1
|
Pagoni M, Zogopoulos VL, Kontogiannis S, Tsolakou A, Zoumpourlis V, Tsangaris GT, Fokaefs E, Michalopoulos I, Tsatsakis AM, Drakoulis N. Integrated Pharmacogenetic Signature for the Prediction of Prostatic Neoplasms in Men With Metabolic Disorders. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2025; 22:285-305. [PMID: 39993800 PMCID: PMC11880924 DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2024] [Revised: 01/14/2025] [Accepted: 01/16/2025] [Indexed: 02/26/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Oncogenic processes are delineated by metabolic dysregulation. Drug likeness is pharmacokinetically tested through the CYP450 enzymatic system, whose genetic aberrations under epigenetic stress could shift male organisms into prostate cancer pathways. Our objective was to predict the susceptibility to prostate neoplasia, focused on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa), based on the pharmacoepigenetic and the metabolic profile of Caucasians. MATERIALS AND METHODS Two independent cohorts of 47,389 individuals in total were assessed to find risk associations of CYP450 genes with prostatic neoplasia. The metabolic profile of the first cohort was statistically evaluated and frequencies of absorption-distribution-metabolism-excretion-toxicity (ADMET) properties were calculated. Prediction of miRNA pharmacoepigenetic targeting was performed. RESULTS We found that prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia patients of the first cohort shared common cardiometabolic trends. Drug classes C08CA, C09AA, C09CA, C10AA, C10AX of the cardiovascular, and G04CA, G04CB of the genitourinary systems, were associated with increased prostate cancer risk, while C03CA and N06AB of the cardiovascular and nervous systems were associated with low-risk for PCa. CYP3A4*1B was the most related pharmacogenetic polymorphism associated with prostate cancer susceptibility. miRNA-200c-3p and miRNA-27b-3p seem to be associated with CYP3A4 targeting and prostate cancer predisposition. Metabolomic analysis indicated that 11β-OHT, 2β-OHT, 15β-OHT, 2α-OHT and 6β-OHT had a high risk, and 16α-OHT, and 16β-OHT had an intermediate disease-risk. CONCLUSION These findings constitute a novel integrated signature for prostate cancer susceptibility. Further studies are required to assess their predictive value more fully.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pagoni
- Research Group of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece;
| | - Vasileios L Zogopoulos
- Centre of Systems Biology, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - Annia Tsolakou
- Research Group of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | | | - George Th Tsangaris
- Proteomics Research Unit, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece;
| | | | - Ioannis Michalopoulos
- Centre of Systems Biology, Biomedical Research Foundation, Academy of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Aristidis M Tsatsakis
- Department of Forensic Sciences and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Drakoulis
- Research Group of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, School of Health Sciences, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lucas AR, Bastiach D, Dahman B, Paul AK, Hirani S, Sheppard VB, Hundley WG, Patel BB, Bitting RL, Chang MG. Major adverse cardiovascular events among Black and White Veterans receiving androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study. CARDIO-ONCOLOGY (LONDON, ENGLAND) 2025; 11:12. [PMID: 39915845 PMCID: PMC11800468 DOI: 10.1186/s40959-025-00312-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2025] [Indexed: 02/09/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the cornerstone treatment strategy for men diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer (PC) but may increase risk for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). We examined whether men treated with ADT and radiation therapy (ADT + RT) developed MACE at a higher rate than men receiving RT alone. Secondly, we sought to determine if Black men receiving RT + ADT developed MACE at a higher rate than White men. METHODS This retrospective cohort study examined time to diagnosis of MACE among Veterans with PC. We used a 1:1 propensity score matching process to determine whether treatment type (ADT + RT vs. RT alone), race (Black vs. White men) or having a previous diagnosis of a cardiometabolic disease (CMD) were associated with differences in the rate at which men develop MACE. RESULTS Veterans with PC were White (68%) and Black (32%). At PC diagnosis, the mean age was 65.9 years. The majority had stage 2 disease (83.0%) classified as intermediate risk (43.1%). Treatment-matched models showed men receiving ADT + RT were less likely to develop MACE when they no pre-existing CMD. Men treated with ADT + RT or RT alone had significantly increased risks of MACE is they had pre-existing CMD. Black men had the same risk of MACE as non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSIONS Preexisting CMD and multimorbidity are significant risks for MACE among men treated for PC within the VA healthcare system whether treated with ADT + RT or with RT alone, highlighting the importance pretreatment optimization of comorbidities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander R Lucas
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Public Health, One Capitol Square, 830 East Main Street, Richmond, VA, USA.
- Division of Cardiology, VCU Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Dustin Bastiach
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Public Health, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Bassam Dahman
- Division of Cardiology, VCU Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Public Health, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Asit K Paul
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Samina Hirani
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Vanessa B Sheppard
- Division of Cardiology, VCU Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - W Gregory Hundley
- Division of Cardiology, VCU Pauley Heart Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Bhaumik B Patel
- Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Rhonda L Bitting
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Duke University and Durham VA Healthcare System, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael G Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, Richmond, VA, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Leong DP, Cirne F, Pinthus JH. Cardiovascular Risk in Prostate Cancer. Cardiol Clin 2025; 43:83-91. [PMID: 39551564 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.09.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2024]
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is common in patients with prostate cancer and is an important cause of death. Cardiovascular risk factors are frequent in this population and are often not addressed to thresholds recommended by cardiovascular practice guidelines. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) reduces muscle strength and increases adiposity, thereby increasing the risk of diabetes and hypertension, although its relationship with adverse cardiovascular events requires confirmation. Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors and CYP17A1 inhibitors may confer incremental risks of hypertension and cardiovascular events to ADT. Lower cardiovascular risk with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists as compared with agonists requires prespecified randomized clinical trial confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl P Leong
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada; Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada.
