Biologic response modifiers: Indications, implications, and insights

Efficiency and Safety of Tocilizumab for the Treatment of Thyroid Eye Disease: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To review existing literature concerning the effectiveness and safety of tocilizumab (TCZ) for managing thyroid eye disease.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across the PubMed and Embase databases to identify studies on TCZ therapy, from inception to May 2023. The search included the keywords "Graves orbitopathy," "thyroid ophthalmopathy," "thyroid eye disease," "thyroid-associated orbitopathy," "thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy," "Graves ophthalmopathy," "endocrine ophthalmopathy," and "Tocilizumab." Only articles written in English, Spanish, or French were considered.

RESULTS

Among the 1,013 articles initially screened, a total of 29 fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were selected. Most studies were case reports or case series, and only one randomized clinical trial was found. TCZ has been used mainly in glucocorticoid-resistant or relapsing cases, with a dosage ranging from 4 or 8 mg/kg every 4 weeks when intravenous or a weekly subcutaneous dose of 162 mg. Treatment duration is usually adjusted to the clinical response. TCZ is mostly effective in reducing inflammatory signs during the active phase of thyroid eye disease, with an improvement of at least 3 points in clinical activity score and an overall relapsing rate of 8.2%. Numerous studies have shown marked reductions in proptosis; although the only available randomized controlled trial reported a nonstatistically significant improvement 6 months after treatment, a recent meta-analysis indicated that TCZ seems to be the most effective treatment for reducing proptosis. No severe side effects related to intravenous or subcutaneous TCZ administration were reported.

DISCUSSION

Despite these promising findings, randomized clinical trials to directly compare the efficacy and safety of TCZ and other currently available therapeutic options are needed.

Production of Neutralizing Antibody

Techniques employing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used in the initial development phase of biologics. The usefulness of mAbs in basic RA research has been established based on their characteristics, including specificity of binding, homogeneity, and ability to be produced on a large scale. MAb immunoglobulins are the starting material for the generation of smaller antibody fragments and other engineered immunomodulatory antibodies. In this chapter, the basic hybridoma technique, which is a well-established and feasible method for the production of mAbs involving animal immunization, cell fusion, hybridoma screening, expanding positive hybridomas, and purification, is introduced. Aiming at specific affinity to a membrane protein, synthetic proteoliposomes are used in the immunization and screening steps.

Harnessing the immune system against cancer: current immunotherapy approaches and therapeutic targets

Cancer immunotherapy is a rapidly evolving concept that has been given the tag "fifth pillar" of cancer therapy while radiation therapy, chemotherapy, surgery and targeted therapy remain the other four pillars. This involves the stimulation of the immune system to control tumor growth and it specifically targets the neoplastic cells rather than the normal cells. Conventional chemotherapy has many limitations which include drug resistance, recurrence of cancer and severe adverse effects. Immunology has made major treatment breakthroughs for several cancers such as colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, liver cancer, kidney cancer, stomach cancer, acute lymphoblastic leukaemia etc. Currently, therapeutic strategies harnessing the immune system involve Checkpoint inhibitors, Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR T cells), Monoclonal antibodies, Cancer vaccines, Cytokines, Radio-immunotherapy and Oncolytic virus therapy. The molecular characterization of several tumor antigens (TA) indicates that these TA can be utilized as promising candidates in cancer immunotherapy strategies. Here in this review, we highlight and summarize the different categories of emerging cancer immunotherapies along with the immunologically recognized tumor antigens involved in the tumor microenvironment.

Hypersensitivity and Immune-related Adverse Events in Biologic Therapy

Biologic medications are an expanding field of therapeutics for various medical conditions including cancer and inflammatory diseases. Due to their targeted approach to therapy, biologics can be less toxic than traditional systemic medications. However, as use becomes more widespread, adverse effects from biologic administration have also become apparent. Immune-related adverse events are a common mechanism by which biologics can cause on-target immune-related toxicities and both immediate and delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. Immediate hypersensitivity reactions can be mediated by cytokine release or antibody mediated reactions, while delayed-type hypersensitivity is most often caused by serum sickness-like reactions. Additionally, biologics used for treatment of cancer using checkpoint blockade and rheumatologic disease using cytokine blockade can result in autoimmunity. Finally, when inflammatory cytokines are targeted for treatment of autoimmune or autoinflammatory disease, the host immune defense can be compromised predisposing to secondary immunodeficiency. This review will discuss the mechanisms of these reactions and discuss examples of biologics implicated in each of these adverse events.

