Efficacy and Safety of Same-Day Discharge for Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

Safety and efficacy of same-day discharge for premature ventricular complex ablations

AIMS

Patients undergoing catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are generally observed overnight in the hospital given the concern for complications. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) of patients undergoing elective CA of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective evaluation of all patients undergoing elective VA ablation at Ascension St Vincent Hospital from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 was undertaken. Of those, the patients undergoing PVC ablation were divided into SDD and non-SDD. Patients underwent SDD at the discretion of the operator. The primary safety outcome was the 30-day incidence of complications and death. The primary efficacy outcome was procedural success. Among 188 patients who underwent VA ablation, 98 (52.1%) were PVC ablations, and of those, 55 (56.1%) were SDD. There was no difference in age, gender, comorbidities, or ejection fraction between the two groups. Patients that were non-SDD were more likely to be on chronic anticoagulation (P = 0.03), have ablation in the LV (P = 0.04), have retrograde access (P = 0.03), and receive heparin during the procedure (P = 0.01). There were no complications in the SDD group compared with one (2.3%) in the non-SDD group. There was no difference in primary efficacy between the two groups with a 90.9% acute success in the SDD and 88.4% in the non-SDD (P = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Same-day discharge for CA of PVCs is feasible and could lower healthcare resource utilization without compromising outcomes in this unique population.

Same-day discharge vs. overnight stay following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive review and meta-analysis by the European Heart Rhythm Association Health Economics Committee

AIMS

Same-day discharge (SDD) after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) may address the growing socio-economic health burden of the increasing demand for interventional AF therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis analyses the current evidence on clinical outcomes in SDD after AF ablation compared with overnight stay (ONS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

A systematic search of the PubMed database was performed. Pre-defined endpoints were complications at short-term (24-96 h) and 30-day post-discharge, re-hospitalization, and/or emergency room (ER) visits at 30-day post-discharge, and 30-day mortality. Twenty-four studies (154 716 patients) were included. Random-effects models were applied for meta-analyses of pooled endpoint prevalence in the SDD cohort and for comparison between SDD and ONS cohorts. Pooled estimates for complications after SDD were low both for short-term [2%; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1-5%; I2: 89%) and 30-day follow-up (2%; 95% CI: 1-4%; I2: 91%). There was no significant difference in complications rates between SDD and ONS [short-term: risk ratio (RR): 1.62; 95% CI: 0.52-5.01; I2: 37%; 30 days: RR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.42-1.00; I2: 95%). Pooled rates of re-hospitalization/ER visits after SDD were 4% (95% CI: 1-10%; I2: 96%) with no statistically significant difference between SDD and ONS (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.58-1.27; I2: 61%). Pooled 30-day mortality was low after SDD (0%; 95% CI: 0-1%; I2: 33%). All studies were subject to a relevant risk of bias, mainly due to study design.

CONCLUSION

In this meta-analysis including a large contemporary cohort, SDD after AF ablation was associated with low prevalence of post-discharge complications, re-hospitalizations/ER visits and mortality, and a similar risk compared with ONS. Due to limited quality of current evidence, further prospective, randomized trials are needed to confirm safety of SDD and define patient- and procedure-related prerequisites for successful and safe SDD strategies.

Comprehensive analysis of same day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation: Clinical, cost, and patient reported outcomes

BACKGROUND

Same day discharge (SDD) following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation procedure has emerged as routine practice, and primarily driven by operator discretion. However, the impacts of SDD on clinical outcomes, healthcare system costs, and patient reported outcomes (PROs) have not been systematically studied.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing routine AF ablation procedures with SDD versus overnight observation (NSDD). After propensity adjustment we compared postprocedure adverse events (AEs), healthcare system costs, and changes in PROs.

RESULTS

We identified 310 cases, with 159 undergoing SDD and 151 staying at least one midnight in the hospital (NSDD). Compared with NSDD, SDD patients were similar age (mean 64 vs. 66, p = 0.3), sex (26% female vs. 27%, p = 0.8), and with lower mean CHADS2-VA2Sc scores (2.0 vs. 2.7; p < 0.011). The primary outcome of AEs was noninferior in SDD versus NSDD patients (odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.21-0.99; noninferiority margin of 10%). There were also no differences in overall cost to the healthcare system between SDD and NSDD (p = 0.11). PROs numerically favored SDD (p = NS for all scores).

CONCLUSIONS

Physician selection for SDD appears at least as safe as NSDD with respect to clinical outcomes and SDD is not significantly less costly to the health system. There is a trend towards more favorable, general PROs among SDD patients. Routine SDD should be strongly considered for patients undergoing routine AF ablation procedures.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Safety of same-day discharge without anticoagulation for left-sided radiofrequency catheter ablations in pediatrics

BACKGROUND

For left-sided radiofrequency catheter ablation (LCA) in pediatrics, significant practice variability exists regarding anticoagulation and discharge practices. Given the lack of data in pediatric patients, the risks and benefits of these practices are not well defined.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety of same-day discharge and use of aspirin (ASA) in pediatric patients following LCA.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study of pediatric patients who underwent LCA from 2010 to 2020 at our institution. Discharge timing and ASA usage were based on operator preference. The primary outcome was incidence of postablation anticoagulation complications reported within 1 month of the procedure.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventy-six patients underwent LCA and met inclusion criteria. Median [25th, 75th percentiles] age was 13.9 [10.5, 16.2] years; 18 (4.7%) had a history of structural heart disease. The most common substrates for ablation were Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (183 patients [48.7%]), concealed accessory pathway (159 patients [42.3%]), and ectopic atrial tachycardia (10 patients [2.7%]). Three hundred thirty-eight patients (89.9%) were discharged on the day of LCA. Seventy-six patients (20.2%) were prescribed ASA at discharge. Of those who underwent follow-up (273 patients [72.6%]), 7 (2.7%) reported an anticoagulation complication (5 with hematoma, 2 with headache). One of these patients was prescribed ASA; none required readmission. There was no correlation between anticoagulation complications and same-day discharge or with ASA usage.

CONCLUSION

Given the rare incidence of anticoagulation complications in pediatric patients undergoing LCAs, same-day discharge from the electrophysiology laboratory without anticoagulation should be considered.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

Same-day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation under a nurse-coordinated standardized protocol

AIMS

Same-day discharge (SDD) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is an effective means to spare healthcare resources. However, safety remains a concern, and besides structural adaptations, SDD requires more efficient logistics and coordination. Therefore, in this study, we implement a streamlined, nurse-coordinated SDD programme following a standardized protocol.

