Thromboembolic Complications After Surgical Correction of Mitral Regurgitation

Recurrent Annular Thrombosis and Embolism Following Mitral Valve Repair

A patient without evident systemic thrombophilia developed recurrent ischemic stroke following surgical mitral valve repair. Thromboembolism proved resistant to anticoagulation; however, following explantation of the prosthesis, she became asymptomatic with normal valve function. We postulate that an unusual reaction to prosthetic material was the source of thromboembolism.

Stroke after heart valve surgery: a single center institution report

INTRODUCTION

Stroke is a potentially debilitating complication of heart valve replacement surgery, with rates ranging from 1 to 10%. Despite advancements in surgical techniques, the incidence of postoperative stroke remains a significant concern, impacting patient outcomes and healthcare resources. This study aims to investigate the incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of in-hospital adverse neurologic events, particularly stroke, following valve replacement. The analysis focuses on identifying patient characteristics and procedural factors associated with increased stroke risk.

METHODS

This retrospective study involves a review of 417 consecutive patients who underwent SVR between January 2004 and December 2022. The study cohort was extracted from a prospectively recorded cardiac intensive care unit database. Preoperative and perioperative data were collected, and subjects with specific exclusion criteria were omitted from the analysis. The analysis includes demographic information, preoperative risk factors, and perioperative variables.

RESULTS

The study identified a 4.3% incidence of postoperative stroke among SVR patients. Risk factors associated with increased stroke susceptibility included prolonged cardiopulmonary bypass time, aortic cross-clamp duration exceeding 90 min, prior stroke history, diabetes mellitus, and mitral valve annulus calcification. Patients undergoing combined procedures, such as aortic valve replacement with mitral valve replacement or coronary artery bypass grafting with AVR and MVR, (OR = 10.74, CI:2.65-43.44, p-value = < 0.001) and (OR = 11.66, CI:1.02-132.70, p-value = 0.048) respectively, exhibited elevated risks. Internal carotid artery stenosis (< 75%) and requiring prolonged inotropic support were also associated with increased stroke risk(OR = 3.04, CI:1.13-8.12, P-value = 0.026). The occurrence of stroke correlated with extended intensive care unit stay (OR = 1.12, CI: 1.04-1.20, P-value = 0.002) and heightened in-hospital mortality.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study identifies key risk factors and underscores the importance of proactive measures to reduce postoperative stroke incidence in surgical valve replacement patients.

Left atrial appendage closure during mitral repair in patients without atrial fibrillation

OBJECTIVE

Routine left atrial appendage closure during mitral repair in patients without atrial fibrillation (AF) is controversial. We aimed to compare the incidence of stroke after mitral repair in patients without recent AF according to left atrial appendage closure.

METHODS

An institutional registry identified 764 consecutive patients without recent AF, endocarditis, prior appendage closure, or stroke undergoing isolated robotic mitral repair between 2005 and 2020. Left atrial appendages were closed via left atriotomy using a double-layer continuous suture in 5.3% (15 out of 284) patients before 2014, versus 86.7% (416 out of 480) after 2014. The cumulative incidence of stroke (including transient ischemic attack) was determined using statewide hospital data. Median follow-up was 4.5 years (range, 0-16.6 years).

RESULTS

Patients undergoing left atrial appendage closure were older (63 vs 57.5 years, P < .001), with higher prevalence of remote AF requiring cryomaze (9%, n = 40 vs 1%, n = 3, P < .001). After appendage closure there were fewer reoperations for bleeding (0.7% [n = 3] vs 3% [n = 10]; P = .02), and more AF (31.8% [n = 137] vs 25.2% [n = 84]; P = .047). Two-year freedom from >2+ mitral regurgitation was 97%. Six strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack occurred after appendage closure compared with 14 and 5 in patients without (P = .002), associated with a significant difference in 8-year cumulative incidence of stroke/transient ischemic attack (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% CI, 0.14-0.85; P = .02). This difference persisted in the sensitivity analysis, excluding patients undergoing concomitant cryomaze procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Routine left atrial appendage closure during mitral repair in patients without recent AF appears safe and was associated with a lower risk of subsequent stroke/transient ischemic attack.

Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Anticoagulant Therapy Early After Surgical Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement: Rationale and Design of the ENBALV Trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Anticoagulant therapy with vitamin K antagonists is recommended within 3 to 6 months after bioprosthetic valve replacement to prevent thromboembolic events. However, data regarding whether direct oral anticoagulants can be an alternative to warfarin in such patients are limited. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of edoxaban versus warfarin within 3 months after bioprosthetic valve replacement.

METHODS

The ENBALV trial is an investigator-initiated, phase 3, randomized, open-label, multicenter study. It involves patients aged 18 to 85 years undergoing bioprosthetic valve replacement at the aortic and/or mitral position. They are randomized 1:1 to receive either edoxaban or warfarin. Administration of edoxaban or warfarin is to be continued for 12 weeks after surgery. The primary outcome is the occurrence rate of stroke or systemic embolism at 12 weeks after surgery. The net clinical outcome is a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, or major bleeding, which is included in the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

The ENBALV trial demonstrates the efficacy and safety of edoxaban compared with warfarin in patients early after bioprosthetic valve replacement, including patients with sinus rhythm, which will bring a significant benefit to patients in clinical practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCT) 2051210209. 30 Mar 2022 https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2051210209 .

Effects of mitral valve disease etiology on the outcomes of mechanical and biological valve replacement: retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The choice of an artificial mitral valve (MV) is a crucial clinical decision that affects the long-term survival and quality of life of patients. However, current guidelines recommend selecting MV based on patient age and life expectancy at the time of mitral valve replacement (MVR), without considering the etiology of MV disease. This study aimed to investigate whether MV disease etiology should be considered when choosing a valve for MVR and to evaluate the impact of MV disease etiology on long-term patient survival.

METHODS

Using data (2002-2018) from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database, the authors conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study to compare the biological and mechanical valves in terms of all-cause mortality as the primary outcome. The inverse probability of the treatment weighting method was used to reduce the effects of the confounding factors. The following etiologies were assessed: infective endocarditis, rheumatic heart disease, ischemic mitral regurgitation, and degenerative mitral regurgitation.

