pharmacodynamic studies, ticagrelor demonstrated faster onset and more potent inhibition of platelet aggregation than clopidogrel. These properties of ticagrelor may contribute to reduced rates of thrombotic outcomes compared with clopidogrel, as demonstrated in a phase III clinical trial. However, in addition to bleeding, distinctive adverse effects of this new chemical entity have not been reported with the thienopyridine P2Y₁₂-receptor inhibitors. Although ticagrelor represents an advancement in P2Y₁₂-receptor inhibition therapy, a thorough understanding of this compound as an antiplatelet therapy remains to be elucidated.

Combination of high on-treatment platelet aggregation and low deaggregation better predicts long-term cardiovascular events in PCI patients under dual antiplatelet therapy

High on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with short-term major cardiovascular (CV) events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Maximum and final aggregation assessed by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) have both been used to predict short-term outcome after PCI, however their long-term prognostic impact remains controversial. There is currently no information regarding the prognostic role of deaggregation and its added value in combination with established aggregation parameters. About 1279 patients with symptomatic coronary artery disease (CAD) undergoing PCI were enrolled in this monocentric study. On-treatment platelet aggregation under clopidogrel maintenance therapy, as well as deaggregation was determined by maximum and final aggregation (5 min after adding of the agonist). Deaggregation was defined as slope of the tangent between Aggmax +0.5 min. Primary endpoints were the composite of myocardial infarction, stroke, and CV death or stent thrombosis according to the ARC criteria. Low deaggregation, defined as values in the lowest tertile (<1.5), was more frequent in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) compared to patients with stable angina pectoris (SAP), ACS: 29.6% vs. SAP: 22.0%, p = 0.001. The combination of high on-treatment platelet reactivity, defined by the upper tertile of Aggmax and low deaggregation, was associated with significantly increased risk for combined long-term CV events. The combination of low deaggregation and high on-treatment platelet reactivity is associated with higher risk for recurrent events in patients with CAD undergoing PCI. Thus, deaggregation might be a more sensitive parameter providing added value in terms of risk prediction for long-term recurrent CV events in relation with established aggregation parameters.

Effects of prolactin on platelet activation and blood clotting

Increased levels of prolactin often coincide with an increased risk for thromboembolic events, but it is unclear whether a direct causal relation exists. Our aim was to examine the effect of prolactin on platelet function. In addition to using recombinant prolactin for experiments in vitro, we analyzed platelet function by flow cytometry in a group of 13 females with hyperprolactinaemia and 18 healthy female controls. Platelet activation was measured by P-selectin expression and by the amount of platelet-bound fibrinogen after stimulation with adenosine di phosphate (ADP), collagen-related peptide and the protease activated receptor (thrombin receptor) (PAR)-activating peptides PAR4-AP and PAR1-AP. Free oscillation rheometry was used to measure clotting time in whole blood. No significant effect on platelet activation or clotting time could be seen in in vitro experiments by adding recombinant prolactin. However, significantly lower P-selectin expression was found in the hyperprolactinemic group when platelets were activated by ADP (5 and 10 μM) or PAR4-AP. The expression of fibrinogen did not differ between the two groups for any of the activators used. For all samples, inverse significant correlations between P-selectin expression and prolactin concentration were found for both 5 μM ADP (r = - 0.61, p < 0.01), 10 μM ADP (r = - 0.62, p < 0.001) and PAR4-AP (r = - 0.69, p < 0.001). Thrombin cleavage of recombinant prolactin resulting in a 16 kDa C-terminal fragment did not alter the P-selectin expression upon activation. We found an indirect inhibitory effect of prolactin on platelets in hyperprolactinemic patients, suggesting that prolactin might have a protective role in thromboembolic disease.

Effect of rifampicin on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor in healthy subjects

PURPOSE

Ticagrelor, a reversibly binding oral P2Y12 receptor antagonist, is predominantly metabolized by cytochrome P450 3A and both the parent compound and its active metabolite AR-C124910XX are substrates of P-glycoprotein. Rifampicin was used to assess the effects of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein induction on the single-dose pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ticagrelor.

METHODS

Healthy volunteers received a single 180 mg oral dose of ticagrelor on days 1 and 15, and a once-daily 600 mg dose of rifampicin on days 4-17. Ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX plasma concentrations were quantified for pharmacokinetic analysis (n = 14); inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) was also assessed (n = 14).

