LPA genotype is associated with premature cardiovascular disease in familial hypercholesterolemia

Epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease in polygenic hypercholesterolemia with or without high lipoprotein(a) levels

Background and aims

Epidemiology of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease might be different in patients with polygenic hypercholesterolemia plus high levels (≥30 mg/dl) of Lp(a) (H-Lpa) than in those with polygenic hypercholesterolemia alone (H-LDL). We compared the incidence of peripheral artery disease (PAD), coronary artery disease (CAD), and cerebrovascular disease (CVD) in patients with H-Lpa and in those with H-LDL.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of demographics, risk factors, vascular events, therapy, and lipid profile in outpatient clinical data. Inclusion criteria was adult age, diagnosis of polygenic hypercholesterolemia, and both indication and availability for Lp(a) measurement.

Results

Medical records of 258 patients with H-Lpa and 290 H-LDL were reviewed for occurrence of vascular events. The median duration of follow-up was 10 years (IQR 3-16). In spite of a similar reduction of LDL cholesterol, vascular events occurred more frequently, and approximately 7 years earlier (P = 0.024) in patients with H-Lpa than in H-LDL (HR 1.96 1.21-3.17, P = 0.006). The difference was around 10 years for acute events (TIA, Stroke, acute coronary events) and one year for chronic ones (P = 0.023 and 0.525, respectively). Occurrence of acute CAD was higher in H-Lpa men (HR 3.1, 95% CI 1.2-7.9, P = 0.007) while, among women, PAD was observed exclusively in H-Lpa subjects with smoking habits (P = 0.009).

Conclusions

Patients with high Lp(a) levels suffer from a larger and earlier burden of the disease compared to those with polygenic hypercholesterolemia alone. These patients are at higher risk of CAD if they are men, and of PAD if they are women.

Subtyping Severe Hypercholesterolemia by Genetic Determinant to Stratify Risk of Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Severe hypercholesterolemia, defined as LDL (low-density lipoprotein) cholesterol (LDL-C) measurement ≥190 mg/dL, is associated with increased risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). Causes of severe hypercholesterolemia include monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia, polygenic hypercholesterolemia, elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] hypercholesteremia, polygenic hypercholesterolemia with elevated Lp(a) (two-hit), or nongenetic hypercholesterolemia. The added value of using a genetics approach to stratifying risk of incident CAD among those with severe hypercholesterolemia versus using LDL-C levels alone for risk stratification is not known.

METHODS

To determine whether risk stratification by genetic cause provided better 10-year incident CAD risk stratification than LDL-C level, a retrospective cohort study comparing incident CAD risk among severe hypercholesterolemia subtypes (genetic and nongenetic causes) was performed among 130 091 UK Biobank participants. Analyses were limited to unrelated, White British or Irish participants with available exome sequencing data. Participants with cardiovascular disease at baseline were excluded from analyses of incident CAD.

RESULTS

Of 130 091 individuals, 68 416 (52.6%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 56.7 (8.0) years. Of the cohort, 9.0% met severe hypercholesterolemia criteria. Participants with LDL-C between 210 and 229 mg/dL and LDL-C ≥230 mg/dL showed modest increases in incident CAD risk relative to those with LDL-C between 190 and 209 mg/dL (210-229 mg/dL: hazard ratio [HR], 1.3 [95% CI, 1.1-1.7]; ≥230 mg/dL: HR, 1.3 [95% CI, 1.0-1.7]). In contrast, when risk was stratified by genetic subtype, monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia, elevated Lp(a), and two-hit hypercholesterolemia subtypes had increased rates of incident CAD relative to the nongenetic hypercholesterolemia subtype (monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia: HR, 2.3 [95% CI, 1.4-4.0]; elevated Lp(a): HR, 1.5 [95% CI, 1.2-2.0]; two-hit: HR, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.4-2.6]), while polygenic hypercholesterolemia did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Genetics-based subtyping for monogenic familial hypercholesterolemia and Lp(a) in those with severe hypercholesterolemia provided better stratification of 10-year incident CAD risk than LDL-C-based stratification.

