The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates

Galectin-3 as a Prognostic Biomarker of Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Outcomes

We assessed the prognostic potential of Galectin-3 in a sample of 159 heart failure patients who received a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant from 2012 to 2020. Clinical outcomes included hemodynamic data, right heart failure (RHF), hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs), and mortality. Galectin-3 was compounded into Michigan-RVF and EUROMACS-RHF risk scores and compared to the noncompounded risk scores. Right heart failure was significantly correlated with Galectin ( p = 0.004) on a continuous spectrum. Inotrope duration was significantly correlated to Galectin-3 (interquartile range [IQR]: 7.58-8.65, p < 0.001) along with INTERMACS score (IQR: 2.14-1.90, p < 0.001). Intensive care unit length of stay (median 8 days, p = 0.02), blood urea nitrogen ( p < 0.001), creatinine ( p < 0.001), and pulmonary artery pulsatility index ( p = 0.05) were also significantly correlated with Galectin-3. In our c-statistic analysis, the predictive value for RHF improved when Galectin-3 was included for both the Michigan-RVF (0.80-0.86) and EUROMACS-RHF (0.77-0.82) risk scores. When elevated over a binary cutoff of 18.2 ng/ml, Galectin-3 significantly correlated with HRAEs ( p = 0.014) and mortality ( p = 0.031). Galectin-3 shows great promise as a predictive biomarker in patients implanted with durable LVADs. In addition to significant correlation with key clinical outcomes, Galectin-3 enhanced the Michigan-RVF and EUROMACS-RHF risk scores in predicting progression to RHF.

The Right Ventricular-Arterial Compliance Index: A Novel Hemodynamic Marker to Predict Right Heart Failure Following Left Ventricular Assist Device

The development of right heart failure (RHF) in patients with advanced heart failure following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains difficult to predict. We proposed a novel composite hemodynamic index-the right ventricular-arterial compliance index (RVACi), derived from pulmonary artery pulse pressure (PAPP), ejection time (ET), heart rate (HR), and cardiac output (CO), with and expressed as mm Hg·s/L. We then conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis comparing the predictive value of RVACi for the development of RHF or unplanned right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support following LVAD implantation against existing hemodynamic indices. One hundred patients were enrolled after screening 232 patients over a 10 year period, with 74 patients having complete hemodynamic data for RVACi calculation. There was good correlation between pulmonary arterial capacitance ( R ² = 0.48) and pulmonary vascular resistance ( R ² = 0.63) with RVACi, but not RV stroke work index or pulmonary artery pulsatility index. Reduced baseline RVACi (52 ± 23 vs . 92 ± 55 mm Hg·s/L; p = 0.02) was the strongest hemodynamic predictor of unplanned RV mechanical circulatory support requirement in patients following LVAD insertion. Composite pulsatile hemodynamic indices including RVACi may provide additional insight over existing hemodynamic indices for the prediction of RHF and need for RV mechanical circulatory support.

Predicting right ventricular failure after left ventricular assist device implant: A novel approach

AIMS

Right ventricular (RV) failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant is an important cause of morbidity and mortality. Modern, data-driven approaches for defining and predicting RVF have been under-utilized.

METHODS

Two hundred thirty-two patients were identified with a mean age of 55 years; 40 (17%) were women, 132 were (59%) Caucasian and 74 (32%) were Black. Patients were split between Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) Classes 1, 2 and 3 (25%, 38% and 34%, respectively). Within this group, 'provisional RVF' patients were identified, along with 'no RVF' patients. 'No RVF' patients were defined as patients who never demonstrated more than moderate RV dysfunction on a post-LVAD transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) (ordinal RV function <3), never required an RV assist device (RVAD), were not discharged on sildenafil and were not on a pulmonary vasodilator or inotropic medication at 3 months after LVAD implant. In total, n = 67 patients were defined as 'no RVF'. The remaining patients represented the 'provisional RVF' population (n = 165). Extensive electronic health records queries yielded >1200 data points per patient. Using <1 and >1 month post-LVAD time windows motivated by established, expert-consensus definitions of 'early' and 'late' post-implant RVF, unbiased clustering analysis was performed to identify hidden patient 'phenogroups' within these two established RVF populations. Clusters were compared on post-implant clinical metrics and 1 year outcomes. Lastly, pre-implant metrics were used to generate models for predicting post-implant RVF phenogroup.

RESULTS

Within the 'early RVF' time window, distinct 'well' and 'sick' patient phenogroup clusters were identified. These clusters had similar RV function and pulmonary vasodilator usage during the first month after LVAD but differed significantly in heart failure therapy tolerance, renal (P < 0.001) and hepatic (P = 0.013) function, RVAD usage (P = 0.001) and 1 year mortality (P = 0.047). Distinct 'well' and 'sick' phenogroups were also identified in the 'late RVF' time window. These clusters had similar RV function (P = 0.111) and RVAD proportions (P = 0.757) but differed significantly in heart failure medication tolerance, pulmonary vasodilator usage (P = 0.001) and 1 year mortality (P < 0.001). Prediction of phenogroup clusters from the 'early RVF' population achieved an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) of 0.84, with top predictors including renal function, liver function, heart rate and pre-LVAD RV function.

CONCLUSIONS

Distinct, potentially predictable phenogroups of patients who have significantly different long-term outcomes exist within consensus-defined post-LVAD RVF populations.

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs 2024 Annual Report: Focus on Outcomes in Younger Patients

The 15th Annual Report from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support includes 29,634 continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices from the 10-year period between 2014 and 2024. The outcomes reported here demonstrate continued improved survival in the current era of fully magnetically levitated devices, with a significantly higher 1-year (85.7% vs 78.4%) and 5-year (59.7% vs 43.7%) survival than those receiving non-magnetically levitated devices. Magnetically levitated device recipients are experiencing a lower incidence of adverse events, including freedom from gastrointestinal bleeding (72.6%), device malfunction (82.9%), and stroke (86.7%) at 5 years. Additionally, a focus on a subgroup of patients younger than 50 years of age has demonstrated both superior outcomes in survival (91.6% survival at 1 year and 72.6% survival at 5 years) and decreased incidence of adverse events compared with older recipients. This younger cohort also demonstrated more tolerance to the characteristics of sex, race, ethnicity, and psychosocial indicators that are associated with worse outcomes after heart transplantation. Based upon these data, a potential net prolongation of life may be realized by considering prolonged left ventricular assist device support prior to heart transplantation in this population. These analyses provide preliminary data that could positively influence adoption of left ventricular assist device technology in groups previously not seen as candidates for this therapy, while providing a more responsible donor allocation strategy for advanced heart failure patients.

Right Ventricular Function Following Sternotomy Versus a Less-Invasive Approach for Left Ventricular Assist Device Implant: Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

Durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is traditionally performed via median sternotomy (MS). Less-invasive implantation may lower the incidence of postimplant right ventricular failure (RVF). Our primary objective was to determine whether less-invasive implantation reduces the odds of severe RVF compared to MS.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred ninety-eight adult patients between January 2008 and August 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

Isolated LVAD implantation either via median sternotomy or via a less-invasive surgical approach.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. A sensitivity analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis based on propensity scores was conducted. One hundred seventy-two patients were analyzed; 54% (94/172) underwent LVAD implantation via MS, and 45% (78/172) via less-invasive approaches. Age, sex, and comorbidities were comparable, but the MS group tended to be more critically ill prior to surgery. After adjusting for confounders, less-invasive approaches did not show significant protection against severe postimplant RVF compared to MS (adjusted odds ratio 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.20-1.44; p = 0.21). However, patients undergoing less-invasive techniques had reduced adjusted odds of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 0.29; 95% confidence interval 0.09-0.99); p = 0.049). There was no observed benefit of less-invasive approaches over MS for major bleeding, prevention of blood product transfusion, and listing for transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no reduction in the odds of severe RVF following LVAD implantation using less-invasive approaches versus MS. However, we found improved odds of 30-day survival in the less-invasive group. The underlying mechanism requires further investigation.

Pregnancy with a Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Narrative Review

ABSTRACT

This narrative review discusses the various challenges associated with the presence of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) during pregnancy. Given the hemodynamic and coagulation changes associated with pregnancy, the presence of an LVAD adds a layer of complexity with respect to optimal management. This review will discuss the anesthetic considerations when dealing with this subset of patients who may have other comorbidities alongside their advanced heart failure. Additionally, this paper aims to review successful pregnancies with an LVAD placement focusing on the mode of delivery and hemodynamic management risk.