RESULTS

In patients aged below 70 years, it was observed that mechanical valves demonstrated an association with benefits compared to biological valves in the context of survival. In patients with infective endocarditis aged below 72 years, mechanical valves were associated with survival benefits, but not in those with stroke during hospitalization. These valves were also found to be linked with survival advantages for patients with rheumatic heart disease aged below 60 years and for those with degenerative mitral regurgitation aged below 72 years. However, no age-dependent effects of valve type on all-cause mortality were observed in patients with ischemic mitral regurgitation.

CONCLUSION

The etiology of MV disease appears to be important in the selection of a suitable MV and determination of a cutoff age for mechanical and biological MVR.

Morbidity and mortality outcomes of patients requiring isolated tricuspid valve surgery: a retrospective cohort study of 537 patients in New South Wales between 2002 and 2018

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate mortality and morbidity outcomes following open-heart isolated tricuspid valve surgery (TVSx) with medium to long-term follow-up.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

New South Wales public and private hospital admissions between 1 January 2002 and 30 June 2018.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 537 patients underwent open isolated TVSx during the study period.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Primary outcome was all-cause mortality tracked from the death registry to 31 December 2018. Secondary morbidity outcomes, including admission for congestive cardiac failure (CCF), new atrial fibrillation (AF), infective endocarditis (IE), pulmonary embolism (PE) and insertion of a permanent pacemaker (PPM) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), were tracked from the Admitted Patient Data Collection database. Independent mortality associations were determined using the Cox regression method.

RESULTS

A total of 537 patients underwent open isolated TVSx (46% male): median age (IQR) was 63.5 years (43.9-73.8 years) with median length of stay of 16 days (10-31 days). Main cardiovascular comorbidities were AF (54%) and CCF (42%); 67% had rheumatic tricuspid valve. In-hospital and total mortality were 7.4% and 39.3%, respectively (mean follow-up: 4.8 years). Cause-specific deaths were evenly split between cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular causes. Predictors of mortality included a history of CCF (HR=1.78, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.38, p<0.001) and chronic pulmonary disease (HR=2.66, 95% CI 1.63 to 4.33, p<0.001). In-hospital PPM rate was 10.0%. At 180 days, 53 (9.9%) patients were admitted for CCF, 25 (10.1%) had new AF, 7 (1.5%) had new IE and <1% had PE, post-discharge PPM or ICD insertion.

CONCLUSION

Open isolated TVSx carries significant mortality risk, with decompensated CCF and new AF the most common morbidities encountered after surgery. This report forms a benchmark to compare outcomes with newer percutaneous tricuspid interventions.

Antithrombotic therapy after heart valve surgery: contemporary practice in the UK

OBJECTIVES

There is a lack of high-quality data informing the optimal antithrombotic drug strategy following bioprosthetic heart valve replacement or valve repair. Disparity in recommendations from international guidelines reflects this. This study aimed to document current patterns of antithrombotic prescribing after heart valve surgery in the UK.

METHODS

All UK consultant cardiac surgeons were e-mailed a custom-designed survey. The use of oral anticoagulant (OAC) and/or antiplatelet drugs following bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement or mitral valve replacement, or mitral valve repair (MVrep), for patients in sinus rhythm, without additional indications for antithrombotic medication, was assessed. Additionally, we evaluated anticoagulant choice following MVrep in patients with atrial fibrillation.

RESULTS

We identified 260 UK consultant cardiac surgeons from 36 units, of whom 103 (40%) responded, with 33 units (92%) having at least 1 respondent. The greatest consensus was for patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement, in which 76% of surgeons favour initial antiplatelet therapy and 53% prescribe lifelong treatment. Only 8% recommend initial OAC. After bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement, 48% of surgeons use an initial OAC strategy (versus 42% antiplatelet), with 66% subsequently prescribing lifelong antiplatelet therapy. After MVrep, recommendations were lifelong antiplatelet agent alone (34%) or following 3 months OAC (20%), no antithrombotic agent (20%), or 3 months OAC (16%). After MVrep for patients with established atrial fibrillation, surgeons recommend warfarin (38%), a direct oral anticoagulant (37%) or have no preference between the 2 (25%).

CONCLUSIONS

There is considerable variation in the use of antithrombotic drugs after heart valve surgery in the UK and a lack of high-quality evidence to guide practice, underscoring the need for randomized studies.

Concomitant interventions in mitral valve surgery - A European perspective

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, major findings on concomitant procedures and anticoagulation management have occurred in Mitral Valve (MV) surgery. Therefore, we sought to evaluate the current practices in MV interventions across Europe.

METHODS

In October 2021, all national cardio-thoracic societies in the European region were identified following an electronic search and sent an online survey of 14 questions to distribute among their member consultant/attending cardiac surgeons.

RESULTS

The survey was completed by 91 consultant/attending cardiac surgeons across 12 European countries, with 78% indicating MV repair as their specialty area. 57.1% performed >150 operations/year and 71.4% had 10+ years of experience.Concomitant tricuspid valve repair is performed for moderate tricuspid regurgitation (TR) by 69% of surgeons and for mild TR by 26.3%, both with annular diameter >40 mm. 50.6% indicated ischaemic MV surgery in patients undergoing CABG if moderate mitral regurgitation with ERO >20 mm2 and regurgitant volume >30 mL, and 45.1% perform it if severe MR with ERO >40 mm2 and regurgitant volume >60 mL. For these patients the preferred management was: MVR if predictors of repair failure identified (47.2%) and downsizing annuloplasty ring only (34.1%).For atrial fibrillation (AF) in cardiac surgery, 34.1% perform ablation with biatrial lesion and 20% with left sided only. 62.6% perform concomitant Left Atrial Appendage (LAA) Occlusion irrespective of AF ablation with a left atrial clip. A wide variability in anticoagulation strategies for MV repair and bioprosthetic MV valve was reported both for patients in sinus rhythm and AF.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate a variable practice for MV surgery, and a degree of lack of compliance with surgical intervention guidelines and anticoagulation strategy.

