How Does the Ascending Aorta Geometry Change When It Dissects?

Baseline Diameter Does Not Predict Growth Rate in a Presurgical Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm Population

BACKGROUND

Patients with ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm are recommended to undergo routine imaging surveillance. Although maximal diameter is the primary metric of disease severity, recent American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines emphasize the importance of aortic growth in determining surgical candidacy and risk. As diameter increases, it is assumed that aortic growth rate accelerates because of increased wall tension; however, this relationship is poorly studied. We aim to investigate the relationship between ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm diameter and growth rate using vascular deformation mapping, a validated technique for 3-dimensional growth mapping with submillimeter accuracy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively identified adult patients with ascending aortic dilation (≥4.0 cm) and serial gated computed tomography angiograms separated by ≥2 years, excluding confirmed heritable thoracic aortic disease. Ascending growth rate was defined as 90th percentile radial wall deformation by vascular deformation mapping. Maximal diameter measurements were derived from the baseline computed tomography angiogram, and aortic length and body size-adjusted indexes were calculated. Among 258 included patients (63.2% men; age of 63 years [interquartile range, 55-69 years]), mean±SD baseline diameter was 46.3±3.6 mm and median growth rate was 0.21 mm/year (interquartile range, 0.13-0.38 mm/year). No correlation was noted between growth rate and baseline diameter (r=0.02, P=0.74) or other aortic size metrics. On multivariate analysis, age was independently predictive of growth rate (β=-0.007, P=0.021), alongside weight (β=0.003, P=0.016) and the presence of moderate or severe aortic valve insufficiency (β=0.146, P=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Maximal aortic diameter is not predictive of aortic growth rate, in this contemporary cohort of patients with sizes under current surgical thresholds (<55 mm).

Next-Generation Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique in the Era of Precision Medicine

The frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique can be applied to extensive aortic pathology, including lesions in the aortic arch and proximal descending thoracic aorta. FET is useful for tear-oriented surgery in dissections, managing malperfusion syndrome, and promoting positive aortic remodeling. Despite these benefits, complications such as distal stent-induced new entry and spinal cord ischemia can pose serious problems with the FET technique. To prevent these complications, careful sizing and planning of the FET are crucial. Additionally, since the FET technique involves total arch replacement, meticulous surgical skills are essential, particularly for young surgeons. In this article, we propose several techniques to simplify surgical procedures, which may lead to better outcomes for patients with extensive aortic pathology. In the era of precision medicine, the next-generation FET device could facilitate the treatment of complex aortic diseases through a patient-tailored approach.

Sex-related differences in the clinical course of aortic root and ascending aortic aneurysms: the DisSEXion Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To explore male-female differences in aneurysm growth and clinical outcomes in a two-centre retrospective Dutch cohort study of adult patients with ascending aortic aneurysm (AscAA).

METHODS

Adult patients in whom imaging of an AscAA (root and/or ascending: ≥40 mm) was performed between 2007 and 2022 were included. Aneurysm growth was analysed using repeated measurements at the sinuses of Valsalva (SoV) and tubular ascending aorta. Male-female differences were explored in presentation, aneurysm characteristics, treatment strategy, survival, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

One thousand eight hundred and fifty-eight patients were included (31.6% female). Median age at diagnosis was 65.4 years (interquartile range: 53.4-71.7) for females and 59.0 years (interquartile range: 49.3-68.0) for males (P < .001). At diagnosis, females more often had tubular ascending aortic involvement (75.5% vs. 70.2%; P = .030) while males more often had SoV involvement (42.8% vs. 21.6%; P < .001). Maximum absolute aortic diameter, at any location, at diagnosis did not differ between females (45.0 mm) and males (46.5 mm; P = .388). In females, tubular ascending growth was faster (P < .001), whereas in males, SoV growth was faster (P = .005), corrected for covariates. Unadjusted 10-year survival was 72.5% [95% confidence interval (CI) 67.8%-77.6%] for females and 78.3% (95% CI 75.3%-81.3%) for males (P = .010). Twenty-three type A dissections occurred, with an incidence rate of 8.2/1000 patient-years (95% CI 4.4-14.1) in females and 2.4/1000 patient-years (95% CI 1.2-4.5) in males [incidence rate ratio females/males: 3.4 (95% CI 1.5-8.0; P = .004)].

CONCLUSIONS

In patients having entered a diagnostic programme, involvement of aortic segments and age- and segment-related growth patterns differ between women and men with AscAA, particularly at an older age. Unravelling of these intertwined observations will provide a deeper understanding of AscAA progression and outcome in women and men and can be used as an evidence base for patient-tailored clinical guideline development.

A De Novo Missense MYLK Variant Leading to Nonsyndromic Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm and Dissection Identified by Segregation Analysis

Nonsyndromic hereditary thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection (TAAD) is an autosomal dominant disease; however, it is frequently difficult to identify the causative genes. We report in this study a 33-year-old Japanese male with TAAD (Stanford type A) that is complicated with severe aortic regurgitation. There was no family history of aortic diseases in the patient nor any specific clinical features suggestive of connective tissue diseases, such as Marfan syndrome. Genetic testing identified candidate causative variants in two different genes: MYLK (c.4819G > A, p.[Gly1607Ser]) and FBN1 (c.365G > A, p.[Arg122His]). Familial cosegregation analysis revealed that the novel de novo MYLK variant was present only in the proband, and the FBN1 variant was also found in his nonaffected mother, and thus the MYLK variant was classified as likely pathogenic. MYLK is a causative gene for nonsyndromic TAAD that requires careful management; however, the number of reports is limited. Accumulating data on the pathogenicity of rare variants by performing a comprehensive pedigree analysis would help establish better treatment strategies for life-threatening hereditary TAAD cases.

Thoracic Aortic Volume as a Predictor of Cardiovascular Events: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether thoracic aortic volume (TAV) is useful for cardiovascular (CV) disease prognosis and risk assessment.

PURPOSE

This study evaluated cross-sectional associations of TAV with CV risk factors, and longitudinal association with incident CV events in the multiethnic study of atherosclerosis.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective cohort analysis of prospective data.

POPULATION

1182 participants (69 ± 9 years, 54% female, 37% Caucasian, 18% Chinese, 31% African American, 14% Hispanic, 60% hypertensive, and 20% diabetic) without prior CV disease.

FIELD STRENGTH AND SEQUENCES

Axial black-blood turbo spin echo or bright blood steady-state free precession images on 1.5T scanners.

ASSESSMENT

TAV was calculated using Simpson's method from axial images, and included the ascending arch and descending segments. Traditional CV risk factors were assessed at the time of MRI. CV outcomes over a 9-year follow-up period were recorded and represented a composite of stroke, stroke death, coronary heart disease (CHD), CHD death, atherosclerotic death, and CVD death.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Multivariable linear regression models adjusted for height and weight were used to determine the relationship (β coefficient) between TAV and CV risk factors. Cox regression models assessed the association of TAV and incident CV events. A P-value of <0.05 was deemed statistically significant.

RESULTS

Mean TAV was = 139 ± 41 mL. In multivariable regression, TAV was directly associated with age (β = 1.6), male gender (β = 23.9), systolic blood pressure (β = 0.1), and hypertension medication use (β = 7.9); and inversely associated with lipid medication use (β = -5.3) and treated diabetes (β = -8.9). Compared to Caucasians, Chinese Americans had higher TAV (β = 11.4), while African Americans had lower TAV (β = -7.0). Higher TAV was independently associated with incident CV events (HR: 1.057 per 10 mL).