The Prognostic Role of Pulmonary Arterial Elastance in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Pilot Study

Background: Pulmonary arterial elastance (Ea) is a helpful parameter to predict the risk of acute postoperative right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. A new method for calculating Ea, obtained by the ratio between transpulmonary gradient and stroke volume (EaB), has been proposed as a more accurate measure than the Ea obtained as the ratio between pulmonary artery systolic pressure and stroke volume (EaC). However, the role of EaB in predicting acute RVF post-LVAD implantation remains unclear. Methods and Results: A total of 35 patients who underwent LVAD implantation from 2018 to 2021 were reviewed in this retrospective analysis. Acute RVF after LVAD implantation occurred in 12 patients (34%): 5 patients with moderate RVF (14% of total) and 7 patients with severe RVF. The EaB was not significantly different between the "severe RVF" vs. "not-severe RVF" groups (0.27 ± 0.04 vs 0.23 ± 0.1, p < 0.403). However, the combination of arterial elastance and central venous pressure was significantly different between the "not-severe RVF" group (central venous pressure < 14 mmHg and EaC < 0.88 mmHg/mL or EaB < 0.24 mmHg/mL; p < 0.005) and the "severe RVF" group (central venous pressure > 14 mmHg and EaC > 0.88 mmHg/mL or EaB > 0.24 mmHg/mL; p < 0.005). Conclusions: Ea is a reliable parameter of right ventricular afterload and helps discriminate the risk of acute RVF after LVAD implantation. The combined analysis of Ea and central venous pressure can also risk stratify patients undergoing LVAD implantation for the development of RVF.

Right heart failure with left ventricular assist devices: Preoperative, perioperative and postoperative management strategies. A clinical consensus statement of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC

Right heart failure (RHF) following implantation of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is a common and potentially serious condition with a wide spectrum of clinical presentations with an unfavourable effect on patient outcomes. Clinical scores that predict the occurrence of right ventricular (RV) failure have included multiple clinical, biochemical, imaging and haemodynamic parameters. However, unless the right ventricle is overtly dysfunctional with end-organ involvement, prediction of RHF post-LVAD implantation is, in most cases, difficult and inaccurate. For these reasons optimization of RV function in every patient is a reasonable practice aiming at preparing the right ventricle for a new and challenging haemodynamic environment after LVAD implantation. To this end, the institution of diuretics, inotropes and even temporary mechanical circulatory support may improve RV function, thereby preparing it for a better adaptation post-LVAD implantation. Furthermore, meticulous management of patients during the perioperative and immediate postoperative period should facilitate identification of RV failure refractory to medication. When RHF occurs late during chronic LVAD support, this is associated with worse long-term outcomes. Careful monitoring of RV function and characterization of the origination deficit should therefore continue throughout the patient's entire follow-up. Despite the useful information provided by the echocardiogram with respect to RV function, right heart catheterization frequently offers additional support for the assessment and optimization of RV function in LVAD-supported patients. In any patient candidate for LVAD therapy, evaluation and treatment of RV function and failure should be assessed in a multidimensional and multidisciplinary manner.

Dynamic Risk Estimation of Adverse Events in Ambulatory LVAD Patients: A MOMENTUM 3 Analysis

BACKGROUND

Hemocompatibility-related adverse events affect patients after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation but are hard to predict.

OBJECTIVES

Dynamic risk modeling with a multistate model can predict risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), stroke, or death in ambulatory patients.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of the MOMENTUM 3 (Multicenter Study of MagLev Technology in Patients Undergoing Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy with HeartMate 3) trial. HeartMate 3 LVAD recipients who survived to hospital discharge and were followed for up to 2 years. A total of 145 variables were included in the multistate model with multivariate logistic regression. Model performance was assessed with the area under the curve in a holdout validation cohort. A risk stratification tool was created by dividing patients into categories of predicted risk using the final model variables and associated OR.

RESULTS

Among 2,056 LVAD patients, the median age was 59.4 years (20.4% women, 28.6% Black). At 2 years, the incidence of GIB, stroke, and death was 25.6%, 6.0%, and 12.3%, respectively. The multistate model included 39 total variables to predict risk of GIB (16 variables), stroke (10 variables), and death (19 variables). When ambulatory patients were classified according to their risk category, the 30-day observed event rate in the highest risk group for GIB, stroke, or death was 26.9%, 1.8%, and 4.8%, respectively. The multistate model predicted GIB, stroke, and death at any 30-day period with an area under the curve of 0.70, 0.69, and 0.86, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The multistate model informs 30-day risk in ambulatory LVAD recipients and allows recalculation of risk as new patient-specific data become available. The model allows for accurate risk stratification that predicts impending adverse events and may guide clinical decision making. (MOMENTUM 3 IDE Clinical Study Protocol; NCT02224755).

Differential Effects of Pharmacologic and Mechanical Support on Right-Left Ventricular Coupling

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous ventricular assist devices are increasingly relied on to maintain perfusion for cardiogenic shock patients. Optimal medical management strategies however remain uncertain from limited understanding of interventricular effects. This study analyzed the effects of pharmacologic and left-sided mechanical support on right ventricular function.

METHODS

A porcine model was developed to assess biventricular function during bolus pharmacologic administration before and after left-sided percutaneous ventricular assist and in cardiogenic shock.

RESULTS

The presence of mechanical support increased right ventricular load and stress with respect to the left ventricle. This shifted and exaggerated the relative effects of commonly used vasoactive agents. Furthermore, induction of cardiogenic shock led to differential pulmonary vascular and right ventricular responses.

CONCLUSIONS

Left ventricular ischemia and mechanical support altered interventricular coupling. Resulting impacts of pharmacologic agents indicate differential right heart responses and sensitivity to treatments and the need for further study to optimize biventricular function in shock patients.

Load Dependency of Ventricular Pump Function: Impact on the Non-Invasive Evaluation of the Severity and the Prognostic Relevance of Myocardial Dysfunction

Ventricular pump function, which is determined by myocyte contractility, preload and afterload, and, additionally, also significantly influenced by heart rhythm, synchrony of intraventricular contraction and ventricular interdependence, explains the difficulties in establishing the contribution of myocardial contractile dysfunction to the development and progression of heart failure. Estimating myocardial contractility is one of the most difficult challenges because the most commonly used clinical measurements of cardiac performance cannot differentiate contractility changes from alterations in ventricular loading conditions. Under both physiological and pathological conditions, there is also a permanent complex interaction between myocardial contractility, ventricular anatomy and hemodynamic loading conditions. All this explains why no single parameter can alone reveal the real picture of ventricular dysfunction. Over time there has been increasing recognition that a load-independent contractility parameter cannot truly exist, because loading itself changes the myofilament force-generating capacity. Because the use of a single parameter is inadequate, it is necessary to perform multiparametric evaluations and also apply integrative approaches using parameter combinations which include details about ventricular loading conditions. This is particularly important for evaluating the highly afterload-sensitive right ventricular function. In this regard, the existence of certain reluctance particularly to the implementation of non-invasively obtainable parameter combinations in the routine clinical praxis should be reconsidered in the future. Among the non-invasive approaches used to evaluate ventricular function in connection with its current loading conditions, assessment of the relationship between ventricular contraction (e.g., myocardial displacement or deformation) and pressure overload, or the relationship between ejection volume (or ejection velocity) and pressure overload, as well as the relationship between ventricular dilation and pressure overload, were found useful for therapeutic decision-making. In the future, it will be unavoidable to take the load dependency of ventricular function much more into consideration. A solid basis for achieving this goal will be obtainable by intensifying the clinical research necessary to provide more evidence for the practical importance of this largely unsolved problem.

Effectiveness of mechanical circulatory support devices in reversing pulmonary hypertension among heart transplant candidates: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) poses a significant challenge in the selection of candidates for heart transplantation, impacting their eligibility and post-transplant outcomes. Mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices, particularly left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), have emerged as a therapeutic option to manage PH in this patient population. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of MCS devices in reversing fixed pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, to identify studies that evaluated the effectiveness of MCS devices in reversing fixed pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates. Data on pulmonary vascular resistance, PH reversal, heart transplant eligibility, and post-transplant outcomes were extracted and synthesized.

RESULTS

The review included studies that demonstrated the potential of MCS devices, especially LVADs, to significantly reduce pulmonary vascular resistance and reverse fixed pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates. These findings suggest that MCS devices can improve transplant eligibility and may positively impact post-transplant survival rates. However, the literature also indicates a need for further comparative studies to optimize MCS device selection and treatment protocols.

CONCLUSION

MCS devices, particularly LVADs, play a crucial role in the management of fixed pulmonary hypertension in heart transplant candidates, improving their eligibility for transplantation and potentially enhancing post-transplant outcomes. Future research should focus on comparative effectiveness studies to guide clinical decision-making and optimize patient care in this challenging clinical scenario.