Between a rock and a hard place: resumption of oral anticoagulant therapy after intracranial hemorrhage

Intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is the most feared and lethal complication of oral anticoagulant (OAC) therapy. Resumption of OAC after ICH has long posed a challenge for clinicians, complicated by the expanding range of anticoagulant agents available in modern clinical practice, including direct OACs and, more recently, factor XI and XII inhibitors. A review of the current literature found support for resuming OAC in the majority of patients after ICH based on pooled retrospective data showing that resumption is associated with a lower risk of mortality and thromboembolism without a significantly increased risk of recurrent hemorrhage. The optimal time to resume OAC is less clear; however, the available evidence suggests that the composite risk of both recurrent hemorrhage and thromboembolism is likely minimized, somewhere between 4 and 6 weeks, after ICH in most patients. Specific considerations to guide the optimal resumption time in the individual patient include ICH location, mechanism, and anticoagulant class. Patients with mechanical heart valves and intracerebral malignancy represent high-risk groups who require more nuanced decision making. Here, we appraise the literature with the aim of providing a practical guide for clinicians while also discussing priorities for future investigation.

Oral Anticoagulation Versus Antiplatelet Treatment After Mitral Valve Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists is currently advised for a period of 3 months after surgical mitral valve repair, regardless of the rhythm status. The evidence supporting this recommendation is weak and recent studies have challenged the safety and efficacy of this recommendation. A systematic review of literature was conducted by searching PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Emcare, and Cochrane Library databases for original publications comparing the efficacy and safety of oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists to antiplatelet treatment early after mitral valve surgery in patients with no atrial fibrillation. Study end points included thromboembolic complications, bleeding complications and survival. A total of 5 studies, including 5,093 patients, met the inclusion criteria; 2,824 patients were included in the oral anticoagulation and 2,269 in the antiplatelet treatment group. Pooled analyses demonstrated no beneficial effect of oral anticoagulation on the incidence of thromboembolic complications (risk ratio 1.14, 95% confidence interval 0.76 to 1.70, p = 0.53, I2 = 8%). Moreover, oral anticoagulation did not result in a significantly increased risk of bleeding complications (risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.32 to 2.44, p = 0.81, I2 = 87%). When combining the efficacy and safety end points, no difference was observed between groups (risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.51 to 1.97, p = 0.99 I2 = 85%). Likewise, mortality did not differ between groups (risk ratio 0.89, 95% confidence interval 0.15 to 5.23, p = 0.90 I2 = 71%). Our results confirmed the safety but failed to confirm the efficacy of oral anticoagulation in patients who underwent mitral valve surgery. A randomized controlled trial would provide the evidence needed to support treatment recommendations.

Long-term Outcomes and Anticoagulation in Mitral Valve Surgery-A Report From The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Database

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulation after bioprosthetic mitral valve (MV) replacement (BMVR) and repair (MVrep) is controversial. We explore outcomes among BMVR and MVrep patients in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database based on discharge anticoagulation status.

METHODS

BMVR and MVrep patients aged ≥65 years in The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database were linked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services claims database. Long-term mortality, ischemic stroke, bleeding, and a composite of the primary end points were compared as a function of anticoagulation. Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using multivariable Cox regression.

RESULTS

A total of 26,199 BMVR and MVrep patients were linked to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database; of these, 44%, 4%, and 52% were discharged on warfarin, non-vitamin K-dependent anticoagulant (NOAC), and no anticoagulation (no-AC; reference), respectively. Warfarin was associated with increased bleeding in the overall study cohort (HR, 1.38; 95% CI 1.26-1.52) and in the BMVR (HR, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.13-1.55) and MVrep subcohorts (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.26-1.60). Warfarin was associated with decreased mortality only among BMVR patients (HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.79-0.96). Stroke and the composite outcome did not differ across cohorts with warfarin. NOAC use was associated with increased mortality (HR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.11-1.59), bleeding (HR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.07-1.74), and the composite outcome (HR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.47).

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation was used in fewer than half of mitral valve operations. In MVrep patients, warfarin was associated with increased bleeding and was not protective against stroke or mortality. In BMVR patients, warfarin was associated with a modest survival benefit, increased bleeding, and equivalent stroke risk. NOAC was associated with increased adverse outcomes.

Should mitral valve replacement age guidelines be lowered due to better bioprosthetic mitral valve durability?

OBJECTIVE

Guideline recommendations for mechanical or bioprosthetic valve for mitral valve replacement by age remains controversial. We sought to determine bovine pericardial valve durability by age and risk of reintervention.

METHODS

This retrospective study between 2 large university-based cardiac surgery programs examined patients who underwent bioprosthetic mitral valve replacement from 2004 to 2020. Follow-up was obtained through June 2022. Durability outcomes involving structural valve deterioration were compared by age decile.

RESULTS

Of 1544 available patients, mean age was 66 ± 13 years and 652 (42%) were aged less than 65 years. Indications for mitral valve replacement were as follows: mitral regurgitation greater than 2+ in 53% (n = 813), mitral stenosis in 44% (n = 650), endocarditis in 18% (n = 277), and reoperation in 39% (n = 602). Concomitant procedures were aortic valve replacement in 28% (n = 426), tricuspid valve in 36% (n = 550), and coronary artery bypass in 19% (n = 290). Thirty-day mortality was 5.4%. In follow-up (clinical: median [interquartile range] 75 [25-129] months), reoperation for endocarditis and new stroke were low (0.30 and 1.06 per 100 patient/years, respectively). The cumulative incidence of mitral valve reintervention for structural valve deterioration among all patients was 6.2% at 10 years and 9.0% at 12 years with no statistical difference in structural valve deterioration in patients aged 40 to 70 years (P = .1). In 90 patients with mitral valve reintervention, 30-day mortality after reintervention was 4.7% (n = 2) for 43 with mitral valve-in-valve and 6.4% (n = 3) for 47 with reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Bovine pericardial mitral valve replacement is a durable option for younger patients. The opportunity to avoid anticoagulation and the associated risks with mechanical mitral valve replacement may be of benefit to patients. These insights may provide data needed to revise the current guidelines.

Neurological outcomes in minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: risk factors analysis from the Mini-Mitral International Registry

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to examine the incidence and predictors of stroke after minimally invasive mitral valve surgery (mini-MVS) and to assess the role of preoperative CT scan on surgical management and neurological outcomes in the large cohort of Mini-Mitral International Registry.

METHODS

Clinical, operative and in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing mini-MVS between 2015 and 2021 were collected. Univariable and multivariable analyses were used to identify predictors of stroke. Finally, the impact of preoperative CT scan on surgical management and neurological outcomes was assessed.

