Dipyrone (metamizole) can nullify the antiplatelet effect of aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease

The Multifaceted Effects of Non-Steroidal and Non-Opioid Anti-Inflammatory and Analgesic Drugs on Platelets: Current Knowledge, Limitations, and Future Perspectives

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are among the most widely utilized pharmaceuticals worldwide. Besides their recognized anti-inflammatory effects, these drugs exhibit various other pleiotropic effects in several cells, including platelets. Within this article, the multifaceted properties of NSAIDs on platelet functions, activation and viability, as well as their interaction(s) with established antiplatelet medications, by hindering several platelet agonists' pathways and receptors, are thoroughly reviewed. The efficacy and safety of NSAIDs as adjunctive therapies for conditions involving inflammation and platelet activation are also discussed. Emphasis is given to the antiplatelet potential of commonly administered NSAIDs medications, such as ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen and ketoprofen, alongside non-opioid analgesic and antipyretic medications like paracetamol. This article delves into their mechanisms of action against different pathways of platelet activation, aggregation and overall platelet functions, highlighting additional health-promoting properties of these anti-inflammatory and analgesic agents, without neglecting the induced by these drugs' side-effects on platelets' functionality and thrombocytopenia. Environmental issues emerging from the ever-increased subscription of these drugs are also discussed, along with the need for novel water treatment methodologies for their appropriate elimination from water and wastewater samples. Despite being efficiently eliminated during wastewater treatment processes on occasion, NSAIDs remain prevalent and are found at significant concentrations in water bodies that receive effluents from wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), since there is no one-size-fits-all solution for removing all contaminants from wastewater, depending on the specific characteristics of the wastewater. Several novel methods have been studied, with adsorption being proposed as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly method for wastewater purification from such drugs. This article also presents limitations and future prospects regarding the observed antiplatelet effects of NSAIDs, as well as the potential of novel derivatives of these compounds, with benefits in other important platelet functions.

Excess Mortality in Aspirin and Dipyrone (Metamizole) Co-Medicated in Patients With Cardiovascular Disease: A Nationwide Study

Background

Pain is a major issue in our aging society. Dipyrone (metamizole) is one of the most frequently used analgesics. Additionally, it has been shown to impair pharmacodynamic response to aspirin as measured by platelet function tests. However, it is not known how this laboratory effect translates to clinical outcome.

Methods and Results

We conducted a nationwide analysis of a health insurance database in Germany comprising 9.2 million patients. All patients with a cardiovascular event in 2014 and subsequent secondary prevention with aspirin were followed up for 36 months. Inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis was conducted to investigate the rate of mortality, myocardial infarction, and stroke/transient ischemic attack between patients on aspirin‐dipyrone co‐medication compared with aspirin‐alone medication. Permanent aspirin‐alone medication was given to 26,200 patients, and 5946 patients received aspirin–dipyrone co‐medication. In the inverse probability of treatment weighted sample, excess mortality in aspirin–dipyrone co‐medicated patients was observed (15.6% in aspirin‐only group versus 24.4% in the co‐medicated group, hazard ratio [HR], 1.66 [95% CI, 1.56–1.76], P<0.0001). Myocardial infarction and stroke/transient ischemic attack were increased as well (myocardial infarction: 1370 [5.2%] versus 355 [5.9%] in aspirin‐only and co‐medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.05–1.32]; P=0.0066, relative risk [RR], 1.14; number needed to harm, 140. Stroke/transient ischemic attack, 1901 [7.3%] versus 506 [8.5%] in aspirin‐only and co‐medicated groups, respectively; HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.11–1.35]; P<0.0001, RR, 1.17, number needed to harm, 82).

Conclusions

In this observational, nationwide analysis, aspirin and dipyrone co‐medication was associated with excess mortality. This was in part driven by ischemic events (myocardial infarction and stroke), which occurred more frequently in co‐medicated patients as well. Hence, dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin‐treated patients for secondary prevention.

Impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity after angioplasty in patients with critical limb ischemia

OBJECTIVES

Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin and clopidogrel is standard of care in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA). However, high on treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to DAPT is frequent and associated with major adverse limb events (MALE) in PAD patients. Nevertheless, association of MALE and HTPR in patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI) is not known. Moreover, comorbidities might confound response to antiplatelet medication further. Hence, in this trial we analyzed pharmacodynamic responses to DAPT and clinical events in CLI patients post PTA.

METHODS

In this prospective single center pilot analysis, we included 71 CLI patients. Patients received DAPT after PTA. Antiplatelet effect were measured by light transmission aggregometry (LTA) and vasodilator-stimulated protein phosphorylation assay (VASP). MALE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and BARC bleeding within 12 months follow-up were assessed.

