Oral Anticoagulation and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and End-Stage Renal Disease

Anticoagulation in patients with end-stage kidney disease and atrial fibrillation: a national population-based study

Background

The prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is high and increasing. However, evidence regarding oral anticoagulant (OAC) use in these patients is insufficient and conflicting.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients in the Korea National Health Insurance System diagnosed with AF after ESKD onset from January 2007 to December 2017. The primary outcome was all-cause death. Secondary outcomes were ischaemic stroke, hospitalization for major bleeding and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). Outcomes were compared between OAC users and non-users using 6-month landmark analysis and 1:3 propensity score matching (PSM).

Results

Among patients with ESKD and AF, the number of prescribed OACs increased 2.3-fold from 2012 (n = 3579) to 2018 (n = 8341) and the proportion of direct OACs prescribed increased steadily from 0% in 2012 to 51.4% in 2018. After PSM, OAC users had a lower risk of all-cause death {hazard ratio [HR] 0.67 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.81]}, ischaemic stroke [HR 0.61 (95% CI 0.41-0.89)] and MACE [HR 0.70 (95% CI 0.55-0.90)] and no increased risk of hospitalization for major bleeding [HR 0.99 (95% CI 0.72-1.35)] compared with non-users. Unlike warfarin, direct OACs were associated with a reduced risk of all-cause death and hospitalization for major bleeding.

Conclusions

In patients with ESKD and AF, OACs were associated with reduced all-cause death, ischaemic stroke and MACE.

Cardiovascular and renal outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease receiving direct oral anticoagulants: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

The role of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease (CKD) is controversial. Electronic medical records from 2012 to 2021 were retrieved for patients with AF and stage 4-5 CKD receiving oral anticoagulants. Patients were separated into those receiving DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, or edoxaban) or vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Primary outcomes included ischemic stroke (IS), systemic thrombosis (SE), major bleeding, gastrointestinal bleeding, hemorrhagic stroke, acute myocardial infarction, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. Renal outcomes included eGFR declines, creatinine doubling, progression to dialysis, and major adverse kidney events (MAKE). The primary analysis was until the end of follow up and the results at 1-year and 2-year of follow ups were also assessed. 2,382 patients (DOAC = 1,047, VKA = 1,335) between 2012 and 2021 with AF and stage 4-5 CKD were identified. The mean follow-up period was 2.3 ± 2.1 years in DOCAs and 2.6 ± 2.3 years in VKA respectively. At the end of follow up, the DOAC patients had significantly decreased SE (subdistribution hazard ratio [SHR] = 0.50, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.34-0.73), composite of IS/SE (SHR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.62-0.98), major bleeding (HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.66-0.90), hemorrhagic stroke (HR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.36-0.76), and composite of bleeding events (SHR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.69-0.92) compared with VKA patients. The IS efficacy outcome revealed neutral between DOAC and VKA patients (HR = 1.05, 95% CI = 0.79-1.39). In addition, DOAC patients had significantly decreased rates of eGFR decline > 50% (SHR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.64-0.87), creatinine doubling (SHR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67-0.95), and MAKE (SHR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.71-0.93). In patients with AF and stage 4-5 CKD, use of DOAC was associated with decreased rates of a composite of ischemic stroke/systemic embolism, a composite of bleeding events, and renal events compared to VKA. Efficacy and safety benefits associated with apixaban at standard doses were consistent throughout follow-up.

Zero-Contrast Left Atrial Appendage Closure in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) usually requires contrast medium during the procedure. However, patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk of developing contrast nephropathy. This study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of zero-contrast LAAC in patients with CKD.Methods and Results: Zero-contrast LAAC was attempted in 15 patients with CKD Stages 3b-5 who were not on hemodialysis. All procedures were performed successfully, without any periprocedural complications. At the 45-day follow-up, no device-related complications or acute kidney disease were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The strategy of zero-contrast LAAC in patients with CKD can be an acceptable option.