RESULTS

Compared with administration of ticagrelor alone, co-administration of ticagrelor and rifampicin significantly decreased the maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) of ticagrelor from 1091 to 297.8 ng/ml, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUC) of ticagrelor from 6225 to 864.0 ng.h/ml, and also decreased plasma half-life of ticagrelor from 8.4 to 2.8 h; reductions of 73 %, 86 % and 67 % respectively. With rifampicin, AR-C124910XX Cmax was unaffected, AUC was significantly decreased by 46 %, and metabolite to parent ratio for AUC increased fourfold. Although maximal IPA was unaffected, offset of ticagrelor-mediated IPA was more rapid in the presence of rifampicin; a significant reduction (27 %) in the area under the effect curve between 0 and 24 h was observed following co-administration with rifampicin.

CONCLUSION

Co-administration with rifampicin reduced ticagrelor exposure and resulted in a more rapid offset of ticagrelor-mediated IPA. Co-administration of strong CYP3A/P-glycoprotein inducers with ticagrelor should be discouraged.

Aspirin and platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: role in therapy and strategies to overcome resistance

Platelet activation and aggregation are key components in the cascade of events causing thrombosis following plaque rupture. Antiplatelet therapy is essential in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for those requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is a well established antiplatelet therapy and is mandated for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events following ACS. In patients with ACS, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone. For patients undergoing PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is warranted. Aspirin should be continued indefinitely after PCI. Pretreatment of patients with clopidogrel prior to PCI lowers the incidence of cardiovascular events, yet the optimum timing of drug administration and dose are still being investigated, as is the duration of therapy following PCI. Late-stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents has pushed the recommendation for duration of clopidogrel therapy up to 1 year and perhaps beyond, in patients without risks for bleeding. The concepts of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are important clinical questions. No uniform definition exists for aspirin or clopidogrel resistance. Measurements of resistance are often highly variable and do not necessarily correlate with clinical resistance. Noncompliance remains the most prominent mode of resistance. Screening of selected patient populations for resistance or pharmacologic intervention of those patients termed 'resistant' warrants further study.

Effects of P2Y(1) receptor antagonism on the reactivity of platelets from patients with stable coronary artery disease using aspirin and clopidogrel

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

P2Y(1) is a purine receptor that triggers platelet aggregation. Its inhibition was studied in patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) receiving standard anti-platelet therapy.

EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH

Blood samples from 10 patients on aspirin therapy (ASA, 80 mg·day(-1) ) were withdrawn before and 24 h after the administration of 450 mg clopidogrel (ASA/C) and were anti-coagulated with citrate or hirudin/PPACK in the presence or absence of the P2Y(1 ) inhibitor MRS2179 (M, 100 µM). Platelet responses to ADP (2.5 µM) and TRAP (2.5 µM), and collagen-induced thrombosis under flow conditions were analysed.

KEY RESULTS

Compared with ASA, ASA + M strongly inhibited ADP-induced peak platelet aggregation (88%), late aggregation (84%), P-selectin expression (85%) and α(IIb) β(3) activation (62%) (28%, 65%, 70% and 51% inhibition, respectively, for ASA/C vs. ASA). ASA + M also inhibited platelet/monocyte and platelet/neutrophil conjugate formation by 69% and 71% (57% and 59% for ASA/C vs. ASA). In TRAP-activated blood, ASA + M unexpectedly inhibited α(IIb) b(3) activation by 30%. In blood perfused in collagen-coated glass capillaries (shear rate of 1500 s(-1) ), ASA/C prevented thrombus growth beyond 5 min in relation to thrombus fragments embolization. ASA + M with or without clopidogrel completely prevented thrombus formation. Finally, ex vivo addition of MRS2179 and ASA to the blood of healthy donors markedly blocked thrombus formation on collagen in flow conditions, in contrast to ASA plus the P2Y(12) inhibitor 2-MeSAMP.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Through particularly efficient complementarities with ASA to inhibit platelet activation and thrombus formation, the inhibition of P2Y(1) in the blood of patients with CAD appears to play a more important role than previously anticipated.