| | - Filipe Cirne
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jehonathan H Pinthus
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wenzel M, Hoeh B, Siech C, Humke C, Welte M, Ahrens M, Würnschimmel C, Tilki D, Steuber T, Graefen M, Kluth L, Chun FKH, Mandel P. Association between frailty and specific comorbidities on oncological outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer. Urol Oncol 2025:S1078-1439(25)00001-8. [PMID: 39855961 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2024] [Revised: 12/20/2024] [Accepted: 01/02/2025] [Indexed: 01/27/2025]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Demographic changes will lead to higher proportions of metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with higher frailty index and multiple comorbidities. MATERIALS AND METHODS We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to explore the effect of frailty (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]), as well as cardiovascular (CVD) and secondary malignancy (SecCa) comorbidities on overall survival (OS) and time to mCRPC in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC patients with Kaplan-Meyer estimates and Cox regression models. RESULTS Of 802 mHSPC patients, 61% were ECOG0 vs. 32% ECOG1 vs. 6.5% ECOG≥2. Significant differences in baseline patient and baseline mHSPC characteristics were observed for all three groups (all P ≤ 0.05). In time to mCRPC analyses and OS analyses of mHSPC and mCRPC patients, significant disadvantages were observed for ECOG 1/≥2 patients, relative to ECOG0, even after multivariable adjustment. Moreover, 31% of included patients had history/active CVD, which yielded significant median OS differences in mHSPC patients (95 vs. 63 months, multivariable hazard ratio: HR: 1.77, P < 0.01), but not in mCRPC patients (P = 0.085). After stratification according to SecCa, 14% had a SecCa which led to significant median OS differences in mCRPC patients (50 vs. 37 months, P < 0.01) but not in mHSPC patients (76 vs. 64 months, P = 0.089). Patients with higher frailty index and comorbidities showed significant differences in therapy lines. CONCLUSION Frailty and specific comorbidities significantly influence cancer-control outcomes in mHSPC, as well as mCRPC patients, even after controlling for adverse tumor characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mike Wenzel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany.
| | - Benedikt Hoeh
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Carolin Siech
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Clara Humke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Maria Welte
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marit Ahrens
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; Department of Urology, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Thomas Steuber
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Graefen
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Luis Kluth
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Philipp Mandel
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt, Germany; Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gallucci G, Larocca M, Navazio A, Turazza FM, Inno A, Canale ML, Oliva S, Besutti G, Tedeschi A, Aschieri D, Russo A, Gori S, Silvestris N, Pinto C, Tarantini L. Atherosclerosis and the Bidirectional Relationship Between Cancer and Cardiovascular Disease: From Bench to Bedside, Part 2 Management. Int J Mol Sci 2025; 26:334. [PMID: 39796190 PMCID: PMC11719480 DOI: 10.3390/ijms26010334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2024] [Revised: 12/25/2024] [Accepted: 12/29/2024] [Indexed: 01/13/2025] Open
Abstract
The first part of this review highlighted the evolving landscape of atherosclerosis, noting emerging cardiometabolic risk factors, the growing impact of exposomes, and social determinants of health. The prominent role of atherosclerosis in the bidirectional relationship between cardiovascular disease and cancer was also discussed. In this second part, we examine the complex interplay between multimorbid cardio-oncologic patients, cardiometabolic risk factors, and the harmful environments that lend a "syndemic" nature to these chronic diseases. We summarize management strategies targeting disordered cardiometabolic factors to mitigate cardiovascular disease and explore molecular mechanisms enabling more tailored therapies. Importantly, we emphasize the early interception of atherosclerosis through multifactorial interventions that detect subclinical signs (via biomarkers and imaging) to treat modifiable risk factors and prevent clinical events. A concerted preventive effort-referred to by some as a "preventome"-is essential to reduce the burden of atherosclerosis-driven chronic diseases, shifting from mere chronic disease management to the proactive promotion of "chronic health".
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mario Larocca
- Provincial Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technologies, AUSL—IRCCS in Tecnologie Avanzate e Modelli Assistenziali in Oncologia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.L.); (C.P.)
| | - Alessandro Navazio
- Cardiologia Ospedaliera, Department of Specialized Medicine, AUSL—IRCCS in Tecnologie Avanzate e Modelli Assistenziali in Oncologia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| | | | - Alessandro Inno
- Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; (A.I.)
| | - Maria Laura Canale
- Division of Cardiology, Azienda USL Toscana Nord-Ovest, Versilia Hospital, 55041 Lido di Camaiore, Italy;
| | - Stefano Oliva
- UOSD Cardiologia di Interesse Oncologico IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Giulia Besutti
- Radiology Unit, Department of Imaging and Laboratory Medicine, AUSL—IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
- Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences of Children and Adults, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, 41100 Modena, Italy
| | - Andrea Tedeschi
- Cardiology Unit of Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.)
| | - Daniela Aschieri
- Cardiology Unit of Emergency Department, Guglielmo da Saliceto Hospital, 29100 Piacenza, Italy; (A.T.); (D.A.)
| | - Antonio Russo
- Department of Precision Medicine in Medical, Surgical and Critical Care (Me.Pre.C.C.), University of Palermo, 90127 Palermo, Italy;
| | - Stefania Gori
- Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar di Valpolicella, Italy; (A.I.)
| | - Nicola Silvestris
- Medical Oncology Department, IRCCS Istituto Tumori “Giovanni Paolo II”, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Carmine Pinto
- Provincial Medical Oncology, Department of Oncology and Advanced Technologies, AUSL—IRCCS in Tecnologie Avanzate e Modelli Assistenziali in Oncologia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy; (M.L.); (C.P.)