CONCLUSION

Greater TAV is associated with incident CV events, increased age, and hypertension in a large multiethnic population while treated diabetes and lipid medication use were associated with lower TAV.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Endovascular Technique for Ascending Aorta Repair Based on TEVAR and TAVI Procedures

PURPOSE

Ascending aorta (AAo) acute pathology still has an open-surgery indication with a high mortality rate associated to cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. In these cases, the endovascular aortic approach could be an excellent option. The aim of the present study is to detail an optimized technique for the endovascular treatment of AAo diseases, based on thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) procedures.

TECHNIQUE

The procedure implies the usual preparation for TEVAR and TAVI implants. A transient pacemaker lead is necessary to deliver the prosthesis under "rapid pacing." As in the TAVI technique, a final high-support guidewire is placed at the left ventricle. The proximal landing zone is the sinotubular junction (zone 0B). Transesophageal echocardiography is essential to ensure aortic valve function and patency in coronary arteries during the delivery. To assess a potential occlusion of the brachiocephalic artery, a guidewire is positioned in the descending aorta from the axillary artery. Finally, a noncovered stent is implanted to stabilize the AAo prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

The technique presented here can standardize a safe and reproducible procedure to endovascular repair of AAo diseases. However, new devices specifically designed for the AAo could facilitate the transcatheter approach.

CLINICAL IMPACT

Ascending aorta acute pathology still has an open-surgery indication with high mortality rate associated to cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Moreover, near 30% of patients are not considered suitable for surgery because of age, critical situation or the presence of severe comorbidities. The present study provides a detailed and optimized technique for the endovascular treatment of ascending aorta disease, based on TEVAR and TAVI procedures.

Patient-specific ascending aortic intervention criteria

OBJECTIVES

Ascending aortic aneurysms pose a different risk to each patient. We aim to provide personalized risk stratification for such patients based on sex, age, body surface area and aneurysm location (root versus ascending).

METHODS

Root and ascending diameters, and adverse aortic events (dissection, rupture, death) of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm patients were analysed. Aortic diameter was placed in context vis-a-vis the normal distribution in the general population with similar sex, age and body surface area, by conversion to z scores. These were correlated of major adverse aortic events, producing risk curves with 'hinge points' of steep risk, constructed separately for the aortic root and mid-ascending aorta.

RESULTS

A total of 1162 patients were included. Risk curves unveiled generalized thresholds of z = 4 for the aortic root and z = 5 for the mid-ascending aorta. These correspond to individualized thresholds of less than the standard criterion of 5.5 cm in the vast majority of patients. Indicative results include a 75-year-old typical male with 2.1 m2 body surface area, who was found to be at increased risk of adverse events if root diameter exceeds 5.15 cm, or mid ascending exceeds 5.27 cm. An automated calculator is presented, which identifies patients at high risk of adverse events based on sex, age, height, weight, and root and ascending size.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis exploits a large sample of aneurysmal patients, demographic features of the general population, pre-dissection diameter, discrimination of root and supracoronary segments, and statistical tools to extract thresholds of increased risk tailor-made for each patient.

Impact of nondiameter aortic indices on surgical eligibility: Results from the Treatment in Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm: Surgery Versus Surveillance (TITAN: SvS) randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVES

Traditional criterion for intervention on an asymptomatic ascending aortic aneurysm has been a maximal aortic diameter of 5.5 cm or more. The 2022 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association aortic guidelines adopted cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio, aortic size index, and aortic height index as alternate parameters for surgical intervention. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of using these newer indices on patient eligibility for surgical intervention in a prospective, multicenter cohort with moderate-sized ascending aortic aneurysms between 5.0 and 5.4 cm.

METHODS

Patients enrolled from 2018 to 2023 in the randomization or registry arms of the multicenter trial, Treatment In Thoracic Aortic aNeurysm: Surgery versus Surveillance, were included in the study. Clinical data were captured prospectively in an online database. Imaging data were derived from a core computed laboratory.

RESULTS

Among the 329 included patients, 20% were female. Mean age was 65.0 ± 11.6 years, and mean maximal aortic diameter was 50.8 ± 3.9 mm. In the one-third of all patients (n = 109) who met any 1 of the 3 criteria (ie, aortic size index ≥3.08 cm/m2, aortic height index ≥3.21 cm/m, or cross-sectional aortic area/height ≥ 10 cm2/m), their mean maximal aortic diameter was 52.5 ± 0.52 mm. Alternate criteria were most commonly met in women compared with men: 20% versus 2% for aortic size index (P < .001), 39% versus 5% for aortic height index (P < .001), and 39% versus 21% for cross-sectional aortic area/height (P = .002), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

One-third of patients in Treatment In Thoracic Aortic aNeurysm: Surgery versus Surveillance would meet criteria for surgical intervention based on novel parameters versus the classic definition of diameter 5.5 cm or more. Surgical thresholds for aortic size index, aortic height index, or cross-sectional aortic area/height ratio are more likely to be met in female patients compared with male patients.

The correlation study between the length and angle of ascending aortic and the incidence risk of acute type A aortic dissection

Objective

This study utilized computed tomography angiography (CTA) to assess the risk of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) by analyzing the imaging morphology indicators of the ascending aorta, along with the relevant risk factors associated with aortic dissection.

Methods

The study utilized a retrospective observational research design. The population consisted of 172 patients who received treatment in the Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery at Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, from January 2018 to December 2022. The patients were divided into two groups: the ATAAD group (n = 97) and the thoracic aortic aneurysm group (TAA, n = 75). Demographic data and ascending aorta CTA measurements were collected from all patients. Single factor and multivariate logistic regression were employed to analyze the statistical differences in clinical data and ascending aorta CTA imaging morphology indicators between the two groups.

Results

The variables were included in logistic multivariate analysis for further screening, indicating that the length of the ascending aorta (LAA) before ATAAD (OR = 3.365; 95% CI :1.742-6.500, P<0.001), ascending arch angle (asc-arch angle, OR = 0.902; 95% CI: 0.816-0.996, P = 0.042) and the maximum aortic diameter (MAD) before ATAAD, (OR = 0.614; 95% CI: 0.507-0.743, P<0.001) showed statistically significant differences.

Conclusions

This study suggests that increased LAA and MAD, as well as a smaller asc-arch angle may be high-risk factors for the onset of ATAAD.

Diameter changes of the thoracic aorta caused by acute type B aortic dissection

BACKGROUND

The impact of type B acute aortic dissection (TBAAD) on historical pre-TBAAD diameters of the thoracic aorta is rarely reported. The aim of this study was to assess the extent of changes in aortic diameters induced by dissection, measured with a computed tomography (CT) scan obtained before and after TBAAD.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2014, CT angiography of 50 non-Marfan patients with nonbicuspid aortic valves diagnosed with TBAAD were compared to historical CTs on file.

RESULTS

The ascending aorta and proximal arch showed negligible change. The proximal, mid, and distal aorta diameters changed compared with predissected values (107.7 ± 4.8%, 109.3 ± 4.9%, and 105.7 ± 5.8%, respectively). Neither sex, false lumen status, or mural calcification, nor prior thoracoabdominal aortic ectasia, correlated with the diameter change. Age ≥80 years in the proximal descending aorta did correlate with the diameter change (110.7 ± 4.0% vs 106.1 ± 4.6% p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Although identifying predicting factors for an aortic diameter increase all along with the thoracic aorta was still challenging, the degree of diameter change by aortic dissection was 105.7% to 109.3% in descending thoracic aorta, most prominent in middle descending aorta.