Right Ventricular Assist Device Placement During Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Is Associated With Improved Survival

Right ventricular failure (RVF) is a significant cause of mortality in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. Although right ventricular assist devices (RVADs) can treat RVF in the perioperative LVAD period, liberal employment before RVF is not well established. We therefore compared the survival outcomes between proactive RVAD placement at the time of LVAD implantation with a bailout strategy in patients with RVF. Retrospectively, 75 adult patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation at our institution and had an RVAD placed proactively before LVAD implantation or as a bailout strategy postoperatively due to hemodynamically unstable RVF were evaluated. Patients treated with a proactive RVAD strategy had lower Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) and a higher proportion of these required temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) preoperatively. Preoperative hemodynamic profiling showed a low pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) score of 1.8 ± 1.4 and 1.6 ± 0.94 ( p = 0.42) in the bailout RVAD and proactive RVAD groups, respectively. Survival at 3, 6, and 12 months post-LVAD implantation was statistically significantly higher in patients who received a proactive RVAD. Thus, proactive RVAD implantation is associated with short- and medium-term survival benefits compared to a bailout strategy in RVF patients undergoing LVAD placement.

Preoperative passive venous pressure-driven cardiac function determines left ventricular assist device outcomes

BACKGROUND

Right heart output in heart failure can be compensated through increasing systemic venous pressure. We determined whether the magnitude of this "passive cardiac output" can predict LVAD outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective review of 383 patients who received a continuous-flow LVAD at the University of Michigan between 2012 and 2021. Pre-LVAD cardiac output driven by venous pressure was determined by dividing right atrial pressure by mean pulmonary artery pressure, multiplied by total cardiac output. Normalization to body surface area led to the passive cardiac index (PasCI). The Youden J statistic was used to identify the PasCI threshold, which predicted LVAD death by 2 years.

RESULTS

Increased preoperative PasCI was associated with reduced survival (hazard ratio [HR], 2.27; P < .01), and increased risk of right ventricular failure (RVF) (HR, 3.46; P = .04). Youden analysis showed that a preoperative PasCI ≥0.5 (n = 226) predicted LVAD death (P = .10). Patients with PasCI ≥0.5 had poorer survival (P = .02), with a trend toward more heart failure readmission days (mean, 45.09 ± 67.64 vs 35.13 ± 45.02 days; P = .084) and increased gastrointestinal bleeding (29.2% vs 20.4%; P = .052). Additionally, of the 97 patients who experienced readmissions for heart failure, those with pre-LVAD implantation PasCI ≥0.5 were more likely to have more than 1 readmission (P = .05).

CONCLUSIONS

Although right heart output can be augmented by raising venous pressure, this negatively impacts end-organ function and increases heart failure readmission days. Patients with a pre-LVAD PasCI ≥0.5 have worse post-LVAD survival and increased RVF. Using the PasCI metric in isolation or incorporated into a predictive model may improve the management of LVAD candidates with RV dysfunction.

Quantitative Evaluation of Right Ventricular Workload Based on the Stroke Work Index in Patients after Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction

The evaluation of right ventricular workload is sometimes complicated in patients after right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction (RVOTR) because both stenotic and regurgitation lesions are involved. In this study, we modified the right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI) and evaluated the relationship between the modified RVSWI (mRVSWI) and patient prognosis after RVOTR.We enrolled 69 patients who underwent RVOTR (the RVOTR group), including those who needed early reoperation (early reoperation subgroup) and those who did not (follow-up subgroup), and 13 age-matched control participants (control group). Based on the catheterization results 1 year after RVOTR, we compared the mRVSWI between these groups. Additionally, we evaluated the influence of the mRVSWI on the reoperation avoidance rate and survival.The mRVSWI in the RVOTR group was significantly greater than that in the control group (17.7 ± 8.6 vs. 11.0 ± 2.7 g·m/m2, p = 0.008). The mRVSWI in the early reoperation subgroup was significantly greater than that in the follow-up subgroup (32.5 ± 11.1 vs. 15.8 ± 6.0 g·m/m2, p < 0.0001). In the follow-up subgroup, patients with an mRVSWI higher than the upper limit of normal (16.4 g·m/m2) had a greater rate of reoperation than did the other patients (p = 0.0013). One patient died suddenly, and her mRVSWI was consistently high throughout her life.We established the mRVSWI as an index that integrates the pressure and volume load on the right ventricle. Our results indicate the utility of the mRVSWI for predicting patient prognosis after RVOTR.

LVAD as a Bridge to Transplantation-Current Status and Future Perspectives

Heart failure (HF) is a common disease associated with high morbidity and mortality rates despite advanced pharmacological therapies. Heart transplantation remains the gold standard therapy for end-stage heart failure; however, its application is curtailed by the persistent shortage of donor organs. Over the past two decades, mechanical circulatory support, notably Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs), have been established as an option for patients waiting for a donor organ. This comprehensive review focuses on elucidating the benefits and barriers associated with this application. We provide an overview of landmark clinical trials that have evaluated the use of LVADs as a bridge to transplantation therapy, with a particular focus on post-transplant outcomes. We discuss the benefits of stabilizing patients with these systems, weighing associated complications and limitations. Further technical advancements and research on optimal implantation timing are critical to ultimately improve outcomes and securing quality of life. In a world where the availability of donor organs remains constrained, LVADs are an increasingly important piece of patient care, bridging the critical gap to transplantation in advanced heart failure management.

Epidemiology of perioperative RV dysfunction: risk factors, incidence, and clinical implications

In this edition of the journal, the Perioperative Quality Initiative (POQI) present three manuscripts describing the physiology, assessment, and management of right ventricular dysfunction (RVD) as pertains to the perioperative setting. This narrative review seeks to provide context for these manuscripts, discussing the epidemiology of perioperative RVD focussing on definition, risk factors, and clinical implications. Throughout the perioperative period, there are many potential risk factors/insults predisposing to perioperative RVD including pre-existing RVD, fluid overload, myocardial ischaemia, pulmonary embolism, lung injury, mechanical ventilation, hypoxia and hypercarbia, lung resection, medullary reaming and cement implantation, cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass, heart and lung transplantation, and left ventricular assist device implantation. There has however been little systematic attempt to quantify the incidence of perioperative RVD. What limited data exists has assessed perioperative RVD using echocardiography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and pulmonary artery catheterisation but is beset by challenges resulting from the inconsistencies in RVD definitions. Alongside differences in patient and surgical risk profile, this leads to wide variation in the incidence estimate. Data concerning the clinical implications of perioperative RVD is even more scarce, though there is evidence to suggest RVD is associated with atrial arrhythmias and prolonged length of critical care stay following thoracic surgery, increased need for inotropic support in revision orthopaedic surgery, and increased critical care requirement and mortality following cardiac surgery. Acute manifestations of RVD result from low cardiac output or systemic venous congestion, which are non-specific to the diagnosis of RVD. As such, RVD is easily overlooked, and the relative contribution of RV dysfunction to postoperative morbidity is likely to be underestimated.We applaud the POQI group for highlighting this important condition. There is undoubtedly a need for further study of the RV in the perioperative period in addition to solutions for perioperative risk prediction and management strategies. There is much to understand, study, and trial in this area, but importantly for our patients, we are increasingly recognising the importance of these uncertainties.

Artificial Intelligence Approaches for Predicting the Risks of Durable Mechanical Circulatory Support Therapy and Cardiac Transplantation

Background: The use of AI-driven technologies in probing big data to generate better risk prediction models has been an ongoing and expanding area of investigation. The AI-driven models may perform better as compared to linear models; however, more investigations are needed in this area to refine their predictability and applicability to the field of durable MCS and cardiac transplantation. Methods: A literature review was carried out using Google Scholar/PubMed from 2000 to 2023. Results: This review defines the knowledge gaps and describes different AI-driven approaches that may be used to further our understanding. Conclusions: The limitations of current models are due to missing data, data imbalances, and the uneven distribution of variables in the datasets from which the models are derived. There is an urgent need for predictive models that can integrate a large number of clinical variables from multicenter data to account for the variability in patient characteristics that influence patient selection, outcomes, and survival for both durable MCS and HT; this may be fulfilled by AI-driven risk prediction models.

Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Right Ventricular Failure Post Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: An INTERMACS Analysis

Right heart failure (RHF) management after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation includes inotropes, right ventricular mechanical support, and heart transplantation. The purpose of this study is to compare different RHF treatment strategies in patients with a magnetically levitated centrifugal LVAD. A total of 6,632 Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support (INTERMACS) patients from 2013 to 2020 were included. Of which, 769 (69.6%) patients (group 1) were supported with inotropes (≥14 days post-LVAD implantation), 233 (21.1%) patients (group 2) were supported with temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) that was implanted during LVAD implant, 77 (7.0%) patients (group 3) with durable centrifugal RVAD implanted during the LVAD implant, and 26 (2.4%) patients (group 4) were supported with RVAD (temporary or permanent), which was implanted at a later stage. Groups 1 and 4 had higher survival rates in comparison with group 2 (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.513, 95% confidence intervals [CIs] = 0.402-0.655, p < 0.001, versus group 1) and group 3 (HR = 0.461, 95% CIs = 0.320-0.666, p < 0.001, versus group 1). Patients in group 3 showed higher heart transplantation rates at 12 and 36 months as compared with group 1 (40.4% and 46.6% vs. 21.9% and 37.4%, respectively), group 2 (40.4% and 46.6% vs. 25.8% and 39.3%, respectively), and group 4 (40.4% and 46.6% vs. 3.8% and 12.0%, respectively). Severe RHF post-LVAD is associated with poor survival. Patients with LVAD who during the perioperative period are in need of right ventricular temporary or durable mechanical circulatory support constitute a group at particular risk. Improvement of devices tailored for right ventricular support is mandatory for further evolution of the field.