RESULTS

Data from 7343 patients were collected. The incidence of stroke was 1.3% (n = 95/7343). Stroke was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (11.6% vs 1.5%, P < 0.001) and longer intubation time, ICU and hospital stay (median 26 vs 7 h, 120 vs 24 h and 14 vs 8 days, respectively). On multivariable analysis, age (odds ratio 1.039, 95% confidence interval 1.019-1.060, P < 0.001) and mitral valve replacement (odds ratio 2.167, 95% confidence interval 1.401-3.354, P < 0.001) emerged as independent predictors of stroke. Preoperative CT scan was made in 31.1% of cases. These patients had a higher risk profile and EuroSCORE II (median 1.58 vs 1.1, P < 0.001). CT scan influenced the choice of cannulation site, being ascending aorta (18.5% vs 0.5%, P < 0.001) more frequent in the CT group and femoral artery more frequent in the no CT group (97.8% vs 79.7%, P < 0.001). No difference was found in the incidence of postoperative stroke (CT group 1.5, no CT group 1.4%, P = 0.7).

CONCLUSIONS

Mini-MVS is associated with a low incidence of stroke, but when it occurs it has an ominous impact on mortality. Preoperative CT scan affected surgical cannulation strategy but did not led to improved neurological outcomes.

Risk of Stroke and Major Bleeding With Vitamin K Antagonist Use After Mitral Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

Guidelines are discordant on the use of a vitamin K antagonist (VKA) after mitral valve repair (MVr) to reduce the risk of cerebral embolic events. We performed an observational study among patients who underwent a MVr, without perioperative atrial fibrillation, to determine the risk of cerebral ischemic and major bleeding events with or without VKA.

METHODS

From 2004 to 2016, we included patients who underwent MVr, using a national administrative claims database. Those with preoperative atrial fibrillation and anticoagulant use were excluded. Patients were stratified based on the presence of a VKA. Inverse probability weighting with a Cox proportional hazard model was used.

RESULTS

After MVr, 754 patients were discharged on VKA and 1462 on no-VKA. We found no difference in the cumulative incidence for embolic stroke at 180 days (VKA: 2.21% vs no-VKA: 1.50%; hazard ratio, 1.35; P = .38). However, VKA patients had a significantly increased risk for any-cause major bleeding events at 180 days (VKA: 8.58% vs no-VKA: 4.21%; hazard ratio, 2.09; P < .001). VKA patients also had increased need for a pericardiocentesis/pericardial window at 30 days after discharge (VKA: 1.13% vs no-VKA: 0.37%; hazard ratio, 3.88; P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that VKA after MVr does not reduce the risk of cerebral embolic events but is associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events.

Apixaban for Anticoagulation After Robotic Mitral Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus regarding postoperative anticoagulation after mitral valve repair (MVRep). We compared the outcomes of post-MVRep anticoagulation with apixaban compared to warfarin.

METHODS

We reviewed data of 666 patients who underwent isolated robotic MVRep between January 2008 and October 2019. We excluded patients who had conversion to sternotomy and those discharged without anticoagulation or on clopidogrel (n = 40). Baseline and intraoperative characteristics and antiplatelet/anticoagulation records were collected. In-hospital and post-discharge complications and overall survival were compared.

RESULTS

Among the 626 studied patients the median age was 58 years (interquartile range, 51-66), 71% were male, and 1% (n = 9) had atrial fibrillation. Eighty percent (n = 499) were discharged on warfarin and 20% on apixaban (n = 127). Almost all patients (126 of 127, 99%) in the apixaban group were also on aspirin at discharge, whereas in the warfarin group only 79% (n = 395) were also on aspirin at discharge. Baseline characteristics were similar, except that the apixaban group had more female patients (46 of 127, 36% vs 136 of 499, 27%, P = .047). There were no differences in in-hospital complications, including stroke. Readmission rate was higher in the apixaban group (15 of 127, 12% vs 30 of 499, 6%, P = .02), driven mostly by postoperative atrial fibrillation (6 of 127 [5%] vs 5 of 499 [1%], respectively; P = .01). There was no difference in other complications (including bleeding and thromboembolic events), or overall mortality within 3 years. Exclusion of patients who did not receive aspirin at discharge did not affect the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticoagulation with apixaban after minimally invasive robotic MVRep is safe and has similar rates of bleeding and thromboembolism compared to patients treated with warfarin.

Prosthetic choice in mitral valve replacement for severe chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation: Long-term follow-up

BACKGROUND

Prosthetic choice for mitral valve replacement is generally driven by patient age and patient and surgeon preference, and current guidelines do not discriminate between different etiologies of mitral valve disease. Our objective was to assess and compare short- and long-term outcomes after mitral valve replacement among patients with biological or mechanical prostheses in the setting of severe ischemic mitral regurgitation.

METHODS

Between 2000 and 2016, 424 patients underwent mitral valve replacement for severe ischemic mitral regurgitation at our institution, using biological prosthesis in 188 (44%) and mechanical prosthesis in 236 (56%). A 1:1 propensity score match (n = 126 per group) and inverse probability of treatment weighting were used to compare groups. Short-term outcomes included in-hospital mortality and other cardiovascular adverse events. Long-term outcomes included survival and hospital readmission for cardiovascular causes, stroke, and major bleeding.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality and early postoperative adverse events were similar between groups in the propensity score match and inverse probability of treatment weighting cohorts. Overall long-term survival was similar at 5 and 9 years, but mechanical prosthesis recipients were more frequently readmitted to hospital for cardiovascular causes, including stroke and non-neurological bleeding in propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses (all P values < .004). Type of prosthesis did not independently influence all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% confidence interval, 0.71-1.43; P = .959), but placement of a mechanical prosthesis was associated with increased risk of readmission for cardiovascular events (hazard ratio, 1.65; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-2.32; P = .004) among matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The type of prosthesis has no influence on long-term survival among patients with severe ischemic mitral regurgitation undergoing mitral valve replacement. There may be an increased risk of neurologic events and serious bleeding associated with mechanical prostheses.

Efficacy and safety of edoxaban in patients early after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair: A randomized clinical trial

OBJECTIVE

Early warfarin anticoagulation is recommended in patients undergoing surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair. It is unclear whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants can be a full alternative to warfarin. This study aimed to compare efficacy and safety of edoxaban with warfarin in patients early after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair.

