Food protein–induced enterocolitis syndrome in Australia: A population-based study, 2012-2014

Differences in Characteristics Between Patients Who Met or Partly Met the Diagnostic Criteria for Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES)

BACKGROUND

Some patients with food protein-induced enterocolitis (FPIES)-like allergy do not completely fulfill the diagnostic criteria of the international consensus guideline for FPIES. However, it is unclear whether such FPIES-like patients represent a completely different population from FPIES.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to clarify differences in characteristics between patients with FPIES who fully met diagnostic criteria and those who partly met them.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study using data at the time of registration in multicenter, prospective studies of patients with FPIES in Japan. Children who had delayed emesis within 1 to 4 hours and/or diarrhea within 5 to 10 hours after ingestion of food were recruited between March 2020 and February 2022. We examined their compatibility with the diagnostic criteria of the international consensus guideline and their detailed clinical characteristics, including trigger foods, the serving size that elicited symptoms, and antigen-specific IgE antibody titers.

RESULTS

Of the 225 patients with FPIES, 140 fully met the diagnostic criteria whereas 79 patients did not fully meet them but demonstrated reproducible symptoms. The frequencies of pallor, lethargy, and diarrhea were significantly higher in those who met the criteria fully, whereas the age at onset, trigger foods, comorbidity, and perinatal information were comparable. Analysis of patients with FPIES to hen's egg revealed significantly higher levels of egg white- and egg yolk-specific IgE in patients who partly met criteria, whereas the serving size eliciting symptoms was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who partly met the diagnostic criteria may have a milder phenotype of FPIES, but this needs to be validated in further studies using biomarkers reflecting the pathophysiology.

A Second Slice of FPIES: A Single-Center Reappraisal of Pediatric FPIES

BACKGROUND

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is being increasingly recognized as a non-IgE-mediated food allergy; however, it remains unclear if and how the presentation, diagnosis, and management of this disease has changed in recent years.

OBJECTIVE

To reappraise the FPIES cohort at a large US pediatric tertiary referral center.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective chart review of pediatric patients with FPIES (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code K52.21) diagnosed in our allergy/immunology clinics between 2018 and 2022.

RESULTS

There were 210 children diagnosed with FPIES. Most were White (73.8%), non-Hispanic (71.4%), and male (54.3%) with private insurance (77.6%). Cow's milk was the most common food trigger (35.2%), with the earliest median age of onset of 5 months. The atypical FPIES rate was 13.8%. FPIES was accurately diagnosed in 54.3% at the first medical contact. The oral food challenge pass rate was 73.5%. The rate of trigger resolution at 36 months was 77%.

CONCLUSIONS

By comparing trends from a previous and current FPIES cohort, we were able to assess the potential impact of various guidelines and practice changes on the diagnosis and management of FPIES at our center. Milk and oat surpassed rice as the most common FPIES triggers; peanut and egg emerged as new FPIES triggers; there was a shorter time to diagnosis and an increased rate of atypical FPIES. Our findings reflect earlier recognition of FPIES and prompt allergy/immunology referral from community physicians, implementation of recent medical society guidelines for infant feeding practices, and growing clinical expertise of allergists at our center.

Current and future perspectives on the consensus guideline for food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES)

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE mediated food allergy presenting with delayed onset of projectile vomiting in the absence of cutaneous and respiratory symptoms. The pathophysiology of FPIES remains poorly characterized. The first international consensus guidelines for FPIES were published in 2017 and provided clinicians with parameters on the diagnosis and treatment of FPIES. The guidelines have served as a resource in the recognition and management of FPIES, contributing to an increased awareness of FPIES. Since then, new evidence has emerged, shedding light on adult-onset FPIES, the different phenotypes of FPIES, the recognition of new food triggers, center-specific food challenge protocols and management of acute FPIES. Emerging evidence indicates that FPIES impacts both pediatric and adult population. As a result, there is growing need to tailor the consensus guidelines to capture diagnoses in both patient groups. Furthermore, it is crucial to provide food challenge protocols that meet the needs of both pediatric and adult FPIES patients, as well as the subset of patients with atypical FPIES. This review highlights the evolving clinical evidence relating to FPIES diagnosis and management published since the 2017 International FPIES Guidelines. We will focus on areas where recent published evidence may support evolution or revision of the guidelines.

A nationwide survey of non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergies in neonates and infants

BACKGROUND

Non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergies (non-IgE-GIFAs) seem to be increasing rapidly worldwide. However, nationwide studies have been limited to food-protein-induced enterocolitis (FPIES) and food-protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP), with little attention to other non-IgE-GIFA subgroups. The aim of this study was to elucidate the clinical features of all patients with non-IgE-GIFAs, not just certain subgroups.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional survey of non-IgE-GIFAs in Japan from April 2015 through March 2016. A questionnaire was sent to hospitals and clinics throughout Japan. The questionnaire asked about the number of physician-diagnosed non-IgE-GIFA patients, the status of fulfillment of the diagnostic criteria, tentative classification into 4 clusters based on the initial symptoms, the day of onset after birth, complications, and the suspected offending food(s).

RESULTS

The response rate to that questionnaire was 67.6% from hospitals and 47.4% from clinics. Analyses were conducted about "diagnosis-probable" patient cohort (n = 402) and the "diagnosis-confirmed" patients (n = 80). In half of the reported non-IgE-GIFA patients, onset occurred in the neonatal period. The patients were evenly distributed among 4 non-IgE-GIFA clusters. In Cluster 1, with symptoms of vomiting and bloody stool, the onset showed a median of 7 days after birth, which was the earliest among the clusters. Cow's milk was the most common causative food.

CONCLUSIONS

In half of the patients, the onset of non-IgE-GIFAs was in the neonatal period. This highlights the importance of studying the pathogenesis in the fetal and neonatal periods.