The impact of CYP3A5*1/*3, PIA1/A2 and T744C polymorphisms on clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid response variability in Mexican population

INTRODUCTION

Clopidogrel is recommended in addition to aspirin to prevent atherothrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and in those undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, an interindividual variability in platelet inhibition response to clopidogrel has been demonstrated, and is associated with recurrent cardiovascular events. Multiple mechanisms have been associated with no response including genetics factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study enrolled 60 patients with ACS undergoing emergent PCI. Platelet aggregation to adenosine diphosphate and arachidonic acid was assessed by turbidimetric method at 24 hours after dual administration of 300 mg of clopidogrel and 300 mg of acetylsalicylic acid loading dose. Clopidogrel or acetylsalicylic acid resistance was defined by persistence of Platelet Reactivity (PR=ADP-Ag >70% or PR=Arachidonic Acid-Ag>20%) respectively. The CYP3A51*/5*, PIA1/A2, and T744C polymorphisms were determined in all participants by PCR-RFLP.

RESULTS

The allelic frequencies were: CYP3A5*3 (71.65%), PIA2 (10.8%), and 744 C (15.0%). We founded high percent of clopidogrel resistance (60.0%), compared with 8.3% of acetylsalicylic acid in those patients. The genotype frequencies of those polymorphisms were similar between responders and non responders defined by PR. There was a high percent of coronary adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a high percent of clopidogrel resistance in Mexican patients with ACS undergoing PCI. However, a normal platelet response to acetylsalicylic acid was observed in most of them. There was no association between CYP3A5*1/*3, PIA1/A2, and T744C polymorphisms and clopidogrel resistance. More studies are needed to determine the possible interaction between genetics factors, platelet response to clopidogrel and cardiovascular adverse events.

Effect of different anticoagulants on multiple electrode platelet aggregometry after clopidogrel and aspirin administration in patients undergoing coronary stent implantation: a comparison between citrate and hirudin

Outcomes of platelet function tests are highly dependent on the type of blood anticoagulant used. The primary objective of this study was to clinically evaluate the platelet function after dual antiplatelet therapy using two different types of anticoagulant (citrate and hirudin). We compared data obtained from multiple electrode platelet aggregometry (MEA) with reference to light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and VerifyNow (VN) assays. Blood samples were obtained from 119 patients on dual antiplatelet therapy at the time of PCI (PCI) and the following morning (post-PCI). The platelet function tests were performed using two anticoagulated (citrate or hirudin) blood types for MEA as well as citrated blood for LTA and VerifyNow assays. ADP-induced MEA values at PCI for citrated and hirudinated anticoagulants were 36.5 ± 14.3 AUC and 41.4 ± 18.2 AUC (p = 0.021) and post-PCI values were 28.2 ± 11.9 AUC and 28.3 ± 12.8 AUC (p = 0.95). Additionally, AA-induced MEA values at PCI by citrated and hirudinated blood was 13.4 ± 7.3 AUC and 17.6 ± 13.4 AUC (p < 0.01). Post-PCI AA-induced MEA values were 12.0 ± 6.7 AUC and 13.5 ± 8.5 AUC (p = 0.12), respectively. Significant correlations were observed between the two anticoagulants used for MEA and LTA or VN values under ADP-induced platelet stimulation. Citrate tubes are clinically adequate for MEA assays and provide a more economical alternative to hirudin for early and/or delayed phases after clopidogrel-loading doses.

Effect of age and gender on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a single ticagrelor dose in healthy individuals

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess age and gender effects on ticagrelor pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics (PK/PD).

METHODS

Forty healthy individuals [18-45 years (young); ≥ 65 years (elderly); ten men, ten women per age group) received 200 mg ticagrelor.

RESULTS

Ticagrelor was rapidly absorbed [time to maximum concentration (C(max)) (t(max)) 2.5-3.0 h], and its major active metabolite, AR-C124910XX rapidly formed (t(max) 3.0-3.5 h) in all groups. Ticagrelor exposure was higher in elderly vs. the young [area under the curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-∞)) 52%; C(max) 63% higher] and women vs. men (AUC(0-∞) 37%; C(max) 52% higher). Mean terminal elimination half-life was slightly longer in women vs. men but was unaffected by age. Similar results were observed for AR-C124910XX (elderly vs. young, AUC(0-∞) 48%; C(max) 61% higher), and in women vs. men (AUC(0-∞) 55%; C(max) 56% higher). Across all groups, ticagrelor produced substantial final-extent inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA): >90% at 4 and 8 h postdose. Individuals with highest ticagrelor exposure (i.e., elderly) had the lowest IPA, indicating an age-related platelet sensitivity effect. In young individuals, platelet sensitivity was greater in men vs. women. Ticagrelor tolerability was not affected by age or gender.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic exposures to ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were higher in elderly vs. young and in women vs. men. Age- and gender-related changes in IPA were apparent, but substantial IPA was achieved in all groups. No adjustment in ticagrelor dose should be considered necessary based on age and gender.