| | - Luigi Tarantini
- Cardiologia Ospedaliera, Department of Specialized Medicine, AUSL—IRCCS in Tecnologie Avanzate e Modelli Assistenziali in Oncologia, 42100 Reggio Emilia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Nolan MT, Ngo DTM, Sverdlov AL. Editorial commentary: How to build an actionable narrative for cardio-oncology. Trends Cardiovasc Med 2025; 35:32-33. [PMID: 38950663 DOI: 10.1016/j.tcm.2024.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/03/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T Nolan
- Department of Cardiovascular Imaging, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia; Department of Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| | - Doan T M Ngo
- Newcastle Centre of Excellence in Cardio-Oncology, University of Newcastle, Hunter New England Local Health District, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
| | - Aaron L Sverdlov
- Newcastle Centre of Excellence in Cardio-Oncology, University of Newcastle, Hunter New England Local Health District, Calvary Mater Newcastle, Hunter Medical Research institute, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; Cardiovascular Department, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; College of Health Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW 2308, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guan T, Jiang Y, Tu P, Ye B, Zeng L, Luo Z, Chi K, Liang H, Yang Y, Huang J, Zhang B, Tai R, Ye J, Deng Z, Ke Y, Chen H, Zhang Z, Liu Z, Ou C. Risk classification for non-cancer death in middle-aged cancer patients. J Adv Res 2024:S2090-1232(24)00616-7. [PMID: 39730025 DOI: 10.1016/j.jare.2024.12.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2024] [Revised: 12/23/2024] [Accepted: 12/24/2024] [Indexed: 12/29/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Non-cancer events are important causes of competing mortality among cancer patients. However, the risk of non-cancer death and risk classification in middle-aged cancer patients is not clear. To comprehensively analyze the risk of non-cancer deaths in 24 different cancers among middle-aged patients. METHODS Standardized mortality rate (SMR), absolute excess risk (AER), proportion of deaths, age-adjusted mortality rate (AAMR), and the competing model were used to assess the risk of non-cancer death in middle-aged cancer patients. A non-cancer death risk classification was developed for the 24 cancer types based on the competing risk of non-cancer death and the risk of non-cancer death (hazard ratio). RESULTS A total of 1,082,030 middle-aged cancer patients of 24 cancer types was identified. The risk of non-cancer death was elevated in middle-aged cancer patients compared to the general middle-aged population (SMR = 3.37, 95 % CI 3.35-3.39, AER = 99.18). The cumulative mortality was higher for non-cancer causes compared to primary cancer in 15 cancer types. The AAMR for non-cancer causes declined from 2.3 % in 1975 to 1.4 % in 2017. A risk classification was developed to classify different cancers into 6 risk categories. CONCLUSION The risk of non-cancer death was elevated in middle-aged cancer patients and varied for different cancer types. A new risk classification system was developed to estimate the risk of non-cancer deaths in different cancers, and the 24 cancer types were classified into 6 distinct categories. These results highlight the necessity for risk stratification management for non-cancer death in middle-aged cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tianwang Guan
- Cancer Center, The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - Yanting Jiang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, China
| | - Peinan Tu
- Cancer Center, The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China; Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China
| | - Baokui Ye
- Department of Intensive Care Unit, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Guangzhou, China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liangjia Zeng
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Zehao Luo
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Kaiyi Chi
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Haowen Liang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Yuting Yang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Jinqi Huang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Binghua Zhang
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Clinical Medical School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510180, China
| | - Rundong Tai
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China; The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China
| | - Jujian Ye
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China; The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China
| | - Zhilin Deng
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China; The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China
| | - Yushen Ke
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China; The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China
| | - Huiwan Chen
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China; The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China; Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Cancer, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, China.
| | - Zhigang Liu
- Cancer Center, The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China.
| | - Caiwen Ou
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Cardiac Function and Microcirculation, Guangzhou 510280, China; The 10th Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University (Dongguan People's Hospital), Southern Medical University, Guangdong 523059, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huang Y, Wang Y, Su H, Zhang Y. A cross-sectional study of the association between depression and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) among U.S. males: national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES), 2005-2010. BMC Psychiatry 2024; 24:936. [PMID: 39707241 DOI: 10.1186/s12888-024-06302-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/14/2024] [Indexed: 12/23/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The association between depression and serum total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations remains unclear. To explore whether there is a relationship between depression and PSA in American males without prostate cancer (PCa), according to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database. METHODS Three biennial cycles of survey data from 2005 to 2010 were used in our study. Multivariate adjusted regression analysis, stratified analysis, trend testing, smooth curve fitting and multiple imputation (MI) were our main research methods. Depression was assessed by the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9). RESULTS The study included a total of 4185 participants. After adjusting all covariates, whether depression was used as a continuous [β = -0.038; 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.059, -0.017; P < 0.001] or categorical variable (P for trend = 0.001), especially in the mild [β = -0.239; 95% CI: -0.473, -0.006; P = 0.044)] and moderate [β = -0.499; 95% CI: -0.907, -0.092; P = 0.016)] depression groups, it was associated with a decrease in serum PSA concentrations. Smoothing curve fitting found the presence of a linear relationship, with PSA reduced by 0.038 ng/ml or 0.026 ng/ml (log-2 transformed total PSA) for each additional unit of depression score. Similar results were obtained for complete data after MI or data categorized by depressive symptoms. CONCLUSIONS Depression score is inversely correlated with serum total PSA concentrations among American men, and there is an interaction between depression and myocardial infarction. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER Not applicable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China
| | - Yingying Wang
- Department of Oncology, Chongqing Jiulongpo District People's Hospital, Chongqing, 400050, China
| | - Huiyi Su
- Department of respiratory medicine, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400014, China
| | - Yao Zhang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, 400016, China.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Leong DP, Waliany S, Abdel-Qadir H, Atkins KM, Neilan TG, Lang NN, Liu JE, Blaes AH, Mian HS, Moore HN, Hajjar LA, Morgans AK, Ellis PM, Dent S. Cardiovascular Considerations During Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence and JACC: CardioOncology Expert Panel Recommendations. JACC CardioOncol 2024; 6:815-834. [PMID: 39801647 PMCID: PMC11711816 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 01/03/2025] Open
Abstract
The administration of certain cancer therapies can be associated with the development of cardiovascular toxicity or complications. This spectrum of toxicities is broad and requires nuanced approaches for prevention, identification, and management. This expert panel summarizes the consensus of opinions of diverse health care professionals in several key areas: 1) cardioprotection involves strategies aimed at the primary prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity; 2) surveillance entails monitoring for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity during cancer therapy; 3) permissive cardiotoxicity is the informed continuation of cancer therapy in the presence of cardiovascular toxicity, along with the implementation of mitigating cardiovascular treatments; and 4) special considerations include the invasive management of severe cardiovascular disease in patients receiving treatments for advanced cancer and the exploration of drug-drug interactions in cardio-oncology. In this expert panel, we also highlight gaps in evidence in an effort to continue to advance science in the cardiovascular care of our patients undergoing cancer therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl P. Leong
