Phase 2 clinical study of delgocitinib ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis

Topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema: network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Eczema (atopic dermatitis) is the most burdensome skin condition worldwide and cannot currently be prevented or cured. Topical anti-inflammatory treatments are used to control eczema symptoms, but there is uncertainty about the relative effectiveness and safety of different topical anti-inflammatory treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To compare and rank the efficacy and safety of topical anti-inflammatory treatments for people with eczema using a network meta-analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Skin Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase and trial registries on 29 June 2023, and checked the reference lists of included studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included within-participant or between-participant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in people of any age with eczema of any severity, but excluded trials in clinically infected eczema, seborrhoeic eczema, contact eczema, or hand eczema. We included topical anti-inflammatory treatments used for at least one week, compared with another anti-inflammatory treatment, no treatment, or vehicle/placebo. Vehicle is a 'carrier system' for an active pharmaceutical substance, which may also be used on its own as an emollient for dry skin. We excluded trials of topical antibiotics used alone, complementary therapies, emollients used alone, phototherapy, wet wraps, and systemic treatments.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard Cochrane methods. Primary outcomes were patient-reported eczema symptoms, clinician-reported eczema signs and investigator global assessment. Secondary outcomes were health-related quality of life, long-term control of eczema, withdrawal from treatment/study, and local adverse effects (application-site reactions, pigmentation changes and skin thinning/atrophy were identified as important concerns through patient and public involvement). We used CINeMA to quantify our confidence in the evidence for each outcome.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 291 studies involving 45,846 participants with the full spectrum of eczema severity, mainly conducted in high-income countries in secondary care settings. Most studies included adults, with only 31 studies limited to children aged < 12 years. Studies usually included male and female participants, multiple ethnic groups but predominantly white populations. Most studies were industry-funded (68%) or did not report their funding sources/details. Treatment duration and trial participation were a median of 21 and 28 days (ranging from 7 days to 5 years), respectively. Interventions used were topical corticosteroids (TCS) (172), topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) (134), phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitors (55), janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (30), aryl hydrocarbon receptor activators (10), or other topical agents (21). Comparators included vehicle (170) or other anti-inflammatory treatments. The risk of bias was high in 242 of the 272 (89.0%) trials contributing to data analyses, most commonly due to concerns about selective reporting. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was only possible for short-term outcomes. Patient-reported symptoms NMA of 40 trials (6482 participants) reporting patient-reported symptoms as a binary outcome ranked tacrolimus 0.1% (OR 6.27, 95% CI 1.19 to 32.98), potent TCS (OR 5.99, 95% CI 2.83 to 12.69), and ruxolitinib 1.5% (OR 5.64, 95% CI 1.26 to 25.25) as the most effective, all with low confidence. Mild TCS, roflumilast 0.15%, and crisaborole 2% were the least effective. Class-level sensitivity analysis found potent/very potent TCS had similar effectiveness to potent TCI and was more effective than mild TCI and PDE-4 inhibitors. NMA of 29 trials (3839 participants) reporting patient-reported symptoms as a continuous outcome ranked very potent TCS (SMD -1.99, 95% CI -3.25 to -0.73; low confidence) and tacrolimus 0.03% (SMD -1.57, 95% CI -2.42 to -0.72; moderate confidence) the highest. Direct information for tacrolimus 0.03% was based on one trial of 60 participants at high risk of bias. Roflumilast 0.15%, delgocitinib 0.25% or 0.5%, and tapinarof 1% were the least effective. Class-level sensitivity analysis found potent/very potent TCS had similar effectiveness to potent TCI and JAK inhibitors and mild/moderate TCS was less effective than mild TCI. A further 50 trials (9636 participants) reported patient-reported symptoms as a continuous outcome but could not be included in NMA. Clinician-reported signs NMA of 32 trials (4121 participants) reported clinician signs as a binary outcome and ranked potent TCS (OR 8.15, 95% CI 4.99, 13.57), tacrolimus 0.1% (OR 8.06, 95% CI 3.30, 19.67), ruxolitinib 1.5% (OR 7.72, 95% CI 4.92, 12.10), and delgocitinib 0.5% (OR 7.61, 95% CI 3.72, 15.58) as most effective, all with moderate confidence. Mild TCS, roflumilast 0.15%, crisaborole 2%, and tapinarof 1% were the least effective. Class-level sensitivity analysis found potent/very potent TCS more effective than potent TCI, mild TCI, JAK inhibitors, PDE-4 inhibitors; and mild TCS and PDE-4 inhibitors had similar effectiveness. NMA of 49 trials (5261 participants) reported clinician signs as a continuous outcome and ranked tacrolimus 0.03% (SMD -2.69, 95% CI -3.36, -2.02) and very potent TCS (SMD -1.87, 95% CI -2.69, -1.05) as most effective, both with moderate confidence; roflumilast 0.15%, difamilast 0.3% and tapinarof 1% were ranked as least effective. Direct information for tacrolimus 0.03% was based on one trial in 60 participants with a high risk of bias. For some sensitivity analyses, potent TCS, tacrolimus 0.1%, ruxolitinib 1.5%, delgocitinib 0.5% and delgocitinib 0.25% became some of the most effective treatments. Class-level analysis found potent/very potent TCS had similar effectiveness to potent TCI and JAK inhibitors, and moderate/mild TCS was more effective than mild TCI. A further 100 trials (22,814 participants) reported clinician signs as a continuous outcome but could not be included in NMA. Investigator Global Assessment NMA of 140 trials (23,383 participants) reported IGA as a binary outcome and ranked ruxolitinib 1.5% (OR 9.34, 95% CI 4.8, 18.18), delgocitinib 0.5% (OR 10.08, 95% CI 2.65, 38.37), delgocitinib 0.25% (OR 6.87, 95% CI 1.79, 26.33), very potent TCS (OR 8.34, 95% CI 4.73, 14.67), potent TCS (OR 5.00, 95% CI 3.80, 6.58), and tacrolimus 0.1% (OR 5.06, 95% CI 3.59, 7.13) as most effective, all with moderate confidence. Mild TCS, crisaborole 2%, pimecrolimus 1%, roflumilast 0.15%, difamilast 0.3% and 1%, and tacrolimus 0.03% were the least effective. In a sensitivity analysis of low risk of bias information (12 trials, 1639 participants), potent TCS, delgocitinib 0.5% and delgocitinib 0.25% were most effective, and pimecrolimus 1%, roflumilast 0.15%, difamilast 1% and difamilast 0.3% least effective. Class-level sensitivity analysis found potent/very potent TCS had similar effectiveness to potent TCI and JAK inhibitors and were more effective than PDE-4 inhibitors; mild/moderate TCS were less effective than potent TCI and had similar effectiveness to mild TCI. Longer-term outcomes over 6 to 12 months showed a possible increase in effectiveness for pimecrolimus 1% versus vehicle (4 trials, 2218 participants) in a pairwise meta-analysis, and greater treatment success with mild/moderate TCS than pimecrolimus 1% (based on 1 trial of 2045 participants). Local adverse effects NMA of 83 trials (18,992 participants, 2424 events) reporting application-site reactions ranked tacrolimus 0.1% (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.53, 3.17; moderate confidence), crisaborole 2% (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.18, 3.81; high confidence), tacrolimus 0.03% (OR 1.51, 95%CI 1.10, 2.09; low confidence), and pimecrolimus 1% (OR 1.44, 95% CI 1.01, 2.04; low confidence) as most likely to cause site reactions. Very potent, potent, moderate, and mild TCS were least likely to cause site reactions. NMA of eight trials (1786 participants, 3 events) reporting pigmentation changes found no evidence for increased pigmentation changes with TCS and crisaborole 2%, with low confidence for mild, moderate or potent TCS and moderate confidence for crisaborole 2%. NMA of 25 trials (3691 participants, 36 events) reporting skin thinning found no evidence for increased skin thinning with short-term (median 3 weeks, range 1-16 weeks) use of mild TCS (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.12, 4.31), moderate TCS (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.16, 5.33), potent TCS (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.21, 4.43) or very potent TCS (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.31, 2.49), all with low confidence. Longer-term outcomes over 6 to 60 months showed increased skin thinning with mild to potent TCS versus TCI (3 trials, 4069 participants, 6 events with TCS).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Potent TCS, JAK inhibitors and tacrolimus 0.1% were consistently ranked as amongst the most effective topical anti-inflammatory treatments for eczema and PDE-4 inhibitors as amongst the least effective. Mild TCS and tapinarof 1% were ranked amongst the least effective treatments in three of five efficacy networks. TCI and crisaborole 2% were ranked most likely to cause local application-site reactions and TCS least likely. We found no evidence for increased skin thinning with short-term TCS but an increase with longer-term TCS.