The thrombin inhibitors hirudin and Refludan(®) activate the soluble guanylyl cyclase and the cGMP pathway in washed human platelets

A number of direct thrombin inhibitors are successfully used clinically and experimentally as novel antithrombotics and specific anticoagulants. They are also used as anticoagulants in certain blood collection tubes for the analysis of platelet function. A series of platelet function tests have emerged to measure adequate responses to antiplatelet therapy. For comparative and practical reasons, it would be of advantage to use the same anticoagulant in blood collection tubes for different methods, e.g. thrombin inhibitors. However, there are little data on the effects of thrombin inhibitors on platelet signalling pathways that could influence results. We examined the applicability of thrombin inhibitor containing blood for platelet reactivity index (PRI) measurements of the VASP assay and investigated the effects of two thrombin inhibitors (hirudin and lepirudin) on cAMP- and cGMP-mediated signalling pathways in washed human platelets. We show that induction of VASP phosphorylation by PGE1 is markedly reduced in lepirudin containing blood samples. In consequence, PRI levels were highly variable compared to routinely used citrated blood. Surprisingly, in vitro incubation of platelets with thrombin inhibitors increases platelet cGMP levels and induces NOS independent sGC/PKG-mediated VASP phosphorylation. We conclude that thrombin inhibitors activate sGC/PKG-dependent pathways resulting in an increase of VASP phosphorylation which contributes to deviations in PRI measurements. These effects of thrombin inhibitors on sGC- and cGMP-mediated pathways including increased VASP phosphorylation may indicate the presence of an important additional platelet-based mechanism for the reduction of thrombus formation and thromboembolism by thrombin inhibitors.

High doses of clopidogrel to overcome genetic resistance: the randomized crossover CLOVIS-2 (Clopidogrel and Response Variability Investigation Study 2)

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to determine whether the pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) responses to high or standard clopidogrel loading doses (LDs) differ according to CYP2C19*2 allele.

BACKGROUND

CYP2C19 loss-of-function alleles are associated with reduced responsiveness to standard clopidogrel doses.

METHODS

Young post-myocardial infarction patients heterozygous (wild type [wt]/*2, n = 43) or homozygous (*2/*2, n = 8) for the CYP2C19*2 genetic variant were matched with patients not carrying the variant (wt/wt, n = 58). All patients were randomized to a 300- or 900-mg clopidogrel LD. The relative reduction in residual platelet aggregation (RR-RPA, %) and the area under the plasma concentration time curve of active metabolite from baseline to 6 h after loading (AUC(0-6)) were compared according to both LD and CYP2C19*2 carriage.

RESULTS

The 300-mg LD led to a gene-dose effect for RR-RPA (-65.7% ± 35.9% in wt/wt vs. -48.0% ± 38.4% in wt/*2 vs. -14.6% ± 32.4% in *2/*2; overall p value = 0.003, p = 0.03 for wt/wt versus wt/*2, p = 0.04 for wt/*2 versus *2/*2) with minor effect in *2/*2 carriers. After the 900-mg LD, the effect of the CYP2C19*2 variant on platelet inhibition was fully compensated in wt/*2 carriers but not in *2/*2 carriers (-83.6% ± 25.8% in wt/wt vs.-77.2% ± 26.9% in wt/*2 vs. -29.5% ± 26.8% in *2/*2; overall p value = 0.0003, p = 0.20 for wt/wt versus wt/*2, p < 0.001 for wt/*2 versus *2/*2). A similar pattern was observed for the active metabolite AUC(0-6) according to carriage of CYP2C19*2 for both LDs. There was a significant correlation between PK and PD responses irrespective of the LD.

CONCLUSIONS

Carriers of CYP2C19*2 display significantly lower responses to clopidogrel with a gene-dose effect. Clopidogrel resistance can be overcome by increasing the dose in heterozygous carriers but not in homozygous carriers. (Clopidogrel and Response Variability Investigation Study 2 [CLOVIS-2]; NCT00822666).