RESULTS

Mean age of patients was 73.37 ± 7.36 years and 47 (66.2%) were male. Overall HTPR appeared in 46 patients (64.8%). MALE and MACCE showed no differences between patients with and patients without HTPR. However, bleeding was higher in patients with sufficient pharmacodynamic response to DAPT (Bleeding - HTPR: 13.4% vs. no HTPR: 36.0%; log-rank HR: 0.32; 95% CI 0.1079 to 0.9396 p = 0.0217). This finding remained robust in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

HTPR to DAPT is frequent in CLI patients. However, bleeding was higher in patients with sufficient response to DAPT. Ischemic events did not differ. Hence, CLI patients might benefit from an alternative antithrombotic approach.

Analgesia in acute ischemic chest pain

Analgesics, particularly opioids, have been routinely used in the emergency treatment of ischemic chest pain for a long time. In the past two decades; however, several studies have raised the possibility of the harmful effects of opioid administration. In 2014, the American Heart Association (AHA)/American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) changed the guidelines regarding the use of opioids from class IC to class IIb for non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome. And in 2015, the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines incidentally noted the side effects of opioids. In ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, both ESC and AHA/ACCF still recommend the use of opioids. Given the need for adequate pain relief in ischemic chest pain in the emergency setting, it is necessary to understand the adverse effects of analgesia, while still providing sufficiently potent options for analgesia. The primary purpose of this review is to quantify the effects of analgesics commonly used in the prehospital and emergency department in patients with ischemic chest pain.

Impact of high on-treatment platelet reactivity after angioplasty in patients with peripheral arterial disease

Objective: High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) predicts adverse events in coronary artery disease patients. In peripheral artery disease (PAD) patients, data concerning the clinical impact of HTPR are limited. Therefore, we evaluated the incidence of (i) HTPR to DAPT and (ii) its impact on 6 months outcome after angioplasty.Methods and results: In this prospective single center analysis, we investigated 102 consecutive patients with PAD from 2016 to 2017. All patients underwent peripheral endovascular treatment due to intermittent claudication (Fontaine IIb). Clopidogrel effects were measured using vasodilator-stimulated protein phosphorylation (VASP) assay, aspirin effects by light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). Major adverse limb events (MALE), major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and BARC bleeding (bleeding academic research consortium classification) within 6 months were assessed. HTPR to clopidogrel (n = 37, 36%), to aspirin (n = 11, 11%) and to both (n = 11, 11%) were frequent. Compared to sufficient platelet inhibition by aspirin and clopidogrel (n = 43, 42%), patients with dual HTPR showed a higher risk of MALE at 6 months (27% vs. 7%; hazard ratio [HR]: 4.45; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1 to 67.8; p = .03). This was independent of diabetes, creatinine, body mass index, and age as well as of procedural details in a multivariate logistic regression analysis. MACCE (n = 2) and BARC bleeding rates (n = 2) were low.Conclusion: In this small exploratory study, HTPR was frequent in PAD patients. Furthermore, the results are suggestive that MALE might be associated with dual HTPR. This leads to the hypothesis that optimized antithrombotic regimens post percutaneous transluminal angioplasty should be tested in clinical trials.

Role of RXRβ in platelet function and arterial thrombosis

OBJECTIVE

Retinoid X receptors (RXR) are a family of nuclear receptors that play critical roles in the regulation of numerous fundamental biological processes including cell proliferation, differentiation, and death. Earlier studies suggested that treatment with RXR agonists attenuates platelet activation in all adults (male and femal) and mice; however, the underlying molecular mechanisms have remained insufficiently understood. To elaborate further on this issue, we characterized megakaryocyte and platelet-specific RXR knockout mice to study platelet function in vitro and arterial thrombosis in vivo.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

First, we identified RXRβ as the dominant RXR receptor in mouse platelets, prompting us to generate a megakaryocyte and platelet-specific PF4Cre ;RXRβflox/flox mouse. Second, we studied activation, spreading, and aggregation of platelets from C57Bl/6 wild-type mice (WT), PF4Cre+ ;RXRβflox/flox mice, and PF4Cre- ;RXRβflox/flox littermate controls in the presence or absence of RXR ligands, that is, 9-cis-retinoic acid (9cRA) and methoprene acid (MA). We found that in vitro treatment with RXR ligands attenuates spreading and aggregation of platelets and increases proplatelet particle formation from megakaryocytes (MK). However, these effects are also observed in RXRβ-deficient platelets and MKs and are thus independent of RXRβ. Third, we investigated arterial thrombus formation in an iron chloride (FeCl3)-induced vascular injury model in vivo, which is also not affected by the absence of RXRβ in platelets.

CONCLUSIONS

Absence of the most abundant RXR receptor in mouse platelets, RXRβ, does not affect platelet function in vitro and thrombus formation in vivo. Furthermore, RXR agonists' mediated effects on platelet function are independent of RXRβ expression. Hence, our data do not support a significant contribution of RXRβ to arterial thrombosis in mice.

Metamizole inhibits arachidonic acid-induced platelet aggregation after surgery and impairs the effect of aspirin in hospitalized patients

PURPOSE

The inhibitory effect of metamizole on platelet aggregation is known for several years, but most studies were conducted in healthy volunteers with contradictory results. Recent studies have shown an inhibitory effect of metamizole on acetylsalicylic acid (ASA)-induced platelet aggregation. We aimed to investigate the effect of metamizole on platelet aggregation after an elective surgery and the effect of metamizole on ASA-induced platelet aggregation in hospitalized patients.

