Compression-Only Versus Rescue-Breathing Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation After Pediatric Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

Derivation of a clinical decision rule for termination of resuscitation in non-traumatic pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

AIM

Prehospital termination of resuscitation (ToR) rules are used to predict medical futility in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), however, the available evidence for pediatric patients is limited. The primary aim of this study is to derive a Pediatric Termination of Resuscitation (PToR) prediction rule for use in pediatric non-traumatic OHCA patients.

METHODS

We analyzed a retrospective cohort of pediatric OHCA patients within the CARES database over a 10-year period (2013-2022). We split the dataset into training and test datasets and fit logistic regressions with Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) to select predictor variables and estimate predictive test characteristics for the primary outcome of death and a secondary composite outcome of death or survival to hospital discharge with unfavorable neurologic status.

RESULTS

We analyzed a sample of 21,240 children where 2,326 (11.0%) survived to hospital discharge, and 1,894 (8.9%) survived to hospital discharge with favorable neurologic status. We derived a PToR rule for death demonstrating a specificity of 99.1% and a positive predictive value (PPV) of 99.8% and a PToR rule for death or survival with poor neurologic status with a specificity of 99.7% and PPV of 99.9% within the test dataset.

CONCLUSION

We derived a clinical prediction rule with high specificity and positive predictive value in prehospital settings utilizing Advanced Life Support (ALS) providers which may inform termination of resuscitation considerations in pediatric patients. Further prospective and validation studies will be necessary to define the appropriateness and applicability of these PToR criteria for routine use.

Wolf Creek XVII Part 6: Physiology-Guided CPR

Introduction

Physiology-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) offers the potential to optimize resuscitation and enable early prognosis.

Methods

Physiology-Guided CPR was one of six focus topic for the Wolf Creek XVII Conference held on June 14-17, 2023 in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. International thought leaders and scientists in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation from academia and industry were invited. Participants submitted via online survey knowledge gaps, barriers to translation and research priorities for each focus topic. Expert panels used the survey results and their own perspectives and insights to create and present a preliminary unranked list for each category, which was then debated, revised and ranked by all attendees to identify the top 5 for each category.

Results

Top knowledge gaps include identifying optimal strategies for the evaluation of physiology-guided CPR and the optimal values for existing patients using patient outcomes. The main barriers to translation are the limited usability outside of critical care environments and the training and equipment required for monitoring. The top research priorities are the development of clinically feasible and reliable methods to continuously and non-invasively monitor physiology during CPR and prospective human studies proving targeting parameters during CPR improves outcomes.

Conclusion

Physiology-guided CPR has the potential to provide individualized resuscitation and move away from a one-size-fits-all approach. Current understanding is limited, and clinical trials are lacking. Future developments need to consider the clinical application and applicability of measurement to all healthcare settings. Therefore, clinical trials using physiology-guided CPR for individualisation of resuscitation efforts are needed.

Impact of sex of bystanders who perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation on return of spontaneous circulation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients: A retrospective, observational study

Background

The impact of the sex of bystanders who initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients has not been fully elucidated. This study aims to investigate the association between the sex of bystanders who perform CPR and the clinical outcomes of OHCA patients in real-world clinical settings.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, observational study using data from the Okayama City Fire Department in Japan. Patients were categorized based on bystanders' sex. Our primary outcomes were return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Our secondary outcome was 30-day survival and 30-day favorable neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Category score of 1 or 2. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to examine the association between these groups and outcomes.

Results

The study included 3,209 patients with a comparable distribution of male (1,540 patients: 48.0%) and female bystanders (1,669 patients: 52.0%) between the groups. Overall, 221 (6.9%) ROSC at hospital arrival, 226 (7.0%) patients had 30-day survival, and 121 (3.8%) patients had 30-day favorable neurological outcomes. Bystander sex (female as reference) did not contribute to ROSC at hospital arrival (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.11, 95% CI: 0.76-1.61), 30-day survival (aOR 1.23, 95% CI: 0.83-1.82), or 30-day favorable neurological outcomes (aOR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.34-1.27). Basic life support education experience was a bystander factor positively associated with ROSC. Patient factors positively associated with ROSC were initial shockable rhythm and witness of cardiac arrest.

Conclusion

There were no differences in ROSC, 30-day survival, or 30-day neurological outcomes in OHCA patients based on bystander sex.