Topical Treatments in Atopic Dermatitis: An Expansive Review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common inflammatory skin condition found worldwide. It impacts patient quality of life (QoL) and is thought to arise as an inflammatory response to epidermal barrier dysfunction and hypersensitivity. AD can lead to large out-of-pocket costs and increased healthcare expenses over a lifetime. An analysis of all randomized control trials conducted since 1990 on topical therapies for AD were reviewed, including 207 trials in the final analysis. It was found that an average of 226 patients were enrolled over 2.43 arms. Common topical treatments included corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors. The most utilized tools to identify treatment efficacy were the EASI, IGA, SCORAD, and PGA. There was a paucity of data on trials that evaluated efficacy, QoL, and cost of treatment simultaneously. This review highlights the need for comprehensive trials that evaluate multiple aspects of treatment, including financial cost and QoL impact, to ensure each patient has the best treatment modality for the management of their AD.

Safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of delgocitinib ointment in infants with atopic dermatitis: A phase 3, open-label, and long-term study

BACKGROUND

Delgocitinib ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, is used as treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) aged ≥2 years in Japan. Although initiating appropriate and early treatment upon the onset of AD in childhood is important, the safety and efficacy of delgocitinib ointment in infants with AD have not been established.

METHODS

This phase 3 study was conducted from October 2020 to June 2022 (number JapicCTI-205412). Eligible Japanese infants with AD aged 6 to <24 months received 0.25% or 0.5% of delgocitinib ointment twice daily for 52 weeks in an open-label uncontrolled manner. Topical corticosteroids were allowed to apply for worsening AD during the treatment period at the investigators' discretion.

RESULTS

A total of 22 infants were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs) were reported in 21 (95.5%) infants and were mostly mild. No treatment-related AEs were reported. The Modified Eczema Area and Severity Index (mEASI) score continuously decreased until week 4, and the score reduction was maintained until week 52. The mean percent changes in the mEASI score from baseline were -73.5% at week 4, -81.7% at week 28, and -81.9% at week 52. Delgocitinib was not detected in the plasma of most infants (68.2%-95.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

Delgocitinib ointment is well tolerated and effective for up to 52 weeks when applied to Japanese infants with AD.

Post-hoc safety/efficacy analyses from pediatric delgocitinib atopic dermatitis trials

BACKGROUND

Delgocitinib ointment is usually recommended for use in children at a concentration of 0.25%. However, there are no clear criteria for dosing, except that a 0.5% formulation may also be used, depending on symptom severity. Treatment of atopic dermatitis is based on combinations of topical corticosteroids, tacrolimus ointment, and delgocitinib ointment, but there are no reports on the safety of delgocitinib ointment when used in combination with other drugs.

METHODS

This is a post-hoc analysis of data from two delgocitinib ointment trials with pediatric atopic dermatitis patients. The efficacy and safety of the 0.25% and 0.5% formulations were compared. Efficacy and safety were evaluated after up to 4 and 56 weeks of treatment, respectively. The safety of delgocitinib ointment when used in combination with topical corticosteroids and/or tacrolimus ointment was investigated.

RESULTS

The dose-response relationship was examined according to baseline disease severity. The proportions of subjects with mild disease who achieved cumulative investigator's global assessment of 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) were 46.2% (0.25% ointment), 71.4% (0.5% ointment), and 7.7% (vehicle). For subjects with moderate to severe disease, the corresponding proportions were 19.0%, 20.0%, and 0.0%, respectively. No overall differences were seen in the safety profiles of the 0.25% and 0.5% delgocitinib ointment doses, or in the safety profiles of the two doses relating to disease severity or to concomitant use of topical corticosteroids and/or tacrolimus ointment.

CONCLUSIONS

These analyses indicate that after up to 4 weeks of treatment, delgocitinib 0.5% ointment may be more effective than the 0.25% dose for mild atopic dermatitis, and that after up to 56 weeks of treatment, delgocitinib is well tolerated in a pediatric trial population when used as prescribed in combination with topical corticosteroids and/or tacrolimus ointment.

Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition with multiple topical treatment options, but uncertain comparative effects.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD prescription topical treatments.

METHODS

For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, ICTRP, and GREAT databases to September 5, 2022, for randomized trials addressing AD topical treatments. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. We classified topical corticosteroids (TCS) using 7 groups-group 1 being most potent. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/q5m6s).

RESULTS

The 219 included trials (43,123 patients) evaluated 68 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, pimecrolimus improved 6 of 7 outcomes-among the best for 2; high-dose tacrolimus (0.1%) improved 5-among the best for 2; low-dose tacrolimus (0.03%) improved 5-among the best for 1. With moderate- to high-certainty evidence, group 5 TCS improved 6-among the best for 3; group 4 TCS and delgocitinib improved 4-among the best for 2; ruxolitinib improved 4-among the best for 1; group 1 TCS improved 3-among the best for 2. These interventions did not increase harm. Crisaborole and difamilast were intermediately effective, but with uncertain harm. Topical antibiotics alone or in combination may be among the least effective. To maintain AD control, group 5 TCS were among the most effective, followed by tacrolimus and pimecrolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

For individuals with AD, pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, and moderate-potency TCS are among the most effective in improving and maintaining multiple AD outcomes. Topical antibiotics may be among the least effective.

Short-term efficacy and safety of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors for patients with atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

In recent years, biologics targeting key cytokines and Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have demonstrated favorable efficacy and safety outcomes for atopic dermatitis (AD) therapy. To evaluate the short-term efficacy and safety of AD therapy involving biologics, JAK inhibitors, and their combination with topical corticosteroids (TCS) for patients with AD, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis. Using eligible randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of 12 or 16 weeks of treatment with systemic medications and 4 weeks of topical treatment for AD.

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception up to October 25, 2023. English-language randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of 12 or 16 weeks of treatment with systemic medications and 4 weeks of topical treatment for AD were included. Titles, abstracts, and articles were screened in duplicate. Of 7261 citations, 37 studies were included. The data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.4 and the outcomes were measured by the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), the pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), as well as instances of adverse events (AE), and serious AE (SAE), which were presented as risk ratio (RR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI). The efficacy of the biological therapies was analyzed with the percentage of patients who have achieved EASI 75, EASI 90, IGA 0/1 and pruritus NRS4, while the safety of treatments was evaluated in terms of the number of patients who had ≥1 AE and who had at least one SAE.

Results

A total of 37 studies with 43 cohorts that examined 9 medications and placebo and involved 18172 participants were included. Compared with the placebo, all biologics and JAK inhibitors were associated with a higher response rate in efficacy outcomes, while systematic administration was presented by dupilumab 200 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks with superior improvement in EASI 90 (RR 9.50, 95 % CI 2.31-39.03) and IGA0/1 (RR 17.00, 95 % CI 2.33-123.78), upadacitinib 30 mg once daily in EASI 75 (RR 5.14, 95 % CI 4.20-6.31) and Pruritus NRS4 (RR 5.73, 95 % CI 4.44-7.39), and external use was presented by ruxolitinib 1.5 % twice daily orally in EASI 75 (RR 4.14, 95 % CI 3.06-5.61) and Pruritus NRS4 (RR 4.08, 95 % CI 2.86-5.81), and most of doses led to a better safety profile. Most doses of baricitinib, dupilumab, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib in combination with TCS demonstrated good efficacy as compared with the control groups (placebo + TCS). However, patients receiving baricitinib at a dosage of 2 mg daily (RR 1.23, 95 % CI 1.02-1.49) and 4 mg daily (RR 1.39, 95 % CI 1.22-1.58) in combination with TCS, exhibited a higher incidence of one or more SAE as compared with those taking placebo + TCS.

Conclusion

Our research has revealed that ruxolitinib and dupilumab are effective and safe treatments for mild to moderate AD and moderate to severe AD, respectively. Additionally, the combination of dupilumab and TCS demonstrates greater efficacy and safety compared to baricitinib, tralokinumab, and upadacitinib with TCS as a background treatment for moderate to severe AD. We suggest that the use of topical JAK inhibitors could be a potential alternative to TCS when used in combination with systemic medications, as a novel approach to treat AD. Insufficient different data sources caused by partial interventions were only mentioned in a few articles and low event rates in safety analyses may lead to the results being biased. Further studies directly comparing existing and novel treatments are needed and will be included in forthcoming updates of this review. Our findings could form a useful foundation for developing a new generation of treatment guidelines for AD.