METHODS

We performed platelet aggregation analysis after induction with ADP, arachidonic acid (AA), epinephrine, and collagen in 37 patients prior to an elective visceral or thoracic surgery and on postoperative day (POD) 1 and POD 3 1-2 h and 5-6 h after metamizole. In another cohort of 10 hospitalized patients receiving the combination of metamizole and ASA for more than 7 days, AA-induced platelet aggregation was analyzed in the morning prior to the intake of both drugs.

RESULTS

Metamizole induced a strong inhibitory effect on AA-induced platelet aggregation at all time points being detectable up to 41 h in some patients. Besides a less pronounced effect on collagen-induced platelet aggregation on POD 3 1-2 h after metamizole, all other inductors showed no effect. In 4 out of 10 hospitalized patients, no ASA-induced inhibition of platelet aggregation was detectable without correlation to sequence of administration.

CONCLUSIONS

The reason why some patients have a long-lasting inhibitory effect of metamizole on COX-induced platelet aggregation that might interfere with ASA should be investigated in a larger cohort of patients.

Dipyrone (metamizole) markedly interferes with platelet inhibition by aspirin in patients with acute and chronic pain: A case-control study

BACKGROUND

Nonopioid analgesic drugs may interfere with platelet inhibition by aspirin. Recent in vitro and clinical studies in patients with cardiovascular disease have suggested that this pharmacodynamic interaction may also occur with dipyrone, a nonopioid analgesic popular in Europe, Asia and South America.

OBJECTIVE

Dipyrone is used extensively in acute and chronic pain. This study was undertaken to provide clinical data, so far missing, on its interactions in this group of patients.

DESIGN

A case-control study.

SETTING

Primary care in one European university hospital centre.

PATIENTS

In total, 27 patients with stable cardiovascular, cerebrovascular or peripheral arterial disease and acute or chronic pain were identified and given dipyrone for at least 5 days in combination with low-dose aspirin. In total, 10 comparable patients on low-dose aspirin alone served as controls.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Platelet-rich plasma was prepared to determine arachidonic acid-induced aggregation (aggregometry) and thromboxane formation (immunoassay). Platelet sensitivity to aspirin was examined in vitro. The presence of dipyrone (metabolites) in plasma was confirmed by HPLC. Additional in vitro measurements examined the aspirin/dipyrone interaction in healthy donors.

RESULTS

Inhibition of aggregation was observed in only six of 27 patients receiving aspirin with dipyrone, with absence of complete inhibition by antiplatelet therapy showing in 78% of patients. In contrast, aggregation was completely inhibited in nine of 10 control patients (P < 0.001). Platelet thromboxane synthesis was higher in patients receiving dipyrone + aspirin compared with controls (387 ± 89 vs. 7 ± 1 ng ml, P < 0.001). Aspirin added in vitro failed to inhibit aggregation and thromboxane synthesis in platelet-rich plasma from dipyrone-treated patients. In vitro measurements with blood from healthy individuals confirmed that dipyrone dramatically reduces inhibition of platelet thromboxane synthesis by aspirin.

CONCLUSIONS

Dipyrone given for 5 days or longer blunts platelet inhibition by low-dose aspirin in the majority of recipients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS ID DRKS00000204. Universal Trial Number (UTN): U1111-1113-3946.

Dose reduction, oral application, and order of intake to preserve aspirin antiplatelet effects in dipyrone co-medicated chronic artery disease patients

BACKGROUND

Dipyrone comedication in aspirin-treated patients is associated with impaired pharmacodynamic response to aspirin (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]). Additionally, in small observational studies, an association with impaired outcome has been described. In this uncontrolled, hypothesis-generating study, we aimed to investigate strategies to prevent this drug-drug interaction in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We analyzed pharmacodynamic response to aspirin in 80 dipyrone co-medicated CAD patients. Aspirin antiplatelet effects were measured using arachidonic acid (AA)-induced light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). Platelet reactivity was associated with daily dose, administration form, and frequency. Additionally, we conducted a time-series analysis in patients with HTPR to aspirin with re-evaluation of pharmacodynamic response to aspirin after 5 days.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age was 75.5 ± 9.8 years. Forty-three (54%) were male, 22 (27.5%) obese, and 38 (47.5%) diabetics. Baseline characteristics, cardiovascular risk factors, comorbidities, comedication, or laboratory parameters did not differ between patients with or without HTPR. HTPR to aspirin occurred in 34 out of 80 patients (42.5%). The incidence of HTPR was associated with dipyrone daily dose (< 1 g/day: HTPR 20% vs. > 3 g/day: HTPR 50%, p > 0.0001) and form of administration (i.v. 87.5% vs. oral 37.5%; p < 0.0001). A strict order of intake (aspirin 30 min prior to dipyrone) restored aspirin antiplatelet effects in all patients (HTPR before 100% vs. HTPR after 0%, p = 0.0002).