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Waliany
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Husam Abdel-Qadir
- Women’s College Hospital, Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Katelyn M. Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Tomas G. Neilan
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Ninian N. Lang
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Jennifer E. Liu
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anne H. Blaes
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Hira S. Mian
- Juravinski Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather N. Moore
- Department of Pharmacy, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ludhmila A. Hajjar
- Cardio-Oncology Department, InCor, Universidade de São Paolo, São Paolo, Brazil
| | - Alicia K. Morgans
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Peter M. Ellis
- Juravinski Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Dent
- Duke Cancer Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Leong DP, Guha A, Morgans AK, Niazi T, Pinthus JH. Cardiovascular Risk in Prostate Cancer: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol 2024; 6:835-846. [PMID: 39801649 PMCID: PMC11711826 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is common in patients with prostate cancer and is a significant cause of death. Cardiovascular risk factors are frequent in this population and are often not addressed to thresholds recommended by cardiovascular practice guidelines. Androgen deprivation therapy reduces muscle strength and increases adiposity, increasing the risk for diabetes and hypertension, although its relationship with adverse cardiovascular events requires confirmation. Androgen receptor pathway inhibitors, including androgen receptor antagonists and cytochrome P450 17A1 inhibitors confer incremental risks for hypertension and cardiovascular events to androgen deprivation therapy. Lower cardiovascular risk with gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists compared with agonists requires confirmation in well-designed randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Darryl P. Leong
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Avirup Guha
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Georgia Cancer Center at Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia, USA
| | - Alicia K. Morgans
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Tamim Niazi
- Department of Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jehonathan H. Pinthus
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhou Z, Huang Z, Zhao Y, Wang Y, Niu Y. Association between low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and prostate cancer risk in non-hypertensive middle-aged and older American men. Sci Rep 2024; 14:29096. [PMID: 39582086 PMCID: PMC11586403 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80190-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2024] [Accepted: 11/15/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Often linked with the risk of various diseases, blood low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are typically deemed more favorable when lower. The objective of this investigation is to elucidate the link between blood LDL-C levels and the risk of prostate cancer (PCa) in middle-aged and older men without hypertension in the United States. Utilizing continuous data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) database spanning 2003-2010, a selection of 1,223 non-hypertensive men aged ≥ 40 years was made from a pool of 41,156 participants, ensuring no missing information. Regression analyses were employed to investigate the correlation between blood LDL-C levels and the PCa risk, while identifying potential inflection points indicative of threshold effects. Additionally, we scrutinized the linkage between cholesterol-lowering prescription drug usage and PCa. In our study of 2,224 participants, we found no significant correlation between blood LDL-C levels and the PCa risk after adjusting for confounding variables (Odds Ratio = 0.99; P-value > 0.05). However, upon conducting a subgroup analysis, we discovered a meaningful correlation between lower blood LDL-C levels and an increased PCa risk in the non-hypertensive population (Odds Ratio = 0.99; P-value < 0.05). Meanwhile, we identified a threshold effect and a tipping point at an LDL-C levels of 67 mg/dl. Furthermore, a significant correlation was identified between cholesterol-lowering prescription drug usage and a heightened PCa risk in the non-hypertensive population (Odds Ratio = 18.87; P-value < 0.05; P for interaction < 0.05). Our results indicate that in non-hypertensive middle-aged and older men residing in the United States, lower blood LDL-C levels are not necessarily better and the PCa risk escalates when blood LDL-C levels drop below 67 mg/dl, which may guide early screening and prognosis of PCa in specific populations. This finding calls for further validation via larger sample sizes and a more in-depth analysis of PCa history.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Zhou
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China
| | - Zhicong Huang
- Department of Urology and Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510230, Guangdong, China
| | - Yang Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China.
| | - Yong Wang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China.
| | - Yuanjie Niu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Institute of Urology, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300211, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Alekseev BY, Perepukhov VM, Nyushko KM, Poltavskaya MG. Androgen deprivation therapy and cardiological risks in patients with prostate cancer. Are all drugs the same? CANCER UROLOGY 2024; 20:80-93. [DOI: 10.17650/1726-9776-2024-20-3-80-93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2025]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common oncological disease in men in Russia. For a long time, long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) decreasing native testosterone level has been the basis of PCa drug therapy. At the time of PCa diagnosis, 2/3 of men have various risk factors for cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) or established CVDs (one fourth of the patients have CVDs associated with atherosclerosis; 45 % have a diagnosis of arterial hypertension). ADT is associated with increased risk of CVD and cardiovascular complications (CVC) development. Patients with PCa die of 2 main causes: directly due to cancer or due to CVD. Previously, luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH) antagonists were considered to have a better safety profile compared to LHRH agonists. Comparison of all LHRH agonists (leuprorelin, triptorelin, goserelin, buserelin) with LHRH antagonists in meta-analyses showed that the risk of serious CVCs during LHRH antagonist therapy was 43 % lower than during agonist therapy. However, comparison of leuprorelin with antagonists did not show a significant difference in CVC rate. Leuprorelin is a drug with the most favorable profile of cardiological safety among the ADT drugs and the most frequently used LHRH agonist in the world. Considering high risk of CVDs and CVCs in patients with PCa, along with treatment of the main disease, careful control and reduction of risks of CVD development from the moment of PCa diagnosis should be implemented, the patients must be informed on the necessity of healthy lifestyle, established CVDs should be treated with rational regimens of antihypertensive, hypolipidemic, and hypoglycemic drugs. Risk control and reduction, as well as CVD treatment, should be performed for the whole duration of ADT. The article proposes an algorithm of cardiometabolic risk stratification prior to ADT initiation and during ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Ya. Alekseev
- National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia;
Medical Institute of Continuing Education, Russian Biotechnological University
| | - V. M. Perepukhov
- National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia
| | - K. M. Nyushko
- National Medical Research Radiological Center, Ministry of Health of Russia;
Medical Institute of Continuing Education, Russian Biotechnological University
| | - M. G. Poltavskaya