METHODS AND RESULTS

As a dedicated SDD coordinator, a nurse specialized in ambulatory cardiac interventions was in charge of the full SDD protocol, including eligibility, patient flow, in-hospital logistics, patient education, and discharge as well as early post-discharge follow-up by smartphone-based virtual visits. Patients planned for AF ablation were considered eligible if they had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥35%, with basic support at home and accessibility of the hospital within 60 min also forming a part of the eligibility criteria. A total of 420 consecutive patients were screened by the SDD coordinator, of whom 331 were eligible for SDD. The reasons for exclusion were living remotely (29, 6.9%), lack of support at home (19, 4.5%), or LVEF <35% (17, 4.0%). Of the eligible patients, 300 (91%) were successfully discharged the same day. There were no major post-SDD complications. Rates of unplanned medical attention (19, 6.3%) and 30-day readmission (5, 1.6%) were extremely low and driven by femoral access-site complications. These were significantly reduced upon the introduction of compulsory ultrasound-guided punctures after the initial 150 SDD patients (P = 0.0145). Standardized SDD coordination resulted in efficient workflows and reduced the total workload of the medical staff.

CONCLUSION

Same-day discharge after AF ablation following a nurse-coordinated standardized protocol is safe and efficient. The concept of ambulatory cardiac intervention nurses functioning as dedicated coordinators may be key in the future transition of hospitals to SDD. Ultrasound-guided femoral puncture virtually eliminated relevant femoral access-site complications in our cohort and should therefore be a prerequisite for SDD.

Outcomes of a 24/7 service for urgent permanent pacemaker implantation

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Most of the complications associated with acute and symptomatic bradyarrhythmia (ASB) occur in the time from diagnosis to permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI). We aimed to evaluate the outcomes of an urgent 24/7 PPI service (PPI-24/7) for patients with ASB.

METHODS

A total of 664 patients undergoing first-time PPI for ASB were prospectively assessed during 2 periods of identical length (18 months): 341 patients who underwent the procedure during working hours only (PPI-WH), and 323 patients who underwent the procedure after the implementation of the PPI-24/7 service. The primary safety endpoint was established as the cumulative 180-day incidence of complications related to the index arrhythmia and device implant. The primary efficacy endpoint was determined as the average number of hospital stays per patient.

RESULTS

The PPI-24/7 period was associated with a significant shortening of the time from diagnosis to implantation (median [interquartile range]): 3hours [2-6] vs 16 [5-21]). The cumulative incidence of patients with complications at 180 days was lower in the PPI-24/7 period: 9% vs 17% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.5; P=.002), due to a significant reduction in preimplant complications: 2.5% vs 12% (P <.001). The average number of hospital stays was reduced by 2 per patient in the PPI-24/7 period (nonparametric P <.001). PPI-24/7 implants performed outside working hours (n=178) were safe, with a 180-day cumulative incidence in procedure-related complications of 3.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients with ASB, PPI-24/7 was associated with a significant reduction in patient morbidity and efficient hospital resource use.

Feasibility and Safety Study of Concomitant Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Atrioventricular Node Ablation with Same-Day Hospital Dismissal

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has rapidly emerged as a promising modality of physiologic pacing and has demonstrated excellent lead stability. In this retrospective study, we evaluate whether this pacing modality can allow concomitant atrioventricular node (AVN) ablation and same-day dismissal.

METHODS

Twenty-four consecutive patients (female 63%, male 37%) with an average age of 78 ± 5 years were admitted for pacemaker (75%)/defibrillator (25%) implantations and concomitant AVN ablation. Device implantation with LBBAP was performed first, followed by concomitant AVN ablation through left axillary vein access to allow for quicker post-procedure ambulation. The patients were discharged on the same day after satisfactory post-ambulation device checks.

RESULTS

LBBAP was successful in 22 patients (92% in total, 20 patients had an LBBP and two patients had a likely LBBP), followed by AVN ablation from left axillary vein access (21/24, 88%). All patients had successful post-op chest x-rays, post-ambulation device checks, and were discharged on the same day. After a mean follow up of three months, no major complications occurred, such as LBBA lead dislodgement requiring a lead revision. The LBBA lead pacing parameters immediately after implantation vs. three-month follow up were a capture threshold of 0.8 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ms vs. 0.6 ± 0.3 V@0.4 ms, sensing 9.9 ± 3.9 mV vs. 10.4 ± 4.1 mV, and impedance of 710 ± 216 ohm vs. 544 ± 110 ohm. The QRS duration before and after AVN ablation was 117 ± 32 ms vs. 123 ± 14 ms. Mean LVEF before and three months after the implantation was 44 ± 14% vs. 46 ± 12%.

CONCLUSION

LBBA pacing not only offers physiologic pacing, but also allows for a concomitant AVN ablation approach from the left axillary vein and safe same-day hospital dismissal.

Randomized prospective evaluation of same-day discharge after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: results of the EASY PVI study

BACKGROUND

With advancements in technology and ablation techniques, catheter ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become safer with time. In the past, standard-of-care recommended overnight stay for outpatient procedures. As safety has improved and procedure times have shortened, some centers have allowed for same-day discharge. We report the results of a multi-center, randomized clinical trial investigating the safety of same-day discharge post-cryoballoon ablation.

METHODS

Patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with the Medtronic Arctic Advance cryoballoon at 3 US centers. Six hours after the procedure, patients were randomized to either stay overnight or be discharged same day.

RESULTS

A total of 49 patients were enrolled. Two patients were withdrawn prior to randomization. One patient chose to withdraw after randomization. Of the 22 patients randomized to same-day discharge and the 23 patients randomized the overnight stay, no significant adverse outcomes were reported in either group. Occurrence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two groups. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time did not significantly differ between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomized trial examining the safety of same-day discharge post-cryoballoon ablation. Based on our results, same-day discharge following cryoballoon ablation for paroxysmal AF is a safe option following uncomplicated ablation for PVI. Operators should use their discretion in selecting patients for same-day discharge.

Clinical and economic outcomes of a systematic same-day discharge programme after pulmonary vein isolation: comparison between cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation

AIMS

Same-day discharge (SDD) is feasible after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We aim to compare prospectively cryoballoon (CRYO) vs. radiofrequency (RF) ablation in a systematic SDD programme.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively analysed the 617 scheduled PVI performed consecutively at our institution (n = 377 CRYO, n = 240 RF) from 1 April 2019 to 31 December 2022 within a systematic programme of SDD. The feasibility of SDD, the 10-day incidence of urgent/unplanned medical care after discharge (UUC-10), and the cost per procedure due to hospital resource use were studied. The 100 procedures performed during the previous year, in which patients were systematically hospitalized, were used as a control group. Same-day discharge was achieved in 585/617 (95%) procedures, with a significant trend towards a higher monthly SDD rate from 2019 to 2022 (P = 0.03). The frequency of SDD was similar in CRYO (356/377; 94%) vs. RF (229/240; 95%). After SDD, the UUC-10 was 66/585 (11.3%), being similar for CRYO (41/356; 11.5%) and RF (25/229; 10.9%); P = 0.8 (log-rank test). Of these, 10 patients were re-hospitalized, with an identical rate in CRYO-treated (6/356; 1.7%) and RF-treated (4/229; 1.7%) patients and owing to similar causes (4 haematomas, 4 pericarditis, and 2 symptomatic sinus node dysfunction). Same-day discharge was associated with an average savings per procedure of 63% (P < 0.001), but no differences were found between the CRYO and RF (P = 0.8).