Heterogeneity of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES)

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy with gastrointestinal symptoms such as vomiting and diarrhea. The development of international consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and management of FPIES in 2017 enabled us to compare patients worldwide, regardless of geographic variation in disease features. As a result, it has become clear that there is heterogeneity among patients with FPIES or that there are cases that partly fit the diagnostic criteria for FPIES but have different characteristics. This review highlights the heterogeneity in FPIES characteristics in terms of trigger foods, the age of onset, differences in geographic regions, and symptoms; it further proposes four disease entities, including acute FPIES in children, acute FPIES in adults, chronic FPIES, and early-onset neonatal FPIES, depending on the age of onset and presumed pathophysiology. The major symptoms at onset and trigger foods differ in acute FPIES in children, acute FPIES in adults, and chronic FPIES, whereas the disease entities may share a similar pathophysiology. Early-onset neonatal FPIES may have a different pathophysiology than acute or chronic FPIES, and may not necessarily fulfil the full diagnostic criteria for acute or chronic FPIES described in the international consensus guidelines. Due to the similarity in symptoms, early-onset neonatal FPIES may sometimes be misdiagnosed as necrotizing enterocolitis. We aim to increase awareness of FPIES among medical staff in pediatrics, neonatology, and internal medicine and promote research, to gain a better understanding of the heterogeneity and pathophysiology of FPIES.

[Differential diagnosis in food allergy]

It is important to establish the differential diagnosis of food allergy with other disorders, for example: toxic reactions that occur in any person exposed to a sufficient amount of some allergen, and non-toxic reactions that depend on individual susceptibility (food allergy or intolerance). The differential diagnosis is decisive to establish the appropriate treatment. Food intolerance involves adverse reactions to foods without any immunological response involved, and commonly manifests with gastrointestinal symptoms (malaise, abdominal pain or diarrhea). Food allergy is an exaggerated reaction of the immune system, often mediated by IgE, that can trigger serious symptoms (hives, inflammation, respiratory distress, even anaphylaxis). The complex thing is because the symptoms sometimes overlap. To establish an accurate diagnosis, exhaustive clinical evaluation, laboratory tests and, in some cases, controlled provocation tests are required. It is important to understand these distinctions, because treatment and management vary significantly. Food intolerance involves the elimination or reduction of the food that triggers the allergic reaction and requires rigorous measures (complete avoidance of the allergen and availability of epinephrine in cases of severe reactions).

[Non-IgE-mediated food allergy]

Food allergy is an immune response to proteins in food. It usually affects 8% of children and 2% of adults in Western countries. Non-IgE-mediated food allergy mainly affects the gastrointestinal tract. Gastrointestinal food allergies are classified, by their underlying pathogenesis, as: IgE-mediated, non-IgE-mediated, or mixed. The symptoms of patients with food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis originate from local inflammation of the distal colon, which causes hematochezia in neonates. It can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract and cause symptoms of intractable emesis, with subsequent metabolic disorders and hypovolemic shock. Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome is a non-IgE-mediated allergy that usually appears in childhood, with prolonged repetitive vomiting, starting 1 to 4 hours after ingestion of food. The manifestation in adults is usually triggered by the consumption of shellfish. Atopic diseases affect 40-60% of patients with food protein- induced enterocolitis syndrome, including 40-50% of those with food protein-induced enteropathy and proctocolitis. Probiotics (Lactobacillus GG) can alleviate the symptoms of allergic proctocolitis induced by food proteins, by altering the composition of the intestinal microbiota. Fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) can change intestinal microecology efficiently compared to food or probiotics.

World Allergy Organization (WAO) Diagnosis and Rationale for Action against Cow's Milk Allergy (DRACMA) guidelines update - X - Breastfeeding a baby with cow's milk allergy

Cow's milk allergy is rare in exclusively breastfed infants. To support the continuation of breastfeeding an infant after diagnosis with a cow's milk allergy, it is critical to examine the evidence for and against any form of cow's milk elimination diet for lactating mothers. In this narrative review, we highlight the lack of high-quality evidence, hence subsequent controversy, regarding whether the minuscule quantities of cow's milk proteins detectable in human milk cause infant cow's milk allergy symptoms. Current clinical practice recommendations advise a 2-4 week trial of maternal cow's milk dietary elimination for: a) IgE-mediated cow's milk allergy only if the infant is symptomatic on breastfeeding alone; b) non-IgE-mediated associated symptoms only if the history and examination strongly suggest cow's milk allergy; and c) infants with moderate to severe eczema/atopic dermatitis, unresponsive to topical steroids and sensitized to cow's milk protein. There should be a clear plan for home reintroduction of cow's milk into the maternal diet for a period of 1 week to determine that the cow's milk elimination is responsible for resolution of symptoms, and then subsequent reoccurrence of infant symptoms upon maternal cow's milk reintroduction. The evidence base to support the use of maternal cow's milk avoidance for the treatment of a breastfed infant with cow's milk allergy is of limited strength due to a lack of high-quality, adequately powered, randomised controlled trials. It is important to consider the consequences of maternal cow's milk avoidance on reducing immune enhancing factors in breast milk, as well as the potential nutritional and quality of life impacts on the mother. Referral to a dietitian is advised for dietary education, along with calcium and vitamin D supplementation according to local recommendations, and a maternal substitute milk should be advised. However, for most breastfed infants with cow's milk allergy maternal cow's milk dietary elimination will not be required, and active support of the mother to continue breastfeeding is essential.

Australian Infant Food Allergy Emergency Presentations Following Updated Early Food Introduction Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The Australasian Society of Clinical Immunology and Allergy food allergy prevention guidelines were updated in 2016 to recommend home introduction of allergenic foods actively in the first year of life, including to infants at high risk of allergy. An important consideration for parents and providers is whether this practice increases food allergy reactions or anaphylaxis.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to determine whether the 2016 update of food allergy prevention guidelines was associated with an increase in food allergy or anaphylaxis emergency department (ED) presentations.

METHODS

We obtained hospital electronic medical records for infants aged 4 to 12 months who attended the Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne ED in 2015 or in 2018 with a presenting problem or an encounter diagnosis of food allergy or anaphylaxis.

RESULTS

Emergency department presentations owing to food allergy increased from 1.0% (95% CI, 0.85-1.23) in 2015 to 1.4% (95% CI, 1.22-1.67) in 2018 (P = .006). There was no increase in the number of anaphylaxis presentations (28 in 2015 and 22 in 2018) or peanut anaphylaxis presentations (three in 2015 and three in 2018). Overall, the proportion of food allergy presentations attributed to IgE-mediated food allergy was similar (82.1% in 2015 and 84.1% in 2018), whereas peanut allergy presentations increased slightly, although not statically significantly, from 14.6% to 21.2% (P = .09). Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome ED presentations were five in 2015 (4.3%) and 12 in 2018(7.6%), although not statistically significant (P = .25).

CONCLUSIONS

Changes to food allergy prevention guidelines recommending the earlier introduction of allergenic food may have led to a small increase in ED presentations for food allergy but not anaphylaxis.