Aortic root enlargement and replacement of the ascending aorta in type 0 aortic valve stenosis

INTRODUCTION

This case report aims to describe an aortic root enlargement in combination with the replacement of the ascending aorta in a patient presenting with severe aortic valve stenosis.

CASE REPORT

A 68-year-old woman with severe aortic stenosis due to a type 0 bicuspid aortic valve and an aortic aneurysm underwent surgery for treatment. The annulus was preoperatively measured with 19 mm. Enlargement was performed by using a tissue patch to create a neo-noncoronary sinus and enlarge the root.

DISCUSSION

Patients with a small aortic root face an increased risk of patient prosthesis mismatch. Enlarging the aortic root can mitigate this, but it extends cross-clamp and overall operative times. This case shows the need for carefully planned surgical interventions to optimize outcomes in complex anatomies.

CONCLUSIONS

Each step of the performed surgery is well-established, however the combination and the creation of a neo-noncoronary sinus is not described so far.

The activator protein-1 complex governs a vascular degenerative transcriptional programme in smooth muscle cells to trigger aortic dissection and rupture

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Stanford type A aortic dissection (AD) is a degenerative aortic remodelling disease marked by an exceedingly high mortality without effective pharmacologic therapies. Smooth muscle cells (SMCs) lining tunica media adopt a range of states, and their transformation from contractile to synthetic phenotypes fundamentally triggers AD. However, the underlying pathomechanisms governing this population shift and subsequent AD, particularly at distinct disease temporal stages, remain elusive.

METHODS

Ascending aortas from nine patients undergoing ascending aorta replacement and five individuals undergoing heart transplantation were subjected to single-cell RNA sequencing. The pathogenic targets governing the phenotypic switch of SMCs were identified by trajectory inference, functional scoring, single-cell regulatory network inference and clustering, regulon, and interactome analyses and confirmed using human ascending aortas, primary SMCs, and a β-aminopropionitrile monofumarate-induced AD model.

RESULTS

The transcriptional profiles of 93 397 cells revealed a dynamic temporal-specific phenotypic transition and marked elevation of the activator protein-1 (AP-1) complex, actively enabling synthetic SMC expansion. Mechanistically, tumour necrosis factor signalling enhanced AP-1 transcriptional activity by dampening mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Targeting this axis with the OXPHOS enhancer coenzyme Q10 or AP-1-specific inhibitor T-5224 impedes phenotypic transition and aortic degeneration while improving survival by 42.88% (58.3%-83.3% for coenzyme Q10 treatment), 150.15% (33.3%-83.3% for 2-week T-5224), and 175.38% (33.3%-91.7% for 3-week T-5224) in the β-aminopropionitrile monofumarate-induced AD model.

CONCLUSIONS

This cross-sectional compendium of cellular atlas of human ascending aortas during AD progression provides previously unappreciated insights into a transcriptional programme permitting aortic degeneration, highlighting a translational proof of concept for an anti-remodelling intervention as an attractive strategy to manage temporal-specific AD by modulating the tumour necrosis factor-OXPHOS-AP-1 axis.

Morphological risk of acute type A aortic dissection in the mildly to moderately dilated aorta

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyse and determine the role of aortic length and curvature in the pathogenesis of acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) with ascending aortic diameters (AADs) <5 cm.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical and imaging data of patients with ATAAD (n = 201) and ascending aortic dilation (n = 83). Thoracic aortic bending index (TABI) was used to quantify aortic curvature and analyse its role in ATAAD below the diameter risk threshold.

RESULTS

The AAD was <5.0 and <4.0 cm in 78% and 37% of patients with ATAAD, respectively. The median ascending aortic length (AAL) was 104.6 mm (Q1-Q3, 96.5-113.6 mm), and in 62.7% of patients, it was <11 cm. The median TABI was 14.99 mm/cm (Q1-Q3, 14.18-15.86 mm/cm). Patients with ATAAD and those with aortic dilation were matched for AAD, age, sex, height and other clinical factors. After matched, the dissection group had higher AALs (median, 102.9 mm; Q1-Q3, 96.0-112.5 mm vs median, 88.2 mm; Q1-Q3, 83.7-95.9 mm; P < 0.001) and TABI (median, 14.84 mm/cm; Q1-Q3, 14.06-15.83 mm/cm vs median, 13.55 mm/cm; Q1-Q3, 13.03-14.28 mm/cm; P < 0.001). According to the regression analysis, the area under the curve required to distinguish patients with ATAAD from those with aortic dilation was 0.831 in AAL, 0.837 in TABI and 0.907 when AAL was combined with TABI.

CONCLUSIONS

The patients with ATAAD had higher AAL and TABI than those with aortic dilation. The combination of TABI and AAL might be a potential morphological marker for determining ATAAD risk below the current aortic diameter risk threshold.

The non to moderately dilated root in acute type A aortic dissection: outcomes of the PENN-BERN registry in young, non-syndromic patients

OBJECTIVES

There is an ongoing debate regarding whether patients benefit more from root replacement compared to a reconstruction of the sinuses of Valsalva in acute type A aortic dissection (aTAAD). In those with known or suspected connective tissue disorders, root replacement is considered appropriate. However, there are currently no diameter-based guidelines regarding the best approach in patients with minimally to moderately dilated root and no connective tissue disorders.

METHODS

From January 2005 to December 2022, a two-centre registry of aTAAD was created. Patients were included based on their age (≤60 years), the absence of root entry and dilatation >50 mm and the absence of syndromic hereditable aortic disease. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the proximal procedure, root reconstruction and root replacement. Propensity score pair matching was performed based on preoperative characteristics.

RESULTS

Cumulative incidence of reintervention at 10 years was slightly higher after root reconstruction 13% vs 3.9% in the matched group (P = 0.040). Survival at 10 years was not affected by the procedure independently of the matching 72.1% vs 71.4% (P = 0.2). Uni- and multivariate Cox regressions showed that a root diameter of >40 mm was associated with a hazard ratio of 7.7 (95% confidence interval 2.6-23) and 5.4 (7-17), respectively, for reoperation for aneurysm and pseudoaneurysm.

CONCLUSIONS

Rate of reoperation due to proximal pseudoaneurysm and aneurysm could be significantly reduced with a lower threshold of 40 mm to replace the aortic root in aTAAD than in elective cases.

Anatomic feasibility of a modular Endo-Bentall stent graft system for type A aortic dissection

OBJECTIVE

The implementation of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with type A aortic dissection has been strictly constrained due to the pulsatile movement and distensibility and the insufficient length of landing zones on ascending aorta. The most prevalent anatomical limitation is the insufficient length of proximal and distal landing zones. We propose a modularly designed Endo-Bentall stent graft system to broaden the scope of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the ascending aorta by covering intimal tears in the aortic root and ascending aorta and reconstructing coronary arteries. This study was conducted to assess the anatomical feasibility of a novel stent graft design.

METHODS

In this study, we included 152 patients with type A aortic dissection for image measurement and analysis. All computed tomography angiography images were assessed on a 3mensio Workstation version 10.2 (3mensio Medical Imaging B.V.) utilizing the centerline method. We compared the diameters and lengths at various planes in relation to the proposed anatomical criteria for the modular Endo-Bentall stent graft system.