Anticoagulant drugs for patients with atrial fibrillation on dialysis: a systematic analysis and network meta-analysis

Objective: A lack of clarity persists regarding the efficacy and risks associated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing dialysis, primarily due to limited retrospective studies. Therefore, the objective of this study was to evaluate the existing data and propose a practical protocol for the clinical utilization of DOACs in ESRD patients with AF undergoing dialysis. Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for clinical studies evaluating DOACs in ESRD patients with AF on dialysis published up to 2 February 2023. DOACs included warfarin, dabigatran, apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban. The outcomes were mortality, ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, any stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, major bleeding, intracranial bleeding, and minor bleeding. Results: Compared with placebo, apixaban (HR = 0.97, 95% CI: 0.88-1.07), rivaroxaban (HR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.76-1.10), and warfarin (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.90-1.01) did not reduce mortality. Regarding direct comparisons of mortality, the comparisons of warfarin vs. apixaban (HR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.92-1.06), placebo vs. warfarin (HR = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.99-1.11), and rivaroxaban vs. warfarin (HR = 0.96, 95% CI: 0.80-1.14) did not significantly reduce mortality. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve, rivaroxaban (75.53%), warfarin (62.14%), and apixaban (45.6%) were the most effective interventions for managing mortality, and placebo (16.74%) was the worst. Conclusion: In conclusion, rivaroxaban demonstrated efficacy in reducing mortality and the incidence of ischemic stroke, gastrointestinal bleeding, and intracranial hemorrhage. Dabigatran is recommended for the prevention of hemorrhagic stroke. However, caution should be exercised due to the risk of major bleeding. Warfarin can effectively reduce minor bleeding but does not offer significant protection against gastrointestinal or intracranial bleeding. Apixaban was not recommended for mortality reduction or for preventing ischemic or hemorrhagic strokes. Further research will be necessary to establish specific clinical protocols.

Comparative Effectiveness of Different Anticoagulation Strategies in Atrial Fibrillation and Renal Dysfunction: A Systematic Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a common cardiac arrhythmia that increases the risk of stroke and thromboembolism. Anticoagulation therapy can reduce this risk, but the optimal choice of anticoagulant in patients with AF and renal dysfunction is challenging. Renal dysfunction is a common comorbidity seen in patients with AF. Renal dysfunction would affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of anticoagulants and make the patient more prone to bleeding complications. This complicates the assessment of the risks, benefits, and ratio for starting anticoagulant drugs in patients with renal dysfunction. Therefore, there is always a therapeutic conundrum due to the increased risk of bleeding and thromboembolic events in AF patients with renal dysfunction. We conducted a systematic review to summarize the current literature and identify the challenges of anticoagulation strategies in AF with renal dysfunction. We examined 180 articles from reputable journals published from 2018 to June 2023 and selected eight papers for detailed analysis. The studies we chose included a variety of drug treatments, such as traditional therapies like vitamin K antagonists, factor Xa inhibitors, heparins, and direct thrombin inhibitors. This systematic review will provide comprehensive information on the latest data on the effectiveness of various pharmacological treatments (anticoagulation strategies) in AF patients with renal dysfunction. The aim is to help doctors and other healthcare decision-makers choose the best anticoagulation strategy in AF patients with renal dysfunction and to overcome their dilemma between bleeding risk and systemic thromboembolic events.

Warfarin treatment quality and outcomes in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and CKD G3-G5D

INTRODUCTION

Warfarin treatment quality is calculated as time in therapeutic range (TTR). TTR ≥ 70 % is considered reducing the risk of adverse events for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The association of TTR and adverse events in chronic kidney disease (CKD) is however poorly investigated. The aim is to explore this further.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Swedish cohort study based on national healthcare registers between 2009 and 2018, including Swedish Renal Registry, Swedish Stroke Register and AuriculA - the Swedish national quality register for AF and anticoagulation. Investigating the effect of individual TTR (iTTR) and iTTR ≥ 70 % versus <70 % on the risk of ischemic stroke, major bleeding and death for patients with CKD GFR category 3-5 (G3-G5) including patients on dialysis (G5D) and non-valvular AF (NVAF).

RESULTS

Of 2379 included patients 21.9 % had G3, 47.5 % G4, 10.8 % G5 and 19.8 % G5D. TTR in G3 was 75.6 %, G4 72.2 %, G5 67.6 % and G5D 62.0 %. Increase by 10 percentage points iTTR conferred lower risk of major bleeding, ischemic stroke and death for all patients (hazard ratio 0.91 (95 % Confidence interval 0.87-0.94), 0.92 (0.85-0.99) and 0.88 (0.85-0.90)). iTTR≥ 70 % versus <70 % was associated with lower risk of bleeding and death in all patients (0.63 (0.51-0.77) and (0.51 (0.43-0.61)), and a non-significant tendency towards lower stroke risk (0.67 (0.43-1.06)).

CONCLUSIONS

Warfarin treatment quality worsens with decreasing GFR. Higher iTTR confers lower risk of bleeding, ischemic stroke and death in patients with NVAF and G3-G5D. iTTR ≥ 70 % was associated with better safety profile. Close monitoring of patients with CKD on warfarin is recommended.