Right ventricular dysfunction in left ventricular assist device candidates: is it time to change our prospective?

The use of left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) has significantly increased in the last years, trying to offer a therapeutic alternative to heart transplantation, in light also to the significant heart donor shortage compared to the growing advanced heart failure population. Despite technological improvements in the devices, LVAD-related mortality is still fairly high, with right heart failure being one of the predominant predictors. Therefore, many efforts have been made toward a thorough right ventricular (RV) evaluation prior to LVAD implant, considering clinical, laboratory, echocardiographic, and invasive hemodynamic parameters. However, there is high heterogeneity regarding both which predictor is the strongest as well as the relative cut-off values, and a consensus has not been reached yet, increasing the risk of facing patients in which the distinction between good or poor RV function cannot be surely reached. In parallel, due to technological development and availability of mechanical circulatory support of the RV, LVADs are being considered even in patients with suboptimal RV function. The aim of our review is to analyze the current evidence regarding the role of RV function prior to LVAD and its evaluation, pointing out the extreme variability in parameters that are currently assessed and future prospective regarding new diagnostic tools. Finally, we attempt to gather the available information on the therapeutic strategies to use in the peri-operative phase, in order to reduce the incidence of RV failure, especially in patients in which the preoperative evaluation highlighted some conflicting results with regard to ventricular function.

Right heart failure after durable left ventricular assist device implantation

INTRODUCTION

Right heart failure (RHF) is a well-known complication after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and portends increased morbidity and mortality. Understanding the mechanisms and predictors of RHF in this clinical setting may offer ideas for early identification and aggressive management to minimize poor outcomes. A variety of medical therapies and mechanical circulatory support options are currently available for the management of post-LVAD RHF.

AREAS COVERED

We reviewed the existing definitions of RHF including its potential mechanisms in the context of durable LVAD implantation and currently available medical and device therapies. We performed a literature search using PubMed (from 2010 to 2023).

EXPERT OPINION

RHF remains a common complication after LVAD implantation. However, existing knowledge gaps limit clinicians' ability to adequately address its consequences. Early identification and management are crucial to reducing the risk of poor outcomes, but existing risk stratification tools perform poorly and have limited clinical applicability. This is an area ripe for investigation with the potential for major improvements in identification and targeted therapy in an effort to improve outcomes.

Machine Learning Multicenter Risk Model to Predict Right Ventricular Failure After Mechanical Circulatory Support: The STOP-RVF Score

Importance

The existing models predicting right ventricular failure (RVF) after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) support might be limited, partly due to lack of external validation, marginal predictive power, and absence of intraoperative characteristics.

Objective

To derive and validate a risk model to predict RVF after LVAD implantation.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This was a hybrid prospective-retrospective multicenter cohort study conducted from April 2008 to July 2019 of patients with advanced heart failure (HF) requiring continuous-flow LVAD. The derivation cohort included patients enrolled at 5 institutions. The external validation cohort included patients enrolled at a sixth institution within the same period. Study data were analyzed October 2022 to August 2023.

Exposures

Study participants underwent chronic continuous-flow LVAD support.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary outcome was RVF incidence, defined as the need for RV assist device or intravenous inotropes for greater than 14 days. Bootstrap imputation and adaptive least absolute shrinkage and selection operator variable selection techniques were used to derive a predictive model. An RVF risk calculator (STOP-RVF) was then developed and subsequently externally validated, which can provide personalized quantification of the risk for LVAD candidates. Its predictive accuracy was compared with previously published RVF scores.

Results

The derivation cohort included 798 patients (mean [SE] age, 56.1 [13.2] years; 668 male [83.7%]). The external validation cohort included 327 patients. RVF developed in 193 of 798 patients (24.2%) in the derivation cohort and 107 of 327 patients (32.7%) in the validation cohort. Preimplant variables associated with postoperative RVF included nonischemic cardiomyopathy, intra-aortic balloon pump, microaxial percutaneous left ventricular assist device/venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, LVAD configuration, Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support profiles 1 to 2, right atrial/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure ratio, use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, platelet count, and serum sodium, albumin, and creatinine levels. Inclusion of intraoperative characteristics did not improve model performance. The calculator achieved a C statistic of 0.75 (95% CI, 0.71-0.79) in the derivation cohort and 0.73 (95% CI, 0.67-0.80) in the validation cohort. Cumulative survival was higher in patients composing the low-risk group (estimated <20% RVF risk) compared with those in the higher-risk groups. The STOP-RVF risk calculator exhibited a significantly better performance than commonly used risk scores proposed by Kormos et al (C statistic, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.53-0.63) and Drakos et al (C statistic, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.57-0.67).

Conclusions and Relevance

Implementing routine clinical data, this multicenter cohort study derived and validated the STOP-RVF calculator as a personalized risk assessment tool for the prediction of RVF and RVF-associated all-cause mortality.

Durability of Tricuspid Valve Repair in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Objectives: Benefits of tricuspid valve repair (TVR) in left ventricular assist device (LVAD) patients have been questioned. High TVR failure rates have been reported. Remaining or recurring TR was found to be a risk factor for right heart failure (RHF). Therefore, we assessed our experience. Methods: Since 12/2010, 195 patients have undergone LVAD implantation in our center. Almost half (n = 94, 48%) received concomitant TVR (LVAD+TVR). These patients were included in our analysis. Echocardiographic and clinical data were assessed. Median follow-up was 2.8 years (7 days-0.6 years). Results were correlated with clinical outcomes. Results: LVAD+TVR patients were 59.8 ± 11.4 years old (89.4% male) and 37.3% were INTERMACS level 1 and 2. Preoperative TR was moderate in 28 and severe in 66 patients. RV function was severely impaired in 61 patients reflected by TAPSE-values of 11.2 ± 2.9 mm (vs. 15.7 ± 3.8 mm in n = 33; p < 0.001). Risk for RHF according to EUROMACS-RHF risk score was high (>4 points) in 60 patients, intermediate (>2-4 points) in 19 and low (0-2 points) in 15. RHF occurred in four patients (4.3%). Mean duration of echocardiographic follow-up was 2.8 ± 2.3 years. None of the patients presented with severe and only five (5.3%) with moderate TR. The vast majority (n = 63) had mild TR, and 26 patients had no/trace TR. Survival at 1, 3 and 5 years was 77.4%, 68.1% and 55.6%, 30-day mortality was 11.7% (n = 11). Heart transplantation was performed in 12 patients (12.8%). Conclusions: Contrary to expectations, concomitant TVR during LVAD implantation may result in excellent repair durability, which appears to be associated with low risk for RHF.

Advanced Heart Failure: Therapeutic Options and Challenges in the Evolving Field of Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Heart Failure is a chronic and progressively deteriorating syndrome that has reached epidemic proportions worldwide. Improved outcomes have been achieved with novel drugs and devices. However, the number of patients refractory to conventional medical therapy is growing. These advanced heart failure patients suffer from severe symptoms and frequent hospitalizations and have a dismal prognosis, with a significant socioeconomic burden in health care systems. Patients in this group may be eligible for advanced heart failure therapies, including heart transplantation and chronic mechanical circulatory support with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Heart transplantation remains the treatment of choice for eligible candidates, but the number of transplants worldwide has reached a plateau and is limited by the shortage of donor organs and prolonged wait times. Therefore, LVADs have emerged as an effective and durable form of therapy, and they are currently being used as a bridge to heart transplant, destination lifetime therapy, and cardiac recovery in selected patients. Although this field is evolving rapidly, LVADs are not free of complications, making appropriate patient selection and management by experienced centers imperative for successful therapy. Here, we review current LVAD technology, indications for durable MCS therapy, and strategies for timely referral to advanced heart failure centers before irreversible end-organ abnormalities.