A pharmacist-managed virtual consult service to improve tuberculosis screening

DISCLAIMER

In an effort to expedite the publication of articles related to the COVID-19 pandemic, AJHP is posting these manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

PURPOSE

To describe a pharmacist-managed virtual consult service practice model to improve medication safety in a population of rheumatology patients and evaluate its initial impact on guideline compliance.

SUMMARY

Optimal pharmacologic care of patients with rheumatologic conditions often revolves around the use of specialty medications such as self-injectable biologics and infused therapies, including biologic response modifiers (BRMs), nearly all of which carry risks of serious adverse events due to their immune-suppressive properties. Possible adverse events include serious infections such as reactivation of tuberculosis (TB) and viral hepatitis B (HBV). This articles describes a pharmacist-managed virtual consult service introduced by a large university-affiliated health system in 2018 to integrate clinical, specialty pharmacy, and therapeutic infusion services for proactive medication and safety management for patients with rheumatologic conditions requiring specialty or infused medications. During a 4-month evaluation period, 157 referrals were sent to the consult service; of 137 consults included in the analysis, 42% were for self-injectable biologic medications, 28% were for intra-articular injections, 26% were for infusions, and 4% were for oral specialty medications. Forty-one percent of the pharmacy benefit consult orders required an intervention prior to submission of prior authorization requests. Most interventions (61%) were clinical in nature and involved the pharmacists ensuring that necessary laboratory work, clinical disease activity scoring, or radiographic imaging were completed prior to submission of the consult results for insurer approval.

CONCLUSION

National rates of HBV screening and TB screening for patients prescribed BRMs continue to be suboptimal. The pharmacist-managed virtual consult service is a novel practice model to increase the screening rate to 100% to ensure the safety and appropriate monitoring of patients who are starting or continued on these complex medications.

The Efficacy and Evidence-Based Use of Biologics in Children and Adolescents: Using Monoclonal Antibodies and Fusion Proteins as Treatments

BACKGROUND

Monoclonal antibodies (mAb) and fusion proteins (FP) are increasingly being used in children and adolescents. In this review, we analyze the evidence for their safety and efficacy in the treatment of the most common chronic inflammatory diseases.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, AWMF.org, and other databases for high-quality trials (i.e., randomized controlled trials with clinical primary endpoints) and guidelines published at any time up to 10 December 2018 that dealt with mAb and FP that are approved for pediatric use. The search term was "monoclonal anti- body/fusion protein [e. g. adalimumab] AND children."

RESULTS

The 620 hits included 25 high-quality trials (20 of them manufacturer- sponsored) on 9 mAb/FP (omalizumab, adalimumab, etanercept, ustekinumab, infliximab, golimumab, anakinra, canakinumab, tocilizumab, and abatacept), as well as 6 guidelines (3 each of levels S3 and S2k) on the treatment of bronchial asthma, psoriasis, juvenile idopathic arthritis, and chronic inflammatory bowel diseases. For none of these conditions are mAb and FP the drugs of first choice. Adverse drug effects are rare but sometimes severe (infection, immune dysregulation, tumors).

CONCLUSION

The retrieved trials have deficiencies that make it difficult to reliably evaluate the efficacy, safety, and utility of mAb/FP for children and adolescents with chronic inflammatory diseases. mAb/FP nonetheless represent a treatment option to be considered in case conventional immune-modulating drugs are ineffective. Researcher-initiated, high-quality trials and manufacturer-independent, systematic long-term evaluations of adverse effects (e.g., tumors) are sorely needed.

Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Immunocompromised Adults: A Consensus Statement Regarding Initial Strategies

Background

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) guidelines have improved the treatment and outcomes of patients with CAP, primarily by standardization of initial empirical therapy. But current society-published guidelines exclude immunocompromised patients.

Research Question

There is no consensus regarding the initial treatment of immunocompromised patients with suspected CAP.

Study Design and Methods

This consensus document was created by a multidisciplinary panel of 45 physicians with experience in the treatment of CAP in immunocompromised patients. The Delphi survey methodology was used to reach consensus.