CONCLUSION

In a systematic SDD programme, feasibility (95%, increasing over time), safety (11% UUC-10, 1.7% re-hospitalizations), and savings (63% per procedure) were similar for CRYO and RF ablation procedures.

Patient perspectives on same-day discharge following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: results from a patient survey as part of the monocentric FAST AFA trial

AIMS

Same-day discharge (SDD) following catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) was already introduced in selected facilities in Europe, but a widespread implementation has not yet succeeded. Data on patients' perspectives are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a survey to address patients' beliefs towards SDD and identify variables that are associated with their evaluation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

As part of the prospective, monocentric FAST AFA trial, patients aged ≥20 years undergoing left atrial CA for AF were asked to participate in the survey consisting of a study-specific questionnaire, the AF knowledge scale, and pre-defined patient-reported outcome measures. The study cohort was stratified based on SDD willingness, and a logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors for patients' valuation. Between 26 July 2021 and 01 July 2022, 256 of 376 screened patients consented to study participation of whom 248 (mean age 61.8 years, 33.9% female) completed the SDD survey. Of them, 50.0% were willing to have SDD concepts integrated into their clinical course with increased patient comfort (27.5%), shorter waiting times (14.6%), and a cost-efficient treatment (14.0%) being imaginable benefits. In contrast, expressed concerns included uncertainties with occurring complaints (50.6%), the insufficient recognition (47.8%), and treatment (48.9%) of complications. European Heart Rhythm Association class at baseline and inpatient treatments within the preceding year were predictors for SDD willingness whereas comorbidity burden or AF knowledge were not.

CONCLUSION

We provide a detailed survey expressing patients' beliefs towards SDD following left atrial CA. Our findings may facilitate adequate patient selection to improve the future implementation of SDD programs in suitable cohorts.

Photoplethysmography-documented atrial fibrillation in the first week after catheter ablation is associated with lower success rates

Aims

To test the feasibility of postprocedural photoplethysmography (PPG) rhythm telemonitoring during the first week after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and its predictive value for later AF recurrence.

Methods

PPG rhythm telemonitoring during the first week after the ablation procedure was offered to a total of 382 consecutive patients undergoing AF ablation. Patients were instructed to perform 1 min PPG recordings by a mobile health application 3 times per day and in case of symptoms. Clinicians assessed the PPG tracings via a secured cloud and the information was remotely integrated into the therapeutic pathway via teleconsultation (TeleCheck-AF approach).

Results

119 patients (31%) agreed to perform PPG rhythm telemonitoring after ablation. Patients included in the TeleCheck-AF approach were younger compared to those who declined participation (58 ± 10 vs. 62 ± 10 years, p < 0.001). Median follow up duration was 544 (53-883) days. 27% of patients had PPG tracings suggestive of AF in the week following the ablation. In 24% of patients, the integration of PPG rhythm telemonitoring resulted in a remote clinical intervention during teleconsultation. During follow-up of one year, 33% of patients had ECG-documented AF recurrences. PPG recordings suggestive of AF in the week after ablation were predictive of late recurrences (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

PPG rhythm telemonitoring during the first week after AF ablation often triggered clinical interventions. Due to its high availability, PPG-based follow-up actively involving patients after AF ablation may close a diagnostic and prognostic gap in the blanking period and increase active patient-involvement.

Early mortality after inpatient versus outpatient catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Rates of early mortality and complications after catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) vary across health care settings.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to identify the rate and predictors of early mortality (within 30 days) after CA in the inpatient and outpatient settings.

METHODS

Using the Medicare Fee for Service database, we analyzed 122,289 patients who underwent CA for treatment of AF between 2016 and 2019 to define 30-day mortality in both inpatients and outpatients. Odds of adjusted mortality were assessed with several methods, including inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

Mean age was 71.9 ± 6.7 years, 44% were women, and mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 3.2 ± 1.7. Overall, 82% underwent AF ablation as an outpatient. Mortality rate 30 days after CA was 0.6%, with inpatients accounting for 71.5% of deaths (P <.001). Early mortality rates were 0.2% for outpatient procedures and 2.4% for inpatient procedures. The prevalence of comorbidities was significantly higher in patients with early mortality. Patients with early mortality had significantly higher rates of postprocedural complications. After adjustment, inpatient ablation was significantly associated with early mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.81; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.87-5.08; P <.001). Hospitals with high overall ablation volume had 31% lower odds of early mortality (highest vs lowest tertile: aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56-0.86; P <.001).

CONCLUSION

AF ablation conducted in the inpatient setting is associated with a higher rate of early mortality compared with outpatient AF ablation. Comorbidities are associated with enhanced risk of early mortality. High overall ablation volume is associated with a lower risk of early mortality.

In-hospital complications associated with pulmonary vein isolation with adjunctive lesions: the NCDR AFib Ablation Registry

AIMS

No prior study has been adequately powered to evaluate real-world safety outcomes in those receiving adjunctive ablation lesions beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We sought to evaluate characteristics and in-hospital complications among patients undergoing PVI with and without adjunctive lesions.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients in the National Cardiovascular Data Registry AFib Ablation Registry undergoing first-time atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation between 2016 and 2020 were identified and stratified into paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent AF, and separated into PVI only, PVI + cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation, and PVI + adjunctive (superior vena cava isolation, coronary sinus, vein of Marshall, atypical atrial flutter lines, other). Adjusted odds of adverse events were calculated using multivariable logistic regression. A total of 50 937 patients [PAF: 30 551 (60%), persistent AF: 20 386 (40%)] were included. Among those with PAF, there were no differences in the adjusted odds of complications between PVI + CTI or PVI + adjunctive when compared with PVI only. Among persistent AF, PVI + adjunctive was associated with a higher risk of any complication [3.0 vs. 4.5%, odds ratio (OR) 1.30, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.07-1.58] and major complication (0.8 vs. 1.4%, OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10-2.21), while no differences were observed in PVI + CTI compared with PVI only. Overall, there was high heterogeneity in adjunctive lesion type, and those receiving adjunctive lesions had a higher comorbidity burden.

CONCLUSION

Additional CTI ablation was common without an increased risk of complications. Adjunctive lesions other than CTI are commonly performed in those with more comorbidities and were associated with an increased risk of complications in persistent AF, although the current analysis is limited by high heterogeneity in adjunctive lesion set type.