Kidney disease and stroke: epidemiology and potential mechanisms of susceptibility

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke compared with the general population. Both acute and chronic kidney impairment are independently associated with poor outcome after the onset of a stroke, after adjustment for confounders. End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) is associated with a 7- and 9-fold increased incidence of both ischaemic and haemorrhagic strokes, respectively, poorer neurological outcome and a 3-fold higher mortality. Acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in 12% of patients with stroke and is associated with a 4-fold increased mortality and unfavourable functional outcome. CKD patients seem to have less access to revascularisation techniques like thrombolysis and thrombectomy despite their poorer prognosis. Even if CKD patients could benefit from these specific treatments in acute ischaemic stroke, their prognosis remains poor. After thrombolysis, CKD is associated with a 40% increased risk of intracerebral haemorrhage (ICH), a 20% increase in mortality and poorer functional neurological outcomes. After thrombectomy, CKD is not associated with ICH but is still associated with increased mortality, and AKI with unfavourable outcome and mortality. The beneficial impact of gliflozins on the prevention of stroke is still uncertain. Non-traditional risk factors of stroke, like uraemic toxins, can lead to chronic cerebrovascular disease predisposing to stroke in CKD, notably through an increase in the blood-brain barrier permeability and impaired coagulation and thrombosis mechanisms. Preclinical and clinical studies are needed to specifically assess the impact of these non-traditional risk factors on stroke incidence and outcomes, aiming to optimize and identify potential therapeutic targets.

Therapeutics of Extracellular Vesicles in Cardiocerebrovascular and Metabolic Diseases

Extracellular vesicles (EVs) are nanoscale membranous vesicles containing DNA, RNA, lipids, and proteins, which play versatile roles in intercellular communications. EVs are increasingly being recognized as the promising therapeutic agents for many diseases, including cardiocerebrovascular and metabolic diseases, due to their ability to deliver functional and therapeutical molecules. In this chapter, the biological characteristics and functions of EVs are briefly summarized. Importantly, the current state of applying EVs in the prevention and treatment of cardiocerebrovascular and metabolic diseases, including myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, myocardial hypertrophy, stroke, diabetes, Alzheimer's disease, fatty liver, obesity, thyroid diseases, and osteoporosis, is discussed. Lastly, the challenges and prospects related to the preclinical and clinical application of EVs receive a particular focus.

Initial report of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation and high risk of bleeding in Japan

In the countries like Japan where anticoagulation is not recommended in hemodialysis patients, the feasibility of percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) in hemodialysis patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) accompanying high risks of thromboembolic stroke and bleeding remains unknown. Peri-procedural and 45-day clinical outcomes following LAAC using WATCHMAN system, which were performed in our institute between Jun 2020 and April 2022 according to the Japanese Circulation Society guidelines, were retrospectively compared between those with and without hemodialysis. 118 patients (median 79 years, 81 men) consisting of 25 hemodialysis patients and 93 non-hemodialysis patients were included. CHADS score was 3 (2, 4) in the hemodialysis patients and 3 (2, 4) in the non-hemodialysis patients (p = 0.98). HAS-BREAD score was 4 (3, 5) in the hemodialysis patients and 3 (2, 3) in the non-hemodialysis patients (p < 0.001). All procedures were successful, except for a non-hemodialysis patient with a larger left atrial appendage. There were no major complications during index hospitalization and 45-day observational period, except for a hemodialysis patient with suspected bleeding and a non-hemodialysis patient who died due to cardiac amyloidosis. LAAC seems to be feasible in hemodialysis patients with high risks of thromboembolic events and bleedings.

Apixaban for Patients With Atrial Fibrillation on Hemodialysis: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

There are no randomized data evaluating the safety or efficacy of apixaban for stroke prevention in patients with end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis and with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

The RENAL-AF trial (Renal Hemodialysis Patients Allocated Apixaban Versus Warfarin in Atrial Fibrillation) was a prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-outcome evaluation (PROBE) of apixaban versus warfarin in patients receiving hemodialysis with AF and a CHA2DS2-VASc score ≥2. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to 5 mg of apixaban twice daily (2.5 mg twice daily for patients ≥80 years of age, weight ≤60 kg, or both) or dose-adjusted warfarin. The primary outcome was time to major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding. Secondary outcomes included stroke, mortality, and apixaban pharmacokinetics. Pharmacokinetic sampling was day 1, day 3, and month 1.