Importance of Coagulation Factors as Critical Components of Premature Cardiovascular Disease in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

For almost a century, familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) has been considered a serious disease, causing atherosclerosis, cardiovascular disease, and ischemic stroke. Closely related to this is the widespread acceptance that its cause is greatly increased low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). However, numerous observations and experiments in this field are in conflict with Bradford Hill’s criteria for causality. For instance, those with FH demonstrate no association between LDL-C and the degree of atherosclerosis; coronary artery calcium (CAC) shows no or an inverse association with LDL-C, and on average, the life span of those with FH is about the same as the surrounding population. Furthermore, no controlled, randomized cholesterol-lowering trial restricted to those with FH has demonstrated a positive outcome. On the other hand, a number of studies suggest that increased thrombogenic factors—either procoagulant or those that lead to high platelet reactivity—may be the primary risk factors in FH. Those individuals who die prematurely have either higher lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)), higher factor VIII and/or higher fibrinogen compared with those with a normal lifespan, whereas their LDL-C does not differ. Conclusions: Many observational and experimental studies have demonstrated that high LDL-C cannot be the cause of premature cardiovascular mortality among people with FH. The number who die early is also much smaller than expected. Apparently, some individuals with FH may have inherited other, more important risk factors than a high LDL-C. In accordance with this, our review has shown that increased coagulation factors are the commonest cause, but there may be other ones as well.

Key Questions About Familial Hypercholesterolemia: JACC Review Topic of the Week

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is characterized as a monogenic, autosomal dominant disorder, producing severe hypercholesterolemia within families due to causal variants within genes regulating the low-density lipoprotein receptor pathway. Demonstration of a causal variant is widely accepted as evidence of substantially higher cardiovascular risk. However, recent large-scale population studies challenge this characterization of FH, which appears to account for only a minor portion of those with severe hypercholesterolemia. Moreover, a substantial portion of FH variant positive patients do not have marked hypercholesterolemia. These discordances raise doubt as to how FH should be defined and how the concentration of low-density lipoprotein in plasma is regulated in individuals with and without FH. Moreover, review of the evidence suggests the impact of an FH causal variant on cardiovascular risk may be less than previously accepted and that all patients with severe hypercholesterolemia should be prioritized for therapy and family screening.

Difficult Journey to Find the Best Treatment for Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia: Case Report

Homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) is a rare autosomal recessive genetic disorder. It is difficult to diagnose and treat it at early stage. We present a nine-year-old boy with HoFH from China. At the beginning, he was misdiagnosed as xanthomatosis in the dermatology department of the local hospital, but the disease did not alleviate after three laser ablation operations. Later, blood lipid monitoring, ultrasound of heart and carotid artery were further added in our hospital, and finally the boy was diagnosed with HoFH by genetic testing. A biallelic mutations was observed in the fourth exon of low density lipoprotein receptor (LDLR): c.418G>A (p.E140K). Our patient achieved a relatively satisfactory therapeutic results after a series of lipid-lowering therapies including atorvastatin monotherapy, lipoprotein apheresis and double-filtration plasma pheresis. We found that LDL-C levels obtained 57% reduction from baseline after atorvastatin combined with double-filtration plasma pheresis (DFPP). It was observed that regression of carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT), valve regurgitation and xanthoma occurred after a series of Intensive lipid-lowering therapy.

Lipoprotein(a) as Part of the Diagnosis of Clinical Familial Hypercholesterolemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Individuals with familial hypercholesterolemia have very high risk of cardiovascular disease due to lifelong elevations in LDL cholesterol. Elevated lipoprotein(a) is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases such as myocardial infarction and aortic valve stenosis. It has been proposed to include elevated lipoprotein(a) in the diagnosis of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Lipoprotein(a) is co-measured in LDL cholesterol, and up to one-quarter of all diagnoses of clinical familial hypercholesterolemia are due to high levels of lipoprotein(a). Further, individuals with both familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) have an extremely high risk of myocardial infarction. We discuss the background for familial hypercholesterolemia and elevated lipoprotein(a) as risk factors for cardiovascular disease and the consequences of the fact that LDL cholesterol measurements/calculations include the cholesterol present in lipoprotein(a). Finally, we discuss the potential of including lipoprotein(a) as part of the diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolemia and in consequence possible treatments.