Same-day discharge following catheter ablation and venous closure with VASCADE MVP: A postmarket registry

INTRODUCTION

Early and safe ambulation can facilitate same-day discharge (SDD) following catheter ablation, which can reduce resource utilization and healthcare costs and improve patient satisfaction. This study evaluated procedure success and safety of the VASCADE MVP venous vascular closure system in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

The AMBULATE SDD Registry is a two-stage series of postmarket studies in patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF undergoing catheter ablation followed by femoral venous access-site closure with VASCADE MVP. Efficacy endpoints included SDD success, defined as the proportion of patients discharged the same day who did not require next-day hospital intervention for procedure/access site-related complications, and access site sustained success within 15 days of the procedure.

RESULTS

Overall, 354 patients were included in the pooled study population, 151 (42.7%) treated for paroxysmal AF and 203 (57.3%) for persistent AF. SDD was achieved in 323 patients (91.2%) and, of these, 320 (99.1%) did not require subsequent hospital intervention based on all study performance outcomes. Nearly all patients (350 of 354; 98.9%) achieved total study success, with no subsequent hospital intervention required. No major access-site complications were recorded. Patients who had SDD were more likely to report procedure satisfaction than patients who stayed overnight.

CONCLUSION

In this study, 99.7% of patients achieving SDD required no additional hospital intervention for access site-related complications during follow-up. SDD appears feasible and safe for eligible patients after catheter ablation for paroxysmal or persistent AF in which the VASCADE MVP is used for venous access-site closure.

Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Most centers performing catheter ablation (CA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) admit the patients for an overnight hospital stay to monitor for post-procedure complications, but the clinical benefits of this overnight hospital admission policy have not been carefully investigated. We hypothesized that same-day discharge strategy is safe and feasible in patients with AF undergoing CA.

METHODS

A systematic review of studies comparing the safety of same-day discharge vs hospital admission for AF patients undergoing CA was conducted in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. No randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria; therefore, observational cohort studies were included. Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios were calculated and I² statistics were reported for heterogeneity assessment.

RESULTS

A total of 8 observational studies with 10,102 patients were included. There were no statistically significant differences between same-day discharge vs hospital admission in all studied outcomes including post-discharge 30-day hospital visits (RR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.40-2.02; p = 0.81), post-discharge vascular/bleeding complications (RR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.46-1.88; p = 0.85), post-discharge stroke/transient ischemic attack/thromboembolism (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.23-2.20; p = 0.55), and post-discharge recurrent arrhythmias (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.60-1.09; p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

In carefully selected AF patients undergoing CA, same-day discharge strategy is feasible and safe. There are no significant differences in post-discharge 30-day hospital visits, post-discharge vascular complications, and other safety outcomes. Randomized trials are needed to validate these hypothesis-generating findings.

Same-day discharge for atrial fibrillation ablation: outcomes and impact of ablation modality

AIMS

Same-day discharge is increasingly common after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, the impact of same-day discharge on healthcare utilization after ablation and whether this differs by ablation modality remains uncertain. We examined the safety, efficacy, and subsequent healthcare utilization of a same-day discharge protocol for AF ablation, including radiofrequency (RF) and cryoballoon ablation, in a contemporary cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All consecutive patients for whom full healthcare utilization data were available at two centres and who underwent AF ablation from 2018 to 2019 were included. Same-day discharge was the default strategy for all patients. The efficacy and safety outcomes were proportions of same-day discharge and readmission/emergency room (ER) visits, and post-discharge complications, respectively. Of the 421 patients who underwent AF ablation (mean 63.3 ± 10.2 years, 33% female), 90.5% (381/421) achieved same-day discharge with no difference between RF and cryoballoon ablation (89.8 vs. 95.1%, adjusted P = 0.327). Readmission ≤30 days occurred in 4.8%, with ER visits ≤30 days seen in 26.1% with no difference between ablation modalities (P = 0.634). Patients admitted overnight were more likely to present to the ER (40.0 vs. 24.7% with same-day discharge, P = 0.036). The overall post-discharge complication rate was low at 4/421 (1.0%), with no difference between ablation modality (P = 0.324) and admission/same-day discharge (P = 0.485).

CONCLUSION

Same-day discharge can be achieved in a majority of patients undergoing RF or cryoballoon ablation for AF. Healthcare utilization, particularly ER visits, remains high after AF ablation, regardless of ablation modality or same-day discharge.

Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge and shortened bedrest after atrial fibrillation ablation

Background

While initial studies suggest that same-day discharge or shortened bedrest may be feasible for some patients following atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation, the risks and benefits of this approach remain unclear for patients undergoing hemostasis with figure-of-eight (FO8) suture technique.

Methods

We prospectively evaluated access site bleeding, length of hospitalization, urinary catheterization, and other clinical outcomes in patients undergoing AF ablation with 3 hours of bedrest between April and May 2021, and compared them to a control group that had undergone AF ablation with 6 hours of bedrest from April to July 2019. FO8 sutures were used for hemostasis in all patients. Independent risk factors for bleeding and urinary catheterization were determined using multiple logistic regression.

Results

Same-day discharge was achieved in 74% of patients in the 3-hour bedrest group compared to 7% of patients in the 6-hour bedrest group (p < 0.001). There were no differences between 3-hour and 6-hour bedrest groups in the rates of serious adverse events (2% vs. 1%, p = 0.45) or rehospitalizations or ED visits (1% vs. 3%, p = 0.45) within 30 days of ablation. The 3-hour bedrest group showed a non-significant trend toward more access site bleeding (15% vs. 8%, p = 0.10), but had a significant reduction in urinary catheterization (27% vs. 64%, p < 0.001) and opioid analgesia use (20% vs. 33%, p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Same-day discharge after 3 hours of bedrest is safe and feasible following AF ablation and is not associated with higher rates of complications or rehospitalizations at 30 days. Reduced bedrest resulted in decreased opioid analgesia and urinary catheterization.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10840-022-01255-4.

Patient‐reported Outcomes and Costs Associated with Vascular Closure and Same‐Day Discharge following Atrial Fibrillation Ablation

BACKGROUND

We aimed to measure patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and costs associated with same-day discharge (SDD) for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation and vascular closure device implantation in clinical practice.

METHODS

PROs were prospectively measured in 50 AF ablation patients, comparing complete vascular device closure (n = 25) versus manual compression hemostasis (n = 25). Health-system costs for SDD patients receiving vascular device closure were compared to matched controls with one-night stays who did not receive any closure device.