IgE-Mediated and Non-IgE-Mediated Fish Allergy in Pediatric Age: A Holistic Approach-A Consensus by Diagnostic Commission of the Italian Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology

Fish is one of the "big nine" foods triggering allergic reactions. For this reason, fish allergens must be accurately specified on food labels. Fish allergy affects less than 1% of the world population, but a higher prevalence is observed in pediatric cohorts, up to 7%. Parvalbumin is the main fish allergen found in the muscles. In childhood, sensitization to fish allergens occurs most frequently through the ingestion of fish, rarely transcutaneously or by inhalation. Fish allergy symptoms usually appear within two hours of the allergen contact. The diagnosis begins with the collection of the history. If it is suggestive of fish allergy, prick tests or the measurement of serum-specific IgE should be performed to confirm the suspicion. The oral food challenge is the gold standard for the diagnosis. It is not recommended in case of a severe allergic reaction. It is important to make a differential diagnosis with anisakiasis or scombroid poisoning, which have overlapping clinical features but differ in pathogenesis. Traditionally, managing fish allergy involves avoiding the triggering species (sometimes all bony fish species) and requires an action plan for accidental exposures. The present review will analyze IgE- and non-IgE-mediated fish allergy in children from epidemiology, pathogenesis to clinical features. Moreover, clinical management will be addressed with a particular focus on potential nutritional deficiencies.

Pearls and pitfalls in food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES)

Background: Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a rare, non-immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated gastrointestinal food hypersensitivity. It is a clinical diagnosis commonly characterized by profuse vomiting 1 to 4 hours after ingestion of the triggering food(s). Objective: The objective was to increase awareness of FPIES and review the epidemiology, clinical presentation, pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of FPIES. The lack of availability of a definite biomarker or diagnostic tool often leads to a delay in diagnosis. Methods: A literature search of salient articles that described case reports and case series of FPIES and their management were analyzed. Results: A case of FPIES with a literature review is presented with emphasis on clinical pearls and pitfalls. FPIES is a diagnosis of exclusion and the mainstay of treatment is avoidance of the trigger food(s) for at least 12-18 months from the last exposure. Conclusion: As FPIES is a non-IgE-mediated reaction, allergy testing via skin-prick test or blood tests to measure food IgE antibodies is not routinely recommended. Many children outgrow FPIES by 3-4 years of age. Supervised oral food challenge is recommended to assess acquisition of tolerance.

A case report of acute food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome to walnut

BACKGROUND

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a delayed, non-IgE-mediated food allergy. This syndrome was once thought to be rare, but emerging literature suggests an increasing incidence along with more foods being implicated. Also, with the introduction of guidelines on early peanut introduction, peanut-induced FPIES seems to be increasing in Australia and USA. Although most patients are diagnosed with FPIES within the first year of life, most commonly with food triggers to cow's milk or soy, other phenotypes exist in comparison to this classic presentation. In this case report, we present a patient with late onset of acute FPIES at age 3 to walnut.

CASE PRESENTATION

We describe a case of FPIES in a 12-year-old boy who had recurrent episodes of repetitive emesis, that began at age 3, each time after consuming walnuts. Mom does not give a history of intentional feeding (or avoidance) of walnut and/ or pecans. She also described possible reactions with pine nuts and macadamia. He was assessed with an oral food challenge to walnut, which triggered an episode of acute FPIES. He developed vomiting with onset 2 h post-ingestion, pallor, lethargy, and required an emergency department visit for anti-emetic medications and oral rehydration therapy. He improved on the therapy and now avoids cashew, pistachio, hazelnuts, walnuts, pecans, pine nuts, and macadamia nuts.

CONCLUSIONS

This case report adds to the limited literature that exists on culprit food allergens in FPIES. We present an acute FPIES triggered by the ingestion of walnuts. The diagnosis, common food triggers, and natural history of FPIES are described. There remains a lack of information on the natural history of FPIES, especially towards uncommon food triggers and on FPIES that present beyond infancy.

Early infancy dysbiosis in food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The microbiome associations of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) are understudied. We sought to prospectively define the clinical features of FPIES in a birth cohort, and investigate for the evidence of gut dysbiosis.

METHODS

We identified children diagnosed with FPIES in the Gastrointestinal Microbiome and Allergic Proctocolitis Study, a healthy infant cohort. Children were assessed and stools were collected at each well child visit. The clinical features of the children with FPIES were summarized. Stool microbiome was analyzed using 16S rRNA sequencing comparing children with and without FPIES.

RESULTS

Of the 874 children followed up for 3 years, 8 FPIES cases (4 male) were identified, yielding a cumulative incidence of 0.92%. The most common triggers were oat and rice (n = 3, each) followed by milk (n = 2). The children with FPIES were more likely to have family history of food allergy (50% vs. 15.9% among unaffected, p = .03). The average age of disease presentation was 6 months old. During the first 6 months of life, stool from children with FPIES contained significantly less Bifidobacterium adolescentis, but more pathobionts, including Bacteroides spp. (especially Bacteroides fragilis), Holdemania spp., Lachnobacterium spp., and Acinetobacter lwoffii. The short-chain fatty acid (SCFA)-producing Bifidobacterium shunt was expressed significantly less in the stool from FPIES children.

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, the cumulative incidence over the 3-year study period was 0.92%. During the first 6 months of life, children with FPIES had evidence of dysbiosis and SCFA production pathway was expressed less in their stool, which may play an important role in the pathogenesis of FPIES.

Outcomes reported in randomized controlled trials for mixed and non-IgE-mediated food allergy: Systematic review

BACKGROUND

Mixed and non-IgE-mediated food allergy is a subset of immune-mediated adverse food reactions that can impose a major burden on the quality of life of affected patients and their families. Clinical trials to study these diseases are reliant upon consistent and valid outcome measures that are relevant to both patients and clinicians, but the degree to which such stringent outcome reporting takes place is poorly studied.

OBJECTIVE

As part of the Core Outcome Measures for Food Allergy (COMFA) project, we identified outcomes reported in randomized clinical trials (RCT) of treatments for mixed or non-IgE-mediated food allergy.

DESIGN

In this systematic review, we searched the Ovid, MEDLINE and Embase databases for RCTs in children or adults investigating treatments for food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome, food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis, food protein-induced enteropathy and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders including eosinophilic esophagitis [EoE], eosinophilic gastritis and eosinophilic colitis published until 14 October 2022.