Antiplatelet therapy and vascular disease: an update

Atherosclerosis is a diffuse, systemic disorder of the large and medium-sized arterial vessels, affecting the coronary, cerebral and peripheral circulation. Chronic inflammatory processes are the central pathophysiological mechanism largely driven by lipid accumulation, and provide the substrate for occlusive thrombus formation. The clinical sequelae of acute arterial thrombosis, heart attack and stroke, are the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. Such acute events are characterized by rupture or erosion of the atherosclerotic plaque leading to acute thrombosis. The atherosclerotic process and associated thrombotic complications are collectively termed atherothrombosis. The platelet is a pivotal mediator of various endothelial, immune, thrombotic and inflammatory responses and therefore a key player in the initiation and progression of atherothrombosis. A robust evidence base supports the clear clinical benefits of antiplatelet agents in the primary and secondary therapy of atherothrombotic disorders. Percutaneous coronary and peripheral interventions have an established central role in the management of atherothrombotic disease and demand a greater understanding of platelet biology. In this article, we provide a clinically orientated overview of the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis and the evidence supporting the use of the various established antiplatelet therapies, and discuss new and future agents.

Comparison of conventional aggregometry with VASP for monitoring P2Y12-specific platelet inhibition

No consensus exists regarding the optimal estimate of light transmission aggregometry (LTA) to reflect P2Y12 ADP receptor inhibition in patients receiving thienopyridine therapy. Currently, the only completely P2Y12-receptor specific method is the measurement of vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation (PRI) with flow cytometry. In the current analysis, we aimed to test the superiority of the late platelet aggregation value over other estimates of light transmission aggregometry in determining P2Y12-receptor inhibition by comparing them to VASP-PRI. On-clopidogrel platelet reactivity was measured in 121 clopidogrel-naïve patients who underwent elective coronary stent implantation. Samples for LTA and VASP assessments were drawn at 12-18 hours after a 600-mg loading dose of clopidogrel and 25 days after the intervention. ADP 5 µM-induced maximal aggregation (AGGmax), 6-minute late aggregation (AGGlate), 6-minute disaggregation (disAGG) and area under the aggregation curve (AUC) were compared to VASP-PRI. Categorical agreement with VASP-defined normal and high platelet reactivity (HPR: PRI ≥ 50%) was calculated according to the optimal cutoff values obtained with receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The evaluation of 242 measurements showed significant, moderate-strength correlations between VASP-PRI and LTA estimates without the superiority of AGGlate over other estimates (AGGmax: ρ = 0.47; AGGlate: ρ = 0.45; disAGG: ρ = -0.44; AUC: ρ = 0.50). Notably, there were considerable intra-individual differences between VASP and LTA testing. LTA estimates were similar in classifying patients to VASP-defined normal or HPR categories (AGGmax: κ = 0.41; AGGlate: κ = 0.45; disAGG: κ = 0.44; AUC: κ = 0.44). When all estimates of LTA were compared in multivariable models, AUC proved to be the independent linear determinant of VASP-PRI and the best predictor of HPR. Estimates of LTA seem equal in determining the degree of P2Y12-receptor inhibition or in predicting VASP-defined HPR without the superiority of AGGlate over others. These results reject a commonly used hypothesis and might contribute to the standardization of the LTA assay.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of multiple ascending doses of ticagrelor in healthy volunteers

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ABOUT THIS SUBJECT

The antiplatelet agent clopidogrel is currently the recommended treatment for acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) with clopidogrel is insufficient, which increases the risk for recurrent ischaemic events. Therefore, there is a need for antiplatelet agents with improved IPA. Ticagrelor (AZD6140) is a new antiplatelet agent in clinical development for reduction of thrombotic events in patients with ACS.

WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS

This study assesses the optimal dosing schedule for ticagrelor in healthy volunteers and compares the degree of IPA with clopidogrel. Our findings illustrate that the pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor are predictable and are associated with consistent inhibition of platelet activity. IPA with ticagrelor was greater and better sustained at high levels with twice daily ticagrelor than once daily regimens.

AIM

To determine the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety and tolerability of multiple oral doses of ticagrelor, a P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, in healthy volunteers.

METHODS

This was a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, ascending dose study. Thirty-two subjects received ticagrelor 50-600 mg once daily or 50-300 mg twice daily or placebo for 5 days at three dose levels in two parallel groups. Another group of 16 subjects received a clopidogrel 300 mg loading dose then 75 mg day(-1), or placebo for 14 days.