Sex, age, and ethnic dependency of lipoprotein variants as the risk factors of ischemic heart disease: a detailed study on the different age-classes and genders in Tehran Cardiometabolic Genetic Study (TCGS)

Biological processes involving environmental and genetic factors drive the interplay between age- and sex-regulating lipid profile. The relation between variations in the LPA gene with increasing the risk of coronary heart disease is dependent on population differences, sex, and age. The present study tried to do a gene candidate association analysis in people with myocardial infarction (MI) in a 22 year cohort family-based longitudinal cohort study, Tehran Cardiometabolic Genetic Study (TCGS). After adjusting p value by the FDR method, only the association of rs6415084 with the MI probability and the age-of-CHD-onset was significant in males in their middle age (p < 0.005). Surprisingly, a lack of association was observed for the rest of the markers (16 SNPs). These results revealed the moderator effects of age and sex on the association between the genetic variants (SNPs) of LPA and heart disease risk. Our observations may provide new insights into the biology that underlies lipid profile with age or the sexual dimorphism of Lp(a) metabolism. Finally, Lp(a) appears to be an independent risk factor; however, the role of sex and ethnicity is important.

Hemoglobin concentration, hematocrit and red blood cell count predict major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a genetic disease associated with an important risk of premature and recurrent atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Red blood cell (RBC) parameters such as cell count and hematocrit (HCT) have previously been associated with ASCVD risk in the general population. However, little is known concerning their effect in FH. The aim of the present study is to investigate the effect of the different RBC parameters on the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in FH patients.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, genetically-confirmed FH patients aged between 18 and 65 years and without history of a prior ASCVD event were included. MACE included myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary revascularization, unstable angina or cardiovascular death.

RESULTS

A total of 482 subjects (6217 person-years of follow-up) were included in the analysis. Hemoglobin (HB), RBC count, and HCT were significant predictors of MACE risk (HR 1.04 (95% CI 1.01-1.06) p = 0.001, HR 2.69 (95% CI 1.49-4.86) p = 0.001, and HR 1.16 (95% CI 1.08-1.26) p < 0.0001, respectively) and these associations remained significant when adjusted for traditional cardiovascular risk factors. In addition, the frequency of recurrent MACE was 4-fold and 7-fold higher in the group above vs below the median for HB (p = 0.002) and RBC count (p = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

HB, RBC count and HCT were significant predictors of incident and recurring MACE in FH patients. These parameters could therefore be used to further refine the ASCVD risk prediction in this vulnerable population.

Pharmacogenomics Variability of Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Familial Hypercholesterolemia

The exponential expansion of genomic data coupled with the lack of appropriate clinical categorization of the variants is posing a major challenge to conventional medications for many common and rare diseases. To narrow this gap and achieve the goals of personalized medicine, a collaborative effort should be made to characterize the genomic variants functionally and clinically with a massive global genomic sequencing of "healthy" subjects from several ethnicities. Familial-based clustered diseases with homogenous genetic backgrounds are amongst the most beneficial tools to help address this challenge. This review will discuss the diagnosis, management, and clinical monitoring of familial hypercholesterolemia patients from a wide angle to cover both the genetic mutations underlying the phenotype, and the pharmacogenomic traits unveiled by the conventional and novel therapeutic approaches. Achieving a drug-related interactive genomic map will potentially benefit populations at risk across the globe who suffer from dyslipidemia.