Results

The panel focused on 21 questions addressing initial management strategies. The panel achieved consensus in defining the population, site of care, likely pathogens, microbiologic workup, general principles of empirical therapy, and empirical therapy for specific pathogens.

Interpretation

This document offers general suggestions for the initial treatment of the immunocompromised patient who arrives at the hospital with pneumonia.

Targeted therapies for autoimmune/idiopathic nonmalignant diseases: risk and management of opportunistic infections

INTRODUCTION

The management of patients affected by autoimmune/idiopathic diseases has been revolutionized by the development of targeted therapies (TT). However, the use of TT is complicated by several adverse events, like opportunistic infections (OIs). The potential of TT to predispose to OIs mainly depends on the site of action; nevertheless, such associations are far from being deterministic, because many factors could increase the infection risk.

AREAS COVERED

The impact on the infective risk of different TT used for autoimmune/idiopathic diseases is far from being completely understood. Indeed, many post-marketing reports documented severe or unexpected infections in patients treated with TT that did not emerge during registrative trials. In this review, the authors attempt to provide an easy and practical update about the 'infectious' safety of TT and examine the management strategies of OIs and other infections more frequently observed in the course of treatment with TT.

EXPERT OPINION

The authors suggest to precisely schedule the clinical management of these subjects, both to prevent and eventually treat promptly the TT-related infectious complications. A coordinated approach should be implemented from different medical specialties to improve the overall understanding of safety of TT and, in general, the management of opportunistic infections in immune-compromised hosts.

Allergic Immune Diseases and the Risk of Mortality Among Patients Hospitalized for Acute Infection

OBJECTIVES

The immune response during sepsis remains poorly understood and is likely influenced by the host's preexisting immunologic comorbidities. Although more than 20% of the U.S. population has an allergic-atopic disease, the type 2 immune response that is overactive in these diseases can also mediate beneficial pro-resolving, tissue-repair functions. Thus, the presence of allergic immunologic comorbidities may be advantageous for patients suffering from sepsis. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that comorbid type 2 immune diseases confer protection against morbidity and mortality due to acute infection.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of patients hospitalized with an acute infection between November 2008 and January 2016 using electronic health record data.

SETTING

Single tertiary-care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

Admissions to the hospital through the emergency department with likely infection at the time of admission who may or may not have had a type 2 immune-mediated disease, defined as asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis, or food allergy, as determined by International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification codes.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 10,789 admissions for infection, 2,578 (24%) had a type 2 disease; these patients were more likely to be female, black, and younger than patients without type 2 diseases. In unadjusted analyses, type 2 patients had decreased odds of dying during the hospitalization (0.47; 95% CI, 0.38-0.59, p < 0.001), while having more than one type 2 disease conferred a dose-dependent reduction in the risk of mortality (p < 0.001). When adjusting for demographics, medications, types of infection, and illness severity, the presence of a type 2 disease remained protective (odds ratio, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.43-0.70; p < 0.001). Similar results were found using a propensity score analysis (odds ratio, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.45-0.71; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with type 2 diseases admitted with acute infections have reduced mortality, implying that the type 2 immune response is protective in sepsis.

Genital Dysplasia and Immunosuppression: Why Organ-Specific Therapy Is Important

Background

Young patients with Crohn's disease (CD) show a high prevalence of human papillomavirus (HPV) which is the main cause of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL). A major complication for patients undergoing immunocompromising therapy is the development of genital dysplasia.

Methods

We report the case of a 32-year-old patient with recurrent genital dysplasia under long-term therapy for CD with a focus on different drug-related, immunosuppressive mechanisms.

Results

Gynecological examination and biopsy revealed high-grade vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (VIN) positive for HPV 16 treated with laser vaporization. Due to the combination of HPV positivity, intraoperative multilocularity, and CD, follow-up examinations were performed every 6 months. One year later, the patient showed a VIN at a new location and additionally, a cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), which were surgically treated. Catch-up HPV vaccination was applied accessorily. After the switch from a TNF-α blocker to vedolizumab, which acts as a gut-selective anti-integrin, the subsequent PAP smear, vulvoscopy, and colposcopy showed no more evidence of dysplasia.