RESULTS

Prospectively enrolled patients receiving vascular device closure for AF ablation had a mean age of 65 years, 17% were female, with a mean CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score of 3. The mean number of venous sheaths was higher among patients receiving vascular device closure (3.8 vs. 3.1, p < 0.001), and there was one case of rebleeding in a patient receiving a vascular closure device (no other complications). Same-day discharge rates (76% vs. 8.3%, p < 0.001), patient satisfaction with bedrest time (8.5 vs. 6, p = 0.004) and with pain (8 vs. 5.1, p = 0.009) were significantly better among patients receiving vascular closure. In matched analyses of health-system costs, patients with vascular closure had mean age 66, 32% were female, and the mean CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc score was 2 (p = NS vs. controls). SDD with vascular closure was associated with the significantly lower facility, pharmacy, and disposable costs, but higher implant costs. Overall costs for ablation were not significantly different (mean difference 1.10%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -3.03 to 5.42).

CONCLUSIONS

Vascular closure for AF ablation improves patient experience in routine care. The use of vascular closure and SDD after AF ablation reduces several components of healthcare system costs, without an overall increase.

Innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Catheter-based ablation to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has established itself as a mainstay in the rhythm control strategy of atrial fibrillation. This review article aims to provide an overview of recent advances in atrial fibrillation ablation technology.

METHODS

We reviewed the available literature and clinical trials of innovations in atrial fibrillation ablation technologies including ablation catheter designs, alternative energy sources, esophageal protection methods, electroanatomical mapping, and novel ablation targets.

RESULTS

Innovative radiofrequency (RF) catheter designs maximize energy delivery while avoiding overheating associated with conventional catheters. Single-shot balloon catheters in the form of cryoballoons, radiofrequency, and laser balloons have proven effective at producing pulmonary vein isolation and improving procedural efficiency and reproducibility. Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a highly anticipated novel nonthermal energy source under development, which demonstrates selective ablation of the myocardium, producing durable lesions while also minimizing collateral damage. Innovative devices for esophageal protection including esophageal deviation and cooling devices have been developed to reduce esophageal complications. Improved electroanatomical mapping systems are being developed to help identify additional non-pulmonary triggers, which may benefit from ablation, especially with persistent atrial fibrillation. Lastly, the vein of Marshall alcohol ablation has been recently studied as an adjunct therapy for improving outcomes with catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous advances have been made in the field of atrial fibrillation ablation in the past decade. While further long-term data is still needed for these novel technologies, they show potential to improve procedural efficacy and safety.

Physical activity, patient-reported symptoms, and clinical events: Insights into postprocedural recovery from personal digital devices

Background

Personal digital devices may offer insights into patient recovery and an approach for remote monitoring after procedures.

Objective

To examine associations between activity measured using personal digital devices, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and clinical events among patients after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) or bariatric surgery.

Methods

We aggregated personal digital device, PROM, and electronic health record data in a study conducted at 2 health systems. We used Fitbit devices for step count assessments, KardiaMobile for cardiac rhythm assessments, and PROMs for pain and palpitations over 5 weeks.

Results

Among 59 patients, 30 underwent AF ablation and 29 bariatric surgery. Thirty-six patients (63%) reported pain. There was no difference in median [interquartile range] daily steps between patients with and those without pain (4419 [3286–7041] vs 3498 [2609–5888]; P = .23). Among AF ablation patients, 21 (70%) reported palpitations. Median daily steps were lower among those with palpitations than among those without (4668 [3021–6116] vs 8040 [6853–10,394]; P = .03). When accounting for within-subject correlation, recordings of AF were associated with a significant mean decrease in median daily steps (–351; 95% confidence interval –524 to –177; P <.01). Patients who received a new antiarrhythmic drug prescription had AF recorded in a median of 5 [5–5] of 5 total weeks, whereas patients who did not receive a new antiarrhythmic recorded AF in a median of 1 [0–3] week (P = .02).

Conclusion

Personal digital device and PROM data can provide insight into postprocedural recovery outside of usual clinical settings and may inform follow-up and clinical decision-making. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03436082)

Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge following catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: what is known and what needs to be explored?

Catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most effective rhythm control strategy and its role in the treatment of AF patients has been strengthened by recent guidelines. An increasing AF prevalence and the resulting demands on interventional electrophysiology call for improved resource allocation through both technical innovations and streamlined workflows and patient pathways. Same-day discharge is already established in the context of other electrophysiological interventions; however, its broad implementation in the practice of AF ablation is pending for several reasons, despite the fact that the body of evidence is growing and the majority of reports propagate early discharge to be feasible and safe under certain conditions. This review article is intended to provide an overview of the existing data, classify these into the specific study context, and to show limitations and open questions.

Economics and laboratory efficiency of atrial fibrillation ablation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Atrial fibrillation is a growing public health problem and is associated with an increased risk of comorbidities with enormous socioeconomic implications. This review article focuses on fiscal burden of atrial fibrillation on the healthcare system and economic value of atrial fibrillation ablations brought to the patient and the payers by improvement in outcomes and reduction in treatment costs.

RECENT FINDINGS

This article summarizes the recently published studies evaluating the economic impact of atrial fibrillation treatment. Catheter ablation have shown to be the most successful strategy for treatment of defibrillation. However, repeat ablation is associated with higher costs, over and above any subsequent procedural costs, compared with a single ablation procedure for atrial fibrillation. Cryoballoon ablation has been shown to have fewer repeat ablations than radiofrequency ablations, which resulted in overall cost reduction. Improvement in laboratory efficiency, better utilization of laboratory resources and same-day discharge strategy can lead to further healthcare savings and increase in value to all stakeholders.

SUMMARY

The value of healthcare delivery for patient with atrial fibrillation can be improved by advancement in technology that demonstrates cost reduction to the health system and outcomes improvements. Implementation of tactics that decrease cost and improve outcomes can alleviate some of the financial strain on healthcare systems, which is of extreme importance in the current climate.

Same Day versus Overnight Discharge in Patients Undergoing Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation (SODA) Study

Patients undergoing catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) are routinely admitted for observation overnight in the hospital. With the rising incidence of AF among the population, increased volumes of procedures are placing increased demands on hospital resources. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of same day discharge in patients undergoing ablation for AF when compared to patients admitted for overnight observation. We performed a retrospective analysis using a multicenter cohort among patients who were discharged home after elective pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) ablation for AF. In our analysis, we found no statistically significant difference between patients discharged on the day of their procedure when compared to patients admitted for overnight observation in terms of 90-day readmission, major adverse cardiovascular events and death. This study shows that same day discharge after AF ablation is a feasible option. Future studies are needed to elicit the appropriate protocol to use.

Same-Day Versus Next-Day Discharge Strategies for Left Atrial Ablation Procedures: A Parallel, Intra-Institutional Comparison of Safety and Feasibility

Background

Head-to-head comparative data for the postoperative care of patients undergoing left atrial ablation procedures are lacking.