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of Russia (Sechenov University)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Moryousef J, Duivenvoorden W, Leong D, Pinthus JH. Comprehensive review of cardiovascular disease in prostate cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, therapeutics and prevention strategies. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00897-x. [PMID: 39506079 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00897-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors and disease is high in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PC). Survivorship of PC patients is often determined by cardiovascular disease (CVD). Our review synthesizes the most recent literature exploring the dynamics between PC and CVD across the disease trajectory and treatments. We review key ongoing clinical trials in the field and highlight avenues for future study. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive narrative review of the literature using various search strategies in three databases (PubMed, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov), focusing on literature published between 2000 and 2024. RESULTS We discuss the significance of CVD-related mortality in PC, review the risk factors, and highlight potential mechanisms for accelerated CVD in the androgen-deprivation setting. Furthermore, we summarize key literature of CVD and cardiotoxicity for various therapeutic approaches in PC, including orchiectomy, taxane-based chemotherapy, GnRH-axis targets, and next-generation hormonal agents and PARP inhibitors. Lastly, we discuss prevention strategies and the importance of multi-disciplinary care in this setting. CONCLUSION CVD is a major cause of death in men with PC. Various novel therapeutic approaches have been pivotal in improving oncologic outcomes, but emerging data demonstrate a complex interplay between the androgen axis and CVD that is likely affected by modern treatment strategies. Given the prolonged PC survivorship, unraveling non-oncologic related causes of death and investigating prevention strategies are imperative (Fig. 1). Fig. 1 LANDSCAPE OF PROSTATE CANCER.: Spectrum of prostate cancer disease states (red) and interventions (yellow) with the potential role for optimization (green) to improve cardiovascular outcomes in the future (blue).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Moryousef
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Wilhelmina Duivenvoorden
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Darryl Leong
- Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University and Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Jehonathan H Pinthus
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
- The Research Institute of St. Joe's Hamilton, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Basaria S, Taplin ME, McDonnell M, Simonson DC, Lin AP, Dufour AB, Habtemariam D, Nguyen PL, Ravi P, Kibel AS, Sweeney CJ, D’ Amico AV, Roberts DA, Xu W, Wei XX, Sunkara R, Choudhury AD, Mantia C, Beltran H, Pomerantz M, Berchuck JE, Martin NE, Leeman JE, Mouw KW, Kilbridge KE, Bearup R, Kackley H, Kafel H, Huang G, Reid KF, Storer T, Braga-Basaria M, Travison TG. Insulin resistance during androgen deprivation therapy in men with prostate cancer. Cancer 2024; 130:3671-3685. [PMID: 38881266 PMCID: PMC11464184 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2024] [Revised: 05/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in prostate cancer (PCa) has been associated with development of insulin resistance. However, the predominant site of insulin resistance remains unclear. METHODS The ADT & Metabolism Study was a single-center, 24-week, prospective observational study that enrolled ADT-naive men without diabetes who were starting ADT for at least 24 weeks (ADT group, n = 42). The control group comprised men without diabetes with prior history of PCa who were in remission after prostatectomy (non-ADT group, n = 23). Prevalent diabetes mellitus was excluded in both groups using all three laboratory criteria defined in the American Diabetes Association guidelines. All participants were eugonadal at enrollment. The primary outcome was to elucidate the predominant site of insulin resistance (liver or skeletal muscle). Secondary outcomes included assessments of body composition, and hepatic and intramyocellular fat. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 12, and 24 weeks. RESULTS At 24 weeks, there was no change in hepatic (1.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.10 to 4.43; p = .47) or skeletal muscle (-3.2; 95% CI, -7.07 to 0.66; p = .10) insulin resistance in the ADT group. No increase in hepatic or intramyocellular fat deposition or worsening of glucose was seen. These changes were mirrored by those observed in the non-ADT group. Men undergoing ADT gained 3.7 kg of fat mass. CONCLUSIONS In men with PCa and no diabetes, 24 weeks of ADT did not change insulin resistance despite adverse body composition changes. These findings should be reassuring for treating physicians and for patients who are being considered for short-term ADT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shehzad Basaria
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mary-Ellen Taplin
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Marie McDonnell
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Donald C. Simonson
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alexander P. Lin
- Center for Clinical Spectroscopy, Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alyssa B. Dufour
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel Habtemariam
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Paul L. Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Praful Ravi
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Adam S. Kibel
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher J. Sweeney
- South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Anthony V. D’ Amico
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Daniel A. Roberts
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Wenxin Xu
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Xiao X. Wei
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Rajitha Sunkara
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Atish D. Choudhury
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Charlene Mantia
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Himisha Beltran
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Mark Pomerantz
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jacob E. Berchuck
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Neil E. Martin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jonathan E. Leeman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kent W. Mouw
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kerry E. Kilbridge
- Lank Center for Genitourinary Oncology and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Richelle Bearup
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hannah Kackley
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Hussein Kafel
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Grace Huang
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Kieran F. Reid
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas Storer
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Milena Braga-Basaria
- Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Hypertension, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas G. Travison
- Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, and Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Reiss AB, Vasalani S, Albert J, Drewes W, Li K, Srivastava A, De Leon J, Katz AE. The Effect of Androgen Deprivation Therapy on the Cardiovascular System in Advanced Prostate Cancer. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:1727. [PMID: 39596912 PMCID: PMC11596556 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60111727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2024] [Revised: 10/09/2024] [Accepted: 10/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/29/2024]
Abstract
Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is a mainstay treatment for metastatic prostate cancer, improving progression-free survival. ADT suppresses the production of testosterone and reduces circulating levels of the hormone. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) agonists are the most commonly used ADT modality. They can be given alone or in combination with androgen synthesis inhibitors or androgen receptor antagonists. An estimated 40% of prostate cancer patients will receive ADT as part of their therapy during their lifetime. However, ADT has numerous adverse effects, including an increased cardiovascular risk that impacts quality of life. Relugolix is an alternative form of ADT. It is the only oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist, circumventing injection site reactions, making it easier for patients to take, and thus increasing compliance. Testosterone suppression with relugolix is excellent and testosterone recovery after discontinuation is rapid. This paper reviews the ADT and anti-androgen treatment options for men with prostate cancer and the cardiovascular effects of these therapies. There is accumulating evidence that cardiovascular risk with relugolix is lower than with other ADT medications and also lower than with androgen synthesis inhibitors and androgen receptor antagonists. This paper provides insight into the use of different ADT regimens based on the cardiovascular status and circumstances. It explores strategies to mitigate negative cardiovascular consequences and highlights the need for further study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison B. Reiss
- Department of Medicine and Foundations of Medicine, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.V.); (J.A.); (W.D.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Samantha Vasalani
- Department of Medicine and Foundations of Medicine, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.V.); (J.A.); (W.D.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Jacqueline Albert
- Department of Medicine and Foundations of Medicine, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.V.); (J.A.); (W.D.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Wendy Drewes
- Department of Medicine and Foundations of Medicine, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.V.); (J.A.); (W.D.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Kathleen Li
- Department of Urology, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (K.L.); (A.E.K.)
