Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy and Apical Aneurysm

Radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Compared to other non-ischemic substrates, there is limited data on the role and outcome of catheter ablation in HCM. The objective of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for the treatment of VT in patients with HCM.

METHODS

Fourteen patients with HCM and drug refractory VT who underwent catheter ablation at a single center were included in this study. The data was evaluated retrospectively. Acute success, procedure-related complications, and long-term outcomes were documented during follow up.

RESULTS

Among the 14 patients (mean age 48.2 ± 8.2 years, 85.7% males, mean LVEF 42.6 ± 6.5%), 4 had an apical aneurysm. Eleven patients had evidence of scar-related VT and three patients had a bundle-branch re-entry VT. The most common sites for scar-related VT were the border-zones of the apical aneurysms, basal septum, and LV lateral wall. Patient either underwent an endocardial ablation or a combined endocardial and epicardial ablation. Acute success was achieved in all patients. In 6 patients VT was terminated during ablation. In two patients, non-clinical VTs were inducible at the end of the procedure. No major or minor complications were observed during and after the procedure in all patients. During long-term follow up, elimination of VTs reached 78%.

CONCLUSION

Catheter ablation of VT in patients with HCM is safe and successful in eliminating VT. Combining endocardial and epicardial ablation techniques can potentially lead to better outcomes in these patients. Bundle branch re-entry should be considered as a potential mechanism of VT in patients with HCM.

High-risk imaging characteristics in left ventricular apex for the life-threatening arrhythmic events in Japanese hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients

Left ventricular (LV) apical aneurysm is known to be associated with the life-threatening arrhythmic events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). However, the current 2014 ESC guideline has not included apical aneurysm as a major risk factor for sudden cardiac death and 2018 JCS guideline includes it only as a modulator, while it has been included as a new major risk marker in 2020 AHA/ACC guideline. Therefore, we sought to identify high-risk imaging characteristics in LV apex which is associated with a higher occurrence of ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF). In 99 consecutive Japanese HCM patients (median age, 65 years; 59 males) undergoing implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation for primary prevention following cardiac magnetic resonance including late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), the occurrence of appropriate ICD interventions for VT/VF was evaluated for 6.2 (median) years after ICD implantation. Overall, appropriate ICD interventions occurred in 43% with annual rates of 7.0% for appropriate interventions. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated that the presence of LV apical aneurysm was significantly associated with a higher occurrence of appropriate interventions (annual rates 18.9% vs. 6.4%, P = 0.013). Similarly, patients with high LV mid-to-apex pressure gradient (annual rates 14.9% vs. 6.2%, P = 0.022) and presence of apical LGE (annual rates 10.9% vs. 4.0%, P = 0.001) experienced appropriate interventions more frequently. An aneurysm, high-pressure gradient, and LGE in an apex are associated with VT/VF. These characteristics in apex should be kept in mind when implanting ICD in Japanese HCM patients as a primary prevention.

State-of-the-art document on optimal contemporary management of cardiomyopathies

Cardiomyopathies represent significant contributors to cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Over the past decades, a progress has occurred in characterization of the genetic background and major pathophysiological mechanisms, which has been incorporated into a more nuanced diagnostic approach and risk stratification. Furthermore, medications targeting core disease processes and/or their downstream adverse effects have been introduced for several cardiomyopathies. Combined with standard care and prevention of sudden cardiac death, these novel and emerging targeted therapies offer a possibility of improving the outcomes in several cardiomyopathies. Therefore, the aim of this document is to summarize practical approaches to the treatment of cardiomyopathies, which includes the evidence-based novel therapeutic concepts and established principles of care, tailored to the individual patient aetiology and clinical presentation of the cardiomyopathy. The scope of the document encompasses contemporary treatment of dilated, hypertrophic, restrictive and arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. It was based on an expert consensus reached at the Heart Failure Association online Workshop, held on 18 March 2021.

Clinical Outcomes After the Surgical Treatment of Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy With Left Ventricular Apical Aneurysm

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular apical aneurysm (LVAA) is a rare complication of hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM). This study aimed to illustrate the clinical characteristics and surgical outcomes of these patients.