RESULTS

The patients were predominantly male (67.1%), with a median age of 56.5 years (interquartile range, 50.0-65.0 years). Among all aortic dissections, 91.5% extended proximally to the sinotubular junction, whereas only 8.6% were restricted to the tubular ascending aorta. The median perimeter-derived diameter of the aortic annulus was 24.1 mm. The median maximum aortic diameter at the sinotubular junction and brachiocephalic trunk were 44.6 mm and 43.5 mm, respectively. The median height of the left coronary artery, right coronary artery, and sinus of Valsalva were 12.7 mm, 16.7 mm, and 28.4 mm, respectively. After applying exclusion criteria, 66.4% of all patients were anatomically eligible for the modular Endo-Bentall stent graft system. A total of 85.1% of patients were suitable for stent grafts with lengths of 70 mm, 80 mm, or 90 mm. Both antegradely and retrogradely tapered stent grafts were required, according to the diameter differences between the STJ and brachiocephalic trunk.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing the modular Endo-Bentall stent-graft design, approximately two-thirds of patients with type A aortic dissection are anatomically eligible for endovascular repair. Further animal studies are required to optimize the device design.

The role of transforming growth factor beta in bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy

A bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is the most prevalent congenital cardiac deformity, which is associated with an increased risk to develop a thoracic aortic aneurysm and/or an aortic dissection as compared to persons with a tricuspid aortic valve. Due to the high prevalence of a BAV in the general population and the associated life-long increased risk for adverse vascular events, BAV disease places a considerable burden on the public health. The aim of the present review is to discuss the role of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) signaling in the development of the vascular wall and on how this complex signaling pathway may be involved in thoracic aortic aneurysm formation in tricuspid and BAV patients.

Male-female differences in thoracic aortic diameters at presentation of acute type A aortic dissection

Background

Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is a highly lethal event, associated with aortic dilatation. It is not well known if patient height, weight or sex impact the thoracic aortic diameter (TAA) at ATAAD. The study aim was to identify male-female differences in TAA at ATAAD presentation.

Methods

This retrospective cross-sectional study analysed all adult patients who presented with ATAAD between 2007 and 2017 in two tertiary care centres and underwent contrast enhanced computed tomography (CTA) before surgery. Absolute aortic diameters were measured at the sinus of Valsalva (SoV), ascending (AA) and descending thoracic aorta (DA) using double oblique reconstruction, and indexed for body surface area (ASI) and height (AHI). Z-scores were calculated using the Campens formula.

Results

In total, 59 % (181/308) of ATAAD patients had CT-scans eligible for measurements, with 82 female and 99 male patients. Females were significantly older than males (65.5 ± 12.4 years versus 60.3 ± 2.3, p = 0.024). Female patients had larger absolute AA diameters than male patients (51.0 mm [47.0-57.0] versus 49.0 mm [45.0-53.0], p = 0.023), and larger ASI and AHI at all three levels. Z-scores for the SoV and AA were significantly higher for female patients (2.99 ± 1.66 versus 1.34 ± 1.77, p < 0.001 and 5.27 [4.38-6.26] versus 4.06 [3.14-5.02], p < 0.001). After adjustment for important clinical factors, female sex remained associated with greater maximal TAA (p = 0.019).

Conclusion

Female ATAAD patients had larger absolute ascending aortic diameters than males, implying a distinct timing in disease presentation or selection bias. Translational studies on the aortic wall and studies on growth patterns should further elucidate these sex differences.

Fate of the unoperated ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm: three-decade experience from the Aortic Institute at Yale University

AIMS

This study aims to outline the 'true' natural history of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA) based on a cohort of patients not undergoing surgical intervention.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The outcomes, risk factors, and growth rates of 964 unoperated ATAA patients were investigated, over a median follow-up of 7.9 (maximum of 34) years. The primary endpoint was adverse aortic events (AAE), including dissection, rupture, and aortic death. At aortic sizes of 3.5-3.9, 4.0-4.4, 4.5-4.9, 5.0-5.4, 5.5-5.9, and ≥6.0 cm, the average yearly risk of AAE was 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.3%, 1.4%, 2.0%, and 3.5%, respectively (P < 0.001), and the 10-year survival free from AAE was 97.8%, 98.2%, 97.3%, 84.6%, 80.4%, and 70.9%, respectively (P < 0.001). The risk of AAE was relatively flat until 5 cm of aortic size, at which it began to increase rapidly (P for non-linearity <0.001). The mean annual growth rate was estimated to be 0.10 ± 0.01 cm/year. Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms grew in a very slow manner, and aortic growth over 0.2 cm/year was rarely seen. Multivariable Cox regression identified aortic size [hazard ratio (HR): 1.78, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.50-2.11, P < 0.001] and age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.05, P = 0.015) as significant independent risk factors for AAE. Interestingly, hyperlipidemia (HR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.23-0.91, P = 0.025) was found to be a significant protective factor for AAE in univariable Cox regression.

CONCLUSION

An aortic size of 5 cm, rather than 5.5 cm, may be a more appropriate intervention criterion for prophylactic ATAA repair. Aortic growth may not be an applicable indicator for intervention.

Emergency and Compassionate Use of a Novel Ascending Endograft for Ascending and Arch Aortic Pathology

PURPOSE

Patients with complicated ascending aortic pathology, including patients with acute type A aortic dissection may be at extreme risk for open repair. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), infrequently used for the ascending aorta, may be considered an alternative in this setting. We describe early results for emergency and compassionate (E&C) use of a novel endograft, specifically designed for use to treat pathology of the ascending aorta.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This case series evaluated 19 patients (mean age, 68.84±13.12 years; 57.9% female) treated with ascending TEVAR for acute and chronic acute (4), subacute (1), or chronic (1) aortic dissection or pseudoaneurysm (13). Six of the 19 patients (31.5%) were treated under compassionate use and 13 patients (68.4%) were treated under the emergency use exemption. Ten patients (52.6%) received additional devices to extend treatment into the arch and descending aorta.

RESULTS

Device delivery was achieved in all patients (100%). Thirty-day mortality and stroke occurred in 3 patients (15.8%) and in 1 patient (5.3%), respectively. In 1 patient (5.3%), with an Unanticipated Adverse Device Event, the aorta ruptured when the endograft eroded into the adventitial portion of dissection site at the posterior aspect of the ascending wall. Devices were explanted in 2 patients (10.5%), 353 and 610 days after the index procedure, respectively. Six patients had endoleaks (31.6%), including type I (n=2, 10.5%), type II endoleaks (n=3, 15.8%), and indeterminate endoleak (n=1, 5.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Delivery and deployment of a novel ascending thoracic stent graft with or without an additional branched arch extension is feasible in patients with complex anatomy and pathology, including acute aortic dissection and pseudoaneurysm. Additional experience with this novel device will further refine the patient population most suitable for endovascular ascending aortic repair for these pathologies.

CLINICAL IMPACT

This study describes a novel stent graft specifically designed for treatment of ascending aortic pathology, including acute type A dissection. The patients described in this series constituted a group outside the formal US FDA sponsored clinical trial, and were those accepted as part of an emergency and compassionate use basis.

2022 ACC/AHA guideline for the diagnosis and management of aortic disease: A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Bicuspid Aortic Valves and Ascending Aorta ≥50 mm Under Surveillance

Background

Clinical outcomes of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) patients with ascending aortic diameters ≥50 mm who are under surveillance are poorly defined.

Objectives

The purpose of this study was to assess clinical outcomes in BAV patients with ascending aorta ≥50 mm.

Methods

Multicenter retrospective cohort study of BAV adults with ascending aorta diameters ≥50 mm by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Patients were categorized into 50 to 54 mm and ≥55 mm groups. Clinical outcomes were aortic dissection (AoD), aorta surgery, surgical mortality, and all-cause death.