CONCLUSION

This study shows that dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin-treated patients. If dipyrone seems indispensable, the lowest effective dose and a strict order of intake seem favorable.

Evaluation of hematological alterations after therapeutic use of dipyrone in healthy adults: a prospective study

Background Dipyrone is a non-narcotic analgesic/antipyretic widely used in some countries but prohibited in others due to suspected risk of agranulocytosis. The primary goal of this study was to evaluate hematological alterations in healthy adult volunteers after treatment with dipyrone. Methods The study enrolled 30 healthy volunteers of both genders, aged 19-37 years. They received tablets containing 500 mg of dipyrone sodium to be used four times daily for 7 consecutive days. Before the first administration, arterial pressure was measured and blood was collected in order to evaluate hematological baseline parameters. On the 8th day after the beginning of treatment, the volunteers had their blood pressure assessed once more and underwent a second blood draw. Total and specific leukocyte counts, creatinine, urea, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), erythrocytes, and platelets were quantitatively determined. Results No statistically significant difference was observed among total or specific leukocyte counts. Number of platelets, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit decreased after treatment. Diastolic pressure, mean arterial pressure (MAP), and urea concentration declined, while creatinine, AST, and ALT showed no significant alterations. It is noteworthy that, even for parameters that showed statistically significant changes, the highest and lowest values remained within the normal ranges. Conclusions Although dipyrone has historically been associated with agranulocytosis, leukocyte counts remained practically unchanged after oral administration of dipyrone. On the other hand, the present study adds evidence that dipyrone is able to produce statistically relevant decrease in number of platelets, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, and hematocrit in healthy adults, even after short-term treatment.

Role of Dipyrone in the High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity amongst Acetylsalicylic Acid-Treated Patients Undergoing Peripheral Artery Revascularisation

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of dipyrone on sensitivity to aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid [ASA]) in patients who underwent peripheral artery vascular reconstruction.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Impedance aggregometry and light transmission aggregometry were used to determine the effects of dipyrone on ASA treatment in 21 patients. Blood samples were drawn in a 7-day period after the surgery. The cut-off value for high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) was set at < 65% of aggregation inhibition for impedance aggregometry. For light transmission aggregometry the cut-off value for arachidonic acid-induced aggregation was set at > 20% of aggregating platelets, and the cut-off value for epinephrine-induced aggregation was > 44% of aggregating platelets. The cut-off value for each method was derived from a large number of patients treated with a daily dose of 100 mg of ASA.

RESULTS

We found HTPR in 14 (67%) of the 21 patients. None had primary resistance to ASA, i.e., after the addition of ASA in vitro all samples showed antiplatelet efficacy. Regression analysis showed a possible correlation between lower efficacy of ASA treatment and higher daily doses of dipyrone (p = 0.005 for impedance aggregometry, p = 0.04 for light transmission aggregometry), higher platelet count (p = 0.005 for impedance aggregometry), and shorter time from surgery (p = 0.03 for impedance aggregometry).

CONCLUSION

HTPR occurs in 67% of ASA-treated patients after lower limb vascular surgery. The occurrence of HTPR correlates with the daily dose of dipyrone. Therefore, dipyrone should not be used as a postoperative analgesic in ASA-treated patients after peripheral artery revascularisation due to its influence on the effectiveness of ASA.

Thromboxane Formation Assay to Identify High On-Treatment Platelet Reactivity to Aspirin

Platelet inhibition by aspirin is indispensable in the secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. Nevertheless, impaired aspirin antiplatelet effects (high on-treatment platelet reactivity [HTPR]) are frequent. This is associated with an enhanced risk of cardiovascular events. The current gold standard to evaluate platelet hyper-reactivity despite aspirin intake is the light-transmittance aggregometry (LTA). However, pharmacologically, the most specific test is the measurement of arachidonic acid (AA)-induced thromboxane (TX) B2 formation. Currently, the optimal cut-off to define HTPR to aspirin by inhibition of TX formation is not known. Therefore, in this pilot study, we aimed to calculate a TX formation cut-off value to detect HTPR defined by the current gold standard LTA. We measured platelet function in 2,507 samples. AA-induced TX formation by ELISA and AA-induced LTA were used to measure aspirin antiplatelet effects. TX formation correlated nonlinearly with the maximum of aggregation in the AA-induced LTA (Spearman's rho R = 0.7396; 95% CI 0.7208-0.7573, p < 0.0001). Receiver operating characteristic analysis and Youden's J statistics revealed 209.8 ng/mL as the optimal cut-off value to detect HTPR to aspirin with the TX ELISA (area under the curve: 0.92, p < 0.0001, sensitivity of 82.7%, specificity of 90.3%). In summary, TX formation ELISA is reliable in detecting HTPR to aspirin. The calculated cut-off level needs to be tested in trials with clinical end points.