Emerging role of topical Janus kinase inhibitors in dermatological disorders: a review

Janus kinase (JAK) refers to a family of tyrosine kinases that are involved in the production of proinflammatory mediators in response to various extracellular signals. The JAK-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway is an appealing target in many inflammatory illnesses as this pathway modulates immune cell activation and T-cell-mediated inflammation in response to several cytokines. The practical considerations of prescription for topical and oral JAK inhibitors (JAKis) in atopic dermatitis, vitiligo and psoriasis have been covered in prior publications. Currently, the US Food and Drug Administration has approved the topical JAKi ruxolitinib for atopic dermatitis and nonsegmental vitiligo. None of the remaining first- or second-generation topical JAKis have been approved for topical application in any dermatological indications so far. For this review, the PubMed database was searched using 'topical' and 'JAK inhibitor' or 'Janus kinase inhibitor' or the names of individual drug molecules as the keyword in the title with no date limits. The description of topical JAKi usage in dermatology from the literature was evaluated in each abstract. The current review concentrates on emphasizing the rising use of topical JAKis in both approved and off-label dermatological applications for both old and novel conditions.

JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors in dermatology

The JAK-STAT signaling pathway mediates important cellular processes such as immune response, carcinogenesis, cell differentiation, division and death. Therefore, drugs that interfere with different JAK-STAT signaling patterns have potential indications for various medical conditions. The main dermatological targets of JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors are inflammatory or autoimmune diseases such as psoriasis, vitiligo, atopic dermatitis and alopecia areata; however, several dermatoses are under investigation to expand this list of indications. As JAK-STAT pathway inhibitors should gradually occupy a relevant space in dermatological prescriptions, this review presents the main available drugs, their immunological effects, and their pharmacological characteristics, related to clinical efficacy and safety, aiming to validate the best dermatological practice.

Type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases: targets, therapies and unmet needs

Over the past two decades, significant progress in understanding of the pathogenesis of type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases has enabled the identification of compounds for more than 20 novel targets, which are approved or at various stages of development, finally facilitating a more targeted approach for the treatment of these disorders. Most of these newly identified pathogenic drivers of type 2 inflammation and their corresponding treatments are related to mast cells, eosinophils, T cells, B cells, epithelial cells and sensory nerves. Epithelial barrier defects and dysbiotic microbiomes represent exciting future drug targets for chronic type 2 inflammatory conditions. Here, we review common targets, current treatments and emerging therapies for the treatment of five major type 2 chronic inflammatory diseases - atopic dermatitis, chronic prurigo, chronic urticaria, asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps - with a high need for targeted therapies. Unmet needs and future directions in the field are discussed.

Topical Janus kinase inhibitors in atopic dermatitis: a safety network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Topical Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are being developed for the treatment of mild to moderate atopic dermatitis. However, comparative evidence on their safety profiles is still limited.

AIM

This study aimed to compare the relative safety of topic JAK inhibitors in patients with atopic dermatitis.

METHOD

Phase 2 and 3 clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of topical JAK inhibitors in atopic dermatitis were searched on Medline, EMBASE and clinicaltrials.gov. The following outcomes were considered: any adverse event (AE), serious AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, any infection, any application site reaction.

RESULTS

Ten RCTs were included in this network meta-analysis. Tofacitinib was associated with a reduced risk of any AE when compared with ruxolitinib (OR 0.18, 95% CrI 0.03-0.92). The analyses for the remaining outcomes did not identify other statistically significant risk differences between the topical JAK inhibitors.

CONCLUSION

Although tofacitinib seems to present a reduced risk of any adverse event compared with ruxolitinib, this was the only statistically significant result found between JAK inhibitors. Therefore, such findings should be interpreted with caution considering the scarce data available and the heterogeneity between the studies, and there is no robust evidence allowing pointing out clinically important differences between the safety profiles of the existing topical JAK inhibitors. Further pharmacovigilance activities are needed to confirm the safety profile of these drugs.

Safety of topical medications in the management of paediatric atopic dermatitis: An updated systematic review

AIM

New topical agents have been developed for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD) in recent years. This systematic review is intended to synthesize the clinical trial literature and concisely report the updated safety and adverse effects of topical medications used to treat atopic dermatitis in children.

METHODS

A systematic search of Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to March 2022 was conducted for trials of topical medications used to treat AD in patients <18 years (PROSPERO #CRD42022315355). Included records were limited to English-language publications and studies of ≥3 weeks duration. Phase 1 studies and those that lacked separate paediatric safety reporting were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 5005 records were screened; 75 records met inclusion criteria with 15 845 paediatric patients treated with tacrolimus, 12 851 treated with pimecrolimus, 3539 with topical corticosteroid (TCS), 700 with crisaborole and 202 with delgocitinib. Safety data was well reported in tacrolimus trials with the most frequently reported adverse events being burning sensation, pruritus and cutaneous infections. Two longitudinal cohort studies were included, one for tacrolimus and one for pimecrolimus, which found no significant increased risk of malignancy with topical calcineurin inhibitor (TCI) use in children. Skin atrophy was identified as an adverse event in TCS trials, which other medications did not. Systemic adverse events for the medications were largely common childhood ailments.

CONCLUSION

Data discussed here support the use of steroid-sparing medications (tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, crisaborole, delgocitinib) as safe options with minimal adverse events for managing paediatric AD, although a larger number of TCI studies reported burning and pruritus compared to TCS studies. TCS was the only medication class associated with reports of skin atrophy in this review. The tolerability of these adverse events should be considered when treating young children. This review was limited to English-language publications and the variable safety reporting of trial investigators. Many newer medications were not included due to pooled adult and paediatric safety data that did not meet inclusion criteria.

Evolving cognition of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway: autoimmune disorders and cancer

The Janus kinase (JAK) signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway is an evolutionarily conserved mechanism of transmembrane signal transduction that enables cells to communicate with the exterior environment. Various cytokines, interferons, growth factors, and other specific molecules activate JAK-STAT signaling to drive a series of physiological and pathological processes, including proliferation, metabolism, immune response, inflammation, and malignancy. Dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling and related genetic mutations are strongly associated with immune activation and cancer progression. Insights into the structures and functions of the JAK-STAT pathway have led to the development and approval of diverse drugs for the clinical treatment of diseases. Currently, drugs have been developed to mainly target the JAK-STAT pathway and are commonly divided into three subtypes: cytokine or receptor antibodies, JAK inhibitors, and STAT inhibitors. And novel agents also continue to be developed and tested in preclinical and clinical studies. The effectiveness and safety of each kind of drug also warrant further scientific trials before put into being clinical applications. Here, we review the current understanding of the fundamental composition and function of the JAK-STAT signaling pathway. We also discuss advancements in the understanding of JAK-STAT-related pathogenic mechanisms; targeted JAK-STAT therapies for various diseases, especially immune disorders, and cancers; newly developed JAK inhibitors; and current challenges and directions in the field.

Biologic Versus Small Molecule Therapy for Treating Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Considerations

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval of dupilumab for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis shifted the paradigm from use of broad, systemic immunosuppressants to a safer, targeted treatment and led to the emergence of newer interleukin (IL)-4/IL-13 directed biologics and small molecule therapies, namely Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors (JAKi). Tralokinumab and emerging (not yet approved) lebrikizumab, which both target IL-13, are alternative biologics to dupilumab. The emerging anti-IL-31 receptor nemolizumab is likely to be used second-line to other biologics, primarily for pruritus. Three JAKi are currently in use for treating atopic dermatitis, 2 of which, abrocitinib and upadacitinib, are U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved. This review provides an in-depth, practical discussion on use of these biologics and JAKi that are approved or have completed phase 3 clinical trials in pediatric patients and adults, comparing the groups of medications based on available efficacy and safety data.

Neuroimmune interactions in atopic and allergic contact dermatitis

The skin is a barrier organ populated by many types of skin-resident immune cells and sensory neurons. It has become increasingly appreciated that neuroimmune interactions are an important component of inflammatory diseases such as atopic dermatitis and allergic contact dermatitis. Neuropeptides secreted from nerve terminals play an important role in mediating cutaneous immune cell function, and soluble mediators derived from immune cells interact with neurons to induce itch. In this review article, we will explore emerging research describing neuronal effector functions on skin immune cells in mouse models of atopic and contact dermatitis. We will also discuss the contributions of both specific neuronal subsets and secreted immune factors to itch induction and the associated inflammatory processes. Finally, we will explore how treatment strategies have emerged around these findings and discuss the relationship between scratching and dermatitis.