RESULTS

Twenty-six eligible studies were identified, with 23 focused on EoE (88%). Most interventions were corticosteroids or monoclonal antibodies. All EoE studies assessed patient-reported dysphagia, usually using a non-validated questionnaire. Twenty-two of 23 EoE studies used peak tissue eosinophil count as the primary outcome, usually using a non-validated assessment method, and other immunological markers were only exploratory. Thirteen (57%) EoE studies reported endoscopic outcomes of which six used a validated scoring tool recently recommended as a core outcome for EoE trials. Funding source was not obviously associated with likelihood of an RCT reporting mechanistic versus patient-reported outcomes. Only 3 (12%) RCTs concerned forms of food allergy other than EoE, and they reported on fecal immunological markers and patient-reported outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes measured in clinical trials of EoE and non-IgE-mediated food allergy are heterogeneous and largely non-validated. Core outcomes for EoE have been developed and need to be used in future trials. For other forms of mixed or non-IgE-mediated food allergies, core outcome development is needed to support the development of effective treatments.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

OSF public registry DOI:10.17605/OSF.IO/AZX8S.

Perspectives on Non-IgE-Mediated Gastrointestinal Food Allergy in Pediatrics: A Review of Current Evidence and Guidelines

Food allergy is an immune-mediated disease that can result in considerable morbidity and even mortality, with a significant negative impact on patients' quality of life. It is characterized by allergic symptoms that can occur shortly after a relevant food allergen ingestion, or can be delayed or chronic, which make it more difficult for diagnosis. The symptoms of this disease can range from mild to severe, and rarely can cause anaphylaxis, a life-threatening allergic reaction. The prevalence of non-immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy is poorly established outside of cow's milk allergy, with an adjusted incidence ranging between 0.13% and 0.72%. Several disorders are classified as non-immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergies that predominantly affect the gastrointestinal tract including food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP), food protein-induced allergic enteropathy (FPE), and food protein-induced dysmotility disorders (GORD and constipation). Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is listed in this group, even though it considered by some authorities to be mixed reaction with both IgE and cell-mediated immune response to be involved in the reaction. The most common types of non-IgE-mediated food allergy are food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) and food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP). These disorders typically present in infancy and are often triggered by cow's milk protein. Patients with FPIES present with profuse emesis and dehydration, while FPIAP patients present with hematochezia in otherwise healthy infants. Since there are no specific confirmatory non-invasive diagnostic laboratory tests, the diagnosis is usually made clinically when typical symptoms improve upon the removal of the culprit food. Food reintroduction should be attempted, when possible, with documentation of symptoms of relapse to confirm the diagnosis. The management includes dietary avoidance, supportive treatment in the case of accidental exposure, and nutritional counseling. This review focuses on the clinical manifestations, epidemiology, management, and recent guidelines of the most common non-IgE-mediated food hypersensitivity disorders (FPIES, FPIAP, and FPE).

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome is an important differential diagnosis of vomiting in pediatric emergency

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical characteristics and management of infants with suspected acute food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) who presented to the pediatric emergency department (ED) before and after the guidelines were published.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. We classified the infants as "acute FPIES-like symptoms" who were younger than 12 months of age and visited the pediatric ED of the National Center for Child Health and Development due to vomiting 1-4 h after food ingestion without any causative disease, such as infection. The medical records of those infants in 2015 and 2021 were reviewed. We used the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U test to compare two groups for continuous variables, whereas chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests were used for nominal variables.

RESULTS

The number of infants with acute FPIES-like symptoms was 15 (13%) in 2015 and 14 (15%) in 2021. The trigger foods were cow's milk or dairy products in half of the infants, and five as a result of ingestion of hen's eggs in 2021, compared to zero cases in 2015. Five in 2015 and 12 in 2021 required examination at the ED. Three in 2015 and six in 2021 met the diagnostic criteria for acute FPIES in the international consensus guidelines. The emergency physicians did not record at least four minor criteria for acute FPIES in seven in 2015 and five in 2021. No infants (0%) in 2015 and two (14%) in 2021 were referred to the allergy department by an emergency physician.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute FPIES should be considered one of the differential diagnoses of vomiting, and pediatric medical staff should be aware of FPIES diagnostic criteria and appropriately refer suspected cases to a specialist.

Introduction of soy-free plant-based pediatric formula in infants with FPIES: A case report

Background: Standard practice for management of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) frequently requires the use of hypoallergenic semi-elemental or elemental formulas. For some patients, there is poor tolerance of these formulas and no improvement of gastrointestinal symptoms. For others, especially those over 4 months of age, the introduction of these formulas is difficult due to their scientifically demonstrated poor palatability. Case presentation: This case report features an 18-month-old child diagnosed with FPIES at 4 months who failed to tolerate standard hypoallergenic semi-elemental and elemental formulas to supplement maternal breast milk feedings resulting in suboptimal growth. After failing to tolerate all standard options, the patient was introduced off-label to a plant-based pediatric formula, Else Toddler, at 6 months-of-age. Outcomes and implications: In this case, Else Toddler was tolerated as a source of supplemental nutrition without triggering FPIES symptoms. Recommendations: This case demonstrates the successful use of Else Toddler, a pediatric formula sourced from almond butter, buckwheat flour, and tapioca maltodextrin, as a possible alternative to the standard use of hydrolysate or elemental amino-acid formulas. It is free of some of the most common FPIES triggers - dairy, soy, rice, and pea proteins and there for a possible acceptable alternative approach to FPIES management.

Recent Update in Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), though first reported in the 1970s, remains poorly understood and likely underdiagnosed. It is a non-immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy syndrome, most commonly identified in infancy and childhood. It can manifest as a constellation of symptoms following food ingestion, including repetitive and projectile emesis (1-4 hours), accompanied by pallor, lethargy, muscular hypotonia, and diarrhea (5-10 hours). In more severe reactions, significant leukocytosis with neutrophilia, thrombocytosis, metabolic derangements, methemoglobinemia, anemia, low albumin, and total protein may be present. Hypotension and ultimately hypovolemic distributive shock may occur in up to 15%-20% of cases. The diagnosis of FPIES is challenging and providers continue to face difficulties in management. This review article aims to highlight the most recent updates in epidemiology, natural history, pathophysiology, potential diagnostic markers, and guidelines for the management of FPIES.