Metamizole and Platelet Inhibition by Aspirin Following On-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the impact of intravenous metamizole on platelet inhibition by aspirin in patients with coronary artery disease early after on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

DESIGN

Prospective, single-blind, randomized trial.

SETTING

Tertiary referal hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

The study comprised 43 patients with multivessel coronary artery disease undergoing CABG.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomized to postoperative intravenous metamizole ± opioids (study group; n = 23) or opioids alone (control group; n = 20). Aspirin was withheld at least 7 days before the surgery and reinitiated (300 mg) immediately after the procedure prior to metamizole use, and continued daily thereafter (150 mg). Platelet function was evaluated using multielectrode impedance aggregometry (acid-induced platelet activation [ASPI] and collagen-induced platelet activation [COL] test), P-selectin expression and urinary 11-dehydro-thromboxane B₂ (11-DTXB₂) level at baseline, postoperative day (POD) 0, POD 1, POD 2, and POD 6. Residual platelet reactivity (RPR) was defined as ASPI test >400 AU*min.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In all study participants, postoperative ASPI test value moderately decreased (1058.2 v 966.6 AU*min, p = 0.047), urinary 11-DTXB₂ level increased (923.4 v 4367.3 pg/mg, p < 0.001), and P-selectin expression and COL test value remained stable postprocedure. The decreases of ASPI (p = 0.146) and COL test (p = 0.642), and P-selectin expression (p = 0.318) did not differ between both groups. Patients in the control group had higher postoperative increase of urinary 11-DTXB₂ level (p = 0.001). The prevalence of RPR was high and comparable between study and control groups (day 1, 95.6% v 100%, p = 0.535; day 6, 100% v 90%, p = 0.21). Multivariate analysis revealed that metamizole use did not predict the fluctuations of ASPI and COL test values and P-selectin expression, yet it independently predicted postoperative change of 11-DTXB₂ level (b = -0.518, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous metamizole preceded by a loading dose of aspirin did not modify platelet response to aspirin in the postoperative period after CABG.

The Prevalence and Clinical Relevance of ASA Nonresponse After Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective Bicentric Study

We aimed to identify the prevalence of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) nonresponse in patients after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and the possible consequences for the rate of major cardiovascular events. This prospective, observational, bicentric cohort study was conducted in two German University hospitals. A total of 400 patients (200 in each study center) undergoing elective CABG surgery were enrolled after written informed consent. Platelet function was analyzed on day 3 (d3) and day 5 (d5) postoperatively following stimulation with arachidonic acid (ASPItest) and with thrombin receptor-activating peptide 6 (TRAPtest) using multiple electrode aggregometry (Multiplate). Individuals with an ASPItest ≥40 AU·min were categorized as ASA nonresponders. A 1-year follow-up recorded the combined end point of cardiovascular events, hospital admissions, or deaths related to cardiovascular disease. The prevalence of ASA nonresponse was 51.5% on d3, and it significantly increased to 71.3% on d5 ( P = .0049). The area under the aggregation curve in the TRAPtest ( P < .0001), the platelet count on d5 ( P = .009), and the cardiopulmonary bypass time ( P = .01) were identified as independent predictors of an ASA nonresponse. A 1-year follow-up recorded 54 events fulfilling criteria for the combined end point with no difference between ASA responders and nonresponders. This study indicates a high incidence of perioperative ASA nonresponse in patients following CABG. No effect on the incidence of cardiovascular events was recorded in the 1-year follow-up. Therefore, a randomized dosage adjustment trial should elucidate whether a tailored ASA treatment after CABG surgery represents a useful concept.

Analgesic medication with dipyrone in patients with coronary artery disease: Relation to MACCE

BACKGROUND

The non-opioid analgesic dipyrone can trigger life-threatening blood formation disorders. However, it is frequently used, as many patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) rely on non-opioid analgesics to relieve pain. In this study, we investigated the incidence of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke in CAD patients with aspirin and dipyrone comedication as compared to aspirin-alone.

METHODS

We conducted an observational pilot study in 72 CAD patients with aspirin ± dipyrone comedication in the department of cardiology of the University Hospital Düsseldorf. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI) or stroke. The secondary end points were the components of the primary end point. The median follow-up period was 3.2years.

RESULTS

The primary end point occurred 67% of patients in the aspirin+dipyrone group as compared to 31% in the aspirin-alone group (odds ratio [OR] 4.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 12.3; P=0.0028;). All-cause mortality was significantly higher in the aspirin+dipyrone group (44%) than the aspirin-alone group (22%; OR 2.8, 95% CI 1.01 to 7.8; P=0.049). Ischemic events (MI and stroke) were more frequent in the aspirin+dipyrone group as compared to the aspirin alone group as well (OR 4, 95% CI 1.1 to 14; P=0.03).

CONCLUSION

In this hypothesis generating pilot analysis, dipyrone medication in aspirin treated coronary artery disease patients is associated with an increased cumulative incidence of death, MI or stroke as well as all-cause mortality and ischemic events. These data have to be confirmed in larger registries and trials.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01402804; Identifier: NCT01402804; Date of registration: July 25, 2011.