Objective

We sought to investigate complication and readmission rates between patients undergoing same-day (SD) or next-day (ND) discharges for ablative procedures in the left atrium, primarily atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods

Two electrophysiology centers simultaneously perform left atrial ablations with differing discharge strategies. We identified all patients who underwent left atrial ablation from August 2017 to August 2019 (n = 409) undergoing either SD (n = 210) or ND (n = 199) discharge protocols. We analyzed any clinical events that resulted in procedural abortion, extended hospitalization, or readmission within 72 hours.

Results

The primary endpoint of complication and readmission rate was similar between SD and ND discharge (14.3% vs 12.6%, p = 0.665). Rates of complications categorized as major (2.4% vs 3.0%, p = 0. 776) and minor (11.9% vs 9.5%, p = 0.524) were also similar.Multivariable regression modeling revealed no significant correlation between discharge strategy and complication/readmission occurrence (OR 1.565 [0.754 - 3.248], p = 0.23), but a positive association of hypertension and procedure duration (OR 3.428 [1.436 - 8.184], p = 0.006) and (OR 1.01 [1 - 1.019], p = 0.046) respectively.

Conclusions

Left atrial ablation complication and readmission rates were similar between SD and ND discharge practices. Hypertension and procedural duration were associated with increased complication rates irrespective of discharge strategy. These data, which represent the first side-by-side comparison of discharge strategy, suggests same-day discharge is safe and feasible for left atrial ablation procedures.

The 30-day readmission rate of same-day discharge protocol following catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: a propensity score-matched analysis from National Readmission Database

AIMS

The effectiveness and safety of same-day discharge (SDD) for catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been fully elucidated using a large nationwide database. This study aimed to evaluate the all-cause readmission rates within 30-days among patients receiving CA for AF with an SDD protocol compared with a conventional overnight stay (ONS).

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the US Nationwide Readmission Database. The primary outcome was all-cause 30-day readmission following discharge in patients receiving CA and a secondary outcome was requiring total healthcare cost. A 1 : 3 propensity score matching was conducted to compare the safety and efficacy within both SDD and ONS group. Among 30 776 patients [mean 67.2 ± 11.4 years, 12 590 female (41.5%)] who received CA from 2016 through 2018, 440 (1.42%) patients were discharged on the same-day following CA (SDD group), and the remaining 30 336 patients stayed at least one night in the hospital (ONS group). A propensity score analysis generated 1751 matched pairs (440 in the SDD group; 1311 in the ONS group). The 30-day readmission following discharge was not significantly higher in the SDD group than the ONS group (SDD vs. ONS: 12.7% vs. 9.7%; hazard ratio: 1.17, 95% confidence interval: 0.76-1.81, P = 0.47). Healthcare cost was significantly higher in the ONS group ($25 237 ± 14 036 vs. $30 749 ± 16 383; P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide database study, there was no significant difference in the all-cause 30-day readmission following SDD for CA compared with ONS.

Comparison between same-day discharge and overnight stay after atrial fibrillation ablation: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In the modern era, atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation trend has been shifted toward same-day discharge (SDD), from a traditional overnight stay. Yet, recent studies have not well stated the safety profiles which remained poor-understood and dispersed. We hence performed systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the adverse outcomes of SDD in comparison with an overnight stay.

METHODS

Databases were searched through January 2021. Effect estimates from the individual studies were extracted and combined using random-effects, generic inverse variance method of der Simonian and Laird. The primary outcomes included total cumulative complications and immediate complications following AF ablation.

RESULTS

Ten observational studies were met our inclusion criteria, comprising of total population of 11,660 patients, with SDD 51.3%. For total cumulative complications, there were no differences observed between SDD and overnight stay (5.2% vs. 6.2%: pooled OR 0.77: 95% CI 0.55-1.08, p = .13 with I²  = 27.1%). In addition, comparable immediate complications were also demonstrated (5.2 % vs. 4.3: pooled OR 1.08: 95% CI 0.72-1.62, p = .718, with I²  = 37.3 %).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggested that SDD had similar complication rates, both total cumulative and immediate outcomes, compared with overnight stay in selected patients following AF ablation. Nevertheless, randomized control trials are warranted to validate the findings.

Low incidence of major complications after the first six hours post atrial fibrillation ablation: Is same-day discharge safe and feasible in most patients?

AIMS

This study evaluates the incidence of procedural complications related to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) to assess the potential feasibility and safety of same-day discharge in a large cohort.

METHODS

We performed an analysis of prospectively collected data of complications of all patients staying overnight after undergoing AF ablation between 2001 and 2020 at a tertiary center. Using medical records, we analyzed complications occurring intraprocedurally until 6 h postablation and between 6 h postablation and discharge the day after the ablation procedure.

RESULTS

In 5414 AF ablations, we identified a total of 108 (2.0%) major complications occurring intraprocedural or before discharge. Most major complications occurred intraprocedurally or within 6 h after the procedure (n = 96, 1.8%). Twelve (0.2%) major complications occurred between 6 h Postablation and discharge. The most common of these major complications were congestive heart failure (n = 6) and transient ischemic attack (TIA, n = 4). During this time span, 61 (1.1%) minor complications occurred. Factors independently associated with major complications intraprocedurally and until discharge were body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg/m² (p = .009), significant valvular disease (p = .001), cardiomyopathy (p < .001), prior stroke or TIA (p = .014), first-time procedure versus repeat procedure (p = .013), cryoablation versus radiofrequency (p < .001), and procedure duration (p < .001).

CONCLUSION

After AF ablation, very few complications occurred between 6 h postprocedure and discharge the next day. Therefore, same-day discharge is a safe option for a majority of patients.

Evaluating outcomes of same-day discharge after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation in a real-world cohort

Background

As same-day discharge (SDD) after catheter ablation (CA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) is increasingly utilized, it is important to further investigate this approach.

Objective

To investigate the safety and efficacy of SDD after CA for AF in a large nationwide administrative sample.

Methods

The IBM MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database was used to identify adult patients under 65 years undergoing CA for AF (2016-2020). Eligible patients were indexed to date of first CA and classified into SDD or overnight stay (ONS) groups based on length of service. A 1:3 propensity score matching was used to create comparable SDD:ONS samples. Study outcomes were CA-related complications within 30 days after index procedure and AF recurrence within 1 year. Cox proportional hazards models were estimated for outcome comparison.

Results

In the postmatch 30-day cohort, there were 1610 SDD and 4637 ONS patients with mean age 56.1 (± 7.6) years. There was no significant difference in composite 30-day postprocedural complication rate between SDD and ONS groups (2.7% vs 2.8%, respectively; P = .884). The most common complications were cerebrovascular events (0.7% vs 0.7%; P = .948), vascular access events (0.6% vs 0.6%; P = .935), and pericardial complications (0.6% vs 0.5%; P = .921). Further, no significant difference in composite AF recurrence rate at 1 year was observed among SDD and ONS groups (10.2% vs 8.8%; hazard ratio = 1.167; 95% confidence interval 0.935-1.455; P = .172).