Results

Of 875 consecutive BAV patients (age 60 ± 13 years, 86% men, aortic diameter 51 mm [interquartile range (IQR): 50-53 mm]), 328 (37%) underwent early surgery ≤3 months from index TTE. Of the remaining 547 patients under surveillance, 496 had diameters 50 to 54 mm and 51 had diameters ≥55 mm and were collectively followed for 7.51 (IQR: 3.98-12.20) years. Of 496 patients with diameters 50 to 54 mm under surveillance, 266 (54%) underwent surgery 2.0 (IQR: 0.77-4.16) years from index TTE. AoD occurred in 9/496 (1.8%) patients for an incidence of 0.4 cases per 100 person-years, surgical mortality was 5/266 (1.9%); and ≥moderate aortic stenosis (but not aorta size) was associated with all-cause death, hazard ratio: 2.05 (95% CI: 1.32-3.20), P = 0.001. Conversely, in 547 total patients under surveillance (including 50-54 mm and ≥55 mm), both aorta size and ≥moderate aortic stenosis were associated with all-cause death (both P ≤ 0.027). AoD rate in patients ≥55 mm under surveillance was 5.9%.

Conclusions

In BAV patients with ascending aorta 50 to 54 mm under surveillance, AoD incidence is low and the overall rates of AoD and surgical mortality are similar, suggesting clinical equivalence between surgical and surveillance strategies. Conversely, patients with aortas ≥55 mm should undergo surgery. Aortic stenosis is associated with all-cause death in these patients.

MR Angiography for Aortic Diseases

Aortic pathologic conditions represent diverse disorders, including aortic aneurysm, acute aortic syndrome, traumatic aortic injury, and atherosclerosis. Given the nonspecific clinical features, noninvasive imaging is critical in screening, diagnosis, management, and posttherapeutic surveillance. Of the commonly used imaging modalities, including ultrasound, computed tomography, and MR imaging, the final choice often depends on a combination of factors: acuity of clinical presentation, suspected underlying diagnosis, and institutional practice. Further research is needed to identify the potential clinical role and define appropriate use criteria for advanced MR applications such as four-dimenional flow to manage patients with aortic pathologic conditions.

Ascending Aortic Volume: A Feasible Indicator for Ascending Aortic Aneurysm Elective Surgery?

Diameter-based criterion have been widely adopted for preventive surgery of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm (ATAA). However, recent and growing evidence has shown that diameter-based methods may not be sufficient for identifying patients who are at risk of an ATAA. In this study, fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis was performed on one-hundred ATAA geometries reconstructed from clinical data to examine the relationship between hemodynamic conditions, ascending aortic volume (AAV), ascending aortic curvature, and aortic ratios measured from the reconstructed 3D models. The simulated hemodynamic and biomechanical parameters were compared among different groups of ATAA geometries classified based on AAV. The ATAAs with enlarged AAV showed significantly compromised hemodynamic conditions and higher mechanical wall stress. The maximum oscillatory shear index (OSI), particle residence time (PRT) and wall stress (WS) were significantly higher in enlarged ATAAs compared with controls (0.498 [0.497, 0.499] vs 0.499 [0.498, 0.499], p = 0.002, 312.847 [207.445, 519.391] vs 996.047 [640.644, 1573.140], p < 0.001, 769.680 [668.745, 879.795] vs 1072.000 [873.060, 1280.000] kPa, p < 0.001, respectively). Values were reported as median with interquartile range (IQR). AAV was also found to be more strongly correlated with these parameters compared to maximum diameter. The correlation coefficient between AAV and average WS was as high as 0.92 (p < 0.004), suggesting that AAV might be a feasible risk identifier for ATAAs. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Ascending thoracic aortic aneurysm is associated with the risk of dissection or rupture, creating life-threatening conditions. Current surgical intervention guidelines are purely diameter based. Recently, many studies proposed to incorporate other morphological parameters into the current clinical guidelines to better prevent severe adverse aortic events like rupture or dissection. The purpose of this study is to gain a better understanding of the relationship between morphological parameters and hemodynamic parameters in ascending aortic aneurysms using fluid-solid-interaction analysis on patient-specific geometries. Our results suggest that ascending aortic volume may be a better indicator for surgical intervention as it shows a stronger association with pathogenic hemodynamic conditions.

Ascending Aorta Dissection Before 5.5 cm Diameter; "It Wasn't Raining When Noah Built the Ark"

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare mean maximum ascending aortic diameter at the time of acute aortic dissection with the current surgical threshold for elective ascending aortic operations on non-syndromic thoracic aortic aneurysms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

All consecutive non-syndromic adult patients admitted for acute type A aortic dissection in a single tertiary centre were prospectively enrolled from April 2020 to March 2021. The primary endpoint was the difference between mean maximum aortic diameter at the time of dissection and the 5.5 cm threshold for elective repair. Secondary endpoints included 30-day/in-hospital mortality, aortic length and comparison with normal controls, length/height ratio index, "actual" preoperative Euroscore II and "predicted" Euroscore II if electively operated.

RESULTS

Among 31 patients ageing 67.3±12.03 years on average, mean maximum aortic diameter at the time of dissection was 5.13±0.66 cm, significantly lower than the guidelines-derived surgical threshold of 5.5 cm (p=0.004). Mean aortic length was 11±1.47 cm, also significantly longer compared normal controls reported in the literature (p<0.001). The 30-day/in-hospital mortality was 35.5%. Mean length/height ratio index was 6.18±0.76 cm/m. Finally, mean "actual" preoperative Euroscore II was 10.43±4.07 which was significantly higher than the 1.47±0.57 "predicted" Euroscore II (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The maximum aortic diameter at the time of acute type A aortic dissection of non-syndromic cases was significantly lower than the current recommendation for elective repair. Lowering of the current diameter-based surgical threshold of 5.5 cm may be profitable in terms of prevention, but further investigations should be undertaken. Length-based thresholds could also add to timely aortic dissection prevention.

A machine learning approach for predicting descending thoracic aortic diameter

Background

To establish models for predicting descending thoracic aortic diameters and provide evidence for selecting the size of the stent graft for TBAD patients.

Methods

A total of 200 candidates without severe deformation of aorta were included. CTA information was collected and 3D reconstructed. In the reconstructed CTA, a total of 12 cross-sections of peripheral vessels were made perpendicular to the axis of flow of the aorta. Parameters of the cross sections and basic clinical characteristics were used for prediction. The data was randomly split into the training set and the test set in an 8:2 ratio. To fully describe diameters of descending thoracic aorta, three predicted points were set based quadrisection, and a total of 12 models at three predicted points were established using four algorithms included linear regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), Extra-Tree regression (ETR) and random forest regression (RFR). The performance of models was evaluated by mean square error (MSE) of the prediction value, and the ranking of feature importance was given by Shapley value. After modeling, prognosis of five TEVAR cases and stent oversizing were compared.

Results

We identified a series of parameters which affect the diameter of descending thoracic aorta, including age, hypertension, the area of proximal edge of superior mesenteric artery, etc. Among four predictive models, all the MSEs of SVM models at three different predicted position were less than 2 mm², with approximately 90% predicted diameters error less than 2 mm in the test sets. In patients with dSINE, stent oversizing was about 3 mm, while only 1 mm in patients without complications.

Conclusion

The predictive models established by machine learning revealed the relationship between basic characteristics and diameters of different segment of descending aorta, which help to provide evidence for selecting the matching distal size of the stent for TBAD patients, thereby reducing the incidence of TEVAR complications.