SeQuent Please vs. Pantera Lux drug coated balloon angioplasty in real life: Results from the Düsseldorf DCB registry

BACKGROUND

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is still a major concern in interventional cardiology. Drug coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty has been shown to be a promising option in treatment of ISR. However heterogeneity of different DCBs in suppression of neointimal growth has been described in a porcine model of coronary ISR. Therefore, in this registry analysis, we compared two frequently used paclitaxel eluting DCBs, the SeQuent Please and the Pantera Lux DCB.

METHODS

571 patients were treated with DCB angioplasty at the Heinrich-Heine University Düsseldorf between 2009 and 2012. Follow-up was conducted during ambulatory care at our department. Major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction [MI] and target lesion revascularization) were registered during hospitalization and follow-up.

RESULTS

Patient characteristics, prior diseases, clinical presentation, ejection fraction, procedural success and lost-for-follow-up did not differ between patients treated with the SeQuent Please and. The Pantera Lux DCB. MACE during hospital course were similar as well (Pantera Lux: 6 patients [1.6%] vs. SeQuent®Please: 3 patients [1.5%], relative risk 1.06, 95% confidence interval 0.3-4.2, P=0.93). Event free survival was significantly longer in patients treated with the Pantera Lux DCB as compared to SeQuent Please DCB (Hazard ratio: 0.65, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.98; P value of log-rank test: 0.0405).

CONCLUSION

MACE free survival was longer in Pantera Lux DCB treated patients as compared to SeQuent Please treated patients. This finding has to be confirmed in future clinical trials.

Dipyrone comedication in aspirin treated stroke patients impairs outcome

BACKGROUND

>50% of stroke patients rely on analgesic medication to control pain. Aspirin is the mainstay of medical treatment of stroke patients; however analgesic medication with dipyrone impairs aspirin antiplatelet effects ex-vivo. The clinical impact of this impairment is unknown. Therefore, we aimed to determine aspirin antiplatelet effects and neurological outcome in stroke patients with aspirin and dipyrone comedication.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study in 41 patients with stroke. Primary outcome was pharmacodynamic response to aspirin in dipyrone treated stroke patients. Secondary outcome was neurological recovery after stroke. Pharmacodynamic response to aspirin was measured using arachidonic acid induced aggregation in light-transmission aggregometry. Neurological outcome was determined three months after stroke onset by telephone interview.

RESULTS

Patient's characteristics were similar in the aspirin-alone group and the aspirin+dipyrone group. Impaired pharmacodynamic response to aspirin occurred in 62% (14/21) of patients with aspirin and dipyrone co-medication. Only 10% (2/20) of aspirin treated patients without analgesic comedication displayed residual platelet reactivity (P=0.001; odds ratio [OR], 18 [95% CI, 3.2-100]). Excellent neurological recovery (measured by three months follow-up modified Rankin Scale<2) was observed in 80% (16/20) of patients in the aspirin-alone group and 48% (10/21) of patients in the aspirin+dipyrone group (P=0.037; OR, 4.4 [95% CI, 1.1-17.7]).

CONCLUSIONS

Dipyrone comedication in patients with stroke impairs pharmacodynamic response to aspirin. This is associated with worse clinical outcome. Therefore dipyrone should be used with caution in aspirin treated stroke patients.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02148939; Identifier: NCT02148939.

[Analgesics in geriatric patients. Adverse side effects and interactions]

Pain is a widespread symptom in clinical practice. Older adults and chronically ill patients are particularly affected. In multimorbid geriatric patients, pharmacological pain treatment is an extension of a previously existing multimedication. Besides the efficacy of pain treatment, drug side effects and drug-drug interactions have to be taken into account to minimize the health risk for these patients. Apart from the number of prescriptions, the age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes significantly increase the risk among older adults. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) is widespread but NSAIDs have the highest risk of adverse drug reactions and drug interactions. In particular, the gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, renal and coagulation systems are affected. Apart from the known toxic effect on the liver (in high doses), paracetamol (acetaminophen) has similar risks although to a lesser degree. According to current data, metamizol is actually better than its reputation suggests. The risk of potential drug interactions seems to be low. Apart from the risk of sedation in combination with other drugs, tramadol and other opioids can induce the serotonin syndrome. Among older adults, especially in the case of polypharmacy, an individualized approach should be considered instead of sticking to the pain management recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in order to minimize drug-drug interactions and adverse drug reactions.

Antiplatelet effects of aspirin in chronic kidney disease patients

ESSENTIALS: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have a high risk of cardiovascular events. A pharmacodynamic evaluation of the effects of aspirin in 116 patients was carried out. The antiplatelet effects of aspirin are associated with impaired renal function. The optimal antithrombotic regimen in CKD patients must be investigated on a larger scale.