Conclusion

In a large, propensity-matched, real-world sample, SDD appears to be safe and have similar outcomes compared with overnight observation following CA for AF.

Same-day discharge after catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation in a large nationwide administrative claims database

BACKGROUND

Catheter ablation (CA) is a common treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). This study evaluated outcomes of same day discharge (SDD) versus overnight stay (ONS) among AF patients undergoing outpatient CA.

METHODS

The Optum SES Clinformatics Extended Data Mart database was used to identify patients ≥18 years of age undergoing outpatient CA for AF (2016-2020). Eligible patients were indexed to the date of first CA and classified into SDD and ONS groups based on the length of service. A 1:3 propensity score matching was used to create comparable SDD:ONS samples. The primary safety outcome was CA-related complications within 30 days of index procedure. The primary efficacy outcome was AF recurrence within 1 year. Cox proportional hazards models were estimated for outcome comparison.

RESULTS

In the postmatch 30-day cohort for safety evaluation, there were 6600 patients (1660 [25.2%] SDD; 4940 [74.8%] ONS), with a mean age of 66.6 years. There was no significant difference in the 30-day composite rate of postablation complications (4.7% [78/1660] vs. 3.8% [187/4940]; p = 0.100) and 1-year composite rate of AF recurrence (14.3% [142/996] vs. 14.5% [430/2972]; p = 0.705) between the SDD and ONS groups.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that SDD following CA to treat patients with AF is safe, with low rates of postablation complications and AF recurrence, which were comparable to rates in patients with an ONS after CA.

Contemporary trends and in-hospital outcomes of catheter and stand-alone surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation

AIMS

The contemporary trends in catheter ablation (CA) and surgical ablation (SA) utilization and surgical techniques [open vs. thoracoscopic, with or without left atrial appendage closure (LAAC)] are unclear. In addition, the in-hospital outcomes of stand-alone SA compared with CA are not well-described.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The National Inpatient Sample 2010-18 was queried for atrial fibrillation (AF) hospitalizations with CA or stand-alone SA. Complex samples multivariable logistic and linear regression models were used to compare the association between stand-alone SA vs. CA and the primary outcomes of in-hospital mortality and stroke. Of 180 243 hospitalizations included within the study, 167 242 were for CA and 13 000 were for stand-alone SA. Catheter ablation and stand-alone SA hospitalizations decreased throughout the study period (Ptrend < 0.001). Surgical ablation had higher rates of in-hospital mortality [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 2.26; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.41-3.61; P = 0.001] and stroke (aOR 4.64; 95% CI 3.25-6.64; P < 0.001) compared with CA. When examining different surgical approaches, thoracoscopic SA was associated with similar in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.53; 95% CI 0.60-3.89; P = 0.369) and similar risk of stroke (aOR 1.75; 95% CI 1.00-3.07; P = 0.051) compared with CA.

CONCLUSION

Stand-alone SA comprises a minority of AF ablation procedures and is associated with increased risk of mortality, stroke, and other in-hospital complications compared to CA. However, when a thoracoscopic approach was utilized, the risks of mortality and stroke appear to be reduced.

Utilization and perception of same-day discharge in electrophysiological procedures and device implantations: an EHRA survey

The aim of this European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) survey was to assess the utilization of same-day discharge (SDD) in electrophysiology (EP). An online-based questionnaire was shared with the EHRA community between 12 and 30 June 2020 and recorded institutional information, complication assessment, recent experiences, and opinions regarding possible advantages or concerns with SDD. In total, 218 responses from 49 countries provided information on current SDD management. Overall, SDD was implemented in 77.5%, whereas this proportion was significantly higher in tertiary and high-volume centres (83.8% and 85.3%, both P < 0.01). The concept of SDD was most commonly used following implantations of cardiac event recorders (97%), diagnostic EP procedures (72.2%), and implantations of pacemakers with one or two intracardiac leads (50%), while the lowest SDD utilization was observed after catheter ablations of left atrial or ventricular arrhythmias. Within SDD-experienced centres, ∼90% respondents stated that this discharge concept is recommendable or highly recommendable and reported that rates of increased rehospitalization and complication rates were low. Most respondents assumed a better utilization of hospital resources (78.2%), better cost effectiveness (77.3%), and an improved patients' comfort but were concerned about possible impairment of detection (72.5%) and management (78.7%) of late complications. In conclusion, >75% of respondents already implement SDD following EP interventions with a large heterogeneity with regard to specific procedures. Further research is needed to confirm or disprove existing and expected benefits and obstacles.

Cost-Utility of Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Heart Failure: An Economic Evaluation

Background Recent trials comparing catheter ablation to medical therapy in patients with heart failure (HF) with symptomatic atrial fibrillation despite first-line management have demonstrated a reduction in adverse outcomes. We performed an economic evaluation to estimate the cost-utility of catheter ablation as second line therapy in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and Results A Markov model with health states of alive, dead, and alive with amiodarone toxicity was constructed, using the perspective of the Canadian healthcare payer. Patients in the alive states were at risk of HF and non-HF hospitalizations. Parameters were obtained from randomized trials and Alberta health system data for costs and outcomes. A lifetime time horizon was adopted, with discounting at 3.0% annually. Probabilistic and 1-way sensitivity analyses were performed. Costs are reported in 2018 Canadian dollars. A patient treated with catheter ablation experienced lifetime costs of $64 960 and 5.63 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY), compared with $49 865 and 5.18 QALYs for medical treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $35 360/QALY (95% CI, $21 518-77 419), with a 90% chance of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000/QALY. A minimum mortality reduction of 28%, or a minimum duration of benefit of >1 to 2 years was required for catheter ablation to be attractive at this threshold. Conclusions Catheter ablation is likely to be cost-effective as a second line intervention for patients with HF with symptomatic atrial fibrillation, with incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $35 360/QALY, as long as over half of the relative mortality benefit observed in extant trials is borne out in future studies.

The long-term effect of thermal-guided second-generation cryoablation in paroxysmal and persistent atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Second-generation cryoballoon ablation is safe and effective in patients with paroxysmal (PAF) and persistent atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the long-term clinical outcomes and freedom from AF in patients undergoing thermal-guided cryoablation without the use of an electrical mapping catheter.

METHODS

All patients who had undergone thermal-guided second-generation cryoablation without electrical mapping between January 2015 and April 2018 at Eastbourne District General Hospital were retrospectively analysed. Success was defined as freedom from atrial arrhythmia lasting >30 s during the follow up period.

RESULTS

The study included 234 patients with a mean age of 65.3 ± 10.6 years. There were 134 (57.0%) and 100 (42.7%) patients who had PAF and persistent AF respectively. Arrhythmia recurrence occurred in 38 of 134 (28.4%) PAF and 42 of 100 (42.0%) persistent AF patients after mean follow up of 40 ± 9.2 months. The patients with PAF had a significantly greater freedom from arrhythmia than patients with persistent AF (p = .040). The mean procedure time was 55.5 ± 12.2 min and the mean fluoroscopy time was 10.9 ± 4.8 min 73.5% of patients were discharged on the same day.