Monitoring of the right ventricular responses to pressure overload: prognostic value and usefulness of echocardiography for clinical decision-making

Regardless of whether pulmonary hypertension (PH) results from increased pulmonary venous pressure in left-sided heart diseases or from vascular remodeling and/or obstructions in pre-capillary pulmonary vessels, overload-induced right ventricular (RV) dysfunction and its final transition into right-sided heart failure is a major cause of death in PH patients. Being particularly suited for non-invasive monitoring of the right-sided heart, echocardiography has become a useful tool for optimizing the therapeutic decision-making and evaluation of therapy results in PH. The review provides an updated overview on the pathophysiological insights of heart-lung interactions in PH of different etiology, as well as on the diagnostic and prognostic value of echocardiography for monitoring RV responses to pressure overload. The article focuses particularly on the usefulness of echocardiography for predicting life-threatening aggravation of RV dysfunction in transplant candidates with precapillary PH, as well as for preoperative prediction of post-operative RV failure in patients with primary end-stage left ventricular (LV) failure necessitating heart transplantation or a LV assist device implantation. In transplant candidates with refractory pulmonary arterial hypertension, a timely prediction of impending RV decompensation can contribute to reduce both the mortality risk on the transplant list and the early post-transplant complications caused by severe RV dysfunction, and also to avoid combined heart-lung transplantation. The review also focuses on the usefulness of echocardiography for monitoring the right-sided heart in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome, particularly in those with refractory respiratory failure requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. Given the pathophysiologic particularity of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) infection to be associated with a high incidence of thrombotic microangiopathy-induced increase in the pulmonary resistance, echocardiography can improve the selection of temporary mechanical cardio-respiratory support strategies and can therefore contribute to the reduction of mortality rates. On the whole, the review aims to provide a theoretical and practical basis for those who are or intend in the future to be engaged in this highly demanding field.

Dynamic load modulation predicts right heart tolerance of left ventricular cardiovascular assist in a porcine model of cardiogenic shock

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) offer mechanical support for patients with cardiogenic shock by unloading the impaired ventricle and increasing cardiac outflow and subsequent tissue perfusion. Their ability to adjust ventricular assistance allows for rapid and safe dynamic changes in cardiac load, which can be used with direct measures of chamber pressures to quantify cardiac pathophysiologic state, predict response to interventions, and unmask vulnerabilities such as limitations of left-sided support efficacy due to intolerance of the right heart. We defined hemodynamic metrics in five pigs with dynamic peripheral transvalvular VAD (pVAD) support to the left ventricle. Metrics were obtained across a spectrum of disease states, including left ventricular ischemia induced by titrated microembolization of a coronary artery and right ventricular strain induced by titrated microembolization of the pulmonary arteries. A sweep of different pVAD speeds confirmed mechanisms of right heart decompensation after left-sided support and revealed intolerance. In contrast to the systemic circulation, pulmonary vascular compliance dominated in the right heart and defined the ability of the right heart to adapt to left-sided pVAD unloading. We developed a clinically accessible metric to measure pulmonary vascular compliance at different pVAD speeds that could predict right heart efficiency and tolerance to left-sided pVAD support. Findings in swine were validated with retrospective hemodynamic data from eight patients on pVAD support. This methodology and metric could be used to track right heart tolerance, predict decompensation before right heart failure, and guide titration of device speed and the need for biventricular support.

The Association of the Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index and Right Ventricular Function after Cardiac Surgery

Background

The pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) has been shown to correlate with right ventricular (RV) failure in patients with cardiac disease. However, the association of PAPi with right ventricular function following cardiac surgery is not yet established.

Methods

PAPi and other hemodynamic variables were obtained postoperatively for 959 adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery. The association of post-bypass right ventricular function and other clinical factors to PAPi was evaluated using linear regression. A propensity-score matched cohort for PAPi ≥ 2.00 was used to assess the association of PAPi with postoperative outcomes.

Results

156 patients (16.3%) had post-bypass right ventricular dysfunction defined by visualization on transesophageal echocardiography. There was no difference in postoperative PAPi based on right ventricular function (2.12 vs. 2.00, p=0.21). In our matched cohort (n = 636), PAPi < 2.00 was associated with increased incidence of acute kidney injury (23.0% vs 13.2%, p < 0.01) and ventilator time (6.0 hours vs 5.6 hours, p=0.04) but not with 30-day mortality or intensive care unit length of stay.

Conclusion

In a general cohort of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, postoperative PAPi was not associated with postcardiopulmonary bypass right ventricular dysfunction. A postoperative PAPi < 2 may be associated with acute kidney injury.

The Role of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in the Prediction of Right Heart Failure after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Comprehensive Review

One of the most challenging and prevalent side effects of LVAD implantation is that of right heart failure (RHF) that may develop afterwards. The purpose of this study is to review and highlight recent advances in the uses of AI in evaluating RHF after LVAD implantation. The available literature was scanned using certain key words (artificial intelligence, machine learning, left ventricular assist device, prediction of right heart failure after LVAD) was scanned within Pubmed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Conventional risk scoring systems were also summarized, with their pros and cons being included in the results section of this study in order to provide a useful contrast with AI-based models. There are certain interesting and innovative ML approaches towards RHF prediction among the studies reviewed as well as more straightforward approaches that identified certain important predictive clinical parameters. Despite their accomplishments, the resulting AUC scores were far from ideal for these methods to be considered fully sufficient. The reasons for this include the low number of studies, standardized data availability, and lack of prospective studies. Another topic briefly discussed in this study is that relating to the ethical and legal considerations of using AI-based systems in healthcare. In the end, we believe that it would be beneficial for clinicians to not ignore these developments despite the current research indicating more time is needed for AI-based prediction models to achieve a better performance.

Pulmonary Vascular Resistance to Predict Right Heart Failure in Patients Undergoing Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Right heart failure (RHF) is associated with poor outcomes, especially in patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. The aim of this study was to identify predictors of RHF after LVAD implantation. Of 129 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 11 years, 89% male) undergoing LVAD implantation, 34 developed RHF. Compared to patients without RHF, those with RHF required longer invasive mechanical ventilation and had longer intensive care unit and hospital stays (p < 0.01). One-year all-cause mortality was significantly higher in patients with versus without RHF after LVAD implantation (29.4% vs. 1.2%; hazard ratio 35.4; 95% confidence interval 4.5-277; p < 0.001). Mortality was highest in patients with delayed RHF after initial LVAD-only implantation (66.7%). Patients who did versus did not develop RHF had significantly higher baseline pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR; 404 ± 375 vs. 234 ± 162 dyn/s/cm5; p = 0.01). PVR > 250 dyn/s/cm5 was a significant predictor of survival in patients with RHF after LVAD implantation. These data confirm the negative impact of RHF on morbidity and mortality after LVAD implantation. Preoperative PVR > 250 dyn/s/cm5 determined using invasive right heart catheterization was an independent predictor of developing RHF after LVAD implantation, and of subsequent mortality, and could be used for risk stratification in the setting for deciding between single or biventricular support strategy.

Postoperative Pulmonary Artery Pulsatility Index Improves Prediction of Right Ventricular Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

OBJECTIVES

This study evaluated whether the postoperative pulmonary artery pulsatility index (PAPi) is associated with postoperative right ventricular dysfunction after durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective observational cohort study.

SETTING

The University of Kansas Medical Center, a tertiary-care academic medical center.

PARTICIPANTS

Sixty-seven adult patients who underwent durable LVAD implantation between 2017 and 2019.

INTERVENTIONS

All patients underwent open cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass under general anesthesia with pulmonary artery catheter insertion.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Clinical and hemodynamic data were collected before and after surgery. The Michigan right ventricular failure risk score and the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support score were calculated for each patient. The primary outcome was right ventricular failure, defined as a composite of right ventricular mechanical circulatory support, inhaled pulmonary vasodilator therapy for 48 hours or greater, or inotrope use for 14 days or greater or at discharge. Thirty percent of this cohort (n = 20) met the primary outcome. Preoperative transpulmonary gradient (odds ratio [OR] 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.28), cardiac index (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.71-0.98), and postoperative PAPi (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75-0.97) were the only hemodynamic variables associated with the primary outcome. The addition of postoperative PAPi was associated with improvement in the predictive model performance of the Michigan score (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve 0.73 v 0.56, p = 0.03). An optimal cutoff point for postoperative PAPi of 1.56 was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The inclusion of postoperative PAPi offers more robust predictive power for right ventricular failure in patients undergoing durable LVAD implantation, compared with the use of existing risk scores alone.