BACKGROUND

The pharmacodynamic response to aspirin varies significantly between individuals. Insufficient antiplatelet effects of aspirin are associated with increased risk of ischemic events. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is suggested to affect the pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet medication. High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to clopidogrel has been reported to partially account for the enhanced risk of death and cardiovascular events in CKD patients. Objective To investigate the antiplatelet effects of aspirin in patients with CKD.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study in 116 patients on permanent aspirin medication. The pharmacodynamic response to aspirin was determined by arachidonic acid-induced thromboxane formation.

RESULTS

HTPR to aspirin was more frequent in patients with impaired renal function (47% vs. 22%; odds ratio, 3.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.34-7.41; P = 0.008). The pharmacodynamic response to aspirin was impaired in patients with moderate/severe CKD (92; interquartile range [IQR], 282 ng mL(-1) ) as compared to patients with normal/mildly reduced renal function (36; IQR, 100 ng mL(-1) ; difference in medians, 57; CI, 5-110 ng mL(-1) ; P = 0.013). Bivariate Pearson analysis showed residual thromboxane formation to be correlated with glomerular filtration rate (R = -0.303; R(2) = 0.092; P = 0.001). Patients with CKD were older and more frequently female. Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that the correlation was independent of age (R = -0.314; R(2) = 0.082; P = 0.002) and gender (R = -0.305; R(2) = 0.077; P = 0.006).

CONCLUSION

Renal function is correlated with pharmacodynamic response to aspirin. Patients with CKD have an increased risk of impaired antiplatelet effects of aspirin. Larger trials are needed to assess the clinical impact of this finding and investigate the optimal antithrombotic regimen in CKD patients.

Aspirin in the perioperative period: a review of the recent literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The indications for aspirin (ASA) for both primary and secondary prevention of thrombotic events continue to evolve. We review some of these indications and the recent literature regarding the perioperative administration of ASA.

RECENT FINDINGS

ASA for primary prevention of cardiac ischemia, stroke, cancer, and death remains controversial. When used for primary prevention, ASA may be safely discontinued perioperatively. Patients with coronary or carotid artery stents should continue to receive ASA perioperatively. For patients with ischemic heart disease currently receiving ASA for secondary prevention of cardiac ischemia and stroke undergoing general surgery, orthopedic surgery, ophthalmological surgery, cardiovascular surgery, major vascular surgery, or a urological procedure, continuation of ASA is probably well tolerated, but further study is required. There is no indication to initiate ASA perioperatively in patients with stable ischemic heart disease as the risks outweigh the benefits. Until further data become available, decisions regarding the perioperative continuation of ASA should be made on a case-by-case risk-benefit analysis.

SUMMARY

The continuation or discontinuation of ASA perioperatively remains a complicated issue. Further, well designed trials are needed for additional clarification.

Antiplatelet effects of clopidogrel and aspirin after interventional patent foramen ovale/ atrium septum defect closure

The optimal antiplatelet therapy after patent foramen ovale (PFO)/ atrium septum defect (ASD) closure is a matter of discussion. It is challenging as inter-individual responses to antiplatelet medication vary significantly and common complications are bleeding and ischemic events. In this study, we aimed to analyze the incidence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to antiplatelet medication in patients undergoing PFO/ASD closure as well as clinical complications and thrombus formation on the occluder during six-month follow-up. This hypothesis generating pilot study was observed, which included 140 patients undergoing PFO/ASD closure. The primary endpoint was pharmacodynamic response to antiplatelet medication. A composite of death, myocardial infarction, bleeding, stroke and thrombus formation on the occluder during six-month follow-up was the secondary endpoint. HTPR to clopidogrel was analyzed using the vasodilator-stimulated protein phosphorylation (VASP), HTPR to aspirin by light-transmission aggregometry (LTA). In 71% of patients HTPR to clopidogrel was detected, HTPR to aspirin in only 4%. We observed 12 complications, 9 bleeding events (including 3 major bleeding events) and 3 transient ischemic attacks. No stroke and no thrombus formation on the occluder occurred. The primary endpoint was not associated with the secondary endpoint. The incidence of HTPR to clopidogrel in PFO/ASD closure patients is very high. Despite this high incidence, no stroke or thrombus formation on the occluder occurred at all. This leads to the hypothesis, that the benefit of additional clopidogrel medication is questionable and has to be investigated in large-scale clinical trials.

Impairment of aspirin antiplatelet effects by non-opioid analgesic medication

Aspirin is the mainstay in prophylaxis of cardiovascular diseases. Impaired aspirin antiplatelet effects are associated with enhanced incidence of cardiovascular events. Comedication with non-opioid analgesic drugs has been described to interfere with aspirin, resulting in impaired aspirin antiplatelet effects. Additionally, non-opioid analgesic medication has been shown to enhance the risk of cardiovascular events and death. Pain is very frequent and many patients rely on analgesic drugs to control pain. Therefore effective analgesic options without increased risk of cardiovascular events are desirable. This review focuses on commonly used non-opioid analgesics, interactions with aspirin medication and impact on cardiovascular risk.