METHODS

The Explore the Efficacy and Safety of Edoxaban in Patients after Heart Valve Repair or Bioprosthetic Valve Replacement study was a prospective, randomized (1:1), open-label, clinical trial conducted from December 2017 to September 2019. Patients were randomly assigned to receive edoxaban (60 mg or 30 mg once daily) or warfarin for the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair. The primary efficacy outcome was a composite of death, clinical thromboembolic events, or asymptomatic intracardiac thrombosis. The primary safety outcome was the occurrence of major bleeding.

RESULTS

Of 220 participants, 218 (109 per group) were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis. The primary efficacy outcome occurred in 4 patients (3.7%) taking warfarin and none taking edoxaban (risk difference, -0.0367; 95% confidence interval, -0.0720 to -0.0014; P < .001 for noninferiority). The primary safety outcome occurred in 1 patient (0.9%) taking warfarin and 3 patients (2.8%) taking edoxaban (risk difference, 0.0183; 95% confidence interval, -0.0172 to 0.0539; P = .013 for noninferiority).

CONCLUSIONS

Edoxaban is noninferior to warfarin for preventing thromboembolism and is potentially comparable for risk of major bleeding during the first 3 months after surgical bioprosthetic valve implantation or valve repair.

High Mitral Annulus Calcium Score in Pre-Operative Chest Computerized Tomography and Adverse Outcomes in Mitral Valve Surgery

BACKGROUND

Severe mitral annulus calcification (MAC) is believed to bear high operative and post-operative risk during mitral valve replacement (MVR) surgery, including longer surgery time, post-surgical valvular leaks and increased rate of embolic phenomena. We hypothesized that quantification of mitral calcium in pre-operative chest computerized tomography (CCT), performed to assess aortic root before cross-clamping may help in risk assessment of adverse intraoperative and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing MVR.

METHODS

We included patients who underwent MVR between the years 2015 and 2018 at Poriya medical center. Preoperative CCT was performed using Philips iCT 256 and Agatston mitral annulus calcium score (MACS) was retrospectively calculated using Philips Intellispace portal version 8.0. Patients were divided into MACS quintiles; 1-3 quintiles were grouped (Low MACS) and compared to the 4-5 quintiles (High MACS) group for demographic, clinical operative and post-operative parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients had MVR, out of which 61% were males, with mean age of 64±9. Concomitant coronary or valvular procedures were done in 60% of patients. The median MACS was 43. High MACS (≥854) was not associated with longer bypass or cross clamp times. No differences in the MVR results were found between the groups. There were 6 post-operative embolic events; 1 mesenteric and 5 cerebral, which were not associated with MACS.

CONCLUSION

MACS did not seem to be related to adverse outcomes in MVR. Due to a low event rate and probable pre-selection of patients without extreme mitral annulus calcifications our results should be confirmed in larger prospective study.

Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement-Age-Dependent Choice of Prosthesis Type

Background: Recently, the use of surgically implanted aortic bioprostheses has been favoured in younger patients. We aimed to analyse the long-term survival and postoperative MACCE (Major Adverse Cardiovascular and Cerebral Event) rates in patients after isolated aortic valve replacement. Methods: We conducted a single-centre observational retrospective study, including all consecutive patients with isolated aortic valve replacement. 1:1 propensity score matching of the preoperative baseline characteristics was performed. Results: A total of 2172 patients were enrolled in the study. After propensity score matching the study included 428 patients: 214 biological vs. 214 mechanical prostheses, divided into two subgroups: group A < 60 years and group B > 60 years. The mean follow-up time was 7.6 ± 3.9 years. Estimated survival was 97 ± 1.9% and 89 ± 3.4% at 10 years for biological and mechanical prosthesis, respectively in group A (p = 0.06). In group B the survival at 10 years was 79.1 ± 5.8% and 69.8 ± 4.4% for biological and mechanical prosthesis, respectively (p = 0.83). In group A, patients with a bioprosthesis exhibited a tendency for higher cumulative incidence MACCE rates compared to patients with a mechanical prosthesis, p = 0.83 (bio 7.3 ± 5.3% vs. mech 4.6 ± 2.2% at 10 years). In group B, patients with a mechanical prosthesis showed a tendency for higher cumulative incidence MACCE rates compared to patients with bioprosthesis, p = 0.86 (bio 4.3 ± 3.1% vs. mech 9.1 ± 3.1% at 10 years). Conclusions: Long-term survival after surgical aortic valve replacement is similar in patients with a biological and mechanical prosthesis, independent of the patients’ age. Moreover, younger patients (<60 years) with bioprosthesis showed a survival benefit, compared to patients with mechanical prosthesis in this age group.

The Prognostic Impact of Anti-thrombotic Treatment Strategies After Biological Aortic Valve Replacement

PURPOSE

Optimal antithrombotic therapy in patients who underwent surgical biological aortic valve replacement (AVR) represents an issue of ongoing discussion. Additionally, the prognostic impact of anti-thrombotic treatment strategies after biological AVR and real-life data on anticoagulation strategies (AC) of patients presenting with short-term postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) has not clearly been investigated so far. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the impact of therapeutic AC after biological AVR on patient outcome and whether the presence of POAF affects decision making on anti-thrombotic management.

METHODS

Within this prospective observational study, 200 individuals that underwent biological AVR surgery were enrolled. Participants were followed prospectively until the primary study endpoint was reached. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to elucidate the effect of therapeutic AC on outcome.

RESULTS

Overall, 106 individuals received therapeutic AC at the time of discharge. The fraction of patients presenting with POAF was balanced between individuals receiving AC and the non-AC subgroup (p = 0.617). After a median follow-up time of 1418 days, 31 (15.5%) individuals died, referring to 15 (13.9%) POAF-free patients and 16 (17.4%) with POAF. We observed a strong inverse association of therapeutic AC and cardiovascular mortality, which remained stable after adjustment for potential confounders showing a HR of 0.437 (95% CI 0.202-0.943; p = 0.035), while bleeding risk was comparable (p = 0.680).

CONCLUSION

Within this investigation, therapeutic AC showed a strong and independent inverse association with long-term mortality in patients that underwent biological AVR. Although POAF is associated with thromboembolic adverse events, the development of this arrhythmia did not affect decision-making of the anti-thrombotic management.

Direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in patients with atrial fibrillation and bioprosthetic valves: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal anticoagulation strategy for patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis using updated evidence comparing direct anticoagulants (DOACs) and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched through March 2021 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies investigating the outcomes of DOAC therapy and VKA therapy in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation. The outcomes of interest were all-cause death, major bleeding, and stroke or systemic embolism.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 4 RCTs and 6 observational studies enrolling a total of 6405 patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation assigned to a DOAC group (n = 2142) or a VKA group (n = 4263). Pooled analysis demonstrated the similar rates of all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.77-1.05; P = .18; I² = 0%) in the DOAC and VKA groups. However, the rate of major bleeding was significantly lower in the DOAC group (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.89; P = .006; I² = 0%), whereas the rate of stroke or systemic embolism was similar in the 2 groups (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.44-1.17; P = .18; I² = 39%).

CONCLUSIONS

DOAC might decrease the risk of major bleeding without increasing the risk of stroke or systemic embolism or all-cause death compared with VKA in patients with bioprosthetic valves and atrial fibrillation.

Late results after mitral valve replacement with Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger

OBJECTIVES

Although in younger patients indications for biological prosthesis implantation in mitral valve replacement remain controversial, recently bioprostheses use increased considerably. We present late results obtained with the Medtronic Mosaic bioprosthesis in patients aged 65 years or younger.

METHODS

Between 2007 and 2017, 67 mitral Mosaic bioprostheses were implanted in patients aged 65 years or younger (58.5 ± 6.4 years). Follow-up extended up to 13 years. Survival, freedom from structural valve degeneration, endocarditis, thromboembolic events and reoperation were considered as main clinical end points evaluated at 1, 5 and 10 years.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 4.7 ± 2.8 years. Overall mortality rate was 12%. At 1, 5 and 10 years, survival was 94 ± 3%, 89 ± 4% and 77 ± 9%, respectively. Freedom from structural valve degeneration was 100%, 94 ± 4% and 71 ± 21%. Freedom from endocarditis was 95 ± 3%, 90 ± 6% and 84 ± 8%. Freedom from thromboembolic events was 94 ± 3%, 90 ± 5% and 90 ± 5%. Freedom from reoperation was 94 ± 3%, 87 ± 5% and 65 ± 19%.

CONCLUSIONS

Mosaic bioprosthesis appears a valid mitral valve substitute even when employed in ≤65-year-old patients.

2020 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease: Executive Summary: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

This executive summary of the valvular heart disease guideline provides recommendations for clinicians to diagnose and manage valvular heart disease as well as supporting documentation to encourage their use.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 1, 2010, to March 1, 2020, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Reports, and other selected database relevant to this guideline. Structure: Many recommendations from the earlier valvular heart disease guidelines have been updated with new evidence and provides newer options for diagnosis and treatment of valvular heart disease. This summary includes only the recommendations from the full guideline which focus on diagnostic work-up, the timing and choice of surgical and catheter interventions, and recommendations for medical therapy. The reader is referred to the full guideline for graphical flow charts, text, and tables with additional details about the rationale for and implementation of each recommendation, and the evidence tables detailing the data considered in developing these guidelines.

Initial Clinical Experience With Mitral Valve Translocation for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation

BACKGROUND

Functional (secondary) mitral regurgitation (FMR) results from altered geometry of the mitral valve apparatus. Repair with restrictive mitral annuloplasty is associated with high rates of recurrent mitral regurgitation (MR). We developed a novel operative repair for FMR that translocates the intact mitral valve towards the apex.

METHODS

The mitral valve was detached circumferentially and translocated into the ventricle with a frustum-shaped glutaraldehyde-treated autologous pericardial patch. Clinical and echocardiographic follow-up was performed.

RESULTS

Fifteen consecutive patients with FMR (mean age, 59 years; 67% female) had mitral valve translocation between 2018 and 2020. Preoperative mean ejection fraction, left ventricular end-diastolic dimension, and systolic pulmonary artery pressure were 40% ± 11%, 59 ± 8 mm, and 49 ± 21 mm Hg, respectively; 33% had atrial fibrillation. Cardiomyopathy was ischemic in 4 and nonischemic in 11. Concomitant procedures included tricuspid valve operation (n = 8), coronary artery bypass grafting (n = 4), and atrial fibrillation ablation (n = 5). Post bypass transesophageal echocardiogram demonstrated none/trace MR in all patients and mean gradient of 3 mm Hg (interquartile range, 2-4 mm Hg). Mean leaflet extent of coaptation was 14 ± 2 mm (range, 11-17 mm). There was no postoperative mortality, stroke, or renal failure. Predismissal echocardiography showed none/trace MR in 14 patients and mild MR in 1. One patient underwent successful late rerepair of a suture line leak. Twelve patients were alive at latest follow-up and MR at 1 and 6 months was mild or less in all patients with mean leaflet extent of coaptation of 14 ± 2 mm (range, 12-16 mm) at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Mitral valve translocation creates a large surface of coaptation and effectively corrects FMR. Further study is needed to demonstrate the long-term durability and clinical utility of this operation.

Biomaterials in Valvular Heart Diseases

Valvular heart disease (VHD) occurs as the result of valvular malfunction, which can greatly reduce patient's quality of life and if left untreated may lead to death. Different treatment regiments are available for management of this defect, which can be helpful in reducing the symptoms. The global commitment to reduce VHD-related mortality rates has enhanced the need for new therapeutic approaches. During the past decade, development of innovative pharmacological and surgical approaches have dramatically improved the quality of life for VHD patients, yet the search for low cost, more effective, and less invasive approaches is ongoing. The gold standard approach for VHD management is to replace or repair the injured valvular tissue with natural or synthetic biomaterials. Application of these biomaterials for cardiac valve regeneration and repair holds a great promise for treatment of this type of heart disease. The focus of the present review is the current use of different types of biomaterials in treatment of valvular heart diseases.

Anticoagulation After Isolated Mitral Valve Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

Recommendations from international guidelines on optimal thromboprophylaxis after mitral repair are controversial and based on underpowered observational studies. This study aimed to evaluate the prophylactic use of warfarin after isolated mitral valve repair (MVr). A PubMed, EMBASE and Scopus search for studies in English on postoperative thromboprophylaxis for isolated MVr published to February 2020 was performed. The analysis excluded all studies with combined operations, mitral valve replacement and preoperative or postoperative atrial fibrillation. Clinical endpoints that were studied were thromboembolic events, bleeding complications and mortality. Random effects meta-analyses of the effect of postoperative warfarin use as compared with no warfarin use across all clinical endpoints was conducted. Warfarin use did not confer benefit in terms of thromboembolic prophylaxis after isolated MVr in patients without atrial fibrillation (OR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.72-1.31). At the same time, it did not increase the risk of bleeding complications (OR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.53-2.30) or affect overall survival during the follow-up period of the included studies (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.28-4.05). To conclude, warfarin use is not necessary for patients after isolated MVr who remain in sinus rhythm. Recommendations from international guidelines may need to be revisited for this group of patients.