Remission of Acute Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome Confirmed by Oral Food Challenges in Japan

The oral food challenge test (OFC) is the gold standard for evaluating the remission of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES). Few acute FPIES remissions confirmed by OFC were reported. This study aimed to examine the OFC for Japanese children with acute FPIES to evaluate its remission. A retrospective cohort study was performed on children with acute FPIES with remission evaluation by OFC based on one food challenge dose (1/50, 1/10, 1/2, and full dose per day). Acute FPIES remission was observed in 65.2% of patients (15/23 patients). Vomiting episodes occurred with 1/50 full doses on the first day among 75% of positive patients. The median duration between the onset and OFC was 14 months (IQR, 8-24 months). Soy was the most common causative food, followed by egg yolk, milk, and wheat. All patients could receive OFC safely without intensive care unit care, based on the FPIES OFC protocol. The remission rate of acute FPIES was high. However, vomiting episodes commonly occurred with 1/50 full doses on the first day. This study suggested that our OFC protocol for acute FPIES was safe and feasible, but it might be safer for some patients to start at a minimal loading dose.

Predictors of initial oral food challenge outcome in food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome

Background

There is a paucity of data on predictors of clinical history in oral food challenge (OFC) outcome for the initial diagnosis of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES).

Objective

This study aimed to identify predictors for the diagnosis of FPIES.

Methods

The study included patients who underwent OFC to diagnose FPIES from 2010 to 2021. Patients with a positive OFC result were classified as belonging to the FPIES group, and those with negative OFC result within 120 days from the last symptomatic episode were classified as belonging to the no-allergy (NA) group. Background factors were analyzed in the groups.

Results

A total of 50 OFCs to 12 different foods were conducted in 50 patients. Of those 50 patients, 30 were classified as belonging to the FPIES group. No significant difference was observed between the FPIES and NA groups with respect to background factors, including the features of symptomatic episodes and examinations of immediate-type allergy. A history of asymptomatic ingestion was observed in 23 of 24 and 13 of 19 patients in the FPIES and NA groups, respectively; thus, it was significantly more common in patients with FPIES. The diagnostic rate of patients with fewer than 3 symptomatic episodes was 52%, and that of patients with 3 episodes or more was 75%, not considering a patient without available data.

Conclusions

A definite diagnosis of FPIES should be based on OFC, as there are no predictors for OFC positivity other than a history of asymptomatic ingestion. The absence of asymptomatic ingestion history was a negative predictor for the diagnosis of FPIES.

Poultry Meat allergy: a Review of Allergens and Clinical Phenotypes

Purpose of review

In the recent years, more cases of poultry meat allergy, both IgE- or non-IgE-mediated, are being reported. Patients have varied clinical reactivity at various levels of sensitivity to different meat preparations. The lack of validated biomarkers renders accurate diagnosis challenging. In this review, we aim to provide an overview of the current status of poultry meat allergy along with a description on the allergens implicated.

Recent findings

Poultry meat allergy occurs as a result of cross-reactions with known allergens of egg yolk or bird feathers or as genuine IgE-mediated sensitivity to allergens in poultry meat. Individuals can also develop non-IgE-mediated hypersensitivity reactions to poultry meat. Chicken serum albumin is the main responsible allergen in secondary cases, while myosin light chain, α parvalbumin, enolase, aldolase, hemoglobin, and α-actin have been recognized as potential eliciting allergens in genuine poultry meat allergy.

Summary

There is a wide phenotypic variation among patients with poultry meat allergy, regarding clinical severity and cross-reactivity features. Recognizing the various clinical entities of reactions to poultry meat is an important step towards accurate diagnosis and providing management options that are well received by patients.

Malabsorption Syndromes and Food Intolerance

Feeding intolerance is ubiquitous in neonatal intensive care units with as many signs and symptoms as possible diagnoses. Optimizing nutrition is paramount in both preterm and term infants. Determining the cause of feeding intolerance and adjusting nutrition interventions is an important part of the daily care of newborns. This review discusses the role of malabsorption and food intolerance as possible causes of nutrition difficulties in the newborn.

Adult Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE, cell-mediated food allergy, commonly diagnosed in infants and young children. In recent years, new-onset adult FPIES has been recognized. The underlying pathogenic mechanism of FPIES has yet to be elucidated, thus disease-specific diagnostic biomarkers have yet to be determined and an oral food challenge (OFC) remains the gold-standard for the diagnosis. Pediatric patients with FPIES classically present with symptoms of delayed, repetitive vomiting approximately 1 to 4 hours following ingestion of a food allergen. However, adults with FPIES have been reported to have a different symptom profile and different food triggers compared to the pediatric FPIES population. The current FPIES diagnostic criteria may not be appropriate for the diagnosis of adult FPIES patients, thus an oral food challenge remains a diagnostic tool. This review provides an overview of the current literature on the clinical presentation, epidemiology, diagnosis, triggers and management of adult FPIES.

Update on Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome (FPIES)

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy characterized by delayed, and potentially severe, gastrointestinal symptoms. Since the advent of a specific diagnostic code and establishment of diagnostic guidelines, our understanding of this condition has grown.

RECENT FINDINGS

FPIES affects patients from early infancy into adulthood. Any food can be a trigger, and common culprit foods vary geographically and by age. An understanding of the complex underlying immune mechanisms remains elusive, although studies show pan-leukocyte activation, cytokine release, and increased gastrointestinal permeability. Management involves trigger avoidance, and patients may benefit from the support of a dietitian to ensure adequate nutrient intake. Tolerance develops over time for most children, but due to the risk of severe symptoms, re-introduction of a suspected FPIES trigger is recommended only under supervision at an oral food challenge. Studies continue to evaluate the optimal challenge protocol. Caregivers of children with FPIES report high levels of anxiety and stress, which is attributed to the dramatic symptomatology, dietary restrictions, nutritional concerns, lack of confirmatory diagnostic tests, and limited tools for management of reactions. Our understanding of the FPIES diagnosis has improved over the last few decades, but there remain opportunities, particularly regarding discerning the pathophysiology and best management practices.

Different Patterns of Foods Triggering FPIES in Germany

BACKGROUND

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated gastrointestinal food allergy mainly affecting infants and young children. Allergic FPIES reactions differ from IgE-mediated food allergies, for example, regarding elicitors and clinical course.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to describe causative agents and development of tolerance in German children with FPIES.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective survey on children with FPIES from 14 centers in Germany assessing a 6-year period.