Identification of high-risk patients for development of type B aortic dissection based on novel morphological parameters

Background: Predicting the development of sporadic type B aortic dissection (TBAD) always remains a difficult issue. This study aimed to identify high-risk patients for development of TBAD based on morphological parameters. Methods: This propensity-score-matched case-control study collected and reconstructed the computed tomography angiography of acute TBAD patients and hospital-based control participants without aortic dissection from January 2013 to December 2016. Multivariate regression analysis was used to calculate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Discriminant and reclassification abilities were compared between our model and a previously established model. Results: Our study included 76 acute TBAD patients and 79 control patients (48 cases and 48 controls after propensity-score matching). The degree of question mark (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.04-1.11), brachiocephalic trunk diameter (aOR 1.49, 95% CI 1.20-1.85), brachiocephalic trunk angle (aOR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-0.99), aortic root diameter (aOR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.48), and aortic width (aOR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07-1.17) were associated with a significantly increased risk of TBAD formation. Similar findings were observed in the propensity-score matching and sensitivity analysis only including hyperacute TBAD patients. A novel prediction model was established based on the aforementioned parameters. The new model showed significantly improved discriminant ability compared with the previously established model (c-index 0.78 [95% CI 0.71-0.85] vs. 0.67 [95% CI 0.58-0.75], p = .03), driven by increased reclassification ability in identifying TBAD patients (NRI for events 0.16, 95% CI 0.02-0.30, p = .02). Conclusion: Morphological predictors, including the degree of question mark, aortic width, aortic root diameter, brachiocephalic trunk angle, and brachiocephalic trunk diameter, may be used to identify patients at high risk of TBAD.

Regional and directional delamination properties of healthy human ascending aorta and sinotubular junction

PURPOSE

Acute type A aortic dissection (AD) is a catastrophic event associated with high mortality. Biomechanics can provide an understanding of the forces that lead the initial intimal tear to propagate, resulting in aortic dissection. We previously studied the material properties of normal human aortic roots. In this study, our objective was to determine the regional and directional delamination properties of healthy human ascending aorta (AscAo) and sinotubular junction (STJ).

RESULTS

From 19 healthy donor hearts, total 107 samples from the AscAo and STJ were collected and tested along the circumferential and longitudinal directions. Specimens were subjected to uniaxial peeling testing with a manually created tear in the medial layer. The lateral AscAo subregion (greater curvature) had significantly lower delamination strength and dissection energy than anterior, medial, and posterior subregions in the longitudinal direction. Regionally, the delamination strength at AscAo was significantly lower than at STJ overall (p = 0.02) and in circumferential direction (p = 0.02) only. Directionally, the delamination strength at AscAo overall and in the anterior AscAo was significant lower in circumferential direction than longitudinal direction. Dissection energy demonstrated similar regional and directional trend as delamination strength. In addition, both dissection energy and delamination strength were correlated positively with thickness and negatively with age in the AscAo. In addition, the dissection energy was negatively related to stiffness at physiologic mean blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The greater curvature of the AscAo had the lowest delamination strength and dissection energy suggesting that region was most vulnerable to dissection propagation distally. Increased thickness of AscAo would be protective of dissection propagation while propagation would be more likely with increased AscAo stiffness.

KIF6 Trp719Arg Genetic Variant Increases Risk for Thoracic Aortic Dissection

BACKGROUND

KIF6 (kinesin family member 6), a protein coded by the KIF6 gene, serves an important intracellular function to transport organelles along microtubules. In a pilot study, we found that a common KIF6 Trp719Arg variant increased the propensity of thoracic aortic aneurysms (TAA) to suffer dissection (AD). The present study aims for a definite investigation of the predictive ability of KIF6 719Arg vis à vis AD. Confirmatory findings would enhance natural history prediction in TAA.

METHODS

1108 subjects (899 aneurysm and 209 dissection patients) had KIF6 719Arg variant status determined.

RESULTS

The 719Arg variant in the KIF6 gene correlated strongly with occurrence of AD. Specifically, KIF6 719Arg positivity (homozygous or heterozygous) was substantially more common in dissectors (69.8%) than non-dissectors (58.5%) (p = 0.003). Odds ratios (OR) for suffering aortic dissection ranged from 1.77 to 1.94 for Arg carriers in various dissection categories. These high OR associations were noted for both ascending and descending aneurysms and for homozygous and heterozygous Arg variant patients. The rate of aortic dissection over time was significantly higher for carriers of the Arg allele (p = 0.004). Additionally, Arg allele carriers were more likely to reach the combined endpoint of dissection or death (p = 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrate the marked adverse impact of the 719Arg variant of the KIF6 gene on the likelihood that a TAA patient will suffer aortic dissection. Clinical assessment of the variant status of this molecularly important gene may provide a valuable "non-size" criterion to enhance surgical decision making above and beyond the currently used metric of aortic size (diameter).

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate. Structure: Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2022 ACC/AHA Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Aortic Disease" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the diagnosis, genetic evaluation and family screening, medical therapy, endovascular and surgical treatment, and long-term surveillance of patients with aortic disease across its multiple clinical presentation subsets (ie, asymptomatic, stable symptomatic, and acute aortic syndromes).

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from January 2021 to April 2021, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, CINHL Complete, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through June 2022 during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Recommendations from previously published AHA/ACC guidelines on thoracic aortic disease, peripheral artery disease, and bicuspid aortic valve disease have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing comprehensive care for patients with aortic disease have been developed. There is added emphasis on the role of shared decision making, especially in the management of patients with aortic disease both before and during pregnancy. The is also an increased emphasis on the importance of institutional interventional volume and multidisciplinary aortic team expertise in the care of patients with aortic disease.

Volume Changes in the Descending Aorta after Frozen Elephant Trunk and Conventional Hemi-Arch Repair after Acute Type A Aortic Dissection

The aim of this study was to compare the mortality rates, re-intervention rates, and volumetric changes in aortas following surgery, in terms of the true lumen and false lumen changes, using conventional hemi-arch repair (CET) and frozen elephant trunk (FET) techniques. During the period from 2015 to 2018, 66 patients underwent surgical treatment for acute aortic dissection (Debakey type 1). Demographic and procedure-related data were evaluated. We measured volumetric change before surgical treatment, at discharge, and at 12- and 24-month time points based on computed tomography angiography. The study cohort was divided into two groups (FET vs. CET). The mean age of the patients was 56.9 ± 9.4 years in the FET group versus 63.6 ± 11 years in the CET group (p = 0.063). The mean follow-up time was 24 ± 6 and 25 ± 5 months for the FET and CET groups, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of the medical histories of the cohorts. The results showed a significant increase in true lumen volume after the FET procedure (within 24 months postoperatively; p = 0.005), and no significant changes in total (p = 0.392) or false lumen (p = 0.659) volumes were noted. After the CET procedure, there were significant increases in total and false lumen volumes (p = 0.013, p = 0.042), while no significant change in true lumen was observed (p = 0.219). The volume increase in true lumen after the FET procedure was higher compared to the CET group at all postoperative time points (at discharge, 12 months, and 24 months) without significant evidence (p = 0.416, p = 0.422, p = 0.268). At two years, the volume increase in false lumen was significantly higher among the CET group compared to the FET group (p = 0.02). The Kaplan–Meier curve analysis showed that patients who underwent the CET procedure underwent significantly more re-interventions due to false lumen expansion of the descending aorta (p = 0.047). Present study results indicate that the true and false lumen changes in the aorta following the FET and CET procedures were different. FET led to a significant increase in true lumen volume, while false lumen volume remained stable; however, after the CET procedure, significant false lumen enlargement was noted at mid-term follow-up time points. The re-intervention rate after CET was higher due to false lumen expansion.