Right ventricular myocardial work for the prediction of early right heart failure and long-term mortality after left ventricular assist device implant

AIMS

Right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implant is burdened by high morbidity and mortality rates and should be prevented by appropriate patient selection. Adequate right ventricular function is of paramount importance but its assessment is complex and cannot disregard afterload. Myocardial work (MW) is a non-invasive Speckle Tracking Echocardiography-derived method to estimate pressure-volume loops. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of right ventricular myocardial work to predict RHF and long-term mortality after LVAD implant.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Consecutive patients from May 2017 to February 2022 undergoing LVAD implant were retrospectively reviewed. Patients without a useful echocardiographic exam prior to LVAD implant were excluded. MW analysis was performed. The primary endpoints were early RHF (<30 days from LVAD implant) and death at latest available follow-up. We included 23 patients (mean age 64 ± 8 years, 91% men). Median follow-up was 339 days (IQR: 30-1143). Early RHF occurred in six patients (26%). A lower right ventricular global work efficiency [RVGWE, OR 0.86, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 0.76-0.97, P = 0.014] was associated with the occurrence of early RHF. Among MW indices, the performance for early RHF prediction was greatest for RVGWE [area under the curve (AUC) 0.92] and a cut-off of 77% had a 100% sensitivity and 82% specificity. At long-term follow-up, death occurred in 4 of 14 patients (28.6%) in the RVGWE > 77% group and in 6 of 9 patients (66.7%) in the RVGWE < 77% group (HR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07-0.90, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

RVGWE was a predictor of early RHF after LVAD implant and brought prognostic value in terms of long-term mortality.

Perioperative Right Ventricular Dysfunction and Abnormalities of the Tricuspid Valve Apparatus in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery

Right ventricular (RV) dysfunction frequently occurs after cardiac surgery and is linked to adverse postoperative outcomes, including mortality, reintubation, stroke, and prolonged ICU stays. While various criteria using echocardiography and hemodynamic parameters have been proposed, a consensus remains elusive. Distinctive RV anatomical features include its thin wall, which presents a triangular shape in a lateral view and a crescent shape in a cross-sectional view. Principal causes of RV dysfunction after cardiac surgery encompass ischemic reperfusion injury, prolonged ischemic time, choice of cardioplegia and its administration, cardiopulmonary bypass weaning characteristics, and preoperative risk factors. Post-left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation RV dysfunction is common but often transient, with a favorable prognosis upon resolution. There is an ongoing debate regarding the benefits of concomitant surgical repair of the RV in the presence of regurgitation. According to the literature, the gold standard techniques for assessing RV function are cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and hemodynamic assessment using thermodilution. Echocardiography is widely favored for perioperative RV function evaluation due to its accessibility, reproducibility, non-invasiveness, and cost-effectiveness. Although other techniques exist for RV function assessment, they are less common in clinical practice. Clinical management strategies focus on early detection and include intravenous drugs (inotropes and vasodilators), inhalation drugs (pulmonary vasodilators), ventilator strategies, volume management, and mechanical support. Bridging research gaps in this field is crucial to improving clinical outcomes associated with RV dysfunction in the near future.

Use and Implications of Echocardiography in the Hemodynamic Assessment of Cardiogenic Shock

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a complex multisystem syndrome due to pump failure, associated with high mortality and morbidity. Its hemodynamic characterization is key to the diagnostic algorithm and management. Pulmonary artery catheterization is the gold standard for the left and right hemodynamic evaluation, but some concerns exist for invasivity and untoward mechanical and infective complications. Transthoracic echocardiography is a robust noninvasive diagnostic tool for hemodynamic multiparametric assessment that well applies to the management of CS. Its applications expand from etiology definition to the choice of therapeutic intervention and their monitoring. The present review aims at detailing the role of ultrasounds in CS emphasizing the clinical implications of combining cardiac and non-cardiac ultrasounds examinations that may correlate with prognosis.

Cardiological Challenges Related to Long-Term Mechanical Circulatory Support for Advanced Heart Failure in Patients with Chronic Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Long-term mechanical circulatory support by a left ventricular assist device (LVAD), with or without an additional temporary or long-term right ventricular (RV) support, is a life-saving therapy for advanced heart failure (HF) refractory to pharmacological treatment, as well as for both device and surgical optimization therapies. In patients with chronic non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), timely prediction of HF's transition into its end stage, necessitating life-saving heart transplantation or long-term VAD support (as a bridge-to-transplantation or destination therapy), remains particularly challenging, given the wide range of possible etiologies, pathophysiological features, and clinical presentations of NICM. Decision-making between the necessity of an LVAD or a biventricular assist device (BVAD) is crucial because both unnecessary use of a BVAD and irreversible right ventricular (RV) failure after LVAD implantation can seriously impair patient outcomes. The pre-operative or, at the latest, intraoperative prediction of RV function after LVAD implantation is reliably possible, but necessitates integrative evaluations of many different echocardiographic, hemodynamic, clinical, and laboratory parameters. VADs create favorable conditions for the reversal of structural and functional cardiac alterations not only in acute forms of HF, but also in chronic HF. Although full cardiac recovery is rather unusual in VAD recipients with pre-implant chronic HF, the search for myocardial reverse remodelling and functional improvement is worthwhile because, for sufficiently recovered patients, weaning from VADs has proved to be feasible and capable of providing survival benefits and better quality of life even if recovery remains incomplete. This review article aimed to provide an updated theoretical and practical background for those engaged in this highly demanding and still current topic due to the continuous technical progress in the optimization of long-term VADs, as well as due to the new challenges which have emerged in conjunction with the proof of a possible myocardial recovery during long-term ventricular support up to levels which allow successful device explantation.

Successful echocardiography-guided medical management of severe early post-implant right ventricular failure in a patient with left ventricular assist device support: a case report

BACKGROUND

Post-implant right heart failure (RHF) has been recognized as a crucial prognostic factor in patients receiving left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), and its management has long attracted attention from cardiologists and surgeons.

CASE PRESENTATION

This report described an 18-year-old female with acutely deteriorating heart failure due to dilated cardiomyopathy who underwent paracorporeal pulsatile-flow LVAD and developed early post-implant RHF. At postoperative day (POD) six, she was almost asymptomatic at rest on 2.5 mg/kg/min of dobutamine; however, the echocardiogram, performed as part of the daily postoperative care, revealed a severely enlarged right ventricle with a decompressed left ventricle, implying the development of post-implant RHF. Bolus infusion of saline and reduction of pump flow (6.0 L/min to 3.0 L/min) led to normalization of both ventricular shapes in 30 s, suggesting that RHF could be managed without surgical interventions. Milrinone was started on POD six, followed by sildenafil administration on POD seven. Fluid balance was strictly adjusted under the close observation of daily echocardiograms. Milrinone and dobutamine were discontinued on PODs 18 and 21, respectively. The patient was listed for a heart transplant on POD 40. Despite reduced right ventricular function (right ventricular stroke work index of 182.34 mmHg*ml/m- 2, body surface area 1.5 m2), she was successfully converted to implantable LVAD on POD 44 with no recurrence of post-implant RHF thereafter for four years.

CONCLUSIONS

In post-implant RHF management, early detection, together with proper and prompt medical management, is crucial to avoiding any surgical intervention. Close observation of daily echocardiograms might be helpful in detecting subclinical RHF and is useful for post-implant medical management.

Prognostic Value of the AST/ALT Ratio versus Bilirubin in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock

This study investigates the prognostic value of the aspartate-to-alanine aminotransferase ratio (i.e., AST/ALT ratio) and bilirubin in patients with cardiogenic shock (CS). Despite ongoing improvements regarding the treatment of CS patients, invasive care unit (ICU) mortality in CS patients remains unacceptably high. Limited data regarding the prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio and bilirubin in patients suffering from CS is available. The authors hypothesize the measurement of liver enzymes during the course of CS may be an easy and feasible method to assess right-heart dysfunction and prognosis in patients with CS. Consecutive patients with CS from 2019 to 2021 were included. Blood samples were retrieved from the day of disease onset (day 1), days 2, 3, 4 and 8. The prognostic value of the AST/ALT ratio and bilirubin was tested for 30-day all-cause mortality. Statistical analyses included univariable t-tests, Spearman's correlations, Kaplan-Meier analyses, as well as multivariable Cox proportional regression analyses. A total of 157 CS patients were included, with an overall rate of all-cause mortality at 30 days of 51%. The median AST/ALT ratio on day 1 was 1.4, and the median bilirubin was 0.63 mg/dL. No association of the baseline AST/ALT ratio (HR = 1.005; 95% CI 0.649-1.558; p = 0.981) and bilirubin (HR = 1.320; 95% CI 0.834-2.090; p = 0.236) with the risk of 30-day all-cause mortality was found. In contrast, the AST/ALT ratio on day 4 was associated with the risk of 30-day all-cause mortality (HR = 2.826; 95% CI 1.227-6.510; p = 0.015), which was still evident after the multivariable adjustment (HR = 2.830; 95% CI 1.054-7.690; p = 0.039). The AST/ALT ratio during the course of ICU hospitalization from day 4-but not the baseline AST/ALT ratio and bilirubin-was associated with an increased risk of 30-day all-cause mortality in CS patients.