Chronic pruritus: from pathophysiology to drug design

Pruritus, the most common symptom in dermatology, is an innate response capable of protecting skin against irritants. Nonetheless, when it lasts more than six weeks it is assumed to be a chronic pathology having a negative impact on people's lives. Chronic pruritus (CP) can occur in common and rare skin diseases, having a high prevalence in global population. The existing therapies are unable to counteract CP or are associated with adverse effects, so the development of effective treatments is a pressing issue. The pathophysiological mechanisms underlying CP are not yet completely dissected but, based on current knowledge, involve a wide range of receptors, namely neurokinin 1 receptor (NK1R), Janus kinase (JAK), and transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels, especially transient receptor potential vanilloid 1 (TRPV1) and transient receptor potential ankyrin 1 (TRPA1). This review will address the relevance of these molecular targets for the treatment of CP and molecules capable of modulating these receptors that have already been studied clinically or have the potential to possibly alleviate this pathology. According to scientific and clinical literature, there is an increase in the expression of these molecular targets in the lesioned skin of patients experiencing CP when compared with non-lesioned skin, highlighting their importance for the development of potential efficacious drugs through the design of antagonists/inhibitors.

A phase 2a randomized vehicle-controlled multi-center study of the safety and efficacy of delgocitinib in subjects with moderate-to-severe alopecia areata

Alopecia areata/AA is an autoimmune cause of nonscarring hair loss. The pathogenesis of AA involves many immune axes, including Th1/Th2 pathways. Delgocitinib is a pan-Janus kinase/JAK inhibitor that broadly blocks pro-inflammatory cytokines and has been effective in other inflammatory skin conditions. Recent human studies/reports have shown that use of some systemic JAK inhibitors led to hair regrowth, suggesting this medication class as a potential therapy for AA. However, topical treatment is desirable due to potential systemic side effects. To assess the efficacy and safety of topical delgocitinib in AA, we conducted a double-blind, randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial in 31 moderate-to-severe AA patients that were randomized 2:1 to receive delgocitinib ointment 30 mg/g (n = 20) or ointment vehicle (n = 11) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in severity of Alopecia Tool/SALT score from baseline to week 12. The secondary endpoint included safety profile by reported adverse events. Twenty-three subjects completed the trial, with eight discontinuing mostly due to voluntary withdrawal. Ten patients receiving delgocitinib ointment and three patients receiving vehicle showed SALT score improvements after 12 weeks, but the mean percent SALT improvement at week 12 compared to baseline between the two arms was not significant (p = 0.92). Our study suggests that delgocitinib ointment is not effective in moderate-to-severe AA, likely due to its inability to penetrate sufficiently deeply into the dermis of the scalp, but larger studies are necessary to assess whether a different formulation of topical JAK inhibitors may be suitable to treat mild or more localized forms of AA.

Efficacy and safety of topical JAK inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis in paediatrics and adults: A systematic review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common skin inflammatory disease. Dysregulation of innate and adaptive immune systems plays a major role in the pathophysiology of AD. JAKi (Janus Kinase Inhibitors) reduce the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and represent a promising novel treatment for AD. To assess and summarize the overall efficacy and safety of topial JAKi in the treatment of AD in adults and pediatrics, a broad search was performed on Ovid Medline, Ovid Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, Scopus, CINAHL and Google Scholar until 14 June 2022. After screening, 19 studies remained for the final review. The current systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA, and the protocol was registered in PROSPERO (ID #CRD42022303321). Topical delgocitinib, tofacitinib, ruxolitinib, cerdulatinib and ifidancitinib are effective in treating AD and significantly improve EASI, IGA, pruritus-NRS score and some other indexes in adults. Moreover, topical delgocitinib was observed to have a great efficacy in the treatment of AD in paediatrics. All topical JAKi showed minimal risk of mild-to-moderate adverse effects. Available topical JAKi are effective and safe modalities in treating AD. Nevertheless, further studies with longer duration and head-to-head comparative trials are necessary to find the best option with the least adverse effects.

Advances in Current Drugs and Formulations for the Management of Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disease with a complex pathophysiology. Treatment of AD remains challenging owing to the presence of a wide spectrum of clinical phenotypes and limited response to existing therapies. However, recent genetic, immunological, and pathophysiological insights into the disease mechanism resulted in the invention of novel therapeutic drug candidates. This review provides a comprehensive overview of current therapies and assesses various novel drug delivery strategies currently under clinical investigation. Further, this review majorly emphasizes on various topical treatments including emollient therapies, barrier repair agents, topical corticosteroids (TCS), phosphodiesterase 4 (PDE4) inhibitors, calcineurin inhibitors, and Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway inhibitors. It also discusses biological and systemic therapies, upcoming treatments based on ongoing clinical trials. Additionally, this review scrutinized the use of pharmaceutical inactive ingredients in the approved topical dosage forms for AD treatment.

JAK-STAT signaling pathway in the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis: An updated review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory, pruritic form of dermatosis with heterogeneous manifestations that can substantially affect patients' quality of life. AD has a complex pathogenesis, making treatment challenging for dermatologists. The Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway plays a central role in modulating multiple immune axes involved in the immunopathogenesis of AD. In particular, Th2 cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-31, and thymic stromal lymphopoietin, which contribute to the symptoms of chronic inflammation and pruritus in AD, are mediated by JAK-STAT signal transduction. Furthermore, JAK-STAT is involved in the regulation of the epidermal barrier and the modulation of peripheral nerves related to the transduction of pruritus. Targeting the JAK-STAT pathway may attenuate these signals and show clinical efficacy through the suppression of various immune pathways associated with AD. Topical and oral JAK inhibitors with variable selectivity have emerged as promising therapeutic options for AD. Notably, topical ruxolitinib, oral upadacitinib, and oral abrocitinib were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for treating patients with AD. Accordingly, the present study reviewed the role of JAK-STAT pathways in the pathogenesis of AD and explored updated applications of JAK inhibitors in treating AD.

Efficacy and safety of topical brepocitinib for the treatment of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis: a phase IIb, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, dose-ranging and parallel-group study

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent inflammatory, pruritic skin disease. The Janus kinase (JAK) pathway is a treatment target.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of topical cream brepocitinib, a small-molecule tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2)/JAK1 inhibitor, in participants with mild-to-moderate AD.

METHODS

In this phase IIb, double-blind, dose-ranging study, participants were randomized to receive one of eight treatments for 6 weeks: brepocitinib 0·1% once daily (QD), 0·3% QD or twice daily (BID), 1·0% QD or BID, 3·0% QD, or vehicle QD or BID. The primary endpoint was the percentage change from baseline in the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) total score at week 6. Adverse events (AEs) were monitored.

RESULTS

Overall, 292 participants were enrolled and randomized. The brepocitinib 1% QD and 1% BID groups achieved statistically significantly greater (with multiplicity-adjusted P < 0·05 due to Hochberg's step-up method) percentage reductions from baseline in EASI total score at week 6 [least squares mean (90% confidence interval, CI): QD: -70·1 (-82·1 to -58·0); BID: -75·0 (-83·8 to -66·2)] compared with respective vehicle [QD: -44·4 (-57·3 to -31·6); BID: -47·6 (-57·5 to -37·7)]. There was not a dose-dependent trend in AE frequency, and there were no serious AEs or deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Topical brepocitinib is effective and well tolerated in participants with mild-to-moderate AD. What is already known about this topic? Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are in development for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). The tyrosine kinase 2 and JAK 1 inhibition by brepocitinib may bring a new profile for topical JAK inhibitors for treatment of mild-to-moderate AD. What does this study add? Topical brepocitinib can provide rapid, effective symptom reduction, and could offer a novel alternative to current topical treatments for mild-to-moderate AD.