RESULTS

Ticagrelor was absorbed with median t(max) 1.5-3 h, exhibiting predictable pharmacokinetics over the 50-600 mg dose range. Mean C(max) and AUC for ticagrelor and its main metabolite, AR-C124910XX, increased approximately dose-proportionately (approximately 2.2- to 2.4-fold with a twofold dose increase) over the dose range. Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) with ticagrelor was greater and better sustained at high levels with ticagrelor twice daily vs. once daily regimens. Throughout dosing, more consistent IPA was observed at doses > or = 300 mg once daily and > or = 100 mg twice daily compared with clopidogrel. Mean IPA with ticagrelor > or = 100 mg twice daily was greater and less variable (93-100%, range 65-100%) than with clopidogrel (77%, range 11-100%) at trough concentrations. No safety or tolerability issues were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple dosing provided predictable pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and its metabolite over the dose range of 50-600 mg once daily and 50-300 mg twice daily with C(max) and AUC(0,t) increasing approximately dose-proportionally. Greater and more consistent IPA with ticagrelor at doses > or = 100 mg twice daily and > or = 300 mg once daily were observed than with clopidogrel. Ticagrelor at doses up to 600 mg day(-1) was well tolerated.

Variable effect of P2Y12 inhibition on platelet thrombus volume in flowing blood

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients treated with percutaneous coronary intervention receive aspirin and P2Y12 ADP receptor inhibitors to reduce thrombotic complications. The choice of methodology for monitoring the effects of treatment and assessing its efficacy is still a topic of debate. We evaluated how decreased P2Y12 function influences platelet aggregate (thrombus) size measured ex vivo.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used confocal videomicroscopy to measure in real time the volume of platelet thrombi forming upon blood perfusion over fibrillar collagen type I at a wall shear rate of 1500 s(-1). The average volume was significantly smaller in 31 patients receiving aspirin and clopidogrel (19) or ticlopidine (12) than in 21 controls, but individual values were above the lower limit of the normal distribution, albeit mostly within the lower quartile, in 61.3% of cases. Disaggregation of platelet thrombi at later perfusion times occurred frequently in the patients. Vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation, reflecting P2Y12 inhibition, was also decreased in the patient group, and only 22.6% of individual values were above the lower normal limit. We found no correlation between volume of thrombus formed on collagen fibrils and level of P2Y12 inhibition, suggesting that additional and individually variable factors can influence the inhibitory effect of treatment on platelet function.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurements of platelet thrombus formation in flowing blood reflects the consequences of antiplatelet therapy in a manner that is not proportional to P2Y12 inhibition. Combining the results of the two assays may improve the assessment of thrombotic risk.

Considerations in patients receiving oral antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome and percutaneous coronary intervention

PURPOSE

Adverse events that can occur in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and with the use of oral antiplatelet agents are discussed.

SUMMARY

Disruption of the vascular endothelium routinely occurs during PCI and stent placement, resulting in vascular injury. This injury can increase the risk of intracoronary thrombosis and subsequent ACS after PCI. Appropriate antiplatelet therapy reduces the risk of intracoronary thrombosis after PCI; however, health care providers should be aware of the possible limitations associated with specific antiplatelet agents and how to tailor therapy to improve outcomes. Platelet response after a clopidogrel loading dose is highly variable, and platelet hyporesponsiveness to clopidogrel may result in a variety of ischemic complications. A number of methods are available for assessing the antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel. However, none of these tests has been standardized as a measurement for clopidogrel responsiveness. Several polymorphic CYP enzymes are involved in the activation of clopidogrel, and genetic polymorphisms may affect the activity of these enzymes. Genetic variants, particularly the presence of the CYP2C19*2 allele, are associated with poor clinical outcomes after stent placement, along with increased ischemic events in clopidogrel-treated patients. Health care providers should also be aware that drug-drug interactions can occur in patients receiving clopidogrel and other CYP2C19 inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Prevention and proper management of adverse events can help to optimize outcomes in patients with ACS who have undergone PCI with stent placement.