METHOD

Patients with HOCM and LVAA who underwent modified extended Morrow myectomy and surgical left ventricular reconstruction (SLVR) between October 2012 and March 2021 were retrospectively recruited. Patients with coronary artery disease were excluded. Clinical characteristics were summarised. Time-to-event outcomes were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by a log-rank test.

RESULTS

Fifteen eligible patients were identified; the mean age was 39.9±17.2 years and 40.0% of them were female. All patients had dyspnoea, 46.7% presented with syncope and/or chest pain, and 13.3% had a family history of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. The mean LVAA size was 36.9±12.3 mm in length and 28.5±11.3 mm in width. Echocardiography showed LV outflow tract obstruction in seven (46.7%) patients, mid-cavity LV obstruction in 12 (80.0%), while systolic anterior motion (SAM) was seen in seven (46.7%). The symptoms were resolved in all patients postoperatively. During a median follow-up of 22.0 months, one (6.7%) patient had sudden cardiac death, one (6.7%) had a haemorrhagic stroke, and the LVAA recurrence was 40.0%. Subgroup analysis showed that signs of SAM and larger LVAA (≥30 mm) were associated with an increased tendency for a longer hospital stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HOCM and LVAA present with high-risk profiles. Modified extended Morrow myectomy combined with SLVR is useful in relieving the symptoms and improving the prognosis, although there might be recurrent LVAA.

Diagnosis and Clinical Implication of Left Ventricular Aneurysm in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a genetic disease with heterogeneous clinical presentation and prognosis. Within the broad phenotypic expression of HCM, there is a subgroup of patients with a left ventricular (LV) apical aneurysm, which has an estimated prevalence between 2% and 5%. LV apical aneurysm is characterized by an area of apical dyskinesis or akinesis, often associated with regional scarring. To date, the most accepted pathomechanism of this complication is, in absence of coronary artery disease, the high systolic intra-aneurysmal pressure, which, combined with impaired diastolic perfusion from lower stroke volume, results in supply-demand ischemia and myocardial injury. Apical aneurysm is increasingly recognized as a poor prognostic marker; however, the efficacy of prophylactic anticoagulation and/or intracardiac cardioverted defibrillator (ICD) in improving morbidity and mortality is not yet clearly demonstrated. This review aims to elucidate the mechanism, diagnosis and clinical implication of LV aneurysm in patients with HCM.

A Narrative Review of Emerging Therapies for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is a hereditary condition that affects myocardial contraction. In case of failure of pharmacological treatment, alternative approaches might be used that include surgical myectomy, percutaneous transluminal septal myocardial ablation, and radiofrequency ablation. In respect of long-term advantages, surgical septal myectomy remains the therapy of choice for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Alcohol septal ablation has been considered an alternative to surgical myectomy, which confers the benefits of a shorter hospital stay, less discomfort, and fewer complications. However, only expert operators should perform it on carefully chosen patients. Further, radiofrequency septal ablation reduces the left ventricular outflow tract gradient and improves the NYHA functional class of patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, despite complications like cardiac tamponade and atrioventricular block. Further research with a larger sample size is required to compare the radiofrequency approach with established invasive treatment methods for hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Septal myectomy has low morbidity and mortality rates, making it the preferred procedure; however, the efficacy and morbidity remain debatable. Advances in invasive techniques, including percutaneous septal radiofrequency ablation and transcatheter myotomy, have provided alternative approaches for reducing left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction in patients who are not candidates for traditional surgical septal myectomy. Candidates for alcohol and radiofrequency septal ablation include patients with symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy, older adults, and those with multiple comorbidities.

Clinical outcomes of radiofrequency catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is rare in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), management of which is challenging. Limited data exists on the utility of catheter ablation for the treatment of VT in this population.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to assess clinical outcomes of catheter ablation for VT in HCM patients.

METHODS

A systematic search, without language restriction, using PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed. The meta-analysis was performed using a meta-package for R version 4.0/RStudio version 1.2 and Freeman Tukey double arcsine method to establish the variance of raw proportions. Outcomes measured included (1) acute procedure success (defined as noninducible for clinical VT), (2) freedom from VT at follow-up, (3) mortality.