Considerations on the Use of Neonatal and Pediatric Resuscitation Guidelines for Hospitalized Neonates and Infants: On Behalf of the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the American Academy of Pediatrics

Between 0.25% and 3% of admissions to the NICU, PICU, and PCICU receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Most CPR events occur in patients <1 year old. The incidence of CPR is 10 times higher in the NICU than at birth. Therefore, optimizing the approach to CPR in hospitalized neonates and infants is important. At birth, the resuscitation of newborns is performed according to neonatal resuscitation guidelines. In older infants and children, resuscitation is performed according to pediatric resuscitation guidelines. Neonatal and pediatric guidelines differ in several important ways. There are no published recommendations to guide the transition from neonatal to pediatric guidelines. Therefore, hospitalized neonates and infants can be resuscitated using neonatal guidelines, pediatric guidelines, or a hybrid approach. This report summarizes the current neonatal and pediatric resuscitation guidelines, considers how to apply them to hospitalized neonates and infants, and identifies knowledge gaps and future priorities. The lack of strong scientific data makes it impossible to provide definitive recommendations on when to transition from neonatal to pediatric resuscitation guidelines. Therefore, it is up to health care teams and institutions to decide if neonatal or pediatric guidelines are the best choice in a given location or situation, considering local circumstances, health care team preferences, and resource limitations.

Comparison of paediatric basic life support guidelines endorsed by member councils of Resuscitation Council of Asia

Background

Paediatric cardiac arrest outcomes, especially for infants, remain poor. Due to different training, resource differences, and historical reasons, paediatric cardiac arrest algorithms for various Asia countries vary. While there has been a common basic life support algorithm for adults by the Resuscitation Council of Asia (RCA), there is no common RCA algorithm for paediatric life support.We aimed to review published paediatric life support guidelines from different Asian resuscitation councils.

Methods

Pubmed and Google Scholar search were performed for published paediatric basic and advanced life support guidelines from January 2015 to June 2023. Paediatric representatives from the Resuscitation Council of Asia were sought and contacted to provide input from September 2022 till June 2023.

Results

While most of the components of published paediatric life support algorithms of Asian countries are similar, there are notable variations in terms of age criteria for recommended use of adult basic life support algorithms in the paediatric population less than 18 years old, recommended paediatric chest compression depth targets, ventilation rates post-advanced airway intra-arrest, and first defibrillation dose for shockable rhythms in paediatric cardiac arrest.

Conclusion

This was an overview and mapping of published Asian paediatric resuscitation algorithms. It highlights similarities across paediatric life support guidelines in Asian countries. There were some differences in components of paediatric life support which highlight important knowledge gaps in paediatric resuscitation science. The minor differences in the paediatric life support guidelines endorsed by the member councils may provide a framework for prioritising resuscitation research and highlight knowledge gaps in paediatric resuscitation.

Multicentric validation of a prognostic tool for predicting brain death following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in children

AIM

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) in pediatric patients is associated with high rates of mortality and neurologic injury, with no definitive evidence-based method to predict outcomes available. A prognostic scoring tool for adults, The Brain Death After Cardiac Arrest (BDCA) score, was recently developed and validated. We aimed to validate this score in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients admitted to 5 PICUs after OHCA between 2011 and 2021. We extracted BDCA score elements for those who survived at least 24 hours but died as a result of their OHCA. We assessed score discrimination for the definitive outcome of brain death. Subgroup analysis was performed for infants < 12mo versus children ≥ 12mo, those who likely had brain death but had withdrawal of life sustaining therapy (WLST) prior to declaration, and by etiology and duration of arrest.

RESULTS

389 subjects were identified across 5 institutions, with 282 meeting inclusion criteria. 169 (59.9%) were formally declared brain dead; 58 (20.6%) had findings consistent with brain death but had withdrawal of life sustaining therapies prior to completion of formal declaration. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the age ≥ 12mo cohort was 0.82 [95% CI 0.75, 0.90], which mirrored the adult subject AUCs of 0.82 [0.77, 0.86] and 0.81 [0.76, 0.86] in the development and validation cohorts. Scores demonstrated worse discrimination in the infant cohort (AUC = 0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

The BDCA score shows promise in children ≥ 12mo following OHCA and may be considered in conjunction with existing multimodal prognostication approaches.

Lay rescuer use of automated external defibrillators in infants, children and adolescents: A systematic review

Importance

Automated external defibrillator (AED) use is increasing, but use in children is uncommon. A growing literature of use in children by lay rescuers warrants review.

Objective

A systematic review of AED effectiveness in children experiencing out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

Data Sources

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials.

Study Selection

Children, ages 0-18, experiencing OHCA with an AED applied by a lay rescuer. Control population: children with no AED application.

Data Extraction and Synthesis

Results are reported according to PRISMA guidelines. Two authors independently reviewed all titles and abstracts of references identified by the search strategy, then generated a subset which all authors reviewed.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Critical outcomes were survival with Cerebral Performance Category (CPC) 1-2 at hospital discharge or 30 days and survival to hospital discharge.

Results

Population: age categories: <1 year, 1-12 years, 13-18 years. Lay rescuer AED application resulted in improved survival with CPC 1-2 at hospital discharge or 30 days to hospital discharge in age groups 1-12 and 13-18 years (RR 3.84 [95 % CI 2.69-5.5], RR 3.75 [95 %CI 2.97-4.72]), respectively and hospital discharge in both groups(RR 3.04 [95 % CI 2.18-4.25], RR 3.38 [95 % CI 2.17-4.16]), respectively. AED use with CPR improved CPC 1-2 at hospital discharge and hospital discharge (RR 1.49 [95 % CI 1.11-1.97], RR 1.55[1.12-2.12]).