Safety issues of current analgesics: an update

Pain represents a complex experience which can be approached by various medicines. Non-opioid and opioid analgesics are the most common drugs used to manage different types of pain. The increased attention nowadays to pain management entailed concomitantly more frequent adverse drug reactions (ADRs) related to analgesic use. Drug-drug interactions can be sometimes responsible for the adverse effects. However, a significant proportion of analgesic ADRs are preventable, which would avoid patient suffering. In order to draw the attention to analgesics risks and to minimize the negative consequences related to their use, the present review comprises a synthesis of the most important safety issues described in the scientific literature. It highlights the potential risks of the most frequently used analgesic medicines: non-opioid (paracetamol, metamizole, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) and opioid analgesics. Even if there is a wide experience in their use, they continue to capture attention with safety concerns and with potential risks recently revealed. Acknowledging potential safety problems represents the first step for health professionals in assuring a safe and efficient analgesic treatment with minimum risks to patients. Taking into consideration all medical and environmental factors and carefully monitoring the patients are also essential in preventing and early detecting analgesic ADRs.

Prevention of dipyrone (metamizole) induced inhibition of aspirin antiplatelet effects

We have recently shown that dipyrone (metamizole), a non-opioid analgesic, can nullify aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid; ASA) antiplatelet effects in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). In this study, we analysed the aspirin and dipyrone drug-drug interaction in order to identify strategies to prevent the dipyrone induced inhibition of asprin antiplatelet effects. Platelet function was measured by arachidonic acid-induced light-transmission aggregometry, thromboxane (TX) B2- formation by immunoassay. Dipyrone metabolite plasma levels were determined by high-performance-liquid-chromatography (HPLC). In seven healthy individuals, in vitro ASA (30 µM/ 100 µM/ 300 µM/ 1,000 µM) and dipyrone (10 µM) coincubation revealed, that the aspirin and dipyrone interaction can be overcome by increasing doses of aspirin. In 36 aspirin and dipyrone comedicated CAD patients, addition of ASA (30 µM/ 100 µM) in vitro inhibited, but did not completely overcome the dipyrone induced reduction of aspirin antiplatelet effects. Notably, the inhibition of thromboxane formation in aspirin and dipyrone comedicated CAD patients coincided with dipyrone plasma levels. In a cross-over designed study in four healthy individuals, we were able to prove that inhibition of aspirin (100 mg/ day) effects by dipyrone (750 mg/ day) was reversible. Furthermore, aspirin (100 mg/ day) medication prior to dipyrone (750 mg/ day) intake prevented the inhibition of antiplatelet effects by dipyrone in 12 healthy individuals. In conclusion, aspirin medication prior to dipyrone intake preserves antiplatelet effects, circumventing the pharmacodynamic drug-drug interaction at the level of cyclooxygenase-1.

Dental procedures in patients treated with antiplatelet or oral anticoagulation therapy - an anonymous survey

OBJECTIVE

To investigate how German dentists adhere to recommendations regarding dental treatment of patients taking antiplatelet or oral anticoagulation therapy for cardiovascular protection.

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of antiplatelet or oral anticoagulation therapy prior to dental procedures is usually not recommended because the risk of thromboembolic events is higher than that of significant procedure-related bleeding.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire regarding the handling of and experiences with patients taking aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) or vitamin-K-antagonists (phenprocoumon) was distributed to approximately 4500 dentists attending the national German Dentists Day 2011.

RESULTS

Of 146 dentists who completed the questionnaire 77.4% and 27.6% stated that they perform tooth extractions under continued therapy with aspirin or vitamin-K-antagonists, respectively. When asked regarding the INR or Quick values, they require for tooth extractions in patients taking oral anticoagulants 29.5% of the dentists provided values that were outside the safe range (INR ≤1.5 or ≥3.5) and 90.7% accepted values too old to be clinically reliable. For pain relief after dental procedures, 71.2% of the dentists recommended ibuprofen notwithstanding the fact that it attenuates protective effects of aspirin and 10.2% would discontinue aspirin and prescribe ibuprofen or paracetamol (acetaminophen).

CONCLUSION

Despite similar recommendations the majority of dentists perform tooth extractions in patients taking aspirin but not in patients taking vitamin-K-antagonists. Moreover, a potentially unfavourable drug interaction of aspirin and ibuprofen is frequently not considered. In patients taking vitamin-K-antagonists too many dentists rely on laboratory values that are too old or outside the recommended range.

Inhibition of antiplatelet effects of aspirin by nonopioid analgesics

In patients undergoing coronary bypass grafting, we noticed that low-dose aspirin failed to inhibit platelet aggregation, potentially elevating the risk of thrombotic bypass occlusion. This "high on-treatment platelet reactivity" was reproducible in vitro and could be transferred with patient plasma or urine to aspirin-sensitive donor platelets, suggesting a drug/drug interaction. Loss of aspirin efficacy was associated with analgesia by dipyrone (metamizol) and initiated further study of the interaction between aspirin and other nonopioid analgesics.