CONCLUSION

Thermal-guided cryoablation is feasible, safe and results in freedom from arrhythmia in the majority of paroxysmal and persistent AF patients in the long term. Randomised controlled trials are required to confirm the findings of this study.

SCAI expert consensus update on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory: This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) in April 2021

The current document commissioned by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) and endorsed by the American College of Cardiology, the American Heart Association, and Heart Rhythm Society represents a comprehensive update to the 2012 and 2016 consensus documents on patient-centered best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory. Comprising updates to staffing and credentialing, as well as evidence-based updates to the pre-, intra-, and post-procedural logistics, clinical standards and patient flow, the document also includes an expanded section on CCL governance, administration, and approach to quality metrics. This update also acknowledges the collaboration with various specialties, including discussion of the heart team approach to management, and working with electrophysiology colleagues in particular. It is hoped that this document will be utilized by hospitals, health systems, as well as regulatory bodies involved in assuring and maintaining quality, safety, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness of patient throughput in this high volume area.

Barriers and financial impact of same-day discharge after atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Same-day discharge (SDD) after atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation is increasingly being considered. This study examined the barriers and financial impact associated with SDD in a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing elective AF ablation.

METHODS

A single center retrospective review was conducted of the 249 first case-of-the-day outpatient AF ablations performed in 2019 to evaluate the proportion of patients that could have undergone SDD. Barriers to SDD were defined as any intervention that prevented SDD by 8 p.m. The financial impact of SDD was based on savings from avoidance of the overnight hospital stay and revenue related to management of chest pain facilitated by a vacant hospital bed.

RESULTS

SDD could have occurred in 157 patients (63%) without change in management and in up to 200 patients (80%) if avoidable barriers were addressed. Barriers to SDD included non-clinical logistical issues (43%), prolonged post-procedure recovery (42%) and minor procedural complications (15%). On multivariate analysis, factors associated with barriers to SDD included increasing age (P = .01), left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 35% (P = .04), and severely dilated left atrium (P = .04). The financial gain from SDD would have ranged from $1,110,096 (assuming discharge of 63% of eligible patients) to $1,480,128 (assuming 80% discharge) over the course of a year.

CONCLUSIONS

Up to 80% of patients undergoing outpatient AF ablation were amenable to SDD if avoidable delays in care had been anticipated. Based on reduced hospital operating expenses and increased revenue from management of individuals with chest pain, this would translate to a financial savings of ∼$1.5 million.

Safety and feasibility of same-day discharge in patients receiving pulmonary vein isolation-systematic review and a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of a same-day discharge protocol following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

METHODS

PubMed and Embase were systematically investigated from the inception to 20 July 2020. Studies on safety and feasibility of PVI for atrial fibrillation (AF) were included. Study-specific estimates were combined using one-group meta-analysis with a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Seven observational studies investigating the safety and feasibility of same-day discharge protocols were identified. Of a total of 3656 patients who have undergone PVI for AF, the overall complication rate was 0.80% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.20-1.40%). The readmission within 30-day following same-day discharge protocol occurred at a pooled rate of 3.6% (95% CI, 0.0-8.4%). Frequent complications following the procedure were complications related to vascular access (0.38%; 95% CI, 0.18-0.58%), and phrenic nerve injury (0.19%; 95% CI, 0.05-0.33%). The reported complications in SDD group were mainly based on results among patients without perioperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The introduction of same-day discharge strategies might be safe and feasible in selected patients given the reported complication and re-admission rates in the current practice. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Same-day discharge after cryoballoon ablation of atrial fibrillation: A multicenter experience

BACKGROUND

It is common practice to observe patients during an overnight stay (ONS) following a catheter ablation procedure for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the safety and economic impact of a same-day discharge (SDD) protocol after cryoballoon ablation for treatment of AF in high-volume, geographically diverse US hospitals.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 2374 consecutive patients (1119 SDD and 1180 ONS) who underwent cryoballoon ablation for AF at three US centers. Baseline characteristics, acute procedure-related complications, and longer-term evaluations of safety were recorded during routine clinical follow-up. The mean cost of an ONS was used in a one-way sensitivity analysis to evaluate yearly cost savings as a function of the percentage of SDD cases per year.

RESULTS

The SDD and ONS cohorts were predominately male (69% vs. 67%; p = .3), but SDD patients were younger (64 ± 11 vs. 66 ± 10; p < .0001) with lower body mass index (30 ± 6 vs. 31 ± 61; p < .0001) and CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc scores (1.4 ± 1.0 vs. 2.2 ± 1.4; p < .0002). There was no difference between SDD and ONS in the 30-day total complication rate (n = 15 [1.26%] versus n = 24 [2.03%]; p = .136, respectively). The most common complication was hematoma in both the SDD (n = 8; 0.67%) and ONS (n = 11; 0.93%) cohorts. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated that when 50% of every 100 patients treated were discharged the same day, hospital cost savings ranged from $45 825 to $83 813 per year across US hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

SDD following cryoballoon ablation for AF appears to be safe and is associated with cost savings across different US hospitals.

Prospective implementation of a same-day discharge protocol for catheter ablation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

PURPOSE

Overnight stays associated with catheter ablation (CA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) account for a significant proportion of treatment cost. Same-day discharge (SDD) after CA may be attractive to both patients and hospitals, especially in light of current restrictions on overnight stays due to COVID-19. This study reports on the selection criteria, protocol, and safety of SDD after CA of PAF.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CA for PAF were evaluated to assess the risk of groin, respiratory, cardiac, or bleeding complications. SDD eligibility criteria were stable anticoagulation with no bleeding history, systolic heart failure, respiratory conditions, or interventional procedures within 60 days, and recommended BMI < 35. Patient proximity to the hospital was also considered. Anesthesia with propofol was used, and ablations were performed with a contact force catheter. Patients rested for 6 h post-procedure and then ambulated over 1-2 h. Discharge followed if they were stable without evidence of complications. A nurse called all patients the following morning to elicit evidence of complications.

RESULTS

Of 44 planned SDD procedures between April 2017 and June 2018, 41 resulted in SDD after 7.2 ± 1.0 h, 2 patients stayed overnight for observation, and one by choice. Average age was 59 ± 10 years with CHA₂DS₂-VASc of 1.6 ± 1.1. No SDD-related complications occurred, and no return visits resulted from the follow-up calls.

CONCLUSION

Appropriate low-risk patients identified by well-defined clinical criteria can be safely discharged the same day after CA for PAF. Evaluation in a larger population across different centers is required for generalizability of this SDD protocol.