Conclusions

AED application by lay rescuers is associated with improved survival with a CPC of 1-2 at 30 days, and improved survival to hospital discharge for children 1-18 years. There are limited data for children < 1 year.

Guidance for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation of Children With Suspected or Confirmed COVID-19

This article aims to provide guidance to health care workers for the provision of basic and advanced life support to children and neonates with suspected or confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It aligns with the 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardiovascular care while providing strategies for reducing risk of transmission of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 to health care providers. Patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 and cardiac arrest should receive chest compressions and defibrillation, when indicated, as soon as possible. Because of the importance of ventilation during pediatric and neonatal resuscitation, oxygenation and ventilation should be prioritized. All CPR events should therefore be considered aerosol-generating procedures. Thus, personal protective equipment (PPE) appropriate for aerosol-generating procedures (including N95 respirators or an equivalent) should be donned before resuscitation, and high-efficiency particulate air filters should be used. Any personnel without appropriate PPE should be immediately excused by providers wearing appropriate PPE. Neonatal resuscitation guidance is unchanged from standard algorithms, except for specific attention to infection prevention and control. In summary, health care personnel should continue to reduce the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 transmission through vaccination and use of appropriate PPE during pediatric resuscitations. Health care organizations should ensure the availability and appropriate use of PPE. Because delays or withheld CPR increases the risk to patients for poor clinical outcomes, children and neonates with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 should receive prompt, high-quality CPR in accordance with evidence-based guidelines.

Dissemination of Chest Compression-Only Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation by Bystanders for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Students: A Nationwide Investigation in Japan

We aimed to investigate how the types of bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) among students have changed recently. We also determined the association between two types of bystander-CPRs (i.e., chest compression-only CPR [CCCPR] and conventional CPR with rescue breathing [CCRB]) and survival after OHCA. From a nationwide registry of pediatric OHCAs occurring in school settings in Japan, the data of 253 non-traumatic OHCA patients (elementary, junior high, and high school/technical college students) receiving bystander-CPR between April 2008 and December 2017 were analyzed. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to assess the impact of different types of bystander-CPR on 30-day survival with favorable neurological outcomes. The proportion of patients receiving CCCPR increased from 25.0% during 2008–2009 to 55.3% during 2016–2017 (p for trend < 0.001). Overall, 53.2% (50/94) of patients receiving CCCPR and 46.5% (74/159) of those receiving CCRB survived for 30 days with favorable neurological outcomes. Multivariable analysis showed no significant difference in outcomes between the two groups (adjusted odds ratio: 1.23, 95% confidence interval: 0.67–2.28). In this setting, CCCPR is a common type of bystander-CPR for OHCA in students, and the effectiveness of CCCPR and CCRB on survival outcomes seems comparable.

Association between the types of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the survival with good neurologic outcome of preschool pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest cases in Japan: A propensity score matching analysis using an extended nationwide database

BACKGROUND

Pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) are frequently associated with a respiratory etiology. Despite the high proportion of preschool children with OHCAs, very few studies on this special population exist. This study characterizes the epidemiologic features of preschool pediatric OHCAs and analyzes the advantage of conventional (ventilations with chest compressions) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) over compression-only bystander CPR (BCPR) on the one-month post-event neurological status of the patient.

METHODS

Japanese nationwide databases for all ambulance transport events and OHCAs occurring during a 4-year period between 2016 and 2019 were combined, totalling 3,608 patient events. Children ≤6-years-old were included; physician- and EMS-witnessed events, no prehospital resuscitation effort events, and neonatal patient events were excluded. Neurologically favorable 1-month survival rates were compared among groups using univariate and multivariate analyses before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

From the combined database, 2,882 pediatric OHCAs meeting selection criteria were categorized as no BCPR (984), compression-only BCPR (1,428), and conventional BCPR (470). The proportion of bystander-witnessed cases was low (22.3%). Most OHCA witnesses were family members (88.5%), and most OHCAs occurred at home (88.0%). The neurologically favorable 1-month survival rates were: no BCPR 2.4%, compression only, 3.2%, and conventional 6.6% (P < 0.01). Multivariate logistic regression analysis before and after matching showed that conventional BCPR was associated with higher neurologically favorable 1-month survival than compression-only BCPR. Subgroup analyses after matching demonstrated that conventional BCPR was associated with better outcomes in nonmedical (adjusted odds ratio; 95% confidence interval, 2.83; 1.09-7.32) and unwitnessed OHCA cases (3.42; 1.09-10.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Conventional CPR is rarely performed by bystanders in preschool pediatric OHCA. However, conventional BCPR results in neurologically favorable outcomes in nonmedical and unwitnessed cases.