Timing and Outcomes of Concurrent and Sequential Biventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs Analysis

BACKGROUND

Biventricular heart failure remains a clinically challenging condition to manage. Available literature describing the use of durable biventricular assist device (BiVAD) support has numerous limitations hindering the development of useful treatment algorithms. Analysis of BiVAD use within a large multicenter data set is needed to clarify outcomes associated with this therapy.

METHODS

The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Intermacs database was queried to identify adults aged ≥18 years who received durable circulatory support from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2220. The data set was divided into the following cohorts: (1) left ventricular assist device (LVAD) only (n = 27,325), (2) LVAD and concurrent right ventricular assist device (RVAD) (n = 1090), and (3) LVAD and sequential RVAD (n = 556). Propensity score matching was used to compare 1-year mortality and adverse events between concurrent (n = 565) and sequential BiVADs (n = 565).

RESULTS

Overall survival within 1 year was significantly worse for the BiVAD cohort compared with the LVAD-only cohort (12-month survival: 50.8% vs 82.6%; log-rank P < .001). In a propensity-matched cohort, patients implanted with a BiVAD concurrently had an improved survival compared with those implanted an LVAD and an RVAD sequentially (12-month survival: 55.8% vs 41.8%; log-rank P < .001). Early (<3 months) adverse event rates were higher among patients receiving sequential BiVADs for bleeding, infection, neurologic dysfunction, and renal dysfunction (P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

After matching for patient and disease characteristics, patients with sequential BiVAD implantation have worse outcomes than patients with concurrent BiVAD implantation.

Right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation: a persistent problem

Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) is an option for bridge-to-transplant or destination therapy for patients with end-stage heart failure. Right heart failure (RHF) remains a complication after LVAD implantation that portends high morbidity and mortality, despite advances in LVAD technology. Definitions of RHF vary, but generally include the need for inotropic or pulmonary vasodilator support, or potential right ventricular (RV) mechanical circulatory support. This review covers the complex pathophysiology of RHF related to underlying myocardial dysfunction, interventricular dependence, and RV afterload, as well as treatment strategies to curtail this challenging problem.

Prospective Phenotyping of Right Ventricle Function Following Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Counterpulsation in Left Ventricular Assist Device Candidates: Outcomes and Predictors of Response

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) may be applied to optimize advanced heart failure (AHF) patients and improve right ventricular (RV) function before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We aimed to evaluate the outcome of this intervention and define RV response predictors. Decompensated AHF patients, not eligible for LVAD because of poor RV function, who required IABP for stabilization were enrolled. Echocardiography and invasive hemodynamics were serially applied to determine fulfillment of prespecified "LVAD eligibility RV function" criteria (right atrium pressure [RA] <12 mm Hg, pulmonary artery pulsatility index [PAPi] >2.00, RA/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure [PCWP] <0.67, RV strain <-14.0%). Right ventricular-free wall tissue was harvested to assess interstitial fibrosis. Eighteen patients (12 male), aged 38 ± 14 years were supported with IABP for 55 ± 51 (3-180) days. In 11 (61.1%), RV improved and fulfilled the prespecified criteria, while seven (38.9%) showed no substantial improvement. Histopathology revealed an inverse correlation between RV interstitial fibrosis and functional benefit following IABP: interstitial fibrosis correlated with post-IABP RA ( r = 0.63, p = 0.037), RA/PCWP ( r = 0.87, p = 0.001), PAPi ( r = -0.83, p = 0.003). Conclusively, IABP improves RV function in certain AHF patients facilitating successful LVAD implantation. Right ventricular interstitial fibrosis quantification may be applied to predict response and guide preoperative patient selection and optimization. http://links.lww.com/ASAIO/A995.

Blood flow kinetic energy is a novel marker for right ventricular global systolic function in patients with left ventricular assist device therapy

Objectives

Right ventricular (RV) failure remains a major concern in heart failure (HF) patients undergoing left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation. We aimed to measure the kinetic energy of blood in the RV outflow tract (KE-RVOT) - a new marker of RV global systolic function. We also aimed to assess the relationship of KE-RVOT to other echocardiographic parameters in all subjects and assess the relationship of KE-RVOT to hemodynamic parameters of RV performance in HF patients.

Methods

Fifty-one subjects were prospectively enrolled into 4 groups (healthy controls, NYHA Class II, NYHA Class IV, LVAD patients) as follows: 11 healthy controls, 32 HF patients (8 NYHA Class II and 24 Class IV), and 8 patients with preexisting LVADs. The 24 Class IV HF patients included 21 pre-LVAD and 3 pre-transplant patients. Echocardiographic parameters of RV function (TAPSE, St', Et', IVA, MPI) and RV outflow color-Doppler images were recorded in all patients. Invasive hemodynamic parameters of RV function were collected in all Class IV HF patients. KE-RVOT was derived from color-Doppler imaging using a vector flow mapping proprietary software. Kruskal-Wallis test was performed for comparison of KE-RVOT in each group. Correlation between KE-RVOT and echocardiographic/hemodynamic parameters was assessed by linear regression analysis. Receiver operating characteristic curves for the ability of KE-RVOT to predict early phase RV failure were generated.

Results

KE-RVOT (median ± IQR) was higher in healthy controls (55.10 [39.70 to 76.43] mW/m) than in the Class II HF group (22.23 [15.41 to 35.58] mW/m, p < 0.005). KE-RVOT was further reduced in the Class IV HF group (9.02 [5.33 to 11.94] mW/m, p < 0.05). KE-RVOT was lower in the LVAD group (25.03 [9.88 to 38.98] mW/m) than the healthy controls group (p < 0.005). KE-RVOT had significant correlation with all echocardiographic parameters and no correlation with invasive hemodynamic parameters. RV failure occurred in 12 patients who underwent LVAD implantation in the Class IV HF group (1 patient was not eligible due to death immediately after the LVAD implantation). KE-RVOT cut-off value for prediction of RV failure was 9.15 mW/m (sensitivity: 0.67, specificity: 0.75, AUC: 0.66).

Conclusions

KE-RVOT, a novel noninvasive measure of RV function, strongly correlates with well-established echocardiographic markers of RV performance. KE-RVOT is the energy generated by RV wall contraction. Therefore, KE-RVOT may reflect global RV function. The utility of KE-RVOT in prediction of RV failure post LVAD implantation requires further study.

Efficacy of levosimendan infusion in patients undergoing a left ventricular assist device implant in a propensity score matched analysis of the EUROMACS registry-the Euro LEVO-LVAD study

OBJECTIVES

Early right-sided heart failure (RHF) was seen in 22% of recipients of a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) in the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS). However, the optimal treatment of post-LVAD RHF is not well known. Levosimendan has proven to be effective in patients with cardiogenic shock and in those with end-stage heart failure. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of levosimendan on post-LVAD RHF and 30-day and 1-year mortality.

METHODS

The EUROMACS Registry was used to identify adults with mainstream continuous-flow LVAD implants who were treated with preoperative levosimendan compared to a propensity matched control cohort.

RESULTS

In total, 3661 patients received mainstream LVAD, of which 399 (11%) were treated with levosimendan pre-LVAD. Patients given levosimendan had a higher EUROMACS RHF score [4 (2- 5.5) vs 2 (2- 4); P < 0.001], received more right ventricular assist devices (RVAD) [32 (8%) vs 178 (5.5%); P = 0.038] and stayed longer in the intensive care unit post-LVAD implant [19 (8-35) vs 11(5-25); P < 0.001]. Yet, there was no significant difference in the rate of RHF, 30-day, or 1-year mortality. Also, in the matched cohort (357 patients taking levosimendan compared to an average of 622 controls across 20 imputations), we found no evidence for a difference in postoperative severe RHF, RVAD implant rate, length of stay in the intensive care unit or 30-day and 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

In this analysis of the EUROMACS registry, we found no evidence for an association between levosimendan and early RHF or death, albeit patients taking levosimendan had much higher risk profiles. For a definitive conclusion, a multicentre, randomized study is warranted.

Associations of right ventricular pulsatile load and cardiac power output to clinical outcomes in heart failure: Difference from systemic circulation

BACKGROUND

Although left ventricular (LV) cardiac power output (CPO) is a powerful prognostic indicator in heart failure (HF), the significance of right ventricular (RV) CPO is unknown. In contrast, RV pulsatile load is a key prognostic marker in HF. We investigated the impact of RV-CPO and pulsatile load on cardiac outcome and the prognostic performance of the combined systemic and pulmonary circulation parameters in HF.

METHODS

Right heart catheterization and echocardiography were performed in 231 HF patients (62 ± 16 years, LV ejection fraction 42 ± 18 %). Invasive and noninvasive CPOs were calculated from mean systemic or pulmonary arterial pressure and cardiac output. LV-CPO was then normalized to LV mass (LV-P/M). Pulmonary arterial capacitance and the ratio of acceleration time to ejection time (AcT/ET) of RV outflow were used as parameters of RV pulsatile load. The primary endpoints, defined as a composite of cardiac death, HF hospitalization, ventricular arrythmia, and LVAD implantation after the examination, were recorded.