What's New in Topicals for Atopic Dermatitis?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that can have tremendous impact on quality of life for affected children and adults. First-line therapy for acute management of AD includes topical therapies such as corticosteroids, calcineurin inhibitors, and, more recently, the phosphodiesterase inhibitor crisaborole. Topical agents have remained the mainstay therapy for decades; however, there has been a longstanding need for topical therapies with high efficacy and low risk of adverse effects with long-term use. Given the ongoing advances in understanding the pathogenesis of AD, there are novel targets for pharmacological intervention. We are now in an unprecedented time with more than 40 topical treatments in the pipeline for AD in addition to many developments and treatments on the horizon. This review summarizes selected therapeutic topical agents in later phases of development that target various aspects in the pathogenesis of AD such as Janus kinase inhibition (ruxolitinib and delgocitinib), phosphodiesterase-4 inhibition (roflumilast and difamilast), aryl hydrocarbon modulation (tapinarof), and modulation of the microbiome. We also review novel targeted therapies that are in early phase clinical trials, including AMTX-100, BEN-2293, and PRN473. Preliminary findings on efficacy and tolerability of most of these agents are promising, but further studies are warranted to evaluate the long-term safety and efficacy of these novel agents against the current standard of care.

The JAK/STAT Pathway and Its Selective Inhibition in the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review

In recent years, the broadening understanding of the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) has led to the development of novel therapeutic molecules, that target core inflammatory components of the disease. The Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducer and activation of transcription (STAT) pathway constitutes the principal signaling cascade for a large number of cytokines and growth factors and is involved in intracellular signal transduction and subsequent regulation of gene transcription. Current knowledge suggests that the robust activation of the T-helper (Th)-2 [interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, IL-13, IL-31] and Th22 (IL-22) immune responses in both skin and serum plays a pivotal role in the immunopathogenesis of AD especially at the acute stage, followed by a variable degree of Th1 (interferon-γ, tumor necrosis factor alpha) and Th17 (IL-17) activation in chronic disease. Of note, most of the aforementioned inflammatory cytokines utilize the JAK/STAT pathway for downstream signal transduction, explaining the emerging role of JAK inhibitors in the therapeutic armamentarium of AD. The present systematic review aims to discuss the involvement of JAK/STAT pathway in the pathogenesis of AD and summarize the clinical data available on the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors which have been used in the treatment of AD thus far.

Comparative efficacy and safety of abrocitinib, baricitinib and upadacitinib for moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis: a network meta-analysis

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors have become promising treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD), however no study directly comparing JAK inhibitors with each other has been reported. We conducted this network meta‐analysis to determine the comparative efficacy and safety of three common oral JAK inhibitors including abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib for moderate‐to‐severe AD. We first identified eligible studies from published meta‐analyzes, then we searched PubMed to obtain additional studies published between February and July 2021. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated as primary and secondary outcome, respectively. After extracting data and assessing methodological quality, we utilized ADDIS 1.4 software to conduct pair‐wise and network meta‐analyzes. Ten eligible studies were included in the final analysis. Pooled results that abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib obtained higher investigator global assessment (IGA), eczema area, and severity index (EASI) response, however abrocitinib and upadacitinib caused more treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs) regardless of doses, compared with placebo. Network meta‐analyzes revealed that upadacitinib 30 mg was superior to all regimens and upadacitinib 15 mg was better than remaining regimens except for abrocitinib 200 mg in terms of IGA and EASI response. Moreover, abrocitinib 200 mg was superior to abrocitinib 100 mg, baricitinib 1 mg, 2 mg, and 4 mg for clinical efficacy. However, upadacitinib 30 mg caused more TEAEs. Abrocitinib, baricitinib, and upadacitinib were consistently effective therapies in adult and adolescent patients with AD; however, upadacitinib 30 mg may be the optimal option in short‐term studies. More efforts should be done to reduce the risk of TEAEs caused by upadacitinib 30 mg.

Type 2 Inflammation Contributes to Skin Barrier Dysfunction in Atopic Dermatitis

Skin barrier dysfunction, a defining feature of atopic dermatitis (AD), arises from multiple interacting systems. In AD, skin inflammation is caused by host-environment interactions involving keratinocytes as well as tissue-resident immune cells such as type 2 innate lymphoid cells, basophils, mast cells, and T helper type 2 cells, which produce type 2 cytokines, including IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, and IL-31. Type 2 inflammation broadly impacts the expression of genes relevant for barrier function, such as intracellular structural proteins, extracellular lipids, and junctional proteins, and enhances Staphylococcus aureus skin colonization. Systemic anti‒type 2 inflammation therapies may improve dysfunctional skin barrier in AD.

Real-world efficacy of proactive maintenance treatment with delgocitinib ointment twice weekly in adult patients with atopic dermatitis

Previous studies have shown the efficacy of delgocitinib (DEL) ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, against atopic dermatitis (AD). However, there is no available information regarding the efficacy of DEL ointment in maintaining remission. Data of patients with AD who received remission maintenance therapy twice weekly with DEL or topical corticosteroid (TCS) on the affected skin of each upper limb were extracted from the medical records. Efficacy was assessed based on changes in pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) score, stratum corneum hydration (SCH), erythema index (EI). Of 25 patients, four patients (16%) had eczema flare-ups on the TCS side and eight patients (32%) on the DEL side. The extent of change in each parameter between TCS- and DEL-treated areas of the skin did not differ significantly. The mean changes in the NRS and EI showed a slight improvement on the side treated with TCS and were slightly worse on the side treated with DEL. However, the SCH of the DEL group was maintained, while that of the TCS group worsened. TCS is more likely to be effective than DEL in terms of remission maintenance therapy. However, topical DEL is as effective as topical steroid in the maintenance therapy of AD in dry skin patients.

Neuro-immune communication regulating pruritus in atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic-relapsing inflammatory skin disease with significant disease burden. Genetic and environmental trigger factors contribute to AD, activating two of our largest organs, the nervous and immune system. Dysregulation of neuro-immune circuits plays a key role in the pathophysiology of AD causing inflammation, pruritus, pain, and barrier dysfunction. Sensory nerves can be activated by environmental or endogenous trigger factors transmitting itch stimuli to the brain. Upon stimulation, sensory nerve endings also release neuromediators into the skin contributing again to inflammation, barrier dysfunction and itch. Additionally, dysfunctional peripheral and central neuronal structures contribute to neuroinflammation, sensitization, nerve elongation, neuropathic itch, thus chronification and therapy-resistance. Consequently, neuro-immune circuits in skin and central nervous system may be targets to treat pruritus in AD. Cytokines, chemokines, proteases, lipids, opioids, ions excite/sensitize sensory nerve endings not only induce itch but further aggravate/perpetuate inflammation, skin barrier disruption, and pruritus. Thus, targeted therapies for neuro-immune circuits as well as pathway inhibitors (e.g., kinase inhibitors) may be beneficial to control pruritus in AD either in systemic and/or topical form. Understanding neuro-immune circuits and neuronal signaling will optimize our approach to control all pathological mechanisms in AD, inflammation, barrier dysfunction and pruritus.

Targeting Janus Kinase (JAK) for Fighting Diseases: The Research of JAK Inhibitor Drugs

Janus Kinase (JAK), a nonreceptor protein tyrosine kinase, has emerged as an excellent target through research and development since its discovery in the 1990s. As novel small-molecule targeted drugs, JAK inhibitor drugs have been successfully used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), myofibrosis (MF) and ulcerative colitis (UC). With the gradual development of JAK targets in the market, JAK inhibitors have also received very considerable feedback in the treatment of autoimmune diseases such as atopic dermatitis (AD), Crohn's disease (CD) and graft-versus host disease (GVHD). This article reviews the research progress of JAK inhibitor drugs: introducing the existing JAK inhibitors on the market and some JAK inhibitors in clinical trials currently. In addition, the synthesis of various types of JAK inhibitors were summarized, and the effects of different drug structures on drug inhibition and selectivity.

Innovation in the treatment of atopic dermatitis: Emerging topical and oral Janus kinase inhibitors

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by chronic, eczematous, severe pruritic skin lesions. The knowledge on the pathogenesis of AD is driving the development of new drugs. From the research results, it has been revealed that Th2 cell-mediated immunity, skin barrier dysfunction, and pruritus cause a vicious cycle of AD. On the other hand, the Janus kinase (JAK)/signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) pathway are one of the essential signaling pathways in various inflammatory diseases including AD. In particular, TSLP, IL-4, IL-13 and IL-22 occupy an important position for Th2 cell-mediated immune reaction. Moreover, experimentally pan-JAK inhibitor suppress the STAT3 activation and improved the skin barrier function. Furthermore TSLP, IL-4, IL-13 and IL-31 contribute a lot to chronic pruritus of AD, and transmitted via JAK-STAT pathway. Therefore, JAK inhibitors are promising candidates for the treatment of severe AD. Here we review clinical trials of topical dergocitinib; a pan-JAK inhibitor, ruxolitinib; a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, and tofacitinib; a JAK1, JAK2, and JAK3 inhibitor and oral baricitinib; a JAK1 and JAK2 inhibitor, abrocitinib and upadacitinib; JAK1 inhibitor. Significant improvements in the symptoms were obtained by each drug with low frequency of adverse events. In particular, oral JAK inhibitors have the ability to improve the pruritus and skin symptoms quickly. Therefore, the emergence of these topical and oral JAK inhibitors would be regarded as an innovation in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

Sofpironium bromide: an investigational agent for the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, increased knowledge about pathophysiology of primary hyperhidrosis has led to novel therapeutic advances. Topical and systemic anticholinergic agents have been proven beneficial in reducing sweat production in primary axillary hyperhidrosis (PAH), although their use is limited by the increased likelihood of systemic anticholinergic drug reactions, particularly regarding systemic agents.