RESULTS

From January 2017 through January 2019, 154 patients were randomly assigned to apixaban (n=82) or warfarin (n=72). The trial stopped prematurely because of enrollment challenges. Time in therapeutic range (international normalized ratio, 2.0-3.0) for warfarin-treated patients was 44% (interquartile range, 23%-59%). The 1-year rates for major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding were 32% and 26% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively (hazard ratio, 1.20 [95% CI, 0.63-2.30]), whereas 1-year rates for stroke or systemic embolism were 3.0% and 3.3% in apixaban and warfarin groups, respectively. Death was the most common major event in the apixaban (21 patients [26%]) and warfarin (13 patients [18%]) arms. The pharmacokinetic substudy enrolled the target 50 patients. Median steady-state 12-hour area under the curve was 2475 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 1342-3285) for 5 mg of apixaban twice daily and 1269 ng/mL×h (10th to 90th percentiles, 615-1946) for 2.5 mg of apixaban twice daily. There was substantial overlap between minimum apixaban blood concentration, 12-hour area under the curve, and maximum apixaban blood concentration for patients with and without a major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding event.

CONCLUSIONS

There was inadequate power to draw any conclusion regarding rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding comparing apixaban and warfarin in patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis. Clinically relevant bleeding events were ≈10-fold more frequent than stroke or systemic embolism among this population on anticoagulation, highlighting the need for future randomized studies evaluating the risks versus benefits of anticoagulation among patients with AF and end-stage kidney disease on hemodialysis.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov; Unique identifier: NCT02942407.

Nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis. Should dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation receive oral anticoagulation?

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is an independent risk factor for presenting atrial fibrillation (AF), which conditions an increased risk already present in CKD of suffering a thromboembolic event. And this risk is even higher in the hemodialysis (HD) population. On the other hand, in CKD patients and even more so in HD patients, the probability of suffering serious bleeding is also higher. Therefore, there is no consensus on whether or not to anticoagulate this population. Taking as a model what is advised for the general population, the most common attitude among nephrologists has been to opt for anticoagulation, even though there is no randomized studies to support it. Classically, anticoagulation has been done with vitamin K antagonists, at high cost for our patients: severe bleeding events, vascular calcification, and progression of nephropathy, among other complications. With the emergence of direct-acting anticoagulants, a hopeful outlook was opened in the field of anticoagulation, as they were postulated as more effective and safer drugs than antivitamin K. However, in clinical practice, this has not been the case. In this paper we review various aspects of AF and its anticoagulant treatment in the HD population.

Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Scientific Statement of JACC: Asia (Part 2)

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and is associated with substantial increases in the risk for stroke and systemic thromboembolism. With the successful introduction of the first non-vitamin K antagonistdirect oral anticoagulant agent (NOAC) in 2009, the role of vitamin K antagonists has been replaced in most clinical settings except in a few conditions for which NOACs are contraindicated. Data for the use of NOACs in different clinical scenarios have been accumulating in the past decade, and a more sophisticated strategy for patients with AF is now warranted. JACC: Asia recently appointed a working group to summarize the most updated information regarding stroke prevention in AF. The aim of this statement is to provide possible treatment options in daily practice. Local availability, cost, and patient comorbidities should also be considered. Final decisions may still need to be individualized and based on clinicians' discretion. This is part 2 of the statement.

Efficacy and safety of warfarin in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and CKD G3-G5D

Background

Observational data comparing warfarin with no treatment for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) and severely reduced glomerular filtration rate (GFR) are conflicting and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are lacking. Most studies do not provide information on warfarin treatment quality, making them difficult to compare.

Methods

This national cohort study investigates the risk of ischaemic stroke and major bleeding during warfarin treatment compared with no oral anticoagulants in patients with NVAF, GFR category 3-5 (G3-G5) or on dialysis (G5D), with kidney transplant recipients excluded, between 2009 and 2018. Data extracted from high-quality Swedish national healthcare registries, including the Swedish Renal Registry, AuriculA-the Swedish national quality registry for atrial fibrillation and anticoagulation-and the Stroke Registry.

Results

At enrolment of 12 106 patients, 21.4% were G3, 43.5% were G4, 11.6% were G5 and 23.6% were G5D. The mean time in the therapeutic range was 70%. Warfarin compared with no treatment showed a lower risk for ischaemic stroke for G3 {hazard ratio [HR] 0.37 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-0.76]}, G4 [0.53 (0.38-0.74)] and G5 [0.49 (0.30-0.79)] and an increased risk of major bleeding in G4 [HR 1.22 (1.02-1.46)], G5 [1.52 (1.15-2.01)] and G5D [1.23 (1.00-1.51)]. All-cause mortality was more than halved on warfarin compared with no treatment in all GFR categories.

