Valvular Heart Disease in Relation to Race and Ethnicity: JACC Focus Seminar 4/9

Differences in quality of anticoagulation care delivery according to ethnoracial group in the United States: A scoping review

Anticoagulation therapy is standard for conditions like atrial fibrillation, venous thromboembolism, and valvular heart disease, yet it is unclear if there are ethnoracial disparities in its quality and delivery in the United States. For this scoping review, electronic databases were searched for publications between January 1, 2011 - March 30, 2022. Eligible studies included all study designs, any setting within the United States, patients prescribed anticoagulation for any indication, outcomes reported for ≥ 2 distinct ethnoracial groups. The following four research questions were explored: Do ethnoracial differences exist in 1) access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy, 2) quality of anticoagulation therapy management, 3) clinical outcomes related to anticoagulation care, 4) humanistic/educational outcomes related to anticoagulation therapy. A total of 5374 studies were screened, 570 studies received full-text review, and 96 studies were analyzed. The largest mapped focus was patients' access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy (88/96 articles, 91.7%). Seventy-eight articles made statistical outcomes comparisons among ethnoracial groups. Across all four research questions, 79 articles demonstrated favorable outcomes for White patients compared to non-White patients, 38 articles showed no difference between White and non-White groups, and 8 favored non-White groups (the total exceeds the 78 articles with statistical outcomes as many articles reported multiple outcomes). Disparities disadvantaging non-White patients were most pronounced in access to guideline-based anticoagulation therapy (43/66 articles analyzed) and quality of anticoagulation management (19/21 articles analyzed). Although treatment guidelines do not differentiate anticoagulant therapy by ethnoracial group, this scoping review found consistently favorable outcomes for White patients over non-White patients in the domains of access to anticoagulation therapy for guideline-based indications and quality of anticoagulation therapy management. No differences among groups were noted in clinical outcomes, and very few studies assessed humanistic or educational outcomes.

The Impact of Kidney Stones on Congestive Heart Failure Risk

Introduction Heart failure (HF) represents a substantial global health concern, evidenced by its high prevalence, significant mortality rates, and considerable economic impact worldwide. Within this broader context, congestive heart failure (CHF) emerges as a critical subset, affecting millions and leading to high rates of morbidity and mortality. Recent explorations have started to uncover a potential link between kidney stones and broader systemic health problems, including coronary artery disease. This association suggests that kidney stones might also indicate an increased risk for cardiovascular diseases such as CHF. However, the exploration into the direct relationship between kidney stones and CHF is still in its nascent stages, creating a significant gap in understanding the full cardiovascular implications of kidney stone disease. Methods Utilizing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) for the period of March 2017 to March 2020, we conducted a logistic regression analysis to assess the relationship between kidney stones and CHF. This analysis adjusted for key variables such as age, gender, race, and educational attainment, aiming to isolate the impact of kidney stones on CHF risk among 8,521 participants. Results Our findings revealed a higher incidence of CHF among individuals with a history of kidney stones (7%) compared to those without (3%). Logistic regression analysis further highlighted kidney stones as an independent risk factor for CHF, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.857, significant at p < 0.01. These results underline the importance of considering kidney stones in the broader context of cardiovascular health risks, particularly CHF, as their presence significantly elevates the risk compared to the general population without kidney stones. Additional demographic analyses indicated significant influences of age, gender, race, and educational level on the risk of CHF, emphasizing the complex interplay between these factors and heart health. Conclusion The study confirms the association between a history of kidney stones and an increased risk of CHF, suggesting the need for heightened cardiovascular monitoring for patients with such a history. It also brings to light the significant role demographic factors play in CHF risk, advocating for targeted interventions to mitigate these disparities. Our research supports a broader view of patient care that includes consideration of urological conditions as potential risk factors for heart failure. Further exploration into the mechanisms linking kidney stones and cardiovascular health is recommended to inform more effective prevention and treatment strategies.