RESULTS

This systematic review of six studies (three from the United States and three from Japan) incorporated a total of 68 drug-refractory HCM patients who underwent VT radiofrequency catheter ablation (mean age 57.6 ± 13.3 years, mean LVEF 45.8 ± 15.4%, 85% men, maximum septal wall thickness 17.4 ± 4.6 mm, and 32.3% with an apical aneurysm). Acute procedural success was achieved in 84.5% patients (95% confidence interval [CI]: 70.6%-95.2%) with 27.9% patients had recurrent VT requiring multiple ablations (median 1, IQR 1-3). During the follow-up period (18.3 ± 11.7 months), the pooled incidence of freedom from recurrent VT after index procedure was 70.2% (95% CI: 51.9%-86.2%), while after the last ablation was 82.8% (95% CI: 57%-99.2%). There were two deaths during follow-up, one from heart failure and one from SCD 0.8% (95% CI: 0%-5.8%).

CONCLUSION

The results of our pooled analysis demonstrated that catheter ablation for VT in HCM patients was associated with high acute procedural success, and reduced VT recurrence-findings comparable to previously published reports in other disease substrates.

Catheter Ablation for Ventricular Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators are the mainstay of therapy for prevention of sudden cardiac death in high-risk patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Catheter ablation is a useful option for patients with recurrent, drug refractory monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT), and device therapy. Compared with other nonischemic substrates, there are limited data on the role and outcomes of catheter ablation in HCM. The challenges of VT ablation in HCM patients include deep intramural and epicardial substrates, suboptimal power delivery, and higher recurrence due to progression of disease. Patient selection, using cardiac MRI scar localization, and optimizing ablation techniques can improve outcomes in these patients.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: The Times They Are a-Changin'

The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is a life-saving therapy in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) at high risk of sudden cardiac death. The heterogeneity of clinical scenarios in HCM and the availability of ICDs with distinct characteristics emphasizes the need for selecting the right device for the right patient. There is growing awareness that unnecessarily complex devices can lead to short- and long-term complications without adding significant clinical benefits. Young patients have the greatest potential years of life gained from the ICD but are also most exposed to device-related complications. This increases the complexity of decision-making of ICD prescription in these often otherwise well patients in whom device selection should be tailored to preserve survival benefit without introducing morbidity. In the light of the multiple clinical phenotypes characterizing HCM, the present article offers evidence-based perspectives helpful in predicting the individual impact of the ICD and choosing the most appropriate device.

Characteristics and Long-Term Ablation Outcomes of Supraventricular Arrhythmias in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A 10-Year, Single-Center Experience

Background: A variety of supraventricular arrhythmias (SVAs) may occur in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). The characteristics and long-term ablation outcomes of different types of SVAs in HCM have not been comprehensively investigated. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 101 consecutive patients with HCM who were referred to the electrophysiology and arrhythmia service from May 2010 to October 2020. The clinical features and ablation outcomes were analyzed. Results: Seventy-eight patients had SVAs, which comprised 50 (64.1%) cases of atrial fibrillation (AF), 16 (20.5%) of atrial flutter (AFL), 15 (19.2%) of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia (AVRT), 11 (14.1%) of atrial arrhythmia (AT), and 3 (3.8%) of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Thirty-four patients underwent catheter ablation and were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 58.5 (82.9) months. There was no recurrence in patients with non-AF SVAs. In patients with AF, the 1- and 7-year AF-free survival rates were 87.5 and 49.5%, respectively. A receiver operator characteristic analysis showed that a greater left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) was associated with a higher recurrence of AF, with an optimum cutoff value of 47 mm (c-statistic = 0.91, p = 0.011, sensitivity = 1.00, specificity = 0.82). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, patients with a LVEDD ≥ 47 mm had worse AF-free survival than those with a LVEDD <47 mm (log-rank p = 0.014). Conclusions: In this unique population of HCM, AF was the most common SVA, followed in order by AFL, AVRT, AT, and AVNRT. The long-term catheter ablation outcome for non-AF SVAs in HCM is satisfactory. A greater LVEDD predicts AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with HCM.

Ventricular arrhythmia management in patients with genetic cardiomyopathies

Genetic cardiomyopathies are associated with increased risk for cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death. The management of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) in patients with these conditions can be nuanced due to particular disease-based considerations, yet data specifically addressing management in these patients are limited. Here we describe the current evidence-based approach to the management of ventricular rhythm disorders in patients with genetic forms of cardiomyopathy, namely, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular noncompaction, and Brugada syndrome, including recommendations from consensus guideline statements when available.

Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia in patients with postinfarction left ventricular aneurysm

BACKGROUND

While ventricular tachycardia (VT) in the setting of postmyocardial infarction left ventricular aneurysms (LVA) is not uncommonly encountered, there is a scarcity of data regarding the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of ablation of VT in this subset of patients.

METHODS

Our study included consecutive patients aged 18 years or older with postmyocardial infarction LVA who presented to Mayo Clinic for catheter ablation of VT between 2002 and 2018.

RESULTS

Of 34 patients, the mean age was 70.4 ± 9.1 years; 91% were male. Mean LVEF was 29 ± 9.7% and left ventricular end-diastolic dimension was 64.9 ± 6.6 mm. The site of the LVA was apical in 21 patients (62%). Fifteen patients (44%) presented with electrical storm or incessant VT. Nine patients (26%) had a history of intracardiac thrombus. All except for one patient had at least one VT originating from the aneurysm. The mean number of VTs was 2.9 ± 1.7. All patients underwent ablation at the site of the aneurysm. Ablation outside the aneurysm was performed in 13 patients (38%). Low-voltage fractionated potentials and/or late potentials at the aneurysmal site were present in all cases. Complete elimination of all VTs was achieved in 18 (53%), while the elimination of the clinical VT with continued inducibility of nonclinical VTs was achieved in a further 11 patients (32%). Two patients developed cardiac tamponade requiring pericardiocentesis. During a mean follow-up period of 2.3 ± 2.4 years, 11 patients (32%) experienced VT recurrence. Freedom from all-cause mortality at 1-year follow-up was 94%.

CONCLUSION

Radiofrequency catheter ablation targeting the aneurysmal site is a feasible and reasonably effective management strategy for clinical VTs in patients with postinfarction LVA.

Validation of the 2020 AHA/ACC Risk Stratification for Sudden Cardiac Death in Chinese Patients With Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Background: Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a common cause of death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), but identification of patients at a high risk of SCD is challenging. The study aimed to validate the three SCD risk stratifications recommended by the 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline, the 2014 ESC guideline, and the 2020 AHA/ACC guideline in Chinese HCM patients.

Methods: The study population consisted of a consecutive cohort of 511 patients with HCM without a history of SCD event. The endpoint was a composite of SCD or an equivalent event (appropriate implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy or successful resuscitation after cardiac arrest).

Results: During a follow-up of 4.7 ± 1.7 years, 15 patients (2.9%) reached the SCD endpoint and 12 (2.3%) were protected by implantable cardioverter defibrillator for primary prevention. A total of 13 (2.8%) patients experiencing SCD events were misclassified as low-risk patients by the 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline, 12 (2.3%) by the 2014 ESC model, and 7 (1.6%) by the 2020 AHA/ACC guideline. The SCD risk stratification in the 2020 AHA/ACC guideline showed greater area under the curve (0.71; 95% CI 0.56–0.87, p < 0.001) than the one in the 2011 ACCF/AHA guideline (0.52; 95% CI 0.37–0.67, p = 0.76) and 2014 ESC guideline (0.68; 95% CI 0.54–0.81, p = 0.02).

Conclusion: The SCD risk stratification recommended by the 2020 AHA/ACC guideline showed a better discrimination than previous stratifications in Chinese patients with HCM. A larger multicenter, independent, and prospective study with long-term follow-up would be warranted to validate our result.

Pacemaker Treatment for Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the Setting of an Apical Ventricular Aneurysm

We describe the case of a patient with apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with concomitant apical aneurysm. We measured the aneurysmal cavity pressure using the pressure guidewire system. The patient underwent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator treatment successfully to reduce the pressure gradient between the aneurysmal cavity and the true left ventricle. (Level of Difficulty: Intermediate.)

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Prognostic role of left ventricular apical aneurysm in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to systematically review and quantitatively synthesize existing evidence about the prognostic value of LV apical aneurysm in patients with HCM.

BACKGROUND

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) represents a common inherited heart disease associated with enormous diversity in morphologic expression and clinical course. With the increasing penetration of advanced high resolution cardiovascular imaging into routine HCM practice, a subset of HCM patients with left ventricular (LV) apical aneurysm have become more widely recognized.