| | - Ankita Srivastava
- Department of Medicine and Foundations of Medicine, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.V.); (J.A.); (W.D.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Joshua De Leon
- Department of Medicine and Foundations of Medicine, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (S.V.); (J.A.); (W.D.); (A.S.); (J.D.L.)
| | - Aaron E. Katz
- Department of Urology, NYU Grossman Long Island School of Medicine, Mineola, NY 11501, USA; (K.L.); (A.E.K.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bloom MW, Vo JB, Rodgers JE, Ferrari AM, Nohria A, Deswal A, Cheng RK, Kittleson MM, Upshaw JN, Palaskas N, Blaes A, Brown SA, Ky B, Lenihan D, Maurer MS, Fadol A, Skurka K, Cambareri C, Chauhan C, Barac A. Cardio-Oncology and Heart Failure: a Scientific Statement From the Heart Failure Society of America. J Card Fail 2024:S1071-9164(24)00363-4. [PMID: 39419165 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.08.045] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 08/27/2024] [Accepted: 08/28/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024]
Abstract
Heart failure and cancer remain 2 of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, and the 2 disease entities are linked in a complex manner. Patients with cancer are at increased risk of cardiovascular complications related to the cancer therapies. The presence of cardiomyopathy or heart failure in a patient with new cancer diagnosis portends a high risk for adverse oncology and cardiovascular outcomes. With the rapid growth of cancer therapies, many of which interfere with cardiovascular homeostasis, heart failure practitioners need to be familiar with prevention, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management strategies in cardio-oncology. This Heart Failure Society of America statement addresses the complexities of heart failure care among patients with active cancer diagnoses and cancer survivors. Risk stratification, monitoring and management of cardiotoxicity are presented across stages A through D heart failure, with focused discussion on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and special populations, such as survivors of childhood and young-adulthood cancers. We provide an overview of the shared risk factors between cancer and heart failure, highlighting heart failure as a form of cardiotoxicity associated with many different cancer therapeutics. Finally, we discuss disparities in the care of patients with cancer and cardiac disease and present a framework for a multidisciplinary-team approach and critical collaboration among heart failure, oncology, palliative care, pharmacy, and nursing teams in the management of these complex patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jacqueline B Vo
- Radiation Epidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology & Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD
| | - Jo E Rodgers
- Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Alana M Ferrari
- Division of Hematology/ Oncology, University of Virginia Health, Charlottesville, VA
| | - Anju Nohria
- Cardio-Oncology Program, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Anita Deswal
- Department of Cardiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Richard K Cheng
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Michelle M Kittleson
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Nicolas Palaskas
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Anne Blaes
- Division of Hematology/Oncology/Transplantation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
| | - Sherry-Ann Brown
- Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; Research Collaborator, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Bonnie Ky
- Division of Cardiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Thalheimer Center for Cardio-Oncology, Abramson Cancer Center and Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel Lenihan
- Saint Francis Healthcare, Cape Girardeau, MO and the International Cardio-Oncology Society, Tampa, FL
| | - Mathew S Maurer
- Division of Cardiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY
| | | | | | - Christine Cambareri
- Clinical Oncology Pharmacist, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Abramson Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Ana Barac
- Department of Cardiology, Inova Schar Heart and Vascular, Inova Schar Cancer, Falls Church, VA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Hauber B, Hong A, Hunsche E, Maculaitis MC, Collins SP. Patient Preferences for Attributes of Androgen Deprivation Therapies in Prostate Cancer: A Discrete Choice Experiment with Latent Class Analysis. Adv Ther 2024; 41:3934-3950. [PMID: 39167332 PMCID: PMC11399292 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-024-02955-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 07/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Medical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) options have expanded for patients with advanced prostate cancer (PC). Historically, ADT was primarily available in long-acting injectable formulations. In 2020, the first oral formulation was US Food and Drug Administration-approved for adults with advanced PC. This study's aim was to assess patient preferences for attributes of medical ADT, including mode of administration, side effects, impact on sexual interest, and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs, and to segment respondents into distinct groups based on their treatment choice patterns. METHODS A cross-sectional survey was conducted among US residents aged > 40 years with PC, employing a discrete choice experiment to assess preferences for ADT attributes. For each choice task, respondents were asked to select the hypothetical treatment profile that they preferred out of two presented. Latent class analysis (LCA) was conducted to estimate attribute-level preference weights and calculate attribute relative importance for groups of respondents with similar treatment preferences. RESULTS A total of 304 respondents completed the survey (mean age 64.4 years). LCA identified four preference groups, named according to the attribute each group considered most important: Sexual interest, Cost-sensitive, Favors daily pill, and Favors injection. Most respondents in the Sexual interest group were < 65 years, while the Cost-sensitive group was mostly ≥ 65 years. Favors daily pill had the highest proportion of ADT-naïve individuals. On average, respondents in these groups preferred an oral medication. Favors injection, which had the highest proportion of ADT-experienced individuals, preferred infrequent intramuscular injections, lower chance of post-ADT testosterone recovery, and lower OOP cost. CONCLUSION Respondents differed in their preferences regarding ADT attributes, highlighting the need for patient involvement in their treatment decisions. Effective communication between healthcare providers and patients about the benefits and risks of available therapies should be encouraged to ensure that patients receive the PC treatment that best meets their needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Elke Hunsche
- Sumitomo Pharma Switzerland GmbH, Basel, Switzerland
| | | | - Sean P Collins
- Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd. NW, Washington, DC, 20007, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wallis CJD, Chen KC, Atkinson S, Boldt-Houle DM. Patient Demographics and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events after Androgen Deprivation Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Adv Urol 2024; 2024:2988289. [PMID: 39372193 PMCID: PMC11452244 DOI: 10.1155/2024/2988289] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/16/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024] Open
Abstract