Conclusions

This case report highlights that gut-selective immunosuppression with vedolizumab might be favorable in young HPV-positive patients due to a good side effect profile. Regular screening and HPV vaccination are a mainstay of dysplasia prevention and control. The risk for HPV-associated dysplasia in immunosuppressed patients is highly dependent on the choice of immunosuppressive therapy.

Delivery of siRNA using folate receptor-targeted pH-sensitive polymeric nanoparticles for rheumatoid arthritis therapy

Systemic delivery of siRNA to target tissues is difficult to achieve owing to its limited cellular uptake and poor serum stability. Herein, polymeric nanoparticles were developed for systemic administration of siRNA to inflamed tissues. The polymeric nanoparticles were composed of PK3 as a pH-sensitive polymer, folate-polyethyleneglycol-poly(lactide-co-glycolide) as a targeting ligand, and a DOTAP/siRNA core. The polymeric nanoparticles had a mean particle size of 142.6 ± 0.61 nm and a zeta potential of 3.6 ± 0.43 mV. In vitro studies indicated pH-dependent siRNA release from polymeric nanoparticles, with accelerated release at pH 5.0. Cellular uptake was efficient and gene silencing was confirmed by Western blot. In vivo, polymeric nanoparticles were shown to have inflammation-targeting activity and potent therapeutic effects in an adjuvant-induced arthritis rat model. These results suggest that pH-sensitive and folate receptor-targeted nanoparticles are a promising drug carrier for siRNA delivery for rheumatoid arthritis.

Impact of Host Genetics and Biological Response Modifiers on Respiratory Tract Infections

Host susceptibility to respiratory tract infections (RTI) is dependent on both genetic and acquired risk factors. Repeated bacterial and viral RTI, such as pneumonia from encapsulated microorganisms, respiratory tract infections related to respiratory syncytial virus or influenza, and even the development of bronchiectasis and asthma, are often reported as the first symptom of primary immunodeficiencies. In the same way, neutropenia is a well-known risk factor for invasive aspergillosis, as well as lymphopenia for Pneumocystis, and mycobacterial infections. However, in the last decades a better knowledge of immune signaling networks and the introduction of next generation sequencing have increased the number and diversity of known inborn errors of immunity. On the other hand, the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting cytokines, such as tumor necrosis factor alpha has revealed new risk groups for infections, such as tuberculosis. The use of biological response modifiers has spread to almost all medical specialties, including inflammatory diseases and neoplasia, and are being used to target different signaling networks that may mirror some of the known immune deficiencies. From a clinical perspective, the individual contribution of genetics, and/or targeted treatments, to immune dysregulation is difficult to assess. The aim of this article is to review the known and newly described mechanisms of impaired immune signaling that predispose to RTI, including new insights into host genetics and the impact of biological response modifiers, and to summarize clinical recommendations regarding vaccines and prophylactic treatments in order to prevent infections.

Complications of Treatments for Pediatric Rheumatic Diseases

Medications to treat children with rheumatic disease include disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, glucocorticosteroids, and biologic response modifiers that target mediators and cells involved in autoimmunity and inflammation. Although usually well-tolerated, such medications have many possible side effects, of which primary care and emergency providers should be aware. Both disease and immunosuppression contribute to susceptibility to unusual and opportunistic infections, in addition to usual childhood infections for which these children should receive all applicable nonlive vaccines. Close coordination between the rheumatologist and other medical care providers is essential, because medication side effects, infections, and disease flares are difficult to distinguish, and may occur together.

[Infections during Immunosuppression]

Infections during Immunosuppression Abstract. Immunomodulating and immunosuppressive therapies are being used more and more frequently. Depending on the mechanism of action and the underlying disease, there is an increased risk of infection with these therapies. In everyday clinical practice, the individual risk of infection depends on a large number of patients, and environmental as well as pathogen-specific factors. Elderly and multimorbid patients are at particular risk of infection. Classical bacterial infections with possible atypical manifestation, hepatitis B virus, herpes viruses, mycobacteria and other granulomatous infections are prevalent. Typical clinical signs of infections may be missing and laboratory chemical parameters may fail as diagnostic tools. Systematic screening for latent or chronic infections prior to initiation and close monitoring of patients during immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive therapy are necessary to reduce morbidity and mortality.