Conclusions

Warfarin treatment is associated with a lower risk of ischaemic stroke for patients with NVAF and G3, G4 and G5D at the cost of a higher risk of major bleeding for G4-G5D. Existing observational data are conflicting, stressing the need for RCTs on warfarin compared with no treatment in G4-G5D. Awaiting RCTs, it seems reasonable to treat selected patients on dialysis and NVAF with warfarin.

Warfarin Usage in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Hemodialysis in Indonesian Population

The data about the efficacy and safety of warfarin usage in atrial fibrillation (AF) in hemodialysis patients is still limited, especially in the Asia population. The population of this study was end-stage renal disease patients with AF who underwent hemodialysis. The design of the study was a retrospective observational cohort that collected the patient data from 2016 to 2019. The Cox regression model was applied to assess the effect of warfarin on the outcomes. We conducted a survival analysis by comparing Kaplan-Meier curves using the log-rank test. We also measured the time in therapeutic range as a quality indicator of warfarin usage. Among 444 hemodialysis patients, 126 patients with AF matched the inclusion criteria, 88 patients completely followed up. Half patients used warfarin. The mean age was 52.2 ± 12.97 years, the mean follow-up duration was 11 ± 10 months. We observed all-cause death in 86.4% of patients, ischemic stroke in 10.2%, and hemorrhagic stroke in 2.3% of patients. There were no significant differences in all-cause death, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke. Warfarin use was not associated with a lower rate for death (HR 0.782; 95% CI, 0.494-1.237, P = 0.293) or ischemic stroke (HR 0.435; 95% CI, 0.103-1.846, P = 0.259) or hemorrhagic stroke (HR 0.564; 95% CI, 0.034-9.386, P = 0.689). None of the patients reach the time in the therapeutic range >65%. Our findings suggest that warfarin has no association with mortality, ischemic stroke, and hemorrhagic stroke events rate in atrial fibrillation patients who underwent hemodialysis in the Indonesian population.

Survival Benefit of Anticoagulation Therapy in End Stage Kidney Disease Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Single Center Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: Although the need for anticoagulation to prevent thromboembolism is increasing and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) have been tried, there is still controversy about the efficacy of anticoagulation in patients with dialysis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the risk and benefit of anticoagulation in dialysis patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). We retrospectively analyzed all data of 89 patients who received dialysis therapy and were diagnosed with AF. Among them, 27 received anticoagulation (11 warfarin and 16 apixaban 2.5 mg twice a day), while 62 received no anticoagulation. Results: In multivariate Cox regression analysis, compared to no anticoagulation treatment, anticoagulation treatment was associated with a low incidence of all-cause mortality (hazard ratios (HR) 0.36; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.15–0.88). Compared to no anticoagulation treatment, more anticoagulation treatment patients experienced severe bleeding (HR 4.67; 95% CI 1.26–17.25) and any bleeding (HR 2.79; 95% CI 1.01–7.74). Compared to no anticoagulation, warfarin treatment patients were associated with a low incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 0.26; 95% CI 0.09–0.81) and a high incidence of severe bleeding (HR 4.85; 95% CI 1.12–21.10). All-cause mortality and bleeding were not significantly different between no anticoagulation and apixaban treatment patients. Conclusions: In dialysis patients with AF, anticoagulation therapy is associated with an increased incidence of severe bleeding, but anticoagulation therapy is associated with a low incidence of all-cause mortality. Individualized anticoagulation therapy with careful bleeding monitoring is needed in dialysis patients with AF.

Non-valvular Atrial Fibrillation in CKD: Role of Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants. A Narrative Review

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia in chronic kidney disease (CKD), with a close bidirectional relationship between the two entities. The presence of CKD in AF increases the risk of thromboembolic events, mortality and bleeding. Vitamin K antagonists (VKA) have been the mainstay of treatment for the prevention of thromboembolic events in AF until recently, with confirmed benefits in AF patients with stage 3 CKD. However, the risk-benefit profile of VKA in patients with AF and stages 4-5 CKD is controversial due to the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials. Treatment with VKA in CKD patients has been associated with conditions such as poorer anticoagulation quality, increased risk of bleeding, faster progression of vascular/valvular calcification and higher risk of calciphylaxis. Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have shown equal or greater efficacy in stroke/systemic embolism prevention, and a better safety profile than VKA in post-hoc analysis of the pivotal randomized controlled trials in patients with non-valvular AF and stage 3 CKD, yet evidence of its risk-benefit profile in more advanced stages of CKD is scarce. Observational studies associate DOACs with a good safety/effectiveness profile compared to VKA in non-dialysis CKD patients. Further, DOACs have been associated with a lower risk of acute kidney injury and CKD development/progression than VKA. This narrative review summarizes the evidence of the efficacy and safety of warfarin and DOACs in patients with AF at different CKD stages, as well as their effects on renal function, vascular/valvular calcification and bone health.