Background The association between patient demographics and CV events after ADT using real-world data was evaluated. In addition to encompassing >30 times more patients than all previous MACE studies, this is the first study, to the best of our knowledge, to include a comprehensive listing of many demographic factors from one large, recent US dataset over a long period of time. Materials and Methods The retrospective analysis of data in the Decision Resources Group (now Clarivate) Real World Evidence repository, representing >300M US patients from 1991 to 2020 across all US regions, was performed. Patients with PCa receiving ≥1 ADT injection were included. MACE risk after ADT initiation was evaluated for demographic and potential PCa-related risk factors. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed, and Cox regression was used to evaluate the association between MACE risk and demographic/PCa-related risk factors. Results Overall, MACE risk was slightly lower in the first year after ADT initiation (3.9%) vs. years 2-4 (∼5.2%). In a multivariate Cox model, MACE risk after ADT initiation was significantly higher for older vs. younger patients (adjusted HR per increasing year = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.07-1.09), men with a history of MACE vs. without (HR = 2.22, 95% CI: 1.72-2.88), men with very low BMI vs. normal or high BMI (HR for decreasing BMI per kg/m2 = 1.02, 95% CI: 1.01-1.03), White vs. Black patients (HR = 1.30, 95% CI: 1.08-1.55), and patients who did not use statins vs. those who did (HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.00-1.27). Of the PCa-related risk factors, MACE risk after ADT initiation was significantly higher for oncology vs. urology treatment setting (HR = 2.47, 95% CI: 2.12-2.88), patients with baseline metastasis vs. those without (HR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.72-3.07), and patients treated with antagonists vs. agonists (HR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.25-2.10). Conclusions Demographic factors are important contributors to increased MACE risk for men with PCa on ADT. Clinicians should monitor risk factors and modify if possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher J. D. Wallis
- Division of UrologyDepartment of SurgeryUniversity of Toronto, 60 Murray Street, Koffler Ctr, 6th Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G3L9, Canada
| | - Kevin C. Chen
- Analytics and InformationXelay Acumen Group, Inc., 181 2 Ave, Suite 488, San Mateo, California 94401, USA
| | - Stuart Atkinson
- Medical AffairsTolmar Inc., 485 Half Day Road, Suite 400, Buffalo Grove, IL 60089, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Chen K, Wong TH, Tan YG, Tay KJ, Tan WC, Chan J, Ho H, Cheng C, Teoh JYC, Chiu PKF, Wang HJ, Saad MB, Kanesvaran R, Li YQ, Ng CT, Tuan JKL, Yuen JSP. Cardio-oncology in advanced prostate cancer. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1386597. [PMID: 38947889 PMCID: PMC11211357 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1386597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Treatment intensification with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPi) have led to improved survival in advanced prostate cancer. However, ADT is linked to significant cardiovascular toxicity, and ARPi also negatively impacts cardiovascular health. Together with a higher prevalence of baseline cardiovascular risk factors reported among prostate cancer survivors at diagnosis, there is a pressing need to prioritise and optimise cardiovascular health in this population. Firstly, While no dedicated cardiovascular toxicity risk calculators are available, other tools such as SCORE2 can be used for baseline cardiovascular risk assessment. Next, selected patients on combination therapy may benefit from de-escalation of ADT to minimise its toxicities while maintaining cancer control. These patients can be characterised by an exceptional PSA response to hormonal treatment, favourable disease characteristics and competing comorbidities that warrant a less aggressive treatment regime. In addition, emerging molecular and genomic biomarkers hold the potential to identify patients who are suited for a de-escalated treatment approach either with ADT or with ARPi. One such biomarker is AR-V7 splice variant that predicts resistance to ARPi. Lastly, optimization of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors for patients through a coherent framework (ABCDE) and exercise therapy is equally important. This article aims to comprehensively review the cardiovascular impact of hormonal manipulation in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, propose overarching strategies to mitigate cardiovascular toxicity associated with hormonal treatment, and, most importantly, raise awareness about the detrimental cardiovascular effects inherent in our current management strategies involving hormonal agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Chen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Ting Hong Wong
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yu Guang Tan
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kae Jack Tay
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Wei Chong Tan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Johan Chan
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Henry Ho
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Christopher Cheng
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Peter Ka-Fung Chiu
- S. H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Hung Jen Wang
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University and College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Marniza Binti Saad
- Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Malaya Medical Centre, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ravindran Kanesvaran
- Division of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - You Quan Li
- Division of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Choon Ta Ng
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | - John Shyi Peng Yuen
- Department of Urology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
- Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Taylor LL, Hong AS, Hahm K, Kim D, Smith-Morris C, Zaha VG. Health Literacy, Individual and Community Engagement, and Cardiovascular Risks and Disparities: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol 2024; 6:363-380. [PMID: 38983375 PMCID: PMC11229558 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2024.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiovascular and cancer outcomes intersect within the realm of cardio-oncology survivorship care, marked by disparities across ethnic, racial, social, and geographical landscapes. Although the clinical community is increasingly aware of this complex issue, effective solutions are trailing. To attain substantial public health impact, examinations of cancer types and cardiovascular risk mitigation require complementary approaches that elicit the patient's perspective, scale it to a population level, and focus on actionable population health interventions. Adopting such a multidisciplinary approach will deepen our understanding of patient awareness, motivation, health literacy, and community resources for addressing the unique challenges of cardio-oncology. Geospatial analysis aids in identifying key communities in need within both granular and broader contexts. In this review, we delineate a pathway that navigates barriers from individual to community levels. Data gleaned from these perspectives are critical in informing interventions that empower individuals within diverse communities and improve cardio-oncology survivorship.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arthur S. Hong
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- UT Southwestern O’Donnell School of Public Health, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Kristine Hahm
- University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA
| | - Dohyeong Kim
- University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, Texas, USA
| | | | - Vlad G. Zaha
- UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- UT Southwestern Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Bernard S, Evans H, Hoy NY, Suderman K, Cameron B, Sexsmith J, Kinnaird A, Rourke K, Dean L, Pituskin E, Usmani N, Tandon P, McNeely ML. Control4Life: A randomized controlled trial protocol examining the feasibility and efficacy of a combined pelvic health rehabilitation and exercise fitness program for individuals undergoing prostatectomy. Contemp Clin Trials 2024; 139:107482. [PMID: 38431130 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2024.107482] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2023] [Revised: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Urinary incontinence (UI), erectile dysfunction and cardiometabolic conditions are common after prostatectomy for prostate cancer (PCa). Although physical activity could improve overall survival and quality of survivorship, fear of UI can restrict participation in exercise. Individuals with PCa could benefit from therapeutic exercise programming to support continence recovery and cardiometabolic health. AIM The main objective of this study is to determine the feasibility and the effects of a combined pelvic health rehabilitation and exercise fitness program on UI after prostatectomy. The combined exercise program will be delivered both in-person and virtually. METHODS This study follows a modified Zelen, two-arm parallel randomized controlled trial design. A total of 106 individuals with PCa will be recruited before prostatectomy surgery. Participants will be randomized between two groups: one receiving usual care and one receiving a combined exercise fitness and intensive pelvic floor muscle training program. Exercise programming will begin 6-8 weeks after prostatectomy and will last 12 weeks. Outcomes include: the 24-h pad test (primary outcome for UI); physical fitness, metabolic indicators, and patient-reported outcomes on erectile function, self-efficacy, severity of cancer symptoms and quality of life. Important timepoints for assessments include before surgery (T0), after surgery (T1), after intervention (T3) and at one-year after surgery (T4). CONCLUSION This study will inform the feasibility of offering comprehensive exercise programming that has the potential to positively impact urinary continence, erectile function and cardiometabolic health of individuals undergoing prostatectomy for prostate cancer. CLINICALTRIALS REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT06072911.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stéphanie Bernard