AREAS COVERED

This paper provides an overview of pharmaceutical characteristics, efficacy and safety data from phase II and III clinical trials on sofpironium bromide (SB), a topical anticholinergic agent that has been employed for the treatment of PAH and has already received its first approval in Japan for the treatment of PAH in the form of 5% gel formulation.

EXPERT OPINION

The retrometabolic drug design of topical SB presents distinct advantages, by limiting systemic absorption and therefore development of anticholinergic adverse events. This along with the popularity of the non-greasy gel formulation is expected to increase compliance. However, this therapy still offers a temporary control of PAH, compared to sympathectomy or device-based treatments, such as microwave thermolysis. Hence, physicians should balance the effectiveness against adverse events of each therapeutic modality and use a personalized approach based on patient's needs.

Evaluating topical JAK inhibitors as a treatment option for atopic dermatitis

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory skin condition mediated by cytokines that utilize the Janus Kinase/Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling cascade. Topical JAK inhibitors are an emerging alternative in the treatment of AD.

AREAS COVERED

This expert review presents an overview of the underlying molecular pathophysiology of AD, current standards of care, and evaluation of the efficacy and safety of topical JAK inhibitors. A PubMed database search was utilized with a focus on the evidence from double-blind, randomized Phase I, II, and III clinical trials published between January 2015 and July 2021.

EXPERT OPINION

Current topical therapies for AD are efficacious but limited by their adverse side effects. Long-term topical corticosteroid use leads to loss of pigmentation, striae, and skin atrophy. Patients may be concerned about topical calcineurin inhibitors' black box warning of increased risk of malignancy. Topical crisaborole, a phosphodiesterase four inhibitor, is limited by application site burning. Topical ruxolitinib is a JAK inhibitor comparable to triamcinolone in efficacy without the adverse effects seen with long-term topical corticosteroid use. Although topical JAK inhibitors have promising efficacy and safety profiles, poor medication adherence common to topical treatments may limit their utility in a clinical setting.

Sensitivity of clinician-assessed efficacy outcome measurement instruments in trials of topical therapies for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The rising prevalence of atopic dermatitis (AD) in developing countries and its substantial socioeconomic impact have furthered research over the last two decades giving way to advances in its aetiopathogenesis and treatment. Topical therapies targeting newly identified AD signalling pathways are being developed. Numerous clinician-assessed disease severity outcome measurement instruments (OMIs) are available to evaluate the efficacy of investigational treatments in proof-of-concept (POC) trials for AD. However, little is known about the comparative sensitivity of these efficacy OMIs. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the sensitivity of different OMIs in controlled trials of topical therapies for AD published between January 1, 2000 and April 7, 2020. Treatment effect size of OMIs reported at Week 4 was calculated with 95% Confidence Interval (CI). The sensitivity of OMIs was compared by pooling the standardized difference between means (Cohen's d and Cohen's h) for any two OMI-parameter combinations that were reported in ≥3 studies identified in our systematic review. Assessed parameters were difference between active and vehicle at Week 4 and change from baseline [CFB] and percentage change from baseline [%CFB] at Week 4. We identified a total of 15 studies with 3313 subjects examining 14 different OMIs were included in this quantitative meta-analysis. Continuous OMIs had a significantly higher treatment effect size vs. dichotomous OMIs (P = 0.006). Comparisons of Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA), body surface area (BSA) and SCORing Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) for available parameters were performed and generally had a similar sensitivity, with BSA showing smaller overall effect size estimates. In conclusion, continuous OMIs used in topical clinical trials for AD had significantly higher treatment effect sizes when compared to dichotomous OMIs. Continuous OMIs could provide more power for POC trials with a small sample size in atopic dermatitis with topical therapies.

From Emollients to Biologicals: Targeting Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common chronic inflammatory skin disease and significantly impacts patients' lives, particularly in its severe forms. AD clinical presentation varies over the course of the disease, throughout different age groups, and across ethnicities. AD is characterized by a spectrum of clinical phenotypes as well as endotypes. Starting from the current description of AD pathogenesis, this review explores the rationale of approved AD therapies from emollients to biologicals and introduces novel promising drugs.

Janus kinase inhibitors for the therapy of atopic dermatitis

The JAK-STAT pathway is involved in the signaling of multiple cytokines driving cutaneous inflammation in atopic dermatitis (AD). Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors target individual receptor-associated kinases, thereby preventing the mediation of inflammatory signals. Several JAK inhibitors with varying mechanism of action, potency, and safety represent potential therapeutic options for AD in both topical and systemic application. The JAK1/2 selective JAK inhibitor baricitinib was the first substance from this class of drugs approved by the EMA for the systemic oral treatment of AD. The clinical development program of the JAK1 selective inhibitors upadacitinib and abrocitinib is finalized with positive results for AD. The PAN-JAK inhibitor delgocitinib was the first substance being approved for the treatment of AD (in Japan). This review article covers the rising data on investigational and approved JAK inhibitors in the context of the treatment of AD.

Efficacy and safety of topical Janus kinase and phosphodiesterase inhibitor-4 inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A network meta-analysis

Topical Janus kinase (JAK) and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE4) inhibitors are novel treatment approaches for atopic dermatitis (AD). This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of JAK and PDE4 inhibitors for AD treatment. The databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched until June 2021 for eligible studies of AD patients treated with topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors. Baseline and follow-up data were extracted. Efficacy of JAK inhibitors was evaluated using Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) achieving "clear" or "almost clear", with 2 points or more improvement from baseline at the end of treatment, referred to as "IGA response"). A Bayesian multiple treatment network meta-analysis with fixed effects was performed. Odds ratio (OR) with 95% credibility interval (CrI) were used for comparing the efficacy of JAK and PDE4 inhibitors with placebo for AD. A total of 10 randomized controlled trials of topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors with 4689 patients were included for analysis. A total of three topical JAK inhibitors and two topical PDE4 inhibitors were included. Compared with placebo, all JAK and PDE4 inhibitors had higher IGA response at 4 weeks of treatment. Notably, with similar safety profile, tofacitinib 2% b.i.d., ruxolitinib 1.5% b.i.d., and delgocitinib 3% b.i.d. showed favorable IGA response compared with topical tacrolimus and corticosteroids. Ranking analysis suggested that among all included JAK and PDE4 inhibitors, tofacitinib 2% b.i.d. had the highest probability of achieving IGA response (SUCRA = 0.880). Besides, JAK and PDE4 inhibitors showed non-inferior safety profile with placebo. This study confirmed that topical JAK and PDE4 inhibitors had promising treatment efficacy and safety for AD patients. Tofacitinib 2% b.i.d., ruxolitinib 1.5% b.i.d. and delgocitinib 3% b.i.d. showed superior efficacy over other JAK and PDE4 inhibitors.

Efficacy and Safety of Janus Kinase Inhibitors for the Treatment of Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Current therapeutic options for atopic dermatitis (AD) are limited. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors may be viable alternatives.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors for AD treatment.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, Web of Science, Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to September 1, 2020. Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing JAK inhibitors with placebo/vehicle treatment for AD patients were included. The primary study outcomes included (1) the change (%) from the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) baseline expressed as weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI), and (2) the Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) response and safety outcomes expressed as relative risk (RR) and 95% CI.