RESULTS

We analyzed 142 patients with 190 FPIES reactions, 130 of which met acute FPIES criteria and 60 were defined as chronic FPIES. The most frequent eliciting food for acute FPIES was cow's milk, followed by fish, vegetables (eg, potato, pumpkin), meats (eg, beef), and grains. A total of 119 children reacted to 1 food only, 16 children to 2 or 3 foods, and 7 children to ≥4 foods. In chronic FPIES, all but 4 exclusively breastfed infants reacted to cow's milk feeding. IgE sensitization to the triggering food was found in 21 of 152 (14%) cases. Two children developed additional IgE-mediated symptoms upon a food challenge. Time to proof of tolerance was shortest in cow's milk-induced FPIES, and it was shorter in chronic than in acute FPIES.

CONCLUSION

In our national survey, we identified triggers for acute FPIES that partially differ from those reported internationally. Mainly foods introduced early in infant nutrition triggered acute reactions. Time to proven tolerance was shown to be contingent on FPIES symptomatology and on the triggering food. These data should be considered regarding nutritional advice for infants with FPIES.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome in the British Isles

BACKGROUND

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a delayed type of food allergy, most often seen in infancy. We aimed to estimate its incidence, to describe common food triggers and the patient journeys of this rare but serious condition.

DESIGN

We undertook a prospective epidemiological survey of FPIES using the British Paediatric Surveillance Unit.

SETTING

UK and Ireland.

PARTICIPANTS

A survey of all paediatricians over 13 months between January 2019 and February 2020.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

204 cases were reported, 98 (48%) meeting case definition, giving an incidence of 0.006% for England based on 93 cases.

RESULTS

98 patients reported 135 trigger foods, 27% (26 of 98) had multiple food triggers. Common food triggers included cow's milk (24%, 33 of 135), fruits and vegetables (19%, 26 of 135), hen's egg (16%, 22 of 135) and fish (14%, 19 of 135). In 46% (41 of 90), the initial trigger food had been ingested three or more times before diagnosis, with a median diagnostic delay of 7.9 months (3.0, 17.3). Half (50 of 98) were admitted, yet only 5% (5 of 98) received appropriate acute treatment with ondansetron. Most cases were diagnosed by an allergy specialist (74 of 98, 76%), within a median of 7.5 (3.0, 13.3) miles from home.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of FPIES was significantly lower than expected across the whole of the British Isles. Most reports were of cases local to specialist allergy centres, with delays in diagnosis. This suggests under-recognition of FPIES in frontline clinical setting where education of healthcare professionals is required to improve recognition, earlier diagnosis and treatment.

Pathophysiology of Non-IgE-Mediated Food Allergy

Non-IgE-mediated food allergies are a group of disorders characterized by subacute or chronic inflammatory processes in the gut. Unlike IgE mediated food allergies that may result in multi-organ system anaphylaxis, the non-IgE mediated food allergies primarily affect the gastrointestinal tract. This review outlines the clinical manifestations, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and management of non-IgE-mediated food allergies. An updated literature search of selected non-IgE-mediated food allergies was conducted for this review using PubMed database to the current year (2021). Reviewed disorders include food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES), food-protein enteropathy (FPE), food protein-induced allergic proctocolitis (FPIAP), and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) such as eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). While extensive gains have been made in understanding FPIES, FPIAP, FPE, and EoE, more information is needed on the pathophysiology of these food allergies. Similarities among them include involvement of innate immunity, T-lymphocyte processes, alteration of the intestinal lumen at the cellular level with the appearance of inflammatory cells and associated histologic changes, and specific cytokine profiles suggesting food-specific, T-cell, and immune-mediated responses. While FPIES and FPIAP typically resolve in early childhood, EGIDs typically do not. Emerging new therapies for EoE offer promise of additional treatment options. Further studies identifying the immunopathogenesis, associated biomarkers, and mechanisms of tolerance are needed to inform prevention, diagnosis and management.

Food allergen ladders: A need for standardization

INTRODUCTION

The process of gradually reintroducing food allergens into an individual's diet is referred to as food allergen "ladders". There remain many questions regarding the foods chosen, structure and composition of the ladder, and medical and safety considerations. The COVID-19 pandemic has propelled us into an era where medicine is increasingly practiced via online platforms, highlighting the need for standardized food allergen ladder approaches for successful and safe introduction of food allergens.

METHODS

We performed a search of currently published food allergen ladders and obtained published information and clinical expertise to summarize current knowledge and suggest future standardized approaches for using food allergen ladders.

RESULTS

There are currently a limited number of published milk, egg, wheat, and soy ladders. We suggest the following points should be considered when developing food ladders: (1) Food allergen: dose, time, and temperature of heating of the food allergen, simplicity of the ladder and recipes, the possible role of the wheat matrix, and testing for allergenic protein levels to standardize doses; (2) Nutritional factors: health and nutritional value of the foods in the ladder, taste, texture, and cultural appropriateness of foods should be considered; and (3) Medical aspects: consideration of which patients are safe to undergo ladders outside of the clinical setting, other safety aspects and risk factors for severe reactions, number of days suggested per steps, and availability and provision of rescue medication. Written instructions and recipes should be provided to families who wish to use food allergen ladders.

DISCUSSION

Food allergen ladders used for gradual reintroduction of food allergens into a food allergic individual's diet are increasingly being used internationally. Standardization regarding the foods included in the ladder and medical considerations are required to practice patient-centered care, best assist patients and families, and ensure safety.

Alternative Fish Species for Nutritional Management of Children with Fish-FPIES—A Clinical Approach

In the Mediterranean region, fish is a common cause of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) in children. No laboratory tests specific to FPIES are available, and oral food challenge (OFC) is the gold standard for its diagnosis and testing for achievement of tolerance. Children with FPIES to fish are usually advised to avoid all fish, regardless of the species. Fish are typically classified into bony and cartilaginous, which are phylogenetically distant species and therefore contain less cross-reacting allergens. The protein β-parvalbumin, considered a pan-allergenic, is found in bony fish, while the non-allergenic α-parvalbumin is commonly found in cartilaginous fish. Based on this difference, as a first step in the therapeutic process of children with FPIES caused by a certain fish in the bony fish category (i.e., hake, cod, perch, sardine, gilthead sea bream, red mullet, sole, megrim, sea bass, anchovy, tuna, swordfish, trout, etc.), an OFC to an alternative from the category of cartilaginous fish is suggested (i.e., blue shark, tope shark, dogfish, monkfish, skate, and ray) and vice versa. Regarding the increased mercury content in some sharks and other large species, the maximum limit imposed by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) for weekly mercury intake must be considered. An algorithm for the management of fish-FPIES, including alternative fish species, is proposed.