RESULTS

Noninvasive CPOs were moderately correlated with invasive ones (LV: ρ = 0.787, RV: ρ = 0.568, and p < 0.001 for both). During a median follow-up period of 441 days, 57 cardiovascular events occurred. Lower LV-P/M and higher RV pulsatile load were associated with cardiovascular events; however, RV-CPO was not associated with the outcome. Echocardiographic LV-P/M and AcT/ET showed significant incremental prognostic value over the clinical parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

RV pulsatile load assessed by AcT/ET may be a predictor of clinical events in HF patients. The combination of echocardiographic LV-P/M and AcT/ET could be a novel noninvasive prognostic indicator in HF patients.

Preoperative Pulmonary Artery-to-Aorta Diameter Ratio as a Predictor of Postoperative Severe Right Ventricular Failure and 1-Year Mortality After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the association of pulmonary artery diameter and pulmonary artery- to-aorta diameter ratio (PA/Ao) with right ventricular failure and mortality within 1 year after left ventricular assist device implantation.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective observational study between March 2013 and July 2019.

SETTING

The study was conducted at a single, quaternary-care academic center.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (≥18 years old) receiving a durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Inclusion if (1) a chest computed tomography scan was performed within 30 days before the LVAD and (2) a right and left heart catheterization was completed within 30 days before the LVAD.

INTERVENTIONS

A left ventricular assist device was used for intervention.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

A total of 176 patients were included in this study. Median PA diameter and PA/Ao ratio were significantly greater in the severe right ventricular failure (RVF) group (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed PA/Ao and RVF as predictors for mortality (area under the curve = 0.725 and 0.933, respectively). Logistic regression analysis-predicted probability gave a PA/Ao ratio cutoff point of 1.04 (p < 0.001). Survival probability was significantly worse in patients with a PA/Ao ratio ≥1.04 (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The PA/Ao ratio is an easily measurable noninvasive indicator that can predict RVF and 1-year mortality after LVAD implantation.

Characteristics and Predictors of Late Right Heart Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation

Late right heart failure (LRHF) following left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation remains poorly characterized and challenging to predict. We performed a multicenter retrospective study of LRHF in 237 consecutive adult LVAD patients, in which LRHF was defined according to the 2020 Mechanical Circulatory Support Academic Research Consortium guidelines. Clinical and hemodynamic variables were assessed pre- and post-implant. Competing-risk regression and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to assess outcomes. LRHF prediction was assessed using multivariable logistic and Cox proportional hazards regression. Among 237 LVAD patients, 45 (19%) developed LRHF at a median of 133 days post-LVAD. LRHF patients had more frequent heart failure hospitalizations ( p < 0.001) alongside other complications. LRHF patients did not experience reduced bridge-to-transplant rates but did suffer increased mortality (hazard ratio 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11-3.42; p = 0.02). Hemodynamically, LRHF patients demonstrated higher right atrial pressure, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR), but no difference in pulmonary arterial wedge pressure. History of early right heart failure, blood urea nitrogen (BUN) > 35 mg/dl at 1 month post-LVAD, and diuretic requirements at 1 month post-LVAD were each significant, independent predictors of LRHF in multivariable analysis. An LRHF prediction risk score incorporating these variables predicted LRHF with excellent discrimination (log-rank p < 0.0001). Overall, LRHF post-LVAD is more common than generally appreciated, with significant morbidity and mortality. Elevated PVR and precapillary pulmonary pressures may play a role. A risk score using early right heart failure, elevated BUN, and diuretic requirements 1 month post implant predicted the development of LRHF.

A novel metrics to predict right heart failure after left ventricular assist device implantation

BACKGROUND

Right Heart Failure (RHF) is a severe complication that can occur after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, increasing early and late mortality. Although numerous RHF predictive scores have been developed, limited data exist on the external validation of these models. We therefore aimed at comparing existent risk score models and identifying predictors of severe RHF at our center.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center analysis, clinical, biological and functional data were collected in patients implanted with a LVAD between 2011 and 2020. Early severe RHF was defined as the use of inotropes for ≥ 14 days, nitric oxide use for ≥ 48 h or unplanned right-sided circulatory support. Risk models were evaluated for the primary outcome of RHF or RVAD implantation by means of logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

Among 92 patients implanted, 24 (26%) developed early severe RHF. The EUROMACS-RHF risk score performed the best in predicting RHF (C = 0.82-95% CI: 0.68-0.90), compared with the other scores (Michigan, CRITT). In addition, we developed a new model, based on four variables selected for the best reduced logistic model: the INTERMACS level, the number of inotropes used, the ratio of right atrial/pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and the ratio of right ventricle/left ventricle diameters by echocardiography. This model demonstrated significant discrimination of RHF (C = 0.9-95% CI: 0.76-0.96).

CONCLUSION

Amongst available risk scores, EUROMACS-RHF performs best to predict the occurrence of RHF after LVAD implantation. Our model's performance compares well to the EUROMACS-RHF score, adding a more objective parameter to RV function evaluation.

Supporting the "forgotten" ventricle: The evolution of percutaneous RVADs

Right heart failure (RHF) can occur as the result of an acute or chronic disease process and is a challenging clinical condition for surgeons and interventionalists to treat. RHF occurs in approximately 0.1% of patients after cardiac surgery, in 2-3% of patients following heart transplantation, and in up to 42% of patients after LVAD implantation. Regardless of the cause, RHF portends high morbidity and mortality and is associated with longer hospital stays and higher healthcare costs. The mainstays of traditional therapy for severe RHF have included pharmacological support, such as inotropes and vasopressors, and surgical right ventricular (RV) assist devices. However, in recent years catheter-based mechanical circulatory support (MCS) strategies have offered novel solutions for addressing RHF without the morbidity of open surgery. This manuscript will review the pathophysiology of RHF, including the molecular underpinnings, gross structural mechanisms, and hemodynamic consequences. The evolution of techniques for supporting the right ventricle will be explored, with a focus on various institutional experiences with percutaneous ventricular assist devices.

Preoperative Computed Tomography Assessment of Risk of Right Ventricle Failure After Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement

Identification of patients who are at a high risk for right ventricular failure (RVF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is of critical importance. Conventional tools for predicting RVF, including two-dimensional echocardiography, right heart catheterization (RHC), and clinical parameters, generally have limited sensitivity and specificity. We retrospectively examined the ability of computed tomography (CT) ventricular volume measures to identify patients who experienced RVF after LVAD implantation. Between September 2017 and November 2021, 92 patients underwent LVAD surgery at our institution. Preoperative CT-derived ventricular volumes were obtained in 20 patients. Patients who underwent CT evaluation had a similar demographics and rate of RVF after LVAD as patients who did not undergo cardiac CT imaging. In the study cohort, seven of 20 (35%) patients experienced RVF (2 unplanned biventricular assist device, 5 prolonged inotropic support). Computed tomography-derived right ventricular end-diastolic and end-systolic volume indices were the strongest predictors of RVF compared with demographic, echocardiographic, and RHC data with areas under the receiver operating curve of 0.79 and 0.76, respectively. Computed tomography volumetric assessment of RV size can be performed in patients evaluated for LVAD treatment. RV measures of size provide a promising means of pre-LVAD assessment for postoperative RV failure.

Concomitant tricuspid valve repair in left ventricular assist device implantation may increase the risk for temporary right ventricular support but does not impact overall outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Tricuspid valve repair in left ventricular assist device implantation continues to pose a challenge and may impact the occurrence of early and late right heart failure. We investigated the effects of concomitant tricuspid repair on clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective, multicentre study enrolled adult patients who received continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices between 2005 and 2017 and compared those who received concomitant tricuspid valve repair to those who did not. Primary outcomes were early right heart failure necessitating temporary ventricular assist devices and right heart failure-related rehospitalizations requiring inotropic or diuretic treatment.

RESULTS

Out of 526 patients who underwent left ventricular assist device implantation, 110 (21%) received a concomitant tricuspid valve repair. Those patients were sicker, and most had moderate or severe tricuspid regurgitation. A significantly higher incidence of temporary right ventricular assist devices was observed in the group with concomitant tricupid valve repair (18% vs. 11%, P = 0.049), with a significantly elevated risk for temporary right heart assist device (sHR 1.68, 95% CI 1.04-2.72; P = 0.037). After adjusting for confounders, no significant differences were found in the incidence of and risk for most clinical outcomes, including right heart failure-related rehospitalizations (P = 0.891) and death (P = 0.563).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant tricuspid valve repair, when deemed necessary in left ventricular assist device implantation, may increase the risk of early right heart failure requiring a temporary right ventricular assist device but does not impact the incidence or risk of death or rehospitalizations due to late right heart failure.