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy

Immune checkpoints are accessory molecules that either promote or inhibit T-cell activation. Two inhibitory molecules, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), got high attention, as inhibition of CTLA-4 or PD-1 signaling provides the first immune therapy that significantly improves the survival of patients with metastatic solid cancers. Inhibition of CTLA-4 or PD-1 was first studied in and approved for patients with metastatic melanoma. Blocking immune checkpoints is also efficient in non-small-cell lung cancer, renal cell cancers, hypermutated gastrointestinal cancers, and others. Immune responses, whether directed against infections or against tumors, are divided into 2 phases: an initiation phase and an activation phase, where the immune system recognizes a danger signal and becomes activated by innate signals to fight the danger. This reaction is fundamental for the control of infections and cancer, but needs to be turned off once the danger is controlled, because persistence of this activation ultimately causes severe tissue damage. Therefore, each activation of the immune system is followed by a termination phase, where endogenous immune suppressor molecules arrest immune responses to prevent harmful damage. In the case of cancer immune therapies, therapeutic approaches classically enhanced the initiation and activation of immune responses to increase the emergence and the efficacy of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) against cancers. In sharp contrast, immune checkpoint blockade focuses on the termination of immune responses by inhibiting immune suppressor molecules. It thus prevents the termination of immune responses or even awakes those CTLs that became exhausted during an immune response. Therefore, blocking negatively regulating immune checkpoints restores the capacity of exhausted CTL to kill the cancer they infiltrate. In addition, they drive surviving cancer cells into a still poorly defined state of dormancy. As the therapy also awakes self-reactive CTL, one downside of the therapy is the induction of organ-specific autoimmune diseases. The second downside is the exorbitant drug price that withdraws patients in need from a therapy that was developed by academic research, which impairs further academic treatment development and financially charges the public health system.

Production of Neutralizing Antibody

Techniques employing monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) are widely used in the initial development phase of biologics. The usefulness of mAbs in basic RA research has been established based on their characteristics, including specificity of binding, homogeneity, and ability to be produced on a large scale. MAb immunoglobulins are the starting material for the generation of smaller antibody fragments and other engineered immunomodulatory antibodies. In this chapter, the basic hybridoma technique, which is a well-established and feasible method for the production of mAbs involving animal immunization, cell fusion, hybridoma screening, expanding positive hybridomas, and purification, is introduced. Aiming at specific affinity to a membrane protein, synthetic proteoliposomes are used in the immunization and screening steps.

TNF-α-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3)/A20 acts as a master switch in TNF-α blockade-driven IL-17A expression

BACKGROUND

Anti-TNF inhibitors successfully improve the quality of life of patients with inflammatory disease. Unfortunately, not all patients respond to anti-TNF therapy, and some patients show paradoxical immune side effects, which are poorly understood. Surprisingly, anti-TNF agents were shown to promote IL-17A production with as yet unknown clinical implications.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the molecular mechanism underlying anti-TNF-driven IL-17A expression and the clinical implications of this phenomenon.

METHODS

Fluorescence-activated cell sorting, RNA sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR, Western blotting, small interfering RNA interference, and kinase inhibitors were used to study the molecular mechanisms in isolated human CD4⁺ T cells from healthy donors. The clinical implication was studied in blood samples of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) receiving anti-TNF therapy.

RESULTS

Here we show that anti-TNF treatment results in inhibition of the anti-inflammatory molecule TNF-α-induced protein 3 (TNFAIP3)/A20 in memory CD4⁺ T cells. We found an inverse relationship between TNFAIP3/A20 expression levels and IL-17A production. Inhibition of TNFAIP3/A20 promotes kinase activity of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase and protein kinase C, which drives IL-17A expression. Regulation of TNFAIP3/A20 expression and cognate IL-17A production in T cells are specifically mediated through TNF receptor 2 signaling. Ex vivo, in patients with IBD treated with anti-TNF, we found further evidence for an inverse relationship between TNFAIP3/A20 expression levels and IL-17A-producing T cells.

CONCLUSION

Anti-TNF treatment interferes in the TNFAIP3/A20-mediated anti-inflammatory feedback loop in CD4⁺ T cells and promotes kinase activity. This puts TNFAIP3/A20, combined with IL-17A expression, on the map as a potential tool for predicting therapy responsiveness or side effects of anti-TNF therapy. Moreover, it provides novel targets related to TNFAIP3/A20 activity for superior therapeutic regimens in patients with IBD.