Anticoagulation and antiplatelet therapy in patients with prosthetic heart valves

BACKGROUND

The choice of antithrombotic therapy, anticoagulants or antiplatelets, after prosthetic heart valve replacement or repair, remains a disputed topic in the literature. Antithrombotic therapies are used after heart valve intervention to reduce the rates of thromboembolic events, therefore improving patient outcomes. Different interventions may require different therapeutic regimens to achieve the most efficacious clinical outcome for patients.

METHODS AND DISCUSSION

This review aims to summarize and critique the available literature concerning therapeutic agents used for bioprosthetic and mechanical valves as well as for valve repair, so as to assist clinicians and researchers in making decisions with regard to their patients and research endeavors.

Anticoagulation following mitral valve repair

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Anticoagulation after mitral valve repair is controversial and guidelines are not well-established. This study evaluated the association between postoperative warfarin use and complications after mitral valve repair, including bleeding and thromboembolic incidents, readmission, and mortality.

METHODS

This retrospective study investigated 1097 patients who underwent elective mitral valve repair between April 2003 and March 2017, and was naïve to atrial fibrillation or prior cardiac surgery. This cohort had no other indication for or against anticoagulation. About 775 patients were placed on warfarin with international normalized ratio goal 2.5 and 322 patients were not anticoagulated. The association between anticoagulation and complications was assessed with univariate comparisons between groups and multiple logistic regression.

RESULTS

Postoperative warfarin use was associated with a reduced composite of bleeding and thromboembolic complications (pulmonary embolism, TIA, stroke, pericardial effusion or cardiac tamponade, gastrointestinal bleeding, and reoperation for bleeding) with an odds ratio of 0.29 (95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.64, P = .003). There was no difference in 30-day or 6-month mortality or readmission rate between groups. Long-term survival estimates were superior in the warfarin group (10-year: 92% vs 85%; log-rank P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis showed that postoperative warfarin use was associated with an overall reduced composite of bleeding and thromboembolic incidents and superior long-term survival. These findings suggest that anticoagulation with warfarin following mitral valve repair may be a safe and effective means for avoiding postoperative complications and that a large prospective randomized clinical trial is warranted.

Economic Analysis and Long-term Follow-up of Distant Referral for Degenerative Mitral Valve Repair

BACKGROUND

Despite the superiority of mitral valve repair (MVr) over replacement for degenerative disease, repair rates vary widely across centers. Traveling to a mitral reference center (MRC) is 1 way to increase the odds of MVr. This study assessed the economic value (quality/cost) and long-term outcomes of distant referral to an MRC.

METHODS

Among 746 mitral surgery patients between January 2011 and June 2013, low-risk patients with an ejection fraction greater than 40% undergoing isolated degenerative MVr were identified and included 26 out-of-state (DISTANT) and 104 in-state patients (LOCAL). Short- and long-term outcomes and institutional financial data (including travel expenses) were used to compare groups. National average and MRC-specific MVr rates, clinical outcomes, and marginal value of quality-adjusted life-years collected from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons database and Medicare estimates were used to perform a nationally representative cost-benefit analysis for distant referral.

RESULTS

Age, ejection fraction, operative time, blood transfusions, and annuloplasty ring size did not differ between groups. Median charges were $76,022 for LOCAL and $74,171 for DISTANT (P = .35), whereas median payments (including travel expenses) were $57,795 for LOCAL and $58,477 for DISTANT (P = .70). Short- and long-term outcomes were similar between groups and median follow-up was 7.1 years. Estimated 5-year survival was 97% (96% for LOCAL and 100% for DISTANT; P = .24). Cost-benefit analysis showed a net benefit through distant referral to an MRC ranging from $436 to $6078 to the payer and $22,163 to $30,067 to the patient, combining for an estimated $22,599 to $32,528 societal benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that distant referral to an MRC is achievable and reasonable.

Predictors of 30-day outcomes following mitral valve repair

INTRODUCTION

Mitral valve repair has been established as the preferred treatment option in the management of degenerative mitral valve disease. Compared with other surgical treatment options, mitral valve repair is associated with increased survival and decreased rates of both complications and reoperations. However, among patients undergoing mitral valve repair, little is known about the predictors of postoperative outcomes. The purpose of this study is to identify preoperative patient risk factors associated with postoperative morbidity and mortality within 30 days of mitral valve repair.

METHODS

Data was derived from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to assess patients who underwent mitral valve repair from 2011 through 2017. Preoperative risk factors were analyzed to determine their association with a variety of postoperative 30-day outcome measures.

RESULTS

One thousand three hundred and sixty-six patients underwent mitral valve repair; 849 (62.2%) males and 517 (37.8%) females. Ages ranged from 18 to 90 years, with a mean age of 64 years. The overall 30-day mortality was 3.1% (43 patients). Among the 12 identified risk factors associated with increased mortality on univariate analysis, pre-operative hematocrit level was the only variable significantly correlated with mortality after undergoing multivariate analysis. 259 patients (19.1%) were discharged to a location other than home, an outcome associated with 22 identified risk factors. Among these risk factors, female gender, age, dialysis, pre-operative serum sodium, pre-operative serum albumin, and partial or full living dependency remained statistically significant following multivariate analysis. 126 patients (9.2%) experienced unplanned readmission. This outcome was associated with five risk factors, of which only dyspnea upon mild exertion was significant on multivariate analysis. Reoperation occurred in 105 patients (7.7%). Of the seven identified variables associated with reoperation, patient age, pre-operative platelet count, dyspnea upon mild exertion were independent predictors on multivariate analysis. 53 patients (3.9%) underwent reintubation, which was associated with 11 identified risk factors. Among them, patient age and pre-operative INR value were predictive of reintubation on multivariate analysis. 26 patients (1.9%) experienced stroke, of whom age was the only associated risk factor on both univariate and multivariate analysis. 31 patients (2.3%) experienced acute renal failure, which correlated with 11 risk factors on univariate analysis. Of these, only patient age and pre-operative hematocrit were identified as independent predictors on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes are good following mitral valve repair. Although a substantial number of risk factors were found to be associated with adverse outcomes, only a small subset remained statistically significant following multivariate analysis. Identification of these risk factors may help guide clinical decision making with respect to which patients are the best candidates to undergo mitral valve repair.