The Association of Chronic Kidney Disease With Outcomes Following Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the associations of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) with in-hospital and short-term outcomes using a large national database representative of contemporary clinical practice.

BACKGROUND

CKD and ESRD are associated with increased risk for stroke and bleeding in patients with atrial fibrillation on oral anticoagulation. Left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may provide a reasonable alternative for these patients; however, the impact of CKD and ESRD on in-hospital and short-term outcomes following LAAC remain largely unknown.

METHODS

The Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify LAAC procedures from 2016 to 2017 in patients with no CKD, CKD (stages I-V), and ESRD. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess in-hospital and short-term outcomes. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

Of 21,274 patients who underwent LAAC during the study period, 3,954 (18.6%) had CKD and 571 (2.7%) had ESRD. ESRD was associated with increased risk for in-hospital mortality compared with no CKD (3.3% vs 0.4%; adjusted odds ratio: 6.48; 95% confidence interval: 3.35-12.50; P < 0.001) and CKD (3.3% vs 0.5%; adjusted odds ratio: 11.43; 95% confidence interval: 4.77-27.39; P < 0.001). CKD was associated with increased risk for in-hospital acute kidney injury or hemodialysis and stroke or transient ischemic attack. ESRD and CKD were associated with increased readmissions extending to 90 days compared with no CKD, and ESRD was associated with increased readmissions compared with CKD. There was no difference with respect to other in-hospital outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

ESRD is associated with higher in-hospital mortality, and CKD is associated with higher rates of stroke or transient ischemic attack in patients undergoing LAAC. Further research is needed to assess the impact of CKD and ESRD on long-term outcomes in these patients.

Does Chronic Kidney Disease Have an Impact on the Use of Oral Anticoagulants after Stroke? An Observational Follow-Up Study

INTRODUCTION

Chronic kidney disease is common in patients with acute ischemic stroke. We investigated whether chronic kidney disease has an impact on anticoagulation treatment recommendations after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) related with atrial fibrillation (AF).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We extracted treatment-related data concerning stroke/TIA patients with AF and available estimated glomerular filtration rates (eGFR) from a monocentric prospective German stroke registry. Chronic kidney disease was defined as eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m2. Using uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses, we investigated whether chronic kidney disease was associated with a lower probability to be treated with anticoagulation early after stroke.

RESULTS

A total of 273 patients entered the analysis. In 242 AF patients (88.6%), oral anticoagulation was recommended after stroke. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, chronic kidney disease was not identified as an independent factor for the decision against anticoagulation (OR 1.63, 95% CI: 0.50-5.31, p = 0.421); only increasing age (OR 1.10, 95% CI: 1.00-1.21, p = 0.061) and a modified Rankin Scale >3 at discharge (OR 3.41, 95% CI: 0.88-13.24, p = 0.077) showed a nonsignificant trend for the decision to omit anticoagulation. A total of 155 of 167 patients (92.8%) were still anticoagulated at follow-up. A total of 44 patients with chronic kidney disease completed follow-up, and of those, 37 were still anticoagulated (84%). In patients without chronic kidney disease, 118/167 (70.7%) had continued anticoagulation (p = 0.310).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that chronic kidney disease was not the main factor in the decision to withhold oral anticoagulation in patients with recent stroke/TIA and AF.

Epidemiology, thrombolytic management, and outcomes of acute stroke among patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The relative frequency of ischemic versus hemorrhagic stroke among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) has not been clearly described. Moreover, no recent meta-analysis has investigated the outcomes of patients with CKD treated with thrombolysis for acute ischemic stroke. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the proportion of stroke subtypes and the outcomes of thrombolysis in CKD.

METHODS

A PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane literature research was conducted. The primary outcome was the proportion and incidence of ischemic versus hemorrhagic strokes among patients with CKD. In addition, we assessed the impact of CKD on disability, mortality, and bleeding among patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis. The pooled proportion and the risk ratio (RR) were estimated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine observational studies were included: 22 on the epidemiology of stroke types and 17 on the outcomes of thrombolysis in this population. In the main analysis (> 99,281 patients), ischemic stroke was more frequent than hemorrhagic among patients with CKD (78.3%, 95% confidence interval 73.3%-82.5%). However, among patients with kidney failure, the proportion of ischemic stroke decreased and was closer to that of hemorrhagic stroke: 59.8% (95% confidence interval 49.4%-69.4%). CKD was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke compared with patients with preserved kidney function.