Contemporary perspectives on the genetics and clinical use of lipoprotein(a) in preventive cardiology

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The pathogenicity of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] as a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is well evidenced and recognized by international consensus-based guidelines. However, the measurement of Lp(a) is not routine clinical practice. Therapeutic agents targeting Lp(a) are now progressing through randomised clinical trials, and it is timely for clinicians to familiarize themselves with this complex and enigmatic lipoprotein particle.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments in the understanding of genetic influences on the structure, plasma concentration and atherogenicity of Lp(a) have contextualized its clinical relevance. Mendelian randomization studies have enabled estimation of the contribution of Lp(a) to ASCVD risk. Genotyping individual patients with respect to Lp(a)-raising single nucleotide polymorphisms predicts ASCVD, but has not yet been shown to add value beyond the measurement of Lp(a) plasma concentrations, which should be done by Lp(a) isoform-independent assays capable of reporting in molar concentrations. Contemporary gene-silencing technology underpins small interfering RNA and antisense oligonucleotides, which are emerging as the leading Lp(a)-lowering therapeutic agents. The degree of Lp(a)-lowering required to achieve meaningful reductions in ASCVD risk has been estimated by Mendelian randomization, providing conceptual support.

SUMMARY

Measurement of Lp(a) in the clinical setting contributes to the assessment of ASCVD risk, and will become more important with the advent of specific Lp(a)-lowering therapies. Knowledge of an individual patient's genetic predisposition to increased Lp(a) appears to impart little or not additional clinical value beyond Lp(a) particle concentration.

Treatment and prevention of lipoprotein(a)-mediated cardiovascular disease: the emerging potential of RNA interference therapeutics

Lipid- and lipoprotein-modifying therapies have expanded substantially in the last 25 years, resulting in reduction in the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events. However, no specific lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]-targeting therapy has yet been shown to reduce cardiovascular disease risk. Many epidemiological and genetic studies have demonstrated that Lp(a) is an important genetically determined causal risk factor for coronary heart disease, aortic valve disease, stroke, heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. Accordingly, the need for specific Lp(a)-lowering therapy has become a major public health priority. Approximately 20% of the global population (1.4 billion people) have elevated levels of Lp(a) associated with higher cardiovascular risk, though the threshold for determining ‘high risk’ is debated. Traditional lifestyle approaches to cardiovascular risk reduction are ineffective at lowering Lp(a). To address a lifelong risk factor unmodifiable by non-pharmacological means, Lp(a)-lowering therapy needs to be safe, highly effective, and tolerable for a patient population who will likely require several decades of treatment. N-acetylgalactosamine-conjugated gene silencing therapeutics, such as small interfering RNA (siRNA) and antisense oligonucleotide targeting LPA, are ideally suited for this application, offering a highly tissue- and target transcript-specific approach with the potential for safe and durable Lp(a) lowering with as few as three or four doses per year. In this review, we evaluate the causal role of Lp(a) across the cardiovascular disease spectrum, examine the role of established lipid-modifying therapies in lowering Lp(a), and focus on the anticipated role for siRNA therapeutics in treating and preventing Lp(a)-related disease.

The Role of miR-107 as a Potential Biomarker and Cellular Factor for Acute Aortic Dissection

Acute aortic dissection (AD) is one of the most severe and highly mortality vascular disease. Its actual prevalence may be seriously underestimated. We studied different expression genes to understand gene profile change between acute AD and nondiseased individuals, and then discover potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets of acute AD. In our study, acute AD differentially expressed mRNAs and miRNAs were identified through bioinformatics analysis on Gene Expression Omnibus data sets GSE52093, GSE98770, and GSE92427. Then, comprehensive target prediction and network analysis methods were used to evaluate protein-protein interaction networks and to identify Gene Ontology terms for differentially expressed mRNAs. Differentially expressed mRNAs-miRNAs involved in acute AD were assessed as well. Finally, the quantitative real-time PCR and in vitro experiment was used to validate the results. We found Integral Membrane Protein 2C (ITM2C) was low expressed and miR-107-5p was highly expressed in acute AD tissues. Meanwhile, overexpression miR-107-5p promoted the cell proliferation and inhibited the cell apoptosis in RASMC cells. miR-107-5p inhibited the progression of acute AD through targeted ITM2C.

Coronary artery disease and the risk-associated LPA variants, rs3798220 and rs10455872, in patients with suspected familial hypercholesterolaemia

BACKGROUND

The rs3798220 and rs10455872 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in LPA are associated with increased plasma concentrations of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We investigated the association between rs3798220 and rs10455872 and prevalent CAD in 763 patients with suspected familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). The rs3798220 and rs10455872 SNPs in LPA were detected using a SEQUENOM platform.