Low molecular weight heparin in surgical valve procedures: When and how much for an optimal prophylaxis?

BACKGROUND

Periprocedural antithrombotic prophylaxis in patients undergoing surgical valve procedures (SVP) is insufficiently investigated. Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) has been considered as an alternative to unfractionated heparin (UFH). However, safety and efficacy of this prophylaxis strategy is unknown. This study aimed to investigate safety and efficacy of periprocedural LMWH prophylaxis and determine optimal dosage and timing for periprocedural cessation and initiation.

METHODS

The present study is a retrospective, single-center observational analysis of 388 patients who underwent SVP (valve replacement or valvuloplasty) between 2015 and 2016. In-hospital endpoints were bleeding, transfusions, reoperation due to bleeding, and thromboembolic events.

RESULTS

Giving the first dose of LMWH on the day of SVP was a risk factor for bleeding (OR 1.07; 95% CI 1.04-1.10; p < 0.001), transfusions (OR 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.07; p = 0.008) and reoperation due to bleeding (OR 1.20; 95% CI 1.12-1.28; p < 0.001), with > 40 mg/day as a predictor. A higher dosage of LMWH premedication was an independent risk factor for bleeding (OR 1.02; 95% CI 1.00-1.04; p = 0.03) and transfusion (OR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.05; p = 0.01), with > 60 mg/day as a predictor for these events. LMWH dosed within 24 h prior to SVP increased the risk of transfusion (AUC 0.636; 95% CI 0.496-0.762; p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Bleeding is an important early concern after surgical valve procedures. Safety and efficacy of periprocedural prophylaxis with LMWH depends on dosage and the timing of its administration. The most optimal periprocedural prophylaxis in the SVP population appears to be LMWH in dosage of 40-60 mg/day, which is recommended for deep vein thrombosis prophylaxis, ceased at least one day before SVP.

Benefit of Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography Derived Ejection Fraction of the Left Atrial Appendage to Predict Thromboembolic Risk in the Patients with Valvular Heart Disease

Background and Objectives

Decreased left atrial appendage (LAA) emptying velocity in transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is related with higher incidence of thrombus and increased risk of stroke. Patients with valve disease are at higher risk of thrombus formation before and after surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the role of 4-dimensional cardiac computed tomography (4DCT) to predict the risk of thrombus formation.

Methods

Between March 2010 to March 2015, total of 62 patients (mean 60±15 years old, male: 53.2%) who underwent 4DCT and TEE for cardiac valve evaluation before surgery were retrospectively included in the current study. Fractional area change in TEE view and emptying velocity at left atrial appendage in TEE view (Ve_TEE) were measured. Ejection fraction (EF) of left atrial appendage in computed tomography (EF_CT) was calculated by 4DCT with full volume analysis. The best cut-off value of EF_CT predicting presence of spontaneous echo contrast (SEC) or thrombus was evaluated, and correlation between the parameters were also estimated.

Results

SEC or thrombus was observed in 45.2%. EF_CT and Ve_TEE were significantly correlated (r=0.452, p<0.001). However, fractional area change measured by TEE showed no correlation with Ve_TEE (r=0.085, p=0.512). EF_CT <37.5% best predicted SEC or thrombus in the patients with valve disease who underwent 4DCT and TEE (area under the curve, 0.654; p=0.038).

Conclusions

In the patients who underwent 4DCT for cardiac valve evaluation before surgery, EF_CT by volume analysis might have additional role to evaluate LAA function and estimate the risk of thrombus.

Antithrombotic Management of Patients With Prosthetic Heart Valves

Valvular heart disease is a major public health issue. The prevalence of valvular heart disease is expected to increase due to an aging population. Valve dysfunction manifests as valve stenosis, regurgitation, or both due to various etiologies. Valve repair and replacement are the main treatment options for severe valve dysfunction. Valve replacement is achieved by using either a mechanical or a bioprosthetic valve. Mechanical valves are more durable but require lifelong anticoagulation with associated complications. Bioprosthetic valves usually require anticoagulation only transiently after implantation but are less durable and degenerate more rapidly. In this article, we discuss antithrombotic regimens in persons after valve operations. We discuss general issues and antithrombotic recommendations for patients undergoing surgical bioprosthetic valve replacement, mechanical valve replacement (including different regimens for different positions and types of mechanical valves), mitral valve repair, and transcatheter aortic valve replacement. In addition, we discuss the antithrombotic management of patients in special circumstances, including patients with mechanical valves who have recurrent bleeding or thrombotic events, patients with mechanical valves undergoing surgery, and pregnant women with mechanical valves.

Antithrombotic therapy after mitral valve repair: VKA or aspirin?

The optimal antithrombotic therapy following mitral valve repair (MVr) is still a matter of debate. Therefore, we evaluated the rate of thromboembolic and bleeding complications of two antithrombotic prevention strategies: vitamin K antagonists (VKA) versus aspirin. Consecutive patients who underwent MVr between 2004 and 2016 at three Dutch hospitals were evaluated for thromboembolic and bleeding complications during three postoperative months. The primary endpoint was the combined incidence of thromboembolic and bleeding complications to determine the net clinical benefit of VKA strategy as compared with aspirin. Secondary objectives were to evaluate both thromboembolic and bleeding rates separately and to identify predictors for both complications. A total of 469 patients were analyzed, of whom 325 patients (69%) in the VKA group and 144 patients (31%) in the aspirin group. Three months postoperatively, the cumulative incidence of the combined end point of the study was 9.2% (95%CI 6.1-12) in the VKA group and 11% (95%CI 6.0-17) in the aspirin group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.6, 95%CI 0.83-3.1]. Moreover, no significant differences were observed in thromboembolic rates (adjusted HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.16-4.2) as well as in major bleeding rates (adjusted HR 1.89, 95%CI 0.90-3.9). VKA and aspirin therapy showed a similar event rate of 10% during 3 months after MVr in patients without prior history of AF. In both treatment groups thromboembolic event rate was low and major bleeding rates were comparable. Future prospective, randomized trials are warranted to corroborate our findings.