RESULTS

We included 14 RCTs published in 13 studies (3,822 patients). Treatment with JAK inhibitors significantly improved IGA response (RR 2.83, 95% CI 2.25-3.56, p < 0.001) and EASI score (WMD -28.82, 95% CI -34.48 to -23.16, p < 0.001). JAK inhibitor treatment achieved the largest improvement in both IGA response (RR 3.59, 95% CI 2.66-4.84, p < 0.001) and EASI score (WMD -42.00, 95% CI -48.64 to -35.36, p < 0.001) by week 4 of treatment. Topical JAK inhibitors were significantly more efficacious than oral inhibitors. Upadacitinib treatment for 4 weeks was most effective in reducing EASI score (WMD -53.92, 95% CI -69.26 to -38.58, p < 0.001), while abrocitinib for 4 weeks led to the most effective IGA response (RR 5.47, 95% CI 2.74-10.93, p < 0.001). There was no difference in the frequency of adverse events (AEs) leading to discontinuation; however, JAK inhibitors use, especially abrocitinib, led to a higher incidence of treatment-emergent AEs (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.42, p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our results imply that JAK inhibitors are an effective and safe AD treatment. Nevertheless, further trials with longer duration and head-to-head comparisons of different JAK inhibitors are needed.

JAK inhibitors in the treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disorder associated with heterogenous presentation and often immense patient burden. Safe, targeted treatment options are currently limited. This focused review of the published literature, including clinical trial results, case reports, and abstracts, as well as presentations from scientific meetings and data from industry press releases, describes the use of topical and systemic Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the treatment of AD. New topical JAK inhibitors include ruxolitinib (JAK1/2) and delgocitinib (pan-JAK). Ruxolitinib cream met all primary and secondary endpoints in phase 3 clinical trials for mild-to-moderate AD with minimal treatment-emergent adverse events. Delgocitinib ointment was recently approved in Japan for pediatric and adult AD. Oral JAK inhibitors include baricitinib (JAK1/2), abrocitinib (JAK1-selective), and upadacitinib (JAK1-selective). All 3 met primary and secondary endpoints across numerous trials for moderate-to-severe AD. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mainly mild to moderate and included acne, nausea, headache, upper respiratory tract infection, and to a lesser degree, herpes infection and selected laboratory abnormalities. JAK inhibitors hold great promise as the next generation of targeted AD therapy. While their outstanding efficacy is balanced by a favorable safety profile in clinical trials, real-world data are needed to better understand long-term safety, durability, and treatment success.

Safety of Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors in the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic heterogeneous condition characterized by erythematous, pruritic, and inflamed skin. Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are a new class of drugs that target proteins in the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (JAK-STAT) pathway. These drugs can be administered orally or topically to inhibit signaling of the JAK-STAT pathway and minimize the production of proinflammatory cytokines. The efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors have been investigated in phase 2 and 3 clinical trials for AD. The safety of new medications, which are immunosuppressive by nature, is of utmost concern for the prescriber and patient alike. Herein we summarize the safety results of clinical trials using oral abrocitinib, upadacitinib, and baricitinib, as well as topical ruxolitinib and delgocitinib for the treatment of AD. The most prevalent (2-5% occurrence rate) treatment-emergent adverse events from oral JAK inhibitor use in AD were nausea, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, herpes zoster, herpes simplex, acne, increased blood creatine phosphokinase levels, and decreased platelet counts. Topical JAK inhibitors were not associated with systemic effects. All studies reported that JAK inhibitors were well tolerated in patients with AD in comparison with the control group. While the use of JAK inhibitors in patients suffering from AD is very promising, trials reported to date are of short duration (maximum 16 weeks), and more information on the long-term safety of these novel agents is required.

The efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the serious global problems. There were wide concerns about whether Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor was an alternative treatment for AD.

METHOD

Eight databases were searched from the earliest publication date available to January 2, 2021. We included randomized controlled trials comparing JAK inhibitors with control treatment for AD. Data were pooled using Stata.14 software and performed as mean differences (MD) and risk ratios (RR) with 95% CIs. We did subgroup analysis based on specific outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of studies, ten randomized controlled trials, with 2583 patients were included in the final synthesis. This meta-analysis showed JAK inhibitor resulted in significant improvement on EASI total score (MD = -0.31; 95%CI, -0.46 to -0.17; p = .000; I² = 90.0%, p = .000) and pruritus numerical rating scale (NRS) score (MD = -1.15; 95%CI, -1.48 to -0.83; p = .000; I² = 95.9%, p = .000), without the higher risk of total adverse effects (RR = 1.02; 95%CI, 0.90-1.16; p = .745; I² =27.9%, p = .206).

CONCLUSIONS

JAK inhibitor was a promising option for atopic dermatitis. More data and surveillance will be needed to identify efficacy, safety, and the risk of adverse effects.

The IL-4, IL-13 and IL-31 pathways in atopic dermatitis

Introduction: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is the most common inflammatory skin disease. It has a complex pathophysiology, with a combination of immune dysregulation and intrinsic barrier defects driving cutaneous inflammation and allergic symptomatology. The IL-4, IL-13 and IL-31 inflammatory pathways have been identified as hallmark features in the pathogenesis of the disease, contributing uniquely and synergistically to immune and barrier abnormalities as well as the key symptoms, such as pruritis. Novel therapeutics that target these pathways have been under development to find treatments for AD.Areas covered: This review discusses the IL-4, IL-13 and IL-31 pathways in AD. We will also detail novel targeted therapeutics that have recently been or are currently in clinical trials for AD. A literature search was conducted by querying Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Clinicaltrials.gov up to January 2021 using combinations of the search terms 'IL-4' 'IL-13' 'IL-31' 'atopic dermatitis' 'immune pathway' 'biologics' 'novel therapeutics' 'JAK/STAT inhibitors.'Expert opinion: The complex pathophysiology of AD advocates for innovation. Novel minimally invasive sampling modalities such as tape stripping will allow for a broader characterization of the immunomechanisms behind AD pathophysiology. This will allow for the continued development of a personalized medicine approach to treat AD.

Delgocitinib ointment in pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis: A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled study and a subsequent open-label, long-term study

BACKGROUND

Delgocitinib 0.5% ointment, a topical Janus kinase inhibitor, has been approved in Japan for adult patients with atopic dermatitis (AD).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of delgocitinib ointment in pediatric patients with AD.

METHODS

Part 1 of this study was a 4-week double-blind period in which Japanese patients aged 2 through 15 years were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to delgocitinib 0.25% ointment or vehicle ointment. Part 2 was a 52-week extension period. Eligible patients entered part 2 to receive 0.25% or 0.5% delgocitinib ointment.

RESULTS

At the initiation of the study, approximately half of the patients had moderate AD. At the end of treatment in part 1, the least-squares mean percent change from baseline in modified Eczema Area and Severity Index score, the primary efficacy endpoint, was significantly greater for delgocitinib ointment than for vehicle (-39.3% vs +10.9%, P < .001). In part 2, improvements in AD were also seen through week 56. Most adverse events were mild and unrelated to delgocitinib across the study periods.

LIMITATIONS

Only Japanese patients were included. In part 2, no control group was included and rescue therapy was allowed.

CONCLUSION

Delgocitinib ointment was effective and well tolerated when applied to Japanese pediatric patients with AD for up to 56 weeks.

New Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis Targeting Skin Barrier Repair via the Regulation of FLG Expression

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is one of the most common chronic, inflammatory skin disorders with a complex etiology and a broad spectrum of clinical phenotypes. Despite its high prevalence and effect on the quality of life, safe and effective systemic therapies approved for long-term management of AD are limited. A better understanding of the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis in recent years has contributed to the development of new therapeutic approaches that target specific pathophysiological pathways. Skin barrier dysfunction and immunological abnormalities are critical in the pathogenesis of AD. Recently, the importance of the downregulation of epidermal differentiation complex (EDC) molecules caused by external and internal stimuli has been extensively emphasized. The purpose of this review is to discuss the innovations in the therapy of atopic dermatitis, including biologics, small molecule therapies, and other drugs by highlighting regulatory mechanisms of skin barrier-related molecules, such as filaggrin (FLG) as a crucial pathway implicated in AD pathogenesis.

Innate Immune Regulation of Dermatitis

Dermatitis encompasses a spectrum of inflammatory skin disorders with aberrant immune responses classified as type 1, type 2, and/or type 3. Major advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of atopic dermatitis (AD) have shed new light on how innate immune responses critically regulate type 2 inflammation and itch. This article highlights the diverse ways by which type 2 immune cells regulate diseases beyond AD. The discovery of human Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor X2 on mast cells has revealed novel T cell-independent and immunoglobulin E-independent mechanisms of allergic contact dermatitis-associated and urticarial itch, respectively.