Association of Antibiotic Usage with Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome Development from a Caregiver's Survey

Background

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a frequently misdiagnosed, serious, non-IgE mediated food allergy, and the precise mechanism of disease is unknown. Acute FPIES typically presents with repetitive, profuse vomiting approximately 1-4 hours post ingestion of a food trigger. Chronic FPIES is considered less common and less well characterized.

Objective

We aimed to better describe FPIES and identify factors that may influence FPIES development through use of a self-reported, caregiver's survey.

Methods

FPIES and allergy-free infant caregivers completed a survey regarding lifestyle factors that may influence allergy acquisition such as: antibiotic usage and delivery mode. FPIES caregivers reported symptoms, number of food triggers, type of FPIES, and symptoms from breastmilk ingestion. FPIES infants were compared to allergy-free infants to identify factors potentially associated with FPIES.

Results

Infant and prenatal maternal antibiotic usage was higher in FPIES infants compared to allergy-free infants (43.8% vs 20.6% and 48.8% vs 23.57%, respectively, p< 0.05). When compared to infants with ACUTE FPIES alone, infants described as BOTH acute and chronic FPIES reported earlier onset of symptoms, more non-specific symptoms and symptoms triggered by breast milk, more antibiotic exposure, and more food triggers (p< 0.05).

Conclusion

Antibiotic usage was significantly higher in FPIES infants when compared to allergy-free infants. Work is needed to elucidate the role of antibiotic usage in the etiology of FPIES. Infants reported to have BOTH acute and chronic FPIES were significantly different from infants with ACUTE FPIES alone highlighting the need to more closely examine these different subtypes of FPIES.

Current Guidelines and Future Strategies for the Management of Cow's Milk Allergy

Abstract

Exclusive breast feeding is recommended in all guidelines as the first choice feeding. Cow milk allergy (CMA) can be diagnosed by a diagnostic elimination diet for 2 to 4 weeks with a hypo-allergenic formula, followed by a challenge test with intact cow milk protein. The most often used hypo-allergenic formula for the diagnostic elimination diet and the therapeutic diet is a CM based extensive hydrolysate. CM-based partial hydrolysates cannot be recommended in the management of CMA because of insufficient efficacy and possible reactions, but about half of the infants with CMA may tolerate a partial hydrolysate. The pros and cons of other dietary options are discussed in this paper. The use of an amino acid-based formula and/or rice based hydrolysate formula during the diagnostic elimination and therapeutic diet is debated. When available, there is sufficient evidence to consider rice hydrolysates as an adequate alternative to CM-based hydrolysates, since some infants will still react to the CM hydrolysate. The pros and cons of dietary options such as soy formula, buckwheat, almond, pea or other plant based dietary products are discussed. Although the majority of the plant-based beverages are nutritionally inadequate, some are nutritionally adapted for toddlers. However, accessibility and content vary by country and, thus far there is insufficient evidence on the efficacy and tolerance of these plant-based drinks (except for soy formula and rice hydrolysates) to provide an opinion on them.

Conclusion

A diagnostic elimination diet, followed by a challenge remains the diagnostic standard. The use of an awareness tool may result in a decrease of delayed diagnosis. Breastmilk remains the ideal source of nutrition and when not available a CM extensively hydrolyzed formula, rice hydrolysate or amino acid formula should be recommended. More evidence is needed regarding plant-based drinks.

IL-27 as a potential biomarker for distinguishing between necrotising enterocolitis and highly suspected early-onset food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome with abdominal gas signs

Background

The initial clinical manifestations and abdominal imaging findings of neonates with necrotising enterocolitis (NEC) and food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) are sometimes similar; however, their prognosis and therapies are different. We aimed to evaluate the utility of interleukin (IL)-27 as a differentiation marker between NEC and highly suspected early onset (HSEO)-FPIES.

Methods

All samples used in this study were obtained from the neonatal diagnosis centre of Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. In the case-control study, neonates with NEC (n = 13), HSEO-FPIES (n = 9), and jaundice (control, n = 8) were enroled to determine the serum IL-27 levels using commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits. In the validation cohort study, the NEC (n = 87), HSEO-FPIES (n = 62), and jaundice (control, n = 54) groups were included to analyse the diagnostic efficiency of IL-27 for discriminating between NEC and HSEO-FPIES using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Findings

In the case-control study, IL-27 levels were higher in the NEC group than in the HSEO-FPIES group (p = 0·005). In the cohort study, the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of IL-27 for differentiating NEC from HSEO-FPIES was 0·878, which was higher than the AUCs of IL-6 (0·761), C-reactive protein (0·800), white blood cell count (0·637), neutrophils (0·765), lymphocytes (0·782), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (0·781), and platelet count (0·729).

Interpretation

Serum IL-27 is a novel biomarker that may potentially discriminate NEC from HSEO-FPIES in neonates.

Drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome: Similarities and differences compared with food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome

In 2014, drug-induced enterocolitis syndrome (DIES) was described for the first time. It is still a poorly known disease with symptoms that typically resemble those of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES). To date, six more cases of DIES have been described and new clinical diagnostic criteria have been proposed based on those in the international guidelines for FPIES. In this paper, the authors describe three more cases of DIES. In addition, similarities and differences with FPIES have been deeply analyzed. To date, several unanswered questions need to be addressed, but clinicians must be instructed how to identify DIES, in order to make an allergy workup and give definite therapeutic indications to patients, especially in children where DIES seems to be more frequent.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: Current practices in oral food challenge

Background: Oral food challenges (OFC) in food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) are performed to confirm a diagnosis, test for development of tolerance, and find safe alternatives. Objective: We aimed to define OFC outcomes and identify safer test strategies. Methods: OFCs performed in children with FPIES over a 5-year period were reviewed. Results: A total of 160 OFCs were performed in 59 children (median age, 2.3 years). The most commonly tested foods were hen's egg, fish, and cow's milk. Sixty-six OFC results (41.3%) were positive. Twelve (18.2%) reactions were mild, 18 (27.3%) were moderate, and 36 (54.5%) were severe. Intravenous fluid, ondansetron, and corticosteroids were administered in 83.3, 72.7, and 66.7% of the patients, respectively; one patient required hospitalization. A reaction was most likely with fish (odds ratio [OR] 2.878 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 1.279-6.473]; p = 0.011), and least likely with cow's milk (OR 0.268 [95% CI, 0.082-0.872]; p = 0.029). Of the 36 OFCs with egg yolk, 23 patients had a failed OFC, and of the 17 OFCs with egg white (all tolerant to egg yolk), only 2 patients had a failed result. Interestingly, two patients tolerated baked whole egg but not egg yolk. In cow's milk FPIES, two patients could consume fermented milk but not fresh milk. Of the 11 patients with anchovy-triggered FPIES, 6 tolerated sea bass, and 5 tolerated trout, whereas 4 patients with sea bass FPIES tolerated trout. Conclusion: The search for alternative food species, processing, or subdivision of a trigger food is common practice in FPIES, which reflects the expectations of children and their families. The experience gained can be put into practice and will contribute to the understanding of the disease mechanism.