Clinical Trial Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Roadmap of the Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network

BACKGROUND

There is a recognized lack of diversity among patients enrolled in cardiovascular interventional and surgical trials. Diverse patient representation in clinical trials is necessary to enhance generalizability of findings, which may lead to better outcomes across broader populations. The Cardiothoracic Surgical Trials Network (CTSN) recently developed a plan of action to increase diversity among participating investigators and trial participants and is the focus of this review.

METHODS

A review of literature and enrollment data from CTSN trials was conducted.

RESULTS

CTSN completed more than a dozen major clinical trials (2008-2022), enrolling >4000 patients, of whom 30% were women, 11% were non-White, and 5.6% were Hispanic. CTSN also completed trials of hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019, wherein enrollment was more diverse, with 42% women, and 58% were Asian, Black, Hispanic, or from another underrepresented racial group. The discrepancy in diversity of enrollment between cardiac surgery trials and coronavirus disease trials highlights the need for a more comprehensive understanding of (1) the prevalence of underlying disease requiring cardiac interventions across broad populations, (2) differences in access to care and referral for cardiac surgery, and (3) barriers to enrollment in cardiac surgery trials.

CONCLUSIONS

Committed to diversity, CTSN's multifaceted action plan includes developing site-specific enrollment targets, collecting social determinants of health data, understanding reasons for nonparticipation, recruiting sites that serve diverse populations, emphasizing greater diversity among clinical trial teams, and implicit bias training. The CTSN will prospectively assess how these interventions influence enrollment as we work to ensure trial participants are more representative of the communities we serve.

Contemporary evaluation and treatment of tricuspid regurgitation

Valvular heart disease is a global health burden with substantial mortality. The left-sided valvular diseases have been extensively described using the robust treatment strategies available. By contrast, the right-sided diseases, particularly the tricuspid valve (TV) and associated regurgitation, still have much to be delineated. Worsening tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with increased mortality; the non-invasive management is suboptimal; and surgical approaches carry significant risk. With advances in multimodality imaging, 3D echocardiography, improved understanding of TV anatomy, and pathophysiological mechanisms of primary and secondary regurgitation, as well as favorable data with transcatheter therapies, the field of TV management is rapidly evolving. This review aims to highlight pathophysiological mechanisms of TR, describe echocardiographic approaches to diagnosis and TV interrogation, and outline the latest transcatheter developments.

Lifestyle Medicine: An Antidote to Cardiovascular Diseases

Despite numerous advances in basic understanding of cardiovascular disease pathophysiology, pharmacology, therapeutic procedures, and systems improvement, there hasn't been much decline in heart disease related mortality in the US since 2010. Hypertension and diet induced risk continue to be the leading causes of cardiovascular morbidity. Even with the excessive mortality associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, in 2020, heart disease remained the leading cause of death. Given the degree of disease burden, morbidity, and mortality, there is an urgent need to redirect medical professionals' focus towards prevention through simple and cost effective lifestyle strategies. However, current practice paradigm and financial compensation systems are mainly centered disease management and not health promotion. For example, the financial value placed on 3-10 min smoking cessation counseling (.24RVUs) is 47-fold lower than an elective PCI (11.21 RVUs). The medical community seems to be enamored with the latest and greatest technology, new devices, and surgical procedures. What if the greatest technology of all was simply the way we live every day? Perhaps when this notion is known by enough, we will switch to this lifestyle medicine technology to prevent disease in the first place.

Integrating Advocacy into Your Practice

In the last 60 years, health care has evolved due to many trends including the introduction of third-party payers, a progressively aging society, advancing technology, emerging recognition of social issues of race/gender/poverty, the relative decline in the physician workforce, rising health care costs, ongoing consolidation of health care entities, and the corporatization of health care delivery. This has led to problems in health care delivery with respect to cost, quality, and access. Many medical leaders feel it is now the duty of the physician to go beyond the classic patient-doctor clinical responsibility and work to advocate for their patients and society regarding economic, financial, educational, and social issues.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Perioperative Health Care Among Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: JACC State-of-the-Art Review