METHODS

Medline was searched for studies describing the prognostic implication of LV apical aneurysm in patients with HCM. In the main analysis the combined endpoint of major HCM-related outcomes was assessed. Separate analyses for sudden cardiac death (SCD) events and thromboembolic events were also performed.

RESULTS

Six studies comprising of 2382 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the pooled analysis, the presence of LV apical aneurysm was significantly associated with major adverse outcomes (pooled OR: 5.13, 95 CI: 2.85 to 9.23, I²:31%), increased risk of SCD arrhythmic events (pooled OR: 4.67, 95% CI: 2.30 to 9.48, I²: 38%) and thromboembolic events (pooled OR: 6.30, 95% CI: 1.52 to 26.19, I²: 66%).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that LV apical aneurysm in HCM patients is associated with an increased risk for SCD events and thromboembolism. This finding might encourage the inclusion of LV apical aneurysm into the HCM SCD risk stratification algorithm as a novel risk marker that supports consideration for primary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator and anticoagulation for stroke prophylaxis.

Clinical Evidence behind Stereotactic Radiotherapy for the Treatment of Ventricular Tachycardia (STAR)-A Comprehensive Review

The electrophysiology-guided noninvasive cardiac radioablation, also known as STAR (stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation) is an emerging treatment method for persistent ventricular tachycardia. Since its first application in 2012 in Stanford Cancer Institute, and a year later in University Hospital Ostrava, Czech Republic, the authors from all around the world have published case reports and case series, and several prospective trials were established. In this article, we would like to discuss the available clinical evidence, analyze the potentially clinically relevant differences in methodology, and address some of the unique challenges that come with this treatment method.

A simple algorithm for a clinical step-by-step approach in the management of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is the most common inherited heart disease with an autosomal dominant pattern and a reported prevalence of about 0.2%. In this review, we present a simple algorithm for the management of first diagnosed HCM patients. Initially, the clinical examination, medical and detailed family history and the ECG are essential. The etiological diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy is important in order to differentiate HCM due to sarcomeric genes mutation from other phenocopies, such as cardiac amyloidosis. The next step consists of the cardiovascular imaging and ambulatory electrocardiography. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing may also be considered if available. All of the above provide evidence for the critical step of the risk stratification of patients for sudden cardiac death. The therapeutic strategy, with respect to obstructive and nonobstructive disease, arrhythmias and end-stage HCM is also described.

Evolution of risk stratification and sudden death prevention in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: Twenty years with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is a relatively common inherited myocardial disorder, once regarded as largely untreatable with ominous prognosis and most visibly as a common cause of sudden death (SD) in the young. Over the last several years, HCM has been transformed into a contemporary treatable disease with management options that significantly alter clinical course. With the use of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) in the HCM patient population, a new paradigm has emerged, with primary prevention device therapy reliably terminating potentially lethal ventricular tachyarrhythmias (3%-4% per year) and being largely responsible for a >10-fold decrease in disease-related mortality (to 0.5% per year), independent of age. An evidenced-based and guideline directed clinical risk stratification algorithm has evolved, including variables identified with cardiac magnetic resonance. One or more risk markers judged major and relevant within a patient's clinical profile can be considered sufficient to recommend a primary prevention implant (associated with a measure of physician judgment and shared decision-making). ICD decisions using the prospective individual risk marker strategy have been associated with 95% sensitivity for identifying patients who subsequently experienced appropriate ICD therapy, (albeit often delayed substantially for >5 or >10 years after implant), but without heart failure deterioration or HCM death following device intervention. A rigid mathematically derived statistical risk model proposed by the European Society of Cardiology is associated with low sensitivity (ie, 33%) for predicting SD events. Introduction of prophylactically inserted ICDs to HCM 20 years ago has significantly altered the clinical course and landscape of this disease. SD prevention has reduced HCM mortality significantly, making preservation of life and the potential for normal longevity a reality for most patients.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Ventricular Arrhythmia in Septal and Apical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: The French-Canadian Experience

Background: Apical hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (aHCM) is thought to have a more benign clinical course compared to septal HCM (sHCM), but most data have been derived from Asian cohorts. Comparative data on clinical outcome in Caucasian aHCM cohorts are scarce, and the results are conflicting. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and outcome of aHCM in French-Canadians of Caucasian descent.