CONCLUSIONS

The relative frequency of hemorrhagic stroke seems to increase as kidney function declines. Among patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with thrombolysis, presence of CKD is associated with higher disability, mortality, and bleeding, compared with patients with preserved kidney function.

Safety and Efficacy of Vitamin K Antagonists versus Rivaroxaban in Hemodialysis Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In patients with normal renal function or early stage CKD, the risk-benefit profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) is superior to that of vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). In patients on hemodialysis, the comparative efficacy and safety of DOACs versus VKAs are unknown.

METHODS

In the Valkyrie study, 132 patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation were randomized to a VKA with a target INR of 2-3, 10 mg rivaroxaban daily, or rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 for 18 months. Patients continued the originally assigned treatment and follow-up was extended for at least an additional 18 months. The primary efficacy end point was a composite of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events. Secondary efficacy end points were individual components of the composite outcome and all-cause death. Safety end points were life-threatening, major, and minor bleeding.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) follow-up was 1.88 (1.01-3.38) years. Premature, permanent discontinuation of anticoagulation occurred in 25% of patients. The primary end point occurred at a rate of 63.8 per 100 person-years in the VKA group, 26.2 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban group, and 21.4 per 100 person-years in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group. The estimated competing risk-adjusted hazard ratio for the primary end point was 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25 to 0.68; P=0.0006) in the rivaroxaban group and 0.34 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.61; P=0.0003) in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group, compared with the VKA group. Death from any cause, cardiac death, and risk of stroke were not different between the treatment arms, but symptomatic limb ischemia occurred significantly less frequently with rivaroxaban than with VKA. After adjustment for competing risk of death, the hazard ratio for life-threatening and major bleeding compared with the VKA group was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.90; P=0.03) in the rivaroxaban group, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.22 to 1.08; P=0.08) in the rivaroxaban and vitamin K2 group and 0.44 (95% CI, 0.23 to 0.85; P=0.02) in the pooled rivaroxaban groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients on hemodialysis with atrial fibrillation, a reduced dose of rivaroxaban significantly decreased the composite outcome of fatal and nonfatal cardiovascular events and major bleeding complications compared with VKA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRY NAME AND REGISTRATION NUMBER

Oral Anticoagulation in Hemodialysis, NCT03799822.

Anticoagulation Management In Hemodialysis Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Evidence And Opinion

In the absence of robust evidence to guide clinical decision making, the optimal approach to prevent stroke and systemic embolism in hemodialysis patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) remains moot. In this position paper, studies on oral anticoagulation in hemodialysis patients with AF are highlighted, followed by an evidence-based conclusion, a critical analysis to identify sources of bias, and practical opinion-based suggestions on how to manage anticoagulation in this specific population. It remains unclear whether AF is a true risk factor for embolic stroke in hemodialysis. The currently employed cutoff values for the CHA2DS2-VASc score do not adequately discriminate dialysis patients deriving a net benefit from those suffering a net harm from oral anticoagulation. Anticoagulation initiation should probably be more restrictive than currently advocated by official guidelines. Recent evidence reveals that the superior benefit-risk profile of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) versus vitamin K antagonists (VKA) observed in the general population and in moderate chronic kidney disease can be extended to the hemodialysis population. VKA may be especially harmful in dialysis patients and should therefore be avoided, in particular in patients with a high bleeding risk and labile international normalized ratio. Dose-finding studies of DOAC suggest that rivaroxaban 10 mg daily and apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily are appropriate choices in dialysis patients. Combined treatment of oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents should be reserved for strong indications and limited in time. Left atrial appendage occlusion is a potential attractive solution to reduce the risk of stroke without increasing bleeding propensity, but has not been properly studied in dialysis patients.

Rivaroxaban: Expanded Role in Cardiovascular Disease Management-A Literature Review

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are widely used for the prevention of stroke in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, and as prophylaxis after hip and knee surgery after approval by the Food and Drug Administration. In the last decade, DOACs were studied for various indications; this review is focused on rivaroxaban, a factor Xa inhibitor, which is used in an expanded evidence-based fashion for coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, heart failure, malignancy, and prophylaxis of deep venous thrombosis in acute medical illnesses.