There has been little progress in reducing health care disparities since the 2003 landmark Institute of Medicine's report Unequal Treatment. Despite the higher burden of cardiovascular disease in underrepresented racial and ethnic groups, they have less access to cardiologists and cardiothoracic surgeons, and have higher rates of morbidity and mortality with cardiac surgical interventions. This review summarizes existing literature and highlights disparities in cardiovascular perioperative health care. We propose actionable solutions utilizing multidisciplinary perspectives from cardiology, cardiac surgery, cardiothoracic anesthesiology, critical care, medical ethics, and health disparity experts. Applying a health equity lens to multipronged interventions is necessary to eliminate the disparities in perioperative health care among patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Treatment of Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis: Impact of Patient Sex and Life Expectancy on Treatment Choice

In adults with severe aortic stenosis, sex and age differences in symptoms and diagnosis may lead to delays in intervention. Choice of intervention partly depends on expected longevity because bioprosthetic valves have limited durability, particularly in younger patients. Current guidelines recommend the following: a mechanical valve in younger adults (aged <50 years) if lifelong anticoagulation is possible and acceptable and a valve-sparing procedure is not possible; surgical mechanical or bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement (SAVR) in adults aged 50-65 years; and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for those aged >80 years based on lower mortality and morbidity compared to SAVR and adequate valve durability. For patients aged 65-80 years, the choice between TAVI and a bioprosthetic SAVR depends on expected longevity, which is greater in women than men, as well as associated cardiac and noncardiac conditions, valvular and vascular anatomy, estimated risk of SAVR versus TAVI and expected complications and patient preferences.

The association of racial differences with in-hospital outcomes of patients admitted for sinus node dysfunction

Background

The impact of race and its related social determinants of health on cardiovascular disease outcomes has been well documented. However, limited data exist regarding the association of race with in-hospital outcomes in patients admitted for sinus node dysfunction (SND).

Objective

To evaluate whether racial disparities exist in outcomes for patients hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of SND.

Methods

The National Inpatient Sample was queried from 2011 to 2018 for relevant ICD-9 and ICD-10 diagnosis and procedure codes. Baseline characteristics and in-hospital outcomes in patients with a primary diagnosis of SND were compared among White and non-White patients. A multivariate logistic regression model was used to adjust for potential confounding factors and statistically significant comorbidities between both cohorts.

Results

We identified 655,139 persons admitted with a primary diagnosis of SND, 520,926 (79.5%) of whom were White. Non-White patients had significantly higher all-cause mortality, length of stay, and total hospital cost. There were lower odds of pacemaker insertion (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11–1.15]), temporary transvenous pacing (aOR 1.15 [95% CI 1.11–1.22]), and cardioversion (aOR 1.50 [95% CI 1.42–1.58]) in non-White patients. A subgroup analysis was performed and non-Hispanic Black race was predictive of a decreased odds of pacemaker insertion, cardioversion/defibrillation, and temporary transvenous pacing.

Conclusion

Significant differences of in-hospital outcomes exist between White and non-White patients with SND. These findings appeared to be primarily driven by disparities in non-Hispanic Black patients. Increased recognition and focused efforts to mitigate these disparities will improve the care of underrepresented populations treated for SND.

Artificial intelligence for the echocardiographic assessment of valvular heart disease

Developments in artificial intelligence (AI) have led to an explosion of studies exploring its application to cardiovascular medicine. Due to the need for training and expertise, one area where AI could be impactful would be in the diagnosis and management of valvular heart disease. This is because AI can be applied to the multitude of data generated from clinical assessments, imaging and biochemical testing during the care of the patient. In the area of valvular heart disease, the focus of AI has been on the echocardiographic assessment and phenotyping of patient populations to identify high-risk groups. AI can assist image acquisition, view identification for review, and segmentation of valve and cardiac structures for automated analysis. Using image recognition algorithms, aortic and mitral valve disease states have been directly detected from the images themselves. Measurements obtained during echocardiographic valvular assessment have been integrated with other clinical data to identify novel aortic valve disease subgroups and describe new predictors of aortic valve disease progression. In the future, AI could integrate echocardiographic parameters with other clinical data for precision medical management of patients with valvular heart disease.