Clinical presentation and management of food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome in 113 Swedish children

BACKGROUND

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy causing severe acute gastrointestinal symptoms and lethargy, mainly affecting infants and young children. There are geographic variations in its clinical features. This study aimed to describe the clinical characteristics and management of FPIES in Swedish children.

METHODS

The study included children who presented with acute FPIES during 2008-2017. All Swedish pediatric departments (n = 32) were invited to report their known patients. Data were collected through chart reviews and interviews with parents.

RESULTS

Eighteen pediatric departments contributed, and 113 patients were included. Most had a family history of atopy (74%), and 51% had an atopic disease. Common trigger foods were cow's milk (26%), fish (25%), oat (22%), and rice (8%). Most patients (85%) reacted to a single food. The median age at first reaction was 3.9 months for cow's milk and 6.0 months for other foods (p < 0.001, range 1.0 month to 9 years). Repetitive vomiting (100%), lethargy (86%), and pallor (61%) were common symptoms; 40% had diarrhea. Sixty percent visited the emergency department, and 27% of all patients were hospitalized. Most patients were diagnosed clinically (81%). Specific IgE for the trigger food was positive in 4/89 tested patients (4%), and skin prick test for the trigger food was positive in 1/53 tested patients (2%).

CONCLUSIONS

In our Swedish study of 113 children, cow's milk, fish, and oat were the commonest trigger foods. Most patients reacted to a single food, and IgE sensitization was rare.

Nutritional Aspects of Pediatric Gastrointestinal Diseases

In the last decade, the role of nutritional management in pediatric gastrointestinal diseases has gained increasing popularity. Disease-specific diets have been introduced as conventional treatments by international guidelines. Patients tend to more willingly accept food-based therapies than drugs because of their relatively “harmless” nature. Apart from a diet’s therapeutic role, nutritional support is crucial in maintaining growth and improving clinical outcomes in pediatric patients. Despite the absence of classical “side effects”, however, it should be emphasized that any dietary modification might have negative consequences on children’s growth and development. Hence, expert supervision is always advised, in order to support adequate nutritional requirements. Unfortunately, the media provide an inaccurate perception of the role of diet for gastrointestinal diseases, leading to misconceptions by patients or their caregivers that tends to overestimate the beneficial role of diets and underestimate the potential adverse effects. Moreover, not only patients, but also healthcare professionals, have a number of misconceptions about the nutritional benefits of diet modification on gastrointestinal diseases. The aim of this review is to highlight the role of diet in pediatric gastrointestinal diseases, to detect misconceptions and to give a practical guide for physicians on the basis of current scientific evidence.

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: epidemiology and comorbidities

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

First described in the mid 20th century, it was just in the last decade that diagnostic and treatment guidelines for food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) were established. Awareness of the diagnosis is improving, and epidemiologic data are emerging.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies suggest that FPIES may affect as many as 0.5% of children worldwide. FPIES in adults is usually triggered by seafood and may be more common than previously thought. Many patients with FPIES have other allergic disorders.

SUMMARY

With refined diagnostic criteria and improved awareness, FPIES is now diagnosed with increasing frequency, and epidemiologic data are emerging. FPIES appears to be increasing in prevalence, and the frequent association with other allergic disorders suggests a shared predisposition or immune mechanism that remains to be elucidated.

Food Protein-Induced Enterocolitis Syndrome

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergy that manifests with projectile, repetitive emesis that can be followed by diarrhea and may be accompanied by lethargy, hypotonia, hypothermia, hypotension, and metabolic derangements. FPIES usually starts in infancy although onset at older ages is being increasingly recognized. FPIES is not rare, with the cumulative incidence of FPIES in infants estimated to be 0.015% to 0.7%, whereas the population prevalence in the US infants was 0.51%. FPIES diagnosis is challenging and might be missed because of later (1-4 hours) onset of symptoms after food ingestion, lack of typical allergic skin and respiratory symptoms, and food triggers that are perceived to be hypoallergenic. Diagnosis is based on the recognition of symptoms because there are no biomarkers of FPIES. The pathophysiology remains obscure although activation of the innate immune compartment has been detected. Management relies of avoidance of food triggers, treatment of accidental exposures, and periodic re-evaluations with supervised oral food challenges to monitor for resolution. There are no strategies to accelerate development of tolerance in FPIES. Here we review the most important current concepts in epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of FPIES.

An exploration of factors associated with food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome: Birth, infant feeding and food triggers

BACKGROUND

Food protein-induced enterocolitis syndrome (FPIES) is a non-IgE-mediated food allergic disorder with a well-characterized phenotype, but limited understanding of factors associated with food cross-reactivity, severity and tolerance.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study spanning 20 years on children with acute FPIES from a single paediatric tertiary centre in New South Wales, Australia, focusing on identifying food trigger co-associations and factors associated with reaction severity, multiple trigger FPIES and/or tolerance was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 168 individuals with 329 recorded FPIES episodes between 1997 and 2017 were included. 49% were male. The median age at first reaction was 5 months, and median age at diagnosis was 9 months. 73% experienced at least one severe FPIES reaction. Rice (45%), cow's milk (30%) and soya (13%) were the most common triggers. Rice or cow's milk FPIES was strongly associated with increased odds of having multiple trigger FPIES. The odds of having multiple food FPIES and severe reactions were slightly decreased with vaginal delivery. No factors were associated with increased risk of severe reactions. Infants with rice and grains FPIES outgrew their reactions at an earlier age, compared to those with fish FPIES.

CONCLUSIONS

Rice remains the most common trigger in Australia with co-associations between rice/oats and cow's milk/soya observed. This suggests that taxonomically related foods may share similar protein structure and trigger similar mechanisms of antigen recognition. Vaginal delivery may have a mild protective effect on the development of multiple FPIES and severe reactions. No other features from birth or infant-feeding history influenced outcomes in FPIES.