Management of Severe Atopic Dermatitis in Pediatric Patients

Atopic dermatitis is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disorder, present in about 12% of children worldwide. Optimizing management of severe atopic dermatitis in pediatric patients is critical to reduce signs of inflammation, alleviate pruritus and sleep disturbance, minimize the development and/or impact of comorbidities, and improve the patient and caregiver's quality of life. Evaluating the longitudinal severity of pediatric atopic dermatitis is an important component of measuring therapeutic response and long-term management, and is different in clinical practice versus clinical trials. This article describes when and how to use different treatments for pediatric patients with severe atopic dermatitis, including topical medications, phototherapy, and systemic medical therapies (traditional immunosuppressants, biologics, and small molecule inhibitors). It also provides recommendations useful in clinical practice for nonpharmacologic interventions for pediatric patients with severe atopic dermatitis.

Practical algorithm to inform clinical decision-making in the topical treatment of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis is a chronic relapsing, inflammatory skin disorder associated with skin barrier dysfunction, the prevalence of which has increased dramatically in developing countries. In this article, we propose a treatment algorithm for patients with mild-to-moderate and severe atopic dermatitis flares in daily clinical practice. An international panel of 15 dermatology and allergy experts from eight countries was formed to develop a practical algorithm for the treatment of patients with atopic dermatitis, with a particular focus on topical therapies. In cases of mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis involving sensitive skin areas, the topical calcineurin inhibitor pimecrolimus should be applied twice daily at the first signs of atopic dermatitis. For other body locations, patients should apply a topical calcineurin inhibitor, either pimecrolimus or tacrolimus, twice daily at the first signs of atopic dermatitis, such as pruritus, or twice weekly in previously affected skin areas. Emollients should be used regularly. Patients experiencing acute atopic dermatitis flares in sensitive skin areas should apply a topical corticosteroid twice daily or alternate once-daily topical corticosteroid/topical calcineurin inhibitor until symptoms improve. Following improvement, topical corticosteroid therapy should be discontinued and patients switched to a topical calcineurin inhibitor. Maintenance therapy should include the use of pimecrolimus once daily for sensitive areas and tacrolimus for other body locations. This treatment algorithm can help guide clinical decision-making in the treatment of atopic dermatitis.

Application of Janus Kinase Inhibitors in Atopic Dermatitis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Trials

Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors are promising treatments for atopic dermatitis (AD). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors for AD treatment via the “Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation” approach. We identified 15 randomized controlled trials comparing oral or topical JAK inhibitors against placebo to treat AD. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed, and the numbers-needed-to-treat (NNTs)/numbers-needed-to-harm (NNHs) were calculated. Patients treated with JAK inhibitors were associated with higher rates of achieving eczema area and severity index-75 (rate ratio (RR): 2.84; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.20–3.67; I²: 38.9%; NNT = 3.97), Investigator’s Global Assessment response (RR: 2.99; 95% CI: 2.26–3.95; I²: 0%; NNT = 5.72), and pruritus numerical rating scale response (RR: 2.52; 95% CI: 1.90–3.35; I²: 39.4%; NNT = 4.91) than those treated with placebo. Moreover, patients treated with JAK inhibitors had a higher risk of treatment-emergent adverse events (RR: 1.14; 95% CI: 1.02–1.28; I²: 52%; NNH = 14.80) but not adverse events leading to drug discontinuation. According to the evidence-based results, JAK inhibitors are potentially effective strategies (certainty of evidence: “moderate”) for treating AD with tolerable side effects (certainty of evidence: “low”). Nevertheless, long-term follow-up is required.

Therapeutic New Era for Atopic Dermatitis: Part 2. Small Molecules

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, inflammatory cutaneous disease driven by immune dysregulation and skin barrier dysfunction. Currently, we are experiencing a new era of understanding of the pathogenesis of AD and, as a consequence, a new era of innovation in therapeutics, including small molecules and biologic therapy. In contrast to biologics, small molecules are similar to conventional pharmacologic chemical agents used as drugs and are generally prepared by chemical synthesis. Unlike biologics, these drugs often are taken orally or formulated for topical use. The purpose of this review is to summarize the efficacy and safety of the current topical and systemic new therapies in AD by reviewing recently published papers on therapies currently in phase 2 or 3 clinical trials. In this review, it is important to note the characteristics of the study population, the primary endpoints, and whether or not there was concomitant topical therapy allowed. These study design elements may significantly alter the results of studies and should be taken into account. Targeted therapy help push AD treatment into a new era of personalized medicine.

Biological Therapies for Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a widely acquired, relapsing inflammatory skin disease. Biologics are now widely used in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

OBJECTIVE

This work aims to summarize both label and off-label biologics on AD treatment in phase II and phase III stages, and compile evidence on the efficacy of the most-studied biologics.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search through PubMed, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov to identify all documented biological therapies for AD. The criteria were further refined to focus on those treatments with the highest evidence level for AD with at least one randomized clinical trial supporting their use. Only studies or articles published in English were enrolled in this study.

FINDINGS

Primary searches identified 525 relevant articles and 27 trials. Duplicated articles and papers without a full text were excluded. Only completed trials were enrolled. We included 28 randomized controlled trials, 4 unpublished trials, 2 observational studies, and 1 meta-analysis. Eight kinds of biologics, including IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors, JAK inhibitors, anti-IL-13 antibodies, anti-IL-22 antibodies, anti-IL-33 antibodies, thymic stromal lymphopoietin inhibitor (TSLP), OX40 antibodies, and H4R-antagonists were included in this work. Dupliumab, as the most widely used and investigated biologic, was reported in 1 meta-analysis and 4 trials exploring its long-term use and application in both adults and pediatric patients. Besides dupilumab, four other IL-4/IL-13 inhibitors recruited were all randomized, clinical trials at phase 2-3 stage. Six different kinds of JAK inhibitors were summarized with strong evidence revealing their significant therapeutic effects on AD. There were 3 trials for nemolizumab, an anti-IL-13 antibody, all of which were in the phase 2 clinical trial stage. Results showed nemolizumab could be another alternative therapy for moderate-to-severe AD with long-term efficiency and safety.

CONCLUSION

The biological therapies with the most robust evidence on efficacy and long-term safety for AD treatment include dupilumab, barcitinib, abrocitinib, and delgocitinib. Most of the biologics mentioned in this review were still at the exploratory stage. This review will help practitioners advise patients seeking suitable biological therapies and offer experimental study directions for treatment.

A phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group study of 5% sofpironium bromide (BBI-4000) gel in Japanese patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis

A phase 3 study was conducted to verify the efficacy and safety of 5% sofpironium bromide (BBI‐4000) gel (hereinafter referred to as sofpironium) administrated for 6 weeks in Japanese patients with primary axillary hyperhidrosis. The primary efficacy end‐point was the proportion of patients who satisfied both criteria of a Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Score (HDSS) of 1 or 2 at the end of 6‐week treatment and a 50% or more reduction in total gravimetric weight of sweat at the end of treatment relative to baseline. A total of 281 patients were randomized to receive 5% sofpironium (141 patients) or vehicle (140 patients), and all patients were included in the full analysis set (FAS). In the FAS, 70.1% of patients were female, and the median age was 35.0 years. The proportion of patients who achieved the primary efficacy end‐point was 53.9% in the sofpironium group and 36.4% in the vehicle group, with a statistically significant difference of 17.5% (95% confidence interval, 6.02–28.93) between these two groups (P = 0.003). The incidence of adverse events was 44.0% in the sofpironium group and 30.7% in the vehicle group, and the incidence of adverse drug reactions was 16.3% in the sofpironium group and 5.0% in the vehicle group. Reported adverse events were generally mild or moderate in severity. In the sofpironium group, common events (incidence, ≥5%) were nasopharyngitis (14.2%) and dermatitis/erythema at the application site (8.5%/5.7%), with no serious adverse events reported. This study demonstrated the efficacy and safety of 5% sofpironium.

Translating JAKs to Jakinibs

The discovery of JAKs and STATs and their roles in cytokine and IFN action represented a significant basic advance and a new paradigm in cell signaling. This was quickly followed by discoveries pointing to their essential functions, including identification of JAK3 mutations as a cause of SCID. This and other findings predicted the use of therapeutically targeting JAKs as a new strategy for treating immune and inflammatory diseases. This now is a reality with seven approved jakinibs being used to treat multiple forms of arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and myeloproliferative neoplasms, and numerous ongoing clinical trials in other settings. This story provides interesting insights into the process of translating basic discoveries and also reveals the need to return to basic work to fill gaps that now become apparent.