Clinical importance of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance

Aspirin and clopidogrel are important components of medical therapy for patients with acute coronary syndromes, for those who received coronary artery stents and in the secondary prevention of ischaemic stroke. Despite their use, a significant number of patients experience recurrent adverse ischaemic events. Interindividual variability of platelet aggregation in response to these antiplatelet agents may be an explanation for some of these recurrent events, and small trials have linked "aspirin and/or clopidogrel resistance", as measured by platelet function tests, to adverse events. We systematically reviewed all available evidence on the prevalence of aspirin/clopidogrel resistance, their possible risk factors and their association with clinical outcomes. We also identified articles showing possible treatments. After analyzing the data on different laboratory methods, we found that aspirin/clopidogrel resistance seems to be associated with poor clinical outcomes and there is currently no standardized or widely accepted definition of clopidogrel resistance. Therefore, we conclude that specific treatment recommendations are not established for patients who exhibit high platelet reactivity during aspirin/clopidogrel therapy or who have poor platelet inhibition by clopidogrel.

Dosing strategies for antiplatelet therapy in percutaneous coronary intervention

Both clopidogrel and aspirin have been shown to decrease the rate of cardiovascular events and especially stent thrombosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, recent studies have suggested that there is large inter-individual response variability to these drugs (especially to clopidogrel) and that improved inhibition of platelet reactivity using higher doses or new, more potent agents would further reduce the occurrence of cardiovascular events, but may also increase the risk of bleeding. Many different protocols of antiplatelet therapy have been studied and have shown benefit in reducing the rate of major adverse cardiovascular events after PCI. Therefore, the choice of an appropriate antiplatelet therapy protocol is sometimes difficult for the clinician and should be individualized as per the particular patient risk, accounting for both the risk of recurrent cardiovascular events and bleeding. We review the recent data on efficacy and safety of dosing strategies for antiplatelet therapy in PCI.

Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, tolerability and safety of single ascending doses of ticagrelor, a reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, in healthy subjects

PURPOSE

Ticagrelor (AZD6140) is the first reversibly binding oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist in development for reduction of clinical thrombotic events in patients with acute coronary syndromes. The purpose of our studies was to determine the effect of single-ascending doses of ticagrelor in healthy subjects.

METHODS

In two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled single ascending dose studies, healthy subjects received oral doses of 0.1-100 mg or placebo (n = 25) and 30-400 mg or placebo (n = 13).

RESULTS

Absorption of ticagrelor was rapid [median time to peak plasma concentration (t(max)) 1.3-2 h], as was the formation of its main (active) metabolite, AR-C124910XX (t(max) 1.5-3 h). For both ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX, the peak plasma concentration (C(max)) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC(0-infinity)) increased in an apparently dose-proportional manner over the dose range studied, indicating linear pharmacokinetics. The mean terminal-phase half-life (t(1/2)) was approximately 7-8.5 h for ticagrelor and 8.5-10 h for AR-C124910XX; AR-C124910XX exposure was approximately one third that of ticagrelor. Inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) was dose related and was nearly complete at 2 h (mean 88-95%; final extent, with 20 microM adenosine diphosphate ADP) at doses of 100-400 mg.

CONCLUSION

Linear and predictable pharmacokinetics of ticagrelor and AR-C124910XX were observed. A consistent and high IPA was maintained over 2-12 h, gradually decreasing with declining plasma concentration starting around 12 h post-dose, indicating that the IPA is reversible. Ticagrelor was well tolerated, with no serious or dose-related adverse events or notable changes in laboratory values observed.

Aspirin and clopidogrel hyporesponsiveness and nonresponsiveness in patients with coronary artery stenting

Patients undergoing coronary artery stenting receive an antiplatelet regimen to reduce the risk of antithrombotic complications. Current guidelines recommend the use of acetyl salicylic acid (aspirin) and clopidogrel as evidenced by large clinical trials. There has been a concern about variable responses of patients to aspirin and clopidogrel which may predispose them to subacute stent thrombosis or late stent thrombosis. Up to 25% of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were found to have hyporesponsiveness or resistance to clopidogrel which may predispose them to recurrent events. Dual antiplatelet regimen is a standard therapy in these patients and there is always a concern about variable responses to aspirin and clopidogrel predisposing them to acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Prevalence of this hyporesponsiveness or resistance may be due to noncompliance, genetic mutations, co-morbid situations and concomitant use of other drugs. This issue is of considerable importance in the era of coronary drug eluting stents when a long-term dual antiplatelet regimen is needed. This paper is a review for clinicians taking care of such patients with hyporesponsiveness or nonresponsiveness to dual antiplatelet regimen.