Methods and results: We conducted a retrospective, single-center cohort study. The primary endpoint was a composite of documented sustained ventricular arrhythmia (VA), appropriate ICD therapy, arrhythmogenic syncope, cardiac arrest, or all-cause mortality. A total of 301 HCM patients (65% males) were enrolled including 80/301 (27%) with aHCM and 221/301 (73%) with sHCM. Maximal wall thickness was similar in both groups. Left ventricular apical aneurysm was significantly more common in aHCM (10 vs. 0.5%; p < 0.001). The proportion of patients with myocardial fibrosis ≥ 15% of the left ventricular mass was similar between aHCM and sHCM (21 vs. 24%; p = 0.68). Secondary prevention ICDs were more often implanted in aHCM patients (16 vs. 7%; p = 0.02). The primary endpoint occurred in 26% of aHCM and 10.4% of sHCM patients (p = 0.001) and was driven by an increased incidence of sustained VA (10 vs. 2.3%; p = 0.01). Multivariate analysis identified apical aneurysm and a phenotype of aHCM as independent predictors of the primary endpoint and the occurrence of sustained ventricular tachycardia. Unexplained syncope and a family history of sudden cardiac death were additional predictors for sustained VA. Apical HCM was associated with an increased risk of ventricular arrhythmia even when excluding patients with apical aneurysm.

Conclusions: The phenotype of apical HCM is much more common in French-Canadians (27%) of Caucasian descent compared to other Caucasian HCM populations. Apical HCM in French-Canadians is associated with an increased risk for ventricular arrhythmia.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Perioperative Imaging to Guide Epicardial Mapping and Ablation

Accessing the epicardial space without a sternotomy or a surgical pericardial window to treat ventricular arrhythmias in Chagas disease became a medical necessity in South America. Since the introduction of the dry percutaneous epicardial access approach, epicardial access has been standard procedure for management of ventricular arrhythmias in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies and atrioventricular accessory pathways after failed conventional endocardial ablation. Understanding the epicardial space and neighboring structures has become an important subject of teachings in electrophysiology. The evolution of complex ablation procedures to treat atrial and ventricular arrhythmias and device interventions to prevent cardioembolic stroke requires thorough understanding of pericardial anatomy.

Successful epicardial ablation for ventricular tachycardia originating from the true apex of apical aneurysm associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with apical aneurysm (AA) is rare, but has been reported to be associated with refractory ventricular tachycardias (VTs). Majority of such cases had a central isthmus of the reentry circuit on the border zone of AA. In this report, we describe a rare case of the successful epicardial ablation for a refractory VT originating from a true apex of the aneurysm in a HCM patient. Mid-diastolic potential during sustained VT was recorded at the isolated epicardial myocardium surround by the gross unexcitable scar in AA, and radiofrequency current application rendered VT non-inducible.

Catheter and Device Management of Inherited Cardiac Conditions

This state-of-the art review discusses sudden cardiac death (SCD) risk stratification and prevention using implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapy and the place of catheter ablation in the major inherited cardiomyopathies and primary arrhythmic syndromes. ICD therapy protects against SCD in many inherited cardiac conditions, particularly the cardiomyopathies in advanced stages, such as hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC). However, they are not usually indicated in most patients with cardiac ion channelopathies, particularly long QT syndrome, since medical management is safe and preferable for most cases. The general exception is the secondary prevention setting following a cardiac arrest, where guidelines mostly support ICD therapy. However, in the case of catecholaminergic polymorphic ventricular tachycardia (CPVT), ICD therapy is less clear, with some studies indicating increased mortality when an ICD is used following a cardiac arrest, compared to optimal medical therapy alone. When ICDs are placed, they are commonly associated with morbidity, and do not reduce the burden of ventricular arrhythmias (VA), such that multiple ICD shocks can ensue. Catheter ablation has been shown to reduce VA burden, VA related symptoms and ICD therapy in correctly identified patients in each condition. Its role is particularly important in cases where monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (VT) is prevalent, such as Lamin-related dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) and ARVC. Evidence is growing to support the use of catheter ablation to treat premature ventricular contraction (PVC) induced VF in the setting of long and short QT syndromes, CPVT, idiopathic VF and early repolarisation syndromes. In Brugada syndrome, epicardial substrate ablation can even apparently eliminate the electrocardiographic (ECG) phenotype and reduce VA burden during follow-up.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Non-ischemic Cardiomyopathy