- School of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada
| | - Howard Evans
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nathan Y Hoy
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Kirsten Suderman
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Bruce Cameron
- Patient-partner, Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - John Sexsmith
- Patient-partner, Cancer Rehabilitation Clinic, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Adam Kinnaird
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Keith Rourke
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Lucas Dean
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Edith Pituskin
- Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta, Edmonton; Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nawaid Usmani
- Cross Cancer Institute, Division of Radiation Oncology, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Puneeta Tandon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology (Liver Unit), University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Margaret L McNeely
- Department of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada; Department of Oncology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Luo Z, Chi K, Zhao H, Liu L, Yang W, Luo Z, Liang Y, Zeng L, Zhou R, Feng M, Li Y, Hua G, Rao H, Lin X, Yi M. Cardiovascular mortality by cancer risk stratification in patients with localized prostate cancer: a SEER-based study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2023; 10:1130691. [PMID: 37614944 PMCID: PMC10443648 DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1130691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 07/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa) by risk stratification remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the risk of CVD death in patients with localized PCa by risk stratification. Patients and methods Population-based study of 340,806 cases in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database diagnosed with localized PCa between 2004 and 2016. The proportion of deaths identifies the primary cause of death, the competing risk model identifies the interaction between CVD and PCa, and the standardized mortality rate (SMR) quantifies the risk of CVD death in patients with PCa. Results CVD-related death was the leading cause of death in patients with localized PCa, and cumulative CVD-related death also surpassed PCa almost as soon as PCa was diagnosed in the low- and intermediate-risk groups. However, in the high-risk group, CVD surpassed PCa approximately 90 months later. Patients with localized PCa have a higher risk of CVD-related death compared to the general population and the risk increases steadily with survival (SMR = 4.8, 95% CI 4.6-5.1 to SMR = 13.6, 95% CI 12.8-14.5). Conclusions CVD-related death is a major competing risk in patients with localized PCa, and cumulative CVD mortality increases steadily with survival time and exceeds PCa in all three stratifications (low, intermediate, and high risk). Patients with localized PCa have a higher CVD-related death than the general population. Management of patients with localized PCa requires attention to both the primary cancer and CVD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zehao Luo
- Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kaiyi Chi
- Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongjun Zhao
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Qingyuan People's Hospital), Qingyuan, China
| | - Linglong Liu
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wenting Yang
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Medical Imageology, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhijuan Luo
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The Third Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yinglan Liang
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liangjia Zeng
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The Nanshan Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Ruoyun Zhou
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The Third Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Manting Feng
- Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yemin Li
- Cardiovascular Medicine and Cardio-Oncology Group, Medical Exploration and Translation Team, Guangzhou, China
- Department of Clinical Medicine, The First Clinical College of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Guangyao Hua
- Department of Cardiology, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University (Qingyuan People’s Hospital), Qingyuan, China
| | - Huying Rao
- Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiaozhen Lin
- Department of Cardiology, Guangzhou Institute of Cardiovascular Disease, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Min Yi
- Department of Endocrinology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ng CT, Bonilla HMG, Bryce AH, Singh P, Herrmann J. Approaches to Prevent and Manage Cardiovascular Disease in Patients Receiving Therapy for Prostate Cancer. Curr Cardiol Rep 2023; 25:889-899. [PMID: 37490155 PMCID: PMC10894683 DOI: 10.1007/s11886-023-01909-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate cancer (PCa) is amongst the most common cancers in men worldwide. Cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and CV disease (CVD) are common comorbidities in this patient population, posing a challenge for PCa-directed therapies which can cause or worsen CVRFs and CVDs. Herein, we summarize the approaches to prevent and manage CVD in patients with PCa receiving therapy. RECENT FINDINGS While patients with locally advanced and metastatic PCa benefit from hormonal therapy, these treatments can potentially cause CV toxicity. Androgen receptor targeting therapies, such as androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), can induce metabolic changes and directly impact cardiovascular function, thereby reducing cardiorespiratory fitness and increasing CV mortality. Moreover, more than half of the PCa patients have poorly controlled CV risk factors at baseline. Hence, there is an urgent need to address gaps in preventing and managing CVD in PCa patients. Screening and optimizing CV risk factors and CVD in patients undergoing ADT are essential to reduce CV mortality, the leading non-cancer cause of death in PCa survivors. The risk of CV morbidity and mortality can be further mitigated by considering the patient's cardiovascular risk profile when deciding the choice and duration of ADT. A multidisciplinary team-based approach is crucial to achieve the best outcomes for PCa patients undergoing therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Choon Ta Ng
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
- Department of Cardiology, National Heart Centre Singapore, 5 Hospital Drive, Singapore, 169609, Singapore.
| | | | - Alan H Bryce
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Parminder Singh
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Joerg Herrmann
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lin CA, Kao YS. Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk Factors. JACC CardioOncol 2023; 5:551. [PMID: 37614571 PMCID: PMC10443193 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yung-Shuo Kao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Taoyuan General Hospital, No.1492, Zhongshan Road, Taoyuan District, Taoyuan City 330, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Klimis H, Leong DP. Reply: Prostate Cancer and Cardiovascular Risk Factors. JACC CardioOncol 2023; 5:552. [PMID: 37614588 PMCID: PMC10443196 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2023.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Harry Klimis
- Hamilton General Hospital, C2-238 David Braley Building, 237 Barton Street East, Hamilton L8L 2X2, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|