Endovascular reintervention after frozen elephant trunk: where is the evidence?

The introduction of the single-step hybrid frozen elephant trunk (FET) procedure for total arch replacement has revolutionized the field of aortovascular surgery. FET has proven to achieve excellent results in the repair of complex thoracic aorta pathologies. However, there remains a risk of reintervention post-FET for a variety of causes. This secondary intervention can either be performed endovascular, with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR), or via open surgery. Multiple FET hybrid prosthesis are commercially available, each requiring different rates of endovascular reintervention. The current review will focus on providing an overview of the reintervention rates for main causes in relation to the FET grafts on the market. In addition, strategies to prevent reintervention will be highlighted. A comprehensive literature search was conducted on multiple electronic databases including PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and Embase to highlight the evidence in the literature on endovascular reintervention after FET. The main causes for secondary intervention are distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE), endoleak and negative aortic remodeling, and to a much lesser extent, graft kinking and aorto-esophageal fistulae. In addition, it is clear that the Thoraflex Hybrid (Terumo Aortic, Inchinnan, UK) is the superior FET device, showing excellent reintervention rates for all the above causes. Interestingly, the choice of FET device as well as its size and length can help prevent the need for reintervention. The FET procedure is indeed associated with excellent clinical outcomes, however, the need for reintervention may still arise. Importantly, the Thoraflex Hybrid prosthesis has shown excellent results when it comes to endovascular reintervention. Finally, several strategies exist that can prevent reintervention.

Individualized prediction of risk of ascending aortic syndromes

Objectives

Although ascending aortic diameter changes acutely after dissection, recommendation for prophylactic surgery of thoracic aortic aneurysms rely on data from dissected aortas. In this case-control study we aim to identify risk markers for acute and chronic aortic syndromes of the ascending aorta (ACAS-AA). Furthermore, to develop a predictive model for ACAS-AA.

Methods

We collected data of 188 cases of ACAS-AA and 376 controls standardized to age- and sex of the background population. Medical history and CT-derived aortic morphology were collected. For the dependent outcome ACAS-AA, potential independent risk factors were identified by univariate logistic regression and confirmed in multivariate logistic regression. As post-dissection tubular ascending aortic diameter is prone to expand, this factor was not included in the first model. The individual calculated adjusted odds ratios were then used in ROC-curve analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the model. To test the influence of post-ACAS-AA tubular ascending aortic diameter, this was added to the model.

Results

The following risk factors were identified as independent risk factors for ACAS-AA in multivariate analysis: bicuspid aortic valve (OR 20.41, p = 0.03), renal insufficiency (OR 2.9, p<0.01), infrarenal abdominal aortic diameter (OR 1.08, p<0.01), left common carotid artery diameter (OR 1.40, p<0.01) and aortic width (OR 1.07, p<0.01). Area under the curve was 0.88 (p<0.01). Adding post-ACAS-AA tubular ascending aortic diameter to the model, negated the association of bicuspid aortic valve, renal insufficiency, and left common carotid artery diameter. Area under the curve changed to 0.98 (p<0.01).

Conclusions

A high performing predictive model for ACAS-AA, free of ascending aortic diameter, can be achieved. Furthermore, we have identified abdominal aortic ectasia as an independent risk factor of ACAS-AA. Integration of potential biomarkers and morphologic variables, derived from undissected aortas, would probably improve the model.

Relationship Between Length and Curvature of Ascending Aorta and Type a Dissection

Background

Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) has a rapid onset and high mortality. Currently, aortic diameter is the major criterion for evaluating the risk of TAAD. We attempted to find other aortic morphological indicators to further analyze their relationships with the risk of type A dissection.

Methods

We included the imaging and clinical data of 112 patients. The patients were divided into three groups, of which Group 1 had 49 patients with normal aortic diameter, Group 2 had 22 patients with ascending aortic aneurysm, and Group 3 had 41 patients with TAAD. We used AW Server software, version 3.2, to measure aorta-related morphological indicators.

Results

First, in Group 1, the univariate analysis results showed that ascending aortic diameter was correlated with patient age (r² = 0.35) and ascending aortic length (AAL) (r² = 0.43). AAL was correlated with age (r² = 0.12) and height (r² = 0.11). Further analysis of the aortic morphological indicators among the three groups found that the median aortic diameter was 36.20 mm in Group 1 (Q1–Q3: 33.40–37.70 mm), 42.5 mm in Group 2 (Q1–Q3: 41.52–44.17 mm) and 48.6 mm in Group 3 (Q1–Q3: 42.4–55.3 mm). There was no significant difference between Groups 2 and 3 (P > 0.05). Group 3 had the longest AAL (median: 109.4 mm, Q1–Q3: 118.3–105.3 mm), followed by Group 2 (median: 91.0 mm, Q1–Q3: 95.97–84.12 mm) and Group 1 (81.20 mm, Q1–Q3: 76.90–86.20 mm), and there were statistically significant differences among the three groups (P < 0.05). The Aortic Bending Index (ABI) was 14.95 mm/cm in Group 3 (Q1–Q3: 14.42–15.78 mm/cm), 13.80 mm/cm in Group 2 (Q1–Q3: 13.42–14.42 mm/cm), and 13.29 mm/cm in Group 1 (Q1–Q3: 12.71–13.78 mm/cm), and the difference was statistically significant in comparisons between any two groups (P < 0.05). Regression analysis showed that aortic diameter + AAL + ABI differentiated Group 2 and Group 3 with statistical significance (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.834), which was better than aortic diameter alone (AUC = 0.657; P < 0.05).

Conclusions

We introduced the new concept of ABI, which has certain clinical significance in distinguishing patients with aortic dissection and aneurysm. Perhaps the ascending aortic diameter combined with AAL and ABI could be helpful in predicting the occurrence of TAAD.

Association of 3-Year All-Cause Mortality and Peak Wall Stresses of Ascending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms in Veterans

Risk of aortic dissection in ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms is not sufficiently captured by size-based metrics. From a biomechanical perspective, dissection may be initiated when wall stress exceeds wall strength. Our objective was to assess the association between aneurysm peak wall stresses and 3-year all-cause mortality. Finite element analysis was performed in 273 veterans with chest computed tomography for surveillance of ascending thoracic aortic aneurysms. Three-dimensional geometries were reconstructed and models developed accounting for prestress geometries. A fiber-embedded hyperelastic material model was applied to obtain circumferential and longitudinal wall stresses under systolic pressure. Patients were followed up to 3 years following the scan to assess aneurysm repair and all-cause mortality. Fine-Gray subdistribution hazards were estimated for all-cause mortality based on age, aortic diameter, and peak wall stresses, treating aneurysm repair as a competing risk. When accounting for age, subdistribution hazard of mortality was not significantly increased by peak circumferential stresses (p = 0.30) but was significantly increased by peak longitudinal stresses (p = 0.008). Aortic diameter did not significantly increase subdistribution hazard of mortality in either model (circumferential model: p = 0.38; longitudinal model: p = 0.30). The effect of peak longitudinal stresses on subdistribution hazard of mortality was maximized at a binary threshold of 355kPa, which captured 34 of 212(16%) patients with diameter <5 cm, 11 of 36(31%) at 5.0-5.4 cm, and 11 of 25(44%) at ≥5.5 cm. Aneurysm peak longitudinal stresses stratified by age and diameter were associated with increased hazard of 3-year all-cause mortality in a veteran cohort. Risk prediction may be enhanced by considering peak longitudinal stresses.