Non-ischemic cardiomyopathies are a heterogeneous group of diseases of the myocardium that have a distinct proclivity to ventricular arrhythmias. Of these, ventricular tachycardias pose significant management challenges with the risk of sudden cardiac death and morbidity from multiple causes. Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardias is becoming an increasingly utilised intervention that has been found to have significant benefits with improving symptoms, reducing anti-arrhythmic drug burden and debilitating device therapies, thereby improving quality of life. Nonetheless, the approach to the ablation of ventricular tachycardias in non-ischemic cardiomyopathies is governed heavily by the disease process, with several distinct differences from ischemic cardiomyopathy including a preponderance to epicardial and deep intramural substrate. This contemporary review aims to present the various disease processes within non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, catheter ablation techniques which have been developed to target ventricular tachycardia and more novel adjunctive therapeutic measures.

Evaluation of cardiac hypertrophy in the setting of sudden cardiac death

Ventricular hypertrophy is a common pathological finding at autopsy that can act as a substrate for arrhythmogenesis. Pathologists grapple with the significance of ventricular hypertrophy when assessing the sudden and unexpected deaths of young people and what it could mean for surviving family members. The pathological spectrum of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is reviewed herein. This article is oriented to the practicing autopsy pathologist to help make sense of various patterns of increased heart muscle, particularly those that are not clearly cardiomyopathic, yet present in the setting of sudden cardiac death. The article also reviews factors influencing arrhythmogenesis as well as genetic mutations most commonly associated with ventricular hypertrophy, especially those associated with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias: Executive summary

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

2019 HRS/EHRA/APHRS/LAHRS expert consensus statement on catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias are an important cause of morbidity and mortality and come in a variety of forms, from single premature ventricular complexes to sustained ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation. Rapid developments have taken place over the past decade in our understanding of these arrhythmias and in our ability to diagnose and treat them. The field of catheter ablation has progressed with the development of new methods and tools, and with the publication of large clinical trials. Therefore, global cardiac electrophysiology professional societies undertook to outline recommendations and best practices for these procedures in a document that will update and replace the 2009 EHRA/HRS Expert Consensus on Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias. An expert writing group, after reviewing and discussing the literature, including a systematic review and meta-analysis published in conjunction with this document, and drawing on their own experience, drafted and voted on recommendations and summarized current knowledge and practice in the field. Each recommendation is presented in knowledge byte format and is accompanied by supportive text and references. Further sections provide a practical synopsis of the various techniques and of the specific ventricular arrhythmia sites and substrates encountered in the electrophysiology lab. The purpose of this document is to help electrophysiologists around the world to appropriately select patients for catheter ablation, to perform procedures in a safe and efficacious manner, and to provide follow-up and adjunctive care in order to obtain the best possible outcomes for patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation Complicated with Ventricular Rupture

Patients with cardiomyopathy (CM) are at increased risk for sudden cardiac death (SCD), specifically, secondary to ventricular arrhythmias such as ventricular tachycardia (VT) or ventricular fibrillation (VF). Those that have CM are further stratified based on risk of death from ventricular arrhythmias. If determined high risk, implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD), anti-arrhythmic medication or even ablation procedures are considered in order to minimize the risk of SCD. Ablation procedures have increased in number over the years, along with the recognition of high-risk CM patients. Along with the increase in number of ablation procedures, complications from such procedures have decreased in number and the ventricular arrhythmia ablation remains a relatively low-risk procedure. Here we describe a patient with known CM, specifically hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with a relatively rare and high-risk complication, being ventricular aneurysm. HCM patients with ventricular aneurysm are often referred for ablation procedures as they are at a significantly higher risk for SCD due to arrhythmias. Our patient not only underwent an ablation procedure, but suffered from the rare complication of tamponade, which occurs on average <2% annually. Although, risk assessments exist for stratifying CM as high-risk prior to invasive procedures, risk assessments are lacking for the specific population of HCM patients with LV aneurysm, thus presenting us with an area for further research.