RESULTS

Both LPA SNPs were significantly associated with CAD, but only rs3798220 after adjustment for other risk factors (odds ratio [OR] 2.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-4.12; p = 0.045), and neither after adjustment for Lp(a) concentrations. Both SNPs were positively and independently associated with increased Lp(a) (rs3798220: OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.96-1.57; p < 0.001. rs10455872: OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.24-1.58; p < 0.001). Plasma concentrations of Lp(a) were independently associated with prevalent CAD (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.08-1.52, p = 0.005) after adjustment for LPA SNPs and other cardiovascular risk factors. While both the rs3798220 and rs10455872 SNPs were associated with Lp(a) concentrations and prevalent CAD in patients with suspected FH, this was not independent of Lp(a) concentration.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantification of Lp(a) is more likely to be useful than assessment of these Lp(a)-associated SNPs to augment CAD risk prediction.

Apolipoprotein B Particles and Cardiovascular Disease: A Narrative Review

Importance

The conventional model of atherosclerosis presumes that the mass of cholesterol within very low-density lipoprotein particles, low-density lipoprotein particles, chylomicron, and lipoprotein (a) particles in plasma is the principal determinant of the mass of cholesterol that will be deposited within the arterial wall and will drive atherogenesis. However, each of these particles contains one molecule of apolipoprotein B (apoB) and there is now substantial evidence that apoB more accurately measures the atherogenic risk owing to the apoB lipoproteins than does low-density lipoprotein cholesterol or non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

Observations

Cholesterol can only enter the arterial wall within apoB particles. However, the mass of cholesterol per apoB particle is variable. Therefore, the mass of cholesterol that will be deposited within the arterial wall is determined by the number of apoB particles that are trapped within the arterial wall. The number of apoB particles that enter the arterial wall is determined primarily by the number of apoB particles within the arterial lumen. However, once within the arterial wall, smaller cholesterol-depleted apoB particles have a greater tendency to be trapped than larger cholesterol-enriched apoB particles because they bind more avidly to the glycosaminoglycans within the subintimal space of the arterial wall. Thus, a cholesterol-enriched particle would deposit more cholesterol than a cholesterol-depleted apoB particle whereas more, smaller apoB particles that enter the arterial wall will be trapped than larger apoB particles. The net result is, with the exceptions of the abnormal chylomicron remnants in type III hyperlipoproteinemia and lipoprotein (a), all apoB particles are equally atherogenic.

Conclusions and Relevance

Apolipoprotein B unifies, amplifies, and simplifies the information from the conventional lipid markers as to the atherogenic risk attributable to the apoB lipoproteins.

Reducing cardiovascular risk in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia: Risk prediction and lipid management

Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) is a frequent genetic disorder characterized by elevated low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels and early onset of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. FH is caused by mutations in genes that regulate LDL catabolism, mainly the LDL receptor (LDLR), apolipoprotein B (APOB) and gain of function of proprotein convertase subtilisin kexin type 9 (PCSK9). However, the phenotype may be encountered in individuals not carrying the latter monogenic defects, in approximately 20% of these effects of polygenes predominate, and in many individuals no molecular defects are encountered at all. These so-called FH phenocopy individuals have an elevated atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in comparison with normolipidemic individuals but this risk is lower than in those with monogenic disease. Individuals with FH are exposed to elevated LDL-C levels since birth and this explains the high cardiovascular, mainly coronary heart disease, burden of these subjects. However, recent studies show that this risk is heterogenous and depends not only on high LDL-C levels but also on presence of previous cardiovascular disease, a monogenic cause, male sex, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, low HDL-cholesterol, obesity and elevated lipoprotein(a). This heterogeneity in risk can be captured by risk equations like one from the SAFEHEART cohort and by detection of subclinical coronary atherosclerosis. High dose high potency statins are the main stain for LDL-C lowering in FH, however, in most situations these medications are not powered enough to reduce cholesterol to adequate levels. Ezetimibe and PCSK9 inhibitors should also be used in order to better treat LDL-C in FH patients.