Toward standard abbreviations and acronyms for use in articles on aortic disease

Objectives

Academic medical literature is fraught with complex article-specific acronyms and abbreviations that can impair communication and make reading arduous. Our goal is to ease frustration with bespoke, inconsistent, and variable sets of abbreviations that currently exist for common aorta-related terminology (eg, anatomy, imaging, disease, and therapy). We hope to ease reading and improve communication in the aortic sphere of cardiovascular literature.

Methods

We reviewed a total of 205 published references related to aortic disease, including a systematic review of aorta-related articles in the Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery from the years 2020 and 2021. The array of variable definitions, abbreviations, and acronyms encountered in different papers that refer to the same terminology was striking, revealing that there were few standardized abbreviations in the aortic literature. We cataloged these terms, their associated abbreviations, and their frequency of use, and compiled a list of proposed standard abbreviations for commonly used terms that could be implemented uniformly in articles written about aortic diseases.

Results

We present suggested acronyms and abbreviations for common terminology related to the aorta. It is anticipated that this standard list will evolve over time as the literature and technology of the field grows and develops.

Conclusions

A proposed standard set of acronyms and abbreviations for aorta-related terminology is provided that, if found useful, could be implemented broadly in the aortic literature.

Can We Better Differentiate Type A Dissections: Evaluating the Role of Aortic Ratios

OBJECTIVES

Type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) is hypothesised as a progression of aneurysmal dilation, but 60% of patients in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (iRAD) registry had a maximum aortic diameter (MAD)<55 mm. We aim to demonstrate that size ratios and aortic wall stress, assessed using a simplified markers, are unique to aortic patients who have had adverse events (ATAAD) compared to those who have not (thoracic aortic aneurysm [TAA]).

METHODS

A retrospective cohort analysis of patients who underwent aortic intervention at Waikato Hospital, New Zealand between 2015-2020, comparing dissection (ATAAD) to TAA patients. MAD; ratio of MAD to standardised-points within the aorta; and MAD-to-height collected from computed tomography (CT)-scans of all patients was undertaken. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC)-analysis to determine cut-off point for each marker was undertaken together with multivariable logistic regression comparing both cohorts, cross-validated by propensity-score matched analysis.

RESULTS

Cohort of 215 patients, 78 (36.3%) ATAAD and 137 (63.7%) TAA; median age at intervention 63.3 years, 52 (24.2%) females, both cohorts matched for size. Using the entire cohort, the MAD: sinus of Valsalva (SoV) ratio>1.06 (cut-off value) had 4.5-times greater association with ATAAD (95%CI 1.46-13.8) and a 0.1-unit increased conferred 1.45-times greater association with ATAAD (95%CI 1.00-2.08). MAD>55 mm only seen in 33.3% of ATAAD (n=26/78), and not associated with ATAAD (OR 1.88, 95%CI 0.64-5.51). Compared to MAD, MAD:SoV ratio had greater sensitivity (33% vs 73%), lower number-needed-to-treat (17.9 vs 2.7) and superior discrimination (area under the curve [AUC] 0.54 vs 0.71). Findings were consistent with propensity score matched analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

MAD:SoV ratio significantly correlates with ATAAD (4.5 times), with superior sensitivity, discrimination, and attributable-risk-percentage compared to MAD alone.

Early aortic growth in acute descending aortic dissection

OBJECTIVES

Acute aortic dissection leads to the destabilization of the aortic wall, followed by an immediate increase in aortic diameter. It remains unclear how the aortic diameter changes during the dissection's acute and subacute phases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the change in aortic geometry within 30 days after the onset of a descending aortic dissection.

METHODS

Patients with acute type B and non-A non-B dissection who had at least 2 computed tomography angiography scans obtained within 30 days after the onset of dissection were evaluated. Exclusion criteria were a thrombosed false lumen, connective tissue disorders and endovascular or open aortic repair performed prior to the second computed tomography angiography.

RESULTS

Among 190 patients with acute aortic dissection, 42 patients met our inclusion criteria. Their aortic geometry was analysed according to the computed tomography angiography scans obtained between 0-3 (N = 35), 4-7 (N = 9) and 8-30 (N = 12) days after the dissection onset. The highest aortic diameter growth rate was observed in the first quartile of the thoracic aorta and measured 0.66 (0.06; 1.03), 0.29 (-0.01; 0.41) and 0.06 (-0.13; 0.26) mm/day at 0-3, 4-7 and 8-30 days after the dissection, respectively. Proximal entry location (P = 0.037) and entry located at the arch concavity (P = 0.008) were associated with a higher aortic diameter increase.

CONCLUSIONS

Early rapid growth occurs during the first week after the descending aortic dissection-most intensely over the first 3 days, and this is associated with the location of the dissection's entry.

mTOR inhibition prevents angiotensin II-induced aortic rupture and pseudoaneurysm but promotes dissection in Apoe-deficient mice

Aortic dissection and rupture are triggered by decreased vascular wall strength and/or increased mechanical loads. We investigated the role of mTOR signaling in aortopathy using a well-described model of angiotensin II–induced dissection, aneurysm, or rupture of the suprarenal abdominal aorta in Apoe-deficient mice. Although not widely appreciated, nonlethal hemorrhagic lesions present as pseudoaneurysms without significant dissection in this model. Angiotensin II–induced aortic tears result in free rupture, contained rupture with subadventitial hematoma (forming pseudoaneurysms), dilatation, or healing, while the media invariably thickens regardless of mural tears. Medial thickening results from smooth muscle cell hypertrophy and extracellular matrix accumulation, including matricellular proteins. Angiotensin II activates mTOR signaling in vascular wall cells, and inhibition of mTOR signaling by rapamycin prevents aortic rupture but promotes dissection. Decreased aortic rupture correlates with decreased inflammation and metalloproteinase expression, whereas extensive dissection correlates with induction of matricellular proteins that modulate adhesion of vascular cells. Thus, mTOR activation in vascular wall cells determines whether aortic tears progress to dissection or rupture. Previous mechanistic studies of aortic aneurysm and dissection by angiotensin II in Apoe-deficient mice should be reinterpreted as clinically relevant to pseudoaneurysms, and mTOR inhibition for aortic disease should be explored with caution.

Aortic Size and Clinical Care Pathways Before Type A Aortic Dissection

Patients with aortic enlargement are recommended to undergo serial imaging and clinical follow-up until they reach surgical thresholds. This study aimed to identify aortic diameter and care of patients with aortic imaging before aortic dissection (AD). In a retrospective cohort of AD patients, we evaluated previous imaging results in addition to ordering providers and indications. Imaging was stratified as >1 or <1 year: 62 patients (53% men) had aortic imaging before AD (most recent test: 82% echo, 11% computed tomography, 6% magnetic resonance imaging). Imaging was ordered most frequently by primary care physicians (35%) and cardiologists (39%). The most frequent imaging indications were arrhythmia (11%), dyspnea (10%), before or after aortic valve surgery (8%), chest pain (6%), and aneurysm surveillance in 13%. Of all patients, 94% had aortic diameters below the surgical threshold before the AD. Imaging was performed <1 year before AD in 47% and aortic size was 4.4 ± 0.8 cm in ascending aorta and 4.0 ± 0.8 cm in sinus. In patients whose most recent imaging was >1 year before AD (1,317 ± 1,017 days), the mean ascending aortic diameter was 4.2 ± 0.4 cm. In conclusion, in a series of patients with aortic imaging before AD, the aortic size was far short of surgical thresholds in 94% of the group. In >50%, imaging was last performed >1 year before dissection.