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: safety issues in the elderly

INTRODUCTION

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are increasingly used for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Since NOACs are predominantly used in the elderly with AF at high risk for stroke and bleeding and with comorbidities requiring polypharmacy, it is important to assess their safety and efficacy in this population.

AREAS COVERED

We review changes in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics observed with senescence and the effect on NOACs and drug and food interactions. We also provide an update on challenges related to NOAC use in situations that increases the risk for bleeding or require temporary discontinuation and address practical issues in the elderly AF patients managed on NOACs. Clinical studies and trials with cardiovascular outcomes reported from January 1990 to August 2020 were identified through the Medline database using PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE database.

EXPERT OPINION

NOACs are highly effective in preventing stroke in AF patients with non-inferior or superior efficacy to warfarin, with reduced risk of major bleeding. However, in the older-elderly, evidence comes mainly from observational studies or extrapolation from studies in populations with minimal functional limitations or comorbidities. The high upfront cost and out-of-pocket expense for copayment or deductibles also limit the use of this effective therapy in a substantial number of patients. The cost reduction may further improve long-term use for NOACs in stroke prevention in elderly patients with AF.

Unprotected discharge: absence of stroke prevention strategies in patients with atrial fibrillation admitted for bleeding

PURPOSE

Patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF) on anticoagulation (AC) for stroke prevention are at an increased risk of bleeding. A common clinical dilemma is deciding when to safely restart AC following a bleed. Although studies have shown better outcomes with re-initiation of AC after hemostasis, there are clinical barriers to restarting AC. Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) is a safe and efficacious alternative for patients who are unable to tolerate AC following major bleeding. We aimed to evaluate the rate of stroke prevention strategies instituted at time of discharge in patients with AF on AC who had been hospitalized for a bleeding event.

METHODS

We retrospectively identified patients with AF on AC admitted for bleeding between January 2016 and August 2019. The type of AC, form of bleeding, and CHA₂DS₂VASc were collected. Stroke prevention strategies upon discharge and at 3 months were noted.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-four patients with AF on AC were hospitalized with a bleeding event, of which 10.9% died. Among patients who survived, AC was restarted in 45.2% of patients, 9.7% were referred for LAAO, and 45.1% were discharged without stroke prevention strategy. At 3 months, 32.6% of patients still had no documented stroke prophylaxis. Those referred for LAAO had, on average, higher CHA₂DS₂VASc (5 ± 1 vs 4 ± 1, p = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of patients with AF hospitalized for bleeding were discharged with no plan for stroke prophylaxis. Despite its safety and efficacy, LAAO appears to be an underutilized alternative in AF patients with high bleeding risk.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.

Oral anticoagulation and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic kidney disease in Asian Population, Data from the COOL-AF Thailand registry

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with AF and chronic kidney disease(CKD) encountered increased risks of stroke, bleeding, morbidity, and overall mortality. Oral anticoagulation in these populations definitely enhances major bleeding but the benefit of stroke reduction remained inconclusive.The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of oral anticoagulation (OAC) on the 2-year cardiovascular outcomes in patients with AF and CKD.

METHOD

NVAF patients were consecutively enrolled from 27 hospitals located all across Thailand.Baseline demographic and clinical data were collected within 6 months from enrollment.GFR was calculated using CKD-EPI formula. CKD patients were defined as GFR less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m² according to KDOQI of the National Kidney Foundation. Clinical outcomes included ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and major bleeding.

RESULTS

At 25.7 ± 10.6 months of follow up, we identified 2538 patients with complete renal follow-up data. Among these were 1594 patients with CKD (stage 3-5) and 944 patients without CKD. The rate of ischemic stroke in patients with and without CKD were 3.7% and 1.7% respectively (p = 0.004),the rate of major bleeding was 5.6 and 3.5% accordingly (p = 0.015) and, likewise, the death rate was substantially high in patients with CKD (10.0% and 6.5%, p = 0.02). The rate of ischemic stroke/TIA in patients with CKD who were and were not on OAC did not differ significantly, 3.6% and 4.2% respectively (p = 0.602). NOAC and warfarin did not differ significantly in the propensity score-matched rate of both ischemic stroke/TIA (0 and 1.2%, p = 0.554) and major bleeding (3.3% and 7.4%, p = 0.122).The net clinical benefit of NOAC over warfarin was 2.153 per 100-patient years.

CONCLUSIONS

COOL AF registry demonstrated that AF patients with CKD had increased risks of ischemic stroke/TIA, major bleeding and death. The benefit of stroke/TIA reduction was not significantly evident for either warfarin or NOAC. However, NOAC was associated with the positive net clinical benefit over no OAC.